1
|
Smith NR, Hassmiller Lich K, Ng SW, Hall MG, Trogdon JG, Frerichs L. Implementation costs of sugary drink policies in the United States. J Public Health Policy 2023; 44:566-587. [PMID: 37714964 PMCID: PMC10841536 DOI: 10.1057/s41271-023-00435-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
To support implementation of important public health policies, policymakers need information about implementation costs over time and across stakeholder groups. We assessed implementation costs of two federal sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) policies of current policy interest and with evidence to support their effects: excise taxes and health warning labels. Our analysis encompassed the entire policy life cycle using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework. We identified implementation actions using key informant interviews and developed quantitative estimates of implementation costs using published literature and government documents. Results show that implementation costs vary over time and among stakeholders. Explicitly integrating implementation science theory and using mixed methods improved the comprehensiveness of our results. Although this work is specific to federal SSB policies, the process can inform how we understand the costs of many public health policies, providing crucial information for public health policy making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Riva Smith
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Kristen Hassmiller Lich
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Shu Wen Ng
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Marissa G Hall
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Justin G Trogdon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Leah Frerichs
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alvarado M, Adams J, Penney T, Murphy MM, Abdool Karim S, Egan N, Rogers NT, Carters-White L, White M. A systematic scoping review evaluating sugar-sweetened beverage taxation from a systems perspective. NATURE FOOD 2023; 4:986-995. [PMID: 37857862 PMCID: PMC10661741 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00856-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Systems thinking can reveal surprising, counterintuitive or unintended reactions to population health interventions (PHIs), yet this lens has rarely been applied to sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation. Using a systematic scoping review approach, we identified 329 papers concerning SSB taxation, of which 45 considered influences and impacts of SSB taxation jointly, involving methodological approaches that may prove promising for operationalizing a systems informed approach to PHI evaluation. Influences and impacts concerning SSB taxation may be cyclically linked, and studies that consider both enable us to identify implications beyond a predicted linear effect. Only three studies explicitly used systems thinking informed methods. Finally, we developed an illustrative, feedback-oriented conceptual framework, emphasizing the processes that could result in an SSB tax being increased, maintained, eroded or repealed over time. Such a framework could be used to synthesize evidence from non-systems informed evaluations, leading to novel research questions and further policy development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Alvarado
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Jean Adams
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tarra Penney
- Global Food System and Policy Research, School of Global Health, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Madhuvanti M Murphy
- George Alleyne Chronic Disease Research Centre, Caribbean Institute for Health Research, The University of the West Indies, Bridgetown, Barbados
| | | | - Nat Egan
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nina Trivedy Rogers
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lauren Carters-White
- SPECTRUM Consortium, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Martin White
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Curley C, Eddie R, Tallis K, Lane TS, Yazzie D, Sanderson PR, Lorts C, Shin S, Behrens TK, George C, Antone-Nez R, Ashley C, de Heer HD. The Navajo Nation Healthy Diné Nation Act: Community Support of a 2% Tax on Unhealthy Foods. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2023; 29:622-632. [PMID: 37253351 PMCID: PMC10363222 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The Healthy Diné Nation Act (HDNA) of 2014 included a 2% tax on foods of little-to-no-nutritious value ("junk foods") on the Navajo Nation. The law was the first ever in the United States and any Indigenous nation worldwide with a population at a high risk for common nutrition-related conditions. To date, research on community support for food tax legislation among Indigenous nations is entirely lacking. OBJECTIVE To assess the extent of support for the HDNA and factors associated with support including sociodemographic variables, knowledge of the HDNA, nutrition intake, and pricing preferences. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING The Navajo Nation. PARTICIPANTS A total of 234 Navajo Nation community members across 21 communities. OUTCOME MEASURES The percentage of participants who were supportive of the HDNA. RESULTS Participants were 97% Navajo, on average middle-aged, 67% reported an income below $25 000 annually, and 69.7% were female. Half of the respondents said they "support" (37.4%) or "strongly support" (13.0%) the tax, while another 35% of people said they were neutral or somewhat supportive; 15% did not support the tax. Participants with higher income ( P = .025) and education ( P = .026) and understanding of the legislation ( P < .001 for "very well" vs "not at all") had increased odds of greater support, as did people who believed that the HDNA would make Navajo people healthier (vs not, P < .001). Age, gender, language, and reported nutrition intake (healthy or unhealthy) were not associated with HDNA support, but participants willing to pay 5% or 12%-15% higher prices for fast food and soda had increased odds of greater support ( P values range from .023 to <.001). CONCLUSIONS The majority of Navajo community members surveyed were moderately supportive of the Navajo Nation tax on unhealthy foods. Higher income and education and understanding of the law were associated with greater support, but nutrition intake was not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caleigh Curley
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Regina Eddie
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Kristen Tallis
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Taylor S. Lane
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Del Yazzie
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Priscilla R. Sanderson
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Cori Lorts
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Sonya Shin
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Timothy K. Behrens
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Carmen George
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Ramona Antone-Nez
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Christine Ashley
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| | - Hendrik D. de Heer
- Department of Health Sciences (Ms Curley and Drs Lane, Sanderson, Lorts, and de Heer) and College of Nursing (Dr Eddie), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (Ms Curley); Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Chinle, Arizona (Ms Tallis); Navajo Epidemiology Center (Mr Yazzie and Ms Antone-Nez), Navajo Department of Health (Ms Ashley), Window Rock, Arizona; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Shin and Ms George) College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dr Behrens)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Daly K, Fort M, Falbe J. Framing and Themes of the City of Boulder's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Coverage in the Local News From 2016 to 2018. AJPM FOCUS 2023; 2:100068. [PMID: 37790648 PMCID: PMC10546592 DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this paper was to analyze the contents of opinion and news articles related to the city of Boulder's sugar-sweetened beverage excise tax campaigns in Boulder's only local newspaper. We searched for articles in The Daily Camera related to the sugar-sweetened beverage tax, published from January 2016 to December 2018. We conducted a content analysis, categorizing 152 relevant articles by type, authors, and frames (pro, anti, neutral) on the basis of the preponderance of arguments, themes, and use of evidence. The majority of articles were opinion (n=92) versus news (n=60). Most articles were pro-frame (n=78) versus anti-frame (n=37) and neutral frame (n=37). Pro-frame articles were more likely to cite evidence in support of arguments or the professional credentials/experience of the authors. The most frequent pro-frame themes were health, benefits of the revenues, equity, and unethical tactics of the industry. The most frequent anti-frame themes were economic consequences, claims that the measure was confusing, government overreach, and purported ineffectiveness of taxes. The leveraging of local issues by the beverage industry was observed. Themes identified in the news regarding Boulder's successful sugar-sweetened beverage tax may appear in future sugar-sweetened beverage policy campaigns and should be anticipated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Daly
- Development Practice, Regis University, Denver, Colorado
| | - Meredith Fort
- Department of Health Systems, Management & Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jennifer Falbe
- Department of Human Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kapadia F. Gun Control for Health: A Public Health of Consequence, December 2022. Am J Public Health 2022; 112:1710-1712. [PMID: 36383932 PMCID: PMC9670217 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2022.307133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Farzana Kapadia
- Farzana Kapadia is the Deputy Editor of AJPH and professor of epidemiology at the School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Etsitty SO, John B, Greenfield A, Alsburg R, Egge M, Sandman S, George C, Curley C, Curley C, De Heer HD, Begay G, Jumbo-Rintila S, Ashley ME, Yazzie D, Antone-Nez R, Shin SS, Bancroft C. Implementation of Indigenous Food Tax Policies in Stores on Navajo Nation. Health Promot Pract 2022; 23:76S-85S. [PMID: 36374598 PMCID: PMC10767710 DOI: 10.1177/15248399221112964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
In 2014, the Navajo Nation Healthy Diné Nation Act (HDNA) was enacted and permanently approved in 2020; HDNA places a 2% surtax on unhealthy foods and beverages, while other 2014 legislation exempted healthy food items from the 6% regular sales tax. Little is known about Navajo Nation store manager/owner perspectives toward the HDNA and how best to support stores to implement the legislation. Purposive sampling was used to ensure a balanced sample of correct HDNA implementers, incorrect HDNA implementers, and stores which made healthy store changes over the past 6 years. Three community-based interviewers collected surveys by phone or in-person. Frequency of closed-ended questions was quantified, and open-ended responses were coded using thematic analysis. Of 29 identified sample stores, 20 were interviewed to reach saturation. Eleven of 20 stores made changes improving their healthy food environments. Barriers included lack of equipment (6/20) and low consumer demand (5/20). Facilitators included consumer awareness and increased produce supply options (5/20). Sixteen of 20 stores supported HDNA continuation. Facilitators to HDNA implementation included orientation and informational materials (6/20) and promotion of tax-free items (5/20). Barriers included confusion about the tax (6/20) and tax exemption (5/20). Suggestions for support included printed materials (6/20) and store training (5/20). HDNA benefits included greater awareness of healthy choices among staff (7/20) and customer-community members (2/20). Most managers and owners expressed receiving support for healthy store changes and HDNA, but also identified a need for added resources and support. Findings inform legislative action to promote timely and appropriate uptake of HDNA, and support equitable, healthy food systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brianna John
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
- Community Outreach and Patient Empowerment, Gallup, NM, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alex Greenfield
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert Alsburg
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Malyssa Egge
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
- Community Outreach and Patient Empowerment, Gallup, NM, USA
| | - Sharon Sandman
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
- Community Outreach and Patient Empowerment, Gallup, NM, USA
| | - Carmen George
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cameron Curley
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caleigh Curley
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
- University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Del Yazzie
- Navajo Epidemiology Center, Window Rock, AZ, USA
| | | | - Sonya Sunhi Shin
- Community Outreach and Patient Empowerment, Gallup, NM, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Associations between free sugar intake and markers of health in the UK population: an analysis of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme. Br J Nutr 2022; 128:225-236. [PMID: 34369329 DOI: 10.1017/s0007114521002981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Recommendations for free sugar intake in the UK should be no more than 5 % of total energy due to increased health risks associated with overconsumption. It was therefore of interest to examine free sugar intakes and associations with health parameters in the UK population. The UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme (2008-2017) was used for this study. Dietary intake, anthropometrical measurements and clinical biomarker data collated from 5121 adult respondents aged 19-64 years were statistically analysed. Compared with the average total carbohydrate intake (48 % of energy), free sugars comprised 12·5 %, with sucrose 9 % and fructose 3·5 %. Intakes of these sugars, apart from fructose, were significantly different over collection year (P < 0·001) and significantly higher in males (P < 0·001). Comparing those consuming above or below the UK recommendations for free sugars (5 % energy), significant differences were found for BMI (P < 0·001), TAG (P < 0·001), HDL (P = 0·006) and homocysteine concentrations (P = 0·028), and significant sex differences were observed (e.g. lower blood pressure in females). Regression analysis demonstrated that free sugar intake could predict plasma TAG, HDL and homocysteine concentrations (P < 0·0001), consistent with the link between these parameters and CVD. We also found selected unhealthy food choices (using the UK Eatwell Guide) to be significantly higher in those that consumed above the recommendations (P < 0·0001) and were predictors of free sugar intakes (P < 0·0001). We have shown that adult free sugar intakes in the UK population are associated with certain negative health parameters that support the necessary reduction in free sugar intakes for the UK population.
Collapse
|
8
|
Oddo VM, Knox MA, Pinero Walkinshaw L, Saelens BE, Chan N, Jones-Smith JC. Evaluation of Seattle’s Sweetened Beverage Tax on Tax Support and Perceived Economic and Health Impacts. Prev Med Rep 2022; 27:101809. [PMID: 35656219 PMCID: PMC9152812 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
It is important to understand whether the publics’ attitudes towards sugary beverage taxes (SBT) change after tax implementation to ensure the long-term success of tax policies. Seattle’s SBT went into effect on January 1, 2018. We administered a mixed-mode survey to adults in Seattle and comparison areas, pre- and 2-years post-tax, to evaluate the impact of the SBT on 1) tax support and 2) perceived tax impacts (N = 2,933). Using a difference-in-differences approach, we employed adjusted income-stratified modified Poisson models to test the impacts of the tax on net changes in attitudes in Seattle versus the comparison areas, pre- to post-tax. Among lower-income individuals in Seattle, support for the tax increased by 14% (PRDD: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.21) and there was a 20% net-increase in the perception that the SBT would positively affect the economy (PRDD: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.39), compared to changes in the comparison areas. Among higher-income individuals in Seattle, support for the tax was not different (PRDD: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.22) pre- to post-tax, but there was a net-increase in the perception that the tax would have negative effects on small businesses (PRDD: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.00) and family finances (PRDD: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.09, 3.19). After living with the tax for 2-years, support for the tax increased among lower-income individuals in Seattle. Tax support was high and unchanged among higher-income individuals, but overall attitudes became more negative. Policy makers should consider investing in ongoing campaigns that explain the benefits of SSB taxes and revenues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa M. Oddo
- University of Illinois Chicago, College of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, Chicago, IL, USA
- Corresponding author at: Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 West Taylor Street, 502A, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| | - Melissa A. Knox
- University of Washington, Department of Economics, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lina Pinero Walkinshaw
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian E. Saelens
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nadine Chan
- Public Health - Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jessica C. Jones-Smith
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Forberger S, Reisch L, Meshkovska B, Lobczowska K, Scheller DA, Wendt J, Christianson L, Frense J, Steinacker JM, Luszczynska A, Zeeb H. Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:33. [PMID: 35331245 PMCID: PMC8944035 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is seen as a win–win situation for governments. It is argued that SSB taxes are relatively easy to implement from a practical perspective compared to for example other nutrition policies. However, the implementation of SSB taxation laws does not happen by itself. Therefore, this work examines implementation processes for SSB taxation in terms of (1) pre-implementation context, (2) taxation instruments used and (3) interactions in the implementation process. Ten databases and grey literature were systematically searched for studies reporting on SSB taxation implementation processes up to February 2020. All studies (N = 1248) were screened independently by two reviewers according to predefined criteria. The selection of variables to be extracted was based on the policy cycle heuristic and informed by intervention implementation research. Information on the process of implementing SSB taxation is limited. Only six cases based on three publications were identified, indicating a gap in this research area. SSB taxation implementation was accomplished by hiring a subcontractor for the implementation or using pre-existing tax collection structures. Political and public support within the implementation process seems to be supportive for the city of Berkeley and for Portugal but was not reported for the Pacific Islands. However, the existing data are very limited, and further research on SSB taxation implementation processes is needed to determine whether the aim of the policy and the envisaged outcome are linked in practice.
Registration The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (osf.io/7w84q/)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Forberger
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Lucia Reisch
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,El-Erian Professor of Behavioural Economics and Policy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 9ET, United Kingdom
| | - Biljana Meshkovska
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Domus Medica, Gaustad, Sognsvannsveien 9, 2. etg., 0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karolina Lobczowska
- Department of Psychology in Wroclaw, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ostrowskiego Street 30b, 53238, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Daniel Alexander Scheller
- Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, Leimgrubenweg 14, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Janine Wendt
- Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, Leimgrubenweg 14, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lara Christianson
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Jennifer Frense
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Michael Steinacker
- Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, Leimgrubenweg 14, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - Aleksandra Luszczynska
- Department of Psychology in Wroclaw, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ostrowskiego Street 30b, 53238, Wroclaw, Poland.,National Institute for Human Resilience, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, 1420 Austin Bluffs Pkwy, CO Springs, CO, 80918, United States of America
| | - Hajo Zeeb
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstr.1, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grummon AH, Golden SD. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Pricing Policies: Simulation of Minimum Price Laws and Taxes in New York City. Am J Prev Med 2022; 62:e159-e168. [PMID: 34782187 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Minimum price laws, which set a price below which a product cannot be sold, are a promising but understudied strategy for reducing the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. New York City has implemented a minimum price law for tobacco products and could consider this policy for sugar-sweetened beverages. This study projects the impacts of a sugar-sweetened beverage minimum price law among New York City adults, with effects of a sugar-sweetened beverage excise tax examined for comparison. METHODS In 2020-2021, a microsimulation model of dietary behaviors and body weight was developed using population-based survey data, research on responsiveness to and avoidance of price increases, and a validated weight change model. Analyses applied the model to simulate the impacts of implementing a minimum price law (8 or 10 cents/ounce price floors) or an excise tax (1 or 2 cents/ounce tax rates) on diet and body weight among New York City adults for more than 5 years. Sensitivity analyses varied assumptions about price responsiveness, caloric compensation, and avoidance. RESULTS A sugar-sweetened beverage minimum price law with an 8 cents/ounce floor would reduce average sugar-sweetened beverage intake by 16.5 calories/day (95% uncertainty interval= -17.2, -15.8) and obesity prevalence by 0.86 percentage points (95% uncertainty interval= -1.03, -0.69). Benefits were similar for a minimum price law with a 10 cents/ounce floor and for 1 and 2 cents/ounce taxes (range of obesity reductions: -0.84 to -1.24 percentage points). Benefits persisted in sensitivity analyses and were larger for Black and Hispanic than for White and Asian adults and for adults with lower than for those with higher income. CONCLUSIONS Excise taxes and minimum price laws for sugar-sweetened beverages could both reduce New York City adults' sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and obesity prevalence and narrow sociodemographic disparities in obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna H Grummon
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Shelley D Golden
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Context Policy-specific actions to improve food environments will support healthy population diets. Objective To identify cited barriers and facilitators to food environment policy (FEP) processes reported in the literature, exploring these according to the nature of the policy (voluntary or mandatory) and country development status. Data sources A systematic search was conducted of 10 academic and 7 grey-literature databases, national websites, and manual searches of publication references. Data extraction Data on government-led FEPs, barriers, and facilitators from key informants were collected. Data synthesis The constant-comparison approach generated core themes for barriers and facilitators. The appraisal tool developed by Hawker et al. was adopted to determine the quality of qualitative and quantitative studies. Results A total of 142 eligible studies were identified. Industry resistance or disincentive was the most cited barrier in policy development. Technical challenges were most frequently a barrier for policy implementation. Frequently cited facilitators included resource availability or maximization, strategies in policy process, and stakeholder partnership or support. Conclusions The findings from this study will strategically inform health-reform stakeholders about key elements of public health policy processes. More evidence is required from countries with human development indices ranging from low to high and on voluntary policies. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018115034.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SeeHoe Ng
- Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Heather Yeatman
- Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bridget Kelly
- Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sreelakshmi Sankaranarayanan
- School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Tilakavati Karupaiah
- T. Karupaiah, School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Krieger J, Bleich SN, Scarmo S, Ng SW. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Reduction Policies: Progress and Promise. Annu Rev Public Health 2021; 42:439-461. [PMID: 33256536 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-103005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Evidence showing the effectiveness of policies to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is growing. SSBs are one of the largest sources of added sugar in the diet and are linked to multiple adverse health conditions. This review presents a framework illustrating the various types of policies that have been used to reduce SSB exposure and consumption; policies are organized into four categories (financial, information, defaults, and availability) and take into consideration crosscutting policy considerations (feasibility, impact, and equity). Next, for each category, we describe a specific example and provide evidence of impact. Finally, we discuss crosscutting policy considerations, the challenge of choosing among the various policy options, and important areas for future research. Notably, no single policy will reduce SSB consumption to healthy levels, so an integrated policy approach that adapts to changing market and consumption trends; evolving social, political, and public health needs; and emerging science is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Krieger
- Healthy Food America, Seattle, Washington 98122, USA.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
| | - Sara N Bleich
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;
| | - Stephanie Scarmo
- American Heart Association, National Center, Dallas, Texas 75231, USA;
| | - Shu Wen Ng
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health and Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Emmons KM, Chambers D, Abazeed A. Embracing policy implementation science to ensure translation of evidence to cancer control policy. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:1972-1979. [PMID: 34850924 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Although health-related policies are abundant, efforts to understand how to ensure that these policies serve as an effective vehicle for translating scientific evidence are relatively sparse. This paper explores how policy-focused implementation science (IS) may contribute to understanding the translation of scientific evidence to health-related policy in governmental and nongovernmental sectors. Expanding the focus of implementation science in cancer control could systematically address policy to both increase the use of scientific evidence in general and to address health equity. In this Commentary, we look to relevant work outside of IS that could be informative, most notably from the field of political science. We propose several ideas for future research that could help move the field of policy implementation science in cancer control in the USA forward. Although most efforts to increase uptake of the scientific evidence base reference translation to "practice and policy," there has been relatively little emphasis in the USA on implementation at the policy level, especially related to cancer control. If we are to achieve the full benefits of scientific discovery on population and public health, we will need to consider policy as a critical mechanism by which evidence can be translated to practice. We have a robust set of methods within implementation science that are increasing the pace of adoption and maintenance of evidence-based programs in a variety of settings. Building on these efforts, the time is right to expand our focus to include policy implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Emmons
- Department of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - David Chambers
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Office of the Director, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MA 20014, USA
| | - Ali Abazeed
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Office of the Director, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MA 20014, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ng SW, Colchero MA, White M. How should we evaluate sweetened beverage tax policies? A review of worldwide experience. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1941. [PMID: 34702248 PMCID: PMC8546197 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11984-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Over 45 jurisdictions globally have implemented sweetened beverage taxes. Researchers and policymakers need to assess whether and how these taxes change beverage demand and supply, their intended and unanticipated health, economic and equity impacts. Lessons from such evaluations can maximise the policies' success and impact on non-communicable disease prevention globally. We discuss key theoretical, design and methodological considerations to help policymakers, funders and researchers commission and conduct rigorous evaluations of these policies and related disease prevention efforts. We encourage involving the perspectives of various stakeholders on what evaluations are needed given the specific context, what data and methods are appropriate, readily available or can be collected within time and budget constraints. A logic model /conceptual system map of anticipated implications across sectors and scales should help identify optimal study design, analytical techniques and measures. These models should be updated when synthesising findings across diverse methods and integrating findings across subpopulations using similar methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Wen Ng
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #8120, 137 East Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#7461, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7461, USA.
| | - M Arantxa Colchero
- Center for Health Systems Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Universidad No 655 Colonia Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cerrada Los Pinos y Caminera, CP, 62100, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Martin White
- Centre for Diet and Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Braid L, Oliva R, Nichols K, Reyes A, Guzman J, Goldman RE, Woo Baidal JA. Community Perceptions in New York City: Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Policies and Programs in the First 1000 Days. Matern Child Health J 2021; 26:193-204. [PMID: 34618312 PMCID: PMC8495667 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03255-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To examine perceptions of Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) policies and programs focused on the first 1000 days—gestation through age 2 years—among community stakeholders in Washington Heights and the South Bronx, two neighborhoods in New York City with disproportionately high prevalence of childhood obesity. Methods A multilevel framework informed interview guide development. Using purposeful sampling, we recruited study participants who were (1) able to speak English or Spanish and (2) resided or employed in Washington Heights or the South Bronx. Participants included community leaders (local government officials, community board members, and employees from community- and faith-based organizations) as well as community members. Trained research staff conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews. Using immersion/crystallization and template style coding, the study team performed thematic analysis until no new relevant themes emerged. Results Among the 19 female study participants, perceived facilitators to SSB policy and program implementation included sustained partnerships with broad coalitions; continual education and clear messaging; and increased accessibility to healthier beverages. Perceived barriers included systems-level challenges accessing programs that support healthy beverage options, and individual-level lack of access to affordable healthy beverages. Acceptable potential intervention strategies included messaging that emphasizes health in pregnancy and infancy; policies that require healthy beverages as the default option in restaurants; and policies that remove SSBs from childcare settings. Some strongly favored SSB excise taxes while others opposed them, but all participants supported reinvestment of SSB tax revenue into health resources among marginalized communities. Conclusions A multi-pronged approach that incorporates engagement, access, equitable reinvestment of revenue, and continual clear messaging may facilitate implementation of policies and programs to reduce SSB consumption in the first 1000 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Braid
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W. 168th Street, New York, NY, 100032, USA.,UC Berkeley School of Public Health, 2121 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Rocio Oliva
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W. 168th Street, New York, NY, 100032, USA.,The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI, USA.,Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kelsey Nichols
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W. 168th Street, New York, NY, 100032, USA
| | - Anita Reyes
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Center for Bronx Health Equity, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jairo Guzman
- Coalición Mexicana (Mexican Coalition), Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Roberta E Goldman
- The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jennifer A Woo Baidal
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 W. 168th Street, New York, NY, 100032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McGurk MD, Takeda CR, Murakami J, La Chica T, Yamauchi J. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Fee: A Model to Address Health Disparities in Hawai'i. HAWAI'I JOURNAL OF HEALTH & SOCIAL WELFARE 2021; 80:64-68. [PMID: 34704071 PMCID: PMC8538112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is associated with increased risk of obesity, diabetes, and other chronic diseases. SSB consumption is also a health equity issue, as rates of consumption and related chronic diseases vary by race, ethnicity, and income in Hawai'i. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for greater investment in public health and the well-being of communities experiencing health disparities because individuals with chronic diseases are more likely to develop complications from the virus. It has also created economic hardships for the people of Hawai'i, especially the state's most vulnerable populations. Amid this health and economic crisis, an opportunity exists to implement an SSB fee in Hawai'i. An SSB fee would impose a fee on SSB distributors that would be passed on to consumers in the form of price increases that influence purchasing behavior. Jurisdictions with SSB taxes or fees have seen reductions in SSB purchases and consumption and have generated millions of dollars in revenues to support health initiatives and reduce socioeconomic disparities. Models predict that a $0.02 SSB fee in Hawai'i could generate $60.5 million and significantly reduce healthcare costs and chronic diseases. This commentary will present an SSB fee policy as a viable model for Hawai'i to reduce SSB consumption, lower chronic disease risks, and generate needed revenues to support health, reduce inequities, and rebuild the state's economy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan D. McGurk
- Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Krieger J, Magee K, Hennings T, Schoof J, Madsen KA. How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States. Prev Med Rep 2021; 23:101388. [PMID: 34040929 PMCID: PMC8141925 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
We sought to describe how revenues from sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise taxes in 7 U.S. cities are being allocated, who is benefiting from these investments, and whether allocations are consistent with the original intent of tax legislation. We collected information from public documents and key informants about allocations in the most recent fiscal year available (ranging from 2018 to 2021). Across the 7 U.S. cities with taxes, the average annual revenue from SSB taxes totaled $133.9 M. In the fiscal year studied, cities allocated a total of $133.2 M in SSB tax revenues. Human and community capital investments totaled $89.6 M (67% of all allocations) funding early childhood development, community infrastructure improvements, and youth and workforce development. Health-related investments totaled $36.9 M (28% of total allocations), funding access to healthy foods and beverages; support for physical activity opportunities; promotion of overall physical, mental or social health and wellbeing; health and nutrition education; chronic-disease prevention and management; and reducing SSB consumption. In the 3 cities that specified how tax revenues would be spent, allocations were consistent with promised uses of revenues. In addition, 85% of aggregated revenues ($112.9 M) were targeted to support work and programs in impacted communities (communities that experience health inequities, discrimination and exclusion). SSB tax revenues are supporting initiatives to improve community health, develop human and community capital, and advance equity. These investments may yield additional health benefits beyond those resulting from lower SSB consumption. Consistent tracking and public reporting on revenue allocations would increase transparency and accountability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Krieger
- University of Washington, Department of Health Services, USA
| | - Kiran Magee
- Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA
| | - Tayler Hennings
- Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA
| | - John Schoof
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, USA
| | - Kristine A. Madsen
- Berkeley Food Institute and the Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hua SV, Uzwiak B, Hudgins A, Peterhans A, Lawman HG, Bleich SN, Falbe J, Roberto CA. A qualitative study on retailer experiences with Philadelphia's sweetened beverage tax. Transl Behav Med 2021; 12:554-567. [PMID: 34347874 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The Philadelphia Beverage Tax was implemented on January 1, 2017 for some sugar- and artificially-sweetened beverages. Few qualitative studies have assessed retailers' reactions to beverage taxes. We aimed to understand food retailers' knowledge and attitudes about the Philadelphia beverage tax and how they responded to it with the goal of informing the framing and implementation of beverage taxes in other interested jurisdictions. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with retailers within Philadelphia before (n = 15) and after (n = 11) the Philadelphia Beverage Tax was implemented. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit participants with different store locations and customer base characteristics. A priori codes based on the interview guide were used to organize data, and analytic memos were developed and reviewed to identify themes that emerged within the data using a grounded theory approach. Five themes emerged: (a) concerns about the tax purpose, amount, and use of revenue; (b) concerns about the tax's impact on finances and business operations; (c) business strategies implemented to lessen financial burden of the tax; (d) perceptions of customer responses to the tax based on income; and (e) confusion around tax implementation. Results highlighted ways to improve implementation. Retailers in Philadelphia implemented various strategies to offset negative effects on taxed beverage sales. Cities implementing a beverage tax would benefit from investment in educational outreach and support to business owners prior to tax implementation and ensure transparency in how tax revenue will be spent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia V Hua
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | | | - Ana Peterhans
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hannah G Lawman
- Division of Chronic Disease Prevention, Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Sara N Bleich
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jennifer Falbe
- Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Christina A Roberto
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Roesler A, Rojas N, Falbe J. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption, Perceptions, and Disparities in Children and Adolescents. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR 2021; 53:553-563. [PMID: 34246410 PMCID: PMC8388314 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) perceptions-knowledge, attitudes, and norms and media literacy-and beverage consumption, and to identify differences in beverage consumption and SSB perceptions by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. DESIGN Cross-sectional. SETTING Diverse California school district. PARTICIPANTS A total of 992 fifth-grade (elementary), seventh-grade (middle), and ninth-12th-grade (high school) students. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Questionnaire-assessed continuous beverage consumption and perceptions. ANALYSIS Linear regression adjusting for school, grade, gender, race/ethnicity, and free and reduced-price meal (FRPM) eligibility. RESULTS Knowledge, attitudes, and norms, and media literacy items were associated with SSB consumption in expected directions (P < 0.05). Among elementary students, FRPM-eligible and Black students had higher SSB consumption (P < 0.01). In middle/high school, non-Hispanic White students consumed fewer SSBs than all other racial/ethnic groups (P < 0.01). There were differences in SSB-related perceptions by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (eg, Black students perceived sugary drinks as less unhealthy); Black, Hispanic, and FRPM-eligible students expressed less distrust of food/beverage advertisements; and Black, Hispanic, Asian, multirace, and FRPM-eligible students perceived more frequent SSB consumption among their peers (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Sugar-sweetened beverage perceptions were associated with SSB consumption. There were racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in SSB consumption and perceptions. Sugar-sweetened beverage perceptions and related social and commercial determinants like marketing may be useful targets for reducing SSB consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athena Roesler
- Department of Human Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | | | - Jennifer Falbe
- Department of Human Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hagenaars LL, Jeurissen PPT, Klazinga NS, Listl S, Jevdjevic M. Effectiveness and Policy Determinants of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes. J Dent Res 2021; 100:1444-1451. [PMID: 34034538 DOI: 10.1177/00220345211014463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Sugar consumption is on the rise globally with detrimental (oral) health effects. There is ample evidence that sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes can efficiently reduce sugar consumption. However, evidence alone is seldom enough to implement a policy. In this article, we present a narrative synthesis of evidence, based on real-world SSB tax evaluations, and we combine this with lessons from policy development case studies. This article is structured according to the Health Policy Analysis Triangle, which identifies a policy's content and process and important contextual factors. SSB tax policy content needs to be coupled to existing problems and public sentiment, which depend on more aspects than aspects related to (oral) health alone. Whether or not to include artificially sweetened beverages, therefore, is not solely a matter of showing the evidence of their oral health impact but also dependent on the stated aim of a tax and public sentiment toward tax policies in general. SSB taxes also need to be in line with existing tax and decision-making rules. Earmarking revenue for specific (health promotion) purposes may therefore be less straightforward as it might appear. The policy process of creating context-sensitive SSB tax policy content is not easy either. Advocacy coalitions need to be formed early in the process, and stamina, expertise, and flexibility are required to get a SSB tax adopted in a specific community. This requires a meticulously considered SSB tax structure implementation process. Oral health professionals who want to lead the way in advocating for SSB taxes should realize that evidence-based arguments on potential effectiveness alone will not be enough to realize change. The oral health community can learn important lessons from other "doctor-activists" such as pulmonologists, who have successfully advocated for higher tobacco taxes by being visible in the public debate with clear messaging and robust policy proposals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L L Hagenaars
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - P P T Jeurissen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - N S Klazinga
- Department of Social Medicine, Amsterdam UMC-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Listl
- Department of Dentistry-Quality and Safety of Oral Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Conservative Dentistry, Translational Health Economics Group, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Jevdjevic
- Department of Dentistry-Quality and Safety of Oral Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Altman EA, Madsen KA, Schmidt LA. Missed Opportunities: The Need to Promote Public Knowledge and Awareness of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:4607. [PMID: 33925290 PMCID: PMC8123585 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Despite a growing body of evidence showing that sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes nudge consumers away from SSBs, we lack an understanding of people's awareness and perceptions of SSB taxes and whether tax awareness and perceptions differ based on sociodemographic characteristics. We used serial cross-sectional study intercept surveys (n = 2715) in demographically diverse neighborhoods of Berkeley and Oakland in 2015 and 2017, and San Francisco and Richmond in 2017. In the year following successful SSB tax ballot measures, 45% of respondents correctly recalled that an SSB tax had passed in their city. In untaxed cities, 14% of respondents incorrectly thought that a tax had passed. Perceived benefits of SSB taxes to the community and to children's health were moderate and, like correct recall of an SSB tax, were higher among respondents with higher education levels. Awareness of SSB taxes was low overall, and perceptions about taxes' benefits varied by educational attainment, reflecting a missed opportunity to educate citizens about how SSB taxes work and their importance. Public health efforts should invest in campaigns that explain the benefits of SSB taxes and provide information about how tax revenues will be invested, both before and after a tax proposal has passed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A. Altman
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;
| | - Kristine A. Madsen
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;
| | - Laura A. Schmidt
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
McGurk MD, Cacal SL, Vu U, Sentell T, Beckelman T, Lee J, Yang A, Pirkle CM. Baseline Assessment of Children's Meals and Healthy Beverage Options Prior to a State-Level Healthy Default Beverage (HDB) Law. JOURNAL OF HEALTHY EATING AND ACTIVE LIVING 2021; 1:63-73. [PMID: 37789908 PMCID: PMC10544922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
In January 2020, Hawai'i became the second state with a healthy default beverage (HDB) law, requiring restaurants to offer HDBs with their children's meals. This observational study presents baseline characteristics of restaurants with a children's menu and meal. The study describes pre-law beverage options to inform future HDB policy language, implementation, and evaluation. Between November and December 2019, data were collected from a statewide sample of unique restaurants (N = 383) with health inspection permits. Restaurants were assessed separately for a children's menu and meal using website reviews, telephone calls, and in-person visits. Meals were evaluated for pre-law beverage type and compliance. Logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of having a children's menu and meal. Most of the restaurants were full-service (70.2%) and non-chains (67.9%). While 49.3% of restaurants had a children's menu, only 16.7% had a children's meal. Significant predictors of having a children's menu were being full-service, national/international or local chains, neighbor island (non-Honolulu) locations, and hotel locations. Only being a national/international chain significantly predicted having a children's meal. Although 35.9% of children's meals offered a non-sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) option, only 3.1% offered law-compliant beverages. Inclusion of an SSB default option (60.9%) and not specifying the type of default beverage were the predominant factors for pre-law non-compliance. Results support the need for HDB regulations, especially for national/international chains, which were most likely to have children's meals, and provide data to inform policies in other jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Uyen Vu
- University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawai‘i
| | | | | | - Jessica Lee
- Hawai‘i State Department of Health, Honolulu, Hawai‘i
| | - Alyssa Yang
- Hawai‘i State Department of Health, Honolulu, Hawai‘i
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Asada Y, Pipito AA, Chriqui JF, Taher S, Powell LM. Oakland's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax: Honoring the "Spirit" of the Ordinance Toward Equitable Implementation. Health Equity 2021; 5:35-41. [PMID: 33681687 PMCID: PMC7929915 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2020.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: On November 8, 2016, Oakland, California, voters passed a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax, which included language to support programs affecting communities and residents most affected by SSB-related health disparities. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively assess the extent to which those communities most affected by SSB-related health disparities were included in implementation decisions and were recipients of funding to support their needs. Methods: A longitudinal case study from 2016 to 2019 in Oakland, CA, explored equity implementation themes through key informant interview transcripts (n=15) triangulated with media (n=90) and archived documents (n=43). Using principals of constant comparative analysis, all documents (n=148) were coded and thematically analyzed in Atlas.ti. Results: SSB taxes—designed to support communities disproportionately impacted by SSB consumption—can be implemented with inclusivity and community representation. The Oakland ordinance established a Community Advisory Board (CAB) that partnered with community organizations throughout implementation to ensure inclusivity and recommend funding for programs to address health inequities, described as the “spirit” of the ordinance. These activities countered the beverage industry's tactics to target lower income communities of color with misinformation campaigns and hinder implementation. Conclusion: A clearly written ordinance provides guidance, which affords an intentional and legal foundation for implementation processes. Establishing a CAB can mitigate inequities as members are invested in the community and initiatives to support residents. Advisory boards are able to liaise between city and local partners, which is a powerful tool for countering opposition campaigns, reaching lower income and communities of color, and ensuring adherence to funding mandates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuka Asada
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Andrea A Pipito
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jamie F Chriqui
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sabira Taher
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lisa M Powell
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Falbe J. The ethics of excise taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages. Physiol Behav 2020; 225:113105. [PMID: 32712210 PMCID: PMC7377978 DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation has emerged as a priority policy for promoting health and funding investments in communities most affected by diet-related disease. There are now 8 U.S. jurisdictions and over 40 countries that have implemented SSB taxes. Evaluations show that these policies reduce SSB consumption and purchasing while raising revenues to fund public health, education, and equity. However, there have been few analyses of the ethical considerations of SSB taxation. Using a framework for evaluating the ethics of public health interventions, this paper considers the ethical aspects of SSB excise taxes with respect to: physical health, psychosocial well-being, equality, informed choice, liberty, social and cultural values, and responsibility. Available evidence suggests there is a strong ethical case for levying SSB excise taxes on manufacturers and distributors. SSB excise taxes reduce consumption and purchasing of SSBs and are expected to meaningfully reduce obesity and diet-related morbidity and mortality. Because SSB taxes are specific to a product and its manufacturers, they are unlikely to harm psychosocial health by stigmatizing people who are overweight. SSB excise taxes should lead to greater equality because the health and social benefits are progressive (i.e., low-income individuals are likely to accrue the largest benefits from the tax, even more so when revenues are spent on health and social equity). Meanwhile, the average consumer cost burden that would result if distributors raise SSB prices in reponse to the tax is minimally regressive. Regarding liberty, SSB taxes do not eliminate the option of buying SSBs, but if SSB distributors raise SSB prices, it becomes somewhat more expensive to continue purchasing the same amount of SSBs. Meanwhile, the taxes expand beverage options by funding drinking water availability and prompting industry to expand offerings of unsweetened drinks and SSBs containing less sugar. Furthermore, by averting poor health, SSB taxes should expand overall freedom to pursue one's goals. Informed choice could be facilitated by seeing a higher SSB shelf price (which indicates a drink contains added sugar) and exposure to nutrition education funded with tax revenues. SSB taxation is unlikely to negatively interfere with social or cultural values because taxation would not eliminate having SSBs for special occasions, and SSBs are not a staple of traditional diets. Lastly, SSB taxation attributes responsibility for health in a manner that reflects industry's contribution to obesity and the multisectoral solutions that are needed to prevent diet-related disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Falbe
- Human Development and Family Studies Program, Department of Human Ecology, UC Davis. 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, United States.
| |
Collapse
|