Antibiotic Prophylaxis in the Management of Open Fractures

Open fractures of the lower leg: Outcome and risk-factor analysis for fracture-related infection and nonunion in a single center analysis of 187 fractures

BACKGROUND

Open fractures of the lower extremity have a higher risk of fracture-related infections (FRI) or nonunion. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for complications and evaluate outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single center study, we identified and included 187 patients with extraarticular and intraarticular fractures of the tibia or fibula between 2010 and 2018. Patient characteristics, treatment protocols, and complications were assessed, with a focus on soft tissue management and timing of wound closure versus fracture fixation. To analyze risk factors for FRI and nonunion, a univariate logistic regression model was used.

RESULTS

The open fractures included were 52 Gustilo-Anderson type-I (28 %), 99 type-II (53 %), and 36 type-III (19 %) fractures. The mean time from admission to first surgical intervention was 3.47 h (SD 1.4), with 122 (60 %) patients treated within 3 h and 182 (97 %) patients, within 6 h. During primary surgery, definitive fracture fixation was carried out in 112 (60 %) patients and wound closure in 122 (65 %) patients. FRI was reported in 27 (14 %) patients with the highest prevalence in type-III fractures (31 %). Secondary wound closure was associated with a significantly higher risk for FRI than primary wound closure (odds ratio [OR] = 3.3; p = 0.004). Nonunion was reported in 37 (20 %) patients. Significant risk factors for nonunion were FRI (OR=11.9, p < 0.001) and definitive fracture fixation before wound closure compared to fracture fixation and wound closure at the same time (OR = 8.2, p < 0.001). Gustilo-Anderson type-IIIb and -IIIc fractures had a significant lower FRI-free survival compared to other fractures. No patient underwent amputation during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Open fractures of the tibia and fibula are associated with a high risk of FRI and nonunion. FRI is the strongest predictor of nonunion in open fractures of the lower extremity. Primary wound closure and simultaneous definitive fracture fixation are protective even in higher Gustilo-Anderson fracture types and prevent complications. Early antibiotic therapy and surgical treatment are crucial, as evidenced by all cases receiving treatment within 6 h post trauma.

Comparing piperacillin/tazobactam to current guidelines for the treatment of open fractures: A systematic review

Background

Current guidelines call for the use of a first-generation cephalosporin with or without an aminoglycoside for the treatment of open fractures. Due to its superior safety profile and single-dose administration, Piperacillin/tazobactam (PT) may be an effective alternative. The present systematic literature review aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that PT antibiotic prophylaxis does not differ in clinical outcomes as compared to the current guidelines in the treatment of open fractures.

Methods

Five databases were queried for literature pertaining to PT administration for open fractures. A 2-author screening process was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Methodologic index for non-randomized studies criteria was used to objectively assess the methodologic quality of the studies reviewed. Retrospective cohort studies that compared PT to current guidelines in open fractures were included.

Results

Four retrospective cohort studies consisting of 752 patients were included. The injury severity score (ISS) score was higher for the PT group, 18.1, versus the control group, 14.5 (p = .0008). Seventy-eight patients developed a surgical site infection (SSI) in the PT group versus 67 patients in the control group (p = .82). Twenty-one patients developed an acute kidney injury (AKI) in the PT group versus 19 in the control group (p = .51). There was no difference in the number of patients who developed resistant pathogens (6 (PT group) vs. 1 (control group); p = .99). Length of stay was greater in the PT group, 16.4 days, compared to the control group, 10.5 days (p=<0.00001).

Conclusion

The use of piperacillin/tazobactam for open fractures does not differ from first-generation cephalosporins with or without an aminoglycoside in regard to SSI, AKI, return to operating room, 1-year mortality, non-union, and development of resistant pathogens. LOS was significantly longer in the PT group but may be explained by a greater ISS. PT may be a non-inferior alternative to current guidelines due to its better safety profile and single-dose administration method, however, this review is limited by the lack of side effect reporting and underscores the need for larger prospective studies that compare side effect profiles between PT and control groups.

Synthesizing evidence to guide the design and implementation of effective strategies for discontinuing postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical settings: an umbrella review post-WHO 2018 recommendations

BACKGROUND

Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) involves using antibiotics after surgery to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs). However, studies have shown that PAP offers no additional benefits compared to discontinuation after surgical incision closure, prompting its de-implementation to prevent unnecessary antibiotic use that may contribute to antibiotic resistance. We conducted this review to synthesize evidence for guiding the design and implementation of effective strategies for discontinuing PAP practice and optimizing antibiotic use in surgical settings.

METHODS

This umbrella review searched for articles from PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus, focusing on reviews conducted on human subjects on PAP to prevent SSIs, published in English language from 2019 to 5th July 2024. This review followed guidelines from PRISMA-P and PRIOR. The risk of bias (methodological quality) was assessed using AMSTAR-2. The pooled risk ratio (RR) was estimated using a fixed-effects model (Mantel-Haenszel method), while I2 was used to assess the heterogeneity between reviews. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024566124).

RESULTS

In our umbrella review, we screened 1156 articles, with 28 review articles found eligible for final analysis, involving over 457 primary studies. About 80,483 patients were involved in 9 meta-analysis reviews, which were used to estimate the pooled RR. We found no significant benefits to patients from continuing PAP beyond 24-h post-surgery compared to immediate discontinuation, RR: 1.07 (95% CI: 0.97-1.17, I2: 25%, p-value: 0.22). Strategies such as regularly assessing and refining guidelines to fit specific surgical settings and patients' characteristics, multidisciplinary collaboration, availability of resources needed for best practices, education and training healthcare workers on SSI prevention and antibiotic stewardship, and patient education in SSI prevention and proper antibiotic use were recommended to improve best practices in surgical settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonging antibiotic prophylaxis beyond 24-h post-surgery did not show significant protective benefits against SSIs. Our findings support the 2018 WHO recommendation for the immediate discontinuation of PAP following surgical incision closure in clean and clean-contaminated procedures. Further de-implementation research studies are needed to guide the effective discontinuation of PAP practice.

Initial treatment of severe soft-tissue injuries in closed and open fractures to prevent fracture-related infection

The management of soft tissue damage during fracture treatment requires surgical proficiency and meticulous care adhering to established treatment protocols. This approach is paramount for minimizing the risk of potentially limb- or even life-threatening complications such as fracture-related infection (FRI) in all age groups. There is a general consensus on essential measures such as wound assessment, surgical debridement and early use of antibiotics. Treatment should always be based on the correct classification of the fracture and the corresponding soft tissue injury, but needs to be adapted to the individual patient considering general health status, secondary diagnoses and currently available treatment options.

Management of Open Fractures of the Extremities and Pediatrics

The modern management of open fractures was established after the foundational work of Gustilo and Anderson, but we continue to strive to determine the optimal treatment of open fractures to diminish the risk of infection. The ideal timing of antibiotics, presentation to the operating room, and timing of procedures such as flap coverage continue to be investigated with incremental changes recommended over the years. This article aims to provide the most recent review of the literature regarding the timing and management of both upper and lower extremity open fractures, pediatric open fractures, current topics of controversy, and the data supporting current treatment recommendations.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical wound infections in clean and clean-contaminated surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and necessity of prophylactic antibiotics in clean and clean-contaminated surgery remains controversial.

METHODS

The studies were screened and extracted using databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials.gov according to predefined eligibility criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of preoperative and postoperative prophylactic antibiotic use on the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing any clean or clean-contaminated surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 16 189 participants in 48 RCTs were included in the primary meta-analysis following the eligibility criteria. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for SSI with antibiotic prophylaxis versus placebo was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.53-0.68). The pooled OR among gastrointestinal, oncology, orthopedics, neurosurgery, oral, and urology surgery was 3.06 (95% CI: 1.05-8.91), 1.16 (95% CI: 0.89-1.50), 2.04 (95% CI: 1.09-3.81), 3.05 (95% CI: 1.25-7.47), 3.55 (95% CI: 1.78-7.06), and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.12-4.55), respectively. Furthermore, the summary mean difference (MD) for patients' length of hospitalization was -0.91 (95% CI: -1.61, -0.16). The results of sensitivity analyses for all combined effect sizes showed good stability.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotics are both effective, safe, and necessary in preventing surgical wound infections in clean and clean-contaminated procedures, attributed to their reduction in the incidence of surgical site infections as well as the length of patient hospitalization.

Factors affecting early antibiotic delivery in open tibial shaft fractures

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of infection in open tibial shaft injuries varies with the severity of the injury with rates ranging from roughly 2% for Gustilo-Anderson type I to nearly 43% for type IIIB fractures. As with all fractures, timely antibiotics administration in the emergency department (ED) is an essential component of fracture management and infection prevention. This study identifies factors associated with the expedient administration of antibiotics for open tibial shaft fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified patients treated for open tibial shaft fractures at an academic level 1 trauma center between 2015 and 2021. Open fractures were identified by reviewing patient charts. We used chart reviews to gather demographics, fracture characteristics, postoperative outcomes, trauma activation, and time to antibiotic order, delivery, and operating room. Univariate analysis was used to compare patients who received antibiotics within 1 h of ED presentation to those who did not. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with faster delivery of antibiotics.

RESULTS

Among 70 ED patients with open tibial shaft fractures, 39 (56%) received early administration of antibiotics. Arrival at the ED via emergency medical service (EMS) as opposed to walking in (98% vs. 74%, p = 0.01) and trauma activation (90% vs. 52%, p < 0.001) were significantly more common in the early administration group than the late group. The early group had shorter intervals between antibiotic order and delivery (0.02 h vs. 0.35 h, p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis suggested that trauma activation, EMS arrival, and arrival during non-overnight shifts were independent predictors of a shorter time to antibiotic administration (odds ratios 11.9, 30.7, and 5.4, p = 0.001, 0.016, and 0.013, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Earlier antibiotic delivery is associated with non-overnight arrival at the ED, arrival via EMS, and a coordinated trauma activation. Our findings indicate that in cases where administering antibiotics is critical to achieving positive outcomes, it is advisable to initiate a coordinated trauma response. Furthermore, hospital personnel should be attentive to the need for rapid administration of antibiotics to patients with open fractures who arrive via walk-in or during late-night hours.

Prophylactic antibiotic use for penetrating trauma in prolonged casualty care: A review of the literature and current guidelines

ABSTRACT

Prolonged casualty care (PCC), previously known as prolonged field care, is a system to provide patient care for extended periods of time when evacuation or mission requirements surpass available capabilities. Current guidelines recommend a 7- to 10-day course of ertapenem or moxifloxacin, with vancomycin if methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is suspected, for all penetrating trauma in PCC. Data from civilian and military trauma have demonstrated benefit for antibiotic prophylaxis in multiple types of penetrating trauma, but the recommended regimens and durations differ from those used in PCC, with the PCC guidelines generally recommending broader coverage. We present a review of the available civilian and military literature on antibiotic prophylaxis in penetrating trauma to discuss whether a strategy of broader coverage is necessary in the PCC setting, with the goal of optimizing patient outcomes and antibiotic stewardship, while remaining cognizant of the challenges of moving medical material to and through combat zones. Empiric extended gram-negative coverage is unlikely to be necessary for thoracic, maxillofacial, extremity, and central nervous system trauma in most medical settings. However, providing the narrowest appropriate antimicrobial coverage is challenging in PCC because of limited resources, most notably, delay to surgical debridement. Antibiotic prophylaxis regimen must be determined on a case-by-case basis based on individual patient factors while still considering antibiotic stewardship. Narrower regimens, which focus on matching up the site of infection to the antibiotic chosen, may be appropriate based on available resources and expertise of treating providers. When resources permit in PCC, the narrower cefazolin-based regimens (with the addition of metronidazole for esophageal or abdominal involvement, or gross contamination of central nervous system trauma) likely provide adequate coverage. Levofloxacin is appropriate for ocular trauma. Ideally, cefazolin and metronidazole should be carried by medics in addition to first-line antibiotics (moxifloxacin and ertapenem, Literature Synthesis and Expert Opinion; Level V).

Monotherapy Antibiotic Prophylaxis of Lower Extremity Long Bone Type III Open Fractures

Gustilo type III open fractures involve extensive soft tissue damage and wound contamination that pose significant infection risks. The historical standard for antibiotic prophylaxis has been cefazolin and gentamicin. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of lower extremity type III open fractures treated with ceftriaxone alone for prophylaxis. Eighty-six patients were identified. Nearly all (98%) were managed with appropriate antibiotics, but only 55 (64%) received prophylaxis within 1 hour. Overall, there were 12 infections. This infection rate was not statistically different than the reported literature (14% vs 19%, P = .20). The infection rate between those who received antibiotics within 1 hour was not statistically different from those who got it beyond 1 hour (15% vs 13%, P = .98). In conclusion, the use of ceftriaxone as monotherapy for antibiotic prophylaxis in lower extremity type III open fractures is not statistically different than the use of historic prophylactic regimens.

Acute prophylactic antibiotic nailing of open femoral shaft fractures for prevention of fracture-related infection

Background

Open, grossly contaminated femoral shaft fractures pose a significant threat for fracture-related infection. Traditional treatment for these injuries consists of irrigation and debridement with temporizing external fixation placement and staged conversion to definitive fixation.

Methods

We describe a protocol for acute antibiotic cement nailing of open femoral shaft fractures as an infection prophylaxis modality in fractures with a high risk of infection and present three cases.

Results

Three patients presented with open femoral shaft fractures with large soft tissue defects and gross contamination and were successfully treated with acute retrograde antibiotic nailing and external fixation with later conversion to definitive metallic nailing. They did not develop infection and had acceptable postoperative function and fracture alignment.

Conclusion

This technique of early infection prophylaxis after open femoral shaft fracture is reproducible, pragmatic, and cost-effective.

A Comparison of the Rates of Postoperative Infection Following Distal Radius Fixation Between Pediatric and Young Adult Populations: An Analysis of 32 368 Patients

BACKGROUND

Infection following surgical fixation of a distal radius fracture can markedly compromise a patient's functional outcome. This study aimed to compare infection rates in pediatric (5-14 years) and adolescent (15-17 years) patients undergoing fixation of a distal radius fracture to a cohort of young adult (18-30 years) patients.

METHODS

A matched retrospective study was performed using PearlDiver to determine the rates of postoperative infection following distal radius fixation. χ2 and logistic regression were used to assess differences in rates, while linear regression was used to analyze rates of infection over time.

RESULTS

In 32 368 patients, young adults experienced postoperative infection at a significantly increased rate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.27). This trend was consistent among the male (OR = 1.96; 1.49-2.57) and female (OR = 2.11, 1.37-3.27) cohorts. In the multivariate model, the adult cohort remained at increased risk (OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.89), with open fracture (OR = 4.99; 3.55-6.87), smoking (OR = 1.76; 1.22-2.48), hypertension (OR = 1.69; 1.20-2.33), and obesity (OR = 1.37; 1.02, 1.80) identified as other significant risk factors. There was no significant change in the rate of postoperative infections over the 11-year study period.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that although surgical site infections following distal radius fixation are low in patients aged 30 years or younger (0.97%), young adults develop infections at a significantly increased rate. This is important for surgeons to recognize when counseling patients on the risks of surgical fixation.

Time Savings and Safety of EMS Administration of Antibiotics for Open Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Early administration of antibiotics for open fractures reduces serious bone and soft tissue infections. The effectiveness of antibiotics in reducing these infections is time-dependent, with various surgical associations recommending administration within one hour of injury, or within one hour of patient arrival to the emergency department (ED). The extent to which prehospital antibiotic administration in these situations might reduce the time to treatment has not been previously reported. The purpose of this study was to describe current prehospital use of antibiotics for traumatic injury, to assess the safety of prehospital antibiotic administration, and to estimate the potential time-savings associated with antibiotic administration by EMS clinicians.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the 2019 through 2022 ESO Data Collaborative research data set. Included subjects were patients that had a linked ICD-10 code indicating an open extremity fracture and who received prehospital antibiotics. Time to antibiotic administration was calculated as the elapsed time from EMS dispatch until antibiotic administration. The minimum potential time saved by EMS antibiotic administration was calculated as the elapsed time from administration until ED arrival. To assess safety, epinephrine and diphenhydramine administration were used as proxies for the adverse events of anaphylaxis and minor allergic reactions.

RESULTS

There were 523 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The median (and interquartile range [IQR]) elapsed time from EMS dispatch until antibiotic administration was 31 (IQR: 24-41) minutes. The median potential time savings associated with prehospital antibiotic administration was 15 (IQR: 8-22) minutes. Notably, 144 (27.5%) of the patients who received prehospital antibiotics had total prehospital times exceeding one hour. None of the patients who received antibiotics also received epinephrine for presumed anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

EMS clinicians were able to safely administer antibiotics to patients with open fractures a median of 15 min before arrival at the hospital, and 99% of the patients receiving antibiotics had them administered within one hour of EMS dispatch. EMS administration of antibiotics may be a safe way to increase compliance with recommendations for early antibiotic administration for open fractures.

[Importance of local antibiotics in the prophylaxis and treatment of fracture-associated infections]

BACKGROUND

Fracture-associated infections (FRI) are a severe complication that lead to higher morbidity and high costs for the healthcare system. An effective prophylaxis and treatment of FRI are therefore of great interest.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on the use of local antibiotics for the prophylaxis and treatment of FRI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A thorough search and a narrative synthesis of the available literature were performed. Their depiction is supplemented by an illustrative presentation of a case report.

RESULTS

A robust consensus definition of FRI has existed since 2018. The current use of local antibiotics for the prophylaxis and treatment of FRI in Germany is heterogeneous. There is no consensus on local antibiotic treatment of FRI. The available literature shows an advantage for the additive local antibiotic treatment of open fractures. In closed fractures there is a tendency towards an advantage especially in the presence of further risk factors (long duration of external fixation, higher degree of closed tissue damage, compartment syndrome). According to analogous data from the field of endoprosthetics, additive local antibiotic treatment could also be advantageous under closed soft tissue conditions. The evidence is insufficient to enable the recommendation for a specific antibiotic or a specific mode of application. Local and systemic adverse reactions are frequently discussed in the literature but their incidence is low.

CONCLUSION

Overall, additive local antibiotic treatment is to be recommended for open fractures and in closed fractures in the presence of other risk factors. Local and systemic adverse reactions as well as the development of antibiotic resistance must be weighed up in individual cases.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Grade 3 Open Fractures: A Retrospective Comparison of Ceftriaxone Plus Vancomycin Versus Cefazolin Plus Gentamicin

Background: Because of the established path of bacterial entry and contamination-associated mechanisms, grade 3 open orthopedic fractures represent a substantial infection risk. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) guidelines recommended covering Staphylococcus aureus and adding aminoglycoside gram-negative coverage. Local institutional guidelines rely on ceftriaxone for gram negative coverage and add methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus coverage with vancomycin. Patients and Methods: The electronic health records of adults admitted for a grade 3 open fracture between January 1, 2016, and October 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received cefazolin and gentamicin (CZ+GM) or ceftriaxone and vancomycin (CRO+VA) as prophylaxis were included. We recorded the rate of a composite treatment failure outcome of receipt of antibiotic agents, infection-related hospitalization, or subsequent debridement for injury-site skin and soft tissue infection or osteomyelitis. The presence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was also evaluated. Results: There were 65 patients included in the CZ+GM group and 53 patients in the CRO+VA group. Patients in the CZ+GM group were younger (mean 42.6 compared with 50.6 years; p = 0.02). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between groups' demographics, mechanism and site of injury, timeline of care, or surgical interventions. More patients in the CZ+GM arm met the composite treatment failure outcome, but it was not statistically significant (45% vs. 32%; p = 0.2). There were similar rates of treatment failure at 30 days (21% vs. 26%; p = 0.5) and for only osteomyelitis (8% vs. 9%; p = 1). Conclusions: The trend in numerically lower treatment failure rates in the CRO+VA group across outcomes provides sufficient evidence to continue the current local recommendations. Given our sample size, type 2 error may have occurred, and studies with greater power should analyze this question.

The Effect of Topical Antibiotic Powder Application in the Emergency Department on Deep Fracture-Related Infection in Type III Open Lower Extremity Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in management, open fractures are at an elevated risk for deep fracture-related infection (FRI). Time to systemic antibiotic (ABX) administration and intraoperative topical administration of ABX powder have been used to decrease FRI risk. The purpose of this study was to determine whether topical application of antibiotic powder to type III open lower extremity fractures immediately on presentation to the emergency department (ED) reduces the rate of FRI.

METHODS

DESIGN

Prospective cohort compared with retrospective historical control.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

INTERVENTION

Application of 1 g of vancomycin and 1.2 g of tobramycin powder directly to open fracture wounds on presentation to the ED.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients with type III open lower extremity fractures treated from July 1, 2019, to September 17, 2022, who received topical ABX powder in the ED were compared with patients from a 4-year historical cohort from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2019, who were treated without topical ABX powder.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Development of a FRI within 6 months of follow-up. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and postoperative data were analyzed as risk factors for FRI.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients received topical ABX powder in the ED and were compared with 129 patients who were treated without topical ABX powder. The rate of FRI in the trial group was 6/66 (9.09%) versus 22/129 (17.05%) in the control cohort ( P = 0.133). Multivariate analysis demonstrated higher body mass index as a risk factor for development of FRI ( P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant difference in rates of FRI in open lower extremity fractures treated with immediate topical ABX administration in the ED versus standard-of-care treatment without topical ABX was found. These findings may have been limited by insufficient power. Further large-scale study is warranted to determine the significance of topical antibiotic powder application in the ED.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Antibiotic prophylaxis following low-velocity gunshot fractures: an updated review

PURPOSE

Low-velocity gunshot fractures (LVGFs) are a common type of gunshot-induced trauma with the potential for complications such as infection and osteomyelitis. The effectiveness of antibiotic therapy in LVGFs remains uncertain, leading to ongoing debate about the appropriate treatment. In this review, we evaluate recent updates on the current understanding of antibiotic therapy in LVGFs, how previous studies have investigated the use of antibiotics in LVGFs, and the current state of institutional policies and protocols for treating LVGFs with antibiotics.

METHODS

We conducted a review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify studies that investigated the use of antibiotics in LVGFs after the last review in 2013. Due to the lack of quantitative clinical trial studies, we employed a narrative synthesis approach to analyze and present the findings from the included primary studies. We categorized the outcomes based on the anatomical location of the LVGFs.

RESULTS

After evaluating 67 publications with the necessary qualifications out of 578 abstracts, 17 articles were included. The sample size of the studies ranged from 22 to 252 patients. The antibiotics used in the studies varied, and the follow-up period ranged from three months to ten years. The included studies investigated the use of antibiotics in treating LVGFs at various anatomic locations, including the humerus, forearm, hand and wrist, hip, femur, tibia, and foot and ankle.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides updated evidence for the use of antibiotics in LVGFs and highlights the need for further research to establish evidence-based guidelines. We also highlight the lack of institutional policies for treating LVGFs and the heterogeneity in treatments among institutions with established protocols. A single-dose antibiotic approach could be cost-effective for patients with non-operatively treated LVGFs. We suggest that a national or international registry for gunshot injuries, antibiotics, and infections could serve as a valuable resource for collecting and analyzing data related to these important healthcare issues.

Infectious profiles in civilian gunshot associated long bone fractures

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of literature on infections in civilian gunshot associated with long bone fractures with the reported rates ranging from 0-15.7%.This study aimed to investigate the rates of infection associated with long bone fractures caused by civilian gunshots. The specific objectives were to determine if certain extremities were at a higher risk for infection and to identify the types of bacteria present in these infections by analyzing culture isolates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients aged 18-64 who sustained gunshot-associated long bone fractures at an urban Level I trauma centre from 2010 to 2017. Patient selection was based done through a institutional trauma centre database using international classification of diseases (ICD) 9 and 10 codes. We included patients who underwent surgical treatment, specifically fracture fixation, at our institution and excluded patients with fractures involving the pelvis, spine, foot, and hand. A total of 384 gunshot-associated long bone fractures in 347 patients were identified for analysis. Relevant patient-, injury-, and treatment-related variables were extracted from clinical records and radiographic reviews. Outcomes of interest included bony union, repeat operative procedures, and the development of deep infection.

RESULTS

347 patients with 384 long bone fractures were included. 32 fractures in 32 patients developed an infection for an incidence of 9.3% of patients and 8.3% of fractures. Gram-positive bacteria were present in 23/32 (72.0%) culture isolates, gram-negative bacteria in 10/32 (31.3%) culture isolates, and six infections were polymicrobial. Staphylococcus 16/32 (50.0%) and Enterobacter 6/32 (18.8%) species were the most common isolates. Of the Staphylococcus species, 5/16 (31.3%) were MRSA. Lower extremity fractures had a greater risk for infection compared to the upper extremity (11.7% vs 3.7% p < 0.01) and fractures that developed an infection had a larger average zone of comminution (63.9 mm vs 48.5 mm p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study investigated the rates of infection associated with long bone fractures caused by civilian gunshots. The overall infection rate observed in our series aligns with existing literature. Gram-positive bacteria were the predominant isolates, with a notable incidence of MRSA in our patient population, highlighting the need for considering empiric coverage. Additionally, gram-negative organisms were found in a significant proportion of infections, and a notable percentage of infections were polymicrobial. Our findings emphasize the importance of carefully assessing highly comminuted lower extremity fractures and implementing appropriate antibiotic coverage and operative debridement for patients with gunshot-related long bone fractures. While current prophylaxis algorithms for open fractures lack specific inclusion of gunshot wounds, we propose incorporating these injuries to reduce the incidence of infections associated with such fractures.

Hematoma-like dynamic hydrogelation through natural glycopeptide molecular recognition for infected bone fracture repair

Infected bone fractures remain a major clinical challenge for orthopedic surgeons. From a tissue regeneration perspective, biomaterial scaffolds with antibacterial and osteoinductive activities are highly desired, while advanced materials capable of mimicking the pathological microenvironment during the healing process of infected tissues remain an area deserving more research. Hematoma, the gel-like blood coagulum, plays an essential role in bone fracture repair because of its ability to serve as a dynamic and temporary scaffold with cytokines for both pathogen elimination and tissue healing. In light of this, we designed a dynamic hydrogel with hematoma-like antimicrobial or reparative performance for infected bone fracture repair in this study. The proposed dynamic hydrogel network was based on the reversible recognition of a natural glycopeptide antibiotic vancomycin (Van) and its target dipeptide D-Ala-D-Ala (AA), which could serve as a hematoma-like scaffold for obliterating bacteria in the fracture region and promoting bone repair by introducing an endogenous osteogenic peptide (OGP). In vivo experiments demonstrated that the hydrogel could rapidly eradicate bacteria, improve bone regeneration and restore the local inflammatory microenvironment. Together, findings from this study imply that the use of hematoma-like dynamic hydrogel could lead to a biomimetic revolution in surgical strategies against susceptible bone fractures.

Local Antibiotic Therapy for Open Long Bone Fractures: Appropriate Prophylaxis or Unnecessary Exposure for the Orthopedic Trauma Patient?

INTRODUCTION

Prophylactic local antibiotic therapy (LAbT) to prevent infection in open long bone fracture (OLBF) patients has been in use for many decades despite lack of definitive evidence confirming a beneficial effect. We aimed to evaluate the effect of LAbT on outcomes of OLBF patients on a nationwide scale.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of 2017-2018 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, all adult (≥18 years) patients with isolated OLBF (non-extremity-Abbreviated Injury Scale < 3) were included. We excluded early deaths (<24 h) and those who had burns or non-extremity surgery. Outcomes were infectious complications (superficial surgical site infection, deep superficial surgical site infection, osteomyelitis, or sepsis), unplanned return to operating room, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS). Patients were stratified into two groups: those who received LAbT and those who did not receive LAbT (No-LAbT). Propensity score matching (1:3) and chi-square tests were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 61,337 isolated OLBF patients were identified, among whom 2,304 patients were matched (LAbT: 576; No-LAbT: 1,728). Both groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. Mean age was 43 ± 17 years, 75% were male, 14% had penetrating injuries, and the median extremity-Abbreviated Injury Scale was 1 (1-2). Most common fracture locations were tibia (66%), fibula (49%), femur (24%), and ulna (11%). About 52% of patients underwent external fixation, 79% underwent internal fixation, and 86% underwent surgical debridement. The median time to LAbT was 17 (5-72) h, and the median time to debridement was 7 (3-15) h (85% within 24 h). The LAbT group had similar rates of infectious complications (3.5% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.24) and unplanned return to the operating room (2.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.74) compared to the No-LAbT group. Patients who received LAbT had longer hospital LOS (16 [10-29] vs. 14 [9-24] days, P < 0.001) but similar intensive care unit LOS (4 [3-9] vs. 4 [2-7] days, P = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that prophylactic LAbT for OLBF may not be beneficial over well-established standards of care such as early surgical debridement and systemic antibiotics. Prospective studies evaluating the efficacy, risks, costs, and indications of adjuvant LAbT for OLBF are warranted.

Type III Gustilo-Anderson open fracture does not justify routine prophylactic Gram-negative antibiotic coverage

Postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is common in open long bone fractures, so early administration of prophylactic antibiotics is critical to prevent SSI. However, the necessity of initial broad-spectrum coverage for Gram-positive and -negative pathogens remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effectiveness of prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics in a large, national-wide sample. We reviewed an open fracture database of prospectively collected data from 111 institutions managed by our society. A retrospective cohort study was designed to compare the rates of deep SSI between narrow- and broad-spectrum antibiotics, which were initiated within three hours after injury. A total of 1041 type III fractures were evaluated at three months after injury. Overall deep SSI rates did not differ significantly between the narrow-spectrum group (43/538, 8.0%) and broad-spectrum group (49/503, 9.8%) (p = 0.320). During propensity score-matched analysis, 425 pairs were analyzed. After matching, no significant difference in the SSI rate was seen between the narrow- and broad-spectrum groups, with 42 SSIs (9.9%) and 40 SSIs (9.4%), respectively (p = 0.816). The probability of deep SSI was not reduced by broad-spectrum antibiotics compared with narrow-spectrum antibiotics in type III open long bone fractures.

State of the Union: Timeliness to Antibiotics in Open Fractures

OBJECTIVE

In open fractures, early administration of systemic antibiotics has recently been recognized as a universal recommendation, with the current American College of Surgeons Trauma Center Verification recommendation for administration within 1 hour of facility arrival. We sought to quantify the baseline rate of timely antibiotic administration and the various factors associated with delay.

METHODS

Data from the National Trauma Data Bank were obtained for all patients treated for open fractures in 2019. 65,552 patients were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, first for patient, prehospital, and hospital factors compared with rate of antibiotic administration within 1 hour of hospital arrival, then with a multivariate analysis of factors affecting these times.

RESULTS

The overall rate of antibiotic administration within 1 hour of arrival was 47.6%. Patient factors associated with lower rates of timely antibiotics include increased age, Medicare status, and a higher number of comorbidities. Associated prehospital factors included non-work-related injuries, fixed-wing air or police transport, and walk-in arrival method. Patients with lower extremity open fractures were more likely to receive antibiotics within 1 hour of arrival than those with upper extremity open fractures. Traumatic amputations had a higher rate of timely administration (67.3%). ACS trauma Level II (52.5%) centers performed better than Level III (48.3%), Level I (45.5%), and Level IV (34.5%) centers. Multivariate analysis confirmed the findings of the univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite current clinical standards, rates of adherence to rapid antibiotic administration are low. Certain patient, facility, and environmental factors are associated with delays in antibiotic administration and can be a focus for quality improvement processes. We plan to use these data to evaluate how focus on antibiotic administration as this quality standard changes practice over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Bacillus licheniformis reverses the environmental ceftriaxone sodium-induced gut microbial dysbiosis and intestinal inflammation in mice

Antibiotics used as a common clinical treatment have saved many lives. Widespread use of antibiotic therapy has been known to disrupt the balance of pathogenic bacteria, host-associated microorganisms and environment. However, our understanding of Bacillus licheniformis for health benefits and ability to restore the ceftriaxone sodium-induced gut microbial dysbiosis is severely limited. We used Caco-2 cell, H&E (hematoxylin-eosin staining), RT-PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing techniques to investigate the influence of Bacillus licheniformis on gut microbial dysbiosis and inflammation following ceftriaxone sodium treatment. The results showed that treatment of ceftriaxone sodium in 7 days suppressed the expression of Nf-κB pathway mRNA levels, which caused cytoplasmic vacuolization in intestinal tissues, afterward, the administration of Bacillus licheniformis could effectively restore intestinal morphology and inflammation levels. Moreover, the ceftriaxone sodium treatment entirely affected the intestinal microbial ecology, leading to a decrease in microbial abundance. Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Epsilonbacteraeota were the most predominant phyla in each of the four groups. Specifically, the MA group (ceftriaxone sodium treatment) resulted in a significant decrease in the relative abundance of 2 bacterial phyla and 20 bacterial genera compared to the administration of Bacillus licheniformis after ceftriaxone sodium treatment. The supplementation of Bacillus licheniformis could increase the growth of Firmicutes and Lactobacillus and encourage the construction of a more mature and stable microbiome. Furthermore, Bacillus licheniformis could restore the intestinal microbiome disorders and inflammation levels following ceftriaxone sodium treatment.

Locked intramedullary nailing of open fractures in resource-poor settings: a prospective observational study of challenges and functional outcomes in 101 fractures at Ogbomoso, Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Trauma is now one of the fastest growing epidemics globally but low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are more severely affected in terms of cost, disability and death. The high-energy trauma of road traffic accidents and violence often produces open fractures which can be difficult to manage in resource-poor settings. Adequate stabilization, such as provided by locked nails, has been found to ensure better outcome for open fractures. There is dearth of published studies on the use of locked intramedullary nail in the treatment of open fractures in Nigeria.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study of all the 101 open fractures of the humerus, femur and tibia treated over a period of 92 months with Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) nail. Fracture severity was classified according to the modified Gustilo-Anderson system. The intervals between fracture and antibiotics administration, débridement and definitive fixation, as well as surgery duration and method of fracture reduction were noted. Outcomes measured at follow-up included infection, ongoing radiographic healing, knee flexion/shoulder abduction beyond ninety degrees (KF/SA > 90⁰), full weight bearing (FWB), painless squatting (PS&S)/shoulder abduction-external rotation (SAER).

RESULTS

Most of the patients fall between ages 20 and 49 years; 75.5% of them were males. There were more Gustilo-Anderson type IIIA fractures than other types but nine type IIIB tibia fractures were also nailed. The overall infection rate was 15%, contributed mostly by the type IIIB fractures. By the 12th post-operative week, at least 79% had ongoing radiographic healing and had achieved all of KF/SA > 90⁰, FWB, and PS&S/SAER.

CONCLUSION

The SIGN nail's solid construct reduces the risk of infection and allows earlier use of the limb, making it particularly suitable in LIMCs where socioeconomic functioning often requires an unhindered use of the limbs.

Change in Gustilo-Anderson classification at time of surgery does not increase risk for surgical site infection in patients with open fractures: A secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Open fractures represent a major source of morbidity. Surgical site infections (SSIs) after open fractures are associated with a high rate of reoperations and hospitalizations, which are associated with a lower health-related quality of life. Early antibiotic delivery, typically chosen through an assessment of the size and contamination of the wound, has been shown to be an effective technique to reduce the risk of SSI in open fractures. The Gustilo-Anderson classification (GAC) was devised as a grading system of open fractures after a complete operative debridement of the wound had been undertaken but is commonly used preoperatively to help with the choice of initial antibiotics. Incorrect preoperative GAC, leading to less aggressive initial management, may influence the risk of SSI after open fracture. The objectives of this study were to determine (1) how often the GAC changed from the initial to definitive grading, (2) the injury and patient characteristics associated with increases and decreases of the GAC, and (3) whether a change in GAC was associated with an increased risk of SSI.

Methods

Using data from the FLOW trial, a large multicenter randomized study, we used descriptive statistics to quantify how frequently the GAC changed from the initial to definitive grading. We used regression models to determine which injury and patient characteristics were associated with increases and decreases in GAC and whether a change in GAC was associated with SSI.

Results

Of the 2420 participants included, 305 participants had their preoperative GAC change (12.6%). The factors associated with upgrading the GAC (from preoperative score to the definitive assessment) included fracture sites other than the tibia, bone loss at presentation, width of wound, length of wound, and skin loss at presentation. However, initial misclassification of type III fractures as type II fractures was not associated with an increased risk of SSI (P = 0.14).

Conclusions

When treating patients with open fracture wounds, surgeons should consider that 12% of all injuries may initially be misclassified when using the GAC, particularly fractures that have bone loss at presentation or those located in sites different than the tibia. However, even in misclassified fractures, it did not seem to increase the risk of SSI.

Infection complicating locked intramedullary nailing of open lower-extremity fractures: incidence, associated risk factors, and lessons for improving outcome in a low-resource setting

Introduction: Infection is the chief complication that makes open fractures difficult to treat. Most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are missing out on modern management techniques developed to achieve better outcomes in high-income countries (HICs). One of these is the use of locked intramedullary (IM) nails. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with infection of open fractures treated with the surgical implant generation network (SIGN) nail at a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on 101 open fractures of the femur and tibia over an 8-year period. Active surveillance for infection was done on each patient. Infection was diagnosed as the presence of wound breakdown or purulent discharge from (or near) the wound or surgical incision. Potential risk factors were tested for association with infection. Results: There were 101 fractures in 94 patients with a mean age of 37.76 years. The following treatment-related factors demonstrated significant associations with infection - timings of antibiotic administration (p < 0.001 ) and definitive fracture fixation (p = 0.002 ); definitive wound closure (p < 0.001 ), fracture-reduction methods (p = 0.005 ), and surgery duration (p = 0.007 ). Conclusions: Although this study has limitations precluding the drawing up of final conclusions, the findings suggest that the risk factors for infection of nailed open fractures in LMICs are similar to those in HICs. Consequently, outcomes can potentially improve if LMICs adopt the management principles used in HICs in scientifically sound ways that are affordable and socially acceptable to their people. Further studies are suggested to establish our findings.

Open lower extremity fractures in the geriatric population

INTRODUCTION

Open fractures in the elderly are distinct compared to younger populations. The purpose of this study is to follow a series of open fractures of the lower extremity in the geriatric population to better prognosticate outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients over the age of 65 years old who were treated for an open, lower extremity fracture across two level I trauma medical systems. Patients were included if they had documented wound healing problems in the postoperative period, or 6 months of follow-up, or if they had a definitive radiographic outcome. Sixty-four patients were included of an average age of 76.23, of whom 73.4% were female.

RESULTS

The fracture types were midshaft femur in 3, distal femur in 9, patella in 2, proximal tibia in 3, proximal fibula in 1, midshaft tibia in 14, distil tibia in 8, ankle in 23, and talar neck/calcaneus in 1. Forty-two fractures were the result of low energy mechanism and 22 fractures were from high energy mechanism. Fourteen fractures were type 1, 32 were type 2, 11 were type 3A, 6 were type 3B, and 1 was type 3C. At final follow-up, 13 wounds were well healed, 39 wounds were healed following a delay of more than 6 weeks to achieve healing, 3 were infected, 3 had been treated with amputation, 2 had chronic ulceration, 2 with active draining, and 2 had draining sinuses.

DISCUSSION

Open lower extremity fractures are serious injuries with high rates of morbidity. Such risks are even higher in the geriatric population, particularly with regard to wound healing. This study provides important prognostic information in counseling geriatric patient with an open lower extremity fracture, as well as informs treatment in terms of wound surveillance and care in the postoperative period.

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury and Fracture-Related Infection After Antibiotic Prophylaxis With Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Open Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of prophylactic piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) on inpatient acute kidney injury (AKI) and fracture-related infection (FRI) in patients with open fractures.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

We reviewed 358 Gustilo-Anderson type II and III open fractures at our institution from January 2013 to December 2017.

INTERVENTION

Administration of PT (the PT group) or antibiotics other than PT (the historical control group) during the first 48 hours of arrival for open fracture antibiotic prophylaxis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The main outcome measurements were rates of inpatient AKI and FRI within six months after definitive fixation.

RESULTS

There were 176 patients in the PT group and 182 patients in the historical control group. The PT group had worse American Society of Anesthesiologists class ( P = 0.004) and injury severity scores ( P < 0.001), a higher average number of debridements before closure/coverage ( P = 0.043), and higher rates of gross soil contamination ( P = 0.049) and staged procedures ( P = 0.008) compared with the historical control group.There was no difference in the rate of AKI between the PT and historical control groups (5.7% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.166) nor when stratified by Gustilo-Anderson fracture classification (type II: 5.8% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.702; type III: 5.6% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.283). There was no significant difference in the rate of FRI between the PT and historical control groups (23.6% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.469).

CONCLUSION

The use of PT in prophylactic antimicrobial treatment in patients with Gustilo-Anderson type II and III open fractures does not increase the rate of AKI or FRI. We believe PT can be used as an effective monotherapy in these patients without an increased risk of renal injury, but future investigations are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Adherence to Antibiotic Recommendations and Infection Among Patients With Open Long-Bone Fractures: An Examination of Antibiotic Prioritization in Fracture Management

Open fractures are at high risk of infection because of exposure of bone and tissue to the environment. Initiation of intravenous antibiotics is recommended within 1 hour of hospital arrival, although the presence of other severe injuries may lead to delays in fracture management. This retrospective study of adult patients with open long-bone fractures admitted to six level 1 trauma centers between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, aimed to examine adherence to antibiotic recommendations. Associations between receiving recommendation-adherent antibiotics and patient and injury characteristics were investigated univariately and in adjusted regression analyses. The most common fracture locations among the 404 patients included were the tibia (43%) and fibula (26%). Fifty-eight percent of patients received recommendation-adherent antibiotics. After adjustment, patient demographics, comorbidities, cause of injury, and overall injury severity did not show significant associations with adherence to recommendations. Concomitant serious abdominal (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.44) and spinal injuries (AOR=0.23) were associated with lower odds of receiving recommendation-adherent antibiotics. Additionally, fractures of certain locations were associated with increased odds of adherence (humerus: AOR=2.78; fibula: AOR=1.64), as were type 3 fractures (AOR=1.55). The overall infection rate was 4%, and adherence to antibiotic recommendations was not associated with infection (3% vs 5% for nonadherent, P=.34). Results suggest that although full recommendation adherence was somewhat low among this patient population, certain injury characteristics were predictive of adherence rates. Current antibiotic recommendations may benefit from consideration of how antibiotic initiation may fit into the prioritization of injury management, especially in patients with polytrauma with other severe injuries. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):54-58.].

Effect of Local Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Postoperative Deep Infection in Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Despite the use of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative infection after fracture surgery remains an issue. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of locally applied antibiotics on deep infection in fracture surgery in both the open and closed fractures.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed was performed from the date of inception to April 15, 2021, and included studies in all languages.

STUDY SELECTION

Cohort studies were eligible if they investigated the effect on the infection rate of local antibiotic prophylaxis on deep infection after fracture surgery.

DATA EXTRACTION

This study was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies tool where applicable.

DATA SYNTHESIS

An inverse variance random-effects model was the primary analysis model because of the anticipated diversity in the evaluated populations. Univariate models were used when a single outcome was of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of deep infection was significantly reduced when local antibiotics were applied compared with the control group receiving systemic prophylaxis only. This beneficial effect was observed in open fractures but failed to reach statistical significance in closed fractures. This meta-analysis suggests that there may be a significant risk reduction in deep infection rate after fracture surgery when local antibiotics are added to standard systemic prophylaxis, particularly in open fractures. Further high-powered Level I studies are needed to support these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk of Infection Following Gunshot Wound Fractures to the Foot and Ankle: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

The purpose of this multicenter retrospective chart review was to describe demographics, fracture and wound characteristics, and treatments for foot and/or ankle fractures caused by gunshot wounds (GSWs) and identify factors that increase risk of infection in adults treated at 5 urban level 1 trauma centers in South and Midwest regions of the United States. A total of 244 patients sustained GSW-related fractures of the foot/ankle during 2007-2017, of whom 179 had ≥30 days of follow-up data after the initial injury. Most patients were male (95.1%; 232/244) with an average age of 31.2 years. On average, patients sustained 1.3 GSWs (range 1-5) to the foot/ankle. Most GSWs were categorized as low energy (85.1%; 171/201) and the majority (58.2%; 142/244) had retained bullet fragments. Antibiotics were administered at initial presentation to 78.7% (192/244) of patients and 41.8% (102/244) were managed operatively at the time of initial injury. Nerve injury, vascular injury, and infection were documented in, respectively, 8.6% (21/243), 6.6% (16/243), and 17.2% (42/244) of all cases. Multivariable analysis revealed that high-energy injuries and retained bullet fragments increased the risk of infection by 3-fold (odds ratio 3.09, 95% confidence interval 1.16-8.27, p = .025) and 3.5-fold (OR 3.48, 95% CI1.40-8.67; p = .008), respectively. Side of injury, primary injury region, and vascular injury were not significant predictors of infection risk. Further research should examine whether retained bullet fragments are directly associated with infection risk and support the development of guidelines regarding the management of patients with GSW-related fractures to the ankle/foot.

Current Concept Review: Risk Factors for Infection Following Open Fractures

Infection following open fracture is a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a central tenet of treatment is to minimize the risk of infection. The initial risk of infection is determined by wound characteristics, such as size, soft tissue coverage, vascular injury, and contamination. While no consensus exists on optimal antibiotic regimen, early administration of prophylactic antibiotics, within an hour of injury, when possible, has been shown definitively to decrease the risk of infection. Infection risk is further reduced by early irrigation with normal saline and aggressive debridement of devitalized tissue. Patient factors that increase risk of infection following open fracture include diabetes mellitus, smoking, male gender, and lower extremity fracture.

The effect of cigarette smoke versus vaporized nicotine on healing of a rat femur

INTRODUCTION

Little data exists regarding the effects of vaporized nicotine on healing. Our goal was to compare vaporized nicotine, combusted nicotine and control with respect to bone healing in a rat femur fracture model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into three equal cohorts. Rats were exposed to two cigarettes daily, an equivalent dose of vaporized nicotine, or control, six days a week. Exposures occurred for 4 weeks prior to iatrogenic femur fracture and intramedullary repair. Four additional weeks of exposure occurred prior to sacrifice. Radiographic, biomechanical and histologic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

No significant difference between the three groups was identified for total mineralized bone volume (p = 0.14), total volume of mature bone (p = 0.12) or immature bone (p = 0.15). Importantly, less total mineralized bone volume and immature bone volume was seen in the vaporized nicotine group compared to combusted tobacco, but results were not significant. Biomechanical testing revealed no significant difference in group torsional stiffness (p = 0.92) or maximum torque (p = 0.31) between the three groups. On histologic analysis, chi-square testing showed no significant difference in any category.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study compared combusted nicotine, vaporized nicotine and a control on rat femur fractures. While no statistically significant differences were identified, there were trends showing less total mineralized bone volume and immature bone volume in the vaporized nicotine group compared to the other groups. Additional study is warranted based on our findings.

Open Fractures in Pediatric Orthopaedics-Can Pathways Improve Care? A 1-Year Pre and Postimplementation Analysis

BACKGROUND

In the care of open fractures, time to antibiotic administration has been shown to be a critical factor in preventing infection. To help improve outcomes at our institution we designed and implemented an open fracture pathway with the goal of reducing the time from emergency department (ED) arrival to antibiotic administration. Here we evaluate the success of this pathway, propose improvements in the protocol, and provide a framework for initiation at other institutions.

METHODS

We compared a retrospective prepathway cohort with a prospective postpathway cohort for 1-year pre and postpathway implementation. First, we analyzed the number of patients from outside facilities who had received antibiotics before transfer. For patients who had not received antibiotics before arriving at our institution, we reviewed pathway metrics including time from ED arrival to the ordering and administration of antibiotics, whether the correct antibiotic type was selected, and time to surgical debridement.

RESULTS

There were 50 patients in the prepathway cohort and 29 in the postpathway cohort. Prepathway 60.5% of transfers (23 of 38) received antibiotics before transfer, whereas post-pathway 90.0% of transfers (18 of 20) received antibiotics ( P =0.032). For patients who had not received antibiotics before arriving at our institution and were included in pathway metric analysis, there were no differences in demographics or fracture characteristics. Time from ED arrival to antibiotic order decreased from 115.3 to 63.5 minutes ( P =0.016). Time from antibiotic order to administration was similar between groups (48.0 vs. 35.7 min, P =0.191), but the overall time from ED arrival to antibiotic administration decreased from 163.3 to 99.2 minutes ( P =0.004). There were no significant differences in whether the correct antibiotic type was chosen ( P =0.354) or time from ED arrival to surgery ( P =0.783).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that for pediatric patients presenting with open fractures, a care pathway can successfully decrease the time from ED arrival to antibiotic administration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III-retrospective comparative study.

Revisiting the Classic Open Fracture Studies to Correct Misperceptions and Errors

The Gustilo and Anderson open fracture system is a commonly used classification in orthopaedic surgery. Unfortunately, misunderstandings of the original manuscripts are common, and familiar treatment and classification dogma are scribed to the landmark studies. This study describes the actual assertions of the work, and several misperceptions are set straight.

The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: the management of open fracture care in the UK

AIMS

The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study was performed to provide clarity in open fracture management previously skewed by small, specialist centre studies and large, unfocused registry investigations. We report the current management metrics of open fractures across the UK.

METHOD

Patients admitted to hospital with an open fracture (excluding phalanges or isolated hand injuries) between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 were included. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture software. All domains of the British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Open Fracture Management were recorded.

RESULTS

Across 51 centres, 1,175 patients were analyzed. Antibiotics were given to 754 (69.0%) in the emergency department, 240 (22.0%) pre-hospital, and 99 (9.1%) as inpatients. Wounds were photographed in 848 (72.7%) cases. Median time to first surgery was 16 hrs 14 mins (interquartile range (IQR) 8 hrs 29 mins to 23 hrs 19 mins). Complex injuries were operated on sooner (median 12 hrs 51 mins (IQR 4 hrs 36 mins to 21 hrs 14 mins)). Of initial procedures, 1,053 (90.3%) occurred between 8am and 8pm. A consultant orthopaedic surgeon was present at 1,039 (89.2%) first procedures. In orthoplastic centres, a consultant plastic surgeon was present at 465 (45.1%) first procedures. Overall, 706 (60.8%) patients required a single operation. At primary debridement, 798 (65.0%) fractures were definitively fixed, while 734 (59.8%) fractures had fixation and coverage in one operation through direct closure or soft-tissue coverage. Negative pressure wound therapy was used in 235 (67.7%) staged procedures. Following wound closure or soft-tissue cover, 509 (47.0%) patients received antibiotics for a median of three days (IQR 1 to 7).

CONCLUSION

OPEN provides an insight into care across the UK and different levels of hospital for open fractures. Patients are predominantly operated on promptly, in working hours, and at specialist centres. Areas for improvement include combined patient review and follow-up, scheduled operating, earlier definitive soft-tissue cover, and more robust antibiotic husbandry.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(9):1073-1080.

Timing of antibiotic administration, wound debridement, and the stages of reconstructive surgery for open long bone fractures of the upper and lower limbs

BACKGROUND

Open fractures of the major long bones are complex limb-threatening injuries that are predisposed to deep infection. Treatment includes antibiotics and surgery to debride the wound, stabilise the fracture and reconstruct any soft tissue defect to enable infection-free bone repair. There is a need to assess the effect of timing and duration of antibiotic administration and timing and staging of surgical interventions to optimise outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (risks and benefits) of the timing of antibiotic administration, wound debridement and the stages of surgical interventions in managing people with open long bone fractures of the upper and lower limbs.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and clinical trial registers in February 2021. We also searched conference proceedings and reference lists of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs that recruited adults with open fractures of the major long bones, comparing: 1) timings of prophylactic antibiotic treatment, 2) duration of prophylactic antibiotic treatment, 3) timing of wound debridement following injury or 4) timing of the stages of reconstructive surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We aimed to collect data for the following outcomes: limb function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), deep surgical site infection, delayed or non-union, adverse events (in the short- and long-term course of recovery), and resource-related outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs of 613 randomised participants with 617 open fractures. Studies were conducted in medical and trauma centres in the USA and Kenya. Where reported, there was a higher proportion of men and a mean age of participants between 30 and 34 years old. Fractures were in the upper and lower limbs in one study, and were tibia fractures in two studies; where reported, these were the result of high-energy trauma such as road traffic accidents. No studies compared the timing of antibiotic treatment or wound debridement. Duration of prophylactic antibiotic treatment (1 study, 77 participants available for analysis) One study compared antibiotic treatment for 24 hours with antibiotic treatment for five days. We are very uncertain about the effects of different durations of antibiotic treatment on superficial infections (risk ratio (RR) 1.19, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.87, favours 5 day treatment; 1 study, 77 participants); this was very low-certainty evidence derived from one small study with unclear and high risks of bias, and with an imprecise effect estimate. This study reported no other review outcomes. Reconstructive surgery: timing of the stages of surgery (2 studies, 458 participants available for analysis) Two studies compared the timing of wound closure, which was completed immediately or delayed. In one study, the mean time of delay was 5.9 days; in the other study, the time of delay was not reported. We are very uncertain about the effects of different timings of wound closure on deep infections (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.80, favours immediate closure; 2 studies, 458 participants), delayed union or non-union (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.55, favours delayed closure; 1 study, 387 participants), or superficial infections (RR 6.45, 95% CI 0.35 to 120.43, favours delayed closure; 1 study, 71 participants); this was very low-certainty evidence. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for very serious risks of bias because both studies had unclear and high risks of bias. We also downgraded for serious imprecision because effect estimates were imprecise, including the possibility of benefits as well as harms, and very serious imprecision when the data were derived from single small study. These studies reported no other review outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We could not determine the risks and benefits of different treatment protocols for open long bone fractures because the evidence was very uncertain for the two comparisons and we did not find any studies addressing the other possible comparisons. Well-designed randomised trials with adequate power are needed to guide surgical and antibiotic treatment of open fractures, particularly with regard to timing and duration of antibiotic administration and timing and staging of surgery.

Ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefazolin plus aminoglycosides for antimicrobial prophylaxis in management of Gustilo type IIIA open fractures: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The antibiotic regimens for prophylaxis in the management of open fractures remain controversial. Although the use of aminoglycosides is widely accepted for treatment of Gustilo type III open fractures, aminoglycosides are often avoided in patients with risk factors. This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of two regimens, cephazolin plus aminoglycoside (amikacin or gentamicin) and ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT), in patients with Gustilo type IIIA open fractures.

METHODS

A total of 95 Gustilo type IIIA fractures in 90 patients were retrospectively reviewed in this study. The cohort was categorized into two groups that were treated in accordance with the institutional prescribed regimen in different periods: (1) cefazolin plus aminoglycoside (January 1, 2014-September 30, 2017) and (2) ABPC/SBT monotherapy (October 1, 2017-September 30, 2020). Cefazolin was used at 1-2 g every 8 h, aminoglycoside (amikacin or gentamicin) was used daily depending on body weight, and ABPC/SBT was used at 3 g every 8 h The antibiotic administration was continued within 3 days or until successful soft tissue coverage was achieved. The infection rate and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in both groups were assessed.

RESULTS

ABPC/SBT was used in 34 patients (36 fractures), and 56 patients (59 fractures) received cefazolin plus aminoglycoside for antibiotic prophylaxis. Infection developed in 2 of 36 fractures in ABPC/SBT group and 4 of 59 fractures in the cefazolin plus aminoglycoside group (p > 0.99). The average serum creatinine levels on admission, baseline, and peak during the hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. One case of AKI was identified in each group, indicating that incidence rate of AKI was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the non-inferiority of ABPC/SBT therapy over cefazolin plus aminoglycoside regimen for type IIIA open fractures. The ABPC/SBT regimen may be an alternative option for managing Gustilo type IIIA open fractures. Further prospective studies with larger samples are needed to verify these results.

Type of antibiotic but not the duration of prophylaxis correlates with rates of fracture-related infection

PURPOSE

The issue of optimal prophylactic antibiotic administration for closed and open fracture surgeries remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the role of type and duration longer than 48 h of antibiotic prophylaxis on the rates of fracture-related infection (FRI).

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective observational cohort study carried out with patients undergoing surgery for implants insertion to fracture stability. Risk estimates were calculated on the variables associated with factors for FRI and reported as a prevalence ratio (PR) with respect to the 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Overall, 132 patients were analyzed. The global rate of FRI was 15.9% (21/132), with open and closed fractures accounting for 30.5% (11/36) and 10.4% (10/96), respectively. The FRI rates in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery for fracture stabilization who received prophylactic antibiotic for up to and longer than 48 h were 8.9% and 26.4%, respectively. This difference did not reach statistical significance (prevalence ratio [PR] = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.9-7.3. p = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical orthopedic fractures was not correlated with rates of FRI.

Risk Factors for Infection After Distal Radius Fracture Fixation: Analysis of Impact on Cost of Care

Purpose

Infection after distal radius fracture fixation can be a devastating complication, leading to potential hardware removal, prolonged antibiotic courses, multiple office visits, and increased costs. This study aimed to identify potential risk factors for infectious complications after distal radius fracture fixation and assess the impacts on cost.

Methods

This study used the PearlDiver national database, encompassing 53 million unique patients from January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2020. The cohort included patients undergoing distal radius fracture fixation. The endpoint was postoperative infection within 180 days of fixation. Two-sample t test was used to compare rates of infection between open and percutaneous fracture fixation techniques. A propensity-matched cohort was created using patient age, gender, and open fracture. Logistic regression analyses defined independent risk factors for developing a postoperative infection among all patients and within the matched cohorts. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare costs of care with and without infection.

Results

The database included 87,169 patients who underwent distal radius fracture fixation. Postoperative infections were identified in 781 patients (0.9%). There was a significant difference in rates of postoperative infection with percutaneous fixation (1.3%) versus open fixation (0.8%). Logistic regression analysis identified male gender, open fracture, lung disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, liver disease, obesity, and tobacco to be independent risk factors for developing a postoperative infection. Logistic regression analysis of the propensity-matched cohorts identified tobacco use as a significant risk factor. The average cost of care for patients undergoing fracture fixation without an infection was $6,383, versus $23,355 for those with an infection, which was significantly different.

Conclusions

Multiple risk factors for postoperative infection were identified. Cost is significantly increased after postoperative infection, by almost 4-fold. Attempts to correct or optimize modifiable risk factors may lead to substantial cost savings, and potentially decreased rates of infection.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic III.

Evaluation of Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Traumatic Grade III Open Fractures

Background: Broad-spectrum antibiotic agents are sometimes utilized for prophylaxis of Gustilo grade III open fractures. However, this practice is not recommended by current guidelines, and it is unknown how patient outcomes are impacted. This study aimed to determine if prophylaxis with piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) results in different rates of infection versus guideline-concordant therapy (GCT). Patients and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients with Gustilo grade III open long bone fractures admitted between January 2008 and August 2018. The primary outcome of infection (superficial or deep) at six weeks and secondary outcomes of delayed union, nonunion, Clostridioides difficile, and development of resistant organisms were abstracted from medical records. Guideline-concordant therapy was defined as a first-generation cephalosporin with or without an aminoglycoside. Univariable and multivariable analyses controlling for injury severity score (ISS) were performed. Results: One hundred twenty patients were included; 97 (81%) received PT, 23 (19%) received GCT. Common injury mechanisms were motor vehicle/motorcycle accident (57%) and falls (17%), and a majority involved a lower extremity (65%). Baseline characteristics were similar except higher median ISS in PT (14; interquartile range [IQR], 9-22) versus GCT (9; IQR, 9-14). Guideline-concordant therapy was given for a median of four (range, 2-8) days and PT for six (range, 3-11) days (p = 0.078). On univariable analysis, PT patients had more infections at six weeks (23.7% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.042), but multivariable analysis demonstrated no difference (odds ratio [OR], 5.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-46.25; p = 0.096). Patients receiving prophylaxis with PT had a longer median length of stay at 16 days (range, 10-22) versus nine days (range, 4-16). No statistically significant differences in delayed union, non-union, Clostridioides difficile, or development of resistant organisms were observed. Conclusions: Broad-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis with PT did not improve infection rates compared to GCT, suggesting it may not be warranted.

A Simple Initiative to Decrease Time to Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Open Fractures Is Durable After 2 Years

INTRODUCTION

A simple antibiotic prophylaxis initiative can effectively decrease the time to antibiotic administration for patients with open fractures. We aim to determine whether adherence to the protocol decreased over time without active input from the orthopaedic trauma team.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with open fractures (excluding hand) presenting directly to the emergency department at one Level I trauma center. Three separate 50-patient groups were included: a preimplementation cohort, immediately postimplementation cohort, and a retention cohort 2 years later. The primary outcome was time from emergency department presentation to antibiotic administration, and secondary outcomes were the percentage of patients receiving antibiotics within 60 minutes and incidence of infection requiring revision surgery within 90 days. The χ2 and Student t-tests evaluated between-group differences, and multivariable linear or logistic regression evaluated risk factors.

RESULTS

After implementation, the time from presentation to antibiotic administration decreased markedly from 123.1 to 35.7 minutes and remained durable (50.0 minutes) at retention. The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics within 60 minutes increased markedly from 46% preimplementation to 82% postintervention and remained similar at retention (80%). The postintervention and retention groups were markedly more likely to receive antibiotics within 60 minutes than the preintervention group (odds ratio [OR], 8.4 and 4.7, respectively), as were patients with a higher Gustilo-Anderson type (OR, 2.4/unit increase), lower extremity injury (OR, 2.8), and male sex (OR, 3.1); mechanism, age, and Injury Severity Score were not associated. No difference was observed in infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our educational initiative showed durable results in reducing the time from presentation to antibiotic administration after 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Evolution in the Acute Management of Open Fracture Treatment? Part 1

INTRODUCTION

Despite decades of advancement in wound debridement, prophylactic antibiotic therapy, fracture stabilization, and soft tissue reconstruction, infection remains a serious complication after open fracture. Inconclusive historical data and new challenges with resistant organisms and antimicrobial stewardship having created a difficult environment within which to develop sound, evidence-based treatment protocols that can be applied universally. The first part of this 2-part series will synthesize the historical perspective along with the current concepts surrounding bacteriology and antibiotic use/stewardship. Part 2 will analyze and summarize the current literature regarding the management of open fracture and prevention of subsequent infection.Numerous authors from Hippocrates to Larrey noted that superior results were obtained with an early aggressive debridement of necrotic tissue after wounding.1-7 Historically, the usual outcome after open fracture was infection, sepsis, amputation, and death before the introduction of antibiotics.8-11 As recently as the first half of the 20th century, surgeons argued that if an appropriate debridement was performed, antibiotics were not necessary and advocated against their routine use over concern for resistant organisms.The current period of open fracture treatment (starting in the 1970s) heralded a more scientific era with critical evaluation of antibiotics, surgical debridement, and the development of standardized evidence-based protocols. This era began with 3 classic articles by Patzakis and Gustilo that, to this day, remain central to the discussion of infection prevention after open fractures.12-14.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a Complete description of levels of evidence.

Low Adherence to Recommended Guidelines for Open Fracture Antibiotic Prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Prompt administration of antibiotics is a critical component of open fracture treatment. Traditional antibiotic recommendations have been a first-generation cephalosporin for Gustilo Type-I and Type-II open fractures, with the addition of an aminoglycoside for Type-III fractures and penicillin for soil contamination. However, concerns over changing bacterial patterns and the side effects of aminoglycosides have led to interest in other regimens. The purpose of the present study was to describe the adherence to current prophylactic antibiotic guidelines.

METHODS

We evaluated the antibiotic-prescribing practices of 24 centers in the U.S. and Canada that were participating in 2 randomized controlled trials of skin-preparation solutions for open fractures. A total of 1,234 patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients received antibiotics on the day of admission. The most commonly prescribed antibiotic regimen was cefazolin monotherapy (53.6%). Among patients with Type-I and Type-II fractures, there was 61.1% compliance with cefazolin monotherapy. In contrast, only 17.2% of patients with Type-III fractures received the recommended cefazolin and aminoglycoside therapy, with an additional 6.7% receiving piperacillin/tazobactam.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate adherence to the traditional antibiotic treatment guidelines for Gustilo Type-I and Type-II fractures and low adherence for Type-III fractures. Given the divergence between current practice patterns and prior recommendations, high-quality studies are needed to determine the most appropriate prophylactic protocol.

The evidence base for 2017 BOAST-4 guidance on open fracture management: Are we due an update?

INTRODUCTION

Open fracture management in the United Kingdom and several other countries is guided by the British Orthopaedic Association's Standards for Trauma Number 4 (BOAST-4). This is updated periodically and is based on the best available evidence at the time. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence base forming this guidance and to highlight new developments since the last version in 2017.

METHODS

Searches have been performed using the PubMed, Embase and Medline databases for time periods a) before December 31, 2017 and from 01/01/2018-01/02/2021. Results have been summarized and discussed.

DISCUSSION

Several contentious issues remain within the 2017 guideline. Antibiotic guidance, the use of antibiotic impregnated PMMA beads and intramedullary devices, irrigation in the emergency department, time to theatre and the use of negative pressure dressings and guidance regarding the management of paediatric injuries have all demonstrated no clear consensus.

CONCLUSION

The advent of the BOAST-4 guideline has been of huge benefit, however the refinement and improvement of this work remains ongoing. There remains a need for further study into these contentious issues previously listed.

Impact of duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on development of fracture-related infection in open fractures

INTRODUCTION

Infection is a common complication of open fractures potentially leading to nonunion, functional loss, and even amputation. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is standard practice for infection prevention in the management of open fractures. However, optimal duration of PAP remains controversial. The objectives were to assess whether PAP duration is independently associated with infection in open fractures and if administration of PAP beyond the commonly-recommended limit of 72 h has any effect on the infection rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 14-year period from 2003 to 2017, 530 skeletally-mature patients with operatively-treated, non-pathologic, long-bone open fractures were treated at one institution. Twenty-eight patients were excluded because of death or loss to follow-up and the remaining 502 patients (with 559 open fractures) who completed a 24-month follow-up were included in this retrospective study. The outcome was fracture-related infection (FRI), defined by the criteria of a recent consensus definition. A logistic generalized estimating equations regression model was conducted, including PAP duration and variables selected by a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method, to assess the association between PAP duration and FRI. Propensity score analysis using a 72-h cut-off was performed to further cope with confounding.

RESULTS

PAP duration, adjusted for the LASSO selected predictors, was independently associated with FRI (OR: 1.11 [95%CI, 1.04-1.19] for every one-day increase in PAP duration, p = 0.003). PAP duration longer than 72 h did not significantly increase the odds for FRI compared to shorter durations (p = 0.06, analysis adjusted for propensity score).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no evidence that administration of prophylactic antibiotics beyond 72 h in patients with long-bone open fractures is warranted. Analyses adjusted for known confounders even revealed a higher risk for FRI for longer PAP. However, this effect cannot necessarily be considered as causal and further research is needed.

Surgical Infection Society Research Priorities: A Narrative Review of Fourteen Years of Progress

Background: In 2006, the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) utilized a modified Delphi approach to define 15 specific priority research questions that remained unanswered in the field of surgical infections. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the scientific progress achieved during the ensuing period in answering each of the 15 research questions and to determine if additional research in these fields is warranted. Methods: For each of the questions, a literature search using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) was performed by the Scientific Studies Committee of the SIS to identify studies that attempted to address each of the defined questions. This literature was analyzed and summarized. The data on each question were evaluated by a surgical infections expert to determine if the question was answered definitively or remains unanswered. Results: All 15 priority research questions were studied in the last 14 years; six questions (40%) were definitively answered and 9 questions (60%) remain unanswered in whole or in part, mainly because of the low quality of the studies available on this topic. Several of the 9 unanswered questions were deemed to remain research priorities in 2020 and warrant further investigation. These included, for example, the role of empiric antimicrobial agents in nosocomial infections, the use of inotropes/vasopressors versus volume loading to raise the mean arterial pressure, and the role of increased antimicrobial dosing and frequency in the obese patient. Conclusions: Several surgical infection-related research questions prioritized in 2006 remain unanswered. Further high-quality research is required to provide a definitive answer to many of these priority knowledge gaps. An updated research agenda by the SIS is warranted at this time to define research priorities for the future.