Implementing Falls Prevention in Primary Care: Barriers and Facilitators

Investigating nurses' attitudes towards the prevention of falls: A mixed-method study

The purpose of this study was to investigate nurses' attitudes towards prevention of falls using the Nurses Attitudes Towards Prevention of Falls Scale and to identify factors affecting these attitudes. A mixed-method design was applied and a convenience study was conducted. Six-hundred and thirty nurses participated. In the first stage of this study, the psychometric properties of the Nurses' Attitudes Towards Prevention of Falls Scale were tested. Quantitative data were collected using the Introductory Information Form and the Nurses' Attitudes Towards Prevention of Falls Scale. While collecting this data, 24 nurses were interviewed. The Nurses' Attitudes Towards Prevention of Falls Scale was determined to be a valid and reliable measurement tool. Most of the participating nurses did not complete a fall incident report when their patients experienced a fall, and that led to nurses experiencing remorse, fear, guilt, sadness, anxiety, and panic when their patients fell.

A co-designed conceptual model for implementing falls prevention programmes for community-dwelling older adults in Singapore: a systems thinking approach

INTRODUCTION

Implementing falls prevention programmes in the community presents numerous challenges. We sought to understand the dynamics between the determinants influencing implementation to develop a common conceptual model describing the complexities of implementing falls prevention programmes in Singapore.

METHODS

A full-day group model building workshop with a series of structured activities was organised with 31 multidisciplinary stakeholders. Stakeholders who attended include healthcare professionals of different specialities (i.e. geriatrics, rehabilitation medicine, physiotherapy, nursing), community-based voluntary welfare organisations, researchers and policymakers.

RESULTS

A causal loop diagram was developed to illustrate the determinants influencing implementation of community-based fall prevention programmes. It revealed factors driving key implementation and service outcomes in supply and demand of such programmes. Determinants of these outcomes were synthesised into four themes: (i) structural factors affecting the management and resource allocation for community-based falls prevention programmes, (ii) participation in programmes affected by older adults' willingness and ability to participate, (iii) perceived value as a composite of costs and benefits, and (iv) social support and exercise self-efficacy motivating long-term adherence. Furthermore, in our analysis of feedback relationships, two organisational behaviours were identified: unsustainable growth due to resource constraints (Limits to Growth) and tensions between executing symptomatic or fundamental solutions (Eroding Goals). Stakeholders also explored strategies for effective implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

A conceptual model describing the dynamics of implementing community-based fall prevention programmes was developed. This informed the formulation of a National Falls Prevention Framework, a priority action step for the effective implementation of these programmes in Singapore.

Exploring how falls prevention practitioners assess and manage concerns about falling

BACKGROUND

Concerns about falling (CaF) are common in older adults. They can lead to various negative outcomes, including an increased risk for future falls. The Worlds Falls Guidelines recently published recommendations for assessing and treating CaF. However, the extent to which these guidelines have been adopted into falls prevention practice (in addition to the barriers preventing implementation) are currently unknown.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was completed by 114 healthcare professionals working in falls prevention and rehabilitation services in the UK and Ireland. The survey explored their experiences and perceptions regarding the management and assessment of CaF.

RESULTS

Only 39% of respondents reported using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), a tool recommended by the World Falls Guidelines for assessing CaF. Healthcare professionals in hospital settings were significantly less likely to use the FES-I compared to those working in the community (X2 = 6.324, p = 0.043). While there was no significant difference between settings regarding the type of intervention used to manage CaF, only about 50% of participants adopted a holistic approach combining physical and psychological strategies as recommended by the World Falls Guidelines. The most commonly identified barriers to clinical management of CaF were a lack of both time and perceived effective interventions, particularly for those working within hospital settings (X2 = 6.209, p = 0.013 and X2 = 3.752, p = 0.053, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate low levels of adoption of the World Falls Guidelines recommendations for assessing and managing CaF, especially in hospital settings. Future work should focus on addressing these barriers to maximise the clinical adoption of these recommendations.

Intervention to systematize fall risk assessment and prevention in older hospitalized adults: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Fall-prevention interventions are efficient but resource-requiring and should target persons at higher risk of falls. We need to ensure that fall risk is systematically assessed in everyday practice. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) intervention to systematize fall risk assessment and prevention in older adults hospitalized on general internal medicine wards. We evaluated the efficacy of the intervention in a pre-post intervention study and assessed its feasibility and acceptability through a mixed methods process evaluation, which results are reported in here.

METHODS

The QI intervention was conducted between 09/2022 and 10/2023 and targeted the nursing staff and residents in two tertiary hospitals of two different language and cultural regions of Switzerland. The intervention comprised an oral presentation, an e-learning, and reminder quizzes. We conducted a process evaluation including 25 interviews and a survey sent to all participants to assess feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and qualitative data with a mixed deductive and inductive approach. Results were integrated through meta-inferences.

RESULTS

Among 544 clinicians, 59% completed the e-learning, 74% found the intervention useful, and 25% reported an increase in interprofessional team working. A rewarding system was deemed motivating by 33% of clinicians. Main implementation barrier was the high workload. A concise and clear content as well as regular reminders were perceived as facilitators.

CONCLUSIONS

A concise and multimodal QI intervention with regular reminders seemed to be feasible and well-accepted. Future QI intervention projects should consider the barriers and facilitators identified in this project to improve quality of care in older hospitalized adults.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The conducted research was not pre-registered.

FallFitness exercise program provided using the train-the-trainer approach for community-dwelling older adults: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Falls and fall-related injuries remain a global challenge and threat to the health of older adults. Specific strength and balance exercises are effective in preventing falls among community-dwelling older adults. Nevertheless, provision of evidence-based fall prevention interventions to a broad population represents a healthcare challenge, indicating that new models for promoting exercise among community-dwelling older adults need to be addressed. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effects of a peer-led group-based exercise intervention provided using the train-the-trainer approach and targeting physical performance, activity level, handgrip strength, quality of life, fall-related self-efficacy, fear of falling, and falling techniques compared with a control group at 8-week follow-up.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) included trainers and participants who were recruited from four collaborating regional organizations for retired persons. The intervention was planned to be provided in five municipalities in Sweden, depending on the location of the registered trainers. Eligible participants included adults aged ≥ 60 years who could walk independently and understand written and oral information in Swedish. The FallFitness multicomponent exercise program delivered weekly strength, balance, and falling techniques over eight weeks. It was evaluated using the train-the-trainer approach. Fourteen older adults were eligible for trainer education, and 101 participants were randomly allocated for the FallFitness exercise (n = 50) or a control group (n = 51).

RESULTS

After 8 weeks of peer-led training, the short multicomponent exercise program significantly improved the physical activity levels (p = 0.036) and backward and sideways falling techniques (p < 0.001) compared to those in the control group. Fear of falling significantly decreased in the exercise group (p = 0.009). Other outcomes in this study showed to be non-significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The multicomponent exercise program provided in eight sessions using the train-the-trainer approach may be effective in promoting physical activity and the learning of motor skills and safe landing strategies. Furthermore, the FallFitness exercise program may reduce the fear of falling and may be both time- and cost-effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06265480 (20240208).

Feasibility and acceptability of the HOLObalance telerehabilitation system compared with standard care for older adults at risk of falls: the HOLOBalance assessor blinded pilot randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND

Falls have high socioeconomic costs. Information and communication technologies may support provision and monitoring of multisensory (MSR) physiotherapy programmes. The HOLOBalance platform used augmented reality holograms to provide patient-centred, individualised MSR.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the platform's safety, acceptability and feasibility, investigate functional gait and dynamic balance benefits and provide data for a definitive trial.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Single-blinded pilot randomised controlled feasibility study. Interventions were conducted at clinical sites or participants' homes in three European countries.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling older adults (median age 73 years; 64.2% female) at risk of falls were enrolled (May 2020-August 2021).

METHODS

Participants were randomised to an 8-week clinic or home-based telerehabilitation MSR or OTAGO (control group) programme. Compliance, satisfaction, and adverse events determined feasibility. Clinical outcomes, assessed (blinded) within one-week prior to and post-intervention, included functional gait assessment (FGA), Mini BESTest and cognitive function.

RESULTS

Randomisation to completion rate was 76.15% with 109 participants recruited (n = 289 screened). Drop-out rate was similar between groups. Adverse events were reported (n = 3) in the control group. Sixty-nine percent would recommend the HOLOBalance intervention. Findings were similar for the home and clinic-based arms of each intervention; data was combined for analysis. FGA (95%CI [1.63, 4.19]) and Mini-BESTest (95%CI [1.46, 3.93]) showed greater improvement in the HOLOBalance group with a clinically meaningful change of 4/30 noted for the FGA.

CONCLUSIONS

HOLObalance was feasible to implement and acceptable to older adults at risk of falls, with FGA and Mini-BEST improvements exceeding those for the OTAGO programme. A definitive trial is warranted.

Factors influencing older adult community fall prevention exercise implementation: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Exercise that challenges balance is the most effective fall prevention intervention in community-dwelling older adults. Identifying factors influencing implementation of community fall prevention exercise programs is a critical step in developing strategies to support program delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To identify implementation facilitators, barriers, and details reported in peer-reviewed publications on community fall prevention exercise for older adults.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases up to July 2023 for English-language publications that reported facilitators and/or barriers to implementing an evidence-based fall prevention exercise program in adults aged 50+ years living independently. At least two reviewers independently identified publications and extracted article, implementation, and exercise program characteristics and coded barriers and facilitators using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

RESULTS

We included 22 publications between 2001 and July 2023 that reported factors influencing implementation of 10 exercise programs. 293 factors were reported: 183 facilitators, 91 barriers, 6 described as both a facilitator and barrier, and 13 unspecified factors. Factors represented 33 CFIR constructs across all five CFIR domains: implementation inner setting (n = 95 factors); innovation (exercise program) characteristics (n = 84); individuals involved (n = 54); implementation process (n = 40) and outer setting (n = 20). Eight publications reported implementation strategies used; 6 reported using a conceptual framework; and 13 reported implementation outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The high number of factors reflects the complexity of fall prevention exercise implementation. The low reporting of implementation strategies, frameworks and outcomes highlight the ongoing need for work to implement and sustain community fall prevention exercise programs.

Fall assessment and intervention among community-dwelling older people in a primary health care center in Spain: a best practice implementation project

INTRODUCTION

The implementation of fall prevention programs in the community is complex. Although there is solid scientific evidence that supports the effectiveness of such programs, there are multiple barriers that should be addressed using multifaceted strategies.

AIMS

The aim of this project was to increase compliance with evidence-based recommendations regarding fall risk screening and preventive interventions among older adults in a primary health care setting.

METHODS

This project used a pre-/post-implementation clinical audit based on the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. Eight audit criteria were derived from JBI evidence summaries. The sample size was 62 patients aged 70 years or older. Data collection methods included a review of medical records and a questionnaire. A baseline audit was conducted and five barriers to best practice were identified. Strategies were then developed to increase compliance with the evidence-based recommendations, guided by JBI's Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) analysis. A follow-up audit was conducted in July 2022 to evaluate changes in compliance with best practices.

RESULTS

The baseline audit showed 0% compliance with best practice recommendations for seven out of eight audit criteria. Five barriers were identified: (1) absence of fall risk screening tools, (2) lack of fall prevention intervention protocols, (3) insufficient reporting of fall episodes in the records, (4) need for staff training, and (5) high staff turnover. Following the implementation of a fall risk assessment and intervention protocol, along with staff training, seven out of eight audit criteria increased from 0% to between 22.6% and 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

This evidence-based implementation project improved nursing practice in relation to compliance with best practice interventions to prevent falls.

SPANISH ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A229.

Development and external validation of the eFalls tool: a multivariable prediction model for the risk of ED attendance or hospitalisation with a fall or fracture in older adults

BACKGROUND

Falls are common in older adults and can devastate personal independence through injury such as fracture and fear of future falls. Methods to identify people for falls prevention interventions are currently limited, with high risks of bias in published prediction models. We have developed and externally validated the eFalls prediction model using routinely collected primary care electronic health records (EHR) to predict risk of emergency department attendance/hospitalisation with fall or fracture within 1 year.

METHODS

Data comprised two independent, retrospective cohorts of adults aged ≥65 years: the population of Wales, from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank (model development); the population of Bradford and Airedale, England, from Connected Bradford (external validation). Predictors included electronic frailty index components, supplemented with variables informed by literature reviews and clinical expertise. Fall/fracture risk was modelled using multivariable logistic regression with a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator penalty. Predictive performance was assessed through calibration, discrimination and clinical utility. Apparent, internal-external cross-validation and external validation performance were assessed across general practices and in clinically relevant subgroups.

RESULTS

The model's discrimination performance (c-statistic) was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.68 to 0.76) on internal-external cross-validation and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.83) on external validation. Calibration was variable across practices, with some over-prediction in the validation population (calibration-in-the-large, -0.87; 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.78). Clinical utility on external validation was improved after recalibration.

CONCLUSION

The eFalls prediction model shows good performance and could support proactive stratification for falls prevention services if appropriately embedded into primary care EHR systems.

The Belgian physiotherapy reimbursement criteria for fall prevention fails in screening appropriately fall-prone community-dwelling older adults

OBJECTIVES

The incidence of falling in older adults has remained unchanged over the past decades, despite evidence-based prevention initiatives. Therefore, it is appropriate to reflect on the current screening approach for preventive initiatives. The objective of this study was to determine whether the multifactorial algorithm proposed by Lusardi et al. (2017) exhibits superior predictive validity compared to the currently employed algorithm by the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI).

METHODS

The current study includes a secondary analysis of data collected from a falls-related study in the Department of Rehabilitation Sciences at Ghent University to compare the predictive validity of the two algorithms. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to ascertain which algorithm is more accurate.

RESULTS

The database included a total of 94 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 76 years ±7.4, 35% male). Thirty-nine participants experienced at least one fall in the 8 month follow up. Lusardi's approach has a higher sensitivity score (89.7% compared to 10.3%) and negative predictive value (89.9% compared to 61.1%), but a lower specificity score (61.8% compared to 100%) and positive predictive value (62.2% compared to 100%) than the NIHDI approach. The AUC is 0.76 for Lusardi's approach and 0.55 for the NIHDI approach.

CONCLUSION

The use of the multifactorial algorithm proposed by Lusardi et al. may be significant and more accurate in identifying adults at risk to falls. Further research is needed particularly with a larger, more heterogenous group of older adults.

Development and Usability Testing of an Exercise-Based Primary Care Fall Prevention Clinical Decision Support Tool

For older patients, falls are the leading cause offatal and nonfatal injuries. Guidelines recommend that at-risk older adults are referred to appropriate fall-prevention exercise programs, but many do not receive support for fall-risk management in the primary care setting. Advances in health information technology may be able to address this gap. This article describes the development and usability testing of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool for fall prevention exercise. Using rapid qualitative analysis and human-centered design, our team developed and tested the usability of our CDS prototype with primary care team members. Across 31 Health-Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale surveys, our CDS prototype received a median score of 5.0, mean (SD) of 4.5 (0.8), and a range of 4.1-4.9. This study highlights the features and usability offall prevention CDS for helping primary care providers deliver patient-centeredfall prevention care.

Contextual determinants influencing the implementation of fall prevention in the community: a scoping review

Background

Successful implementation of multifactorial fall prevention interventions (FPIs) is essential to reduce increasing fall rates in community-dwelling older adults. However, implementation often fails due to the complex context of the community involving multiple stakeholders within and across settings, sectors, and organizations. As there is a need for a better understanding of the occurring context-related challenges, the current scoping review purposes to identify what contextual determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators) influence the implementation of FPIs in the community.

Methods

A scoping review was performed using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. First, electronic databases (Pubmed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO) were searched. Studies that identified contextual determinants that influence the implementation of FPIs in the community were included. Second, to both validate the findings from the literature and identify complementary determinants, health and social care professionals were consulted during consensus meetings (CMs) in four districts in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Data were analyzed following a directed qualitative content analysis approach, according to the 39 constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results

Fourteen relevant studies were included and 35 health and social care professionals (such as general practitioners, practice nurses, and physical therapists) were consulted during four CMs. Directed qualitative content analysis of the included studies yielded determinants within 35 unique constructs operating as barriers and/or facilitators. The majority of the constructs (n = 21) were identified in both the studies and CMs, such as "networks and communications", "formally appointed internal implementation leaders", "available resources" and "patient needs and resources". The other constructs (n = 14) were identified only in the .

Discussion

Findings in this review show that a wide array of contextual determinants are essential in achieving successful implementation of FPIs in the community. However, some determinants are considered important to address, regardless of the context where the implementation occurs. Such as accounting for time constraints and financial limitations, and considering the needs of older adults. Also, broad cross-sector collaboration and coordination are required in multifactorial FPIs. Additional context analysis is always an essential part of implementation efforts, as contexts may differ greatly, requiring a locally tailored approach.

Health Emergencies, Falls, and Use of Communication Technologies by Older People with Functional and Social Frailty: Ageing in Place in Deprived Areas of Italy

Frail older people ageing alone in place need help to perform daily living activities, especially when functional limitations are increasing and formal/informal supports are lacking. This context represents a risk of experiencing health emergencies, in particular falls. It is thus important to understand how seniors manage these potential difficulties and who helps them. The present study aimed to explore these dimensions in Italy, where 120 qualitative interviews were carried out in 2019 within the "Inclusive ageing in place" (IN-AGE) research project, involving frail older people living alone at home. A content analysis was conducted. Results showed that seniors need to manage health emergencies regarding heart and breathing problems but mainly episodes of falls are reported, with consequent fractures and fear of falling again. In several cases, the use of a mobile phone was crucial in order to seek for help, and the first to intervene were children, in addition to some neighbors. Some seniors also referred their ability to call independently the General Practitioner (GP) or the emergency room, in order to not disturb family members. These findings highlight new useful insights for policy makers, regarding health emergencies prevention and management measures to put in place, especially concerning falls, and the support provided by communication technologies.