Durvalumab: a potential maintenance therapy in surgery-ineligible non-small-cell lung cancer

Maintenance therapy with anlotinib after induction therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of 2 single-arm trials

BACKGROUND

Maintenance therapy could significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemotherapy. Anlotinib is effective, tolerable, and convenient in administration as a third-line treatment for NSCLC. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with anlotinib after platinum-based induction chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

This pooled analysis of 2 multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trials (ALTER-L014 and ALTER-L011) enrolled patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and without known sensitive mutations in China between September 2018 and January 2021. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. The secondary outcomes were objective response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

The data of 23 patients were pooled, with 15 from ALTER-L014 and 8 from ALTER-L011. At the cutoff date of June 13, 2021, the median progression-free survival since the start of maintenance therapy was 5.95 (95% confidence interval, 4.30-8.80) months. Nineteen patients had stable disease, 1 had a partial response and 3 had progressive disease. The objective response rate was 4.35%, while disease control rate was 86.96%. The median overall survival of the patients since the start of maintenance therapy was 18.60 (95% confidence interval, 6.87-22.80) months. The incidence of adverse events of grade ≥ 3 was 21.7%.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib might offer a new option for maintenance treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC without known sensitive mutations after standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Research progress of biomarkers in the prediction of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapeutic efficiency in lung cancer

Currently, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors is widely used in the treatment of multiple cancer types including lung cancer, which is a leading cause of cancer death in the world. However, only a limited proportion of lung cancer patients will benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Therefore, it is of importance to predict the response to immunotherapy for the precision treatment of patients. Although the expression of PD-L1 and tumor mutation burden (TMB) are commonly used to predict the clinical response of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, other factors such as tumor-specific genes, dMMR/MSI, and gut microbiome are also promising predictors for immunotherapy in lung cancer. Furthermore, invasive peripheral blood biomarkers including blood DNA-related biomarkers (e.g., ctDNA and bTMB), blood cell-related biomarkers (e.g., immune cells and TCR), and other blood-related biomarkers (e.g., soluble PD-L1 and cytokines) were utilized to predict the immunotherapeutic response. In this review, the current achievements of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and the potential biomarkers for the prediction of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment were summarized and discussed.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the new oncological drug durvalumab in Italian patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The monoclonal antibody durvalumab, an immune‐checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) antiprogrammed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1), is available for unresectable stage III NSCLC patients as consolidation therapy following induction chemoradiotherapy, with very promising overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survial (PFS) results in registration trials. The purpose of this study was to provide policymakers with an estimate of the cost‐effectiveness of durvalumab in the treatment of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

The study developed a Markov model covering a 5‐year period to compare costs and outcomes of treating PD‐L1 positive patients with or without durvalumab. We conducted a series of sensitivity analyses (Tornado analysis and Monte Carlo simulation) by varying some parameters to assess the robustness of our model and identify the parameters with the greatest impact on cost‐effectiveness.

Results

Prior to the release of durvalumab, the management of NSCLC over a 5‐year period cost €33 317 per patient, with an average life expectancy of 2.01 years. After the introduction of the drug, this increased to €37 317 per patient, with an average life expectancy of 2.13 years. Treatment with durvalumab led to an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €35 526 per year. OS is the variable that contributes the most to the variability of the ICER.

Conclusions

The study observed that durvalumab is a cost‐effective treatment option for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Age-Associated Changes in Adverse Events Arising From Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy

Background

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may complicate the immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy. The effect of age on these irAEs is not elucidated. The aim of the study was to compare the occurrence of irAEs in different age groups.

Methods

Patients with lung cancer receiving anti-programmed death- (ligand)1 (PD-(L)1) were selected from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Immune cell infiltration data set was obtained from TIMER 2.0 web server. The patients were stratified for age as follows: <65 year-old (young patients, YP), 65 to 75 year-old (middle aged patients, MP), ≥75 year-old (old patients, OP). The severity of irAEs was compared using logistic binary regression model. The distribution differences of immune cell infiltration were estimated using non-parametric tests.

Results

Of all the 17,006 patients treated by anti-PD-(L)1, 7,355 were <65 (YP), 6,706 were 65–75 (MP), and 2,945 were ≥75 (OP). In general, we analyzed a total of 16 irAEs in this article and found that pulmonary toxicity was more frequent in OP (OP vs. YP: OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.28–1.64) and MP (MP vs. YP: OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.24–1.52), but hepatitis was less frequent in OP (OP vs. YP: OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.32–0.97) and MP (MP vs. YP: OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.38–0.85). Further analysis demonstrated that older patients showed less B cell, CD8⁺ T cell and myeloid dendritic cell infiltration than younger patients.

Conclusions

Elderly patients exhibited higher incidences of pulmonary toxicity, while hepatitis was found at low incidence. Therefore, clinicians should carefully monitor comorbidities in elderly patients.

Durvalumab: an investigational anti-PD-L1 antibody for the treatment of biliary tract cancer

Introduction: The prognosis of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains dismal, with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape of several hematological and solid tumors, controversial results have been reported in BTC. In this setting, the anti-PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is currently under investigation in several clinical trials as monotherapy, or in combination with other pharmacological agents.Areas covered: We offer an overview of immunotherapies for BTC, discuss recently published or presented data on durvalumab pharmacology, safety, and efficacy in the treatment of BTC and consider future research directions for the agent in this setting.Expert opinion: The promising antitumor activity shown by durvalumab in early trials warrants further investigation because it may provide more effective, much needed treatment options. The results of clinical trials of this PD-L1 inhibitor, as a monotherapy or in combination, are eagerly awaited. Future efforts should focus on the identification and development of reliable biomarkers of response to durvalumab in BTC, clarifying the role of PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), mismatch repair (MMR), tumor mutational burden (TMB) and other emerging predictors.

A Review of Monoclonal Antibody-Based Treatments in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common types of lung cancer worldwide. It metastasizes rapidly and has a poor prognosis. The first-line treatment for most patients is a combination of chemotherapy and radiation. In many subjects, using targeted treatments alongside chemoradiation has shown a better outcome in terms of progression and quality of life for patients. These targeted treatments include small biological inhibiting molecules and monoclonal antibodies. In this review, we have assessed studies focused upon the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Some therapies are approved, such as bevacizumab and atezolizumab, while some are still in clinical trials, such as ficlatuzumab and ipilimumab, and others have been rejected due to inadequate disease control, such as figitumumab.

Enlarged Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Computed Tomography are a Valuable Prognostic Factor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Pathologically Negative Lymph Nodes

Background

Most non-small cell lung cancer patients with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (LN) in preoperative computer tomography (CT) images are diagnosed with N0 in the pathological examination after surgery. However, these patients seem to have worse survival than those without enlarged mediastinal LN in our clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate whether the size of mediastinal LN is correlated with the prognosis in pathological N0 patients, which could help us to predict the prognoses further.

Methods

The retrospective cohort study involved 758 N0 patients with a thin layer CT scan. We have measured the size of mediastinal LN, including long diameter, short diameter, and volume on CT image, and classified patients by X-tile. Next, we explored the risk factors of enlarged LN by univariate and multivariate logistic analysis. Then, we have compared the 5-year cancer-specific survival by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank method. Multivariate Cox analysis was utilized to further survival analysis. Finally, we have constructed the prediction model by nomogram.

Results

A total of 150 N0 patients (19.8%) had mediastinal LN enlargement in our study. After multivariate logistic analysis, we found the LN enlargement was significantly correlated with age (p=0.001), pathology (p < 0.001) and tumor recurrence (p < 0.001). The patients with LN enlargement had a worse 5-year cancer-specific survival (75.3% vs 92.8%, p < 0.001) after Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients with a larger volume had increased risk of tumor-associated death when compared with the normal group (p < 0.001) by multivariate Cox analyses.

Conclusion

N0 patients with larger mediastinal LN had a worse 5-year cancer-specific survival and a higher risk of recurrence. The volume of LN was the most valuable prognostic factor in N0 patients.

Status of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) by Immunohistochemistry and Scoring Algorithms

The detection of the Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein by immunohistochemistry is currently the only approved test predictive of response to drugs targeting the PD1/PDL1 axis. The role of this test is debated since several reagents have been used as companion diagnostics for different drugs on diverse immunostaining platforms. In addition, different scoring systems for PD-L1 immunohistochemistry have been applied in the registration studies regarding single drugs. This review deals with the various issues that are related to the immunohistochemical test for PD-L1. We discuss currently unsolved problems such as the advantages and the flaws of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry; the choice of the best reagents and the best scoring system. Finally, we review the current experiences on the role of immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 in clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Implementation of durvalumab maintenance treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-a German radiation oncology survey

BACKGROUND

Durvalumab as maintenance treatment after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has become the standard of care in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this nationwide survey, we solicited members of the German Radiation Oncology Society to review the current distribution and clinical settings of durvalumab treatment after cCRT, observed side effects and summarize follow-up management.

METHODS

We surveyed radiation oncology institutions in Germany via an anonymous online questionnaire sent by e-mail to all members of the German Radiation Oncology Society which agreed their willingness to participate.

RESULTS

We received a total of 255 responses (response rate: 18%). Of which 203 (80%) were completed and returned and thus eligible for further evaluation. The respondents work in 87 different cities and 44% in a private medical practice, 29% in university and 22% in a general hospital. Durvalumab was implemented in clinical routine by 70% of respondents. Major reasons for failed implementation in clinical practice reported by the respondents were patient's ineligibility (42%), lack of required PD-L1 status (25%), decision of medical oncologists (7%) or absence of updated German guidelines (7%). Thirty-six percent of all respondents report low (≤30%) PD-L1 testing before cCRT based on IHC assay. No respondent had applied durvalumab in less than 14 days after the completion of CRT. Severe side effects requiring hospital admission in more than 10% of all patients were reported by 12% of all respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Durvalumab maintenance is already implemented in the radiation oncology community and administered by the absolute majority of respondents. Low testing rates of PD-L1 at initial diagnosis were observed and should be considered a major barrier to universal adoption and integration in the clinical work-flow in countries with durvalumab approval restricted to PD-L1 positive patients. No respondent applies durvalumab in less than 14 days after cCRT.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with locally-advanced unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a KSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, ISMPO, JSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of early and locally-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was published in 2017, and covered the diagnosis, staging, management and treatment of both early stage I and II disease and locally-advanced stage III disease. At the ESMO Asia Meeting in November 2018, it was decided by both the ESMO and the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO) to convene a special face-to-face guidelines meeting in 2019 in Seoul. The aim was to adapt the ESMO 2017 guidelines to take into account potential differences related to ethnicity, cancer biology and standard practices associated with the treatment of locally-advanced, unresectable NSCLC in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by those experts in the treatment of patients with lung cancer who represented the oncology societies of Korea (KSMO), China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence, and it was independent of both local current treatment practices and the treatment availability and reimbursement situations in the individual participating Asian countries.