Impact and prevention of severe exacerbations of COPD: a review of the evidence

Step up to triple therapy versus switch to dual bronchodilator therapy in patients with COPD on an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist: post-hoc analyses of KRONOS

BACKGROUND

In people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommends stepping up to ICS/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) in those with exacerbations or switching to LAMA/LABA in those with major symptoms. However, the effect of stepping up to ICS/LAMA/LABA versus switching to LAMA/LABA on exacerbation risk is unclear. This analysis evaluated the effect of escalating to ICS/LAMA/LABA versus switching to LAMA/LABA or staying on ICS/LABA on lung function and exacerbation rates in symptomatic individuals with COPD without a recent exacerbation history from KRONOS.

METHODS

In KRONOS (NCT02497001), symptomatic participants with moderate-to-very severe COPD (exacerbations in the prior year were not required for inclusion) were randomized to budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate 320/14.4/10 μg (BGF), glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate 14.4/10 μg (GFF), budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate 320/10 μg (BFF) via metered-dose inhaler, or budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate 400/12 μg via dry-powder inhaler (BUD/FORM) for 24 weeks. In participants without a recent exacerbation history on ICS/LABA in the 30 days before screening, morning pre-dose trough FEV1 change from baseline and moderate/severe exacerbation rates over 24 weeks were analyzed post-hoc using linear repeated measures models and negative binomial regression, respectively, and participants escalated to ICS/LAMA/LABA (BGF) were compared with those switching to LAMA/LABA (GFF) or staying on ICS/LABA (BFF or BUD/FORM).

RESULTS

On stepping up to BGF, least square means (95% confidence interval [CI]) differences for morning pre-dose trough FEV1 change from baseline over 24 weeks was similar versus switching to GFF (12 [-21, 44] mL) but greater versus staying on ICS/LABA (BGF vs. BFF, 106 [64, 148] mL; BGF vs. BUD/FORM, 55 [12, 97] mL). Moderate/severe exacerbations were experienced by participants in all treatment arms (BGF, 14.9%; GFF, 24.0%; BFF 17.6%; BUD/FORM, 21.2%). Exacerbation risk was reduced when stepping up to BGF versus switching to GFF (rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.57 [0.35, 0.94]); rate ratios (95% CI) for BGF versus remaining on ICS/LABA were 0.93 (0.47, 1.82) with BFF and 0.62 (0.33, 1.18) with BUD/FORM.

CONCLUSIONS

People with symptomatic COPD and no recent exacerbation history previously on ICS/LABA had reduced exacerbation risk after escalating to ICS/LAMA/LABA versus switching to LAMA/LABA, and improved lung function versus staying on ICS/LABA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov registry number NCT02497001 (registration date, 7 July 2015).

Predictive Value of CCQ and its Subdomains for Hospitalized Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A 3-Year Observational Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

The prediction capacity of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and its functional, symptom, and mental subdomain for COPD hospitalized exacerbation were rarely studied.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prognostic capacity of the total CCQ and its three subdomains for 3-year COPD hospitalized exacerbations.

METHODS

We analyzed the predictive ability of total CCQ score and its subdomains for hospitalized exacerbations in an observational cohort of 987 subjects with stable COPD from the RealDTC, an ongoing multicenter prospective study. Hospitalized exacerbations were prospectively collected every 6 month for a maximum of 3 years.

RESULTS

The total CCQ and its functional and symptom domain, but not the mental domain, were significantly associated with 3-year hospitalized exacerbations by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The predictive capacity of functional domain was similar to that of the total CCQ, but significantly stronger than the symptom and mental domain by ROC analysis (P < 0.05). ROC curves also showed that the AUC of exacerbation history combined with CCQ functional domain was larger than that of exacerbation history alone (P < 0.0001). Additionally, the predictive value of multivariable models that contains CCQ functional domain was significantly better than the corresponding model without CCQ functional domain (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The total CCQ and its functional and symptom domain were independent risk factors of 3-year hospitalized exacerbations. The prognostic capacity of the functional domain was similar to that of total CCQ, and was significantly stronger than the symptom and mental domain. The CCQ functional domain was able to increase the predictive power of exacerbation history and other multivariable prediction models, indicating it may have an important role in the multivariable prediction tool for hospitalized exacerbation, and its combination with other clinical variables might be used as a low-cost approach for assessments of the disease severity and severe exacerbation in COPD patients in the future.

Effects of the oral probiotic Familact on dyspnea management in COPD patients: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that oral probiotics may enhance the immune response in respiratory diseases, offering potential benefits in managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

OBJECTIVES

This trial aims to evaluate whether the addition of the oral probiotic Familact to standard therapies significantly enhances dyspnea management in COPD patients compared to standard treatment alone.

METHODS

In this single-blind randomized clinical trial 60 COPD patients randomly allocated into the control and intervention groups (n = 30). Over three months, the control group received standard treatment, while the intervention group received standard treatment plus oral Familact. Spirometry was conducted twice, and dyspnea was assessed four times using the Borg Scale Ratings (BORG) and Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale Scores in COPD patients (MMRC) scales and were evaluated using repeated measurement analysis.

RESULTS

No significant change was observed in FEV1 post-intervention, but MMRC and BORG scores showed a statistically significant improvement in the intervention group compared to the control group (P < 0.01). Repeated measures tests based on estimated marginal means revealed significant MMRC differences within groups over time, with inter-group differences notable only between the first and second measurements. BORG showed significant within- and between-group differences at all time points, confirmed by post hoc tests.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that Familact, as an oral probiotic can significantly alleviate dyspnea in COPD patients, as reflected in notable improvements in BORG and MMRC scores. These findings underscore the potential of probiotics as an adjunctive therapy for COPD, particularly in improving patient-reported outcomes related to respiratory difficulty.

Dupilumab for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with type 2 inflammation: a pooled analysis of two phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for IL-4 and IL-13, which are key drivers of type 2 inflammation. We aimed to characterise the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation.

METHODS

For this pooled analysis, we pooled and analysed data from all patients in the intention-to-treat populations of the phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled BOREAS and NOTUS trials, which comprised 206 hospitals and clinics in BOREAS and 217 in NOTUS in 38 countries across Europe, Asia, North America, South America, Africa, and Australia. Eligible patients were current or former smokers with 10 pack-years or more of smoking history, were aged 40-85 years, had physician-diagnosed COPD for at least 12 months before randomisation, had a post-bronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio of less than 0·7, had a post-bronchodilator percentage predicted FEV1 of 30-70%, had documented evidence of two moderate or one severe exacerbations of COPD in the previous year (at least one exacerbation had to have occurred on triple therapy), and had blood eosinophil counts 300 cells per μL or more during screening. Patients had to have symptomatic COPD and a reported chronic productive cough for at least 3 months in the previous year. Key exclusion criteria were history of asthma, pulmonary disease other than COPD, or other diagnosed pulmonary or systemic disease associated with elevated blood eosinophil. In both trials, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via block randomisation with block size 4 to receive subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg or matching placebo once every 2 weeks for 52 weeks, alongside established background therapy with inhaled corticosteroids, a long-acting β2-agonist, and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist. The primary endpoint was the annualised rate of moderate or severe exacerbations over 52 weeks.

FINDINGS

1874 patients were randomly assigned in BOREAS and NOTUS from May 9, 2019, to May 23, 2023; 938 (50·1%) were randomly assigned to the dupilumab groups and 936 (49·9%) were randomly assigned to the placebo groups. Mean age across both groups was 65·1 years (SD 8·2). 622 (33·2%) of 1874 patients were female and 1252 (66·8%) were male. 1628 (86·9%) patients were White, 719 (38·4%) were from Eastern Europe, and 1316 (70·2%) were former smokers. During the 52-week treatment period, 559 moderate or severe exacerbations were reported in 338 (36·0%) of 938 patients in the dupilumab group and 774 exacerbations were reported in 394 (42·1%) of 936 patients in the placebo group. There was a reduction in the annualised rate of moderate or severe exacerbations compared with placebo (annualised exacerbation rate 0·794 in the dupilumab group and 1·156 in the placebo group; incidence rate ratio 0·687, 95% CI 0·595-0·793; p<0·0001). In the dupilumab group, the time to first severe exacerbation was longer than in the placebo group (0·611, 0·409-0·912; p=0·016). However, there was no reduction in the annualised rate of severe exacerbations (annualised exacerbation rate 0·084 in the dupilumab group and 0·124 in the placebo group; 0·674, 0·438-1·037; p=0·073). Treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse events that led to permanent treatment discontinuation, and adverse events that led to death were similar between the two groups.

INTERPRETATION

Dupilumab, as an add-on to standard triple therapy, reduced the annualised rate of moderate or severe exacerbations compared with placebo, highlighting its potential for personalised treatment approaches in patients with COPD with specific clinical endotypes.

FUNDING

Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Diffusion capacity and static hyperinflation as markers of disease progression predict 3-year mortality in COPD: Results from COSYCONET

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibits diverse patterns of disease progression, due to underlying disease activity. We hypothesized that changes in static hyperinflation or KCO % predicted would reveal subgroups with disease progression unidentified by preestablished markers (FEV1, SGRQ, exacerbation history) and associated with unique baseline biomarker profiles. We explored 18-month measures of disease progression associated with 18-54-month mortality, including changes in hyperinflation parameters and transfer factor, in a large German COPD cohort.

METHODS

Analysing data of 1364 patients from the German observational COSYCONET-cohort, disease progression and improvement patterns were assessed for their impact on mortality via Cox hazard regression models. Association of biomarkers and COPD Assessment test items with phenotypes of disease progression or improvement were evaluated using logistic regression and random forest models.

RESULTS

Increased risk of 18-54-month mortality was linked to decrease in KCO % predicted (7.5% increments) and FEV1 (20 mL increments), increase in RV/TLC (2% increments) and SGRQ (≥6 points), and an exacerbation grade of 2 at 18 months. Decrease in KCO % predicted ≥7.5% and an increase of RV/TLC ≥2% were the most frequent measures of 18-month disease progression occurring in ~52% and ~46% of patients, respectively. IL-6 and CRP thresholds exhibited significant associations with medium- and long-term disease measures.

CONCLUSION

In a multicentric cohort of COPD, new markers of current disease activity predicted mid-term mortality and could not be anticipated by baseline biomarkers.

Reducing Hospital Readmissions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: Current Treatments and Preventive Strategies

COPD is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, so it represents a significant public health challenge. Over the years, new effective therapies have been proposed. However, the burden of COPD is still conditioned by frequent acute events defined as exacerbations (exacerbation of COPD-ECOPD), which have a significant impact not only on the patient's quality of life but also on the progression of the disease, morbidity, and mortality. Related to the severity of the condition, ECOPD may require hospital admission and often repeatedly more admissions (readmission). The phenomenon of readmissions is a significant problem, contributing substantially to the utilisation of healthcare resources and the economic burden of COPD. Related contributing factors are still poorly understood, and managing the patients readmitted to the hospital with ECOPD may be challenging. Hospital readmissions should be optimally managed, including supporting and preventive strategies. Although early readmissions (30 days from discharge) are a marker of the quality of the patient's care, we need to consider COPD patients globally. It is not sufficient to address just the acute events, so multidimensional management is necessary, able to follow the patient over time to identify, by a personalised approach, the correct treatment during and post hospitalisation and intercept any factor affecting the natural history of the disease, comprising the risk of hospital readmissions. In the context of the literature concerning respiratory medicine, particularly COPD patients, our narrative review analyses recent evidence regarding the current management of COPD hospital readmissions, aiming to propose preventive strategies helpful in clinical practice. The proposed strategies can potentially improve clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs when effectively implemented in practice.

Implementation of an algorithm for predicting exacerbations in telemonitoring: A multimethod study of patients' and clinicians' experiences

Background

Prediction algorithms may improve the ability of telehealth solutions to assess the risk of future exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Learning from patients' and clinicians' evaluations and experiences about the use of such algorithms is essential to evaluate its potential and examine factors that could potentially influence the implementation and sustained use.

Objective

To investigate the patients' and clinicians' perceptions and satisfaction with an algorithm for predicting exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Design

Multimethod study.

Setting

Three community nursing sites in Aalborg Municipality, Denmark.

Participants

One hundred and eleven adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and four clinicians (three nurses and one physiotherapist) specialized in telehealth monitoring of the disease.

Methods

The study was performed from November 2021 to November 2022 alongside a clinical trial in which a prediction algorithm was integrated into an existing telehealth system. The patients' perspectives were investigated using a self-constructed questionnaire. The clinicians' perspective was explored using semistructured individual interviews.

Results

Most patients (84.0 %-90.8 %) were satisfied with the algorithm and the additional measurements required by the algorithm. Approximately 71.7 %-75.9 % found that the algorithm could be a useful tool for disease assessment. Patients elaborated that they could see an exacerbation prevention potential in the algorithm. Patients trusted the algorithm and found an increased sense of security. The clinicians showed a positive response toward the algorithm and its user-friendliness. However, they were concerned that the additional measurements could be too demanding for some patients and questioned the accuracy of the measurements. Some felt that the algorithm could risk being time-consuming and harm the overall assessment of the individual patient. They expressed a need for continuous information about the algorithm to understand its functions and alarms.

Conclusions

Optimal use of the algorithm would require that patients perform additional pulse and oxygen saturation measurements. Furthermore, it will require in-depth insight among clinicians regarding the algorithm's functions and alarms.

Registration

The study was performed alongside a clinical trial, which was first registered September 9, 2021, at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT05218525). Date of first recruitment was September 28, 2021.

Prognostic risk prediction model for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD): a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent respiratory condition and a leading cause of mortality, with acute exacerbations (AECOPD) significantly complicating its management and prognosis. Despite the development of various prognostic prediction models for patients with AECOPD, their performance and clinical applicability remain unclear, necessitating a systematic review to evaluate these models and provide guidance for their future improvement and clinical use.

METHOD

PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, EMBASE, and Medline were searched for studies published from their inception until February 5, 2024. Data extraction and evaluation were conducted using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). The Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was employed to assess the risk of bias and applicability of the models.

RESULTS

After deduplication and screening 5942 retrieved articles, 46 studies comprising 53 models were included. Of these, 17 (37.0%) studies developed from studies conducted in China. All models were based on cohort studies. Mortality was the predicted outcome in 27 (50.9%) models. Logistic regression was used in 41 (77.4%) models, while machine learning methods were employed in 9 (17.0%) models. The median (minimum, maximum) sample size for model development was 672 (106, 150,035). The median (minimum, maximum) number of predictors per model was 5 (2, 42). Frequently used predictors included age (n = 28), dyspnea severity scores (n = 12), and PaCO2 (n = 11). The pooled AUC was 0.80 for mortality prediction models and 0.84 for hospitalization-related outcomes. 52 models have a high overall risk of bias, and all models were judged to have low concern regarding applicability. Major sources of bias included insufficient sample sizes (83.0%), reliance on univariate analysis for predictor selection (73.6%), inappropriate internal and external validation methods (54.7%), inappropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria for study subjects (50.9%) and so on. The only model with low bias was the PEARL score.

CONCLUSION

Current prognostic risk prediction models for patients with AECOPD generally exhibit high bias. Future efforts should standardize model development and validation methods, and develop widely usable clinical models.

Long-term mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring acute non-invasive ventilation with and without obstructive sleep apnoea

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) overlap syndrome (OVS) is associated with higher mortality compared with COPD alone in stable outpatients. However, the prognosis of patients hospitalised with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (ARF) is unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 124 patients with COPD and 44 patients with OVS were treated with positive airway pressure (PAP) for ARF and followed up for a median of 20.6 months (IQR 3.80-53.4). Patients treated in the emergency or intensive care units and did not continue PAP on the wards were excluded. We compared patient characteristics and overall survival.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age of participants was 71 (9.7) years and 51% were males. Patients with OVS had a higher prevalence of hypertension (75% vs 50.0%, p=0.004) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (45.5% vs 19.4%, p<0.001). There was no difference in arterial pH or carbon dioxide levels at presentation. On univariate analysis, mortality was lower in OVS compared with patients with COPD alone (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.87). Median survival was 51.0 (95% CI 38.1 to 93.7) months in OVS and 27.7 (95% CI 16.9 to 35.1) months in COPD alone. Median survival in OVS prescribed home PAP therapy was significantly higher (59.0 months) compared with OVS not discharged on therapy (36.1 months), and to patients with COPD, irrespective of home therapy prescription (p=0.022). After adjusting for multiple known confounders, patients with OVS still appeared to have lower mortality; however, this was no longer statistically significant (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.24).

DISCUSSION

We found that patients with COPD and ARF requiring non-invasive ventilation may have higher mortality rates compared with patients with OVS. Patients with OVS treated with home PAP had lower mortality compared with patients not prescribed PAP on discharge. These findings suggest that patients with COPD who present with ARF may benefit from early diagnosis of OSA and initiation of long-term PAP therapy.

The application effect of a pulmonary rehabilitation program based on empowerment theory for patients with COPD combined with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure are often coexisting conditions that can severely impact patients' cardiopulmonary function and quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs, particularly those based on empowerment theory, may improve clinical outcomes by enhancing self-efficacy and promoting patient engagement.

METHODS

A total of 70 patients with COPD and heart failure admitted to our hospital's respiratory department from January 1, 2023, to April 31, 2024, were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 35) or an observation group (n = 35). The control group received routine care, while the observation group underwent an empowerment-based pulmonary rehabilitation program in addition to routine care for 4 weeks. Lung function (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, maximum voluntary ventilation), arterial blood gas levels (partial pressure of carbon dioxide, partial pressure of oxygen, and arterial oxygen saturation), cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction and serum brain natriuretic peptide), cardiopulmonary function (heart rate, respiratory rate, and 6-minute walk test), self-efficacy, and rehabilitation compliance were measured before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups before the intervention (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the observation group exhibited significant improvements in lung function, arterial blood gas levels, cardiac and cardiopulmonary function, and self-efficacy scores compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Rehabilitation compliance was also significantly higher in the observation group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

An empowerment-based pulmonary rehabilitation program effectively improves rehabilitation compliance, lung and heart function, and self-efficacy in COPD patients with heart failure, suggesting it has strong potential for clinical application.

Exacerbation history and blood eosinophil count prior to diagnosis of COPD and risk of subsequent exacerbations

BACKGROUND

Prior exacerbation history is used to guide initial maintenance therapy in COPD; however, the recommendations were derived from patients already diagnosed and treated.

METHODS

We assessed the rates of moderate (i.e. treated with antibiotics and/or systemic corticosteroids) and severe (i.e. hospitalised) exacerbations in the year following diagnosis in patients newly diagnosed with COPD according to their prior history of exacerbations, blood eosinophil count (BEC) and whether maintenance therapy was started. Data were extracted from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database.

RESULTS

73 189 patients were included. 61.9% had no exacerbations prior to diagnosis, 21.5% had 1 moderate, 16.5% had ≥2 moderate and 0.3% had ≥1 severe. 50% were started on maintenance therapy. In patients not started on maintenance therapy the rates of moderate exacerbations in the year after diagnosis in patients with no, 1 moderate, ≥2 moderate and ≥1 severe prior exacerbations were 0.34 (95% CI 0.33-0.35), 0.59 (95% CI 0.56-0.61), 1.18 (95% CI 1.14-1.23) and 1.21 (95% CI 0.73-1.69), respectively. Similar results were seen in patients started on maintenance therapy. BEC did not add significantly to the prediction of future exacerbation risk.

CONCLUSIONS

A single moderate exacerbation in the year prior to diagnosis increases the risk of subsequent exacerbations, and more frequent or severe exacerbations prior to diagnosis are associated with a higher risk.

Reducing the risk of death - a possible outcome in COPD patients

INTRODUCTION

COPD is a leading cause of global mortality, particularly under-recognized and under-diagnosed. In 2020, it was the sixth leading cause of death in the US and has contributed to 4.72% of all-cause mortality (ACM) according to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Factors influencing COPD-related mortality include smoking, aging populations, comorbidities, sarcopenia, physical capacity, and lack of effective treatments.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses various factors influencing COPD-related mortality and analyzes observational studies and pivotal RCTs evaluating the impact of different therapies on ACM.

EXPERT OPINION

COPD significantly impacts ACM, necessitating effective management strategies. Smoking cessation is crucial in reducing mortality risk. Exacerbation management and comorbidity treatment are essential to improve patient outcomes. Various therapeutic interventions, such as smoking cessation, vaccination, long-term oxygen therapy, and lung volume reduction surgery, have shown benefits in reducing mortality. Pharmacotherapies might reduce the risk of mortality, although the current scientific evidences remain inconclusive. Advances in pharmacological interventions, tailored treatment plans, and physical activity programs are vital. More robust and long-term studies, focusing on real-world data and addressing biases in treatment allocation, are needed to conclusively determine the efficacy of different therapies in reducing ACM in COPD patients.

Medication adherence to inhalation therapy and the risk of COPD exacerbations: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Assessing medication adherence is crucial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management to prevent exacerbations. However, it is unclear whether this association between adherence and exacerbations is influenced by the adherence assessment methods or thresholds used. Electronic healthcare databases are valuable to study exacerbations and adherence in real life. We aimed to systematically review the literature to identify adherence assessment methods and thresholds used in healthcare databases when investigating the association between medication adherence and COPD exacerbations and to meta-analyse the associated effect sizes.

METHOD

MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase were searched for peer-reviewed articles, written in English, published up to 10 October 2022 (PROSPERO: CRD42022363449). Two reviewers independently conducted screening for inclusion and performed data extraction. A qualitative approach described the adherence assessment methods and thresholds used. A quantitative approach (meta-analysis using random effects model) estimated the association between adherence and the risk of COPD exacerbations.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the systematic review of which five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The medication possession ratio (MPR) and the proportion of days covered (PDC) were the adherence assessment methods used and 0.80 was always used as threshold to differentiate good from poor adherence. Adherence and exacerbations were mostly measured over the same time period. Poor adherence (MPR or PDC<0.80) was significantly associated with a higher COPD exacerbation risk (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.62, I2=85%), regardless of the adherence assessment method used. Results were consistent when stratified by exacerbation severity. Poor adherence was also associated with a time-dependent risk of COPD exacerbations (incidence rate ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.46).

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review with meta-analysis demonstrated a 40% increased risk of COPD exacerbations in case of poor adherence to inhaler medication.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022363449.

An Italian Delphi Consensus on the Triple inhalation Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND

The management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) lacks standardization due to the diverse clinical presentation, comorbidities, and limited acceptance of recommended approaches by physicians. To address this, a multicenter study was conducted among Italian respiratory physicians to assess consensus on COPD management and pharmacological treatment.

METHODS

The study employed the Delphi process using the Estimate-Talk-Estimate method, involving a scientific board and expert panel. During a 6-month period, the scientific board conducted the first Delphi round and identified 11 broad areas of COPD management to be evaluated while the second Delphi round translated all 11 items into statements. The statements were subsequently presented to the expert panel for independent rating on a nine-point scale. Consensus was considered achieved if the median score was 7 or higher. Consistently high levels of consensus were observed in the first rating, allowing the scientific board to finalize the statements without requiring further rounds.

RESULTS

Topics generating substantial discussion included the pre-COPD phase, patient-reported outcomes, direct escalation from a single bronchodilator to triple therapy, and the role of adverse events, particularly pneumonia, in guiding triple therapy prescriptions. Notably, these topics exhibited higher standard deviations, indicating greater variation in expert opinions.

CONCLUSIONS

The study emphasized the significance that Italian pulmonologists attribute to managing mortality, tailoring treatments, and addressing cardiovascular comorbidities in COPD patients. While unanimous consensus was not achieved for all statements, the results provide valuable insights to inform clinical decision-making among physicians and contribute to a better understanding of COPD management practices in Italy.

The Potential Use and Value of a Wearable Monitoring Bracelet for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study Investigating the Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of exacerbations has major effects on the health of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Monitoring devices that measure (vital) parameters hold promise for timely identification and treatment of exacerbations. Stakeholders' perspectives on the use of monitoring devices are of importance for the successful development and implementation of a device.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the potential use and value of a wearable monitoring bracelet (MB) for patients with COPD at high risk for exacerbation. The perspectives of health care professionals as well as patients were examined, both immediately after hospitalization and over a longer period. Furthermore, potential facilitators and barriers to the use and implementation of an MB were explored.

METHODS

Data for this qualitative study were collected from January to April 2023. A total of 11 participants (eg, n=6 health care professionals [HCPs], 2 patients, and 3 additional patients) participated. In total, 2 semistructured focus groups were conducted via video calls; 1 with HCPs of various professional backgrounds and 1 with patients. In addition, 3 semistructured individual interviews were held with patients. The interviews and focus groups addressed attitudes, wishes, needs, as well as factors that could either support or impede the potential MB use. Data from interviews and focus groups were coded and analyzed according to the principles of the framework method.

RESULTS

HCPs and patients both predominantly emphasized the importance of an MB in terms of promptly identifying exacerbations by detecting deviations from normal (vital) parameters, and subsequently alerting users. According to HCPs, this is how an MB should support the self-management of patients. Most participants did not anticipate major differences in value and use of an MB between the short-term and the long-term periods after hospitalization. Facilitators of the potential use and implementation of an MB that participants highlighted were ease of use and some form of support for patients in using an MB and interpreting the data. HCPs as well as patients expressed concerns about potential costs as a barrier to use and implementation. Another barrier that HCPs mentioned, was the prerequisite of digital literacy for patients to be able to interpret and react to the data from an MB.

CONCLUSIONS

HCPs and patients both recognize that an MB could be beneficial and valuable to patients with COPD at high risk for exacerbation, in the short as well as the long term. In particular, they perceived value in supporting self-management of patients with COPD. Stakeholders would be able to use the obtained insights in support of the effective implementation of MBs in COPD patient care, which can potentially improve health care and the overall well-being of patients with COPD.

Remote Patient Monitoring and Machine Learning in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Dual Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are associated with high mortality, morbidity, and poor quality of life and constitute a substantial burden to patients and health care systems. New approaches to prevent or reduce the severity of AECOPD are urgently needed. Internationally, this has prompted increased interest in the potential of remote patient monitoring (RPM) and digital medicine. RPM refers to the direct transmission of patient-reported outcomes, physiological, and functional data, including heart rate, weight, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, physical activity, and lung function (spirometry), directly to health care professionals through automation, web-based data entry, or phone-based data entry. Machine learning has the potential to enhance RPM in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by increasing the accuracy and precision of AECOPD prediction systems.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to conduct a dual systematic review. The first review focuses on randomized controlled trials where RPM was used as an intervention to treat or improve AECOPD. The second review examines studies that combined machine learning with RPM to predict AECOPD. We review the evidence and concepts behind RPM and machine learning and discuss the strengths, limitations, and clinical use of available systems. We have generated a list of recommendations needed to deliver patient and health care system benefits.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy, encompassing the Scopus and Web of Science databases, was used to identify relevant studies. A total of 2 independent reviewers (HMGG and CM) conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment, with discrepancies resolved through consensus. Data synthesis involved evidence assessment using a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and a narrative synthesis. Reporting followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

RESULTS

These narrative syntheses suggest that 57% (16/28) of the randomized controlled trials for RPM interventions fail to achieve the required level of evidence for better outcomes in AECOPD. However, the integration of machine learning into RPM demonstrates promise for increasing the predictive accuracy of AECOPD and, therefore, early intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests a transition toward the integration of machine learning into RPM for predicting AECOPD. We discuss particular RPM indices that have the potential to improve AECOPD prediction and highlight research gaps concerning patient factors and the maintained adoption of RPM. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of a more comprehensive examination of patient and health care burdens associated with RPM, along with the development of practical solutions.

Effects of the teach-back method on the health status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a real-world community-based cluster-randomized controlled trial

Background

The teach-back method (TBM), also known as the "show-me" method, is a technique for verifying patients' understanding of health-related information that has been recommended for improving health literacy. However, the research on TBM effect on the outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of a TBM intervention on the health status of COPD patients.

Methods

This real-world community-based cluster-randomized controlled trial enrolled 1,688 patients with COPD from 18 communities in China. Participants received either TBM plus usual care (UC) or UC only. General practitioners were trained in TBM before the intervention. The primary outcomes were depression and anxiety symptoms, as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life and dyspnea, as measured by the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Dyspnea was assessed using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale. Data on acute exacerbations and deaths were extracted from medical records. Lung function was expressed as the forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percentage of the predicted value [FEV1 (% pred)].

Results

In total, 336 of the 853 COPD patients in the intervention group (TBM plus UC) had comorbid depression, compared with 329 of the 835 in the control group (UC only). The TBM group showed a significantly greater improvement in HADS depression and anxiety subscale scores (HADS-D and HADS-A, respectively) than the UC group at12 months (t =8.34, P<0.001; t=12.18, P<0.001). The CAT and mMRC scores were significantly lower in the TBM than UC group at 12 months (t=8.43, P<0.001; t=7.23, P<0.001). The numbers of acute exacerbations and deaths were significantly lower in the TBM than UC group at 12 months (mean MCF values were 0.35 and 0.56, respectively [difference of 0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.41, -0.02; χ2=9.63, P<0.001]. The FEV1 (% pred) was significantly higher in the TBM than UC group at 12 months (t=7.45, P<0.001).

Conclusions

General practitioners can use TBM interventions to effectively reduce anxiety, depression, and dyspnea symptoms, decrease the frequency of exacerbations and likelihood of death, and improve health-related quality of life and pulmonary function in patients with COPD.

Trial Registration

The trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (reference: ChiCTR-TRC-12001958).

Mortality of patients with COPD

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third most common cause of death worldwide and 24% of the patients die within 5 years of diagnosis.

AREAS COVERED

The epidemiology of mortality and the interventions that reduce it are reviewed. The increasing global deaths reflect increases in population sizes, increasing life expectancy and reductions in other causes of death. Strategies to reduce mortality aim to prevent the development of COPD and improve the survival of individuals. Historic changes in mortality give insights: improvements in living conditions and nutrition, and later improvements in air quality led to a large fall in mortality in the early 20th century. The smoking epidemic temporarily reversed this trend.Older age, worse lung function and exacerbations are risk factors for death. Single inhaler triple therapy; smoking cessation; pulmonary rehabilitation; oxygen therapy; noninvasive ventilation; and surgery reduce mortality in selected patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The importance of addressing the global burden of mortality from COPD must be recognized. Steps must be taken to reduce it, by reducing exposure to risk factors, assessing individual patients' risk of death and using treatments that reduce the risk of death. Mortality rates are falling in countries that have adopted a comprehensive approach to COPD prevention and treatment.

Phenotype to Treatable Traits-Based Management in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a heterogeneous respiratory disease driven by various genetic and environmental factors, presents significant challenges in diagnosis and management. Traditional approaches focused on phenotypic classification, but recent paradigms emphasize identifying and addressing treatable traits to personalize treatment strategies. Treatable traits facilitate personalized interventions, optimizing symptom control, and reducing exacerbation risk. Dyspnea and exacerbations, recognized as key traits, guide treatment decisions and follow-up management. Various interventions, including bronchodilators, corticosteroids, and lifestyle modifications, target specific traits like airway inflammation, mucus overproduction, and emphysema. Strategies for assessing and addressing treatable traits during initial encounters and follow-up visits enhance disease monitoring and treatment efficacy. Comprehensive trait assessment demands resources and specialized monitoring, posing barriers to widespread implementation. The lack of standardized protocols and evolving evidence further complicates decision-making and clinical practice. Despite these challenges, the shift toward treatable traits-based management signifies a pivotal advancement in COPD care, emphasizing holistic approaches tailored to individual patient needs. Recognizing and addressing treatable traits offers personalized interventions, enhancing symptom control and disease management. Embracing treatable traits-based approaches holds promise for improving clinical outcomes and enhancing the quality of life for individuals living with COPD.

Associations between outpatient care and later hospital admissions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a registry study from Norway

BACKGROUND

Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) admissions put a substantial burden on hospitals, most of the patients' contacts with health services are in outpatient care. Traditionally, outpatient care has been difficult to capture in population-based samples. In this study we describe outpatient service use in COPD patients and assess associations between outpatient care (contact frequency and specific factors) and next-year COPD hospital admissions or 90-day readmissions.

METHODS

Patients over 40 years of age residing in Oslo or Trondheim at the time of contact in the period 2009-2018 were identified from the Norwegian Patient Registry (in- and outpatient hospital contacts, rehabilitation) and the KUHR registry (contacts with GPs, contract specialists and physiotherapists). These were linked to the Regular General Practitioner registry (characteristics of the GP practice), long-term care data (home and institutional care, need for assistance), socioeconomic and-demographic data from Statistics Norway and the Cause of Death registry. Negative binomial models were applied to study associations between combinations of outpatient care, specific care factors and next-year COPD hospital admissions and 90-day readmissions. The sample consisted of 24,074 individuals.

RESULTS

A large variation in the frequency and combination of outpatient service use for respiratory diagnoses (GP, emergency room, physiotherapy, contract specialist and outpatient hospital contacts) was apparent. GP and outpatient hospital contact frequency were strongly associated to an increased number of next-year hospital admissions (1.2-3.2 times higher by increasing GP frequency when no outpatient hospital contacts, 2.4-5 times higher in combination with outpatient hospital contacts). Adjusted for healthcare use, comorbidities and sociodemographics, outpatient care factors associated with lower numbers of next-year hospitalisations were fees indicating interaction between providers (7% reduction), spirometry with GP or specialist (7%), continuity of care with GP (15%), and GP follow-up (8%) or rehabilitation (18%) within 30 days vs. later following any current year hospitalisations. For 90-day readmissions results were less evident, and most variables were non-significant.

CONCLUSION

As increased use of outpatient care was strongly associated with future hospitalisations, this further stresses the need for good communication between providers when coordinating care for COPD patients. The results indicated possible benefits of care continuity within and interaction between providers.

Rate of severe exacerbations, healthcare resource utilisation and clinical outcomes in patients with COPD in low-income and middle-income countries: results from the EXACOS International Study

INTRODUCTION

The EXAcerbations of Chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) and their OutcomeS (EXACOS) International Study aimed to quantify the rate of severe exacerbations and examine healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and clinical outcomes in patients with COPD from low-income and middle-income countries.

METHODS

EXACOS International was an observational, cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection from medical records for a period of up to 5 years. Data were collected from 12 countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Mexico, Panama, Russia and Taiwan. The study population comprised patients ≥40 years of age with COPD. Outcomes/variables included the prevalence of severe exacerbations, the annual rate of severe exacerbations and time between severe exacerbations; change in lung function over time (measured by the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)); peripheral blood eosinophil counts (BECs) and the prevalence of comorbidities; treatment patterns; and HCRU.

RESULTS

In total, 1702 patients were included in the study. The study population had a mean age of 69.7 years, with 69.4% males, and a mean body mass index of 26.4 kg/m2. The mean annual prevalence of severe exacerbations was 20.1%, and 48.4% of patients experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation during the 5-year study period. As the number of severe exacerbations increased, the interval between successive exacerbations decreased. A statistically significant decrease in mean (SD) FEV1 from baseline to post-baseline was observed in patients with ≥1 severe exacerbation (1.23 (0.51) to 1.13 (0.52) L; p=0.0000). Mean BEC was 0.198 x109 cells/L, with 64.7% of patients having a BEC ≥0.1 x109 cells/L and 21.3% having a BEC ≥0.3 x109 cells/L. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (58.3%). An increasing number of severe exacerbations per year was associated with greater HCRU.

DISCUSSION

The findings presented here indicate that effective treatment strategies to prevent severe exacerbations in patients with COPD remain a significant unmet need in low-income and middle-income countries.

Do pulmonary rehabilitation programmes improve outcomes in patients with COPD posthospital discharge for exacerbation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Previous systematic reviews have provided heterogeneous and differing estimates for the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this review was to examine the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes initiated within 3 weeks of hospital discharge following an exacerbation of COPD.

METHODS

An update of a previous Cochrane review was undertaken using the Cochrane Airways Review Group Specialised Register. Searches were conducted from October 2015 to August 2023 for studies that initiated pulmonary rehabilitation within 3 weeks of hospital discharge. Studies assessing the impact of solely inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation were excluded. Forest plots were generated using a generic inverse variance random effects method.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included. Posthospital discharge pulmonary rehabilitation reduced hospital re-admissions (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.77, I2=67%), improved exercise capacity (6 min walk test, mean difference (MD) 57 m, 95% CI 29 to 86, I2=89%; incremental shuttle walk test, MD 43 m, 95% CI 6 to 79, I2=81%), health-related quality of life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, MD -8.7 points, 95% CI -12.5 to -4.9, I2=59%; Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ)-emotion, MD 1.0 points, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.6, I2=74%; CRQ-fatigue, MD 0.9 points, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.6, I2=91%), and dyspnoea (CRQ-dyspnoea, MD 1.0 points, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.7, I2=87%; modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale, MD -0.3 points, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.1, I2=60%). Significant effects were not observed for CRQ-mastery, COPD assessment test, EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level and mortality. No intervention-related adverse events were reported.

DISCUSSION

Pulmonary rehabilitation delivered posthospital discharge for exacerbation of COPD results in a reduction in hospital re-admissions and improvements in exercise capacity, health-related quality of life and dyspnoea in the absence of any intervention-related adverse events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023406397.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Mortality and Hospitalization during the COVID-19 Pandemic Compared with before the Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic on hospitalization and mortality rates among patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). We conducted a systematic search across three medical databases for studies comparing the AECOPD mortality and hospitalization rates during the COVID-19 pandemic with those before the pandemic, up until December 2023. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis with a random-effects model to pool odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity (I2). From 4689 records, 21 studies met our inclusion criteria. Our analysis revealed a significant increase in in-hospital mortality during the pandemic (pooled OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.17-1.39, I2 = 50%). Subgroup analysis highlighted a more pronounced mortality risk in single-center studies and smaller populations. Conversely, hospitalization rates for AECOPD significantly declined during the pandemic (pooled OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.18-0.85, I2 = 99%). The study demonstrates that during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a substantial decrease in hospital admissions for AECOPD and an increase in in-hospital deaths. This shows that better healthcare plans and pandemic preparedness are needed to help people with chronic conditions.

Exercise training initiated early during hospitalisation in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is safe and improves exercise capacity and physical function at hospital discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Earlier reviews of exercise in people during exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) included studies where exercise training was initiated late during hospital admission or shortly following hospital discharge. Our question was: in adults hospitalised with an exacerbation of COPD, does initiating exercise training early during an admission versus not initiating exercise training during admission, change outcomes measured at discharge?

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Database searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, PEDro and EMBASE conducted in December 2021 and updated in January 2024. Studies were included if they had at least one group that was prescribed exercise training within 48 h of hospital admission (experimental) and at least one group that received usual care which did not include prescribed exercise training (control). Outcomes included exercise capacity, physical function, adverse events and uptake of outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programs.

RESULTS

Ten studies (423 participants; mean FEV1 ranging from 26 % to 50 % predicted) were included. At discharge, compared to the control group, the experimental group demonstrated better exercise capacity (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.58, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.83; five studies, moderate effect, low certainty evidence) and physical function (SMD -0.54, 95 % CI -0.86 to -0.22; four studies, moderate effect, low certainty evidence). No observed serious adverse events were reported. None of the studies reported uptake of pulmonary rehabilitation following discharge.

CONCLUSION

In adults with an exacerbation of COPD, exercise training prescribed within 48 h of hospitalisation was safe and improved exercise capacity and physical function.

Exacerbation Burden in COPD and Occurrence of Mortality in a Cohort of Italian Patients: Results of the Gulp Study

Objective

To describe the burden of moderate to severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality; the secondary objectives were to analyze treatment patterns and changes over follow-up.

Design

Observational, multicenter, retrospective, cohort study with a three year follow-up period.

Setting

Ten Italian academic secondary- and tertiary-care centers.

Participants

Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD referring to the outpatient clinics of the participating centers were retrospectively recruited.

Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures

Annualized frequency of moderate and severe exacerbations stratified by exacerbation history prior to study enrollment. Patients were classified according to airflow obstruction, GOLD risk categories, and divided in 4 groups: A = no exacerbations; B = 1 moderate exacerbation; C = 1 severe exacerbation; D = ≥2 moderate and/or severe exacerbations. Overall all-cause mortality stratified by age, COPD category, and COPD therapy. A logistic regression model assessed the association of clinical characteristics with mortality.

Results

1111 patients were included (73% males), of which 41.5% had a history of exacerbations. As expected, the proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 exacerbation during follow-up increased according to pre-defined study risk categories (B: 79%, C: 84%, D: 97.4%). Overall, by the end of follow-up, 45.5% of patients without a history of exacerbation experienced an exacerbation (31% of which severe), and 13% died. Deceased patients were significantly older, more obstructed and hyperinflated, and more frequently active smokers compared with survivors. Severe exacerbations were more frequent in patients that died (23.5%, vs 10.2%; p-value: 0.002). Chronic heart failure and ischemic heart disease were the only comorbidities associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) for death (OR: 2.2, p-value: 0.001; and OR: 1.9, p-value: 0.007). Treatment patterns were similar in patients that died and survivors.

Conclusion

Patients with a low exacerbation risk are exposed to a significant future risk of moderate/severe exacerbations. Real life data confirm the strong association between mortality and cardiovascular comorbidities in COPD.

Development of a performance-based toolkit of the treatable traits of functioning in hospitalised patients with exacerbation of COPD: a survey-based study protocol

Background

The management of COPD has been based on the premise of identifying problems that guide personalised treatment based on a multidimensional assessment, known as treatable traits. Exacerbation of COPD (ECOPD) results in physical and functional impairments, limitation of daily activities and negative impact on patients' quality of life and prognosis. In this context, identifying treatable traits in patients with ECOPD is essential to properly guide individualised patient care. There is a need to develop a performance-based toolkit to identify the main treatable traits of functioning in hospitalised patients with ECOPD.

Methods and analysis

This is a study protocol of a survey method observational study to develop a performance-based toolkit. The study will include the following steps: 1) definition of treatable traits by both physiotherapists who provide or have provided care to hospitalised patients with ECOPD on a regular basis, and patients who have experienced at least one ECOPD which required hospitalisation; 2) selection of the most appropriate measures (markers) for each treatable trait based on established criteria and a previous systematic review; and 3) implementation of the toolkit in a pilot/feasibility study with hospitalised patients with ECOPD.

Conclusion

The development of a feasible performance-based toolkit with the best markers for each key treatable trait of functioning in hospitalised patients with ECOPD will make it possible to create individualised patient care for the specific demands of these patients.

The pomegranate-derived peptide Pug-4 alleviates nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae-induced inflammation by suppressing NF-kB signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome activation

The respiratory pathogen nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is the most common cause of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), of which an excessive inflammatory response is a hallmark. With the limited success of current medicines there is an urgent need for the development of novel therapeutics that are both safe and effective. In this study, we explored the regulatory potential of pomegranate-derived peptides Pug-1, Pug-2, Pug-3, and Pug-4 on NTHi-induced inflammation. Our results clearly showed that to varying degrees the Pug peptides inhibited NTHi-induced production of IL-1β, a pivotal cytokine in COPD, and showed that these effects were not related to cytotoxicity. Pug-4 peptide exhibited the most potent inhibitory activity. This was demonstrated in all studied cell types including murine (RAW264.7) and human (differentiated THP-1) macrophages as well as human lung epithelial cells (A549). Substantial reduction by Pug-4 of TNF-α, NO and PGE2 in NTHi-infected A549 cells was also observed. In addition, Pug-4 strongly inhibited the expression of nuclear-NF-κB p65 protein and the NF-κB target genes (determined by IL-1β, TNF-α, iNOS and COX-2 mRNA expression) in NTHi-infected A549 cells. Pug-4 suppressed the expression of NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β proteins and inhibited NTHi-mediated cleavage of caspase-1 and mature IL-1β. These results demonstrated that Pug-4 inhibited NTHi-induced inflammation through the NF-κB signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Our findings herein highlight the significant anti-inflammatory activity of Pug-4, a newly identified peptide from pomegranate, against NTHi-induced inflammation. We therefore strongly suggest the potential of the Pug-4 peptide as an anti-inflammatory medicine candidate for treatment of NTHi-mediated inflammation.

Relationship Between Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Risk of Respiratory Failure and Death in COPD: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the MIMIC-IV Database

Purpose

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) concurrent with respiratory failure (RF) is devastating, and may result in death and disability. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a new prognostic biomarker linked to unfavorable outcomes of acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, and heart failure. Nonetheless, its role in COPD is rarely investigated. Consequently, this study intends to assess the accuracy of SII in predicting the prognosis of COPD.

Patients and Methods

The clinical information was retrospectively acquired from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database. The outcomes encompassed the incidence of RF and mortality. The relationship between different SII and outcomes was examined utilizing the Cox proportional-hazards model and restricted cubic splines. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed for all-cause mortality.

Results

The present study incorporated 1653 patients. During hospitalization, 697 patients (42.2%) developed RF, and 169 patients (10.2%) died. And 637 patients (38.5%) died during long-term follow-up. Higher SII increased the risk of RF (RF: HR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.28, P<0.001), in-hospital mortality (HR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39, P=0.003), and long-term follow-up mortality (HR: 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19, P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested a significantly elevated risk of all-cause death (log-rank P<0.001) in patients with higher SII, especially during the short-term follow-up period of 21 days.

Conclusion

SII is closely linked to an elevated risk of RF and death in COPD patients. It appears to be a potential predictor of the prognosis of COPD patients, which is helpful for the risk stratification of this population. However, more prospective studies are warranted to consolidate our conclusion.

Lung regeneration: diverse cell types and the therapeutic potential

Lung tissue has a certain regenerative ability and triggers repair procedures after injury. Under controllable conditions, lung tissue can restore normal structure and function. Disruptions in this process can lead to respiratory system failure and even death, causing substantial medical burden. The main types of respiratory diseases are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Multiple cells, such as lung epithelial cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and immune cells, are involved in regulating the repair process after lung injury. Although the mechanism that regulates the process of lung repair has not been fully elucidated, clinical trials targeting different cells and signaling pathways have achieved some therapeutic effects in different respiratory diseases. In this review, we provide an overview of the cell type involved in the process of lung regeneration and repair, research models, and summarize molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of lung regeneration and fibrosis. Moreover, we discuss the current clinical trials of stem cell therapy and pharmacological strategies for COPD, IPF, and ARDS treatment. This review provides a reference for further research on the molecular and cellular mechanisms of lung regeneration, drug development, and clinical trials.

Stability-indicating UPLC assay coupled with mass spectrometry for the analysis of vilanterol degradation products in human urine

Vilanterol is a once-daily dose inhaler prescribed for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study involved an investigation of vilanterol stability under acidic, basic, oxidative, thermal, and photolytic stress conditions. UPLC method was developed and validated for the analysis of vilanterol with its degradants. The drug was stable under photolytic and thermal stress conditions and degraded under acidic, basic, and oxidative stress conditions. Degradation kinetics was performed for acidic, basic and oxidative stress conditions. Kinetics parameters, K, half-life time (t1/2) and shelf-life time (t90) were assessed, and the degradation followed first order reaction. The method was linear from 0.10 to 100.00 µg mL-1 with accuracy, inter-day and intra-day precision from 99.45 to 100.02%, 0.391-0.694 and 0.041-0.345, respectively. Mass spectrometry was employed to elucidate the structure of the degradants, and the results revealed that certain degradation products were comparable to vilanterol metabolites. The World Anti-Doping Agency has prohibited the presence of vilanterol and its metabolites in athletes' urine except for exercise bronchoconstriction with limited dose. So, quantification of vilanterol in the presence of its degradants was performed in human urine. The results revealed that the method was linear in range of 1.00 to 100.00 µg mL-1. Samples collection and experimental protocol was performed according to the guidelines of the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Pharmacy, the British University in Egypt with approval No. CH-2305.

Any Decrease in Lung Function is Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes: Post Hoc Analysis of the IMPACT Interventional Trial

This article does not contain an abstract.

Real-World Disease Burden and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients with COPD and Asthma Using Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) in the United States

Purpose

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are associated with chronic inflammation of the respiratory tract; despite some overlap of symptoms, they are considered separate disorders. Triple therapy is recommended for patients with COPD and asthma whose symptoms remain uncontrolled despite dual therapy. There are limited real-world studies evaluating outcomes among patients with COPD and asthma who are receiving inhaled triple therapy. This United States (US)-based real-world study aimed to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes among patients with COPD and asthma receiving single-inhaler triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI]).

Patients and Methods

Retrospective pre-post study using claims data from the Optum Clinformatics® database. Patients with COPD and asthma were indexed on the first date of FF/UMEC/VI prescription (1 October 2017-31 March 2019). Each patient acted as their own control. Patients were required to have continuous health plan enrollment for 12 months prior to (pre-treatment) and following (post-treatment) index. Exacerbations, all-cause and COPD-related healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared before and after FF/UMEC/VI initiation.

Results

Overall, 2743 patients were included (mean age: 71 years; 64% female). Cardiovascular disease was the most prevalent comorbidity during both the pre- and post-treatment periods (90% for both periods). There was a lower proportion of patients with ≥1 COPD exacerbation or ≥1 asthma exacerbation post-treatment versus pre-treatment (51% vs 57%, p<0.0001, and 22% vs 32%, p<0.0001, respectively). Fewer patients had ≥1 all-cause office visit post-treatment versus pre-treatment (99.3% vs 99.7%, p=0.0329); more patients had ≥1 COPD-related office visit post-treatment versus pre-treatment (89.6% vs 87.5%, p=0.0035). Total all-cause healthcare costs were significantly higher post-treatment versus pre-treatment ($72,809 vs $63,734, p<0.0001). The driver of increased costs appeared to be primarily non-COPD-related (COPD-related costs: post-treatment $27,779 vs pre-treatment $25,081, p=0.0062).

Conclusion

FF/UMEC/VI reduced exacerbations among patients with COPD and asthma in a real-world setting in the US.

Real-World Effectiveness of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Symptomatic COPD: The ELLITHE Non-Interventional Trial

Purpose

Real-life effectiveness data on once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (odSITT) with the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF), the long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC), and the long-acting β2-agonist vilanterol (VI) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important to complement evidence from well-controlled randomized clinical trials. Effectiveness of odSITT was quantified by assessing health status and symptoms in usual care.

Patients and Methods

ELLITHE was a single-country (Germany), multicenter, open-label, non-interventional effectiveness study between 2020 and 2022, evaluating the effect of treatment initiation with FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg once-daily via the ELLIPTA inhaler on improvements in clinical outcomes versus baseline in COPD patients. The primary endpoint was the change in the total COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score between baseline and month 12. Key secondary endpoints included change in CAT score over time, occurrence of exacerbations until month 12, changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), inhaler adherence, and safety.

Results

Nine hundred and six patients were included (age 66.6 years, 55.6% male, mean FEV1 52.6% of predicted, mean CAT 21.5 units, 1.4 exacerbations/year pre-study). About 63.9% of patients were escalated from dual therapies, and 18% were switched from multiple-inhaler triple therapies. Reductions in CAT score at month 12 were statistically significant and above the threshold of clinical importance (-2.6 units; p < 0.0001). CAT score also improved at interim visits. CAT improvements were more pronounced in patients with high baseline scores and better inhaler adherence. Exacerbations during follow-up were rare (0.2 events/year) compared to pre-study (1.4 events/year). FEV1 was improved by 93 mL (p < 0.0001). No new safety effects were observed.

Conclusion

In usual care, treatment with odSITT resulted in significant and clinically relevant improvements of CAT score and FEV1 in COPD patients, regardless of the occurrence of exacerbations. These findings challenge the current guideline recommendations for SITT only in patients experiencing exacerbations.

Prevention of exacerbation in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD with the intent to modulate respiratory microbiome: a pilot prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Considering the role of bacteria in the onset of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), we hypothesized that the use of influenza-Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccination, oral probiotics or inhaled amikacin could prevent AECOPD.

Methods

In this pilot prospective, muti-central, randomized trial, moderate-to-very severe COPD subjects with a history of moderate-to-severe exacerbations in the previous year were enrolled and assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 into 4 groups. All participants were managed based on the conventional treatment recommended by GOLD 2019 report for 3 months, with three groups receiving additional treatment of inhaled amikacin (0.4 g twice daily, 5-7 days monthly for 3 months), oral probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (1 tablet daily for 3 months), or influenza-S. pneumoniae vaccination. The primary endpoint was time to the next onset of moderate-to-severe AECOPD from enrollment. Secondary endpoints included CAT score, mMRC score, adverse events, and survival in 12 months.

Results

Among all 112 analyzed subjects (101 males, 96 smokers or ex-smokers, mean ± SD age 67.19 ± 7.39 years, FEV1 41.06 ± 16.09% predicted), those who were given dual vaccination (239.7 vs. 198.2 days, p = 0.044, 95%CI [0.85, 82.13]) and oral probiotics (248.8 vs. 198.2 days, p = 0.017, 95%CI [7.49, 93.59]) had significantly delayed onset of next moderate-to-severe AECOPD than those received conventional treatment only. For subjects with high symptom burden, the exacerbations were significantly delayed in inhaled amikacin group as compared to the conventional treatment group (237.3 vs. 179.1 days, p = 0.009, 95%CI [12.40,104.04]). The three interventions seemed to be safe and well tolerated for patient with stable COPD.

Conclusion

The influenza-S. pneumoniae vaccine and long-term oral probiotic LGG can significantly delay the next moderate-to-severe AECOPD. Periodically amikacin inhalation seems to work in symptomatic patients. The findings in the current study warrants validation in future studies with microbiome investigation.Clinical trial registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT03449459.

Effect of a nurse-led integrated care intervention on quality of life and rehospitalisation in patients with severe exacerbation of COPD-a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility and effect of a nurse-led integrated care intervention on health-related quality of life (QoL) and unplanned 90-day rehospitalisation in patients hospitalised due to acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).

METHOD

A monocentric non-randomized parallel cluster design was applied. The primary endpoint was the difference between Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) Mastery Scores at hospital discharge and 13 weeks post-discharge. Secondary endpoints were differences between other CRQ scores, numbers of rehospitalisations and self-reported exacerbations. The study would end either 13 weeks after the full sample size was achieved or when study time ran out.

RESULTS

The study was terminated before reaching the targeted sample size. Of 174 invitees, 69 (39.7%, 30 control, 39 intervention) consented to participate. Of those, 47 completed the study, 45 of whom had complete data sets for the primary endpoint. No differences in QoL scores, unplanned COPD-related rehospitalisations or unplanned all-cause rehospitalisations were detected. The mean number of self-reported moderate exacerbations was higher in the intervention group (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The pilot study had slow recruitment, high drop-out rates, and no significant effect on 3-month outcomes. Further research should focus on enhancing the current understanding of how to motivate and recruit patients in this setting.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID

NCT04011332.

Development of a Communication Tool between Patients and Physicians for Recognizing COPD Exacerbations in Japan

In Japan, exacerbations are underreported compared with other countries, possibly due in part to a failure to recognize them. This study aimed to create a simple chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Exacerbation Recognition Tool (CERT-J) specifically for Japanese patients. Patients ≥40 years with confirmed COPD or asthma-COPD overlap were included. Focus groups were held to identify words and phrases used by patients to describe symptoms associated with an exacerbation, resulting in candidate items being identified. Following cognitive debriefing, the items were refined based on item frequency, level of endorsement and effect of demographic factors. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was then performed to inform an expert panel's choice of items to form the new tool. A total of 41 patients were included in the focus groups and nine patients performed the cognitive debrief. Following this, the expert panel identified 26 items for testing in a further 100 patients (mean age 72 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 54.8% predicted and 1.8 exacerbations in the preceding 12 months). Eleven items were associated with breathlessness or activity limitation and seven of these were the most frequently endorsed. EFA identified four factors, with one (breathlessness) being dominant. The expert panel recommended that the CERT-J should include six items: breathlessness and activity limitation (3 items), cough (1 item) and phlegm (2 items). The final CERT-J should benefit patients with COPD by providing them with an increased understanding and recognition of exacerbations.Clinical Trial Registration: GSK K.K (jRCT1080224526).

30-Day Readmission Rate of Patients with COPD and Its Associated Factors: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital

Purpose

Readmission of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been used as a measure of performance for COPD care. This study aimed to determine the rate of readmission of COPD in tertiary care hospital in Malaysia and its associated factors.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Malaysia from 1st January to 21st May 2019. Seventy admissions for COPD exacerbation involving 58 patients were analyzed.

Results

The majority of the patients were male (89.8%), had a mean age of 71.95 ± 7.24 years and a median smoking history of 40 (IQR = 25) pack-years, 84.5% were in GOLD group D and 91.4% had a mMRC grading of 2 or greater. Approximately 60.3% had upper or lower respiratory tract infection as the cause of exacerbation; one in five patients had uncompensated hypercapnic respiratory failure at presentation, and 27.6% needed mechanical ventilatory support. Approximately 43.1% of patients had a history of exacerbation that required hospitalisation in the past year. The mean blood eosinophil concentration was 0.38 ± 0.46 x109 cells/L. The 30-day readmission rate was 20.3%, revisit rate to the emergency room within 30 days after discharge was 3.4%, and in-hospital mortality rate was 1.7%. Among all characteristics, a higher baseline mMRC grade (p = 0.038) and history of exacerbation in the past 1 year (p < 0.001) were statistically associated with 30-day readmission.

Conclusion

The 30-day readmission rate for COPD exacerbation in a Malaysian tertiary hospital is similar to the rates in high-income countries. Exacerbation in the previous year and a higher baseline mMRC grading were significant risk factors for 30-day readmission in patients with COPD. Strategies of COPD management should concentrate on improvement of symptoms control by optimisation of pharmacotherapy, and early initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation, and structured integrated care programs to reduce readmission rates.

Vaccination as a tool for influencing the course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients with diabetes mellitus

Introduction. Repeated exacerbations play a leading role in the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), contributing to an increase in the number of hospitalizations, a decrease in ventilation function of the lungs, and an increase in deaths.

Aim. To analyze the clinical efficacy of pneumococcal disease vaccine prophylaxis in patients with COPD in combination with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) during 5 years of follow-up.

Materials and methods. The study included patients (n = 113) with COPD and type 2 DM. The main parameters for evaluating the effectiveness of vaccination were the number of COPD exacerbations, including severe, requiring hospitalization of patients, the incidence of pneumonia, the dynamics of the severity of shortness of breath using the Modified Medical Research Council questionnaire – mMRC, the volume of forced exhalation in 1 second (FEV1), the dynamics of changes in laboratory indicators and prognostic indices BODEX, e-BODE, DOSE, ADO, CODEX. Pneumococcal conjugate 13-valent vaccine was used for vaccinoprophylaxis.

Results. It has been established that vaccination against pneumococcal disease in patients with COPD and type 2 DM allows not only to significantly reduce the number of COPD exacerbations (by 2.7 times), reduce the frequency of episodes of community-acquired pneumonia (by 8 times) and significantly reduce the number of hospitalizations, but also stabilize the main functional indicators of the respiratory system while maintaining clinical effectiveness during the 5-year follow-up period. The dynamics of prognostic indices in the group of vaccinated patients reliably confirms the effectiveness of pneumococcal disease vaccine prophylaxis programs and the survival rate of patients with a combination of COPD and type 2 DM.

Conclusion. The results of the study confirm that the vaccine prophylaxis of pneumococcal infection significantly reduces the risk of such undesirable events as exacerbations of COPD, pneumonia, hospitalization, and allows to stabilize the course of not only COPD, but also concomitant type 2 diabetes mellitus and thereby improve the prognosis for patients.

Impact of acute exacerbations of COPD on patients' health status beyond pulmonary function: A scoping review

This scoping review summarized the evidence regarding the impact of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) on patients' health status beyond pulmonary function. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Prospective cohort studies assessing the health status of patients with COPD in a stable phase of the disease and after a follow-up period (where at least one AECOPD occurred) were included. An integrated assessment framework of health status (i.e., physiological functioning, complaints, functional impairment, quality of life) was used. Twenty-two studies were included. AECOPD acutely affected exercise tolerance, quadriceps muscle strength, physical activity levels, symptoms of dyspnoea and fatigue, and impact of the disease. Long-term effects on quadriceps muscle strength, symptoms of dyspnoea and depression, and quality of life were found. Repeated exacerbations negatively impacted the fat-free mass, levels of dyspnoea, impact of the disease and quality of life. Conflicting evidence was found regarding the impact of repeated exacerbations on exercise tolerance and physical activity levels. AECOPD have well-established acute and long-term adverse effects on health status beyond pulmonary function; nevertheless, the recovery trajectory and the impact of repeated exacerbations are still poorly studied. Further prospective research is recommended to draw firm conclusions on these aspects.

Intensive out-of-hospital coaching for frequently hospitalized COPD patients: a before-after feasibility study

Background

This study assesses whether out-of-hospital coaching of re-hospitalized, severe COPD patients by specialized respiratory nurses is feasible in terms of cost-effectiveness, implementation, and recipient acceptability. The coaching was aimed at improving patients' health management abilities, motivation for healthy behavior, strengthening the professional and informal care network, stimulating physiotherapy treatment and exercise training, improving knowledge on symptom recognition and medication use, and providing safety and support.

Methods

Cost-effectiveness of 6 months of out-of-hospital coaching was assessed based on a before-after intervention design, with real-life data and one-year follow-up. A total of 170 patients were included. Primary (questionnaires, meeting reports) and secondary data (insurance reimbursement data) were collected in one province in the Netherlands. The implementing and recipient acceptability was assessed based on the number of successfully delivered coaching sessions, questionnaire response rate, Patient Reported Experience Measure, and interviews with coaches.

Results

Post-intervention, the COPD-related hospitalization rate was reduced by 24%, and patients improved in terms of health status, anxiety, and nutritional status. Patients with a high mental burden and a poor score for health impairment and wellbeing at the start of the intervention showed the greatest reduction in hospitalizations. The coaching service was successfully implemented and considered acceptable by recipients, based on patient and coach satisfaction and clinical use of patient-reported measures.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates the value of coaching patients out-of-hospital, with a strong link to primary care, but with support of hospital expertise, thereby adding to previous studies on disease- or self-management support in either primary or secondary care settings. Patients benefit from personal attention, practical advice, exercise training, and motivational meetings, thereby improving health status and reducing the likelihood of re-hospitalization and its associated costs.

Perceptions of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological management of respiratory disorders among CRD patients

Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are among the leading cause of mortality worldwide. While pharmacological approaches are commonly used to manage symptoms, non-pharmacological management of CRDs is considered crucial in preventing disease progression and improving patient self-efficacy. To describe the perceived effectiveness of non-pharmacological management of CRDs among CRD patients and determine whether the CRD patients perceptions of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological management are associated with their demographic characteristics. An analytic cross-sectional study design was utilized. The non-pharmacological management practices of CRD patients and their perception of the effectiveness of these therapeutic measures were assessed using a researcher-developed questionnaire. Data collection took place in primary healthcare centers in Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia from October 2021 to March 2022. The proportion of CRD patients who perceived that non-pharmacological interventions were effective was computed. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine the association between the demographic characteristics of the respondents and their perception of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological management. Among the 390 respondents, 42% perceived that non-pharmacological measures were effective. Half of the respondents believed that smoking cessation, influenza vaccination, improving physical activity, and nutrition support helped alleviate CRD symptoms, while less than half of the respondents considered pulmonary rehabilitation, educational programs, and oxygen therapy effective measures to control symptoms. Women were found to be 3.24 times more likely to perceive non-pharmacological interventions as effective (P < .0000) compared to men. Those with university-level education were 66.6% less likely to consider non-pharmacological interventions to be effective (P < .0000) than those who completed preuniversity-level education. Age and marital status did not significantly influence perceptions of effectiveness. Differences in the perceptions of the effectiveness of various non-pharmacological measures to alleviate CRD symptoms existed among the CRD patients of Al Ahsa. The perception of effectiveness was significantly associated with the patient's gender and educational attainment.

Performance-based outcome measures to assess functionality in hospitalised patients with COPD exacerbations: a systematic review of the measurement properties

INTRODUCTION

Hospitalised patients with exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) may have physical and functional impairments that impact morbidity and readmission. Therefore, it is crucial to properly identify reduced functionality in these patients to support a personalised rehabilitation. The objective of this study is to summarise and compare the measurement properties of functionality performance-based outcome measures for hospitalised patients with ECOPD.

METHODS

A systematic review based on the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) was performed. The PubMed, Embase, PEDro and Cochrane databases were searched using terms related to functionality, hospitalised patients with ECOPD and measurement properties. Studies were selected and extracted by two researchers. The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was applied to assess the methodological quality of the studies and measurement property results were compared with the criteria for good measurement properties. Quality of evidence was graded using a modified Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

13 studies were included with nine outcome measures, namely the 6-min pegboard ring test, the de Morton mobility index, the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), the 6-min walk test (6MWT), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), the Berg balance scale, 4-m gait speed, handgrip strength and the 6-min stepper test. Construct validity was rated as sufficient, except for the ISWT. Responsiveness, assessed only for MIP, was considered insufficient and measurement errors for the ISWT and 6MWT were insufficient, with a very low quality of evidence for all measurement properties.

CONCLUSION

Measurement properties of performance-based outcome measures to assess functionality in patients hospitalised with ECOPD are still scarce, with very low evidence supporting validity and a lack of evidence of responsiveness and reliability. Further studies are needed to address this topic and guide assertive and personalised management.

Putative Bidirectionality of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Periodontal Disease: A Review of the Literature

The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasing worldwide and is currently the third leading cause of death globally. The long-term inhalation of toxic substances, mainly cigarette smoke, deteriorates pulmonary function over time, resulting in the development of COPD in adulthood. Periodontal disease is an inflammatory condition that affects most adults and is caused by the bacteria within dental plaque. These bacteria dissolve the gums around the teeth and the bone that supports them, ultimately leading to tooth loss. Periodontal disease and COPD share common risk factors, such as aging and smoking. Other similarities include local chronic inflammation and links with the onset and progression of systemic diseases such as ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus. Understanding whether interventions for periodontal disease improve the disease trajectory of COPD (and vice versa) is important, given our rapidly aging society. This review focuses on the putative relationship between COPD and periodontal disease while exploring current evidence and future research directions.

Nalmefene combined noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease coupled with type II respiratory failure: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nalmefene is an opioid system modulator with antagonist activity at the μ and δ receptors and partial agonist activity at the κ receptor. Previous studies have suggested that nalmefene could improve respiratory function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there is no comprehensive systematic review published regarding the clinical efficacy of nalmefene.

METHODS

We explored the following electronic bibliographic databases: EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, Wanfang, and Chinese national knowledge infrastructure. To collect data from randomized controlled trials on the therapy of COPD coupled with type II respiratory failure and nalmefene + noninvasive ventilator treatment. The retrieved articles were screened to determine the final inclusion criteria and to extract relevant data, such as the clinical efficacy rate, pulmonary function, blood gas analysis, and adverse reactions. In our study, we used relative risk and weighted mean deviation, as well as a 95% confidence interval for describing nalmefene effectiveness and safety while treating COPD with type II respiratory failure.

RESULTS

The outcomes of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the clinical efficacy rate of the nalmefene + noninvasive ventilation group was higher than that of the naloxone + noninvasive ventilation and noninvasive ventilation groups. Moreover, the improvement indices of pH value, partial pressure and saturation of blood oxygen, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and pulmonary function of the nalmefene + noninvasive ventilation group were better than those of the noninvasive ventilation group, and there was no increase in the occurrence of adverse drug reactions.

CONCLUSION

Nalmefene combined with noninvasive ventilation can significantly improve the blood gas index and lung function in patients with COPD combined with type II respiratory failure.

The Experiences of Individuals with a History of Acute Exacerbations of COPD and Their Thoughts on Death: Empirical Qualitative Research

Background

The most important problem of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients is acute exacerbation. Researching this experience and examining its relationship with death is extremely important in patient care.

Methods

This study was conducted to reveal the experiences of individuals with a history of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs) and their thoughts on death by qualitative empirical research. The study was conducted in a pulmonology clinic between July and September 2022. In-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted with patients in their rooms using a semi-structured form created specifically for the study and used as a data collection tool. With patient consent, interviews were recorded and documented. During the data analysis phase, the Colaizzi method was used. The study was presented in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist for qualitative research.

Results

The study was completed with 15 patients. A total of 13 of the patients were male and the mean age was 65 years. Patient statements were coded after the interviews and collected under 11 sub-themes. These sub-themes were categorized under the following main themes: recognizing AECOPDs, AECOPD instant experiences, post-AECOPD, and thoughts on death.

Conclusion

Patients were able to recognize the symptoms of an AECOPD, that the severity of the symptoms increased during the exacerbation, that they felt regret or anxiety about re-exacerbation, and that all of these factors contributed to their fear of death.

The Experiences of Individuals with a History of Acute Exacerbations of COPD and Their Thoughts on Death: Empirical Qualitative Research

Background

The most important problem of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients is acute exacerbation. Researching this experience and examining its relationship with death is extremely important in patient care.

Methods

This study was conducted to reveal the experiences of individuals with a history of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs) and their thoughts on death by qualitative empirical research. The study was conducted in a pulmonology clinic between July and September 2022. In-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted with patients in their rooms using a semi-structured form created specifically for the study and used as a data collection tool. With patient consent, interviews were recorded and documented. During the data analysis phase, the Colaizzi method was used. The study was presented in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist for qualitative research.

Results

The study was completed with 15 patients. A total of 13 of the patients were male and the mean age was 65 years. Patient statements were coded after the interviews and collected under 11 sub-themes. These sub-themes were categorized under the following main themes: recognizing AECOPDs, AECOPD instant experiences, post-AECOPD, and thoughts on death.

Conclusion

Patients were able to recognize the symptoms of an AECOPD, that the severity of the symptoms increased during the exacerbation, that they felt regret or anxiety about re-exacerbation, and that all of these factors contributed to their fear of death.

The Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Which Symptom is Most Important to Monitor?

Background

GOLD 2023 defines an exacerbation of COPD (ECOPD) by a deterioration of breathlessness at rest (BaR), mucus and cough. The severity of an ECOPD is determined by the degree of BaR, ranging from 0 to 10. However, it is not known which symptom is the most important one to detect early of an ECOPD, and which symptom that predicts future ECOPDs best. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to find out which symptom is the most important one to monitor.

Methods

We analysed data on COPD symptoms from the telehealth study The eHealth Diary. Frequent exacerbators (n = 27) were asked to daily monitor BaR and breathlessness at physical activity (BaPA), mucus and cough, employing a digital pen and symptom scales (0-10). Twenty-seven patients with 105 ECOPDs were analysed. The association between symptom development and the occurrence of exacerbations was evaluated using the Andersen-Gill formulation of the Cox proportional hazards model for the analysis of recurrent time-to-event data with time-varying predictors.

Results

According to the criteria proposed by GOLD 2023, 42% ECOPDs were mild, 48% were moderate and 5% were severe, while 6% were undefinable. Mucus and cough improved over study time, while BaR and BaPA deteriorated. Mucus appeared earliest, which was the most prominent feature of the average exacerbation, and worsening of mucus increased the risk for a future ECOPD. There was a 58% increase in the risk of exacerbation per unit increase in mucus score.

Conclusion

This study suggests that mucus worsening is the most important COPD symptom to monitor to detect ECOPDs early and to predict future risk för ECOPDs. In the present study, we also noticed a pronounced difference between GOLD 2022 and 2023. Hence, GOLD 2023 defined the ECOPD severity much lower than GOLD 2022 did.

Impact of COPD Exacerbations and Burden of Disease in Spain: AVOIDEX Study

Purpose

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by high morbidity and mortality, with a considerable consumption of healthcare resources (HRU). This study aims to obtain real world evidence regarding the consequences of COPD exacerbations and to provide updated data on the burden of this disease and its treatment.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective study in seven Spanish regions was conducted among COPD patients diagnosed between 1/01/2010 and 31/12/2017. The index date was the diagnosis of COPD and patients were followed until lost to follow-up, death or end of the study, whichever occurred first. Patients were classified by patient pattern (incident or prevalent), type and severity of exacerbations, and treatments prescribed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated, together with the incidence of exacerbations, comorbidities, and the use of HRU, during the baseline (12 months before the index date) and the follow-up periods by incident/prevalent and treatment prescribed. Mortality rate was also measured.

Results

The study included 34,557 patients with a mean age of 70 years (standard deviation: 12). The most frequent comorbidities were diabetes, osteoporosis, and anxiety. Most patients received inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with long-acting beta agonists (LABA), or long-acting muscarinic agonists (LAMA), followed by LABA with LAMA. Incident patients (N=8229; 23.8%) had fewer exacerbations than prevalent patients (N=26328; 76.2%), 0.3 vs 1.2 exacerbations per 100 patient-years. All treatment patterns present a substantial disease burden, which seems to increase with the evolution of the disease (ie moving from initial treatments to combination therapies). The overall mortality rate was 40.2 deaths/1000 patient-years. General practitioner visits and tests were the HRU most frequently required. The frequency and severity of exacerbations positively correlated with the use of HRU.

Conclusion

Despite receiving treatment, patients with COPD suffer a considerable burden mainly due to exacerbations and comorbidities, which require a substantial use of HRU.

Lipid-Sensing Receptor FFAR4 Modulates Pulmonary Epithelial Homeostasis following Immunogenic Exposures Independently of the FFAR4 Ligand Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA)

The role of pulmonary free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFAR4) is not fully elucidated and we aimed to clarify the impact of FFAR4 on the pulmonary immune response and return to homeostasis. We employed a known high-risk human pulmonary immunogenic exposure to extracts of dust from swine confinement facilities (DE). WT and Ffar4-null mice were repetitively exposed to DE via intranasal instillation and supplemented with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) by oral gavage. We sought to understand if previous findings of DHA-mediated attenuation of the DE-induced inflammatory response are FFAR4-dependent. We identified that DHA mediates anti-inflammatory effects independent of FFAR4 expression, and that DE-exposed mice lacking FFAR4 had reduced immune cells in the airways, epithelial dysplasia, and impaired pulmonary barrier integrity. Analysis of transcripts using an immunology gene expression panel revealed a role for FFAR4 in lungs related to innate immune initiation of inflammation, cytoprotection, and immune cell migration. Ultimately, the presence of FFAR4 in the lung may regulate cell survival and repair following immune injury, suggestive of potential therapeutic directions for pulmonary disease.