Association of the Pretreatment Lung Immune Prognostic Index with Survival Outcomes in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with PD-1 Inhibitors

Deep learning radiomics analysis for prediction of survival in patients with unresectable gastric cancer receiving immunotherapy

Objective

Immunotherapy has become an option for the first-line therapy of advanced gastric cancer (GC), with improved survival. Our study aimed to investigate unresectable GC from an imaging perspective combined with clinicopathological variables to identify patients who were most likely to benefit from immunotherapy.

Method

Patients with unresectable GC who were consecutively treated with immunotherapy at two different medical centers of Chinese PLA General Hospital were included and divided into the training and validation cohorts, respectively. A deep learning neural network, using a multimodal ensemble approach based on CT imaging data before immunotherapy, was trained in the training cohort to predict survival, and an internal validation cohort was constructed to select the optimal ensemble model. Data from another cohort were used for external validation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was analyzed to evaluate performance in predicting survival. Detailed clinicopathological data and peripheral blood prior to immunotherapy were collected for each patient. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis of imaging models and clinicopathological variables was also applied to identify the independent predictors of survival. A nomogram based on multivariable logistic regression was constructed.

Result

A total of 79 GC patients in the training cohort and 97 patients in the external validation cohort were enrolled in this study. A multi-model ensemble approach was applied to train a model to predict the 1-year survival of GC patients. Compared to individual models, the ensemble model showed improvement in performance metrics in both the internal and external validation cohorts. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) among patients with different imaging models based on the optimum cutoff score of 0.5 (HR = 0.20, 95 % CI: 0.10-0.37, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the imaging models, PD-L1 expression, and lung immune prognostic index were independent prognostic factors for OS. We combined these variables and built a nomogram. The calibration curves showed that the C-index of the nomogram was 0.85 and 0.78 in the training and validation cohorts.

Conclusion

The deep learning model in combination with several clinical factors showed predictive value for survival in patients with unresectable GC receiving immunotherapy.

Advancements in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The advent of immune-based combinations, primarily leveraging immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The current scenario features multiple therapies that have shown superiority over tyrosine kinase inhibitors; however, the absence of direct comparisons and validated prognostic biomarkers complicates therapeutic decision-making. Additionally, a significant proportion of patients still exhibit primary or secondary resistance to existing immunotherapies, underscoring the ongoing need for novel therapeutic strategies.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review discusses current strategies aimed at improving the efficacy of immunotherapy for HCC, focusing on the following aspects: available therapeutic options, identification of prognostic biomarkers, approaches to overcoming resistance (including the development of neoantigen vaccines), and the exploration of adjuvant and neoadjuvant strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

The future of systemic therapies for HCC is likely to be driven by advancements in immunotherapy. Key areas of exploration for the coming years include the discovery of novel checkpoint inhibitors or complementary agents to enhance tumor response when combined with existing treatments, a shift toward neoadjuvant/perioperative trials instead of traditional adjuvant approaches, and the development of personalized neoantigen vaccines.

Prognosis stratification of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors through lung immune prognostic index: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies have reported the prognostic value of the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the prognostic value of the LIPI in a pancancer setting remains unclear.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted until July 2023 across the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies evaluating the prognostic value of the LIPI in cancer patients treated with ICIs. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). We described and compared the pooled outcomes by stratifying the patients based on different groupings of LIPI (good vs. intermediate [0 vs. 1], good vs. poor [0 vs. 2], and good vs. intermediate / poor [0 vs. 1 + 2]).

RESULTS

A total of 9959 patients in 35 studies were included. A higher score of LIPI was associated with impaired OS. The pooled HRs were 1.69 (95% CI: 1.55-1.85, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1), 3.03 (95% CI: 2.53-3.63, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 2), and 2.38 (95% CI: 1.97-2.88, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1 + 2). A higher LIPI score was associated with shorter PFS. The pooled HRs were 1.41 (95% CI: 1.31-1.52, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1), 2.23 (95% CI: 1.87-2.66, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 2), and 1.65 (95% CI: 1.46-1.86, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1 + 2). Similarly, a higher LIPI score was associated with a lower ORR. The pooled ORs were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.75, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.29-0.50, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 2). A higher LIPI score was associated with a lower DCR. The pooled ORs were 0.47 (95% CI: 0.35-0.61, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1) and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.12-0.30, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 2).

CONCLUSION

In patients with NSCLC or other solid tumours, the lung immune prognostic index could robustly stratify the clinical outcomes into three groups among the patients who receive ICIs. LIPI is a low-cost, simple, accessible, and accurate prognostic tool in a pancancer setting and it may contribute to the evaluation of risk stratification in patients treated with ICIs.

Biomarkers and prognostic factors of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Systemic therapies using programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have demonstrated commendable efficacy in some patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, other individuals do not respond favorably. Hence, identifying the biomarkers, the prognostic factors, and their underlying mechanisms is crucial. In this review, we summarized the latest advancements in this field. Within the tumor microenvironment, PD-L1 expression is commonly utilized to predict response. Moreover, the characteristics of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Preclinical studies have identified stimulatory dendritic cells, conventional dendritic cells, and macrophages as potential biomarkers. The emergence of single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics has provided invaluable insights into tumor heterogeneity through the lens of single-cell profiling and spatial distribution. With the widespread adoption of next-generation sequencing, certain genomic characteristics, including tumor mutational burden, copy number alterations, specific genes (TP53, CTNNB1, and GZMB), and signaling pathways (WNT/β-catenin) have been found to correlate with prognosis. Furthermore, clinical features such as tumor size, number, and metastasis status have demonstrated prognostic value. Notably, common indicators such as the Child-Pugh score and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, which are used in patients with liver diseases, have shown potential. Similarly, commonly employed laboratory parameters such as baseline transforming growth factor beta, lactate dehydrogenase, dynamic changes in alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and abnormal prothrombin, CRAFITY score (composed of C-reactive protein and AFP), and immune adverse events have been identified as predictive biomarkers. Novel imaging techniques such as EOB-MRI and PET/CT employing innovative tracers also have potential. Moreover, liquid biopsy has gained widespread use in biomarker studies owing to its non-invasive, convenient, and highly reproducible nature, as well as its dynamic monitoring capabilities. Research on the gut microbiome, including its composition, dynamic changes, and metabolomic analysis, has gained considerable attention. Efficient biomarker discovery relies on continuous updating of treatment strategies. Next, we summarized recent advancements in clinical research on HCC immunotherapy and provided an overview of ongoing clinical trials for contributing to the understanding and improvement of HCC immunotherapy.

Association of the lung immune prognostic index with the survival of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), a simple index calculated from the blood lactate dehydrogenase level and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, is thought to be associated with host immune status. However, the utility of LIPI in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) is unknown.

METHODS

In this multicentre, retrospective, observational study, an association between LIPI and the survival of patients with IIPs was evaluated.

RESULTS

Exploratory and validation cohorts consisting of 460 and 414 patients with IIPs, respectively, were included (159 and 159 patients had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF], and 301 and 255 had non-IPF, respectively). In the exploratory cohort, patients with IPF and a low LIPI had significantly better survival than those with a high LIPI (median of 5.6 years vs. 3.9 years, p = 0.016). The predictive ability of LIPI for the survival of patients with IPF was validated in the validation cohort (median of 8.5 years vs. 4.4 years, p = 0.003). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, LIPI was selected as an independent predictive factor for the survival of IPF patients. There was no significant association between LIPI and survival of non-IPF patients in the exploratory and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The LIPI was a predictive factor for the survival of patients with IPF and could aid the management of IPF.

Correlation of Lung Immune Prognostic Index With Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Combined With Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a devastating but universal class of lung carcinoma with an unfavorable prognosis. This paper mainly investigated the correlation between lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) score and combined treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy (CHT) in patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Totally, 301 advanced NSCLC patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥1% were assigned into good LIPI group (N=113), intermediate LIPI group (N=101), and poor LIPI group (N=87) based on LIPI scoring system, followed by treatment of CHT plus programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitor. The differences in clinical parameters between subgroups of NSCLC patients were analyzed by χ 2 test, 1-way analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis H test. All patients were followed up until June 30, 2022, and objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were recorded. The independent associations of LIPI score with PFS and OS were assessed via the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

There were evident differences in clinical stage and lymphocyte among the 3 subgroups of NSCLC patients. The efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with CHT was better in patients with good LIPI score, manifested by higher objective response rate and disease control rate. Moreover, LIPI score was an independent factor influencing PFS and OS in patients with advanced NSCLC, with longer PFS and OS in patients with good LIPI score.

CONCLUSION

LIPI score has a predictive value for combination therapy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and CHT in advanced NSCLC patients.

Prognostic value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index for HER-2-negative metastatic gastric cancer

Background: The aim of this study was to explore whether the Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) treated with anti-PD-1 and chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with MGC treated with an anti-PD-1 therapy or chemotherapy were enrolled. This study was composed of two cohorts including 266 patients in the anti-PD-1-treated group and 139 patients in the chemotherapy-treated group. Results: Patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy that also showed a good LIPI showed a longer median progression-free survival and median overall survival in patients with an intermediate or poor LIPI. These outcomes were not observed in the chemotherapy cohort. Conclusion: Good LIPI correlated with better outcomes for patients with MGC in the anti-PD-1-treated group but not in the chemotherapy-treated group.

Association of the pretreatment lung immune prognostic index with immune checkpoint inhibitor outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the pretreatment Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) is associated with outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients under ICI.

METHODS

A two-center retrospective study of patients with HCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between January 2018 and January 2021 was performed. Based on pretreatment derived neutrophils/ (leukocytes minus neutrophils) ratio (dNLR) greater than 3 and a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level greater than the normal value, patients were stratified into three groups (good LIPI:0 risk factor, intermediate LIPI: 1 risk factor, and poor LIPI: 2 risk factors). The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The second endpoints were disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

In the pooled cohort (n = 224), 80 (35.7%) had a good LIPI (zero factor), 91 (40.6%) had intermediate LIPI (one factor), and 53 (23.7%) had poor LIPI (two factors). The median follow-up was 25.1 months. Median OS was 16.8 months, 12.5 months, and 9.5 months for the good, intermediate, and poor LIPI groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Median PFS was 11.8 months, 7.8 months, and 4.0 months for the good, intermediate, and poor LIPI groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the intermediate LIPI and poor LIPI both were independently associated with OS, PFS, and ORR, DCR (P < 0.05), as risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment LIPI was correlated with worse outcomes for ICIs suggesting that LIPI could be promising biomarker for advanced HCC patients under ICIs.

Nomogram for predicting survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors: incorporating pre-treatment and post-treatment clinical parameters

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has transformed cancer treatment patterns for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) in recent years. Therefore, the identification of predictive biomarkers has important clinical implications.

METHODS

We collected medical records from 117 aHCC patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibody. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to evaluate the association between peripheral blood biomarkers and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Finally, the prognostic nomogram was constructed.

RESULTS

The mPFS and mOS were 7.0 months and 18.7 months, respectively. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis, we regarded the treatment regimen (p = 0.020), hemoglobin (Hb) at 6-week (p = 0.042), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at 6-week (p < 0.001), system immune inflammation index (SII) at 6-week (p = 0.125) as predictors of PFS, and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) (p = 0.035), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (p = 0.012), Hb at 6-week (p = 0.010) and NLR at 6-week (p = 0.020) as predictors of OS. Furthermore, the results suggest that the OS and PFS nomogram model were in agreement with actual observations.

CONCLUSION

Biomarkers in peripheral blood can predict the prognosis of patients with aHCC treated with anti-PD-1 antibody. The development of nomogram models can help us to screen potential patients who can benefit from immunotherapy.

Evaluation of Predictive and Prognostic Importance of Lung Immune Prognostic Index in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The systemic inflammatory response (SIR) is known as an important factor associated with tumorigenesis and tumor progression, and can be reflected by inflammatory markers. One of the markers that reflect this is the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI). It is based on a derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. We aimed to investigate the significance of LIPI in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we stratified the patients according to LIPI score as good LIPI and intermediate (int)/poor LIPI. According to pathological response to NACRT, we divided the patients into two groups as those with complete response (CR) or near-CR, and those with partial response (PR) or poor/no response. We classified CR and near-CR as good response. We evaluated the predictive and prognostic significance of LIPI for NACRT response, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

We included 137 patients in the results, with 72 (52.6%) having good LIPI and 65 (47.4%) having int/poor LIPI. The median follow-up period was 44.7 months (range: 10-105 months). Thirteen patients (18.0%) in the good LIPI group and 22 patients (34.0%) in the int/poor LIPI group achieved good response. In multivariate analysis, we found only the LIPI score as an independent risk factor (hazard ratio (HR): 2.4, p = 0.04) for NACRT response. Median DFS was 89.2 months (95% CI: 11.4-167.0) in the int/poor LIPI group; however, the DFS of all study populations and patients in the good LIPI group did not reach the median value. In multivariate analysis for DFS, we identified abdominoperineal resection (APR) (HR: 2.21, p = 0.02), presence of tumor deposit (HR: 2.96, p = 0.003), and int/poor LIPI score (HR: 2.07, p = 0.02) as separate risk variables. OS of all study populations and the patients in the LIPI groups did not reach the median value. In multivariate analysis for OS, we identified APR (HR: 2.74, p = 0.02), surgical margin positivity (HR: 12.94, p < 0.001), and adjuvant CT (HR: 0.20, p = 0.002) as separate risk variables for OS.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study investigating the predictive and prognostic significance of LIPI in LARC patients treated with NACRT. The results revealed that int/poor LIPI was associated with a higher rate of good response but shorter DFS compared to good LIPI. The baseline LIPI score serves as an easily accessible and useful prognostic index, and it has significant potential for making appropriate treatment decisions in LARC.

Blood biomarkers predict outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint Inhibitors: A pooled analysis of 44 retrospective sudies

OBJECTIVE

We conducted the first meta-analysis to identify the predictive significance of baseline blood biomarkers (such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), early alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI), AFP, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), protein induced by vitamin K absence II (PIVKA-II), and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR)) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

Eligible articles were retrieved using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar by November 24, 2022. Clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and hyperprogressive disease (HPD).

RESULTS

A total of 44 articles with 5322 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with high NLR levels had significantly poorer OS (HR: 1.951, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.632, P < 0.001), lower ORR (OR: 0.484, P < 0.001) and DCR (OR: 0.494, P = 0.027), and higher HPD (OR: 8.190, P < 0.001). The patients with high AFP levels had shorter OS (HR: 1.689, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.380, P < 0.001), and lower DCR (OR: 0.440, P < 0.001) than those with low AFP levels, however, there was no difference in ORR (OR: 0.963, P = 0.933). We also found that early AFP response was correlated with better OS (HR: 0.422, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.385, P < 0.001), higher ORR (OR: 7.297, P < 0.001) and DCR (OR: 13.360, P < 0.001) compared to non-responders. Besides, a high ALBI grade was significantly related to shorter OS (HR: 2.440, P = 0.009) and PFS (HR: 1.373, P = 0.022), lower ORR (OR: 0.618, P = 0.032) and DCR (OR: 0.672, P = 0.049) than those with an ALBI grade 1.

CONCLUSION

The NLR, early AFP response, and ALBI were useful predictors of outcomes in HCC patients treated with ICIs.

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have been increasingly employed for the treatment of various cancers in clinical practice. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Abstracts of American Society of Clinical Oncology proceedings databases were searched. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events (AEs) and drug withdrawal were pooled. Odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) were calculated to analyze the difference in the ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS between groups.

RESULTS

Among the 14,902 initially identified papers, 98 studies regarding use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced HCC were included. Based on different criteria of response in solid tumors, the pooled ORR, DCR, and median PFS was 16-36%, 54-74%, and 4.5-6.8 months, respectively. The pooled median OS was 11.9 months. Compared to multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy significantly increased ORR (OR 2.73, P < 0.00001) and OS (HR 0.97, P = 0.05), and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with TKIs significantly increased ORR (OR 3.17, P < 0.00001), DCR (OR 2.44, P < 0.00001), PFS (HR 0.58, P < 0.00001), and OS (HR 0.58, P < 0.00001). The pooled incidence of all-grade AEs, grade ≥ 3 AEs, and drug withdrawal was 71%, 25%, and 7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the present systematic review and meta-analysis, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors should be the preferred treatment choice for advanced HCC owing to their higher antitumor effect and improved outcomes.

Conversion surgery for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after combination treatment of lenvatinib and camrelizumab: a case report

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy with high morbidity and mortality. Conversion therapy can improve surgical resection rate and prolong survival time for patients with advanced HCC. We show that combination therapy with lenvatinib and camrelizumab is a novel approach to downstage unresectable HCC.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 49-year-old man was diagnosed with massive HCC with hilar lymph node and lung metastases. Since radical resection was not feasible, lenvatinib and camrelizumab were administered as first-line therapy. After 10 cycles of camrelizumab and continuous oral administration of lenvatinib, the tumor exhibited striking shrinkage in volume indicating a partial radiological response, accompanied by a reduction in the alpha-fetoprotein levels, followed by salvage resection. Intriguingly, an improvement in predictive biomarkers, like lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), was observed. Notably, the pathological examination found high levels of necrosis in the resected tumor, and flow cytometry analysis indicated a significant increase in the ratio of CD5+ and CD5- B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. After the treatment, the overall survival period was over 24 months, and no recurrence was observed 17-month post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of lenvatinib and camrelizumab may be a new conversion therapy for initially unresectable HCC to resectable HCC, thus contributing to improve the disease prognosis. In addition, the combination regimen could cause an activated immune response, and LDH, NLR, and CD5+ B-cell levels might be predictors for immunotherapy efficacy.

Metabolic Tumor Volume Measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT is Associated with the Survival of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Plus Molecular Targeted Agents

Purpose

The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and molecular targeted agents showed promising efficacy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of metabolic parameters from ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with uHCC underwent the combined therapies.

Patients and Methods

Patients with uHCC treated with a combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy who underwent baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT between July 2018 and December 2021 were recruited retrospectively. The metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max), and clinical and biological parameters were recorded. A multivariate prediction model was developed for overall survival (OS) using these parameters together with clinical prognostic factors.

Results

Seventy-seven patients were finally included. The median OS was 16.8 months. We found that a high MTV (≥39.65 cm³ as the median value) was significantly associated with OS (P<0.05). In multivariate analyses for OS, a high MTV, high Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS, ≥1), Child-Pugh (B-C) grade, and the presence of bone metastasis were significantly associated with poor OS (HR 1.371, HR 3.73, HR 15.384, and HR 2.994, all P<0.05, respectively). A multivariate prognostic model including MTV and prognostic factors, such as ECOG-PS, Child-Pugh grade, and bone metastasis, further improved the identification of different OS subgroups.

Conclusion

High MTV is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with uHCC treated with a combination of immunotherapy and molecular targeted agents. Integrating PET/CT parameters with clinical prognostic factors could help to personalize immunotherapy.

Clinical Significance of Serum Biomarkers in Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with PD-1 Inhibitors: LIPI Score, NLR, dNLR, LMR, and PAB

Background

To assess the prognostic value of pretreatment serum biomarkers in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) inhibitors and their value as a predictor of benefit.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study including patients with stage IV NSCLC who were treated with anti-PD-1 drugs in first or advanced lines of therapy in the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University. Serum biomarkers such as NLR, dNLR, LMR, PAB, ALB, and LIPI scores were calculated and analyzed in detail.

Results

A total of 85 patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitors in the first or advanced lines of therapy were included in this subject. According to the tumor response of PD-1-based treatment, ORR was 42.4% (36/85) and DCR was 68.2% (58/85). The median OS and PFS were 20.0 months and 7.0 months, respectively. The ROC curves showed that the serum biomarkers of NLR, dNLR, LDH, LMR, PAB, and ALB were significantly associated with overall survival and helped to determine the cut-off value. The multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses for stage IV NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors indicated that dNLR (P < 0.001) and ALB (P = 0.033) were independent prognostic indicators of PFS, while liver metastasis (P = 0.01), NLR (P = 0.01), dNLR (P = 0.001), and LMR (P = 0.006) were independent prognostic indicators of OS. Moreover, patients of the good LIPI group showed prolonged PFS and OS than those with intermediate/poor LIPI score (P < 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively).

Conclusions

Pretreatment dNLR is an independent prognostic indicator of both PFS and OS in stage IV NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Pretreatment LIPI, combining dNLR > 3 and LDH>ULN, was correlated with worse outcome for stage IV NSCLC patients treated with ICI. High NLR, high dNLR, low LMR, and low ALB at baseline might be useful as an early predictive biomarker of benefit.

The Prognostic Value of Gastric Immune Prognostic Index in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the gastric immune prognostic index (GIPI) in gastric cancer patients treated with programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors.

Methods: This study was conducted to elucidate the role of GIPI using the data from 146 gastric cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between August 2016 and December 2020 in Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The GIPI calculation was based on dNLR and LDH. Patients were categorized into three groups: 1) GIPI good (LDH ≤250 U/L and dNLR ≤3); 2) GIPI intermediate (LDH &gt;250 U/L and NLR &gt;3); 3) GIPI poor (LDH &gt;250 U/L and dNLR &gt;3). The correlations between GIPI and clinicopathologic characteristics were determined by the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test. The Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to calculate and compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to detect prognostic and predictive factors of PFS and OS.

Results: 146 patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included in this study, of which, 72.6% were GIPI good, 23.3% were GIPI intermediate, and 4.1% were GIPI poor. The GIPI was associated with the common blood parameters, including neutrophils and lymphocytes. The multivariate analysis showed that platelet, TNM stage, and treatment were the independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Patients with GIPI intermediate/poor were associated with shorter PFS (median: 24.63 vs. 32.50 months; p = 0.078) and OS (median: 28.37 months vs. not reached; p = 0.033) than those with GIPI good. GIPI intermediate/poor was correlated with shorter PFS and OS than GIPI good, especially in subgroups of patients with ICI treatment and patients with PD-1/PD-L1 positive status.

Conclusions: The GIPI correlated with poor outcomes for PD-1/PD-L1 expression status and may be useful for identifying gastric cancer patients who are unlikely to benefit from treatment.

Prognostic value of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with anti-PD-1 therapy

BACKGROUND

There are no validated biomarkers that can predict the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint blockers against the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score (IINS) in patients with HCC treated with anti-PD-1 therapy.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 101 HCC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors in Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital between January 2018 and August 2020 were enrolled in the retrospective study. IINS (0-6) was constructed based on pretreatment high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), lymphocyte (LYM), and albumin (ALB). The patients were divided into high and low IINS groups according to IINS values. Prognostic values of each variable were evaluated with univariate and multivariate time-dependent Cox regression analyses. Survival curves were calculated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic performance of IINS was further compared with that of other traditional prognostic indicators by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the areas under the ROC curve.

RESULTS

Patients with low IINS had longer overall survival (OS) (HR: 4.711, 95% CI: 1.80-12.37, p = .001) and progression-free survival (HR: 3.411, 95% CI: 1.79-6.51, p < .0001) than those with high IINS. The multivariate analysis identified IINS (HR: 3.746, 95% CI: 1.05-13.38, p = .042) and tumor number (HR: 5.111, 95% CI: 1.075-24.299, p = .04) as independent prognostic factors. According to ROC analysis, IINS (AUC =0.729, 95% CI: 0.597-0.861, p = .002) presented better prognostic performance than other traditional prognostic indicators. The area of the IINS-CA19-9 under the ROC curve (AUC) was higher than that of the IINS or CA19-9 levels for the prediction of OS.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that IINS may be an independent prognostic indicator for HCC patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. IINS-CA19-9 classification may be more effective in predicting clinical benefit of anti-PD-1 therapy in HCC patients.

Analysis of a Systemic Inflammatory Biomarker in Advanced Bile Tract Carcinoma Treated with Anti-PD-1 Therapy: Prognostic and Predictive Significance of Lung Immune Prognostic Index Score

Background

The application of immunotherapy is gradually increasing in advanced bile tract carcinoma (BTC), but only some patients could benefit from it. Validated biomarkers can screen out the beneficiaries. Therefore, the objective of this research is aimed at exploring the predictive value of lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) in advanced BTC patients receiving immunotherapy.

Methods

This study was conducted on 110 BTC patients. The cut-off value of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (dNLR) ratio was obtained by the ROC curves to predict the tumor progression rate at the 6^th month. The high levels of dNLR (≥the cut-off value) and lactate dehydrogenase (≥the upper limit of normal) were considered to be two risk factors for LIPI. Based on these two risk factors, patients were categorized into 3 groups based on risk factors: 0 for the good group, 1 for the intermediate group, and 2 for the poor group. Due to the limited number of patients in the poor group, it was integrated into the intermediate group to be the intermediate/poor group. Finally, the subjects were divided into two groups: LIPI-good and LIPI-intermediate/poor.

Results

The results shed light on the 110 BTC patients' LIPI in advanced BTC patients receiving immunotherapy, indicating that the cut-off value of dNLR was 1.74. According to the risk stratification, 38 (34.5%) patients had a good LIPI score, whereas the LIPI score was intermediate/poor in 72 (65.5%). In addition, patients with good LIPI were related to longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), compared to those with intermediate/poor LIPI (12.17 months vs. 3.17 months; 20.2 months vs. 8.7 months). According to multivariate analysis, the intermediate/poor LIPI group was independently correlated with over 2.3 times greater risk of tumor progression (HR = 2.301; 95% CI, 1.395-3.796; P = 0.001) and over 1.8 times greater risk of death (HR = 1.877; 95% CI, 1.076-3.275; P = 0.027) than the good group. Moreover, the result also revealed that there were significant differences of DCR for patients of the good group and the intermediate/poor group (86.8% vs. 65.3%; P = 0.012).

Conclusion

Finally, this study verifies, for the first time, that LIPI is an independent factor affecting the survival and clinical efficacy of advanced BTC patients receiving immunotherapy. It may be difficult for patients with intermediate/poor LIPI to benefit from immunotherapy.

Association of lung immune prognostic index with survival outcome in advanced thymic carcinoma patients treated with palliative intent chemotherapy

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Prognostic Value of the Pretreatment Lung Immune Prognostic Index in Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With First-Line PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy

Background

Lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) refers to a biomarker combining derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Its prognostic effect on advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients receiving programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment remains unclear. Our research investigated the relationship between pretreatment LIPI and the prognosis of patients receiving first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy.

Methods

Advanced SCLC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment from Jan 2015 to Oct 2020 were included. Based on the values of dNLR and LDH, the study population was divided into two groups: LIPI good and LIPI intermediate/poor. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute the median survival time and the log-rank test was used to compare the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine the correlation between the pretreatment LIPI and clinical outcomes.

Results

One hundred patients were included in this study, of which, 64% were LIPI good (dNLR < 4.0 and LDH < 283 U/L), 11% were LIPI poor (dNLR ≥ 4.0 and LDH ≥ 283 U/L), and the remaining 25% were LIPI intermediate. The LIPI good group had better progression-free survival (PFS) (median: 8.4 vs 4.7 months, p = 0.02) and overall survival (OS) (median: 23.8 vs 13.3 months, p = 0.0006) than the LIPI intermediate/poor group. Multivariate analysis showed that pretreatment LIPI intermediate/poor was an independent risk factor for OS (HR: 2.34; 95%CI, 1.13, 4.86; p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis showed that pretreatment LIPI good was associated with better PFS and OS in males, extensive disease (ED), PD-1 inhibitor treatment, smokers, and liver metastasis (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Pretreatment LIPI could serve as a prognostic biomarker for advanced SCLC patients receiving first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy.

The Prediction Potential of the Pretreatment Lung Immune Prognostic Index for the Therapeutic Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Solid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is recently developed to predict immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer. However, its predictive value for other types of cancer remained unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between pretreatment LIPI score and therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients treated with ICIs.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library literature databases and EMBASE for abstracts and full-text articles published from the inception of the database until 16th, Nov 2020. Meta-analyses were performed separately for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by using the random-effects model.

Results

A total of 12 studies involving 4883 patients receiving ICIs treatment were identified for the primary analysis. The pooled results implied that compared with good LIPI score groups, patients with poor or intermediate LIPI score were significantly associated with worse OS (HR=3.33, 95%CI 2.64-4.21, P < 0.001, I² = 64.2%; HR=1.71, 95%CI 1.43-2.04, P < 0.001, I² = 43.6%, respectively) and PFS (HR=2.73,95%CI 2.00-3.73, P < 0.001, I² = 78.2%; HR=1.43, 95%CI 1.28-1.61, P < 0.001, I² = 16.3%, respectively). Also, for 1873 patients receiving chemotherapy, a poor LIPI score was significantly associated with worse OS (HR=2.30, 95%CI 1.73-3.07, P < 0.001; I² = 56.2%) and PFS (HR=1.92,95%CI 1.69-2.17; P < 0.001; I² = 0.0%) compared with good LIPI score groups.

Conclusions

A good LIPI score was significantly correlated with improved OS and PFS in cancer patients receiving ICIs or chemotherapy, regardless of the types of cancer.

Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Initiating First-Line Atezolizumab Combination Therapy: Subgroup Analysis of the IMPOWER150 Trial

The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is proposed to differentiate prognosis and treatment benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There is minimal information on the predictive importance with first-line, combination ICI approaches. In post-hoc analysis of IMpower150, Cox-proportional hazard analysis assessed the association between LIPI groups and overall survival (OS)/progression free survival (PFS). IMpower150 involved chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic non-squamous NSCLC participants randomized atezolizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (ACP), bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (BCP), or atezolizumab-BCP (ABCP). Good (0 factors), intermediate (1 factor), and poor LIPI (2 factors) were defined via derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >3, and lactate dehydrogenase >upper limit of normal. Of 1148 participants, 548 had good, 479 intermediate, and 121 poor LIPI. In 385 participants randomised ABCP, a significant association between LIPI and OS (HR (95%CI): intermediate LIPI = 2.16 (1.47-3.18), poor LIPI = 5.28 (3.20-8.69), p < 0.001) and PFS (HR (95%CI): intermediate LIPI = 1.47 (1.11-1.95), poor LIPI = 3.02 (2.03-4.50), p < 0.001) was identified. Median OS was 24, 16, and 7 months for good, intermediate, and poor LIPI, respectively. ACP associations were similar. Relative OS treatment effect (HR 95%CI) of ABCP vs. BCP was 0.78 (0.53-1.15), 0.67 (0.49-0.91), and 0.87 (0.51-1.47) for the good, intermediate, and poor LIPI groups, respectively (P(interaction) = 0.66), with no benefit in median OS observed in the poor LIPI group. LIPI identified subgroups with significantly different survival following ABCP and ACP initiation for chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. There was insufficient evidence that LIPI identifies patients unlikely to benefit from ABCP treatment.