Evaluation of a new tablet formulation of deferasirox to reduce chronic iron overload after long-term blood transfusions

Role of gut microbiota in thalassemia: a review of therapeutic prospects

In recent years, the study of gut microbiota has gradually become a research hotspot in the field of medicine, as gut microbiota dysbiosis is closely related to various diseases. Thalassemia, as a hereditary hemoglobinopathy, has a complex pathophysiological mechanism, and traditional treatment methods show limited efficacy. With a deeper understanding of the gut microbiome, researchers have begun to focus on its role in the pathogenesis of thalassemia and its therapeutic effects. This article aims to review the role of gut microbiota in thalassemia and its potential therapeutic prospects, analyze the latest research findings, and explore the impact and mechanisms of gut microbiota on patients with thalassemia, with the goal of providing new ideas and directions for future research and clinical treatment of thalassemia.

Comparison of the effects of deferasirox film-coated tablets (Jadenu®) and deferasirox dispersible tablets (Exjade®) in patients with beta thalassemia major: a preliminary report of the effects on the satisfaction, convenience, cardiac/liver MRI T2*, serum ferritin level, and biochemical profiles

Background

Deferasirox (DFX) is a once-daily oral iron chelator with proven dose-dependent efficacy in patients with thalassemia major (TM). The reason for switching from DFX dispersible tablets (Exjade®) to DFX film-coated tablets (Jadenu®) was intolerance. Many patients also reported that deferasirox® did not taste good. In this study, we compared the effect of Jadenu® and Exjade® on satisfaction, convenience, cardiac/liver MRI T2*, serum ferritin levels, and biochemical profiles in patients with thalassemia major.

Method

Sixty-two patients with thalassemia over 2 years of age, who had iron overload indicated by chelation therapy, were randomly divided into two groups. The first group (n = 32) is treated with Exjade®, and the second group (n = 30) is treated with Jadenu®. Laboratory investigations included alkaline phosphatase (ALK), alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate transferase (AST), and serum ferritin levels. Cardiac/liver MRI T2* levels and patient satisfaction and convenience, were assessed before and 1 year after starting therapy.

Results

The study found that 53.3% of Jadenu® patients were satisfied with the taste of the medication compared to only 12.5% of Exjade® patients, which was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Additionally, 40% of Jadenu® patients were satisfied with the ease of taking the medication compared to 28.1% of Exjade® patients, and again, the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.047). A comparison of the cardiac MRI T2* levels between the two studied groups showed no significant difference (p = 0.851).

Conclusion

Jadenu® offers patients an improved formulation that can be taken on an empty stomach, has a better taste, and presents fewer gastrointestinal tolerability concerns. Overall, patient satisfaction is higher with Jadenu®, which may improve adherence and reduce the frequency and severity of complications associated with iron overload. This, in turn, may help mitigate cardiovascular and hepatic complications from iron overload in the long term.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/search/result?query=IRCT20210830052346N1.

Switching from Deferasirox Dispersible Tablets to Deferasirox Film-Coated Tablets: Is There an Effect on Ferritin Levels in Children and Adolescents with Transfusion-Dependent Anemia?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of switching from deferasirox dispersible tablet (DT) to deferasirox film-coated tablet (FCT) on serum ferritin (SF) levels in transfusion-dependent patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who received regular erythrocyte transfusion and whose treatment was switched from DT to FCT were included in the study. FCT start date was taken as the index date. Patients were followed over 2 equal and long periods, both before and after index date.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included, and the comparison periods ranged from 4 to 12 months. The SF values increased from a median of 1723 ng/mL (range 717-5369 ng/mL) to 1.853 ng/mL (range 924-5478 ng/mL) after switching from DT to FCT (P = .036). While there was a significant increase in median SF after switching in Turkish patients (1467 ng/mL to 1778 ng/ mL, P = .010) and patients ≥12 years (1598-1848 ng/mL, P = .009), there was an insignificant (P = .859) decrease in SF in immigrant children. Considering only the post-switch period, there was a non-significant increase in median SF in the entire cohort, while SF decreased significantly in immigrant children (P = .026). No serious side effects were observed in any patient that would cause discontinuation of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Overall, higher SF value was observed with FCT compared to DT in short term. There were different results between patient groups. Our results suggest that FCT is more effective than DT in patients with high basal ferritin and who are actually incompatible with treatment and should be preferred first in these patients.

Genetic polymorphisms influencing deferasirox pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse drug reactions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Deferasirox is an iron-chelating agent prescribed to patients with iron overload. Due to the interindividual variability of deferasirox responses reported in various populations, this study aims to determine the genetic polymorphisms that influence drug responses. Methods: A systematic search was performed from inception to March 2022 on electronic databases. All studies investigating genetic associations of deferasirox in humans were included, and the outcomes of interest included pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse drug reactions. Fixed- and random-effects model meta-analyses using the ratio of means (ROM) were performed. Results: Seven studies involving 367 participants were included in a meta-analysis. The results showed that subjects carrying the A allele (AG/AA) of ABCC2 rs2273697 had a 1.23-fold increase in deferasirox C_max (ROM = 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.06-1.43; p = 0.007) and a lower Vd (ROM = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.36-0.63; p < 0.00001), compared to those with GG. A significant attenuated area under the curve of deferasirox was observed in the subjects with UGT1A3 rs3806596 AG/GG by 1.28-fold (ROM = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.60-0.99; p = 0.04). In addition, two SNPs of CYP24A1 were also associated with the decreased C_trough: rs2248359 CC (ROM = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29-0.87; p = 0.01) and rs2585428 GG (ROM = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.35-0.63; p < 0.00001). Only rs2248359 CC was associated with decreased C_min (ROM = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08-0.93; p = 0.04), while rs2585428 GG was associated with a shorter half-life (ROM = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.23-0.83; p = 0.01). Conclusion: This research summarizes the current evidence supporting the influence of variations in genes involved with drug transporters, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and vitamin D metabolism on deferasirox responses.

Use of Deferasirox Film-Coated Tablets in Pediatric Patients with Transfusion Dependent Thalassemia: A Single Center Experience

Thalassemic syndromes are characterized by clinical heterogenicity. For severe disease forms, lifelong blood transfusions remain the mainstay of therapy, while iron overload monitoring and adequate chelation treatment are required in order to ensure effective disease management. Compared to previous chelators, the new deferasirox film-coated tablet (DFX FCT) is considered to offer a more convenient and well-tolerated treatment scheme, aiming at better treatment-related and patient-related outcomes. The present study’s objective was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of DFX FCT in children and adolescents with transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Data collected included patient demographics, hematology and biochemistry laboratory work up, magnetic resonance imaging of heart and liver for iron load, as well as ophthalmological and audiological examination prior to and a year following drug administration. Study results confirmed DFX FCT safety in older children in a manner similar to adults, but demonstrated increased frequency of adverse events in younger patients, mainly, involving liver function. With regards to efficacy, study results confirmed the preventive role of DFX FCT in iron loading of liver and heart, however, higher doses than generally recommended were required in order to ensure adequate chelation.

A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran: A cost-utility analysis

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited X-linked bleeding disease with costly treatment, especially for high titer inhibitory patients. Emicizumab, a new humanized bispecific antibody, has been approved for use to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in HA patients with inhibitors. This study evaluated the cost-utility of emicizumab prophylaxis (EP) in comparison with recombinant factor VII activated on-demand treatment in HA patients with inhibitors.

METHODS

A life-time Markov model with payer and societal perspectives was developed in different age groups with different annual bleeding rates (ABR). Efficacy of treatments were extracted from HAVEN trials. Utilities were retrieved from published evidence. Costs were calculated based on Iran food and drug administration official website, national tariff book for medical services and hospital data. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed.

RESULTS

EP was dominant choice in comparison with on-demand administration of recombinant factor VII activated in all age groups with ABR 20 and 25, and it remained dominant in patients with age 2 and age 12 at start point with ABR 16 and 17. The reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the group with ABR 18 at the age 20, was 12,936 United States Dollars which is lower than the acceptable threshold of cost-effectiveness in Iran (1-3 gross domestic product per capita) and EP can be considered as cost-effective choice in this scenario.

CONCLUSION

EP was found to be a dominant and cost-effective choice for Iranian HA patients with factor VIII inhibitors with ABR 18 and above with considerable cost saving.

The role of iron in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and possible treatment with lactoferrin and other iron chelators

Iron overload is increasingly implicated as a contributor to the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Indeed, several of the manifestations of COVID-19, such as inflammation, hypercoagulation, hyperferritinemia, and immune dysfunction are also reminiscent of iron overload. Although iron is essential for all living cells, free unbound iron, resulting from iron dysregulation and overload, is very reactive and potentially toxic due to its role in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS react with and damage cellular lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins, with consequent activation of either acute or chronic inflammatory processes implicated in multiple clinical conditions. Moreover, iron-catalyzed lipid damage exerts a direct causative effect on the newly discovered nonapoptotic cell death known as ferroptosis. Unlike apoptosis, ferroptosis is immunogenic and not only leads to amplified cell death but also promotes a series of reactions associated with inflammation. Iron chelators are generally safe and are proven to protect patients in clinical conditions characterized by iron overload. There is also an abundance of evidence that iron chelators possess antiviral activities. Furthermore, the naturally occurring iron chelator lactoferrin (Lf) exerts immunomodulatory as well as anti-inflammatory effects and can bind to several receptors used by coronaviruses thereby blocking their entry into host cells. Iron chelators may consequently be of high therapeutic value during the present COVID-19 pandemic.

Effectiveness and tolerability of twice daily dosing of deferasirox in unresponsive and intolerant transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia patients: A narrative review

Chronic iron overload in beta-thalassemia patients after continuous blood transfusions has caused notable morbidity and mortality in these patients. The once-a-day oral iron chelator, deferasirox has established efficacy and bearable safety in adults and pediatric thalassemia patients. It is now extensively used for the management of transfusional hemosiderosis. However, a number of studies have revealed a few patients continued to be none respondent or intolerant toward the once-a-day regimen of deferasirox even after the administration of maximum dose recommended by the World Health Organization. In the literature, there were three studies showing the boon of twice in a day dosing of deferasirox among transfusional-dependent beta thalassemia patients. Therefore, a nonsystematic review was conducted on above three studies to ascertain the enhanced effectiveness and tolerability of twice per day regimen of deferasirox with the same total dose as that of once daily regimen of deferasirox in unresponsive or intolerant transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT) patients. All the above studies concluded that the twice per day regimen of deferasirox was more efficacious and tolerable among TDT patients when compared to the once-a-day regimen with the same total daily dose. Although there was a significant good results from these studies, there is a need to conduct either muticenter study or randomized control study in a larger number of patients for the better confirmation of the results as all the above studies were conducted in the small number of TDT patients.

Effectiveness and Safety of Deferasirox in Thalassemia with Iron Overload: A Meta-Analysis

Deferasirox (DFX) has recently been used to treat thalassemia with iron overload; however, its long-term effectiveness and safety await multi-year studies. In this study, a systematic meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of DFX in the treatment of thalassemia with iron overload. We performed a systematic electronic literature search for randomized controlled studies of DFX in the Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM) databases from January 1990 to May 2018. Particular attention was paid to mortality, serum ferritin (SF), liver iron concentration (LIC), myocardial iron concentration, and adverse events (AEs). Six studies comparing DFX with deferoxamine (DFO) and placebo were enrolled. DFX was not better than DFO in lowering SF and LIC, with an exception that high DFX dose (> 30 mg/kg/day) was superior to DFO in LIC. Otherwise, AEs such as gastrointestinal problems appeared to be more common with DFX. DFX does not seem to be superior to DFO at low dose. Similar efficacy seems to be achievable depending on dose. However, the convenient oral administration of DFX has a higher compliance rate.

Jadenu® Substituting Exjade® in Iron Overloaded β-Thalassemia Major (BTM) Patients: A Preliminary Report of the Effects on the Tolerability, Serum Ferritin Level, Liver Iron Concentration and Biochemical Profiles

INTRODUCTION

Due to the chronic nature of chelation therapy and the adverse consequences of iron overload, patient adherence to therapy is an important issue. Jadenu ® is a new oral formulation of deferasirox (Exjade ®) tablets for oral suspension. While Exjade® is a dispersible tablet that must be mixed in liquid and taken on an empty stomach, Jadenu ® can be taken in a single step, with or without a light meal, simplifying administration for the treatment of patients with chronic iron overload. This may significantly improve the compliance to treatment of patients with β-thalassemia major (BMT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the drug tolerability and the effects of chelation therapy on serum ferritin concentration, liver iron concentration (LIC) and biochemical profiles in patients with BMT and iron overload.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve selected adult patients BMT (mean age: 29 years; range:15-34 years) were enrolled in the study. All patients were on monthly regular red cell transfusion therapy to keep their pre-transfusional hemoglobin (Hb) level not less than 9 g/dL. They were on Exjade® therapy (30 mg/kg per day) for two years or more before starting Jadenu® therapy (14-28 mg/kg/day). The reason for shifting from Deferasirox® to Jadenu® therapy was lack of tolerability, as described by patients, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain. Most of them also reported that Deferasirox® was not palatable. Lab investigations included monthly urine analysis and measurement of their serum concentrations of creatinine, fasting blood glucose (FBG), serum ferritin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine transferase (ALT), aspartate transferase (AST) and albumin concentrations. LIC was measured using FerriScan ®. Thyroid function, vitamin D and serum parathormone, before and one year after starting Jadenu ® therapy, were also assessed.

RESULTS

Apart from some minor gastrointestinal complaints reported in 3 BMT patients that did not require discontinuation of therapy, other side effects were not registered during the treatment. Subjectively, patients reported an improvement in the palatability of Jadenu® compared to Exjade® therapy in 8 out of 12 BMT patients. A non-significant decrease in LIC measured by FerriScan® and serum ferritin levels was observed after one year of treatment with Jadenu®. A significant positive correlation was found between serum ferritin level and LIC measured by the FerriScan® method. LIC and serum ferritin level correlated significantly with ALT level (r = 0.31 and 0.45 respectively, p < 0.05). No significant correlation was detected between LIC and other biochemical or hormonal parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that short-term treatment with Jadenu ® is safe but is associated with a non-significant decrease in LIC and serum ferritin levels. Therefore, there is an urgent need for adequately-powered and high-quality trials to assess the clinical efficacy and the longterm outcomes of new deferasirox formulation.

Deferasirox for managing iron overload in people with thalassaemia

BACKGROUND

Thalassaemia is a hereditary anaemia due to ineffective erythropoiesis. In particular, people with thalassaemia major develop secondary iron overload resulting from regular red blood cell transfusions. Iron chelation therapy is needed to prevent long-term complications.Both deferoxamine and deferiprone are effective; however, a review of the effectiveness and safety of the newer oral chelator deferasirox in people with thalassaemia is needed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral deferasirox in people with thalassaemia and iron overload.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 12 August 2016.We also searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Biosis Previews, Web of Science Core Collection and three trial registries: ClinicalTrials.gov; the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; and the Internet Portal of the German Clinical Trials Register: 06 and 07 August 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies comparing deferasirox with no therapy or placebo or with another iron-chelating treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 1807 randomised participants (range 23 to 586 participants) were included. Twelve two-arm studies compared deferasirox to placebo (two studies) or deferoxamine (seven studies) or deferiprone (one study) or the combination of deferasirox and deferoxamine to deferoxamine alone (one study). One study compared the combination of deferasirox and deferiprone to deferiprone in combination with deferoxamine. Three three-arm studies compared deferasirox to deferoxamine and deferiprone (two studies) or the combination of deferasirox and deferiprone to deferiprone and deferasirox monotherapy respectively (one study). One four-arm study compared two different doses of deferasirox to matching placebo groups.The two studies (a pharmacokinetic and a dose-escalation study) comparing deferasirox to placebo (n = 47) in people with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia showed that deferasirox leads to net iron excretion. In these studies, safety was acceptable and further investigation in phase II and phase III studies was warranted.Nine studies (1251 participants) provided data for deferasirox versus standard treatment with deferoxamine. Data suggest that a similar efficacy can be achieved depending on the ratio of doses of deferoxamine and deferasirox being compared. In the phase III study, similar or superior efficacy for the intermediate markers ferritin and liver iron concentration (LIC) could only be achieved in the highly iron-overloaded subgroup at a mean ratio of 1 mg of deferasirox to 1.8 mg of deferoxamine corresponding to a mean dose of 28.2 mg per day and 51.6 mg per day respectively. The pooled effects across the different dosing ratios are: serum ferritin, mean difference (MD) 454.42 ng/mL (95% confidence interval (CI) 337.13 to 571.71) (moderate quality evidence); LIC evaluated by biopsy or SQUID, MD 2.37 mg Fe/g dry weight (95% CI 1.68 to 3.07) (moderate quality evidence) and responder analysis, LIC 1 to < 7 mg Fe/g dry weight, risk ratio (RR) 0.80 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.92) (moderate quality evidence). The substantial heterogeneity observed could be explained by the different dosing ratios. Data on mortality (low quality evidence) and on safety at the presumably required doses for effective chelation therapy are limited. Patient satisfaction was better with deferasirox among those who had previously received deferoxamine treatment, RR 2.20 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.57) (moderate quality evidence). The rate of discontinuations was similar for both drugs (low quality evidence).For the remaining comparisons in people with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia, the quality of the evidence for outcomes assessed was low to very low, mainly due to the very small number of participants included. Four studies (205 participants) compared deferasirox to deferiprone; one of which (41 participants) revealed a higher number of participants experiencing arthralgia in the deferiprone group, but due to the large number of different types of adverse events reported and compared this result is uncertain. One study (96 participants) compared deferasirox combined with deferiprone to deferiprone with deferoxamine. Participants treated with the combination of the oral iron chelators had a higher adherence compared to those treated with deferiprone and deferoxamine, but no participants discontinued the study. In the comparisons of deferasirox versus combined deferasirox and deferiprone and that of deferiprone versus combined deferasirox and deferiprone (one study, 40 participants), and deferasirox and deferoxamine versus deferoxamine alone (one study, 94 participants), only a few patient-relevant outcomes were reported and no significant differences were observed.One study (166 participants) included people with non-transfusion dependent thalassaemia and compared two different doses of deferasirox to placebo. Deferasirox treatment reduced serum ferritin, MD -306.74 ng/mL (95% CI -398.23 to -215.24) (moderate quality evidence) and LIC, MD -3.27 mg Fe/g dry weight (95% CI -4.44 to -2.09) (moderate quality evidence), while the number of participants experiencing adverse events and rate of discontinuations (low quality evidence) was similar in both groups. No participant died, but data on mortality were limited due to a follow-up period of only one year (moderate quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Deferasirox offers an important treatment option for people with thalassaemia and secondary iron overload. Based on the available data, deferasirox does not seem to be superior to deferoxamine at the usually recommended ratio of 1 mg of deferasirox to 2 mg of deferoxamine. However, similar efficacy seems to be achievable depending on the dose and ratio of deferasirox compared to deferoxamine. Whether this will result in similar efficacy and will translate to similar benefits in the long term, as has been shown for deferoxamine, needs to be confirmed. Data from randomised controlled trials on rare toxicities and long-term safety are still limited. However, after a detailed discussion of the potential benefits and risks, deferasirox could be offered as the first-line option to individuals who show a strong preference for deferasirox, and may be a reasonable treatment option for people showing an intolerance or poor adherence to deferoxamine.

Qualitative modification and development of patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures for iron chelation therapy

BACKGROUND

Compliance, palatability, gastrointestinal (GI) symptom, and treatment satisfaction patient- and observer-reported outcome (PRO, ObsRO) measures were developed/modified for patients with transfusion-dependent anemias or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) requiring iron chelation therapy (ICT).

METHODS

This qualitative cross-sectional observational study used grounded theory data collection and analysis methods and followed PRO/ObsRO development industry guidance. Patients and caregivers of patients with transfusion-dependent anemias or MDS were individually interviewed face-to-face to cognitively debrief the Compliance, Palatability, GI Symptom Diary, and Modified Satisfaction with Iron Chelation Therapy (SICT) instruments presented electronically. Interviews were conducted in sets. Interviews began open-endedly to spontaneously elicit ICT experiences. Item modifications were debriefed during the later interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded. Data was analyzed using ATLAS.ti qualitative research software.

RESULTS

Twenty-one interviews were completed (Set 1: 5 patients, 6 caregivers; Set 2: 6 patients, 4 caregivers) in 6 US cities. Mean age was 43 years for patients and 9 years for children of caregivers. Conditions requiring ICT use across groups included transfusion-dependent anemias (85.7%) and MDS (14.3%). Concepts spontaneously reported were consistent with instruments debriefed. Interview analysis resulted in PRO and ObsRO versions of each instrument: Compliance (2 items), Palatability (4 items), GI Symptom Diary (6 items), and Modified SICT (PRO = 13, ObsRO = 17 items).

CONCLUSION

Qualitative research data from cognitive interviews supports the content validity and relevance of the instruments developed/modified. Quantitative validation of these PRO and ObsRO measures is needed testing for validity, reliability, and responsiveness for future research use with new formulations of oral ICT.