Antiepileptic drugs. A review of clinically significant drug interactions

Individual Pharmacotherapy Management (IPM)—IV: Optimized Usage of Approved Antimicrobials Addressing Under-Recognized Adverse Drug Reactions and Drug-Drug Interactions in Polypharmacy

Antimicrobial therapy is often a life-saving medical intervention for inpatients and outpatients. Almost all medical disciplines are involved in this therapeutic procedure. Knowledge of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is important to avoid drug-related harm. Within the broad spectrum of antibiotic and antifungal therapy, most typical ADRs are known to physicians. The aim of this study was to evaluate relevant pharmacological aspects with which we are not so familiar and to provide further practical guidance. Individual pharmacotherapy management (IPM) as a synopsis of internal medicine and clinical pharmacology based on the entirety of the digital patient information with reference to drug information, guidelines, and literature research has been continuously performed for over 8 years in interdisciplinary intensive care and trauma and transplant patients. Findings from over 52,000 detailed medication analyses highlight critical ADRs and DDIs, especially in these vulnerable patients with polypharmacy. We present the most relevant ADRs and DDIs in antibiotic and antifungal pharmacology, which are less frequently considered in relation to neurologic, hemostaseologic, hematologic, endocrinologic, and cardiac complexities. Constant awareness and preventive strategies help avoid life-threatening manifestations of these inherent risks and ensure patient and drug safety in antimicrobial therapy.

Pharmacokinetic variability of phenobarbital: a systematic review of population pharmacokinetic analysis

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Population pharmacokinetics with Bayesian forecasting provides for an effective approach when individualized drug dosing, while phenobarbital is a narrow therapeutic index drug that requires therapeutic drug monitoring. To date, several population pharmacokinetic models have been developed for phenobarbital, these showing a number of significant predictors of phenobarbital clearance and volume of distribution. We have therefore conducted a systematic review to summarize how these predictors affect phenobarbital pharmacokinetics as well as their relationships with pharmacokinetic parameters.

METHOD

A systematic search for studies of phenobarbital population pharmacokinetics that were carried out in humans and that employed a nonlinear mixed-effect approaches was made using the PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, and ScienceDirect databases. The search covered the period from these databases' inception to March 2020.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in this review, all of which used a one-compartment structure. The estimated phenobarbital clearance and volume of distribution ranged from 0.0034 to 0.0104 L/h/kg and 0.37 to 1.21 L/kg, respectively, with body weight, age, and concomitant antiepileptic drugs being the three most frequently identified predictors of clearance. Most models were validated through the use of an advanced internal approach.

CONCLUSION

Phenobarbital clearance may be predicted from previously developed population pharmacokinetic models and their significant covariate-parameter relationships along with Bayesian forecasting. However, when applying these models in a target population, an external evaluation of these models using the target population is warranted, and it is recommended that future research be conducted to investigate the link between population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy update

Epilepsy affects millions of people worldwide. Approximately one-third have pharmacoresistant epilepsy, and of these, the majority are not candidates for epilepsy surgery. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy has been an option to treat pharmacoresistant seizures for 30 years. In this update, we will review the clinical data that support the device's efficacy in children, adolescents, and adults. We will also review its side-effect profile, quality of life and cost benefits, and the impact the device has on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). We will then discuss candidate selection and provide guidance on dosing and future models. Vagus nerve stimulation therapy is an effective treatment for many seizure types and epilepsy syndromes with a predictable and benign side-effect profile that supports its role as the most commonly prescribed device to treat pharmacoresistant epilepsy. "This article is part of the Supplement issue Neurostimulation for Epilepsy."

Pharmacology and Therapeutic Aspects of Antiepileptic Drugs in Pediatrics

In the past year, several new antiepileptic drugs have emerged that have potential benefits for children with epilepsy. The spectrum of adverse effects is the principal feature that differentiates among the older drugs used to treat partial and related seizures, including simple partial, complex partial, and partial secondarily generalized seizures. Based on studies in adults with refractory seizures, the new or investigational compounds felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, and vigabatrin should be active against these types of seizures in children, but none of them have been subjected to pediatric randomized controlled trials, and no studies have been done that compare new and old drugs in this category. Thus, the new drugs hold promise in children with these types of seizures, but their role relative to old drugs has not been elucidated. Several of the new drugs are active against myoclonic and generalized tonic-clonic seizures, but thus far, none have been proven to possess antiabsence activity in children. Open-label investigations suggest that lamotrigine may be helpful in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and vigabatrin in infantile spasms. Only felbamate has been evaluated in a randomized controlled study in children, in which it has proven beneficial against astatic and generalized tonic-clonic seizures in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Whereas investigations of these and other novel drugs are ongoing, this is an active and exciting period in pediatric antiepileptic drug development. (J Child Neurol 1994;9(Suppl):2S1-2S7).

The modified atkins diet in refractory epilepsy

The modified Atkins diet is a less restrictive variation of the ketogenic diet. This diet is started on an outpatient basis without a fast, allows unlimited protein and fat, and does not restrict calories or fluids. Recent studies have shown good efficacy and tolerability of this diet in refractory epilepsy. In this review, we discuss the use of the modified Atkins diet in refractory epilepsy.

Use of the modified Atkins diet for treatment of refractory childhood epilepsy: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the modified Atkins diet in a randomized controlled trial in children with refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

Children aged 2-14 years who had daily seizures despite the appropriate use of at least three anticonvulsant drugs were enrolled. Children were randomized to receive either the modified Atkins diet or no dietary intervention for a period of 3 months. The ongoing anticonvulsant medications were continued unchanged in both the groups. Seizure control at 3 months was the primary end point. Analysis was intention to treat. Adverse effects of the diet were assessed by parental reports (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00836836).

KEY FINDINGS

Among a total of 102 children, 50 were in the diet group and 52 in the control group. Four children discontinued the diet before the study end point, and three children in the control group were lost to follow-up. The mean seizure frequency at 3 months, expressed as a percentage of the baseline, was significantly less in the diet group: 59 ± 54 (95% confidence interval [CI] 44-74.5) versus 95.5 ± 48 (95% CI 82-109), p = 0.003. The proportion of children with >90% seizure reduction (30% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.005) and >50% seizure reduction was significantly higher in the diet group (52% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.001). Constipation was the most common adverse effect among children on the diet (23, 46%).

SIGNIFICANCE

The modified Atkins diet was found to be effective and well tolerated in children with drug-refractory epilepsy.

Managing epilepsy in women of childbearing age

Epilepsy affects the menstrual cycle, aspects of contraception, fertility, pregnancy and bone health in women. It is common for seizure frequency to vary throughout the menstrual cycle. In ovulatory cycles, two peaks can be seen around the time of ovulation and in the few days before menstruation. In anovulatory cycles, there is an increase in seizures during the second half of the menstrual cycle. There is also an increase in polycystic ovaries and hyperandrogenism associated with valproate therapy. There are no contraindications to the use of non-hormonal methods of contraception in women with epilepsy. Non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) [valproate, benzodiazepines, ethosuximide, levetiracetam, tiagabine and zonisamide] do not show any interactions with the combined oral contraceptive (OC). There are interactions between the combined OC and hepatic microsomal-inducing AEDs (phenytoin, barbiturates, carbamazepine, topiramate [dosages>200 mg/day], oxcarbazepine) and lamotrigine. Pre-conception counselling should be available to all women with epilepsy who are considering pregnancy. Women with epilepsy should be informed about issues relating to the future pregnancy, including methods and consequences of prenatal screening, fertility, genetics of their seizure disorder, teratogenicity of AEDs, folic acid and vitamin K supplements, labour, breast feeding and care of a child. During pregnancy, the lowest effective dose of the most appropriate AED should be used, aiming for monotherapy where possible. Recent pregnancy databases have suggested that valproate is significantly more teratogenic than carbamazepine, and the combination of valproate and lamotrigine is particularly teratogenic. Most pregnancies in women with epilepsy are without complications, and the majority of infants are delivered healthy with no increased risk of obstetric complications in women. There is no medical reason why a woman with epilepsy cannot breastfeed her child. The AED concentration profiled in breast milk follows the plasma concentration curve. The total amount of drug transferred to infants via breast milk is usually much smaller than the amount transferred via the placenta during pregnancy. However, as drug elimination mechanisms are not fully developed in early infancy, repeated administration of a drug such as lamotrigine via breast milk may lead to accumulation in the infant. Studies have suggested that women with epilepsy are at increased risk of fractures, osteoporosis and osteomalacia. No studies have been undertaken looking at preventative therapies for these co-morbidities.

Effect of nebicapone on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE

Nebicapone is a new catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor. In vitro, nebicapone has showed an inhibitory effect upon CYP2C9, which is responsible for the metabolism of S-warfarin. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of nebicapone on warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Single-centre, open-label, randomised, two-period crossover study in 16 healthy volunteers. In one period, subjects received nebicapone 200 mg thrice daily for 9 days and a racemic warfarin 25-mg single dose concomitantly with the nebicapone morning dose on day 4 (test). In the other period, subjects received a racemic warfarin 25-mg single dose alone (reference). The treatment periods were separated by a washout of 14 days.

RESULTS

For R-warfarin, mean +/- SD C(max) was 1,619 +/- 284 ng/mL for test and 1,649 +/- 357 ng/mL for reference, while AUC(0-t ) was 92,796 +/- 18,976 ng x h/mL (test) and 73,597 +/- 11,363 ng x h/mL (reference). The R-warfarin test-to-reference geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (90%CI) were 0.973 (0.878-1.077) for C(max) and 1.247 (1.170-1.327) for AUC(0-t ). For S-warfarin, mean +/- SD C(max) was 1,644 +/- 331 ng/mL for test and 1,739 +/- 392 ng/mL for reference, while AUC(0-t ) was 66,627 +/- 41,199 ng x h/mL (test) and 70,178 +/- 42,560 ng x h/mL (reference). The S-warfarin test-to-reference GMR and 90%CI were 0.932 (0.845-1.028) for C(max) and 0.914 (0.875-0.954) for AUC(0-t ). No differences were found for the pharmacodynamic parameter (INR).

CONCLUSION

Nebicapone showed no significant effect on S-warfarin pharmacokinetics or on the coagulation endpoint (INR). A mild inhibition of the R-warfarin metabolism was found but is unlikely to be of clinical relevance.

Management of epilepsy in pregnancy

Pregnancies in women with epilepsy need careful management, by both the medical and obstetric teams, owing to the increased incidence of complications and adverse outcomes of pregnancy. By the time a pregnant woman with epilepsy presents, the major fetal organs are significantly formed, apart from the brain, and the development of which may be impaired by the maternal intake of valproate. Women of child-bearing age need to be counseled and told to seek advice regarding their anticonvulsant antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy, should they wish to become pregnant. All major AEDs are teratogenic, but the main risk to the developing fetus appears to be when the mother is on polytherapy, especially if sodium valproate forms part of the combination. Other issues that need to be discussed include the methods and consequences of prenatal screening, genetics of seizure disorder, folic acid and vitamin K supplements, labor, breast feeding and care and safety of the child.

Best Practice Guidelines for the Management of Women with Epilepsy

Being a woman with epilepsy is not the same as being a man with epilepsy. Epilepsy affects sexual development, menstrual cycle, aspects of contraception, fertility, and reproduction. MENSTRUAL CYCLE, EPILEPSY, AND FERTILITY: The diagnosis of epilepsy and the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) present women of childbearing age with many problems; both the disease and its treatment can alter the menstrual cycle and fertility. CONTRACEPTION IN EPILEPSY: There are no contraindications to the use of nonhormonal methods of contraception in women with epilepsy (see Table 3). Nonenzyme-inducing AEDs (valproate sodium, benzodiazepines, ethosuximide, and levetiracetam) do not show any interactions with the combined oral contraceptive pill. There are interactions between the COCP and hepatic microsomal-inducing AEDs (phenytoin, barbiturates, carbamazepine, topiramate [doses above 200 mg/day], and oxcarbazepine) and also lamotrigine. SEXUALITY: The majority of women with epilepsy appear to have normal sex lives, although in some women with epilepsy, both the desire and arousal phases may be inhibited. PRECONCEPTION COUNSELING: Preconception counseling should be available to all women with epilepsy who are considering pregnancy. Women with epilepsy should be aware of a number of issues relating to future pregnancy, including methods and consequences of prenatal screening, genetics of their seizure disorder, teratogenicity of AEDs, folic acid and vitamin K supplements, labor, breast feeding, and childcare. PREGNANCY: The lowest effective dose of the most appropriate AED should be used, aiming for monotherapy where possible. Recent pregnancy databases have suggested that valproate is significantly more teratogenic than carbamazepine, and the combination of valproate sodium and lamotrigine is particularly teratogenic. Most pregnancies are uneventful in women with epilepsy, and most babies are delivered healthy with no increased risk of obstetric complications in women. BREAST FEEDING: All women with epilepsy should be encouraged to breastfeed their babies. The AED concentration profiled in breast milk follows the plasma concentration curve. The total amount of drug transferred to infants via breast milk is usually much smaller than the amount transferred via the placenta during pregnancy. However, as drug elimination mechanisms are not fully developed in early infancy, repeated administration of a drug such as lamotrigine via breast milk may lead to accumulation in the infant. THE CARE OF CHILDREN OF MOTHERS WITH EPILEPSY: Although there is much anxiety about the possible risks to a child from the mother's epilepsy, there is little published evidence. The risk of the child being harmed depends on the type of seizure and its severity and frequency, and this risk is probably small if time is taken to train mothers and caregivers in safety precautions. MENOPAUSE: During menopause, about 40% of women report worsening of their seizure disorder, 27% improve, and a third had no change. Hormone replacement therapy is significantly associated with an increase in seizure frequency during menopause, and this is more likely in women with a history of catamenial epilepsy. BONE HEALTH: Women with epilepsy are at increased risk of fractures, osteoporosis, and osteomalacia.

The safety and effectiveness of newer antiepileptics: a comparative postmarketing cohort study

Clinical trials for the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have provided inconclusive information to evaluate comparative risk benefit. The authors use data from postmarketing observational cohort studies to compare the failure of treatment with lamotrigine, vigabatrin, and gabapentin in patients with refractory epilepsy. The Drug Safety Research Unit has conducted prescription event monitoring (PEM) studies for lamotrigine, vigabatrin, and gabapentin to monitor their safety when used in primary care. The primary outcome of this study was time to treatment failure in patients who had been prescribed the drug after the start of the PEM study. Patients on gabapentin had reduced time to treatment failure compared to those on the other 2 drugs. The age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio of failure was 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38-1.70) for gabapentin compared to lamotrigine and 1.19 (95% CI = 1.10-1.30) for vigabatrin compared to lamotrigine. The observed differences between the 3 study drugs might be confounded by a higher proportion of patients treated with gabapentin having refractory epilepsy, a shorter duration of the gabapentin PEM study, and a lower relative dose of gabapentin (approved at the time of the PEM study). The current study provides information about the routine usage of newer AEDs, which complements evidence from clinical trials regarding the efficacy and safety of these AEDs. Although this study showed differences on times to treatment failure between lamotrigine, vigabatrin, and gabapentin, the results are only useful when considered together with results from other studies seeking to answer the same questions.

Antiepileptic-Induced Resistance to Neuromuscular Blockers

Prolonged administration of antiepileptic drugs is associated with several drug interactions. In the field of anaesthesia and critical care, patients exhibit both sensitivity and resistance to non-depolarising neuromuscular blockers (NDNMBs) after acute and long-term administration of antiepileptic drugs, respectively. Although antiepileptic therapy alone has only mild neuromuscular effects, acutely administered antiepileptic drugs can potentiate the neuromuscular effects of NDNMBs as a result of direct pre- and post-junctional effects. Resistance to NDNMBs during long-term antiepileptic therapy is due to multiple factors operating alone or in combination, including induction of hepatic drug metabolism, increased protein binding of the NDNMBs and/or upregulation of acetylcholine receptors.

Clinically important drug interactions in epilepsy: general features and interactions between antiepileptic drugs

There are two types of interactions between drugs, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic. For antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), pharmacokinetic interactions are the most notable type, but pharmacodynamic interactions involving reciprocal potentiation of pharmacological effects at the site of action are also important. By far the most important pharmacokinetic interactions are those involving cytochrome P450 isoenzymes in hepatic metabolism. Among old generation AEDs, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone induce the activity of several enzymes involved in drug metabolism, leading to decreased plasma concentration and reduced pharmacological effect of drugs, which are substrates of the same enzymes (eg, tiagabine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, and topiramate). In contrast, the new AEDs gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide do not induce the metabolism of other AEDs. Interactions involving enzyme inhibition include the increase in plasma concentrations of lamotrigine and phenobarbital caused by valproic acid. Among AEDs, the least potential interaction is associated with gabapentin and levetiracetam.

Levetiracetam, a new antiepileptic agent: lack of in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic interaction with valproic acid

PURPOSE

The novel antiepileptic drug (AED) levetiracetam (LEV; Keppra) has a wide therapeutic index and pharmacokinetic characteristics predicting limited drug-interaction potential. It is indicated as an add-on treatment in patients with epilepsy, and thus coadministration with valproic acid (VPA) is likely. These studies were performed to determine whether coadministration of LEV with VPA might result in pharmacokinetic interactions.

METHODS

In vitro assays were performed to characterize the transformation of LEV into its main in vivo metabolite UCB L057. The reaction was examined for its sensitivity to clinically relevant concentrations of VPA. An open-label, one-way, one-sequence crossover clinical trial was conducted in 16 healthy volunteers to assess further the possibility of any relevant pharmacokinetic interaction.

RESULTS

Human whole blood and, to a lesser extent, human liver homogenates were demonstrated to hydrolyze LEV to UCB L057, its main metabolite. The reaction possibly involves type-B esterases and is not affected by 1 mM VPA (i.e., 166 microg/ml). Pharmacokinetic parameters of a single dose of LEV (1,500 mg) coadministered with steady-state concentrations of VPA (8 days of 500 mg, b.i.d.) did not differ significantly from the pharmacokinetics of LEV administered alone [area under the curve (AUC) of 397 and 400 microg/h/ml, respectively]. Furthermore, LEV did not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of VPA.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest the absence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between VPA and LEV during short-term administration, and suggest that dose adjustment is not required when these two drugs are given together.

[Antiepileptic drugs used in childhood. New products and new concepts]

INTRODUCTION

Eight new antiepileptic drugs (AED) have been marketed in Spain since 1990 and others will soon follow.

OBJECTIVE

To review the concepts underlying the development of the new drugs, as well as their indications, efficacy and safety.

DEVELOPMENT

Pharmacologic antiepileptic intervention is no longer solely directed towards an anticonvulsant effect, but also to epileptogenic prevention, disease modification and reversal of pharmacoresistance. The development of new AED, initially based on the screening of putative products in animal models, changed during the last half of the century to a rational design based on known facts about excitatory /inhibitory neuronal mechanisms. More recently, attention has focussed on pharmacogenetics. The new AED were initially indicated for partial epilepsies, but some have been shown to have a broader clinical spectrum. Some show the ideal pharmacokinetic mechanisms, avoiding hepatic metabolism and protein binding. Drug interactions and adverse effects, especially severe idiosyncratic adverse effects, are rare, although there are some exceptions. In most cases, however, seizure control does not seem to be better than with the classic AED. Because of the specific characteristics of childhood epilepsy and pharmacokinetics, as well as the regulations governing the development of clinical trials, the use of new products in children is circumspect, which in turn delays the access of such patients to a possible therapeutic benefit.

The importance of drug interactions in epilepsy therapy

Long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy is the reality for the majority of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. One AED will usually be sufficient to control seizures effectively, but a significant proportion of patients will need to receive a multiple AED regimen. Furthermore, polytherapy may be necessary for the treatment of concomitant disease. The fact that over-the-counter drugs and nutritional supplements are increasingly being self-administered by patients also must be considered. Therefore the probability of patients with epilepsy experiencing drug interactions is high, particularly with the traditional AEDs, which are highly prone to drug interactions. Physicians prescribing AEDs to patients with epilepsy must, therefore, be aware of the potential for drug interactions and the effects (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) that can occur both during combination therapy and on drug discontinuation. Although pharmacokinetic interactions are numerous and well described, pharmacodynamic interactions are few and usually concluded by default. Perhaps the most clinically significant pharmacodynamic interaction is that of lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA); these drugs exhibit synergistic efficacy when coadministered in patients with refractory partial and generalised seizures. Hepatic metabolism is often the target for pharmacokinetic drug interactions, and enzyme-inducing drugs such as phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbitone (PB), and carbamazepine (CBZ) will readily enhance the metabolism of other AEDs [e.g., LTG, topiramate (TPM), and tiagabine (TGB)]. The enzyme-inducing AEDs also enhance the metabolism of many other drugs (e.g., oral contraceptives, antidepressants, and warfarin) so that therapeutic efficacy of coadministered drugs is lost unless the dosage is increased. VPA inhibits the metabolism of PB and LTG, resulting in an elevation in the plasma concentrations of the inhibited drugs and consequently an increased risk of toxicity. The inhibition of the metabolism of CBZ by VPA results in an elevation of the metabolite CBZ-epoxide, which also increases the risk of toxicity. Other examples include the inhibition of PHT and CBZ metabolism by cimetidine and CBZ metabolism by erythromycin. In recent years, a more rational approach has been taken with regard to metabolic drug interactions because of our enhanced understanding of the cytochrome P450 system that is responsible for the metabolism of many drugs, including AEDs. The review briefly discusses the mechanisms of drug interactions and then proceeds to highlight some of the more clinically relevant drug interactions between AEDs and between AEDs and non-AEDs. Understanding the fundamental principles that contribute to a drug interaction may help the physician to better anticipate a drug interaction and allow a graded and planned therapeutic response and, therefore, help to enhance the management of patients with epilepsy who may require treatment with polytherapy regimens.

Strategies for optimizing antiepileptic drug therapy in elderly people

The elderly take more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) than all other adults. This extensive use directly correlates with an increased prevalence of epilepsy in a growing population of older people, as well as other neuropsychiatric conditions such as neuropathic pain and behavioral disorders associated with dementia and for which AEDs are administered. The agents account for nearly 10% of all adverse drug reactions in the elderly and are the fourth leading cause of adverse drug reactions in nursing home residents. Numerous factors associated with advanced age contribute to the high frequency of untoward drug effects in this population; however, strategies are available to ensure optimal outcomes.

Determination of antiepileptic drugs in biological material

Current analytical methodologies applied to the determination of antiepileptic drugs in biological material are reviewed. The role of chromatographic techniques is emphasized. Special attention is focused on new chemical entities as well as current trends such as high-speed liquid chromatographic techniques, hyphenated techniques and electrochromatography techniques. A review with 542 references.

Lack of effect of repeated administration of levetiracetam on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of warfarin

The objective of this study was to determine if repeated administration of levetiracetam alters the pharmacokinetics or the pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Forty-two healthy subjects (18-50 years old) were recruited into the study. After a dose-finding phase and a stabilization phase, during which a warfarin treatment was introduced and the dose maintained stable for at least 5 days, 18 male and 8 female subjects were eligible and enrolled. Subjects received warfarin (2.5, 5 or 7.5 mg/day) plus levetiracetam 1000 mg bid, and warfarin plus placebo. The treatment periods were 7 days long and were separated by a 3-day wash-out period. The protein binding and the pharmacokinetic profiles of R- and S-warfarin were assessed at steady state by analysis of blood samples, and the anticoagulant effect was measured using the international normalized ratio (INR). The ratios of the geometric means for AUC(ss) (90% confidence interval) between coadministration of warfarin with levetiracetam or with placebo were 97.17% (92.85%, 101.68%) for R-warfarin and 100.16% (96.43%, 104.02%) for S-warfarin. Results for C(max), C(min) and oral clearance were consistent with those of AUC(ss). In addition, the protein binding of warfarin was not affected by the concomitant treatment. The INR values measured the last 5 days of each period were not statistically altered by the concomitant administration of levetiracetam or placebo: 1.59+/-0.18 for warfarin alone, 1.49+/-0.21 when coadministered with placebo, and 1.55+/-0.23 with levetiracetam (means+/-S.D.). The frequency and profile of adverse events under the concomitant therapy of warfarin and levetiracetam were expected for subjects receiving these drugs, and the coadministration was safe. Moreover, levetiracetam pharmacokinetics after repeated warfarin administration did not differ from those previously reported in healthy volunteers. At the doses administered, there is no evidence of a pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between warfarin and levetiracetam.

Implications and consequences of enzyme induction on preclinical and clinical drug development

1. Enzyme induction has traditionally been studied during drug development to assess the potential of drug entities to interact with concomitant medications and alter their pharmacological effects, and clearly it is an unwanted phenomenon. However, another hurdle caused by induction occurs during preclinical development via the attainment of safety data, obtained by dosing high quantities of compound to species used in toxicology assessment. This review considers the techniques that can now be utilized in drug discovery, their relevance, the pharmacokinetic aspects of this phenomenon, and it discusses the consequences and implications of induction during preclinical and clinical development. 2. It is becoming increasingly routine to employ hepatocyte cultures and novel techniques such as quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR to identify enzyme inducers in vitro. The major challenge is to utilize these in vitro data to predict the consequences of induction in vivo. From an understanding of pharmacokinetic principles and low clinical doses relative to preclinical studies, there is limited potential for induction by a development candidate to significantly alter the pharmacological efficacy of a co-administered drug. 3. The most comprehensive approach when considering induction involves integrating quantitative in vitro data, information on the pharmacokinetic behaviour of the compound and the PK/PD) relationship in order to predict its consequences. The generation of this holistic strategy would enable more detailed and informed decision-making about both the suitability of molecules for development and the development strategy itself.

Mood and Cognitive Changes During Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy

BACKGROUND: Physicians in the United States write approximately 10 million new prescriptions for oral corticosteroids each year. Common side effects of corticosteroids include weight gain, osteoporosis, and diabetes mellitus. This article reviews the available literature on psychiatric and cognitive changes during corticosteroid therapy. METHOD: A search of the MEDLINE and psycINFO databases was conducted to find clinically relevant articles on psychiatric and cognitive side effects with corticosteroids using search terms including corticosteroid, prednisone, mania, depression, psychosis, mood, memory, and cognition. RESULTS: Symptoms of hypomania, mania, depression, and psychosis occur during corticosteroid therapy as do cognitive changes, particularly deficits in verbal or declarative memory. Psychiatric symptoms appear to be dose-dependent and generally occur during the first few weeks of therapy. Patients who must remain on corticosteroids may benefit from pharmacotherapeutic approaches, such as lithium and the new antipsychotic medications. CONCLUSION: Mood and cognitive changes with corticosteroids appear to be common but generally mild and reversible side effects. More studies are needed to determine effective treatment for steroid-induced psychiatric disorders.

The star systems: overview and use in determining antiepileptic drug choice

An explosion in antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy began in the 1990s with the licensing of 9 new chemical entities and more to come. Important differences between AEDs may not be detected by regulatory trials, which are designed to satisfy licensing requirements and often diverge considerably from everyday clinical practice. The Star Systems have been developed as evidence-based yet pragmatic and flexible models for comparing AEDs. Each drug has been judged across a range of criteria, including mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, ease of use, efficacy, tolerability, safety, interaction profile and a 'comfort factor'. A score has been allocated under each category and systems have been devised for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and those with difficult-to-control seizures requiring combination therapy. The choice of treatment should involve assessment of patient-related factors, accurate classification of seizure type and syndrome, married with an understanding of the pharmacology of the AEDs. A staged management plan should be formulated when initiating treatment with the aim of preventing the development of refractory epilepsy. When using combinations of AEDs, the mechanism of action of each agent should be taken into consideration. Such an individualised approach to management will optimise the chance of attaining remission and help many more patients achieve a fulfilling life.

Antiepileptic drug treatment: outcomes and adherence

The goal in treating patients with epilepsy is a cost-effective approach to the elimination of seizures or a reduction in their number and frequency while avoiding drug interactions and side effects, so as to achieve the best possible quality of life. Among the desirable outcomes are an enhanced understanding of epilepsy by patients, caregivers, and society, and a lessening of the psychosocial risks of this disease. Patients fail to achieve their goals and outcomes when they fail to adhere to the drug regimen or when a less-than-adequate drug regimen is prescribed. To help improve adherence, once- or twice-daily formulations should be used. New antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) increase the possibility of effective treatment for a patient who initially fails therapy. Working together, patients and clinicians can maximize the effectiveness of AED therapy and the potential for achieving desired goals and outcomes.

Management of epilepsy in adolescents and adults

Epilepsy is the most common serious neurological disorder affecting an estimated 50 million people worldwide. Particular focus should be placed on a safe diagnosis, seizure and syndrome classification, and choice of pharmacological and surgical options for a range of patient populations with different health-care requirements. Eight new antiepileptic drugs were licensed in the 1990s with more to come. These new drugs along with earlier resective surgery have led to a better outcome for many more people with this condition.

Gabapentin enhances the analgesic effect of morphine in healthy volunteers

The most effective group of drugs for the treatment of severe pain is opioid analgesics. Their use, however, is limited by decreased effects in neuropathic and chronic pain as a result of increased pain and development of tolerance. Gabapentin (GBP) is effective in both experimental models of chronic pain and clinical studies of neuropathic pain. Therefore, we investigated, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction of GBP and morphine in 12 healthy male volunteers. Morphine (60 mg, controlled release) or placebo was administered at 8:00 AM, and GBP (600 mg) or placebo was administered at 10:00 AM, thus comparing the analgesic effect of placebo + GBP (600 mg) with placebo + placebo and morphine (60 mg) + GBP in comparison to morphine plus placebo by using the cold pressor test. The duration and intensity of the side effects were assessed by using visual analog scales. The analgesic effect was evaluated by the change in the area under the curve (h x %; 0% baseline before Medication 1) of pain tolerance. Placebo + GBP (18.9% x h, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.5 to 40.3) did not present any significant analgesic effect compared with placebo + placebo (4.7% x h, 95% CI: -16.7 to 26.1). A significant increase in pain tolerance was observed comparing the combination of morphine and GBP (75.5% x h, 95% CI: 54.0-96.9) with morphine + placebo (40.6% x h, 95% CI: 19. 2-62.0). The observed adverse events after placebo + GBP were not significantly different compared with placebo + placebo. Morphine + placebo led to the expected opioid-mediated side effects. They were significantly more pronounced compared with placebo + placebo but did not differ significantly compared with the combination of morphine + GBP. Concerning the pharmacokinetic variables of morphine and its glucuronides, no significant difference between morphine + placebo and morphine + GBP was observed, whereas the area under the curve of GBP (43.9 +/- 5.3 vs 63.4 +/- 16.2 microg. h(-1). mL(-1), P < 0.05) significantly increased, and apparent oral clearance (230.8 +/- 29.4 mL/min vs 178 +/- 97.9 mL/min, P = 0.06) and apparent renal clearance (86.9 +/- 20.6 vs 73.0 +/- 24.2 mL/min, P = 0.067) of GBP decreased when morphine was administered concomitantly. These results suggest two different sites for the pharmacokinetic interaction-one at the level of absorption and the other at the level of elimination. Our study reveals both a pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between morphine and GBP, leading to an increased analgesic effect of morphine + GBP. These results and the good tolerability of GBP should favor clinical trials investigating the clinical relevance of the combination of morphine and GBP for treating severe pain.

IMPLICATIONS

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial with 12 healthy volunteers, we studied the interaction of morphine and gabapentin using the cold pressor test. The anticonvulsant gabapentin enhanced the acute analgesic effect of morphine. Furthermore, the plasma concentration of gabapentin was increased when morphine was administered concomitantly. Therefore, the well tolerated combination of gabapentin and morphine may improve pain therapy, especially in pain states, like chronic and neuropathic pain, which respond poorly to opioids.

Interaction of topiramate with conventional antiepileptic drugs in mice

Topiramate [2,3:4, 5-bis-O-(1-methyl-ethylidene-)-beta-D-fructopyranose sulfamate], administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) up to 5 mg/kg, did not influence the threshold for electroconvulsions. In doses of 10-30 mg/kg, topiramate significantly raised the threshold. This novel antiepileptic drug, in subprotective doses, enhanced the protective activity of i.p. given valproate, carbamazepine, dihenylhydantoin and phenobarbital against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice. The potentiation induced by topiramate (2.5-5 mg/kg) was most profound for carbamazepine and phenobarbital. The anticonvulsive activity of valproate and diphenylhydantoin was potentiated by topiramate only at 5 mg/kg. Topiramate (5 mg/kg) combined with valproate, phenobarbital and diphenylhydantoin did not alter their free plasma levels but its combination with carbamazepine resulted in an increased free plasma level of this antiepileptic drug. Treatment with topiramate (5 mg/kg) alone or in combination with the studied antiepileptics (providing 50% protection against maximal electroshock) resulted in no adverse effects, as measured in the chimney test (motor coordination) or passive avoidance task (long-term memory). In contrast, valproate administered alone at its ED(50) against maximal electroshock impaired motor coordination. It is noteworthy that valproate and carbamazepine at their respective ED(50) values of 248 and 11.2 mg/kg disturbed long-term memory. The results provide an experimental basis for rational polytherapy.

Induction of drug metabolising enzymes: pharmacokinetic and toxicological consequences in humans

Currently, 5 different main mechanisms of induction are distinguished for drug-metabolising enzymes. The ethanol type of induction is mediated by ligand stabilisation of the enzyme, but the others appear to be mediated by intracellular 'receptors'. These are the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor, the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR), the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR, phenobarbital induction) and the pregnane X receptor [PXR, rifampicin (rifampin) induction]. Enzyme induction has the net effect of increasing protein levels. However, many inducers are also inhibitors of the enzymes they induce, and the inductive effects of a single drug may be mediated by more than one mechanism. Therefore, it appears that every inducer has its own pattern of induction; knowledge of the main mechanism is often not sufficient to predict the extent and time course of induction, but may serve to make the clinician aware of potential dangers. The possible pharmacokinetic consequences of enzyme induction depend on the localisation of the enzyme. They include decreased or absent bioavailability for orally administered drugs, increased hepatic clearance or accelerated formation of reactive metabolites, which is usually related to local toxicity. Although some severe drug-drug interactions are caused by enzyme induction, most of the effects of inducers are not detected in the background of nonspecific variation. For any potent inducer, however, its addition to, or withdrawal from, an existing drug regimen may cause pronounced concentration changes and should be done gradually and with appropriate monitoring of therapeutic efficacy and adverse events. The toxicological consequences of enzyme induction in humans are rare, and appear to be mainly limited to hepatoxicity in ethanol-type induction.

Effect of vigabatrin addition on carbamazepine blood serum levels in patients with epilepsy

Because vigabatrin (VGB) is not metabolized by liver enzymes and does not bind with serum proteins, there is little theoretical chance of it interacting with other antiepileptic drugs. However, our observations have shown that if VGB is added to carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy, some patients respond with adverse, toxic symptoms suggesting possible carbamazepine-vigabatrin interaction. This article presents the results of a study of 66 epileptic patients (27 women and 39 men), age 10-66 years (mean, 28.2 years), with focal seizure onset with or without secondary generalization. In these patients, in addition to CBZ therapy with an average dose of 16.7 mg/kg per day (8.6-26.8), VGB, average dose 31.1 mg/kg per day (7.1-57.9), was added. CBZ concentration was measured twice: prior to VGB introduction and 5-12 weeks after the final dose of VGB was reached. In our study 69.7% of patients responded to VGB addition with a significant increase (by at least 10%) in CBZ concentration. A correlation between the value of the increase and the initial level of CBZ prior to VGB addition was found also. Correlational analysis (Pearson's r) revealed a negative correlation between CBZ concentration and increased concentration after VGB addition (r = -0.47, df = 64, P < 0.001). This negative correlation means that if the initial CBZ level is lower, its concentration value after VGB addition is higher.

Important drug interactions in dermatology

Drug interactions can occur at any step from absorption to elimination of a drug, and can induce adverse as well as beneficial effects. Since systemic drugs are increasingly available and important in the treatment of dermatological diseases, a variety of possible interactions between concomitantly administered drugs have to be considered by dermatologists. The xenobiotic-metabolising enzyme system cytochrome P450 (CYP) is involved in the metabolism of many drugs, regulating their plasma concentrations and activities. Furthermore, the adverse effects of many drugs depend on the basal activity and inducibility of particular CYP isoenzymes in an individual patient. Since drug therapy in dermatological practice is of increasing complexity, and an increasing number of potent systemic drugs have become commonly used therapeutic agents, this review focuses on the following topics with the aim of optimising dermatological drug therapy. In the first section, all the different types of drug interactions that can occur through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mechanisms are introduced briefly, and then discussed systematically with special reference to drugs important for dermatologists. Then, the network of drug interactions that may occur from absorption to elimination is presented. The most important drug interactions mediated by CYP isoenzymes are listed. Finally, the importance of pharmacogenetics for the development of new drugs and its potential impact on the optimisation of individual therapy regimens is discussed.

Oxcarbazepine versus carbamazepine treatment and induction of serum lipid abnormalities

Long-term treatment with carbamazepine is associated with many metabolic changes, including elevations in serum cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride levels. Oxcarbazepine has been reported to be a preferable antiepileptic drug, when compared to carbamazepine with respect to its effects on lipid metabolism, especially cholesterol, high-density lipoproteins, and low-density lipoproteins. The case of a 16-year-old girl who developed high serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels on both of these medications successively, while triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein levels were unaffected, is reported.

Effect of amlodipine upon the protective activity of antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

Amlodipine, a calcium channel antagonist of the dihydropyridine class, up to 10 mg kg(-1)(i.p.) did not significantly affect the threshold for electroconvulsions. However, this calcium channel antagonist (10 mg kg(-1)) enhanced the anticonvulsive activity of carbamazepine, valproate and phenobarbital against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. Furthermore, amlodipine (5 mg kg(-1)) intensified the protection offered by carbamazepine. This effect was associated with the increased free plasma level of carbamazepine in the presence of amlodipine. Amlodipine did not influence the free or total plasma level of phenobarbital and valproate, so a pharmacokinetic interaction is not probable for valproate and phenobarbital. The anticonvulsive action and free plasma level of diphenylhydantoin was not modified by amlodipine. The combined treatment of the calcium channel antagonist and antiepileptics caused motor impairment (evaluated in the chimney test). Long-term memory (assessed in the passive avoidance test) in case of combinations of amlodipine with carbamazepine or diphenylhydantoin was not affected. The combination of amlodipine with valproate or phenobarbital significantly influenced the retention in this test. A possible usefulness of amlodipine as add-on therapy in epileptic patients may be limited by its considerable adverse effect revealed by behavioural tests. The pharmacokinetic interaction between carbamazepine and amlodipine might have some clinical importance for patients treated with these drugs.

Olanzapine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile

Multicentre trials in patients with schizophrenia confirm that olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic agent with broad efficacy, eliciting a response in both the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Compared with traditional antipsychotic agents, olanzapine causes a lower incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and minimal perturbation of prolactin levels. Generally, olanzapine is well tolerated. The pharmacokinetics of olanzapine are linear and dose-proportional within the approved dosage range. Its mean half-life in healthy individuals was 33 hours, ranging from 21 to 54 hours. The mean apparent plasma clearance was 26 L/h, ranging from 12 to 47 L/h. Smokers and men have a higher clearance of olanzapine than women and nonsmokers. After administering [14C]olanzapine, approximately 60% of the radioactivity was excreted in urine and 30% in faeces. Olanzapine is predominantly bound to albumin (90%) and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (77%). Olanzapine is metabolised to its 10- and 4'-N-glucuronides, 4'-N-desmethylolanzapine [cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2] and olanzapine N-oxide (flavin mono-oxygenase 3). Metabolism to 2-hydroxymethylolanzapine via CYP2D6 is a minor pathway. The 10-N-glucuronide is the most abundant metabolite, but formation of 4'-N-desmethylolanzapine is correlated with the clearance of olanzapine. Olanzapine does not inhibit CYP isozymes. No clinically significant metabolic interactions were found between olanzapine and diazepam, alcohol (ethanol), imipramine, R/S-warfarin, aminophylline, biperiden, lithium or fluoxetine. Fluvoxamine, an inhibitor of CYP1A2, increases plasma concentrations of olanzapine; inducers of CYP1A2, including tobacco smoke and carbamazepine, decrease olanzapine concentrations. Orthostatic changes were observed when olanzapine and diazepam or alcohol were coadministered. Pharmacodynamic interactions occurred between olanzapine and alcohol, and olanzapine and imipramine, implying that patients should avoid operating hazardous equipment or driving an automobile while experiencing the short term effects of the combinations. Individual factors with the largest impact on olanzapine pharmacokinetics are gender and smoking status. The plasma clearance of olanzapine generally varies over a 4-fold range, but the variability in the clearance and concentration of olanzapine does not appear to be associated with the severity or duration of adverse effects or the degree of efficacy. Thus, dosage adjustments appear unnecessary for these individual factors. However, dosage modification should be considered for patients characterised by a combination of factors associated with decreased oxidative metabolism, for example, debilitated or elderly women who are nonsmokers.

Treatment of epilepsy in the elderly

Management of epilepsy in the elderly involves many challenges, including the presence of concomitant diseases, polypharmacy and changes in body physiology. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have to be taken into account in order to avoid potentially severe adverse drug reactions in elderly people. The present study reviews the most commonly used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the elderly. Because some AEDs may induce the metabolism of other agents and reduce the effectiveness of several drugs, the physicians have to carefully evaluate concomitant drugs being administered. Moreover, the main problems appear to be when beginning therapy, the first choice drug, the appropriate dosage and pharmacologic compliance. Elderly patients must be screened for hepatic and renal functions before beginning a treatment with an AED, carefully interviewed to reduce complaints for drug side-effects which may negatively influence compliance and monitored for total and free blood levels. Besides the 'classic' AEDs, such as phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, valproic acid, primidone and benzodiazepines, the review shows the possible advantages of new AEDs, such as felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and gamma-vinyl-GABA, which may be used in the elderly too for their good tolerability. A careful control of drug assumption is requested in the elderly, especially when it is difficult to achieve seizure control.

Absence of interaction between tiagabine, a new antiepileptic drug, and the benzodiazepine triazolam

In a randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled, four-period cross-over study in 12 healthy volunteers, the potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between the new antiepileptic drug, tiagabine, and the benzodiazepine, triazolam, were investigated. A single dose of tiagabine HCl 10 mg did not enhance the sedative or cognitive effects of a single dose of the benzodiazepine triazolam 0.125 mg, although the time-course of the effects was prolonged. Furthermore, tiagabine did not produce any statistically significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of triazolam. Similarly, the pharmacokinetics of tiagabine were not modified by triazolam. Tiagabine was well tolerated when administered alone or with triazolam.

Best practice guidelines for the management of women with epilepsy. The Women with Epilepsy Guidelines Development Group

Clinical guidelines for the treatment of epilepsy have been published. A statement on management issues for women with epilepsy has recently been produced by the American Academy of Neurology which has raised awareness of the issues facing women with epilepsy. The communication presented here aims to review current literature on specific issues relating to women with epilepsy, and proposes graded recommendations for its management within a UK health care framework.

Modelling of the pharmacodynamic interaction between phenytoin and sodium valproate

Treatment of epilepsy with a combination of antiepileptic drugs remains the therapeutic choice when monotherapy fails. In this study, we apply pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling to characterize the interaction between phenytoin (PHT) and sodium valproate (VPA). Male Wistar rats received a 40 mg kg(-1) intravenous dose of PHT over 5 min either alone or in combination with an infusion of VPA resulting in a steady-state concentration of 115.5+/-4.9 microg ml(-1). A control group received only the infusion of VPA. The increase in the threshold for generalized seizure activity (ATGS) was used as measure of the anticonvulsant effect. PHT pharmacokinetics was described by a pharmacokinetic model with Michaelis-Menten elimination. The concentration-time course and plasma protein binding of PHT were not altered by VPA. The pharmacokinetic parameters Vmax and Km were, respectively, 294+/-63 microg min(-1) and 7.8+/-2.4 microg ml(-1) in the absence of VPA and 562+/-40 microg min(-1) and 15.6+/-0.9 microg ml(-1) upon administration in combination with VPA. A delay of the onset of the effect relative to plasma concentrations of PHT was observed. The assessment of PHT concentrations at the effect site was based on the effect-compartment model, yielding mean ke0 values of 0.128 and 0.107 min(-1) in the presence and absence of VPA, respectively. A nonlinear relationship between effect-site concentration and the increase in the TGS was observed. The concentration that causes an increase of 50% in the baseline TGS (EC50%TGS) was used to compare drug potency. A shift of EC50%TGS from 13.27+3.55 to 4.32+/-0.52 microg ml(-1) was observed upon combination with VPA (P<0.01). It is concluded that there is a synergistic pharmacodynamic interaction between PHT and VPA in vivo.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in antituberculosis chemotherapy

Therapeutic drug monitoring in antituberculosis chemotherapy may play a strategic role in improving outcomes in selected patients. The most important use is in assisting clinicians to optimize therapy to achieve success and minimize toxicity. The other principal indication lies in the management of interaction of antituberculosis drugs with other drugs.

Therapeutic drug monitoring--antiepileptic drugs

AIMS

To provide a brief critical review of the basis and contemporary practice of monitoring the concentrations of antiepileptic drugs in biological fluids.

METHODS

The review is based on literature data and observations from clinical practice.

RESULTS

As experience has accumulated, monitoring of antiepileptic drug concentrations has come to be applied mainly to certain of the drugs when present in whole plasma. For these drugs there is a reasonably established relationship between drug concentrations and biological effects, but attention still needs to be paid to issues such as the timing of the measurements in relation to drug intake, the presence or absence of steady-state conditions, the presence in plasma of active metabolites and possible nonlinear pharmacokinetics of particular agents e.g. phenytoin.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma antiepileptic drug concentration monitoring is coming to be used in a more thoughtful and critical manner. Lack of adequate knowledge of matters such as the relationship between the plasma concentrations and antiepileptic and toxic effects of the drugs, not only the newer, but also the longer established ones, in particular clinical situations, remains more important than deficiencies in analytical methodology in limiting the clinical usefulness of antiepileptic drug concentration monitoring.