Olanzapine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile

How to Determine a Therapeutic Reference Range for a Psychotropic Drug Systematically? Recommendations of the TDM Task Force of the AGNP

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential for controlling pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic variations and for optimizing pharmacotherapy. However, its value is often underestimated because of nonsystematic recommendations for target ranges in the literature. The purpose of this study was to emphasize transparency and systematization in the forthcoming Updates to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP)-TDM Consensus Guidelines.

METHODS

Here, a stepwise method for determining therapeutic reference ranges (TRRs) in psychiatry is introduced. By using various data types, a multidimensional approach for establishing a range is presented. The data types were classified based on how effectively they supported the target ranges. This method was demonstrated for 3 drugs commonly used in psychiatry (aripiprazole, olanzapine, and escitalopram).

RESULTS

Despite the methodological shortcomings in published concentration-effect studies, the approach used here enabled the determination of reference ranges by combining multiple types of data. The lower limit of the TRR is ideally derived from studies that link blood drug concentrations to clinical effectiveness, particularly symptom-specific responses, after fixed-dose treatment. The upper limit depends on the concentrations associated with adverse reactions or maximal response. Thresholds can be estimated using receiver operating characteristic analyses. Preliminary thresholds were derived from responder concentration data or from expected drug concentrations under approved doses. Positron emission tomography studies were used to further validate these ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposed a new standard for determining the TRR of psychotropic drugs, thereby enhancing their clinical utility and validity. Adjusting blood levels to these ranges should improve response rates and medication tolerance.

Risk Stratification of QTc Prolongation in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Antipsychotics for the Management of Delirium Symptoms

BackgroundPatients experiencing significant agitation or perceptual disturbances related to delirium in an intensive care setting may benefit from short-term treatment with an antipsychotic medication. Some antipsychotic medications may prolong the QTc interval, which increases the risk of potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. In this targeted review, we describe the evidence regarding the relationships between antipsychotic medications and QTc prolongation and practical methods for monitoring the QTc interval and mitigating arrhythmia risk.MethodsSearches of PubMed and Cochrane Library were performed to identify studies, published before February 2023, investigating the relationships between antipsychotic medications and QTc prolongation or arrhythmias.ResultsMost antipsychotic medications commonly used for the management of delirium symptoms (eg, intravenous haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine) cause a moderate degree of QTc prolongation. Among other antipsychotics, those most likely to cause QTc prolongation are iloperidone and ziprasidone, while aripiprazole and lurasidone appear to have minimal risk for QTc prolongation. Genetic vulnerabilities, female sex, older age, pre-existing cardiovascular disease, electrolyte abnormalities, and non-psychiatric medications also increase the risk of QTc prolongation. For individuals at risk of QTc prolongation, it is essential to measure the QTc interval accurately and consistently and consider medication adjustments if needed.ConclusionsAntipsychotic medications are one of many risk factors for QTc prolongation. When managing agitation related to delirium, it is imperative to assess an individual patient's risk for QTc prolongation and to choose a medication and monitoring strategy commensurate to the risks. In intensive care settings, we recommend regular ECG monitoring, using a linear regression formula to correct for heart rate. If substantial QTc prolongation (eg, QTc > 500 msec) is present, a change in pharmacologic treatment can be considered, though a particular medication may still be warranted if the risks of discontinuation (eg, extreme agitation, removal of invasive monitoring devices) outweigh the risks of arrhythmias.AimsThis review aims to summarize the current literature on relationships between antipsychotic medications and QTc prolongation and to make practical clinical recommendations towards the approach of antipsychotic medication use for the management of delirium-related agitation and perceptual disturbances in intensive care settings.

Insufficient correctness of package inserts for psychotropic drugs in Germany

Package inserts often cause displeasure among patients as they are perceived as misleading and confusing. The aim of this study was to find out how comprehensible, complete, and truthful package inserts are formulated in Germany. 311 package inserts for antipsychotics (mGPCR antagonists) and antidepressants (NE/5-HT enhancers) from different manufacturers and dosages were analysed. The analysis criteria included the description of the effect, the warning of increased suicide risk, the explanation of interactions with co-medication, food and stimulants, as well as alcohol and the warning of impaired roadworthiness. In addition, the timeliness of the information regarding pregnancy and breastfeeding was checked and the symptoms mentioned under the topic of discontinuation symptoms and adverse drug reactions were compared. For most parameters, inconsistencies among various products, deficiencies and incorrect information were noted. This was particularly true for the items pregnancy and breastfeeding. Thus, package inserts for mGPCR antagonists and NE/5-HT enhancers need to be updated and standardised urgently. Such measures will reduce confusion among patients and increase drug adherence.

Effectiveness of antipsychotic medication in patients with schizophrenia in a real world retrospective observational study in Ethiopia

Antipsychotic medications have become the cornerstone of treatment for schizophrenia. The antipsychotic drugs are high-affinity antagonists of dopamine D2 receptors that are most effective against psychotic symptoms, but antipsychotic drugs can have side effects that overshadow their advantages, like sedation, extrapyramidal symptoms, and weight gain, which are often experienced as adverse effects. In our country, the relative effectiveness of antipsychotic medication as well as their tolerance in schizophrenia patients is not fully addressed. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication and associated factors in schizophrenia patients at the psychiatry clinic. An institutional-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative data of patients with schizophrenia disorder based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) that initiated or changed to a new antipsychotic treatment by clinicians assessments from April 1, 2023, to March 1, 2024 at university of Gondar specialized hospital. The effectiveness of prescribed antipsychotic medication was evaluated using the Clinical Global Impressions-Schizophrenia scale (CGI-SCH), inclusive of subscales for positive, negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms. A total of 608 patients were receiving antipsychotic medications as follows: 118 patients (19.4%) were prescribed haloperidol, 88 patients (14.5%) were taking chlorpromazine, 48 patients (7.9%) received fluphenazine (decanoate), 126 patients (20.7%) were on risperidone, and 228 patients (37.5%) were treating with olanzapine. In total, 64.8% of patients show improvement in the prescribed medications within one year of treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate 35.2%) for haloperidol, 31 (26.3%) for chlorpromazine, 30 (34.1%) for Fluphenazine, 19 (39.6%) for risperidone, 51 (40.5%), and 83 (36.4%) for olanzapine. Effectiveness was assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I); the overall improvements like negative, positive, depressive, and cognitive symptoms were significantly higher for olanzapine, followed by haloperidol (p < .001). Good adherence (AHR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.5-0.78), history of relapse (AHR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.13-1.82), unemployment (AHR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.06-1.85), and history of suicidal ideation (AHR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.24-2.58) were significant predictors of symptoms improvement. The study found olanzapine is more effective in improving schizophrenia symptoms than other antipsychotic drugs. Medication adherence, symptom relapse, and suicidal thoughts significantly impacted antipsychotic effectiveness in individuals with schizophrenia disorder.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of olanzapine-based prophylactic antiemetic therapy for delayed and persistent nausea and vomiting in patients with HER2-positive or HER2-low breast cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan: ERICA study (WJOG14320B)

BACKGROUND

Nausea and vomiting are common adverse events associated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). We evaluated the efficacy of an olanzapine-based triplet regimen for preventing nausea and vomiting in patients receiving their first cycle T-DXd.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (ERICA) phase II study enrolled patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low metastatic breast cancer receiving their first cycle of T-DXd. Patients were randomized to olanzapine 5 mg or placebo once daily (1 : 1 ratio) from day 1 to day 6, plus a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone 6.6 mg intravenously or 8 mg orally on day 1. The total observation period was 504 h (21 days) from the first T-DXd administration. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emetic events and no rescue medications, in the delayed phase (24-120 h after T-DXd), with the type I error rate of 0.2 (one-sided) for the comparison. Secondary endpoints included no nausea rate in the delayed and persistent phases (120-504 h), adverse event by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE).

RESULTS

In total, 168 patients were enrolled at 43 sites in Japan (November 2021-September 2023) with 162 patients (olanzapine, n = 80; placebo, n = 82) included in the per protocol set. The primary endpoint was met as the delayed phase CR rate was significantly greater with olanzapine than placebo (70.0% versus 56.1%, P = 0.047). Efficacy was maintained in the persistent phase (63.9% versus 44.4%). No nausea rate was also greater with olanzapine (delayed phase: 57.5% versus 37.8%; persistent phase: 51.4% versus 31.9%). CR rates in the delayed phase favored olanzapine across subgroups. Appetite loss was also decreased with olanzapine. Hyperglycemia and somnolence were mostly of low-grade severity.

CONCLUSION

Olanzapine 5 mg for 6 days with 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone appears effective for T-DXd-treated patients to prevent delayed and persistent nausea and vomiting.

Clinical effects of CYP2D6 phenoconversion in patients with psychosis

BACKGROUND

Pharmacogenetics is considered a promising avenue for improving treatment outcomes, yet evidence arguing for the use of pharmacogenetics in the treatment of psychotic disorders is mixed and clinical usefulness is under debate. Many patients with psychosis use multiple medications, which can alter the metabolic capacity of CYP enzymes, a process called phenoconversion. In clinical studies, treatment outcomes of drugs for psychosis management may have been influenced by phenoconversion.

AIM

Here we evaluate the impact and predictive value of CYP2D6 phenoconversion in patients with psychotic disorders under pharmacological treatment.

METHOD

Phenoconversion-corrected phenotype was determined by accounting for inhibitor strength. Phenoconversion-corrected and genotype-predicted phenotypes were compared in association with side effects, subjective well-being and symptom severity.

RESULTS

Phenoconversion led to a large increase in poor metabolizers (PMs; 17-82, 16% of sample), due to concomitant use of the serotonin reuptake inhibitors fluoxetine and paroxetine. Neither CYP2D6-predicted nor phenoconversion-corrected phenotype was robustly associated with outcome measures. Risperidone, however, was most affected by the CYP2D6 genotype.

CONCLUSION

Polypharmacy and phenoconversion were prevalent and accounted for a significant increase in PMs. CYP2D6 may play a limited role in side effects, symptoms and well-being measures. However, due to the high frequency of occurrence, phenoconversion should be considered in future clinical trials.

Rare but elevated incidence of hematological malignancy after clozapine use in schizophrenia: A population cohort study

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is widely regarded as a highly efficacious psychotropic drug that is largely underused worldwide. Recent disproportionality analyses and nationwide case-control studies suggested a potential association between clozapine use and hematological malignancy (HM). Nevertheless, the absolute rate difference is not well-established due to the absence of analytic cohort studies. The clinical significance of such a potential risk remains unclear.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We extracted data from a territory-wide public healthcare database from January 2001 to August 2022 in Hong Kong to conduct a retrospective cohort study of anonymized patients aged 18+ years with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who used clozapine or olanzapine (drug comparator with highly similar chemical structure and pharmacological mechanisms) for 90+ days, with at least 2 prior other antipsychotic use records within both groups. Weighted by inverse probability of treatment (IPTW) based on propensity scores, Poisson regression was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of HM between clozapine and olanzapine users. The absolute rate difference was also estimated. In total, 9,965 patients with a median follow-up period of 6.99 years (25th to 75th percentile: 4.45 to 10.32 years) were included, among which 834 were clozapine users. After IPTW, the demographic and clinical characteristics of clozapine users were comparable to those of olanzapine users. Clozapine users had a significant weighted IRR of 2.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) [1.52, 3.34]; p < 0.001) for HM compared to olanzapine users. The absolute rate difference was estimated at 57.40 (95% CI [33.24, 81.55]) per 100,000 person-years. Findings were consistent across subgroups by age and sex. Sensitivity analyses all supported the robustness of the results and showed good specificity to HM but no other cancers. The main limitation of this observational study is the potential residual confounding effects that could have arisen from the lack of randomization in clozapine or olanzapine use.

CONCLUSIONS

Absolute rate difference in HM incidence associated with clozapine is small despite a 2-fold elevated rate. Given the rarity of HM and existing blood monitoring requirements, more restrictive indication for clozapine or special warnings may not be necessary.

Recent Advances in representative small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors: Synthetic Routes and clinical applications

The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) represents a pivotal target for therapeutic intervention in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and Parkinson's disease. The successful discovery of numerous effective DRD2 inhibitors has led to their clinical application and ongoing evaluation in various clinical trials. This review explores the synthetic approaches and clinical applications of prototypical small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors that have received approval or are currently undergoing clinical trials, highlighting their therapeutic potential and challenges. The synthesis of these inhibitors employs various chemical strategies, including modifications of phenothiazine and butyrophenone structures, which have yielded significant antipsychotic agents like chlorpromazine and haloperidol. Additionally, newer classes of inhibitors, such as aripiprazole, exhibit partial agonist activity at DRD2, offering a unique therapeutic profile. Clinically, DRD2 inhibitors demonstrate efficacy in managing positive symptoms of schizophrenia, manic episodes in bipolar disorder, and dopaminergic imbalance in Parkinson's disease. However, the emergence of adverse effects, including tardive dyskinesia, extrapyramidal symptoms and metabolic syndrome, presents substantial challenges. Advances in the development of second-generation antipsychotics aim to balance efficacy with a better side effect profile by targeting additional neurotransmitter receptors. This review aims to deliver an overview of the synthesis and clinical applications of representative small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors across various clinical phases, thereby offering strategic insights for the advancement of DRD2 inhibitor development.

Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: Focus on antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

For psychotic disorders (i.e. schizophrenia), pharmacotherapy plays a key role in controlling acute and long-term symptoms. To find the optimal individual dose and dosage strategy, specialised tools are used. Three tools have been proven useful to personalise drug treatments: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug levels, pharmacogenetic testing (PG), and molecular neuroimaging.

METHODS

In these Guidelines, we provide an in-depth review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics for 45 antipsychotics. Over 30 international experts in psychiatry selected studies that have measured drug concentrations in the blood (TDM), gene polymorphisms of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, or receptor/transporter occupancies in the brain (positron emission tomography (PET)).

RESULTS

Study results strongly support the use of TDM and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotyping and/or phenotyping to guide drug therapies. Evidence-based target ranges are available for titrating drug doses that are often supported by PET findings.

CONCLUSION

All three tools discussed in these Guidelines are essential for drug treatment. TDM goes well beyond typical indications such as unclear compliance and polypharmacy. Despite its enormous potential to optimise treatment effects, minimise side effects and ultimately reduce the global burden of diseases, personalised drug treatment has not yet become the standard of care in psychiatry.

Comparison of olanzapine 2.5 mg and 5 mg in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a Japanese nationwide database study

BACKGROUND

Olanzapine is prescribed as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting at a dose of 2.5 or 5 mg in Asian countries. We compared the effectiveness of olanzapine 2.5 mg and 5 mg in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among patients receiving high-emetogenic chemotherapy for lung cancer.

METHODS

Using a Japanese national inpatient database, we identified patients who received olanzapine doses of 2.5 or 5 mg during high-emetogenic chemotherapy for lung cancer between January 2016 and March 2021. We conducted a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis with adjustment for various factors, including those affecting olanzapine metabolism. The outcomes were additional antiemetic drug administration (within 2-5 days after chemotherapy initiation), length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

Olanzapine 2.5 and 5.0 mg were used in 2905 and 4287 patients, respectively. The propensity score-matched analysis showed that olanzapine 2.5 mg administration was significantly associated with a higher proportion of additional antiemetic drug administration (36% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) than olanzapine 5 mg. The median length of hospital stay was 8 days in both groups. Total hospitalization cost did not differ significantly between the two doses of olanzapine (5061 vs. 5160 USD, p = 0.07). The instrumental variable analysis demonstrated compatible results.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic use of olanzapine 2.5 mg during chemotherapy for lung cancer was associated with a higher rate of additional antiemetic drugs than olanzapine 5 mg.

A 6-year retrospective study of olanzapine plasma concentration inpatients with schizophrenia CYP1A2 polymorphisms in real-life settings

Aim

to investigate the potential influence of CYP1A2 polymorphisms on olanzapine plasma concentration of inpatients with schizophrenia in real-life settings.

Methods

409 inpatients who received OLA for at least 2 weeks, from June 2016 to March 2022 were included in the retrospective investigation. Moreover, 503 samples of above inpatients receiving OLA was built to investigate the influence of the relevant OLA plasma concentration, polymorphisms CYP1A2 -163C/A on the inpatients outcome.

Results

Scale score reduction rate (SSRR) in 1 mutated CYP1A2 -163C/A alleles (CA) was significantly higher than other CYP1A2 alleles (CC + AA) (P = 0.002). Inverse S-curve correlations relationship was between SSRR and plasma concentrations of OLA (r = 0.130, P < 0.005). When remove ineffective subjects (ineffective group), the results of all CYP1A2 -163C/A genotype showed perfect correlations relationship tendencies with SSRR (r = 1.000). The best concentrations of OLA corrected for daily dose (C/D) range and the best concentration range of OLA of all CYP1A2 -163C/A genotype was 3.18-3.53 ng/mL/mg and 17.42-57.33 ng/mL. The C/D range and concentration range of OLA were 2.722-4.221 ng/mL/mg and 13.61-84.42 ng/mL, which belong CYP1A2 -163C/A CA genotype subjects, was largest.

Conclusions

The best effective C/D range and concentration range of OLA respective were 3.18-3.53 ng/mL/mg and 17.42-57.33 ng/mL, which range values of CYP1A2 -163C/A CA genotype of inpatients with schizophrenia was largest.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal study of adjunctive brexpiprazole maintenance treatment for major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE

To compare time to relapse in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) stabilised on antidepressant treatment (ADT) + brexpiprazole who were randomised to continued adjunctive brexpiprazole or brexpiprazole withdrawal (switch to placebo).

METHODS

This Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, randomised withdrawal study enrolled adults with MDD and inadequate response to 2–3 ADTs. All patients started on adjunctive brexpiprazole 2–3 mg/day (Phase A, 6–8 weeks). Patients whose symptoms stabilised (Phase B, 12 weeks) were randomised 1:1 to adjunctive brexpiprazole or adjunctive placebo (Phase C, 26 weeks). The primary endpoint was time to relapse in Phase C. Depression rating scale score changes were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

1149 patients were enrolled and 489 patients were randomised (ADT + brexpiprazole n = 240; ADT + placebo n = 249). Median time to relapse was 63 days from randomisation in both treatment groups for patients who received ≥1 dose. Relapse criteria were met by 22.5% of patients (54/240) on ADT + brexpiprazole and 20.6% (51/248) on ADT + placebo (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.67; p = 0.51, log-rank test). Depression scale scores improved during Phases A–B and were maintained in Phase C. Mean weight increased by 2.2 kg in Phases A–B and stabilised in Phase C.

CONCLUSION

Time to relapse was similar between continued adjunctive brexpiprazole and brexpiprazole withdrawal; in both groups, ∼80% of stabilised patients remained relapse free at their last visit. Adjunctive brexpiprazole therapy was generally well tolerated over up to 46 weeks, with minimal adverse effects following brexpiprazole withdrawal.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03538691. Funding: Otsuka, Lundbeck.

Aripiprazole, but Not Olanzapine, Alters the Response to Oxidative Stress in Fao Cells by Reducing the Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPKs) and Promoting Cell Survival

Prolonged use of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) is commonly associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk. While weight gain and related health issues are generally considered the primary contributors to this risk, direct interference with mitochondrial bioenergetics, particularly in the liver where these drugs are metabolized, is emerging as an additional contributing factor. Here, we compared the effects of two AAPs with disparate metabolic profiles on the response of Fao hepatoma cells to oxidative stress: olanzapine (OLA), which is obesogenic, and aripiprazole (ARI), which is not. Results showed that cells treated with ARI exhibited resistance to H2O2-induced oxidative stress, while OLA treatment had the opposite effect. Despite enhanced survival, ARI-treated cells exhibited higher apoptotic rates than OLA-treated cells when exposed to H2O2. Gene expression analysis of pro- and anti-apoptotic factors revealed that ARI-treated cells had a generally blunted response to H2O2, contrasting with a heightened response in OLA-treated cells. This was further supported by the reduced activation of MAPKs and STAT3 in ARI-treated cells in response to H2O2, whereas OLA pre-treatment enhanced their activation. The loss of stress response in ARI-treated cells was consistent with the observed increase in the mitochondrial production of O2•-, a known desensitizing factor. The physiological relevance of O2•- in ARI-treated cells was demonstrated by the increase in mitophagy flux, likely related to mitochondrial damage. Notably, OLA treatment protected proteasome activity in Fao cells exposed to H2O2, possibly due to the better preservation of stress signaling and mitochondrial function. In conclusion, this study highlights the underlying changes in cell physiology and mitochondrial function by AAPs. ARI de-sensitizes Fao cells to stress signaling, while OLA has the opposite effect. These findings contribute to our understanding of the metabolic risks associated with prolonged AAP use and may inform future therapeutic strategies.

Initial dosage optimization of olanzapine in patients with bipolar disorder based on model-informed precision dosing: a study from the real world

Objectives

Olanzapine is used for treating bipolar disorder (BPD); however, the optimal initial dosing regimen is unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the optimal olanzapine initial dosage in patients with BPD via model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) based on a real-world study.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients with BPD from the real-world study were collected to construct the MIPD model.

Results

Weight, combined used quetiapine influenced olanzapine clearances in patients with BPD, where the clearance rates were 0.152:1 in patients with or without quetiapine under the same weight. We simulated olanzapine doses once a day or twice a day, of which twice a day was optimal. Without quetiapine, for twice-a-day olanzapine doses, 0.80, 0.70, and 0.60 mg/kg/day were suitable for 40- to 56-kg BPD patients, 56- to 74-kg BPD patients, and 74- to 100-kg BPD patients, respectively. With quetiapine, for twice-a-day olanzapine doses, 0.05 mg/kg/day was suitable for 40- to 100-kg BPD patients.

Conclusion

This study was the first to investigate the optimal olanzapine initial dosage in patients with BPD via MIPD based on a real-world study, providing clinical reference for the precision medication of olanzapine in BPD patients.

In vivo deposition of poorly soluble drugs

Administered drug molecules, whether dissolved or solubilized, have the potential to precipitate and accumulate as solid forms in tissues and cells within the body. This phase transition can significantly impact the pharmacokinetics of treatment. It is thus crucial to gain an understanding of how drug solubility/permeability, drug formulations and routes of administration affect in vivo behaviors of drug deposition. This review examines literature reports on the drug deposition in tissues and cells of poorly water-soluble drugs, as well as underlying physical mechanisms that lead to precipitation. Our work particularly highlights drug deposition in macrophages and the subcellular fate of precipitated drugs. We also propose a tissue permeability-based classification framework to evaluate precipitation potentials of poorly soluble drugs in major organs and tissues. The impact on pharmacokinetics is further discussed and needs to be considered in developing drug delivery systems. Finally, bioimaging techniques that are used to examine aggregated states and the intracellular trafficking of absorbed drugs are summarized.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Olanzapine: Effects of Clinical Factors on Plasma Concentrations in Psychiatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is strongly recommended for olanzapine due to its high pharmacokinetic variability. This study aimed to investigate the impact of various clinical factors on olanzapine plasma concentrations in patients with psychiatric disorders.

METHODS

The study used TDM data from the PsyMetab cohort, including 547 daily dose-normalized, steady-state, olanzapine plasma concentrations (C:D ratios) from 248 patients. Both intrinsic factors (eg, sex, age, body weight) and extrinsic factors (eg, smoking status, comedications, hospitalization) were examined. Univariate and multivariable, linear, mixed-effects models were employed, with a stepwise selection procedure based on Akaike information criterion to identify the relevant covariates.

RESULTS

In the multivariable model (based on 440 observations with a complete data set), several significant findings emerged. Olanzapine C:D ratios were significantly lower in smokers (β = -0.65, P < 0.001), valproate users (β = -0.53, P = 0.002), and inpatients (β = -0.20, P = 0.025). Furthermore, the C:D ratios decreased significantly as the time since the last dose increased (β = -0.040, P < 0.001). The male sex had a significant main effect on olanzapine C:D ratios (β = -2.80, P < 0.001), with significant interactions with age (β = 0.025, P < 0.001) and body weight (β = 0.017, P = 0.011). The selected covariates explained 30.3% of the variation in C:D ratios, with smoking status accounting for 7.7% and sex contributing 6.9%. The overall variation explained by both the fixed and random parts of the model was 67.4%. The model facilitated the prediction of olanzapine C:D ratios based on sex, age, and body weight.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical factors examined in this study, including sex, age, body weight, smoking status, and valproate comedication, remarkably influence olanzapine C:D ratios. Considering these factors, in addition to TDM and the clinical situation, could be important for dose adjustment.

Rapid Metabolism Underlying Subtherapeutic Serum Levels of Atypical Antipsychotics Preceding Clozapine Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data

INTRODUCTION

Adequate antipsychotic treatment intensity is required before diagnosing resistant schizophrenia and initiating clozapine treatment. We aimed to investigate potential rapid drug metabolism underlying low dose-adjusted serum concentration (CD) of non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics preceding clozapine treatment.

METHODS

Patients using non-clozapine, atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, risperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine) within 1 year before starting clozapine were included in this study from a therapeutic drug monitoring service in Oslo, Norway, between 2005 and 2023. Patients were assigned into low CD (LCD) and normal CD (NCD) subgroups. Using a reference sample with 147,964 antipsychotic measurements, LCD was defined as CDs below the 25th percentile, while patients with NCD exhibited CDs between the 25th and 75th percentile of the respective reference measurements. Metabolic ratios, doses, and frequency of subtherapeutic levels of non-clozapine antipsychotics were compared between LCD and NCD groups.

RESULTS

Preceding clozapine treatment, 110 out of 272 included patients (40.4%) were identified with LCD. Compared with the NCD group, LCD patients exhibited higher metabolic ratios of olanzapine (1.5-fold; p < 0.001), quetiapine (3.0-fold; p < 0.001), and risperidone (6.0-fold; p < 0.001). Metabolic ratio differences were independent of smoking and CYP2D6 genotype for olanzapine (p = 0.008) and risperidone (p = 0.016), respectively. Despite higher doses of olanzapine (1.25-fold; p = 0.054) and quetiapine (1.6-fold; p = 0.001) in LCD versus NCD patients, faster metabolism among the former was accompanied by higher frequencies of subtherapeutic levels of olanzapine (3.3-fold; p = 0.044) and quetiapine (1.8-fold; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

LCD and associated rapid metabolism of non-clozapine antipsychotics is frequent before starting clozapine treatment. For olanzapine and quetiapine, this is associated with significantly increased risk of having subtherapeutic concentrations.

Estrogens prevent the hypothalamus-periphery crosstalk induced by olanzapine intraperitoneal treatment in female mice: Effects on brown/beige adipose tissues and liver

Olanzapine (OLA) is a highly obesogenic second-generation antipsychotic (SGA). Recently we demonstrated that, contrarily to OLA oral treatment, intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration resulted in weight loss and absence of hepatic steatosis in wild-type (WT) and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B)-deficient (KO) male mice. This protection relied on two central-peripheral axes connecting hypothalamic AMPK with brown/inguinal white adipose tissue (BAT/iWAT) uncoupling protein-1 (UCP-1) and hypothalamic JNK with hepatic fatty acid synthase (FAS). Herein, we addressed OLA i.p. treatment effects in WT and PTP1B-KO female mice. Contrarily to our previous results in WT females receiving OLA orally, the i.p. treatment did not induce weight gain or hyperphagia. Molecularly, in females OLA failed to diminish hypothalamic phospho-AMPK or elevate BAT UCP-1 and energy expenditure (EE) despite the preservation of iWAT browning. Conversely, OLA i.p. treatment in ovariectomized mice reduced hypothalamic phospho-AMPK, increased BAT/iWAT UCP-1 and EE, and induced weight loss as occurred in males. Pretreatment of hypothalamic neurons with 17β-estradiol (E2) abolished OLA effects on AMPK. Moreover, neither hypothalamic JNK activation nor hepatic FAS upregulation were found in WT and PTP1B-KO females receiving OLA via i.p. Importantly, this axis was reestablished upon ovariectomy. In this line, E2 prevented OLA-induced phospho-JNK in hypothalamic neurons. These results support the role of estrogens in sex-related dimorphism in OLA treatment. This study evidenced the benefit of OLA i.p. administration in preventing its obesogenic effects in female mice that could offer clinical value.

Mechanisms of adverse mammary effect induced by olanzapine and therapeutic interventions in rat model

BACKGROUND

Olanzapine antagonizes dopamine receptors and is prescribed to treat multiple psychiatric conditions. The main side effect of concern for olanzapine is weight gain and metabolic syndrome. Olanzapine induces hyperprolactinemia, however its effect on the mammary gland is poorly documented.

METHODS

Rats received olanzapine by gavage or in drinking water at 1, 3, and 6 mg/kg/day for 5-40 days or 100 days, with and without coadministration of bromocriptine or aripiprazole and using once daily or continuous administration strategies. Histomorphology of the mammary gland, concentrations of prolactin, estradiol, progesterone, and olanzapine in serum, mammary gland and adipose tissue, and mRNA and protein expressions of prolactin receptors were analyzed.

RESULTS

In adult and prepubescent female rats and male rats, olanzapine induced significant development of mammary glands in dose- and time-dependent manners, with histopathological hyperplasia of mammary ducts and alveoli with lumen dilation and secretion, marked increase of mammary prolactin receptor expression, a marker of breast tissue, and with mild increase of circulating prolactin. This side effect can be reversed after medication withdrawal, but long-term olanzapine treatment for 100 days implicated tumorigenic potentials indicated by usual ductal epithelial hyperplasia. Olanzapine induced mammary development was prevented with the coaddition of the dopamine agonist bromocriptine or partial agonist aripiprazole, or by continuous administration of medication instead of a once daily regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

These results shed light on the previously overlooked effect of olanzapine on mammary development and present experimental evidence to support current clinical management strategies of antipsychotic induced side effects in the breast.

Effects of Aripiprazole on Olanzapine Population Pharmacokinetics and Initial Dosage Optimization in Schizophrenia Patients

Objective

Olanzapine has already been used to treat schizophrenia patients; however, the initial dosage recommendation when multiple drugs are used in combination, remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore the drug-drug interaction (DDI) of multiple drugs combined with olanzapine and to recommend the optimal administration of olanzapine in schizophrenia patients.

Methods

In this study, we obtained olanzapine concentrations from therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database. In addition, related medical information, such as physiological, biochemical indexes, and concomitant drugs was acquired using medical log. Sixty-five schizophrenia patients were enrollmented for analysis using population pharmacokinetic model by means of nonlinear mixed effect (NONMEM).

Results

Weight and combined use of aripiprazole significantly affected olanzapine clearance. Without aripiprazole, for once-daily olanzapine administration dosages, 0.6, 0.5 mg/kg/day were recommended for 40-70, and 70-100 kg schizophrenia patients, respectively; for twice-daily olanzapine administration dosages, 0.6, 0.5 mg/kg/day were recommended for 40-60, and 60-100 kg schizophrenia patients, respectively. With aripiprazole, for once-daily olanzapine administration dosages, 0.4, 0.3 mg/kg/day were recommended for 40-53, and 53-100 kg schizophrenia patients, respectively; for twice-daily olanzapine administration dosages, 0.4 mg/kg/day was recommended for 40-100 kg schizophrenia patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Aripiprazole significantly affected olanzapine clearance, and when schizophrenia patients use aripiprazole, the olanzapine dosages need adjust. Meanwhile, we firstly recommended the optimal initial dosages of olanzapine in schizophrenia patients.

Review of Dopamine Antagonists for Nausea and Vomiting in Palliative Care Patients

Symptoms of nausea and vomiting are common in palliative care and hospice patients. One of the many classes of medications used for the treatment of nausea and vomiting is dopamine receptor antagonists which are particularly helpful for treating nausea mediated by the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) and impaired gastrointestinal function. While dopamine antagonists can be very effective treatments for nausea they should be used with caution as they carry the risk of QTc prolongation, have a FDA black box warning for tardive dyskinesia (TD), and increased risk of precipitating psychosis and death in patients with dementia. This review will cover haloperidol, olanzapine, prochlorperazine, and metoclopramide for treatment of nausea and vomiting including evidence of efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics to improve safe and effective utilization in clinical practice. This includes medication receptor site affinities at histaminic, muscarinic, serotonergic, and alpha-adrenergic receptors which can help providers anticipate potential adverse effects and risk of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), TD, and QTc prolongation. This review also includes considerations for dose adjustments based on renal function, hepatic function, and age. Understanding the pharmacology of dopamine antagonists can help providers choose the best treatment for control of nausea and vomiting and subsequently improve patients' quality of life.

Olanzapine Pharmacokinetics: A Clinical Review of Current Insights and Remaining Questions

Olanzapine is one of the most widely used antipsychotics since its initial approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1996 and has undergone extensive pharmacokinetic study. Despite being utilized in clinical psychiatry for decades, there remain questions regarding the variety of available formulations, the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring, altered kinetic properties in special populations/medical illnesses, the use of high-dose olanzapine, and drug interactions, among many others. We performed a narrative literature review of olanzapine pharmacokinetics in June 2023 using the US National Library of Medicine's PubMed.gov resource (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) and Google Scholar. Herein, we review clinically relevant aspects of olanzapine pharmacokinetic data while highlighting knowledge gaps and potential areas of future study.

Association of smoking cigarettes, age, and sex with serum concentrations of olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia

Introduction

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug which is effective in the treatment of schizophrenia. Cigarette smoking, age, and sex could be related to the pharmacokinetics and serum concentrations of olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia. The aim of the study was to examine whether there was a significant difference in the serum olanzapine concentrations with regard to the mentioned factors.

Materials and methods

A total of 58 outpatients with schizophrenia (37 smokers, 42 men, 35 older than 40 years) participated in the study. Blood was sampled in serum tubes just before taking the next dose of olanzapine. Olanzapine was extracted by liquid-liquid extraction and was measured by an in-house high-performance liquid chromatography method on Shimadzu Prominence HPLC System with diode array detector SPD-M20A (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The results were expressed as the ratio of concentration to the daily dose of olanzapine (C/D). Non-parametric statistical tests were used to analyse differences between variables.

Results

The median C/D of olanzapine (interquartile range) in smokers was 6.0 (3.4-10.2) nmol/L/mg and in non-smokers 10.1 (5.9-17.6) nmol/L/mg; P = 0.007. The median C/D of olanzapine in patients younger than 40 years was 5.6 (4.5-10.2) nmol/L/mg and in patients older than 40 years 8.4 (5.6-13.0) nmol/L/mg; P = 0.105. The median C/D of olanzapine in male patients was 6.6 (4.6-10.4) nmol/L/mg and in female patients 9.0 (5.9-15.3) nmol/L/mg; P = 0.064.

Conclusions

The serum olanzapine concentration was significantly lower in smoking than in non-smoking patients with schizophrenia. No significant difference was demonstrated with regard to age and sex.

Olanzapine as an add-on, pre-operative anti-emetic drug for postoperative nausea or vomiting: a randomised controlled trial

Postoperative nausea or vomiting occurs in up to 40% in patients with multiple risk factors, despite prophylaxis. Olanzapine is an antipsychotic drug that is used to prevent nausea and vomiting in palliative care and to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This study aimed to examine whether pre-operative olanzapine, as a prophylactic anti-emetic added to intra-operative dexamethasone, ondansetron and total intravenous anaesthesia, reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting. We performed a multiply-blinded randomised controlled trial in patients aged 18-60 years with cancer at high risk of postoperative nausea or vomiting (three or four risk factors according to the Apfel criteria) plus a previous history of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Patients were allocated at random to receive 10 mg olanzapine or placebo orally 1 h before surgery in addition to a two-drug regimen (dexamethasone and ondansetron) and propofol anaesthesia to prevent postoperative nausea or vomiting. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting in the first 24 h after surgery. In total, 100 patients were enrolled; 47 in the olanzapine group and 49 in the control group completed the study. The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. The incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting in the first 24 h after surgery was lower in the olanzapine group (12/47, 26%) than in the control group (31/49, 63%) (p = 0.008, RR 0.40 (95%CI 0.21-0.79)). Adding pre-operative oral olanzapine to intra-operative dexamethasone and ondansetron was highly effective in reducing the risk of postoperative nausea or vomiting in the first 24 hours after surgery in patients with a previous history of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and at least three Apfel risk factors for postoperative nausea or vomiting.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring of olanzapine]

Olanzapine, atypical antipsychotic, is used to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Its therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is quite commonly done. Olanzapine is well absorbed orally (bioavailability: 85 %), with peak plasma occurring between 4 and 6hours after oral administration. It is extensively metabolized by different hepatic enzymes (including CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 isoforms) to a large number of inactive metabolites, and its half-life is between 30 and 60hours. No specific therapeutic range, or threshold concentration could not be a consensus, but the higher intra- and interindividual variability, as well as the existence of studies suggesting a correlation between circulating concentrations of olanzapine and occurrence of therapeutic relapse or toxic phenomena appear to justify the STP for this molecule. Given these data, the interest of the STP was evaluated for this molecule to: recommended with therapeutic window of 20μg/L to 80μg/L.

Olanzapine Overdose in a Two-Year-Old Girl Resulting in Both High Serum and Plasma Levels

The antipsychotic olanzapine is used increasingly to treat various psychiatric illnesses. Accidental olanzapine overdose is uncommon among children. Here, we report a case of a child presenting with an unexplained coma. Accidental ingestion of olanzapine (20 mg) was confirmed by measurement of drug concentrations in both serum and plasma.

Olanzapine treatment effectively relieves breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a real-world experience

BACKGROUND

Olanzapine treatment prevents chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). However, its role in the secondary prevention of breakthrough CINV in real-world cancer care should be further evaluated.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective study on patients receiving olanzapine to prevent breakthrough CINV refractory to standard antiemetic therapy. The major outcome was improvement in CINV, defined as any downgrade in CINV symptoms, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Comprete response was defined as no symptoms in CINV, i.e., Grade 0. These outcomes were compared in the HEC versus non-HEC groups and the standard- (5 or 10 mg/day) versus low- (2.5 mg/day) dose groups. The other outcome measurement was adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

We analyzed 127 patients, including 92 women, with a median age of 50 years (range: 19-89 years). Baseline CINV severity was grade 1, 2, and 3 in 18%, 69%, and 13% of the patients, respectively. After prophylaxis with olanzapine at doses of 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/day, improvement was observed in 105 (83%) patients, with a complete response in 42 patients (33%). The improvement and complete remission rates for the HEC (n = 96) and non-HEC (n = 31) groups were 86% and 71% (p = 0.048) versus 38% and 19% (p = 0.062), respectively. The rates for the standard- (n = 98) and low- (n = 29) dose groups were 86% and 82% (p = 0.568) versus 28% and 52% (p = 0.015), respectively. Thirty-four patients (27%) experienced olanzapine-related AEs, mainly somnolence (n = 28). Grade 3 or higher AEs were not observed.

CONCLUSION

Our study results support the clinical application of olanzapine for the secondary prevention of breakthrough CINV.

Drug-drug interactions between antiseizure medications and antipsychotic medications: a narrative review and expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) and antipsychotic drugs are frequently coadministered with the potential for drug-drug interactions. Interactions may either be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic, resulting in a decrease or increase in efficacy and/or an increase or decrease in adverse effects.

AREAS COVERED

The clinical evidence for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics is reviewed based on the results of a literature search in MEDLINE conducted in April 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

There is now extensive published evidence for the clinical importance of interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics. Enzyme-inducing ASMs can decrease blood concentrations of many of the antipsychotics. There is also evidence that enzyme-inhibiting ASMs can increase antipsychotic blood concentrations. Similarly, there is limited evidence showing that antipsychotic drugs may affect the blood concentrations of ASMs through pharmacokinetic interactions. There is less available evidence for pharmacodynamic interactions, but these can also be important, as can displacement from protein binding. The lack of published evidence for an interaction should not be interpreted as meaning that the given interaction does not occur; the evidence is building continually. There is no substitute for careful patient monitoring and sound clinical judgment.

Intranasal administration of olanzapine has beneficial outcome in a rat activity-based anorexia model

The atypical antipsychotic drug olanzapine is prescribed despite clinical studies on olanzapine treatment showing mixed results on treatment efficacy in anorexia nervosa. We investigated the effect of systemic and intranasal administration of olanzapine in the activity-based anorexia (ABA) model. Rats were habituated to a running wheel and exposed to the ABA model while treated with olanzapine. During ABA rats had 1.5 h of daily access to food and ad libitum access to a running wheel for seven consecutive days. Olanzapine was administered via an osmotic minipump (1, 2.75, and 7.5 mg/kg) or intranasally 2 h before dark onset (1 and 2.75 mg/kg). We monitored body weight, food intake, wheel revolutions, body temperature, and adipose tissue. We found 2.75 and 7.5 mg/kg systemic olanzapine decreased wheel revolutions during ABA. Relative adipose tissue mass was increased in the 7.5 mg/kg olanzapine-treated group while body weight, food intake, and body temperature were unaltered by the systemic olanzapine. 1 and 2.75 mg/kg intranasal olanzapine diminished wheel revolutions and body temperature during the first 2 h after administration. The intranasal olanzapine-treated rats had a higher body weight at the end of ABA. We find that olanzapine has beneficial outcomes in the ABA via two administration routes by acting mainly on running wheel activity. Intranasal olanzapine showed a rapid effect in the first hours after administration in reducing locomotor activity. We recommend further exploring intranasal administration of olanzapine in anorectic patients to assist them in coping with restlessness.

Deep Learning Methods Applied to Drug Concentration Prediction of Olanzapine

Pharmacometrics and the utilization of population pharmacokinetics play an integral role in model-informed drug discovery and development (MIDD). Recently, there has been a growth in the application of deep learning approaches to aid in areas within MIDD. In this study, a deep learning model, LSTM-ANN, was developed to predict olanzapine drug concentrations from the CATIE study. A total of 1527 olanzapine drug concentrations from 523 individuals along with 11 patient-specific covariates were used in model development. The hyperparameters of the LSTM-ANN model were optimized through a Bayesian optimization algorithm. A population pharmacokinetic model using the NONMEM model was constructed as a reference to compare to the performance of the LSTM-ANN model. The RMSE of the LSTM-ANN model was 29.566 in the validation set, while the RMSE of the NONMEM model was 31.129. Permutation importance revealed that age, sex, and smoking were highly influential covariates in the LSTM-ANN model. The LSTM-ANN model showed potential in the application of drug concentration predictions as it was able to capture the relationships within a sparsely sampled pharmacokinetic dataset and perform comparably to the NONMEM model.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring of antipsychotic drugs in routine psychiatric practice]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between daily doses of antipsychotic drugs, their serum concentrations, and characteristics of patients treated for schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder in day-to-day clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 187 patients were included in the study, 77 (41.1%) patients were on monotherapy, and 110 (58.9%) patients received two or more antipsychotics. Patients age was 27.8±8.1 years, and their body weight was 79.8±15.6 kg. The sample was represented mainly by young men (93.0%). The proportion of smokers was 37.4%. The appropriate HPLC-MS/MS method was used for the simultaneous analysis of 8 antipsychotics and its active metabolites. Serum concentrations of the drugs aripiprazole (ARI), chlorpromazine (CPZ), haloperidol (HAL), zuclopenthixol (ZUC), clozapine (CLO), risperidone (RIS), quetiapine (QUE), olanzapine (OLA), norclozapine (N-desmethylclozapine, NOR), 9-hydroxyrisperidone (9-OH-RIS), dehydroaripiprazole (DGA) were measured. The serum concentration/dose ratio (C/D) was employed as the primary outcome measure, as doses were not kept constant during the study. The active antipsychotic fraction (drug+active metabolite, active moiety - AM) was also evaluated for RIS and ARI. In addition, the metabolite/parent ratio (MPR) was evaluated for RIS and ARI.

RESULTS

A total of 265 biological samples were obtained, 421 and 203 measurements of the concentration of drugs and their metabolites were carried out, respectively. Overall, 48% of antipsychotics levels were in the expected therapeutic ranges, 30% were below therapeutic ranges, and 22% were above them. A total of 55 patients underwent dose adjustments or drug changes due to ineffectiveness or side-effects. It has been found that smoking reduces the level of C/D for CLO (p<0.01, Mann-Whitney test). We have established that comedication with CLO significantly increases the C/D ratio of QUE (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney test). We have not revealed any influence of weight and age of the subjects on the C/D. The dose-concentration regression relationships are formalized for all AP.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutical drug monitoring (TDM) is an essential tool to personalize antipsychotic therapy. Careful analysis of TDM data can contribute significantly to the study of the impact of individual patient characteristics on systemic exposure to these drugs.

Vitamin D supplementation is effective for olanzapine-induced dyslipidemia

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug that is clinically applied in patients with schizophrenia. It increases the risk of dyslipidemia, a disturbance of lipid metabolic homeostasis, usually characterized by increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides, and accompanied by decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in the serum. In this study, analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, JMDC insurance claims, and electronic medical records from Nihon University School of Medicine revealed that a co-treated drug, vitamin D, can reduce the incidence of olanzapine-induced dyslipidemia. In the following experimental validations of this hypothesis, short-term oral olanzapine administration in mice caused a simultaneous increase and decrease in the levels of LDL and HDL cholesterol, respectively, while the triglyceride level remained unaffected. Cholecalciferol supplementation attenuated these deteriorations in blood lipid profiles. RNA-seq analysis was conducted on three cell types that are closely related to maintaining cholesterol metabolic balance (hepatocytes, adipocytes, and C2C12) to verify the direct effects of olanzapine and the functional metabolites of cholecalciferol (calcifediol and calcitriol). Consequently, the expression of cholesterol-biosynthesis-related genes was reduced in calcifediol- and calcitriol-treated C2C12 cells, which was likely to be mediated by activating the vitamin D receptor that subsequently inhibited the cholesterol biosynthesis process via insulin-induced gene 2 regulation. This clinical big-data-based drug repurposing approach is effective in finding a novel treatment with high clinical predictability and a well-defined molecular mechanism.

The pathophysiology of rapid fluctuations in mental status associated with olanzapine: A case report

Background

Olanzapine toxicity is reported to be a rare but specific phenomenon characterized by rapid fluctuations between somnolence and agitation, which has been referred to as “agitation despite sedation.” A similar phenomenon is observed as an adverse reaction of the long-acting injectable olanzapine formulation, which has been referred to as “delirium/sedation syndrome.”

Case presentation

This case report describes a 48-year-old man diagnosed with schizophrenia who experienced rapid fluctuations between somnolence and agitation during a cross-titration of olanzapine to clozapine. The patient had normal serum levels of both medications and the symptoms resolved with the discontinuation of olanzapine.

Conclusion

Rapid fluctuations in mental status between somnolence and agitation are not clearly described among other antipsychotics, and it is possible that this phenomenon may be specific to olanzapine. The findings of this case report suggested that this phenomenon was likely the result of the oversaturation of (H1) and (M1) receptors.

Efficacy of Olanzapine for Symptom Relief in Cancer Patients

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic and is widely used for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. Previous studies have suggested its potential efficacy for the relief of various symptoms in cancer patients, especially gastrointestinal and psychiatric symptoms. We retrospectively reviewed the prescription of olanzapine to cancer patients at our hospital. Between 2008 and 2020, olanzapine was prescribed to 41 patients for relief of symptoms associated with cancer other than prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Of those patients, symptom relief was seen in 53.7%. Notably, olanzapine was effective in 13 of 14 patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting refractory to guideline-recommended prophylaxis. Of 16 patients in whom this symptom was not relieved by olanzapine, 13 (81.3%) continued taking olanzapine even after it was judged ineffective. No treatment-related adverse events were seen in this study. Our observation implies good efficacy of olanzapine for refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and a tendency to continue olanzapine even in those for whom it was ineffective.

Metabolic, genetic, and pharmacokinetic parameters for the prediction of olanzapine efficacy

Clinical use of the a olanzapine has significantly different individual-to-individual outcomes. Accordingly, this study aimed to develop a means of predicting response to olanzapine using a combined approach based on pharmacokinetics, pharmacometabonomics, and genetic polymorphism. The olanzapine pharmacokinetics of 19 healthy volunteers treated with orally disintegrating tablets were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Metabolic profiling and phenotyping were performed on the blood samples that remained after pharmacokinetic analysis using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry. Uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), γ-aminobutyric acid transaminase (GABA-T), and succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase (SSADH) were identified as key genes. The single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes most related to drug metabolism were investigated by polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Forty-one metabolites (p < 0.05) are increased or decreased after treatment with olanzapine. Tryptophan metabolism, norepinephrine metabolism, and γ-aminobutyric acid metabolism were identified as being related to the effects of olanzapine. Subjects carrying rs1641031 AC and CC exhibited a 59.2% increase in the mean peak concentration (C_max) value and a 25.33% decrease in the mean oral clearance rate (CL/F) value, compared to that in subjects with the GABA-T rs1641031 AA genotype (p < 0.05). Moreover, polymorphism of the GABA-T gene has an impact on the metabolism of 5-hydroxytryptamine. Lysophosphatidylethanolamine (0:0/18:3), lysophosphatidylethanolamine (0:0/22:5), and octadecatrienoic acid distinguish subjects with high and low olanzapine drug oral clearance and are thus identified as biomarkers for predicting its efficacy.

Olanzapine/Samidorphan: A New Option for the Treatment of Adults With Schizophrenia or Bipolar I Disorder

Objective

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy and safety data of a combination of olanzapine and samidorphan (OLZ/SAM) for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder, which mitigates the possible unwanted side effects of weight gain associated with olanzapine (OLZ).

Data Sources

The review was done with a bibliographic survey of studies using MEDLINE/PubMed (January 1999-May 2021) database using the keywords olanzapine and samidorphan. Abstracts, scientific posters, and information from the manufacturer's product labeling were evaluated for inclusion. Inclusion criteria: phase 2, phase 3, and open-labeled studies that evaluated the use of OLZ/SAM for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder.

Data Synthesis

We have included one phase 2 dose-ranging exploratory study, two phase 3 efficacy and safety studies, and several open-label extension studies without a comparator. For the treatment of schizophrenia, OLZ/SAM and OLZ alone were analyzed in 2 randomized, double-blind comparison studies of approximately 960 patients. Analysis indicated that OLZ (5-20 mg)/SAM (10 mg) significantly mitigated the side effect of weight gain compared with OLZ alone (control) while maintaining antipsychotic efficacy. For bipolar I disorder, OLZ/SAM was approved as an acute treatment for manic or mixed episodes, as well as an adjunct to valproate or lithium for manic/mixed episodes based on bridging strategy allowed by the Food and Drug Administration.

Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice

The combination of olanzapine and samidorphan demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of schizophrenia with a dosage range of 5 to 20 mg OLZ to a 10-mg fixed dose of samidorphan. Advantages of this drug combination include once-daily dosing, favorable tolerability, and most importantly, mitigation of weight gain, which may encourage adherence, when compared with OLZ alone.

Conclusion

The new combination treatment of OLZ/SAM is a unique antipsychotic formulation to provide the recognized efficacious treatment of OLZ, while mitigating the weight gain and possibly the weight-related adverse effects secondary to OLZ monotherapy.

Amisulpride Augmentation in Schizophrenia Patients with Poor Response to Olanzapine: A 4-week, Randomized, Rater-Blind, Controlled, Pilot Study

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of continued olanzapine (OLA) versus amisulpride (AMI) augmentation in schizophrenic patients with poor response to OLA monotherapy.

Methods

The present 4-week, randomized, rater-blinded study included 25 patients with schizophrenia who were partially or completely unresponsive to treatment with OLA monotherapy. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned at a 11 ratio to continuation of OLA monotherapy (OLA group) or OLA with AMI augmentation (AMI group). Efficacy was primarily evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at baseline and at 1, 2, and 4 weeks.

Results

The changes in PANSS total score and PANSS-positive subscale score were significantly different (p < 0.05) between the OLA and AMI groups. The differences between the two groups in PANSS-negative subscale, PANSS-general subscale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale scores were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

AMI augmentation could be an effective strategy for patients with schizophrenia who show inadequate early response to OLA monotherapy.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Pharmacokinetics of Antipsychotics: Focusing on East Asians

Empirical clinical studies have suggested that East Asian patients may require lower dosages of psychotropic drugs, such as antipsychotics, lithium, and antidepressants, than non-Asians. Both the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a drug can affect the clinical response of an illness. The levels of antipsychotics used for the treatment of schizophrenia may affect patient clinical responses; several factors can affect these levels, including patient medication adherence, body weight (BW) or body mass index, smoking habits, and sex. The cytochrome P450 (CYP) system is a major factor affecting the blood levels of antipsychotics because many antipsychotics are metabolized by this system. There were notable genetic differences between people of different races. In this study, we determined the racial or ethnic differences in the metabolic patterns of some selected antipsychotics by reviewing therapeutic drug monitoring studies in East Asian populations. The plasma concentrations of haloperidol, clozapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and lurasidone, which are metabolized by specific CYP enzymes, were determined to be higher, under the same daily dose, in East Asian populations than in Western populations.

Comorbidities and the right dose: antipsychotics

INTRODUCTION

The effects of antipsychotic drugs are dose-dependent, which is particularly true for their efficacy, each antipsychotic having a specific dose-response curve. This may justify individualizing doses for these agents.

AREAS COVERED

We review the pharmacokinetic profiles of seven oral antipsychotics: haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole. Their main indications are psychotic and affective disorders. They are prescribed in a very large population which may have comorbidities. Hence, we analyze the impact of the latter on the pharmacokinetic profiles of these antipsychotics, focusing on renal and hepatic impairment. Reviews and clinical trials were discussed based on a systematic literature search (PubMed) ranging from 1995 to 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Factors liable to impact antipsychotic dosage are numerous and their subsequent effects often hard to predict, due to multi-level interactions and compensatory phenomena. In clinical practice, physicians must be aware of these potential effects, but base their decisions on monitoring antipsychotic plasma levels.

The Use of Atypical Antipsychotics in Treating a Pediatric Psychiatric Patient

Approaches to enhancing mental health management entail several perspectives and efforts to promote competent treatment. In light of this, we present a case report to describe the nature of events encountered during the management of a psychiatric patient. The paper commences by providing a general introduction and background of the concept of atypical antipsychotics before adding a thesis statement that healthcare providers should be knowledgeable regarding psychopharmacotherapy to effectively design and implement safe patient care. The paper's method involved the review of a case scenario and discussion of the concepts using evidence-based guidance and perspectives. In the case scenario, a pediatric patient significantly gains weight and develops extrapyramidal effects like dystonias, and erratic, jerky neck movements as a consequence of treatment with olanzapine. The most effective care plan involves stopping the medication, reviewing treatment options, and incorporating physical exercise. Most importantly, the plan encourages achieving an adequate heart rate above 100 beats per minute to maintain sufficient perfusion during exercise. The paper concludes by summarizing the perspectives from the studies reviewed.

Alcohol use history increases the likelihood of suicide behavior among male chronic patients with schizophrenia in a Chinese population

AIMS

This study was designed to detect the association between the history of alcohol drinking and suicidality in schizophrenia (SCZ) inpatients in a Chinese population.

METHODS

We recruited 616 male SCZ inpatients and collected demographic and clinical data. Five-factor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to assess their psychopathological symptoms.

RESULTS

Our results showed that 31.33% of SCZ patients had a history of alcohol drinking. They had higher rates of lifetime suicide attempt and suicidal ideation than those without a history of alcohol drinking. Moreover, patients with a history of drinking were more likely to attempt suicide (14.51% vs. 7.09%; χ²  = 7.70, df = 1, p = 0.006), with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.22 and have suicidal ideation (29.02% vs. 17.49%; χ²  = 9.89, df = 1, p = 0.002), with an OR of 1.93. In addition, patients who used to drink alcohol were more likely to be smokers and had more severe positive and depressive symptoms (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that history of alcohol drinking may increase the prevalence of lifetime suicide attempt and suicidal ideation in male patients with chronic SCZ. Moreover, the history of alcohol drinking may be associated with some demographic data and clinical symptoms.

Comparative, Single-Dose, 2-Way Cross-Over Bioavailability Study of Two Olanzapine 10 Mg Tablet Formulations in Healthy Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions

Objectives: Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is approved across Europe, the USA, and in many other countries for oral treatment of schizophrenia and acute manic episodes in patients with bipolar disorder as well as for maintenance therapy to prevent recurrence in responders. The objective of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of two 10 mg tablet formulations of Olanzapine following a single oral dose in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions, as per the European Medicine Agency (EMA) guidelines to grant marketing authorization. Methods: This study was a randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequences, single-dose, cross-over design with a washout period of 14 days. Both the test and the reference products were administered as 10 mg tablets with 240 mL of water after an overnight fast in each study period. A total of twenty blood samples were collected before dosing and within 144 hours after drug administration. Adverse events were monitored, recorded, and evaluated by investigators throughout the study. Results: Of the 24 healthy adult male subjects enrolled, all of them completed both study periods. The geometric mean ratio 90% confidence intervals (CI) for fasting Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-infinity were 94.83-113.71%, 95.04-105.69% and 95.94-107.00%, respectively. The 90% CI for the ratios of the three primary pharmacokinetic parameters (using log-transformed data) were within the range of 80-125%, meeting the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence. Conclusions: The generic Olanzapine was bioequivalent to the reference formulation. It was well tolerated and provides an acceptable alternative to the reference drug.

Adverse Drug Reactions of Olanzapine, Clozapine and Loxapine in Children and Youth: A Systematic Pharmacogenetic Review

Children and youth treated with antipsychotic drugs (APs) are particularly vulnerable to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and prone to poor treatment response. In particular, interindividual variations in drug exposure can result from differential metabolism of APs by cytochromes, subject to genetic polymorphism. CYP1A2 is pivotal in the metabolism of the APs olanzapine, clozapine, and loxapine, whose safety profile warrants caution. We aimed to shed some light on the pharmacogenetic profiles possibly associated with these drugs’ ADRs and loss of efficacy in children and youth. We conducted a systematic review relying on four databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 recommendations and checklist, with a quality assessment. Our research yielded 32 publications. The most frequent ADRs were weight gain and metabolic syndrome (18; 56.3%), followed by lack of therapeutic effect (8; 25%) and neurological ADRs (7; 21.8%). The overall mean quality score was 11.3/24 (±2.7). In 11 studies (34.3%), genotyping focused on the study of cytochromes. Findings regarding possible associations were sometimes conflicting. Nonetheless, cases of major clinical improvement were fostered by genotyping. Yet, CYP1A2 remains poorly investigated. Further studies are required to improve the assessment of the risk–benefit balance of prescription for children and youth treated with olanzapine, clozapine, and/or loxapine.

Olanzapine/Samidorphan: A New Combination Treatment for Schizophrenia and Bipolar I Disorder Intended to Reduce Weight Gain

Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic with established efficacy in several psychiatric disease states, but its use is limited because of weight gain and metabolic side effects. Samidorphan is a novel opioid antagonist that binds to mu-opioid, kappa-opioid, and delta-opioid receptors and is hypothesized to reduce cravings for high-calorie foods thus attenuating antipsychotic-induced weight gain. The combination product olanzapine/samidorphan was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in June 2021 for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder; this article reviews the pharmacological properties of oral olanzapine/samidorphan and its clinical efficacy and tolerability with a focus on mitigation of olanzapine-induced weight gain in these patient populations. In clinical trials, the combination of olanzapine/samidorphan was associated with significantly less weight gain and smaller increases in waist circumference as compared with olanzapine monotherapy. Olanzapine/samidorphan demonstrated similar efficacy as olanzapine monotherapy and was well tolerated. Weight gain and metabolic side effects associated with olanzapine monotherapy can result in tolerability issues and potentially medication nonadherence. Olanzapine/samidorphan is an effective treatment for schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder with less weight gain than olanzapine monotherapy.

Chronic Oral Olanzapine Treatment but not Haloperidol Decreases [3H] MK-801 Binding in the Rat Brain Independent of Dietary Conditions

Haloperidol and olanzapine are first and second-generation antipsychotic (neuroleptic) medications approved to treat schizophrenia. Glutamate signaling is known to play an important role in the manifestation of schizophrenia symptoms, as phencyclidine, a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist, replicates and exasperates these symptoms. While initial reports show that neuroleptic treatments can impact aspects of NMDAR expression, there is little attention on the interaction between neuroleptics and dietary conditions. Thus, we examined the impact of chronic haloperidol and olanzapine treatment under both normal and high-fat dietary conditions on NMDAR expression. Adult male rats were treated for 28-days with either oral vehicle, haloperidol (1.5mg/kg), or olanzapine (10mg/kg), and fed either a standard control diet or a high-fat diet. In-vitro receptor autoradiography binding was performed using [³H] MK-801 as a measure of NMDAR expression. Results showed that olanzapine, irrespective of the diet, significantly decreased [³H] MK-801 binding within the cingulate cortex, substantia nigra, insular cortex, piriform cortex, ectorhinal cortex and perirhinal cortex, the forelimb region of the somatosensory cortex, and all quadrants of the caudate-putamen. In contrast, haloperidol treatment did not impact [³H] MK-801 binding, and we also report no effect of diet on [³H] MK-801 binding. These data suggest that the effects seen in olanzapine treatment are not mediated by diet, nor does a 28-day chronic high-fat diet alter [³H] MK-801 binding. Furthermore, these data also importantly support that combined consumption of a high-fat diet and pharmacological treatments are not immediately detrimental to NMDARs and contribute to the expansive literature of precision medicine.

Metformin Ameliorates Hepatic Steatosis induced by olanzapine through inhibiting LXRα/PCSK9 pathway

Studies have confirmed that olanzapine, the mainstay treatment for schizophrenia, triggers metabolic diseases, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the etiology of olanzapine-induced NAFLD is poorly understood. Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is involved in NAFLD pathogenesis, and metformin can significantly decrease circulating PCSK9. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of PCSK9 and explore the therapeutic effect of metformin for olanzapine-associated NAFLD. Olanzapine significantly upregulated PCSK9 and promoted lipid accumulation in mouse livers and HepG2 and AML12 cells. Metformin ameliorated these pathological alterations. PCSK9 upstream regulator liver X receptor α (LXRα) was significantly upregulated in olanzapine-induced NAFLD. LXRα antagonist treatment and LXRα overexpression resulted in a decrease and increase of PCSK9, respectively. Hepatic lipogenesis-associated genes FAS and SCD1 were significantly upregulated in olanzapine-induced NAFLD mice and HepG2 cells overexpressing PCSK9, and genes related to lipid β-oxidation (SCAD and PPARα) were downregulated, while metformin reversed these changes. In addition, we found that LXRα overexpression compromised the effect of metformin on PCSK9 levels and intracellular lipid droplet formation. Taken together, our findings suggest that olanzapine enhances hepatic PCSK9 expression by upregulating LXRα, thereby increasing FAS and SCD1 expression as well as decreasing SCAD and PPARα, and promoting lipid accumulation, and, subsequently, NAFLD, which is ameliorated by metformin.

Serum levels of olanzapine are associated with acute cognitive effects in bipolar disorder

Bipolar (BPD) patients have deficits in cognition, but there are still controversies about the effects of some medications on their cognitive performance. Here, we investigated the relationship between cognition in terms of executive functions, memory, and attention in both first-episode medication-naive BPD patients and BPD patients taking olanzapine. Forty-one healthy controls, 40 unmedicated drug-naive BPD patients, and 34 BPD patients who took only olanzapine were recruited for the study. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Flanker test, Stroop test, and Corsi-block test. Bayesian multivariate regression analysis was run considering maximum robustness to avoid bias and to predict the outcomes. Our results revealed that unmedicated medication-naive BPD patients performed worse than healthy controls and the olanzapine group in some tasks. Additionally, BPD patients who took olanzapine had better cognitive performance than healthy controls and unmedicated BPD patients. The acute cognitive effects were predicted by olanzapine dosage and serum levels (i.e., large effects). The potential pro-cognitive effects of olanzapine in BPD patients should be carefully interpreted by considering various other clinical variables. We expect that our findings will contribute to further research in this area, with the goal of helping other researchers, patients, and the population.

Utilization of Polymeric Micelles as a Lucrative Platform for Efficient Brain Deposition of Olanzapine as an Antischizophrenic Drug via Intranasal Delivery

Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterized by alterations in cognition, behavior and emotions. Oral olanzapine (OZ) administration is extensively metabolized (~up to 40% of the administrated dose). In addition, OZ is a P-glycoproteins substrate that impairs the blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability. To direct OZ to the brain and to minimize its systemic side effects, the nasal pathway is recommended. OZ-loaded polymeric micelles nano-carriers were developed using suitable biodegradable excipients. The developed micelles were physicochemically investigated to assess their appropriateness for intranasal delivery and the potential of these carriers for OZ brain targeting. The selected formula will be examined in vivo for improving the anti-schizophrenic effects on a schizophrenia rat model. The binary mixture of P123/P407 has a low CMC (0.001326% w/v), which helps in maintaining the formed micelles’ stability upon dilution. The combination effect of P123, P407 and TPGS led to a decrease in micelle size, ranging between 37.5–47.55 nm and an increase in the EE% (ranging between 68.22–86.84%). The selected OZ–PM shows great stability expressed by a suitable negative charge zeta potential value (−15.11 ± 1.35 mV) and scattered non-aggregated spherical particles with a particle size range of 30–40 nm. OZ–PM maintains sustained drug release at the application site with no nasal cytotoxicity. In vivo administration of the selected OZ–PM formula reveals improved CNS targeting and anti-schizophrenia-related deficits after OZ nasal administration. Therefore, OZ–PM provided safe direct nose-to-brain transport of OZ after nasal administration with an efficient anti-schizophrenic effect.