Food does not influence the pharmacokinetics of a new extended release formulation of tolterodine for once daily treatment of patients with overactive bladder

A short review of drug-food interactions of medicines treating overactive bladder syndrome

Background Overactive bladder syndrome is a condition where one or more of the symptoms such as pollakiuria, urgent need to urinate, nocturia and urinary incontinence is observed. Its prevalence ranges between 7 and 27 % in men and 9–43 % in women. The role of a pharmacist is to educate the patient on medications administration scheme, and drug interactions with particular food or food components. Aim of the review To assess a potential impact of food and fruit juice on the pharmacokinetic and therapeutic effects of medications used in treating overactive bladder syndrome. This information will enhance pharmaceutical care and is vital and helpful for pharmacists counseling their patients. Method In order to gather information on interactions of medications employed in bladder dysfunctions, the English language reports published in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and CINAHL database over the years 1996–2015 were studied. Additionally, other resources, namely drugs.com, Medscape, UpToDate, Micromedex, Medical Letter, as well as Stockley Drugs Interaction electronic publication were included in the study. The analysis also covered product data sheets for particular medicinal products. Results Meals and the consumption of grapefruit juice were found to exert a diversified effect on the pharmacokinetics of drugs employed in overactive bladder syndrome therapy. Neither tolterodine, nor mirabegron interact with food and citrus fruit juice, whereas darifenacin, fesoterodine, oxybutynin and solifenacin do interact with grapefruit and others citrus fruit juice. The effects of such interactions may potentially be negative to patients. Trospium absorption is significantly decreased by food. Conclusion For selected medicines used in treating bladder dysfunctions food and grapefruit juice consumption may significantly affect efficacy and safety of the therapy. All information on the topic is likely to enhance the quality of pharmaceutical care.

The clinical efficacy of tolterodine extended-release is maintained for 24 h in patients with overactive bladder

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 24-h efficacy of tolterodine extended-release (ER) in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis of a 12-week, placebo-controlled trial of tolterodine-ER in patients with frequency (> or =8 voids/24 h) and UUI (> or=5 episodes/week) for > or = 6 months. Seven-day bladder diaries were used to record diary endpoints; 24-h diary data were stratified by 6-h periods beginning at midnight.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo (508 patients), tolterodine-ER (507 patients) significantly and consistently increased volume voided per void and reduced UUI episodes and micturition frequency during each interval.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that tolterodine-ER maintained clinical efficacy over 24 h and should be effective for OAB symptoms without regard to whether symptoms occur during the day or at night.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Tolterodine for Treatment of Overactive Bladder

Tolterodine was developed as an antimuscarinic agent specifically for the treatment of overactive bladder. Initial in vivo studies demonstrated a functional selectivity for the muscarinic receptors in the urinary bladder over the salivary glands, and subsequent clinical trials showed an overall superior tolerability profile compared with other drugs in the same class (ie, oxybutynin). With immediate- and extended-release formulations and sustained clinical efficacy during long-term treatment, tolterodine gas become an important treatment option for the symptoms of overactive bladder.

Effect of the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine

This study assessed the effect of the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the bioavailability of the extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine. Forty-four healthy volunteers received each of 4 treatments in a 4-period crossover design. The treatments consisted of osmotically controlled extended-release oxybutynin chloride tablets at 10 mg/d or extended-release tolterodine tartrate capsules at 4 mg/d, with and without preceding treatment with 20 mg omeprazole daily for 4 days. Blood samples collected predose and at scheduled time points for 36 hours postdose were analyzed for oxybutynin and its active metabolite, N-desethyloxybutynin, or tolterodine and its active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite, as appropriate. The AUCinfinity ratios for oxybutynin and its metabolite with and without prior omeprazole fell within the 80% to 125% range (accepted as the criterion for bioequivalence), as did those for tolterodine and its active moiety. The peak concentration ratios for oxybutynin and metabolite also conformed to this range; those for tolterodine did not. Increasing gastric pH with omeprazole does not substantially alter the pharmacokinetic properties of extended-release oxybutynin but may alter those of extended-release tolterodine.

Human Muscarinic Receptor Binding Characteristics of Antimuscarinic Agents to Treat Overactive Bladder

PURPOSE

We characterized the binding affinities of several antimuscarinic agents in human muscarinic receptors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Competitive inhibitory effects of antimuscarinic agents on specific NMS [H] (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts) binding were examined in human tissue homogenates and in CHO-K1 cell membranes expressing human muscarinic receptor subtypes.

RESULTS

Oxybutynin, propiverine, tolterodine, the respective metabolites DEOB, DPr-P-4(N-->O) and 5-HM, and darifenacin inhibited in concentration dependent fashion specific [(3)H]NMS binding in homogenates of the human bladder and parotid gland as well as in membranes of CHO-K1 cell lines expressing human muscarinic M(1) to M(5) receptor subtypes. Based on inhibition constant values the inhibitory effects of tolterodine, 5-HM and DPr-P-4(N-->O) were 1.4 to 1.7 times greater in the bladder than in the parotid gland, whereas the inhibitory effects of oxybutynin, DEOB, propiverine and darifenacin were 2 to 10 times greater in the parotid gland. Consequently tolterodine, 5-HM and DPr-P-4(N-->O) compared with oxybutynin, DEOB, propiverine and darifenacin were found to show 3 to 4 times greater affinity to muscarinic receptors in the human bladder than in the parotid gland. Tolterodine and 5-HM were 2-fold more potent for inhibiting specific [(3)H]NMS binding at cell membranes expressing the M(2) vs the M(3) subtype. Conversely oxybutynin, DEOB, propiverine, DPr-P-4(N-->O) and darifenacin showed 2 to 22 times higher affinity to the M(3) than to the M(2) subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with oxybutynin, tolterodine, 5-HM and DPr-P-4(N-->O) may bind more selectively to muscarinic receptors in the human bladder than in the parotid gland.

Tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder: a review

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a prevalent condition. Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of immediate release tolterodine in the treatment of OAB in different patient populations. This review details the characteristics, clinical efficacy and safety of extended release (ER) tolterodine. This formulation yields a flatter serum concentration profile and provides clinically meaningful symptom improvement as early as week 1 of treatment. Tolterodine ER is effective in diverse patient populations with varying levels of symptom severity, and efficacy is maintained with long-term treatment. Tolterodine is an effective, safe, and convenient treatment option for long-term relief of OAB symptoms.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs used to treat urge incontinence

Urge incontinence (also known as overactive bladder) is a common form of urinary incontinence, occurring alone or as a component of mixed urinary incontinence, frequently together with stress incontinence. Because of the pathophysiology of urge incontinence, anticholinergic/antispasmodic agents form the cornerstone of therapy. Unfortunately, the pharmacological activity of these agents is not limited to the urinary tract, leading to systemic adverse effects that often promote nonadherence. Although the pharmacokinetics of flavoxate, propantheline, scopolamine, imipramine/desipramine, trospium chloride and propiverine are also reviewed here, only for oxybutynin and tolterodine are there adequate efficacy/tolerability data to support their use in urge incontinence. Oxybutynin is poorly absorbed orally (2-11% for the immediate-release tablet formulation). Controlled-release oral formulations significantly prolong the time to peak plasma concentration and reduce the degree of fluctuation around the average concentration. Significant absorption occurs after intravesical (bladder) and transdermal administration, although concentrations of the active N-desethyl metabolite are lower after transdermal compared with oral administration, possibly improving tolerability. Food has been found to significantly affect the absorption of one of the controlled-release formulations of oxybutynin, enhancing the rate of drug release. Oxybutynin is extensively metabolised, principally via N-demethylation mediated by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isozyme. The pharmacokinetics of tolterodine are dependent in large part on the pharmacogenomics of the CYP2D6 and 3A4 isozymes. In an unselected population, oral bioavailability of tolterodine ranges from 10% to 74% (mean 33%) whereas in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers and poor metabolisers mean bioavailabilities are 26% and 91%, respectively. Tolterodine is metabolised via CYP2D6 to the active metabolite 5-hydroxymethyl-tolterodine and via CYP3A to N-dealkylated metabolites. Urinary excretion of parent compound plays a minor role in drug disposition. Drug effect is based upon the unbound concentration of the so-called 'active moiety' (sum of tolterodine + 5-hydroxymethyl-tolterodine). Terminal disposition half-lives of tolterodine and 5-hydroxymethyl-tolterodine (in CYP2D6 extensive metabolisers) are 2-3 and 3-4 hours, respectively. Coadministration of antacid essentially converts the extended-release formulation into an immediate-release formulation. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of these agents may improve the treatment of urge incontinence by allowing the identification of individuals at high risk for toxicity with 'usual' dosages. In addition, the use of alternative formulations (controlled-release oral, transdermal) may also facilitate adherence, not only by reducing the frequency of drug administration but also by enhancing tolerability by altering the proportions of parent compound and active metabolite in the blood.

Effect of Antacid on the Pharmacokinetics of Extended-Release Formulations of Tolterodine and Oxybutynin

BACKGROUND

In general, extended-release (ER) formulations are designed to prolong the duration of efficacy and reduce the adverse effects of a drug. These formulations often contain the entire daily dose in a single tablet. Therefore, failure of the ER mechanism not only diminishes the desired benefits, but may temporarily expose the patient to drug concentrations higher than those released from a conventional tablet. In this study we determined whether pH has an effect on drug release from the ER formulations of oxybutynin (OROS technology) and tolterodine (membrane coated beads) in vitro and in vivo.

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro studies were based on standardised dissolution experiments for each drug in media of different pH (artificial gastric fluid at pH 1.2, artificial intestinal fluid at pH 7.5, and water). In the two separate, identically designed in vivo studies, single doses of each drug were administered alone and with an antacid to male and female healthy volunteers aged 18-45 years. The randomised, crossover, open-label in vivo studies employed a validated assay to determine plasma concentrations of tolterodine and its metabolite 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HM), or oxybutynin and its metabolite N-desethyloxybutynin.

RESULTS

The in vitro study showed similar slow and steady drug release from ER-oxybutynin in each pH medium, with 64-71% released after 12 hours. Drug release from ER-tolterodine was steady and slow in artificial gastric fluid, with 72.5% of drug released after 12 hours. However, drug release was much faster in artificial intestinal fluid and water, where 69.8% and 69.1%, respectively, of the drug was released within 4 hours. These in vitro results were consistent with the findings of the in vivo studies. In vivo, the pharmacokinetic profile (peak plasma concentration [C(max)] and area under the concentration-time curve) of ER-oxybutynin was similar after administration with or without antacid, whereas C(max) values of both tolterodine and 5-HM increased significantly when ER-tolterodine was administered with antacid (p < or = 0.017 vs ER-tolterodine alone).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in pH affected the release of tolterodine from ER-tolterodine, while they had no effect on the release of oxybutynin from the proprietary ER technology used in ER-oxybutynin. The technology employed in ER formulations thus determines sensitivity of drug release to external factors.

Once-daily, extended-release formulations of antimuscarinic agents in the treatment of overactive bladder: a review

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic condition that often requires long-term treatment to maintain control of symptoms. A range of therapeutic options are available; however, antimuscarinic agents form the mainstay of treatment. Of these agents, tolterodine and oxybutynin are the most widely used. It is well documented that the immediate-release (IR) formulations of these agents have equivalent efficacy in relieving OAB symptoms. However, tolterodine demonstrates a more favorable tolerability profile, particularly in terms of the frequency and severity of dry mouth. Due to the development of novel drug delivery systems, extended-release (ER) formulations of both oxybutynin and tolterodine are now available, permitting once-daily dosing. The convenience of once-daily dosing of antimuscarinic agents would be expected to improve patient compliance and further relieve the symptoms of OAB. Clinical studies with the ER formulations of tolterodine and oxybutynin demonstrate potential clinical advantages over their respective IR forms in terms of either efficacy or tolerability or both, although the therapeutic index of tolterodine ER appears to show a greater advantage over its IR counterpart compared with oxybutynin ER and its IR form. Importantly, the two ER agents have not been compared directly in a head-to-head clinical study. Overall, available clinical data suggest that the newly developed ER formulation of tolterodine represents a significant therapeutic advancement in the treatment of OAB.

Tolterodine: a review of its use in the treatment of overactive bladder

Tolterodine is a competitive muscarinic receptor antagonist that shows in vivo selectivity for the bladder over the salivary glands compared with oxybutinin. Results of randomised double-blind placebo-controlled studies indicate that tolterodine 4 mg/day (administered as immediate-release tablets 2mg twice daily or extended-release capsules 4mg daily) is superior to placebo in improving micturition diary variables in patients with overactive bladder. Moreover, tolterodine 2mg twice daily is as effective as oxybutynin 5mg 3 times daily. Maximum treatment effects with both drugs occurred after 5 to 8 weeks of treatment and improvements were maintained during long term treatment for up to 24 months. In a pooled analysis of four 12-week studies, equivalent and significant reductions in micturition frequency (-2.3 and -2.0 vs -1.4, p < 0.001) and the incidence of urge incontinence episodes (-1.6 and -1.8 vs -1.1, p < 0.05) were reported for tolterodine 2mg twice daily and oxybutynin 5mg 3 times daily compared with placebo. Functional bladder capacity was also significantly increased. Improvements in patient perceptions of their urgency symptoms and of problems caused by their bladder condition were significantly greater during treatment with tolterodine than with placebo. Tolterodine was generally well tolerated in clinical trials of up to 24 months' duration. Dry mouth was the most frequent adverse event. The incidence (40 vs 78%, p < 0.001) and intensity of this event was lower with tolterodine 2mg twice daily than oxybutynin 5mg 3 times daily. Additionally, a 23% lower incidence of dry mouth was reported with once daily extended-release tolterodine capsules than with twice daily immediate-release tablets (p < 0.02). The incidence of adverse CNS events with tolterodine was low and similar to that of placebo. Tolterodine was well tolerated in elderly patients and no serious tolerability concerns were identified.

CONCLUSION

Tolterodine is the first antimuscarinic agent to specifically developed for the treatment of overactive bladder. The functional selectivity of tolterodine for the bladder translates into good efficacy and tolerability in patients, including the elderly, with overactive bladder. Tolterodine is as effective as oxybutynin in improving micturition diary variables but is associated with a significantly lower incidence and intensity of dry mouth. This favourable tolerability profile, together with sustained clinical efficacy during long term treatment, places tolterodine as valuable treatment for the symptoms of overactive bladder.

Evidence for the efficacy and safety of tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic and prevalent condition, the symptoms of which (urinary frequency and urgency, with or without urge incontinence) can exert a profound negative effect on a person's daily life activities. Tolterodine (Detrol in North America and Detrusitol in the rest of the world, Pharmacia), a competitive muscarinic antagonist, is the first agent of this class to be specifically developed for the treatment of OAB. This agent displays in vivo functional selectivity for the bladder over other tissues that contain muscarinic receptors (e.g., salivary glands, eye), which translates into good efficacy and tolerability in patients with OAB (including the elderly). Comparative, randomised, double-blind studies show that tolterodine (administered as immediate-release [IR] tablets 2 mg b.i.d.) is as effective as oxybutynin (5 mg t.i.d.) in improving all of the troublesome symptoms of OAB but with a significantly lower incidence and severity of dry mouth. The advent of a new extended-release (ER) capsule formulation of tolterodine (4 mg) for convenient once-daily treatment builds upon these findings, with significantly improved efficacy for reducing urge incontinence episodes and a lower frequency of dry mouth relative to the existing IR tablet (2 mg b.i.d.). Tolterodine can therefore be considered a valuable, well-tolerated treatment option for patients with OAB, providing improvements in symptoms that are both clinically meaningful to patients and sustained during long-term treatment.

Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of a new once daily extended release tolterodine formulation versus immediate release tolterodine

OBJECTIVE

To determine the multiple dose pharmacokinetics of a new extended release (ER) capsule formulation of tolterodine, compared with the existing immediate release (IR) tablet, in healthy volunteers.

DESIGN

Nonblind, randomised, 2-way crossover trial.

PARTICIPANTS

19 healthy volunteers (7 females, 12 males), mean age 33 years (range 18 to 55 years). Prior to the study, all volunteers were classified as either extensive or poor metabolisers by cytochrome P450 2D6 genotyping.

METHODS

Volunteers received tolterodine ER 4mg once daily or tolterodine IR 2mg twice daily for 6 days (all doses given as the L-tartrate salt). A washout period of 7 days separated the 2 treatments. Serum concentrations of tolterodine, its active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite (5-HM) and the active moiety (extensive metabolisers: sum of unbound tolterodine + 5-HM; poor metabolisers: unbound tolterodine) were measured for up to 48 hours post-dose on day 6 (steady state). Tolerability was also determined.

RESULTS

17 volunteers (13 extensive metabolisers, 4 poor metabolisers) completed the study and were evaluable for both treatment periods. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio of area under the serum concentration-time curve to 24 hours (AUC24) of the active moiety, for all volunteers combined, indicated equivalence for the 2 formulations. Pooled analysis also demonstrated that the peak serum concentration (Cmax) of the active moiety following administration of tolterodine ER was around 75% of that observed for the IR tablet, whereas the trough concentration was around 1.5-fold higher. Overall, the pharmacokinetics of tolterodine (irrespective of genotype) and 5-HM (extensive metabolisers only) were consistent with sustained drug release over 24 hours. Tolterodine ER was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The new once daily ER formulation of tolterodine 4mg shows pharmacokinetic equivalence (AUC24) to the existing IR tablet given at a dose of 2mg twice daily. Findings of lower Cmax for tolterodine ER may explain the significantly lower rate of dry mouth subsequently observed in patients with overactive bladder.