Long- versus short-acting beta 2-agonists. Implications for drug therapy

National athletic trainers' association position statement: preventing sudden death in sports

OBJECTIVE

To present recommendations for the prevention and screening, recognition, and treatment of the most common conditions resulting in sudden death in organized sports.

BACKGROUND

Cardiac conditions, head injuries, neck injuries, exertional heat stroke, exertional sickling, asthma, and other factors (eg, lightning, diabetes) are the most common causes of death in athletes.

RECOMMENDATIONS

These guidelines are intended to provide relevant information on preventing sudden death in sports and to give specific recommendations for certified athletic trainers and others participating in athletic health care.

Polymorphisms of the β2-adrenergic receptor correlated to nocturnal asthma and the response of terbutaline nebulizer

BACKGROUND

Inhaled β(2)-adrenergic receptor (β(2)-AR) agonists are the mainstay of treatment of acute asthma. Polymorphisms of the β(2)-AR, especially codons 16, 27, and 164, may affect the functions of the receptor. This study was conducted to investigate whether different polymorphisms of the β(2)-AR are related to the treatment responses of an inhaled β(2)-AR agonist in children with nocturnal and nonnocturnal asthma in Taiwan.

METHODS

The nocturnal asthma group consisted of 27 children (mean age of 10.3±2.4 years), and the nonnocturnal asthma group consisted of 24 patients (mean age of 9.9±3.0 years). Allele-specific polymerase chain reaction was performed to determine 16, 27, and 164 loci alleles of β(2)-AR genetic polymorphisms, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) was measured before and 1 hour after inhalation of 0.2mg/kg/dose of terbutaline to determine the treatment response in these patients.

RESULTS

The polymorphisms of β(2)-AR 27 but not 16 or 164 were significantly associated with the response to terbutaline nebulizer (p<0.05). The polymorphism of β(2)-AR 16 was associated with nocturnal asthma (p=0.027). The Gly16 allele was more prevalent in the nocturnal asthma group (9/27; 33.3%) than in the nonnocturnal asthma group (3/24; 12.5%). Arg16 allele was less prevalent in the nocturnal asthma (3/27; 11.1%) than in the nonnocturnal asthma group (10/24; 41.7%). There was also a linkage disequilibrium found between β(2)-AR 16 (Arg/Arg) and β(2)-AR 27 (Gln/Gln).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that polymorphisms of β(2)-AR 16 are related to nocturnal asthma and polymorphisms of β(2)-AR 27 are associated with the variable responses to the inhaled terbutaline in children with nocturnal and nonnocturnal asthma.

Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic asthma in adults and children where background therapy contains varied or no inhaled corticosteroid

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common respiratory disease among both adults and children and short acting inhaled beta-2 agonists are used widely for 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy. Long acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) were introduced as prospective 'symptom controllers' in addition to inhaled corticosteroid 'preventer' therapy (ICS). In this updated review we have included studies in which patients were either not on ICS as a group, or in which some patients, but not all, were on ICS to complement previous systematic reviews of studies where LABA was given in patients uniformly receiving ICS. We have focussed particularly on serious adverse events, given previous concerns about potential risks, especially of death, from regular beta-2 agonist use.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to determine the benefit or detriment on the primary outcome of asthma control with the regular use of LABA compared with placebo, in mixed populations in which only some were taking ICS and in populations not using ICS therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out searches using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, most recently in October 2005. We searched bibliographies of identified RCTs for additional relevant RCTs and contacted authors of identified RCTs for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least four weeks duration, comparing a LABA given twice daily with a placebo, in chronic asthma. Selection criteria to this updated review have been altered to accommodate recently published Cochrane reviews on combination and addition of LABA to ICS therapy. Studies in which all individuals were uniformly taking ICS were excluded from this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. We contacted authors of studies for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies (representing 68 experimental comparisons) randomising 42,333 participants met the inclusion criteria. Salmeterol was used as long-acting agent in 50 studies and formoterol fumarate in 17. The treatment period was four to nine weeks in 29 studies, and 12 to 52 weeks in 38 studies. Twenty-four studies did not permit the use of ICS, and forty permitted either inhaled corticosteroid or cromones (in three studies this was unclear). In these studies between 22% and 92% were taking ICS, with a median of 62%. There were significant advantages to LABA treatment compared to placebo for a variety of measurements of airway calibre including morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening PEF and FEV1. They were associated with significantly fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life scores. This was true whether patients were taking LABA in combination with ICS or not. Findings from SMART (a recently published surveillance study) indicated significant increases in asthma related deaths, respiratory related deaths and combined asthma related deaths and life threatening experiences. The absolute increase in asthma-related mortality was consistent with an increase of around one per 1250 patients treated with LABA for six months, but the confidence intervals are wide (from 700 to 10,000). Post-hoc exploratory subgroups suggested that African-Americans and those not on inhaled corticosteroids were at particular risk for the primary end-point of death or life-threatening asthma event. There was also a suggestion of an increase in exacerbation rate in children. Pharmacologically predicted side effects such as headache, throat irritation, tremor and nervousness were more frequent with LABA treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

LABA are effective in the control of chronic asthma in the "real-life" subject groups included. However there are potential safety issues which call into question the safety of LABA, particularly in those asthmatics who are not taking ICS, and it is not clear why African-Americans were found to have significant differences in comparison to Caucasians for combined respiratory-related death and life threatening experiences, but not for asthma-related death.

The use of inhaled formoterol in the treatment of asthma

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the clinical efficacy and safety of formoterol when used to relieve symptoms of asthma and prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was performed for articles published between 1997 and 2005 with the keywords formoterol, asthma, and long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist, with cross-referencing to identify peer-reviewed journal articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Published articles on the clinical use of formoterol for asthma or EIB were included as well as articles detailing the pharmacologic properties of the drug. To present a thorough review of the literature, published studies based on patient number, study design, or other measures of study quality were not excluded.

RESULTS

Formoterol is the only long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist that combines a rapid onset of action (within 3 minutes) with a long duration of effect (approximately 12 hours). Clinically, as recommended by asthma treatment guidelines, formoterol in conjunction with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) is a preferred treatment for moderate to severe persistent asthma. Significant clinical data support the use of formoterol in combination with ICSs for the treatment of asthma, with studies demonstrating improved pulmonary function and symptom scores and decreased need for maintenance ICSs and short-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (SABAs) as relief medication. Recent studies also demonstrate that use of formoterol as needed as relief medication is associated with a prolonged time to exacerbation, improved pulmonary function, and decreased asthma symptoms. When used as monotherapy, formoterol provides protection against EIB. Clinical data also demonstrate that formoterol is safe and well tolerated even in high doses, with an adverse event profile similar to that of SABAs.

CONCLUSION

Overall, formoterol is safe and effective as adjunct controller therapy for moderate and severe persistent asthma and as monotherapy for EIB.

Short polystyrene monolith-fritted micro-liquid chromatography columns for rapid isocratic analysis of pharmaceuticals direct from plasma

The manufacture of micro-HPLC columns with combined stationary phases, a body of 3.5-microm XTerra-C18 particles, and poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) (PS-DVB) frits is described in detail. The efficiency of the columns was assessed by rapid separation of neutral and acid compound mixtures. Direct analysis of some pharmaceuticals in plasma resulted in lower limits of detection (LOD) for salmeterol xinofate of 12.5 nanograms on-column.

Evidence of tachyphylaxis associated with salmeterol treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

Bronchodilator therapy is lifelong mandatory for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. There is evidence of loss of bronchodilator effectiveness over time with beta2-agonists but not with anticholinergics. The aim of this study was to examine the development of tachyphylaxis to the long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol using as a control therapeutic regimen the combination of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol sulphate. Fifty-six subjects participated in a 20-week, crossover randomised clinical trial. The parameters forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and FEV1/forced vital capacity were measured via spirometry and the parameters triangle DeltaFEV1%pre, triangle DeltaPEFR%pre and triangle DeltaAUC(0-2 h) were calculated. FEV1 increased significantly after two weeks of treatment with the combination treatment but not with the salmeterol. The observed diminished increase could be attributed to the development of tolerance to the long acting beta2-agonist. Salmeterol seems to be an effective bronchodilator, however, its duration of action over time and its peak effect might be subject to tachyphylaxis.

2003 canadian asthma consensus guidelines executive summary

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma have been published over the last 15 years; however, there has been little focus on issues relating to asthma in childhood. Since the last revision of the 1999 Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, important new studies, particularly in children, have highlighted the need to incorporate new information into the asthma guidelines. The objectives of this article are to review the literature on asthma published between January 2000 and June 2003 and to evaluate the influence of new evidence on the recommendations made in the 1999 Canadian Asthma Consensus Report and its 2001 update, with a major focus on pediatric issues.

METHODS

The diagnosis of asthma in young children and prevention strategies, pharmacotherapy, inhalation devices, immunotherapy, and asthma education were selected for review by small expert resource groups. The reviews were discussed in June 2003 at a meeting under the auspices of the Canadian Network For Asthma Care and the Canadian Thoracic Society. Data published through December 2004 were subsequently reviewed by the individual expert resource groups.

RESULTS

This report evaluates early-life prevention strategies and focuses on treatment of asthma in children, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and preventive therapy, the benefits of additional therapy, and the essential role of asthma education.

CONCLUSION

We generally support previous recommendations and focus on new issues, particularly those relevant to children and their families. This document is a guide for asthma management based on the best available published data and the opinion of health care professionals, including asthma experts and educators.

Safety of formoterol after cumulative dosing via Easyhaler and Aerolizer

This randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, cumulative dose, multicentre crossover study aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority in safety of formoterol delivered via Easyhaler versus Aerolizer. The secondary objective was to compare the efficacy of the devices. Thirty-three adult asthmatic subjects entered the study and 32 completed it. The study comprised screening and two study days, with each subject inhaling 96 microg (12, 12, 24 and 48 microg) cumulative dose of formoterol via the study inhalers. Serum potassium (S-K+), vital signs and spirometry were performed at baseline, 1h after each dose and additionally 4h after the last dose. The primary safety variable was S-K+. Secondary safety variables were heart rate, corrected QT interval, blood pressure, serum glucose and adverse events. Spirometry was assessed to evaluate efficacy. The results showed non-inferiority in safety of formoterol inhaled via Easyhaler compared to Aerolizer. The adjusted treatment difference in the S-K+ values after 96 microg cumulative dose of formoterol was 0.14 mmol/L being clearly above the pre-determined lower limit of the non-inferiority criterion of -0.2 mmol/L. There were dose-related changes in secondary efficacy variables after both treatments. The changes were comparable in most of the parameters but heart rate was statistically significantly higher and decrease in diastolic blood pressure greater after formoterol via Aerolizer than that via Easyhaler. The occurrence of adverse events was dose-related, the most common events being tremor, hypokalaemia, headache and palpitation. The spirometry results showed no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the treatments. In conclusion, formoterol delivered via Easyhaler was as safe as via Aerolizer.

Inhaled long acting beta agonists for stable chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common respiratory disease among both adults and children and short acting inhaled beta-2 agonists are used widely for 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy. Long acting beta-2 agonists were introduced as prospective 'symptom controllers' in addition to inhaled corticosteroid 'preventer' therapy (ICS).

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to determine the benefit or detriment on the primary outcome of asthma control with the regular use of long acting inhaled beta-2 agonists compared with placebo.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out searches using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, most recently in October 2002. We searched bibliographies of identified RCTs for additional relevant RCTs and contacted authors of identified RCTs for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least two weeks duration, comparing a long acting inhaled beta-agonist given twice daily with a placebo, in chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. We contacted authors of studies for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty five studies met the inclusion criteria, 56 parallel group and 29 cross over design. Salmeterol xinafoate was used as long acting agent in 60 studies and formoterol fumarate in 25. The treatment period was two to four weeks in 32 studies, and 12 to 52 weeks in 53 studies. 34 study groups used concurrent inhaled corticosteroid treatment, 21 studies did not permit their use and 35 permitted either inhaled corticosteroid or cromones. There were significant advantages to long acting beta-2 agonist treatment compared to placebo for a variety of measurements of airway calibre including morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (weighted mean difference (WMD) 26.78 L/min 95%CI 20.36 to 33.20), evening PEF (WMD 19.17 L/min 95%CI 11.63 to 26.73). They were associated with significantly fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life scores. The risk of exacerbation was lower in adults using regular inhaled corticosteroids.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Long acting beta-2 agonists are effective in the control of chronic asthma, and the evidence supports their use in addition to inhaled corticosteroids, as emphasised in current guidelines. Further research is needed on their use in children under 12 and in mild asthmatics not taking ICS.

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-asthma agents

OBJECTIVE

To review the previously published studies on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chiral drugs used in the treatment of asthma.

DATA SOURCES

Primary and review articles were identified with a MEDLINE search (1980-May 2001) and through secondary sources.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All English-language studies and reviews obtained from the MEDLINE search pertaining to stereoselective pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chiral anti-asthma drugs were assessed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Several anti-asthma drugs (e.g., beta(2)-adrenergic agonists, leukotriene modifiers) are chiral and marketed as racemates, which consist of equal proportions of 2 enantiomers. Significant stereoselectivity has also been reported in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the beta(2)-agonists. The enantiomers of beta(2)-agonists in the R configuration are primarily responsible for the bronchodilating effects of the racemate. The plasma concentrations of the enantiomers of anti-asthma drugs may differ as a reflection of stereoselectivity in clearance, volume of distribution, and route of administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereoselectivity in the pharmacokinetics of anti-asthma drugs may complicate the relationship between dose and/or plasma concentration of racemic drug versus effect relationship. An appreciation of the stereoselective pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chiral anti-asthma drugs may optimize the use of these agents in asthmatic patients.

Regular treatment with long acting beta agonists versus daily regular treatment with short acting beta agonists in adults and children with stable asthma

BACKGROUND

Selective beta-adrenergic agonists for use in asthma are: short acting (2-6 hours) and long acting (>12 hours). There has been little controversy about using short acting beta-agonists intermittently, but long acting beta-agonists are used regularly, and their regular use has been controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefit or detriment of treatment with regular short- or long acting inhaled beta-agonists in chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was carried out using the Cochrane Airways Group register. Bibliographies of identified RCTs were searched for additional relevant RCTs. Authors of identified RCTs were contacted for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least two weeks duration, comparing a long acting inhaled beta-agonist given twice daily with any short acting inhaled beta-agonist of equivalent bronchodilator effectiveness given regularly in chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. Authors of studies were contacted for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

31 studies met the inclusion criteria, 24 of parallel group and 7 cross over design. Salmeterol xinafoate was used as long acting agent in 22 studies and formoterol fumarate in 9. Salbutamol was the short acting agent used in 27 studies and terbutaline in 5. The treatment period was over 2 weeks in 29 studies, and at least 12 weeks in 20. 25 studies permitted a variety of co-intervention treatments, usually inhaled corticosteroid or cromones. One study did not permit inhaled corticosteroid. Long acting beta-agonists were significantly better than short acting for a variety of lung function measurements including morning PEF (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 33 l/min 95% CI 25, 42) or evening PEF (WMD 26 l/min 95% CI 18, 33); and had significantly lower scores for day and night time asthma symptom scores and percentage of days and nights without symptoms. They were also associated with a significantly lower use of rescue medication both during the day and night. Risk of exacerbations was not different between the two types of agent, but most studies were of short duration which limits the power to test for such differences.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Long acting inhaled beta-agonists have advantages across a wide range of physiological and clinical outcomes for regular treatment.

Effect of salmeterol on allergen-induced airway inflammation in mild allergic asthma

A previous study suggested that the long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist salmeterol (SM) had inhibitory effects on bronchial mucosal inflammation 6 hours after allergen exposure. To further evaluate the influence of SM on allergen-induced airway inflammation. We studied, in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial, 16 mild asthmatic patients who had a dual asthmatic response to allergen inhalation. Subjects received 50 microg of SM or placebo (P), twice daily for 1 week each, separated by a 2-week wash-out period. At the end of each treatment period, after withholding SM for 24 h, they had a methacholine inhalation test (medication was resumed after the test), followed 24 h later by an AC with the concentration of allergen that had induced a LAR at baseline. Airway inflammation was assessed 24 h after the AC by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (n = 16) and bronchial biopsies (n = 13). As expected, SM improved baseline FEV1 and PC20 (P < or = 0.009) and decreased the allergen-induced early bronchoconstrictive response. There were no significant differences in BAL cell counts after the two treatments. On bronchial biopsies, numbers (median, mm2) of submucosal CD45 (P: 43 +/- 23; SM: 161 +/- 43, P = 0.031), CD45Ro (P: 37 +/- 19; SM: 126 +/- 41, P = 0.047) and AA1 positive cells (P: 38 +/- 6, SM: 65 +/- 17, P = 0.006) were significantly higher after SM than P treatment. The numbers of CD4 (P: 11 +/- 10; SM: 32 +/- 7, P = 0.085), HLA-DR (P: 65 +/- 30; SM: 116 +/- 36, P = 0.079) and EG2 positive cells (P: 25 +/- 15; SM: 38 +/- 26, P = 0.09) tended to increase with SM treatment. In summary, compared to placebo, 1 week of regular use of SM is associated with an increase in bronchial inflammatory cells 24 h after AC. This is in keeping with the recommendation that salmeterol should only be used with an anti-inflammatory agent, particularly in the context of significant allergen exposure.

A randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol dry powder inhaler with albuterol metered-dose inhaler

BACKGROUND

Formoterol is a beta2-adrenergic agent which, when inhaled, produces rapid and long-lasting bronchodilatation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of formoterol powder for inhalation delivered via the Aerolizer device with placebo and with albuterol delivered via metered-dose inhaler in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma.

METHODS

In a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study, 541 patients were randomized at 26 trial sites to receive either formoterol, 12 microg twice daily; formoterol, 24 microg twice daily; albuterol, 180 microg four times daily; or a placebo for 12 weeks. The effects of each treatment on lung function, asthma symptoms, and frequency of rescue albuterol use were evaluated. Adverse effects and clinical laboratory parameters were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The bronchodilatory effects of formoterol were rapid in onset and persisted for 12 hours. Both formoterol doses were more effective than placebo and albuterol for objective measures of lung function. Morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates were more improved with formoterol, and formoterol provided significantly greater improvements in asthma symptom scores compared with both albuterol and placebo. Overall, patients taking formoterol used significantly less rescue medication than did those taking albuterol or placebo. Nocturnal awakenings occurred less often with formoterol than with placebo or albuterol. The therapeutic effects of formoterol were maintained over the entire 12 weeks of treatment. Adverse events were similar for all treatment groups, and clinical laboratory data were unremarkable.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid-onset, long-acting formoterol, administered via the Aerolizer inhaler, is an effective and safe treatment for patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma.

Effects of theophylline on tolerance to the bronchoprotective actions of salmeterol in asthmatics in vivo

Long-term treatment with salmeterol produces tolerance for its protective effects against bronchoconstrictor stimuli in patients with asthma. There is human in vitro evidence that theophylline may prevent beta2-adrenoceptor downregulation. Therefore, we investigated the effect of theophylline on the tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol against histamine challenge in asthma in vivo. In a parallel 6-wk study, 25 asthmatics were treated with theophylline (mean serum level +/- SEM: 9.9 +/- 1.1 mg/L, Days 1 to 40) or placebo, combined with inhaled salmeterol (50 microgram twice daily, Days 8 to 36). Histamine challenges were carried out by tidal breathing method at entry, and at Days 4, 8, 22, 36, and 40. The response was measured by PC20. There was no significant change in PC20 after 4 d monotherapy with theophylline or placebo (mean difference +/- SEM: 0.54 +/- 0.39 and -0.02 +/- 0.41 doubling dose [DD], respectively; p > 0.15). One hour after the first dose, salmeterol afforded significant protection against histamine, as shown by an increase in PC20 in both the theophylline and placebo group (by 3.49 +/- 0.28 and 3.36 +/- 0.32 DD, respectively; p < 0. 001). However, after 2 and 4 wk salmeterol treatment, the improvements in PC20 by salmeterol were significantly reduced to 1. 80 +/- 0.35 and 1.69 +/- 0.36 DD, respectively, in the theophylline group (p < 0.001), and to 1.55 +/- 0.47 and 1.52 +/- 0.56 DD, respectively, in the placebo group (p < 0.002). These changes were not significantly different between the groups (p > 0.80). After cessation of salmeterol treatment, PC20 was not significantly different from the values at entry in either group (p > 0.90). We conclude that regular theophylline treatment neither prevents, nor worsens, the development of tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol in asthmatics in vivo.

Influence of beclomethasone and salmeterol on the perception of methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

Patient evaluation of asthma severity and medication needs is mostly based on respiratory symptoms and may be influenced by changes in perception of bronchoconstriction-induced sensations. However, the influence of asthma medication on the ability to perceive symptoms is still to be documented. This study evaluated the effects of short-term and regular use of salmeterol on the perception of methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction (MIB) in subjects with mild asthma, using inhaled salbutamol on an "as required" basis (n=15), and in subjects with moderate asthma, using daily inhaled beclomethasone (mean daily dose, 640 microg; n=15) in addition to salbutamol to control their asthma.

METHODS

Methacholine challenges (MC) were performed at entry into the study, and then before, 1, and 12 h following inhalation of 50 microg of salmeterol or a placebo, after a 15-day baseline period; and after 4 weeks of twice daily use of those treatments. The measurements were then repeated with the alternate treatment after a 15-day washout period. Finally, a last MC was performed after another 15-day washout period. For each MC, the perception score of bronchoconstriction-associated breathlessness at 20% fall in FEV1 (PS20) was evaluated on a modified Borg scale from 0 to 10.

RESULTS

Subjects using regular beclomethasone had a higher baseline PS20 than those using only salbutamol (means: 3.06 0.06 and 2.01+/-0.07, p=0.0001). Short- and long-term use of salmeterol did not change significantly the PS20 compared with placebo (p>0.05) in either group (with or without corticosteroid). Although there were some intraindividual variations, mean PS20 did not vary significantly throughout the study.

CONCLUSION

These observations show that the perception of bronchoconstriction-associated breathlessness is not influenced by regular use of salmeterol. Patients using inhaled corticosteroids show a greater perception of MIB.

Pharmacological treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are usually treated with bronchodilator therapy, glucocorticoids and antibiotics. However, there are few experimental data on the effects of these agents in patients with acute COPD. A beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist is usually given first because it can be expected to produce a rapid response. An anticholinergic agent should also be given when the patient is severely ill or responds inadequately to the beta(2) agonist. These agents can be administered via a nebuliser or using a metered-dose inhaler in conjunction with a spacer device. Glucocorticoids can accelerate recovery if the standard empirical regimens for acute exacerbations of asthma are used, although a longer treatment duration appears to be required. Theophylline provides little additional benefit in patients who receive frequent doses of inhaled bronchodilators and an adequate dosage of a glucocorticoid. Although the role of bacterial infections is not completely understood, the use of antibiotics is justified in patients with severe airflow limitation who have febrile tracheobronchitis.

Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol 12 hours after starting twice daily treatment

BACKGROUND

Regular use of salmeterol has been associated with reduced bronchoprotective effect against methacholine as early as 24 hours after initiating treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether loss of the bronchoprotective effect measured one hour after salmeterol could be demonstrated 12 hours following one previous dose.

METHODS

Ten subjects with stable, mild asthma were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study comparing two 2-dose treatment periods: (1) blinded salmeterol 50 microg inhaled at bedtime, followed by unblinded salmeterol 50 microg inhaled 12 hours later and (2) blinded placebo inhaled at bedtime, followed by unblinded salmeterol 50 microg inhaled 12 hours later. The methacholine PC20 was measured one hour after the morning salmeterol; FEV1 was measured just prior to the morning salmeterol dose and at the start of the methacholine inhalation test.

RESULTS

The mean log methacholine PC20 recorded one hour after a single dose of salmeterol (1.20 +/- 0.17 SE) was significantly higher than the mean log methacholine PC20 recorded after two doses of salmeterol at 12-hour intervals (1.00 +/- 0.16 SE; P = .024). The mean FEV1 12 hours after salmeterol was significantly higher than the mean FEV1 recorded 12 hours after placebo (P = .0017), however, there was no significant difference between the FEV1 recordings one hour after the two unblinded doses of salmeterol.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol against methacholine induced bronchoconstriction occurs extremely quickly as it is evident 12 hours after starting twice daily treatment.

Current therapies for asthma. Promise and limitations

Effective treatments for asthma exist, but morbidity and mortality have continued to climb. Many attempts have been made to refine rather than change therapy over the past 20 years. Drugs currently used to treat asthma include beta 2-agonists, glucocorticoids, theophylline, cromones, and anticholinergic agents. For acute, severe asthma, the inhaled beta 2-agonists are the most effective bronchodilators. Short-acting forms give rapid relief; long-acting agents provide sustained relief and help nocturnal asthma; and serious adverse effects are rare when these drugs are used properly. First-line therapy for chronic asthma is inhaled glucocorticoids, the only currently available agents that reduce airway inflammation. Their side effects can be reduced by rinsing the mouth or by using large-volume spacers. Theophylline is a bronchodilator that is useful for severe and nocturnal asthma, but recent studies suggest that it may also have an immunomodulatory effect. Although theophylline is inexpensive, monitoring its plasma concentrations is both expensive and inconvenient. Cromones work best for patients who have mild asthma: they have few adverse effects, but their activity is brief, so they must be given four times daily. The anticholinergic bronchodilators are more useful for treating COPD than for chronic asthma. These drugs have virtually no side effects, and their onset is slower and their action longer than inhaled beta 2-agonists. The new direction in treating asthma will be orally administered medication that has few side effects and is targeted specifically to the pathogenesis of asthma.

Asthma therapy with aerosols: clinical relevance for the next decade

Inhaled therapy is the mainstay of modern asthma management, as this optimizes the therapeutic ratio. Short-acting beta 2-agonists are the most effective bronchodilators and when given by inhalation give rapid relief of symptoms, without adverse effects, although there are concerns about overuse of these drugs. Inhaled long-acting beta 2-agonists are useful in some patients. Inhaled anticholinergics are particularly useful in patients with COPD and in the future long-acting drugs, such as tiotropium bromide, will be available. Inhaled glucocorticoids are the most effective therapy in controlling chronic asthma symptoms, and systemic effects are not a problem in the vast majority of patients. Improved inhalation devices and steroids with reduced oral bioavailability have resulted in reduced systemic side effects, which now arise largely from absorption from the lungs. In the future it is likely that new classes of drug will be developed, but whether they will be used by inhalation or given by mouth will depend on the frequency of side effects and the mode of action of the drugs. There are likely to be several improvements in inhaler delivery systems, so that the inhaled route will remain predominant for many years to come.

A twelve-week comparison of salmeterol and salbutamol in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma: a Canadian multicenter study

BACKGROUND

A long-acting inhaled bronchodilator that is both well tolerated and effective could allow for improved control of both daytime and nighttime symptoms in patients with asthma who use frequent as-needed short-acting bronchodilators despite antiinflammatory treatment.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

We compared the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol, 50 micrograms twice daily, with inhaled salbutamol, 200 micrograms four times daily, delivered through a metered-dose inhaler for 3 months in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of 228 patients (aged 12 to 76 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma.

RESULTS

A single morning dose of salmeterol produced improvement in FEV1 that was significantly greater (p < or = 0.012) than that produced by two doses of salbutamol (taken 6 hours apart) when patients were assessed 3 to 6 hours and 10 to 12 hours after the dose. This greater bronchodilation was present on day 1 of the study and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of regular treatment. Over the 12 weeks, compared with salbutamol, salmeterol treatment was associated with a greater mean improvement in morning peak expiratory flow (35 L/min vs -3 L/min, p < 0.001), a higher percentage of days with no symptoms (29% vs 15%; p = 0.012), and a higher percentage of nights with no awakenings (14% vs -1%; p < 0.001). Adverse events were similar for both treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study salmeterol, 50 micrograms twice daily, was well tolerated and more effective than salbutamol, 200 micrograms four times daily, in improving symptoms and lung function in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

The beta-agonist controversy

After many years of increasing morbidity and mortality, several avenues of scientific investigation now appear to be converging to offer an explanation for the asthma paradox and indicate that regular or long-term use of short-acting inhaled beta-agonist drugs is inappropriate. Pharmacoepidemiologic studies indicate a strong association between increased beta-agonist use and asthma deaths, which does not appear entirely related to confounding by severity. Clinical data, although still limited, show little evidence for symptomatic or functional improvement during long-term beta-agonist therapy and, in many instances, reveal significant adverse effects. Related investigations offer evidence of potential plausible mechanisms, notably increased bronchial responsiveness to inhaled allergen, to explain these findings. A radical revision of the therapeutic use of these drugs in asthma has been prompted by these findings. Beta-agonist drugs remain essential for the management of acute severe attacks. They are also useful on demand for the relief of breakthrough symptoms and for prophylaxis of exercise-induced symptoms. In chronic asthma, however, adequate anti-inflammatory therapy is the treatment of choice. Long-term treatment with short-acting beta-agonist, even in the presence of seemingly adequate anti-inflammatory therapy, may be associated with deterioration of asthma over the long-term. The effects of long-acting beta-agonists remain under review. To date, there are no data that clearly indicate a deleterious effect, and many clinical trials show benefits in symptom control and improved lung function associated with their regular use. The significance of tachyphylaxis remains to be defined. Their current role is still somewhat unclear, but they have been successfully used in subjects in whom, despite the use of moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroid, short-acting bronchodilator is still frequently required. The use of twice-daily long-acting beta-agonist appears preferable to frequent use of short-acting beta-agonists.

Inhaled corticosteroids do not prevent the development of tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol

INTRODUCTION

Twice-daily inhaled salmeterol produces rapid reduction in its acute bronchoprotective effect against methacholine in patients with mild asthma. This investigation examined this effect in patients with moderate asthma who were using inhaled corticosteroids.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Eight asthmatic volunteers who required inhaled corticosteroids for control of their symptoms and who were able to withhold treatment with beta 2-agonists for 4 weeks before and during the study participated in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study with two random-order treatment periods: inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg twice a day for seven doses, and placebo in similar fashion, with a 7-day or greater washout between these periods. Methacholine inhalation tests were done 1 h after doses 1, 3, 5, and 7, and then 24 h after the last dose of the study inhaler, 10 min post-200 microg salbutamol.

RESULTS

Baseline FEV1 measurements before doses 3, 5, and 7 of salmeterol, ie, 12 h after salmeterol, were significantly higher than all other baseline values. Twenty-four hours after the last dose of salmeterol, the FEV1 was no different from that during the placebo period. The geometric mean methacholine concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) following the third dose of salmeterol (6.8 mg/mL) was significantly lower than after the first dose of salmeterol (12.0 mg/mL; p=0.031), and this reduction of bronchoprotection persisted following doses 5 and 7. The methacholine PC20 10 min postsalbutamol measured after the salmeterol period was significantly lower than after placebo (5.6 vs 13.3 mg/mL; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tolerance to the acute bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol was significant after the first two doses and persisted after the seventh dose. Tolerance to the acute bronchoprotective effect of salbutamol was also significant after regular use of salmeterol for seven doses. These effects, in subjects using inhaled corticosteroids regularly, were similar to the those previously seen in patients with mild asthma using as-required beta 2-agonists only, indicating that tolerance is not prevented by use of inhaled corticosteroids.

Comparison of salmeterol with disodium cromoglycate in the treatment of adult asthma

BACKGROUND

Disodium cromoglycate and salmeterol, a long acting beta 2-agonist, achieve their therapeutic effects through different mechanisms but both are used as maintenance therapies in asthma.

OBJECTIVES

It was the purpose of this study to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of both drugs when used as prophylactic therapy for adults with symptomatic mild to moderate asthma.

METHODS

In this 8-week, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multicenter study, 134 adult patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ranging from 60% to 90% predicted, reversibility in FEV1 of greater than 15% and a total daily symptom score of at least 2 or a diurnal variation in peak expiratory flow (PEF) of greater than 15% on three of the seven days of the run-in period, were randomized to either salmeterol, 50 microgram twice daily (via metered-dose inhaler), or disodium cromoglycate, 20 mg four times daily (via Spinhaler), plus corresponding placebo. Approximately 50% of the total population were concurrently receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Salmeterol was significantly better than disodium cromoglycate in improving both morning (mean difference between treatments = 31 L/min; P = .007) and evening PEF (mean difference between treatments = 29 L/min; P = .008). Both treatments were however, associated with significant improvement in FEV1, daytime and night-time symptoms score and use of rescue salbutamol (P < .001). Although salmeterol tended to produce greater improvement than disodium cromoglycate in all these parameters only the difference in rescue salbutamol achieved statistical significance (P = .021). Salmeterol was the preferred treatment of both the patients and the physicians (P = .002). Both treatments were well tolerated with a similarly low incidence of adverse event reports, the majority of which were related to underlying disease.

CONCLUSION

Salmeterol, 50 microgram twice daily, provides better control of symptomatic mild to moderate asthma than disodium cromoglycate, 20 mg four times daily.

Acute asthma

The number of patients presenting to the emergency department with severe acute asthma exacerbations is increasing. Prompt and aggressive therapy often ameliorates the symptoms and decreases the morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. A directed history and physical examination should be performed, often simultaneously with treatment. The use of inhaled beta-adrenergic agents and the early use of corticosteroids will reverse most attacks. In addition, the use of anticholinergic agents may benefit selected patients. Despite aggressive treatment, some patients will require endotracheal intubation. Controlled intubation with proper sedation and paralysis will decrease the associated morbidity. Complications associated with mechanical ventilation may be prevented by decreasing the amount of auto-PEEP by controlled hypoventilation. Asthma, when incompletely or inadequately treated, can be a rapidly fatal disease process. Conservative approaches to patient admission based on strict objective pulmonary function testing should decrease morbidity and mortality.

Rapid onset of tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol

INTRODUCTION

Twice-daily inhaled salmeterol for 4 weeks produces marked reduction in its acute bronchoprotective effect against methacholine. This investigation examined the onset of this effect over 5 days, and also assessed cross-tolerance with salbutamol.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Ten asthmatic volunteers who were able to withhold beta 2-agonist therapy for 4 weeks before and during the study participated in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study with two random-order treatment periods: inhaled salmeterol, 50 micrograms twice a day for seven doses, and placebo in similar fashion. Methacholine inhalation tests were done 1 h after doses 1, 3, 5, and 7, and then 24 h after the last dose of the study inhaler 10 minutes after 200 micrograms of salbutamol.

RESULTS

Baseline FEV1 value before doses 3, 5, and 7 of salmeterol (ie, 12 h after salmeterol) was significantly higher than all other (n = 7) values. Twenty-four hours after the last dose of salmeterol, the FEV1 was no different from that during the placebo period. The geometric mean methacholine concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) after the first dose of salmeterol (6.1 mg/mL) was statistically similar to the value achieved 10 min after salbutamol after the placebo period (8.3 mg/mL), and these were significantly (analysis of variance, p < 0.00005) larger than the second, third, and fourth salmeterol days (3.4 mg/mL, 2.6 mg/mL, 1.9 mg/mL, respectively). The methacholine PC20 10 min after salbutamol measured after the salmeterol period was significantly lower than after placebo (2.3 mg/mL vs 8.3 mg/mL; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tolerance to the acute bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol was significant after the first two doses and progressively increased to the seventh dose. Tolerance to the acute bronchoprotective effect of salbutamol was significant after regular use of salmeterol for seven doses.

Salmeterol: its place in asthma management

SALMETEROLXINAFOATE (Serevent, Allen and Hanburys) is an inhaled beta-adrenergic agonist approved for mainte-nance asthma therapy in adults and children older than 12 years of age. The recommended dose is two inhalations (42 μg) twice daily. Its adverse effect profile is similar to that of albuterol; however, salmeterol has a prolonged, 12-hour duration of action. It may also have activity as an antiinflammatory agent, which may be beneficial in the treatment of asthma; however, the clinical relevance of these potential effects remains to be elucidated. As a new therapeutic agent for the treatment of asthma, its place in the hierarchy of asthma therapies is currently undefined and a number ofquestions may arise regarding its use.

Pharmacokinetic optimisation of asthma treatment

Asthma is generally managed with bronchodilator therapy and/or anti-inflammatory drugs. Guidelines now advocate selection of drugs and pharmaceutical formulations (long-acting vs short-acting, inhaled vs systemic) on the basis of disease severity. Theophylline has a narrow therapeutic margin. Clearance is highly variable and plasma concentrations should be monitored to avoid the occurrence of plasma concentration-related adverse effects. The rate of absorption of theophylline differs depending on the sustained release formulation administered. Some products do not provide sufficient plasma drug concentrations for therapeutic efficacy over a 12-hour period, particularly in patients with high clearance rates (e.g. children and patients who smoke). Administration of drugs via inhalation offers several advantages over systemic routes of administration (e.g. adverse effects are decreased). Inhalation is now advocated as first-line therapy. Aerosol medications available for the treatment of asthma are beta 2-agonist (including the newer long-acting agents such as salmeterol), corticosteroids, anticholinergic drugs, sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) and nedocromil. To reach the airways, aerosolised particles should be 1 to 5 microns in diameter. Particles of this size can be produced by nebuliser for continuous administration or by metered-dose inhaler and drug powder inhaler for unit dose medication. For efficient use of the metered-dose inhaler, slow inhalation and actuation must be coordinated. However, efficacy and convenience can be improved when spacer devices are used. Furthermore, spacer devices lessen the oropharyngeal adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids. Dry powder inhalers are more easily used by children and elderly patients than metered-dose inhalers. Regardless of the device used, a maximum of 10% of the inhaled dose reaches the airways. The rest of the dose is swallowed and absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract. Most inhaled drugs have low oral bioavailability, either because of a high first-pass metabolism (beta 2-agonists and glucocorticoids) or because of lack of absorption (sodium cromoglycate). Sulphation of beta 2-agonists occurs in the wall of the gastrointestinal tract and extensive metabolism of inhaled corticosteroids occurs in the liver. Low bioavailability of the swallowed fraction contributes to reduced adverse effects. The pharmacokinetic properties of an inhaled drug are of interest. The fraction of the dose absorbed through the lung has the same disposition characteristics as an intravenous dose, and the swallowed fraction has the same disposition as an orally administered dose. However, for many drugs, pharmacokinetic data after inhalation are limited and cannot be used as a criteria for selection of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)