Azithromycin. A review of its pharmacological properties and use as 3-day therapy in respiratory tract infections

Azithromycin in the Management of Upper Respiratory Tract Infections (URTIs): Indian Real-Life Experience

Objective

Upper Respiratory Tract Infections (URTIs) pose a significant public health challenge worldwide. Azithromycin has been approved for its management due to broad-spectrum antibacterial properties and favorable pharmacokinetics. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Azithromycin in treatment of URTIs in a real-world setting.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted across 184 Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) clinics in India. Medical records of adults (≥18 years) who received Azithromycin 500 mg for 5 days to treat URTIs and provided consent were retrieved. Sore throat, fever, and interference with daily activities were assessed alongside clinical signs (pharyngeal erythema, tonsillar erythema, and exudates/plugs on tonsils). Clinical global impression of change was evaluated using a 7-point rating scale. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests for mean score changes and the McNemar-Bowker test to evaluate symptom improvement from baseline to day 5.

Results

Data from 884 patients were analyzed. With 5 days of Azithromycin therapy, significant reduction in proportion of patients reporting URTI symptoms and signs was noted. Proportion of patients reporting sore throat was reduced from 95.8% to 10.4%; work absenteeism dropped from 47.9% to 1%; and fever subsided in 97.4% of patients. Clinical signs also improved notably, with moderate-to-severe pharyngeal erythema (90.9% of patients at baseline to 13.6% at day 5), tonsillar erythema (84% of patients at baseline to 9.6%), and tonsillar exudates (58.3% patients at baseline to 4.4%). Also, 97.2% of patients showed considerable improvement in their Clinical Global Impression score with Azithromycin. Adverse events were reported by 2.37% of patients.

Conclusion

Azithromycin demonstrates a significant improvement in clinical manifestations of URTIs, with a low incidence of adverse events.

Climate change as a challenge for pharmaceutical storage and tackling antimicrobial resistance

The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains a pressing global health challenge. Infections that were once easily treatable with first-line antimicrobials are becoming increasingly difficult to manage. This shift directly threatens the wellness of humans, animals, plants, and the environment. While the AMR crisis can be attributed to a myriad of factors, including lack of infection prevention and control measures, over-prescription of antimicrobials, patient non-compliance, and the misuse of antimicrobials, one aspect that has garnered less attention is the role of storage conditions of these medicines. The way medications, particularly antimicrobials, are transported and stored until the point of use can influence their efficacy and, subsequently, may impact the development of resistant microbial strains. This review delves deeper into the often-overlooked domain of climate change (CC) and antimicrobial storage practices and the potential effects. Inappropriate storage conditions, such as exposure to extreme temperatures, humidity or light, can degrade the potency of antimicrobials. When these compromised medicines are administered to patients or animals alike, they may not effectively eradicate the targeted pathogens, leading to partial survival of the pathogens. These surviving pathogens, having been exposed to sub-lethal doses, are more likely to evolve and develop resistance mechanisms. The review discusses the mechanism underlying this and underscores the implications of antimicrobial storage practices in relation to two of the most pressing global health challenges: AMR and CC. The review also presents specific case studies and highlights the importance of monitoring storage practices and supply chain surveillance. Furthermore, the importance of deploying genomic tools to understand the potential impact of storage conditions on the development of AMR is discussed, and antimicrobial storage highlighted as a crucial part of comprehensive strategies in the fight against AMR.

Analyzing atomic scale structural details and nuclear spin dynamics of four macrolide antibiotics: erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, and roxithromycin

The current investigation centers on elucidating the intricate molecular architecture and dynamic behavior of four macrolide antibiotics, specifically erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, and roxithromycin, through the application of sophisticated solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) methodologies. We have measured the principal components of chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) parameters, and the site-specific spin-lattice relaxation time at carbon nuclei sites. To extract the principal components of CSA parameters, we have employed 13C 2DPASS CP-MAS SSNMR experiments at two different values of magic angle spinning (MAS) frequencies, namely 2 kHz and 600 Hz. Additionally, the spatial correlation between 13C and 1H nuclei has been investigated using 1H-13C frequency switched Lee-Goldburg heteronuclear correlation (FSLGHETCOR) experiment at a MAS frequency of 24 kHz. Our findings demonstrate that the incorporation of diverse functional groups, such as the ketone group and oxime group with the lactone ring, exerts notable influences on the structure and dynamics of the macrolide antibiotic. In particular, we have observed a significant decrease in the spin-lattice relaxation time of carbon nuclei residing on the lactone ring, desosamine, and cladinose in roxithromycin, compared to erythromycin. Overall, our findings provide detailed insight into the relationship between the structure and dynamics of macrolide antibiotics, which is eventually correlated with their biological activity. This knowledge can be utilized to develop new and more effective drugs by providing a rational basis for drug discovery and design.

Protection of melatonin treatment and combination with traditional antibiotics against septic myocardial injury

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is a common complication of sepsis with a high mortality rate. It has been reported that melatonin can attenuate septic injury due to various properties. On the basis of previous reports, this study will further explore the effects and mechanisms of melatonin pretreatment, posttreatment, and combination with antibiotics in the treatment of sepsis and septic myocardial injury.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Our results showed that melatonin pretreatment showed an obvious protective effect on sepsis and septic myocardial injury, which was related to the attenuation of inflammation and oxidative stress, the improvement of mitochondrial function, the regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), and the activation of the AMPK signaling pathway. In particular, AMPK serves as a key effector for melatonin-initiated myocardial benefits. In addition, melatonin posttreatment also had a certain degree of protection, while its effect was not as remarkable as that of pretreatment. The combination of melatonin and classical antibiotics had a slight but limited effect. RNA-seq detection clarified the cardioprotective mechanism of melatonin.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, this study provides a theoretical basis for the application strategy and combination of melatonin in septic myocardial injury.

Effect of Azithromycin on Sciatic Nerve Injury in the Wistar Rats

After a severe peripheral nerve injury, complete functional recovery is rare. Modulating the inflammatory response could be an effective way to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. The present study aimed to determine the effect of azithromycin on functional recovery following sciatic nerve crush in Wistar rats. 40 male Wistar rats were used in four groups, including: the negative control, sham, and two groups of azithromycin (15 and 150 mg/kg/day) (n = 10).The rats' right sciatic nerve was crushed using a non-serrated clamp. In experimental groups, animals were treated with azithromycin (15 and 150 mg/kg/day) for 7 days. Then, sensory-motor functions were evaluated over eight weeks. Real-time PCR was used to measure the expression of NGF and BDNF genes. At the end of the 4th week, the sensory recovery accelerated in the azithromycin-treated rats so that the reaction times in the groups treated with 15 mg/kg and 150 mg/kg doses of azithromycin reached 5.14 s and 6.61 s, respectively, which were significantly lower than the 12 s in the negative control group (P < 0.05).Eventually, the mean SFI values in the negative control and both azithromycin-treated groups recovered to preoperative levels in the 8th week, with no significant difference between the sciatic lesion groups. Findings showed a seven-day course of azithromycin administered immediately after a sciatic nerve crush could accelerate regeneration and improve motor and sensory function recovery compared to negative controls. These significant effects were observed in both the azithromycin 15 mg/kg and the azithromycin 150 mg/kg treatment groups. Azithromycin treatment upregulated the expression of NGF and BDNF genes in crushed sciatic nerve. Our findings suggest that a seven-day treatment of azithromycin after a sciatic nerve injury could accelerate the regeneration process and improve functional recovery.

Efficacy of azithromycin 1% and 1.5% ophthalmic solutions compared to tobramycin 0.3% eye drops: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:

Azithromycin 1% and 1.5% ophthalmic preparations are used widely in clinical practice for the treatment of signs and symptoms of eye diseases. The aim of this study was to render conclusive evidence by comparing the efficacy of azithromycin 1% and 1.5% over tobramycin 0.3% ophthalmic solutions for the treatment of eye diseases in a short duration in terms of bacterial resolution, the cure rate, and resolving clinical sign and symptoms.

Methods:

Systematic searches were performed in the electronic database (MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and Web of Science) and other sources. Multicenter randomized controlled trial studies conducted in English were identified and screened. Analysis of individual studies was conducted using the OpenMeta-analyst and Review Manager Version 5.3 software.

Results:

Eleven studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. In clinical cure rate, azithromycin 1% and 1.5% eye drops were more effective than tobramycin 0.3% eye drops in short duration dosing (⩽5 days) with a twice-a-day regimen (relative risk = 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 1.008, 1.28), whereas on increased duration (>5 days), azithromycin is almost similarly as effective as tobramycin (relative risk = 1.007; 95% confidence interval: 0.96, 1.05). There was no significant difference in efficacy of bacterial resolution of azithromycin (1%, 1.5%) eye drops compared to tobramycin (0.3%) eye drops (relative risk = 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.96, 1.018). Azithromycin eye drops are effective in improving the signs and symptoms of eye disease.

Conclusion:

Azithromycin 1% or 1.5% is more effective in the clinical cure rate of eye disease than tobramycin 0.3% eye drops in ⩽5 days of treatment. It is also the best choice of treatment for improving the signs and symptoms of eye disease. So that we recommend clinicians to use azithromycin 1% or 1.5% eye drops.

Systematic Review Registration:

PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019139911

Potential Therapeutic Options for COVID-19: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

The COVID-19 pandemic represents an unprecedented challenge for the researchers to offer safe, tolerable, and effective treatment strategies for its causative agent known as SARS-CoV-2. With the rapid evolution of the pandemic, even the off-label use of existing drugs has been restricted by limited availability. Several old antivirals, antimalarial, and biological drugs are being reconsidered as possible therapies. The effectiveness of the controversial treatment options for COVID-19 such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, angiotensin 2 conversion enzyme inhibitors and selective angiotensin receptor blockers was also discussed. A systemic search in the PubMed, Science Direct, LitCovid, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov data bases was conducted using the keywords "coronavirus drug therapy," passive immunotherapy for COVID-19', "convalescent plasma therapy," (CPT) "drugs for COVID-19 treatment," "SARS-CoV-2," "COVID-19," "2019-nCoV," "coronavirus immunology," "microbiology," "virology," and individual drug names. Systematic reviews, case presentations and very recent clinical guidelines were included. This narrative review summarizes the available information on possible therapies for COVID-19, providing recent data to health professionals.

The effect of gender and ABCB1 gene polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in healthy male and female Pakistani subjects

In the current study, the possible outcome of gender difference and genotypic polymorphism of the ABCB1 gene encoding P-glycoprotein on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin has been evaluated. An open-label, comparative pharmacokinetic study was done in healthy Pakistani volunteers (females (n = 8) and males (n = 8)). They were administered a single 500 mg oral dose of azithromycin. Blood samples (≈5 mL) were collected in heparinized tubes and the HPLC/MS/MS method was used to determine azithromycin plasma levels. ABCB1 polymorphism (single nucleotide polymorphisms) at C3435T, G26SST was performed using the RFLP-PCR method. The Student t test was applied to compare pharmacokinetic parameters of azithromycin between male and female human subjects (at 95% CI) using GraphPad Prism-8. A significant difference was observed in pharmacokinetic parameters between males and females, as C_max in males (230 ± 80.2 ng/mL) was significantly higher than in females (224.9 ± 75.5 ng/mL), while [Formula: see text] was also significantly higher (p < 0.05) in males (2102 ± 200.3 ng·h^-1·mL^-1) compared to females (1825.7 ± 225.4 ng·h^-1·mL^-1). There was a significant variation in C_max and AUC in three ABCB1 genotyping groups as well. Gender difference and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms have a significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, as they contribute to interindividual variability in therapeutic response.

Fumaryl diketopiperazine based effervescent microparticles to escape macrophage phagocytosis for enhanced treatment of pneumonia via pulmonary delivery

The treatment of pulmonary infections with antibiotics administered via pulmonary delivery provides for higher local therapeutic efficacy rather than through systemic administration. Pneumonia is globally considered a major cause of death due to a lack of proper medication. The treatment of pneumonia with inhalable antibiotics (such as azithromycin (AZM)) can provide a maximum pulmonary therapeutic effect without significant systemic side effects. Compared to non-effervescent microparticles, effervescent microparticles can provide an active driving force to release loaded antibiotics for subsequent distribution deep into the lung by virtue of its smaller size. In this study, N-fumaroylated diketopiperazine (FDKP) was used as a carrier to prepare effervescent inhalable microparticles loaded with AZM (AZM@FDKP-E-MPs). This effervescent dry powder was characterized for both in vitro and in vivo deposition in the lung and the results obtained showed significant improvement in lung deposition and anti-bacterial efficiency, suggesting a strong potential application for pneumonia treatment.

Integration of multiscale molecular modeling approaches with the design and discovery of fusidic acid derivatives

Aim: Fusidic acid (FA) is an effective antibiotic against Staphylococcus aureus, but it is metabolically unstable. Methods & results: 14 derivatives were designed and synthesized by blocking the metabolic sites of FA (21-COOH and 3-OH) to maintain antibacterial activity and prolong the half-life. Six derivatives showed good antibacterial activity, and the pharmacokinetic experiments confirmed that two derivatives modified in 21-COOH released FA in vivo and showed longer half-lives than FA. Docking analysis and structure–activity relationships indicated that the 3-glycine derivatives with more hydrogen-bonding acceptor sites and positively charged surface areas were more likely to have good antibacterial activity. Conclusion: The results suggest that introducing groups that block the metabolic sites of FA could maintain antibacterial activity and prolong the half-lives.

In vitro activity and pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic parameters of clarithromycin and azithromycin: why they matter in the treatment of respiratory tract infections

Clarithromycin and azithromycin are second-generation macrolides established and widely used for treating a range of upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Extensive clinical trials data indicate that these drugs are highly effective in these applications and broadly comparable in their clinical and microbiological effectiveness. However, consideration of pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and tissue-penetration data, including the significant antibacterial activity of the metabolite 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin, plus the findings of pharmacodynamic modeling, provide evidence that the long half-life and lower potency of azithromycin predispose this agent to select for resistant isolates. Comparison of the "mutant-prevention concentrations" of clarithromycin and azithromycin, and examination of large-scale epidemiological data from Canada, also support the view that these drugs differ materially in their propensity to promote resistance among bacterial strains implicated in common respiratory infections, and that clarithromycin may offer important advantages over azithromycin that should be considered when choosing a macrolide to treat these conditions.

Azithromycin-loaded respirable microparticles for targeted pulmonary delivery for the treatment of pneumonia

Pneumonia is a major contributor to infection-based hospitalizations and deaths in the United States. Antibiotics such as azithromycin (AZM), although effective at managing pneumonia, often suffer from off-target diffusion and poor bioavailability when administered orally or via intravenous injection. The formation of biofilms at the disease sites makes the treatment more complicated by protecting bacteria from antimicrobial agents and thus necessitating a much higher dosage of antibiotics to eradicate the biofilms. As such, targeted pulmonary delivery of antibiotics has emerged as a promising alternative by providing direct access to the lung while also allowing higher local therapeutic concentrations but minimal systemic exposure. In this study, AZM was encapsulated in N-fumaroylated diketopiperazine (FDKP) microparticles for efficient pulmonary delivery. Both in vitro and in vivo results demonstrated that AZM@FDKP-MPs administered via intratracheal insufflation achieved at least a 3.4 times higher local concentration and prolonged retention times compared to intravenous injection and oral administration, suggesting their potential to better manage bacterial pneumonia.

Estimation of elimination half-lives of organic chemicals in humans using gradient boosting machine

BACKGROUND

Elimination half-life is an important pharmacokinetic parameter that determines exposure duration to approach steady state of drugs and regulates drug administration. The experimental evaluation of half-life is time-consuming and costly. Thus, it is attractive to build an accurate prediction model for half-life.

METHODS

In this study, several machine learning methods, including gradient boosting machine (GBM), support vector regressions (RBF-SVR and Linear-SVR), local lazy regression (LLR), SA, SR, and GP, were employed to build high-quality prediction models. Two strategies of building consensus models were explored to improve the accuracy of prediction. Moreover, the applicability domains (ADs) of the models were determined by using the distance-based threshold.

RESULTS

Among seven individual models, GBM showed the best performance (R(2)=0.820 and RMSE=0.555 for the test set), and Linear-SVR produced the inferior prediction accuracy (R(2)=0.738 and RMSE=0.672). The use of distance-based ADs effectively determined the scope of QSAR models. However, the consensus models by combing the individual models could not improve the prediction performance. Some essential descriptors relevant to half-life were identified and analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

An accurate prediction model for elimination half-life was built by GBM, which was superior to the reference model (R(2)=0.723 and RMSE=0.698).

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Encouraged by the promising results, we expect that the GBM model for elimination half-life would have potential applications for the early pharmacokinetic evaluations, and provide guidance for designing drug candidates with favorable in vivo exposure profile. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "System Genetics" Guest Editor: Dr. Yudong Cai and Dr. Tao Huang.

Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections

BACKGROUND

Acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) range from acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis to pneumonia. Approximately five million people die from acute respiratory tract infections annually. Among these, pneumonia represents the most frequent cause of mortality, hospitalisation and medical consultation. Azithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic, structurally modified from erythromycin and noted for its activity against some gram-negative organisms associated with respiratory tract infections, particularly Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of azithromycin to amoxycillin or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (amoxyclav) in the treatment of LRTI, in terms of clinical failure, incidence of adverse events and microbial eradication.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2014, Issue 10), MEDLINE (January 1966 to October week 4, 2014) and EMBASE (January 1974 to November 2014).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs, comparing azithromycin to amoxycillin or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in participants with clinical evidence of an acute LRTI, such as acute bronchitis, pneumonia and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review authors independently assessed all potential studies identified from the searches for methodological quality. We extracted and analysed relevant data separately. We resolved discrepancies through discussion. We initially pooled all types of acute LRTI in the meta-analyses. We investigated the heterogeneity of results using the forest plot and Chi(2) test. We also used the index of the I(2) statistic to measure inconsistent results among trials. We conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 trials involving 2648 participants. We were able to analyse 15 of the trials with 2496 participants. The pooled analysis of all the trials showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of clinical failure on about days 10 to 14 between the two groups (risk ratio (RR), random-effects 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.85). A subgroup analysis in trials with acute bronchitis participants showed significantly lower clinical failure in the azithromycin group compared to amoxycillin or amoxyclav (RR random-effects 0.63; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.88). A sensitivity analysis showed a non-significant reduction in clinical failure in azithromycin-treated participants (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.21) in three adequately concealed studies, compared to RR 1.32; 95% CI 0.70 to 2.49 in 12 studies with inadequate concealment. Twelve trials reported the incidence of microbial eradication and there was no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.03). The reduction of adverse events in the azithromycin group was RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.00).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is unclear evidence that azithromycin is superior to amoxycillin or amoxyclav in treating acute LRTI. In patients with acute bronchitis of a suspected bacterial cause, azithromycin tends to be more effective in terms of lower incidence of treatment failure and adverse events than amoxycillin or amoxyclav. However, most studies were of unclear methodological quality and had small sample sizes; future trials of high methodological quality and adequate sizes are needed.

In Vitro Fractional Inhibitory Concentration (FIC) Study of Cefixime and Azithromycin Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Against Respiratory Clinical Isolates

INTRODUCTION

Acute respiratory infections (ARI) contribute to more than 75% of health care seeking in primary health care facilities in India. Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are managed frequently by β-lactam, macrolide and fluroquinolone class of antibiotics. However, these recommended classes of antibiotic have shown resistance in community settings. Antibiotic combinations may provide broader spectrum not only in terms of coverage but also to overcome multiple resistance mechanisms overcoming individual class limitations.

AIM

The study aimed to determine In vitro interactions interpreted according to calculated fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index between cefixime and azithromycin against common respiratory clinical isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty four bacterial respiratory clinical isolates from microbiology department of tertiary care hospital from Mumbai were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of cefixime and azithromycin. Synergy testing of cefixime combination with azithromycin was performed by checkerboard method. Interaction was determined according to calculated FIC index.

RESULTS

MIC values were ranging from 2-128 μg/ml and 0.24-128 μg/ml for cefixime and azithromycin respectively against K.pneumoniae, M.catarrhalis, S.pneumoniae and H.influenzae isolates. All the tested isolates were resistant to cefixime. Azithromycin resistance was noted in all the isolates except six M. catarrhalis isolates. FIC index showed synergy and additive effect in 66% (29/44) and 34% (15/44) all bacterial clinical isolates. Maximum synergy between cefixime and azithromycin was observed against K. pneumoniae in 91% isolates.

CONCLUSION

This is one of the first attempts to check the rationality of fixed dose antibiotic combination of cefixime and azithromycin in India market. Though results of this study cannot be generalized considering the limitations of low sample size and in vitro model, our data provides stepping stone for further validation of cefixime and azithromycin fixed dose combinations (FDCs) in clinical setting by conducting randomized controlled trials. We think that judicious and rational use of FDCs may help to reduce the risk of selection of further drug resistance along with better clinical outcome.

Preliminary pharmaceutical development of antimalarial-antibiotic cotherapy as a pre-referral paediatric treatment of fever in malaria endemic areas

Artemether (AM) plus azithromycin (AZ) rectal co-formulations were studied to provide pre-referral treatment for children with severe febrile illnesses in malaria-endemic areas. The target profile required that such product should be cheap, easy to administer by non-medically qualified persons, rapidly effective against both malaria and bacterial infections. Analytical and pharmacotechnical development, followed by in vitro and in vivo evaluation, were conducted for various AMAZ coformulations. Of the formulations tested, stability was highest for dry solid forms and bioavailability for hard gelatin capsules; AM release from AMAZ rectodispersible tablet was suboptimal due to a modification of its micro-crystalline structure.

A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric method for the quantification of azithromycin in human plasma

A liquid chromatographic mass spectrometric assay for the quantification of azithromycin in human plasma was developed. Azithromycin and imipramine (as internal standard, IS) were extracted from 0.5 mL human plasma using extraction with diethyl ether under alkaline conditions. Chromatographic separation of drug and IS was performed using a C18 column at room temperature. A mobile phase consisting of methanol, water, ammonium hydroxide and ammonium acetate was pumped at 0.2 mL/min. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode and selected ion recording acquisition mode. The ions utilized for quantification of azithromycin and IS were m/z 749.6 (M + H)(+) and m/z 591.4 (fragment) for azithromycin, and 281.1 m/z for internal standard; retention times were 6.9 and 3.4 min, respectively. The calibration curves were linear (r(2) > 0.999) in the concentration ranges of 10-1000 ng/mL. The mean absolute recoveries for 50 and 500 ng/mL azithromycin and 1 µg/ mL IS were >75%. The percentage coefficient of variation and mean error were <11%. Based on validation data, the lower limit of quantification was 10 ng/mL. The present method was successfully applied to determine azithromycin pharmacokinetic parameters in two obese volunteers. The assay had applicability for use in pharmacokinetic studies.

Blood, tissue, and intracellular concentrations of azithromycin during and after end of therapy

Although azithromycin is extensively used in the treatment of respiratory tract infections as well as skin and skin-related infections, pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in extracellular space fluid of soft tissues, i.e., one of its therapeutic target sites, are not yet fully elucidated. In this study, azithromycin concentration-time profiles in extracellular space of muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue, but also in plasma and white blood cells, were determined at days 1 and 3 of treatment as well as 2 and 7 days after the end of treatment. Of all compartments, azithromycin concentrations were highest in white blood cells, attesting for intracellular accumulation. However, azithromycin concentrations in both soft tissues were markedly lower than in plasma both during and after treatment. Calculation of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24))/MIC(90) ratios for selected pathogens suggests that azithromycin concentrations measured in the present study are subinhibitory at all time points in both soft tissues and at the large majority of observed time points in plasma. Hence, it might be speculated that azithromycin's clinical efficacy relies not only on elevated intracellular concentrations but possibly also on its known pleotropic effects, including immunomodulation and influence on bacterial virulence factors. However, prolonged subinhibitory azithromycin concentrations at the target site, as observed in the present study, might favor the emergence of bacterial resistance and should therefore be considered with concern. In conclusion, this study has added important information to the pharmacokinetic profile of the widely used antibiotic drug azithromycin and evidentiates the need for further research on its potential for induction of bacterial resistance.

Screening paediatric rectal forms of azithromycin as an alternative to oral or injectable treatment

The aim of this study was to identify a candidate formulation for further development of a home or near-home administrable paediatric rectal form of a broad-spectrum antibiotic - specially intended for (emergency) use in tropical rural settings, in particular for children who cannot take medications orally and far from health facilities where injectable treatments can be given. Azithromycin, a broad-spectrum macrolide used orally or intravenously for the treatment of respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue infections, was selected because of its pharmacokinetic and therapeutic properties. Azithromycin in vitro solubility and stability in physiologically relevant conditions were studied. Various pharmaceutical forms, i.e. rectal suspension, two different rectal gels, polyethylene glycol (PEG) suppository and hard gelatin capsule (HGC) were assessed for in vitro dissolution and in vivo bioavailability in the rabbit. Azithromycin PEG suppository appears to be a promising candidate.

Influence of macrolide maintenance therapy and bacterial colonisation on exacerbation frequency and progression of COPD (COLUMBUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by progressive development of airflow limitation that is poorly reversible. Because of a poor understanding of COPD pathogenesis, treatment is mostly symptomatic and new therapeutic strategies are limited. There is a direct relationship between the severity of the disease and the intensity of the inflammatory response. Besides smoking, one of the hypotheses for the persistent airway inflammation is the presence of recurrent infections. Macrolide antibiotics have bacteriostatic as well as anti-inflammatory properties in patients with cystic fibrosis and other inflammatory pulmonary diseases. There is consistent evidence that macrolide therapy reduces infectious exacerbations, decreases the requirement for additional antibiotics and improves nutritional measures. Because of these positive effects we hypothesised that maintenance macrolide therapy may also have beneficial effects in patients with COPD who have recurrent exacerbations. The effects on development of bacterial resistance to macrolides due to this long-term treatment are unknown. Until now, studies investigating macrolide therapy in COPD are limited. The objective of this study is to assess whether maintenance treatment with macrolide antibiotics in COPD patients with three or more exacerbations in the previous year decreases the exacerbation rate in the year of treatment and to establish microbial resistance due to the long-term treatment.

METHODS/DESIGN

The study is set up as a prospective randomised double-blind placebo-controlled single-centre trial. A total of 92 patients with COPD who have had at least three exacerbations of COPD in the previous year will be included. Subjects will be randomised to receive either azithromycin 500 mg three times a week or placebo. Our primary endpoint is the reduction in the number of exacerbations of COPD in the year of treatment.

DISCUSSION

We investigate whether long-term therapy with macrolide antibiotics can prevent exacerbations in patients with COPD. Additionally, our study aims to assess the effect of long-term use of macrolide on the development of antimicrobial resistance and on inflammatory parameters related to COPD. We believe this study will provide more data on the effects of macrolide treatment in patients in COPD and will add more knowledge on its working mechanisms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00985244.

Safety and effectiveness of azithromycin in the treatment of respiratory infections in children

OBJECTIVES

To describe clinical effectiveness of azithromycin in the management of respiratory tract infections in children up to 12 years of age; to examine duration of symptoms after commencement of therapy and to mark adverse events possibly caused by treatment with azithromycin.

METHODS

The overall ITT population included 156 children (65 with acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis (AP), 32 with acute otitis media (AOM), and 59 with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI)). Clinical effectiveness was based on results of improvement and cure after 3 day's treatment with azithromycin, calculating the clinical score for each diagnosis before treatment, at the 4th day (end of the therapy) and at the 12th or 28th day (end of the study). To better estimate patients' (parents') satisfaction with treatment, a diary was provided for each child and parents recorded the days when a child felt relief of symptoms.

RESULTS

In this study azithromycin led to relief of symptoms after 3 days in 89.1% of patients. Antibiotics had been prescribed within 1 year prior to inclusion in 74.4% of patients and 29.5% had previously been treated with macrolides. Clinical effectiveness in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population was 94.8% and there were 5.2% failures. Overall, 18 (11.5%) patients reported 25 adverse events (AEs) and nine AEs were characterized as possibly, probably or definitely related to azithromycin. The most common adverse events were diarrhea in nine (5.8%) cases, vomiting in six (3.8%) and abdominal pain reported in four (2.6 %) patients.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study show that azithromycin in the treatment of children with respiratory tract infections has high clinical effectiveness and a small number of adverse events. However, major limitations of the study are its design as a non-comparative, observational, postmarketing study and that the etiology of infections was not confirmed. Despite this, it can be concluded that azithromycin is a reliable antibiotic treatment for children's respiratory tract infections, giving fast resolution of symptoms with few adverse events in patients with presumed bacterial infections.

Azithromycin plus chloroquine: combination therapy for protection against malaria and sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy

Introduction:

The first-line therapy for the intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) is sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). There is an urgent need to identify safe, well-tolerated and efficacious alternatives to SP due to widespread Plasmodium falciparum resistance. Combination therapy using azithromycin and chloroquine is one possibility that has demonstrated adequate parasitological response > 95% in clinical trials of non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa and where IPTp is a government policy in 33 countries.

Areas covered:

Key safety, tolerability and efficacy data are presented for azithromycin and chloroquine, alone and/or in combination, when used to prevent and/or treat P. falciparum, P. vivax, and several curable sexually transmitted and reproductive tract infections (STI/RTI). Pharmacokinetic evidence from pregnant women is also summarized for both compounds.

Expert opinion:

The azithromycin-chloroquine regimen that has demonstrated consistent efficacy in non-pregnant adults has been a 3-day course containing daily doses of 1 g of azithromycin and 600 mg base of chloroquine. The pharmacokinetic evidence of these compounds individually suggests that dose adjustments may not be necessary when used in combination for treatment efficacy against P. falciparum, P. vivax, as well as several curable STI/ RTI among pregnant women, although clinical confirmation will be necessary. Mass trachoma-treatment campaigns have shown that azithromycin selects for macrolide resistance in the pneumococcus, which reverses following the completion of therapy. Most importantly, no evidence to date suggests that azithromycin induces pneumococcal resistance to penicillin.

Ocular pharmacokinetics of AzaSite Xtra-2% azithromycin formulated in a DuraSite delivery system

PURPOSE

The pharmacokinetics of a 2% ocular solution of azithromycin in DuraSite was evaluated in rabbits to determine whether the PK/PD parameters support a once-a-day for three-day therapeutic regimen against bacterial conjunctivitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mean levels of azithromycin were determined in tears, bulbar conjunctiva, cornea, and plasma following a single drop of 2% azithromycin. The levels were determined by HPLC-MS.

RESULTS

Concentrations of azithromycin peaked at 30 minutes. At the end of 24 hours, ocular tissue concentrations exceeded the MIC breakpoint for the most common causative pathogens of bacterial conjunctivitis by at least 7-fold.

CONCLUSION

The PK/PD profile of 2% azithromycin suggests efficacy against common causative bacteria with just one dose per day for three days.

Azithromycin-related agranulocytosis in an elderly man with acute otitis media

Azithromycin (AZM) is widely used for respiratory tract infections and otitis media because of its activity against Haemophilus influenzae and atypical pathogens, and its ease of administration. Although leukopenia is the one of the most frequent AZM-related laboratory abnormalities in children, agranulocytosis has not been reported in adults. Here, we present the case of an 81-year-old man with agranulocytosis following AZM-treatment for acute otitis media. He developed febrile neutropenia and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and cefepim were administered. All his symptoms and absolute neutrophil counts were recovered within 7 days after admission. Physicians must be vigilant in identifying drug-induced neutropenia in AZM-treated patients because early detection can decrease the severity and prevent mortality.

Efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, including patients with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae infection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The growing problem of drug resistance among respiratory pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae, (S. pneumoniae) has complicated initial empiric therapy of CAP. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a 3-day course of azithromycin in adults with mild to moderately severe CAP, and to determine whether in vitro macrolide resistance among strains of S. pneumoniae is related to clinical efficacy/failure.

METHODS

An open-label, non-comparative study was undertaken at 3 university-affiliated hospitals in Japan. Patients were eligible if they were 18 years or older and had mild or moderately severe CAP. All patients received azithromycin 500 mg/day for three days, and clinical and microbiological responses were evaluated 1 and 2 weeks after initiating therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients received the study medication, 59 of whom had sufficient data available for efficacy analysis. Overall, a good clinical response with azithromycin was achieved in 49 patients (83.1%) and a microbiological response was achieved in 78.3%. Azithromycin resistance, based on CLSI criteria, was demonstrated in 85.7% (12/14) of S. pneumoniae isolates, and the presence of ermB genes was found in 50.0% (7/14). However, among patients in whom S. pneumoniae was isolated (n=17), a good clinical response was achieved in 76.5% (13/17), and the microbiological response rate was 64.3% (9/14). Furthermore, 6 of 7 patients in whom high-level resistance was documented (MICs >256 microg/mL and carrying ermB genes) exhibited good clinical responses. Azithromycin was well tolerated; adverse events, mainly of a gastrointestinal nature, were recorded in 6 patients (7.7%).

CONCLUSION

Most patients responed well to azithromycin, indicating that azithromycin might be clinically effective for the treatment of CAP with macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. However, a larger study is necessary to prove the efficacy against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae.

Azithromycin-chloroquine and the intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy

In the high malaria-transmission settings of sub-Saharan Africa, malaria in pregnancy is an important cause of maternal, perinatal and neonatal morbidity. Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) reduces the incidence of low birth-weight, pre-term delivery, intrauterine growth-retardation and maternal anaemia. However, the public health benefits of IPTp are declining due to SP resistance. The combination of azithromycin and chloroquine is a potential alternative to SP for IPTp. This review summarizes key in vitro and in vivo evidence of azithromycin and chloroquine activity against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax, as well as the anticipated secondary benefits that may result from their combined use in IPTp, including the cure and prevention of many sexually transmitted diseases. Drug costs and the necessity for external financing are discussed along with a range of issues related to drug resistance and surveillance. Several scientific and programmatic questions of interest to policymakers and programme managers are also presented that would need to be addressed before azithromycin-chloroquine could be adopted for use in IPTp.

Efficacy and safety of azithromycin 1 g once daily for 3 days in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: an open-label randomised comparison with amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg twice daily for 7 days

This randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study was designed to demonstrate that a 3-day course of oral azithromycin 1 g once daily was at least as effective as a standard 7-day course of oral amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg twice daily in the treatment of outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (Fine class I and II). In total, 267 patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed community-acquired pneumonia were randomly assigned to receive either the azithromycin (n=136) or the amoxicillin-clavulanate (n=131) regimen. At screening, 60/136 (58.8%) and 61/131 (62.9%) respectively had at least one pathogen identified by sputum culture, PCR, or serology. The primary endpoint was the clinical response in the intent-to-treat population at the end of therapy (day 8 to 12). Clinical success rates were 126/136 (92.6%) for azithromycin and 122/131 (93.1%) for amoxicillin-clavulanate (treatment difference: - 0.48%; 95% confidence interval: - 5.66%; 4.69%). Clinical and radiological success rates at follow-up (day 22-26) were consistent with the end of therapy results, no patient reporting clinical relapse. Bacteriological success rates at the end of therapy were 32/35 (91.4%) for azithromycin and 30/33 (90.9%) for amoxicillin-clavulanate (treatment difference: 0.52%; 95% confidence interval - 10.81%; 11.85%). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated: the overall incidence of adverse events was 34/136 (25.0%) for azithromycin and 22/132 (16.7%) for amoxicillin-clavulanate. In both treatment groups, the most commonly reported events were gastrointestinal symptoms. Azithromycin 1g once daily for 3 days is at least as effective as amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg twice daily for 7 days in the treatment of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections

BACKGROUND

Acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) range from acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis to pneumonia. Approximately five million people die of acute respiratory tract infections annually. Among these, pneumonia represents the most frequent cause of mortality, hospitalization and medical consultation. Azithromycin is a new macrolide antibiotic, structurally modified from erythromycin and noted for its activity against some gram-negative organisms associated with respiratory tract infections, particularly Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of azithromycin to amoxycillin or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (amoxyclav) in the treatment of LRTI, in terms of clinical failure, incidence of adverse events and microbial eradication.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007 Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2007), and EMBASE (January 1974 to July 2007).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials, comparing azithromycin to amoxycillin or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in participants with clinical evidence of acute LRTI: acute bronchitis, pneumonia, and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were studied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The criteria for assessing study quality were generation of allocation sequence, concealment of treatment allocation, blinding, and completeness of the trial. All types of acute LRTI were initially pooled in the meta-analyses. The heterogeneity of results was investigated by the forest plot and Chi-square test. Index of I-square (I(2)) was also used to measure inconsistent results among trials. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen trials were analysed. The pooled analysis of all trials showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of clinical failure on about day 10 to 14 between the two groups (relative risk (RR), random-effects 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.85). Sensitivity analysis showed a reduction of clinical failure in azithromycin-treated participants (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.21) in three adequately concealed studies, compared to RR 1.32; 95% CI 0.70 to 2.49 in 12 studies with inadequate concealment. Twelve trials reported the incidence of microbial eradication and there was no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.03). The reduction of adverse events in the azithromycin group was RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.00).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is unclear evidence that azithromycin is superior to amoxicillin or amoxyclav in treating acute LRTI. In patients with acute bronchitis of a suspected bacterial cause, azithromycin tends to be more effective in terms of lower incidence of treatment failure and adverse events than amoxicillin or amoxyclav. Future trials of high methodological quality are needed.

Comparison between azithromycin and amoxicillin in the treatment of infectious exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of azithromycin and amoxicillin in the treatment of patients with infectious exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

METHODS

This study was conducted at six medical centers across Brazil and included 109 patients from 33 to 82 years of age. Of those, 102 were randomized to receive either azithromycin (500 mg/day for three days, n = 49) or amoxicillin (500 mg every eight hours for ten days, n = 53). The patients were evaluated at the study outset, on day ten, and at one month. Based on the clinical evaluation of the signs and symptoms present on day ten and at one month, the outcomes were classified as cure, improvement, or treatment failure. The microbiological evaluation was made through the culture of sputum samples that were considered appropriate samples only after leukocyte counts and Gram staining. Secondary efficacy evaluations were made in order to analyze symptoms (cough, dyspnea, and expectoration) and pulmonary function.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups treated with azithromycin or amoxicillin in terms of the percentages of cases in which the outcomes were classified as cure or improvement: 85% vs. 78% (p = 0.368) on day ten; and 83% vs. 78% (p = 0.571) at one month. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the secondary efficacy variables or the incidence of adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Azithromycin and amoxicillin present similar efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison between generic and branded azithromycin capsule: a randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover in healthy male Thai volunteers

BACKGROUND

Azithromycin is a semisynthetic azalide antibiotic with extensive tissue penetration and a prolonged t(12). It is used once daily for 3 days in the treatment of a number of bacterial infections. However, based on a literature search, information concerning its pharmacokinetic properties, including the relative bioavailability of a newly developed generic capsule formulation compared with an established branded one in the Thai population, has not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the relative bioavailability and other pharmacokinetic properties of a newly developed generic capsule formulation of azithromycin with those of an established branded formulation in healthy male volunteers in Thailand.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study was performed in healthy male Thai volunteers under fasting conditions with a washout of 30 days between the study periods. A single dose of 2 x 250-mg azithromycin capsules was orally administered, and blood samples were collected over a period of 120 hours. Plasma azithromycin concentrations were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with fluorescence detection after derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride. A plasma concentration-time curve was generated for each volunteer from which the C(max), T(max), AUC(0-Iast), AUC(0-infinity), t(1/2), and kappa(e) were determined using noncompartmental analysis. Bioequivalence was defined using regulatory requirements set forth by Thailand, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and the US Food and Drug Administration (bioequivalence acceptance range, 0.80-1.25).

RESULTS

A total of 14 volunteers completed the study. The mean age of volunteers was 20.8 years (range, 19-23 years), and the mean body weight was 62.8 kg (range, 50.6-70.0 kg). The mean (SD) T(max), C(max), AUC(0-last), and AUC(0-infinity) values after administration of the generic and branded formulations were 1.46 (0.41) versus 1.54 (0.41) hours, 425.23 (208.45) versus 431.75 (198.16) ng/mL, 3919.77 (1549.65) versus 4344.79 (1654.98) ng . h/mL, and 4027.05 (1839.13) versus 4515.53 (2203.87) ng . h/mL, respectively. The relative bioavailability of the generic and branded formulations were 1.00 (0.17). The mean (SD) t1/2 values after administration of the generic and branded formulations were 26.43 (10.92) and 28.10 (13.13) hours, respectively. The analysis of variance results of the natural logarithm (In) -transformed values found no significant effect of formulation, period, or sequence on the studied pharmacokinetic parameters. The 90% CIs of the treatment ratios for the Intransformed values of C(max), AUC(0-last), and AUC(0-infinity) were 0.82 to 1.11, 0.91 to 1.06, and 0.91 to 1.08, respectively. All were within the standard bioequivalence acceptance range of 0.80 to 1.25. No adverse events were reported in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small study in a selected population of healthy male Thai volunteers, the C(max) and AUC were not statistically significantly different between generic and branded formulations of a single, 2 x 250-mg dose of azithromycin capsules. The generic and branded formulations were found to be bioequivalent. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Azithromycin extended release: a review of its use in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis and community-acquired pneumonia in the US

Azithromycin is a macrolide antibacterial agent. The novel microspheres oral extended-release formulation (Zmax) is the first antibacterial drug approved in the US for administration as a single dose in adult patients with mild to moderate acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS) or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It has a broad spectrum of in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative and atypical pathogens that cause ABS and CAP infections (including Streptococcus pneumoniae), and achieves good tissue penetration. Azithromycin extended release is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment in patients with ABS or CAP. The clinical cure rates of a single 2.0 g dose of azithromycin extended release were noninferior to those obtained with a 10-day regimen of levofloxacin in patients with ABS, and with 7-day regimens of clarithromycin extended release or levofloxacin in patients with CAP. With a pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile well suited to administration as a single-dose regimen that may offer the advantage of improved compliance and convenience compared with once-daily longer-course regimens, azithromycin extended release is a new option in the empirical treatment of adult patients with mild or moderate ABS or CAP in the US.