Irbesartan: an updated review of its use in cardiovascular disorders

An injectable polyacrylamide/chitosan-based hydrogel with highly adhesive, stretchable and electroconductive properties loaded with irbesartan for treatment of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury

Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) significantly contributes to the high incidence of complications and mortality associated with acute myocardial infarction. Recently, injectable electroconductive hydrogels (IECHs) have emerged as promising tools for replicating the mechanical, electroconductive, and physiological characteristics of cardiac tissue. Herein, we aimed to develop a novel IECH by incorporating irbesartan as a drug delivery system (DDS) for cardiac repair. Our approach involved merging a conductive poly-thiophene derivative (PEDOT: PSS) with an injectable dual-network adhesive hydrogel (DNAH) comprising a catechol-branched polyacrylamide network and a chitosan-hyaluronic acid covalent network. The resulting P-DNAH hydrogel, benefitting from a high conducting polymer content, a chemically crosslinked network, a robust dissipative matrix, and dynamic oxidation of catechol to quinone exhibited superior mechanical strength, desirable conductivity, and robust wet-adhesiveness. In vitro experiments with the P-DNAH hydrogel carrying irbesartan (P-DNAH-I) demonstrated excellent biocompatibility by cck-8 kit on H9C2 cells and a rapid initial release of irbesartan. Upon injection into the infarcted hearts of MIRI mouse models, the P-DNAH-I hydrogel effectively inhibited the inflammatory response and reduced the infarct size. In conclusion, our results suggest that the P-DNAH hydrogel, possessing suitable mechanical properties and electroconductivity, serves as an ideal IECH for DDS, delivering irbesartan to promote heart repair.

An Analytical Method for Determining N-Nitrosodimethylamine and N-Nitrosodiethylamine Contamination in Irbesartan, Olmesartan and Metformin by UPLC-APCI-MS/MS in Tablet Dosage Form

N-nitrosamine pollutants are probable carcinogens. Regulatory agencies declared their presence in the drugs unsafe for human consumption and demanded their recall. Using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-APCI-MS/MS) in tablet dosage form based on International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) tripartite guideline criteria, we aim to develop and test a new approach for identifying and validating nitrosamine-contaminants, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) in irbesartan, olmesartan and metformin. The column was Phenomenex Luna-C18, 100 × 3.0 mm and 3.0 μm. A mobile gradient phase of formic acid in either water or methanol separated the impurities. NDMA and NDEA had retention times of 0.85 and 2.55 min, respectively. The detector's linearity was established at concentrations ranging from 0.6 to 100 ng/mL. R2 for NDMA and NDEA were 0.9996 and 0.9998, respectively, with a linear response function established at 0.6-100 ng/mL. Limit of detection and limit of quantification for NDMA and NDEA were 0.35, 0.29 and 0.55, 0.37 ng/mL, respectively. On average, recovery rates for NDMA and NDEA ranged from 96.0 to 98.4 and 96.2 to 98.0%, respectively. The relative standard deviation for NDMA and NDEA was 3.46 and 2.69, respectively. According to the ICH guidelines, the developed method was quick, sensitive and valid. The pharmaceutical formulations of irbesartan, olmesartan and metformin may be regularly examined using the approach provided here.

Pharmacokinetic study on the interaction between succinic acid and irbesartan in rats and its potential mechanism

CONTEXT

Succinic acid and irbesartan are commonly used drugs in cardiovascular disease treatment. The interaction might occur during their co-administration, which was still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To reveal the effect of succinic acid on the metabolism of irbesartan and its potential mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 6) were treated with a single dose of 30 mg/kg irbesartan (control) or the co-administration with the pre-treatment of 200 mg/kg succinic acid for 7 d. The effect of succinic acid on the metabolic stability and the activity of CYP2C9 was evaluated in rat liver microsomes.

RESULTS

Succinic acid increased the AUC (5328.71 ± 959.31 μg/L × h vs. 3340.23 ± 737.75 μg/L × h) and prolonged the half-life of irbesartan (from 12.79 ± 0.73 h to 20.59 ± 6.35 h). The T_max (2.83 ± 0.75 h vs. 3.83 ± 1.10 h) and clearance rate (3.46 ± 1.13 L/h/kg vs. 6.91 ± 1.65 L/h/kg) of irbesartan was reduced by succinic acid. Consistently, succinic acid improved the metabolic stability (half-life from 23.32 ± 3.46 to 27.35 ± 2.15 min, intrinsic clearance rate from 59.43 ± 6.12 to 50.68 ± 5.64 μL/min/mg protein). Succinic acid was also found to inhibit the activity of CYP2C9 with the IC₅₀ value of 13.87 μM.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Succinic acid increased the system exposure of irbesartan via inhibiting CYP2C9. The experiment design of this study also provides a reference for the further validation of this interaction in humans.

In Silico Based Structural and Fingerprint Analysis of Structurally Diverse AT1 inhibitors

Background and Objective:

The development of pharmacologically active molecules for the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases are important nowadays. In the present investigation, computational techniques have been implemented on Angiotensin II Type 1 (AT1) antagonists to develop better predictive models.

Methods:

Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) and structural patterns/fragments analyses were performed using physicochemical descriptors and MACCS Fingerprints calculaced from AT1 inhibitors collected from the literature.

Results:

The significant models developed have been validated by Leave One Out (LOO) and test set methods, which exhibit considerable Q2 values (>0.65 for the training set and >0.5 for the test set) and the R2pred values for the models are also >0.5. The applicability of the contributed descriptors in these models revealed that the chlorine atom, dipole moment, hydrogen bond donor atoms and electrostatic potential are negatively contributing, and the presence of bond between heavy atoms and the carbon atom connected with small side chain and topological polar vdW surface area are favorable for the AT1 antagonistic activity. The MACCS Fingerprints showed that the presence of atoms (kind of heavy atoms), such as N, O, and S, connected with other heteroatoms or carbon or any other atoms, through single or double bonds are predominantly present in highly active molecules. The presence of halogens, long chain alkanes, halogenated alkanes, and sulfur atoms attached with nitrogen through any atoms are responsible for decreased AT1 antagonistic activity.

Conclusion:

The results have provided additional information on the structural patterns of the compounds based on its MACCS Fingerprints, which may be used for further characterization and design of novel AT1 inhibitors.

ARBs and target organ protection

Recognition of the role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in initiating and maintaining hypertension prompted the development of drugs that disrupt the RAAS, notably the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and, more recently, the angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). This article focuses on the use of ARBs in hypertension management and reviews evidence emerging from clinical trials that ARBs offer target organ protection over and above their antihypertensive activity.

Irbesartan/amlodipine: a review of its use in adult patients with essential hypertension not adequately controlled with monotherapy

Combination therapy is often required in patients with hypertension, and fixed-dose single-pill combinations have been shown to provide an easier regimen for patients, improving adherence. Irbesartan/amlodipine (Aprovasc®) is an angiotensin-receptor blocker/calcium-channel blocker fixed-dose single-pill combination, whose constituent drugs exert additive effects when coadministered. In two randomized, open-label, multicentre, phase III trials, fixed-dose combination therapy with irbesartan/amlodipine was more effective than continuation of irbesartan or amlodipine monotherapy in patients with hypertension not adequately controlled with initial irbesartan or amlodipine monotherapy; there was a significantly greater decrease from baseline in mean seated home systolic blood pressure (primary endpoint) with the fixed-dose combination. The fixed-dose combination was also associated with a greater decrease in mean seated home diastolic blood pressure and mean seated office systolic and diastolic blood pressure than monotherapy. The fixed-dose combination of irbesartan/amlodipine was well tolerated in these patients; most treatment-emergent adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. The most frequent adverse event was peripheral oedema, generally associated with amlodipine treatment.

Irbesartan-mediated AT1 receptor blockade attenuates hyposmotic-induced enhancement of I Ks current and prevents shortening of action potential duration in atrial myocytes

INTRODUCTION

Stretch of the atrial membrane upregulates the slow component of delayed rectifier K(+) current (I(Ks)). Blockade of angiotensin II subtype 1 receptors (AT(1)R) attenuates this increase in I(Ks). The present study aimed to examine the effects of irbesartan, a selective AT(1)R blocker (ABR), on both the enhancement of I(Ks) and the shortening of action potential duration (APD) induced by stretching atrial myocytes for exploring the mechanisms underlying the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) by ABR.

METHODS

Hyposmotic solution (Hypo-S) was used to stretch guinea pig atrial myocytes. I(Ks) and APD were recorded using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique.

RESULTS

Irbesartan (1-50 μM) attenuated the Hypo-S-induced increase in I(Ks) and shortening of APD90. Hypo-S increased the I(Ks) by 113.4%, whereas Hypo-S + 1 μM irbesartan and Hypo-S + 50 μM irbesartan increased the I(Ks) by only 74.5% and 70.3%, respectively. In addition, Hypo-S shortened the APD(90) by 19.0%, whereas Hypo-S + 1 μM irbesartan and Hypo-S + 50 μM irbesartan shortened the APD90 by 12.1% and 12.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The actions of irbesartan on electrical changes induced by stretching atrial myocytes are associated with blocking AT(1)R. These actions may be beneficial for treating AF.

The role of irbesartan in the treatment of patients with hypertension: a comprehensive and practical review

Irbesartan is an orally active angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) whose pharmacological profile differs significantly from those of many other compounds of the same class. In particular, according to its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, irbesartan has a high bioavailability, a long duration of action and a small potential for pharmacological interactions due to the nature of the enzymatic pathway involved in its metabolic process. Morbidity data with irbesartan have been mainly accumulated in patients with renal impairment where the drug has demonstrated the most remarkable evidence of efficacy among the ARBs class, regardless of the stage of the renal disease (from early to late) and the length of the observational period. The efficacy of irbesartan has also been demonstrated in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure. The drug is indicated for the treatment of hypertension and renal impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and hypertension, and its tolerability and safety profile have been extensively investigated and reported to be similar to placebo. From the pharmacoeconomic point of view, treating patients with T2D, hypertension and overt nephropathy using irbesartan was both a cost- and life-saving procedure compared with the use of amlodipine and standard antihypertensive treatment in an Italian setting. The role of irbesartan in the management of hypertension with or without T2D and renal impairment is clearly recognized by national and international guidelines and largely acknowledged by the medical community according to the efficacy of the drug in the prevention of cardiovascular risk in addition to and beyond kidney prevention.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension in elderly patients: focus on patient outcomes

Hypertension in the elderly is one of the main risk factors of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Knowledge regarding the mechanisms of hypertension and specific considerations in managing hypertensive elderly through pharmacological intervention(s) is fundamental to improving clinical outcomes. Recent clinical studies in the elderly have provided evidence that angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists can improve clinical outcomes to a similar or, in certain populations, an even greater extent than other classical arterial blood pressure-lowering agents. This newer class of antihypertensive agents presents several benefits, including potential for improved adherence, excellent tolerability profile with minimal first-dose hypotension, and a low incidence of adverse effects. Thus, AT(1) receptor antagonists represent an appropriate option for many elderly patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and/or left ventricular dysfunction.

Long-term safety of antihypertensive therapy

Lowering blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients reduces morbidity and mortality. However the long-term safety of some antihypertensive agents was a matter of concern. Diuretic, the gold standard treatment in hypertension may impair glucose tolerance and thereby accelerate the development of diabetes mellitus. It was also associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in diabetic patients. However, recent evidence showed that low-medium dose of thiazide diuretic especially when given in combination with potassium sparing agent is effective in reducing BP and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Beta blockers are less effective than other antihypertensive agents in the elderly. Therefore they may be appropriate as a first choice in young and middle-age hypertensives, and in those with fast heart rate, but they should not be considered appropriate as the first-line therapy in the elderly with uncomplicated hypertension. Several years ago a plethora of publications showed that short-acting calcium antagonists may increase the risk for myocardial infarction and cancer. A few years ago two studies showed that calcium antagonists are less effective than angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in preventing cardiovascular events in diabetic hypertensive patients. However, recent results from large prospective randomized studies showed that calcium antagonists reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensive patients. Some investigators have suggested that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may increase the risk of myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients. However, recent meta analyses refuted this conclusions and showed that ARBs are probably as effective as other antihypertensive agents in prevention of myocardial infarction. Despite the concern that has been raised regarding the long-term safety of some antihypertensive agents, it is clear that lowering BP is safe and beneficial.

Rationale and design of ACTIVE: the atrial fibrillation clopidogrel trial with irbesartan for prevention of vascular events

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently occurring cardiac arrhythmia with often serious clinical consequences. Many patients have contraindications to anticoagulation, and it is often underused in clinical practice. The addition of clopidogrel to aspirin (ASA) has been shown to reduce vascular events in a number of high-risk populations. Irbesartan is an angiotensin receptor-blocking agent that reduces blood pressure and has other vascular protective effects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ACTIVE W is a noninferiority trial of clopidogrel plus ASA versus oral anticoagulation in patients with AF and at least 1 risk factor for stroke. ACTIVE A is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of clopidogrel in patients with AF and with at least 1 risk factor for stroke who receive ASA because they have a contraindication for oral anticoagulation or because they are unwilling to take an oral anticoagulant. ACTIVE I is a partial factorial, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of irbesartan in patients participating in ACTIVE A or ACTIVE W. The primary outcomes of these studies are composites of vascular events. A total of 14000 patients will be enrolled in these trials.

CONCLUSIONS

ACTIVE is the largest trial yet conducted in AF. Its results will lead to a new understanding of the role of combined antiplatelet therapy and the role of blood pressure lowering with an angiotensin II receptor blocker in patients with AF.

Angiotensin II antagonists: clinical experience in the treatment of hypertension, prevention of cardiovascular outcomes and renal protection in diabetic nephropathy and proteinuria

Angiotensin II antagonists (AIIAs) were introduced to treat hypertension about 10 years ago. During this period they were evaluated not only in terms of efficacy and safety but also in several large studies with clinical outcomes. They are efficacious in all clinical forms of hypertension and are effective also in all ethnic groups. Cardiovascular and renal protection in proteinuric diabetic nephropathy beyond blood pressure reduction was proved in major clinical studies: Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE), Reduction of Endpoint in Non-Insulin dependent Diabetes Mellitus with the AII Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) and Irbesartan Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT). Their blood pressure independent protective effect is also mentioned by the blockade of AT1 receptor. As a class AIIs have a tolerability profile similar to placebo.

The Role of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonists in Elderly Patients with Hypertension

Hypertension is a major risk factor for stroke and coronary events in elderly people and clinical trials have shown that treatment of hypertension with various drugs can result in a substantial reduction in cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. The angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists are the newest class of antihypertensive agents to be used widely in clinical practice. AT1 receptor antagonists can generally be given once-daily. They are also extremely well tolerated with minimal first-dose hypotension and an incidence of adverse effects similar to that seen with placebo. Adverse event rates are significantly lower than with other classes of antihypertensive drugs including ACE inhibitors. These factors result in improved compliance and increased rates of continuance on therapy. AT1 receptor antagonists show similar efficacy in lowering blood pressure to other classes of antihypertensive agents and their antihypertensive effect is potentiated when they are given concomitantly with low-dose thiazide diuretics. AT1 receptor antagonists are eliminated predominantly by the hepatic route but most are not subject to extensive metabolism and interactions with other drugs are uncommon. This is an advantage in the elderly, who are often receiving multiple medications which increases the risk for adverse drug interactions. Dose adjustments are not usually required in the elderly unless there is plasma volume depletion. Although plasma AT1 receptor antagonist concentrations are generally higher in the elderly than in younger subjects, this pharmacokinetic difference may be balanced by decreased activation of the circulating renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the elderly. Recent clinical studies in high-risk hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy or in patients with diabetic nephropathy or heart failure have demonstrated that AT1 receptor antagonists can improve clinical outcomes to a similar or sometimes greater extent than other antihypertensive agents. Many of these studies have included large numbers of older patients and have confirmed the excellent tolerability profile of these drugs. Thus, AT1 receptor antagonists should be considered as a possible first-line treatment or as a component of combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria or nephropathy and as an alternative or additional treatment to ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction. AT1 receptor antagonists also appear to reduce the onset of new diabetes compared with some other antihypertensive drugs. The benefits in terms of organ protection have mainly been seen in studies using higher doses of particular AT1 receptor antagonists and it is not certain at present whether these results can be extrapolated to other members of the class. As the elderly are more likely to have developed organ damage related to hypertension or to have heart failure or diabetes as concomitant conditions, AT1 receptor antagonists represent an appropriate option for many elderly patients. The main disadvantage of these drugs is the cost of the medication but this may be offset by their improved tolerability with fewer adverse reactions and thus increased compliance, resulting in better blood pressure control and fewer clinical events. Overall, AT1 receptor antagonists are well tolerated and efficacious for blood pressure-lowering when given as a single daily dose in elderly patients and have many potential benefits in high-risk hypertensive subjects.

Quantitative Analysis of Irbesartan in Commercial Dosage Forms by Kinetic Spectrophotometry

The objective of this work is to develop a new kinetic spectrophotometric method for the determination of irbesartan in pharmaceutical formulations. The method is based on the reaction of carboxylic acid group of the oxidized irbesartan with a mixture of potassium iodate (KIO(3)) and iodide (KI) to form yellow colored triiodide ions in aqueous medium at 30+/-1 degrees C. The reaction is followed spectrophotometrically by measuring the rate of change of absorbance at 352 nm. The initial-rate and fixed-time (DeltaA) methods are adopted for constructing the calibration curves, which were found to be linear over the concentration ranges of 10.0-60.0 and 7.5-60.0 microg ml(-1) respectively. The regression analysis of calibration data yielded the linear equations: rate=-2.138 x 10(-6)+1.058 x 10(-4)C and DeltaA=-3.75 x 10(-3)+3.25 x 10(-3)C for initial rate and fixed time (DeltaA) methods, respectively. The limit of detection for initial rate and fixed time methods are 0.21 and 2.40 mug ml(-1), respectively. The various activation parameters such as E(a), DeltaH++, DeltaS++ and DeltaG++ are also calculated for the reaction and found to be 70.95+/-0.43 kJ mol(-1), 68.48+/-0.21 kJ mol(-1), 16.54+/-0.24 J K(-1) mol(-1) and -4.94+/-0.07 kJ mol(-1), respectively. The proposed methods are optimized and validated as per the guidelines of International Conference on Harmonisation (U.S.A.). The point and interval hypothesis tests have been performed which indicate that there is no significant difference between the proposed methods and the reference method. The methods have been successfully applied to the determination of irbesartan in commercial dosage forms.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in renal hypertensive dogs

Combined irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) formulations are often used clinically. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling was applied to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between irbesartan and HCTZ in renal hypertensive dogs at non-steady-state and steady-state. The renal hypertensive dogs were treated with oral irbesartan alone, or HCTZ alone, or the combination of irbesartan and HCTZ for 8 days. Blood pressure and plasma concentrations were measured and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters were analyzed. Irbesartan showed a two-compartment model pharmacokinetic profile. The concentration-time course of irbesartan was not changed by HCTZ, but irbesartan increased the peak plasma concentration and area under the curve of HCTZ at steady-state. HCTZ had no blood pressure lowering effect at non-steady-state. Irbesartan plus HCTZ had greater blood pressure lowering action than irbesartan alone. HCTZ increased actions of irbesartan. Hysteresis loops were found between effect and plasma concentrations of irbesartan after a single dose. However, hysteresis loops disappeared at steady state with more rapid realization of maximum concentration and effects. The relationship between effects and effect-compartment concentrations of the drugs was represented by a sigmoid Emax model. The results suggest synergistic pharmacodynamic interaction between irbesartan and HCTZ in renal hypertensive dogs and some differences of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic properties between irbesartan and irbesartan/HCTZ combinations at non-steady-state and steady state.

Role of angiotensin system and effects of its inhibition in atrial fibrillation: clinical and experimental evidence

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that is difficult to treat. Anti-arrhythmic drug therapy, to maintain sinus-rhythm, is limited by inadequate efficacy and potentially serious adverse effects. There is increasing interest in novel therapeutic approaches that target AF-substrate development. Recent trials suggest that angiotensin converting-enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) may be useful, particularly in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy or failure. The clinical potential and mechanisms of this approach are under active investigation. Angiotensin-II is involved in remodelling and may have direct electrophysiological actions. Experimental studies show protection from atrial structural and possibly electrical remodelling with ACE-inhibitors and ARBs, as well as potential effects on cardiac ion-channels. This article reviews information pertaining to the clinical use and mechanism of action of ACE-inhibitors and ARBs in AF. A lack of prospective randomized double-blind trials data limits their application in AF patients without another indication for their use, but studies under way may alter this in the near future. This exciting field of investigation may lead to significant improvements in therapeutic options for AF patients.

Aliskiren, a Novel Orally Effective Renin Inhibitor, Provides Dose-Dependent Antihypertensive Efficacy and Placebo-Like Tolerability in Hypertensive Patients

Background— Stopping the detrimental effects of the renin-angiotensin system at the most upstream point of the cascade offers theoretical advantages for cardiovascular protection. This study compares the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the novel oral renin inhibitor aliskiren with placebo and an active comparator.

Methods and Results— The study was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator 8-week trial in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥95 and <110 mm Hg). After a 2-week, single-blind placebo run-in, 652 patients were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with once-daily oral doses of aliskiren (150, 300, or 600 mg), irbesartan 150 mg, or placebo. Aliskiren 150, 300, and 600 mg effectively lowered both trough mean sitting DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) ( P <0.001 versus placebo for both variables). The least-squares mean reductions in trough DBP were 9.3±0.8, 11.8±0.8, and 11.5±0.8 mm Hg, respectively, versus 6.3±0.8 mm Hg for placebo, and the least-squares mean reductions in trough SBP were 11.4±1.3, 15.8±1.2, and 15.7±1.2 mm Hg, respectively, versus 5.3±1.2 mm Hg for placebo. The antihypertensive effect of aliskiren 150 mg was comparable to that of irbesartan 150 mg (8.9±0.7 and 12.5±1.2 mm Hg, least-squares reduction in mean sitting DBP and SBP, respectively, for irbesartan). Aliskiren 300 and 600 mg lowered mean sitting DBP significantly more than irbesartan 150 mg ( P <0.05). Aliskiren showed safety and tolerability comparable to those of placebo and irbesartan; the incidence of adverse events and number of patients discontinuing therapy were similar in all groups.

Conclusions— Once-daily oral treatment with aliskiren lowers blood pressure effectively, with a safety and tolerability profile comparable to that of irbesartan and placebo, in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Aliskiren 150 mg is as effective as irbesartan 150 mg in lowering blood pressure.

Antihypertensive Effect of Irbesartan and Predictors of Response in Obesity-Associated Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Obesity-associated hypertension is difficult to treat and puts patients at a substantially increased risk of cardiovascular events. Irbesartan has previously been shown to effectively lower blood pressure (BP) in high-risk groups including patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or nephropathy, and may therefore also be suitable for the treatment of obesity-associated hypertension. In this study we aimed to: (a) assess the efficacy and tolerability of irbesartan alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with obesity-associated mild-to-moderate hypertension; and (b) investigate patient-associated determinants of poor BP control in this patient group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a 3-month, prospective, open-label, multicentre, phase IV study in 72 479 hypertensive patients in 6989 general practices across Germany. Main outcome measures were BP reduction (primary parameter of effectiveness) and BP response rates after 3 months, as well as adverse events (AEs). Independent predictors of poor control were identified in a multivariate proportional odds model.

RESULTS

All of the patients were Caucasian, 50.5% were females, mean age was 62.1 +/- 11.1 years, mean bodyweight was 88.6 +/- 15.4kg, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.7 +/- 4.8 kg/m(2). Almost all the patients were overweight or obese (92.3%). From a baseline value of 162/94mm Hg, systolic and diastolic BP were reduced by a mean of -23/-12mm Hg after 3 months. 66.1% of the patients were responders (reduction of diastolic BP >/=10mm Hg), and 48.0% achieved BP normalisation (i.e. <140/90mm Hg). 79% of patients met their individual treatment goals as defined by the treating physician (mean 135/80mm Hg). AEs were reported in only 322 patients (0.4%). Factors requiring special attention in patients not achieving BP control were age (>55 years), high BMI category (>25 kg/m(2)), and increased waist circumference.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with irbesartan (+/- hydrochlorothiazide) appeared to be effective and well tolerated in the study population of patients with obesity- associated hypertension. Easily recognisable characteristics allow physicians to identify patients whose BP is likely to be difficult to control.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists alone and combined with hydrochlorothiazide: potential benefits beyond the antihypertensive effect

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers; ARBs) and thiazide diuretics have an accepted place in the management of hypertension. Most patients require combination therapy with two or more drugs to adequately control blood pressure to targets recommended by European and international guidelines. ARBs and the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide have complementary modes of action. Fixed-dose combinations of an ARB and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide provide a convenient and effective treatment option for patients who do not achieve blood pressure targets on monotherapy, without compromising the placebo-like tolerability of ARBs. In Europe, fixed-dose combinations with hydrochlorothiazide currently are available for the ARBs candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, losartan, telmisartan, and valsartan. Recently, a number of studies have focused on the use of ARBs in monotherapy and in combination therapy, in conditions including congestive heart failure, post-myocardial infarction management, hypertension with cardiovascular risk factors, and diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy. Evidence from these studies suggests a beneficial role beyond the antihypertensive effect of these therapies in providing protection against cardiovascular, renovascular, and cerebrovascular events.

Irbesartan: a review of its use in hypertension and in the management of diabetic nephropathy

Irbesartan (Avapro, Aprovel) is a potent and selective angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonist indicated for use in patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy. Once-daily administration of irbesartan provided 24-hour control of blood pressure (BP). In patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension irbesartan was as effective as enalapril, atenolol and amlodipine, and more effective than valsartan in terms of absolute reduction in BP and response rates. Irbesartan produced a greater reduction in diastolic BP at trough than once-daily losartan, but had a smaller effect than olmesartan; the reduction in systolic BP achieved with irbesartan was similar or greater than that with losartan and similar to that seen with olmesartan. The combination of irbesartan with hydrochlorothiazide produced additive effects on BP reduction. Irbesartan also induced regression of left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. In two large studies (IRbesartan MicroAlbuminuria type 2 diabetes mellitus in hypertensive patients [IRMA 2] and the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT]) irbesartan exerted a renoprotective effect in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes at both the early and later stages of diabetic nephropathy. The renoprotective effect was at least partly independent of the BP-lowering effect. In the IRMA 2 trial, the proportion of patients progressing to overt nephropathy was significantly lower for recipients of irbesartan 300mg once daily than placebo. In patients with overt nephropathy in the IDNT, irbesartan 300mg once daily provided significantly greater renoprotection than amlodipine 10mg once daily or placebo. The relative risk of doubling of serum creatinine was significantly lower with irbesartan than amlodipine or placebo. Irbesartan is well tolerated in hypertensive patients, including those with type 2 diabetes and incipient or overt nephropathy. The overall incidence of adverse events with irbesartan was similar to that with placebo. Irbesartan was associated with a lower incidence of cough than enalapril and was not associated with ankle oedema or with any clinically significant drug interactions. In conclusion, irbesartan is a well tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent. It also slows the progression of renal disease in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes at both the early and later stages of diabetic nephropathy. Thus, irbesartan is a valuable agent in the management of patients with these indications.

The KARTAN study: A postmarketing assessment of Irbesartan in patients with hypertension

BACKGROUND

An important purpose of postmarketing surveillance of drugs is to better characterize the safety profile of drug therapy in the clinical setting. Another goal is to confirm the effectiveness of these drugs in patients who are candidates for antihypertensive therapy and who may have been excluded from Phase III studies. Irbesartan is a long-acting angiotensin II-receptor blocker specific for the angiotensin 1-receptor subtype that, in clinical trials in patients with hypertension, reduces blood pressure.

OBJECTIVES

The KARTAN (this word was derived from the first and last syllables of Karvea [trademark of Bristol-Myers Squibb Group, Madrid, Spain] and irbesartan) study was designed to confirm and extend the findings from previous clinical trials using data from a large number of patients with hypertension treated with irbesartan in routine clinical practice. The primary goal was to assess the types and incidences of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurring at a low frequency (<0.05%) with irbesartan. The secondary objectives were to study the effect of irbesartan as an antihypertensive agent, to assess the types and incidences of the most frequent ADRs (>/=0.05%) occurring in routine clinical practice, and to detect possible interactions between irbesartan and other drugs frequently used in the primary care setting.

METHODS

This 6-month, observational, open-label, uncontrolled, national, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted by 852 primary care physicians across Spain. Men and women aged >/=18 years with mild to moderate hypertension who, in their physicians' opinion, should have been treated with irbesartan were included. Each patient was followed up for 6 months, attending visits at baseline (ie, the start of treatment) and 1, 3, and 6 months after the start of treatment. A sample size of 3219 patients was calculated for the detection of >/=1 low-incidence (<0.05%) ADR. After the baseline visit, therapy typically was begun with irbesartan 150 mg/d. The initial dose was titrated up, at 300-mg increments based on the patient's response, at each visit as needed to achieve the treatment goals (systolic blood pressure, <140 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure, <90 mm Hg). Information regarding ADRs was collected on case-report forms designed for each visit and analyzed by the scientific committee of the study. All recruited patients were included in the tolerability analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 4887 patients were enrolled (2165 men, 2 772 women; mean [SD] age, 61.1 [11.0] years [range, 19-94 years]; 23.3% of patients were aged >70 years); 4612 were assessable for efficacy. One hundred eight patients (2.2%) experienced ADRs over the 6-month treatment period; 3 of these patients (0.1%) experienced >1 ADR. Of the total number of clinical manifestations of ADRs, 24 occurred at an incidence <0.05%. Irbesartan produced reductions in blood pressure that were statistically significant from the first visit (all p < 0.001), and 39.9% of the patients achieved the treatment goal at the end of the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

In this postmarketing surveillance study of patients with hypertension treated in routine clinical practice, irbesartan showed a satisfactory tolerability profile that was consistent with that seen in randomized, controlled trials.

Oxidative stress is a critical mediator of the angiotensin II signal in human neutrophils: involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase, calcineurin, and the transcription factor NF-kappaB

Neutrophils are mobilized to the vascular wall during vessel inflammation. Published data are conflicting on phagocytic nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activation during the hypertensive state, and the capacity of angiotensin II (Ang II) to modulate the intracellular redox status has not been analyzed in neutrophils. We here describe that Ang II highly stimulates endogenous and extracellular O2- production in these cells, consistent with the translocation to the cell membrane of the cytosolic components of NADPH oxidase, p47phox, and p67phox. The Ang II-dependent O2- production was suppressed by specific inhibitors of AT1 receptors, of the p38MAPK and ERK1/2 pathways, and of flavin oxidases. Furthermore, Ang II induced a robust phosphorylation of p38MAPK, ERK1/2, and JNK1/2 (particularly JNK2), which was hindered by inhibitors of NADPH oxidase, tyrosine kinases, and ROS scavengers. Ang II increased cytosolic Ca2+ levels-released mainly from calcium stores-enhanced the synthesis de novo and activity of calcineurin, and stimulated the DNA-binding activity of the transcription factor NF-kappaB in cultured human neutrophils. Present data demonstrate for the first time a stimulatory role of Ang II in the activation of phagocytic cells, underscore the relevant role of ROS as mediators in this process, and uncover a variety of signaling pathways by which Ang II operates in human neutrophils.

Effects of irbesartan on cloned potassium channels involved in human cardiac repolarization

We studied the effects of irbesartan, a selective angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, on human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG), KvLQT1+minK, hKv1.5, and Kv4.3 channels using the patch-clamp technique. Irbesartan exhibited a low affinity for HERG and KvLQT1+minK channels (IC(50) = 193.0 +/- 49.8 and 314.6 +/- 85.4 microM, respectively). In hKv1.5 channels, irbesartan produced two types of block, depending on the concentration tested. At 0.1 microM, irbesartan inhibited the current in a time-dependent manner (22 +/- 3.9% at +60 mV). The blockade increased steeply with channel activation increasing at more positive potentials. However, at 10 microM, irbesartan induced a time-independent blockade that occurred in the range of potentials of channel opening, reaching its maximum at approximately 0 mV, and remaining unchanged at more positive potentials (24.0 +/- 1.0% at +60 mV). In Kv4.3 currents, irbesartan produced a concentration-dependent block, which resulted in two IC(50) values (1.0 +/- 0.1 nM and 7.2 +/- 0.6 microM). At 1 microM, it inhibited the peak current and accelerated the time course of inactivation, decreasing the total charge crossing the membrane (36.6 +/- 7.8% at +50 mV). Irbesartan shifted the inactivation curve of Kv4.3 channels, the blockade increasing as the amount of inactivated channels increased. Molecular modeling was used to define energy-minimized dockings of irbesartan to hKv1.5 and HERG channels. In conclusion, irbesartan blocks Kv4.3 and hKv1.5 channels at therapeutic concentrations, whereas the blockade of HERG and KvLQT1+minK channels occurred only at supratherapeutic levels. In hKv1.5, a receptor site is apparent on each alpha-subunit of the channel, whereas in HERG channels a common binding site is present at the pore.

Cholestatic hepatitis related to use of irbesartan: a case report and a literature review of angiotensin II antagonist-associated hepatotoxicity

We report a patient who developed cholestatic hepatitis shortly after starting therapy with irbesartan, one of the new, recently marketed angiotensin II antagonists. Serological studies and ultrasonography ruled out viral hepatitis and extrahepatic obstructive jaundice, respectively. A percutaneous liver biopsy showed a portal inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophils and marked cholestatic features in the perivenular area. Irbesartan was discontinued and the patient's jaundice resolved slowly over a period of several weeks, although mild biochemical cholestasis lasted for more than 1 year. There have been seven prior cases of angiotensin II antagonist-induced hepatotoxicity reported in the literature. A class warning for hepatotoxicity for these compounds should probably be considered.

Mature adipocytes inhibit in vitro differentiation of human preadipocytes via angiotensin type 1 receptors

Recent studies suggest that angiotensin II (Ang II) plays a role in the adipogenesis of murine preadipocytes. Here, we examined the role of Ang II for the differentiation of primary cultured human preadipocytes. Preadipocytes were isolated from human adipose tissue and stimulated to differentiate. Quantitation of gene expression during adipogenesis was performed for renin-angiotensin system (RAS) genes. The influence of the RAS on adipogenic differentiation was investigated by addition of either angiotensinogen (AGT), Ang II, or angiotensin receptor antagonists to the differentiation medium. We also examined the influence of adipocytes on adipogenesis by co-culture experiments. Expression of the RAS genes AGT, renin, angiotensin-converting enzyme, and Ang II type 1 receptor increased during adipogenesis. Stimulation of the Ang II type 1 receptor by Ang II reduced adipose conversion, whereas blockade of this receptor markedly enhanced adipogenesis. Adipocytes were able to inhibit preadipocyte differentiation in the co-culture, and this effect was abolished by blockade of the Ang II type 1 receptor. This finding points to a functional role of the RAS in the differentiation of human adipose tissue. Because AGT secretion and Ang II generation are characteristic features of adipogenesis, we postulate a paracrine negative-feedback loop that inhibits further recruitment of preadipocytes by maturing adipocytes.

Hemodynamic effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists have been proposed as new drugs for portal hypertension. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study aimed to assess the effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan on portal and systemic hemodynamics and renal function in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension received 150 mg/d irbesartan or placebo for 1 week. Systemic hemodynamics, kidney and liver function parameters were recorded regularly; hepatic venous pressure gradient and plasma renin were assessed on days 0 and 7.

RESULTS

Irbesartan reduced the hepatic venous pressure gradient by 12.2% +/- 6.6% (P < 0.05) and mean arterial pressure by 5.3% +/- 4.0% in 13 of 18 verum patients. In 4 (22%) verum patients, arterial hypotension, accompanied by significant renal impairment, required withdrawal of irbesartan. In these patients, baseline plasma renin (P < 0.002) and cystatin C (P < 0.001) levels were higher, and creatinine clearance (P < 0.02), serum sodium (P < 0.01), and albumin (P < 0.05) were lower than in patients who tolerated irbesartan. Four of five patients with baseline renin >900 microU/mL developed treatment-limiting hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

The angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan is not advisable in patients with advanced cirrhosis and high plasma renin because it may induce arterial hypotension and only moderately reduces portal pressure.