International guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: the role of macrolides

Disease Risk and Mortality Prediction in Intensive Care Patients with Pneumonia. Australian and New Zealand Practice in Intensive Care (ANZPIC II)

This study of ventilated patients investigated pneumonia risk factors and outcome predictors in 476 episodes of pneumonia (48% community-acquired pneumonia, 24% hospital-acquired pneumonia, 28% ventilator-associated pneumonia) using a prospective survey in 14 intensive care units within Australia and New Zealand. For community acquired pneumonia, mortality increased with immunosuppression (OR 5.32, CI 95% 1.58–17.99, P<0.01), clinical signs of consolidation (OR 2.43, CI 95% 1.09–5.44, P=0.03) and Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (OR 1.19, CI 95% 1.08–1.30, P<0.001) but improved if appropriate antibiotic changes were made within three days of intensive care unit admission (OR 0.42, CI 95% 0.20–0.86, P=0.02). For hospital-acquired pneumonia, immunosuppression (OR 6.98, CI 95% 1.16–42.2, P=0.03) and non-metastatic cancer (OR 3.78, CI 95% 1.20–11.93, P=0.02) were the principal mortality predictors. Alcoholism (OR 7.80, CI 95% 1.20–17.50, P<0.001), high SOFA scores (OR 1.44, CI 95% 1.20–1.75, P=0.001) and the isolation of “high risk” organisms including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp, Stenotrophomonas spp and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (OR 4.79, CI 95% 1.43–16.03, P=0.01), were associated with increased mortality in ventilator-associated pneumonia. The use of non-invasive ventilation was independently protective against mortality for patients with community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia (OR 0.35, CI 95% 0.18–0.68, P=0.002). Mortality was similar for patients requiring both invasive and non-invasive ventilation and non-invasive ventilation alone (21% compared with 20% respectively, P=0.56).

Pneumonia risks and mortality predictors in Australian and New Zealand ICUs vary with pneumonia type. A history of alcoholism is a major risk factor for mortality in ventilator-associated pneumonia, greater in magnitude than the mortality effect of immunosuppression in hospital-acquired pneumonia or community-acquired pneumonia. Non-invasive ventilation is associated with reduced ICU mortality. Clinical signs of consolidation worsen, while rationalising antibiotic therapy within three days of ICU admission improves mortality for community-acquired pneumonia patients.

Clarithromycin (Biaxin®) extended-release tablet: a therapeutic review

Clarithromycin (Biaxin) extended-release tablets, an advanced generation macrolide, were recently introduced into the USA for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia and acute maxillary sinusitis. The reformulation is intended to improve both patient compliance and tolerability. The extended-release tablets allow convenient once-daily dosing (1000 mg). The extended-release formulation has been shown to be equivalent to the immediate-release formulation concerning area under the plasma concentration time curve. In comparative clinical trials for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia and acute maxillary sinusitis, clarithromycin extended-release tablets were equivalent to the immediate-release formulation concerning clinical efficacy and bacterial eradication, with improved gastrointestinal tolerability. Similar efficacy and gastrointestinal tolerability results were demonstrated in a recent comparative study of clarithromycin extended-release formulation and amoxicillin-clavulanate in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg daily has also been shown to be equivalent to levofloxacin 500 mg daily for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in a recent study. The macrolide class of antimicrobials, including clarithromycin extended-release, continues to be a safe and efficacious choice for the out-patient management of community-acquired bacterial respiratory tract infections.

Future Trends in Antimicrobial Chemotherapy: Expert Opinion on the 43rdICAAC

The current document bestows an expert synopsis of key new information presented at the 43rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) meeting in 2003. Data is presented on the socio-political aspects of and policies on antimicrobial prescribing, novel mechanisms of resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae, and current epidemiological trends in global resistance. Novel information on new (and existing) antimicrobial agents--new penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams and oxipenem inhibitors, ketolides, glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones (and hybrids), peptides, daptomycin, aminomethylcyclines, glycylcyclines, and newer formulations of agents such as amoxycillin-clavulanate--provides renewed hope that resistant pathogens can be controlled through use of more potent agents. Improved strategies for the use of existing antimicrobial agents, such as the use of high-dose regimens, short-course therapy, also may delay or reduce the development of resistance and preserve the value of our antibiotic armamentarium.

Long-term macrolide treatment of chronic inflammatory airway diseases: risks, benefits and future developments

Macrolide antibiotics were discovered over 50 years ago and following their use as antimicrobials it became apparent that this group of antibiotics also possessed anti-inflammatory properties. Subsequent clinical trials showed benefits of macrolides as long-term adjuncts in the treatment of a spectrum of chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases, particularly diffuse panbronchiolitis, cystic fibrosis, post-transplant bronchiolitis obliterans and more recently chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The evidence for efficacy of macrolides in the long-term treatment of chronic asthma and bronchiectasis is less well established. The mechanism(s) of action of macrolides in the treatment of these diseases remains unexplained, but may be due to their antibacterial and/or anti-inflammatory actions, which include reductions in interleukin-8 production, neutrophil migration and/or function. Macrolides have additional potentially beneficial properties including anti-viral actions and an ability to restore corticosteroid sensitivity. The increased prescribing of macrolides for long-term treatment could result in the development of microbial resistance and adverse drug effects. New macrolides have been developed which do not possess any antimicrobial activity and hence lack the ability to produce microbial resistance, but which still retain immunomodulatory effects. Potentially novel macrolides may overcome a significant barrier to the use of this type of drug for the long-term treatment of chronic inflammatory airway diseases.

Comparative antibiotic failure rates in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: Results from a claims analysis

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic treatment failure contributes to the economic and humanistic burdens of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) by increasing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. This study compared treatment failure rates of levofloxacin with those of other antibiotics in a large US sample.

METHODS

Medical and pharmacy claims in the nationally representative SDI database were used to identify adults with a new outpatient diagnosis of CAP receiving a study antibiotic (levofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, azithromycin, moxifloxacin) between September 1, 2005 and March 31, 2008. Treatment failure was defined as ≥1 of the following events ≤30 days after index date: a refill for the index antibiotic after completed days of therapy, a different antibiotic dispensed >1 day after the index prescription, or hospitalization with a pneumonia diagnosis or emergency department visit >3 days postindex. Cohorts were propensity score matched for demographic and clinical characteristics. Treatment failure rates were compared between pairs of cohorts for the full sample and for high-risk patients (age ≥65 and/or on Medicaid).

RESULTS

Among the 3994 study patients, the numbers of dispensed index prescriptions were 268 for amoxicillin/clavulanate, 1609 for azithromycin, 1460 for levofloxacin, and 657 for moxifloxacin. Unadjusted treatment failure rates for the sample were 20.8% for levofloxacin, 23.9% for amoxicillin/clavulanate, 23.9% for azithromycin, and 19.9% for moxifloxacin. For high-risk patients, unadjusted treatment failure rates were 19.1% for levofloxacin, 26.1% for amoxicillin/clavulanate, 26.3% for azithromycin, and 24.3% for moxifloxacin. Propensity score-matched treatment failure rates were significantly lower with levofloxacin than azithromycin (19.8% vs. 24.5%, odds ratio [OR] comparator vs. levofloxacin 1.38; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.67), a difference amplified in high-risk patients (19.0% vs. 26.4%, OR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.13). No significant differences were observed for other paired comparisons.

CONCLUSION

In a large US sample, treatment failure in CAP appeared to be less likely with quinolones (such as levofloxacin) than azithromycin, an effect particularly marked in high-risk patients (age ≥65 and/or on Medicaid).

Approaches to treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department and the appropriate role of fluoroquinolones

The Emergency Department is a critical point of care for patients presenting with signs and symptoms of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The initial diagnosis, the decision to admit or discharge, the timing of initiating treatment, and appropriateness of the empirical therapy are key factors in successful management. Rising resistance rates to commonly used CAP antibiotics has complicated empirical treatment. Respiratory fluoroquinolones represent an important therapeutic option for patients with co-morbidities and risk factors for penicillin-, macrolide-, and multi-drug-resistant S. pneumoniae infections. Ensuring appropriate use is required to maintain their high level of effectiveness in key respiratory pathogens. Treatment guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, American Thoracic Society, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are available to assist emergency physicians in developing clinical pathways to ensure appropriate use of available therapies.

Clinical significance of pneumococcal resistance and factors influencing outcomes

Despite increasing penicillin and macrolide resistance worldwide, the clinical relevance of this phenomenon is still unknown. Debate continues as to whether increasing resistance among pneumococci to beta-lactam agents, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones has been accompanied by an increase in the rate of treatment failure. In vitro findings do not appear to be predictive of in vivo outcomes. Studies have failed to demonstrate significantly higher mortality for patients infected with penicillin-resistant rather than penicillin susceptible pneumococcal strains. Treatment failures are associated solely with the highest levels of resistance. Antimicrobial resistance appears to affect other markers of morbidity, but only statistically nonsignificant trends toward increased mortality have been demonstrated. Whether macrolide resistance among invasive pneumococcal isolates is clinically relevant or a matter of limited influence remains to be determined.

Efficacy of a new pharmacokinetically enhanced formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanate (2000/125 mg) in adults with community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, including penicillin-resistant strains

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common respiratory illness, frequently caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. The prevalence of S. pneumoniae resistance to common antimicrobials has increased over recent years. A new pharmacokinetically enhanced formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanate (2000/125 mg) has been developed, designed to combat infections caused by S. pneumoniae, including penicillin-resistant (PRSP, penicillin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >or=2mg/l) isolates, and those with elevated amoxicillin/clavulanic acid MICs, while maintaining coverage of beta-lactamase-producing pathogens. A pooled efficacy analysis of four randomized (1:1) and one non-comparative clinical trials of amoxicillin/clavulanate, 2000/125 mg, given twice daily, was conducted in adult patients with CAP. Comparator agents were conventional amoxicillin/clavulanate formulations. At follow-up (days 16-39), efficacy (eradication of the initial pathogen or clinical cure in patients for whom no repeat culture was performed) in patients with S. pneumoniae infection was 92.3% (274/297) for amoxicillin/clavulanate, 2000/125 mg and 85.2% (46/54) for comparators (P=0.11). Twenty-four of 25 PRSP-infected patients receiving amoxicillin/clavulanate, 2000/125 mg were treated successfully. Both amoxicillin/clavulanate, 2000/125 mg and comparators were well tolerated, with few patients withdrawing from the studies.

Meta-analysis of bacterial resistance to macrolides

OBJECTIVES

Understanding changing resistance patterns is important in determining appropriate antibiotic treatments. This meta-analysis systematically evaluated resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes to macrolide antibiotics among patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched and experts were consulted to identify published and unpublished literature reporting macrolide resistance rates. Identified studies were evaluated by two independent reviewers; those meeting a priori specified criteria (resistance by patient condition and strain, resistance thresholds, 1997-2003 isolates) were included. Data from included studies were abstracted by two independent reviewers using a standard review form. Discrepancies in abstracted data were resolved by the study investigator.

RESULTS

Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for outcomes present in at least four studies overall and for specified subgroups. We identified 3849 studies and performed detailed review on 407; of these 29, published between 1998-2003, met the inclusion criteria. Mean resistance of S. pneumoniae isolates to azithromycin was 27.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 24.6-29.7]; mean resistance to erythromycin was statistically equivalent (30.4%; 95% CI 28.1-32.7). Resistance of S. pyogenes to erythromycin (30.0%; CI 18.6-41.5) was similar to that of S. pneumoniae. Too few studies of clarithromycin were included to allow evaluation of resistance. In subgroup analyses, substantial variation in resistance to erythromycin was seen by geographic area.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported macrolide resistance of S. pneumoniae varies substantially and may be a significant issue in certain regions. Use of meta-analysis to aggregate individual studies enabled determination of robust values for macrolide resistance. This information is useful for clinical and policy decision makers in developing appropriate antibiotic strategies.

An economic and outcomes assessment of first-line monotherapy in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia within managed care

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the resource consumption and outcomes associated with first-line monotherapy for community-acquired pneumonia, focusing specifically on the use of erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective managed care database analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects included patients within a managed care setting over 18 years of age with an initial diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia from January 1995 to April 2002. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to examine associations with treatment success rates and direct medical costs between antibiotic treatments after controlling for patient demographics and pneumonia risk factors.

MAIN RESULTS

Overall, treatment success rates were high (95.8%), the use of second antibiotics was un common (2.3%), and hospitalizations were infrequent (2.0%) among the 1952 subjects studied. After controlling for patient characteristics and risk factors, significantly lower total costs were associated with erythromycin (92.7% lower, p < 0.001), azithromycin (48.7% lower, p < 0.001), and clarithromycin (21.3% lower, p = 0.015) relative to levofloxacin, with no difference in treatment success between groups. Among newer agents, azithromycin (49.2% lower, p < 0.001) and clarithromycin (21.7% lower, p = 0.013) treatment groups were associated with significantly lower total costs than levofloxacin in the full sample. However, in subjects with a chronic disease score above the sample's mean, only azithromycin was associated with significantly lower total costs (47.9% lower, p < 0.001) relative to levofloxacin.

CONCLUSION

Erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin were associated with significantly lower total costs than levofloxacin, although treatment success rates did not differ between groups. Following stratification based upon various subset criteria, erythromycin and azithromycin were observed to have significantly lower total costs than levofloxacin. Although these findings may augment clinical guidelines and evidence-based approaches, health plans should consider evaluating their own patient data to see if similar differences exist in their populations.

Nonresponses and treatment failures with conventional empiric regimens in patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Although most patients with suspected CAP respond to empiric therapy,a small number of patients do not respond in the expected fashion. Age and underlying comorbid conditions have a strong influence on the course of illness. Less common causes of treatment failures include overwhelming infection, antimicrobial resistance, and misdiagnosis. It is a common practice for empiric antimicrobial treatment of CAP to be initiated without microbiologic studies. Clinicians carefully should observe these patients for unusual or slow responses and should be ready to pursue a more extensive search for the cause of treatment failure.

Management of respiratory infections in the elderly

Respiratory infections are common at all ages but are particularly sinister among the elderly because of the fragility and chronic comorbidity associated with this age group. The three types of respiratory infection in the elderly are community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and nonpneumonic respiratory tract infection. The etiology of these three types of infection includes classic bacteria, atypical pathogens and respiratory viruses. The relative frequency of each of the etiological groups as the causative agent of the infection varies significantly among these types of infection, but in all three types a significant proportion of infections involves more than one pathogen. The causative agent of respiratory infection in the elderly cannot be determined on the basis of clinical manifestation or the results of routine imaging procedures or laboratory tests. Thus, initial antibiotic therapy in these patients should be empiric, based on accepted guidelines. In recent years, the antipneumococcal fluoroquinolones have gained in stature as one of the best options to treat these infections. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations can reduce morbidity and mortality from respiratory infections in the elderly, so it is important that all elderly individuals are vaccinated through a structured program in the framework of primary care. The economic impact of respiratory infections in the elderly is primarily associated with the requirement for hospitalization in many of the cases. Any action that can reduce hospitalization rates has important economic ramifications. In light of the difficulty in reaching an early etiologic diagnosis in respiratory infections, it is essential to invest in the development of a compact diagnostic kit for the early stages of the disease, which could change reality in this important area of medicine.

Ketolides: an emerging treatment for macrolide-resistant respiratory infections, focusing on S. pneumoniae

Resistance to antibiotics in community acquired respiratory infections is increasing worldwide. Resistance to the macrolides can be class-specific, as in efflux or ribosomal mutations, or, in the case of erythromycin ribosomal methylase (erm)-mediated resistance, may generate cross-resistance to other related classes. The ketolides are a new subclass of macrolides specifically designed to combat macrolide-resistant respiratory pathogens. X-ray crystallography indicates that ketolides bind to a secondary region in domain II of the 23S rRNA subunit, resulting in an improved structure-activity relationship. Telithromycin and cethromycin (formerly ABT-773) are the two most clinically advanced ketolides, exhibiting greater activity towards both typical and atypical respiratory pathogens. As a subclass of macrolides, ketolides demonstrate potent activity against most macrolide-resistant streptococci, including ermB- and macrolide efflux (mef)A-positive Streptococcus pneumoniae. Their pharmacokinetics display a long half-life as well as extensive tissue distribution and uptake into respiratory tissues and fluids, allowing for once-daily dosing. Clinical trials focusing on respiratory infections indicate bacteriological and clinical cure rates similar to comparators, even in patients infected with macrolide-resistant strains.

A review of clinical failures associated with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The emerging reports of clinical failures using macrolides and their associations with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae prompted us to review the literature describing these cases. Thirty-three cases reporting macrolide treatment failure during treatment of pneumococcal infections were available for review. The most prevalent diagnosis (24/27 or 88.8% of available diagnoses) was community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Previous medical history included cardiopulmonary disease in eight (24.2%) and immunocompromised states in five (15.1%) patients. The majority, 31/33 (93.9%) of patients received oral macrolide treatment in an outpatient setting. S. pneumoniae was isolated from the blood in 26 (78.8%) of 33 patients, three (9.1%) patients had bacteria present in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid, two (6%) patients grew S. pneumoniae from blood and bronchial washings and two (6%) patients had positive sputum cultures. The MLS(B) phenotype was the most predominant phenotype present in 12 (63.2%) of 19 patients. After failing initial macrolide treatment, 26 (78.8%) of 33 patients received parenteral antibiotic treatment. Of 33 patients admitted to hospital, 29 (87.8%) had their outcome described as 'survived'.