1
|
Santos JAR, Grant R, Di Tanna GL. Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Health State Utility Values: A Tutorial with a Practical Application in Heart Failure. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024:10.1007/s40273-024-01387-7. [PMID: 38767714 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01387-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Researchers incorporate health state utility values as inputs to inform economic models. However, for a particular health state or condition, multiple utility values derived from different studies typically exist and a single study is often insufficient to represent the best available source of utility needed to inform policy decisions. The purpose of this paper is to provide an introductory guidance for conducting Bayesian meta-analysis of health state utility values to generate a single parameter input for economic evaluation, using R. The tutorial is illustrated using data from a systematic review of health state utilities of patients with heart failure, with 21 studies that reported utilities measured using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Explanations, key considerations and suggested readings are provided for each step of the tutorial, adhering to a clear workflow for conducting Bayesian meta-analysis: (1) setting-up the data; (2) employing methods to impute missing standard deviations; (3) defining the priors; (4) fitting the model; (5) diagnosing model convergence; (6) interpreting the results; and (7) performing sensitivity analyses. The posterior distributions for the pooled effect size (i.e. mean health state utility) and between-study heterogeneity are discussed and interpreted in light of the data, priors and models used. We hope that this tutorial will foster interest in Bayesian methods and their applications in the meta-analysis of utilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Alvin Ramos Santos
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care (DEASS), University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Ticino, Switzerland
| | - Robert Grant
- BayesCamp Ltd, Winchester, UK
- Kingston University, London, UK
| | - Gian Luca Di Tanna
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care (DEASS), University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Ticino, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Research (DCR), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zakiyah N, Marulin D, Alfaqeeh M, Puspitasari IM, Lestari K, Lim KK, Fox-Rushby J. Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Patients With Heart Failure: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e53500. [PMID: 38687991 PMCID: PMC11094606 DOI: 10.2196/53500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) have shown promising results in enhancing the management of heart failure (HF). Although health care interventions are increasingly being delivered digitally, with growing evidence on the potential cost-effectiveness of adopting them, there has been little effort to collate and synthesize the findings. OBJECTIVE This study's objective was to systematically review the economic evaluations that assess the adoption of DHIs in the management and treatment of HF. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using 3 electronic databases: PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Scopus. Articles reporting full economic evaluations of DHIs for patients with HF published up to July 2023 were eligible for inclusion. Study characteristics, design (both trial based and model based), input parameters, and main results were extracted from full-text articles. Data synthesis was conducted based on the technologies used for delivering DHIs in the management of patients with HF, and the findings were analyzed narratively. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed for this systematic review. The reporting quality of the included studies was evaluated using the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) guidelines. RESULTS Overall, 27 economic evaluations were included in the review. The economic evaluations were based on models (13/27, 48%), trials (13/27, 48%), or a combination approach (1/27, 4%). The devices evaluated included noninvasive remote monitoring devices (eg, home telemonitoring using digital tablets or specific medical devices that enable transmission of physiological data), telephone support, mobile apps and wearables, remote monitoring follow-up in patients with implantable medical devices, and videoconferencing systems. Most of the studies (24/27, 89%) used cost-utility analysis. The majority of the studies (25/27, 93%) were conducted in high-income countries, particularly European countries (16/27, 59%) such as the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Mobile apps and wearables, remote monitoring follow-up in patients with implantable medical devices, and videoconferencing systems yielded cost-effective results or even emerged as dominant strategies. However, conflicting results were observed, particularly in noninvasive remote monitoring devices and telephone support. In 15% (4/27) of the studies, these DHIs were found to be less costly and more effective than the comparators (ie, dominant), while 33% (9/27) reported them to be more costly but more effective with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios below the respective willingness-to-pay thresholds (ie, cost-effective). Furthermore, in 11% (3/27) of the studies, noninvasive remote monitoring devices and telephone support were either above the willingness-to-pay thresholds or more costly than, yet as effective as, the comparators (ie, not cost-effective). In terms of reporting quality, the studies were classified as good (20/27, 74%), moderate (6/27, 22%), or excellent (1/27, 4%). CONCLUSIONS Despite the conflicting results, the main findings indicated that, overall, DHIs were more cost-effective than non-DHI alternatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42023388241; https://tinyurl.com/2p9axpmc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neily Zakiyah
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Dita Marulin
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Mohammed Alfaqeeh
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Irma Melyani Puspitasari
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Keri Lestari
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Ka Keat Lim
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Raes S, Prezzi A, Willems R, Heidbuchel H, Annemans L. Investigating the Cost-Effectiveness of Telemonitoring Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e47616. [PMID: 38640471 PMCID: PMC11069092 DOI: 10.2196/47616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemonitoring patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can improve their care management. However, the results of cost-effectiveness studies are heterogeneous. Therefore, it is still a matter of debate whether telemonitoring is worth the investment. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to investigate the cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring patients with CIEDs, focusing on its key drivers, and the impact of the varying perspectives. METHODS A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and EconLit. The search was completed on July 7, 2022. Studies were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: patients had a CIED, comparison with standard care, and inclusion of health economic evaluations (eg, cost-effectiveness analyses and cost-utility analyses). Only complete and peer-reviewed studies were included, and no year limits were applied. The exclusion criteria included studies with partial economic evaluations, systematic reviews or reports, and studies without standard care as a control group. Besides general study characteristics, the following outcome measures were extracted: impact on total cost or income, cost or income drivers, cost or income drivers per patient, cost or income drivers as a percentage of the total cost impact, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, or cost-utility ratios. Quality was assessed using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria checklist. RESULTS Overall, 15 cost-effectiveness analyses were included. All studies were performed in Western countries, mainly Europe, and had primarily a male participant population. Of the 15 studies, 3 (20%) calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, 1 (7%) the cost-utility ratio, and 11 (73%) the health and cost impact of telemonitoring. In total, 73% (11/15) of the studies indicated that telemonitoring of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy ICDs was cost-effective and cost-saving, both from a health care and patient perspective. Cost-effectiveness results for telemonitoring of patients with pacemakers were inconclusive. The key drivers for cost reduction from a health care perspective were hospitalizations and scheduled in-office visits. Hospitalization costs were reduced by up to US $912 per patient per year. Scheduled in-office visits included up to 61% of the total cost reduction. Key drivers for cost reduction from a patient perspective were loss of income, cost for scheduled in-office visits and transport. Finally, of the 15 studies, 8 (52%) reported improved quality of life, with statistically significance in only 1 (13%) study (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS From a health care and patient perspective, telemonitoring of patients with an ICD or a cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD is a cost-effective and cost-saving alternative to standard care. Inconclusive results were found for patients with pacemakers. However, telemonitoring can lead to a decrease in providers' income, mainly due to a lack of reimbursement. Introducing appropriate reimbursement could make telemonitoring sustainable for providers while still being cost-effective from a health care payer perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42022322334; https://tinyurl.com/puunapdr.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Raes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Andrea Prezzi
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Rik Willems
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hein Heidbuchel
- Department of Genetics, Pharmacology and Physiopathology of Heart, Blood Vessels and Skeleton (GENCOR), Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lieven Annemans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
MIHEVC M, ZAVRNIK Č, MORI LUKANČIČ M, VIRTIČ POTOČNIK T, PETEK ŠTER M, KLEMENC-KETIŠ Z, POPLAS SUSIČ A. Bottom-Up Analysis of Telemonitoring Costs: A Case Study in Slovenian Primary Care. Zdr Varst 2024; 63:5-13. [PMID: 38156340 PMCID: PMC10751888 DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Telemonitoring improves clinical outcomes in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), however, cost structure analyses are lacking. This study seeks to explore the cost structure of telemonitoring for the elderly with AH and T2D in primary care and identify factors influencing costs for potential future expansions. Methods Infrastructure, operational, patient participation, and out-of-pocket costs were determined using a bottom-up approach. Infrastructure costs were determined by dividing equipment and telemonitoring platform expenses by the number of participants. Operational and patient participation costs were determined by considering patient training time, data measurement/review time, and teleconsultation time. The change in out-of-pocket costs was assessed in both groups using a structured questionnaire and 12-month expenditure data. Statistical analysis employed an unpaired sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test. Results A total of 117 patients aged 71.4±4.7 years were included in the study. The telemonitoring intervention incurred an annual infrastructure costs of €489.4 and operational costs of €97.3 (95% CI 85.7-109.0) per patient. Patient annual participation costs were €215.6 (95% CI 190.9-241.1). Average annual out-of-pocket costs for both groups were €345 (95% CI 221-469). After 12 months the telemonitoring group reported significantly lower out-of-pocket costs (€132 vs. €545, p<0.001), driven by reduced spending on food, dietary supplements, medical equipment, and specialist check-ups compared to the standard care group. Conclusion To optimise the cost structure of telemonitoring, strategies like shortening the telemonitoring period, developing a national telemonitoring platform, using patient devices, integrating artificial intelligence into platforms, and involving nurse practitioners as telemedicine centre coordinators should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matic MIHEVC
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Črt ZAVRNIK
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Majda MORI LUKANČIČ
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tina VIRTIČ POTOČNIK
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Taborska ulica 8, 2000Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Marija PETEK ŠTER
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Zalika KLEMENC-KETIŠ
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Taborska ulica 8, 2000Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Antonija POPLAS SUSIČ
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Metelkova ulica 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miranda R, Silvério R, Baptista FM, Oliveira MD. Unlocking Continuous Improvement in Heart Failure Remote Monitoring: A Participatory Approach to Unveil Value Dimensions and Performance Indicators. Telemed J E Health 2024. [PMID: 38436266 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Heart failure (HF) constitutes a public health concern affecting quality of life, survival, and costs. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) can enhance HF management, involving patients actively and improving follow-up. While current HF RPM assessments emphasise cost-effectiveness analysis, there is a need to consider wider RPM impacts and integrate stakeholders' perspectives into assessments for better comprehensiveness. Methods: We developed a four-stage participatory approach to select value dimensions and indicators for continuous HF RPM assessment: Stage 1 involved building a literature-informed initial list; Stage 2 utilized expert interviews for validation and list expansion; Stage 3 involved a web-Delphi process with Portuguese stakeholders and experts for agreement assessment; and Stage 4 included a conclusive expert interview. Results: A literature review identified fourteen studies on telehealth, RPM, and HF, informing an initial list of four value dimensions (Access, Clinical aspects, Acceptability, and Costs) and 22 indicators. Seven semistructured interviews validated and further adjusted the list to 38 indicators. Subsequently, the web-Delphi process engaged 29 stakeholders, giving their opinions regarding assessment aspects' relevance and proposing additional elements - 1 dimension and 12 indicators. Five value dimensions and 38 indicators (76.0%) reached group agreement for selection, while 12 did not reach an agreement. Upon expert appreciation, 5 dimensions, 43 indicators, and 6 case-mix parameters were considered relevant. Discussion: This comprehensive social approach captured diverse stakeholder perspectives, achieving agreement on pertinent HF RPM monitoring and evaluation indicators. Findings can inform visualization and management tool development, aiding day-to-day RPM evaluation and identification of improvement opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Miranda
- Centro de Estudos de Gestão do Instituto Superior Técnico, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Enterprise Services Portugal, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rita Silvério
- Centro de Estudos de Gestão do Instituto Superior Técnico, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Mónica Duarte Oliveira
- Centro de Estudos de Gestão do Instituto Superior Técnico, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- iBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences and i4HB-Associate Laboratory Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Le Goff-Pronost M, Bongiovanni-Delarozière I. Economic evaluation of remote patient monitoring and organizational analysis according to patient involvement: a scoping review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e59. [PMID: 37750813 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462323002581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A literature review concerning the economic evaluation of telemonitoring was requested by the authority in charge of health evaluation in France, in a context of deployment of remote patient monitoring and identification of its financing. Due to the heterogeneity of existing telemonitoring solutions, it was necessary to stratify the evaluation according to patient involvement. Three levels of patient involvement are considered: weak (automated monitoring), medium (monitoring supported by a professional), and strong (active remote participation). OBJECTIVES We performed a scoping review to provide a comprehensive overview of different systems of telemonitoring and their reported cost-effectiveness. METHODS Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a search was performed in four databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library between January 1, 2013 and May 19, 2020. Remote patient monitoring should include the combination of three elements: a connected device, an organizational solution for data analysis and alert management, and a system allowing personalized interactions, and three degrees of involvement. RESULTS We identified 61 eligible studies among the 489 records identified. Heart failure remains the pathology most represented in the studies selected (n = 24). The cost-utility analysis was chosen in a preponderant way (n = 41). Forty-four studies (72 percent) reported that the intervention was expected cost-effective. Heterogeneity has been observed in the remote monitoring solutions but all systems are reported cost-effective. The small number of long-term studies does not allow conclusions to be drawn on the transposability. CONCLUSIONS Remote patient monitoring is reported to be cost-effective whatever the system and patient involvement.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ferrick AM, Raj SR, Deneke T, Kojodjojo P, Lopez-Cabanillas N, Abe H, Boveda S, Chew DS, Choi JI, Dagres N, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Frazier-Mills CG, Gilbert O, Han JK, Hewit S, Kneeland C, DeEllen Mirza S, Mittal S, Ricci RP, Runte M, Sinclair S, Alkmim-Teixeira R, Vandenberk B, Varma N. 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on practical management of the remote device clinic. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:e92-e144. [PMID: 37211145 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Haruhiko Abe
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Aarti S Dalal
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Olivia Gilbert
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Janet K Han
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary Runte
- University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Bert Vandenberk
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Svennberg E, Caiani EG, Bruining N, Desteghe L, Han JK, Narayan SM, Rademakers FE, Sanders P, Duncker D. The digital journey: 25 years of digital development in electrophysiology from an Europace perspective. Europace 2023; 25:euad176. [PMID: 37622574 PMCID: PMC10450797 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Over the past 25 years there has been a substantial development in the field of digital electrophysiology (EP) and in parallel a substantial increase in publications on digital cardiology.In this celebratory paper, we provide an overview of the digital field by highlighting publications from the field focusing on the EP Europace journal. RESULTS In this journey across the past quarter of a century we follow the development of digital tools commonly used in the clinic spanning from the initiation of digital clinics through the early days of telemonitoring, to wearables, mobile applications, and the use of fully virtual clinics. We then provide a chronicle of the field of artificial intelligence, a regulatory perspective, and at the end of our journey provide a future outlook for digital EP. CONCLUSION Over the past 25 years Europace has published a substantial number of papers on digital EP, with a marked expansion in digital publications in recent years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Svennberg
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Enrico G Caiani
- Politecnico di Milano, Electronic, Information and Biomedical Engineering Department, Milan, Italy
- Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nico Bruining
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Information processing (Digital Cardiology), Erasmus Medical Center, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lien Desteghe
- Research Group Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2056 Edegem, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Janet K Han
- Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sanjiv M Narayan
- Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Institute and Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, 5005 Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Duncker
- Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ferrick AM, Raj SR, Deneke T, Kojodjojo P, Lopez‐Cabanillas N, Abe H, Boveda S, Chew DS, Choi J, Dagres N, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Frazier‐Mills CG, Gilbert O, Han JK, Hewit S, Kneeland C, Mirza SD, Mittal S, Ricci RP, Runte M, Sinclair S, Alkmim‐Teixeira R, Vandenberk B, Varma N, Davenport E, Freedenberg V, Glotzer TV, Huang J, Ikeda T, Kramer DB, Lin D, Rojel‐Martínez U, Stühlinger M, Varosy PD. 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic. J Arrhythm 2023; 39:250-302. [PMID: 37324757 PMCID: PMC10264760 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Haruhiko Abe
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health HospitalJapan
| | | | | | | | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Heart Center Leipzig at the University of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | | | | | | | | | - Janet K. Han
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemLos AngelesCalifornia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary Runte
- University of LethbridgeLethbridgeAlbertaCanada
| | | | | | - Bert Vandenberk
- University of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Cardiovascular SciencesLeuvenBelgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferrick AM, Raj SR, Deneke T, Kojodjojo P, Lopez-Cabanillas N, Abe H, Boveda S, Chew DS, Choi JI, Dagres N, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Frazier-Mills CG, Gilbert O, Han JK, Hewit S, Kneeland C, Mirza SD, Mittal S, Ricci RP, Runte M, Sinclair S, Alkmim-Teixeira R, Vandenberk B, Varma N, Davenport E, Freedenberg V, Glotzer TV, Huang JL, Ikeda T, Kramer DB, Lin D, Rojel-Martínez U, Stühlinger M, Varosy PD. 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic. Europace 2023; 25:euad123. [PMID: 37208301 PMCID: PMC10199172 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Haruhiko Abe
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Aarti S Dalal
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Olivia Gilbert
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Janet K Han
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary Runte
- University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Bert Vandenberk
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ezer P, Farkas N, Szokodi I, Kónyi A. Automatic daily remote monitoring in heart failure patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronisation therapy-defibrillator: a single-centre observational pilot study. Arch Med Sci 2023; 19:73-85. [PMID: 36817653 PMCID: PMC9897079 DOI: 10.5114/aoms/131958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The impact of remote monitoring (RM) on clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with cardiac resynchronisation therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation is controversial. This study sought to evaluate the performance of an RM follow-up protocol using modified criteria of the PARTNERS HF trial in comparison with a conventional follow-up scheme. MATERIAL AND METHODS We compared cardiovascular (CV) mortality (primary endpoint) and hospitalisation events for decompensated HF, and the number of ambulatory in-office visits (secondary endpoint) in CRT-D implanted patients with automatic RM utilising daily transmissions (RM group, n = 45) and conventional follow-up (CFU group, n = 43) in a single-centre observational study. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 25 months, a significant advantage was seen in the RM group in terms of CV mortality (1 vs. 6 death event, p = 0.04), although RM follow-up was not an independent predictor for CV mortality (HR = 0.882; 95% CI: 0.25-3.09; p = 0.845). Patient CV mortality was independently influenced by hospitalisation events for decompensated HF (HR = 3.24; 95% CI: 8-84; p = 0.022) during follow-up. We observed significantly fewer hospitalisation events for decompensated HF (8 vs. 29 events, p = 0.046) in the RM group. Furthermore, a decreased number of total (161 vs. 263, p < 0.01) and unnecessary ambulatory in-office visits (6 vs. 19, p = 0.012) were seen in the RM group as compared to the CFU group. CONCLUSIONS Follow-up of CRT-D patients using automatic RM with daily transmissions based on modified PARTNERS HF criteria enabled more effective ambulatory interventions leading indirectly to improved CV survival. Moreover, RM directly decreased the number of HF hospitalizations and ambulatory follow-up burden compared to CRT-D patients with conventional follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Ezer
- Heart Institute, University of Pécs, Medical School, Foreign Medical Sciences, Hungary
| | - Nelli Farkas
- Bioanalytical Institute, University of Pécs, Medical School, Pecs, Hungary
| | - István Szokodi
- Heart Institute, University of Pécs, Medical School, Foreign Medical Sciences, Hungary
- Szentagothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Attila Kónyi
- Heart Institute, University of Pécs, Medical School, Foreign Medical Sciences, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McGee MJ, Ray M, Brienesse SC, Sritharan S, Boyle AJ, Jackson N, Leitch JW, Sverdlov AL. Remote monitoring in patients with heart failure with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart 2022; 9:openhrt-2022-002096. [PMID: 36442906 PMCID: PMC9710367 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is now the standard of care, but whether the demonstrated benefits of RM translate into improvements in heart failure (HF) management is controversial. This systematic review addresses the role of RM in patients with HF with a CIED. METHODS AND RESULTS A systematic search of the literature for randomised clinical trials in patients with HF and a CIED assessing efficacy/effectiveness of RM was performed using MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase. Meta-analysis was performed on the effects of RM of CIEDs in patients with HF on mortality and readmissions. Effects on implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy, healthcare costs and clinic presentations were also assessed.607 articles were identified and refined to 10 studies with a total of 6579 patients. Implementation of RM was not uniform with substantial variation in methodology across the studies. There was no reduction in mortality or hospital readmission rates, while ICD therapy findings were inconsistent. There was a reduction in patient-associated healthcare costs and reduction in healthcare presentations. CONCLUSION RM for patients with CIEDs and HF was not uniformly performed. As currently implemented, RM does not provide a benefit on overall mortality or the key metric of HF readmission. It does provide a reduction in healthcare costs and healthcare presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019129270.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J McGee
- Department of Cardiology, Tamworth Rural Referral Hospital, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia,Department of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Max Ray
- Department of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stepehn C Brienesse
- Department of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shanathan Sritharan
- Department of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J Boyle
- Department of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Jackson
- Department of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James W Leitch
- Department of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aaron L Sverdlov
- Department of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
de Graaf G, Timmermans I, Meine M, Alings M, Pedersen SS, Mabo P, Zitron E, Redekop K, Versteeg H. Economic evaluation of remote monitoring of patients with an implantable cardiac defibrillator (REMOTE-CIED study). J Telemed Telecare 2022:1357633X221129176. [PMID: 36245363 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x221129176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Remote patient monitoring (RPM) of heart failure patients has the potential to reduce healthcare resource use and costs, but current evidence has been inconclusive. This study aims assess the impact of RPM of heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator on medical resource use, direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and travel time of patients, and to estimate its commercial headroom in the Netherlands and Germany. METHODS Data from the REMOTE-CIED randomized controlled trial were used to calculate differences in length of hospital stay, outpatient clinic visits, telephone consults, emergency room visits, and travel time between patients on in-clinic follow-up and RPM in the Netherlands, Germany, and France. Incremental cardiac-related healthcare costs and QALYs were calculated and used to calculate the commercial headroom of RPM in the Netherlands and Germany. The impact of imputation, parameter, and case-mix uncertainty on these outcomes was explored using probabilistic analysis. RESULTS Length of hospitalization, number of unscheduled admissions, and number of outpatient visits were lower in the remote monitoring group in all three countries. Number of hospital admissions was higher, and number of calls was lower in the Netherlands and Germany but not in France. Costs were lower in both the Netherlands (-€1041, 95% confidence interval (CI): -€3308, €1005) and Germany (-€2865, 95% CI: -€7619, €1105), while incremental effectiveness differed: -0.003 (95% CI: -0.114, 0.107) QALY in the Netherlands and +0.086 (95% CI: -0.083, 0.256) in Germany. Commercial headroom was estimated at €881 (95% CI: -€5430, €7208) in the Netherlands and €5005 (95% CI: -€1339, €11,960) in Germany. DISCUSSION RPM was found to result in reduced medical resource use and travel time. Whether it is cost saving or cost effective strongly depends on the costs of remote monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND TRIAL REGISTER ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01691586.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gimon de Graaf
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, 6984Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ivy Timmermans
- Department of Cardiology, 8124University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, 7899Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Mathias Meine
- Department of Cardiology, 8124University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Alings
- Department of Cardiology, 8124University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Susanne S Pedersen
- Department of Psychology, 6174University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, 11286Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Philippe Mabo
- Department of Cardiology, 36684Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Rennes, France
| | - Edgar Zitron
- Department of Cardiology, 27178Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ken Redekop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, 6984Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henneke Versteeg
- Department of Cardiology, 8124University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, 7899Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A mobile app for improving the compliance with remote management of patients with cardiac implantable devices: a multicenter evaluation in clinical practice. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2022; 64:257-264. [PMID: 35412167 PMCID: PMC9002029 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01207-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background The remote device management (RM) is recommended for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). RM underutilization is frequently driven by the lack of correct system activation. The MyLATITUDE Patient App (Boston Scientific) has been developed to encourage patient compliance with RM by providing information on communicator setup, troubleshooting, and connection status of the communicator. Methods At 14 centers, patients with CIEDs were invited to download and install the App on a mobile device. After 3 months, patients were asked to complete an ad hoc questionnaire to evaluate their experience. Results The App was proposed to 242 consecutive patients: 81 before RM activation, and 161 during follow-up. The App was successfully installed by 177 (73%) patients. The time required for activation of the communicator and the need for additional support were similar between patients who followed the indications provided by the App and those who underwent standard in-clinic training. During follow-up, notifications of lack of connection were received by 20 (11%) patients and missed transmission by 22 (12%). The median time from notification to resolution was 2 days. After 3 months, 175 (99%) communicators of the 177 patients who installed the App were in “Monitored” status versus 113 (94%) of 120 patients without the App installed (p=0.033). The use of the app made 84% of patients feel reassured. Conclusions The App was well accepted by CIED patients and offered support for communicator management and installation. Its use enabled patients to remain connected with greater continuity during follow-up.
Collapse
|
15
|
Magnocavallo M, Vetta G, Bernardini A, Piro A, Mei MC, Di Iorio M, Mariani MV, Della Rocca DG, Severino P, Quaglione R, Giunta G, Chimenti C, Miraldi F, Vizza CD, Fedele F, Lavalle C. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiac Electronic Device Management and Role of Remote Monitoring. Card Electrophysiol Clin 2022; 14:125-131. [PMID: 35221081 PMCID: PMC8556573 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide pandemic, patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) refused scheduled follow-up visits because of the risk of infection. In this scenario, different telemedicine strategies have been implemented to ensure continuity of care to CIED patients. Patients can be monitored through dedicated applications, telephone calls, or virtual visits providing easy access to valuable information, such as arrhythmic events, acute decompensation manifestations, and device-related issues, without the need for in-person visits. This review provides a comprehensive description of the many possible applications of telemedicine for CIED patients during the COVID-19 period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Magnocavallo
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, 3000 North IH-35, Suite 720, Austin, TX 78705, USA
| | - Giampaolo Vetta
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Bernardini
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Agostino Piro
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Mei
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Di Iorio
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Valerio Mariani
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico G Della Rocca
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, 3000 North IH-35, Suite 720, Austin, TX 78705, USA
| | - Paolo Severino
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaele Quaglione
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Giunta
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Chimenti
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Miraldi
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmine Dario Vizza
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Fedele
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Lavalle
- Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Diseases, Nephrology, Anesthesiology, and Geriatric Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chew DS, Zarrabi M, You I, Morton J, Low A, Reyes L, Yuen B, Sumner GL, Raj SR, Exner DV, Wilton SB. Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Remote Monitoring for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Population-Based Analysis. Can J Cardiol 2022; 38:736-744. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
17
|
Lappegård KT, Moe F. Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 19:ijerph19010312. [PMID: 35010572 PMCID: PMC8751026 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators are increasingly monitored by systems transmitting information directly from the patient to the hospital. This may increase safety and patient satisfaction and also under certain circumstances represent an economic advantage. The review summarizes some of the recent research in the field of remote monitoring of cardiac devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Tore Lappegård
- Department of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, N-8092 Bodo, Norway;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
- Correspondence:
| | - Frode Moe
- Department of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, N-8092 Bodo, Norway;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lopez-Villegas A, Leal-Costa C, Perez-Heredia M, Villegas-Tripiana I, Catalán-Matamoros D. Knowledge Update on the Economic Evaluation of Pacemaker Telemonitoring Systems. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182212120. [PMID: 34831876 PMCID: PMC8624333 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
(1) Introduction: In the last two decades, telemedicine has been increasingly applied to telemonitoring (TM) of patients with pacemakers; however, presently, its growth has significantly accelerated because of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has pushed patients and healthcare workers alike to seek new ways to stay healthy with minimal physical contact. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to update the current knowledge on the differences in the medium-and long-term effectiveness of TM and conventional monitoring (CM) in relation to costs and health outcomes. (2) Methods: Three databases and one scientific registry were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar), with no restrictions on language or year of publication. Studies published until July 2021 were included. The inclusion criteria were: (a) experimental or observational design, (b) complete economic evaluation, (c) patients with implanted pacemakers, and (d) comparison of TM with CM. Measurements of study characteristics (author, study duration, sample size, age, sex, major indication for implantation, and pacemaker used), analysis, significant results of the variables (analysis performed, primary endpoints, secondary endpoints, health outcomes, and cost outcomes), and further miscellaneous measurements (methodological quality, variables coded, instrument development, coder training, and intercoder reliability, etc.) were included. (3) Results: 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 3372 enrolled patients; 1773 (52.58%) of them were part of randomized clinical trials. The mean age was 72 years, and the atrioventricular block was established as the main indication for device implantation. TM was significantly effective in detecting the presence or absence of pacemaker problems, leading to a reduction in the number of unscheduled hospital visits (8.34-55.55%). The cost of TM was up to 87% lower than that of CM. There were no significant differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the number of cardiovascular events. (4) Conclusions: Most of the studies included in this systematic review confirm that in the TM group of patients with pacemakers, cardiovascular events are detected and treated earlier, and the number of unscheduled visits to the hospital is significantly reduced, without affecting the HRQoL of patients. In addition, with TM modality, both formal and informal costs are significantly reduced in the medium and long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Lopez-Villegas
- Social Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS-609 Research Group, Poniente Hospital, 04700 El Ejido-Almería, Spain;
| | - César Leal-Costa
- Nursing Department, University of Murcia, 30120 Murcia, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-868-889-771
| | - Mercedes Perez-Heredia
- Research Management Department, Primary Care District Poniente of Almería, 04700 El Ejido-Almería, Spain;
| | | | - Daniel Catalán-Matamoros
- UC3M MediaLab, Department of Communication and Media Studies, Madrid University Carlos III, 28903 Madrid, Spain;
- Health Sciences Research Institute, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Di Tanna GL, Urbich M, Wirtz HS, Potrata B, Heisen M, Bennison C, Brazier J, Globe G. Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:211-229. [PMID: 33251572 PMCID: PMC7867520 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00984-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES New treatments and interventions are in development to address clinical needs in heart failure. To support decision making on reimbursement, cost-effectiveness analyses are frequently required. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and summarize heart failure utility values for use in economic evaluations. METHODS Databases were searched for articles published until June 2019 that reported health utility values for patients with heart failure. Publications were reviewed with specific attention to study design; reported values were categorized according to the health states, 'chronic heart failure', 'hospitalized', and 'other acute heart failure'. Interquartile limits (25th percentile 'Q1', 75th percentile 'Q3') were calculated for health states and heart failure subgroups where there were sufficient data. RESULTS The systematic literature review identified 161 publications based on data from 142 studies. Utility values for chronic heart failure were reported by 128 publications; 39 publications published values for hospitalized and three for other acute heart failure. There was substantial heterogeneity in the specifics of the study populations, methods of elicitation, and summary statistics, which is reflected in the wide range of utility values reported. EQ-5D was the most used instrument; the interquartile limit for mean EQ-5D values for chronic heart failure was 0.64-0.72. CONCLUSIONS There is a wealth of published utility values for heart failure to support economic evaluations. Data are heterogenous owing to specificities of the study population and methodology of utility value elicitation and analysis. Choice of value(s) to support economic models must be carefully justified to ensure a robust economic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Luca Di Tanna
- Statistics Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- The George Institute for Global Health, Level 5, 1 King St, Newtown, NSW, 2042, Australia.
| | - Michael Urbich
- Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Global Value & Access, Modeling Center of Excellence, Rotkreuz, Switzerland
| | - Heidi S Wirtz
- Amgen Inc, Global Health Economics, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Barbara Potrata
- Pharmerit - an OPEN Health company, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Heisen
- Pharmerit - an OPEN Health company, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - John Brazier
- Health Economics and Decision Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Gary Globe
- Amgen Inc, Global Health Economics, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bautista-Mesa RJ, Lopez-Villegas A, Peiro S, Catalan-Matamoros D, Robles-Musso E, Lopez-Liria R, Leal-Costa C. Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:474. [PMID: 33198629 PMCID: PMC7670660 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01883-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cost-effectiveness studies on pacemakers have increased in the last years. However the number of long-term cost-utility studies is limited. The objective of this study was to perform a cost-utility analysis comparing remote monitoring (RM) versus conventional monitoring (CM) in hospital of older patients with pacemakers, 5 years after implant. Methods Under a controlled, not randomized, nor masked clinical trial, 83 patients with pacemakers were initially selected. After five years of follow-up, a total of 55 patients (CM = 34; RM = 21) completed the study. A cost-utility analysis of RM in terms of costs per gained quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was conducted. The costs from the Public Health System (PHS) as well as patients and their relatives were taken into account for the study. The robustness of the results was verified by the probabilistic analyses through Monte-Carlo simulations. Results After a five-year follow-up period, total costs were lower in the RM group by 23.02% than in the CM group (€274.52 versus €356.62; p = 0.033) because of a cost saving from patients’ perspective (€59.05 versus €102.98; p = 0.002). However, the reduction of in-hospital visits derived from RM exhibited insignificant impact on the costs from the PHS perspective, with a cost saving of 15.04% (€215.48 vs. €253.64; p = 0.144). Costs/QALYs obtained by the RM group were higher as compared to the CM group, although there were no significant differences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CM in comparison to RM became positive (€301.16). Conclusions This study confirms RM of older patients with pacemakers appears still as a cost-utility alternative to CM in hospital after 5 years of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: (Identifier: NCT02234245). Registered 09 September 2014 - Prospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Lopez-Villegas
- Social Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS-609 Research Group, Hospital de Poniente, El Ejido, s/n, 04700, Almeria, Spain.
| | - Salvador Peiro
- Health Services Research Unit, FISABIO-PUBLIC HEALTH, Valencia, Spain
| | - Daniel Catalan-Matamoros
- Department of Communication Studies, University Carlos III of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Health Sciences CTS-451 Research Group, University of Almería, Almería, Spain
| | - Emilio Robles-Musso
- Pacemaker Unit, Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de Poniente, El Ejido, Almería, Spain
| | - Remedios Lopez-Liria
- Department of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Hum-498 Research Team, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, Almería, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jang JP, Lin HT, Chen YJ, Hsieh MH, Huang YC. Role of Remote Monitoring in Detection of Atrial Arrhythmia, Stroke Reduction, and Use of Anticoagulation Therapy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ J 2020; 84:1922-1930. [PMID: 33012748 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-20-0633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of remote monitoring (RM) in atrial arrhythmia detection, stroke reduction, and anticoagulation therapy remains unknown, particularly for patients with implantable or wearable cardiac devices.Methods and Results:We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of RM in atrial arrhythmia detection, stroke reduction and anticoagulation therapeutic intervention. Online databases were queried to include randomized controlled trials comparing detection of atrial arrhythmia and stroke risk between patients undergoing RM and those receiving in-office (IO) follow-up. Outcomes and complications of RM-guided anticoagulation therapy and conventional therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation were also reviewed. A total of 16 studies were included. Compared with patients receiving IO follow-up, patients undergoing RM had a significantly higher detection rate of atrial arrhythmia (risk ratio [RR], 1.363; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.147-1.619), and a lower risk of stroke (RR, 0.539; 95% CI, 0.301-0.936). The higher rate of atrial arrhythmia was only noted in patients with wearable devices (RR, 4.070; 95% CI, 2.408-6.877), and the lower risk of stroke was only noted in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) (RR, 0.513; 95% CI, 0.265-0.996). CONCLUSIONS RM is effective for atrial arrhythmia detection in patients using wearable devices and for reducing the risk of stroke in patients with CIED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Pei Jang
- Center of Nursing and Healthcare Research in Clinical Practice Application, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University
| | - Hui-Ting Lin
- Center of Nursing and Healthcare Research in Clinical Practice Application, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University
| | - Yu-Jen Chen
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University.,Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University
| | - Ming-Hsiung Hsieh
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University
| | - Yu-Chen Huang
- Department of Dermatology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University.,Research Center of Big Data and Meta-analysis, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University.,Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Snoswell CL, Taylor ML, Comans TA, Smith AC, Gray LC, Caffery LJ. Determining if Telehealth Can Reduce Health System Costs: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17298. [PMID: 33074157 PMCID: PMC7605980 DOI: 10.2196/17298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Telehealth represents an opportunity for Australia to harness the power of technology to redesign the way health care is delivered. The potential benefits of telehealth include increased accessibility to care, productivity gains for health providers and patients through reduced travel, potential for cost savings, and an opportunity to develop culturally appropriate services that are more sensitive to the needs of special populations. The uptake of telehealth has been hindered at times by clinician reluctance and policies that preclude metropolitan populations from accessing telehealth services. Objective This study aims to investigate if telehealth reduces health system costs compared with traditional service models and to identify the scenarios in which cost savings can be realized. Methods A scoping review was undertaken to meet the study aims. Initially, literature searches were conducted using broad terms for telehealth and economics to identify economic evaluation literature in telehealth. The investigators then conducted an expert focus group to identify domains where telehealth could reduce health system costs, followed by targeted literature searches for corresponding evidence. Results The cost analyses reviewed provided evidence that telehealth reduced costs when health system–funded travel was prevented and when telehealth mitigated the need for expensive procedural or specialist follow-up by providing competent care in a more efficient way. The expert focus group identified 4 areas of potential savings from telehealth: productivity gains, reductions in secondary care, alternate funding models, and telementoring. Telehealth demonstrated great potential for productivity gains arising from health system redesign; however, under the Australian activity-based funding, it is unlikely that these gains will result in cost savings. Secondary care use mitigation is an area of promise for telehealth; however, many studies have not demonstrated overall cost savings due to the cost of administering and monitoring telehealth systems. Alternate funding models from telehealth systems have the potential to save the health system money in situations where the consumers pay out of pocket to receive services. Telementoring has had minimal economic evaluation; however, in the long term it is likely to result in inadvertent cost savings through the upskilling of generalist and allied health clinicians. Conclusions Health services considering implementing telehealth should be motivated by benefits other than cost reduction. The available evidence has indicated that although telehealth provides overwhelmingly positive patient benefits and increases productivity for many services, current evidence suggests that it does not routinely reduce the cost of care delivery for the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Centaine L Snoswell
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Monica L Taylor
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Tracy A Comans
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Anthony C Smith
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Leonard C Gray
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Liam J Caffery
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are finite resources available to spend on healthcare, with the increasing burden of disease and the increasing cost of providing healthcare it is imperative that methods for optimising health systems to improve sustainability are investigated. This study is part of a larger body of work investigating the potential for telehealth to improve the economic sustainability of the health system. The aim of this sub-analysis is to investigate the breakeven point for implementing a telehealth service; that is the point after which the initial investment is recouped and the cost savings have become tangible. METHOD Literature searches were conducted using broad terms for telehealth and economics to identify economic evaluation literature focusing on telehealth. Articles were included if they reported their findings from a health system perspective, demonstrated cost savings, and provided sufficient information to calculate the breakeven point. RESULTS Less than half of the economic analysis studies examined reported cost savings for the health system as a result of telehealth. The breakeven point could be calculated for 12 articles, all of which were included in the analysis. These articles described evaluations for store-and-forward, remote monitoring and videoconference services. The breakeven points for these services ranged from near immediate (less than 1 year) to 9 years. Remote monitoring and store-and-forward services reached their breakeven points sooner than the videoconference services. CONCLUSION The results demonstrated that telehealth is cost saving for the health system in a proportion of services. When costs are saved, the breakeven point can be immediate (less than 1 year) or may take more time to eventuate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Centaine L Snoswell
- Centre for Health, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Monica L Taylor
- Centre for Health, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Liam J Caffery
- Centre for Health, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sequeira S, Jarvis CI, Benchouche A, Seymour J, Tadmouri A. Cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in France: a meta-analysis and an integrated economic model derived from randomized controlled trials. Europace 2020; 22:1071-1082. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
Cost-effectiveness data on the remote monitoring (RM) of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) compared to the current standard of care (SC) remains limited. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the economic burden, and to develop an integrated economic model evaluating the efficiency of the RM strategy vs. SC in the context of French healthcare.
Methods and results
Randomized controlled trials, comparing RM to SC in patients implanted with ICDs with or without resynchronization therapy (±CRT-D), were identified through a systematic search of scientific literature databases dating from 2005. Seventeen trials (10 229 patients) reporting data on clinical outcomes, quality of life, cost, and/or utility, either as primary or secondary endpoints were identified. Compared to SC, RM resulted in significant reductions in annual costs per patient for direct healthcare costs (seven studies, difference in means −276.1, 95% standard error [SE]: 66.0, I2 = 76.3%) and for labour costs (two studies, difference in means −11.3, 95% SE: 1.4, I2 = 96.3%). A three-state Markov Model showed that RM resulted in cost-savings of €4142 per patient over a 5-year time horizon, with a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.29. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was −14 136 €/QALY, in favour of RM. Furthermore, probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed that the RM strategy was dominant over SC in 70% of cases.
Conclusion
Our economic model demonstrates that once implemented, RM of ICD ± CRT-D patients would result in increased effectiveness for lower costs over a 5-year period, compared to the current SC in France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saannya Sequeira
- Scientific Department, ClinSearch, 110 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 92240 Malakoff, France
| | - Christopher I Jarvis
- Scientific Department, ClinSearch, 110 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 92240 Malakoff, France
| | - Akram Benchouche
- Scientific Department, ClinSearch, 110 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 92240 Malakoff, France
| | - Jerome Seymour
- ClinSearch, 110 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 92240 Malakoff, France
| | - Abir Tadmouri
- Scientific Department, ClinSearch, 110 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 92240 Malakoff, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zoppo F, Lupo A, Mugnai G, Zerbo F. Cardiac implantable electronic device remote monitoring in a large cohort of patients and the need for planning. Future Cardiol 2020; 16:447-456. [PMID: 32351140 DOI: 10.2217/fca-2019-0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is standard of care. We describe an organizational and projection RM workload model. Methods: At the time of the analysis (2015), 3995 CIED patients were followed-up; 1582 (40.5%) with RM. All RM transmissions (Tx) have been gathered in five event types. Results: We received 10,406 Tx, classified as: 128 (1.2%) red alerts, 141 (1.3%) atrial fibrillation episodes, 1944 (18.6%) yellow alerts, 403 (3.9%) lost Tx (disconnected/noncompliant patients) and 7790 (75.0%) Tx 'OK' (un-eventful Tx). At the time of 100% of remote CIED managed, we can expect a total of 25,990 Tx/year. Conclusion: We provide a descriptive analysis of remote monitoring management and workload estimation in a large cohort of CIED patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Zoppo
- U.O.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Civile Gorizia, Gorizia, Italy
| | - Antonio Lupo
- U.O.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Civile Mirano, Mirano, Venezia, Italy
| | - Giacomo Mugnai
- U.O.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Civile Arzignano, Arzignano, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Francesca Zerbo
- U.O.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Civile Mirano, Mirano, Venezia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Valuing health-related quality of life in heart failure: a systematic review of methods to derive quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in trial-based cost-utility analyses. Heart Fail Rev 2020; 24:549-563. [PMID: 30903357 PMCID: PMC6560006 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-019-09780-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The accurate measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the value of improving it for patients are essential for deriving quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to inform treatment choice and resource allocation. The objective of this review was to identify and describe the approaches used to measure and value change in HRQoL in trial-based economic evaluations of heart failure interventions which derive QALYs as an outcome. Three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane) were systematically searched. Twenty studies reporting economic evaluations based on 18 individual trials were identified. Most studies (n = 17) utilised generic preference-based measures to describe HRQoL and derive QALYs, commonly the EQ-5D-3L. Of these, three studies (from the same trial) also used mapping from a condition-specific to a generic measure. The remaining three studies used patients’ direct valuation of their own health or physician-reported outcomes to derive QALYs. Only 7 of the 20 studies reported significant incremental QALY gains. Most interventions were reported as being likely to be cost-effective at specified willingness to pay thresholds. The substantial variation in the approach applied to derive QALYs in the measurement of and value attributed to HRQoL in heart failure requires further investigation.
Collapse
|
27
|
López-Liria R, López-Villegas A, Leal-Costa C, Peiró S, Robles-Musso E, Bautista-Mesa R, Rocamora-Pérez P, Lappegård KT, Catalán-Matamoros D. Effectiveness and Safety in Remote Monitoring of Patients with Pacemakers Five Years after an Implant: The Poniente Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17041431. [PMID: 32102208 PMCID: PMC7068341 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional capacity values immediately after pacemaker (PM) implantation have been well established; however, not much has been known about its long-term effects. The present study compared the long-term effectiveness and safety of remote monitoring plus a clinic visit versus clinic visits alone during follow-up of adults implanted with PMs. This study was a single-centre, controlled, non-randomised, non-blinded clinical trial. Data were collected pre-implantation and after 60 months. The patients in the PONIENTE study were assigned to two different groups: remote monitoring (RM) and conventional monitoring (CM). The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire was used to assess HRQoL and Duke Activity Status Index was used for the functional capacity. After five years, 55 patients completed the study (RM = 21; CM = 34). EuroQol-5D and functional capacity values were improved; however, significant differences were observed only in the EQ5D visual analogue scale (p < 0.001). Remote monitoring was equally feasible, reliable, safe, and clinically useful as CM. The frequencies of rehospitalisations and emergency visits did not differ between the groups. RM was found to be safe and effective in early detection and treatment of medical- and device-related events and in reducing hospital visits. Improved HRQoL was described not only immediately after PM implantation but also extended over a long time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remedios López-Liria
- Department of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Hum-498 Research Team, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain;
| | - Antonio López-Villegas
- Social Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS-609 Research Team, Hospital de Poniente, 04700 Almeria, Spain
- Institute of Clinical Medicine. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, 9019 Tromsø. Norway;
- Correspondence: (A.L.-V.); (P.R.-P.); Tel.: +34-950-022-935
| | | | - Salvador Peiró
- Health Services Research Unit, FISABIO-PUBLIC HEALTH, 04700 Valencia, Spain;
| | | | | | - Patricia Rocamora-Pérez
- Department of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Hum-498 Research Team, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain;
- Correspondence: (A.L.-V.); (P.R.-P.); Tel.: +34-950-022-935
| | - Knut Tore Lappegård
- Institute of Clinical Medicine. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, 9019 Tromsø. Norway;
- Division of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, N-8092 Bodø, Norway
| | - Daniel Catalán-Matamoros
- Department of Communication Studies, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28903 Madrid, Spain;
- Health Sciences CTS-451 Research Group, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lopez-Villegas A, Catalan-Matamoros D, Peiro S, Lappegard KT, Lopez-Liria R. Cost-utility analysis of telemonitoring versus conventional hospital-based follow-up of patients with pacemakers. The NORDLAND randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0226188. [PMID: 31995558 PMCID: PMC6988929 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of our study was to perform an economic assessment in order to check whether or not telemonitoring of users with pacemakers offers a cost-effective alternative to traditional follow-up in outpatient clinics. METHODS We used effectiveness and cost data from the NORDLAND trial, which is a controlled, randomized, non-masked clinical trial. Fifty patients were assigned to receive either telemonitoring (TM; n = 25) or conventional monitoring (CM; n = 25) and were followed up for 12 months after the implantation. A cost-utility analysis was performed in terms of additional costs per additional Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) attained from the perspectives of the Norwegian National Healthcare System and patients and their caregivers. RESULTS Effectiveness was similar between alternatives (TM: 0.7804 [CI: 0.6864 to 0.8745] vs. CM: 0.7465 [CI: 0.6543 to 0.8387]), while cost per patient was higher in the RM group, both from the Norwegian NHS perspective (TM: €2,079.84 [CI: 0.00 to 4,610.58] vs. €271.97 [CI: 158.18 to 385.76]; p = 0.147) and including the patient/family perspective (TM: €2,295.91 [CI: 0.00 to 4,843.28] vs. CM: €430.39 [CI: 0.00 to 4,841.48]), although these large differences-mainly due to a few patients being hospitalized in the TM group, as opposed to none in the CM group-did not reach statistical significance. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) from the Norwegian NHS perspective (€53,345.27/QALY) and including the patient/caregiver perspective (€55,046.40/QALY), as well as the Incremental Net Benefit (INB), favors the CM alternative, albeit with very broad 95%CIs. The probabilistic analysis confirmed inconclusive results due to the wide CIs even suggesting that TM was not cost-effective in this study. Supplemental analysis excluding the hospitalization costs shows positive INBs, whereby suggesting a discrete superiority of the RM alternative if hospitalization costs were not considered, albeit also with broad CIs. CONCLUSIONS Cost-utility analysis of TM vs. CM shows inconclusive results because of broad confidence intervals with ICER and INB figures ranging from potential savings to high costs for an additional QALY, with the majority of ICERs being above the usual NHS thresholds for coverage decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02237404.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Lopez-Villegas
- Social Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS-609 Research Group, Hospital de Poniente, Almería, Spain
- Division of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Daniel Catalan-Matamoros
- Department of Journalism and Communication, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Health Sciences CTS-451 Research Group, University of Almería, Almería, Spain
| | - Salvador Peiro
- Health Services Research Unit, FISABIO-PUBLIC HEALTH, Valencia, Spain
| | - Knut Tore Lappegard
- Division of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Remedios Lopez-Liria
- Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Almería, Almería, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Atreja A, Francis S, Kurra S, Kabra R. Digital Medicine and Evolution of Remote Patient Monitoring in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A State-of-the-Art Perspective. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2019; 21:92. [DOI: 10.1007/s11936-019-0787-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
30
|
Farabi H, Rezapour A, Jahangiri R, Jafari A, Rashki Kemmak A, Nikjoo S. Economic evaluation of the utilization of telemedicine for patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Heart Fail Rev 2019; 25:1063-1075. [DOI: 10.1007/s10741-019-09864-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
31
|
Hummel JP, Leipold RJ, Amorosi SL, Bao H, Deger KA, Jones PW, Kansal AR, Ott LS, Stern S, Stein K, Curtis JP, Akar JG. Outcomes and costs of remote patient monitoring among patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators: An economic model based on the PREDICT RM database. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019; 30:1066-1077. [PMID: 30938894 PMCID: PMC6850124 DOI: 10.1111/jce.13934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators has been associated with reduced rates of all‐cause rehospitalizations and mortality among device recipients, but long‐term economic benefits have not been studied. Methods and Results An economic model was developed using the PREDICT RM database comparing outcomes with and without remote monitoring. The database included patients ages 65 to 89 who received a Boston Scientific device from 2006 to 2010. Parametric survival equations were derived for rehospitalization and mortality to predict outcomes over a maximum time horizon of 25 years. The analysis assessed rehospitalization, mortality, and the cost‐effectiveness (expressed as the incremental cost per quality‐adjusted life year) of remote monitoring versus no remote monitoring. Remote monitoring was associated with reduced mortality; average life expectancy and average quality‐adjusted life years increased by 0.77 years and 0.64, respectively (6.85 life years and 5.65 quality‐adjusted life years). When expressed per patient‐year, remote monitoring patients had fewer subsequent rehospitalizations (by 0.08 per patient‐year) and lower hospitalization costs (by $554 per patient year). With longer life expectancies, remote monitoring patients experienced an average of 0.64 additional subsequent rehospitalizations with increased average lifetime hospitalization costs of $2784. Total costs of outpatient and physician claims were higher with remote monitoring ($47 515 vs $42 792), but average per patient‐year costs were lower ($6232 vs $6244). The base‐case incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio was $10 752 per quality‐adjusted life year, making remote monitoring high‐value care. Conclusion Remote monitoring is a cost‐effective approach for the lifetime management of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Hummel
- Division of Cardiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | - Haikun Bao
- Yale University School of Medicine and Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut; and on behalf of the NCDR
| | | | - Paul W Jones
- Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts
| | | | - Lesli S Ott
- Yale University School of Medicine and Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut; and on behalf of the NCDR
| | | | - Kenneth Stein
- Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts
| | - Jeptha P Curtis
- Yale University School of Medicine and Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut; and on behalf of the NCDR
| | - Joseph G Akar
- Yale University School of Medicine and Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut; and on behalf of the NCDR
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Permanent Pacemakers: A Health Technology Assessment. ONTARIO HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT SERIES 2018; 18:1-199. [PMID: 30443279 PMCID: PMC6235077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Under usual care, people with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without a defibrillator (CRT-D and CRT-P, respectively), or a permanent pacemaker have follow-up in-person clinic visits. Remote monitoring of these devices allows the transfer of the information stored in the device so that it can be accessed by the clinic personnel via a secured website. METHODS We completed a health technology assessment, which included an evaluation of clinical benefits and harms, value for money, and patient preferences for remote monitoring of ICDs, CRTs, and permanent pacemakers plus clinic visits compared with clinic visits alone. This is an update of a 2012 health technology assessment. In addition to the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the 2012 publication, we included RCTs identified through a systematic literature search on June 1, 2017. We assessed the risk of bias of each study using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We conducted an economic evaluation to determine the cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring blended with in-clinic follow-up compared to in-clinic follow-up alone in patients with an ICD, a CRT-D, or a pacemaker. We determined the budget impact of blended remote monitoring in patients implanted with ICD, CRT-D, CRT-P, or pacemaker devices from the perspective of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. To understand patient experiences with remote monitoring, we interviewed 16 patients and family members. RESULTS Based on 15 RCTs in patients with implanted ICDs or CRT-Ds, remote monitoring plus clinic visits resulted in fewer patients with inappropriate ICD shocks within 12 to 37 months of follow-up (moderate quality evidence; absolute risk difference -0.04 [95% confidence interval -0.07 to -0.01]), fewer total clinic visits (moderate quality evidence), and a shorter time to detection and treatment of events (moderate quality evidence) compared with clinic visits alone. There was a similar risk of major adverse events (moderate quality evidence).Based on 6 RCTs in patients with pacemakers, remote monitoring plus clinic visits reduced the arrhythmia burden (high quality evidence), the time to detection and treatment of arrhythmias (high quality evidence), and the number of clinic visits (moderate quality evidence]) compared with clinic visits alone. Here again, there was a similar risk of major adverse events (high quality evidence).Results from the economic evaluation showed that among ICD and CRT-D recipients, blended remote monitoring (remote monitoring plus in-clinic follow ups) was more costly (incremental value of $4,354 per person) and more effective, providing higher quality-adjusted life years (incremental value of 0.19), compared to in-clinic follow-up alone. Among pacemaker recipients, blended remote monitoring was less costly (with an incremental saving of $2,370 per person) and more effective (with an incremental value of 0.12 quality-adjusted life years) than with in-clinic follow-up alone. We estimated that publicly funding remote monitoring could result in cost savings of $14 million over the first five years.Participants using remote monitoring reported that these devices provide important medical and safety benefits in managing their heart condition. Remote cardiac monitoring provides patients and their family members with an increased freedom. Their belief that the device will help with earlier detection of technical or clinical problems reduces the amount of stress and distraction their condition causes in their lives. CONCLUSIONS Remote monitoring of ICDs, CRT-Ds, and pacemakers plus clinic visits resulted in improved outcomes without increasing the risk of major adverse events compared with clinic visits alone. Remote monitoring is a cost-effective option for patients implanted with cardiac electronic devices. Patients reported positive experiences using remote monitoring, and perceived that the device provided important medical and safety benefits.
Collapse
|
33
|
Capucci A, De Simone A, Luzi M, Calvi V, Stabile G, D'Onofrio A, Maffei S, Leoni L, Morani G, Sangiuolo R, Amellone C, Checchinato C, Ammendola E, Buja G. Economic impact of remote monitoring after implantable defibrillators implantation in heart failure patients: an analysis from the EFFECT study. Europace 2018; 19:1493-1499. [PMID: 28407139 DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Heart failure (HF) patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) require admissions for disease management and out-patient visits for disease management and assessment of device performance. These admissions place a significant burden on the National Health Service. Remote monitoring (RM) is an effective alternative to frequent hospital visits. The EFFECT study was a multicentre observational investigation aiming to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of RM compared with in-office visits standard management (SM). The present analysis is an economic evaluation of the results of the EFFECT trial. Methods and results The present analysis considered the direct consumption of healthcare resources over 12-month follow-up. Standard tariffs were applied to hospitalizations, in-office visits and remote device interrogations. Economic comparisons were also carried out by means of propensity score (PS) analysis to take into account the lack of randomization in the study design. The analysis involved 858 patients with ICD or CRT-D. Of these, 401 (47%) were followed up via an SM approach, while 457 (53%) were assigned to RM. The rate of hospitalizations was 0.27/year in the SM group and 0.16/year in the RM group (risk reduction =0.59; P = 0.0004). In the non-adjusted analysis, the annual cost for each patient was €817 in the SM group and €604 in the RM group (P = 0.014). Propensity score analysis, in which 292 RM patients were matched with 292 SM patients, confirmed the results of the non-adjusted analysis (€872 in the SM group vs. €757 in the RM group; P < 0.0001). Conclusion There is a reduction in direct healthcare costs of RM for HF patients with ICDs, particularly CRT-D, compared with standard monitoring. Clinical Trial Registration http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier, NCT01723865.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Capucci
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Mario Luzi
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Valeria Calvi
- Cardiology Department, A.O.U.P. "Vittorio Emanuele", Ospedale Ferrarotto, Catania, Italy
| | | | | | - Simone Maffei
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Loira Leoni
- Cardiology Department, Policlinico Universitario, Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Morani
- Cardiology Department, Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Borgo Trento, Verona, Italy
| | - Raffaele Sangiuolo
- Cardiology Department, Ospedale Buon Consiglio - Fatebenefratelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Amellone
- Cardiology Department, Ospedale di Ciriè - ASL TO 4, Ciriè (TO), Italy
| | | | | | - Gianfranco Buja
- Cardiology Department, Policlinico Universitario, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lopez-Villegas A, Catalan-Matamoros D, Robles-Musso E, Bautista-Mesa R, Peiro S. Cost-utility analysis on telemonitoring of users with pacemakers: The PONIENTE study. J Telemed Telecare 2018; 25:204-212. [PMID: 29621908 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x18767184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few studies have confirmed the cost-saving of telemonitoring of users with pacemakers (PMs). The purpose of this controlled, non-randomised, non-masked clinical trial was to perform an economic assessment of telemonitoring (TM) of users with PMs and check whether TM offers a cost-utility alternative to conventional follow-up in hospital. METHODS Eighty-two patients implanted with an internet-based transmission PM were selected to receive either conventional follow-up in hospital ( n = 52) or TM ( n = 30) from their homes. The data were collected during 12 months while patients were being monitored. The economic assessment of the PONIENTE study was performed as per the perspectives of National Health Service (NHS) and patients. A cost-utility analysis was conducted to measure whether the TM of patients with PMs is cost-effective in terms of costs per gained quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS There was a significant cost-saving for participants in the TM group in comparison with the participants in the conventional follow-up group. From the NHS's perspective, the patients in the TM group gained 0.09 QALYs more than the patients in the conventional follow-up group over 12 months, with a cost saving of 57.64% (€46.51 versus €109.79, respectively; p < 0.001) per participant per year. In-office visits were reduced by 52.49% in the TM group. The costs related to the patient perspective were lower in the TM group than in the conventional follow-up group (€31.82 versus €73.48, respectively; p < 0.005). The costs per QALY were 61.68% higher in the in-office monitoring group. DISCUSSION The cost-utility analysis performed in the PONIENTE study showed that the TM of users with PMs appears to be a significant cost-effective alternative to conventional follow-up in hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Lopez-Villegas
- 1 Social Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS-609 Research Group, Hospital de Poniente, Almeria, Spain.,2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø. Norway
| | - Daniel Catalan-Matamoros
- 3 Department of Journalism and Communication, University Carlos III of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,4 Health Sciences CTS-451 Research Group, University of Almeria, Almería, Spain
| | | | | | - Salvador Peiro
- 7 Health Services Research Unit, FISABIO-PUBLIC HEALTH, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kidholm K, Kristensen MBD. A Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations Alongside Randomised Controlled Trials of Home Monitoring in Chronic Disease Management. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2018; 16:167-176. [PMID: 28871514 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-017-0351-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Many countries have considered telemedicine and home monitoring of patients as a solution to the demographic challenges that health-care systems face. However, reviews of economic evaluations of telemedicine have identified methodological problems in many studies as they do not comply with guidelines. The aim of this study was to examine economic evaluations alongside randomised controlled trials of home monitoring in chronic disease management and hereby to explore the resources included in the programme costs, the types of health-care utilisation that change as a result of home monitoring and discuss the value of economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials of home monitoring on the basis of the studies identified. A scoping review of economic evaluations of home monitoring of patients with chronic disease based on randomised controlled trials and including information on the programme costs and the costs of equipment was carried out based on a Medline (PubMed) search. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies include both costs of equipment and use of staff, but there is large variation in the types of equipment and types of tasks for the staff included in the costs. Equipment costs constituted 16-73% of the total programme costs. In six of the nine studies, home monitoring resulted in a reduction in primary care or emergency contacts. However, in total, home monitoring resulted in increased average costs per patient in six studies and reduced costs in three of the nine studies. The review is limited by the small number of studies found and the restriction to randomised controlled trials, which can be problematic in this area due to lack of blinding of patients and healthcare professionals and the difficulty of implementing organisational changes in hospital departments for the limited period of a trial. Furthermore, our results may be based on assessments of older telemedicine interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Kidholm
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Timmermans I, Meine M, Zitron E, Widdershoven J, Kimman G, Prevot S, Rauwolf T, Anselme F, Szendey I, Romero Roldán J, Mabo P, Schaer B, Denollet J, Versteeg H. The patient perspective on remote monitoring of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Narrative review and future directions. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2017; 40:826-833. [DOI: 10.1111/pace.13123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Revised: 04/14/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ivy Timmermans
- Department of Cardiology; University Medical Center Utrecht; 3508 GA Utrecht the Netherlands
- CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology; Tilburg University; 5000 LE Tilburg the Netherlands
| | - Matias Meine
- Department of Cardiology; University Medical Center Utrecht; 3508 GA Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Edgar Zitron
- Department of Cardiology; Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Jos Widdershoven
- Department of Cardiology; Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital; AD Tilburg the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kimman
- Department of Cardiology; Medisch Centrum Alkmaar; JD Alkmaar the Netherlands
| | - Sébastien Prevot
- Department of Cardiology; Hôpital Privé Clairval; Marseille France
| | - Thomas Rauwolf
- Department of Cardiology; Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg; Magdeburg Germany
| | | | - Istvan Szendey
- Department of Cardiology; Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH; Mönchengladbach Germany
| | | | - Philippe Mabo
- Department of Cardiology; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire; Rennes France
| | - Beat Schaer
- Department of Cardiology; University Hospital Basel; Basel Switzerland
| | - Johan Denollet
- CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology; Tilburg University; 5000 LE Tilburg the Netherlands
| | - Henneke Versteeg
- Department of Cardiology; University Medical Center Utrecht; 3508 GA Utrecht the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Economic analysis of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Results of the Health Economics Evaluation Registry for Remote Follow-up (TARIFF) study. Heart Rhythm 2017; 14:50-57. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
38
|
Boriani G, Da Costa A, Quesada A, Ricci RP, Favale S, Boscolo G, Clementy N, Amori V, Mangoni di S. Stefano L, Burri H. Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE-CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 19:416-425. [DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Revised: 07/27/2016] [Accepted: 07/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Boriani
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Policlinico di Modena; Modena Italy
- University of Bologna; S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital; Bologna Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Haran Burri
- University Hospital of Geneva; Geneva Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Or CK, Tao D, Wang H. The effectiveness of the use of consumer health information technology in patients with heart failure: A meta-analysis and narrative review of randomized controlled trials. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 23:155-166. [PMID: 26759365 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x15625540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine whether the use of consumer health information technologies (CHITs) has an impact on outcomes of patients in the self-management of heart failure (HF). Methods A literature search of six electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the analysis. Mortality, hospitalization and length of hospital stay were meta-analyzed and other patient outcomes were synthesized using a narrative approach. Results The literature search identified 50 studies, representing 43 RCTs, comparing the use of CHITs with usual care for HF patients. The meta-analysis showed that the use of CHITs reduced the risk of HF-caused mortality (relative risk (RR) = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-0.91), p = 0.007), lowered the risk of HF-caused hospitalization (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66-0.96), p = 0.020), and shortened HF-caused length of hospital stay (mean difference = -0.52, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.27, p < 0.00), but not all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization or all-cause length of hospital stay, compared with usual care. The narrative synthesis indicated that only a small proportion of the trials reported positive effects of CHITs over usual care. Conclusions Evidence from RCTs presents mixed results on the impacts of CHITs for HF management. Further studies are required to assess whether and how CHITs would play a role in enhancing health care and patient outcomes and what specific CHIT features and functions are relevant to different HF treatment goals and self-care objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calvin Kl Or
- 1 Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, China
| | - Da Tao
- 2 Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, College of Mechatronics and Control Engineering, Shenzhen University, China
| | - Hailiang Wang
- 1 Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ladapo JA, Turakhia MP, Ryan MP, Mollenkopf SA, Reynolds MR. Health Care Utilization and Expenditures Associated With Remote Monitoring in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Devices. Am J Cardiol 2016; 117:1455-62. [PMID: 26996767 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Revised: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Several randomized trials and decision analysis models have found that remote monitoring may reduce health care utilization and expenditures in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), compared with in-office monitoring. However, little is known about the generalizability of these findings to unselected populations in clinical practice. To compare health care utilization and expenditures associated with remote monitoring and in-office monitoring in patients with CIEDs, we used Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental Databases. We selected patients newly implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D), or permanent pacemaker (PPM), in 2009, who had continuous health plan enrollment 2 years after implantation. Generalized linear models and propensity score matching were used to adjust for confounders and estimate differences in health care utilization and expenditures in patients with remote or in-office monitoring. We identified 1,127; 427; and 1,295 pairs of patients with a similar propensity for receiving an ICD, CRT-D, or PPM, respectively. Remotely monitored patients with ICDs experienced fewer emergency department visits resulting in discharge (p = 0.050). Remote monitoring was associated with lower health care expenditures in office visits among patients with PPMs (p = 0.025) and CRT-Ds (p = 0.006) and lower total inpatient and outpatient expenditures in patients with ICDs (p <0.0001). In conclusion, remote monitoring of patients with CIEDs may be associated with reductions in health care utilization and expenditures compared with exclusive in-office care.
Collapse
|
41
|
Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). Trends Cardiovasc Med 2016; 26:568-77. [PMID: 27134007 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Revised: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
With increasing indications and access to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) worldwide, the number of patients needing CIED follow-up continues to rise. In parallel, the technology available for managing these devices has advanced considerably. In this setting, remote monitoring (RM) has emerged as a complement to routine in-office care. Rigorous studies, randomized and otherwise, have demonstrated advantages to patient with CIED management systems, which incorporates RM resulting in authoritative guidelines from relevant professional societies recommending RM for all eligible patients. In addition to clinical benefits, CIED management programs that include RM have been shown to be cost effective and associated with high patient satisfaction. Finally, RM programs hold promise for the future of CIED research in light of the massive data collected through RM databases converging with unprecedented computational capability. This review outlines the available data associated with clinical outcomes in patients managed with RM with an emphasis on randomized trials; the impact of RM on patient satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, and healthcare utilization; and possible future directions for the use of RM in clinical practice and research.
Collapse
|
42
|
Klersy C, Boriani G, De Silvestri A, Mairesse GH, Braunschweig F, Scotti V, Balduini A, Cowie MR, Leyva F. Effect of telemonitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices on healthcare utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18:195-204. [DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2015] [Revised: 10/18/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Klersy
- Service of Biometry & Statistics; IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S Matteo; Pavia Italy
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Department; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena; Modena Italy
| | - Annalisa De Silvestri
- Service of Biometry & Statistics; IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S Matteo; Pavia Italy
| | | | | | - Valeria Scotti
- Centre for Scientific Documentation; IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S Matteo; Pavia Italy
| | - Anna Balduini
- Centre for Scientific Documentation; IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S Matteo; Pavia Italy
| | - Martin R. Cowie
- Centre for Scientific Documentation; IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S Matteo; Pavia Italy
| | - Francisco Leyva
- Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston Medical School; Aston University; Birmingham UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dario C, Delise P, Gubian L, Saccavini C, Brandolino G, Mancin S. Large Controlled Observational Study on Remote Monitoring of Pacemakers and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators: A Clinical, Economic, and Organizational Evaluation. Interact J Med Res 2016; 5:e4. [PMID: 26764170 PMCID: PMC4730109 DOI: 10.2196/ijmr.4270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2015] [Revised: 07/17/2015] [Accepted: 08/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with implantable devices such as pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) should be followed up every 3–12 months, which traditionally required in-clinic visits. Innovative devices allow data transmission and technical or medical alerts to be sent from the patient's home to the physician (remote monitoring). A number of studies have shown its effectiveness in timely detection and management of both clinical and technical events, and endorsed its adoption. Unfortunately, in daily practice, remote monitoring has been implemented in uncoordinated and rather fragmented ways, calling for a more strategic approach. Objective The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of remote monitoring for PM and ICD in a “real world” context compared with in-clinic follow-up. The evaluation focuses on how this service is carried out by Local Health Authorities, the impact on the cardiology unit and the health system, and organizational features promoting or hindering its effectiveness and efficiency. Methods A multi-center, multi-vendor, controlled, observational, prospective study was conducted to analyze the impact of remote monitoring implementation. A total of 2101 patients were enrolled in the study: 1871 patients were followed through remote monitoring of PM/ICD (I-group) and 230 through in-clinic visits (U-group). The follow-up period was 12 months. Results In-clinic device follow-ups and cardiac visits were significantly lower in the I-group compared with the U-group, respectively: PM, I-group = 0.43, U-group = 1.07, P<.001; ICD, I-group = 0.98, U-group = 2.14, P<.001. PM, I-group = 0.37, U-group = 0.85, P<.001; ICD, I-group = 1.58, U-group = 1.69, P=.01. Hospitalizations for any cause were significantly lower in the I-group for PM patients only (I-group = 0.37, U-group = 0.50, P=.005). There were no significant differences regarding use of the emergency department for both PM and ICD patients. In the I-group, 0.30 (PM) and 0.37 (ICD) real clinical events per patient per year were detected within a mean (SD) time of 1.18 (2.08) days. Mean time spent by physicians to treat a patient was lower in the I-group compared to the U-group (-4.1 minutes PM; -13.7 minutes ICD). Organizational analysis showed that remote monitoring implementation was rather haphazard and fragmented. From a health care system perspective, the economic analysis showed statistically significant gains (P<.001) for the I-group using PM. Conclusions This study contributes to build solid evidence regarding the usefulness of RM in detecting and managing clinical and technical events with limited use of manpower and other health care resources. To fully gain the benefits of RM of PM/ICD, it is vital that organizational processes be streamlined and standardized within an overarching strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Dario
- Arsenàl.IT, Veneto's Research Centre for eHealth Innovation, Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Workload, time and costs of the informal cares in patients with tele-monitoring of pacemakers: the PONIENTE study. Clin Res Cardiol 2015; 105:307-13. [PMID: 26423396 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-015-0921-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2015] [Accepted: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess the burden borne by and the costs to informal caregivers of patients with remotely monitored (RM) pacemakers. METHODS The PONIENTE study was a controlled, non-randomised clinical trial, with data collected from informal caregivers, 12 months after implantation of pacemakers. The survey on disabilities, personal autonomy, and dependency situations was used to gather information on demographic and social characteristics, levels of professionalism, time and types of care, difficulties in providing care, health status, professional aspects, economic and family or leisure impacts due to informal caregiving for patients with pacemakers. RESULTS During 14 months, 76 caregivers were enrolled in the PONIENTE trial. Of which, 26 were included in the RM group and 50 in the hospital-monitored group (HM). The mean ages were 58.62 ± 16.51 and 61.10 ± 12.67 years, respectively (p = 0.56) in the groups, and 69.7 % were females. The majority (96.1 %) of the caregivers declared that they had to provide their services between 6 and 7 days per week (88.5 % in RM group versus 100 % in HM group; p = 0.037). The costs related to care provided by the informal caregivers were 21.38 % lower in the RM group than in the HM group (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS The PONIENTE study shows a significant impact of informal care on relatives and friends of patients with pacemakers in terms of their well-being and costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02234245.
Collapse
|
45
|
Flodgren G, Rachas A, Farmer AJ, Inzitari M, Shepperd S. Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2015. [PMID: 26343551 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002098.pub2.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemedicine (TM) is the use of telecommunication systems to deliver health care at a distance. It has the potential to improve patient health outcomes, access to health care and reduce healthcare costs. As TM applications continue to evolve it is important to understand the impact TM might have on patients, healthcare professionals and the organisation of care. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness, acceptability and costs of interactive TM as an alternative to, or in addition to, usual care (i.e. face-to-face care, or telephone consultation). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group's specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, five other databases and two trials registers to June 2013, together with reference checking, citation searching, handsearching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered randomised controlled trials of interactive TM that involved direct patient-provider interaction and was delivered in addition to, or substituting for, usual care compared with usual care alone, to participants with any clinical condition. We excluded telephone only interventions and wholly automatic self-management TM interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS For each condition, we pooled outcome data that were sufficiently homogenous using fixed effect meta-analysis. We reported risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS We included 93 eligible trials (N = 22,047 participants), which evaluated the effectiveness of interactive TM delivered in addition to (32% of studies), as an alternative to (57% of studies), or partly substituted for usual care (11%) as compared to usual care alone.The included studies recruited patients with the following clinical conditions: cardiovascular disease (36), diabetes (21), respiratory conditions (9), mental health or substance abuse conditions (7), conditions requiring a specialist consultation (6), co morbidities (3), urogenital conditions (3), neurological injuries and conditions (2), gastrointestinal conditions (2), neonatal conditions requiring specialist care (2), solid organ transplantation (1), and cancer (1).Telemedicine provided remote monitoring (55 studies), or real-time video-conferencing (38 studies), which was used either alone or in combination. The main TM function varied depending on clinical condition, but fell typically into one of the following six categories, with some overlap: i) monitoring of a chronic condition to detect early signs of deterioration and prompt treatment and advice, (41); ii) provision of treatment or rehabilitation (12), for example the delivery of cognitive behavioural therapy, or incontinence training; iii) education and advice for self-management (23), for example nurses delivering education to patients with diabetes or providing support to parents of very low birth weight infants or to patients with home parenteral nutrition; iv) specialist consultations for diagnosis and treatment decisions (8), v) real-time assessment of clinical status, for example post-operative assessment after minor operation or follow-up after solid organ transplantation (8) vi), screening, for angina (1).The type of data transmitted by the patient, the frequency of data transfer, (e.g. telephone, e-mail, SMS) and frequency of interactions between patient and healthcare provider varied across studies, as did the type of healthcare provider/s and healthcare system involved in delivering the intervention.We found no difference between groups for all-cause mortality for patients with heart failure (16 studies; N = 5239; RR:0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.03, P = 0.12; I(2) = 44%) (moderate to high certainty of evidence) at a median of six months follow-up. Admissions to hospital (11 studies; N = 4529) ranged from a decrease of 64% to an increase of 60% at median eight months follow-up (moderate certainty of evidence). We found some evidence of improved quality of life (five studies; N = 482; MD:-4.39, 95% CI -7.94 to -0.83; P < 0.02; I(2) = 0%) (moderate certainty of evidence) for those allocated to TM as compared with usual care at a median three months follow-up. In studies recruiting participants with diabetes (16 studies; N = 2768) we found lower glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c %) levels in those allocated to TM than in controls (MD -0.31, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.24; P < 0.00001; I(2)= 42%, P = 0.04) (high certainty of evidence) at a median of nine months follow-up. We found some evidence for a decrease in LDL (four studies, N = 1692; MD -12.45, 95% CI -14.23 to -10.68; P < 0.00001; I(2 =) 0%) (moderate certainty of evidence), and blood pressure (four studies, N = 1770: MD: SBP:-4.33, 95% CI -5.30 to -3.35, P < 0.00001; I(2) = 17%; DBP: -2.75 95% CI -3.28 to -2.22, P < 0.00001; I(2) = 45% (moderate certainty evidence), in TM as compared with usual care.Seven studies that recruited participants with different mental health and substance abuse problems, reported no differences in the effect of therapy delivered over video-conferencing, as compared to face-to-face delivery. Findings from the other studies were inconsistent; there was some evidence that monitoring via TM improved blood pressure control in participants with hypertension, and a few studies reported improved symptom scores for those with a respiratory condition. Studies recruiting participants requiring mental health services and those requiring specialist consultation for a dermatological condition reported no differences between groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The findings in our review indicate that the use of TM in the management of heart failure appears to lead to similar health outcomes as face-to-face or telephone delivery of care; there is evidence that TM can improve the control of blood glucose in those with diabetes. The cost to a health service, and acceptability by patients and healthcare professionals, is not clear due to limited data reported for these outcomes. The effectiveness of TM may depend on a number of different factors, including those related to the study population e.g. the severity of the condition and the disease trajectory of the participants, the function of the intervention e.g., if it is used for monitoring a chronic condition, or to provide access to diagnostic services, as well as the healthcare provider and healthcare system involved in delivering the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd Flodgren
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LF
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Flodgren G, Rachas A, Farmer AJ, Inzitari M, Shepperd S. Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD002098. [PMID: 26343551 PMCID: PMC6473731 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002098.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 329] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemedicine (TM) is the use of telecommunication systems to deliver health care at a distance. It has the potential to improve patient health outcomes, access to health care and reduce healthcare costs. As TM applications continue to evolve it is important to understand the impact TM might have on patients, healthcare professionals and the organisation of care. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness, acceptability and costs of interactive TM as an alternative to, or in addition to, usual care (i.e. face-to-face care, or telephone consultation). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group's specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, five other databases and two trials registers to June 2013, together with reference checking, citation searching, handsearching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered randomised controlled trials of interactive TM that involved direct patient-provider interaction and was delivered in addition to, or substituting for, usual care compared with usual care alone, to participants with any clinical condition. We excluded telephone only interventions and wholly automatic self-management TM interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS For each condition, we pooled outcome data that were sufficiently homogenous using fixed effect meta-analysis. We reported risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS We included 93 eligible trials (N = 22,047 participants), which evaluated the effectiveness of interactive TM delivered in addition to (32% of studies), as an alternative to (57% of studies), or partly substituted for usual care (11%) as compared to usual care alone.The included studies recruited patients with the following clinical conditions: cardiovascular disease (36), diabetes (21), respiratory conditions (9), mental health or substance abuse conditions (7), conditions requiring a specialist consultation (6), co morbidities (3), urogenital conditions (3), neurological injuries and conditions (2), gastrointestinal conditions (2), neonatal conditions requiring specialist care (2), solid organ transplantation (1), and cancer (1).Telemedicine provided remote monitoring (55 studies), or real-time video-conferencing (38 studies), which was used either alone or in combination. The main TM function varied depending on clinical condition, but fell typically into one of the following six categories, with some overlap: i) monitoring of a chronic condition to detect early signs of deterioration and prompt treatment and advice, (41); ii) provision of treatment or rehabilitation (12), for example the delivery of cognitive behavioural therapy, or incontinence training; iii) education and advice for self-management (23), for example nurses delivering education to patients with diabetes or providing support to parents of very low birth weight infants or to patients with home parenteral nutrition; iv) specialist consultations for diagnosis and treatment decisions (8), v) real-time assessment of clinical status, for example post-operative assessment after minor operation or follow-up after solid organ transplantation (8) vi), screening, for angina (1).The type of data transmitted by the patient, the frequency of data transfer, (e.g. telephone, e-mail, SMS) and frequency of interactions between patient and healthcare provider varied across studies, as did the type of healthcare provider/s and healthcare system involved in delivering the intervention.We found no difference between groups for all-cause mortality for patients with heart failure (16 studies; N = 5239; RR:0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.03, P = 0.12; I(2) = 44%) (moderate to high certainty of evidence) at a median of six months follow-up. Admissions to hospital (11 studies; N = 4529) ranged from a decrease of 64% to an increase of 60% at median eight months follow-up (moderate certainty of evidence). We found some evidence of improved quality of life (five studies; N = 482; MD:-4.39, 95% CI -7.94 to -0.83; P < 0.02; I(2) = 0%) (moderate certainty of evidence) for those allocated to TM as compared with usual care at a median three months follow-up. In studies recruiting participants with diabetes (16 studies; N = 2768) we found lower glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c %) levels in those allocated to TM than in controls (MD -0.31, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.24; P < 0.00001; I(2)= 42%, P = 0.04) (high certainty of evidence) at a median of nine months follow-up. We found some evidence for a decrease in LDL (four studies, N = 1692; MD -12.45, 95% CI -14.23 to -10.68; P < 0.00001; I(2 =) 0%) (moderate certainty of evidence), and blood pressure (four studies, N = 1770: MD: SBP:-4.33, 95% CI -5.30 to -3.35, P < 0.00001; I(2) = 17%; DBP: -2.75 95% CI -3.28 to -2.22, P < 0.00001; I(2) = 45% (moderate certainty evidence), in TM as compared with usual care.Seven studies that recruited participants with different mental health and substance abuse problems, reported no differences in the effect of therapy delivered over video-conferencing, as compared to face-to-face delivery. Findings from the other studies were inconsistent; there was some evidence that monitoring via TM improved blood pressure control in participants with hypertension, and a few studies reported improved symptom scores for those with a respiratory condition. Studies recruiting participants requiring mental health services and those requiring specialist consultation for a dermatological condition reported no differences between groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The findings in our review indicate that the use of TM in the management of heart failure appears to lead to similar health outcomes as face-to-face or telephone delivery of care; there is evidence that TM can improve the control of blood glucose in those with diabetes. The cost to a health service, and acceptability by patients and healthcare professionals, is not clear due to limited data reported for these outcomes. The effectiveness of TM may depend on a number of different factors, including those related to the study population e.g. the severity of the condition and the disease trajectory of the participants, the function of the intervention e.g., if it is used for monitoring a chronic condition, or to provide access to diagnostic services, as well as the healthcare provider and healthcare system involved in delivering the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd Flodgren
- Norwegian Institute of Public HealthThe Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health ServicesPilestredet Park 7OsloNorway0176
| | - Antoine Rachas
- European Hospital Georges Pompidou and Paris Descartes UniversityDepartment of IT and Public Health20‐40 Rue leBlancParisFrance75908
| | - Andrew J Farmer
- University of OxfordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesRadcliffe Observatory Quarter, Walton StreetOxfordUKOX2 6GG
| | - Marco Inzitari
- Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili and Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaDepartment of Healthcare/Medicinec Esteve Terrades 30BarcelonaSpain08023
| | - Sasha Shepperd
- University of OxfordNuffield Department of Population HealthRosemary Rue Building, Old Road CampusHeadingtonOxfordOxfordshireUKOX3 7LF
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the current state of the electronic medical record, including benefits and shortcomings, and presents key factors likely to drive development in the next decade and beyond. The current electronic medical record to a large extent represents a digital version of the traditional paper legal record, owned and maintained by the practitioner. The future electronic health record is expected to be a shared tool, engaging patients in decision making, wellness and disease management and providing data for individual decision support, population management and analytics. Many drivers will determine this path, including payment model reform, proliferation of mobile platforms, telemedicine, genomics and individualized medicine and advances in 'big data' technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve G Peters
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 SW First Street, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm 2015; 12:e69-100. [PMID: 25981148 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 359] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
49
|
|
50
|
Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Smith BR, Alverson DC, Antoniotti N, Barsan WG, Bashshur N, Brown EM, Coye MJ, Doarn CR, Ferguson S, Grigsby J, Krupinski EA, Kvedar JC, Linkous J, Merrell RC, Nesbitt T, Poropatich R, Rheuban KS, Sanders JH, Watson AR, Weinstein RS, Yellowlees P. The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions for chronic disease management. Telemed J E Health 2014; 20:769-800. [PMID: 24968105 PMCID: PMC4148063 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.9981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2014] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The telemedicine intervention in chronic disease management promises to involve patients in their own care, provides continuous monitoring by their healthcare providers, identifies early symptoms, and responds promptly to exacerbations in their illnesses. This review set out to establish the evidence from the available literature on the impact of telemedicine for the management of three chronic diseases: congestive heart failure, stroke, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. By design, the review focuses on a limited set of representative chronic diseases because of their current and increasing importance relative to their prevalence, associated morbidity, mortality, and cost. Furthermore, these three diseases are amenable to timely interventions and secondary prevention through telemonitoring. The preponderance of evidence from studies using rigorous research methods points to beneficial results from telemonitoring in its various manifestations, albeit with a few exceptions. Generally, the benefits include reductions in use of service: hospital admissions/re-admissions, length of hospital stay, and emergency department visits typically declined. It is important that there often were reductions in mortality. Few studies reported neutral or mixed findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashid L. Bashshur
- E-Health Center, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Gary W. Shannon
- Department of Geography, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Brian R. Smith
- E-Health Center, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | - Noura Bashshur
- E-Health Center, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Molly J. Coye
- University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Charles R. Doarn
- Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - Jim Grigsby
- University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Joseph C. Kvedar
- Partners Health Care, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrew R. Watson
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|