Predicting first-line VEGFR-TKI resistance and survival in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma using a clinical-radiomic nomogram

BACKGROUND

This study aims to construct predicting models using radiomic and clinical features in predicting first-line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) early resistance in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) patients. We also aim to explore the correlation of predicting models with short and long-term survival of mccRCC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 110 mccRCC patients from 2009 to 2019 were included and assigned into training and test sets. Radiomic features were extracted from tumor 3D-ROI of baseline enhanced CT images. Radiomic features were selected by Lasso method to construct a radiomic score. A combined nomogram was established using the combination of radiomic score and clinical factors. The discriminative abilities of the radiomic, clinical and combined nomogram were quantified using ROC curve. Cox regression analysis was used to test the correlation of nomogram score with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS and OS were compared between different risk groups by log-rank test.

RESULTS

The radiomic, clinical and combined nomogram demonstrated AUCs of 0.81, 0.75, and 0.83 in training set; 0.79, 0.77, and 0.88 in test set. Nomogram score ≥ 1.18 was an independent prognostic factor of PFS (HR 0.22 (0.10, 0.47), p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.38 (0.20, 0.71), p = 0.002), in training set. PFS in low-risk group were significantly longer than high-risk group in training (p < 0.001) and test (p < 0.001) set, respectively. OS in low-risk group were significantly longer than high-risk group in training (p = 0.003) and test (p = 0.009) set, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram combining baseline radiomic signature and clinical factors helped detecting first-line VEGFR-TKI early resistance and predicting short and long-term prognosis in mccRCC patients.

Clinical application of radiomics for the prediction of treatment outcome and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) relies on clinical and histopathological features for treatment decisions. Recently, radiomics, which involves the extraction and analysis of quantitative imaging features, has shown promise in improving RCC management. This review evaluates the current application and limitations of radiomics for predicting treatment and oncological outcomes in RCC.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases or studies that used radiomics to predict response to treatment and survival outcomes in patients with RCC. The study quality was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) tools.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified a total of 27 studies, examining 6,119 patients. The most used imaging modality was contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. The reviewed studies extracted between 19 and 3376 radiomics features, including Histogram, Texture, Filter, or transformation method. Radiomics-based risk stratification models provided valuable insights into treatment response and oncological outcomes. All developed signatures demonstrated at least modest accuracy (AUC range: 0.55-0.99). The studies included in this analysis reported heterogeneous results regarding radiomics methods. The range of Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) was from - 5 to 20, with a mean RQS total of 9.15 ± 7.95.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics has emerged as a promising tool in the management of RCC. It offers the potential for improved risk stratification and response assessment. However, future trials must demonstrate the generalizability of findings to prospective cohorts before progressing towards clinical translation.

Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Renal Lesion Assessment

Radiomics, the extraction and analysis of quantitative features from medical images, has emerged as a promising field in radiology with the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis and management of renal lesions. This comprehensive review explores the radiomics workflow, including image acquisition, feature extraction, selection, and classification, and highlights its application in differentiating between benign and malignant renal lesions. The integration of radiomics with artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, such as machine learning and deep learning, can help patients' management and allow the planning of the appropriate treatments. AI models have shown remarkable accuracy in predicting tumor aggressiveness, treatment response, and patient outcomes. This review provides insights into the current state of radiomics and AI in renal lesion assessment and outlines future directions for research in this rapidly evolving field.

A MRI-based radiomics model for predicting the response to anlotinb combined with temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma patients

OBJECTIVE

Anlotinib is a multitarget anti-angiogenic drug that combined with temozolomide (TMZ) can effectively prolongs the overall survival (OS) of recurrent malignant glioma(rMG),but some patients do not respond to anlotinib combined with TMZ. These patients were associated with a worse prognosis and lack effective identification methods. Therefore, it is necessary to differentiate patients who may have good response to anlotinb in combination with TMZ from those who are not, in order to provide personalized targeted therapies.

METHODS

Fifty three rMG patients (42 in training cohort and 11 in testing cohort) receiving anlotinib combined with TMZ were enrolled. A total of 3668 radiomics features were extracted from the recurrent MRI images. Radiomics features are reduced and filtered by hypothesis testing and Least Absolute Shrinkage And Selection (LASSO) regression. Eight machine learning models construct the radiomics model, and then screen out the optimal model. The performance of the model was assessed by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness with validation.

RESULTS

Fifty three patients with rMG were enrolled in our study. Thirty four patients displayed effective treatment response, showed a higher survival benefits than non-response group, the median progression-free survival(PFS) was 8.53 months versus 5.33 months (p = 0.06) and the median OS was 19.9 months and 7.33 months (p = 0.029), respectively. Three radiomics features were incorporated into the model construction as final variables after LASSO regression analysis. In testing cohort, Logistic Regression (LR) model has the best performance with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.93 compared with other models, which can effectively predict the response of rMG patients to anlotinib in combination with TMZ. The calibration curve confirmed the agreement between the observed actual and prediction probability. Within the reasonable threshold probability range (0.38-0.88), the radiomics model shows good clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

The above-described radiomics model performed well, which can serve as a clinical tool for individualized prediction of the response to anlotinb combined with TMZ in rMG patients.

Role of AI and Radiomic Markers in Early Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and Clinical Outcome Prediction: A Brief Review

Globally, renal cancer (RC) is the 10th most common cancer among men and women. The new era of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics have allowed the development of AI-based computer-aided diagnostic/prediction (AI-based CAD/CAP) systems, which have shown promise for the diagnosis of RC (i.e., subtyping, grading, and staging) and prediction of clinical outcomes at an early stage. This will absolutely help reduce diagnosis time, enhance diagnostic abilities, reduce invasiveness, and provide guidance for appropriate management procedures to avoid the burden of unresponsive treatment plans. This survey mainly has three primary aims. The first aim is to highlight the most recent technical diagnostic studies developed in the last decade, with their findings and limitations, that have taken the advantages of AI and radiomic markers derived from either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images to develop AI-based CAD systems for accurate diagnosis of renal tumors at an early stage. The second aim is to highlight the few studies that have utilized AI and radiomic markers, with their findings and limitations, to predict patients' clinical outcome/treatment response, including possible recurrence after treatment, overall survival, and progression-free survival in patients with renal tumors. The promising findings of the aforementioned studies motivated us to highlight the optimal AI-based radiomic makers that are correlated with the diagnosis of renal tumors and prediction/assessment of patients' clinical outcomes. Finally, we conclude with a discussion and possible future avenues for improving diagnostic and treatment prediction performance.

Radiogenomics in Renal Cancer Management-Current Evidence and Future Prospects

Renal cancer management is challenging from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up. In cases of small renal masses and cystic lesions the differential diagnosis of benign or malignant tissues has potential pitfalls when imaging or even renal biopsy is applied. The recent artificial intelligence, imaging techniques, and genomics advancements have the ability to help clinicians set the stratification risk, treatment selection, follow-up strategy, and prognosis of the disease. The combination of radiomics features and genomics data has achieved good results but is currently limited by the retrospective design and the small number of patients included in clinical trials. The road ahead for radiogenomics is open to new, well-designed prospective studies, with large cohorts of patients required to validate previously obtained results and enter clinical practice.

Artificial intelligence and radiomics in evaluation of kidney lesions: a comprehensive literature review

Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) may increase the differentiation of benign from malignant kidney lesions, differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC), differentiation of oncocytoma from RCC, differentiation of different subtypes of RCC, to predict Fuhrman grade, to predict gene mutation through molecular biomarkers and to predict treatment response in metastatic RCC undergoing immunotherapy. Neural networks analyze imaging data. Statistical, geometrical, textural features derived are giving quantitative data of contour, internal heterogeneity and gray zone features of lesions. A comprehensive literature review was performed, until July 2022. Studies investigating the diagnostic value of radiomics in differentiation of renal lesions, grade prediction, gene alterations, molecular biomarkers and ongoing clinical trials have been analyzed. The application of AI and radiomics could lead to improved sensitivity, specificity, accuracy in detecting and differentiating between renal lesions. Standardization of scanner protocols will improve preoperative differentiation between benign, low-risk cancers and clinically significant renal cancers and holds the premises to enhance the diagnostic ability of imaging tools to characterize renal lesions.

CT-Based Radiomics Can Predict the Efficacy of Anlotinib in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Anlotinib is a small-molecule RTK inhibitor that has achieved certain results in further-line treatment, but many patients do not respond to this drug and lack effective methods for identification. Although radiomics has been widely used in lung cancer, very few studies have been conducted in the field of antiangiogenic drugs. This study aims to develop a new model to predict the efficacy of patients receiving anlotinib by combining pretreatment computed tomography (CT) radiomic characters with clinical characters, in order to assist precision medicine of pulmonary cancer. 254 patients from seven institutions were involved in the study. Lesions were selected according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, and the corresponding radiomic features were obtained. We constructed prediction models based on clinical, NCE-CT, and CE-CT radiomic features, respectively, and evaluated the prediction performance of the models for training sets, internal validation sets, and external validation sets. In the RAD score only model, the area under curve(AUC) of the NCE-CT cohort was 0.740 (95% CI: 0.622, 0.857) for the training set, 0.711 (95% CI: 0.480, 0.942) for the internal validation set, and 0.633(95% CI: 0.479, 0.787) for the external validation set, while that of the CE-CT cohort was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.705, 0.926) for the training set, 0.771 (95% CI: 0.539, 1.000) for the internal validation set, and 0.701 (95% CI: 0.489, 0.913) for the external validation set. In the RAD score-combined model, the AUC of the NCE-CT cohort was 0.796 (95% CI: 0.691, 0.901) for the training set, 0.579 (95% CI: 0.309, 0.848) for the internal validation set, and 0.590 (95% CI: 0.427, 0.753) for the external validation set, while that of the CE-CT cohort was 0.902 (95% CI: 0.828, 0.977) for the training set, 0.865 (95% CI: 0.696, 1.000) for the internal validation set, and 0.837 (95% CI: 0.682, 0.992) for the external validation set. In conclusion, radiomics has accurate predictions for the efficacy of anlotinib. CE-CT-based radiomic models have the best predictive potential in predicting the efficacy of anlotinib, and model predictions become better when they are combined with clinical characteristics.

Radiomics for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Predicting Outcomes from Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies-A Narrative Review

T-cell immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapies have become standard-of-care treatments for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). There is a need to develop robust biomarkers that predict patient outcomes to targeted therapies to personalise treatment. In recent years, quantitative analysis of imaging features, termed radiomics, has been used to extract tumour features. This narrative mini review summarises the evidence for radiomics prediction of immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy outcomes in RCC. Radiomics may predict survival, treatment response, and disease progression in RCC treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (eg, sunitinib) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (eg, nivolumab). Further validation is necessary in large-scale studies. PATIENT SUMMARY: We summarise evidence on the ability of features extracted from CT (computed tomography) scans to predict patient outcomes from new treatments for kidney cancer. Although these features can predict treatment outcomes for patients, including survival, treatment response, and cancer progression, further research is necessary before this technology can be applied clinically.

Radiomics in Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Radiomics may answer questions where the conventional interpretation of medical imaging has limitations. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the (current) status of evidence in the application of radiomics in the field of renal masses. We focused on its role in diagnosis, sub-entity discrimination and treatment response assessment in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and benign renal masses. Our quantitative synthesis showed promising results in discrimination of tumor dignity, nevertheless, the value added to human assessment remains unclear and should be the focus of future research. Furthermore, the benefit regarding treatment response assessment remains unclear as well, since the existing studies are investigating already abandoned systemic therapies (ST), which no longer represent the current “reference” standard. Open science could enable to establish technical and clinical validity of radiomic signatures prior to the incorporation of radiomics into everyday clinical practice.

Abstract

Radiomics may increase the diagnostic accuracy of medical imaging for localized and metastatic RCC (mRCC). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Doing so, we comprehensively searched literature databases until May 2020. Studies investigating the diagnostic value of radiomics in differentiation of localized renal tumors and assessment of treatment response to ST in mRCC were included and assessed with respect to their quality using the radiomics quality score (RQS). A total of 113 out of 1098 identified studies met the criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis. Median RQS of all studies was 13.9% (5.0 points, IQR 0.25–7.0 points), and RQS increased over time. Thirty studies were included into the quantitative synthesis: For distinguishing angiomyolipoma, oncocytoma or unspecified benign tumors from RCC, the random effects model showed a log odds ratio (OR) of 2.89 (95%-CI 2.40–3.39, p < 0.001), 3.08 (95%-CI 2.09–4.06, p < 0.001) and 3.57 (95%-CI 2.69–4.45, p < 0.001), respectively. For the general discrimination of benign tumors from RCC log OR was 3.17 (95%-CI 2.73–3.62, p < 0.001). Inhomogeneity of the available studies assessing treatment response in mRCC prevented any meaningful meta-analysis. The application of radiomics seems promising for discrimination of renal tumor dignity. Shared data and open science may assist in improving reproducibility of future studies.

Components of Radiologic Progressive Disease Defined by RECIST 1.1 in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background Progression-free survival (PFS) determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) is the reference standard to assess efficacy of treatments in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Purpose To assess the most common components of radiologic progressive disease as defined by RECIST 1.1 in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and how the progression events impact PFS. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of the phase III METEOR trial conducted between 2013 and 2014 included patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma, with at least one target lesion at baseline and one follow-up time point, who were determined according to RECIST 1.1 to have progressive disease. A chest, abdominal, and pelvic scan were acquired at each time point. Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used to test differences in median PFS among the RECIST 1.1 progression events. The Holm-Bonferroni method was used to compare the median PFS of the progression events for the family-wise error rate of 5% to adjust P values for multiple comparisons. Results Of the 395 patients (296 men, 98 women, and one patient with sex not reported; mean age, 61 years ± 10), 73 (18.5%) had progression due to non-target disease, 105 (26.6%) had new lesions, and 126 (31.9%) had progression of target lesions (defined by an increase in the sum of diameters). Patients with progression of non-target disease and those with new lesions had shorter PFS than patients with progression defined by the target lesions (median PFS, 2.8 months [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.9 months, 3.7 months] and 3.6 months [95% CI: 3.3 months, 3.7 months] vs 5.4 months [95% CI: 5.0 months, 5.5 months], respectively [P < .01]). Conclusion The most common causes for radiologic progression of renal cell carcinoma were based on non-target disease and new lesions rather than change in target lesions, despite this being considered uncommon in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 literature. © RSNA, 2019 See also the editorial by Kuhl in this issue.