MRI, Clinical Examination, and Mammography for Preoperative Assessment of Residual Disease and Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: ACRIN 6657 Trial

Impact of margin distance on recurrence and survival following breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Current evidence does not support the application of "no-ink-on-tumor" negative margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in breast cancer (BC) patients who have received neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). We compared loco-regional free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) based on different tumor margin distance thresholds in a cohort of 235 BC patients treated with NST and subsequent BCS between 01/2015 and 12/2019. The 5-year LRFS was 81.6% in patients with "no-ink-on-tumour", margins and 71.0% in those with positive margins (p = 0.584). Margins >1 mm were associated with superior outcomes, with a 5-year LRFS of 84.0% compared to 69.3% in patients with margins ≤1 mm (p = 0.005). Additionally, margins >1 mm were significantly correlated with longer DFS (p = 0.028) and OS (p = 0.001). These findings suggest that a surgical margin distance >1 mm provides the best LRFS, DFS, and OS outcomes for this group of BC patients.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are invasive carcinomas that lack ER and PR expression and also lack amplification or overexpression of HER2. Triple-negative breast cancers are histopathologically diverse, with the majority classified as invasive breast carcinomas of no special type with a basal-like profile. Triple-negative breast cancer is the most aggressive molecular subtype of invasive breast carcinoma, with the highest rates of stage-matched mortality and regional recurrence. Triple-negative breast cancer has a younger median age of diagnosis than other molecular subtypes and is disproportionately diagnosed in Black women and BRCA1 germline pathogenic mutation carriers. On US and mammography, TNBCs are most often seen as a noncircumscribed mass without calcifications; TNBCs can have circumscribed margins and mimic a cyst or have probably benign features that may result in delayed diagnosis. MRI is the most sensitive modality for detecting TNBC, with rim enhancement being a common feature, and MRI is also the most accurate imaging for assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Understanding the radiologic and pathologic findings of TNBC can aid in diagnosis.

Digital mammography with AI-based computer-aided diagnosis to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer patients: comparison with MRI

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether digital mammography (DM) with artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD) predicts pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative (TN) breast cancers and compare performance with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-center study, patients who underwent NAC and surgery for HER2-positive or TN cancers between September 2020 and August 2021 were retrospectively selected to develop prediction models for pCR after NAC. From a prospective ASLAN (Avoid axillary Sentinel Lymph node biopsy After Neoadjuvant chemotherapy) trial, HER2-positive and TN cancer patients who underwent NAC and surgery between December 2021 and July 2022 were prospectively selected for model validation. Clinical-pathologic data and DM and MRI scans were obtained before and after NAC. Logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with pCR for model development and four models (clinical-pathologic, MRI, DM-AI-CAD, and combined) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 259 women (mean age, 53 years ± 10.5 [SD]) constituted the development cohort and 119 (50.8 years ± 11.1) the validation cohort. Age, clinical N stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Ki-67 were incorporated into the clinical-pathologic model. In the validation cohort, the DM-AI-CAD model, applying AI-CAD score ≤ 16 on post-NAC DM as the radiologic CR criterion, showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) compared to the clinical-pathologic model (0.72 vs. 0.62; p = 0.01) for pCR. However, the MRI model showed the highest AUC (0.83), then the combined model (0.78).

CONCLUSION

The model utilizing post-NAC DM with AI-CAD score ≤ 16 predicted pCR more accurately than the clinical-pathologic model in HER2-positive and TN cancers but was inferior to the MRI model.

KEY POINTS

Question The performance of digital mammography (DM) with AI-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD) for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unclear. Findings The DM-AI-CAD model incorporating AI-CAD score ≤ 16 on post-NAC DM predicted pCR more accurately than the clinical-pathologic model but not the MRI model. Clinical relevance The DM-AI-CAD model has potential to predict pCR after NAC in breast cancer patients for whom MRI is unavailable or contraindicated.

Frequency and outcomes of new or suspicious MRI findings on breast MRI for patients on neoadjuvant therapy

PURPOSE

To assess the frequency and outcomes of indeterminate enhancing findings on breast MRI unrelated to the index primary tumor(s) in patients on neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective review identified all diagnostic breast MRIs performed to evaluate response to NAT at our institution between 2017 and 2020. All exams with indeterminate enhancing findings (BI-RADS 3-5) unrelated to the index tumor(s) for which follow-up imaging or tissue diagnosis was recommended were included. Cases lacking a pre-treatment MRI or those with insufficient follow-up were excluded. Imaging of all post-NAT breast MRIs were re-reviewed. The electronic medical record was reviewed to evaluate patient and lesion characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2020, 614/4042 (15.2%) breast MRIs were performed to evaluate response to NAT. After exclusions, 38 of these exams (6.2%) identified 42 indeterminate enhancing findings unrelated to the index tumor for which follow-up imaging (15 exams) or tissue diagnosis (23 exams) was recommended. Fifteen of 42 (35.7%) of the findings were new compared to the pre-treatment baseline MRI, 8/42 (19.0%) increased and 19/42 (45.2%) were present on pre-treatment MRI. Most findings were contralateral to the index tumor (28, 66.7%). Findings were masses (17, 40.4%), focus (15, 35.7%), and non-mass enhancement (10, 23.8%). Of the 42 findings, 19 (45.2%) underwent percutaneous biopsy, 10 (23.8%) underwent surgical biopsy or mastectomy, and 13 (31%) were followed by imaging. Thirty-seven were benign, 4 were high-risk lesions without upgrade (atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, and papillomatosis with atypical ductal hyperplasia), and one (2.4%) was malignant (invasive lobular carcinoma), which was non-mass enhancement present on the pre-treatment MRI.

CONCLUSION

Indeterminate enhancing lesions unrelated to the index tumor(s) on breast MRIs performed to assess response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are uncommon. When present, these lesions have an extremely low likelihood of malignancy, especially when new compared to the pre-treatment MRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Because incidental indeterminate enhancing lesions on breast MRI at post-NAT follow-up are rarely malignant, radiologists should be judicious in recommending follow-up or tissue diagnosis for such lesions after NAT.

Ultrasonographic accuracy in evaluating response of clipped lymph nodes in targeted axillary dissection in breast cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in assessing the response of clipped axillary lymph nodes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Between February 2022 and September 2023, 43 patients who underwent axillary lymph node marking for targeted axillary dissection were retrospectively analyzed. Ultrasonography parameters such as the number, size, shape, cortical thickness, hilum status, and treatment response of the clipped lymph node were assessed. Post-surgery pathology results served as the gold standard. Ultrasonography revealed 70% complete and 30% partial response, while pathology results showed 51% complete response, 9% micro-metastases, and 40% macro-metastases. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography was 81.4%, with 61.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity. A significant correlation was found between clipped node response in ultrasound and pathology. Additionally, a notable association was observed between clipped node response on ultrasonography, molecular subtype of the breast mass, and the mass's response to NAC. Assessing the treatment response of clipped lymph nodes with preoperative ultrasound, followed by surgical excision using needle wire localization, can be a viable alternative to axillary dissection, offering low false-negative rates.

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and change in tumor load on MRI to assess response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to explore if the combination of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and change in tumor load on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging leads to better assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer, compared to either alone.

METHODS

In 190 NAC treated patients, MRI scans were performed before and at the end of treatment. The percentage of stromal TILs (%TILs) was assessed in pre-NAC biopsies according to established criteria. Prediction models were developed with linear regression by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and cross validation (CV), with residual cancer burden as the dependent variable. Discrimination for pathological complete response (pCR) was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). We used Cox regression analysis for exploring the association between %TILs and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients reached pCR. In all patients, the %TILs model and change in MRI tumor load model had an estimated CV AUC of 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.78) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.61-0.79), respectively, whereas a model combining the variables resulted in an estimated CV AUC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.83). In the group with tumors that were ER positive and HER2 negative (ER+/HER2-) and in the group with tumors that were either triple negative or HER2 positive (TN&HER2+) separately, the combined model reached an estimated CV AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.60-0.88) and 0.70(95% CI 0.59-0.82), respectively. A significant association was observed between pre-treatment %TILS and RFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.72 (95% CI 0.53-0.98), for every standard deviation increase in %TILS, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

The combination of TILs and MRI is informative of response to NAC in patients with both ER+/HER2- and TN&HER2+ tumors.

Prediction of early clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Triple-negative breast cancer: Incorporating Radiomics through breast MRI

This study assessed pretreatment breast MRI coupled with machine learning for predicting early clinical responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), focusing on identifying non-responders. A retrospective analysis of 135 TNBC patients (107 responders, 28 non-responders) treated with NAC from January 2015 to October 2022 was conducted. Non-responders were defined according to RECIST guidelines. Data included clinicopathologic factors and clinical MRI findings, with radiomics features from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, to train a stacking ensemble of 13 machine learning models. For subgroup analysis, propensity score matching was conducted to adjust for clinical disparities in NAC response. The efficacy of the models was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) before and after matching. The model combining clinicopathologic factors and clinical MRI findings achieved an AUROC of 0.752 (95% CI 0.644-0.860) for predicting non-responders, while radiomics-based models showed 0.749 (95% CI 0.614-0.884). An integrated model of radiomics, clinicopathologic factors, and clinical MRI findings reached an AUROC of 0.802 (95% CI 0.699-0.905). After propensity score matching, the hierarchical order of key radiomics features remained consistent. Our study demonstrated the potential of using machine learning models based on pretreatment MRI to non-invasively predict TNBC non-responders to NAC.

Unveiling Neoadjuvant Therapy: Insights and Outlooks for HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

This perspective underscores the evolution and significance of neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer, tracing its history and efficacy in improving outcomes. It delves into the correlation between achieving complete response and long-term survival, emphasizing the predictive value of treatment response estimation. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer, particularly with taxanes and anti-HER2 therapies, emerges as a cornerstone, offering enhanced breast conservation rates and prognostic insights. The focus on individualized care, tailored to treatment response, underscores the need for adaptive strategies. Additionally, the article discusses the ongoing debate surrounding anthracyclines' role and the benefits of dual HER2 blockade. Ultimately, advocating for a personalized approach, guided by treatment response assessment, ensures optimal outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer management.

Imaging evaluation focused on microstructural tissue changes using tensor-valued diffusion encoding in breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: is it a promising way forward?

Background

Single diffusion encoding is a widely used, noninvasive technique for probing the tissue microstructure in breast tumors. However, it does not provide detailed information about the microenvironmental complexity. This study investigated the clinical utility of tensor-valued diffusion encoding for evaluating microstructural changes in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Methods

We retrospectively included patients underwent chemotherapy for histologically proven invasive breast cancer between July 2020 and June 2023 and monitored the tumor response with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including tensor-valued diffusion encoding. We reviewed pre- and post-NAC MRIs regarding chemotherapy in 23 breast cancers. Q-space trajectory imaging (QTI) parameters were estimated at each time-point, and were compared with histopathological parameters.

Results

The mean total mean kurtosis (MKT), anisotropic mean kurtosis (MKA), and microscopic fractional anisotropy (µFA) were significantly decreased on post-NAC MRI compared with pre-NAC MRI, with the large effect size (ES) in MKA and µFA (0.81±0.41 vs. 0.99±0.33, ES: 0.48, P=0.03; 0.48±0.30 vs. 0.73±0.27, ES: 0.88, P<0.001; 0.58±0.14 vs. 0.68±0.11, ES: 0.79, P=0.003; respectively). Regarding prognostic factors, tumors with high Ki-67 expression showed significantly lower pre-NAC mean diffusivity (MD) and higher pre-NAC µFA compared to tumors with low Ki-67 expression (0.98±0.09 vs. 1.25±0.20, P=0.002; and 0.72±0.07 vs. 0.57±0.10, P=0.005; respectively). And negative progesterone receptor (PR) group revealed significantly lower MKT, MKA, and isotropic mean kurtosis than positive PR group on the post-NAC MRI (0.60±0.31 vs. 1.03±0.40, P=0.008; 0.36±0.21 vs. 0.61±0.33, P=0.04; and 0.23±0.17 vs. 0.42±0.25, P=0.046; respectively).

Conclusions

QTI parameters reflected the microstructural changes in breast cancer treated with NAC and can be used as noninvasive imaging biomarkers correlated with prognostic factors.

Non-contrast-enhanced breast MRI for evaluation of tumor volume change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (3D-Ce-MRI) is a most powerful tool for evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, the use of contrast agent is invasive, expensive, and time consuming, Thus, contrast agent-free imaging is preferable. We aimed to investigate the tumor volume change after NAC using maximum intensity projection diffusion-weighted image (MIP-DWI) and 3D-Ce-MRI.

METHOD

We finally enrolled 55 breast cancer patients who underwent NAC in 2018. All MRI analyses were performed using SYNAPSE VINCENT® medical imaging system (Fujifilm Medical, Tokyo, Japan). We evaluated the tumor volumes before, during, and after NAC. Tumor volume before NAC on 3D-Ce-MRI was termed Pre-CE and those during and after NAC were termed Post-CE. The observer raised the lower end of the window width until the tumor was clearly visible and then manually deleted the non-tumor tissues. A month thereafter, the same observer who was blinded to the 3D-Ce-MRI results randomly evaluated the tumor volumes (Pre-DWI and Post-DWI) using MIP-DWI with the same method. Tumor volume change between ΔCE (Pre-CE - Post-CE/Pre-CE) and ΔDWI (Pre-DWI - Post-DWI/Pre-DWI) and the processing time for both methods (Time-DWI and Time-CE) were compared.

RESULTS

We enrolled 55 patients. Spearman's rho between ΔDWI and ΔCE for pure mass lesions, and non-mass enhancement (NME) was 0.89 (p < 0.01), 0.63(p < 0.01) respectively. Time-DWI was significantly shorter than Time-CE (41.3 ± 21.2 and 199.5 ± 98.3 respectively, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-contrast-enhanced Breast MRI enables appropriate and faster evaluation of tumor volume change after NAC than 3D-Ce-MRI especially for mass lesions.

Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus MR Imaging of the Breast

Breast MR imaging and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) are both techniques that employ intravenously injected contrast agent to assess breast lesions. This approach is associated with a very high sensitivity for malignant lesions that typically exhibit rapid enhancement due to the leakiness of neovasculature. CEM may be readily available at the breast imaging department and can be performed on the spot. Breast MR imaging provides stronger enhancement than the x-ray-based techniques and offers higher sensitivity. From a patient perspective, both modalities have their benefits and downsides; thus, patient preference could also play a role in the selection of the imaging technique.

Explainable 3D CNN based on baseline breast DCE-MRI to give an early prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

So far, baseline Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) has played a key role for the application of sophisticated artificial intelligence-based models using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to extract quantitative imaging information as earlier indicators of pathological Complete Response (pCR) achievement in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, these models did not exploit the DCE-MRI exams in their full geometry as 3D volume but analysed only few individual slices independently, thus neglecting the depth information.

METHOD

This study aimed to develop an explainable 3D CNN, which fulfilled the task of pCR prediction before the beginning of NAC, by leveraging the 3D information of post-contrast baseline breast DCE-MRI exams. Specifically, for each patient, the network took in input a 3D sequence containing the tumor region, which was previously automatically identified along the DCE-MRI exam. A visual explanation of the decision-making process of the network was also provided.

RESULTS

To the best of our knowledge, our proposal is competitive than other models in the field, which made use of imaging data alone, reaching a median AUC value of 81.8%, 95%CI [75.3%; 88.3%], a median accuracy value of 78.7%, 95%CI [74.8%; 82.5%], a median sensitivity value of 69.8%, 95%CI [59.6%; 79.9%] and a median specificity value of 83.3%, 95%CI [82.6%; 84.0%], respectively. The median and CIs were computed according to a 10-fold cross-validation scheme for 5 rounds.

CONCLUSION

Finally, this proposal holds high potential to support clinicians on non-invasively early pursuing or changing patient-centric NAC pathways.

MRI-based tumor shrinkage patterns after early neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: correlation with molecular subtypes and pathological response after therapy

BACKGROUND

MRI-based tumor shrinkage patterns (TSP) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) have been associated with pathological response. However, the understanding of TSP after early NAT remains limited. We aimed to analyze the relationship between TSP after early NAT and pathological response after therapy in different molecular subtypes.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled participants with invasive ductal breast cancers who received NAT and performed pretreatment DCE-MRI from September 2020 to August 2022. Early-stage MRIs were performed after the first (1st-MRI) and/or second (2nd-MRI) cycle of NAT. Tumor shrinkage patterns were categorized into four groups: concentric shrinkage, diffuse decrease (DD), decrease of intensity only (DIO), and stable disease (SD). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables associated with pathologic complete response (pCR), and stratified analysis according to tumor hormone receptor (HR)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) disease subtype.

RESULTS

344 participants (mean age: 50 years, 113/345 [33%] pCR) with 345 tumors (1 bilateral) had evaluable 1st-MRI or 2nd-MRI to comprise the primary analysis cohort, of which 244 participants with 245 tumors had evaluable 1st-MRI (82/245 [33%] pCR) and 206 participants with 207 tumors had evaluable 2nd-MRI (69/207 [33%] pCR) to comprise the 1st- and 2nd-timepoint subgroup analysis cohorts, respectively. In the primary analysis, multivariate analysis showed that early DD pattern (OR = 12.08; 95% CI 3.34-43.75; p < 0.001) predicted pCR independently of the change in tumor size (OR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.94-2.01; p = 0.106) in HR+/HER2- subtype, and the change in tumor size was a strong pCR predictor in HER2+ (OR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.22-2.13; p = 0.001) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC, OR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.22-2.11; p = 0.001). Compared with the change in tumor size, the SD pattern achieved a higher negative predictive value in HER2+ and TNBC. The statistical significance of complete 1st-timepoint subgroup analysis was consistent with the primary analysis.

CONCLUSION

The diffuse decrease pattern in HR+/HER2- subtype and stable disease in HER2+ and TNBC after early NAT could serve as additional straightforward and comprehensible indicators of treatment response.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration at https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2000038578, registered September 24, 2020.

Optimizing surgical strategy in locally advanced breast cancer: a comparative analysis between preoperative MRI and postoperative pathology after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

In the treatment of breast cancer, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is often used as systemic treatment followed by tumor excision. In this context, planning the operation with regard to excision margins relies on tumor size measured by MRI. The actual tumor size can be determined through pathologic evaluation. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation and agreement between pre-operative MRI and postoperative pathological evaluation.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-three breast cancer patients that underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent breast surgery were retrospectively included between January 2013 and July 2016. Preoperative tumor diameters determined with MRI were compared with postoperative tumor diameters determined by pathological analysis. Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman agreement methods were used. Results were subjected to subgroup analysis based on histological subtype (ER, HER2, ductal, lobular).

RESULTS

The correlation between tumor size at MRI and pathology was 0.63 for the whole group, 0.39 for subtype ER + /HER2-, 0.51 for ER + /HER2 + , 0.63 for ER-/HER2 +, and 0.85 for ER-/HER2-. The mean difference and limits of agreement (LoA) between tumor size measured MRI vs. pathological assessment was 4.6 mm (LoA -27.0-36.3 mm, n = 195). Mean differences and LoA for subtype ER + /HER2- was 7.6 mm (LoA -31.3-46.5 mm, n = 100), for ER + /HER2 + 0.9 mm (LoA -8.5-10.2 mm, n = 33), for ER-/HER2+ -1.2 mm (LoA -5.1-7.5 mm, n = 21), and for ER-/HER- -0.4 mm (LoA -8.6-7.7 mm, n = 41).

CONCLUSION

HER2 + and ER-/HER2- tumor subtypes showed clear correlation and agreement between preoperative MRI and postoperative pathological assessment of tumor size. This suggests that MRI evaluation could be a suitable predictor to guide the surgical approach. Conversely, correlation and agreement for ER + /HER2- and lobular tumors was poor, evidenced by a difference in tumor size of up to 5 cm. Hence, we demonstrate that histological tumor subtype should be taken into account when planning breast conserving surgery after NAC.

Contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Current status and future challenges

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced breast MRI and recently also contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) are available for breast imaging. The aim of the current overview is to explore existing evidence and ongoing challenges of contrast-enhanced breast imaging.

METHODS

This narrative provides an introduction to the contrast-enhanced breast imaging modalities breast MRI and CEM. Underlying principle, techniques and BI-RADS reporting of both techniques are described and compared, and the following indications and ongoing challenges are discussed: problem-solving, high-risk screening, supplemental screening in women with extremely dense breast tissue, breast implants, neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) response monitoring, MRI-guided and CEM- guided biopsy.

RESULTS

Technique and reporting for breast MRI are standardised, for the newer CEM standardisation is in progress. Similarly, compared to other modalities, breast MRI is well established as superior for problem-solving, screening women at high risk, screening women with extremely dense breast tissue or with implants; and for monitoring response to NST. Furthermore, MRI-guided biopsy is a reliable technique with low long-term false negative rates. For CEM, data is as yet either absent or limited, but existing results in these settings are promising.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced breast imaging achieves highest diagnostic performance and should be considered essential. Of the two contrast-enhanced modalities, evidence of breast MRI superiority is ample, and preliminary results on CEM are promising, yet CEM warrants further study.

Evaluation of Treatment Response in Patients with Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) remains one of the leading causes of death among women. The management and outcome in BC are strongly influenced by a multidisciplinary approach, which includes available treatment options and different imaging modalities for accurate response assessment. Among breast imaging modalities, MR imaging is the modality of choice in evaluating response to neoadjuvant therapy, whereas F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, conventional computed tomography (CT), and bone scan play a vital role in assessing response to therapy in metastatic BC. There is an unmet need for a standardized patient-centric approach to use different imaging methods for response assessment.

Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: Recent Advances in Imaging and Current Limitations

Breast cancer detection has a significant impact on population health. Although there are many breast imaging modalities, mammography is the predominant tool for breast cancer screening. The introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis to mammography has contributed to increased cancer detection rates and decreased recall rates. In average-risk women, starting annual screening mammography at age 40 years has demonstrated the highest mortality reduction. In intermediate- and high-risk women as well as in those with dense breasts, additional modalities, including MRI, ultrasound, and molecular breast imaging, can also be considered for adjunct screening to improve the detection of mammographically occult malignancy.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Histopathologic Features, Genomics, and Treatment

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous and aggressive group of tumors that are defined by the absence of estrogen and progesterone receptors and lack of ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu) overexpression. TNBC accounts for 8%-13% of breast cancers. In addition, it accounts for a higher proportion of breast cancers in younger women compared with those in older women, and it disproportionately affects non-Hispanic Black women. TNBC has high metastatic potential, and the risk of recurrence is highest during the 5 years after it is diagnosed. TNBC exhibits benign morphologic imaging features more frequently than do other breast cancer subtypes. Mammography can be suboptimal for early detection of TNBC owing to factors that include the fast growth of this cancer, increased mammographic density in young women, and lack of the typical features of malignancy at imaging. US is superior to mammography for TNBC detection, but benign-appearing features can lead to misdiagnosis. Breast MRI is the most sensitive modality for TNBC detection. Most cases of TNBC are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgery and radiation. MRI is the modality of choice for evaluating the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Survival rates for individuals with TNBC are lower than those for persons with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive cancers. The 5-year survival rates for patients with localized, regional, and distant disease at diagnosis are 91.3%, 65.8%, and 12.0%, respectively. The early success of immunotherapy has raised hope regarding the development of personalized strategies to treat TNBC. Imaging and tumor biomarkers are likely to play a crucial role in the prediction of TNBC treatment response and TNBC patient survival in the future. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancer: evolution, indication, and tailored treatment strategy

In recent years, endocrine therapy (ET), an effective systemic treatment for the management of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers, has regained interest as a neoadjuvant therapy based on evidence that ET can fulfill the aim of neoadjuvant systemic treatment for tumor shrinkage as well as elucidate important clinical information on endocrine sensitivity that enables the prognostication of patients. Moreover, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) potentially provides an opportunity for early assessment of the clinical efficacy of novel agents. Furthermore, recently reported trials have generated evidence for a more tailored approach for perioperative management of ER-positive breast cancer using clinical and molecular biomarkers, and this has provided a rationale that enables the broadening of clinical indications for NET. This review discusses the current evidence for NET, the evolution of NET trials, clinical indications, and NET-based treatment strategies.

Correlation between synthetic MRI relaxometry and apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer subtypes with different neoadjuvant therapy response

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the correlation between synthetic MRI (syMRI) relaxometry and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in different breast cancer subtypes and treatment response subgroups.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-three neoadjuvant therapy (NAT)-treated breast cancer patients with baseline MRI were enrolled. Tumor annotations were obtained by drawing regions of interest (ROIs) along the lesion on T1/T2/PD and ADC maps respectively. Histogram features from T1/T2/PD and ADC maps were respectively calculated, and the correlation between each pair of identical features was analyzed. Meanwhile, features between different NAT treatment response groups were compared, and their discriminatory power was evaluated.

RESULTS

Among all patients, 20 out of 27 pairs of features weakly correlated (r = - 0.13-0.30). For triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), features from PD map in the pathological complete response (pCR) group (r = 0.60-0.86) showed higher correlation with ADC than that of the non-pCR group (r = 0.30-0.43), and the mean from the ADC and PD maps in the pCR group strongly correlated (r = 0.86). For HER2-positive, few correlations were found both in the pCR and non-pCR groups. For luminal HER2-negative, T2 map correlated more with ADC than T1 and PD maps. Significant differences were seen in T2 low percentiles and median in the luminal-HER2 negative subtype, yielding moderate AUCs (0.68/0.72/0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between ADC and PD maps in TNBC may indicate different NAT responses. The no-to-weak correlation between the ADC and syMRI suggests their complementary roles in tumor microenvironment evaluation.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The relationship between ADC and PD maps in TNBC may indicate different NAT responses, and the no-to-weak correlation between the ADC and syMRI suggests their complementary roles in tumor microenvironment evaluation.

KEY POINTS

• The relationship between ADC and PD in TNBC indicates different NAT responses. • The no-to-weak correlations between ADC and syMRI complementarily evaluate tumor microenvironment. • T2 low percentiles and median predict NAT response in luminal-HER2-negative subtype.

Comparison of MRI vs. [18F]FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Primary Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Literature Review and Future Perspectives

The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/CT and breast MRI for primary breast cancer (BC) response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to evaluate future perspectives in this setting. We performed a critical review using three bibliographic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) for articles published up to the 6 June 2023, starting from 2012. The Quality Assessment of Diagnosis Accuracy Study (QUADAS-2) tool was adopted to evaluate the risk of bias. A total of 76 studies were identified and screened, while 14 articles were included in our systematic review after a full-text assessment. The total number of patients included was 842. Eight out of fourteen studies (57.1%) were prospective, while all except one study were conducted in a single center. In the majority of the included studies (71.4%), 3.0 Tesla (T) MRI scans were adopted. Three out of fourteen studies (21.4%) used both 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI and only two used 1.5 T. [18F]FDG was the radiotracer used in every study included. All patients accepted surgical treatment after NAC and each study used pathological complete response (pCR) as the reference standard. Some of the studies have demonstrated the superiority of [18F]FDG PET/CT, while others proved that MRI was superior to PET/CT. Recent studies indicate that PET/CT has a better specificity, while MRI has a superior sensitivity for assessing pCR in BC patients after NAC. The complementary value of the combined use of these modalities represents probably the most important tool to improve diagnostic performance in this setting. Overall, larger prospective studies, possibly randomized, are needed, hopefully evaluating PET/MR and allowing for new tools, such as radiomic parameters, to find a proper place in the setting of BC patients undergoing NAC.

Imaging findings for response evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

In approximately 45% of invasive breast cancer (IBC) patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is present. Recent studies suggest response of DCIS to NST. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarise and examine the current literature on imaging findings for different imaging modalities evaluating DCIS response to NST. More specifically, imaging findings of DCIS pre- and post-NST, and the effect of different pathological complete response (pCR) definitions, will be evaluated on mammography, breast MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM).

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies investigating NST response of IBC, including information on DCIS. Imaging findings and response evaluation of DCIS were assessed for mammography, breast MRI, and CEM. A meta-analysis was conducted per imaging modality to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting residual disease between pCR definition no residual invasive disease (ypT0/is) and no residual invasive or in situ disease (ypT0).

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were included. Calcifications on mammography are related to DCIS, but can persist despite complete response of DCIS. In 20 breast MRI studies, an average of 57% of residual DCIS showed enhancement. A meta-analysis of 17 breast MRI studies confirmed higher pooled sensitivity (0.86 versus 0.82) and lower pooled specificity (0.61 versus 0.68) for detection of residual disease when DCIS is considered pCR (ypT0/is). Three CEM studies suggest the potential benefit of simultaneous evaluation of calcifications and enhancement.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Calcifications on mammography can remain despite complete response of DCIS, and residual DCIS does not always show enhancement on breast MRI and CEM. Moreover, pCR definition effects diagnostic performance of breast MRI. Given the lack of evidence on imaging findings of response of the DCIS component to NST, further research is demanded.

KEY POINTS

• Ductal carcinoma in situ has shown to be responsive to neoadjuvant systemic therapy, but imaging studies mainly focus on response of the invasive tumour. • The 31 included studies demonstrate that after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, calcifications on mammography can remain despite complete response of DCIS and residual DCIS does not always show enhancement on MRI and contrast-enhanced mammography. • The definition of pCR has impact on the diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting residual disease, and when DCIS is considered pCR, pooled sensitivity was slightly higher and pooled specificity slightly lower.

Biopsy-Guided Pathological Response Assessment in Breast Cancer is Insufficient: Additional Pathology Findings of the MICRA Trial

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) leads to pathologic complete response (pCR) in 10-89% of breast cancer patients depending on subtype. The added value of surgery is uncertain in patients who reach pCR; however, current imaging and biopsy techniques aiming to predict pCR are not accurate enough. This study aims to quantify the residual disease remaining after NST in patients with a favorable response on MRI and residual disease missed with biopsies.

METHODS

In the MICRA trial, patients with a favorable response to NST on MRI underwent ultrasound-guided post-NST 14G biopsies followed by surgery. We analyzed pathology reports of the biopsies and the surgical specimens. Primary outcome was the extent of residual invasive disease among molecular subtypes, and secondary outcome was the extent of missed residual invasive disease.

RESULTS

We included 167 patients. Surgical specimen showed residual invasive disease in 69 (41%) patients. The median size of residual invasive disease was 18 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 12-30) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) patients, 8 mm (IQR 3-15) in HR+/HER2-positive (HER2+) patients, 4 mm (IQR 2-9) in HR-negative (HR-)/HER2+ patients, and 5 mm (IQR 2-11) in triple-negative (TN) patients. Residual invasive disease was missed in all subtypes varying from 4 to 7 mm.

CONCLUSION

Although the extent of residual invasive disease is small in TN and HER2+ subtypes, substantial residual invasive disease is left behind in all subtypes with 14G biopsies. This may hamper local control and limits adjuvant systemic treatment options. Therefore, surgical excision remains obligatory until accuracy of imaging and biopsy techniques improve.

Effect of Longitudinal Variation in Tumor Volume Estimation for MRI-guided Personalization of Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Treatment

Purpose To investigate the impact of longitudinal variation in functional tumor volume (FTV) underestimation and overestimation in predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials and Methods Women with breast cancer who were enrolled in the prospective I-SPY 2 TRIAL (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response with Imaging and Molecular Analysis 2) from May 2010 to November 2016 were eligible for this retrospective analysis. Participants underwent four MRI examinations during NAC treatment. FTV was calculated based on automated segmentation. Baseline FTV before treatment (FTV0) and the percentage of FTV change at early treatment and inter-regimen time points relative to baseline (∆FTV1 and ∆FTV2, respectively) were classified into high-standard or standard groups based on visual assessment of FTV under- and overestimation. Logistic regression models predicting pCR using single predictors (FTV0, ∆FTV1, and ∆FTV2) and multiple predictors (all three) were developed using bootstrap resampling with out-of-sample data evaluation with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) independently in each group. Results This study included 432 women (mean age, 49.0 years ± 10.6 [SD]). In the FTV0 model, the high-standard and standard groups showed similar AUCs (0.61 vs 0.62). The high-standard group had a higher estimated AUC compared with the standard group in the ∆FTV1 (0.74 vs 0.63), ∆FTV2 (0.79 vs 0.62), and multiple predictor models (0.85 vs 0.64), with a statistically significant difference for the latter two models (P = .03 and P = .01, respectively). Conclusion The findings in this study suggest that longitudinal variation in FTV estimation needs to be considered when using early FTV change as an MRI-based criterion for breast cancer treatment personalization. Keywords: Breast, Cancer, Dynamic Contrast-enhanced, MRI, Tumor Response ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01042379 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023 See also the commentary by Ram in this issue.

Abbreviated Versus Full-Protocol MRI for Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response Assessment: Diagnostic Performance by General and Breast Radiologists

BACKGROUND. Abbreviated protocols could allow wider adoption of MRI in patients undergoing breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, abbreviated MRI has been explored primarily in screening settings. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to compare diagnostic performance of abbreviated MRI and full-protocol MRI for evaluation of breast cancer NAC response, stratifying by radiologists' breast imaging expertise. METHODS. This retrospective study included 203 patients with breast cancer (mean age, 52.1 ± 11.2 [SD] years) from two hospitals who underwent MRI before NAC initiation and after NAC completion before surgical resection from March 2017 to April 2021. Abbreviated MRI was extracted from full-protocol MRI and included the axial T2-weighted sequence and precontrast and single early postcontrast T1-weighted sequences. Three general radiologists and three breast radiologists independently interpreted abbreviated and full-protocol MRI in separate sessions, identifying enhancing lesions to indicate residual tumor and measuring lesion size. The reference standard was presence and size of residual tumor on pathologic assessment of post-NAC surgical specimens. RESULTS. A total of 50 of 203 patients had pathologic complete response (pCR). Intraobserver and interobserver agreement for abbreviated and full-protocol MRI for general and breast radiologists ranged from substantial to nearly perfect (κ = 0.70-0.81). Abbreviated MRI compared with full-protocol MRI showed no significant difference for general radiologists in sensitivity (54.7% vs 57.3%, p > .99), specificity (92.8% vs 95.6%, p = .29), or accuracy (83.4% vs 86.2%, p = .30), nor for breast radiologists in sensitivity (60.0% vs 61.3%, p > .99), specificity (94.6% vs 97.4%, p = .22), or accuracy (86.0% vs 88.5%, p = .30). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were not significantly different between protocols for any reader individually (p > .05). Mean difference in residual tumor size on MRI relative to pathology for abbreviated protocol ranged for general radiologists from -0.19 to 0.03 mm and for breast radiologists from -0.15 to -0.05 mm, and for full protocol ranged for general radiologists from 0.57 to 0.65 mm and for breast radiologists from 0.66 to 0.79 mm. CONCLUSION. Abbreviated compared with full-protocol MRI showed similar intraobserver and interobserver agreement and no significant difference in diagnostic performance. Full-protocol MRI but not abbreviated MRI slightly overestimated pathologic tumor sizes. CLINICAL IMPACT. Abbreviated protocols may facilitate use of MRI for post-NAC response assessment by general and breast radiologists.

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and radiological picture of the tumor

Tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex entity that includes besides the tumor cells also a whole range of immune cells. Among various populations of immune cells infiltrating the tumor, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a population of lymphocytes characterized by high reactivity against the tumor component. As, TILs play a key role in mediating responses to several types of therapy and significantly improve patient outcomes in some cancer types including for instance breast cancer and lung cancer, their assessment has become a good predictive tool in the evaluation of potential treatment efficacy. Currently, the evaluation of the density of TILs infiltration is performed by histopathological. However, recent studies have shed light on potential utility of several imaging methods, including ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), and radiomics, in the assessment of TILs levels. The greatest attention concerning the utility of radiology methods is directed to breast and lung cancers, nevertheless imaging methods of TILs are constantly being developed also for other malignancies. Here, we focus on reviewing the radiological methods used to assess the level of TILs in different cancer types and on the extraction of the most favorable radiological features assessed by each method.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer: 2022 Update

Imaging plays a vital role in managing patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as treatment decisions rely heavily on accurate assessment of response to therapy. This document provides evidence-based guidelines for imaging breast cancer before, during, and after initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Correlation of Mammographic Microcalcifications with Final Surgical Pathology After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Imaging guidelines for post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) breast cancer patients lack specificity on appropriateness and utility of individual modalities for surgical planning. Microcalcifications confound mammographic interpretation. We examined the correlation between the mammographic extent of microcalcifications present post-NAC, corresponding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions, and definitive surgical pathology.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with calcifications on mammography were collected from a database of consecutive breast cancer patients receiving NAC. The primary objective was to determine the correlation between maximum dimension of post-NAC calcifications with surgical pathology (invasive disease, tumor bed, and ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]), stratified by tumor receptor subgroup. Secondarily, we examined the correlation of residual disease with MRI mass enhancement (ME) and non-ME (NME). Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate statistical significance (strong: R² ≥70%; moderate: R²=25-70%; weak: R² ≤25%).

RESULTS

Overall, 186 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mammographic calcifications correlated poorly with invasive disease (R² = 10.8%), overestimating by 57%. In patients with calcifications on mammography, MRI ME and NME correlated weakly with the maximum dimension of invasive disease and DCIS. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, invasive disease correlated strongly with the maximum dimension of calcifications (R² = 83%) and moderately with ME (R² = 37.7%) and NME (R² = 28.4%).

CONCLUSION

Overall, current imaging techniques correlate poorly and overestimate final surgical pathology. This poor correlation may lead to uncertainty in the extent of required surgical excision and the exclusion of potential candidates for non-surgical management in ongoing trials. TNBCs would be good candidates for these trials given the stronger observed correlations between pathology and imaging.

Surgical Planning after Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Multimodality Imaging-Based Approach Focused on MRI

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) today represents a cornerstone in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer and highly chemo-sensitive tumors at early stages, increasing the possibilities of performing more conservative treatments and improving long term outcomes. Imaging has a fundamental role in the staging and prediction of the response to NACT, thus aiding surgical planning and avoiding overtreatment. In this review, we first examine and compare the role of conventional and advanced imaging techniques in preoperative T Staging after NACT and in the evaluation of lymph node involvement. In the second part, we analyze the different surgical approaches, discussing the role of axillary surgery, as well as the possibility of non-operative management after-NACT, which has been the subject of recent trials. Finally, we focus on emerging techniques that will change the diagnostic assessment of breast cancer in the near future.

Early Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Luminal B-like Subtype of Breast Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Prospective Study

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of multiparametric breast magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with luminal B subtype breast cancer. The prospective study included thirty-five patients treated with NAC for both early and locally advanced breast cancer of the luminal B subtype at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb between January 2015 and December 2018. All patients underwent breast mpMRI before and after two cycles of NAC. Evaluation of mpMRI examinations included analysis of both morphological (shape, margins, and pattern of enhancement) and kinetic characteristics (initial signal increase and post-initial behavior of the time-signal intensity curve), which were additionally interpreted with a Göttingen score (GS). Histopathological analysis of surgical specimens included grading the tumor response based on the residual cancer burden (RCB) grading system and revealed 29 NAC responders (RCB-0 (pCR), I, II) and 6 NAC non-responders (RCB-III). Changes in GS were compared with RCB classes. A lack of GS decrease after the second cycle of NAC is associated with RCB class and non-responders to NAC.

Surgical Management of the Axilla for Breast Cancer

This review discusses the contemporary surgical management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Surgical paradigms are highlighted by clinical nodal status at presentation and treatment approach, including upfront surgery and neoadjuvant systemic therapy settings. This review focuses on the increasing opportunities for de-escalating the extent of axillary surgery in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy, while also reviewing the remaining indications for axillary clearance with axillary lymph node dissection.

Multimodality Imaging Review of HER2-positive Breast Cancer and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu or ErbB2)-positive breast cancers comprise 15%-20% of all breast cancers. The most common manifestation of HER2-positive breast cancer at mammography or US is an irregular mass with spiculated margins that often contains calcifications; at MRI, HER2-positive breast cancer may appear as a mass or as nonmass enhancement. HER2-positive breast cancers are often of intermediate to high nuclear grade at histopathologic analysis, with increased risk of local recurrence and metastases and poorer overall prognosis. However, treatment with targeted monoclonal antibody therapies such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab provides better local-regional control and leads to improved survival outcome. With neoadjuvant treatments, including monoclonal antibodies, taxanes, and anthracyclines, women are now potentially able to undergo breast conservation therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy versus mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection. Thus, the radiologist's role in assessing the extent of local-regional disease and response to neoadjuvant treatment at imaging is important to inform surgical planning and adjuvant treatment. However, assessment of treatment response remains difficult, with the potential for different imaging modalities to result in underestimation or overestimation of disease to varying degrees when compared with surgical pathologic analysis. In particular, the presence of calcifications at mammography is especially difficult to correlate with the results of pathologic analysis after chemotherapy. Breast MRI findings remain the best predictor of pathologic response. The authors review the initial manifestations of HER2-positive tumors, the varied responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the challenges in assessing residual cancer burden through a multimodality imaging review with pathologic correlation. ^© RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Comparison of automated breast volume scanning with conventional ultrasonography, mammography, and MRI to assess residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy by molecular type

AIM

To compare the accuracy of hand-held ultrasonography (US), mammography (MG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) in defining residual breast cancer tumour size after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed breast cancer and who received NAT at the Breast Center, Peking University People's Hospital, were enrolled prospectively. Imaging was performed after the last cycle of NAT. The residual tumour size, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) to predict pathological complete response (pCR) were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients with 159 tumours were analysed. ABVS had a moderate correlation with histopathology residual tumour size (ICC = 0.666), and showed high agreement among triple-positive tumours (ICC = 0.797). With 5 mm as the threshold, the coincidence rate reached 64.7% between ABVS and pathological size, which was significantly higher than that between US, MG, MRI, and pathological size (50%, 45.1%, 41.4%; p=0.009, p=0.001, p<0.001, respectively). For ROC analysis, ABVS demonstrated a higher area under the ROC curve, but with no statistical difference, except for MG (0.855, 0.816, 0.819, and 0.788, respectively; p=0.183 for US, p=0.044 for MG, and p=0.397 for MRI, with ABVS as the reference).

CONCLUSIONS

The longest tumour diameter on ABVS had a moderate correlation with pathological residual invasive tumour size. ABVS was shown to have good ability to predict pCR and would appear to be a potential useful tool for the assessment after NAT for breast cancer.

Diagnostic performance of image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

Image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of the tumour bed, performed after neoadjuvant therapy, is increasingly being used to assess residual cancer and to potentially identify to identify pathological complete response (pCR). In this study, the accuracy of preoperative VABB specimens was assessed and compared with surgical specimens in patients with triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive invasive ductal breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. As a secondary endpoint, the performance of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast and PET-CT for response prediction was assessed.

METHODS

This single-institution prospective pilot study enrolled patients from April 2018 to April 2021 with a complete response on imaging (iCR) who subsequently underwent VABB before surgery. Those with a pCR at VABB were included in the primary analysis of the accuracy of VABB. The performance of imaging (MRI and PET-CT) was analysed for prediction of a pCR considering both patients with an iCR and those with residual disease at postneoadjuvant therapy imaging.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included in the primary analysis. The median age was 44 (range 35-51) years. At surgery, 18 of 20 patients showed a complete response (accuracy 90 (95 per cent exact c.i. 68 to 99) per cent). Only two patients showed residual ductal intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 and 3 respectively. In the secondary analysis, accuracy was similar for MRI and PET-CT (77 versus 78 per cent; P = 0.76).

CONCLUSION

VABB in patients with an iCR might be a promising method to select patients for de-escalation of surgical treatment in triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer. The present results support such an approach and should inform the design of future trials on de-escalation of surgery.

Changes in the tumor oxygenation but not in the tumor volume and tumor vascularization reflect early response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) allows for assessing tumor sensitivity to systemic treatment, planning adjuvant treatment and follow-up. However, a sufficiently large number of patients fail to achieve the desired level of pathological tumor response while optimal early response assessment methods have not been established now. In our study, we simultaneously assessed the early chemotherapy-induced changes in the tumor volume by ultrasound (US), the tumor oxygenation by diffuse optical spectroscopy imaging (DOSI), and the state of the tumor vascular bed by Doppler US to elaborate the predictive criteria of breast tumor response to treatment.

METHODS

A total of 133 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of invasive breast cancer stage II to III admitted to NACT following definitive breast surgery were enrolled, of those 103 were included in the final analysis. Tumor oxygenation by DOSI, tumor volume by US, and tumor vascularization by Doppler US were determined before the first and second cycle of NACT. After NACT completion, patients underwent surgery followed by pathological examination and assessment of the pathological tumor response. On the basis of these, data regression predictive models were created.

RESULTS

We observed changes in all three parameters 3 weeks after the start of the treatment. However, a high predictive potential for early assessment of tumor sensitivity to NACT demonstrated only the level of oxygenation, ΔStO₂, (ρ = 0.802, p ≤ 0.01). The regression model predicts the tumor response with a high probability of a correct conclusion (89.3%). The "Tumor volume" model and the "Vascularization index" model did not accurately predict the absence of a pathological tumor response to treatment (60.9% and 58.7%, respectively), while predicting a positive response to treatment was relatively better (78.9% and 75.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Diffuse optical spectroscopy imaging appeared to be a robust tool for early predicting breast cancer response to chemotherapy. It may help identify patients who need additional molecular genetic study of the tumor in order to find the source of resistance to treatment, as well as to correct the treatment regimen.

Assessment and Response to Neoadjuvant Treatments in Breast Cancer: Current Practice, Response Monitoring, Future Approaches and Perspectives

Neoadjuvant treatments (NAT) for breast cancer (BC) consist in the administration of chemotherapy-more rarely endocrine therapy-before surgery. Firstly, it was introduced 50 years ago to downsize locally advanced (inoperable) BCs. NAT are now widespread and so effective to be used also at the early stage of the disease. NAT are heterogeneous in terms of therapeutic patterns, class of used drugs, dosage, and duration. The poly-chemotherapy regimen and administration schedule are established by a multi-disciplinary team, according to the stage of disease, the tumor subtype and the age, the physical status, and the drug sensitivity of BC patients. Consequently, an accurate monitoring of treatment response can provide significant clinical advantages, such as the treatment de-escalation in case of early recognition of complete response or, on the contrary, the switch to an alternative treatment path in case of early detection of resistance to the ongoing therapy. Future is going toward increasingly personalized therapies and the prediction of individual response to treatment is the key to practice customized care pathways, preserving oncological safety and effectiveness. To gain such goal, the development of an accurate monitoring system, reproducible and reliable alone or as part of more complex diagnostic algorithms, will be promising.

Predicting pathological response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparing the performance of whole body 18F-FDG PETCT versus DCE-MRI of the breast

Background

With the expansion of the use of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), both dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET CT) are promising methods for assessment of the tumor response during chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of DCE-MRI of breast &18 F-FDG PETCT regarding the assessment of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced breast cancer patients (LABC) and pathologic complete response (pCR) prediction.

Results

A total of forty LABC patients who had NAC were included in the study. Before and during NAC, PET/CT and DCE-MRI were used. Various morphological and functional criteria were compared and linked with post-operative pathology for both. The MRI sensitivity and specificity in assessing NAC response in conjunction with pathological data were 100% (p = 0.001) and 12.5% (p = 0.18) respectively. The equivalent readings for PET/CT were 94.1% (p = 0.001) and 25% (p = 0.18), respectively, although the estimated total accuracy for both MRI and PETCT was the same measuring 94.1% (p = 0.001) and 25% (p = 0.18) (72%). PETCT had a higher overall accuracy than MRI in assessing the response of axillary lymph nodes (ALN) to NAC (64% and 56%, respectively). Longest diameter of lesion, ADC value, and maximal enhancement in baseline MRI, SUVmax and SUV mean in baseline PETCT were all significant predictors of rCR.

Conclusion

During NAC in the primary breast mass and ALN, DCE-MRI demonstrated a better sensitivity in predicting pCR in LABC patients. Although both MRI and PETCT were equally accurate in detecting pCR of LABC patients to NAC, PETCT was more accurate in detecting pathological response of ALN to NAC.

Predicting the Early Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy with Breast MR Morphological, Functional and Relaxometry Features-A Pilot Study

Aim: To evaluate the role of MR relaxometry and derived proton density analysis in the prediction of early treatment response after two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), in patients with breast cancer. Methods: This was a prospective study that included 59 patients with breast cancer, who underwent breast MRI prior (MRI1) and after two cycles of NAT (MRI2). The MRI1 included a sequential acquisition with five different TE’s (50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 ms) and a TR of 5000 ms. Post-processing was used to obtain the T2 relaxometry map from the MR acquisition. The tumor was delineated and seven relaxometry and proton density parameters were extracted. Additional histopathology data, T2 features and ADC were included. The response to NAT was reported based on the MRI2 as responders: partial response (>30% decreased size) and complete response (no visible tumor stable disease (SD); and non-responders: stable disease or progression (>20% increased size). Statistics was done using Medcalc software. Results: There were 50 (79.3%) patients with response and 13 (20.7%) non-responders to NAT. Age, histologic type, “in situ” component, tumor grade, estrogen and progesterone receptors, ki67% proliferation index and HER2 status were not associated with NAT response (all p > 0.05). The nodal status (N) 0 was associated with early response, while N2 was associated with non-response (p = 0.005). The tumor (T) and metastatic (M) stage were not statistically significant associated with response (p > 0.05). The margins, size and ADC values were not associated with NAT response (p-value > 0.05). The T2 min relaxometry value was associated with response (p = 0.017); a cut-off value of 53.58 obtained 86% sensitivity (95% CI 73.3−94.2), 69.23 specificity (95% CI 38.6−90.9), with an AUC = 0.715 (p = 0.038). The combined model (T2 min and N stage) achieved an AUC of 0.826 [95% CI: 0.66−0.90, p-value < 0.001]. Conclusions: MR relaxometry may be a useful tool in predicting early treatment response to NAT in breast cancer patients.

Staging Breast Cancer with MRI, the T. A Key Role in the Neoadjuvant Setting

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) indications have expanded from inoperable locally advanced to early-stage breast cancer. Achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) has been proven to be an excellent prognostic marker leading to better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Although diagnostic accuracy of MRI has been shown repeatedly to be superior to conventional methods in assessing the extent of breast disease there are still controversies regarding the indication of MRI in this setting. We intended to review the complex literature concerning the tumor size in staging, response and surgical planning in patients with early breast cancer receiving NACT, in order to clarify the role of MRI. Morphological and functional MRI techniques are making headway in the assessment of the tumor size in the staging, residual tumor assessment and prediction of response. Radiomics and radiogenomics MRI applications in the setting of the prediction of response to NACT in breast cancer are continuously increasing. Tailored therapy strategies allow considerations of treatment de-escalation in excellent responders and avoiding or at least postponing breast surgery in selected patients.

MRI Breast: Current Imaging Trends, Clinical Applications, and Future Research Directions

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive and advanced imaging technique in diagnosing breast cancer and is essential in improving cancer detection, lesion characterization, and determining therapy response. In addition to the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) technique, functional techniques such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) further characterize and differentiate benign and malignant lesions thus, improving diagnostic accuracy. There is now an increasing clinical usage of MRI breast, including screening in high risk and supplementary screening tools in average-risk patients. MRI is becoming imperative in assisting breast surgeons in planning breast-conserving surgery for preoperative local staging and evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Other clinical applications for MRI breast include occult breast cancer detection, investigation of nipple discharge, and breast implant assessment. There is now an abundance of research publications on MRI Breast with several areas that still remain to be explored. This review gives a comprehensive overview of the clinical trends of MRI breast with emphasis on imaging features and interpretation using conventional and advanced techniques. In addition, future research areas in MRI breast include developing techniques to make MRI more accessible and costeffective for screening. The abbreviated MRI breast procedure and an area of focused research in the enhancement of radiologists' work with artificial intelligence have high impact for the future in MRI Breast.

Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Review

Despite the high sensitivity and widespread use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the American Cancer Society and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not recommend the routine use of preoperative MRI owing to the conflicting results and lack of clear benefit to the surgical outcome (reoperation and mastectomy) and long-term clinical outcomes (local recurrence and metachronous contralateral breast cancer). Preoperative MRI detects additional cancers that are occult at mammography and ultrasound but increases the rate of mastectomy. Concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment of preoperative MRI might be mitigated by adjusting the confounding factors when conducting studies, using the state-of-the-art image-guided biopsy technique, applying the radiologists’ cumulative experiences in interpreting MRI findings, and performing multiple lumpectomies in patients with multicentric cancer. Among the various imaging methods, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI has the highest accuracy in predicting pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective trials aimed at applying the MRI information to the de-escalation of surgical or radiation treatments are underway. In this review, current studies on the clinical outcomes of preoperative breast MRI are updated, and circumstances in which MRI may be useful for surgical planning are discussed.

Robustness Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model on Sagittal and Axial Breast DCE-MRIs to Predict Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

To date, some artificial intelligence (AI) methods have exploited Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) to identify finer tumor properties as potential earlier indicators of pathological Complete Response (pCR) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, they work either for sagittal or axial MRI protocols. More flexible AI tools, to be used easily in clinical practice across various institutions in accordance with its own imaging acquisition protocol, are required. Here, we addressed this topic by developing an AI method based on deep learning in giving an early prediction of pCR at various DCE-MRI protocols (axial and sagittal). Sagittal DCE-MRIs refer to 151 patients (42 pCR; 109 non-pCR) from the public I-SPY1 TRIAL database (DB); axial DCE-MRIs are related to 74 patients (22 pCR; 52 non-pCR) from a private DB provided by Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II” in Bari (Italy). By merging the features extracted from baseline MRIs with some pre-treatment clinical variables, accuracies of 84.4% and 77.3% and AUC values of 80.3% and 78.0% were achieved on the independent tests related to the public DB and the private DB, respectively. Overall, the presented method has shown to be robust regardless of the specific MRI protocol.

Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype

The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrafast DCE (UF-DCE) MRI after the completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in breast cancer. In this study, MR examinations of 55 post-NST breast cancers were retrospectively analyzed. Residual tumor sizes were measured in the 20th phase of UF-DCE MRI, early and delayed phases of conventional DCE MRI, and high spatial-resolution CE MRI (UF, early, delayed, and HR, respectively). The diagnostic performance for the detection of residual invasive cancer was calculated by ROC analysis. The size difference between MRI and pathological findings was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with the Bonferroni correction. The overall AUC was highest for UF (0.86 and 0.88 for readers 1 and 2, respectively). The difference in imaging and pathological sizes for UF (5.7 ± 8.2 mm) was significantly smaller than those for early, delayed, and HR (p < 0.01). For luminal subtype breast cancer, the size difference was significantly smaller for UF and early than for delayed (p < 0.01). UF-DCE MRI demonstrated higher AUC and specificity for the more accurate detection of residual cancer and the visualization of tumor extent than conventional DCE MRI.

MRI in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy may reduce tumor burden preoperatively, allowing breast conservation treatment for tumors previously unresectable or requiring mastectomy without reducing disease-free survival. Oncologists can also use the response of the tumor to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to identify treatment likely to be successful against any unknown potential distant metastasis. Accurate preoperative estimations of tumor size are necessary to guide appropriate treatment with minimal delays and can provide prognostic information. Clinical breast examination and mammography are inaccurate methods for measuring tumor size after NAC and can over- and underestimate residual disease. While US is commonly used to measure changes in tumor size during NAC due to its availability and low cost, MRI remains more accurate and simultaneously images the entire breast and axilla. No method is sufficiently accurate at predicting complete pathological response that would obviate the need for surgery. Diffusion-weighted MRI, MR spectroscopy, and MRI-based radiomics are emerging fields that potentially increase the predictive accuracy of tumor response to NAC.

Advances in Imaging in Evaluating the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly widely used in breast cancer treatment, and accurate evaluation of its response provides essential information for treatment and prognosis. Thus, the imaging tools used to quantify the disease response are critical in evaluating and managing patients treated with NAC. We discussed the recent progress, advantages, and disadvantages of common imaging methods in assessing the efficacy of NAC for breast cancer.

The Impact of Dense Breasts on the Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Review and Options for Supplemental Screening

The purpose of breast cancer screening is to find cancers early to reduce mortality and to allow successful treatment with less aggressive therapy. Mammography is the gold standard for breast cancer screening. Its efficacy in reducing mortality from breast cancer was proven in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted from the early 1960s to the mid 1990s. Panels that recommend breast cancer screening guidelines have traditionally relied on the old RCTs, which did not include considerations of breast density, race/ethnicity, current hormone therapy, and other risk factors. Women do not all benefit equally from mammography. Mortality reduction is significantly lower in women with dense breasts because normal dense tissue can mask cancers on mammograms. Moreover, women with dense breasts are known to be at increased risk. To provide equity, breast cancer screening guidelines should be created with the goal of maximizing mortality reduction and allowing less aggressive therapy, which may include decreasing the interval between screening mammograms and recommending consideration of supplemental screening for women with dense breasts. This review will address the issue of dense breasts and the impact on the stage of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis, and discuss options for supplemental screening.

Computer-aided classification of MRI for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Background: To determine suitable optimal classifiers and examine the general applicability of computer-aided classification to compare the differences between a computer-aided system and radiologists in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) from patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed a total of 455 masses and used the U-Net network and ResNet to execute MRI segmentation and pCR classification. The diagnostic performance of radiologists, the computer-aided system and a combination of radiologists and computer-aided system were compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: The combination of radiologists and computer-aided system had the best performance for predicting pCR with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.899, significantly higher than that of radiologists alone (AUC: 0.700) and computer-aided system alone (AUC: 0.835). Conclusion: An automated classification system is feasible to predict the pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer and can complement MRI.

Surrogate endpoints for early-stage breast cancer: a review of the state of the art, controversies, and future prospects

Drug approval for early-stage breast cancer (EBC) has been historically granted in the context of registration trials based on adequate outcomes such as disease-free survival and overall survival. Improvements in long-term outcomes have made it more difficult to demonstrate the clinical benefit of a new cancer drug in large, randomized, comparative clinical trials. Therefore, the use of surrogate endpoints rather than traditional measures allows for cancer drug trials to proceed with smaller sample sizes and shorter follow-up periods, which reduces drug development time. Among surrogate endpoints for breast cancer, the increase in pathological complete response (pCR) rates was considered appropriate for accelerated drug approval. The association between pCR and long-term outcomes was strongest in patients with aggressive tumor subtypes, such as triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive/hormone receptor-negative breast cancers. Whereas in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative EBC, the most accepted surrogate markers for endocrine therapy-based trials include changes in Ki67 and the preoperative endocrine prognostic index. Beyond the classic endpoints, further prognostic tools are required to provide EBC patients with individualized and effective therapies, and the neoadjuvant setting provides an excellent platform for drug development and biomarker discovery. Nowadays, the availability of multigene signatures is offering a standardized quantitative and reproducible tool to potentiate the efficacy of standard treatment for high-risk patients and develop de-escalated treatments for patients at lower risk of relapse. In this article, we first evaluate the surrogacies used for long-term outcomes and the underlying evidence supporting the use of each surrogate endpoint for the accelerated or regular drug approval process in EBC. Next, we provide an overview of the most recent studies and innovative strategies in a (neo)adjuvant setting as a platform to accelerate new drug approval. Finally, we highlight some clinical trials aimed at tailoring systemic treatment of EBC using prognosis-related factors or early biomarkers of drug sensitivity or resistance.