1
|
Saldanha EF, Powis M, Sharma D, Espin-Garcia O, Hack S, Cavalher F, Costa MR, Simoes M, Li H, Baiad A, Chen K, Mohmand Z, Nakhla P, Aguiar S, Riechelmann R, Krzyzanowska MK. Impact of the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Care for Colorectal and Anal Cancers at Comprehensive Cancer Centers on Two Continents. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2400037. [PMID: 39348613 DOI: 10.1200/go.24.00037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 10/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic affected cancer care globally. Evaluating the impact of the pandemic on the quality of cancer care delivery is crucial for understanding how changes in care delivery may influence outcomes. Our study compared care delivered during the early phase of the pandemic with the same period in the previous year at two institutions across continents (Princess Margaret Cancer Center [PM] in Canada and A.C. Camargo Cancer Center [AC] in Brazil). METHODS Patients newly diagnosed with colorectal or anal cancer between February and December 2019 and the same period in 2020 were analyzed. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and performance of individual indicators within and between centers and between the peri-COVID-19 and control cohorts were tested using Cohen's h test to assess the standardized differences between the two groups. RESULTS Among 925 patients, distinct effects of the early COVID-19 pandemic on oncology services were observed. AC experienced a 50% reduction in patient consultations (98 v 197) versus a 12.5% reduction at PM (294 v 336). Similarly, AC experienced a higher proportion of stage IV disease presentations (42.9% v 29.9%; P = .015) and an increase in treatment delay (61.9% v 9.7%; P < .001) compared with prepandemic. At PM, a 10% increase in treatment interruption (32.4% v 22.3%; P < .001) and a higher rate of discontinuation of radiotherapy (9.4% v 1.1%; P < .001) were observed during the pandemic. Postsurgical readmission rates increased in both AC (20.9% v 2.6%; P < .001) and PM (10.5% v 3.6%; P < .01). CONCLUSION The early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic affected the quality of care delivery for colorectal and anal cancers at both centers. However, the magnitude of this impact was greater in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erick F Saldanha
- A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Melanie Powis
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Divya Sharma
- Biostatistics Division, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Osvaldo Espin-Garcia
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Biostatistics Division, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Saidah Hack
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Huaqi Li
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Abed Baiad
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kevin Chen
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zuhul Mohmand
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter Nakhla
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Cancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sönmez Ö, Tezcanli E, Taşçı EŞ, Kazancı HB, Altınok A, Toklucu E, Taşçı Y, Aydoğdu Ç, Aydın AB, Yüce S, Oyan B. Coronaphobia: A barrier to ongoing cancer treatment? Psychooncology 2022; 31:1178-1185. [PMID: 35194885 PMCID: PMC9088561 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Increased stress levels caused by the pandemic might cause delays in cancer treatment. We conducted a survey among cancer patients undergoing treatment to evaluate their psychological wellbeing and treatment adherence during Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients receiving active chemotherapy at a private oncology center between January and May 2021 were included. Healthy volunteers were employees of a district health directorate with no history of cancer or chronic disease. Treatment adherence was described as compliant if the prescribed treatment was received within a week and the information was gained from patient charts. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and COVID-19 phobia scale (CP19-S) were administered to participants. RESULTS 402 participants were included; 193 (48%) were cancer patients. The mean age of the participants was 44 years old and 68% of the participants were female. All participants' CP19-S mean score was 47.9. Patient group had significantly lower CP19-S (p = 0.006). Chronic disease and history of a shocking event were the factors associated with CP19-S. All participants reporting hospital anxiety were found to have significantly higher COVID-19 phobia levels (p < 0.05). Patients' mean HADS-anxiety score was significantly higher (7.3 vs. 6.5, p = 0.027). COVID-19 phobia was an independent factor increasing the level of anxiety and depression in both groups. Adherence to treatment was 100%. CONCLUSION The pandemic increased levels of anxiety, however, cancer treatment continued to be a priority in patients' lives. Strategies should be developed to support oncology patients cope with the pandemic and increase their courage to avoid treatment delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Özlem Sönmez
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of MedicineAcibadem UniversityIstanbulTurkey
- Department of General Senology, School of MedicineAcibadem UniversityResearch Institute of SenologyIstanbulTurkey
| | - Evrim Tezcanli
- Department of General Senology, School of MedicineAcibadem UniversityResearch Institute of SenologyIstanbulTurkey
| | - Elif Şenocak Taşçı
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of MedicineAcibadem UniversityIstanbulTurkey
| | - Hande Büşra Kazancı
- Department of General Senology, School of MedicineAcibadem UniversityResearch Institute of SenologyIstanbulTurkey
| | - Ayşe Altınok
- Department of General Senology, School of MedicineAcibadem UniversityResearch Institute of SenologyIstanbulTurkey
| | | | - Yusuf Taşçı
- Department of Public HealthIstanbul UniversityInstitute of Health SciencesIstanbulTurkey
| | | | | | | | - Başak Oyan
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of MedicineAcibadem UniversityIstanbulTurkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Erdem D, Karaman I. Impact of corona-phobia on attitudes and acceptance towards COVID-19 vaccine among cancer patients: a single-center study. Future Oncol 2022; 18:457-469. [PMID: 34851155 PMCID: PMC8650765 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 phobia and related factors on attitude towards COVID-19 vaccine in cancer patients. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 300 adult patients using a validated COVID-19 Phobia Scale (C19P-S) and related survey to determine the factors affecting vaccine acceptance between May-June 2021. Results: Regarding the COVID-19 vaccine willingness, 86.7% accepted vaccination, 6.3% were hesitant and 7% refused vaccination. Patients that accepted vaccination had significantly higher C19P-S scores in general, and in psychological and psychosomatic subdivisions. Univariate analysis revealed that increased age, being retired, and being married were significantly associated with willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Conclusion: The majority of patients had high 'coronophobia' levels which were associated with increased willingness for the COVID-19 vaccines. Minimizing negative attitudes towards vaccines will most likely be achieved by raising awareness in the cancer population about COVID-19 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilek Erdem
- VM Medical Park Samsun Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Irem Karaman
- Medical Student(MS)/Intern Doctor, School of Medicine, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul/TURKEY
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Karacin C, Eren T, Zeynelgil E, Imamoglu GI, Altinbas M, Karadag I, Basal FB, Bilgetekin I, Sutcuoglu O, Yazici O, Ozdemir N, Ozet A, Yildiz Y, Esen SA, Ucar G, Uncu D, Dinc B, Aykan MB, Erturk İ, Karadurmus N, Civelek B, Çelik İ, Ergun Y, Dogan M, Oksuzoglu OB. Immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac vaccine in patients with cancer receiving active systemic therapy. Future Oncol 2021; 17:4447-4456. [PMID: 34342517 PMCID: PMC8336634 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac vaccine in patients with cancer receiving active systemic therapy. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted with 47 patients receiving active systemic therapy for cancer. CoronaVac was administered as two doses (3 μg/day) on days 0 and 28. Antibody level higher than 1 IU/ml was defined as 'immunogenicity.' Results: The immunogenicity rate was 63.8% (30/47) in the entire patient group, 59.5% (25/42) in those receiving at least one cytotoxic drug and 100% (five of five) in those receiving monoclonal antibody or immunotherapy alone. Age was an independent predictive factor for immunogenicity (odds ratio: 0.830; p = 0.043). Conclusion: More than half of cancer patients receiving active systemic therapy developed immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cengiz Karacin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training & Research Hospital, Rize, Turkey
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tulay Eren
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Esra Zeynelgil
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Goksen Inanc Imamoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Altinbas
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ibrahim Karadag
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Osman Sutcuoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozan Yazici
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuriye Ozdemir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Ozet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yesim Yildiz
- Department of Infectious Diseases & Clinical Microbiology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Selin Akturk Esen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ucar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dogan Uncu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bedia Dinc
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Musa Baris Aykan
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Gulhane Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İsmail Erturk
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Gulhane Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Gulhane Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burak Civelek
- Department of Medical Oncology, A Life Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İsmail Çelik
- Department of Preventive Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yakup Ergun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Batman Training & Research Hospital, Batman, Turkey
| | - Mutlu Dogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Omur Berna Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|