Monitoring immunotherapy outcomes with circulating tumor DNA

Molecular Testing for Diagnostics, Prognostication, and Treatment Stratification in Cancers

ABSTRACT

Precision cancer care, for essentially all cancer types, now requires molecular diagnostics to assess mutations, chromosomal alterations, and gene expression to personalize treatments for individual patients. Advances in the diagnostics and treatment options have moved the field forward from fundamental discoveries beginning in the 1960s to the development of many targeted therapies that can be as specific as targeting a single-base-pair mutation. Herein is a brief historical perspective on cancer precision medicine with current diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment stratification guidance for early- and late-stage cancers.

A Pilot, Prospective, Observational Study to Investigate the Value of NGS in Liquid Biopsies to Predict Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: The LiBReCa Study

Introduction

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) correlates with the response to therapy in different types of cancer. However, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), little is known about how ctDNA levels change with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (Na-ChRT) and how they correlate with treatment response. This work aimed to explore the value of serial liquid biopsies in monitoring response after Na-ChRT with the hypothesis that this could become a reliable biomarker to identify patients with a complete response, candidates for non-operative management.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-five consecutive LARC patients undergoing long-term Na-ChRT therapy were included. Applying next-generation sequencing (NGS), we characterized DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded diagnostic biopsy and resection tissue and plasma ctDNA collected at the following time points: the first and last days of radiotherapy (T0, Tend), at 4 (T4), 7 (T7) weeks after radiotherapy, on the day of surgery (Top), and 3–7 days after surgery (Tpost-op). On the day of surgery, a mesenteric vein sample was also collected (TIMV). The relationship between the ctDNA at those time-points and the tumor regression grade (TRG) of the surgical specimen was statistically explored.

Results

We found no association between the disappearance of ctDNA mutations in plasma samples and pathological complete response (TRG1) as ctDNA was undetectable in the majority of patients from Tend on. However, we observed that the poor (TRG 4) response to Na-ChRT was significantly associated with a positive liquid biopsy at the Top.

Conclusions

ctDNA evaluation by NGS technology may identify LARC patients with poor response to Na-ChRT. In contrast, this technique does not seem useful for identifying patients prone to developing a complete response.

Circulating tumor DNA predicts response in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory classical hodgkin lymphoma treated with sintilimab

Background

Blood-based biomarker such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising tool for assessment of response to immunotherapy in solid tumors; But in hematological malignances, evidences are still lacking to support its clinical utility. In current study the feasibility of ctDNA for prediction and monitoring of response to anti-PD-1 therapy in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r cHL) was assessed.

Methods

A total of 192 plasma samples from 75 patients with r/r cHL were collected at baseline and upon therapeutic evaluation. ctDNA were sequenced by targeting panels capturing frequently mutated genes in cHL and other hematological malignancies and then quantified. Analysis on: 1) Gene mutation profile and association of the gene mutations with progression-free survival; 2) Association of pre- and post-treatment ctDNA variant allelic frequencies with clinical outcome; (3) Correlation of the mutated genes with treatment resistance; were performed.

Findings

Somatic mutations were detected in 50 out of 61 patients by ctDNA genotyping. The mutations of CHD8 was significantly higher in patients with PFS ≥ 12 months. Baseline ctDNA was significantly higher in responders and a decrease of ctDNA ≥ 40% from baseline indicated superior clinical outcome. Strong agreement between ctDNA dynamic and radiographic response change during therapy was observed in majority of the patients. Furthermore, the mutations of B2M, TNFRSF14 and KDM2B were found to be associated with acquired resistance.

Interpretation

ctDNA could be an informative biomarker for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in r/r cHL.

Funding

This work was supported by Innovent Biologics, Eli Lilly and Companyhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100002852, China National New Drug Innovation Program (2014ZX09201041-001 and 2017ZX09304015), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2016-I2M-1-001) and National Key Scientific Program Precision Medicine Research Fund of China (2017YFC0909801). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation or writing.

Clinical correlates for immune checkpoint therapy: significance for CNS malignancies

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy. Most commonly, inhibitors of PD-1 and CTLA4 are used having received approval for the treatment of many cancers like melanoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and leukemia. In contrast, to date, clinical studies conducted in patients with CNS malignancies have not demonstrated promising results. However, patients with CNS malignancies have several underlying factors such as treatment with supportive medications like corticosteroids and cancer therapies including radiation and chemotherapy that may negatively impact response to ICIs. Although many clinical trials have been conducted with ICIs, measures that reproducibly and reliably indicate that treatment has evoked an effective immune response have not been fully developed. In this article, we will review the history of ICI therapy and the correlative biology that has been performed in the clinical trials testing these therapies in different cancers. It is our aim to help provide an overview of the assays that may be used to gauge immunologic response. This may be particularly germane for CNS tumors, where there is currently a great need for predictive biomarkers that will allow for the selection of patients with the highest likelihood of responding.

Correlating Radiomic Features of Heterogeneity on CT with Circulating Tumor DNA in Metastatic Melanoma

Clinical imaging methods, such as computed tomography (CT), are used for routine tumor response monitoring. Imaging can also reveal intratumoral, intermetastatic, and interpatient heterogeneity, which can be quantified using radiomics. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the plasma is a sensitive and specific biomarker for response monitoring. Here we evaluated the interrelationship between circulating tumor DNA mutant allele fraction (ctDNAmaf), obtained by targeted amplicon sequencing and shallow whole genome sequencing, and radiomic measurements of CT heterogeneity in patients with stage IV melanoma. ctDNAmaf and radiomic observations were obtained from 15 patients with a total of 70 CT examinations acquired as part of a prospective trial. 26 of 39 radiomic features showed a significant relationship with log(ctDNAmaf). Principal component analysis was used to define a radiomics signature that predicted ctDNAmaf independent of lesion volume. This radiomics signature and serum lactate dehydrogenase were independent predictors of ctDNAmaf. Together, these results suggest that radiomic features and ctDNAmaf may serve as complementary clinical tools for treatment monitoring.

From the Broad Phase II Trial to Precision Oncology: A Perspective on the Origins of Basket and Umbrella Clinical Trial Designs in Cancer Drug Development

Oncologic phase II trials that evaluate the activity of new therapeutic agents have evolved dramatically over the past 50 years. The standard approach beginning in the late 1960s focused on individual studies that evaluated new anticancer agents against a wide range of both solid and hematopoietic malignancies often in a single "broad phase II trial" that included hundreds of patients; such studies efficiently established the landscape for subsequent development of a specific drug with respect to likely disease focus, toxicity, dose, and schedule. In the 1980s and 1990s, emphasis on histological context drove an explosion in the number of individual phase II trials conducted; despite this increase in trial activity, investigations based on histology per se failed to improve the success rate of new agents brought to the clinic. Over the past 20 years, evolution toward a molecular drug development paradigm has demonstrably improved our ability to select patients more likely to benefit from systemic treatment; simultaneously, technological advances have permitted initial attempts at the rapid assignment of therapy based on predefined molecular characteristics of tumor or germline in broad-based master protocols that are inclusive of many diseases and molecularly characterized disease subsets, akin to but much more sophisticated scientifically than the broad phase II platforms of the past.

Genomics and the History of Precision Oncology

Progress toward the implementation of a molecular characterization paradigm in cancer drug development over the past 20 years has markedly enhanced our capability to select patients who are more likely to benefit from cancer therapy. Improvements in genomic and related diagnostic testing platforms have permitted evaluation of the efficacy of treatment assignment based on predefined biologic features of a patient's tumor or germline using master protocols that may include many malignancies and their molecularly characterized subsets. With this approach, a wide range of new targeted and immunologic treatment approaches have been defined for patients who, heretofore, lacked effective therapeutic options.

Cell Free Tumoral DNA Versus Paraffin Block Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Detection in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Increasing knowledge about the molecular profile of tumors has led to personalized treatment for achieving better outcomes in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, finding exact somatic genomic changes of tumor has gained great importance. On the other hand, crescendoing needs to actual tumor tissue at different time points during cancer treatment may produce major discomfort for NSCLC patients. Tumor genomes can be reconstructed by information obtained from circulating cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) of peripheral blood. cfDNA may be represented as a suitable alternative test  for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation detection in these patients. This study aimed to assess validity of cfDNA in somatic EGFR mutation identification in Iranian NSCLC cases.

METHODS

Somatic mutation of EGFR gene was studied in both tissue specimens and plasma. Then, mutations were detected by polymerase chain reaction(PCR) and sequencing.

RESULTS

We observed a high concordance (90%) between tissue samples and cfDNA for EGFR gene mutation.  The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive precision value were 90%, 90% and 100%, respectively. A false negative rate of 10% was also demonstrated in this study.

CONCLUSION

We established sensitive methods for detecting EGFR gene mutation which may be very useful in clinical practice.
.

Circulating biomarkers predictive of tumor response to cancer immunotherapy

Introduction: The advent of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, but clinical response to immunotherapies is highly heterogeneous among individual patients and between cancer types. This represents a challenge to oncologists when choosing specific immunotherapies for personalized medicine. Thus, biomarkers that can predict tumor responsiveness to immunotherapies before and during treatment are invaluable. Areas covered: We review the latest advances in 'liquid biopsy' biomarkers for noninvasive prediction and in-treatment monitoring of tumor response to immunotherapy, focusing primarily on melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. We concentrate on high-quality studies published within the last five years on checkpoint blockade immunotherapies, and highlight significant breakthroughs, identify key areas for improvement, and provide recommendations for how these diagnostic tools can be translated into clinical practice. Expert opinion: The first biomarkers proposed to predict tumor response to immunotherapy were based on PD1/PDL1 expression, but their predictive value is limited to specific cancers or patient populations. Recent advances in single-cell molecular profiling of circulating tumor cells and host cells using next-generation sequencing has dramatically expanded the pool of potentially useful predictive biomarkers. As immunotherapy moves toward personalized medicine, a composite panel of both genomic and proteomic biomarkers will have enormous utility in therapeutic decision-making.

Update on emerging biomarkers in lung cancer

There has been considerable progress made in identifying oncogenic driver mutations in advanced lung cancer. The recognition that lung cancer is actually an umbrella classification that is comprised of multiple molecular subgroups has had a profound impact on how medical oncologists make treatment decisions. These mutations are clinically important as available targeted therapies can achieve significant responses and prolonged disease control. This review will summarize the current guidelines for biomarker testing and available therapeutic agents.