Identification of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis eligible for high-efficacy therapies

Consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of multiple sclerosis and holistic patient management in 2023

The last consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Demyelinating Diseases Study Group on the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was issued in 2016. Although many of the positions taken remain valid, there have been significant changes in the management and treatment of MS, both due to the approval of new drugs with different action mechanisms and due to the evolution of previously fixed concepts. This has enabled new approaches to specific situations such as pregnancy and vaccination, and the inclusion of new variables in clinical decision-making, such as the early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT), consideration of the patient's perspective, and the use of such novel technologies as remote monitoring. In the light of these changes, this updated consensus statement, developed according to the Delphi method, seeks to reflect the new paradigm in the management of patients with MS, based on the available scientific evidence and the clinical expertise of the participants. The most significant recommendations are that immunomodulatory DMT be started in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome with persistent radiological activity, that patient perspectives be considered, and that the term "lines of therapy" no longer be used in the classification of DMTs (> 90% consensus). Following diagnosis of MS, the first DMT should be selected according to the presence/absence of factors of poor prognosis (whether epidemiological, clinical, radiological, or biomarkers) for the occurrence of new relapses or progression of disability; high-efficacy DMTs may be considered from disease onset.

Evaluation of the use of high-efficacy treatments (HETs) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Argentina

BACKGROUND

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) can be classified according to the efficacy in which they prevent inflammatory activity. To date, there are limited data regarding the use of high-efficacy treatments (HETs) in Latin America (LATAM). We aimed to analyze the use of HETs in Argentina, focusing on the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the patients who use these treatments and the changes in the trend of use over the years.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was done using the Argentina MS patient registry, RelevarEM. Patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) according to validated diagnostic criteria and under treatment with natalizumab, alemtuzumab, cladribine, rituximab or ocrelizumab were included.

RESULTS

Out of 2450 RRMS patients under a DMT, 462 (19%) were on HETs. One third of those patients (35%) received HETs as the first treatment. The most frequent reason for switching to HETs was treatment failure to previous DMT (77%). The time from MS diagnosis to the first HET in treatment-naive patients was less than one year (IQR: 0-1 year) and in treatment-experienced patients it was 5 years (IQR: 3-9 years). Between 2015 and 2017 (P1), 729 patients included in RelevarEM started a new treatment, of which 85 (11.65%) were HETs. Between 2018 and 2020 (P2), 961 patients included in RelevarEM started a new treatment, of which 284 (29.55%) were HETs. When comparing P2 with P1, a significant increase in the use of HETs was observed (p < 0.01). The most frequently used HETs were alemtuzumab (50.59%) in P1, and cladribine (45.20%) in P2.

CONCLUSION

The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients under HET in Argentina were identified. Based on a real-world setting, we found a significant trend towards and a rapid increase in the use of HETs in clinical practice in patients with RRMS.

Sensitivity of conventional cognitive tests in multiple sclerosis: Application of item response theory

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment (CI) is common in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and its prevalence rate ranges between 22% and 70%. Because CI significantly impacts vocational status, caregiver burden, and quality of life, an accurate neuropsychological assessment is required. Three widely used and validated batteries for MS-associated CI are the Brief Repeatable Neuropsychological Battery (BRN-B), the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function (MACFIMS), and the Brief International Cognitive Assessment (BICAMS). Although similar, these batteries differ in time-consuming and in specific tests employed. This study aims to assess the sensitivity of cognitive tests included in these batteries through an Item Response Theory approach.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with MS and 91 demographically matched controls (HC) were consecutively assessed using the three neuropsychological batteries (i.e., BRN-B, MACFIMS, and BICAMS). Continuous Response Model (CRM) was used to identify the cognitive test(s) that best discriminate patients with MS from HC. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the accuracy of the CRM results.

RESULTS

Cognitive tests loaded on two different latent variables: the 'higher-order executive functioning,' consisting of tests assessing concept formation, problem-solving, and inhibitory control, and the 'memory and information processing speed,' comprising tests assessing long-term, working memory, and information processing speed. The Delis Kaplan Executive Functioning System-Sorting Test and the Stroop Test were the most sensitive tests in differentiating cognitive functioning between MS and HC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the importance of including a more extensive executive assessment in MS clinical practice since higher-order executive functions (e.g., abstraction and inhibitory control) significantly impact patients' quality of life and functional autonomy. Clinical implications of careful dissection of executive functioning in MS neuropsychological assessment are discussed.

Treatment with natalizumab during pregnancy in multiple sclerosis: The experience of implementing a clinical practice protocol (NAP-30)

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy planning in women with highly active multiple sclerosis (HAMS) who need a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (heDMT) currently requires a careful risk-benefit evaluation. This includes minimizing fetal drug toxicity and preventing MS reactivation. We describe our experience with natalizumab in women with HAMS and unplanned pregnancy by implementing a clinical practice protocol (NAP-30) designed to maintain the effectiveness of natalizumab during pregnancy, reduce fetal exposure and prevent complications.

METHODS

This was an observational retrospective study including women with HAMS on active treatment with natalizumab who became unexpectedly pregnant in the period 2018-2021 and continued this treatment during pregnancy according to the NAP-30 protocol. MS clinical and radiological variables were analyzed before and during pregnancy and in the postpartum period, along with maternal and fetal toxicity during pregnancy and safety findings in newborns. We also describe the NAP-30 protocol, which includes the use of a bridging dose to adjust and maintain natalizumab infusions every 6 weeks during pregnancy up to week 30 and scheduled delivery at week 40.

RESULTS

Six women (one in her first gestation) with a median age of 31.5 years at the onset of pregnancy (min-max: 24-37 years) were included. All were negative for anti-John Cunningham virus (JCV) antibodies and were on treatment with intravenous natalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks. At the time of conception, three patients had received 12, 17 and 53 infusions of natalizumab, respectively, while for the remaining three patients natalizumab was their first DMT (two patients had received 6 infusions and one patient had received 3 infusions of natalizumab). All six patients received 6 doses of natalizumab during pregnancy according to the NAP-30 protocol. After delivery, all six patients restarted natalizumab every 4 weeks (median: 3 days; range: 2-4 days). No patients had relapses during pregnancy or at 6 months postpartum, nor did they develop any general health or laboratory abnormalities. The MRI scan performed at 4-6 months postpartum showed no new T2 lesions or gadolinium-enhancing lesions. No miscarriages or threatened miscarriages were reported. One of the patients underwent elective preterm delivery at week 35 after mild-to-moderate anemia was detected by fetal Doppler scan. The newborn had low birth weight (2080 g) and mild anemia, which resolved within two months with oral iron supplementation. The other infants were born with normal birth weight and showed no blood count abnormalities. After a median follow-up of 10 months, all six babies showed normal development with no complications detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our experience, the implementation of the NAP-30 protocol in women with HAMS and unplanned pregnancy undergoing treatment with natalizumab allows the continuation of natalizumab during pregnancy, with a very favorable clinical and radiological effectiveness and maternal-fetal safety profile during pregnancy and postpartum. Both in pregnancy with HAMS and in general, and particularly for successful implementation of the NAP-30 protocol, obstetric support and monitoring is essential for adequate pregnancy management.