Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial

High-Dose Semaglutide (Up to 16 mg) in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Overweight or Obesity: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial

OBJECTIVE

Studies have demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for glycemic control and body weight. The aim of this trial was to characterize the dose-dependent effects of semaglutide (up to 16 mg/week) in people with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this parallel-group, participant- and investigator-blinded, phase 2 trial, 245 individuals with type 2 diabetes and BMI ≥27 kg/m2 on metformin were randomized to weekly semaglutide (2, 8, or 16 mg s.c.) or placebo for 40 weeks. Doses were escalated every 4 weeks, followed by a maintenance period. Dose modifications were not allowed. Primary and secondary efficacy end points included change from baseline to week 40 in HbA1c and body weight, respectively.

RESULTS

Estimated treatment difference between 16 and 2 mg was -0.3 percentage points (%-points) (95% CI -0.7 to 0.2; P = 0.245) for HbA1c change and -3.4 kg (-6.0 to -0.8; P = 0.011) for weight change for the treatment policy estimand and -0.5%-points (-1.0 to -0.1; P = 0.015) and -4.5 kg (-7.6 to -1.4; P = 0.004), respectively, for the hypothetical estimand. Dose-response modeling confirmed these findings. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuations due to AEs, primarily gastrointestinal, were more frequent in the semaglutide 8 and 16 mg groups than in the 2 mg group. No severe hypoglycemic episodes were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher semaglutide doses for type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity provide modest additional glucose-lowering effect, with additional weight loss, at the expense of more AEs and treatment discontinuations. A study for evaluating high-dose semaglutide in obesity is currently underway.

Exploring beyond numeric weight loss: The metabolic effects of semaglutide

The global burden of overweight and obesity has increased by threefold since the 1970s, which led to increased incidences of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. This review aimed to explore the metabolic impacts of semaglutide, including its effects on hunger and satiety, weight loss maintenance and regain, body composition, lipid profile, and glycemic control. Studies have shown that semaglutide reduced fat mass, particularly visceral fat, while preserving lean muscle mass, as the proportion relative to total body mass decreased by 3.5 % and 2.0 % for total and visceral fat mass, respectively, while it increased by 3.0 % for lean body mass. Also, it enhanced glycemic control, as evidenced by significant reductions in hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) with the 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg doses. From a baseline range of 8.1-8.7 %, 0.5 mg dose lowered HbA1c by 1.2-1.5 %, while the 1.0 mg dose reduced it by 1.4-1.8 %. Furthermore, semaglutide was the only effective Glucagon Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist in reducing Low-Density Lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels, with mean differences of -0.16 mmol/L and -0.48 mmol/L, respectively. Evidence shows that withdrawing semaglutide led to weight regain, while continued treatment resulted in further weight loss. Semaglutide also slowed weight regain and promoted weight loss after failed bariatric surgery. It also significantly reduced ad libitum energy intake, decreased hunger, and increased satiety in multiple trials. Overall, these findings underscore the potential of semaglutide as a comprehensive treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Compared with GLP-1 RAs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal Insulin: A Network Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The relative efficacy and safety of tirzepatide was compared with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with basal insulin using a network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials of GLP-1 RAs in patients with T2DM treated with insulin and an antihyperglycaemic drug. For the NMA, studies included trials with 100% of patients treated with basal insulin background therapy with a titration scheme comparable to the SURPASS-5 trial. The following data were extracted for efficacy and safety assessment at the primary endpoint of each study: changes from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight and the incidence of nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea, hypoglycaemia, and patients discontinuing treatment because of adverse events. In this study, a comparative analysis of tirzepatide was performed with the GLP-1 RAs dulaglutide, exenatide, and lixisenatide in addition to placebo.

RESULTS

A total of six studies were included across the analyses. Tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg showed statistically significant, greater reductions in HbA1c and body weight at the primary endpoint versus all GLP-1 RA comparators and placebo. Tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg showed a statistically significant, higher likelihood of experiencing nausea compared with those who received placebo or exenatide 2 mg; no statistically significant differences were observed when compared with all other GLP-1 RA comparators. No statistically significant differences were observed in the proportions of patients who discontinued treatment because of adverse events when tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg were compared with GLP-1 RA comparators, apart from tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg versus placebo.

CONCLUSION

Tirzepatide demonstrated statistically significantly greater reductions in HbA1c and body weight when compared with selected GLP-1 RAs and placebo in patients with T2DM treated with basal insulin. Overall, the safety profile of tirzepatide was similar to that of GLP-1RAs.

Efficacy, Safety, and Future of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

GLP-1 receptor agonists have emerged as important therapeutic agents for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but their comparative efficacy and broader applications remain subjects of ongoing research. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, and clinical applications of three GLP-1 receptor agonists - Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, and Exenatide - through systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science (2015-2023) identified 20 randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Primary outcomes included changes in HbA1c and body weight. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. Semaglutide demonstrated superior efficacy with mean HbA1c reduction of 1.45% and weight loss of 1.44 kg. Dulaglutide showed consistent reductions in HbA1c (1.1%) and weight (1.2 kg). while Exenatide exhibited moderate effects. Meta-analysis revealed a significant pooled effect estimate favoring GLP-1 receptor agonists. with a mean HbA1c difference of -0.81 (95% CI: -0.92 to -0.70). Gastrointestinal side effects were most common, with Semaglutide showing the highest incidence. This meta-analysis establishes Semaglutide as the most effective GLP-1 receptor agonist for glycemic control and weight reduction, while Dulaglutide and Exenatide offer viable alternatives with fewer side effects. These findings support evidence-based decision-making in T2DM management and highlight the potential broader therapeutic applications of GLP-1 receptor agonists beyond diabetes care.

Comparing the Efficacy of Liraglutide and Semaglutide on Weight Loss: Experience from the Middle East Gulf Region and Literature Review

Objective: Available data comparing the efficacy of liraglutide and semaglutide in managing weight loss is limited. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy of both drugs on weight loss. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study conducted at our quaternary care hospital from June 2018 to July 2022. The study included adults who received either liraglutide or semaglutide during the study period. The primary outcome was weight loss, while secondary outcomes included effects on HbA1c levels and lipid profile. Results: A total of 366 patients were analyzed (122 on liraglutide, 244 on semaglutide). The groups were comparable in mean age (51.00 ± 11.55 vs 51.16 ± 12.35 years, P = 0.521) and baseline mean weight (94.7 ± 19.5 vs 94.6 ± 19.9 kg, P = 0.989). After a median follow-up of 10 (6-17) months for the liraglutide group and 7.5 (6-11) months for the semaglutide group (P < 0.001), the resultant weights were 90.8 ± 19.6 kg for the liraglutide group and 91.1 ± 19.8 kg for the semaglutide group (P < 0.001) when comparing each group to its baseline separately. When comparing the weight loss achieved in each group, liraglutide achieved a median weight loss of -4 (-7 to 0) kg versus -3 (-6 to 0) kg for semaglutide (P = 0.867). The reduction in HbA1c levels with liraglutide was significantly less than with semaglutide: -0.2 (-0.5 to 0.3) versus -0.5 (-1.1 to 0.1), respectively, (P = 0.003). Both drugs significantly lowered LDL and triglycerides. Multivariable linear regression analysis confirmed no significant difference between the drugs [B -0.577, 95% CI -1.87 to 0.7; P = 0.38], while baseline weight, diabetes, and SGLT2 inhibitors were significant factors affecting weight. Conclusion: Both liraglutide and semaglutide were effective in reducing weight, with no significant difference between the two drugs. However, semaglutide was more effective in reducing HbA1c levels.

Association of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists with Optic Nerve and Retinal Adverse Events: A Population-Based Observational Study Across 180 Countries

PURPOSE

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are important therapeutic options for type 2 diabetes and obesity; however, concerns about ophthalmic safety persist. This study examined associations between GLP-1 RAs and ocular adverse events (AEs).

DESIGN

Global observational pharmacovigilance study.

METHODS

We searched the US FAERS database (via OpenVigil 2.1) and WHO's VigiBase (via VigiAccess) for optic nerve and retinal AEs associated with semaglutide and tirzepatide, covering the period from their respective approval dates-December 2017 for semaglutide and May 2022 for tirzepatide-through September 2024. In FAERS, all other drugs were compared, while in VigiBase, metformin, empagliflozin, dulaglutide, and insulin served as controls. Disproportionality metrics included reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Semaglutide and tirzepatide accounted for 76,444 cases (0.59%) in FAERS (n=12,936,341) and 118,639 cases (0.34%) in VigiBase (n>35,000,000). Semaglutide showed significantly higher odds of ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) (FAERS: ROR=11.12, 95%CI=8.15-15.16; VigiBase: ROR=68.58, 95%CI=16.75-280.67), diabetic retinopathy (DR) (FAERS: ROR=17.28, 95%CI=13.62-21.91; VigiBase: ROR=7.81, 95%CI=5.60-10.90), as well as retinal/vitreous detachment, retinal/vitreous hemorrhage, and retinal tear (FAERS: ROR=2.44-5.89, 95%CI=1.70-8.97, all p<0.001, IC025=0.49, compared to all other drugs. VigiBase: ROR=5.49-20.91, 95%CI=2.71-90.11, all p≤0.0001, IC025≥0.53, compared to metformin). Unique to VigiBase were macular edema (ROR=3.87, 95%CI=1.89-7.92), macular hole (ROR=20.90, 95%CI=2.65-165.01), and papilledema (ROR=6.97, 95%CI=2.53-19.17) (all p≤0.004, IC025≥0.27, compared to metformin). Sensitivity analyses using empagliflozin and dulaglutide revealed significant associations with ION and DR, while vitreous detachment and hemorrhage were significant when compared to dulaglutide. Additionally, when insulin was used as a comparator, semaglutide showed a higher ROR for ION (ROR=9.84, 95%CI=4.25-22.81, P<0.0001, IC025=0.42). However, tirzepatide was only significantly associated with DR in FAERS.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the widespread use of semaglutide, its association with ocular AEs highlight the need for global pharmacovigilance and post-marketing surveillance.

Risk of Hearing Loss in Patients Treated with Exendin-4 Derivatives: A Network Meta-Analysis of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors

Background/Objectives: Emerging evidence suggests an association between glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors with altered risk of damage in the inner ear system. However, limited research exists on the relationship between these medications and subsequent irreversible hearing loss. We conducted this network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the comparative risk of hearing loss associated with such medications. Methods: In this NMA, we used a confirmatory approach to specifically focus on particular adverse effects of interest (i.e., incidence of hearing loss here) based on the Cochrane recommendation. A Bayesian-based NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors was conducted. The primary outcome was the hearing loss events. Results: Our NMA of 29 RCTs with 145,895 participants found that only two exendin-4 derivatives-lixisenatide and high-dose efpeglenatide (i.e., 6 mg/week)-showed increased hearing loss events compared to controls. No other GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated significantly elevated hearing loss risk. Lixisenatide ranked highest in risk among all investigated regimens. Conclusions: This comprehensive NMA identifies a significant association between exendin-4 derivatives (lixisenatide and efpeglenatide) and potential ototoxicity. Clinicians should carefully consider this potential ototoxicity when prescribing exendin-4 derivatives, particularly in patients with pre-existing hearing loss risk factors.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in neurodegenerative diseases: Promises and challenges

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GRA) belong to a class of compounds that reduce blood glucose and energy intake by simulating actions of endogenous incretin hormone GLP-1 after it is released by the gut following food consumption. They are used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity and have systemic effects on various organs, including the brain, liver, pancreas, heart, and the gut. Patients with T2DM have a higher risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases (NDs), including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Huntington's disease (HD), accompanied by more severe motor deficits and faster disease progression, suggesting dysregulation of insulin signaling in these diseases. Experimental studies have shown that GRA have protective effects to modulate neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial and autophagic functions, and protein misfolding. Hence the compounds have generated enormous interest as novel therapeutic agents against NDs. To date, clinical trials have shown that three GRA, exenatide, liraglutide and lixisenatide can improve motor deficits as an add-on therapy in PD patients and liraglutide can improve cognitive function in AD patients. The neuroprotective effects of these and other GRA, such as PT320 (a sustained-released exenatide) and semaglutide, are still under investigation. The dual GLP-1/gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists have been demonstrated to have beneficial effects in AD and PD mice models. Overall, GRA are highly promising novel drugs, but future clinical studies should identify which subsets of patients should be targeted as potential candidates for their symptomatic and/or neuroprotective benefits, investigate whether combinations with other classes of drugs can further augment their efficacy, and evaluate their long-term disease-modifying and adverse effects.

GLP-1 receptor agonists, are we witnessing the emergence of a paradigm shift for neuro-cardio-metabolic disorders?

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as groundbreaking therapeutic agents in managing a spectrum of metabolic disorders, demonstrating remarkable efficacy across multiple organ systems and disease states. These compounds are not only well-established in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity-conditions for which they have received widespread approval-but also exhibit promising potential in addressing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Recent investigations have begun to illuminate the utility of GLP-1RAs in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), as well as neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease and various behavioral disorders. A plethora of clinical trials have consistently validated the capacity of GLP-1RAs to improve glycemic control, promote weight loss, and mitigate cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with T2D and obesity. While their application in T1D remains limited due to safety concerns-particularly regarding the risks of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemic ketoacidosis-emerging data suggest that GLP-1RAs may offer hepatoprotective benefits, potentially reducing liver fat content and decelerating the progression of MASLD. The neuroprotective attributes of GLP-1 RAs have garnered significant interest, with research indicating their potential to alleviate cognitive decline associated with neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, preliminary findings highlight the role of GLP-1 RAs in addressing behavioral disorders, emphasizing their extensive therapeutic promise. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current evidence supporting the diverse therapeutic applications of GLP-1RAs, positioning them as "magic drug" therapies for metabolic and neurological disorders. As ongoing research continues to explore innovative applications and combinations of GLP-1RAs, the landscape of disease management in metabolic and neurological contexts is poised for transformative advancements. This review will also critically assess safety considerations and underscore the need for personalized treatment strategies to optimize patient outcomes in these complex and often comorbid conditions.

New advances in novel pharmacotherapeutic candidates for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) between 2022 and 2024

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) covers a broad spectrum of profile from simple fatty liver, evolving to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), to hepatic fibrosis, further progressing to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MASLD has become a prevalent disease with 25% in average over the world. MASH is an active stage, and requires pharmacological intervention when there is necroptotic damage with fibrotic progression. Although there is an increased understanding of MASH pathogenesis and newly approved resmetirom, given its complexity and heterogeneous pathophysiology, there is a strong necessity to develop more drug candidates with better therapeutic efficacy and well-tolerated safety profile. With an increased list of pharmaceutical candidates in the pipeline, it is anticipated to witness successful approval of more potential candidates in this fast-evolving field, thereby offering different categories of medications for selective patient populations. In this review, we update the advances in MASH pharmacotherapeutics that have completed phase II or III clinical trials with potential application in clinical practice during the latest 2 years, focusing on effectiveness and safety issues. The overview of fast-evolving status of pharmacotherapeutic candidates for MASH treatment confers deep insights into the key issues, such as molecular targets, endpoint selection and validation, clinical trial design and execution, interaction with drug administration authority, real-world data feedback and further adjustment in clinical application.

Newer Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Are Associated With Improved Glycemic Control in US Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Level Time Series Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The population-level impact of newer glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) treatments on patients with type 2 diabetes remains unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the association of newer GLP-1 RAs with population-level diabetes-related outcomes in US adults with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This was a noninterventional, retrospective analysis of administrative insurance claims data obtained from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database between January 2004 and December 2022. Individual patient data were aggregated into monthly time series at the population level. Associations between the proportion of patients on newer GLP-1 RAs of interest (dulaglutide, once-weekly or oral semaglutide, and tirzepatide) and average hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), HbA1c <7.0%, and HbA1c <8.0% were assessed using time series regressions. Time-based trends in population-level outcomes were assessed using interrupted time series analyses. All analyses were adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Time series regression analyses demonstrated that a higher proportion of patients taking newer GLP-1 RAs was associated with a lower average HbA1c and a higher proportion of patients with HbA1c <7.0% (after 5 months of treatment) and <8.0% (after 2 months of treatment). Results from the interrupted time series analyses demonstrated that population-level glycemic control has been improving since the first newer GLP-1 RA (dulaglutide) was approved. This trend has persisted, even after the COVID-19 emergency declaration.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher percentage of patients receiving newer GLP-1 RAs was associated with significantly improved population-level glycemic control. The newer GLP-1 RA period displayed improved population-level glycemic control compared with the older GLP-1 RA period.

Advances in incretin therapies for targeting cardiovascular disease in diabetes

The global prevalence of obesity is skyrocketing at an alarming rate, with recent data estimating that one-in-eight people are now living with the disease. Obesity is a chronic metabolic disorder that shares underlying pathophysiology with other metabolically-linked diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and diabetic cardiomyopathy. There is a distinct correlation between type 2 diabetes status and the likelihood of heart failure. Of note, there is an apparent sexual dimorphism, with women disproportionately affected with respect to the degree of severity of the cardiac phenotype of diabetic cardiomyopathy that results from diabetes. The current pharmacotherapies available for the attenuation of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes are not always effective, and have varying degrees of efficacy in the setting of heart failure. Insulin can worsen heart failure prognosis whereas metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and more recently, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), have demonstrated cardioprotection with their administration. This review will highlight the advancement of incretin therapies for individuals with diabetes and heart failure and explore newly-reported evidence of the clinical usefulness of GLP-1R agonists in this distinct phenotype of heart failure.

Evolving Role of Double and Triple Therapy With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as a transformative class of therapies, expanding their clinical utility far beyond glycemic control. Initially developed for the treatment of diabetes, these agents are now recognised as potent therapies for managing overweight and obesity, atherosclerosis, and heart failure. This review explores the evolution of GLP-1RA-based therapies, with a focus on novel advances such as dual GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists ("double G") and triple receptor agonists incorporating glucagon modulation ("triple G"). We also provide an overview of completed and ongoing clinical trials investigating the role of GLP-1RAs in atherosclerosis and heart failure. These developments underscore the expanding therapeutic landscape of GLP-1RAs and their growing significance in cardiometabolic medicine.

Dual and Triple Gut Peptide Agonists on the Horizon for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity. An Overview of Preclinical and Clinical Data

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of long-acting incretin receptor agonists represents a significant advance in the fight against the concurrent epidemics of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. The aim of the present review is to examine the cellular processes underlying the actions of these new, highly significant classes of peptide receptor agonists. We further explore the potential actions of multi-agonist drugs as well as the mechanisms through which gut-brain communication can be used to achieve long-term weight loss without negative side effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several unimolecular dual-receptor agonists have shown promising clinical efficacy studies when used alone or in conjunction with approved glucose-lowering medications. We also describe the development of incretin-based pharmacotherapy, starting with exendin- 4 and ending with the identification of multi-incretin hormone receptor agonists, which appear to be the next major step in the fight against T2DM and obesity. We discuss the multi-agonists currently in clinical trials and how each new generation of these drugs improves their effectiveness. Since most glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor: glucagon-like peptide- 1 receptor (GLP- 1) receptor: glucagon receptor triagonists compete in efficacy with bariatric surgery, the success of these agents in preclinical models and clinical trials suggests a bright future for multi-agonists in the treatment of metabolic diseases. To fully understand how these treatments affect body weight, further research is needed.

The pharmacodynamics-based prophylactic benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors on neurodegenerative diseases: evidence from a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors represent a new generation of antihyperglycemic agents that operate through mechanisms distinct from conventional diabetes treatments. Beyond their metabolic effects, these medications have demonstrated neuroprotective properties in preclinical studies. While clinical trials have explored their therapeutic potential in established neurodegenerative conditions, their role in disease prevention remains unclear. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to comprehensively evaluate the prophylactic benefits of these agents across multiple neurodegenerative diseases and identify the most promising preventive strategies.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalKey, Cochrane CENTRAL, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov through October 24th, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors. Our primary outcome was the incidence of seven major neurodegenerative diseases: Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body dementia, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, frontotemporal dementia, and Huntington's disease. Secondary outcomes included safety profiles assessed through dropout rates. We performed a frequentist-based NMA and evaluated risk of bias with Risk of Bias tool. The main result of the primary outcome in the current study would be re-affirmed via sensitivity test with Bayesian-based NMA.

RESULTS

Our analysis encompassed 22 RCTs involving 138,282 participants (mean age 64.8 years, 36.4% female). Among all investigated medications, only dapagliflozin demonstrated significant prophylactic benefits, specifically in preventing Parkinson's disease (odds ratio = 0.28, 95% confidence intervals = 0.09 to 0.93) compared to controls. Neither GLP-1 receptor agonists nor other SGLT2 inhibitors showed significant preventive effects for any of the investigated neurodegenerative conditions. Drop-out rates were comparable across all treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive NMA reveals a novel and specific prophylactic effect of dapagliflozin against Parkinson's disease, representing a potential breakthrough in preventive neurology. The specificity of dapagliflozin's protective effect to Parkinson's disease might rely on its highly selective inhibition to SGLT2. These findings provide important direction for future research and could inform preventive strategies for populations at risk of Parkinson's disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021252381.

Real-World Treatment Patterns Among US Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiating Treatment With Once Weekly Semaglutide for Diabetes

PURPOSE

Injectable once weekly semaglutide for diabetes (OW sema) is a medication approved in 2017 for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In clinical trials, OW sema has been shown to be effective at helping patients achieve glycemic targets. However, more data are needed to understand how patients who initiate treatment with OW sema are treated in the real world and to aid prescribers in making treatment decisions. This study characterized noninsulin antidiabetic medication use patterns among US patients with T2DM initiating treatment with OW sema.

METHODS

In this retrospective, claims-based study, patients (15,588) were included if they had at least 1 claim for OW sema between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019, were at least 18 years old, were continuously enrolled in the health plan, and had at least 1 claim indicating a diagnosis of T2DM. All patients had at least 1 line of therapy (LOT) that started on the date of the first fill for OW sema. Data related to pre-index date demographics and clinical characteristics were collected, as were data on patient regimens and LOTs. The length of the LOT was calculated, and the top 10 noninsulin treatment regimens were reported in each LOT.

FINDINGS

In the first LOT, OW sema monotherapy was the most common regimen. More than one third (36.5%) of patients had 1 LOT until the end of follow-up and most patients who had a second (52.1%) or third (72.0%) LOT continued it to the end of the study. Among the top 10 regimens, 42.2% of patients with a second LOT and 45.8% of patients with a third LOT had an LOT that included OW sema.

IMPLICATIONS

This study describes medication regimens within the first year of OW sema use. Among patients initiating OW sema, monotherapy was the most common regimen. These results provide insight into real-world usage patterns of this medication.

Once-weekly IcoSema versus once-weekly semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes: the COMBINE 2 randomised clinical trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

COMBINE 2 assessed the efficacy and safety of once-weekly IcoSema (a combination therapy of basal insulin icodec and semaglutide) vs once-weekly semaglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue) 1.0 mg in individuals with type 2 diabetes inadequately managed with GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) therapy, with or without additional oral glucose-lowering medications.

METHODS

This 52 week, randomised, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, Phase IIIa trial was conducted across 121 sites in 13 countries/regions. Adults with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 53.0-85.8 mmol/mol [7.0-10.0%]) receiving GLP-1 RA therapy with or without additional oral glucose-lowering medications were randomly assigned 1:1 to once-weekly IcoSema or once-weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 52; superiority of IcoSema to semaglutide 1.0 mg was assessed. Secondary endpoints included change in fasting plasma glucose and body weight (baseline to week 52), and combined clinically significant (level 2; <3.0 mmol/l) or severe (level 3; associated with severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery) hypoglycaemia (baseline to week 57).

RESULTS

Overall, 683 participants were randomised using a Randomisation and Trial Supply Management system to IcoSema (n=342) or semaglutide 1.0 mg (n=341). Mean ± SD baseline characteristics were as follows: HbA1c 64.0±8.2 mmol/mol (8.0±0.7%); diabetes duration 12.6±6.9 years; and BMI 31.1±4.7 kg/m2. From baseline to week 52, mean change in HbA1c was -14.7 mmol/mol (-1.35%-points) in the IcoSema group and -9.88 mmol/mol (-0.90%-points) in the semaglutide group; the estimated treatment difference (ETD) was -4.85 (95% CI -6.13, -3.57) mmol/mol (-0.44 [95% CI -0.56, -0.33]%-points), confirming superiority of IcoSema to semaglutide (p<0.0001). The estimated mean change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 52 was statistically significantly reduced with IcoSema vs semaglutide (-2.48 mmol/l vs -1.43 mmol/l, respectively; ETD -1.05 [95% CI -1.36, -0.75] mmol; p<0.0001). Mean change in body weight from baseline to week 52 was statistically significantly different between groups: +0.84 kg for IcoSema vs -3.70 kg for semaglutide (ETD 4.54 kg [95% CI 3.84, 5.23]; p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia between IcoSema and semaglutide (0.042 vs 0.036 episodes per person-year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 1.20 [95% CI 0.53, 2.69]; p=0.66). The proportion of participants experiencing gastrointestinal adverse events was similar between treatment groups (IcoSema 31.4%; semaglutide 34.4%).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

In people living with type 2 diabetes inadequately managed with GLP-1 RA therapy, with or without additional oral glucose-lowering medications, switching to once-weekly IcoSema in comparison with once-weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg demonstrated superiority in HbA1c reduction, similar rates of clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia, and similar frequency of gastrointestinal adverse events. However, weight change from baseline to week 52 was statistically significantly in favour of semaglutide 1.0 mg.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05259033 FUNDING: This trial was funded by Novo Nordisk.

Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and incretin mimetics for type 2 diabetes and obesity: A narrative review

Incretin mimetics, including glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonists, have become first-line treatment options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Their therapeutic status is attributed to their high level of efficacy as well as positive impact on related comorbidities, such as sleep apnea and heart failure. Multiple incretin mimetics are currently available with different durations of drug action, dosing frequencies, and delivery devices. Patients may benefit from education on the proper drug administration, anticipated adverse effects, and nutrition considerations with treatment. Practitioners must monitor progress and support the patient to achieve maintenance doses for optimal weight reduction and diabetes-related outcomes. This review aims to present the current literature supporting US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications of incretin mimetics, equip healthcare professionals to optimize care for patients who are prescribed these agents, and provide insights into potential future applications, which may include dual- or triple-mechanism agents that are injected or administered orally. Additional studies are anticipated with existing and future incretin mimetics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and related comorbidities in a rapidly developing therapeutic pipeline.

Drug adherence, glycemic control, and weight reduction with subcutaneous semaglutide in real-world management of type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

We describe changes in HbA1c and body-weight and the relationship between drug adherence and clinical response in a large real-world cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with subcutaneous semaglutide for up to three years.

METHODS

We included adults with T2D registered at Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel, who initiated subcutaneous semaglutide (August 2019 - June 2022). Adherence, assessed as Proportion of Days Covered (PDC), was based on drug's dispensation. We assessed the absolute change in HbA1c and the relative change in body-weight from baseline.

RESULTS

The 23,442 participants (11,513 women) had a mean age of 62.2 years, HbA1c of 7.6 %, and BMI of 33.7 kg/m2. Compared to baseline, the mean reductions in HbA1c were 0.77 [95 %CI 0.75-0.78], 0.57 [0.53-0.61], and 0.35 [0.27-0.44] %-points at 6 months, 2 years, and 3 years, respectively. The respective body-weight reductions were 4.9 % [4.8-5.0], 5.3% [5.1-5.5], and 4.5 % [3.7-5.2]. Among 6049 patients with ≥2 years of potential follow-up, median PDC between 0-6 months was 83.9 %, and remained relatively stable thereafter, reaching 74.6 % between 18-24 months. Higher PDC was associated with more pronounced HbA1c and body-weight reductions.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term real-world adherence with semaglutide was relatively stable. Semaglutide use was associated with sustained glycemic control and weight reduction in patients with T2D and relatively good baseline glycemic control, especially among those with high adherence, supporting its use for long-term management of T2D.

The promise of incretin-based pharmacotherapies for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND

The presence of excess liver fat secondary to metabolic dysregulation represents the end-organ manifestation of a systemic disease that can progress to steatohepatitis, cirrhosis and its feared complications of clinical decompensation and hepatocellular cancer. Since metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is highly prevalent globally, there is a pressing need to augment lifestyle interventions with pharmacotherapies to ameliorate disease burden and reduce adverse liver-related events.

PURPOSE

This review summarises current evidence for the utility of incretin mimetics in the MAFLD/MASH arena.

METHODS

A literature review that encompassed multiple database searches to inform the evidence base for incretin drugs in MAFLD/MASH.

RESULTS

Incretin mimetics demonstrate multifarious benefits across the metabolic diseases spectrum with mounting evidence for their role in remitting steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis. Weight loss and insulin sensitisation contribute, but additional mechanisms may also be engaged. Gastrointestinal adverse effects are common but for most, can be managed while preserving the hepatic and cardiometabolic benefits.

CONCLUSION

The literature reveals benefits from incretin-based therapies for MASH, but data on whether they improve long-term hepatic outcomes are awaited to support their future incorporation into routine clinical care.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist Use in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Effect, Safety, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Obesity is prevalent among patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) and contributes to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. There is a paucity of data regarding glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) for weight loss in patients with ACHD.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect, safety, and outcomes of GLP-1 RA among patients with ACHD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with ACHD at Mayo Clinic (January 2013-January 2024) who were prescribed semaglutide or liraglutide. The primary endpoint was weight loss. Secondary endpoints were changes in NYHA functional class, hemoglobin A1c, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and safety endpoints of renal adverse event, hypoglycemia, hospitalization/drug discontinuation due to side effects.

RESULTS

Seventy patients received GLP-1 RA over a mean duration of 21 ± 20 months. Majority (85.7%) had moderate/severe complexity congenital heart disease. Weight loss >5% was achieved in 30 (42.9%) patients. Patients with body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 were more likely to achieve weight loss >5% [66.7% vs 40%, P = 0.027]. Younger age resulted in improved weight loss of 0.17 kg per 1-year age difference (P = 0.014). Hemoglobin A1c lowered by a mean of 0.6% (P = 0.054). There were no significant changes in NYHA functional class or estimated glomerular filtration rate. One-third of patients experienced side effects, mostly from gastrointestinal intolerance (20%); 11.4% discontinued the medication due to side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1 RAs are safe and effective for weight loss in patients with ACHD with beneficial effects on glycemic control.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular events and risk factors: A review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to systematically evaluate and perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the comprehensive cardiovascular protective effects of various glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), focusing on cardiovascular events and risk factors.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from inception to December 15, 2024. Included studies were published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing GLP-1RAs to placebo or other GLP-1RAs. Missing data were standardized, and network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0. Study heterogeneity, publication bias and evidence quality were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).

RESULTS

As of December 15, 2024, a total of 18 313 articles were retrieved. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 156 high-quality studies were included, incorporating 144 782 patients and 14 different GLP-1RAs. The network meta-analysis demonstrated low heterogeneity, ensuring the reliability of the results. Comprehensive analysis revealed the following: Efpeglenatide was the most effective in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events. Oral semaglutide shows more significant advantages in reducing all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Orforglipron excelled in glycaemic control and weight reduction. SC-Semaglutide showed the greatest efficacy in lowering both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, Liraglutide showed the greatest efficacy in lowering total cholesterol, Noiiglutide in triglycerides and Taspoglutide in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, but no GLP-1RAs in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. GLP-1RAs did not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events, but Orforglipron and Taspoglutide significantly increased the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

This study compared the cardiovascular benefits of different GLP-1RAs, including reductions in cardiovascular events and improvements in multiple cardiovascular risk factors. However, due to limitations in the quantity and quality of the included studies, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution. Future large-scale, high-quality clinical trials are needed to validate these findings and further optimize comprehensive cardiovascular management strategies for patients.

Novel Antidiabetic Drugs and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review

Novel antidiabetic drugs, particularly sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, have significantly transformed the management landscape for type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic kidney diseases, owing to their well-established cardiorenal protective effects. Given the shared risk factors and comorbidities, it is relevant to consider the potential risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in individuals prescribed these novel antidiabetic medications. This literature review aims to summarize currently available evidence on VTE risk associated with novel antidiabetic drugs, including GLP-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors, and SGLT2 inhibitors. Following a comprehensive search on PubMed using relevant keywords and backward reference searching, we identified 25 publications that directly reported on associations between these medications and VTE risk. Findings from these studies, including seven meta-analyses, reveal inconsistent results: some studies suggest that GLP-1 receptor agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors may be associated with increased risk of VTE, whereas SGLT2 inhibitors do not appear to be associated with VTE and may even be a protective factor. A notable limitation of the existing studies is the significant challenge posed by confounding in observational studies, while the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often concluded with a limited number of VTE events, if it was studied. Furthermore, all identified studies focused on the risk of primary VTE, leaving an important knowledge gap regarding whether these novel antidiabetic drugs may influence the efficacy or safety of anticoagulants used for preventing VTE recurrence. Addressing these gaps presents an important avenue for future research.

Semaglutide as a GLP-1 Agonist: A Breakthrough in Obesity Treatment

This review addresses the role of semaglutide (SMG), a GLP-1 receptor agonist, in the treatment of obesity and its related comorbidities. Originally developed for type 2 diabetes (DM2), SMG has shown significant efficacy in weight reduction, with superior results compared to other treatments in the same class. Its effects include appetite suppression, increased satiety, and improvements in cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic parameters. Studies such as SUSTAIN, PIONEER, and STEP highlight its superiority compared to other GLP-1 receptor agonists and anti-obesity drugs. The oral formulation showed promising initial results, with higher doses (50 mg) showing weight losses comparable to those of subcutaneous administration. Despite its benefits, there are challenges, such as weight regain after cessation of treatment, gastrointestinal adverse effects, and variability of response. Future studies should explore strategies to mitigate these effects, identify predictive factors of efficacy, and expand therapeutic indications to other conditions related to obesity and insulin resistance. The constant innovation in this class of drugs reinforces the potential of SMG to transform treatment protocols for chronic weight-related diseases.

Association of Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists use with fracture risk in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis (OP) and fractures.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the available evidence on the effect of GLP-1 RAs on fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic search based on PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases was performed to collect relevant literature published until May 2024 on the application of GLP-1 RAs in T2DM patients. Data were extracted from each study for comparative analysis, and meta-analysis was performed using R software to calculate relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous variables. Two subgroup analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 44 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 47,823 patients were analyzed. There were 292 incident fracture cases (138 in GLP-1 RAs group and 154 in control group). The pooled RR for fractures in patients treated with GLP-1RAs compared with those treated with placebo or other anti-diabetic drugs was 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.96). Subgroup analyses showed that the beneficial effect was dependent on the period of treatment with GLP-1 RAs, only treated for >78 weeks were effective in reducing the risk of fractures in patients with T2DM (RR 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.61-0.96). Furthermore, subgroup analyses showed that liraglutide treatment was associated with a significant reduction in fracture risk (RR 0.42; 95 % CI: 0.21-0.85). However, other GLP-1 RAs did not present benefits over other anti-diabetic drug treatments.

CONCLUSION

GLP-1 RAs could reduce the risk of fracture in T2DM patients, and the beneficial effect was interrelated to the period of treatment. Liraglutide could significantly reduce the risk of fracture in T2DM patients compared to placebo and other anti-diabetic drugs. Due to the limited nature of contemporary research, further studies are needed to develop a clear clinical consensus.

Structured lifestyle modification as an adjunct to obesity pharmacotherapy: there is much to learn

We are at the start of an exciting new era of very effective pharmacotherapy for patients with obesity, with the latest generation of drugs approaching the efficacy of obesity surgery. Clinical trials of obesity drugs tend to emphasise the importance of participation in some form of structured lifestyle intervention for all trial participants. This usually consists of advice to reduce calorie intake and increase moderate to vigorous physical activity. There is strong evidence that structured lifestyle modification programmes improve health in patients with obesity and related disorders. However, there is no specific evidence that they improve the response to obesity medications. This is because of the way that drug trials for patients with obesity have traditionally been designed, with participants in the active drug treatment group being compared to participants on placebo drug treatment, but with both groups always receiving the same structured lifestyle intervention. While this approach is entirely reasonable, it makes it impossible to draw any inferences about the efficacy of structured lifestyle modification to augment the response to drug therapy. Given this genuine equipoise, a critical step in ensuring that our treatment of patients with obesity is robustly evidence-based is to determine whether "drug plus lifestyle" offer any advantage over "drug plus placebo" in large, well-designed and adequately powered clinical trials. We also need to determine the cost-effectiveness of these programmes.

The pleiotropic effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a review for gastroenterologists

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) or glucagon receptor agonists have emerged as promising agents to treat metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Although the beneficial effects of GLP-1RAs on glycemic control and weight are well-established, clinicians may be unfamiliar with other potential benefits of this class.

AREAS COVERED

We examined the pleiotropic effects of GLP-1RAs and how they relate to gastroenterologists for MASLD/MASH treatment. Our narrative review of English articles included four GLP-1RAs (subcutaneous semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and efpeglenatide), a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist (tirzepatide), a dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist (survodutide), MASLD/MASH, related disorders, clinical management, treatment outcomes and landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

In Phase I - III trials, GLP-1RAs are associated with clinically relevant hepatic improvements including MASH resolution, liver fat reduction, and preventing worsening fibrosis. Effects on cardiometabolic parameters align with type 2 diabetes/obesity Phase III data, comprising substantial improvements in glycemic, weight, and cardiovascular outcomes. Promising data also suggest benefits in common comorbidities, including obstructive sleep apnea, polycystic ovary syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.GLP-1RAs represent a valuable pharmacotherapeutic option for gastroenterologists managing individuals with MASLD/MASH and cardiometabolic comorbid conditions.

Reduced Efficacy of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Therapy in People With Type 1 Diabetes and Genetic Forms of Obesity

BACKGROUND

Once weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RA) have been shown to improve glycemic outcomes and cause significant weight loss. However, 9% to 27% of individuals have little or no response to these drugs. In this article, we investigated the efficacy of GLP-1 RA therapy among adults with type 1 diabetes and obesity likely related to genetic mutations compared with obesity likely unrelated to genetic mutations.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we compared body weight and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change with the use of GLP-1 RA therapy (including a dual agonist, Tirzepatide) over six months among adults with type 1 diabetes and obesity likely (n = 11, median age 39.5 years with a median BMI of 43.0 kg/m2) versus unlikely related to genetic mutation(s) (n = 15, median age 45.8 years with a median BMI of 38.7 kg/m2).

RESULTS

Six months of GLP-1 RA treatment resulted in a numerically lower reduction of weight (-5.75 ± 9.46 kg vs -8.65 ± 9.36 kg, P = .44) and HbA1c (-0.28 ± 0.96% vs -0.43 ± 0.57%, P = .64) among individuals with obesity likely versus unlikely related to a genetic mutation(s), respectively. Fewer individuals with genetic obesity met goal weight loss ≥5% or HbA1c decrease ≥0.4% than did individuals with obesity unlikely related to a genetic cause (36.4% vs 80.0%, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

The weight loss and glycemic lowering effects of GLP-1 RA therapy may be decreased in people with type 1 diabetes and obesity likely related to genetic causes. Further research is needed to understand GLP-1 RA mechanisms via energy regulating genes.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist-Experienced Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Switching to Once-Weekly Semaglutide in a Real-World Setting: SURE Program Post Hoc Analysis

INTRODUCTION

To investigate outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes who switched to once-weekly (OW) semaglutide from another glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) in clinical practice.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis used data from the SemaglUtide Real-world Evidence (SURE) program, which included nine observational studies investigating the initiation of OW semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice. Using a random coefficient-adjusted mixed model for repeated measurements, changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, and body mass index were analyzed for GLP-1RA-experienced patients who had at least one documented HbA1c value within the 12 weeks before switching to OW semaglutide. In addition, descriptive statistics were used for HbA1c, body weight target achievement, and safety data.

RESULTS

Of the 3,505 patients included in the nine SURE studies, 651 switched to OW semaglutide from another GLP-1RA. GLP-1RA-experienced patients who switched to OW semaglutide demonstrated a 0.67%-point [95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.74; - 0.60, p < 0.0001] reduction in HbA1c, and a 3.69-kg [95% CI - 3.98; - 3.41, p < 0.0001] reduction in body weight over 30 weeks. A body weight reduction of ≥ 5% was achieved by 27.6% of patients, and 33.3% of patients with baseline HbA1c ≥ 7% achieved HbA1c < 7% at end of study. No new safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this post hoc analysis suggest that, for those not adequately responding to treatment with other GLP-1RAs, switching to OW semaglutide could provide additional glycemic and weight benefits with the convenience of an OW dosing regimen.

Exploring omics signature in the cardiovascular response to semaglutide: Mechanistic insights and clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, is a widely used drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes that offers significant cardiovascular benefits.

RESULTS

This review systematically examines the proteomic and metabolomic indicators associated with the cardiovascular effects of semaglutide. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies. The review utilizes advanced analytical technologies such as mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of semaglutide on insulin secretion, weight control, anti-inflammatory activities and lipid metabolism. These "omics" approaches offer critical insights into metabolic changes associated with cardiovascular health. However, challenges remain such as individual variability in expression, the need for comprehensive validation and the integration of these data with clinical parameters. These issues need to be addressed through further research to refine these indicators and increase their clinical utility.

CONCLUSION

Future integration of proteomic and metabolomic data with artificial intelligence (AI) promises to improve prediction and monitoring of cardiovascular outcomes and may enable more accurate and effective management of cardiovascular health in patients with type 2 diabetes. This review highlights the transformative potential of integrating proteomics, metabolomics and AI to advance cardiovascular medicine and improve patient outcomes.

De-intensification of basal-bolus therapy by replacing prandial insulin with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in individuals with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: A single-centre, open-label randomised trial (TRANSITION-T2D)

AIMS

The study aims to examine the outcome of replacement of prandial insulin with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes reasonably controlled on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-centre, randomised, open-label trial enrolled a statistically predetermined sample of 60 adults with HbA1c ≤7.5% (58 mmol/mol) receiving MDI, with a total daily dose (TDD) ≤120 units/day. Participants were assigned 2:1 to subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg plus insulin degludec, or to continue MDI. The primary outcome was percentage of subjects maintaining HbA1c ≤7.5% (58 mmol/mol) at Week 26.

RESULTS

At Week 26, 90% of semaglutide and 75% of MDI subjects maintained HbA1c ≤7.5% (≤58 mmol/mol) (p = 0.18). Mean changes (95% CI) in HbA1c, weight and percentage body weight for semaglutide versus MDI, respectively, were -0.5% (-0.7, -0.3) versus 0.0% (-0.3, 0.3; p = 0.009); -8.9 kg (-9.9, -7.8) versus 1.5 kg (-0.1, 3.1; p < 0.001); and -8.6% (-9.6, -7.6) versus 1.4% (0.0, 2.8; p < 0.001). Insulin TDD decreased 56.0% (-62.3, -49.7) with semaglutide and increased 6.7% (-2.5, 16.0) with MDI (p < 0.001). Among semaglutide subjects, 58% reduced insulin TDD > 50%, 97.5% stopped prandial insulin and 45% lost >10% body weight. Participant treatment satisfaction scores trended higher with semaglutide. Hypoglycaemia frequency was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In people with type 2 diabetes well controlled (HbA1c ≤7.5% [≤58 mmol/mol]) on MDI ≤120 units/day, replacing multiple daily injections of prandial insulin with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide can maintain and even improve HbA1c, lower body weight and lessen the burden of management.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: New Pathogenetic Mechanisms, Treatment and the Most Important Complications

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a prevalent chronic disease affecting over 400 million people globally, is driven by genetic and environmental factors. The pathogenesis involves insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, mediated by mechanisms such as the dedifferentiation of β-cells, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress. Treatment should be based on non-pharmacological therapy. Strategies such as increased physical activity, dietary modifications, cognitive-behavioral therapy are important in maintaining normal glycemia. Advanced therapies, including SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, complement these treatments and offer solid glycemic control, weight control, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Complications of T2DM, such as diabetic kidney disease, retinopathy, and neuropathy, underscore the need for early diagnosis and comprehensive management to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Evaluating semaglutide + LAI-287 (IcoSema) for the treatment of diabetes mellitus type II

INTRODUCTION

A stepwise coordinated multiple therapeutic targeted approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes includes starting with lifestyle modification, oral antihyperglycemic agents, non-insulin injectables (Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and both short and long-acting insulins. Ultra-long-acting insulins offer more convenient administration. As in any chronic disease, the introduction of a novel medication must balance safety, efficacy, financial cost, as well as improved patient convenience and adherence.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript describes IcoSema - a new investigational fixed-ratio combination of basal insulin icodec and the GLP-1 RA semaglutide. The key trials from the clinical development process of insulin icodec, semaglutide, and IcoSema are reviewed with important endpoints highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

Once-weekly IcoSema offers glycemic efficacy that is non-inferior to glargine+aspart, similar risk of hypoglycemia, significant reduction in body weight, the convenience of use, and favorable safety profile with most adverse events being gastrointestinal.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed NA, McCoy RG, Aleppo G, Bajaj M, Balapattabi K, Beverly EA, Briggs Early K, Bruemmer D, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Ekhlaspour L, Gaglia JL, Garg R, Girotra M, Khunti K, Lal R, Lingvay I, Matfin G, Neumiller JJ, Pandya N, Pekas EJ, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Bannuru RR. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Charting New Territories in Obesity Management- Traditional Techniques to Tirzepatide

BACKGROUND

Obesity, a pervasive global health challenge affecting more than 2 billion people, requires comprehensive interventions. Traditional approaches, including lifestyle modification, and diverse drugs targeting a gastrointestinal hormone, including glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 (Liraglutide, Semaglutide, Exenatide, Albiglutide, Dulaglutide, Lixisenatide, Orlistat, Phentermine/Topiramate, Lorcaserin, Sibutramine, and Rimonabant) offer tailored strategies; yet their effectiveness is limited and some drugs were taken off the market. Moreover, various surgical modalities, such as Roux-en-Y Bypass surgery, sleeve gastrectomy, intragastric balloons, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and vagal nerve blockade can be considered but are associated with numerous side effects and require careful monitoring. Consequently, there is a pressing need for novel anti-obesity treatments.

METHODS

This comprehensive review was based on the available data to discuss the traditional pharmaceutical and surgical therapeutical strategies for obesity, going further to discuss tirzepatide's mode of action, its outcomes for obesity, and the associated side effects.

RESULTS

In this landscape, tirzepatide, initially designed for type 2 diabetes management, emerges as a potential game-changer. Functioning as a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, it not only addresses control but also introduces a fresh perspective on weight reduction. This review intricately explores tirzepatide's mechanism, dissecting insights from clinical studies and positioning it as a major force in obesity treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In the middle of significant shifts in obesity management, tirzepatide presents itself as a promising and cost-effective intervention. Its Food and Drug Administration approval marks a milestone in the realm of obesity therapeutics. Going beyond a recapitulation of findings, the conclusion emphasizes the imperative for ongoing exploration and vigilant safety monitoring in tirzepatide's application.

Comparing medication persistence with oral and subcutaneous semaglutide in a real-world setting

AIMS

To compare medication persistence and efficacy of oral and subcutaneous semaglutide, in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective observational cohort study. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) starting treatment with either formulation of semaglutide between January 1 2019 and July 31 2023 and with at least one follow-up visit were included. The primary endpoint was the difference in the proportion of patients that continued treatment after 6, 12 and 18 months. Main secondary endpoints were change in HbA1c and body weight.

RESULTS

We included 242 patients on oral (n = 121) and subcutaneous (n = 121) semaglutide. At baseline, patients in the oral semaglutide group were significantly older (mean age: 67 ± 11 vs. 63 ± 11 years, p = 0.002) and had a lower body mass index (BMI: 30.5 ± 5.6 vs. 33.9 ± 7.1 kg/m2, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients persistent to treatment was significantly lower in the oral group at 6 (85.3% vs. 94.8%; p < 0.001), 12 (72.3% vs. 92.4%, p < 0.001) and 18 (46.0% vs. 83.8%; p < 0.001) months. Most common reasons for discontinuation were gastro-intestinal side effects. When adjusted for age and BMI, body weight and HbA1c reduction were not significantly different between the two formulations, as the proportion of patients achieving the composite outcome of weight loss ≥ 5% and HbA1c < 7.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The present real-world study suggests that persistence is significantly lower when semaglutide is administered as a once-daily tablet compared with a weekly injection, while there are no differences in efficacy between the two formulations.

REAL life study of subcutaneous SEMaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes in SPain: Ambispective, multicenter clinical study. Results in the GLP1-experienced cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of switching to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were previously treated with other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in a real-world setting in Spain.

METHODS

The REAL Life study of SEMaglutide in Patients with Type 2 diabetes in Spain (REALSEM-SP) was conducted in four endocrinology departments in Madrid, Spain. Adult patients with T2DM who were prescribed once-weekly (OW) subcutaneous semaglutide and had been previously treated with other GLP-1 RAs were included. Baseline characteristics, including demographic, anthropometric, and laboratory variables, were recorded at baseline and at 6 ± 3 and 12 ± 3 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c at 12 ± 3 months of follow-up, with secondary outcomes including changes in weight, BMI, and other glycemic parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 61.6 years and a mean T2DM duration of 11.3 years. The majority of patients had grade 1 or 2 obesity at baseline. Switching to OW-semaglutide was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline to 13 months (-0.35 % ± 0.81). Patients who reached the 1.0 mg OW-dose showed a significant reduction in HbA1c compared to those on the ≤0.5 mg OW-dose. Significant reductions in weight, BMI, and fasting plasma glucose were also observed. Adverse events were mostly gastrointestinal and led to treatment withdrawal in few cases.

CONCLUSION

Switching to OW-subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with T2DM previously treated with other GLP-1 RAs was associated to improvements in glycemic control and weight management in a real-world setting in Spain. These findings support the use of OW-semaglutide as an effective option for patients with T2DM who require additional glycemic control and weight management.

Porous silicon and silica carriers for delivery of peptide therapeutics

Peptides have gained tremendous popularity as biological therapeutic agents in recent years due to their favourable specificity, diversity of targets, well-established screening methods, ease of production, and lower cost. However, their poor physiological and storage stability, pharmacokinetics, and fast clearance have limited their clinical translation. Novel nanocarrier-based strategies have shown promise in overcoming these issues. In this direction, porous silicon (pSi) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have been widely explored as potential carriers for the delivery of peptide therapeutics. These materials possess several advantages, including large surface areas, tunable pore sizes, and adjustable pore architectures, which make them attractive carriers for peptide delivery systems. In this review, we cover pSi and MSNs as drug carriers focusing on their use in peptide delivery. The review provides a brief overview of their fabrication, surface modification, and interesting properties that make them ideal peptide drug carriers. The review provides a systematic account of various studies that have utilised these unique porous carriers for peptide delivery describing significant in vitro and in vivo results. We have also provided a critical comparison of the two carriers in terms of their physicochemical properties and short-term and long-term biocompatibility. Lastly, we have concluded the review with our opinion of this field and identified key areas for future research for clinical translation of pSi and MSN-based peptide therapeutic formulations.

Recent achievements and future directions of anti-obesity medications

Pharmacological management of obesity long suffered from a reputation of a 'Mission Impossible,' with inefficient weight loss and/or unacceptable tolerability. However, the tide has turned with recent progress in biochemical engineering and the development of long-acting agonists at the receptor for glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and with unimolecular peptides that simultaneously possess activity at the receptors for GLP-1, the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon. Some of these novel therapeutics not only improve body weight and glycemic control in individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes with hitherto unmet efficacy and tolerable safety, but also exhibit potential therapeutic value in diverse areas such as neurodegenerative diseases, fatty liver disease, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular diseases. In this review, we highlight recent advances in incretin-based therapies and discuss their pharmacological potential within and beyond the treatment of obesity and diabetes, as well as their limitations in use, side effects, and underlying molecular mechanisms.

The effect of GLP-1R agonists on the medical triad of obesity, diabetes, and cancer

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists have garnered significant attention for their therapeutic potential in addressing the interconnected health challenges of diabetes, obesity, and cancer. The role of GLP-1R in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is highlighted, emphasizing its pivotal contribution to glucose homeostasis, promoting β-cell proliferation, and facilitating insulin release. GLP-1R agonists have effectively managed obesity by reducing hunger, moderating food intake, and regulating body weight. Beyond diabetes and obesity, GLP-1R agonists exhibit a multifaceted impact on cancer progression across various malignancies. The mechanisms underlying these effects involve the modulation of signaling pathways associated with cell growth, survival, and metabolism. However, the current literature reveals a lack of in vivo studies on specific GLP-1R agonists such as semaglutide, necessitating further research to elucidate its precise mechanisms and effects, particularly in cancer. While other GLP-1R agonists have shown promising outcomes in mitigating cancer progression, the association between some GLP-1R agonists and an increased risk of cancer remains a topic requiring more profound investigation. This calls for more extensive research to unravel the intricate relationships between the GLP-1R agonist and different cancers, providing valuable insights for clinicians and researchers alike.

Time-Efficacy Relationship of Semaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to quantify the efficacy of subcutaneous once-weekly semaglutide in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) over time.

METHODS

Based on a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases, a modified maximum effect (Emax) model including rebound effects was built using model-based meta-analysis with change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin as the efficacy endpoint. This was combined with the covariate model to form a final model, and then theoretical values of Emax and time to reach 50% of Emax (ET50) were obtained for each dose. Model fit and prediction were assessed using goodness-of-fit plots and visual prediction checking.

RESULTS

Emax and ET50 were influenced by the proportion of males and the baseline values, respectively. There was no evidence of a placebo effect with semaglutide. The efficacy of other doses became more significant over time, and a rebound effect was observed after maximum efficacy, at a rate of 0.018. Simulation of the typical efficacy at the different doses yielded a maximum efficacy of -1.58% with 0.5 mg and a maximum efficacy of -1.87% with 1 mg. In addition, the six simulated doses (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg) showed a dose-dependent relationship between dose and efficacy except for 0.4 mg and 0.8 mg. A higher dose would result in greater efficacy and a faster onset of action.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of semaglutide in glucose control was investigated using the model-based meta-analysis method, which yields new insights into the treatment of T2DM with semaglutide.

Treatment of Hypothalamic Obesity With GLP-1 Analogs

Introduction

Congenital and acquired damage to hypothalamic nuclei or neuronal circuits controlling satiety and energy expenditure results in hypothalamic obesity (HO). To date, successful weight loss and satiety has only been achieved in a limited number of affected patients across multiple drug trials. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) acts via central pathways that are independent from the hypothalamus to induce satiety. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) may provide an alternative approach to treating HO.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive search in Medline, Google Scholar, and clinical trials registries (ClinicalTrials.gov; clinicaltrialsregister.eur). This nonsystematic literature review was conducted to identify scientific papers published from January 2005 to February 2024 using the Pubmed and Embase databases. Key words used were GLP-1, GLP-1RA, hypothalamic obesity, suprasellar tumor, and craniopharyngioma.

Results

Our search identified 7 case studies, 5 case series, and 2 published clinical trials relating to the use of GLP-1RAs in HO. All case studies demonstrated weight loss and improved metabolic function. In contrast, results from case series were variable, with some showing no weight loss and others demonstrating moderate to significant weight loss and improved metabolic parameters. In the ECHO clinical trial, nearly half the subjects randomized to weekly exenatide showed reduced body mass index (BMI). Paradoxically, BMI reduction was greater in patients with more extensive hypothalamic injuries.

Conclusion

GLP-1RAs potentially offer a new approach to treating HO. There is a need to stratify patients who are more likely to respond. Further randomized controlled trials are required to determine their efficacy either in isolation or combined with other therapies.

Real-World HbA1c Changes Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Initiating Treatment With a 1.0 Mg Weekly Dose of Semaglutide for Diabetes

Background: Medical management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is complex because of the chronic nature of the disease and its associated comorbidities. Injectable once-weekly semaglutide for diabetes (OW sema T2D) is a type of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of patients with T2DM. Objectives: To describe patient characteristics and HbA1c changes for patients prescribed 1.0 mg maintenance dose OW sema T2D. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients with T2DM with a pre-index glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of at least 7%, initiating treatment with OW sema T2D between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, and prescribed a 1.0 mg maintenance dose. Patients were identified in the Optum Research Database and were included if they had continuous health plan enrollment for at least 12 months prior to (pre-index) and at least 12 months following (post-index) the date of the first OW sema T2D claim (index). Dose at initiation and prescriber specialty were captured. Change in HbA1c between the latest post-index and pre-index HbA1c measurement was calculated among all patients and among those with at least 90 days of continuous treatment (persistent patients). Results: A total of 2168 patients were included in this study. On average, patients were taking 13.5 different classes of medications. The majority of patients had lipid metabolism disorder (90.8%), hypertension (86.6%), diabetes with complications (86.8%), or other nutritional/endocrine/metabolic disorders (72.5%). The mean HbA1c reduction was 1.2% (P < .001). Patients persistent with OW sema T2D (n =1280) had a mean HbA1c reduction of 1.4% (P < .001). The mean (SD) days covered with a 1.0 mg maintenance dose was 236.1 (94.1) days. Discussion: Despite being medically complex, the patients in this real-world study experienced significant reductions in HbA1c following initiation of OW sema T2D. Conclusions: A 1.0 mg maintenance dose of OW sema T2D is an effective treatment for T2DM in the real world.

Impact of baseline characteristics on the efficacy of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide among participants with type 2 diabetes: A post hoc analysis of SUSTAIN China

AIMS

To investigate the impact of baseline characteristics on the efficacy of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from the SUSTAIN China trial.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis, data for semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus sitagliptin 100 mg were analysed in the total (n = 868) and Chinese-only (n = 605) populations. Changes from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight were analysed by baseline age, sex, body mass index, HbA1c, diabetes duration, and homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) tertile. Proportions of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) by baseline HbA1c, change from baseline to EOT in standard deviation of seven-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG), derived time-in-range (dTIR) of seven-point SMPG at Week 30, and HOMA-β ratio to baseline at Week 30 were assessed for both populations.

RESULTS

In both populations the efficacy of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus sitagliptin was not significantly affected by most of the baseline characteristics studied. The proportion of participants achieving the target HbA1c <7% was not affected by baseline HbA1c (pinteraction > 0.05). SMPG fluctuation and dTIR indicated less glucose variability in participants treated with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus sitagliptin, and the HOMA-β ratios to baseline at EOT were greater with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus sitagliptin (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the effectiveness of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg across a broad range of baseline characteristics, in participants with T2D from SUSTAIN China.

Tirzepatide: unveiling a new dawn in dual-targeted diabetes and obesity management

INTRODUCTION

Incretin-based therapies have emerged as effective treatments for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. However, not all patients achieve optimal outcomes with existing treatments, highlighting the need for more effective solutions.

AREAS COVERED

We present a comprehensive evaluation of Tirzepatide (TZP), a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GIP/GLP-1) receptor agonist, for managing obesity and T2D. We conducted a systematic search of Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 2024. The focus of the review is on the development and therapeutic potential of TZP, with detailed exploration on pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety. Furthermore, it reviews TZP's impacts on glycemic control, weight management, and its potential cardiovascular (CV) benefits.

EXPERT OPINION

TZP represents a significant advancement in the dual-targeted approach to treating T2D and obesity. Its unique mechanism of action offers superior efficacy in reducing glycemic levels and body weight compared to existing therapies. New data suggesting improvements in CV outcomes indicate that TZP could set a new standard in the treatment paradigm. While long-term data on efficacy and safety are still forthcoming, current evidence positions TZP as a promising option for patients who have not reached their therapeutic goals with existing treatments.

Reconsidering Semaglutide Use for Chronic Obesity in Patients of Asian Descent: A Critical Review

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist. It is the first approved drug for chronic weight management in adults who are overweight or obese since 2014. Its increasing popularity has garnered significant media attention and led to a drug shortage, resulting in limited access for its intended use - patients with type 2 diabetes. Numerous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in promoting weight loss. This review seeks to explain the use of semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, to treat metabolic syndrome in the Asian American population. It raises concerns about the existing diagnostic and treatment approaches and stresses the necessity of integrating visceral fat and other ethnicity-specific risk predictors for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome. The objective of this review is to examine the eligibility criteria for the prescription of semaglutide critically and determine whether Asians are being unfairly excluded and denied access to this medication due to ineffective prescription guidelines.

Real-world use of oral versus subcutaneous semaglutide in a cohort of type 2 diabetic patients: which option to which patient?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the variables influencing the therapeutic choice toward oral versus subcutaneous semaglutide in a cohort of diabetic subjects.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of 292 patients followed at the Diabetes Unit of the University Hospital of Siena and the Hospital of Grosseto, who were prescribed oral (n = 115) or subcutaneous (n = 177) semaglutide between October 2021 and October 2022.

RESULTS

Oral semaglutide was preferentially prescribed in older subjects with longer disease duration in replacement of other antidiabetic drugs, while subcutaneous semaglutide was preferentially prescribed in add-on to metformin in subjects with higher body weight and BMI. After 6 months, both formulations significantly improved glycemic control and body weight, however injectable semaglutide showed a greater efficacy on A1c levels, weight loss, BMI and waist circumference reduction. No differences were found in terms of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, injectable semaglutide is preferred in patients with excess weight and shorter disease duration, while the oral formulation was used later and especially after therapeutic failure of previous therapies. Follow-up data indicate similar tolerability and efficacy of both formulations, despite subcutaneous semaglutide demonstrated greater efficacy.