Gestational Glucose Intolerance and Risk of Future Diabetes

Postnatal Cardiometabolic Health After Metformin Use in Gestational Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of the EMERGE Trial

AIM

Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) display adverse lifetime cardiometabolic health. We examined whether early metformin in GDM could impact cardiometabolic risk factors postpartum.

METHODS

EMERGE, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, randomized pregnancies 1:1 to placebo or metformin at GDM diagnosis and followed participants from randomization until 12 ± 4 weeks postpartum. In total, 478 pregnancies were available for postpartum maternal assessment, 237 and 241 assigned to metformin and placebo respectively. Weight (kg), body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), waist circumference (cm), and blood pressure (mmHg) were measured, infant feeding method documented, and blood specimens drawn for a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test, fasting insulin, C-peptide, and lipid analysis.

RESULTS

Despite similar weight and BMI at trial randomization, participants receiving metformin had significantly lower weight (79.5 ± 15.9 vs 82.6 ± 16.9 kg; P = .04) and BMI (29.3 [5.6] vs 30.5 [5.4]; P = .018) at the postpartum visit. However, no difference in weight change from randomization to 12 weeks postpartum was observed between metformin and placebo groups. Overall, 29% (n = 139) of the cohort met criteria for prediabetes or diabetes, with no positive impact with metformin. There were also no differences in measurements of insulin resistance, blood pressure, or lipids between groups.

CONCLUSION

Early metformin use in GDM did not impact important cardiometabolic parameters in the early postpartum period despite significant benefits in weight gain and insulin use in pregnancy.

Association of maternal blood metabolomics and gestational diabetes mellitus risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of pregnancy that has short- and long-term adverse effects. Therefore, further exploration of the pathophysiology of GDM and related biomarkers is important. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the associations between metabolites in blood detected via metabolomics techniques and the risk of GDM and to identify possible biomarkers for predicting the occurrence of GDM. We retrieved case‒control and cohort studies of metabolomics and GDM published in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science through March 29, 2024; extracted metabolite concentrations, odds ratios (ORs), or relative risks (RRs); and evaluated the integrated results with metabolites per-SD risk estimates and 95% CIs for GDM. We estimated the results via the random effects model and the inverse variance method. Our study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024539435). We included a total of 28 case‒control and cohort studies, including 17,370 subjects (4,372 GDM patients and 12,998 non-GDM subjects), and meta-analyzed 67 metabolites. Twenty-five of these metabolites were associated with GDM risk. Some amino acids (isoleucine, leucine, valine, alanine, aspartate, etc.), lipids (C16:0, C18:1n-9, C18:1n-7, lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) (16:0), LPC (18:0), and palmitoylcarnitine), and carbohydrates and energy metabolites (glucose, pyruvate, lactate, 2-hydroxybutyrate, 3-hydroxybutyrate) were discovered to be associated with increased GDM risk (hazard ratio 1.06-2.77). Glutamine, histidine, C14:0, and sphingomyelin (SM) (34:1) were associated with lower GDM risk (hazard ratio 0.75-0.84). These findings suggest that these metabolites may play essential roles in GDM progression, and serve as biomarkers, contributing to the early diagnosis and prediction of GDM.

The interdependence of mid-trimester blood pressure and glucose levels in shaping fetal growth and neonatal outcomes: implications for risk-benefit assessment and co-management

BACKGROUND

Maternal hypertension and hyperglycemia are closely related but have distinct impacts on fetal growth and are managed independently. How the interdependence of blood pressure (BP) and glucose levels quantitatively influences risk patterns for abnormal fetal growth and neonatal complications remains unexplored.

METHODS

Maternal BP and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were measured between 20 and 28 weeks of gestation in a cohort including 56,881 singleton pregnancies. Linear and quantile regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between BP and FPG. We examined the dose-response relationships between BP and FPG with small-for-gestational age (SGA) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) by using restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves. Additionally, multivariable fractional polynomial interaction (MFPI) analysis was conducted to assess the effects of higher versus lower BP levels across the full range of FPG levels. Heatmaps were created to visualize the contributions of BP and FPG by categorizing them into ordered groups.

RESULTS

Quantile regression revealed consistent positive correlations between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and FPG, with a steeper increase in MAP coefficients above the 0.5 quantile of FPG. MAP had a non-linear positive association with SGA risk, while FPG showed a non-linear negative association. Heatmaps revealed the highest SGA risk with high BP (MAP ≥ 85 mmHg)/low glucose (< 85 mg/dL) combinations and the lowest risk with low BP (MAP < 85 mmHg)/high glucose (≥ 85 mg/dL), with equivalent risk at both high BP/high glucose and low BP/low glucose. In hypertensive patients, SGA risk worsened continuously as glucose levels decreased. LGA risk was not influenced by BP levels. Neonatal complications decreased by approximately 47% as MAP declined from the highest to lowest category, and by about 17% with decreasing glucose levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a large pregnancy cohort in China, this study revealed an interdependent association between maternal BP and glucose levels and their combined impact on the risk of SGA. It provided quantitative evidence of how this interdependence shapes the transition of risk patterns for SGA, neonatal complications, and LGA. These findings underscore the need for an integrated approach to co-managing BP and glucose levels during pregnancy.

Hematologic dynamics during pregnancy and their association with obstetric complications: a retrospective cohort study

Objectives

Pregnancy alters hematologic state as measured by complete blood counts (CBC), but the longitudinal changes in CBC indices that define healthy pregnancies are not well established. Our objectives were (1) to define gestational age-specific reference intervals for CBCs and their longitudinal changes in a large United States-based cohort and (2) to use these reference intervals to examine associations between extreme CBC values and changes and risk of obstetric complications.

Design

Retrospective cohort study including electronic health record-based discovery and validation cohorts.

Setting

Academic medical center and affiliated health system in the United States between 1998 and 2022.

Participants

Individuals with singleton pregnancies delivering after 30 weeks' gestation who presented for prenatal care prior to 20 weeks'. There were 45,992 pregnancies in the discovery cohort, 18% of whom had complications, and 50,603 in the validation cohort, 22% with complications.

Main outcome measures

Composite outcome (hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, small for gestational age birthweight or preterm birth) and its individual components. We analyzed associations between CBC results and outcomes using generalized estimating equations for logistic regression with Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing.

Results

Hematocrit, hemoglobin, and red cell count values above their reference intervals were associated with increased risk of the composite obstetric complication: OR [95% CI] of 1.4 [1.2, 1.6] p=1.8×10-5 for hematocrit; 1.7[1.4, 1.9] p=1.4×10-10 for hemoglobin; and 1.6[1.4, 1.9] p=3.9×10-9 for red cell count. Extreme increase in hemoglobin (>0.67 g/dL) or red cell count (>0.07 106/mm3) between 7-14 weeks' and 26-29 weeks' gestation was associated with increased risk for preterm birth (OR [95% CI] for hemoglobin 2.0[1.6, 2.6] p=2×10-8 and red cell count: 2.1[1.7, 2.6] p=9×10-14). Reference intervals in this cohort were often wider than those previously published for mean red cell volume, mean red cell hemoglobin, red cell count, and mean red cell hemoglobin concentration.

Conclusions

Elevated measures of red blood cell count and large intra-pregnancy increases in those measures are associated with subsequent obstetric complications.

A framework to classify gestational diabetes diagnosed by routine antenatal 75g glucose tolerance testing

OBJECTIVE

To create an objective framework to classify gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed by routine antenatal 75 g diabetes testing results to provide an alternative to current treatment-based classification.

METHODS

A framework was created to classify gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (classes 1 through 4, determined by fasting and post-test glycemic abnormalities). A retrospective cohort chart review was used to correlate clinically how often diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy in each class. Chi-square analysis was used to assess inter-class differences in the success of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy.

RESULTS

Seventy-four of 228 (33%), 35/228 (15%), 76/228 (33%), and 43/228 (19%) of the study population were classified as Class 1, 2, 3, or 4, respectively. Of eighty-nine patients who maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy with diet alone 51/89 (57%) were Class 1, 20/89 (22.5%) were Class 2, 11/89 (12.5%) were Class 3, and 7/89 (8%) were Class 4. Chi-square analysis showed statistically significant inter-class differences in the likelihood of diet therapy alone maintaining glycemic targets throughout pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

In this framework classifying gestational diabetes according to the severity of glycemic abnormalities after routine antenatal 75 g GTT (an objective proxy for disease severity), the higher the assigned class, the less likely that diet therapy alone maintained glycemic targets throughout pregnancy (a clinical proxy for disease severity).

The simultaneous occurrence of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affects fetal growth and neonatal morbidity

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes is associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, but there are limited data on fetal growth and neonatal outcomes when both conditions are present.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the risk of abnormal fetal growth and neonatal morbidity in pregnancies with co-occurrence of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

In a retrospective study of 47,093 singleton pregnancies, we compared the incidence of appropriate for gestational age birthweight in pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes alone, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy alone, or both gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with that in pregnancies affected by neither disorder using generalized estimating equations (covariates: maternal age, nulliparity, body mass index, insurance type, race, marital status, and prenatal care site). Secondary outcomes were large for gestational age birthweight, small for gestational age birthweight, and a neonatal morbidity composite outcome (stillbirth, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress, encephalopathy, preterm delivery, neonatal death, and neonatal intensive care unit admission).

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) birthweight percentile in pregnancies with both gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (50 [24.0-78.0]; N=179) was similar to that of unaffected pregnancies (50 [27.0-73.0]; N=35,833). However, the absolute rate of appropriate for gestational age birthweight was lower for gestational diabetes/hypertensive disorders of pregnancy co-occurrence (78.2% vs 84.9% for unaffected pregnancies). Adjusted analyses showed decreased odds of appropriate for gestational age birthweight in pregnancies with both gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy compared with unaffected pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio, 0.72 [95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.00]; P=.049), and in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes alone (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78 [0.68-0.89]; P<.001) or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy alone (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73 [0.66-0.81]; P<.001). The absolute risk of large for gestational age birthweight was greater in pregnancies with both gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (14.5%) than in unaffected pregnancies (8.2%), without apparent difference in the risk of small for gestational age birthweight (7.3% vs 6.9%). However, in adjusted models comparing pregnancies with gestational diabetes/hypertensive disorders of pregnancy co-occurrence with unaffected pregnancies, neither an association with large for gestational age birthweight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33 [0.88-2.00]; P=.171) nor small for gestational age birthweight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.32 [0.80-2.19]; P=.293) reached statistical significance. Gestational diabetes/hypertensive disorders of pregnancy co-occurrence carried an increased risk of neonatal morbidity that was greater than that observed with either condition alone (gestational diabetes/hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: adjusted odds ratio, 3.13 [2.35-4.17]; P<.001; gestational diabetes alone: adjusted odds ratio, 2.01 [1.78-2.27]; P<.001; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy alone: adjusted odds ratio, 1.38 [1.26-1.50]; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Although pregnancies with both gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy have a similar median birthweight percentile to those affected by neither condition, pregnancies concurrently affected by both conditions have a higher risk of abnormal fetal growth and neonatal morbidity.

Greater risk of type 2 diabetes progression in multifetal gestations with gestational diabetes: the impact of obesity

BACKGROUND

The relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse outcomes in multifetal pregnancies is complex and controversial. Moreover, limited research has focused on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus specifically in multifetal pregnancies, resulting in conflicting results from existing studies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus between singleton and multifetal pregnancies in a large cohort of parturients with a 5-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was conducted on a prospective cohort of pregnant individuals with pregnancies between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, followed up to 5 years after delivery. Glucose levels during pregnancy were obtained from the Meuhedet Health Maintenance Organization laboratory system and cross-linked with the Israeli National Diabetes Registry. The cohort was divided into 4 groups: singleton pregnancy without gestational diabetes mellitus, singleton pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus, multifetal pregnancy without gestational diabetes mellitus, and multifetal pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus. Gestational diabetes mellitus was defined according to the American Diabetes Association criteria using the 2-step strategy. Univariate analyses, followed by survival analysis that included Kaplan-Meier hazard curves and Cox proportional-hazards models, were used to assess differences between groups and calculate the adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Among 88,611 parturients, 61,891 cases met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 6.5% in the singleton pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus group and 9.4% in the multifetal pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus group. Parturients with gestational diabetes mellitus, regardless of plurality, were older and had higher fasting plasma glucose levels in the first trimester of pregnancy. The rates of increased body mass index, hypertension, and earlier gestational age at delivery were significantly higher in the gestational diabetes mellitus group among patients with singleton pregnancies but not among patients with multifetal pregnancies. Survival analysis demonstrated that gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with adjusted hazard ratios of type 2 diabetes mellitus of 4.62 (95% confidence interval, 3.69-5.78) in singleton pregnancies and 9.26 (95% confidence interval, 2.67-32.01) in multifetal pregnancies (P<.001 for both). Stratified analysis based on obesity status revealed that, in parturients without obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies increased the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus by 10.24 (95% confidence interval, 6.79-15.44; P<.001) compared with a nonsignificant risk in multifetal pregnancies (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-90.22; P=.059). Among parturients with obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus for both singleton and multifetal pregnancies (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.66; [95% confidence interval, 2.81-4.67; P<.001] and 9.31 [95% confidence interval, 2.12-40.76; P=.003], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Compared with gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus in multifetal pregnancies doubles the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus. This effect is primarily observed in patients with obesity. Our findings underscore the importance of providing special attention and postpartum follow-up for patients with multifetal pregnancies and gestational diabetes mellitus, especially those with obesity, to enable early diagnosis and intervention for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Risk of Neonatal Hypoglycemia in Infants of Mothers With Gestational Glucose Intolerance

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between gestational glucose intolerance (GGI) and neonatal hypoglycemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of 8,262 mother-infant dyads, with delivery at two hospitals between 2014 and 2023. We categorized maternal glycemic status as normal glucose tolerance (NGT), GGI, or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We defined NGT according to a normal glucose load test result, GGI according to an abnormal glucose load test result with zero (GGI-0) or one (GGI-1) abnormal value on the 100-g oral glucose tolerance test, and GDM according to an abnormal glucose load test result with two or more abnormal values on the glucose tolerance test. Neonatal hypoglycemia was defined according to blood glucose <45 mg/dL or ICD-9 or ICD-10 diagnosis of neonatal hypoglycemia. We used logistic regression analysis to determine associations between maternal glucose tolerance category and neonatal hypoglycemia and conducted a sensitivity analysis using Δ-adjusted multiple imputation, assuming for unscreened infants a rate of neonatal hypoglycemia as high as 33%.

RESULTS

Of infants, 12% had neonatal hypoglycemia. In adjusted models, infants born to mothers with GGI-0 had 1.28 (95% 1.12, 1.65), GGI-1 1.58 (95% CI 1.11, 2.25), and GDM 4.90 (95% CI 3.81, 6.29) times higher odds of neonatal hypoglycemia in comparison with infants born to mothers with NGT. Associations in sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

GGI is associated with increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia. Future research should include examination of these associations in a cohort with more complete neonatal blood glucose ascertainment and determination of the clinical significance of these findings on long-term child health.

Are miR-26a and miR-26b microRNAs potent prognostic markers of gestational diabetes?

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common public health problem, accompanied by complications for the mother and fetus. So, introducing new biomarkers to identify early diabetes is essential. As serum miRNAs are potentially appropriate markers, we investigated miR-26a and miR-26b expression levels in pregnant women with and without gestational diabetes.

Method

Demographic and clinical characteristics of 40 gestational diabetic patients and 40 healthy controls were assessed. The expression level of miR-26a and miR-26b microRNAs was measured by real-time PCR. Statistical analysis was done with GraphPad Prism software (version 8.4.3).

Result

The findings of this study showed that the expression level of miR-26a and miR-26b increased in women with gestational diabetes compared with healthy pregnant women, but the increase in expression was only significant for miR-26a (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

According to the statistical and ROC curves, we suggest miR-26a as a potential biomarker for the early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Gestational glucose intolerance among pregnant women at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital

BACKGROUND

Malaria in pregnancy can have adverse outcomes if untreated. Both malaria and pregnancy are associated with insulin resistance and diabetes. Although malaria is treated prophylactically with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screened for in pregnancy as part a routine antenatal care, their impacts have not been examined in terms of other forms of dysglycaemia. This cross-sectional study examined insulin resistance and its relationship with dysglycaemia and malaria among pregnant women in the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH).

METHODS

Using a structured questionnaire, demographic and clinical information were obtained from 252 pregnant women aged 18-42 years. Weight and height were measured for computation of body mass index (BMI). Measurement of insulin, lipid profile and glucose were taken under fasting conditions followed by oral glucose tolerant test. Insulin resistance and beta-cell function were assessed by the homeostatic model as malaria was diagnosed by microscopy.

RESULTS

The respective prevalence of GDM, gestational glucose intolerance (GGI) and insulin resistance were 0.8% (2/252), 19.44% (49/252) and 56.75% (143/252). No malaria parasite or dyslipidaemia was detected in any of the participants. Apart from BMI that increased across trimesters, no other measured parameter differed among the participants. Junior High School (JHS) education compared with no formal education increased the odds (AOR: 2.53; CI: 1.12-5.71; P = 0.03) but 2nd trimester of pregnancy compared to the 1st decreased the odds (AOR: 0.32; CI: 0.12-0.81; P = 0.02) of having insulin resistance in the entire sample. In a sub-group analysis across trimesters, pregnant women with JHS education in their 3rd trimester had increased odds (AOR: 4.41; CI: 1.25-15.62; P = 0.02) of having insulin resistance.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of GDM and GGI were 0.8% and 19.44% respectively. The odds of insulin resistance increased in pregnant women with JHS education in the 3rd trimester. Appropriate measures are needed to assuage the diabetogenic risk posed by GGI in our setting.

Cohort profile: the Environmental Reproductive and Glucose Outcomes (ERGO) Study (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) - a prospective pregnancy cohort study of the impacts of environmental exposures on parental cardiometabolic health

PURPOSE

Pregnancy and the postpartum period are increasingly recognised as sensitive windows for cardiometabolic disease risk. Growing evidence suggests environmental exposures, including endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), are associated with an increased risk of pregnancy complications that are associated with long-term cardiometabolic risk. However, the impact of perinatal EDC exposure on subsequent cardiometabolic risk post-pregnancy is less understood. The Environmental Reproductive and Glucose Outcomes (ERGO) Study was established to investigate the associations of environmental exposures during the perinatal period with post-pregnancy parental cardiometabolic health.

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant individuals aged ≥18 years without pre-existing diabetes were recruited at <15 weeks of gestation from Boston, Massachusetts area hospitals. Participants completed ≤4 prenatal study visits (median: 12, 19, 26, 36 weeks of gestation) and 1 postpartum visit (median: 9 weeks), during which we collected biospecimens, health histories, demographic and behavioural data, and vitals and anthropometric measurements. Participants completed a postpartum fasting 2-hour 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. Clinical data were abstracted from electronic medical records. Ongoing (as of 2024) extended post-pregnancy follow-up visits occur annually following similar data collection protocols.

FINDINGS TO DATE

We enrolled 653 unique pregnancies and retained 633 through delivery. Participants had a mean age of 33 years, 10% (n=61) developed gestational diabetes and 8% (n=50) developed pre-eclampsia. Participant pregnancy and postpartum urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and postpartum glycaemic biomarkers were quantified. To date, studies within ERGO found higher exposure to phthalates and phthalate mixtures, and separately, higher exposure to radioactive ambient particulate matter, were associated with adverse gestational glycaemic outcomes. Additionally, certain personal care products used in pregnancy, notably hair oils, were associated with higher urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations, earlier gestational age at delivery and lower birth weight.

FUTURE PLANS

Future work will leverage the longitudinal data collected on pregnancy and cardiometabolic outcomes, environmental exposures, questionnaires, banked biospecimens and paediatric data within the ERGO Study.

One abnormal value in oral glucose tolerance test during pregnancy and type 2 diabetes risk: Insights from a 5-Year Follow-Up study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk of type 2 diabetes(T2D) following one abnormal value(OAbV) in an oral glucose tolerance test(oGTT) performed during pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of parturients between 01.01.2017 and 31.12.2020 with 5 years of follow-up after delivery. Glucose levels during pregnancy were extracted from the computerized laboratory system of Meuhedet HMO and cross-tabulated with the Israeli National Registry of Diabetes. Women with multiple gestations or pregestational diabetes were excluded. Maternal characteristics and risk of T2D were stratified and compared between 3 groups: normal glucose status, OAbV in oGTT, and gestational diabetes. Statistical analysis included univariate analysis followed by survival analysis. Further analysis was stratified to women with and without obesity.

RESULTS

58,693 women entered the analysis. Following an adjustment to maternal age, obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, OAbV in oGTT was associated with a 1.8-fold increased risk of T2D in a 5-year follow-up compared to normal glucose status. When stratified by obesity, OAbV was associated with a 3.7-fold increase in T2D in women without obesity, however, was no longer a statistically significant predictor of T2D among women with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with OAbV oGTT during pregnancy are at increased risk for developing T2D over 5 years of follow-up.

Understanding the role of childhood nurture, abuse, and stability on gestational diabetes in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study (CARDIA)

BACKGROUND

To estimate associations between facets of the maternal childhood family environment with gestational diabetes (GDM) and to test mediation by pre-pregnancy waist circumference.

METHODS

We used data from CARDIA, a cohort of individuals aged 18-30 years at baseline (1985-86), followed over 30 years (2016). We included participants with one or more pregnancies ≥ 20 weeks after baseline, without pre-pregnancy diabetes. The primary exposure was the Childhood Family Environment Scale (assessed year 15), including the total score and abuse, nurture, and stability subscales as continuous, separate exposures. The outcome was GDM (self-reported at each visit for each pregnancy). We fit log binomial models with generalized estimating equations to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for age at delivery, parity, race (Black or White), and parental education. We used regression models with bootstrapped CIs to test mediation and effect modification by excess abdominal adiposity at the last preconception CARDIA visit (waist circumference ≥ 88 cm).

RESULTS

We included 1033 individuals (46% Black) with 1836 pregnancies. 130 pregnancies (7.1%) were complicated by GDM. For each 1 point increase on the abuse subscale (e.g., from "rarely or never" to "some or little of the time") there was a 30% increased risk of GDM (RR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.7). There was evidence of effect modification but not mediation by preconception abdominal adiposity.

CONCLUSIONS

A more adverse childhood family environment was associated with increased risk of GDM, with a stronger association among individuals with preconception waist circumference ≥ 88 cm.

Previous High-Intensity Breastfeeding Lowers the Risk of an Abnormal Fasting Glucose in a Subsequent Pregnancy Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

Breastfeeding is associated with reduced lifetime cardiometabolic risk, but little is known regarding the metabolic benefit in a subsequent pregnancy. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the association between breastfeeding duration and intensity and next pregnancy oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results. A retrospective cohort study was conducted from March 2020 to October 2022. All multiparous women who met inclusion criteria and gave birth during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Analysis was stratified by risk for gestational diabetes (GDM). High GDM risk criteria included previous GDM and BMI > 35 kg/m2. The association between breastfeeding duration and high-intensity breastfeeding (HIBF) and subsequent pregnancy OGTT were assessed with multivariate logistic models adjusted for statistically and clinically relevant covariables. There were 5374 multiparous participants who met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these, 61.7% had previously breastfed for >6 months, and 43.4% were at high risk for GDM. HIBF was associated with 47% reduced odds of an abnormal fasting glucose in a subsequent pregnancy OGTT (aOR 0.53; 95%CI 0.38-0.75; p < 0.01). There was no association between HIBF and other glucose results on the OGTT. Women who smoked were least likely to breastfeed at high intensity (aOR 0.31; 95%CI 0.21-0.47; p < 0.01). South Asian women had 65% higher odds of HIBF than women who identified as White/European (aOR 1.65; 1.36-2.00; p < 0.01). This study highlights the importance of exclusive breastfeeding to potentially reduce the prevalence of GDM and may also translate into long-term reduction of cardiometabolic risk.

Commentary from the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists (AMD) and Italian Society of Diabetology (SID) Interassociative Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group on the screening and diagnostic methods for gestational diabetes: An open debate

The current board of the interassociative Italian association of medical diabetologists (AMD)/Italian society of diabetology (SID) Diabetes and Pregnancy Italian Study Group commented about two recent papers published in the New England Journal of Medicine that investigated the screening and diagnostic methods for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). It is well recognized that effective screening and accurate, early diagnosis of GDM contributes to better management of these women in order to reduce adverse maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes. However, there is worldwide controversy concerning which screening (selective or universal; one step or two steps) and which diagnostic criteria (glucose thresholds) are appropriate. The main findings of these papers are discussed along with their implications for the management of pregnant women.

Gestational Glucose Intolerance and Birth Weight-Related Complications

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risks of large-for-gestational-age birth weight (LGA) and birth weight-related complications in pregnant individuals with gestational glucose intolerance, an abnormal screening glucose loading test result without meeting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) criteria.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study of 46,989 individuals with singleton pregnancies who delivered after 28 weeks of gestation, those with glucose loading test results less than 140 mg/dL were classified as having normal glucose tolerance. Those with glucose loading test results of 140 mg/dL or higher and fewer than two abnormal values on a 3-hour 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were classified as having gestational glucose intolerance. Those with two or more abnormal OGTT values were classified as having GDM. We hypothesized that gestational glucose intolerance would be associated with higher odds of LGA (birth weight greater than the 90th percentile for gestational age and sex). We used generalized estimating equations to examine the odds of LGA in pregnant individuals with gestational glucose intolerance compared with those with normal glucose tolerance, after adjustment for age, body mass index, parity, health insurance, race and ethnicity, and marital status. In addition, we investigated differences in birth weight-related adverse pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

Large for gestational age was present in 7.8% of 39,685 pregnant individuals with normal glucose tolerance, 9.5% of 4,155 pregnant individuals with gestational glucose intolerance and normal OGTT, 14.5% of 1,438 pregnant individuals with gestational glucose intolerance and one abnormal OGTT value, and 16.0% of 1,711 pregnant individuals with GDM. The adjusted odds of LGA were higher in pregnant individuals with gestational glucose intolerance than in those with normal glucose tolerance overall (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.35, 95% CI 1.23-1.49, P <.001). When compared separately with pregnant individuals with normal glucose tolerance, those with either gestational glucose intolerance subtype had higher adjusted LGA odds (gestational glucose intolerance with normal OGTT aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08-1.35, P <.001; gestational glucose intolerance with one abnormal OGTT value aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.52-2.08, P <.001). The odds of birth weight-related adverse outcomes (including cesarean delivery, severe perineal lacerations, and shoulder dystocia or clavicular fracture) were higher in pregnant individuals with gestational glucose intolerance with one abnormal OGTT value than in those with normal glucose tolerance.

CONCLUSION

Gestational glucose intolerance in pregnancy is associated with birth weight-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. Glucose lowering should be investigated as a strategy for lowering the risk of these outcomes in this group.

Glucose intolerance in pregnancy and risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The risk of type 2 diabetes among women with glucose intolerance during pregnancy that does not meet gestational diabetes criteria requires further investigation. We aimed to explore the associations between various degrees of gestational glucose intolerance and the risk of type 2 diabetes in young adulthood.

METHODS

For this population-based cohort study, the national Israeli conscription database was linked to Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS), the second-largest state-mandated health provider in Israel. We included 177 241 women who underwent a pre-recruitment evaluation at adolescence (age 16-20 years), 1 year before mandatory military service, and later underwent, from Jan 1, 2001, to Dec 31, 2019, two-step gestational diabetes screening with a 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) based on a threshold of 140 mg/dL (7·8 mmol/L), followed as needed by a 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Abnormal OGTT values were defined according to the Carpenter-Coustan thresholds: 95 mg/dL (5·3 mmol/L) or higher in the fasting state; 180 mg/dL (10·0 mmol/L) or higher at 1 h; 155 mg/dL (8·6 mmol/L) or higher at 2 h; and 140 mg/dL (7·8 mmol/L) or higher at 3 h. The primary outcome was incident type 2 diabetes in the MHS diabetes registry. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for incident type 2 diabetes.

FINDINGS

During a cumulative follow-up of 1 882 647 person-years, and with a median follow-up of 10·8 (IQR 5·2-16·4) years, 1262 women were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Crude incidence rates of type 2 diabetes were 2·6 (95% CI 2·4-2·9) per 10 000 person-years in women with gestational normoglycaemia, 8·9 (7·4-10·6) per 10 000 person-years in women with an abnormal GCT and normal OGTT, 26·1 (22·4-30·1) per 10 000 person-years in women with one abnormal OGTT value (in the fasting state or 1 h, 2 h, or 3 h post-challenge), and 71·9 (66·0-78·3) per 10 000 person-years in women with gestational diabetes. After adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, adolescent BMI, and age at gestational screening, the risk of type 2 diabetes was higher, compared to the gestational normoglycaemia group, in women with an abnormal GCT and normal OGTT (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3·39 [95% CI 2·77-4·16]; p<0·0001), in women with one abnormal OGTT value (9·11 [7·64-10·86]; p<0·0001), and in women with gestational diabetes (24·84 [21·78-28·34]; p<0·0001). The risk of type 2 diabetes was modestly increased in women with isolated elevated fasting glucose (adjusted HR 11·81 [95% CI 8·58-16·25]; p<0·0001), and in women with gestational diabetes and an abnormal fasting glucose (38·02 [32·41-44·61]; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

Gestational glucose intolerance, including conditions not meeting gestational diabetes criteria of the two-step strategy, confers a high risk of type 2 diabetes in young adulthood. These conditions should be recognised as risk factors for type 2 diabetes, especially among women with abnormal fasting glucose concentrations during pregnancy.

FUNDING

None.