1
|
Gervais C, Hjeij D, Fernández-Puerta L, Arbour C. Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep disruptions and fatigue after traumatic brain injury: a scoping review. Brain Inj 2024; 38:403-416. [PMID: 38402580 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2318599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review to determine the nature, variety, and volume of empirical evidence on nonpharmacological interventions for sleep disturbances with potential implications for fatigue in adults sustaining a traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted across four databases to identify primary studies testing a single non-pharmacological intervention or a combination of non-pharmacological interventions for sleep disturbances and fatigue in community-dwelling adults with TBI. RESULTS Sixteen studies were reviewed addressing six non-pharmacological interventions for sleep disruptions and fatigue after TBI including light therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, warm footbath application, shiatsu, and sleep hygiene protocol. Non-pharmacological interventions involving light or cognitive-behavioral therapy were reported in 75% of the studies. Actigraphy-based estimation of total sleep time and subjective level of fatigue were frequent outcomes. CONCLUSION While this scoping review has utility in describing existing non-pharmacological approaches to manage sleep and fatigue after TBI, the findings suggest that interventions are often developed without considering TBI individuals' source of motivation and the need for support in self-administration. Future studies may achieve greater sustainability by considering the evolving needs of TBI patients and their families and the drivers and barriers that might influence non-pharmacological intervention use at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Gervais
- Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Danny Hjeij
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Caroline Arbour
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ingebretsen SMH, Stubberud J, Kirmess M. Family members' and friends' reports after standard and intensive group treatment for social communication difficulties following acquired brain injury - a mixed method approach. Brain Inj 2024; 38:304-315. [PMID: 38318845 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2311345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine family members/friends' perception of change following standard and intensive group interactive structured treatment (GIST) for persons with social communication difficulties (SCDs). METHODS A parallel mixed methods design combining data from questionnaires, the Goal Attainment Scale, and interviews. PARTICIPANTS Forty-nine adult (>18 years) family members/friends (69.4% female) of persons with SCDs and acquired brain injury (ABI) (cohabitating partner, 53.1%; other relatives, 30.6%; friends, 16.3%). INTERVENTION Standard GIST consisted of 12 weekly outpatient sessions (2.5 h). Intensive GIST consisted of 4 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation (2 × 3 days/week, 2 × 4 days/week). Both treatments included 3- and 6-month follow-ups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Quantitative measures (n = 49) included the following informant reports: Latrobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ), Social Communication Skills Questionnaire-Adapted (SCSQ-A), Behavior Rating Inventory for Executive Functions-Adult version (BRIEF-A), and Goal Attainment Scale. The qualitative measure (n=9) was an interview performed at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS Converging results were found, suggesting a perceived positive change over time for both standard and intensive GIST, with no substantial differences reported between the treatments. CONCLUSIONS Family members/friends reported improved social communication skills of the persons with SCDs following standard and intensive GIST. However, the integration of data showed the complexity of assessing SCDs and the need for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Merethe Hansen Ingebretsen
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Research department, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway
| | - Jan Stubberud
- Department of Research, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Melanie Kirmess
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fins JJ, Knitter J, Mukherjee D, Conti K, Donleavy-Hiller B, Gerber LM, Hersh JE, Kotorac-Erlbaum R, Milch B, Klein SM. A Descriptive Analysis of Access to Assistive Technology in Children With Acquired Brain Injury: The Right to Assistive Devices. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2024; 39:152-159. [PMID: 37492972 PMCID: PMC10811270 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pediatric clinicians caring for children with acquired brain injury have noted that many individuals requiring assistive technology (AT) go unserved or face delays until devices are obtained, with potential adverse implications for recovery and development. In this article we map the pathways by which AT is prescribed and assess delays and barriers to access. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with moderate to severe brain injury admitted to Blythedale Children's Hospital over a 2-year period using a database drawn from the medical record. RESULTS We identified 72 children diagnosed with brain injury requiring at least 1 device. Devices were used to improve mobility and positioning, self-care, safety, and communication, and enable access to other technologies and foster social integration. We found that 55% of devices were delivered, with most deliveries to home or the hospital's outpatient department for fitting, training, and instruction. Time to delivery ranged from 12 to 250 days with an average of 69.4 days. Twenty percent of nondeliveries were attributable to change in medical status, transfer to a skilled nursing facility, or continued inpatient status, while 31% were canceled by the family. Other nondeliveries were attributed to insurance coverage. We also found that the medical record is not designed for the longitudinal tracking of devices, indicating the need for a prospective process to document the AT trajectory. CONCLUSION Instead of tolerating delays and denials, there should be a normative expectation that children have a right to medically necessary devices, consistent with disability law. This analysis was undertaken as a step toward formulating a prospective means of tracking AT recommendations, approvals, denials, and/or deliveries. Our findings should be understood as a promissory note toward structural reforms that are reflective of society's responsibility to better meet the needs of vulnerable children and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph J Fins
- Author Affiliations: Division of Medical Ethics (Drs Fins and Mukherjee and Ms Hersh) and Department of Population Health Science (Dr Gerber), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy, Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut (Dr Fins); and Blythedale Children's Hospital, Valhalla, New York (Mss Knitter, Donleavy-Hiller, Kotorac-Erlbaum, and Milch and Drs Conti and Klein)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hall Z, Elbourn E, Togher L, Carragher M. Co-constructed communication therapy for individuals with acquired brain injury: A systematic review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2024; 59:496-518. [PMID: 36640114 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meaningful, varied, joyful conversation is an important therapy target for adults with language or cognitive-communication disorders following acquired brain injury (ABI). However, the complexity of daily communication is often reduced to component parts within intervention programmes, with mixed evidence of generalization to everyday conversation. Interventions targeting co-construction of communication within a dyad offer a structured way in which to retain and treat elements of everyday conversation for individuals and their communication partner (CP). Such interventions exist but they are variably labelled, target different ABI populations and have not been synthesized. AIMS To identify the nature, scope and effects of intervention studies targeting co-constructed communication in adults with ABI. METHOD This systematic review was completed using PRISMA Guidelines. Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, LLBA, PsychInfo) were searched and 1210 studies were screened. Data were extracted and studies were rated for methodological quality and completeness of reporting. Outcome measures and effects of treatment were collated through descriptive synthesis. MAIN CONTRIBUTION This review highlights an emerging evidence base in relation to an intervention approach that targets everyday communication. Co-constructed communication interventions have been reported by 13 studies, from a total of 206 participants with post-stroke aphasia, traumatic brain injury and progressive language impairments. These interventions take a range of formats, including referential communication tasks, retell/recount therapies and communication training programmes. Methodological quality evaluation indicated mostly low-level study designs. Heterogeneity was identified in primary outcome measures, with 28 unique primary outcome measures reported across studies. Most studies demonstrated change in task-specific or broad communication outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Co-constructed communication interventions may offer clinicians a systematic, protocolized, replicable way to target everyday communication for adults with ABI. More high-quality, experimental designs with complete reporting and psychometrically sound outcome measures are needed to strengthen the evidence base. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject Everyday conversation is an important therapy target for adults with ABI, but there is mixed evidence of therapy gains generalizing to everyday life. Many interventions reduce conversation to component parts such as naming or sentence construction. A different approach is needed to capture the social, dyadic, interactive and multifaceted nature of conversation. We propose the term 'co-constructed communication interventions' as a therapy genre targeting semi-structured dialogue. These interventions retain elements of everyday conversation (such as multimodal communication and situating tasks within dyads), combined with experimental elements (where stimuli prompt interactions and responses can be scored against normative data). What this paper adds to existing knowledge This review proposes and describes a distinct genre of discourse intervention within the current evidence base with a novel operational definition of 'co-constructed communication'. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Co-constructed communication interventions directly target elements of everyday communication by situating the therapy goals within a dyadic, interactive, multimodal task. A range of intervention tasks have been identified, including collaborative storytelling and problem-solving. This review will be of interest to clinicians working with adults with ABI; co-constructed communication interventions may offer a useful, replicable way to target aspects of everyday communication. This synthesis of the current evidence base encourages clinicians' informed, evidence-based decisions around these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zali Hall
- The Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elise Elbourn
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- The Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marcella Carragher
- The Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miao M, Morrow R, Salomon A, Mcculloch B, Evain JC, Wright MR, Murphy MT, Welsh M, Williams L, Power E, Rietdijk R, Debono D, Brunner M, Togher L. Digital Health Implementation Strategies Coproduced With Adults With Acquired Brain Injury, Their Close Others, and Clinicians: Mixed Methods Study With Collaborative Autoethnography and Network Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e46396. [PMID: 37725413 PMCID: PMC10548320 DOI: 10.2196/46396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired brain injuries (ABIs), such as stroke and traumatic brain injury, commonly cause cognitive-communication disorders, in which underlying cognitive difficulties also impair communication. As communication is an exchange with others, close others such as family and friends also experience the impact of cognitive-communication impairment. It is therefore an internationally recommended best practice for speech-language pathologists to provide communication support to both people with ABI and the people who communicate with them. Current research also identifies a need for neurorehabilitation professionals to support digital communication, such as social media use, after ABI. However, with >135 million people worldwide affected by ABI, alternate and supplementary service delivery models are needed to meet these communication needs. The "Social Brain Toolkit" is a novel suite of 3 interventions to deliver communication rehabilitation via the internet. However, digital health implementation is complex, and minimal guidance exists for ABI. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to support the implementation of the Social Brain Toolkit by coproducing implementation knowledge with people with ABI, people who communicate with people with ABI, clinicians, and leaders in digital health implementation. METHODS A maximum variation sample (N=35) of individuals with living experience of ABI, close others, clinicians, and digital health implementation leaders participated in an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. Stakeholders quantitatively prioritized 4 of the 7 theoretical domains of the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework as being the most important for Social Brain Toolkit implementation. Qualitative interview and focus group data collection focused on these 4 domains. Data were deductively analyzed against the NASSS framework with stakeholder coauthors to determine implementation considerations and strategies. A collaborative autoethnography of the research was conducted. Interrelationships between considerations and strategies were identified through a post hoc network analysis. RESULTS Across the 4 prioritized domains of "condition," "technology," "value proposition," and "adopters," 48 digital health implementation considerations and 52 tailored developer and clinician implementation strategies were generated. Benefits and challenges of coproduction were identified. The post hoc network analysis revealed 172 unique relationships between the identified implementation considerations and strategies, with user and persona testing and responsive design identified as the potentially most impactful strategies. CONCLUSIONS People with ABI, close others, clinicians, and digital health leaders coproduced new knowledge of digital health implementation considerations for adults with ABI and the people who communicate with them, as well as tailored implementation strategies. Complexity-informed network analyses offered a data-driven method to identify the 2 most potentially impactful strategies. Although the study was limited by a focus on 4 NASSS domains and the underrepresentation of certain demographics, the wealth of actionable implementation knowledge produced supports future coproduction of implementation research with mutually beneficial outcomes for stakeholders and researchers. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/35080.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Miao
- Graduate School of Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rosemary Morrow
- Stakeholder with living experience of acquired brain injury, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander Salomon
- Stakeholder with living experience of acquired brain injury, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ben Mcculloch
- Stakeholder with living experience of acquired brain injury, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jean-Christophe Evain
- Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Ward, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health Network, Melbourne, Australia
- Stakeholder with living experience of acquired brain injury, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Meg Rebecca Wright
- Stakeholder with living experience of acquired brain injury, Blenheim, Australia
| | - Marie Therese Murphy
- Stakeholder with living experience as a communication partner of a person with acquired brain injury, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Education, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Monica Welsh
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, South Australian Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Liz Williams
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Community and Home (BIRCH), South Australian Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- Graduate School of Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rachael Rietdijk
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Deborah Debono
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Melissa Brunner
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Avramović P, Rietdijk R, Kenny B, Power E, Togher L. Developing a Digital Health Intervention for Conversation Skills After Brain Injury (convers-ABI-lity) Using a Collaborative Approach: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e45240. [PMID: 37556179 PMCID: PMC10448295 DOI: 10.2196/45240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with acquired brain injury (ABI) experience communication breakdown in everyday interactions many years after injury, negatively impacting social and vocational relationships. Communication partner training (CPT) is a recommended intervention approach in communication rehabilitation after ABI. Access to long-term services is essential, both in rural and remote locations. Digital health has potential to overcome the challenges of travel and improve cost efficiencies, processes, and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE We aimed to collaboratively develop a novel, multimodal web-based CPT intervention (convers-ABI-lity) with key stakeholders and evaluate its feasibility for improving conversation skills after brain injury. METHODS This mixed methods study consisted of 3 key stages guided by the Integrate, Design, Assess, and Share (IDEAS) framework for developing effective digital health interventions. Stage 1 included the integration of current end-user needs and perspectives with key treatment and theoretical components of existing evidence-based interventions, TBI Express and TBIconneCT. Stage 2 included the iterative design of convers-ABI-lity with feedback from end-user interviews (n=22) analyzed using content analysis. Participants were individuals with ABI, family members, health professionals, and paid support workers. Stage 3 included the evaluation of the feasibility through a proof-of-concept study (n=3). A total of 3 dyads (a person with ABI and their communication partner [CP]) completed 7 weeks of convers-ABI-lity, guided by a clinician. The outcome measures included blinded ratings of conversation samples and self-report measures. We analyzed postintervention participant interviews using content analysis to inform further intervention refinement and development. RESULTS Collaborative and iterative design and development during stages 1 and 2 resulted in the development of convers-ABI-lity. Results in stage 3 indicated positive changes in the blinded ratings of conversation samples for the participants with traumatic brain injury and their CPs. Statistically reliable positive changes were also observed in the self-report measures of social communication skills and quality of life. Intervention participants endorsed aspects of convers-ABI-lity, such as its complementary nature, self-guided web-based modules, clinician sessions, engaging content, and novel features. They reported the intervention to be relevant to their personal experience with cognitive-communication disorders. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the outcome of using the IDEAS framework to guide the development of a web-based multimodal CPT intervention with input from key stakeholders. The results indicate promising outcomes for improving the conversation skills of people with ABI and their CPs. Further evaluation of intervention effectiveness and efficacy using a larger sample size is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Avramović
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Rachael Rietdijk
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Belinda Kenny
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hill E, Whitworth A, Boyes M, Claessen M. An international survey of assessment and treatment practice for discourse in paediatric Acquired Brain Injury. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 25:577-588. [PMID: 35642559 DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2079724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines recommend routine discourse assessment and treatment in paediatric acquired brain injury (ABI) but provide little guidance for clinical practice. The degree to which this has influenced the nature of discourse assessment and treatment in clinical practice has not been examined in detail. METHOD Speech-language pathologists working in paediatric ABI (clients aged <18 years) in Australia, New Zealand, the UK, the USA, Canada, and the Asia Pacific region were invited to complete a survey of discourse assessment and intervention practices (n = 77). RESULT Clinicians from Australia and New Zealand comprised over half of a responses (53%). The largest proportion had over 10 years' experience (60%), worked in the metropolitan area (58%), and with secondary school-age children (64%). Routine discourse assessment was undertaken by 80% of respondents, focussing on a limited range of genres. No preferred intervention approach was identified. One-quarter of clinicians routinely considered holistic factors during clinical decision-making. Limited normative data and treatment evidence, insufficient time and training were identified as clinical barriers. CONCLUSION Assessment practices were consistent with guidelines, yet interventions were highly variable, reflecting limited evidence, client heterogeneity, time constraints, and limited training. A biopsychosocial approach to practice was evident, yet a focus on impairment level factors was prominent. Findings support the need for standardised discourse assessment and discourse intervention methods. Translation into practice guidelines would promote consistency and confidence in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Hill
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia
| | - Anne Whitworth
- College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, and
| | - Mark Boyes
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia
| | - Mary Claessen
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Christensen I, Power E, Togher L, Norup A. "Communication Is Not Exactly My Field, but It Is Still My Area of Work": Staff and Managers' Experiences of Communication With People With Traumatic Brain Injury. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 32:827-847. [PMID: 36455235 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Communication between people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and rehabilitation staff can be impacted by cognitive-communication disorders. Communication partner training (CPT) programs hold potential to improve communication between people with TBI and their communication partners. To tailor CPT programs to the rehabilitation environment, it is critical to understand the nature of communicative interactions for staff members. This study explores staff and managers' experiences of communication with people with TBI in the rehabilitation setting. METHOD Individual semistructured videoconference interviews were carried out with staff members (n = 22) and managers (n = 4) varying in terms of professions and length of work experience. Interviews were guided by a phenomenological approach to gain comprehensive knowledge of staff and managers' lived experiences of communication with people with TBI. RESULTS Four themes with nine subthemes were generated: (a) cognitive-communication disorders challenge interaction (communication is socially inappropriate, the diversity of presenting symptoms associated with TBI is demanding), (b) staff struggle in communication (there is a breakdown of communicative collaboration, communication increases staff's workload, emotional well-being of staff is at risk), (c) communication context is crucial (tasks affect communication, extending the professional roles), and (d) staff want communication knowledge and skills (needs vary according to work experience, access to tailored strategies, and feedback). CONCLUSIONS Staff and managers experienced communication with people with TBI as highly demanding. The socially inappropriate communication in people with TBI was perceived to disturb the collaborative aspects of communication and create negative emotional impacts for staff. Staff experiences varied according to discipline, work experience, rehabilitation tasks, and facility. Consequently, staff and managers expressed a need for specific communication strategies to help them overcome the communicative challenges. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21579159.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iben Christensen
- Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emma Power
- University of Technology Sydney, Department of Speech Pathology, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- Department of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anne Norup
- Neurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Keegan LC, Hoepner JK, Togher L, Kennedy M. Clinically Applicable Sociolinguistic Assessment for Cognitive-Communication Disorders. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 32:966-976. [PMID: 36450153 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The third International Cognitive-Communication Disorders Conference was held in early 2022, providing an opportunity for researchers and clinicians to discuss management of cognitive-communication disorders (CCDs). Presentations that addressed social discourse initiated broader conversations about implementing sociolinguistic methods in research and clinical contexts. Given the heterogeneity of CCDs and sociocultural contexts, a person-centered approach is needed. Sociolinguistic methods are inherently relevant and salient to the individual's communication context and partners. Sociolinguistic analyses provide information about language skills, cognitive-communication skills, and social cognition. The purpose of this article is to share a model of social communication and provide descriptions of current methods that can be used by researchers and clinicians to capture the complexity of social communication, thereby advancing our knowledge and practice. CONCLUSION Although there is a growing literature base that supports the inclusion of sociolinguistic methods, there remains a disconnect between the literature and clinical application that current researchers and practitioners have an opportunity to address. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21614268.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise C Keegan
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Moravian University, Bethlehem, PA
| | | | - Leanne Togher
- Department of Speech Pathology, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nielsen AI, Jensen LR, Power E. Meeting the confused patient with confidence: perceived benefits of communication partner training in subacute TBI. Brain Inj 2022; 37:1-14. [PMID: 36571429 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2158224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore health professionals' perceived benefits of implementing Communication Partner Training (CPT) using Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia (SCA™) in a subacute rehabilitation setting with patients in post-traumatic confusional state (PTCS) after TBI. METHOD The study was conducted in a clinical setting using a pre-post questionnaire design to explore change. One hundred and four interdisciplinary clinicians attended CPT in the SCA™ method and subsequent implementation support. Participants completed a questionnaire with both quantitative and qualitative questions before and after the training and implementation period. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics and qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Participants' perceived confidence and self-assessed ability to communicate with patients in PTCS significantly increased after CPT (p = 0.006). While participants still experienced communication challenges, they reported using CPT-related tools and strategies in their interactions. Participants found they could apply strategies to improve patients' comprehension of information and to confirm their understanding of patients' communication. However, using strategies to enhance patients' expressive abilities was perceived as more challenging. CONCLUSIONS Training health professionals in CPT increase their confidence in managing communication with patients in PTCS. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of CPT within a more rigorous research design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annesofie Ishøy Nielsen
- Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Lise Randrup Jensen
- Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Postal address: Emil Holms Kanal 2, DK-2300 København S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emma Power
- Department of Speech Pathology, University of Technology Sydney, Speech Pathology, Graduate School of Health, Postal address: PO Box 123 Broadway NSW 2007 Australia, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brown J, Kaelin D, Mattingly E, Mello C, Miller ES, Mitchell G, Picon LM, Waldron-Perine B, Wolf TJ, Frymark T, Bowen R. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Clinical Practice Guideline: Cognitive Rehabilitation for the Management of Cognitive Dysfunction Associated With Acquired Brain Injury. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2022; 31:2455-2526. [PMID: 36373898 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-21-00361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive-communication impairments following acquired brain injury (ABI) can have devastating effects on a person's ability to participate in community, social, vocational, and academic preinjury roles and responsibilities. Guidelines for evidence-based practices are needed to assist speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and other rehabilitation specialists in the delivery of cognitive rehabilitation for the adult population. PURPOSE The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, in conjunction with a multidisciplinary panel of subject matter experts, developed this guideline to identify best practice recommendations for the delivery of cognitive rehabilitation to adults with cognitive dysfunction associated with ABI. METHOD A multidisciplinary panel identified 19 critical questions to be addressed in the guideline. Literature published between 1980 and 2020 was identified based on a set of a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria, and main findings were pooled and organized into summary of findings tables. Following the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Evidence to Decision Framework, the panel drafted recommendations, when appropriate, based on the findings, overall quality of the evidence, balance of benefits and harms, patient preferences, resource implications, and the feasibility and acceptability of cognitive rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATIONS This guideline includes one overarching evidence-based recommendation that addresses the management of cognitive dysfunction following ABI and 11 subsequent recommendations focusing on cognitive rehabilitation treatment approaches, methods, and manner of delivery. In addition, this guideline includes an overarching consensus-based recommendation and seven additional consensus recommendations highlighting the role of the SLP in the screening, assessment, and treatment of adults with cognitive dysfunction associated with ABI. Future research considerations are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - E Sam Miller
- Maryland State Department of Education, Baltimore
| | | | | | | | | | - Tobi Frymark
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD
| | - Rebecca Bowen
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brunner M, Rietdijk R, Togher L. Training Resources Targeting Social Media Skills to Inform Rehabilitation for People Who Have an Acquired Brain Injury: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e35595. [PMID: 35482369 PMCID: PMC9100544 DOI: 10.2196/35595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2020 and 2021, people increasingly used the internet to connect socially and professionally. However, people with an acquired brain injury (ABI) experience challenges in using social media, and rehabilitation professionals have reported feeling underprepared to support them in its use. To date, no review of social media skills training to inform ABI rehabilitation has been conducted. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aimed to examine research on interventions addressing social media skills and safety, with a focus on people living with health conditions; free web-based resources for the general public on social media skills training; and currently available online support groups for people with ABI. METHODS An integrative scoping review was conducted, with a systematic search strategy applied in March and November 2020 across OvidSP (MEDLINE, AMED, PsycINFO, and Embase), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Google, and Facebook. The data collected were critically appraised and synthesized to describe the key content and features of social media training resources. RESULTS This review identified 47 peer-reviewed academic articles, 48 social media training websites, and 120 online support groups for people with ABI. A key recommendation was interactive training with practical components addressing cybersafety, how to use platforms, and how to connect with others. However, no social media training resources that were relevant and accessible for people with ABI were identified. CONCLUSIONS Training resources to support people with ABI in safely using social media are limited. The key content to be addressed and the features to be incorporated into web-based social media training were determined, including the need for interactive training that is co-designed and safe and incorporates practical components that support people with ABI. These findings can be used to inform the development of web-based evidence-based support for people with ABI who may be vulnerable when participating in social media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Brunner
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Eora Nation, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Rachael Rietdijk
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Eora Nation, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Eora Nation, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tobar-Fredes R, Salas C. Rehabilitation of communication in people with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of types of intervention and therapeutic ingredients ( Rehabilitación de la comunicación en personas con traumatismo encefalocraneal: una revisión sistemática de tipos de intervención e ingredientes terapéuticos). STUDIES IN PSYCHOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/02109395.2021.2009292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Tobar-Fredes
- Centre for Human Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, Universidad Diego Portales
- Universidad de Chile
- Speech & Language Pathology Unit, Hospital del Trabajador
| | - Christian Salas
- Centre for Human Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, Universidad Diego Portales
- Clinical Neuropsychology Unit, Universidad Diego Portales
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lê K, Coelho C, Fiszdon J. Systematic Review of Discourse and Social Communication Interventions in Traumatic Brain Injury. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2022; 31:991-1022. [PMID: 35226552 DOI: 10.1044/2021_ajslp-21-00088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study reviewed the current state of discourse and social communication interventions in traumatic brain injury (TBI) to provide clinically focused guidance about treatment efficacy, treatment approaches by TBI severity, treatment components, and treatment outcome measures. METHOD Searches were conducted in five electronic databases and reference lists of topical articles for discourse or social communication interventions in TBI published between 2012 and 2021. Search terms reflected three concepts: TBI, treatment, and cognitive-communication. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality using rating scales specific to study design. RESULTS Seven hundred sixty-seven records were identified, culminating in 21 studies for qualitative synthesis. All approaches resulted in improvement posttreatment, but durability and strength of evidence varied. Five treatment components were identified as "essential" for fostering change. Discourse approaches were generally more effective in mild-to-moderate TBI, whereas social communication approaches were more effective in moderate-to-severe TBI. Communication outcome measures were generally more sensitive to change than measures of other domains of functioning. CONCLUSIONS The evidence suggests that discourse and social communication treatments are promising for improving communication in TBI. Selection of treatment components and tailoring treatment to the individual are important clinical considerations. Use of at least two proximal outcome measures that evaluate the target behavior and extent of functional generalization may be advantageous. The field would benefit from additional, more rigorous treatment studies to provide a greater understanding of how best to treat cognitive-communicative impairments in people with TBI. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19233516.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Lê
- Audiology and Speech Pathology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven
| | - Carl Coelho
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Mansfield
| | - Joanna Fiszdon
- Psychology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The Experience of Caregivers Following a Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Requiring ICU Admission. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2021; 35:E299-E309. [PMID: 31479080 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Survivors of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) require substantial care, much of which is ultimately provided by friends and family. We sought to describe the unmet needs of informal caregivers. DESIGN Qualitative, semistructured interviews with informal caregivers of moderate and severe TBI survivors were conducted 72 hours, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after injury. SETTING Intensive care unit of a level 1 trauma center. PARTICIPANTS Informal caregivers were friends or family who planned to provide care for the patient. Patients were 18 years or older with a moderate to severe TBI, and not expected to imminently die of their injuries. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Eighteen patient-caregiver dyads were enrolled. Fifty-three interviews with caregivers were completed and analyzed over the course of 6 months. Three themes were identified in the qualitative analysis: caregiver burden, caregiver health-related quality of life, and caregiver needs for information and support. CONCLUSIONS This study provides new information about the experience of informal caregivers during the 6 months after their friend or family member survived a moderate to severe TBI. Interventions to promote caregiving may be a substantial opportunity to improve patient-centered outcomes following TBI.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoepner JK, Sievert A, Guenther K. Joint Video Self-Modeling for Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Partners: A Case Series. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2021; 30:863-882. [PMID: 33784468 DOI: 10.1044/2021_ajslp-20-00074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience impairments to self-regulation and social communication that strain relationships. Video self-modeling (VSM) provides visible and audible, tangible evidence of what they do well and what could improve. Conducting such training in the context of authentic exchanges with their everyday partners may support positive change in social communication. The present investigation sought to evaluate indices of improved social communication. Method A mixed-methods design was employed for this case series investigation. Quantitative measures include pre- and postoutcomes on goal attainment scales (GASs) and measures of conversational effectiveness. Qualitative measures include responsiveness to video-supported prompts, conversational behaviors, and metacognitive statements. Results Participants perceived gains on GAS of 3-4 SDs, as well as perceived improvements on the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Those gains were validated by gains on the adapted Measure of Participation in Conversation and Measure of Skill in Supported Conversation. Individuals with TBI and their partners reached consensus on most goals and postintervention La Trobe Communication Questionnaire ratings. Participants made accurate judgments about their behaviors at a high rate, given video review. Conversational behaviors and use of metacognitive statements varied across participants and conversational contexts. Field notes and session transcripts provide evidence that both dyads increased internalization of VSM goals and purpose. Conclusions Joint VSM shows promise as a method for eliciting accurate self-assessments among individuals with TBI and their close partners. Both dyads perceived positive gains in interactions within and outside their dyads. Furthermore, joint VSM and GAS appear to improve self-awareness and internalization of VSM goals and purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerry K Hoepner
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
| | - Alexis Sievert
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
| | - Kaitlin Guenther
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Agrela N, Santos ME, Guerreiro S. Communication skills training pilot programme after traumatic brain injury: short and medium-term benefits. Brain Inj 2021; 35:304-314. [PMID: 33464934 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1872096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate whether a pilot communication rehabilitation programme improves different communicative modalities in people who have sustained a moderate to severe TBI immediately following the training and at 3 months follow up.Methods: We have recruited 12 participants who had moderate-to-severe TBI. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups, EG and CG. We have assessed the groups before and after treatment and we have performed a follow-up three months later, through of the ABaCo. The EG followed a very structured programme. In the CG, a programme to stimulate communication through free conversation was carried out. Each programme consisted of 24 group sessions, of 1h30 min, twice a week, for 12 weeks.Results: Improvements were observed in both groups, although more evident in the EG. Both groups had better results in extralinguistic production. In the EG, there was still an improvement in the paralinguistic production and extralinguistic comprehension, after ending the training. These improvements persisted 3 months after ending the programme.Conclusion: The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the intervention of a structured pragmatic rehabilitation programme. However, the existence of a communication group based solely on conversation can also have positive results and should be implemented whenever a more specific intervention is not possible. In future research, it will be important to increase the sample size and involve caregivers in person and regularly in the EG programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Agrela
- Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maria Emília Santos
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sandra Guerreiro
- Centro de Reabilitação Profissional de Gaia (CRPG), Gaia, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Behn N, Francis J, Togher L, Hatch E, Moss B, Hilari K. Description and Effectiveness of Communication Partner Training in TBI: A Systematic Review. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2021; 36:56-71. [PMID: 32472837 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the current evidence on communication partner training and its effectiveness on outcomes for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and/or their communication partners. METHODS Information sources: Systematic searches of 9 databases (AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline/EBSCOHOST, PsycINFO, PsycBITE, PsycARTICLES, PubMed, and Scopus) from database inception to February 2019. Eligibility criteria: Empirical studies on interventions for adult communication partners where the primary focus of the program (>50%) was on improving communication skills of people with TBI and/or communication partners. Data: Participants, characteristics of the training, outcome measures, and findings. Risk of bias: Standard checklists were used for methodological quality (PEDro, ROBiN-T) and intervention description (TIDieR). Synthesis: Narrative synthesis and effect sizes (Cohen's d) for group-level studies. OUTCOMES Ten articles (describing 8 studies) met eligibility criteria: 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 nonrandomized controlled trials, and 3 single-case experimental designs. Studies included a total of 258 people with TBI and 328 communication partners; however, all but one study had fewer than 65 participants. Methodological quality varied and intervention description was poor. Three studies in the final synthesis (n = 41 communication partners, n = 36 people with TBI) reported positive intervention effects. Effect sizes in group studies were d = 0.80 to 1.13 for TBI and d = 1.16 to 2.09 for communication partners. CONCLUSIONS The articles provided encouraging, though limited, evidence for training communication partners. Greater methodological rigor, more clearly described interventions, and consistent use of outcome measures and follow-up after treatment are needed. Further research on this topic is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Behn
- Divisions of Language and Communication Science (Drs Behn, Moss, and Hilari and Ms Hatch) and Health Services Research and Management (Dr Francis), School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, England; and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia (Dr Togher)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bambini V, Tonini E, Ceccato I, Lecce S, Marocchini E, Cavallini E. How to improve social communication in aging: Pragmatic and cognitive interventions. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE 2020; 211:104864. [PMID: 33137591 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Among all aspects of the linguistic and communicative competence, pragmatics seems especially vulnerable in aging, due also to cognitive decline. However, pragmatics has never been considered as an intervention target in healthy aging. Here we tested the effects of a novel training program to improve pragmatics (PragmaCom) in older adults, compared with an active cognitive control group in a randomized-controlled-trial design. Both the PragmaCom group and the control group improved in pragmatic skills such as understanding metaphors and avoiding off-topic speech, indicating that it is possible to improve pragmatics in aging both with a specific training and with a cognitive training. Individual cognitive factors predicted pragmatic improvement in the control group, while in the PragmaCom group benefits were less dependent on individual characteristics. We discuss the results in terms of pragmatic plasticity, highlighting the importance of these findings for promoting older adults' social communication and well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Bambini
- Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax (NEtS), University School for Advanced Studies IUSS Pavia, Piazza della Vittoria 15, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
| | - Elisabetta Tonini
- Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax (NEtS), University School for Advanced Studies IUSS Pavia, Piazza della Vittoria 15, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Irene Ceccato
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Via Luigi Polacchi 11, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Serena Lecce
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 11, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marocchini
- Laboratory of Language and Cognition, University of Genoa, Via Balbi 30, 16128 Genoa, Italy
| | - Elena Cavallini
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 11, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Grayson L, Brady MC, Togher L, Ali M. A survey of cognitive-communication difficulties following TBI: are families receiving the training and support they need? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2020; 55:712-723. [PMID: 32618085 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whilst research into the wide-ranging needs of family members following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is well established, investigation into the specific needs of families in relation to supporting cognitive-communication difficulties, relationships and social participation is limited. AIMS To identify the family needs for cognitive-communication difficulties following TBI and to explore whether current services are meeting these needs. METHODS & PROCEDURES Following a successful pilot, family members from the UK and Australia were invited via posters, social media and e-mail to take part in an anonymous, communication needs survey. Data arising from the thirty two closed questions (six eligibility, nine demographic and seventeen needs questions) were analysed using SPSS descriptive statistics. Data arising from one open question were analysed using qualitative content analysis. OUTCOMES & RESULTS A total of 102 family members from the UK (n = 89, 87%) and Australia (n = 13, 13%) completed the survey. The majority of respondents were female (n = 76; 75%), between the ages of 30 and 69 (n = 88; 87%), and either a parent or a partner of the person following TBI (n = 78;76%). Respondents rated information about expected recovery from cognitive-communication difficulties and training in helpful strategies as their most important needs. The majority of respondents (more than 60%) were not satisfied that any of their cognitive-communication needs had been fully met and high levels of unmet need remained evident at three years or more post-injury. Written information, communication partner training and counselling were identified as key supports. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS Families report high levels of unmet need for managing cognitive-communication difficulties following TBI. Access to written information and communication partner training should be available to families at various time points following TBI and not just in the early stages. What this paper adds What is already known on this subject Attempting to support a person who has cognitive-communication difficulties following TBI has been found to be highly burdensome for family members. However, few studies have asked how families perceive their needs in relation to cognitive-communication difficulties or measured how well current services are meeting their needs. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study demonstrates that current speech and language therapy services are not yet meeting the needs of the relatives of individuals with cognitive-communication difficulties following TBI. Important insights into the information, training and support families' rate as important are identified in addition to how these needs develop over time. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Speech and language therapy service design requires to reflect the ongoing nature of familial needs for cognitive-communication difficulties following TBI. Families require access to appropriate literature, speech and language therapy support, and communication partner training in the longer term, not just in the acute phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Grayson
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
- Community Brain Injury Team, NHS Lanarkshire, Carluke, UK
| | - Marian C Brady
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Leanne Togher
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Myzoon Ali
- NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bertram T, Power E, Douglas J, Togher L. Friendships after severe traumatic brain injury: a survey of current speech pathology practice. Brain Inj 2020; 34:1020-1030. [PMID: 32552132 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1764100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate current speech pathology practice regarding working with friends. METHOD An online survey was conducted with 68 speech pathologists who worked with TBI across metropolitan and rural settings in Australia. The survey investigated the reasons speech pathologists work with friends, barriers to working with friends and perceptions of successful friendships post TBI. Descriptive statistics and content analysis of open ended responses were used to analyze the data. RESULTS There were more speech pathologists (40%) who did not include friends compared to those who did. Friends were most commonly included in the rehabilitation process, through the provision of education programs. The primary rationale for working with friends was to prevent negative psychosocial outcomes for the person with TBI. There were numerous barriers to working with friends, most commonly the inability to access friends. CONCLUSIONS Making and keeping friends are a significant part of most people's lives. Therefore, it is important to consider their role in contributing to improved outcomes for people with TBI. With communication partner training being an integral component to recovery and maintenance of relationships post TBI, the development of targeted education and training materials is warranted, to enable the inclusion of friends in the rehabilitation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tennille Bertram
- Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
| | - Jacinta Douglas
- School of Allied Health, Human Services & Sport, La Trobe University , Bundoora, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Behn N, Francis JJ, Power E, Hatch E, Hilari K. Communication partner training in traumatic brain injury: a UK survey of Speech and Language Therapists' clinical practice. Brain Inj 2020; 34:934-944. [PMID: 32521171 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1763465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To explore the clinical practice of communication partner training by Speech and Language Therapists for people with traumatic brain injury in the UK. STUDY DESIGN Online 97-item survey which addressed the practice of training both familiar and unfamiliar communication partners, and barriers and facilitators to implementation informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. PARTICIPANTS 169 Speech and Language Therapists from private and public settings in the UK. RESULTS While 96% reported training familiar communication partners, only 58% reported training unfamiliar communication partners. Therapists reported providing communication partner training consistent with best practice 43% of the time. Evidence-based published programmes were used by 13.8% and 19.9% of participants for training familiar and unfamiliar partners, respectively. Therapists reported using outcomes for familiar and unfamiliar communication partners 83% and 78% of the time. The most frequently reported barrier was lack of behavioral regulation (e.g., planning). Most frequent perceived facilitators were clinicians wanting to deliver communication partner training and that training was part of therapists' professional role (social professional role and identity). CONCLUSIONS Therapists were motivated to deliver communication partner training but reduced capability affected implementation. Further support to clinicians on outcome measurement with materials to develop workplace systems to monitor implementation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Behn
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London , London, UK
| | - Jill J Francis
- Division of Health Services Research and Management, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London , London, UK
| | - Emma Power
- Graduate School of Health, University Technology Sydney, Speech Pathology , Ultimo, Australia
| | - Ellie Hatch
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London , London, UK
| | - Katerina Hilari
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London , London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rietdijk R, Power E, Attard M, Togher L. Acceptability of telehealth-delivered rehabilitation: Experiences and perspectives of people with traumatic brain injury and their carers. J Telemed Telecare 2020; 28:122-134. [PMID: 32460583 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x20923824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Communication skills training for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their carers is recommended best practice. Delivery via telehealth could improve access to this training. This paper focuses on the acceptability of telehealth delivery of communication skills training. METHODS A mixed-methods investigation of acceptability of telehealth to people with TBI and their carers was incorporated into a clinical trial. Thirty-six people with TBI (23 metropolitan and 13 regional) and their carers were recruited. Metropolitan participants were randomly allocated to telehealth or in-person intervention at a 1:3 ratio. Regional participants were allocated to telehealth. Telehealth and in-person participants were compared on retention, time to complete the programme, home practice completion and therapeutic alliance ratings. Participants completed semi-structured interviews regarding their views on telehealth, which were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS There were no significant differences between telehealth and in-person participants in retention rate, time to complete the programme, degree of home practice completion or therapeutic alliance ratings. Three themes were identified: 'telehealth delivery opens a window for access to rehabilitation in the context of my daily life', 'in-person delivery offers rehabilitation based on natural human interaction' and 'weighing telehealth against in-person delivery'. DISCUSSION Participants found telehealth delivery acceptable, as indicated by the similarity between groups in the quantitative process measures, and as reported in interviews. Some reported a preference for in-person delivery if there had been a choice of delivery mode. Participants described characteristics of the two delivery modes which were relevant to their attitudes towards telehealth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Rietdijk
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- The University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Australia
| | - Michelle Attard
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Howell S, Beeke S, Pring T, Varley R. Measuring outcomes of a peer-led social communication skills intervention for adults with acquired brain injury: A pilot investigation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020; 31:1069-1090. [PMID: 32408795 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1760892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Reduced social competence following severe acquired brain injury (ABI) is well-documented. This pilot study investigated a peer-led group intervention based on the claim that peer models may be a more effective mechanism for behaviour change than clinician-led approaches. Twelve participants with severe ABI were recruited from a post-acute neurorehabilitation setting and randomly assigned to either a peer-led intervention or a staff-led activity group (usual care) (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02211339). The groups met twice a week for 8 weeks. A peer was trained separately to facilitate interaction in the intervention group. Training comprised 16 individual sessions over 4 weeks. Group behaviour was measured twice at baseline, after intervention and at maintenance (4 weeks), using the Adapted Measure of Participation in Conversation (MPC) and the Interactional Network Tool (INT), a newly devised measure of group conversational interaction. Outcome measures showed differential sensitivity. The groups did not differ in baseline behaviour. Findings showed a significant improvement in the treated group on the MPC transaction scale post-intervention (p = .02). The intervention group showed more balanced interaction post-intervention on the INT and at follow-up. Findings show preliminary evidence of the advantage for peer-led groups. The INT shows promise as a method to detect a change in group communication behaviour.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02211339.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Howell
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Suzanne Beeke
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tim Pring
- Division of Language and Communication Science, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary Varley
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wiseman-Hakes C, Ryu H, Lightfoot D, Kukreja G, Colantonio A, Matheson FI. Examining the Efficacy of Communication Partner Training for Improving Communication Interactions and Outcomes for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2020; 2:100036. [PMID: 33543065 PMCID: PMC7853340 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the evidence regarding communication partner training (CPT) interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their conversation partners. DATA SOURCES Eleven key databases-PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials, Embase, Linguistic and Language Behavior Abstracts, ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycBITE, SpeechBITE, and ERIC-were searched from inception through 2019. STUDY SELECTION Selected articles had to be peer reviewed, written in English, experimental or quasiexperimental design, report on TBI communication partners, and describe interventions or strategies targeting communication partners. DATA EXTRACTION Of 1088 articles identified, 12 studies were selected for data extraction, critical appraisal, and analysis with considerations of sex and gender. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine's guideline was used to critically appraise Levels of Evidence. Assessment of bias was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration tools for randomized controlled trials and risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions for nonrandomized controlled trials and the risk of bias in N-of-1 trials scale. DATA SYNTHESIS A systematic review with a qualitative meta-analysis of themes and findings across the selected studies identified 3 major categories: (1) benefits of the training for those with TBI, (2) risks of CPT, and (3) suggestions to improve its efficacy. CONCLUSION Most of the evidence comes from 1 research group, which may be viewed as a weakness in the current body of literature. However, although the evidence to date is modest, CPT may help to increase accessibility and reduce participation inequities in the community for individuals with TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Wiseman-Hakes
- Department of Speech Language Pathology, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Institute for Applied Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- KITE Toronto Rehab, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hyun Ryu
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Lightfoot
- St. Michael’s Hospital Health Sciences Library, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gazal Kukreja
- Acquired Brain Injury, Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Colantonio
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Flora I. Matheson
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rietdijk R, Power E, Attard M, Heard R, Togher L. Improved Conversation Outcomes After Social Communication Skills Training for People With Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Communication Partners: A Clinical Trial Investigating In-Person and Telehealth Delivery. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2020; 63:615-632. [PMID: 32078409 DOI: 10.1044/2019_jslhr-19-00076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of social communication skills training (TBIconneCT) for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their communication partners, delivered in-person or via telehealth, on quality of conversations. Method This study is a clinical trial, including an in-person intervention group (n = 17), a telehealth intervention group (n = 19), and a historical control group (n = 15). Participants were adults at least 6 months post moderate-to-severe TBI with social communication skills deficits and their usual communication partners. Participants completed a casual and purposeful conversation task at pre-intervention, postintervention, and a follow-up assessment. A blinded assessor evaluated conversations using the Adapted Measure of Participation in Conversation and the Adapted Measure of Support in Conversation. Treatment effects were examined by comparing groups on change in ratings between pre- and posttraining. Maintenance of effects was examined using change between posttraining and follow-up assessment. The trial protocol was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615001024538). Results Trained participants with TBI had significant improvements in participation in casual conversation compared to controls. Trained communication partners also had significant improvements compared to controls on ratings of support in casual conversations. However, treatment effects were not maintained at follow-up for two of eight measures. Comparisons between outcomes of in-person and telehealth groups found negligible to small effect sizes for six of eight measures. Conclusions The findings reinforce previous studies demonstrating the efficacy of communication partner training after TBI. Telehealth delivery produced similar outcomes to in-person delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Rietdijk
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Attard
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert Heard
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Health Sciences, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nielsen AI, Power E, Jensen LR. Communication with patients in post-traumatic confusional state: perception of rehabilitation staff. Brain Inj 2020; 34:447-455. [DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1725839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Annesofie Ishøy Nielsen
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, TBI Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Emma Power
- University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, Ultimo, Australia
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Lise Randrup Jensen
- Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
A Clinical Trial Investigating Telehealth and In-Person Social Communication Skills Training for People With Traumatic Brain Injury: Participant-Reported Communication Outcomes. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2020; 35:241-253. [DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
29
|
Tessier A, Power E, Croteau C. Paid worker and unfamiliar partner communication training: A scoping review. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2020; 83:105951. [PMID: 31751831 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication partner training could be employed to train people working in the community to facilitate interaction with individuals who live with a variety of communication disorders. However, current evidence syntheses are limited to a single disorder (e.g., aphasia) and focus on a variety of familiar and unfamiliar communication partners. An understanding of the scope of literature across the evidence-base of acquired neurological populations may provide a better basis to develop interventions and future research tailored for community workers. AIMS To explore the scope of literature on paid worker and unfamiliar partner communication training for acquired neurogenic communication disorders with a focus on describing: 1) the types of communication disorders addressed by interventions; 2) the types of learners who received the interventions; 3) the nature of the interventions; and 4) the reported effects on trainees and people with a communication disorder. METHODS & PROCEDURES A scoping review was conducted. Studies were selected by a systematic keyword search, undertaken through four databases. Eligibility criteria included studies that: (i) reported an intervention directed at paid workers or unfamiliar partners where the primary goal was to improve communication with people with acquired neurogenic communication disorders, (ii) reported original results, (iii) contained quantitative or qualitative data on the effects of the intervention, (iv) were written in English or French and (v) were published in a peer-reviewed journal. The PRISMA-ScR was used to guide design and reporting of the scoping review. RESULTS Seventy publications met the inclusion criteria. Interventions were mostly disorder-specific and addressed communication with people with dementia, aphasia or traumatic brain injury. 15/70 studies examined training programs that were not restructured to a specific population (e.g., aphasia). Learners were mostly working or studying in the healthcare field and only 2/70 studies included community workers without primarily health training. Sixty different interventions were reported and were mostly delivered by speech-language pathologists. Training varied in terms of duration (a few minutes to 46 h) and content, but many shared training methods (e.g., presentation of theory on communication disorders). Nearly all studies demonstrated positive results, 23/26 studies suggested that paid worker and unfamiliar partner communication training may increase the knowledge of trainees, 24/26 studies suggested that it could improve their confidence when interacting with people with a communication disorder and 44/46 studies suggested that it could improve the trainees' communication abilities. CONCLUSION A small developing evidence-base exists for communication training programs for paid and unfamiliar communications partners that focuses beyond a single diagnosis or disorder. However, there is very limited knowledge on interventions for community workers from non-health professions. Future research should focus on the evaluation of existing programs tailored to, or explicitly designed for this context with the aim of identifying active ingredients that lead to improved and sustainable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Tessier
- Université de Montréal, Faculté de médecine, École d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, 6363 chemin Hudson (Pavillon Lindsay), bureau 061, Montréal, Québec H3S 1M9 Canada.
| | - Emma Power
- University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, The Graduate Research School, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Claire Croteau
- Université de Montréal, Faculté de médecine, École d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, 6363 chemin Hudson (Pavillon Lindsay), bureau 061, Montréal, Québec H3S 1M9 Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Elbourn E, Kenny B, Power E, Togher L. Psychosocial Outcomes of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Relation to Discourse Recovery: A Longitudinal Study up to 1 Year Post-Injury. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2019; 28:1463-1478. [PMID: 31487472 DOI: 10.1044/2019_ajslp-18-0204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The interrelationship between psychosocial outcomes and discourse after severe traumatic brain injury remains largely unknown. This study examines outcomes relating to work, relationships, and independence within the context of discourse recovery across the 1st year post-injury. Method An inception cohort comprising 57 participants with severe traumatic brain injury was assessed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-injury. Outcomes were measured with the Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale-2 (Tate et al., 2012; Tate, Simpson, Loo, & Lane-Brown, 2011), and discourse was evaluated with Main Concept Analysis of a narrative retell. Correlation and linear regression analyses were utilized. Results Significant correlations were found between psychosocial outcomes reported by relatives and discourse performance across the 1st year. The 6-month discourse scores significantly predicted the 12-month psychosocial outcomes reported by relatives. Initial discourse severity and recovery pattern also informed outcomes. Conclusions Discourse disorders have a strong relationship with everyday outcomes relating to work, relationships, and independence as reported by relatives. Six months post-injury is a beneficial time for assessment, education, and service planning. Age, years of education, and aphasia may mediate recovery and outcomes. A clinical decision tree is offered to support goal setting. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9755444.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Elbourn
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Belinda Kenny
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Donnelly KZ, Baker K, Pierce R, St Ivany AR, Barr PJ, Bruce ML. A retrospective study on the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of LoveYourBrain Yoga for people with traumatic brain injury and caregivers. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 43:1764-1775. [PMID: 31577456 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1672109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a mixed methods, pre-post, retrospective study on the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of the LoveYourBrain Yoga program. MATERIALS AND METHODS People were eligible if they were a traumatic brain injury survivor or caregiver, age 15-70, ambulatory, and capable of gentle exercise and group discussion. We analyzed attendance, satisfaction, and mean differences in scores on Quality of Life After Brain Injury Overall scale (QOLIBRI-OS) and four TBI-QOL/Neuro-QOL scales. Content analysis explored perceptions of benefits and areas of improvement. RESULTS 1563 people (82.0%) participated ≥1 class in 156 programs across 18 states and 3 Canadian provinces. Mean satisfaction was 9.3 out of 10 (SD 1.0). Mixed effects linear regression found significant improvements in QOLIBRI-OS (B 9.70, 95% CI: 8.51, 10.90), Resilience (B 1.30, 95% CI: 0.60, 2.06), Positive Affect and Well-being (B 1.49, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.84), and Cognition (B 1.48, 95% CI: 0.78, 2.18) among traumatic brain injury survivors (n = 705). No improvement was found in Emotional and Behavioral Dysregulation, however, content analysis revealed better ability to regulate anxiety, anger, stress, and impulsivity. Caregivers perceived improvements in physical and psychological health. CONCLUSIONS LoveYourBrain Yoga is feasible and acceptable and may be an effective mode of community-based rehabilitation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPeople with traumatic brain injury and their caregivers often experience poor quality of life and difficulty accessing community-based rehabilitation services.Yoga is a holistic, mind-body therapy with many benefits to quality of life, yet is largely inaccessible to people affected by traumatic brain injury in community settings.Participants in LoveYourBrain Yoga, a six-session, community-based yoga with psychoeducation program in 18 states and 3 Canadian provinces, experienced significant improvements in quality of life, resilience, cognition, and positive affect.LoveYourBrain Yoga is feasible and acceptable when implemented on a large scale and may be an effective mode of, or adjunct to, community-based rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyla Z Donnelly
- Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.,The LoveYourBrain Foundation, Windsor, VT, USA
| | - Kim Baker
- The LoveYourBrain Foundation, Windsor, VT, USA
| | | | - Amanda R St Ivany
- Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Paul J Barr
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Martha L Bruce
- Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Behn N, Marshall J, Togher L, Cruice M. Setting and achieving individualized social communication goals for people with acquired brain injury (ABI) within a group treatment. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2019; 54:828-840. [PMID: 31250537 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive-communication disorders are common following an acquired brain injury (ABI). Remediation should involve individualized goal-setting, yet few reports describe the effectiveness of setting communication goals in a group setting. AIMS To describe a process for setting and achieving goals for people with ABI. METHODS & PROCEDURES A total of 21 participants with ABI participated in a group treatment (triads and dyads) over 6 weeks (20 h in total). Specific social communication goals were set using goal attainment scaling (GAS) with the participant and their communication partner. Goals targeted strategy use that accounted for existing cognitive abilities. The participant and their communication partner evaluated the goals post-treatment and 6-8 weeks later. Data were analysed using Friedman's test to identify the achievement of GAS goals. OUTCOMES & RESULTS A total of 20 participants recalled goals independently post-treatment. Significant improvement post-treatment on GAS goals was rated by both the participant (p < 0.001) and their communication partner (p < 0.001). This improvement was maintained at follow-up. No significant differences in ratings were found between participants and their communication partners at either time point. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS Individualized social communication goals can be set and achieved for people with ABI in group treatment, even when participants are several years post-injury. GAS offers a method for structuring and quantifying goal progress. Involving communication partners and cognitive strategies were effective in improving communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Behn
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jane Marshall
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Leanne Togher
- Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
| | - Madeline Cruice
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Behn N, Marshall J, Togher L, Cruice M. Reporting on novel complex intervention development for adults with social communication impairments after acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 43:805-814. [PMID: 31361164 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1642964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Interventions are often poorly described in published controlled trials, with relatively little information regarding intervention development, content and fidelity. This makes it difficult to conduct replication studies, interpret and compare findings across studies and for therapists to deliver the intervention in clinical practice. Complete reporting of interventions (including fidelity) is now recommended for treatment studies, and this standardized approach is achieved using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). The aim of this article is to describe the multi-phase process of developing a novel intervention for adults with acquired brain injury (ABI) and report on the findings from involving practicing therapists in this process. METHODS Phase 1 involved a review of relevant literature and specifying the intervention as a prototype intervention manual. Phase 2 comprised a focus group with eight practicing therapists exploring their experiences and perceptions of the intervention, potential active components, and essential elements; it also included a review of the prototype manual. Data from the focus group discussion was transcribed and analyzed thematically. Phase 3 investigated actual fidelity of the intervention undertaken, achieved by observers viewing videoed sessions and appraising against the fidelity checklist, which was then analyzed using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS Project-based intervention was defined as having six essential elements: a project or tangible end product focus; group-based intervention; individualized communication-based goals; communication partner involvement; acknowledgement and support of participants' cognitive ability; and consideration and plan to address impaired awareness. Analysis of focus group data revealed four themes of essential elements; group context; therapeutic skills; and manual core components and informed the development of a fidelity checklist with 13 essential and 6 desirable criteria. Fidelity assessed using percent agreement was acceptable for almost all rater pairs; where significant, Kappa coefficients had values ranging from poor to excellent (k = 0.34-1.0) depending on rater pair and session. DISCUSSION The TIDieR framework provided a clear systematic approach for the complete description and reporting of a complex communication intervention for people with ABI. This article comprehensively described the development and manualisation of intervention in collaboration with practicing therapists which can be used for future testing. In addition, the process undertaken has the potential to inform rehabilitation researchers in other fields on the development of complex interventions.Implications for rehabilitationThe results of this study detail the steps needed to describe an intervention, from the identification of the essential elements through to the creation of a manual and checklist to show fidelity. The process provides a starting point for other rehabilitation researchers developing complex interventions.This article provides a clear and comprehensive description of a novel intervention containing six essential elements for people with acquired brain injury presenting with communication impairments.Project-based intervention is one intervention, which intends to help improve communication skills and quality of life in people with acquired brain injury.This study highlights the important role practicing therapists can play in the creation of an intervention manual and fidelity checklist and in ensuring that sufficient detail is provided to help therapists implement the intervention into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Behn
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jane Marshall
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Leanne Togher
- Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Madeline Cruice
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Protocol for a clinical trial of telehealth-based social communication skills training for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. BRAIN IMPAIR 2019. [DOI: 10.1017/brimp.2019.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackground: A previous clinical trial of training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) demonstrated positive outcomes [Togher, Power, McDonald, Tate, & Rietdijk (2009). Brain Impairment, 10(2), 188-204]. Adapting communication partner training for delivery via telehealth could improve access to this intervention.Objectives: To compare outcomes across in-person communication partner training, telehealth communication partner training and a control groupMethod: Protocol for a partially randomised controlled trial. People with moderate-severe TBI will be allocated to either an in-person or telehealth-based training program. Comparison data will be drawn from the original trial control group, which was recruited using the same eligibility criteria as this protocol. Outcomes after training will be compared between the in-person training group, the telehealth training group and the historical control group.Discussion: This protocol uses specific design features with the aim of maximising the study’s power, including a partially randomised allocation process and a historical control group. The results will inform about the feasibility and effectiveness of delivering TBI rehabilitation via telehealth.Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12615001024538.
Collapse
|
35
|
Behn N, Marshall J, Togher L, Cruice M. Feasibility and initial efficacy of project-based treatment for people with ABI. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2019; 54:465-478. [PMID: 30693611 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2018] [Revised: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication impairments are common and pervasive for people a long time following acquired brain injury (ABI). These impairments have a significant impact on a person's quality of life (QOL) post-injury. Project-based treatment is a treatment approach that could have an impact on communication skills and QOL for people with ABI a long-term post-injury. This treatment is embedded in a context of meaningful activities chosen by people with ABI, whereby, as a group, they work collaboratively to achieve a tangible end product. AIMS To evaluate the feasibility and initial efficacy of project-based treatment on improving the communication skills and QOL for people with ABI. METHODS & PROCEDURES An exploratory controlled trial with alternate allocation of groups, and follow-up at 6-8 weeks, was completed. Twenty-one people with chronic ABI were recruited in groups of two to three from community settings, allocated to either a TREATMENT (n = 11) or WAITLIST group (n = 10). Participants attended a 20-h group-based treatment over 6 weeks where they worked towards achieving a project that helped others. To determine feasibility, four criteria were used: demand, implementation, practicality and acceptability. A range of communication and QOL outcomes was used to determine a fifth feasibility criterion, initial efficacy. Some of these criteria were additionally used to evaluate the feasibility of the outcomes. OUTCOMES & RESULTS All participants received the treatment as allocated with high attendance and no dropouts. The treatment was feasible to deliver as intended and was highly acceptable to participants. Medium and large effect sizes were found from pre- to post-treatment, and from pre-treatment to follow-up for measures of conversation, perceived communicative ability and QOL. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS Project-based treatment is feasible with indications of initial efficacy for both communication skills and QOL. The treatment provides a promising new approach for improving communication skills and QOL in people with chronic acquired brain injuries in the community setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Behn
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jane Marshall
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Leanne Togher
- Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
| | - Madeline Cruice
- Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Meulenbroek P, Ness B, Lemoncello R, Byom L, MacDonald S, O'Neil-Pirozzi TM, Moore Sohlberg M. Social communication following traumatic brain injury part 2: Identifying effective treatment ingredients. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2019; 21:128-142. [PMID: 30955383 DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2019.1583281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Social communication deficits are a severely debilitating aspect of traumatic brain injury (TBI), and there is strong clinical and research interest in how social communication interventions work for this population. Informed by a companion paper targeting assessment of social communication impairments post-TBI, this paper reviews relevant treatment theories and provides an inventory of social communication treatment components. METHOD We completed a mapping review examining 17 articles from recent literature reviews and 4 updated articles from a literature search to identify treatment targets and ingredients using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS). RESULT Social communication interventions are primarily based on behavioural and cognitive treatment theories. Common social communication treatment targets include changing skilled behaviours and cognitive or affective representations. We offer a menu of therapeutic ingredients and treatment considerations which represent the current state of social communication interventions. CONCLUSION By reviewing the social communication intervention literature through a theoretical lens, we identify which treatment targets are missing, which targets are being addressed, and which therapeutic ingredients (i.e. clinician activities) are recommended. A hypothetical case study is provided as a supplement to demonstrate how speech-language pathologists may integrate treatment theory, ingredients, and targets into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Meulenbroek
- a Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders Traumatic Brain Injury Writing Committee
- b Division of Communication Sciences and Disorders , Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Kentucky , Lexington , KY , USA
| | - Bryan Ness
- a Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders Traumatic Brain Injury Writing Committee
- c Communication Sciences and Disorders , California Baptist University , Riverside , CA , USA
| | - Rik Lemoncello
- a Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders Traumatic Brain Injury Writing Committee
- d School of Communication Sciences and Disorders , Pacific University , Forest Grove , OR , USA
| | - Lindsey Byom
- a Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders Traumatic Brain Injury Writing Committee
- e Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences Department of Allied Health , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill , NC , USA
| | - Sheila MacDonald
- a Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders Traumatic Brain Injury Writing Committee
- f Sheila MacDonald & Associates , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | - Therese M O'Neil-Pirozzi
- a Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders Traumatic Brain Injury Writing Committee
- g Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders , Northeastern University and Spaulding-Harvard Traumatic Brain Injury Model System , Boston , MA , USA
| | - McKay Moore Sohlberg
- a Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders Traumatic Brain Injury Writing Committee
- h Communication Disorders & Sciences , University of Oregon, Eugene , OR , USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Keegan LC, Murdock M, Suger C, Togher L. Improving natural social interaction: Group rehabilitation after Traumatic Brain Injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2019; 30:1497-1522. [DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2019.1591464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Louise C. Keegan
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Macy Murdock
- Carolinas Rehabilitation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Caitlin Suger
- Westwood Hills Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, RehabCare, Wilkesboro, NC, USA
| | - Leanne Togher
- Speech Pathology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chia AA, Power E, Kenny B, Elbourn E, McDonald S, Tate R, MacWhinney B, Turkstra L, Holland A, Togher L. Patterns of early conversational recovery for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. Brain Inj 2019; 33:690-698. [DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1571632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- An An Chia
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, UTS Graduate School of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Belinda Kenny
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Recovery, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elise Elbourn
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Recovery, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Skye McDonald
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Recovery, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn Tate
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Recovery, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian MacWhinney
- Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lyn Turkstra
- Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Audrey Holland
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Leanne Togher
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Recovery, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rietdijk R, Power E, Brunner M, Togher L. The reliability of evaluating conversations between people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners via videoconferencing. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2018; 30:1074-1091. [DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1554533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Rietdijk
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Melissa Brunner
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Elbourn E, Kenny B, Power E, Honan C, McDonald S, Tate R, Holland A, MacWhinney B, Togher L. Discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury: exploring the first year. Brain Inj 2018; 33:143-159. [DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1539246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Elbourn
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Belinda Kenny
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Cynthia Honan
- School of Medicine, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Skye McDonald
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Robyn Tate
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Audrey Holland
- Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
| | - Brian MacWhinney
- Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Leanne Togher
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rietdijk R, Power E, Brunner M, Togher L. A single case experimental design study on improving social communication skills after traumatic brain injury using communication partner telehealth training. Brain Inj 2018; 33:94-104. [DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1531313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Rietdijk
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Graduate School of Health, The University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Melissa Brunner
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Graduate School of Health, The University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Volkmer A, Spector A, Warren JD, Beeke S. The 'Better Conversations with Primary Progressive Aphasia (BCPPA)' program for people with PPA (Primary Progressive Aphasia): protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:158. [PMID: 30345067 PMCID: PMC6186039 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0349-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Primary progressive aphasia is a language-led dementia, often associated with frontotemporal dementia. It presents as insidious deterioration of language skills (e.g. naming objects and understanding complex sentences), with relative sparing of cognitive skills initially. There is little research examining the effectiveness of communication skills training for primary progressive aphasia, yet speech and language therapists (SLTs) report regularly using this in clinical practice. ‘Better Conversations with Primary Progressive Aphasia’ has potential to reduce barriers and increase facilitators to conversation and consequently improve confidence in communication and quality of life for people living with primary progressive aphasia and their conversation partners. The aim of this pilot study is to examine the feasibility of running a trial of the ‘Better Conversations with Primary Progressive Aphasia’ intervention. Methods A single blind, randomised controlled pilot study will recruit 42 participants with primary progressive aphasia and their conversation partners across seven UK National Health Service Trusts. Participants will be randomised on a 1:1 basis, stratified by site, to receive either the ‘Better Conversations with Primary Progressive Aphasia’ intervention (21 couples) or no speech and language therapy treatment (21 couples). Participants are recruited by SLTs who will conduct pre-intervention assessment (week 1) and deliver the intervention (weeks 2 to 5). Junior researchers, who are blinded to allocation, will complete post-intervention measures (week 6). SLTs complete 9 h of training to prepare them to deliver the intervention. The primary objective of the study is to establish for a phase III effectiveness study whether the program can be delivered as intended in a UK National Health Service setting. Specifically, it will establish (1) the acceptability of randomisation, (2) an assessment of treatment fidelity to determine necessary levels of SLT training, (3) the most appropriate primary outcome measure, (4) sample size requirements, (5) predicted patient recruitment and retention rates and (6) refined inclusion criteria. Discussion Insights from this study will be of relevance to guide development of future research and in particular, trials of therapeutic interventions in PPA, as well as for clinical care for this population. Trial registration Retrospectively registered 28/02/2018 ISRCTN10148247 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0349-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Volkmer
- 1Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Language and Cognition, University College London, Chandler House, 2 Wakefield Street, London, WC1N 1PF UK
| | - Aimee Spector
- 2Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Jason D Warren
- 3Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Suzanne Beeke
- 1Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Language and Cognition, University College London, Chandler House, 2 Wakefield Street, London, WC1N 1PF UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Barnes S, Nickels L. Interaction-focussed therapy for aphasia: Effects on communication and quality of life. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2018; 20:528-540. [PMID: 28682118 DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1329851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2016] [Revised: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/06/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined the effects of an interaction-focussed therapy for aphasia, which involved both people with aphasia and their familiar conversation partners. It was hypothesised the interaction-focussed therapy would lead to positive changes in targeted conversation behaviours, and improved quality of life for participants with aphasia. METHOD Three people with chronic aphasia and three of their familiar conversation partners completed an 8-week interaction-focussed therapy programme. A series of single case multiple-baseline ABA experiments were conducted. Outcome measures focussed on changes in targeted behaviours between pre- and post-therapy conversation samples, and changes in quality of life. RESULT All participant dyads improved their conversations. Familiar conversation partners demonstrated significant changes in targeted behaviours, while only one participant with aphasia achieved significant improvements. There was little evidence of a positive impact on quality of life for participants with aphasia. CONCLUSION Interaction-focussed therapy enhances everyday communication for people with aphasia and their conversation partners. However, the complex nature of learning in this intervention means that further, likely interdisciplinary work is required to better understand what mediates skill acquisition and therapeutic change and its psychosocial impact. This information is particularly important for optimising interaction-focussed therapy for people with aphasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Barnes
- a Department of Linguistics , Macquarie University , Sydney , Australia and
| | - Lyndsey Nickels
- b Centre for Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Cognitive Science , Macquarie University , Sydney , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Shepherd-Banigan ME, Shapiro A, McDuffie JR, Brancu M, Sperber NR, Van Houtven CH, Kosinski AS, Mehta NN, Nagi A, Williams JW. Interventions That Support or Involve Caregivers or Families of Patients with Traumatic Injury: a Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33:1177-1186. [PMID: 29736752 PMCID: PMC6025684 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4417-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Revised: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Almost 40 million family caregivers care for a loved one with severe physical or cognitive impairments. The purpose of this review is to summarize evidence about the benefits of interventions to support or involve family members/caregivers of patients with trauma-related injury on caregiver, patient, and household outcomes. METHODS English-language peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from 1995 through December 2016 were identified. Eligible studies included RCT or quasi-experimental studies evaluating interventions designed to support or involve caregivers or family members of patients with TBI, PTSD, or polytrauma. Abstractions were completed by one reviewer and checked by a second; two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Criteria. RESULTS Thirteen studies (n = 9 TBI; n = 4 PTSD, n = 0 polytrauma) evaluated psychological or rehabilitation interventions involving caregivers. Interventions did not improve TBI patients' functional status (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.29 [95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.51 to 1.08]) or psychological symptoms (SMD - 0.25, CI - 0.62 to 0.12). Qualitative analysis shows potential intervention benefit for TBI symptoms. Interventions did not improve TBI caregiver psychological symptoms (SMD - 0.26, CI - 0.57 to 0.05); however, qualitative analysis suggests mixed effects for caregiver burden and quality of life. Positive intervention effects on patients' PTSD symptoms, mental health service use, and PTSD caregivers' psychological symptoms were identified with certain interventions. Strength of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. DISCUSSION Studies showed mixed patterns of intervention effects on caregiver and patient outcomes; evidence about intervention impact is inconclusive. This review is the first to identify caregiving interventions for patients with TBI and polytrauma and extends past reviews about patients with PTSD. Limitations include a small evidence base, low study quality, disparate methods, varied outcome measures, and high heterogeneity. PROSPERO Registration CRD42017053516.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Shepherd-Banigan
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Abigail Shapiro
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer R McDuffie
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center Durham, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mira Brancu
- VA Mid-Atlantic Region Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nina R Sperber
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center Durham, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center Durham, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andrzej S Kosinski
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Neha N Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center Durham, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Avishek Nagi
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John W Williams
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center Durham, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kreitzer N, Kurowski BG, Bakas T. Systematic Review of Caregiver and Dyad Interventions After Adult Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99:2342-2354. [PMID: 29752909 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Revised: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe and synthesize the literature on adult traumatic brain injury (TBI) family caregiver and dyad intervention. TBI is a common injury that has a significant long-term impact, and is sometimes even characterized as a chronic condition. Informal (ie, unpaid) family caregivers of adults with TBI experience high rates of burnout, depression, fatigue, anxiety, lower subjective well-being, and poorer levels of physical health compared to noncaregivers. This study addresses the critical gap in the understanding of interventions designed to address the impact of TBI on adult patients and their family caregivers. DATA SOURCES PubMed and MEDLINE. STUDY SELECTION Studies selected for review had to be written in English and be quasi-experimental or experimental in design, report on TBI caregivers, survivors with heavy involvement of caregivers, or caregiver dyads, involve moderate and severe TBI, and describe an intervention implemented during some portion of the TBI care continuum. DATA EXTRACTION The search identified 2171 articles, of which 14 met our criteria for inclusion. Of the identified studies, 10 were randomized clinical trials and 4 were nonrandomized quasi-experimental studies. A secondary search to describe studies that included individuals with other forms of acquired brain injury in addition to TBI resulted in 852 additional titles, of which 5 met our inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS Interventions that targeted the caregiver primarily were more likely to provide benefit than those that targeted caregiver/survivor dyad or the survivor only. Many of the studies were limited by poor fidelity, low sample sizes, and high risk for bias based on randomization techniques. CONCLUSIONS Future studies of TBI caregivers should enroll a more generalizable number of participants and ensure adequate fidelity to properly compare interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Kreitzer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States; Division of Neurocritical Care, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
| | - Brad G Kurowski
- Department of Pediatrics, Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Tamilyn Bakas
- College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hoepner JK, Olson SE. Joint Video Self-Modeling as a Conversational Intervention for an Individual with Traumatic Brain Injury and His Everyday Partner: A Pilot Investigation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.21849/cacd.2018.00262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
47
|
Keegan LC, Togher L. An Innovative Clinical Training Model for Students Using the Context of a Cognitive Communication Skills Group. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1044/persp3.sig2.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
48
|
Finch E, Cornwell P, Copley A, Doig E, Fleming J. Remediation of social communication impairments following traumatic brain injury using metacognitive strategy intervention: a pilot study. Brain Inj 2017; 31:1830-1839. [DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1346284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Finch
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Speech Pathology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Petrea Cornwell
- Allied Health Research Collaborative, The Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Chermside, Queensland, Australia
- Behavioural Basis of Health, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, Queensland, Australia
- Collaborative for Allied Health Research and Learning, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Chermside, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anna Copley
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Emmah Doig
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jennifer Fleming
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Occupational Therapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Assessment and Rehabilitation of Social Cognition Impairment after Brain Injury: Surveying Practices of Clinicians. BRAIN IMPAIR 2017. [DOI: 10.1017/brimp.2016.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined the current assessment practices of clinicians working with people with social cognition impairment following traumatic brain injury.Method: Two hundred and sixty clinicians completed an on-line survey that was disseminated through professional brain injury organisations. Of respondents around 90% were allied health clinicians, with the remainder comprising medical, nursing and academia.Main outcomes: The four areas of social cognition that were routinely assessed across the disciplines were insight, disinhibition, anger and social adjustment. The least routinely assessed areas were theory of mind and alexithymia. The test suggested most likely to identify social cognition impairments was The Awareness of Social Inference Test, although only 8% of clinicians responded to this question. Clinicians preferred informal assessment methods over standardised assessment methods for identifying social cognition rehabilitation goals. Higher levels of education were associated with greater use of standardised assessment modalities. Whilst there was paucity of responses overall, TBI Express was most commonly used for social cognition rehabilitation.Conclusions: Considering the high prevalence of social cognition impairments in this population, formal assessment is extremely limited. The under-utilisation of assessment tools is problematic for the assessment and rehabilitation initiatives offered to people with TBI. These results have implications for the training of clinicians working in brain injury rehabilitation.
Collapse
|
50
|
Saldert C. Pragmatic Assessment and Intervention in Adults. PERSPECTIVES IN PRAGMATICS, PHILOSOPHY & PSYCHOLOGY 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|