1
|
Choi J, Yu K, Lee ST, Shin S, Choi JR. Factors Influencing Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting for Multiple Myeloma Fluorescence in situ Hybridization: Real-world Experience. Ann Lab Med 2025; 45:322-328. [PMID: 40130307 PMCID: PMC11996684 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2024.0582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Revised: 11/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/26/2025] Open
Abstract
Background FISH is the standard method for detecting cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) in patients with multiple myeloma, and pre-enrichment of plasma cells is recommended to increase detection rates. However, optimal strategies to ensure sufficient plasma cell retrieval when standard enrichment techniques fail remain underexplored. We investigated factors influencing the success of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and assessed the use of direct FISH in cases in which FACS failed. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 457 bone marrow samples submitted for FISH between November 2016 and May 2022. FACS was considered successful when plasma cells (CD38+ and CD138+ cells) constituted >1% of the total number of cells. Direct FISH was performed for samples with FACS failure. Results FACS was successful in 70.9% of cases and had a high positivity rate (94.8%). Shorter sample transfer times significantly improved FACS success, with a 77.1% success rate for transfer times <2 hrs, compared with 67.8% for longer times (P =0.0388). Plasma cell percentage was a strong determinant of FACS success, with a median of 31.2% in successful cases versus 8.5% in failures (P <0.0001). Even when FACS failed, direct FISH detected CAs in 43.6% of cases. Conclusions Plasma cell percentage and sample transfer time are critical factors influencing FACS success. While FACS-FISH demonstrates superior sensitivity in detecting CAs, direct FISH serves as a valuable alternative when FACS fails. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing sample handling and FISH protocols for accurate cytogenetic analysis of multiple myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeguk Choi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyunghee Yu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Tae Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Dxome Co. Ltd., Seongnam, Korea
| | - Saeam Shin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Rak Choi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Dxome Co. Ltd., Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pratiwi L, Mashudi FH, Ningtyas MC, Sutanto H, Romadhon PZ. Genetic Profiling of Acute and Chronic Leukemia via Next-Generation Sequencing: Current Insights and Future Perspectives. Hematol Rep 2025; 17:18. [PMID: 40277842 PMCID: PMC12026831 DOI: 10.3390/hematolrep17020018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2025] [Revised: 03/24/2025] [Accepted: 03/27/2025] [Indexed: 04/26/2025] Open
Abstract
Leukemia is a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies characterized by distinct genetic and molecular abnormalities. Advancements in genomic technologies have significantly transformed the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment strategies for leukemia. Among these, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a powerful tool, enabling high-resolution genomic profiling that surpasses conventional diagnostic approaches. By providing comprehensive insights into genetic mutations, clonal evolution, and resistance mechanisms, NGS has revolutionized precision medicine in leukemia management. Despite its transformative potential, the clinical integration of NGS presents challenges, including data interpretation complexities, standardization issues, and cost considerations. However, continuous advancements in sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines are enhancing the reliability and accessibility of NGS in routine clinical practice. The expanding role of NGS in leukemia is paving the way for improved risk stratification, targeted therapies, and real-time disease monitoring, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes. This review highlights the impact of NGS on leukemia research and clinical applications, discussing its advantages over traditional diagnostic techniques, key sequencing approaches, and emerging challenges. As precision oncology continues to evolve, NGS is expected to play an increasingly central role in the diagnosis and management of leukemia, driving innovations in personalized medicine and therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laras Pratiwi
- Internal Medicine Study Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia; (L.P.); (F.H.M.); (M.C.N.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
| | - Fawzia Hanum Mashudi
- Internal Medicine Study Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia; (L.P.); (F.H.M.); (M.C.N.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
| | - Mukti Citra Ningtyas
- Internal Medicine Study Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia; (L.P.); (F.H.M.); (M.C.N.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
| | - Henry Sutanto
- Internal Medicine Study Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia; (L.P.); (F.H.M.); (M.C.N.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
| | - Pradana Zaky Romadhon
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Airlangga University Hospital, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumaran G, Carroll L, Muirhead N, Bottomley MJ. How Can Spatial Transcriptomic Profiling Advance Our Understanding of Skin Diseases? J Invest Dermatol 2025; 145:522-535. [PMID: 39177547 DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2024.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomic (ST) profiling is the mapping of gene expression within cell populations with preservation of positional context and represents an exciting new approach to develop our understanding of local and regional influences upon skin biology in health and disease. With the ability to probe from a few hundred transcripts to the entire transcriptome, multiple ST approaches are now widely available. In this paper, we review the ST field and discuss its application to dermatology. Its potential to advance our understanding of skin biology in health and disease is highlighted through the illustrative examples of 3 research areas: cutaneous aging, tumorigenesis, and psoriasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Girishkumar Kumaran
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Oxford Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Liam Carroll
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Oxford Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Matthew J Bottomley
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Oxford Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balciuniene J, Ning Y, Lazarus HM, Aikawa V, Sherpa S, Zhang Y, Morrissette JJD. Cancer cytogenetics in a genomics world: Wedding the old with the new. Blood Rev 2024; 66:101209. [PMID: 38852016 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2024.101209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
Since the discovery of the Philadelphia chromosome in 1960, cytogenetic studies have been instrumental in detecting chromosomal abnormalities that can inform cancer diagnosis, treatment, and risk assessment efforts. The initial expansion of cancer cytogenetics was with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to assess submicroscopic alterations in dividing or non-dividing cells and has grown into the incorporation of chromosomal microarrays (CMA), and next generation sequencing (NGS). These molecular technologies add additional dimensions to the genomic assessment of cancers by uncovering cytogenetically invisible molecular markers. Rapid technological and bioinformatic advances in NGS are so promising that the idea of performing whole genome sequencing as part of routine patient care may soon become economically and logistically feasible. However, for now cytogenetic studies continue to play a major role in the diagnostic testing and subsequent assessments in leukemia with other genomic studies serving as complementary testing options for detection of actionable genomic abnormalities. In this review, we discuss the role of conventional cytogenetics (karyotyping, chromosome analysis) and FISH studies in hematological malignancies, highlighting the continued clinical utility of these techniques, the subtleties and complexities that are relevant to treating physicians and the unique strengths of cytogenetics that cannot yet be paralleled by the current high-throughput molecular technologies. Additionally, we describe how CMA, optical genome mapping (OGM), and NGS detect abnormalities that were beyond the capacity of cytogenetic studies and how an integrated approach (broad molecular testing) can contribute to the detection of actionable targets and variants in malignancies. Finally, we discuss advances in the field of genomic testing that are bridging the advantages of individual (single) cell based cytogenetic testing and broad genomic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorune Balciuniene
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Yi Ning
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Hillard M Lazarus
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Vania Aikawa
- Division of Precision and Computational Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sarina Sherpa
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Yanming Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jennifer J D Morrissette
- Division of Precision and Computational Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xiao J, Zheng YC, Zhao JW, Cui CH, Wang HJ, Sun Q, Ma J, Ma YS, Song Z, Xiao ZJ, Li CW. [Use of the ETV6/RUNX1 probe to verify the performance of the fluorescence in situ hybridization probe before clinical detection]. ZHONGHUA XUE YE XUE ZA ZHI = ZHONGHUA XUEYEXUE ZAZHI 2024; 45:48-53. [PMID: 38527838 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20230721-00015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Objective: To explore the standardized performance of a FISH probe before clinical detection. Methods: The probe sensitivity and specificity of ETV6/RUNX1 were analyzed via interphase and metaphase FISH in 20 discarded healthy bone marrow samples. The threshold system of the probe was established using an inverse beta distribution, and an interpretation standard was established. Finally, a parallel-controlled polymerase chain reaction detection study was conducted on 286 bone marrow samples from patients at our hospital. The clinical sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic coincidence rate of ETV6/RUNX1 FISH detection were analyzed, and the diagnostic consistency of the two methods was analyzed by the kappa test. Results: The probe sensitivity and specificity of the ETV6/RUNX1 probe were 98.47% and 100%, respectively. When 50, 100, and 200 cells were counted, the typical positive signal pattern cutoffs were 5.81%, 2.95%, and 1.49%, respectively, and the atypical positive signal pattern cutoffs were 13.98%, 9.75%, and 6.26%, respectively. The clinical sensitivity of FISH was 96.1%, clinical specificity was 99.6%, diagnostic coincidence rate was 99.00%, diagnostic consistency test kappa value was 0.964, and P value was <0.001. Conclusion: For FISH probes without a national medical device registration certificate, standardized performance verification and methodology performance verification can be performed using laboratory developed test verification standards to ensure a reliable and accurate reference basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Xiao
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| | - Y C Zheng
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| | - J W Zhao
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| | - C H Cui
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| | - H J Wang
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| | - Q Sun
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| | - J Ma
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| | - Y S Ma
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| | - Z Song
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| | - Z J Xiao
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| | - C W Li
- Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin 300020, China Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin 301600, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koduru P, Chen W, Fuda F, Kaur G, Awan F, John S, Garcia R, Gagan J. RNASeq Analysis for Accurate Identification of Fusion Partners in Tumor Specific Translocations Detected by Standard FISH Probes in Hematologic Malignancies. CLINICAL PATHOLOGY (THOUSAND OAKS, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIF.) 2024; 17:2632010X241230262. [PMID: 38371338 PMCID: PMC10874141 DOI: 10.1177/2632010x241230262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Background Fluorescence labeled DNA probes and in situ hybridization methods had shorter turn round time for results revolutionized their clinical application. Signals obtained from these probes are highly specific, yet they can produce fusion signals not necessarily representing fusion of actual genes due to other genes included in the probe design. In this study we evaluated discordance between cytogenetic, FISH and RNAseq results in 3 different patients with hematologic malignancies and illustrated the need to perform next generation sequencing (NGS) or RNASeq to accurately interpret FISH results. Methods Bone marrow or peripheral blood karyotypes and FISH were performed to detect recurring translocations associated with hematologic malignancies in clinical samples routinely referred to our clinical cytogenetics laboratory. When required, NGS was performed on DNA and RNA libraries to detect somatic alterations and gene fusions in some of these specimens. Discordance in results between these methods is further evaluated. Results For a patient with plasma cell leukemia standard FGFR3 / IGH dual fusion FISH assay detected fusion that was interpreted as FGFR3-positive leukemia, whereas NGS/RNASeq detected NSD2::IGH. For a pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient, a genetic diagnosis of PDGFRB-positive ALL was rendered because the PDGFRB break-apart probe detected clonal rearrangement, whereas NGS detected MEF2D::CSF1R. A MYC-positive B-prolymphocytic leukemia was rendered for another patient with a cytogenetically identified t(8;14) and MYC::IGH by FISH, whereas NGS detected a novel PVT1::RCOR1 not previously reported. Conclusions These are 3 cases in a series of several other concordant results, nevertheless, elucidate limitations when interpreting FISH results in clinical applications, particularly when other genes are included in probe design. In addition, when the observed FISH signals are atypical, this study illustrates the necessity to perform complementary laboratory assays, such as NGS and/or RNASeq, to accurately identify fusion genes in tumorigenic translocations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prasad Koduru
- Departments of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Weina Chen
- Departments of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Franklin Fuda
- Departments of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Gurbakhash Kaur
- Internal Medicine (Division of Oncology), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Farrukh Awan
- Internal Medicine (Division of Oncology), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Samuel John
- Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rolando Garcia
- Departments of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gagan
- Departments of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ansari S, Verma M. Control of Ph + and additional chromosomal abnormalities in chronic myeloid leukemia by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Med Oncol 2023; 40:237. [PMID: 37439908 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-023-02116-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a type of blood cancer that is known to affect hematopoietic stem cells. The presence of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) is the major characteristic of CML. A protein expressed by the Philadelphia chromosome shows elevated tyrosine kinase activity and is considered a tumorigenic factor. The first line of therapy that had been established for CML was "imatinib," a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Various other second- and third-generation TKIs are taken into account in cases of imatinib failure/resistance. With the subsequent rise in the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, optimization in the treatment of CML and amplified total survival were observed throughout TKI dosage. As the disease progresses, additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) have been reported, but their prognostic effect and impact on the response to treatment are still unknown. However, some substantial understandings have been achieved into the disease transformation mechanisms, including the role of somatic mutations, ACAs, and several different genomic mutations that occur during diagnosis or have evolved during treatment. The acquisition of ACAs impedes CML treatment. Due to additional chromosomal lesions, there are greater chances of future disease progression at the time of CML diagnosis beyond the Ph+ translocation. The synchronous appearance of two or more ACAs leads to lower survival and is classified as a poor prognostic group. The key objective of this review is to provide detailed insights into TKIs and their role in controlling Ph+ and ACAs, along with their response, treatment, overall persistence, and survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana Ansari
- School of Biotechnology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P., 221005, India
| | - Malkhey Verma
- School of Biotechnology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, U.P., 221005, India.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koleilat A, Tang H, Sharma N, Yan H, Tian S, Smadbeck J, Shivaram S, Meyer R, Pearce K, Baird M, Zepeda-Mendoza CJ, Xu X, Greipp PT, Peterson JF, Ketterling RP, Bergsagel PL, Vachon C, Rajkumar SV, Kumar S, Asmann YW, Elhaik E, Baughn LB. Disparity in the detection of chromosome 15 centromere in patients of African ancestry with a plasma cell neoplasm. GENETICS IN MEDICINE OPEN 2023; 1:100816. [PMID: 39669246 PMCID: PMC11613710 DOI: 10.1016/j.gimo.2023.100816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the current gold standard assay that provides information related to risk stratification and therapeutic selection for individuals with plasma cell neoplasms. The differential hybridization of FISH probe sets in association with individuals' genetic ancestry has not been previously reported. Methods This retrospective study included 1224 bone marrow samples from individuals who had an abnormal plasma cell proliferative disorder FISH result and a concurrent conventional G-banded chromosome study. DNA from bone marrow samples obtained from the G-banded chromosome study was genotyped, and a biogeographical ancestry prediction was carried out. Results Using a cohort of individuals with a plasma cell neoplasm, we identified reduced hybridization of a chromosome 15 centromere FISH probe (D15Z4). Metaphase FISH studies of cells with 2 copies of chromosome 15 demonstrated a failure of the D15Z4 FISH probe to hybridize to one chromosome 15 centromere, revealing a false-positive monosomy 15 FISH result in some individuals. Surprisingly, individuals with a monosomy 15 FISH result had a median African ancestry of 77.2% (95% CI 74.1%-80.3%), compared with a median African ancestry of 2.2% (95% CI 2.0%-2.5%) in the non-monosomy 15 cohort (P value = 9.4 × 10-10). Thus, individuals with African ancestry had an 8.02-fold (95% CI 3.73-17.25) increased probability of having a false-positive monosomy 15 result (P value = 9.92 × 10-8). Conclusion This study emphasizes a concern regarding the reliability of diagnostic genomic tools and their application in interpreting genetic testing results in diverse patient populations. We discuss alternative methodologies to better represent different ancestry groups in clinical diagnostic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaa Koleilat
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Hongwei Tang
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Neeraj Sharma
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Huihuang Yan
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Shulan Tian
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - James Smadbeck
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Suganti Shivaram
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Reid Meyer
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kathryn Pearce
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Cinthya J. Zepeda-Mendoza
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Xinjie Xu
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Patricia T. Greipp
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jess F. Peterson
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Rhett P. Ketterling
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - P. Leif Bergsagel
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Celine Vachon
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S. Vincent Rajkumar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Yan W. Asmann
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Eran Elhaik
- Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Linda B. Baughn
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Hematopathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) for the Characterization and Monitoring of Primary Cultures from Human Tumors. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY 2023. [DOI: 10.3390/jmp4010007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic and drug sensitivity assays on primary cultures are not only of basic but also of translational interest and could eventually aid oncologists in the selection of treatments. However, cancer cells need to be identified and differentiated from the non-tumor cells always present in primary cultures. Also, successive passages can change the proportions of these two subpopulations. In this study, we propose fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on cell smears to determine the presence of tumor cells in primary cultures obtained from patients carrying translocations or copy number gains. FISH proved to be an easy, fast, economic, and reliable method of characterizing cell populations, which could be used repeatedly at different passages to monitor variations and to confirm the maintenance of translocations and copy number gains throughout the culture process.
Collapse
|
10
|
Optical Genome Mapping for Cytogenetic Diagnostics in AML. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061684. [PMID: 36980569 PMCID: PMC10046241 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The classification and risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is based on reliable genetic diagnostics. A broad and expanding variety of relevant aberrations are structural variants beyond single-nucleotide variants. Optical Genome Mapping is an unbiased, genome-wide, amplification-free method for the detection of structural variants. In this review, the current knowledge of Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) with regard to diagnostics in hematological malignancies in general, and AML in specific, is summarized. Furthermore, this review focuses on the ability of OGM to expand the use of cytogenetic diagnostics in AML and perhaps even replace older techniques such as chromosomal-banding analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, or copy number variation microarrays. Finally, OGM is compared to amplification-based techniques and a brief outlook for future directions is given.
Collapse
|
11
|
Al Harbi SM, Al Ghamdi NJ, Elsharkawy TM, Al Hamad MA, Bajawi S. Primary Cutaneous T-Cell/Histiocyte-Rich B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2023; 16:309-316. [PMID: 36756220 PMCID: PMC9900238 DOI: 10.2147/ccid.s395675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) is a lymphoproliferative disorder in which the majority of cells are reactive T cells with only a minor population of neoplastic large B cells. THRLBCL is a very rare lymphoma, and most cases are nodal THRLBCL; an extranodal case of THRLBCL presenting primarily on the skin is an extremely rare occurrence with only a few cases reported in the literature. Here, we report a case of a primary cutaneous THRLBCL in a 41-year-old Saudi male who presented unusually with multiple skin lesions. He was successfully treated with electron beam radiotherapy and had a complete resolution with no recurrence as of his 24-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadan Mohammed Al Harbi
- Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia,Correspondence: Sadan Mohammed Al Harbi, Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Post Box No. 1982, Dammam, 31441, Saudi Arabia, Email
| | - Nada Jomaan Al Ghamdi
- Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tarek Mohamed Elsharkawy
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Abdelqader Al Hamad
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sultan Bajawi
- Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Utility of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Clinical and Research Applications. Clin Lab Med 2022; 42:573-586. [PMID: 36368783 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2022.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
13
|
Benchikh S, Bousfiha A, El Hamouchi A, Soro SGC, Malki A, Nassereddine S. Chronic myeloid leukemia: cytogenetics and molecular biology’s part in the comprehension and management of the pathology and treatment evolution. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL HUMAN GENETICS 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s43042-022-00248-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a type of blood cancer that affects hematopoietic stem cells and is often characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome. The Philadelphia chromosome encodes for a protein with high tyrosine kinase activity which acts as a tumorigenic factor.
Main body
This review article reports an update on the pathophysiology of CML and highlights the role of cytogenetic and molecular biology in screening, diagnosis, therapeutic monitoring as well as evaluating patients’ response to treatment. Additionally, these genetic tests allow identifying additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACA) and BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase domain mutations in intolerant or resistant patients. Thus, therapeutic advances have enabled this pathology to become manageable and almost curable in its clinical course. The scientific literature search used in the synthesis of this paper was carried out in the PubMed database, and the figures were generated using online software named BioRender.
Conclusion
The role of cytogenetic and molecular biology is crucial for the diagnosis and medical monitoring of patients. In-depth knowledge of molecular mechanisms of the BCR-ABL kinase facilitated the development of new targeted therapies that have improved the vital prognosis in patients. However, the emergence of ACA and new mutations resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors constitutes a real challenge in the quest for adequate therapy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Phung HT, Nguyen CV, Mai NT, Vu HTN, Pham KH, Tran GL. Impact of Androgen Receptor Expression and the AR:ER Ratio on the Survival Outcomes in the Diverse Subgroups of Vietnamese Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338221080941. [PMID: 35379053 PMCID: PMC8988687 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221080941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The androgen receptor (AR) has recently emerged as a useful marker for the more favorable prognosis and better outcomes among women with estrogen receptor (ER) + ve breast cancer (BC) and the further refinement of BC subtype. Furthermore, AR expression in ER − ve tumors has a particular prognostic significance. Additionally, the ratio of nuclear AR to ER may critically have an influence on tumor biology and respond to endocrine therapy. Purpose: To define the AR expression and AR:ER ratio, and explored their correlation with the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and survival outcomes in the various subclasses of invasive BC. Methods: The current study was conducted on 522 BC patients who had surgical operations, without neoadjuvant chemotherapy by applying a retrospective cohort analysis. The clinicopathological characteristics were recorded. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on AR, ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67. Expression of AR was paired into different immunophenotypes for analysis with clinicopathological features and survival. All BC patients’ survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and log-rank models. Results: The presence of AR was detected in 65.3%. Positive AR, the ratio of AR:ER<2, luminal androgen receptor (LAR) + and AR + HER2 + immunophenotypes were significantly associated with better prognostic features. AR:ER<2 was observed in the prolonged overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (87.9 and 86.2%, respectively) compared to AR:ER≥2 (25.0% in both) (P < .001). In contrast, in HR + ve BCs, the AR expression was not significantly correlated with survival. The multivariate model revealed that the ratio of nuclear AR to ER remained as an independent prognostic variable. Conclusion: The AR expression had a distinct OS and DFS. The AR:ER ratio is an independent indicator for predicting the OS and DFS of BC patients in both univariate and multivariate analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chu Van Nguyen
- National Cancer Hospital, Vietnam.,Hanoi Medical University, Vietnam
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Asif M, Hussain A, Wali A, Ahmed N, Ali I, Iqbal Z, Amir M, Shafiq M, Rasool M. Molecular, Cytogenetic, and Hematological Analysis of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients and Discovery of Two Novel Translocations. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2021; 2021:4909012. [PMID: 34422550 PMCID: PMC8378985 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4909012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a disease of hematopoietic stem cells and is caused by the balanced translocations among the long arms of chromosomes 9 and 22, which are called the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. In this study, 131 CML patients were enrolled. Complete blood cell count was performed at the time of diagnosis for all the patients. Cytogenetic (karyotyping) examination using bone marrow samples was conducted on 76 CML patients for the confirmation of Ph-positive (9;22)(q34;q11) standard translocation, complex variant translocation, and additional chromosome abnormalities. FISH was performed on 38 patients for diagnostic purposes and on 39 patients for monitoring purposes. Twenty-two samples of CML patients were evaluated by reverse transcriptase PCR and real-time PCR for the patients who failed to respond against imatinib mesylate. In this study, 72 (54.96%) were males and 59 (45.03%) were females with a median age of 38.5 years. CBC values in the diagnosis process showed that 75 patients had high values of WBC being >100 × 103/μl, while 71 (58.01) patients exhibited reduced values of hemoglobin, i.e., <10.00 mg/dl, and high values of PLTs > 100 were observed in 40 (30.53%) patients. Cytogenetic results show that standard translocation was developed in 63 (82.89%), development of complex variant translocations in 4 (5.32%), additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) in 3 (3.94%), and ACAs together with complex variant translocations in 1 (1.31%) patient. At the time of diagnosis, 61 (92.95%) patients were in the chronic phase, 4 (5.63%) were in the accelerated phase, and only 1 (1.40%) was in the blast crisis. Out of twenty-two patients, only 6 CML patients who were shifted from imatinib mesylate to nilotinib showed BCR-ABL-positive amplification. However, only 7 out of twenty-one patients exhibit BCR-ABL gene values ≥ 1 after three months of follow-up when analyzed by the quantitative real-time PCR. In conclusion, we found a novel five-way translocation 46XX,t(1;2;2;17;9;22)(p36.3,q21;q11.2,q21,q34,q11.2) and a novel four-way complex variant translocation 48XY,+8(8;17)(9;22),+der(22)(q11.2;q23)(q34;q11.2) in the accelerated phase.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Drug Substitution
- Female
- Humans
- Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use
- In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
- Karyotyping
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/blood
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Philadelphia Chromosome
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
- Pyrimidines/therapeutic use
- Translocation, Genetic
- Treatment Outcome
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Asif
- Department of Biotechnology, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan
- Office of Research Innovation and Commercialization, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan
| | - Abrar Hussain
- Department of Biotechnology, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Wali
- Department of Biotechnology, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan
| | - Nazeer Ahmed
- Department of Biotechnology, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan
| | - Irfan Ali
- Centre of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Agriculture University of Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Zafar Iqbal
- Clinical Laboratory Sciences Program, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences/KAIMRC/SSBMT, National Guard Health Affairs, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muhammad Amir
- Department of Biotechnology, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Shafiq
- Department of Biotechnology, University of Sialkot, Pakistan
| | - Mahmood Rasool
- Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nguyen CV, Nguyen QT, Vu HTN, Pham KH, Phung HT. Molecular classification predicts survival for breast cancer patients in Vietnam: a single institutional retrospective analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY 2021; 14:322-337. [PMID: 33786149 PMCID: PMC7994142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Bhagarva surrogate molecular subtype definitions classify invasive breast cancer into seven the different subgroups based on immunohistochemical (IHC) criteria according to expression levels of markers as ER, PR, HER2, EGFR and/or basal cytokeratin (CK5/6) which are different in prognosis and responsiveness to adjuvant therapy. PURPOSE The present study aimed to classify primary breast cancers and directly compares the prognostic significance of the intrinsic subtypes. METHODS The current study was conducted on 522 breast cancer patients who had surgery, but had not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, from 2011 to 2014. The clinicopathologic characteristics were recorded. IHC staining was performed for ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, CK5/6, EGFR and D2-40 markers. All breast cancer patients were stratified according to Bhagarva criteria. The followed-up patients' survival was analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank models. RESULTS The luminal A (LUMA) was observed at the highest rate (32.5%). Non-basal-like triple negative phenotype (TNB-) and Luminal A HER2-Hybrid (LAHH) were the least common (3.3% in both). LUMA and luminal B (LUMB) were significantly associated with better prognostic features compared to HER2, basal-like triple negative phenotype (TNB+) and TNB-. Statistically significant differences were demonstrated between overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and molecular subtypes (P<0.05), of which LUMB and LUMA had the highest rate of OS and DFS being 97.2 and 93.7%; and 97.2 and 90.5%, respectively. Conversely, HER2 revealed the worst prognosis with the lowest prevalence of OS and DFS (72.5 and 69.9%, respectively). CONCLUSION The molecular subtypes had a distinct OS and DFS. The intrinsic stratification displayed inversely to clinicopathological features in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chu Van Nguyen
- Department of Quan Su Pathology, National Cancer HospitalVietnam
| | | | | | - Khoa Hong Pham
- Department of Quan Su Examination, National Cancer HospitalVietnam
| | - Huyen Thi Phung
- Department of Quan Su Internal Medicine, National Cancer HospitalVietnam
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sampaio MM, Santos MLC, Marques HS, Gonçalves VLDS, Araújo GRL, Lopes LW, Apolonio JS, Silva CS, Santos LKDS, Cuzzuol BR, Guimarães QES, Santos MN, de Brito BB, da Silva FAF, Oliveira MV, Souza CL, de Melo FF. Chronic myeloid leukemia-from the Philadelphia chromosome to specific target drugs: A literature review. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:69-94. [PMID: 33680875 PMCID: PMC7918527 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i2.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm and was the first neoplastic disease associated with a well-defined genotypic anomaly - the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome. The advances in cytogenetic and molecular assays are of great importance to the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and monitoring of CML. The discovery of the breakpoint cluster region (BCR)-Abelson murine leukemia (ABL) 1 fusion oncogene has revolutionized the treatment of CML patients by allowing the development of targeted drugs that inhibit the tyrosine kinase activity of the BCR-ABL oncoprotein. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (known as TKIs) are the standard therapy for CML and greatly increase the survival rates, despite adverse effects and the odds of residual disease after discontinuation of treatment. As therapeutic alternatives, the subsequent TKIs lead to faster and deeper molecular remissions; however, with the emergence of resistance to these drugs, immunotherapy appears as an alternative, which may have a cure potential in these patients. Against this background, this article aims at providing an overview on CML clinical management and a summary on the main targeted drugs available in that context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Miranda Sampaio
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Maria Luísa Cordeiro Santos
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Hanna Santos Marques
- Campus Vitória da Conquista, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45083-900, Bahia, Brazil
| | | | - Glauber Rocha Lima Araújo
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Luana Weber Lopes
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Jonathan Santos Apolonio
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Camilo Santana Silva
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Luana Kauany de Sá Santos
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Beatriz Rocha Cuzzuol
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | | | - Mariana Novaes Santos
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Breno Bittencourt de Brito
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | | | - Márcio Vasconcelos Oliveira
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Cláudio Lima Souza
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Fabrício Freire de Melo
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Van Nguyen C, Nguyen QT, Vu HTN, Phung HT, Pham KH, Le RD. Combined p53 and Bcl2 Immunophenotypes in Prognosis of Vietnamese Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Single Institutional Retrospective Analysis. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2020; 19:1533033820983081. [PMID: 33357134 PMCID: PMC7780323 DOI: 10.1177/1533033820983081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Aberrant of p53 and Bcl2 genes cause changes in the quantity and quality of their proteins and contribute to the pathogenesis of some cancer types including breast cancer. Expression of p53 and Bcl2 were associated to adverse clinical outcomes in breast cancer. Purpose: To predict the survival outcomes of invasive breast cancer in Vietnam, using immunohistochemical expression of p53, Bcl2 proteins. Methods: The current study was conducted on 526 breast cancer patients who had surgical operations, but had not received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, from 2011 to 2014. The clinicopathological characteristics were recorded. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on p53, Bcl2 markers. Expression of p53 and Bcl2 were paired into different immunophenotypes for analysis with clinicopathological characteristics and survival. All breast cancer patients’ survival were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank models. Results: The presence of p53 protein was detected in 44.1%. Positive p53, and p53+Bcl2- immunophenotype were significantly associated with poorer prognostic features. In contrast, the positive Bcl2 protein accounted on 57.6%, and combination of p53-Bcl2+ were strong correlated with better clinicopathological parameters. Bcl2 positivity was observed in higher than the negative Bcl2 in the five-year OS (Overall survival) proportion (91.2 vs 79.4%, respectively) (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the expression of p53, Bcl2 or combinations of these 2 proteins was no longer remained as an independent prognostic variable. Conclusion: The Bcl2 positivity had a distinct OS and DFS (Disease free survival). The expression of p53 and Bcl2 are inversely correlated to clinical outcomes in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chu Van Nguyen
- Department of Quan Su Pathology, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Chu Van Nguyen, Department of Quan Su Pathology, National Cancer Hospital, 43 Quan Su Street, Hang Bong Commune, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi, Vietnam.
| | | | - Ha Thi Ngoc Vu
- Vietnam University of Traditional Medicine, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Huyen Thi Phung
- Department of Quan Su Internal Medicine, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Khoa Hong Pham
- Department of Quan Su Examination, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Roanh Dinh Le
- Center for Research and Early Detection of Cancer, Hanoi, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
English CJ, Lima PC. Defining the aetiology of amoebic diseases of aquatic animals: trends, hurdles and best practices. DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS 2020; 142:125-143. [PMID: 33269724 DOI: 10.3354/dao03537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Disease caused by parasitic amoebae impacts a range of aquatic organisms including finfish, crustaceans, echinoderms and molluscs. Despite the significant economic impact caused in both aquaculture and fisheries, the aetiology of most aquatic amoebic diseases is uncertain, which then affects diagnosis, treatment and prevention. The main factors hampering research effort in this area are the confusion around amoeba taxonomy and the difficulty proving that a particular species causes specific lesions. These issues stem from morphological and genetic similarities between cryptic species and technical challenges such as establishing and maintaining pure amoeba cultures, scarcity of Amoebozoa sequence data, and the inability to trigger pathogenesis under experimental conditions. This review provides a critical analysis of how amoebae are commonly identified and defined as aetiological agents of disease in aquatic animals and highlights gaps in the available knowledge regarding determining pathogenic Amoebozoa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe J English
- CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Livestock and Aquaculture, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St. Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Garcia CH, Safranauskas RMDSO, Bezerra AMPS, Velloso EDRP. Cytogenetic studies for cMYC, BCL2 and BCL6 genes in neoplasm: comparison of karyotype, FISH in paraffin-embedded tissue and FISH in methanol-acetic acid-fixed cells suspensions. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther 2020; 43:521-526. [PMID: 32938542 PMCID: PMC8573003 DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Elvira D R P Velloso
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cytogenetics in the genomic era. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2020; 33:101196. [DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2020.101196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
22
|
Roy-Chowdhuri S, Dacic S, Ghofrani M, Illei PB, Layfield LJ, Lee C, Michael CW, Miller RA, Mitchell JW, Nikolic B, Nowak JA, Pastis NJ, Rauch CA, Sharma A, Souter L, Billman BL, Thomas NE, VanderLaan PA, Voss JS, Wahidi MM, Yarmus LB, Gilbert CR. Collection and Handling of Thoracic Small Biopsy and Cytology Specimens for Ancillary Studies: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the American College of Chest Physicians, Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Cytopathology, American Thoracic Society, Pulmonary Pathology Society, Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and Society of Thoracic Radiology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020; 144:933-958. [PMID: 32401054 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0119-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The need for appropriate specimen use for ancillary testing has become more commonplace in the practice of pathology. This, coupled with improvements in technology, often provides less invasive methods of testing, but presents new challenges to appropriate specimen collection and handling of these small specimens, including thoracic small biopsy and cytology samples. OBJECTIVE.— To develop a clinical practice guideline including recommendations on how to obtain, handle, and process thoracic small biopsy and cytology tissue specimens for diagnostic testing and ancillary studies. METHODS.— The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and develop recommendations. Core needle biopsy, touch preparation, fine-needle aspiration, and effusion specimens with thoracic diseases including malignancy, granulomatous process/sarcoidosis, and infection (eg, tuberculosis) were deemed within scope. Ancillary studies included immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, mutational analysis, flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and microbiologic studies routinely performed in the clinical pathology laboratory. The use of rapid on-site evaluation was also covered. RESULTS.— Sixteen guideline statements were developed to assist clinicians and pathologists in collecting and processing thoracic small biopsy and cytology tissue samples. CONCLUSIONS.— Based on the systematic review and expert panel consensus, thoracic small specimens can be handled and processed to perform downstream testing (eg, molecular markers, immunohistochemical biomarkers), core needle and fine-needle techniques can provide appropriate cytologic and histologic specimens for ancillary studies, and rapid on-site cytologic evaluation remains helpful in appropriate triage, handling, and processing of specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Sanja Dacic
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Mohiedean Ghofrani
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Peter B Illei
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Lester J Layfield
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Christopher Lee
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Claire W Michael
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Ross A Miller
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Jason W Mitchell
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Boris Nikolic
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Jan A Nowak
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Nicholas J Pastis
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Carol Ann Rauch
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Amita Sharma
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Lesley Souter
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Brooke L Billman
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Nicole E Thomas
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Paul A VanderLaan
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Jesse S Voss
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Momen M Wahidi
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Lonny B Yarmus
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| | - Christopher R Gilbert
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington (Dr Gilbert); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, Washington (Dr Ghofrani); the Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Illei); the Department of Pathology and Anatomic Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia (Dr Layfield); the Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Lee); the Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Michael); Memorial Pathology Consultants, PA, Houston, Texas (Dr Miller); the Department of Radiology, Capital Regional Medical Center, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Mitchell); the Department of Interventional and Vascular Radiology, Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts (Dr Nikolic); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Pastis); the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Rauch); the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Sharma); the Methodology Consultant, Ontario, Canada (Dr Souter); the Departments of Governance Services (Ms Billman) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr VanderLaan); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Mr Voss); the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Wahidi); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Yarmus)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ohanian M, Telouk P, Kornblau S, Albarede F, Ruvolo P, Tidwell RSS, Plesa A, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Matera EL, Cortes J, Carson A, Dumontet C. A heavy metal baseline score predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol 2020; 95:422-434. [PMID: 31944361 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite abundant epidemiological data linking metals to leukemia and other cancers, baseline values of toxic and essential metals in patients with leukemia and the clinical impact of these metals remain unknown. Thus, we sought to quantify metal values in untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and controls and determine the impact of metal values on AML patients' survival. Serum samples from patients with untreated AML and controls at Hospices Civils de Lyon were analyzed and compared for trace metals and copper isotopic abundance ratios with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Survival analysis was performed as a function of metal values, and a multi-metal score was developed for patients with AML. Serum samples were collected from 67 patients with untreated AML and 94 controls. Most patients had intermediate-risk cytogenetics (63.1%) without FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations (75.6%) or NPM1 mutations (68.1%). Most metal values differed significantly between AML and control groups. Patients with lower magnesium and higher cadmium values had the worst survival rates, with only 36% surviving at 6 months (P = .001). The adverse prognostic effect of this combination was maintained on multivariate analysis. Based on this, we developed a novel metal score, which accounts for multiple relative abnormalities in the values of five toxic and five essential metals. Patients with a higher metal score had significantly worse survival, which was maintained on multivariate analysis (P = .03). This baseline metal scoring system was also prognostic when we applied it to a separate population of front-line AML patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maro Ohanian
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Philippe Telouk
- Department of Géosciences, École Normal Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Steven Kornblau
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Francis Albarede
- Department of Géosciences, École Normal Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Peter Ruvolo
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rebecca S S Tidwell
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adriana Plesa
- CRCL, INSERM 1052/CNRS 5286, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eva-Laure Matera
- CRCL, INSERM 1052/CNRS 5286, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Arch Carson
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| | - Charles Dumontet
- CRCL, INSERM 1052/CNRS 5286, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hindi I, Shen G, Tan Q, Cotzia P, Snuderl M, Feng X, Jour G. Feasibility and clinical utility of a pan-solid tumor targeted RNA fusion panel: A single center experience. Exp Mol Pathol 2020; 114:104403. [PMID: 32061944 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2020.104403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Gene fusions are caused by chromosomal rearrangements and encode fusion proteins that can act as oncogenic drivers in cancers. Traditional methods for detecting oncogenic fusion transcripts include fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, these methods are limited in scalability and pose significant technical and interpretational challenges. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a high-throughput method for detecting genetic abnormalities and providing prognostic and therapeutic information for cancer patients. We present our experience with the validation of a custom-designed Archer Anchored Multiplex PCR (AMP™) technology-based NGS technology, "NYU FUSION-SEQer" using RNA sequencing. We examine both analytical performance and clinical utility of the panel using 75 retrospective validation samples and 84 prospective clinical samples of solid tumors. Our panel showed robust sequencing performance with strong enrichment for target regions. The lower limit of detection was 12.5% tumor fraction at 125 ng of RNA input. The panel demonstrated excellent analytic accuracy, with 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 100% reproducibility on validation samples. Finally, in the prospective cohort, the panel detected fusions in 61% cases (n = 51), out of which 41% (n = 21) enabling diagnosis and 59% (n = 30) enabling treatment and prognosis. We demonstrate that the fusion panel can accurately, efficiently and cost-effectively detect the majority of known fusion genes, novel clinically relevant fusions and provides an excellent tool for discovery of new fusion genes in solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Issa Hindi
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Guomiao Shen
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Qian Tan
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Paolo Cotzia
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Matija Snuderl
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Xiaojun Feng
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - George Jour
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Dermatology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zneimer SM. Validation of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) for Chromosome 5 Monosomy and Deletion. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 105:e96. [PMID: 31922364 DOI: 10.1002/cphg.96] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
In order to comply with regulations set by established local, state, and federal agencies and other regulatory organizations, such as the College of American Pathologists and the International Organization for Standardization, a clinical laboratory needs to develop procedures for the processes of validating laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) and establishing performance specifications for these assays prior to use in clinical testing. This is applicable to all fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays. Even Food and Drug Administration-approved FISH assays must undergo some form of verification before implementation in the clinical laboratory. The process of validating an assay as an LDT must include a plan, a procedure, and a report. The validation studies described here include metaphase and interphase FISH methodology for identification of the LSI EGR1/D5S23, D5S721 dual-color probe, which labels distinct biomarkers consistent with myeloid hematologic disorders, including myelodysplasias and acute myeloid leukemia. © 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Basic Protocol 1: Validation plan for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes for chromosome 5 monosomy and deletion Support Protocol: Normal cut-off calculation Basic Protocol 2: Validation procedure for FISH probes for chromosome 5 monosomy and deletion Basic Protocol 3: Validation report for FISH probes for chromosome 5 monosomy and deletion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Zneimer
- Medical Operation Systems Consulting (MOSYS), Camas, Washington.,Symbiotica, Inc., Vacaville, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nguyen VC, Nguyen TQ, Vu TNH, Phung TH, Nguyen TPH, Nguyen ND, Le DR. Application of St Gallen Categories in Predicting Survival for Patients With Breast Cancer in Vietnam. Cancer Control 2019; 26:1073274819862794. [PMID: 31307207 PMCID: PMC6636225 DOI: 10.1177/1073274819862794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different tumor subtypes. Identifying risk categories will help make better treatment decisions. Hence, this study aimed to predict the survival outcomes of invasive breast cancer in Vietnam, using St Gallen 2007 classification. This study was conducted on 501 patients with breast cancer who had surgical operations, but had not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, from 2011 to 2013. The clinicopathological characteristics were recorded. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed on ER, PR, HER2/neu, and Ki67 markers. For HER2/neu(2+), fluorescence in situ hybridization was used as the test. All patients with breast cancer were stratified according to 2007 St Gallen categories. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank models were used to analyze survival rates. There were 3.8% cases classified as low risk (LR), 72.1% as intermediate risk (IR1: 60.1% and IR2: 12.0%), and 24.1% as high risk (HR1: 11.8% and HR2: 12.3%). Patients who were LR had the best prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 100%. Intermediate-risk patients were at 92.3%. High-risk patients had the worst prognosis, with a 5-year OS proportion of 69.3% (P < .05). For disease-free survival (DFS), risk categories were categorized as LR: 100%, IR: 90.3%, and HR: 69.3% (P < .05). Three main risk categories of breast cancer had a distinct OS and DFS. These findings suggest that the 2007 St Gallen risk category could be used to stratify patients with breast cancer into different risk groups in Vietnam.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Van Chu Nguyen
- 1 Department of Quan Su Pathology, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Tien Quang Nguyen
- 2 Department of Optional A Treatment, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | - Thi Huyen Phung
- 4 Department of Quan Su Internal Medicine, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | - Ngoc Duong Nguyen
- 1 Department of Quan Su Pathology, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Dinh Roanh Le
- 5 Center for Research and Early Detection of Cancer, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zehnbauer BA. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics: 20 Years Defining Professional Practice. J Mol Diagn 2019; 21:938-942. [PMID: 31635797 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
This editorial highlights 20 years of JMD defining professional practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara A Zehnbauer
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (Editor-in-Chief).
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Siegrist KJ, Reynolds SH, Porter DW, Mercer RR, Bauer AK, Lowry D, Cena L, Stueckle TA, Kashon ML, Wiley J, Salisbury JL, Mastovich J, Bunker K, Sparrow M, Lupoi JS, Stefaniak AB, Keane MJ, Tsuruoka S, Terrones M, McCawley M, Sargent LM. Mitsui-7, heat-treated, and nitrogen-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes elicit genotoxicity in human lung epithelial cells. Part Fibre Toxicol 2019; 16:36. [PMID: 31590690 PMCID: PMC6781364 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-019-0318-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The unique physicochemical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) have led to many industrial applications. Due to their low density and small size, MWCNT are easily aerosolized in the workplace making respiratory exposures likely in workers. The International Agency for Research on Cancer designated the pristine Mitsui-7 MWCNT (MWCNT-7) as a Group 2B carcinogen, but there was insufficient data to classify all other MWCNT. Previously, MWCNT exposed to high temperature (MWCNT-HT) or synthesized with nitrogen (MWCNT-ND) have been found to elicit attenuated toxicity; however, their genotoxic and carcinogenic potential are not known. Our aim was to measure the genotoxicity of MWCNT-7 compared to these two physicochemically-altered MWCNTs in human lung epithelial cells (BEAS-2B & SAEC). Results Dose-dependent partitioning of individual nanotubes in the cell nuclei was observed for each MWCNT material and was greatest for MWCNT-7. Exposure to each MWCNT led to significantly increased mitotic aberrations with multi- and monopolar spindle morphologies and fragmented centrosomes. Quantitative analysis of the spindle pole demonstrated significantly increased centrosome fragmentation from 0.024–2.4 μg/mL of each MWCNT. Significant aneuploidy was measured in a dose-response from each MWCNT-7, HT, and ND; the highest dose of 24 μg/mL produced 67, 61, and 55%, respectively. Chromosome analysis demonstrated significantly increased centromere fragmentation and translocations from each MWCNT at each dose. Following 24 h of exposure to MWCNT-7, ND and/or HT in BEAS-2B a significant arrest in the G1/S phase in the cell cycle occurred, whereas the MWCNT-ND also induced a G2 arrest. Primary SAEC exposed for 24 h to each MWCNT elicited a significantly greater arrest in the G1 and G2 phases. However, SAEC arrested in the G1/S phase after 72 h of exposure. Lastly, a significant increase in clonal growth was observed one month after exposure to 0.024 μg/mL MWCNT-HT & ND. Conclusions Although MWCNT-HT & ND cause a lower incidence of genotoxicity, all three MWCNTs cause the same type of mitotic and chromosomal disruptions. Chromosomal fragmentation and translocations have not been observed with other nanomaterials. Because in vitro genotoxicity is correlated with in vivo genotoxic response, these studies in primary human lung cells may predict the genotoxic potency in exposed human populations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12989-019-0318-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelyn J Siegrist
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.,Department of Occupational and Environmental Health Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Steven H Reynolds
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA
| | - Dale W Porter
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA
| | - Robert R Mercer
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA
| | - Alison K Bauer
- Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - David Lowry
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA
| | - Lorenzo Cena
- Department of Health, West Chester University, West Chester, PA, 19383, USA
| | - Todd A Stueckle
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA
| | - Michael L Kashon
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA
| | - John Wiley
- Department of Pediatrics, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA
| | | | | | - Kristin Bunker
- RJ Lee Group, 350 Hochberg Road, Monroeville, PA, 15146, USA
| | - Mark Sparrow
- Independent Consultant, Allison Park, PA, 15101, USA
| | - Jason S Lupoi
- RJ Lee Group, 350 Hochberg Road, Monroeville, PA, 15146, USA
| | - Aleksandr B Stefaniak
- Respiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA
| | - Michael J Keane
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA
| | | | | | - Michael McCawley
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Linda M Sargent
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) for Detecting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase ( ALK) Rearrangement in Lung Cancer: Clinically Relevant Technical Aspects. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20163939. [PMID: 31412611 PMCID: PMC6720438 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20163939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2011, the Vysis Break Apart ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a companion diagnostic for detecting ALK rearrangement in lung cancer patients who may benefit from treatment of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. This assay is the current “gold standard”. According to updated ALK testing guidelines from the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Association for Molecular Pathology published in 2018, ALK immunohistochemistry is formally an alternative to ALK FISH, and simultaneous detection of multiple hot spots, including, at least, ALK, ROS1, RET, MET, ERBB2, BRAF and KRAS genes is also recommended while performing next generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing. Therefore, ALK status in a specimen can be tested by different methods and platforms, even in the same institution or laboratory. In this review, we discuss several clinically relevant technical aspects of ALK FISH, including pros and cons of the unique two-step (50- to 100-cell) analysis approach employed in the Vysis Break Apart ALK FISH assay, including: the preset cutoff value of ≥15% for a positive result; technical aspects and biology of discordant results obtained by different methods; and incidental findings, such as ALK copy number gain or amplification and co-existent driver mutations. These issues have practical implications for ALK testing in the clinical laboratory following the updated guidelines.
Collapse
|
30
|
Press RD, Eickelberg G, Froman A, Yang F, Stentz A, Flatley EM, Fan G, Lim JY, Meyers G, Maziarz RT, Cook RJ. Next-generation sequencing-defined minimal residual disease before stem cell transplantation predicts acute myeloid leukemia relapse. Am J Hematol 2019; 94:902-912. [PMID: 31124175 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the assessment of post-treatment minimal residual disease (MRD) may inform a more effective management approach. We investigated the prognostic utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based MRD detection undertaken before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Forty-two AML subjects underwent serial disease monitoring both by standard methods, and a targeted 42-gene NGS assay, able to detect leukemia-specific mutant alleles (with >0.5% VAF) (mean 5.1 samples per subject). The prognostic relevance of any persisting diagnostic mutation before transplant (≤27 days) was assessed during 22.1 months (median) of post-transplant follow-up. The sensitivity of the NGS assay (27 MRD-positive subjects) exceeded that of the non-molecular methods (morphology, FISH, and flow cytometry) (11 positive subjects). Only one of the 13 subjects who relapsed after HSCT was NGS MRD-negative (92% assay sensitivity). The cumulative incidence of post-transplant leukemic relapse was significantly higher in the pre-transplant NGS MRD-positive (vs MRD-negative) subjects (P = .014). After adjusting for TP53 mutation and transplant conditioning regimen, NGS MRD-positivity retained independent prognostic significance for leukemic relapse (subdistribution hazard ratio = 7.3; P = .05). The pre-transplant NGS MRD-positive subjects also had significantly shortened progression-free survival (P = .038), and marginally shortened overall survival (P = .068). In patients with AML undergoing HSCT, the pre-transplant persistence of NGS-defined MRD imparts a significant, sensitive, strong, and independent increased risk for subsequent leukemic relapse and death. Given that NGS can simultaneously detect multiple leukemia-associated mutations, it can be used in the majority of AML patients to monitor disease burdens and inform treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D. Press
- Department of PathologyOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
- Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| | - Garrett Eickelberg
- Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| | - Allison Froman
- Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| | - Fei Yang
- Department of PathologyOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
- Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| | - Alex Stentz
- Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
- Division of Hematology‐OncologyOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| | - Ellen M. Flatley
- Department of PathologyOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| | - Guang Fan
- Department of PathologyOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| | - Jeong Y. Lim
- Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| | - Gabrielle Meyers
- Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
- Division of Hematology‐OncologyOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| | - Richard T. Maziarz
- Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
- Division of Hematology‐OncologyOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| | - Rachel J. Cook
- Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
- Division of Hematology‐OncologyOregon Health & Science University Portand Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Berry NK, Scott RJ, Rowlings P, Enjeti AK. Clinical use of SNP-microarrays for the detection of genome-wide changes in haematological malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 142:58-67. [PMID: 31377433 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays are commonly used for the clinical investigation of constitutional genomic disorders; however, their adoption for investigating somatic changes is being recognised. With increasing importance being placed on defining the cancer genome, a shift in technology is imperative at a clinical level. Microarray platforms have the potential to become frontline testing, replacing or complementing standard investigations such as FISH or karyotype. This 'molecular karyotype approach' exemplified by SNP-microarrays has distinct advantages in the investigation of several haematological malignancies. A growing body of literature, including guidelines, has shown support for the use of SNP-microarrays in the clinical laboratory to aid in a more accurate definition of the cancer genome. Understanding the benefits of this technology along with discussing the barriers to its implementation is necessary for the development and incorporation of SNP-microarrays in a clinical laboratory for the investigation of haematological malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine K Berry
- Department of Haematology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Molecular Medicine, NSW Health Pathology, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Rodney J Scott
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Molecular Medicine, NSW Health Pathology, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philip Rowlings
- Department of Haematology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anoop K Enjeti
- Department of Haematology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hui HY, Clarke KM, Fuller KA, Stanley J, Chuah HH, Ng TF, Cheah C, McQuillan A, Erber WN. “Immuno‐flowFISH” for the Assessment of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Cytometry A 2019; 95:521-533. [DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Y.L. Hui
- Translational Cancer Pathology LaboratorySchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
| | - Kathryn M. Clarke
- Haemato‐Oncology Diagnostic Service, Department of HaematologyAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge UK
| | - Kathryn A. Fuller
- Translational Cancer Pathology LaboratorySchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine Nedlands Western Australia Australia
| | - Jason Stanley
- Translational Cancer Pathology LaboratorySchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
| | - Hun H. Chuah
- Department of HaematologyRoyal Perth Hospital Perth Western Australia Australia
| | - Teng Fong Ng
- Department of HaematologyRoyal Perth Hospital Perth Western Australia Australia
| | - Chan Cheah
- Department of HaematologySir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia
- Department of HaematologyHollywood Private Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia
| | - Andrew McQuillan
- Department of HaematologyHollywood Private Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia
| | - Wendy N. Erber
- Translational Cancer Pathology LaboratorySchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine Nedlands Western Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yamashita T, Higashi M, Kawano R, Momose S, Tokuhira M, Kizaki M, Tamaru JI. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma with TP63 rearrangement: A dismal prognosis. Pathol Int 2019; 69:155-159. [PMID: 30719810 DOI: 10.1111/pin.12758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) with TP63 rearrangement is a new entity and has the most dismal prognosis in all types of ALCL. This might be due to the resulting fusion protein having N-terminal truncated p63 with high oncogenic ability. Since this N-terminal domain has the function of tumor suppressor activity, the mechanism for high oncogenic capacity is thought to be the dominant negative function. Here, we report two ALCL cases with TP63 rearrangement that was each given too short a prognosis (Case 1 and 2: four and six months) in spite of intensive treatment. Immunohistochemically, p63 was highly expressed, and a sprit signal was detected using a TP63 break apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in each case. Additionally, a poor prognostic marker of ALCL, all cytotoxic molecules (TIA-1, Granzyme B, and Perforin) were also expressed in almost all ALCL cells. Taken together, we suggest that not only the dominant negative function of N-truncated p63 but also the effect of cytotoxic molecules may influence the dismal prognosis of ALCL with TP63 rearrangement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahisa Yamashita
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, 3508550, Japan
| | - Morihiro Higashi
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, 3508550, Japan
| | - Ryutaro Kawano
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, 3508550, Japan
| | - Shuji Momose
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, 3508550, Japan
| | - Michihide Tokuhira
- Department of Hematology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, 3508550, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kizaki
- Department of Hematology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, 3508550, Japan
| | - Jun-Ichi Tamaru
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, 3508550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jung HA, Jang MA, Kim K, Kim SH. Clinical Utility of a Diagnostic Approach to Detect Genetic Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma: A Single Institution Experience. Ann Lab Med 2018; 38:196-203. [PMID: 29401553 PMCID: PMC5820063 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.3.196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The identification of genetic abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has gained emphasis because genetics-based risk stratification significantly affects overall survival (OS). We investigated genetic abnormalities using conventional cytogenetics and FISH and analyzed the prognostic significance of the identified additional abnormalities in MM. Methods In total, 267 bone marrow samples were collected from February 2006 to November 2013 from patients who were newly diagnosed as having MM in a tertiary-care hospital in Korea. The clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively obtained. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to examine the relationship between clinical/genetic factors and survival outcome, using univariate and multivariate models. Results Using conventional cytogenetic analysis and FISH, 45% (120/267) and 69% (183/267) patients, respectively, were identified to harbor genetic abnormalities. In the univariate analysis, the following genetic variables were identified to affect OS: abnormal karyotype (P<0.001), aneuploidy (P=0.046), −13 or del(13q) (P=0.002), 1q amplification (P<0.001), and t(4;14) (P=0.020). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of −13 or del(13q) was the only significant genetic factor affecting OS (P=0.012) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.131 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.185–3.832) in addition to the clinical factor of age (>65 years) (P=0.013) with an HR of 2.505 (95% CI, 1.218–5.151). Conclusions Our findings highlight the importance of applying a comprehensive approach for detecting genetic abnormalities, which could be closely associated with the prognostic significance of MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Ae Jung
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Dongtan, Korea
| | - Mi Ae Jang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.,Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kihyun Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Sun Hee Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Evaluating measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv 2018; 2:1356-1366. [PMID: 29895626 PMCID: PMC5998930 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Mounting evidence indicates that the presence of measurable ("minimal") residual disease (MRD), defined as posttherapy persistence of leukemic cells at levels below morphologic detection, is a strong, independent prognostic marker of increased risk of relapse and shorter survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and can be used to refine risk-stratification and treatment response assessment. Because of the association between MRD and relapse risk, it has been postulated that testing for MRD posttreatment may help guide postremission treatment strategies by identifying high-risk patients who might benefit from preemptive treatment. This strategy, which remains to be formally tested, may be particularly attractive with availability of agents that could be used to specifically eradicate MRD. This review examines current methods of MRD detection, challenges to adopting MRD testing in routine clinical practice, and recent recommendations for MRD testing in AML issued by the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Inclusion of MRD as an end point in future randomized clinical trials will provide the data needed to move toward standardizing MRD assays and may provide a more accurate assessment of therapeutic efficacy than current morphologic measures.
Collapse
|
36
|
Tretiakova M, Mehta V, Kocherginsky M, Minor A, Shen SS, Sirintrapun SJ, Yao JL, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Antic T, Eggener SE, Picken MM, Paner GP. Predominantly cystic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential form a low-grade spectrum. Virchows Arch 2018; 473:85-93. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2371-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
37
|
Use of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect deletions in clinical tissue sections. J Transl Med 2018; 98:403-413. [PMID: 29339834 DOI: 10.1038/s41374-017-0007-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
A variety of laboratory methods are available for the detection of deletions of tumor suppressor genes and losses of their proteins. The clinical utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the identification of deletions of tumor suppressor genes has previously been limited by difficulties in the interpretation of FISH signal patterns. The first deletion FISH assays using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections had to deal with a significant background level of signal losses affecting nuclei that are truncated by the cutting process of slide preparation. Recently, more efficient probe designs, incorporating probes adjacent to the tumor suppressor gene of interest, have increased the accuracy of FISH deletion assays so that true chromosomal deletions can be readily distinguished from the false signal losses caused by sectioning artifacts. This mini-review discusses the importance of recurrent tumor suppressor gene deletions in human cancer and reviews the common FISH methods being used to detect the genomic losses encountered in clinical specimens. The use of new probe designs to recognize truncation artifacts is illustrated with a four-color PTEN FISH set optimized for prostate cancer tissue sections. Data are presented to show that when section thickness is reduced, the frequency of signal truncation losses is increased. We also provide some general guidelines that will help pathologists and cytogeneticists run routine deletion FISH assays and recognize sectioning artifacts. Finally, we summarize how recently developed sequence-based approaches are being used to identify recurrent deletions using small DNA samples from tumors.
Collapse
|
38
|
Wheeler FC, Kim AS, Mosse CA, Shaver AC, Yenamandra A, Seegmiller AC. Limited Utility of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Recurrent Abnormalities in Acute Myeloid Leukemia at Diagnosis and Follow-up. Am J Clin Pathol 2018. [PMID: 29538617 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is classified in part by recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities, often detected by both fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and karyotype. The goal of this study was to assess the utility of FISH and karyotyping at diagnosis and follow-up. METHODS Adult AML samples at diagnosis or follow-up with karyotype and FISH were identified. Concordance was determined, and clinical characteristics and outcomes for discordant results were evaluated. RESULTS Karyotype and FISH results were concordant in 193 (95.0%) of 203 diagnostic samples. In 10 cases, FISH detected an abnormality, but karyotype was normal. Of these, one had a FISH result with clinical significance. In follow-up cases, 17 (8.1%) of 211 showed FISH-positive discordant results; most were consistent with low-level residual disease. CONCLUSIONS Clinically significant discordance between karyotype and AML FISH is uncommon. Consequently, FISH testing can safely be omitted from most of these samples. Focused FISH testing is more useful at follow-up, for minimal residual disease detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferrin C Wheeler
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Annette S Kim
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Claudio A Mosse
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Aaron C Shaver
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Ashwini Yenamandra
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Adam C Seegmiller
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rosolen DCB, Faria DK, Faria CS, Antonangelo L. Performance of the UroVysion ® FISH assay for the diagnosis of malignant effusions using two cutoff strategies. Cancer Med 2018; 7:1967-1977. [PMID: 29577646 PMCID: PMC5943432 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The cytological examination of cavity fluids has limited sensitivity in the diagnosis of malignancy. Aneuploidy, which is commonly observed in neoplastic cells, could potentially be used as an ancillary diagnostic tool. To evaluate the detection of aneuploid cells in cavitary effusion samples using the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay UroVysion® with some adaptations and two different cutoff strategies. Seventy samples of pleural or peritoneal fluid with positive (n = 40), negative (n = 15), or suspicious (n = 15) oncotic cytology were subjected to FISH assay with the multitarget UroVysion® kit, which is composed of probes that hybridize to the centromeric region of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 and to the locus 9p21. FISH performance was evaluated using two different cutoffs: (1) the manufacturer's cutoff (M‐FISH) and 2) a proposed cutoff (P‐FISH). Using M‐FISH, the diagnostic sensitivity was 57.1%, specificity 87.5%, and accuracy 60.0%; with P‐FISH, the sensitivity was 87.3%, specificity 71.4%, and accuracy 85.7%. When combined with cytology, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.0%, 83.3%, and 87.8%, respectively. Malignant cells presented a predominance of chromosomal gains. The UroVysion® test using the P‐FISH cutoff was effective in demonstrating aneuploid cells in all malignant effusions, confirming the diagnosis of malignancy even in cases with suspicious cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Débora C B Rosolen
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Daniel K Faria
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Caroline S Faria
- Faculdade de Medicina, Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM03), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Leila Antonangelo
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Faculdade de Medicina, Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM03), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Baldia PH, Maurer A, Heide T, Rose M, Stoehr R, Hartmann A, Williams SV, Knowles MA, Knuechel R, Gaisa NT. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations in squamous differentiated bladder cancer: a putative therapeutic target for a small subgroup. Oncotarget 2018; 7:71429-71439. [PMID: 27669755 PMCID: PMC5342089 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2016] [Accepted: 09/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Although drugable fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations in squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of various entities are well known, little is known about FGFR modifications in squamous differentiated bladder cancer. Therefore, our study evaluated FGFR1-3 alterations as a putative therapeutic target in this subgroup. We analyzed 73 squamous differentiated bladder cancers (n = 10 pT2, n = 55 pT3, n = 8 pT4) for FGFR1-3 protein expression, FGFR1-3 copy number variations, FGFR3 chromosomal rearrangements (fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)) and FGFR3 mutations (SNapShot analysis). Only single cases displayed enhanced protein expression, most frequently FGFR3 overexpression (9.4% (6/64)). FISH showed no amplifications of FGFR1, 2 or 3. Break apart events were only slightly above the cut off in 12.1% (8/66) of cases and no FGFR3-TACC3 rearrangements could be proven by qPCR. FGFR3 mutations (p.S249C) were found in 8.5% (6/71) of tumors and were significantly associated with FGFR3 protein overexpression (p < 0.001), and unfavourable clinical outcome (p = 0.001). Our findings are consistent with the results of the TCGA data set for the “squamous-like” subtype of bladder cancer (n = 85), which revealed reduced overall expression of FGFR1 and FGFR2 in tumors compared to normal tissue, while expression of FGFR3 remained high. In the TCGA “squamous-like” subtype FGFR3 mutations were found in 4.9% and correlated with high FGFR3 RNA expression. Mutations of FGFR1 and FGFR2 were less frequent (2.4% and 1.2%). Hence, our comprehensive study provides novel insights into a subgroup of squamous differentiated bladder tumors that hold clues for novel therapeutic regimens and may benefit from FGFR3-targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela Maurer
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Timon Heide
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michael Rose
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Robert Stoehr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sarah V Williams
- Section of Molecular Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Margaret A Knowles
- Section of Molecular Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Knuechel
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nadine T Gaisa
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hui H, Fuller KA, Chuah H, Liang J, Sidiqi H, Radeski D, Erber WN. Imaging flow cytometry to assess chromosomal abnormalities in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Methods 2018; 134-135:32-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
|
42
|
Bill M, Kjeldsen E. Refining remission evaluation in MDS with isolated del(5q). Br J Haematol 2018; 180:469-470. [PMID: 29359320 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Bill
- Department of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eigil Kjeldsen
- Department of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lagacé K, Barabé F, Hébert J, Cellot S, Wilhelm BT. Identification of novel biomarkers for MLL- translocated acute myeloid leukemia. Exp Hematol 2017; 56:58-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2017.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
44
|
Do CH, Bailey S, Macardle C, Thurgood LA, Lower KM, Kuss BJ. Development of locus specific sub-clone separation by fluorescence in situ hybridization in suspension in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cytometry A 2017; 91:1088-1095. [PMID: 29024486 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2017] [Revised: 07/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity is a hallmark of cancer. The ability to monitor and analyze these sub-clonal cell populations can be considered key to successful treatment, particularly in the modern era of targeted therapies. Although advances in sequencing technologies have significantly improved our ability to analyze the mutational landscape of tumors, this utility is reduced when considering small, but clinically significant sub-clones, that is, those representing <10% of the tumor burden. We have developed a high-throughput method that utilizes a 17-probe labeled bacterial artificial chromosome contig to quantify sub-clonal populations of cells based on deletion of a single locus. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells harboring deletion of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del17p), an important prognostic marker for CLL were used to demonstrate the technique. Sub-clones of del17p cells were quantified and isolated from heterogeneous CLL populations using fluorescence in situ hybridization in suspension (FISH-IS) and the locus specific probe set. Using the combination of FISH-IS with the locus-specific probe set enables automated analysis of tens of thousands of cells, accurately quantifying and isolating cells carrying a del17p. Based on the fluorescence intensity of 17p probes, 17p (TP53) deleted cells were identified and sorted using flow cytometric techniques, and enrichment was demonstrated using single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. The ability to separate sub-clones of cells based on genetic heterogeneity, independent of the clone size, highlights the potential application of this method not only in the diagnostic and prognostic setting, but also as an unbiased approach to enable further detailed genetic analysis of the sub-clone with deep sequencing approaches. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuc H Do
- Discipline Molecular Medicine and Pathology College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sheree Bailey
- Department of Immunology Allergy and Arthritis, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Cindy Macardle
- Department of Immunology Allergy and Arthritis, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lauren A Thurgood
- Discipline Molecular Medicine and Pathology College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Karen M Lower
- Discipline Molecular Medicine and Pathology College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Bryone J Kuss
- Discipline Molecular Medicine and Pathology College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Hematology, Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zorovich MESDLDM, Dourado DA, Chauffaille MDLLF. Chromosomal aberrations detected by Fluorescence in situ hybridization in 344 Brazilian chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2017; 39:388-390. [PMID: 29150118 PMCID: PMC5693278 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2017.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2017] [Revised: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 05/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
46
|
El Naofal M, Kim A, Yon HY, Baity M, Ming Z, Bui-Griffith J, Tang Z, Robinson M, Grubbs EG, Cote GJ, Hu P. Role of CDKN2C Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Management of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE 2017; 47:523-528. [PMID: 29066476 PMCID: PMC7057027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), an aggressive form of thyroid cancer, occurs sporadically in approximately 75% of MTCs. RET and RAS mutations play a role in about 40% and 15%, respectively, of sporadic MTCs and are predominant drivers in MTC pathways. These mutations are some of the most comprehensively described and screened for in MTC patients; however, in recent studies, other mutations in the CDKN2C gene (p18) have been implicated in the tumorigenesis of MTC. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis revealed that approximately 40% of sporadic MTC samples have loss of CDKN2C at chromosome 1p32 in addition to frequent losses of CDKN2D (p19) at chromosome 19p13. However, no feasible routine method had been established to detect loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of CDKN2C and CD-KN2D The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of using Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) to screen MTC patients for CDKN2C and CDKN2D deletions. We subjected 5 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) MTC samples with defined RET/RAS mutations to dual-color FISH assays to detect loss of CDKN2C and/or CDKN2D We prepared spectrum orange probes using the bacterial artificial chromosomes RP11-779F9 for CDKN2C (p18) and RP11-177J4 for CDKN2D (p19) and prepared spectrum green control probes to the 1q25.2 and 19q11 regions (RP11-1146A3 and RP11-942P7, respectively). Nine FFPE normal thyroid tissue samples were used to establish the cutoff values for the FISH signal patterns. Of the five FFPE MTC samples, four and one yielded a positive significant result for CDKNN2C loss and CDKN2D loss, respectively. The results of a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments validation with a CDKN2C/CKS1B probe set for CDKN2C (p18) loss of heterozygosity were 100% concordant with the FISH results obtained in this study. Thus, FISH is a fast and reliable diagnostic or prognostic indicator of gene loss in MTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha El Naofal
- School of Health Professions Program in Diagnostic Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adriel Kim
- School of Health Professions Program in Diagnostic Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hui Yi Yon
- School of Health Professions Program in Diagnostic Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohamed Baity
- School of Health Professions Program in Diagnostic Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zhao Ming
- Program in Cytogenetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jacquelin Bui-Griffith
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zhenya Tang
- Department of Clinical Cytogenetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Melissa Robinson
- Department of Clinical Cytogenetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Grubbs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gilbert J Cote
- Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter Hu
- School of Health Professions Program in Diagnostic Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Secretory Carcinoma of the Skin Harboring ETV6 Gene Fusions: A Cutaneous Analogue to Secretory Carcinomas of the Breast and Salivary Glands. Am J Surg Pathol 2017; 41:62-66. [PMID: 27631515 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma is a low-grade salivary gland carcinoma that exhibits analogous features to secretory carcinoma of the breast including the presence of a t(12;15) translocation resulting in the ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. Rare cases of purported secretory carcinoma of the skin adnexa have been reported, but their relationship to true secretory carcinoma of the breast and salivary glands is unclear, as they generally do not harbor ETV6 rearrangements. Cases of cutaneous neoplasms with histologic features identical to secretory carcinoma of the breast and salivary glands were identified from the consultation files of 3 academic medical institutions. Immunohistochemistry was performed for S100 protein, mammaglobin and STAT5a. Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization was used evaluate for disruption of the ETV6 gene. Six cases of cutaneous secretory carcinoma were identified. The tumors arose in 4 women and 2 men, ranging from 24 to 71 years in age (mean, 47 y). The carcinomas presented in the skin of the axilla (n=4), ventral neck (n=1), and cheek (n=1). The tumors arose in the superficial dermis in association with adnexal structures. None of the patients had a prior or concurrent breast or salivary gland tumor. They were histologically characterized by well-circumscribed but unencapsulated proliferations of bland, eosinophilic cells arranged in microcysts and follicles with intraluminal secretions. Ectopic breast or salivary gland tissue was not identified. The cases were diffusely positive for S100 protein (6 of 6), mammaglobin (6 of 6), and STAT5a (5 of 5). All 6 cases harbored rearrangements of ETV6. All tumors were treated by simple excision alone. No recurrences or metastases developed in the 2 cases with follow-up. Secretory carcinoma of the skin represents a phenotypic, immunohistochemical, and genetic counterpart to secretory carcinoma of the breast and salivary glands. This tumor entity is less anatomically restricted than previously supposed.
Collapse
|
48
|
Mundt KA, Gallagher AE, Dell LD, Natelson EA, Boffetta P, Gentry PR. Does occupational exposure to formaldehyde cause hematotoxicity and leukemia-specific chromosome changes in cultured myeloid progenitor cells? Crit Rev Toxicol 2017; 47:592-602. [PMID: 28462599 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2017.1301878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Several cross-sectional studies of a single population of workers exposed to formaldehyde at one of two factories using or producing formaldehyde-melamine resins in China have concluded that formaldehyde exposure induces damage to hematopoietic cells that originate in the bone marrow. Moreover, the investigators interpret observed differences between groups as evidence that formaldehyde induces myeloid leukemias, although the mechanisms for inducing these diseases are not obvious and recently published scientific findings do not support causation. Our objective was to evaluate hematological parameters and aneuploidy in relation to quantitative exposure measures of formaldehyde. We obtained the study data for the original study (Zhang et al. 2010 ) and performed linear regression analyses. Results showed that differences in white blood cell, granulocyte, platelet, and red blood cell counts are not exposure dependent. Among formaldehyde-exposed workers, no association was observed between individual average formaldehyde exposure estimates and frequency of aneuploidy, suggested by the original study authors to be indicators of myeloid leukemia risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ethan A Natelson
- b Houston Methodist Hospital - Texas Medical Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Paolo Boffetta
- c Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York , NY , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jeon YK, Yoon SO, Paik JH, Kim YA, Shin BK, Kim HJ, Cha HJ, Kim JE, Huh J, Ko YH. Molecular Testing of Lymphoproliferative Disorders: Current Status and Perspectives. J Pathol Transl Med 2017; 51:224-241. [PMID: 28535584 PMCID: PMC5445208 DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2017.04.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular pathologic testing plays an important role for the diagnosis, prognostication and decision of treatment strategy in lymphoproliferative disease. Here, we briefly review the molecular tests currently used for lymphoproliferative disease and those which will be implicated in clinical practice in the near future. Specifically, this guideline addresses the clonality test for B- and T-cell proliferative lesions, molecular cytogenetic tests for malignant lymphoma, determination of cell-of-origin in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and molecular genetic alterations incorporated in the 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Finally, a new perspective on the next-generation sequencing for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic purpose in malignant lymphoma will be summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Kyung Jeon
- Corresponding Author Yoon Kyung Jeon, MD, PhD Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea Tel: +82-2-2072-1347 Fax: +82-2-743-5530 E-mail:
| | - Sun Och Yoon
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Ho Paik
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Young A Kim
- Department of Pathology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bong Kyung Shin
- Department of Pathology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun-Jung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Jeong Cha
- Department of Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Ji Eun Kim
- Department of Pathology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jooryung Huh
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Hyeh Ko
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - The Hematopathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Pathology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - The Molecular Pathology Study Group of Korean Society of Pathologists
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Pathology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gu J, Smith JL, Dowling PK. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probe Validation for Clinical Use. Methods Mol Biol 2017; 1541:101-118. [PMID: 27910018 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6703-2_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
In this chapter, we provide a systematic overview of the published guidelines and validation procedures for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes for clinical diagnostic use. FISH probes-which are classified as molecular probes or analyte-specific reagents (ASRs)-have been extensively used in vitro for both clinical diagnosis and research. Most commercially available FISH probes in the United States are strictly regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), and the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Although home-brewed FISH probes-defined as probes made in-house or acquired from a source that does not supply them to other laboratories-are not regulated by these agencies, they too must undergo the same individual validation process prior to clinical use as their commercial counterparts. Validation of a FISH probe involves initial validation and ongoing verification of the test system. Initial validation includes assessment of a probe's technical specifications, establishment of its standard operational procedure (SOP), determination of its clinical sensitivity and specificity, development of its cutoff, baseline, and normal reference ranges, gathering of analytics, confirmation of its applicability to a specific research or clinical setting, testing of samples with or without the abnormalities that the probe is meant to detect, staff training, and report building. Ongoing verification of the test system involves testing additional normal and abnormal samples using the same method employed during the initial validation of the probe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Gu
- Cytogenetic Technology Program, School of Health Professions, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 2, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Janice L Smith
- Cytogenetics/FISH Division, Baylor Genetics Laboratories, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Patricia K Dowling
- Cytogenetics, Pathline-Emerge Pathology Services, 535 East Crescent Avenue, Ramsey, NJ, 07446, USA
| |
Collapse
|