High prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria carriage in children screened prospectively for multidrug resistant organisms at admission to a paediatric hospital, Hamburg, Germany, September 2018 to May 2019

Antimicrobial resistance among refugees and asylum seekers: a global systematic review and meta-analysis

Refugees and asylum seekers might have an increased risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) carriage or infection due to several factors, with conflict and war known to accelerate the spread of AMR. However, data are scarce on prevalence and risk factors for AMR among refugees and asylum seekers and how they are affected globally; in addition, how their risk compares to that of the host-country population is unclear. We aimed to explore and assess global AMR data among refugees and asylum seekers. Ovid (MEDLINE and Embase) and PubMed were searched for peer-reviewed primary research articles from Jan 1, 2015, to Oct 23, 2023, and articles were included if they reported carriage or infection with laboratory-confirmed drug-resistant organisms in refugees or asylum seekers from any country. Of 884 articles identified, 41 reported prevalence of AMR among 16 970 refugees and asylum seekers and were included in the study. The most common phenotypes reported were multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (n=26; prevalence ranged from 4·2% to 60·8%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n=24; 0·92% to 73%), and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria (n=20; 1·6% to 61·1%). Refugees and asylum seekers had a higher likelihood of carriage or infection with any AMR than the host-country population (n=7849 vs n=81 283, respectively; odds ratio 2·88, 95% CI 2·61-3·18; I2=94%). Refugees and asylum seekers are at an increased risk of AMR carriage and infection, with our data suggesting that refugees and asylum seekers might be exposed to conditions that support the emergence of drug resistance (including living in overcrowded camps and facing barriers to health and vaccine systems). Hence, more global and regional data on AMR are needed through strengthened surveillance programmes and health-care facilities, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. Increased efforts are needed to drive improvements in infection prevention and control (including vaccination), antimicrobial stewardship, treatment strategies tailored to groups at high risk, accessiblity to quality health care in these populations at risk globally, and address risk factors such as poor living and transit conditions.

Antimicrobial resistance among migrants in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis - update from 2017 to 2023

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health concern. A previous systematic review showed that migrants in Europe are at increased risk of AMR. Since the COVID-19 pandemic there have been rapid changes in patterns of antibiotic use, AMR, and migration. We aimed to present an updated evidence synthesis on the current distribution of AMR among migrants in Europe.

Methods

We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022343263). We searched databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and Scopus) from 18 January 2017 until 18 January 2023 to identify primary data from observational studies reporting any laboratory-confirmed AMR among migrants in the European Economic Area (EEA) and European Union-15 (EU-15) countries using over 7 key search terms for migrants and over 70 terms for AMR and countries in Europe. Outcomes were infection with, or colonisation of AMR bacteria. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Observational Studies. We meta-analysed the pooled-prevalence of infection and/or colonisation of AMR organisms.

Findings

Among 630 articles, 21 observational studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The pooled prevalence for any detected AMR was 28.0% (95% CI 18.0%-41.0%, I 2  = 100%) compared to a 25.4% seen in the previous review; gram-negative bacteria 31.0% (95% CI 20.0%-44.0%, I 2  = 100%), and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus 10.0% (95% CI 5.0%-16.0%, I 2  = 99%). Drug-resistant bacteria were more prevalent in community settings in large migrant populations (pooled prevalence: 41.0%, 95% CI 24.0%-60.0%, I 2  = 99%) than in hospitals (21.0%, 95% CI 12.0%-32.0%, I 2  = 99%). AMR estimates in 'other' migrants were 32.0%, (95% CI 12.0%-57.0%, I 2  = 100%) and 28.0% (95% CI 18.0%-38.0%, I 2 = 100%) in forced migrants. No firm evidence of AMR acquisition with arrival time or length of stay in the host country was found.

Interpretation

Studies investigating AMR in migrants are highly heterogenous. However, since the COVID-19 pandemic, migrants may be at higher risk of acquiring resistant bacteria, particularly gram-negative bacteria, within community settings such as refugee camps and detention centres in Europe. Our study highlights the importance of infrastructure and hygiene measures within these settings, to mitigate transmission of resistant pathogens. Policy-makers should screen for AMR in migrants prior to departure from countries of origin, where feasible, and upon arrival to a new country to ensure optimal health screening, infection control and effective treatment.

Funding

There was no funding source for this study.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam as a Salvage Treatment for Severely Infected Immunosuppressed Children

Background

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) are becoming increasingly common around the world, with carbapenems frequently serving as a last resort but being threatened by the growing incidence of carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is a potential agent against MDR-GNB but with limited clinical experience, particularly in critically ill immunosuppressed children.

Methods

This study analyzed the use of CAZ/AVI as salvage treatment in severely infected immunosuppressed children from September 2019 to July 2022. Patients with confirmed GNB infection who received CAZ/AVI were matched with patients who received other antibiotics.

Results

Twenty-five critically ill immunosuppressed children treated with CAZ/AVI were included. The majority had hematologic diseases. All patients presented with sepsis in all 30 courses. Septic shock presented in 36.7% of these courses. The primary sites of infection included bloodstream infection (20.0%), skin and skin structure infection (20.0%), intra-abdominal infection (13.3%) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (10.0%). Twelve of the 25 (48.0%) patients had positive microbiological cultures, mainly Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae, including 5 carbapenem-resistant GNB-infected cases. Fifteen (50.0%) courses presented clinical improvement. For the initial course of each patient, the clinical response rate of the GNB recovered group was significantly higher than that of the group without GNB recovery (66.7% vs 23.1%, P = 0.047). The 14-day and 30-day mortality rates were 24.0% and 28.0%, respectively, which were significantly correlated with the absence of GNB recovery (P = 0.004 and 0.024, respectively) and hospital-acquired pneumonia as the primary site of infection (P = 0.001 and 0.006, respectively). There was no significant difference in major outcomes between patients who received CAZ/AVI and matched patients who received other antibiotics.

Conclusion

CAZ/AVI could be considered a salvage strategy for immunosuppressed children with confirmed GNB infection. Caution should be taken when CAZ/AVI is applied to these patients in the absence of GNB recovery.

Increase in Incidence Rates and Risk Factors for Multidrug Resistant Bacteria in Septic Children: A Nationwide Spanish Cohort Study (2013-2019)

The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in children is a growing concern, particularly among septic patients, given the need for first-right dosing. Our aim was to determine the incidence rates and factors associated with MDR-sepsis in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), using data from the Spanish ENVIN-HELICS PICU registry between 2013 and 2019. The rate of MDR bacteria among septic children ranged between 5.8 and 16.2% throughout this study period, with a significant increase since 2015 (p = 0.013). MDR-gram-negative bacteria (92%), particularly EBL-Enterobacterales (63.7%), were the most frequent causative microorganisms of MDR-sepsis. During this study period, sixteen MDR-sepsis (32.6%) corresponded to intrahospital infections, and 33 (67.4%) had community-onset sepsis, accounting for 10.5% of the overall community-onset sepsis. Independent risk factors associated with MDR-sepsis were antibiotics 48 h prior to PICU admission (OR 2.38) and PICU onset of sepsis (OR 2.58) in >1 year-old children, and previous malnourishment (OR 4.99) in <1 year-old children. Conclusions: There was an alarming increase in MDR among septic children in Spain, mainly by gram-negative (ESBL-Enterobacterales), mostly coming from the community setting. Malnourished infants and children on antibiotics 48 h prior to PICU are at increased risk and therefore require closer surveillance.

Insights on Current Strategies to Decolonize the Gut from Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Pros and Cons

In the last decades, we have witnessed a steady increase in infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. These infections are associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Several interventions should be taken to reduce the emergence and spread of MDR bacteria. The eradication of resistant pathogens colonizing specific human body sites that would likely cause further infection in other sites is one of the most conventional strategies. The objective of this narrative mini-review is to compile and discuss different strategies for the eradication of MDR bacteria from gut microbiota. Here, we analyse the prevalence of MDR bacteria in the community and the hospital and the clinical impact of gut microbiota colonisation with MDR bacteria. Then, several strategies to eliminate MDR bacteria from gut microbiota are described and include: (i) selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) using a cocktail of antibiotics; (ii) the use of pre and probiotics; (iii) fecal microbiota transplantation; (iv) the use of specific phages; (v) engineered CRISPR-Cas Systems. This review intends to provide a state-of-the-art of the most relevant strategies to eradicate MDR bacteria from gut microbiota currently being investigated.

[Therapy-relevant antibiotic resistances in a One Health context]

One Health refers to a concept that links human, animal, and environmental health. In Germany, there is extensive data on antibiotic resistance (AMR) and multidrug-resistant (micro)organisms (MDRO) in human and veterinary medicine, as well as from studies in various environmental compartments (soil, water, wastewater). All these activities are conducted according to different specifications and standards, which makes it difficult to compare data. A focus on AMR and MDRO of human therapeutic importance is helpful to provide some guidance. Most data are available across sectors on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multiresistant Enterobacterales such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Here, the trends of resistance are heterogeneous. Antibiotic use leads to MRE selection, which is well documented. Success in minimizing antibiotic use has also been demonstrated in recent years in several sectors and could be correlated with success in containing AMR and MDRO (e.g., decrease in MRSA in human medicine). Sector-specific measures to reduce the burden of MDRO and AMR are also necessary, as not all resistance problems are linked to other sectors. Carbapenem resistance is still rare, but most apparent in human pathogens. Colistin resistance occurs in different sectors but shows different mechanisms in each. Resistance to antibiotics of last resort such as linezolid is rare in Germany, but shows a specific One Health correlation. Efforts to harmonize methods, for example in the field of antimicrobial susceptibility testing and genome-based pathogen and AMR surveillance, are an important first step towards a better comparability of the different data collections.

How to use new antibiotics in the therapy of serious multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections are becoming more common and pose a serious threat to both individual patients and the population as a whole. Treatment of these infections can be difficult and result in significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review is to discuss information and strategies for using new antibiotics to combat these infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Eight new antibiotics represent possible means to treat multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections. Although no new mechanisms of action are present amongst these new antibiotics, novel additions to previously utilized mechanisms have been shown to be viable options for treatment of highly resistant organisms.

SUMMARY

The novel antibiotics considered in this review have varying data on their use as empiric treatment of patients at high risk for multidrug resistant organisms and as final therapy for identified multidrug resistant organisms. Cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relabactam have the best support evidence for use in this patient population.

Antibiotic resistant bacteria: A bibliometric review of literature

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) are a serious threat to the health of people and the ecological environment. With this problem becoming more and more serious, more countries made research on the ARB, and the research number has been sharply increased particularly over the past decade. Therefore, it is quite necessary to globally retrace relevant researches on the ARB published from 2010 to 2020. This will help researchers to understand the current research situation, research trends and research hotspots in this field. This paper uses bibliometrics to examine publications in the field of ARB from 2010 to 2020 that were retrieved from the Web of Science (WOS). Our study performed a statistical analysis of the countries, institutions, journals, authors, research areas, author keywords, Essential Science Indicators (ESI) highly cited papers, and ESI hotspots papers to provide an overview of the ARB field as well as research trends, research hotspots, and future research directions in the field. The results showed that the number of related studies is increasing year by year; the USA is most published in the field of ARB; China is the most active in this field in the recent years; the Chinese Acad Sci published the most articles; Sci. Total Environ. published the greatest number of articles; CM Manaia has the most contributions; Environmental Sciences and Ecology is the most popular research area; and "antibiotic resistance," "antibiotics," and "antibiotic resistance genes" were the most frequently occurring author keywords. A citation analysis showed that aquatic environment-related antibiotic resistance is a key research area in this field, while antimicrobial nanomaterial-related research is a recent popular topic.