Prospective Evaluation of 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer and Negative Findings on Conventional Imaging

A Vision for Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Targeting for Imaging and Therapy: Perspective from Academia and Industry

The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is overexpressed in various cancers, including prostate cancer, breast cancer, small cell and non-small cell lung cancer, uterine and ovarian cancer, colon cancer, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. This makes GRPR a multicancer target for theranostics, that is, molecular imaging and therapy. Here, we explore the current state of GRPR-targeted theranostics from bench to bedside, highlighting the preclinical development of various GRPR-targeting compounds and clinical applications. We review the role of GRPR-targeted molecular imaging for all stages of prostate cancer, breast cancer, and other tumors and provide a quo vadis GRPR. We aimed to offer a comprehensive overview of GRPR-targeted theranostics to inform researchers, clinicians, pharma, and regulators of the potential benefits and emerging opportunities in the pursuit of personalized precision cancer care.

NOTA and NODAGA Radionuclide Complexing Agents: Versatile Approaches for Advancements in Radiochemistry

Effective molecular imaging and targeted cancer therapy rely on receptor-specific targeted delivery systems that are both metabolically stable and kinetically inert for optimal in vivo performance. Until now, no single metal complexing agent has demonstrated the versatility to coordinate metals across the periodic table while maintaining the kinetic inertness required for clinical theranostic applications. Therefore, enhancing the in vivo kinetic stability of radiolabeled, cell-targeting, biologically active compounds remains a critical goal to minimize unintended accumulation of radioactivity in collateral tissues. This review describes the usage of NOTA [NOTA = 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid] and derivatives of NOTA, a metal complexing agent that has been found to have the ability to effectively coordinate with a wide range of radiometals, including metal-radiohalogens, to form stable complexes. This enables the development of new cell-targeting small molecule and peptide conjugates with the potential to resist demetallation in vivo, thereby reducing radionuclide uptake in non-target tissues. Herein, we discuss the design and development of NOTA-based, cell-targeting, small molecules having very high affinity and selectivity for the GRPR (Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor), the SSTR2 (Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2), and the MC1R (Melanocortin-1) receptors that are present on the surfaces of numerous solid primary human tumors and their metastatic counterparts.

Cancer Targeting Radiopeptidomimetics in Molecular Nuclear Medicine

Peptides are highly receptor-affine molecules exhibiting suitable pharmacokinetics. Additionally, low-cost production, simple protocols allowing easy modifications, and tolerance toward harsh reaction conditions make peptides ideal ligands for preparation of radiopharmaceuticals for cancer detection and treatment. However, natural peptides being substrates for enzymes are susceptible to proteolysis, which limits the in vivo lifetime and the target uptake. Therefore, the majority of peptides are not able to progress beyond preclinical research. Advancement of peptides for clinical analysis needs modification to instill improved features. Continuous increase and further expected rise in cancer cases in the next decade require development of more disease-directed and promising radiopharmaceuticals. Redesigned peptide, mimicking the original peptide with similar or improved affinity and high metabolic stability, shall have significant edge. This review outlines the design of peptidomimetics by incorporation of D-amino acids (inverso); reversal of D-amino acid sequence (retro-inverso), and reversal of L-amino acid sequence (retro). Clinically successful radiopeptidomimetics prepared using the three approaches have been elaborated to elucidate the important role of peptidomimetics in cancer management.

Diagnostic Value of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor-Targeted PET Imaging in Oncology: A Systematic Review

Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), overexpressed in various cancers, is a promising target for positron emission tomography (PET). This systematic review investigated the diagnostic value of GRPR-targeted PET imaging in oncology. A systematic search was conducted on major medical databases until May 23, 2024. Keywords were modified to include clinical original studies on GRPR-targeted PET in cancer patients. Out of 1624 searched studies initially, 107 were eligible for the full-text review. Overall, data from 38 studies met inclusion criteria, investigating GRPR-targeting radiotracers in breast cancer, prostate cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) and gliomas (including optic pathway glioma and glioblastoma multiforme). In breast cancer, GRPR-targeted PET effectively detected primary tumours and metastases, particularly in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients, and predicted treatment response. In prostate cancer, high sensitivity (up to 88%) and specificity (up to 90%) for detecting primary tumours were observed, providing added value when combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In biochemical recurrence, sites of prostate cancer were identified even at PSA levels below 0.5ng/dL. Compared with PSMA PET, GRPR-targeted PET showed comparable or superior detection rates. Considering GIST, GRPR-targeted PET imaging proved to be a valuable diagnostic tool, particularly when [18F] FDG PET results were inconclusive. Regarding gliomas, GRPR-targeted PET achieved a 100% detection rate (MRI reference), aiding localization, preoperative planning, and differentiation between recurrence and malignant transformation. GRPR-targeted PET shows promise in improving cancer diagnostics, particularly in ER-positive breast cancer, prostate cancer, and gliomas, and may enhance clinical decision-making.

Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target in prostate cancer

Aim: This comprehensive review aims to explore the potential applications of Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Additionally, the study investigates the role of GRPR in prognostic assessment for individuals afflicted with prostate cancer.Methods: The review encompasses a thorough examination of existing literature and research studies related to the upregulation of GRPR in various tumor types, with a specific focus on prostate. The review also evaluates the utility of GRPR as a molecular target in prostate cancer research, comparing its significance to the well-established Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). The integration of radionuclide-targeted therapy with GRPR antagonists is explored as an innovative therapeutic approach for individuals with prostate cancer.Results: Research findings suggest that GRPR serves as a promising molecular target for visualizing low-grade prostate cancer. Furthermore, it is demonstrated to complement the detection of lesions that may be negative for PSMA. The integration of radionuclide-targeted therapy with GRPR antagonists presents a novel therapeutic paradigm, offering potential benefits for individuals undergoing treatment for prostate cancer.Conclusions: In conclusion, this review highlights the emerging role of GRPR in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. Moreover, the integration of radionuclide-targeted therapy with GRPR antagonists introduces an innovative therapeutic approach that holds promise for improving outcomes in individuals dealing with prostate cancer. The potential prognostic value of GRPR in assessing the disease's progression adds another dimension to its clinical significance in the realm of urology.

Radiopharmaceuticals Targeting Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor for Diagnosis and Therapy of Prostate Cancer

The high incidence and heavy disease burden of prostate cancer (PC) require accurate and comprehensive assessment for appropriate disease management. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) cannot detect PSMA-negative lesions, despite its key role in PC disease management. The overexpression of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) in PC lesions reportedly performs as a complementary target for the diagnosis and therapy of PC. Radiopharmaceuticals derived from the natural ligands of GRPR have been developed. These radiopharmaceuticals enable the visualization and quantification of GRPR within the body, which can be used for disease assessment and therapeutic guidance. Recently developed radiopharmaceuticals exhibit improved pharmacokinetic parameters without deterioration in affinity. Several heterodimers targeting GRPR have been constructed as alternatives because of their potential to detect tumor lesions with a low diagnostic efficiency of single target detection. Moreover, some GRPR-targeted radiopharmaceuticals have entered clinical trials for the initial staging or biochemical recurrence detection of PC to guide disease stratification and therapy, indicating considerable potential in PC disease management. Herein, we comprehensively summarize the progress of radiopharmaceuticals targeting GRPR. In particular, we discuss the impact of ligands, chelators, and linkers on the distribution of radiopharmaceuticals. Furthermore, we summarize a potential design scheme to facilitate the advancement of radiopharmaceuticals and, thus, prompt clinical translation.

Gastrin Releasing Peptide Receptors-targeted PET Diagnostics and Radionuclide Therapy for Prostate Cancer Management: Preclinical and Clinical Developments of the Past 5 Years

Each tumor has its own distinctive molecular identity. Treatment, therefore, should be tailored to this unique cancer phenotype. Theragnostics uses the same compound for targeted imaging and treatment, radiolabeled to an appropriate radionuclide, respectively. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs) are overexpressed in prostate cancer, and radiolabeled GRPR antagonists have shown high diagnostic performance at staging and biochemical recurrence. Several GRPR-targeting theragnostic compounds have been developed preclinically. Their translation into clinics is underway with 4 clinical trials recruiting participants with GRPR-expressing tumors.

Prospective Comparison of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptors are both overexpressed in prostate cancer (PC) but may provide complementary information.68Ga-PSMA-R2 and 68Ga-NeoB (DOTA-p-aminomethylaniline-diglycolic acid-DPhe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-NH-CH[CH2-CH(CH3)2]2) are novel PET radiopharmaceuticals that were developed for theranostic use. In this phase II imaging study, we assessed the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic performance of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI for detection of biochemically recurrent PC. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 27 men with suspected biochemically recurrent PC after initial treatment but noncontributory conventional imaging results (negative or equivocal findings on MRI, CT, and/or bone scan). Participants underwent 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI within 2 wk in noncontrolled order. The SUVmax of putative PC lesions was measured and compared with a composite reference standard (histopathology, follow-up imaging, prostate-specific antigen change). The SUVmax and SUVmean of background organs were measured. Vital signs were recorded before injection of the radiopharmaceuticals and after the scans. Adverse events were recorded up to 72 h after each scan. Results: The prostate-specific antigen level at enrollment was 3.5 ± 3.9 ng/mL (range, 0.3-13.5 ng/mL). 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI detected 31 lesions in 18 patients (66.7%), whereas 68Ga-PSMA-R2 identified 20 lesions in 15 participants (55.6%). 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI showed higher sensitivity (85.7% vs. 71.4%), accuracy (88.9% vs. 77.8%), and negative predictive value (66.7% vs. 50.0%) than 68Ga-PSMA-R2, whereas specificity and positive predictive value were equally high (100.0% for both). In 6 patients, 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI identified 14 lesions that were false-negative on 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI. The mean lesion SUVmax was 6.6 ± 3.2 (range, 2.9-13.2) for 68Ga-NeoB and 4.4 ± 1.5 (range, 2.6-8.8) for 68Ga-PSMA-R2 (P = 0.019). Overall lower uptake was noted in tumors and background organs for 68Ga-PSMA-R2. There were no significant changes in vital signs before and after the scans. No adverse events were reported in the 72-h period after scans. Conclusion: 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 are safe for diagnostic imaging. 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI showed better diagnostic performance than 68Ga-PSMA-R2. 68Ga-PSMA-R2 showed overall lower uptake, equally in background organs and tumors, and might therefore not be an ideal theranostic compound. Further evaluation in larger cohorts is needed to confirm our preliminary data.

Two Novel [68Ga]Ga-Labeled Radiotracers Based on Metabolically Stable [Sar11]RM26 Antagonistic Peptide for Diagnostic Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of GRPR-Positive Prostate Cancer

Gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is overexpressed in prostate cancer (PC-3) and can be used for diagnostic purposes. We herein present the design and preclinical evaluation of two novel NOTA/NODAGA-containing peptides suitable for labeling with the positron emission tomography (PET) radionuclide Ga-68. These analogs are based on the previously reported GRPR-antagonist DOTAGA-PEG2-[Sar11]RM26, developed for targeted radiotheraostic applications. Both NOTA-PEG2-[Sar11]RM26 and NODAGA-PEG2-[Sar11]RM26 were successfully labeled with Ga-68 and evaluated in vitro and in vivo using PC-3 cell models. Both, [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-PEG2-[Sar11]RM26 and [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-PEG2-[Sar11]RM26 displayed high metal-chelate stability in phosphate buffered saline and against the EDTA-challenge. The two [68Ga]Ga-labeled conjugates demonstrated highly GRPR-mediated uptake in vitro and in vivo and exhibited a slow internalization over time, typical for radioantagonistis. The [natGa]Ga-loaded peptides displayed affinity in the low nanomole range for GRPR in competition binding experiments. The new radiotracers demonstrated biodistribution profiles suitable for diagnostic imaging shortly after administration with fast background clearance. Their high tumor uptake (13 ± 1 and 15 ± 3% IA/g for NOTA and NODAGA conjugates, respectively) and high tumor-to-blood ratios (60 ± 10 and 220 ± 70, respectively) 3 h pi renders them promising PET tracers for use in patients. Tumor-to-normal organ ratios were higher for [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-PEG2-[Sar11]RM26 than for the NOTA-containing counterpart. The performance of the two radiopeptides was further supported with the PET/CT images. In conclusion, [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-PEG2-[Sar11]RM26 is a promising PET imaging tracer for visualization of GRPR-expressing lesions with high imaging contrast shortly after administration.

GRPR-Antagonists Carrying DOTAGA-Chelator via Positively Charged Linkers: Perspectives for Prostate Cancer Theranostics

Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-antagonists have served as motifs in the development of theranostic radioligands for prostate cancer. Our efforts have been focused on the development of radiolabeled RM26 (H-DPhe6-Gln7-Trp8-Ala9-Val10-Gly11-His12-Sta13-Leu14-NH2) analogs, such as [111In]In-DOTAGA-PEG2-RM26. We recently showed that its Gly11/Sar11-substituted version, [111In]In-AU-RM26-M1, resisted degradation by neprilysin (NEP) while in circulation and achieved higher tumor uptake in mice. We herein introduce the following three new AU-RM26-M1 mimics labeled with In-111, with basic residues in the linker: (i) AU-RM26-M2 (PEG2-Pip), (ii) AU-RM26-M3 (PEG2-Arg), and (iii) AU-RM26-M4 (Arg-Arg-Pip). These analogs were compared in PC-3 cells and animal models vs. AU-RM26-M1 (reference). The new analogs showed high affinity and specificity for the GRPR, exhibiting an uptake and distribution pattern in PC-3 cells typical for a radiolabeled GRPR-antagonist. They showed high stability in peripheral mice blood, except for [111In]In-AU-RM26-M3. AU-RM26-M4 achieved the highest tumor uptake and promising background clearance, followed by [111In]In-RM26-M2, showing lower background levels. These findings were confirmed for [111In]In-AU-RM26-M2 and [111In]In-AU-RM26-M4 by micro-SPECT/CT at 4 and 24 h post-injection. Hence, the type of positively charged residues in the linker of AU-RM26-M1 mimics strongly influenced biological behavior. The analogs with Pip next to DPhe6 demonstrated the best overall characteristics and warrant further investigation.

Elevating theranostics: The emergence and promise of radiopharmaceutical cell-targeting heterodimers in human cancers

Optimal therapeutic and diagnostic efficacy is essential for healthcare's global mission of advancing oncologic drug development. Accurate diagnosis and detection are crucial prerequisites for effective risk stratification and personalized patient care in clinical oncology. A paradigm shift is emerging with the promise of multi-receptor-targeting compounds. While existing detection and staging methods have demonstrated some success, the traditional approach of monotherapy is being reevaluated to enhance therapeutic effectiveness. Heterodimeric site-specific agents are a versatile solution by targeting two distinct biomarkers with a single theranostic agent. This review describes the innovation of dual-targeting compounds, examining their design strategies, therapeutic implications, and the promising path they present for addressing complex diseases.

68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI versus MRI alone for evaluation of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2/3 imaging trial

BACKGROUND

National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines include prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET for detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. However, targeting a single tumour characteristic might not be sufficient to reflect the full extent of disease. Gastrin releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) have been shown to be overexpressed in prostate cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the GRPR-targeting radiopharmaceutical 68Ga-RM2 in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

METHODS

This single-centre, single-arm, phase 2/3 trial was done at Stanford University (USA). Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, a Karnofsky performance status of 50 or higher, increasing prostate-specific antigen concentration 0·2 ng/mL or more after prostatectomy or 2 ng/mL or more above nadir after radiotherapy, and non-contributory conventional imaging (negative CT or MRI, and bone scan) were eligible. All participants underwent 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with PET-positive findings on 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI compared with MRI alone after initial therapy, at a per-patient and per-lesion level. The primary outcome would be considered met if at least 30% of patients had one or more lesions detected by 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI and the detection by 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI was significantly greater than for MRI. Each PET scan was interpreted by three independent masked readers using a standardised evaluation criteria. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02624518, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 12, 2015, and July 27, 2021, 209 men were screened for eligibility, of whom 100 were included in analyses. Median follow-up was 49·3 months (IQR 36·7-59·2). The primary endpoint was met; 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI was positive in 69 (69%) patients and MRI alone was positive in 40 (40%) patients (p<0·0001). In the per-lesion analysis 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI showed significantly higher detection rates than MRI alone (143 vs 96 lesions; p<0·0001). No grade 1 or worse events were reported.

INTERPRETATION

68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI showed better diagnostic performance than MRI alone in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Further prospective comparative studies with PSMA-targeted PET are needed to gain a better understanding of GRPR and PSMA expression patterns in these patients.

FUNDING

The US Department of Defense.

Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: Bone Scan Versus PET Imaging

Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of malignancy among men, with bone metastasis being a significant source of morbidity and mortality in advanced cases. Detecting and treating bone metastasis at an early stage is crucial to improve the quality of life and survival of prostate cancer patients. This objective strongly relies on imaging studies. While CT and MRI have their specific utilities, they also possess certain drawbacks. Bone scintigraphy, although cost-effective and widely available, presents high false-positive rates. The emergence of PET/CT and PET/MRI, with their ability to overcome the limitations of standard imaging methods, offers promising alternatives for the detection of bone metastasis. Various radiotracers targeting cell division activity or cancer-specific membrane proteins, as well as bone seeking agents, have been developed and tested. The use of positron-emitting isotopes such as fluorine-18 and gallium-68 for labeling allows for a reduced radiation dose and unaffected biological properties. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics techniques in medical imaging has shown significant advancements in reducing interobserver variability, improving accuracy, and saving time. This article provides an overview of the advantages and limitations of bone scan using SPECT and SPECT/CT and PET imaging methods with different radiopharmaceuticals and highlights recent developments in hybrid scanners, AI, and radiomics for the identification of prostate cancer bone metastasis using molecular imaging.

Imaging GRPr Expression in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with [68Ga]Ga-RM2-A Head-to-Head Pilot Comparison with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11

BACKGROUND

The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr) is highly overexpressed in several solid tumors, including treatment-naïve and recurrent prostate cancer. [68Ga]Ga-RM2 is a well-established radiotracer for PET imaging of GRPr, and [177Lu]Lu-RM2 has been proposed as a therapeutic alternative for patients with heterogeneous and/or low expression of PSMA. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the expression of GRPr and PSMA in a group of patients diagnosed with castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) by means of PET imaging.

METHODS

Seventeen mCRPC patients referred for radio-ligand therapy (RLT) were enrolled and underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/CT imaging, 8.8 ± 8.6 days apart, to compare the biodistribution of each tracer. Uptake in healthy organs and tumor lesions was assessed by SUV values, and tumor-to-background ratios were analyzed.

RESULTS

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 showed significantly higher uptake in tumor lesions in bone, lymph nodes, prostate, and soft tissues and detected 23% more lesions compared to [68Ga]Ga-RM2. In 4/17 patients (23.5%), the biodistribution of both tracers was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that in our cohort of mCRPC patients, PSMA expression was higher compared to GRPr. Nevertheless, RLT with [177Lu]Lu-RM2 may be an alternative treatment option for selected patients or patients in earlier disease stages, such as biochemical recurrence.

Modified PROMISE criteria for standardized interpretation of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-targeted PET

PURPOSE

There are image interpretation criteria to standardize reporting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET). As up to 10% of prostate cancer (PC) do not express PSMA, other targets such as gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) are evaluated. Research on GRPR-targeted imaging has been slowly increasing in usage at staging and biochemical recurrence (BCR) of PC. We therefore propose a modification of the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) criteria (mPROMISE) for GRPR-targeted PET.

METHODS

[68 Ga]Ga-RM2 PET data from initially prospective studies performed at our institution were retrospectively reviewed: 44 patients were imaged for staging and 100 patients for BCR PC. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently evaluated PET according to the mPROMISE criteria. A third expert reader served as standard reference. Interreader reliability was computed for GRPR expression, prostate bed (T), lymph node (N), skeleton (Mb), organ (Mc) metastases, and final judgment of the scan.

RESULTS

The interrater reliability for GRPR PET at staging was moderate for GRPR expression (0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40, 0.78), substantial for T-stage (0.78; 95% CI 0.63, 0.94), and almost perfect for N-stage (0.97; 95% CI 0.92, 1.00) and final judgment (0.92; 95% CI 0.82, 1.00). The interreader agreement at BCR showed substantial agreement for GRPR expression (0.70; 95% CI 0.59, 0.81) and final judgment (0.65; 95% CI 0.53, 0.78), while almost perfect agreement was seen across the major categories (T, N, Mb, Mc). Acceptable performance of the mPROMISE criteria was found for all subsets when compared to the standard reference.

CONCLUSION

Interpreting GRPR-targeted PET using the mPROMISE criteria showed its reliability with substantial or almost perfect interrater agreement across all major categories. The proposed modification of the PROMISE criteria will aid clinicians in decreasing the level of uncertainty, and clinical trials to achieve uniform evaluation, reporting, and comparability of GRPR-targeted PET.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03113617 and NCT02624518.

GRPR versus PSMA: expression profiles during prostate cancer progression demonstrate the added value of GRPR-targeting theranostic approaches

Introduction

Central to targeted radionuclide imaging and therapy of prostate cancer (PCa) are prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting radiopharmaceuticals. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) targeting has been proposed as a potential additional approach for PCa theranostics. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent and at what stage of the disease GRPR-targeting applications can complement PSMA-targeting theranostics in the management of PCa.

Methods

Binding of the GRPR- and PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals [177Lu]Lu-NeoB and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, respectively, was evaluated and compared on tissue sections of 20 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 16 primary PCa and 17 progressive castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) fresh frozen tissue specimens. Hematoxylin-eosin and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase stains were performed to identify regions of prostatic adenocarcinoma and potentially high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. For a subset of primary PCa samples, RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) was used to identify target mRNA expression in defined tumor regions.

Results

The highest median [177Lu]Lu-NeoB binding was observed in primary PCa samples, while median and overall [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 binding was highest in CRPC samples. The highest [177Lu]Lu-NeoB binding was observed in 3/17 CRPC samples of which one sample showed no [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 binding. RNA ISH analyses showed a trend between mRNA expression and radiopharmaceutical binding, and confirmed the distinct GRPR and PSMA expression patterns in primary PCa observed with radiopharmaceutical binding.

Conclusion

Our study emphasizes that GRPR-targeting approaches can contribute to improved PCa management and complement currently applied PSMA-targeting strategies in both early and late stage PCa.

The effects of novel macrocyclic chelates on the targeting properties of the 68Ga-labeled Gastrin releasing peptide receptor antagonist RM2

BACKGROUND

The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr) is a molecular target for the visualization of prostate cancer. Bombesin (BN) analogs are short peptides with a high affinity for GRPr. RM2 is a bombesin-based antagonist. It has been demonstrated that RM2 have superior in vivo biodistribution and targeting properties than high-affinity receptor agonists. This study developed new RM2-like antagonists by introducing the novel bifunctional chelators AAZTA5 and DATA5m to RM2.

RESULTS

The effects of different macrocyclic chelating groups on drug targeting properties and the possibility of preparing 68Ga-radiopharmaceuticals in a kit-based protocol were investigated using 68Ga-labeled entities. Both new RM2 variants were labelled with 68Ga3+ resulting in high yields, stability, and low molarity of the ligand. DATA5m-RM2 and AAZTA5-RM2 incorporated 68Ga3+ nearly quantitatively at room temperature within 3-5 min, and the labelling yield for 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 was approximately 10% under the same conditions. 68Ga-AAZTA5-RM2 showed stronger hydrophilicity according to partition coefficient. Although the maximal cellular uptake values of the three compounds were similar, 68Ga-AAZTA5-RM2 and 68Ga-DATA5m-RM2 peaked more rapidly. Biodistribution studies showed high and specific tumor uptake, with a maximum of 9.12 ± 0.81 percentage injected activity per gram of tissue (%ID/g) for 68Ga-DATA5m-RM2 and 7.82 ± 0.61%ID/g for 68Ga-AAZTA5-RM2 at 30 min after injection.

CONCLUSIONS

The conditions for complexation of DATA5m-RM2 and AAZTA5-RM2 with gallium-68 are milder, faster and require less amount of precursors than DOTA-RM2. Chelators had an evident influence on the pharmacokinetics and targeting properties of 68Ga-X-RM2 derivatives. Positively charged 68Ga-DATA5m-RM2 provided a high tumor uptake, high image contrast and good capability of targeting GRPr.

A Pilot Study of 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI for Biopsy Guidance in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer

Targeting of lesions seen on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) improves prostate cancer (PC) detection at biopsy. However, 20%-65% of highly suspicious lesions on mpMRI (PI-RADS [Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System] 4 or 5) are false-positives (FPs), while 5%-10% of clinically significant PC (csPC) are missed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs) are both overexpressed in PC. We therefore aimed to evaluate the potential of 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI for biopsy guidance in patients with suspected PC. Methods: A highly selective cohort of 13 men, aged 58.0 ± 7.1 y, with suspected PC (persistently high prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and PSA density) but negative or equivocal mpMRI results or negative biopsy were prospectively enrolled to undergo 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI. PET/MRI included whole-body and dedicated pelvic imaging after a delay of 20 min. All patients had targeted biopsy of any lesions seen on PET followed by standard 12-core biopsy. The SUVmax of suspected PC lesions was collected and compared with gold standard biopsy. Results: PSA and PSA density at enrollment were 9.8 ± 6.0 (range, 1.5-25.5) ng/mL and 0.20 ± 0.18 (range, 0.06-0.68) ng/mL2, respectively. Standardized systematic biopsy revealed a total of 14 PCs in 8 participants: 7 were csPC and 7 were nonclinically significant PC (ncsPC). 68Ga-PSMA11 identified 25 lesions, of which 11 (44%) were true-positive (TP) (5 csPC). 68Ga-RM2 showed 27 lesions, of which 14 (52%) were TP, identifying all 7 csPC and also 7 ncsPC. There were 17 concordant lesions in 11 patients versus 14 discordant lesions in 7 patients between 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET. Incongruent lesions had the highest rate of FP (12 FP vs. 2 TP). SUVmax was significantly higher for TP than FP lesions in delayed pelvic imaging for 68Ga-PSMA11 (6.49 ± 4.14 vs. 4.05 ± 1.55, P = 0.023) but not for whole-body images, nor for 68Ga-RM2. Conclusion: Our results show that 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI are feasible for biopsy guidance in suspected PC. Both radiopharmaceuticals detected additional clinically significant cancers not seen on mpMRI in this selective cohort. 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI identified all csPC confirmed at biopsy.

Peptide Radioligands in Cancer Theranostics: Agonists and Antagonists

The clinical success of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs in the diagnosis and therapy-"theranostics"-of tumors expressing the somatostatin subtype 2 receptor (SST₂R) has paved the way for the development of a broader panel of peptide radioligands targeting different human tumors. This approach relies on the overexpression of other receptor-targets in different cancer types. In recent years, a shift in paradigm from internalizing agonists to antagonists has occurred. Thus, SST₂R-antagonist radioligands were first shown to accumulate more efficiently in tumor lesions and clear faster from the background in animal models and patients. The switch to receptor antagonists was soon adopted in the field of radiolabeled bombesin (BBN). Unlike the stable cyclic octapeptides used in the case of somatostatin, BBN-like peptides are linear, fast to biodegradable and elicit adverse effects in the body. Thus, the advent of BBN-like antagonists provided an elegant way to obtain effective and safe radiotheranostics. Likewise, the pursuit of gastrin and exendin antagonist-based radioligands is advancing with exciting new outcomes on the horizon. In the present review, we discuss these developments with a focus on clinical results, commenting on challenges and opportunities for personalized treatment of cancer patients by means of state-of-the-art antagonist-based radiopharmaceuticals.

[99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-RM2: A potential SPECT probe targeting GRPR expression in prostate cancers

INTRODUCTION

Elevated density of gastrin releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) in prostate cancer has led to exploration of several radiolabeled peptides for imaging and staging of the disease. The GRPR antagonist peptide RM2 has been successfully conjugated with several chelators and radiolabeled with gallium-68. The goal of this study was to synthesize a ^99mTc-labeled probe and investigate its potential for SPECT imaging of prostate cancer. Towards this HYNIC-RM2 peptide conjugate was synthesized, radiolabeled with ^99mTc and evaluated in GRPR-positive PC3 tumor xenografts.

METHODS

HYNIC-RM2 was manually synthesized by standard Fmoc solid phase strategy and radiolabeled with ^99mTc. In vitro cell studies were performed in GRPR-positive human prostate carcinoma (PC3) cells. Metabolic stability studies of [^99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-RM2 were performed in normal mice in the presence as well as absence of neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitor, phosphoramidon (PA). Biodistribution and imaging studies of [^99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-RM2 were performed in SCID mice bearing PC3-xenograft.

RESULTS

[^99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-RM2 exhibited high binding affinity in low nanomolar range (K_d = 1.83 ± 0.31 nM). Metabolic stability studies in mice indicated that in the absence of PA, radiolabeled peptide was about 65 % intact in the blood at 15 min p.i., whereas proportion of intact radiolabeled peptide was enhanced to 90 % on co-administration of PA. Biodistribution studies in PC3 tumor bearing mice demonstrated high tumor uptake (8.02 ± 0.9%ID/g and 6.13 ± 0.44%ID/g at 1 h and 3 h p.i.). Co-administration of PA with the radiolabeled peptide resulted in further enhancement of tumor uptake (14.24 ± 0.76 % ID/g and 11.71 ± 0.59%ID/g at 1 h and 3 h p.i.). SPECT/CT images of [^99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-RM2 could clearly visualize the tumor. Significant (p < 0.001) reduction in the tumor uptake with a co-injected blocking dose of unlabeled peptide ascertained the GRPR specificity of [^99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-RM2.

CONCLUSION

Encouraging results obtained in biodistribution and imaging studies indicate the potential of [^99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-RM2 for further exploration as GRPR targeting agent.

Clinical advancement of precision theranostics in prostate cancer

Theranostic approaches with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) or PET/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) molecular imaging probes are being implemented clinically in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and imaging-guided precision surgery. This review article provides a comprehensive summary of the rapidly expanding list of molecular imaging probes in this field, including their applications in early diagnosis of primary prostate lesions; detection of lymph node, skeletal and visceral metastases in biochemical relapsed patients; and intraoperative guidance for tumor margin detection and nerve preservation. Although each imaging probe shows preferred efficacy in some applications and limitations in others, the exploration and research efforts in this field will eventually lead to improved precision theranostics of PCa.

Clinical Pharmacology of Radiotheranostics in Oncology

The combined use of diagnostic and therapeutic radioligands with the same molecular target, also known as theranostics, enables accurate patient selection, targeted therapy, and prediction of treatment response. Radioiodine, bone-seeking radioligands and norepinephrine analogs have been used for many years for diagnostic imaging and radioligand therapy of thyroid carcinoma, bone metastases, pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, and neuroblastoma, respectively. In recent years, radiolabeled somatostatin analogs and prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands have shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer, respectively. Several candidate compounds are targeting novel theranostic targets such as fibroblast activation protein, C-X-C chemokine receptor 4, and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor. In addition, several strategies to improve efficacy of radioligand therapy are being evaluated, including dosimetry-based dose optimization, multireceptor targeting, upregulation of target receptors, radiosensitization, pharmacogenomics, and radiation genomics. Design and evaluation of novel radioligands and optimization of dose and dose schedules, within the complex context of individualized multimodal cancer treatment, requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes clinical pharmacology. Significant increases in the use of these radiopharmaceuticals in routine oncological practice can be expected, which will have major impact on patient care as well as (radio)pharmacy utilization.

Correlation of 68Ga-RM2 PET with Postsurgery Histopathology Findings in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer

⁶⁸Ga-RM2 targets gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs), which are overexpressed in prostate cancer (PC). Here, we compared preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET to postsurgery histopathology in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate- or high-risk PC. Methods: Forty-one men, 64.0 ± 6.7 y old, were prospectively enrolled. PET images were acquired 42-72 min (median ± SD, 52.5 ± 6.5 min) after injection of 118.4-247.9 MBq (median ± SD, 138.0 ± 22.2 MBq) of ⁶⁸Ga-RM2. PET findings were compared with preoperative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) (n = 36) and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET (n = 17) and correlated to postprostatectomy whole-mount histopathology (n = 32) and time to biochemical recurrence. Nine participants decided to undergo radiation therapy after study enrollment. Results: All participants had intermediate- (n = 17) or high-risk (n = 24) PC and were scheduled for prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen was 8.8 ± 77.4 (range, 2.5-504) and 7.6 ± 5.3 ng/mL (range, 2.5-28.0 ng/mL) when participants who ultimately underwent radiation treatment were excluded. Preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET identified 70 intraprostatic foci of uptake in 40 of 41 patients. Postprostatectomy histopathology was available in 32 patients in which ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET identified 50 of 54 intraprostatic lesions (detection rate = 93%). ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 uptake was recorded in 19 nonenlarged pelvic lymph nodes in 6 patients. Pathology confirmed lymph node metastases in 16 lesions, and follow-up imaging confirmed nodal metastases in 2 lesions. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET identified 27 and 26 intraprostatic lesions, respectively, and 5 pelvic lymph nodes each in 17 patients. Concordance between ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET was found in 18 prostatic lesions in 11 patients and 4 lymph nodes in 2 patients. Noncongruent findings were observed in 6 patients (intraprostatic lesions in 4 patients and nodal lesions in 2 patients). Sensitivity and accuracy rates for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 (98% and 89% for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and 95% and 89% for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11) were higher than those for mpMRI (77% and 77%, respectively). Specificity was highest for mpMRI with 75% followed by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 (67%) and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 (65%). Conclusion: ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET accurately detects intermediate- and high-risk primary PC, with a detection rate of 93%. In addition, ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET showed significantly higher specificity and accuracy than mpMRI and a performance similar to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET. These findings need to be confirmed in larger studies to identify which patients will benefit from one or the other or both radiopharmaceuticals.

PET Imaging Using Gallium-68 (68Ga) RM2

Molecular imaging is advancing rapidly with promising new molecular targets emerging for theragnostic, ie, imaging and treatment with the same compound, to provide targeted, personalized medicine. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) are overexpressed in prostate cancer. Gallium-68 (68Ga) RM2 is a GRPR antagonist and shows high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of primary prostate cancer and recurrent disease. However, compared with the widely used 68Ga-PSMA11 and 18F-DCFPyL, a discordance in uptake pattern is seen reflecting the heterogeneity in tumor biology of prostate cancer. In this review, we present the background, current status, and future perspectives of PET imaging using 68Ga-RM2.

The use of advanced imaging in guiding the further investigation and treatment of primary prostate cancer

In the era of precision medicine, oncological imaging techniques are advancing at a rapid pace, particularly molecular imaging with promising new targets for prostate cancer (PC) such as gastrin releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) along the established and indispensable prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA). As PC is characterized by heterogenous tumor biology ranging from indolent to aggressive disease, distinguishing clinically significant tumors from indolent disease is critical. Multiparametric MRI- and PET-targeted prostate biopsies mitigate the shortcomings and risks of standard systematic template biopsy by identifying more significant cancers.Focal treatment for localized disease is a minimally invasive approach that targets the index tumor - the lesion of the highest grade - while sparing the surrounding healthy tissue. Real-time MRI-guidance and thermal control with MR-thermometry, improves treatment accuracy and results in lower rates of functional side effects. PET imaging could be an useful tool to assess response to treatment compared to invasive prostate biopsies.In this comprehensive review, we focus on the image-guided detection and treatment of localized primary prostate cancer, its current status and future perspectives.

Value of 68Ga-labeled bombesin antagonist (RM2) in the detection of primary prostate cancer comparing with [18F]fluoromethylcholine PET-CT and multiparametric MRI-a phase I/II study

OBJECTIVES

The bombesin derivative RM2 is a GRPr antagonist with strong binding affinity to prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, the impact of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for the detection of primary PCa was compared with that of [¹⁸F]FCH PET-CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).

METHODS

This phase I/II study was conducted in 30 biopsy-positive PCa subjects. The patients were stratified into high (10 patients), intermediate (10 patients), and low risk (10 patients) for extraglandular metastases as defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria (NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 2016). The prostate gland was classified in 12 anatomic segments for data analysis of the imaging modalities as well as histopathologic findings. The segment with the highest radiotracer uptake was defined as the "index lesion." All cases were scheduled to undergo prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection in intermediate- and high-risk patients. Intraprostatic and pelvic nodal [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 and [¹⁸F]FCH PET-CT findings were correlated with mpMRI and histopathologic results.

RESULTS

Of the 312 analyzed regions, 120 regions (4 to 8 lesions per patient) showed abnormal findings in the prostate gland. In a region-based analysis, overall sensitivity and specificity of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT in the detection of primary tumor were 74% and 90%, respectively, while it was 60% and 80% for [¹⁸F]FCH PET-CT and 72% and 89% for mpMRI. Although the overall sensitivity of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT was higher compared to that of [¹⁸F]FCH PET-CT and mpMRI, the statistical analysis showed only significant difference between [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT and [¹⁸F]FCH PET-CT in the intermediate-risk group (p = 0.01) and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT and mpMRT in the high-risk group (p = 0.03). In the lesion-based analysis, there was no significant difference between SUVmax of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 and [¹⁸F]FCH PET-CT in the intraprostatic malignant lesions ([⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2: mean SUVmax: 5.98 ± 4.13, median: 4.75; [¹⁸F]FCH: mean SUVmax: 6.08 ± 2.74, median: 5.5; p = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 showed promising PET tracer for the detection of intraprostatic PCa in a cohort of patients with different risk stratifications. However, significant differences were only found between [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT and [¹⁸F]FCH PET-CT in the intermediate-risk group and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 PET-CT and mpMRT in the high-risk group. In addition, GRP-R-based imaging seems to play a complementary role to choline-based imaging for full characterization of PCa extent and biopsy guidance in low- and intermediate-metastatic-risk PCa patients and has the potential to discriminate them from those at higher risks.

KEY POINTS

• [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 is a promising PET tracer with a high detection rate for intraprostatic PCa especially in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. • GRPr-based imaging seems to play a complementary role to choline-based or PSMA-based PET/CT imaging in selected low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients for better characterization and eventually biopsy guidance of prostate cancer disease.

GRPr Theranostics: Current Status of Imaging and Therapy using GRPr Targeting Radiopharmaceuticals

Addressing molecular targets, that are overexpressed by various tumor entities, using radiolabeled molecules for a combined diagnostic and therapeutic (theranostic) approach is of increasing interest in oncology. The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr), which is part of the bombesin family, has shown to be overexpressed in a variety of tumors, therefore, serving as a promising target for those theranostic applications. A large amount of differently radiolabeled bombesin derivatives addressing the GRPr have been evaluated in the preclinical as well as clinical setting showing fast blood clearance and urinary excretion with selective GRPr-binding. Most of the available studies on GRPr-targeted imaging and therapy have evaluated the theranostic approach in prostate and breast cancer applying bombesin derivatives tagged with the predominantly used theranostic pair of ⁶⁸Ga/¹⁷⁷Lu which is the focus of this review.

Radiosynthesis and biological evaluation of 18F-labeled bispecific heterodimer targeted dual gastrin-releasing peptide receptor and prostate-specific membrane antigen for prostate cancer imaging

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 5% of prostatic primary tumors and 15% of metastatic tumors were found to be prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-negative. Targeting gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) has been shown to complement patients with PSMA-negative prostate cancer (PCa). Based on previous findings, simultaneously targeting PSMA and GRPR imaging may improve the diagnosis of PCa. In this study, we report the radiosynthesis and biological evaluation of a bispecific heterodimer of NOTA-GRPR-PSMA that targeted both PSMA and GRPR for extended PCa imaging.

METHODS

NOTA-GRPR-PSMA was labeled using the Al18F-chelating one-step method. The competitive combination experiment and specific binding assay were performed in vitro using 22Rv1 (PSMA+) and PC-3 (GRPR+) cells. To determine the distribution and specificity in vivo, biodistribution and micro-PET/computed tomography of [18F]AlF-GRPR-PSMA were performed on mice bearing 22Rv1 or PC-3 tumors.

RESULTS

[18F]AlF-GRPR-PSMA had a radiochemical purity of over 98% and demonstrated high stability in vivo and in vitro, with a LogD of -1.2 ± 0.05. Cell uptake and inhibition studies of [18F]AlF-GRPR-PSMA in 22Rv1 and PC-3 cells revealed bispecific GRPR and PSMA bindings. According to the biodistribution study and PET imaging, [18F]AlF-GRPR-PSMA was mainly excreted through the kidney. Tumor uptake was high in 22Rv1 tumor (10.1 ± 0.4 %ID/g) and moderate in PC-3 tumor (2.1 ± 0.6 %ID/g) 2 h p.i., whereas blocking studies significantly decreased the tumor uptake of 22Rv1 and PC-3.

CONCLUSION

[18F]AlF-GRPR-PSMA has the potential to simultaneously target PSMA and GRPR for PCa imaging.

Molecular Mechanisms Related with Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer-Is It Just a Matter of Numbers?

During the last decade, the body of knowledge regarding the oligometastatic state has increased exponentially. Several molecular frameworks have been established, aiding our understanding of metastatic spread caused by genetically unstable cells that adapt to a tissue environment which is distant from the primary tumor. In the current narrative review, we provide an overview of the current treatment landscape of oligometastatic cancer, focusing on the current biomarkers used in the identification of true oligometastatic disease and highlighting the impact of molecular imaging on stage shift in different scenarios. Finally, we address current and future directions regarding the use of genetic and epigenetic targeting treatments in oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Radiotheranostics - Precision Medicine in Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

'See what you treat and treat what you see, at a molecular level', could be the motto of theranostics. The concept implies diagnosis (imaging) and treatment of cells (usually cancer) using the same molecule, thus guaranteeing a targeted cytotoxic approach of the imaged tumor cells while sparing healthy tissues. As the brilliant late Sam Gambhir would say, the imaging agent acts like a 'molecular spy' and reveals where the tumoral cells are located and the extent of disease burden (diagnosis). For treatment, the same 'molecular spy' docks to the same tumor cells, this time delivering cytotoxic doses of radiation (treatment). This duality represents the concept of a 'theranostic pair', which follows the scope and fundamental principles of targeted precision and personalized medicine. Although the term theranostic was noted in medical literature in the early 2000s, the principle is not at all new to nuclear medicine. The first example of theranostic dates back to 1941 when Dr. Saul Hertz first applied radioiodine for radionuclide treatment of thyroid cells in patients with hyperthyroidism. Ever since, theranostics has been an integral element of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. The more we understand tumor biology and molecular pathology of carcinogenesis, including specific mutations and receptor expression profiles, the more specific these 'molecular spies' can be developed for diagnostic molecular imaging and subsequent radionuclide targeted therapy (radiotheranostics). The appropriate selection of the diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclide for the 'theranostic pair' is critical and takes into account not only the type of cytotoxic radiation emission, but also the linear energy transfer (LET), and the physical half-lives. Advances in radiochemistry and radiopharmacy with new radiolabeling techniques and chelators are revolutionizing the field. The landscape of cytotoxic systemic radionuclide treatments has dramatically expanded through the past decades thanks to all these advancements. This article discusses present and promising future theranostic applications for various types of diseases such as thyroid disorders, neuroendocrine tumors (NET), pediatric malignancies, and prostate cancer (PC), and provides an outlook for future perspectives.

Reduced Acquisition Time per Bed Position for PET/MRI Using 68Ga-RM2 or 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND. Growing clinical adoption of PET/MRI for prostate cancer (PC) evaluation has increased interest in reducing PET/MRI scanning times. Reducing acquisition time per bed position below current times of at least 5 minutes would allow shorter examination lengths. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different reduced PET acquisition times in patients with PC who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 or ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI using highly sensitive silicon photomultiplier-based PET detectors. METHODS. This study involved retrospective review of men with PC who underwent PET/MRI as part of one of two prospective trials. Fifty men (mean [± SD] age, 69.9 ± 6.8 years) who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI and 50 men (mean age, 66.6 ± 5.7 years) who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI were included. PET/MRI used a time-of-flight-enabled system with silicon photomultiplier-based detectors. The acquisition time was 4 minutes per bed position. PET data were reconstructed using acquisition times of 30 seconds, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, and 4 minutes. Three readers independently assessed image quality for each reconstruction using a 5-point Likert scale (with 1 denoting nondiagnostic and 5 indicating excellent quality). One reader measured SUV_max for up to six lesions per patient. Two readers independently assessed lesion conspicuity using a a 3-point Likert scale (with 1 indicating that lesions were not visualized and 3 denoting that they were definitely visualized). RESULTS. Mean image quality across readers at 30 seconds, 1 minutes, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, and 4 minutes was, for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI, from 1.0 ± 0.2 to 1.7 ± 0.7, 2.0 ± 0.3 to 2.6 ± 0.8, 3.1 ± 0.5 to 3.9 ± 0.8, 4.6 ± 0.6 to 4.7 ± 0.6, and 4.8 ± 0.4 to 4.8 ± 0.5, respectively, and for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI it was from 1.2 ± 0.4 to 1.8 ± 0.6, 2.2 ± 0.4 to 2.8 ± 0.7, 3.6 ± 0.6 to 4.1± 0.8, 4.8 ± 0.4 to 4.9 ± 0.4, and 4.9 ± 0.3 to 5.0 ± 0.2, respectively. The mean lesion SUV_max for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI was 11.1 ± 12.4, 10.2 ± 11.7, 9.6 ± 11.3, 9.5 ± 11.6, and 9.4 ± 11.6, respectively, and for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI it was 14.7 ± 8.2, 12.9 ± 7.4, 12.1 ± 7.8, 11.7 ± 7.9, and 11.6 ± 7.9, respectively. Mean lesion conspicuity (reader 1/reader 2) was, for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI, 2.4 ± 0.5/2.7 ± 0.5, 2.9 ± 0.3/2.9 ± 0.3, 3.0 ± 0.0/3.0 ± 0.0, 3.0 ± 0.0/3.0 ± 0.0, and 3.0 ± 0.0/3.0 ± 0.0, respectively, and for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI it was 2.6 ± 0.5/2.8 ± 0.4, 3.0 ± 0.2/2.9 ± 0.3, 3.0 ± 0.1/3.0 ± 0.2, 3.0 ± 0.0/3.0 ± 0.0, and 3.0 ± 0.0/3.0 ± 0.0, respectively. CONCLUSION. Our data support routine 3-minute acquisitions, which provided results very similar to those for 4-minute acquisitions. Two-minute acquisitions, although they lowered quality somewhat, provided acceptable performance and warrant consideration. CLINICAL IMPACT. When PC is evaluated using modern PET/MRI equipment, time per bed position may be reduced compared with historically used times. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02624518 and NCT02678351.

68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: Influence of dual-time and PMT- vs SiPM-based detectors

•

⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT showed high detection rates for recurrent prostate cancer.

•

Standard and new generation PET/CT performed equally on a per-patient basis.

•

Delayed imaging revealed no additional lesions.

•

SiPM-based PET/CT identified more prostate cancer lesions.

•

PSMA positivity rate increased with higher PSA levels and higher PSA velocity.

Objectives

⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT is excellent for evaluating biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR PC). Here, we compared the positivity rates of dual-time point imaging using a PET/CT scanner (DMI) with silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) detectors and a PET/CT scanner (D690) with photomultiplier tubes (PMT), in patients with BCR PC.

Methods

Fifty-eight patients were prospectively recruited and randomized to receive scans on DMI followed by D690 or vice-versa. Images from DMI were reconstructed using the block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) algorithm and images from D690 were reconstructed using ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), according to the vendor's recommendations. Two readers independently reviewed all images in randomized order, recorded the number and location of lesions, as well as standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (group A) had DMI as first scanner followed by D690, while 30 patients (group B) underwent scans in reversed order. Mean PSA was 30±112.9 (range 0.3–600.66) ng/mL for group A and 41.5 ± 213.2 (range 0.21–1170) ng/mL for group B (P = 0.796). The positivity rate in group A was 78.6% (22/28 patients) vs. 73.3% (22/30 patients) in group B. Although the performance of the two scanners was equivalent on a per-patient basis, DMI identified 5 additional sites of suspected recurrent disease when used as first scanner. The second scan time point did not reveal additional abnormal uptake.

Conclusions

The delayed time point in ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT did not show a higher positivity rate. SiPM-based PET/CT identified additional lesions. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results.

Preliminary Results of an Ongoing Prospective Clinical Trial on the Use of 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients

The aim of the present study is to investigate the synergic role of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in prostate cancer (PCa) staging. We present pilot data on twenty-two patients with biopsy-proven PCa that underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI for staging purposes, with 19/22 also undergoing ⁶⁸Gaa-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI. TNM classification based on image findings was performed and quantitative imaging parameters were collected for each scan. Furthermore, twelve patients underwent radical prostatectomy with the availability of histological data that were used as the gold standard to validate intraprostatic findings. A DICE score between regions of interest manually segmented on the primary tumour on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and on T2 MRI was computed. All imaging modalities detected the primary PCa in 18/19 patients, with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET not detecting any lesion in 1/19 patients. In the remaining patients, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA and MRI were concordant. Seven patients presented seminal vesicles involvement on MRI, with two of these being also detected by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET being negative. Regarding extraprostatic disease, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and MRI resulted positive in seven, four and five patients at lymph-nodal level, respectively, and at a bone level in three, zero and one patients, respectively. These preliminary results suggest the potential complementary role of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and MRI in PCa characterization during the staging phase.

PSMA- and GRPR-Targeted PET: Results from 50 Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Novel radiopharmaceuticals for PET are being evaluated for the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PC). We compared the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-targeting 68Ga-RM2 with the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting 68Ga-PSMA11 and 18F-DCFPyL. Methods: Fifty patients underwent both 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI and 68Ga-PSMA11 (n = 23) or 18F-DCFPyL (n = 27) PET/CT at an interval ranging from 1 to 60 d (mean ± SD, 15.8 ± 17.7 d). SUVmax was collected for all lesions. Results:68Ga-RM2 PET was positive in 35 and negative in 15 of the 50 patients. 68Ga-PSMA11/18F-DCFPyL PET was positive in 37 and negative in 13 of the 50 patients. Both scans detected 70 lesions in 32 patients. Forty-three lesions in 18 patients were identified on only 1 scan: 68Ga-RM2 detected 7 more lesions in 4 patients, whereas 68Ga-PSMA11/18F-DCFPyL detected 36 more lesions in 13 patients. Conclusion:68Ga-RM2 remains a valuable radiopharmaceutical even when compared with the more widely used 68Ga-PSMA11/18F-DCFPyL in the evaluation of BCR of PC. Larger studies are needed to verify that identifying patients for whom these 2 classes of radiopharmaceuticals are complementary may ultimately allow for personalized medicine.

Potential Targets Other Than PSMA for Prostate Cancer Theranostics: A Systematic Review

Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is not sufficiently overexpressed in a small proportion of prostate cancer (PCa) patients, who require other strategies for imaging and/or treatment. We reviewed potential targets other than PSMA for PCa theranostics in nuclear medicine that have already been tested in humans. Methods: We performed a systematic web search in the PubMed and Cochrane databases, with no time restrictions by pooling terms (“prostate cancer”, “prostatic neoplasms”) and (“radioligand”, “radiotracer”). Included articles were clinical studies. The results were synthetized by the target type. Results: We included 38 studies on six different targets: gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs) (n = 23), androgen receptor (n = 11), somatostatin receptors (n = 6), urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor (n = 4), fibroblast activation protein (n = 2 studies) and integrin receptors (n = 1). GRPRs, the most studied target, has a lower expression in high-grade PCa, CRPC and bone metastases. Its use might be of higher interest in treating earlier stages of PCa or low-grade PCa. Radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitors were the most recent and promising molecules, but specific studies reporting their interest in PCa are needed. Conclusion: Theranostics in nuclear medicine will continue to develop in the future, especially for PCa patients. Targets other than PSMA exist and deserve to be promoted.

Blocking GRP/GRP-R signaling decreases expression of androgen receptor splice variants and inhibits tumor growth in castration-resistant prostate cancer

•

The results of our study strongly indicate that blocking GRP/GRP-R signaling by targeting GRP-R is sufficient to inhibit ARVs expression. In addition, the combination of blocking GRP/GRP-R signaling (targeting ARVs) and anti-androgens (targeting AR-FL) is a potential new therapeutic approach for treatment of CRPC and therapy-induced tNEPC.

Clinical management of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) resulting from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains challenging. Many studies indicate that androgen receptor splice variants (ARVs) play a critical role in the development of CRPC, including resistance to the new generation of inhibitors of androgen receptor (AR) action. ARVs are constitutively active and lack the ligand-binding domain (LBD), thereby allowing prostate cancer (PC) to maintain AR activity despite therapies that target the AR (full-length AR; AR-FL). Previously, we have reported that long-term ADT increases the neuroendocrine (NE) hormone – Gastrin Releasing Peptide (GRP) and its receptor (GRP-R) expression in PC cells. Further, we demonstrated that activation of GRP/GRP-R signaling increases ARVs expression by activating NF-κB signaling, thereby promoting cancer progression to CRPC. Most importantly, as a cell surface protein, GRP-R is easily targeted by drugs to block GRP/GRP-R signaling. In this study, we tested if blocking GRP/GRP-R signaling by targeting GRP-R using GRP-R antagonist is sufficient to control CRPC progression. Our studies show that blocking GRP/GRP-R signaling by targeting GRP-R using RC-3095, a selective GRP-R antagonist, efficiently inhibits NF-κB activity and ARVs (AR-V7) expression in CRPC and therapy-induced NEPC (tNEPC) cells. In addition, blocking of GRP/GRP-R signaling by targeting GRP-R can sensitize CRPC cells to anti-androgen treatment (such as MDV3100). Further, preclinical animal studies indicate combination of GRP-R antagonist (targeting ARVs) with anti-androgen (targeting AR-FL) is sufficient to inhibit CRPC and tNEPC tumor growth.

Prostate cancer: Molecular imaging and MRI

The role of molecular imaging in initial evaluation of men with presumed or established diagnosis of prostate cancer and work up of biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease is rapidly evolving due to superior diagnostic performance compared to anatomic imaging. However, variable tumor biology and expression of transmembrane proteins or metabolic alterations poses a challenge. We review the evidence and controversies with emphasis on emerging PET radiopharmaceuticals and experience on clinical utility of PET/CT and PET/MRI in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

More Than Meets the Eye: Scientific Rationale behind Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Targeting of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in Metastatic Prostate Cancer and Beyond

Simple Summary

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane protein that is overexpressed in prostate cancer and correlates with the aggressiveness of the disease. PSMA is a promising target for imaging and therapeutics in prostate cancer patients validated in prospective trials. However, the role of PSMA in prostate cancer progression is poorly understood. In this review, we discuss the biology and scientific rationale behind the use of PSMA and other targets in the detection and theranostics of metastatic prostate cancer.

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer type in men globally. Although the prognosis for localized prostate cancer is good, no curative treatments are available for metastatic disease. Better diagnostic methods could help target therapies and improve the outcome. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is overexpressed on malignant prostate tumor cells and correlates with the aggressiveness of the disease. PSMA is a clinically validated target for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging-based diagnostics in prostate cancer, and during recent years several therapeutics have been developed based on PSMA expression and activity. The expression of PSMA in prostate cancer can be very heterogeneous and some metastases are negative for PSMA. Determinants that dictate clinical responses to PSMA-targeting therapeutics are not well known. Moreover, it is not clear how to manipulate PSMA expression for therapeutic purposes and develop rational treatment combinations. A deeper understanding of the biology behind the use of PSMA would help the development of theranostics with radiolabeled compounds and other PSMA-based therapeutic approaches. Along with PSMA several other targets have also been evaluated or are currently under investigation in preclinical or clinical settings in prostate cancer. Here we critically elaborate the biology and scientific rationale behind the use of PSMA and other targets in the detection and therapeutic targeting of metastatic prostate cancer.

Radiolabeled GRPR Antagonists for Imaging of Disseminated Prostate Cancer - Influence of Labeling Chemistry on Targeting Properties

BACKGROUND

Radionuclide molecular imaging of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor (GRPR) expression promises unparalleled opportunities for visualizing subtle prostate tumors, which due to small size, adjacent benign tissue, or a challenging location would otherwise remain undetected by conventional imaging. Achieving high imaging contrast is essential for this purpose and the molecular design of any probe for molecular imaging of prostate cancer should be aimed at obtaining as high tumor-to-organ ratios as possible.

OBJECTIVE

This short review summarizes the key imaging modalities currently used in prostate cancer, with a special focus on radionuclide molecular imaging. Emphasis is laid mainly on the issue of radiometals labeling chemistry and its influence on the targeting properties and biodistribution of radiolabeled GRPR antagonists for imaging of disseminated prostate cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus library databases was conducted to find relevant articles.

RESULTS

The combination of radionuclide, chelator and required labeling chemistry was shown to have a significant influence on the stability, binding affinity and internalization rate, off-target interaction with normal tissues and blood proteins, interaction with enzymes, activity uptake and retention in excretory organs and activity uptake in tumors of radiolabeled bombesin antagonistic analogues.

CONCLUSION

Labeling chemistry has a very strong impact on the biodistribution profile of GRPRtargeting peptide based imaging probes and needs to be considered when designing a targeting probe for high contrast molecular imaging. Taking into account the complexity of in vivo interactions, it is not currently possible to accurately predict the optimal labeling approach. Therefore, a detailed in vivo characterization and optimization is essential for the rational design of imaging agents.

Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetric Analysis of [68Ga]Ga-RM2: A Potent GRPR Antagonist in Prostate Carcinoma Patients

[68Ga]Ga-RM2 is a promising innovative positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for patients with primary or metastatic prostate carcinoma. This study aims to analyze the biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 in five prostate cancer patients. The percentages of injected activity in the source organs and blood samples were determined. Bone marrow residence time was calculated using an indirect blood-based method. OLINDA/EXM version 2.0 (Hermes Medical Solutions, Stockholm, Sweden) was used to determine residence times, organ absorbed and effective doses. Physiological uptake was seen in kidneys, urinary bladder, pancreas, stomach, spleen and liver. Blood clearance was fast and followed by rapid clearance of activity from kidneys resulting in high activity concentrations in the urinary bladder. The urinary bladder wall was the most irradiated organ with highest mean organ absorbed dose (0.470 mSv/MBq) followed by pancreas (0.124 mSv/MBq), stomach wall (0.063 mSv/MBq), kidneys (0.049 mSv/MBq) and red marrow (0.010 mSv/MBq). The effective dose was found to be 0.038 mSv/MBq. Organ absorbed doses were found to be comparable to other gallium-68 labelled GRPR antagonists and lower than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA with the exception of the urinary bladder, pancreas and stomach wall. Remarkable interindividual differences were observed for the organ absorbed doses. Therefore, [68Ga]Ga-RM2 is a safe diagnostic agent with a significantly lower kidney dose but higher pancreas and urinary bladder doses as compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA.

New Frontiers in Molecular Imaging Using Peptide-Based Radiopharmaceuticals for Prostate Cancer

The high incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) increases the need for progress in its diagnosis, staging, and precise treatment. The overexpression of tumor-specific receptors for peptides in human cancer cells, such as gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, natriuretic peptide receptor, and somatostatin receptor, has indicated the ideal molecular basis for targeted imaging and therapy. Targeting these receptors using radiolabeled peptides and analogs have been an essential topic on the current forefront of PCa studies. Radiolabeled peptides have been used to target receptors for molecular imaging in human PCa with high affinity and specificity. The radiolabeled peptides enable optimal quick elimination from blood and normal tissues, producing high contrast for positron emission computed tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography imaging with high tumor-to-normal tissue uptake ratios. Owing to their successful application in visualization, peptide derivatives with therapeutic radionuclides for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in PCa have been explored in recent years. These developments offer the promise of personalized, molecular medicine for individual patients. Hence, we review the preclinical and clinical literature in the past 20 years and focus on the newer developments of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for the imaging and therapy of PCa.

Recent updates and developments in PET imaging of prostate cancer

A number of positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers have been developed to improve the sensitivity and specificity of imaging for prostate cancer. These radiotracers include the bone-seeking agent Na¹⁸F as well as more tumor-specific compounds such as ¹¹C-choline and ¹⁸F-fluciclovine. In this review, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these PET radiotracers for the imaging of men with prostate cancer across a range of clinical contexts. We will also touch upon radiotracers in late clinical development that have not gained regulatory approval, including those targeted against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR).

Effect of the versatile bifunctional chelator AAZTA5 on the radiometal labelling properties and the in vitro performance of a gastrin releasing peptide receptor antagonist

Background

Gastrin Releasing Peptide receptor (GRPr)-based radioligands have shown great promise for diagnostic imaging of GRPr-positive cancers, such as prostate and breast.

The present study aims at developing and evaluating a versatile GRPr-based probe for both PET/SPECT imaging as well as intraoperative and therapeutic applications. The influence of the versatile chelator AAZTA⁵ on the radiometal labelling properties and the in vitro performance of the generated radiotracers were thoroughly investigated.

The GRPr-based antagonist D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH₂ was functionalized with the chelator 6-[Bis (carboxymethyl)amino]-1,4-bis (carboyxmethyl)-6-methyl-1,4-diazepane (AAZTA⁵) through the spacer 4-amino-1-carboxymethyl-piperidine (Pip) to obtain AAZTA⁵-Pip-D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH₂ (LF1). LF1 was radiolabelled with gallium-68 (PET), indium-111 (SPECT, intraoperative applications) and lutetium-177 (therapy, SPECT). In vitro evaluation included stability studies, determination of lipophilicity, protein-binding studies, determination of K_d and B_max as well as internalization studies using the epithelial human prostate cancer cell line PC3. In vitro monotherapy as well as combination therapy studies were further performed to assess its applicability as a theranostic compound.

Results

LF1 was labelled with gallium-68, indium-111 and lutetium-177 within 5 min at room temperature (RT). The apparent molar activities (A_m) were ranging between 50 and 60 GBq/μmol for the ⁶⁸Ga-labelled LF1, 10–20 GBq/μmol for the ¹¹¹In- and ¹⁷⁷Lu-labelled LF1. The radiotracers were stable for a period of 4 h post labeling exhibiting a hydrophilic profile with an average of a LogD_octanol/PBS of − 3, while the bound activity to the human serum protein was approximately 10%. ^68/natGa-LF1, ^177/natLu-LF1 and ^111/natIn-LF1 exhibited high affinity for the PC3 cells, with K_d values of 16.3 ± 2.4 nM, 10.3 ± 2.73 nM and 5.2 ± 1.9 nM, respectively, and the required concentration of the radiotracers to saturate the receptors (B_max) was between 0.5 and 0.8 nM which corresponds to approximately 4 × 10⁵ receptors per cell. Low specific internalization rate was found in cell culture, while the total specific cell surface bound uptake always exceeded the internalized activity. In vitro therapy studies showed that inhibition of PC3 cells growth is somewhat more efficient when combination of ¹⁷⁷Lu-labelled LF1 with rapamycin is applied compared to ¹⁷⁷Lu-laballed LF1 alone.

Conclusion

Encouraged by these promising in vitro data, preclinical evaluation of the LF1 precursor are planned in tumour models in vivo.

A comparative PET imaging study of 44gSc- and 68Ga-labeled bombesin antagonist BBN2 derivatives in breast and prostate cancer models

INTRODUCTION

Radiolabeled peptides play a central role in nuclear medicine as radiotheranostics for targeted imaging and therapy of cancer. We have recently proposed the use of metabolically stabilized GRPR antagonist BBN2 for radiolabeling with 18F and 68Ga and subsequent PET imaging of GRPRs in prostate cancer. The present work studied the impact of 44gSc- and 68Ga-labeled DOTA complexes attached to GRPR antagonist BBN2 on the in vitro GRPR binding affinity, and their biodistribution and tumor uptake profiles in MCF7 breast and PC3 prostate cancer models.

METHODS

DOTA-Ava-BBN2 was radiolabeled with radiometals 68Ga and 44gSc. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) affinities of peptides were assessed in PC3 prostate cancer cells. GRPR expression profiles were studied in human breast cancer tissue samples and MCF7 breast cancer cells. PET imaging of 68Ga- and 44gSc-labeled peptides was performed in MCF7 and PC3 xenografts as breast and prostate cancer models.

RESULTS

Radiopeptides [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ava-BBN2 and [44gSc]Sc-DOTA-Ava BBN2 were prepared in radiochemical yields of 70-80% (decay-corrected), respectively. High binding affinities were found for both peptides (IC50 = 15 nM (natGa) and 5 nM (natSc)). Gene expression microarray analysis revealed high GRPR mRNA expression levels in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, which was further confirmed with Western blot and immunohistochemistry. However, PET imaging showed only low tumor uptake of both radiotracers in MCF7 xenografts ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-BBN2 (SUV60min 0.27 ± 0.06); [44gSc]Sc-DOTA-BBN2 (SUV60min 0.20 ± 0.03)). In contrast, high tumor uptake and retention were found for both radiopeptides in PC3 tumors ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-BBN2 (SUV60min 0.46 ± 0.07); [44gSc]Sc-DOTA-BBN2 (SUV60min 0.51 ± 0.11)).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of 68Ga- and 44gSc-labeled DOTA-Ava-BBN2 peptides revealed slight but noticeable differences of the radiometal with an impact on the in vitro GRPR receptor binding properties in PC3 cells. No differences were found in their in vivo biodistribution profiles in MCF7 and PC3 xenografts. Radiopeptides [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ava-BBN2 and [44gSc]Sc-DOTA-Ava-BBN2 displayed comparable tumor uptake and retention profiles with rapid blood and renal clearance profiles in both tumor models.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE

The favorable PET imaging performance of [44gSc]Sc-DOTA-Ava-BBN2 in prostate cancer should warrant the development of an [43Sc]Sc-DOTA-Ava-BBN2 analog for clinical translation which comes with a main γ-line of much lower energy and intensity compared to 44gSc.

The Effect of Various β Values on Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements in 68Ga-RM2 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Images Reconstructed With a Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization Algorithm

PURPOSE

To compare the block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) algorithm with the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm and to evaluate how different penalty factors (b values) influence image quality and SUV measurements.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 78 prostate cancer patients who underwent Ga-RM2 (n = 42) or Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 (n = 36) PET/MRI. The raw PET data were retrospectively reconstructed using both time-of-flight (TOF)-BSREM with b values of 250, 350, 500, 750, and 1000 and TOF-OSEM. Each reconstruction was reviewed independently by 3 nuclear medicine physicians and scored qualitatively using a Likert scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent quality). SUV measurements were analyzed as well.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven lesions were detected (21 on Ga-RM2 and 36 on Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI); SUVmax decreased with the increase of β values for both tracers. Background noise (SUVsd) decreased with increasing of β values for both tracers. The mean ± SD scores for Ga-RM2 PET images were 2.4 ± 0.5 for b = 250 reconstructions, 3.2 ± 0.6 for b = 350, 4 ± 0.6 for b = 500, 4.5 ± 0.5 for b = 750, 4.4 ± 0.7 for b = 1000, and 3.4 ± 0.6 for TOF-OSEM. The mean ± SD scores for Ga-PSMA-11 PET images were 3.2 ± 0.8 for b = 250 reconstructions, 4.1 ± 0.8 for b = 350, 4.7 ± 0.6 for b = 500, 4.8 ± 0.4 for b = 750, 4.7 ± 0.6 for b = 1000, and 3.8 ± 0.5 for TOF-OSEM.

CONCLUSIONS

Time-of-flight-BSREM algorithm improves image quality. Different b values should be used for different Ga-labeled radiopharmaceuticals such as those targeting GRPR and PSMA receptors. Once selected, the same b value should be consistently used because SUVmax measurements differ with different b values.

Clinical application of Fluciclovine PET, choline PET and gastrin-releasing polypeptide receptor (bombesin) targeting PET in prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to explore the clinical application of different PET radiopharmaceuticals in prostate cancer (PCa), beyond inhibitors of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Choline PET represented in the last decades the standard of reference for PET imaging in PCa and has been recently included in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of metastasis-directed therapy in oligo-metastatic disease. Fluciclovine, as synthetic amino acid, has been proposed for investigating PCa. The results obtained by the first prospective studies led to FDA approval in 2016 in patients with biochemical recurrence. Recently, phase II/III trials explored its accuracy compared with PSMA PET and its impact on patient management. Imaging the gastrin-releasing polypeptide receptor (GRPR) recently drawn attention. Radio-labelled GRPR antagonists have the potential to be used as theranostic agents. Further evaluation is needed to understand the relation between GRPR expression and hormonal-resistant PCa, and for tumors characterized by heterogeneity of receptors expressed (e.g. PSMA-negative) on their cell surface.

SUMMARY

Other new generation PET tracers may play an important role in PCa, namely in case of PSMA-negative phenotypes.

Novel PET imaging methods for prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer is a common neoplasm but conventional imaging methods such as CT and bone scan are often insensitive. A new class of PET agents have emerged to diagnose and manage prostate cancer.

METHODS

The relevant literature on PET imaging agents for prostate cancer was reviewed.

RESULTS

This review shows a broad range of PET imaging agents, the most successful of which is prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET. Other agents either lack the sensitivity or specificity of PSMA PET.

CONCLUSION

Among the available PET agents for prostate cancer, PSMA PET has emerged as the leader. It is likely to have great impact on the diagnosis, staging and management of prostate cancer patients.

Heterodimeric Radiotracer Targeting PSMA and GRPR for Imaging of Prostate Cancer-Optimization of the Affinity towards PSMA by Linker Modification in Murine Model

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) are promising targets for molecular imaging of prostate cancer (PCa) lesions. Due to the heterogenic overexpression of PSMA and GRPR in PCa, a heterodimeric radiotracer with the ability to bind to both targets could be beneficial. Recently, our group reported the novel heterodimer BQ7800 consisting of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor, the peptide-based GRPR antagonist RM26 and NOTA chelator. The study reported herein, aimed to improve the affinity of BQ7800 towards PSMA by changing the composition of the two linkers connecting the PSMA- and GRPR-targeting motifs. Three novel heterodimeric analogues were synthesized by incorporation of phenylalanine in the functional linker of the PSMA-binding motif and/or shortening the PEG-linker coupled to RM26. The heterodimers were labeled with indium-111 and evaluated in vitro. In the competitive binding assay, BQ7812, featuring phenylalanine and shorter PEG-linker, demonstrated a nine-fold improved affinity towards PSMA. In the in vivo biodistribution study of [¹¹¹In]In-BQ7812 in PC3-pip tumor-bearing mice (PSMA and GRPR positive), the activity uptake was two-fold higher in the tumor and three-fold higher in kidneys than for [¹¹¹In]In-BQ7800. Herein, we showed that the affinity of a bispecific PSMA/GRPR heterodimer towards PSMA could be improved by linker modification.

Nanotherapeutics for Antimetastatic Treatment

Tumor metastases, that is, the development of secondary tumors in organs distant from the primary tumor, and their treatment remain a serious problem in cancer therapy. The unique challenges for tracking and treating tumor metastases lie in the small size, high heterogeneity, and wide dispersion to distant organs of metastases. Recently, nanomedicines, with the capacity to precisely deliver therapeutic agents to both primary and secondary tumors, have demonstrated many potential benefits for metastatic cancer theranostics. Given the remarkable progression in emerging nanotherapeutics for antimetastatic treatment, it is timely to summarize the latest advances in this field. This review highlights the rationale, advantages, and challenges for integrating biomedical nanotechnology with cancer biology to develop antimetastatic nanotherapeutics.

Insight into the Development of PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Oncology

While the development of positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals closely follows that of traditional drug development, there are several key considerations in the chemical and radiochemical synthesis, preclinical assessment, and clinical translation of PET radiotracers. As such, we outline the fundamentals of radiotracer design, with respect to the selection of an appropriate pharmacophore. These concepts will be reinforced by exemplary cases of PET radiotracer development, both with respect to their preclinical and clinical evaluation. We also provide a guideline for the proper selection of a radionuclide and the appropriate labeling strategy to access a tracer with optimal imaging qualities. Finally, we summarize the methodology of their evaluation in in vitro and animal models and the road to clinical translation. This review is intended to be a primer for newcomers to the field and give insight into the workflow of developing radiopharmaceuticals.