The impact of pre-transplant minimal residual disease on outcome of intensified myeloablative cord blood transplant for acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission

Significance of Measurable Residual Disease in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains an important curative-intent treatment for many patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but AML recurrence after allografting is common. Many factors associated with relapse after allogeneic HCT have been identified over the years. Central among these is measurable ("minimal") residual disease (MRD) as detected by multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and/or next-generation sequencing. Demonstration of a strong, independent prognostic role of pre- and early post-HCT MRD has raised hopes MRD could also serve as a predictive biomarker to inform treatment decision-making, with emerging data indicating the potential value to guide candidacy assessment for allografting as a post-remission treatment strategy, the selection of conditioning intensity, use of small molecule inhibitors as post-HCT maintenance therapy, and preemptive infusion of donor lymphocytes. Monitoring for leukemia recurrence after HCT and surrogacy for treatment response are other considerations for the clinical use of MRD data. In this review, we will outline the current landscape of MRD as a biomarker for patients with AML undergoing HCT and discuss areas of uncertainty and ongoing research.

Intensified conditioning regimens with total marrow irradiation/etoposide/cyclophosphamide and busulfan/etoposide/cyclophosphamide overcome the impact of pre-transplant minimal residual disease on outcomes in high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients in complete remission

PURPOSE

Among high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), those with positive minimal residual disease (MRD) are susceptible to poor outcomes. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the most suitable preparatory regimen for these patients.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 141 patients who received allo-HSCT and were diagnosed with high-risk ALL. These patients underwent intensified conditioning regimens, including either total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI)-etoposide (VP16)-cyclophosphamide (CY) or busulfan (BU)-VP16-CY between October 2016 and November 2022. A total of 141 individuals were in complete remission (CR) before transplantation and, among all patients, 90 individuals exhibited a negative MRD status and 51 patients had a positive MRD status.

RESULTS

In patients who tested negative for MRD, the incidence of relapse within a 2-year timeframe was 25.0% (24.8%-25.5%), compared with 32.2% (31.2%-33.2%) in MRD-positive patients; however, this difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates between the MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups (DFS: 67.2% (57.9%-78.1%) vs. 55.5% (42.6%-72.3%); OS: 69.0% (61.9%-88.2%) vs. 66.7% (53.9%-82.5%)). Furthermore, no notable variations were observed in the occurrence of transplant-related mortality (TRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) across the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals the benefits of TMLI-VP16-CY and BU-VP16-CY conditioning regimens in high-risk ALL patients with CR and MRD-positive status. A large-scale prospective clinical trial is warranted in the future.

Effects of CD34+ cell dose on haematopoietic recovery in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia patients with positive pretransplant measurable residual disease

INTRODUCTION

A higher CD34⁺ cell dose in allografts is associated with faster haematopoietic recovery after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Leukaemia stem cells impair normal bone marrow (BM) niches and induce BM failure during leukemogenesis. However, whether measurable residual disease (MRD), known as the persistence of low-level leukaemic cells, could influence the effects of CD34⁺ cell dose on haematopoietic recovery after transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 975 ALL patients were enrolled and classified into pre-HSCT MRD-positive and MRD-negative subgroups. Cox proportional hazard regression models were built for time-to-event outcomes. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent influencing factors from the univariate analysis.

RESULTS

An appropriate CD34⁺ cell dose was positively associated with faster haematopoietic recovery in the total ALL population. More importantly, in pre-HSCT MRD-positive ALL patients, a higher CD34⁺ cell dose (≥2.76 × 10⁶ /kg) was related to faster neutrophil (HR 1.330, 95% CI 1.045-1.692, p = 0.021) and platelet engraftment (HR 1.808, 95% CI 1.412-2.316, p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. CD34⁺ cell dose was a crucial factor associated with either engraftment or transplant outcomes, although we did not demonstrate direct correlations of CD34⁺ cell dose with relapse, TRM, LFS or OS after allo-HSCT.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that no additional CD34⁺ stem and progenitor cell harvests were needed to ensure successful haematopoietic recovery in pre-HSCT MRD-positive patients compared to pre-HSCT MRD-negative patients.

The mythological chimera and new era of relapse prediction post-transplant

Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for high-risk or relapsed acute leukemia. However, unfortunately, relapse post-transplant continues to be the most common cause of treatment failure with 20-80% of patients relapsing based on disease risk and status at transplant. Advances in molecular profiling of different hematological malignancies have enabled us to monitor low level disease before and after transplant and develop a more personalized approach to the management of these disease including early detection post-transplant. While, in general, detectable disease by morphology remains the gold standard to diagnosing relapse, multiple approaches have allowed detection of cancer cells earlier, using peripheral blood-based methods with sensitivities as high as 1:10⁶, together called minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) detection. However, a in significant number of patients with acute leukemia where no such molecular markers exist it remains challenging to detect early relapse. In such patients who receive transplantation, chimerism monitoring remains the only option. An increase in mixed chimerism in post allogeneic HCT patients has been correlated with relapse in multiple studies. However, chimerism monitoring, while commonly accepted as a tool for assessing engraftment, has not been routinely used for relapse detection, at least in part because of the lack of standardized, high sensitivity, reliable methods for chimerism detection. In this paper, we review the various methods employed for MRD and chimerism detection post-transplant and discuss future trends in MRD and chimerism monitoring from the viewpoint of the practicing transplant physician.

Impact of measurable residual disease by decentralized flow cytometry: a PETHEMA real-world study in 1076 patients with acute myeloid leukemia

The role of decentralized assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) for risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains largely unknown, and so it does which methodological aspects are critical to empower the evaluation of MRD with prognostic significance, particularly if using multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC). We analyzed 1076 AML patients in first remission after induction chemotherapy, in whom MRD was evaluated by MFC in local laboratories of 60 Hospitals participating in the PETHEMA registry. We also conducted a survey on technical aspects of MRD testing to determine the impact of methodological heterogeneity in the prognostic value of MFC. Our results confirmed the recommended cutoff of 0.1% to discriminate patients with significantly different cumulative-incidence of relapse (-CIR- HR:0.71, P < 0.001) and overall survival (HR: 0.73, P = 0.001), but uncovered the limited prognostic value of MFC based MRD in multivariate and recursive partitioning models including other clinical, genetic and treatment related factors. Virtually all aspects related with methodological, interpretation, and reporting of MFC based MRD testing impacted in its ability to discriminate patients with different CIR. Thus, this study demonstrated that "real-world" assessment of MRD using MFC is prognostic in patients at first remission, and urges greater standardization for improved risk-stratification toward clinical decisions in AML.

The Role of Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematological Malignancies Focusing on Acute Leukemia

The significance of measurable residual disease (MRD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is well recognized in different hematological malignancies, but the evidence indicate that pre-transplant MRD status is of particular importance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In ALL, inadequate response at the level of MRD is a commonly accepted risk factor for relapse and thus an indication for allogeneic HSCT. Similarly, growing evidence from the literature strongly suggest that MRD detected by multiparameter flow cytometry or molecular techniques should be also used for risk stratification in AML at the time of HSCT. Despite the well-defined association of MRD and outcomes of HSCT in acute leukemias, there are still many open issues such as the role of additional pre-transplant consolidation for MRD eradication, the ability of HSCT to overcome negative influence of MRD positivity on survival, the impact of conditioning regimen intensity on MRD clearance post HSCT, and transplantation outcomes or the selection of optimal donor with regards to MRD status. In addition, the role of MRD assessment in guiding post-transplant maintenance treatment should also be addressed in prospective trials. These open issues mostly awaiting further clinical studies will be discussed in our current review.

[Comparison of umbilical cord blood transplantation and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched sibling donors in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome-EB or acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes]

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD-HSCT) in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome-EB (MDS-EB) or acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) . Methods: A cohort of 64 patients (including 38 cases of MDS-EB and 26 cases of AML-MRC) who received UCBT/MSD-HSCT from February 2011 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: ①Compared with MSD-HSCT group, UCBT group had a higher proportion of AML-MRC patients [52.8% (19/36) vs 25.0% (7/28) , P=0.025], and a lower median age [13 (1.5-52) years vs 32 (10-57) years, P=0.001]. ②The engraftment of neutrophils both in UCBT and MSD-HSCT groups on +42 d was 100%, and the median engraftment time was 17.5 (11-31) d and 11.5 (10-20) d, respectively. The engraftment of platelet at +100 d in UCBT group was 91.4%, the median engraftment time was 40 (15-96) d; The engraftment of platelet at +100 d in MSD-HSCT group was 100%, and the median engraftment time was 15 (11-43) d. ③There were no statistically significant differences in terms of the cumulative incidence of Ⅱ-Ⅳ and Ⅲ/Ⅳ aGVHD of 100 d and transplant related mortality (TRM) of 180 d, relapse rate, overall survival (OS) , disease-free survival (DFS) between UCBT and MSD-HSCT groups (P>0.05) . ④The 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and severe chronic GVHD in UCBT group were lower than of MSD-HSCT group [28.3% (95%CI 13.4%-45.3%) vs 67.9% (95%CI 46.1%-82.4%) , P=0.002; 10.3% (95%CI 2.5%-24.8%) vs 50.0% (95%CI 30.0%-67.1%) , respectively, P<0.001]. The cumulative 3-year incidence of GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) of UCBT group was significantly higher than of MSD-HSCT group [55.0% (95%CI 36.0%-70.6%) vs 28.6% (95%CI 13.5%-45.6%) , P=0.038]. Conclusion: UCBT could obtain better quality of life after transplantation than MSD-HSCT in treatment of MDS-EB/AML-MRC.

Idarubicin-Intensified Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Improves Relapse and Survival of High-Risk Acute Leukemia Patients with Minimal Residual Disease

The optimal conditioning regimen of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for high-risk patients with minimal residual disease (MRD) remains controversial. We studied the results in 98 high-risk acute leukemia patients transplanted with idarubicin (IDA)-intensified conditioning regimens between 2012 January and 2017 January. Among these patients, 31 (31.6%) had more than 5% marrow blasts at time of transplantation and 67 patients were in morphologic remission: MRD negative status at time of conditioning was achieved in 39 patients (39.8%), whereas 28 (28.6%) remained carriers of any other positive MRD level in the bone marrow. Three-year relapse estimates of patients with MRD-positive remission was 22.0%, which was remarkably lower than patients with active disease (45.4%, P = .027) but approximate to that of patients in MRD-negative remission (15.5%, P = .522). There were no significant differences in terms of 3-year estimated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between MRD-positive remission and MRD-negative remission groups (71.4% versus 79.1% [P = .562] and 67.9% versus 76.9% [P = .634], respectively). Moreover, the estimated rates of 3-year OS and DFS of patients in MRD-positive remission were significantly better than those in patients with active disease (71.4% versus 41.9% [P = .033] and 67.9% versus 38.7% [P = .037], respectively). These data indicate that IDA-intensified conditioning allo-HSCT could overcome the negative prognostic impact of MRD.

The Prognostic Significance of Measurable ("Minimal") Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to evaluate recent literature on detection methodologies for, and prognostic significance of, measurable ("minimal") residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

RECENT FINDINGS

There is no "one-fits-all" approach to MRD testing in AML. Most exploited to date are methods relying on immunophenotypic aberrancies (identified via multiparameter flow cytometry) or genetic abnormalities (identified via PCR-based assays). Current methods have important shortcomings, including the lack of assay platform standardization/harmonization across laboratories. In parallel to refinements of existing technologies and data analysis/interpretation, new methodologies (e.g., next-generation sequencing-based assays) are emerging that eventually may complement or replace existing ones. This dynamic evolution of MRD testing has complicated comparisons between individual studies. Nonetheless, an ever-growing body of data demonstrates that a positive MRD test at various time points throughout chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation identifies patients at particularly high risks of disease recurrence and short survival even after adjustment for other risk factors.

When should patients receive consolidation chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is a potentially curative therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Despite the associated graft-versus-leukemia effect, leukemia relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure after alloHCT. Here, we review the available data on whether there is an advantage in providing pretransplant consolidation chemotherapy prior to alloHCT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Randomized controlled studies are lacking. Data derive largely from four large retrospective registry studies. These analyses are consistent in demonstrating the lack of any survival benefit for pretransplant consolidation chemotherapy once a patient achieves a complete remission and a donor is readily available. These results are valid across conditioning regimen intensities, donor sources, and doses of cytarabine administered during consolidation.

SUMMARY

Available evidence suggests that patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission for whom a suitable donor is readily available should not be given pretransplant consolidation before proceeding to alloHCT, regardless of conditioning regimen intensity and that transplantation should be offered promptly at the time remission is achieved without undue delay. Nevertheless, patients for whom a suitable donor is not readily available after achieving first remission, should probably receive 'bridging' consolidation chemotherapy while waiting for a donor to be identified in an attempt to decrease the risk of early disease recurrence before transplantation. The role of minimal residual disease and genetic markers in directing consolidation choices are unclear to date.

Transplants of unrelated cord blood or sibling allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells/bone marrow in adolescent and young adults with chronic myeloid leukemia: comparable outcomes but better chronic GVHD-free and relapse-free survival among survivors with cord blood

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with hematological malignancy aged 15 to 39 years are recognized as a separate entity, and the efficacy and safety of unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in AYA patients has not been reported. From March 2002 to June 2015, total of 106 CML patients received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in our center. Included in the present study were CML patients aged 15 to 39 years who received unrelated CBT or sibling allo-HCT, and 74 consecutive AYA patients with CML enrolled in this analysis. The day-100 cumulative incidences of grade 2–4 aGVHD and grade 3–4 aGVHD were similar following CBT and sibling-PBSCT/BMT. The cumulative incidences of cGVHD and extensive cGVHD were 21.7% and 5.3% in the CBT cohort, which were significantly lower than those in the sibling-PBSCT/BMT cohort (58.0% and 45.5%), respectively (p = 0.046, 0.008). There was no significant difference between the two cohorts in terms of transplant-related mortality (TRM), relapse, and long-term survival (overall survival and leukemia-free survival). The 5-year probability of GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 47.9% and 33.4% in the CBT and the sibling-PBSCT/BMT cohorts, respectively (p = 0.632); among patients who survived more than 100 days after transplantation (n = 61), the 5-year probability of chronic GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (CRFS) was 66.2% in the CBT cohort, which was significantly higher than that in the sibling-PBSCT/BMT cohort (37.4%) (p = 0.037). Our study suggests that for AYA patients with CML, transplantation using unrelated CB offers comparable outcomes to sibling -PBSCT/BMT, including similar aGVHD, TRM, relapse, and long-term survival; however, from the perspective of quality of life, unrelated CBT have a lower incidence of cGVHD and a higher CRFS among survivors.

Should patients with acute myeloid leukemia and measurable residual disease be transplanted in first complete remission?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Measurable ('minimal') residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia during first complete morphologic remission (MRD CR1) identifies patients with particularly high relapse risk and short survival. Here, we examine the evidence regarding optimal postremission treatment strategy for such patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

With chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy/autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), disease recurrence appears inevitable in patients with MRD CR1. Nonrandomized studies indicate that allogeneic HCT improves outcomes over chemotherapy and/or autologous HCT, although relapse risks remain substantial. Emerging data suggest that myeloablative cord blood HCT may overcome the negative impact of MRD to a greater degree than other transplants, but the relative contributions of intensified conditioning and stem cell source to this effect are unknown.

SUMMARY

Available evidence supports the recommendation to consider allogeneic HCT for all acute myeloid leukemia patients in MRD CR1. Whether cord blood transplants should be prioritized deserves further investigation. To what degree outcomes of MRD CR1 patients could be improved by treatment intensification during induction, postremission therapy and/or before transplantation to revert the patient into an MRD state is currently unknown, as is the value of post-transplant preemptive therapies. These remain areas worthy of investigation, preferably in the setting of controlled clinical trials.

[Comparison of unrelated cord blood transplantation and HLA-identical sibling peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for the treatment of adult hematological malignancies]

Objective: To compare the efficacy of unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) and HLA-identical sibling peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for the treatment of adult hematological malignancies. Methods: From April 2011 to December 2015, a total of 81 patients receiving single-unit UCBT and 57 patients receiving HLA-identical sibling PBSCT were enrolled in this study. All of the patients received myelablative conditioning. Cyclosporine combined with mycophenolate mofetil was adopted for GVHD prophylaxis. Results: The cumulative incidence of neutropil engraftment at day-42 was 95.0% and 100% in UCBT and sibling PBSCT groups, respectively (P=0.863) . Platelet engraftment at day 100 was 87.3% (95%CI 76.8%-93.1%) in UCBT group, which was significantly lower than that of sibling PBSCT group[98.2% (95%CI 87.3%-99.7%) ] (P=0.005) . There were no significant differences in terms of Ⅱ-Ⅳ acute GVHD or Ⅲ-Ⅳ acute GVHD in two groups (P=0.142, 0.521) . The 3-year chronic GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD were 14.9% (95%CI 5.2%-23.5%) and 11.2% (95%CI 2.9%-18.7%) , respectively in UCBT group, which was significantly lower than that of sibling PBSCT group[35.2% (95%CI 19.4%-47.8%) , 31.4% (95%CI 16.2%-43.9%) ] (P=0.008, 0.009) . The 3-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) was similar between two groups (30.1% vs 23.2%, P=0.464) . The relapse rate at 3-year in UCBT group[12.9% (95%CI 6.6%-21.5%) ]was significantly lower than that in sibling PBSCT group[24.3% (95%CI 13.5%-36.8%) ] (P=0.039) . There were no significant differences in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between two groups (58.6% vs 54.8%, P=0.634; 57.0% vs 52.4%, P=0.563) . But GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) in UCBT group [55.7% (95%CI 44.1%-65.8%) ]was significantly higher than that of sibling PBSCT group[42.9% (95%CI 29.8%-55.3%) ] (P=0.047) . Conclusions: For adult hematological malignancies, the incidences of acute GVHD and TRM were similar between UCBT and sibling PBSCT recipients, and the incidences of chronic GVHD and relapse were lower in UCBT recipients. UCBT recipients had higher GRFS rate although OS and DFS were similar between two groups, which may reflect the real recovery and better quality of life following UCBT.

Minimal residual disease prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis

Minimal residual disease prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation has been associated with increased risk of relapse and death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, but detection methodologies and results vary widely. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the prognostic role of minimal residual disease detected by polymerase chain reaction or multiparametric flow cytometry before transplant. We identified 19 articles published between January 2005 and June 2016 and extracted hazard ratios for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality. Pre-transplant minimal residual disease was associated with worse leukemia-free survival (hazard ratio=2.76 [1.90-4.00]), overall survival (hazard ratio=2.36 [1.73-3.22]), and cumulative incidence of relapse (hazard ratio=3.65 [2.53-5.27]), but not non-relapse mortality (hazard ratio=1.12 [0.81-1.55]). These associations held regardless of detection method, conditioning intensity, and patient age. Adverse cytogenetics was not an independent risk factor for death or relapse. There was more heterogeneity among studies using flow cytometry-based than WT1 polymerase chain reaction-based detection (I²=75.1% vs. <0.1% for leukemia-free survival, 67.8% vs. <0.1% for overall survival, and 22.1% vs. <0.1% for cumulative incidence of relapse). These results demonstrate a strong relationship between pre-transplant minimal residual disease and post-transplant relapse and survival. Outcome heterogeneity among studies using flow-based methods may underscore site-specific methodological differences or differences in test performance and interpretation.