The Prognostic Significance of Measurable ("Minimal") Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Analytical assay validation for acute myeloid leukemia measurable residual disease assessment by multiparametric flow cytometry

BACKGROUND

Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessed by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) has gained importance in clinical decision-making for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. However, complying with the recent In Vitro Diagnostic Regulations (IVDR) in Europe and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance in the United States requires rigorous validation prior to their use in investigational clinical trials and diagnostics. Validating AML MRD-MFC assays poses challenges due to the unique underlying disease biology and paucity of patient specimens. In this study, we describe an experimental framework for validation that meets regulatory expectations.

METHODS

Our validation efforts focused on evaluating assay accuracy, analytical specificity, analytical and functional sensitivity (limit of blank (LoB), detection (LLoD) and quantitation (LLoQ)), precision, linearity, sample/reagent stability and establishing the assay background frequencies.

RESULTS

Correlation between different MFC methods was highly significant (r = 0.99 for %blasts and r = 0.93 for %LAIPs). The analysis of LAIP specificity accurately discriminated from negative control cells. The assay demonstrated a LoB of 0.03, LLoD of 0.04, and LLoQ of 0.1%. Precision experiments yielded highly reproducible results (Coefficient of Variation <20%). Stability experiments demonstrated reliable measurement of samples up to 96 h from collection. Furthermore, the reference range of LAIP frequencies in non-AML patients was below 0.1%, ranging from 0.0% to 0.04%.

CONCLUSION

In this manuscript, we present the validation of an AML MFC-MRD assay using BM/PB patient specimens, adhering to best practices. Our approach is expected to assist other laboratories in expediting their validation activities to fulfill recent health authority guidelines.

Harnessing Immune Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Despite the results achieved with the evolution of conventional chemotherapy and the inclusion of targeted therapies in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), survival is still not satisfying, in particular in the setting of relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease or elderly/unfit patients. Among the most innovative therapeutic options, cellular therapy has shown great results in different hematological malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphomas, with several products already approved for clinical use. However, despite the great interest in also expanding the application of these new treatments to R/R AML, no product has been approved yet for clinical application. Furthermore, cellular therapy could indeed represent a powerful tool and an appealing alternative to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for ineligible patients. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the most recent clinical research exploring the effectiveness of cellular therapy in AML, moving from consolidated approaches such as post- transplant donor's lymphocytes infusion, to modern adoptive immunotherapies such as alloreactive NK cell infusions, engineered T and NK cells (CAR-T, CAR-NK) and novel platforms of T and NK cells engaging (i.e., BiTEs, DARTs and ANKETTM).

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells in Minimal/Measurable Residual Disease Detection

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy characterized by an abundance of incompletely matured or immature clonally derived hematopoietic precursors called leukemic blasts. Rare leukemia stem cells (LSCs) that can self-renew as well as give rise to leukemic progenitors comprising the bulk of leukemic blasts are considered the cellular reservoir of disease initiation and maintenance. LSCs are widely thought to be relatively resistant as well as adaptive to chemotherapy and can cause disease relapse. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the molecular bases of LSC forms and functions during different stages of disease progression, so we can more accurately identify these cells and design therapies to target them. Irrespective of the morphological, cytogenetic, and cellular heterogeneity of AML, the uniform, singularly important and independently significant prognosticator of disease response to therapy and patient outcome is measurable or minimal residual disease (MRD) detection, defined by residual disease detection below the morphology-based 5% blast threshold. The importance of LSC identification and frequency estimation during MRD detection, in order to make MRD more effective in predicting disease relapse and modifying therapeutic regimen is becoming increasingly apparent. This review focuses on summarizing functional and cellular composition-based LSC identification and linking those studies to current techniques of MRD detection to suggest LSC-inclusive MRD detection as well as outline outstanding questions that need to be addressed to improve the future of AML clinical management and treatment outcomes.

Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) as a Surrogate Efficacy-Response Biomarker in AML

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) many patients experience relapse, despite the achievement of morphological complete remission; therefore, conventional morphologic criteria are currently considered inadequate for assessing the quality of the response after treatment. Quantification of measurable residual disease (MRD) has been established as a strong prognostic marker in AML and patients that test MRD negative have lower relapse rates and better survival than those who test positive. Different techniques, varying in their sensitivity and applicability to patients, are available for the measurement of MRD and their use as a guide for selecting the most optimal post-remission therapy is an area of active investigation. Although still controversial, MRD prognostic value promises to support drug development serving as a surrogate biomarker, potentially useful for accelerating the regulatory approval of new agents. In this review, we will critically examine the methods used to detect MRD and its potential role as a study endpoint.

Concordance in measurable residual disease result after first and second induction cycle in acute myeloid leukemia: An outcome- and cost-analysis

Measurable residual disease (MRD) measured using multiparameter flow-cytometry (MFC) has proven to be an important prognostic biomarker in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In addition, MRD is increasingly used to guide consolidation treatment towards a non-allogenic stem cell transplantation treatment for MRD-negative patients in the ELN-2017 intermediate risk group. Currently, measurement of MFC-MRD in bone marrow is used for clinical decision making after 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy. However, measurement after 1 cycle has also been shown to have prognostic value, so the optimal time point remains a question of debate. We assessed the independent prognostic value of MRD results at either time point and concordance between these for 273 AML patients treated within and according to the HOVON-SAKK 92, 102, 103 and 132 trials. Cumulative incidence of relapse, event free survival and overall survival were significantly better for MRD-negative (<0.1%) patients compared to MRD-positive patients after cycle 1 and cycle 2 (p ≤ 0.002, for all comparisons). A total of 196 patients (71.8%) were MRD-negative after cycle 1, of which the vast majority remained negative after cycle 2 (180 patients; 91.8%). In contrast, of the 77 MRD-positive patients after cycle 1, only 41 patients (53.2%) remained positive. A cost reduction of –€571,751 per 100 patients could be achieved by initiating the donor search based on the MRD-result after cycle 1. This equals to a 50.7% cost reduction compared to the current care strategy in which the donor search is initiated for all patients. These results show that MRD after cycle 1 has prognostic value and is highly concordant with MRD status after cycle 2. When MRD-MFC is used to guide consolidation treatment (allo vs non-allo) in intermediate risk patients, allogeneic donor search may be postponed or omitted after cycle 1. Since the majority of MRD-negative patients remain negative after cycle 2, this could safely reduce the number of allogeneic donor searches and reduce costs.

Analysis of Subset Chimerism for MRD-Detection and Pre-Emptive Treatment in AML

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) represents the only potentially curative treatment in high-risk AML patients, but up to 40% of patients suffer from relapse after alloHCT. Treatment of overt relapse poses a major therapeutic challenge and long-term disease control is achieved only in a minority of patients. In order to avoid post-allograft relapse, maintenance as well as pre-emptive therapy strategies based on MRD-detection have been used. A prerequisite for the implementation of pre-emptive therapy is the accurate identification of patients at risk for imminent relapse. Detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) represents an effective tool for early relapse prediction in the post-transplant setting. However, using established MRD methods such as multicolor flow cytometry or quantitative PCR, sensitive MRD monitoring is only applicable in about half of the patients with AML and advanced MDS undergoing alloHCT. Donor chimerism analysis, in particular when performed on enriched leukemic stem and progenitor cells, e.g. CD34+ cells, is a sensitive method and has emerged as an alternative option in the post alloHCT setting. In this review, we will focus on the current strategies for lineage specific chimerism analysis, results of pre-emptive treatment using this technology as well as future developments in this field.

Measurable Residual Disease Assessment as a Surrogate Marker in New Drug Development in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

ABSTRACT

Response criteria for patients treated for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on cytomorphology are inadequate. Many patients achieving a complete remission by such criteria will later relapse. Patients with AML in such remissions who test negative using higher sensitivity measures of residual disease burden (measurable residual disease [MRD]) have on average lower relapse rates and better survival than those testing positive. This association has raised the possibility that these technological advances in measurement of tumor burden could be used to optimize the drug development and regulatory approval processes in AML. The heterogeneous genetic etiology, diverse immunophenotypic profiles, related precursor states and polyclonal architecture however combine to make the development of standardized and validated MRD assessments for AML challenging. Current and future methods to measure residual disease in AML, performance characteristics of testing currently in use, and potential uses for optimized AML MRD tests including as a surrogate endpoint are discussed.

Prognostic significance of measurable residual disease based on multiparameter flow cytometry in childhood acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVES

To study the prognostic value of measurable residual disease (MRD) for childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by analyzing MRD-guided risk stratification therapy.

METHODS

A total of 93 children with AML were prospectively enrolled in this study. Chemotherapy with the 2015-AML-03 regimen was completed according to the risk stratification determined by genetic abnormality at initial diagnosis and MRD and bone marrow cytology after induction therapy I. Multiparameter flow cytometry was used to dynamically monitor MRD and analyze the prognostic effect of MRD on 3-year cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) rate, event-free survival (EFS) rate, and overall survival (OS) rate.

RESULTS

The 93 children with AML had a 3-year CIR rate of 48%±6%, a median time to recurrence of 11 months (range 2-32 months), a 3-year OS rate of 65%±6%, and a 3-year EFS rate of 50%±5%. After induction therapy I and intensive therapy I, the MRD-positive children had a significantly higher 3-year CIR rate and significantly lower 3-year EFS and OS rates than the MRD-negative children (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in 3-year CIR, EFS, and OS rates between the MRD-positive children with a low risk at initial diagnosis and the MRD-negative children after adjustment of chemotherapy intensity (P>0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that positive MRD after intensive treatment I was a risk factor for 3-year OS rate in children with AML (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MRD has predictive value for the prognosis of children with AML. Based on the MRD-guided risk stratification therapy, reasonable application of chemotherapy may improve the overall prognosis of children with AML.

AML/Normal Progenitor Balance Instead of Total Tumor Load (MRD) Accounts for Prognostic Impact of Flowcytometric Residual Disease in AML

Simple Summary

Measurable residual disease (MRD), taken as the percentage of white blood cells in acute myeloid leukemia, has important prognostic value, but false negatives and false positives can occur. Immature populations make up the most important part of MRD (now referred to as WBC-MRD). We explored the influence on prognostic impact of the two compartments of WBC-MRD: (1) the AML part of the total primitive/progenitor (CD34+, CD117+, CD133+) compartment (primitive marker MRD; PM-MRD) and (2) the total progenitor compartment (as % of WBC, PM%). Both are related as follows: WBC-MRD = PM-MRD × PM%. In the HOVON/SAKK study (H102; n = 300), using two objectively assessed cut-off points (2.34% and 10%), PM-MRD was found to be prognostically more discriminative than WBC-MRD. The PM% parameter had no prognostic impact and, moreover, resulted in WBC-MRD false positives/false negatives. Highly important for present clinical practice is the identification of a PM-MRD ≥ 10% but MRD^negative (MRD < 0.1, ELN consensus) poor prognosis subgroup. This suggests that a residual disease analysis using PM-MRD should be conducted.

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) in AML, assessed by multicolor flow cytometry, is an important prognostic factor. Progenitors are key populations in defining MRD, and cases of MRD involving these progenitors are calculated as percentage of WBC and referred to as white blood cell MRD (WBC-MRD). Two main compartments of WBC-MRD can be defined: (1) the AML part of the total primitive/progenitor (CD34+, CD117+, CD133+) compartment (referred to as primitive marker MRD; PM-MRD) and (2) the total progenitor compartment (% of WBC, referred to as PM%), which is the main quantitative determinant of WBC-MRD. Both are related as follows: WBC-MRD = PM-MRD × PM%. We explored the relative contribution of each parameter to the prognostic impact. In the HOVON/SAKK study H102 (300 patients), based on two objectively assessed cut-off points (2.34% and 10%), PM-MRD was found to offer an independent prognostic parameter that was able to identify three patient groups with different prognoses with larger discriminative power than WBC-MRD. In line with this, the PM% parameter itself showed no prognostic impact, implying that the prognostic impact of WBC-MRD results from the PM-MRD parameter it contains. Moreover, the presence of the PM% parameter in WBC-MRD may cause WBC-MRD false positivity and WBC-MRD false negativity. For the latter, at present, it is clinically relevant that PM-MRD ≥ 10% identifies a patient sub-group with a poor prognosis that is currently classified as good prognosis MRD^negative using the European LeukemiaNet 0.1% consensus MRD cut-off value. These observations suggest that residual disease analysis using PM-MRD should be conducted.

Immunophenotypic Detection of Measurable Residual (Stem Cell) Disease Using LAIP Approach in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Half of the patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), who achieve complete remission after chemotherapy treatment, will ultimately experience a relapse. Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important post-treatment risk factor in AML, because it gives additional information about the depth of the remission. Within MRD, the small population of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) is thought to be at the base of the actual relapse. In this protocol, the flow cytometric detection of MRD and LSCs herein is outlined. We give a detailed overview of the sampling procedures for optimal multiparameter flow cytometry assessment of both MRD and LSC, using leukemia associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) and LSC markers. Moreover, an overview of the gating strategies to detect LAIPs and LSC markers is provided. This protocol serves as guidance for flow cytometric detection of measurable residual (stem cell) disease necessary for proper therapeutic decision making in AML patients. © 2019 The Authors. Basic Protocol 1: Immunophenotypic LAIP detection for measurable residual disease monitoring Basic Protocol 2: Immunophenotypic detection of CD34+CD38- leukemic stem cells.

Measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia using flow cytometry: approaches for harmonization/standardization

Introduction: Measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rapidly evolving area with many institutes embarking on it, both in academic and pharmaceutical settings. However, there is a multitude of approaches to design, perform, and report flow cytometric MRD. Together with the long-term experience needed, this makes flow cytometric MRD in AML nonstandardized and time-consuming. Areas covered: This paper briefly summarizes critical issues, like sample preparation and transport, markers and fluorochromes of choice, but in particular focuses on the main issues, which includes specificity and sensitivity, hereby providing a new model that may circumvent the main disadvantages of the present approaches. New approaches that may add to the value of flow cytometric MRD includes assessment of leukemia stem cells, MRD in peripheral blood, and approaches to use multidimensional image analysis. Expert commentary: MRD in AML requires standardization/harmonization on many aspects, for which the present paper offers possible guidelines.

Personalized laboratory medicine: a patient-centered future approach

In contrast to population-based medical decision making, which emphasizes the use of evidence-based treatment strategies for groups of patients, personalized medicine is based on optimizing treatment at the level of the individual patient. The creation of molecular profiles of individual patients was made possible by the advent of "omics" technologies, based on high throughput instrumental techniques in combination with biostatistics tools and artificial intelligence. The goal of personalized laboratory medicine is to use advanced technologies in the process of preventive, curative or palliative patient management. Personalized medicine does not rely on changes in concentration of a single molecular marker to make a therapeutic decision, but rather on changes of a profile of markers characterizing an individual patient's status, taking into account not only the expected response to treatment of the disease but also the expected response of the patient. Such medical approach promises a more effective diagnostics with more effective and safer treatment, as well as faster recovery and restoration of health and improved cost effectiveness. The laboratory medicine profession is aware of its key role in personalized medicine, but to empower the laboratories, at least an enhancement in cooperation between disciplines within laboratory medicine will be necessary.

The assessment of minimal residual disease versus that of somatic mutations for predicting the outcome of acute myeloid leukemia patients

Background

In addition to morphological and cytogenetic features, acute myeloid leukemias are characterized by mutations that can be used for target-therapy; also the minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) could be an important prognostic factor. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate if somatic mutations could represent an additional prognostic value in respect of MRD alone.

Method

At baseline, 98 patients were tested for NPM1, FLT3, and for WT1 expression; 31 for ASXL1, TET2, IDH1, IDH2, N-RAS, WT1, c-KIT, RUNX1, and DNMT3A. The same genes have been also tested after induction and consolidation.

Results

Overall, 60.2% of our patients resulted mutated: 24.5% carried mutations of FLT3-ITD, 38.7% of NPM1, 48.4% of c-KIT, 25.8% of N-RAS and 19.3% of IDH2. The probability of achieving a complete response (CR) was higher for younger patients, with low ELN risk score, NPM1-mutated, with low WT1 levels, and without FLT3. The presence of additional mutations represented a poor predictive factor: only 19% of these cases achieved CR in comparison to 43% of subjects without any of it. Concerning survival, it was conditioned by a lower ELN risk score, younger age, reduction > 1 log of the NPM1 mutational burden, disappearance of FLT3 mutations and lower WT1 expression. Regarding the role of the additional mutations, they impaired the outcome of 20% of the already MRD-negative patients. Concerning the possibility of predicting relapse, we observed an increase of the NPM1 mutational burden at the time-point immediately preceding the relapse (about 2 months earlier) in 50% of subjects. Similarly concerning WT1, an increase of its expression anticipated disease recurrence in 64% of cases.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that additional somatic mutations are able to impair outcome of the already MRD-negative subjects. About MRD, we suggest a prognostic role also for the WT1 expression. Finally, we considered as relevant the assessment of NPM1 quantity clearance instead of the presence/absence of mutations alone. Still remains in doubt the utility in terms of long-term prognosis of a baseline more complex mutational screening; we could hypothesize that it would be useful for those patients where other markers are not available or who reached the MRD negativity.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12935-019-0807-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prognostic significance of microRNA-99a in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Overexpression of microRNA-99a (miR-99a) have been associated with adverse prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Nevertheless, whether it also predicts poor outcome in post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) AML patients remains unclear. To further elucidate the prognostic value of miR-99a, 74 AML patients with miR-99a expression report who underwent allo-HSCT from The Cancer Genome Atlas database were identified and grouped into either miR-99a^high or miR-99a^low based on their miR-99a expression levels relative to the median. Two groups had similar clinical and molecular characteristics except that miR-99a^high group had fewer patients of the French-American-British M4 subtype (P = 0.018) and more frequent CEBPA mutations (P = 0.005). Univariate analysis indicated that high miR-99a expression was unfavorable for both event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.029; P = 0.012, respectively). Multivariate analysis suggested that high miR-99a expression was an independent risk factor for both EFS and OS in AML patients who underwent allo-HSCT [hazard ratio (HR) 1.909, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.043-3.494, P = 0.036 and HR 2.179, 95% CI 1.192-3.982, P = 0.011, respectively]. Our results further proved that high miR-99a expression could predict worse outcome in AML patients, even in those who underwent intensive post-remission therapy such as allo-HCST.

Redefining treatment failure for pediatric acute leukemia in the era of minimal residual disease testing

Technologies for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in leukemia and our understanding of the prognostic implications of MRD at different phases of treatment have significantly improved over the past decade. As a result, definitions of treatment failure based on bone marrow morphology by light microscopy are becoming increasingly inadequate for clinical care and trial design. In addition, novel therapies that may have increased efficacy and decreased toxicity in the setting of MRD compared to overt disease are changing clinical practice and challenging investigators to redefine treatment failure, the role of disease surveillance in remission, and clinical trial eligibility in the era of MRD.