1
|
Badhan A, Wang Y, Terry S, Gruninger R, Guan LL, McAllister TA. Invited review: Interplay of rumen microbiome and the cattle host in modulating feed efficiency and methane emissions. J Dairy Sci 2025; 108:5489-5501. [PMID: 40221043 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2024-26063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/14/2025]
Abstract
Given that the majority of energy and protein supplied to cattle arises as a result of ruminal fermentation, the rumen microbiome plays a key role in determining host feed efficiency and methane (CH4) emissions. Some reports suggest that a less diverse rumen microbiome is associated with improved feed efficiency, whereas other studies suggest that microbial diversity does not differ between low- and high-efficiency cattle of the same breed, fed identical diets. Although reducing enteric CH4 emissions offers a dual benefit in terms of improved feed efficiency and a reduced environmental footprint, recent findings indicate that these outcomes are not always consistent in ruminants. The composition of the rumen microbiome is mainly determined by diet but is also influenced by host genetics and physiological parameters such as rumen volume, rate of passage, and rumination. Reduced microbial diversity may impair the ability of cattle to adapt to frequent changes in diet and the environment. Hydrogen exchange and capture are the energetic foundation of the rumen microbiome, and considerable resources have been invested in developing additives that redirect hydrogen flow toward alternative sinks and away from the reduction of CO2 to CH4. These additives reduce enteric CH4 emissions by 30% to 80%, yet the anticipated gains in feed efficiency remain inconsistent. Strategies to improve the feed efficiency of cattle production must consider the multifaceted interactions among the host, rumen microbiome, and diet to ensure the sustainable intensification of cattle production while maintaining the social license for milk and meat production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Badhan
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
| | - Yue Wang
- Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2205 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 124
| | - Stephanie Terry
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
| | - Robert Gruninger
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
| | - Le Luo Guan
- Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2205 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 124
| | - Tim A McAllister
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Callaway T, Perez HG, Corcionivoschi N, Bu D, Fluharty FL. The Holobiont concept in ruminant physiology - more of the same, or something new and meaningful to food quality, food security, and animal health? J Dairy Sci 2024:S0022-0302(24)01427-9. [PMID: 39710259 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2024-25847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 12/01/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
The holobiont concept has emerged as an attempt to recognize and describe the myriad interactions and physiological signatures inherent to a host organism, as impacted by the microbial communities that colonize and/or co-inhabit the environment within which the host resides. The field acknowledges and draws upon principles from evolution, ecology, genetics, and biology, and in many respects has been "pushed" by the advent of high throughput DNA sequencing and, to a lesser extent, other "omics"-based technologies. Despite the explosion in data generation and analyses, much of our current understanding of the human and ruminant "holobiont" is based on compositional forms of data and thereby, restricted to describing host phenotypes via associative or correlative studies. So, where to from here? We will discuss some past findings arising from ruminant and human gut microbiota research and seek to evaluate the rationale, progress, and opportunities that might arise from the "holobiont" approach to the ruminant and human host. In particular, we will consider what is a "good" or "bad" host gastrointestinalmicrobiome in different scenarios, as well as potential avenues to sustain or alter the holobiont. While the holobiont approach might improve food quality, food security and animal health, these benefits will be most likely achieved via a judicious and pragmatic compromise in data generation, both in terms of its scale, as well as its generation in context with the "forgotten" knowledge of ruminant and human physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Callaway
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
| | - H G Perez
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| | | | - D Bu
- Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - F L Fluharty
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Firkins JL, Henderson EL, Duan H, Pope PB. International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology: Current perspective on rumen microbial ecology to improve fiber digestibility. J Dairy Sci 2024:S0022-0302(24)01394-8. [PMID: 39701529 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2024-25863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2024] [Accepted: 11/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/21/2024]
Abstract
Although cellulose has received the most attention, further research is needed for a complete comprehension of other fiber components in forage and nonforage fiber sources corresponding with the array of enzymes needed for depolymerization and resulting fermentation of sugars. The carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) have been described in detail herein, although new information will no doubt accumulate in the future. Known CAZymes are attributed to taxa that are easily detected via 16S rRNA gene profiling techniques, but such approaches have limitations. We describe how closely related species or strains expand into different niches depending on diet and the dynamic availability of remaining fibrous substrates. Moreover, expression of CAZymes and other enzymes such as in fermentation pathways can shift among strains and even within strains over time of incubation. We describe unique fibrolytic components of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi while emphasizing the development of consortia that efficiently increase neutral detergent fiber degradability (NDFD). For example, more powerful genome-centric functional omics approaches combined with expanded bioinformatics and network analyses are needed to expand our current understanding of ruminal function and the bottlenecks that lead to among-study variation in NDFD. Specific examples highlighted include our lack of fundamental understanding why starch limits NDFD, whereas moderate inclusion of rumen-degraded protein, certain supplemental fatty acids (especially palmitic), and supplemental sugars sometimes stimulates NDFD. Current and future research must uncover deeper complexity in the rumen microbiome through a combination of approaches described herein to be followed by validation using novel cultivation studies and, ultimately, NDFD measured in vivo for integration with ruminant productivity traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Firkins
- Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210 USA.
| | - E L Henderson
- Centre for Microbiome Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - H Duan
- Centre for Microbiome Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - P B Pope
- Centre for Microbiome Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia; Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway; Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kholif AE, Anele A, Anele UY. Microbial feed additives in ruminant feeding. AIMS Microbiol 2024; 10:542-571. [PMID: 39219749 PMCID: PMC11362274 DOI: 10.3934/microbiol.2024026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The main purposes of feed additives administration are to increase feed quality, feed utilization, and the performance and health of animals. For many years, antibiotic-based feed additives showed promising results; however, their administration in animal feeds has been banned due to some public concerns regarding their residues in the produced milk and meat from treated animals. Some microorganisms have desirable properties and elicit certain effects, which makes them potential alternatives to antibiotics to enhance intestinal health and ruminal fermentation. The commonly evaluated microorganisms are some species of bacteria and yeasts. Supplementing microorganisms to ruminants boosts animal health, feed digestion, ruminal fermentation, animal performance (meat and milk), and feed efficiency. Moreover, feeding microorganisms helps young calves adapt quickly to consume solid feed and prevents thriving populations of enteric pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract which cause diarrhea. Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Lactococcus, Bacillus, Enterococcus, Bifidobacterium, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Aspergillus oryzae are the commonly used microbial feed additives in ruminant production. The response of feeding such microorganisms depends on many factors including the level of administration, diet fed to animal, physiological status of animal, and many other factors. However, the precise modes of action in which microbial feed additives improve nutrient utilization and livestock production are under study. Therefore, we aim to highlight some of the uses of microorganisms-based feed additives effects on animal production, the modes of action of microorganisms, and their potential use as an alternative to antibiotic feed additives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed E. Kholif
- Department of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
- Dairy Science Department, National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth St. Dokki, Giza, Egypt
| | - Anuoluwapo Anele
- Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Design, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
| | - Uchenna Y. Anele
- Department of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jawaid MZ, Ashfaq MY, Al-Ghouti M, Zouari N. Insights into population adaptation and biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria in challenged date palm leaves silaging, using MALDI-TOF MS. CURRENT RESEARCH IN MICROBIAL SCIENCES 2024; 6:100235. [PMID: 38660337 PMCID: PMC11039324 DOI: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The study focused on isolating indigenous Qatari lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from various challenged date palm tree leaf silages to construct a comprehensive strain collection, useful to study the diversity of these strains following their adaptation to the uncommon silage. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) was employed for strain identification and differentiation. The diversity of LAB populations and strains was assessed through principal component analysis (PCA) and dendrogram analyses. A total of 88 LAB isolates were obtained from silages of fresh palm leaves, silage of mixed leaves and dairy feed, along with fresh palm tree leaves, and dairy feed, adapted to local harsh environments. These isolates were categorized according to the new classification of 2020, belonging to genera of Pediococcus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Companilactobacillus farciminis, Limosilactobacillus oris, Limosilactobacillus vaginalis, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus and Lactobacillus johnsonii. Pediococcus was the most prevalent genus, falling mostly within the species Pediococcus lolii. MALDI-TOF MS protein profiles, PCA, and dendrogram analyses successfully grouped the LAB isolates into five distinctive clusters based on the protein's similarities. The high diversity of the indigenous LAB in spontaneous palm leaf silages demonstrated their adaptation and mutualistic interactions, forming robust consortia that ensure the quality of the silage. The straightforward, quick, and accurate identification of LAB in this silage using MALDI-TOF MS presents a valuable approach for formulating LAB consortia for silaging harsh agricultural by-products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Zaid Jawaid
- Environmental Sciences Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O.B 2713, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mohammad Yousaf Ashfaq
- Environmental Sciences Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O.B 2713, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mohammad Al-Ghouti
- Environmental Sciences Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O.B 2713, Doha, Qatar
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cordeiro MWS, Cappellozza BI, de Melo NN, Bernardes TF. Effects of a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial on performance, blood parameters, fecal characteristics, rumen morphometrics, and intestinal gene expression in finishing beef bulls. J Anim Sci 2024; 102:skae259. [PMID: 39248595 PMCID: PMC11439149 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the effects of supplementing direct-fed microbials (DFM), containing Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis, on performance, rumen morphometrics, intestinal gene expression, and blood and fecal parameters in finishing bulls. Nellore × Angus bulls (n = 144; initial BW = 401 ± 45.5 kg) were distributed at random in 36 pens (4 bulls/pen and 18 pens/treatment), following a completely randomized design. A ground corn-based finishing diet was offered for ad libitum intake twice a day for 84 d, containing the following treatments: 1) control (without DFM); 2) DFM (B. licheniformis and B. subtilis) at 6.4 × 109 CFU (2 g) per animal. The data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, with a pen representing an experimental unit, the fixed effect of the treatment, and the random effect of pen nested within the treatment. For fecal parameters (two collections made), the collection effect and its interaction with the treatment were included in the model. Bulls that received the DFM had a decreased dry matter intake (P ≤ 0.01), did not differ in average daily gain (2.05 kg; P = 0.39), and had a 6% improvement in gain:feed (P = 0.05). The other performance variables, final BW, hot carcass weight, and hot carcass yield, did not differ (P > 0.10). Plasma urea-N concentration decreased by 6.2% (P = 0.02) in the bulls that received DFM. Glucose, haptoglobin, and lipopolysaccharides were not different between treatments (P > 0.10). Ruminal morphometrics were not affected by the treatment (P > 0.10). The use of DFM tended to reduce fecal starch (P = 0.10). At slaughter, bulls fed DFM had an increased duodenal gene expression of tryptophan hydroxylase-1 (P = 0.02) and of superoxide dismutase-1 (P = 0.03). Overall, supplementation with DFM based on B. licheniformis and B. subtilis to Nellore × Angus bulls in the finishing phase decreased dry matter intake, did not influence ADG, improved gain:feed, and increased the expression of genes important for duodenal function.
Collapse
|