Multiinstitutional prospective observational study of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (JLGK0901 study-NSCLC)

Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases: A Review of Treatment Techniques

The advancement of systemic targeted treatments has led to improvements in the management of metastatic disease, particularly in terms of survival outcomes. However, brain metastases remain less responsive to systemic therapies, underscoring the significance of local interventions for comprehensive disease control. Over the past years, the threshold for treating brain metastases through stereotactic radiosurgery has risen. Yet, as the number of treated metastases increases, treatment complexity and duration also escalate. This trend has made multi-isocenter radiosurgery treatments, such as those with the Gamma Knife, challenging to plan and lengthy for patients. In contrast, single-isocenter approaches employing linear accelerators offer an efficient and expeditious treatment option. This review delves into the literature, comparing different linear-accelerator-based techniques with each other and in relation to dedicated systems, focusing on dosimetric considerations and feasibility.

Propensity score-matched analysis comparing hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous integrated boost with hippocampus‑avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy alone for multiple brain metastases-a retrospective study in multiple institutions

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for multiple brain metastases has been recently controversially discussed.This study was aimed to explore the feasibility of Hippocampus-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy plus a simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT + SIB) in patients with multiple brain metastases and assess tumor control in comparison with Hippocampus-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) alone for brain metastases.

METHODS

In this study, 63 patients with multiple brain metastases (≥ 4 metastases) had undergone HA-WBRT + SIB between January 2016 and December 2020 in the observation group:HA-WBRT (30 Gy in 12 fractions, the maximum dose of the hippocampus ≤ 14 Gy) plus a simultaneous integrated boost (48 Gy in 12 fractions) for brain metastases.Overall Survival (OS), Median survival,intracranial control (IC = control within the entire brain), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and adverse events were compared with the control group (a HA-WBRT retrospective cohort) by propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

After 1:1 propensity score matching,there were 56 patients in each group (the observation group, the control group). OS, median survival and iPFS were significantly longer in the observation group (18.4 vs. 10.9 months, P<0.001), (13.0 vs. 8.0 months, P<0.001), (13.9 vs.7.8 months, P<0.001). In comparison of 1-year-IC rates, the observation group also demonstrated higher than the control group (51.8% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.002), respectively. Seven hippocampal metastases were found in the control group (4/56,7.1%) and the observation group (3/56,5.4%) after HA-WBRT. The death rate of intracranial progression were 23.2% in the observation group and 37.5% in the control group.All adverse events were not significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HA-WBRT + SIB resulted in better OS,median survival, IC, iPFS, an acceptable risk of radiation response, and a potential way of declining neurocognitive adverse events, which may be a better treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) versus single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the resection cavity of brain metastases after surgical resection (SATURNUS): study protocol for a randomized phase III trial

BACKGROUND

The brain is a common site for cancer metastases. In case of large and/or symptomatic brain metastases, neurosurgical resection is performed. Adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard procedure to minimize the risk of local recurrence and is increasingly performed as local stereotactic radiotherapy to the resection cavity. Both hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) and single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be applied in this case. Although adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy to the resection cavity is widely used in clinical routine and recommended in international guidelines, the optimal fractionation scheme still remains unclear. The SATURNUS trial prospectively compares adjuvant HFSRT with SRS and seeks to detect the superiority of HFSRT over SRS in terms of local tumor control.

METHODS

In this single center two-armed randomized phase III trial, adjuvant radiotherapy to the resection cavity of brain metastases with HFSRT (6 - 7 × 5 Gy prescribed to the surrounding isodose) is compared to SRS (1 × 12-20 Gy prescribed to the surrounding isodose). Patients are randomized 1:1 into the two different treatment arms. The primary endpoint of the trial is local control at the resected site at 12 months. The trial is based on the hypothesis that HFSRT is superior to SRS in terms of local tumor control.

DISCUSSION

Although adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy after resection of brain metastases is considered standard of care treatment, there is a need for further prospective research to determine the optimal fractionation scheme. To the best of our knowledge, the SATURNUS study is the only randomized phase III study comparing different regimes of postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy to the resection cavity adequately powered to detect the superiority of HFSRT regarding local control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05160818, on December 16, 2021. The trial registry record is available on  https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05160818 . The presented protocol refers to version V1.3 from March 21, 2021.

Comparing Fractionated and Single-Fraction Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases From Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With a Focus on Driver Alterations

Background As the overall survival in non-small-cell lung cancer has increased, safer, long-term treatments for brain metastases are increasingly needed. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of fractionated and single-fraction gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer, focusing on driver alteration status. Methodology Patients who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery as their first local treatment for brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer between May 2018 and December 2021 at our institution were retrospectively enrolled. Results Among the 98 patients (287 lesions), 45 (130 lesions) harbored driver alterations, including epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in 35 patients and anaplastic lymphoma kinase or ROS1 rearrangement in 10 patients. Overall, 64 and 34 patients underwent single-fraction and fractionated radiosurgery (3-15 fractions), respectively. Large tumor size was a risk factor for recurrence, while fractionated radiosurgery (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) = 16.47; confidence interval (CI) = 3.58-75.77; p < 0.001) and small tumor size (sHR = 1.15; CI = 1.04-1.28; p = 0.008) independently protected against radiation necrosis. In the case-matched analyses, the cumulative radiation necrosis rates were significantly lower in the fractionated group than in the single-fraction group among all lesions (p = 0.017) and among those with driver alterations (p = 0.046), whereas no significant difference was confirmed among wild-type lesions (p = 0.382). Conclusions Fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery may be an alternative therapeutic approach for reducing the risk of radiation necrosis, particularly for patients with driver alterations, even when the tumors are small. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal indications for fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery and fractionation methods.

Extended Survival in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer-Associated Brain Metastases in the Modern Era

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) have long been considered a terminal diagnosis with management mainly aimed at palliation and little hope for extended survival. Use of brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and/or resection, in addition to novel systemic therapies, has enabled improvements in overall and progression-free (PFS) survival.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the possibility of extended survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BM in the current era.

METHODS

During the years 2008 to 2020, 606 patients with NSCLC underwent their first Gamma Knife SRS for BM at our institution with point-of-care data collection. We reviewed clinical, molecular, imaging, and treatment parameters to explore the relationship of such factors with survival.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 17 months (95% CI, 13-40). Predictors of increased survival in a multivariable analysis included age <65 years ( P < .001), KPS ≥80 ( P < .001), absence of extracranial metastases ( P < .001), fewer BM at first SRS (≤3, P = .003), and targeted therapy ( P = .005), whereas chemotherapy alone was associated with shorter survival ( P = .04). In a subgroup of patients managed before 2016 (n = 264), 38 (14%) were long-term survivors (≥5 years), of which 16% required no active cancer treatment (systemic or brain) for ≥3 years by the end of their follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival in patients with brain metastases from NSCLC is feasible in the current era of SRS when combined with the use of effective targeted therapeutics. Of those living ≥5 years, the chance for living with stable disease without the need for active treatment for ≥3 years was 16%.

Five-Year Sustained Complete Remission With Minimal Adverse Effects Following Radiosurgery for 2-cm Brain Metastasis With Deep Eloquent Location From Lung Adenocarcinoma Despite Low Marginal Dose and High 12 Gy Volume

In single-fraction (sf) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) from lung adenocarcinoma (LAC), a marginal dose of ≥22-24 Gy is generally deemed desirable for achieving long-term local tumor control, whereas symptomatic brain radionecrosis significantly increases when the surrounding brain volume receiving ≥12 Gy (V_{12 Gy}) exceeds >5-10 cm³, especially in a deep location. Here, we describe a 75-year-old male with a single LAC-BM of 20 mm in diameter, with a deep eloquent location, which was treated with sfSRS followed by erlotinib, resulting in sustained local complete remission (CR) with minimal adverse radiation effect at nearly five years after sfSRS. The LAC harbored epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) alone. sfSRS was implemented 11 days after planning CECT acquisition. The original GTV had some under- and over-coverage of the enhancing lesion. The D_98% values of corrected GTV (cGTV) (3.08 cm³) and 2-mm outside the cGTV were 18.0 Gy with 55% isodose and 14.8 Gy, respectively. The irradiated isodose volumes, including the GTV, receiving ≥22 Gy and ≥12 Gy were 2.18 cm³ and 14.32 cm³, respectively. Erlotinib was administered 13 days after sfSRS with subsequent dose adjustments over 22 months. There was a remarkable tumor response and subsequent nearly CR of the BM were observed at 2.7 and 6.3 months, respectively, with the tumor remnant being visible as a tiny cavitary lesion located in the cortex of the post-central gyrus at 56.4 months. The present case suggests the existence of: (i) extremely radio- and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive LAC-BM for which sfSRS of ≤18 Gy combined with EGFR-TKI is sufficient for attaining long-term CR; and (ii) long-term brain tolerance following sfSRS despite high 12 Gy volume and deep eloquent location in the late 70s The moderate marginal dose of the GTV, the main location of the BM in the cerebral cortex, and the excellent tumor responses with sufficient extrication from the mass effect may render the BM immune to late adverse radiation effect.

Efficacy and safety of combined immunotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in NSCLCBM patients and a novel prognostic nomogram: A real-world study

Objective

To explore the effectiveness of combined immunotherapy (IT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and address the gap between evidence-based clinical practice and academic knowledge of optimal timing of IT relative to SRS. In addition, to meet the unmet need for an up-to-date prognostic assessment model in the era of IT.

Methods

The data of 86 non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis (NSCLCBM) patients treated with SRS to 268 brain metastases (BMs) were retrospectively extracted from our hospital database. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed for overall survival (OS) and a log-rank test for comparison between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify the significant prognostic factors. The prognostic nomogram was established utilizing the rms package of R software.

Results

IT was found to be associated with improved OS (from BM diagnosis: HR 0.363, 95% CI 0.199 - 0.661, P < 0.001; from SRS: HR 0.472, 95% CI 0.260 - 0.857, P = 0.014). Individuals who received IT in combination with SRS had better OS than those who didn't (from the day of BM diagnosis: 16.8 vs. 8.4 months, P = 0.006; from the day of SRS: 12 vs. 7 months, P = 0.037). Peri-SRS timing of IT administration was a significant prognostic factor for OS (from BM diagnosis: HR 0.132, 95% CI 0.034 - 0.517, P = 0.004; from SRS: HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.044 - 0.450, P = 0.001). Initiating IT after SRS led to superior OS than concurrent or before (from BM diagnosis: 26.5 vs. 14.1 vs. 7.1 months; from SRS: 21.4 vs. 9.9 vs. 4.1 months, respectively). Additionally, we build a nomogram incorporating IT, cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV), and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), demonstrating a remarkable prognosis prediction performance for SRS-treated NSCLCBM patients.

Conclusion

Peri-SRS IT is a promising approach in treating NSCLCBM, as improved OS was observed without significantly increasing adverse events. Receipt of IT post-SRS was associated with superior OS than those who received IT concurrently or before. Incorporating IT and CITV into the RPA index could augment its prognosis assessment value for SRS-treated NSCLCBM patients, predominantly in the wild-type.

Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides updated evidence-based recommendations addressing recent developments in the management of patients with brain metastases, including advanced radiation therapy techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy and the emergence of systemic therapies with central nervous system activity.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on the radiotherapeutic management of intact and resected brain metastases from nonhematologic solid tumors. The guideline is based on a systematic review provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Recommendations were created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Strong recommendations are made for SRS for patients with limited brain metastases and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Multidisciplinary discussion with neurosurgery is conditionally recommended to consider surgical resection for all tumors causing mass effect and/or that are greater than 4 cm. For patients with symptomatic brain metastases, upfront local therapy is strongly recommended. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases eligible for central nervous system-active systemic therapy, multidisciplinary and patient-centered decision-making to determine whether local therapy may be safely deferred is conditionally recommended. For patients with resected brain metastases, SRS is strongly recommended to improve local control. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases receiving whole brain radiation therapy, hippocampal avoidance and memantine are strongly recommended. For patients with poor prognosis, early introduction of palliative care for symptom management and caregiver support are strongly recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of radiation therapy for brain metastases with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: Comparison of survival between <5 and ≥5 metastases

Background

Current evidence‐based guidelines support stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with up to four brain metastases (BMs). However, debate continues about how many tumors may be treated by SRS alone.

Methods

This retrospective study included non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with BMs treated with gamma knife as the initial treatment for cerebral lesions. The patients were followed up to obtain their survival information. The outcomes were statistically analyzed to compare the differences in survival between the <5 BMs and ≥5 BMs groups and to identify prognostic factors.

Results

A total of 77 patients were divided into two groups (54 patients with <5 BMs and 23 patients with ≥5 BMs). The median overall survival (OS) was 18.3 months in the <5 BMs group and 17.7 months in the ≥5 BMs group. The median intracranial progression‐free survival (IPFS) was 9.0 months in the <5 BMs group and 9.9 months in the ≥5 BMs group. There was no significant difference in OS and IPFS between the two groups. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that adenocarcinoma, controlled primary cancer, higher Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and salvage treatment were independent prognostic factors favoring longer OS.

Conclusion

SRS alone as the initial treatment for NSCLC patients with more than four BMs was non‐inferior to SRS for those with one to four BMs in terms of OS and IPFS.

Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

Outcomes of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases From Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement-Positive and EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

The outcomes after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were retrospectively analysed in patients with brain metastases from anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to evaluate the efficacy, safety and difference for overall survival and local tumor control.

Methods

The medical records were retrospectively reviewed of 607 patients (25 ALK-positive, 171 EGFR-positive, and 411 wild type) with 2959 tumors who had undergone GKRS.

Results

The median overall survival time after initial GKRS was 14 months. Driver gene mutation-positive patients had significantly longer overall survival than wild type patients (p < 0.0001), and ALK-positive patients survived significantly longer than EGFR-positive patients (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed the unfavorable factors significantly affecting overall survival outcomes were older age, lower Karnofsky Performance Status score, multiple intracranial metastases, uncontrolled primary cancer, uncontrolled extracranial metastases, no administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and driver gene mutation-negative cases. Seventy-three patients died of uncontrolled brain metastases at a median of 12 months. Driver gene mutations had no influence (p = 0.33), and ALK-positive and EGFR-positive patients showed no significant difference in neurological survival (p = 0.83). A total of 174 patients demonstrated distant brain control failure at a median of 15 months. ALK-positive type was significant compared with EGFR-positive type (p = 0.047), but driver gene mutation-positive and -negative types showed no significant difference in the development of new brain metastases (p = 0.2). The median tumor volume was 1.06 cm³ in the driver gene mutation-positive type and 1.85 cm³ in wild type. The median marginal dose was 20 Gy in both types. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month local tumor control rates were 97.3%, 96.1%, and 95.9%, respectively. Driver gene mutations had a significantly positive impact on local tumor control (p = 0.001), and ALK-positive and EGFR-positive types showed no significant difference (p = 0.95). A total of 193 tumors had radiation injury at a median of 12 months after GKRS. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month GKRS-related complication rates were 3.3%, 8.1%, and 8.7%, respectively. Driver gene mutations significantly induced radiation damage (p = 0.021), and the ALK-positive type was affected more than the EGFR-positive type (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

ALK rearrangement-positive NSCLC patients tended to have significantly longer survival, but had higher incidence of new intracranial metastases due to long-term survival after GKRS, compared with EGFR mutation-negative and driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC patients. GKRS induced significantly satisfactory local tumor control in driver gene mutation-positive tumors but GKRS-related complication frequency was higher, especially in ALK-positive NSCLC patients. Therefore, more careful imaging follow-up is necessary after GKRS for patients with driver gene mutation-positive NSCLC.

Non-small cell lung cancer with multiple brain metastases remains relapse-free for more than 13 years: A case report

Brain metastasis (BM) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is usually associated with a poor prognosis. A 55-year-old Japanese man visited Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital with complaints of motor aphasia and fatigue. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed multiple tumors. The patient's medical history included lung cancer surgery performed at another hospital 3 months prior to his visit to our hospital. Total resection of the left frontal tumor revealed BM from lung adenocarcinoma. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was performed for the remaining three BMs. At 9 months after SRS, another new BM was discovered, and SRS was again performed. More than 13 years have elapsed since the last SRS was performed, and the patient has remained relapse-free. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report describing a patient with NSCLC with multiple BMs who has remained relapse-free for >13 years with no neurological dysfunction, including cognitive deficit.

Research Progress and Challenges in the Treatment of Central Nervous System Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common malignant tumors and has high morbidity and mortality rates. Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is one of the most frequent complications in patients with NSCLC and seriously affects the quality of life (QOL) and overall survival (OS) of patients, with a median OS of untreated patients of only 1-3 months. There are various treatment methods for NSCLC CNS metastasis, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, which do not meet the requirements of patients in terms of improving OS and QOL. There are still many problems in the treatment of NSCLC CNS metastasis that need to be solved urgently. This review summarizes the research progress in the treatment of NSCLC CNS metastasis to provide a reference for clinical practice.

Longitudinal Grouping of Target Volumes for Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy of Multiple Brain Metastases

Purpose

Treatment of multiple brain metastases with single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy causes unnecessary exposure to normal brain tissue. In this study, a longitudinal grouping method was developed to reduce such unnecessary exposure.

Materials and Methods

This method has two main aspects: grouping brain lesions longitudinally according to their longitudinal projection positions in beam’s eye view, and rotating the collimator to 90° to make the multiple leaf collimator leaves conform to the targets longitudinally group by group. For 11 patients with multiple (5–30) brain metastases, two single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated using a longitudinal grouping strategy (LGS) and the conventional strategy (CVS). The prescription dose was 52 Gy for 13 fractions. Dose normalization to 100% of the prescription dose in 95% of the planning target volume was adopted. For plan quality comparison, Paddick conformity and the gradient index of the planning target volume, and the mean dose, the V_100%, V_50%, V_25%, and V_10% volumes of normal brain tissue were calculated.

Results

There were no significant differences between the LGS and CVS plans in Paddick conformity (p = 0.374) and the gradient index (p = 0.182) of the combined planning target volumes or for V_100% (p = 0.266) and V_50% (p = 0.155) of the normal brain. However, the V_25% and V_10% of the normal brain which represented the low-dose region were significantly reduced in the LGS plans (p = 0.004 and p = 0.003, respectively). Consistently, the mean dose of the entire normal brain was 12.04 and 11.17 Gy in the CVS and LGS plans, respectively, a significant reduction in the LGS plans (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

The longitudinal grouping method can decrease unnecessary exposure and reduces the low-dose range in normal brain tissue.

Dosimetric comparison of multiple vs single isocenter technique for linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery: The Importance of the six degree couch

PURPOSE

Single isocenter technique (SIT) for linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is feasible. However, SIT introduces the potential for rotational error which can lead to geographical miss. Additional planning treatment volume (PTV) margin is required when using SIT. With the six degrees of freedom (6DoF) couch, rotational error can be minimized. We sought to evaluate the effect of the 6DoF couch on the dosimetry of patients with multiple brain metastases treated with SIT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten consecutive patients treated with SRS to ≥3 metastases were identified. Original treatments had MIT plans (MITP). The lesions were replanned using SIT. Lesions 5-10 cm from isocenter had an additional 1mm of margin. Patients were replanned with these additional margins to account for inability to correct rotational error (SITPM). Multiple dosimetric variables and time metrics were evaluated. Dosimetry planning time (DPT) and patient treatment time (PTT) were evaluated. Statistics were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 73 brain metastases receiving SRS, to a median of 6 lesions per patient, were identified. MITPs treated 73 lesions with 63 isocenters. On average, MITPs had a 19.2% higher brain V12 than SITPs (P = 0.017). For creation of SITPM, 30 lesions required 1 mm of additional margin, while none required 2 mm of margin. This increased V12 by 47.8% on average per patient (P = 0.008) from SITP to SITPM. DPT was 5.5 hours for SITP, while median for MITP was 12.5 hours (P = 0.005) PTT was 30 minutes for SITP, while median for MITP was 144 minutes (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

SITPs are comparable to MITPs if rotational error can be corrected with the use of a 6DoF couch. Increasing margin to account for rotational error leads to a nearly 50% increase in V12, which could result in higher rates of radiation necrosis. Time savings are significant using SIT.

Immunotherapy in association with stereotactic radiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer brain metastases: results from a multicentric retrospective study on behalf of AIRO

BACKGROUND

To define efficacy and toxicity of Immunotherapy (IT) with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) including radiosurgery (RS) or hypofractionated SRT (HFSRT) for brain metastases (BM) from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in a multicentric retrospective study from AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology).

METHODS

NSCLC patients with BM receiving SRT+IT and treated in 19 Italian centers were analysed and compared with a control group of patients treated with exclusive SRT.

RESULTS

One hundred patients treated with SRT+IT and 50 patients treated with SRT-alone were included. Patients receiving SRT+IT had a longer intracranial Local Progression Free Survival (iLPFS) (propensity score-adjusted p=0.007). Among patients who, at the diagnosis of BM, received IT and had also extracranial progression (n=24), IT administration after SRT was shown to be related to a better overall survival (OS) (p=0.037). At multivariate analysis, non-adenocarcinoma histology, KPS =70 and use of HFSRT were associated with a significantly worse survival (p=0.019, p=0.017 and p=0.007 respectively). Time interval between SRT and IT ≤7 days (n=90) was shown to be related to a longer OS if compared to SRT-IT interval >7 days (n=10) (propensity score-adjusted p=0.008). The combined treatment was well tolerated. No significant difference in terms of radionecrosis between SRT+IT patients and SRT-alone patients was observed. Time interval between SRT and IT had no impact on toxicity rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined SRT+IT was a safe approach, associated with a better iLPFS if compared to exclusive SRT.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: A retrospective cohort study comparing treatment results between two lung cancer patient age groups, 75 years or older vs 65-74 years

BACKGROUND

There is little information on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) results for brain metastases (BMs) in lung cancer patients ≥75 years of age. We aimed to reappraise whether SRS results for patients ≥75 (very elderly) differ from those of patients with 65-74 years old (elderly).

METHODS

This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study was based on our prospectively-accumulated database including 7351 consecutive patients undergoing gamma knife (GK) SRS performed for BMs by two highly experienced neurosurgeons during the 1998-2018 period. We selected a total of 2915 elderly patients (age ≥65 years, 39.7 % of the 7351) with lung cancers (902 females, 2013 males, median age; 72 [maximum; 96] years, 2441 NSCLCs, 474 SCLCs) for this study.

RESULTS

Post-SRS median survival times (MSTs, months) differed significantly between the two lung cancer types, NSCLC (9.0) and SCLC (7.2, p < 0.0001). In NSCLC patients, post-SRS MSTs were significantly shorter in the very elderly (9.7) than those in the elderly (7.8) group (p < 0.0001). However, in SCLC patients, there were no significant MST differences (7.3 vs 6.9, p = 0.52) between the two age groups. In both NSCLC and SCLC patients, neither crude nor cumulative incidences of secondary endpoints in the very elderly group, i.e., neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, repeat SRS, salvage whole brain radiotherapy and SRS-related complications, were shown to be unfavorable to those in the elderly group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that carefully-selected patients ≥75 years of age are not poor candidates for SRS as compared to those 65-74 years old.

Separating or combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC brain metastases

With the advancement of imaging technology, systemic disease control rate and survival rate, the morbidity of brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been riding on a steady upward trend (40%), but management of BMs from NSCLC remains obscure. Systemic therapy is anticipated to offer novel therapeutic avenues in the management of NSCLC BMs, and radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy have their own advantages. Recently, it was confirmed that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and RT could mutually promote the efficacy in the treatment of BMs from NSCLC. In this paper, we provide a review on current understandings and practices of separating or combining ICIs and RT, which could provide a reference for the coming laboratory and clinical studies and contribute to the development of new approaches in NSCLC BMs.

[Stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases in complex situations]

Stereotactic radiation therapy of brain metastases is a treatment recognized as effective, well tolerated, applicable for therapeutic indications codified and validated by national and international guidelines. However, the effectiveness of this irradiation, the evolution of patient care and the technical improvements enabling its implementation make it possible to consider it in more complex situations: proximity of brain metastases to organs at risk; large, cystic, haemorrhagic or multiple brain metastases, combination with targeted therapies and immunotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with a pacemaker. This article aims to put forward the arguments available to date in the literature and those resulting from clinical practice to provide decision support for the radiation oncologists.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in elderly patients with brain metastases: comparison with non-elderly patients using database of a multi-institutional prospective observational study (JLGK0901-Elderly)

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly used for elderly patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, no studies based on a large sample size have been reported. To compare SRS treatment results between elderly and non-elderly patients, we performed a subset study of elderly patients using our prospectively-accumulated multi-institution study database (JLGK0901 Study, Lancet Oncol 15:387-395, 2014).

METHODS

During the 2009-2011 period, 1194 eligible patients undergoing gamma knife SRS alone for newly diagnosed BMs were enrolled in this study from 23 gamma knife facilities in Japan. Observation was discontinued at the end of 2013. The 1194 patients were divided into the two age groups, 693 elderly ( ≥ 65 years) and 501 non-elderly ( < 65 years) patients. Our study protocol neither set an upper age limit nor required dose de-escalation.

RESULTS

Median post-SRS survival time was significantly shorter in the elderly than in the non-elderly patient group (10.3 vs 14.3 months, HR 1.380, 95% CI 1.218-1.563, p < 0.0001). However, regarding all secondary endpoints including neurological death, neurological deterioration, SRS-related complications, leukoencephalopathy, local recurrence, newly-developed tumors, meningeal dissemination, salvage SRS, whole brain radiotherapy and surgery and decreased mini-mental state examination scores, the elderly patient group was not inferior to the non-elderly patient group. In the 693 elderly patients, there was no post-SRS median survival time difference between those with 5-10 versus 2-4 tumors (10.8 vs 8.9 months, HR 0.936, 95% CI 0.744-1.167, p = 0.5601).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that elderly BM patients are not unfavorable candidates for SRS alone treatment.

Local tumor progression treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: differences between patients with 2-4 versus 5-10 brain metastases based on an update of a multi-institutional prospective observational study (JLGK0901)

OBJECTIVE

The Japanese Leksell Gamma Knife (JLGK)0901 study proved the efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in patients with 5-10 brain metastases (BMs) as compared to those with 2-4, showing noninferiority in overall survival and other secondary endpoints. However, the difference in local tumor progression between patients with 2-4 and those with 5-10 BMs has not been sufficiently examined for this data set. Thus, the authors reappraised this issue, employing the updated JLGK0901 data set with detailed observation via enhanced MRI. They applied sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the data.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of 1194 patients harboring 1-10 BMs treated with GKRS alone. Patients were categorized into groups A (single BM, 455 cases), B (2-4 BMs, 531 cases), and C (5-10 BMs, 208 cases). Local tumor progression was defined as a 20% increase in the maximum diameter of the enhanced lesion as compared to its smallest documented maximum diameter on enhanced MRI. The authors compared cumulative incidence differences determined by competing risk analysis and also conducted propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Local tumor progression was observed in 212 patients (17.8% overall, groups A/B/C: 93/89/30 patients). Cumulative incidences of local tumor progression in groups A, B, and C were 15.2%, 10.6%, and 8.7% at 1 year after GKRS; 20.1%, 16.9%, and 13.5% at 3 years; and 21.4%, 17.4%, and not available at 5 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in local tumor progression between groups B and C. Local tumor progression was classified as tumor recurrence in 139 patients (groups A/B/C: 68/53/18 patients), radiation necrosis in 67 (24/31/12), and mixed/undetermined lesions in 6 (1/5/0). There were no significant differences in tumor recurrence or radiation necrosis between groups B and C. Multivariate analysis using the Fine-Gray proportional hazards model revealed age < 65 years, neurological symptoms, tumor volume ≥ 1 cm3, and prescription dose < 22 Gy to be significant poor prognostic factors for local tumor progression. In the subset of 558 case-matched patients (186 in each group), there were no significant differences between groups B and C in local tumor progression, nor in tumor recurrence or radiation necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Local tumor progression incidences did not differ between groups B and C. This study proved that tumor progression after GKRS without whole-brain radiation therapy for patients with 5-10 BMs was satisfactorily treated with the doses prescribed according to the JLGK0901 study protocol and that results were not inferior to those in patients with a single or 2-4 BMs.Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000001812 (umin.ac.jp).