Surgery versus radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastasis

Osimertinib plus local treatment for brain metastases versus osimertinib alone in patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Osimertinib is a standard treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is highly effective for brain metastases (BMs). However, it is unclear whether local treatment (LT) for BMs prior to osimertinib administration improves survival in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We aimed to reveal the survival benefit of upfront local treatment (LT) for BMs in patients treated with osimertinib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients with EGFR mutation (19del or L858R)-positive NSCLC who had BMs before osimertinib initiation between August 2018 and October 2021. We compared overall survival (OS) and central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) between patients who received upfront LT for BMs (the upfront LT group), and patients who received osimertinib only (the osimertinib-alone group). Inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of the 121 patients analyzed, 57 and 64 patients had 19del and L858R, respectively. Forty-five and 76 patients were included in the upfront LT group and the osimertinib-alone groups, respectively. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the OS of the upfront LT group was significantly longer than that of the osimertinib-alone group (median, 95 % confidence intervals [95 %CI]: Not reached [NR], NR-NR vs. 31.2, 21.7-33.2; p = 0.021). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS and CNS-PFS was 0.37 (95 %CI, 0.16-0.87) and 0.36 (95 %CI, 0.15-0.87), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The OS and CNS-PFS of patients who received upfront LT for BMs followed by osimertinib were significantly longer than those of patients who received osimertinib alone. Upfront LT for BMs may be beneficial in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib.

Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery as Single or Combined Therapy for Brain Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To determine the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treating patients with brain metastases (BMs), a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a direct comparison of cohort studies were performed. Relevant literature regarding the effectiveness of SRS alone and in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and surgery was retrieved using systematic database searches up to April 2019. The patterns of overall survival (OS), one-year OS, progression-free survival (PFS), one-year local brain control (LBC), one-year distant brain control (DBC), neurological death (ND), and complication rate were analyzed. A total of 18 RCTs and 37 cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. Our data revealed that SRS carried a better OS than SRS+WBRT (p= 0.048) and WBRT (p= 0.041). Also, SRS+WBRT demonstrated a significantly improved PFS, LBC, and DBC compared to WBRT alone and SRS alone. Finally, SRS achieved the same LBC as high as surgery, but intracranial relapse occurred considerably more frequently in the absence of WBRT. However, there were not any significant differences in ND and toxicities between SRS and other groups. Therefore, SRS alone may be a better alternative since increased patient survival may outweigh the increased risk of brain tumor recurrence associated with it.

Stereotactic radiosurgery and resection for treatment of multiple brain metastases: a systematic review and analysis

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to resection for treating multiple brain metastases. Given the lack of consensus regarding the application of SRS versus resection for multiple brain metastases, the authors aimed to conduct a systematic literature review of all published work on the topic.

METHODS

The PubMed, OVID, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were used to identify studies that examined clinical outcomes after resection or SRS was performed in patients with multiple brain metastases. Radiological studies, case series with fewer than 3 patients, pediatric studies, or national database studies were excluded. Data extracted included patient demographics and mean overall survival (OS). Weighted t-tests and ANOVA were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1300 abstracts were screened, 450 articles underwent full-text review, and 129 studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 20,177 patients (18,852 treated with SRS and 1325 who underwent resection). The OS for the SRS group was 10.2 ± 6 months, and for the resection group it was 6.5 ± 3.8 months. A weighted ANOVA test comparing OS with covariates of age, sex, and publication year revealed that the treatment group (p = 0.045), age (p = 0.034), and publication year (0.0078) were all independently associated with OS (with SRS, younger age, and later publication year being associated with longer survival), whereas sex (p = 0.95) was not.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with multiple brain metastases, SRS and resection are effective treatments to prolong OS, with published data suggesting that SRS may have a trend toward lengthened survival outcomes. The authors encourage additional work examining outcomes of treatments for multiple brain metastases.

Maximal surgical tumour load reduction in immune-checkpoint inhibitor naïve patients with melanoma brain metastases correlates with prolonged survival

BACKGROUND

Recent therapeutic advances in metastatic melanoma have led to improved overall survival (OS) rates, with consequently an increased incidence of brain metastases (BM). The role of BM resection in the era of targeted and immunotherapy should be reassessed. In the current study we analysed the role of residual intracranial tumour load in a cohort of melanoma BM patients.

METHODS

Retrospective single-centre analysis of a prospective registry of resected melanoma BM from 2013 to 2021. Correlations of residual tumour volume and outcome were determined with respect to patient, tumour and treatment regimens characteristics.

RESULTS

121 individual patients (66% male, mean age 59.9 years) were identified and included in the study. Pre- and postoperative systemic treatments included BRAF/MEK inhibitors, as well as combination or monotherapy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Median OS of the entire cohort was 20 months. Cox proportional-hazard analysis revealed postoperative anti-CTLA4+anti-PD-1 therapy (HR 0.07, p = .01) and postoperative residual intracranial tumour burden (HR 1.4, p = .027) as significant predictors for OS. Further analysis revealed that ICI-naïve patients with residual tumour volume ≤3.5 cm³ and postoperative ICI showed significantly prolonged OS compared to patients with residual volume >3.5 cm³ (p < .0001). Subgroup analysis of ICI-naïve patients showed steroid intake postoperatively to be negatively associated with OS, however residual tumour volume ≤3.5 cm³ remained independently correlated with superior OS (HR 0.14, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Besides known predictive factors like postoperative ICI, a maximal intracranial tumour burden reduction seems to be beneficial, especially in ICI-naïve patients. This highlights the importance of local CNS control and the need to further investigating the role of initial surgical tumour load reduction in randomised clinical trials.

An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma

Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454-489.

MRI-Based Risk Assessment for Incomplete Resection of Brain Metastases

Object

Recent studies demonstrated that gross total resection of brain metastases cannot always be achieved. Subtotal resection (STR) can result in an early recurrence and might affect patient survival. We initiated a prospective observational study to establish a MRI-based risk assessment for incomplete resection of brain metastases.

Methods

All patients in whom ≥1 brain metastasis was resected were prospectively included in this study (DRKS ID: DRKS00021224; Nov 2020 - Nov 2021). An interdisciplinary board of neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists evaluated the pre- and postoperative MRI (≤48h after surgery) for residual tumor. Extensive neuroradiological analyses were performed to identify risk factors for an unintended STR which were integrated into a regression tree analysis to determine the patients' individual risk for a STR.

Results

We included 150 patients (74 female; mean age: 61 years), in whom 165 brain metastases were resected. A STR was detected in 32 cases (19.4%) (median residual tumor volume: 1.36ml, median EOR_rel: 93.6%), of which 6 (3.6%) were intended STR (median residual tumor volume: 3.27ml, median EOR_rel: 67.3%) - mainly due to motor-eloquent location - and 26 (15.8%) were unintended STR (uSTR) (median residual tumor volume: 0.64ml, median EOR_rel: 94.7%). The following risk factors for an uSTR could be identified: subcortical metastasis ≥5mm distant from cortex, diffuse contrast agent enhancement, proximity to the ventricles, contact to falx/tentorium and non-transcortical approaches. Regression tree analysis revealed that the individual risk for an uSTR was mainly associated to the distance from the cortex (distance ≥5mm vs. <5mm: OR 8.0; 95%CI: 2.7 - 24.4) and the contrast agent patterns (diffuse vs. non-diffuse in those with distance ≥5mm: OR: 4.2; 95%CI: 1.3 - 13.7). The preoperative tumor volume was not substantially associated with the extent of resection.

Conclusions

Subcortical metastases ≥5mm distant from cortex with diffuse contrast agent enhancement showed the highest incidence of uSTR. The proposed MRI-based assessment allows estimation of the individual risk for uSTR and can help indicating intraoperative imaging.

Multiplicity does not significantly affect outcomes in brain metastasis patients treated with surgery

Background

Brain metastasis quantity may be a negative prognostic factor for patients requiring resection of at least one lesion.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastases from July 2018 to June 2019 at our institution, and examined outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and rates of local failure (LF). Patients were grouped according to the number of metastases at the time of surgery (single vs multiple).

Results

We identified 130 patients who underwent surgical resection as the initial treatment modality. At the time of surgery, 87 patients had only one lesion (control) and 43 had multiple (&gt;1). Two-year OS for the entire cohort was 46%, with equal rates in both the multiple metastases group and the control group (p=0.335). 2-year PFS was 27%; 21% in the multiple metastases group and 31% in the control group (p=0.766). The rate of LF at 2-years was 32%, with equal rates in both the multiple lesion group and control group (p=0.889). On univariate analysis, multiplicity was not significantly correlated to OS (HR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.51-1.26, p=0.336), PFS (HR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.71-1.59, p=0.766) or LF (HR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.57-1.97, p=0.840). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative tumor volume of the resected lesion to be the single correlate for OS (p=0.0032) and PFS (p=0.0081).

Conclusions

Having more than one metastasis does not negatively impact outcomes in patients treated with surgery. In carefully selected patients, especially those with large tumors, surgery should be considered regardless of the total number of lesions.

Management Strategies for Large Brain Metastases

Brain metastases represent the most common intracranial neoplasm and pose a significant disease burden on the individual and the healthcare system. Although whole brain radiation therapy was historically a first line approach, subsequent research and technological advancements have resulted in a larger armamentarium of strategies for treatment of these patients. While chemotherapeutic options remain limited, surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery, as well as their combination therapies, have shifted the paradigms for managing intracranial metastatic disease. Ultimately, no single treatment is shown to be consistently effective across patient groups in terms of overall survival, local and distant control, neurocognitive function, and performance status. However, close consideration of patient and tumor characteristics may help delineate more favorable treatment strategies for individual patients. Here the authors present a review of the recent literature surrounding surgery, whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and combination approaches.

Resecting the dominant lesion: Patient outcomes after surgery and radiosurgery vs stand-alone radiosurgery in the setting of multiple brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumors, occurring in 300,000 people per year in the US. While there are immediate local benefits to surgical resection for dominant lesions, including reduction of tumor burden and edema, the survival benefits of surgical resection, over radiosurgery, remains unclear.

METHODS

The University of Pennsylvania Health System database was retrospectively reviewed for patients presenting with multiple brain metastases from 1/1/16-8/31/18 with one dominant lesion > 2 cm in diameter, who underwent initial treatment with either resection of the dominant lesion or Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS). Inclusion criteria were age > 18, > 1 brain metastasis, and presence of a dominant lesion (>2 cm). We analyzed factors associated with mortality.

RESULTS

129 patients were identified (surgery=84, GKS=45). The median number of intracranial metastases was 3 (IQR: 2-5). The median diameter of the largest lesion was 31 mm (IQR: 25-38) in the surgery group vs 21 mm (IQR: 20-24) in the GKS group (p < 0.001). Mortality did not differ between surgery and GKS patients (69.1% vs 77.8%, p = 0.292). In a multivariate survival analysis, there was no difference in mortality between the surgery and GKS cohorts (aHR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.74-2.45 p = 0.32). Pre-operative KPS (aHR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99, p = 0.004), CNS radiotherapy (aHR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19-0.56 p < 0.001), chemotherapy (aHR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.15-0.47, p < 0.001), and immunotherapy (aHR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.25-0.68, p = 0.001) were associated with decreased mortality.

CONCLUSION

In our institution, patients with multiple brain metastases and one symptomatic dominant lesion demonstrated similar survival after GKS when compared with up-front surgical resection of the dominant lesion.

Surgical advances in the management of brain metastases

As the epidemiological and clinical burden of brain metastases continues to grow, advances in neurosurgical care are imperative. From standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences to functional neuroimaging, preoperative workups for metastatic disease allow high-resolution detection of lesions and at-risk structures, facilitating safe and effective surgical planning. Minimally invasive neurosurgical approaches, including keyhole craniotomies and tubular retractors, optimize the preservation of normal parenchyma without compromising extent of resection. Supramarginal surgery has pushed the boundaries of achieving complete removal of metastases without recurrence, especially in eloquent regions when paired with intraoperative neuromonitoring. Brachytherapy has highlighted the potential of locally delivering therapeutic agents to the resection cavity with high rates of local control. Neuronavigation has become a cornerstone of operative workflow, while intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) and intraoperative brain mapping generate real-time renderings of the brain unaffected by brain shift. Endoscopes, exoscopes, and fluorescent-guided surgery enable increasingly high-definition visualizations of metastatic lesions that were previously difficult to achieve. Pushed forward by these multidisciplinary innovations, neurosurgery has never been a safer, more effective treatment for patients with brain metastases.

Surgical resection versus stereotactic radiosurgery on local recurrence and survival for patients with a single brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are the most frequent intracranial tumours in adults. In patients with solitary BM, surgical resection (SR) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is performed. There is limited evidence comparing one treatment over the other.

OBJECTIVE

To compare SR versus SRS on patients with solitary BMs, regarding local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Systematic review of literature following PRISMA guidelines, using the databases of Medline, Clinicaltrials.gov, Embase, Web of Science, Sciencedirect, CINAHL, Wiley Online Library, Springerlink and LILACS. Following study selection based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction and a critical analysis of the literature was performed according to the GRADE scale. For quantitative analysis, a random effects model was used. Data were synthetized and evaluated on a forest plot and funnel plot.

RESULTS

Two randomized clinical trials, four cohort studies and one case-control studies met our inclusion criteria for the qualitative analysis. None was excluded subsequently. Overall, 614 patients with single metastasis were included. Studies had high heterogeneity. Multiple significant variables affecting the outcome were signalized. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences for survival (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.75-1.45) or LR (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.42-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

According to current evidence, in patients with a single small metastasis there is no statistically significant difference in OS or LR among the chosen techniques (SR or SRS). Multiple significant co-variables may affect both outcomes. Different outcomes better than OS should be evaluated in further randomized studies.

Mutation status and postresection survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis: implications of biomarker-driven therapy

OBJECTIVE

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common primary tumor to develop brain metastasis. Prognostic markers are needed to better determine survival after neurosurgical resection of intracranial disease. Given the importance of mutation subtyping in determining systemic therapy and overall prognosis of NSCLC, the authors examined the prognostic value of mutation status for postresection survival of patients with NSCLC brain metastasis.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed all cases of NSCLC brain metastasis with available molecular testing data that were resected by a single surgeon at a single academic center from January 2009 to February 2019. Mutation status, demographic characteristics, clinical factors, and treatments were analyzed. Association between predictive variables and overall survival after neurosurgery was determined with Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of the included patients (n = 84), 40% were male, 76% were smokers, the mean ± SD Karnofsky Performance Status was 85 ± 14, and the mean ± SD age at surgery was 63 ± 11 years. In total, 23%, 26%, and 4% of patients had EGFR, KRAS, and ALK/ROS1 alterations, respectively. On multivariate analysis, survival of patients with EGFR (HR 0.495, p = 0.0672) and KRAS (HR 1.380, p = 0.3617) mutations were not significantly different from survival of patients with wild-type (WT) tumor. However, the subgroup of patients with EGFR mutation who also received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy had significantly prolonged survival (HR 0.421, p = 0.0471). In addition, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (HR 0.409, p = 0.0177) and resected tumor diameter < 3 cm (HR 0.431, p = 0.0146) were also significantly associated with prolonged survival, but Graded Prognostic Assessment score ≤ 1.0 (HR 2.269, p = 0.0364) was significantly associated with shortened survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EGFR mutation who receive TKI therapy may have better survival after resection of brain metastasis than patients with WT tumor. These results may inform counseling and decision-making regarding the appropriateness of resection of NSCLC brain metastasis.

The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects

Simple Summary

In this comprehensive review, we focused on the neurosurgical treatment as an integrative part of the challenging multidisciplinary management of cerebral metastases, a neuro-oncologic entity, which has been observed to have an increased incidence over the last years. In selected cases, the surgical removal of the space-occupying mass reduces the intracranial pressure, normalizes the metabolic environment, reduces the symptom burden, and allows for the intensification of local and systemic adjuvant treatment. In detail, we discuss the incidence of brain metastases, the role of surgical resection, as well as the evolution of current neurosurgical techniques, the surgical morbidity and mortality of single and multiple lesions, and we enlighten the role of surgery for recurrent tumors.

Abstract

The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases (BM) consists of surgical resection, different radiation treatment modalities, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and targeted molecular treatment. This review presents the current state of neurosurgical technology applied to achieve maximal resection with minimal morbidity as a treatment paradigm in patients with BM. In addition, we discuss the contribution of neurosurgical resection on functional outcome, advanced systemic treatment strategies, and enhanced understanding of the tumor biology.

Supracerebellar infratentorial inverted subchoroidal approach to lateral ventricle lesions: Anatomical study and illustrative case

Background:

This study provides an anatomical description of a novel supracerebellar infratentorial inverted subchoroidal (SIIS) approach to the lateral ventricle. An illustrative case is presented in which this approach was used to simultaneously resect two tumors residing in the posterior fossa and lateral ventricle.

Methods:

The SIIS approach was performed on five cadaveric heads using microsurgical and endoscopic techniques. Target points were defined in the lateral ventricle, and quantitative analysis was performed to assess limits of exposure within the lateral ventricle. Two coronal reference planes corresponding to the anterior and posterior margins of the lateral ventricle body were defined. Distances from target points to reference planes were measured, and an imaging-based predicting system was provided according to obtained measurements to guide preoperative approach selection.

Results:

Mean (standard deviation) distances between the predefined target points indicating the anterior limits and the anterior plane were 9 (7.0) mm, 11 (5.8) mm, and 7 (5.1) mm; posterior limits had distances of 8 (3.0) mm, 17 (9.2) mm, 15 (9.2) mm, and 9 (7.2) mm to the posterior plane. Limiting factors of the choroidal fissure dissection were the venous angle anteriorly and thalamocaudate vein posteriorly. The position of the venous angle had a high negative correlation with the anterior exposure limit (r = –0.87, P < 0.001; r = –0.92, P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

A step-by-step anatomical description of a new SIIS approach is given, and a quantitative description of the limits of the exposure is provided to evaluate the application of this approach.

Comparison of Surgical Resection and Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Initial Treatment of Brain Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis (BM) is the most common brain malignancy and a common cause of death in cancer patients. However, the relative outcome-related advantages and disadvantages of surgical resection (SR) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the initial treatment of BM are controversial.

METHOD

We systematically reviewed the English language literature up to March 2020 to compare the efficacy of SR and SRS in the initial treatment of BM. We identified cohort studies from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases and conducted a meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Twenty cohort studies involving 1,809 patients were included. Local control did not significantly differ between the SR and SRS groups overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-1.64, p = 0.92; I2 = 54%, p = 0.03) or in subgroup analyses of SR plus SRS vs. SRS alone, SR plus whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) versus SRS plus WBRT, or SR plus WBRT versus SRS alone. Distant intracranial control did not significantly differ between the SR and SRS groups overall (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.38-1.60, p = 0.49; I2 = 61%, p = 0.03) or in subgroup analyses of SR plus SRS versus SRS alone or SR plus WBRT versus SRS alone. In addition, overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ in the SR and SRS groups (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65-1.27, p = 0.57; I2 = 47%, p = 0.09) or in subgroup analyses of SR plus SRS versus SRS alone, SR plus WBRT versus SRS alone or SR plus WBRT versus SRS plus WBRT.

CONCLUSION

Initial treatment of BM with SRS may offer comparable local and distant intracranial control to SR in patients with single or solitary BM. OS did not significantly differ between the SR and SRS groups in people with single or solitary BM.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of adults with metastatic brain tumors

Brain metastasis is the most common type of intracranial tumor affecting a significant proportion of advanced cancer patients. In recent years, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become commonly utilized. It has contributed significantly to decreased toxicity, prolonged quality of life and general improvement in outcomes of patients with brain metastases. Frequent imaging and advanced treatment techniques have allowed for the treatment of more patients with large and numerous metastases extending their overall survival. The addition of targeted therapy and immunotherapy to SRS has introduced novel treatment paradigms and has further improved our ability to effectively treat brain lesions. In this review, we examined in detail the available evidence for the use of SRS alone or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies. Given our developing understanding of the importance of primary tumor histology, the use of different treatment strategies for different metastasis is evolving. Combining SRS with immunotherapy and targeted therapy in breast cancer, lung cancer and melanoma as well as the use of preoperative SRS have shown significant promise in recent years and are investigated in multiple ongoing prospective trials. Further research is needed to guide the optimal sequence of therapies and to identify specific patient subgroups that may benefit the most from aggressive, combined treatment approaches.

Comparison of Local Control of Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Surgical Resection: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Brain metastases are a common source of morbidity for patients with cancer, and limited data exist to support the local therapeutic choice between surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Objective

To evaluate local control of brain metastases among patients treated with SRS vs surgical resection within the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22952-26001 phase 3 trial.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This unplanned, exploratory analysis of the international, multi-institutional randomized clinical trial EORTC 22952-26001 (conducted from 1996-2007) was performed from February 9, 2017, through July 25, 2018. The EORTC 22952-26001 trial randomized patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases to whole-brain radiotherapy vs observation after complete surgical resection or before SRS. Patients in the present analysis were stratified but not randomized according to local modality (SRS or surgical resection) and treated per protocol with 1 to 2 brain metastases and tumors with a diameter of no greater than 4 cm.

Interventions

Surgical resection or SRS.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was local recurrence of treated lesions. Cumulative incidence of local recurrence was calculated according to modality (surgical resection vs SRS) with competing risk regression to adjust for prognostic factors and competing risk of death.

Results

A total of 268 patients were included in the analysis (66.4% men; median age, 60.7 years [range, 26.9-81.1 years]); 154 (57.5%) underwent SRS and 114 (42.5%) underwent surgical resection. Median follow-up time was 39.9 months (range, 26.0-1982.0 months). Compared with the SRS group, patients undergoing surgical resection had larger metastases (median 28 mm [range, 10-40 mm] vs 20 mm [range, 4-40 mm]; P < .001), more frequently had 1 brain metastasis (112 [98.2%] vs 114 [74.0%]; P < .001), and differed in location (parietal, 21 [18.4%] vs 61 [39.6%]; posterior fossa, 30 [26.3%] vs 12 [7.8%]; P < .001). In adjusted models, local recurrence was similar between the SRS and surgical resection groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.72-1.83). However, when stratified by interval, patients with surgical resection had a much higher risk of early (0-3 months) local recurrence compared with those undergoing SRS (HR, 5.94; 95% CI, 1.72-20.45), but their risk decreased with time (HR for 3-6 months, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.64-2.90]; HR for 6-9 months, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.28-2.00]). At 9 months or longer, the surgical resection group had a lower risk of local recurrence (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.93).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this exploratory analysis, local control of brain metastases was similar between SRS and surgical resection groups. Stereotactic radiosurgery was associated with improved early local control of treated lesions compared with surgical resection, although the relative benefit decreased with time.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002899.

Population-Based Brain Tumor Survival Analysis via Spatial- and Temporal-Smoothing

In cancer research, population-based survival analysis has played an important role. In this article, we conduct survival analysis on patients with brain tumors using the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database from the NCI (National Cancer Institute). It has been recognized that cancer survival models have spatial and temporal variations which are caused by multiple factors, but such variations are usually not “abrupt” (that is, they should be smooth). As such, spatially and temporally pooling all data and analyzing each spatial/temporal point separately are either inappropriate or ineffective. In this article, we develop and implement a spatial- and temporal-smoothing technique, which can effectively accommodate spatial/temporal variations and realize information borrowing across spatial/temporal points. Simulation demonstrates effectiveness of the proposed approach in improving estimation. Data on a total of 123,571 patients with brain tumors diagnosed between 1911 and 2010 from 16 SEER sites is analyzed. Findings different from separate estimation and simple pooling are made. Overall, this study may provide a practically useful way for modeling the survival of brain tumor (and other cancers) using population data.

Operative and peri-operative considerations in the management of brain metastasis

The number of patients who develop metastatic brain lesions is increasing as the diagnosis and treatment of systemic cancers continues to improve, resulting in longer patient survival. The role of surgery in the management of brain metastasis (BM), particularly multiple and recurrent metastases, remains controversial and continues to evolve. However, with appropriate patient selection, outcomes after surgery are typically favorable. In addition, surgery is the only means to obtain a tissue diagnosis and is the only effective treatment modality to quickly relieve neurological complications or life‐threatening symptoms related to significant mass effect, CSF obstruction, and peritumoral edema. As such, a thorough understanding of the role of surgery in patients with metastatic brain lesions, as well as the factors associated with surgical outcomes, is essential for the effective management of this unique and growing patient population.

The role of surgical resection in patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment of brain metastases represent a critical issue and different options have to be considered according to patients and tumour characteristics; in recent years, new therapeutic strategies have been proposed. In this review, we discuss the role of surgical resection on the basis of patient selection, new surgical techniques and the use of intraoperative adjuncts. The integration with postoperative whole brain radiotherapy will be also outlined because alternative treatment options are currently available.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgical removal has been considered the mainstay in the treatment of brain metastases, in selected patients, with limited number of intracranial lesions and controlled primary disease, mainly in combination with whole brain radiotherapy. In the last few years, the increasing role of stereotactic focal radiotherapy has deeply modified the indications to open surgical procedures and whole brain radiotherapy.

SUMMARY

The appearance of brain metastases is considered a sign of bad prognosis. Treatment of these lesions is important for quality of life, providing local tumour control, preventing death from neurological causes and improving survival, although potentially only in a minority of patients. Careful patient selection, with adequate evaluation of clinical prognostic score, the use of appropriate surgical techniques and surgical adjuncts are major determinants of favourable outcome in patients undergoing resection of brain metastases.

Multidisciplinary expert opinion on the treatment consensus for patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases

The presence of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is associated with higher incidence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, patients with synchronous brain metastases at diagnosis have generally been excluded from clinical trials. As there is limited clinical evidence for managing this patient population, a multidisciplinary group of Spanish medical and radiation oncologists, and neuro-oncologist with expertise treating brain metastases in lung cancer patients met with the aim of reaching and developing an expert opinion consensus on the management of patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases. This consensus contains 26 recommendations and 20 conclusion statements across 21 questions in 7 areas, as well as a first-line treatment algorithm.

Surgical Management of Cerebral Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Aims and Background

The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of surgical resection of solitary brain metastasis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods and Study Design

We report a retrospective analysis of 32 patients with single brain metastasis surgically excised at our hospital. All but one patient underwent postoperative whole brain radiation therapy.

Results

The median survival of patients was 12.5 months postoperatively (mean, 17 months), and the overall 1-year survival was 53%. Thirteen patients had recurrence of brain metastasis: 6 of 13 underwent reoperation for the recurrent lesion, and 1 of the 6 patients had a third craniotomy. Baseline characteristics, which significantly influenced survival, included age less than 60 years, tumor histology (ie, adenocarcinoma), and treatment of the primary lung cancer. The analysis did not yield any significant differences between treatment modalities.

Conclusions

Our findings correspond well with those reported in the literature and suggest that surgical resection of single brain metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer can improve survival over conservative management. Furthermore, surgical treatment of the primary tumor and the single brain metastasis, combined or not with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, represents an approach that merits further investigation with more patients and a prospective longitudinal design.

Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Endothelial Activation in the Central Nervous System

Endothelial cells of the central nervous system over-express surface proteins during neurological disorders, either as a cause, or a consequence, of the disease. Since the cerebral vasculature is easily accessible by large contrast-carrying particles, it constitutes a target of choice for molecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this review, we highlight the most recent advances in molecular MRI of brain endothelial activation and focus on the development of micro-sized particles of iron oxide (MPIO) targeting adhesion molecules including intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), P-Selectin and E-Selectin. We also discuss the perspectives and challenges for the clinical application of this technology in neurovascular disorders (ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, diabetes mellitus), neuroinflammatory disorders (multiple sclerosis, brain infectious diseases, sepsis), neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, aging) and brain cancers (primitive neoplasms, metastasis).

Multiple brain metastases: a surgical series and neurosurgical perspective

Despite review papers claim for radical treatment of oligometastatic patients, only few surgical series have been published. In this study, we analyze results and actual role of surgical resection for the management of patients with multiple brain metastases. This retrospective study compares surgical results of two groups of patients consecutively treated in our Institute from January 2004 to June 2015. The first group comprises all 32 patients with multiple brain metastases with only 2-3 lesions who underwent surgical resection of all lesions; the second group comprises 30 patients with a single surgically treated brain mestastasis compatible with the first group (match-paired control series). Median survival was 14.6 months for patients with multiple brain metastases (range 1-28 months) and 17.4 months for patients with a single brain metastasis (range 4-38 months); the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.2). Neurological condition improved in 59.4% of patients with multiple metastases, it remained unchanged in 37.5% and worsened in 3.1%. In our series, selected patients with only 2-3 lesions with well-controlled systemic disease, life expectancy of more than 3 months, Karnofsky's performance status > 60, and surgically accessible lesions, benefited from surgical treatment in terms of survival and quality of life, with reduction or disappearance of significant neurological deficits. The prognosis for these patients is similar to that of patients with a single metastasis. It seems that patients with breast cancer included in our series had the worst prognosis if compared to other histotypes.

The role of surgery for brain metastases from solid tumors

Surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy including novel targeted therapy strategies and any combination thereof as well as supportive care are the key elements for treatment of brain metastases. Goals of microsurgery are to obtain tissue samples for histologic diagnosis (particularly in case of uncertainty about the unknown primary tumor but also in the context of future targeted therapies), to relieve burden from space-occupying effects, to improve local tumor control, and to prolong overall survival. Complete surgical resection improves local tumor control and may even affect overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery is an equal effective alternative for metastases up to 3 cm in diameter, especially in highly eloquent or deep seated location. Gross total resection (as defined by immediate postoperative MRI) does not necessarily have to be combined with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), at least for patients with good performance status and controlled systemic disease. Particularly in cases of incomplete resections, focal irradiation or radiosurgery of the resection cavity or tumor remnant rather than WBRT may be attempted.

Brain metastases: radiosurgery

Stereotactic radiosurgery has revolutionized the management of brain metastases. It delivers focused, highly conformal, ionizing radiation to a tumor delineated using high-resolution imaging, with low toxicity to adjacent brain structures. Randomized controlled and prospective trials have demonstrated a survival advantage and high local control rates after stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic disease to the central nervous system, including for up to 10 brain metastases. Its minimal-access nature makes it an attractive alternative to surgical resection. Furthermore, in addition to chemotherapy, newer targeted therapies and immunotherapies with improved side-effect profiles allow for the concurrent delivery of systemic therapy with radiosurgery, with possible additive or synergistic effects, expediting the treatment of both extracranial and intracranial disease. The modern management of brain metastasis patients should include consideration of routine staging and surveillance magnetic resonance imaging scans in patients with higher-stage cancer to detect intracranial metastases earlier and treat promptly with radiosurgery in order to prevent the development of neurologic symptoms and the need for surgical resection.

Challenges in the delivery of therapies to melanoma brain metastases

Brain metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced melanoma. Recent approval of several molecularly-targeted agents and biologics has brought hope to patients with this previously untreatable disease. However, patients with symptomatic melanoma brain metastases have often been excluded from pivotal clinical trials. This may be in part attributed to the fact that several of the approved small molecule molecularly-targeted agents are substrates for active efflux at the blood-brain barrier, limiting their effective delivery to brain metastases. We believe that successful treatment of melanoma brain metastases will depend on the ability of these agents to traverse the blood-brain barrier and reach micrometastases that are often not clinically detectable. Moreover, overcoming the emergence of a unique pattern of resistance, possibly through adequate delivery of combination targeted therapies in brain metastases will be important in achieving a durable response. These concepts, and the current challenges in the delivery of new treatments to melanoma brain metastases, are discussed in this review.

Radiotherapy management of brain metastases using conventional linear accelerator

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

As treatments for primary cancers continue to improve life expectancy, unfortunately, brain metastases also appear to be constantly increasing and life expectancy for patients with brain metastases is low. Longer survival and improved quality of life may be achieved using localised radiological and surgical approaches in addition to low dose corticosteroids. Stereotactic brain radiotherapy is one rapidly evolving localized radiation treatment. This article describes our experience with stereotactic radiotherapy using a linear accelerator.

METHODS

We reviewed patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy, from the time of its introduction into daily practice in our Department of Oncology in 2014. We collected the data on patient treatment and predicted survival based on prognostic indices and actual patient outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients were treated by stereotactic radiotherapy, in one case in combination with whole brain radiotherapy and hippocampal sparing. There was no significant treatment related toxicity during the treatment or follow-up and due to the small number of fractions, the overall tolerance of the treatment was excellent. The patient intrafractional movement in all cases was under 1 mm suggesting that 1 mm margin around the CTV to create the PTV is sufficient and also that patient immobilization using the thermoplastic mask compared with invasive techniques, is feasible. We also found that prognostic indices such as the Graded Prognostic Assessment provide accurate predictions of patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our current evidence, patients with brain metastases fit enough, should be considered for stereotactic radiotherapy treatment.

The role of local ablative therapy in oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: hype or hope

In recent years, the emergence of the oligometastatic state has called into question whether patients found to have a limited or low metastatic tumor burden may benefit from locally ablative therapy (LAT). In the past two decades, stereotactic body radiation therapy has been increasingly used to safely deliver LAT and provide high local control in nonoperable non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Mostly retrospective analyses suggest that using LAT for oligometastatic disease in non-small-cell lung cancer offers excellent local control and may provide an improvement in progression-free survival. Any meaningful improvement in cancer-specific survival remains debatable. We examine the role of integrating LAT in this patient population and the rationale behind its use in combination with targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Survival prognostic factors for patients with synchronous brain oligometastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma receiving local therapy

Introduction

Clinical evidence for patients with synchronous brain oligometastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma is limited. We aimed to summarize the clinical data of these patients to explore the survival prognostic factors for this population.

Methods

From September 1995 to July 2011, patients with 1–3 synchronous brain oligometastases, who were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical resection as the primary treatment, were identified at Shanghai Chest Hospital.

Results

A total of 76 patients (22 patients underwent brain surgery as primary treatment and 54 patients received SRS) were available for survival analysis. The overall survival (OS) for patients treated with SRS and brain surgery as the primary treatment were 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.3–14.9) and 16.4 months (95% CI 8.8–24.1), respectively (adjusted hazard ratio =0.59, 95% CI 0.33–1.07, P=0.08). Among 76 patients treated with SRS or brain surgery, 21 patients who underwent primary tumor resection did not experience a significantly improved OS (16.4 months, 95% CI 9.6–23.2), compared with those who did not undergo resection (11.9 months, 95% CI 9.7–14.0; adjusted hazard ratio =0.81, 95% CI 0.46–1.44, P=0.46). Factors associated with survival benefits included stage I–II of primary lung tumor and solitary brain metastasis.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in OS for patients with synchronous brain oligometastasis receiving SRS or surgical resection. Among this population, the number of brain metastases and stage of primary lung disease were the factors associated with a survival benefit.

Whole-brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases: what is the evidence?

The overall local treatment paradigm of brain metastases, which includes whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), continues to evolve. Local therapies play an important role in the management of brain metastases. The choice of local therapy depends on factors that involve the patient (performance status, expected survival, and age), the prior treatment history, and the tumor (type and subtype, number, size, location of metastases, and extracranial disease status). Multidisciplinary collaboration is required to facilitate an individualized plan to improve the outcome of disease in patients with this life-limiting complication. There has been concern about the neurocognitive effects of WBRT. A number of approaches that mitigate cognitive dysfunction, such as pharmacologic intervention (memantine) or a hippocampal-sparing strategy, have been studied in a prospective manner with WBRT. Although there has been an increase in the use of SRS in the management of brain metastases in recent years, WBRT retains an important therapeutic role.

[Surgery for metastases, anatomical and ethical limits. Special aspect: oligometastases]

The surgical resection of metastases is nowadays feasible in selected patients with multifocal metastatic disease due to the implementation of interdisciplinary multimodal therapeutic options. Anatomical limitations do not seem to represent obstacles which cannot be overcome because of the development of new surgical techniques. The cornerstone of the selection of patients is the correct staging diagnosis achieved through modern diagnostic tools; however, surgery alone does not always offer acceptable survival and recurrence-free rates. Furthermore, in every complex surgical procedure there is the risk of morbidity and mortality; therefore, parameters such as alternative therapeutic modalities, the individual situation of the patient and tumor biology have to be considered in order to make the correct selection of patients. This is one of the major future challenges and should never be driven by unfounded hopes and expectations of the patients. The same principle also applies for brain metastases, which represent the most common brain tumors. Approximately 70 % of patients with brain metastases have 1-3 lesions (oligometastases). Treatment is now individualized and the goal of therapy has shifted towards long-term survival (≥ 24 months) and improved quality of life. Under this aspect surgery is one of the important treatment options, particularly in patients with a single metastasis or oligometastases. Furthermore, approximately 20 % of patients who have recurrent brain metastases, successfully undergo a complete resection of tumors and with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score > 70 show a long-term survival of ≥ 24 months.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Renal Cancer Brain Metastasis: Prognostic Factors and the Role of Whole-Brain Radiation and Surgical Resection

Background. Renal cell carcinoma is a frequent source of brain metastasis. We present our consecutive series of patients treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) and analyse prognostic factors and the interplay of WBRT and surgical resection. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 66 patients with 207 lesions treated with the Cyberknife radiosurgery system in our institution. The patients were followed up with imaging and clinical examination 1 month and 2-3 months thereafter for the brain metastasis. Patient, treatment, and outcomes characteristics were analysed. Results. 51 male (77.3%) and 15 female (22.7%) patients, with a mean age of 58.9 years (range of 31–85 years) and a median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 90 (range of 60–100), were included in the study. The overall survival was 13.9 months, 21.9 months, and 5.9 months for the patients treated with SRS only, additional surgery, and WBRT, respectively. The actuarial 1-year Local Control rates were 84%, 94%, and 88% for SRS only, for surgery and SRS, and for WBRT and additional SRS, respectively. Conclusions. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment option in patients with brain metastases from RCC. In case of a limited number of brain metastases, surgery and SRS might be appropriate.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from malignant melanoma

Background:

Surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are well-established treatment methods for patients with brain metastases, yet their respective roles in the management of brain metastases remain incompletely defined.

Methods:

To report on the role of SRS in the treatment of patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma, a retrospective analysis of 381 intracranial melanoma metastases in 103 consecutive patients who underwent SRS between 2005 and 2011 at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center was conducted. The Cyberknife^® SRS system was used to treat all patients. Clinical, technical, and radiographic data were recorded at presentation and on follow-up.

Results:

The patient cohort consisted of 40 female (39%) and 63 male (61%) patients with a median age of 57 years. The median overall survival from the time of radiosurgery for the entire patient cohort was 7.6 months. The local control rate at 1-year was 72% for the patients who received surgery followed by SRS and 55% for the entire patient population. Surgery followed by SRS was associated with significantly improved overall survival compared with SRS alone or whole-brain radiation therapy followed by salvage SRS (P < 0.0057).

Conclusions:

Both surgery plus SRS and SRS provide comparable local control. Despite the difference in lesion size in the subgroups who received surgery plus SRS and radiosurgery alone, similar outcomes were achieved in both groups, suggesting that surgical treatment of larger lesions can yield results that are not significantly different from small lesions treated by SRS alone.

Treatment of Brain Metastases

Brain metastases (BMs) occur in 10% to 20% of adult patients with cancer, and with increased surveillance and improved systemic control, the incidence is likely to grow. Despite multimodal treatment, prognosis remains poor. Current evidence supports use of whole-brain radiation therapy when patients present with multiple BMs. However, its associated cognitive impairment is a major deterrent in patients likely to live longer than 6 months. In patients with oligometastases (one to three metastases) and even some with multiple lesions less than 3 to 4 cm, especially if the primary tumor is considered radiotherapy resistant, stereotactic radiosurgery is recommended; if the BMs are greater than 4 cm, surgical resection with or without postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy should be considered. There is increasing evidence that systemic therapy, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, is effective against BM and may be an early choice, especially in patients with sensitive primary tumors. In patients with progressive systemic disease, limited treatment options, and poor performance status, best supportive care may be appropriate. Regardless of treatment goals, use of corticosteroids or antiepileptic medications is helpful in symptomatic patients. In this review, we provide a summary of current therapy, as well as developments in the treatment of BM from solid tumors.

[Interest of biological documentation on brain metastatic disease in breast cancer: A case report]

Breast cancer, after lung cancer, is the second major cause of brain metastases. In breast cancer, the prognosis is closely linked to the molecular subtype of the primary tumor. Targeted therapies, with or without cytotoxic treatment, have significantly modified overall survival in these patients. We report, the case of a patient suffering from breast cancer with brain metastasis in whom the biological documentation of the metastatic disease permitted to tailor the systemic treatment. Analysis of the surgical specimen revealed an immunohistochemical HER2 positive staining, which was not found in the primary tumor and therefore warranted trastuzumab administration. Another interesting insight based on this case report was to underline the phenotypic heterogeneity of the metastatic disease and its potential dynamic course as illustrated by the dissociated response to trastuzumab on body TEP-TDM in this particular patient. This case report also highlights the new place of the neurosurgeon in brain metastases management, not only as a participant in local treatment but also as a physician who is in fact involved in the delineation of the global oncological strategy in these patients as well as medical oncologists and radiation oncologists.

Estimating the Additive Benefit of Surgical Excision to Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Metastatic Brain Disease

BACKGROUND:

There are limited data on the benefits of surgical tumor resection plus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in comparison with SRS alone for patients with oligometastatic brain disease.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the benefit of adding resection to SRS.

METHODS:

We reviewed 162 consecutive patients with oligometastatic brain disease, who underwent surgical tumor resection and SRS boost (n = 49) or SRS alone (n = 113). Patients receiving prior whole brain radiation therapy were excluded. Factors related to patient survival and time-to-local recurrence (TTLR) were determined by Cox regression. The effect of complete resection + SRS boost on survival was further explored by propensity score matching.

RESULTS:

The average age of the cohort was 65.3 years, it was 49.4% female, and included 260 brain tumors, of which 119 tumors were single. Seventy-three brain tumors recurred (28%). TTLR was related to radiation-sensitive pathology (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.34, P = .001), treatment volume (HR = 1.078/mL, P = .002), and complete tumor resection (HR = 0.37, P = .015). Factors related to survival were age (HR = 1.21/decade, P = .037), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (HR = 1.9, P = .001), and complete surgical resection (HR = 0.55, P = .01). Propensity score matched analysis of complete surgical resection + SRS boost (n = 40) vs SRS alone (n = 80) yielded nearly identical survival results (HR = 0.52, P = .030) compared with the initial unmatched sample. Incomplete tumor resection had both median survival and TTLR equivalent to SRS alone.

CONCLUSION:

Complete surgical resection + SRS boost is associated with improved survival and reduced likelihood of local tumor recurrence in comparison with SRS alone. Incomplete resection did not improve survival or TTLR compared with SRS alone.

miR-509 suppresses brain metastasis of breast cancer cells by modulating RhoC and TNF-α

The median survival time of breast cancer patients with brain metastasis is less than 6 months, and even a small metastatic lesion often causes severe neurological disabilities. Because of the location of metastatic lesions, a surgical approach is limited and most chemotherapeutic drugs are ineffective due to the blood brain barrier (BBB). Despite this clinical importance, the molecular basis of the brain metastasis is poorly understood. In this study, we have isolated RNA from samples obtained from primary breast tumors and also from brain metastatic lesions followed by microRNA profiling analysis. Our results revealed that the miR-509 is highly expressed in the primary tumors, while the expression of this microRNA is significantly decreased in the brain metastatic lesions. MicroRNA target prediction and the analysis of cytokine array for the cells ectopically expressed with miR-509 demonstrated that this microRNA was capable of modulating two genes essential for brain invasion, RhoC and TNFα that affect the invasion of cancer cells and permeability of BBB, respectively. Importantly, high levels of TNFα and RhoC-induced MMP9 were significantly correlated with brain metastasis-free survival of breast cancer patients. Furthermore, the results of our in vivo experiments indicate that miR-509 significantly suppressed the ability of cancer cells to metastasize to the brain. These findings suggest that miR-509 plays a critical role in brain metastasis of breast cancer by modulating the RhoC-TNFα network and that this miR-509 axis may represent a potential therapeutic target or serve as a prognostic tool for brain metastasis.

Comparison Between Surgical Resection and Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with a Single Brain Metastasis from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with single brain metastasis (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. Surgical resection (SR) with adjuvant irradiation and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are performed in the treatment of such lesions. This study compared both modalities in terms of tumor control and survival.

METHODS

During the period 2004-2011, 115 patients with single BM from NSCLC were treated with SR or SRS at our institution. Median patient age was 61 years. SR was performed in 43 patients, and SRS was performed in 72 patients. Most patients who underwent SR had adjuvant irradiation. Of patients, 63% in the SR group and 56% in the SRS group had synchronous presentation of BM and lung primary tumor. Thoracic disease was managed with curative intent in 60% of patients in the SR group compared with 50% of patients in the SRS group.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 10.2 months. Local control was 72% in patients in the SR group and 79% in patients in the SRS group (P = 0.992). Median survival for patients in the SR group was 13.3 months, and median survival for patients in the SRS group was 7.8 months (P = 0.047). Multivariate analyses revealed aggressive treatment of the primary NSCLC as an independent factor associated with prolonged survival in patients undergoing SR. In the SRS group, patients with metachronous metastasis showed a better prognosis. Metachronous presentation was associated with more aggressive management of the primary tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, patients with single BM undergoing SR had a survival advantage. However, because SR and SRS achieved comparable local control of BM, patients receiving SRS should benefit from an equally aggressive treatment of the primary NSCLC, as thoracic management was the most important predictor of survival.

Treatment of Large Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Introduction:

We report our series of patients with large brain metastases, >3 cm in diameter, who received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a component of their treatment, focusing on survival and intracranial recurrence rates.

Materials and Methods:

The brain tumor database was queried for patients treated with SRS for large brain metastases. Local recurrence (LR) and distant brain recurrence (DBR) rates were calculated using cumulative incidence analysis, and overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients were classified into 1 of the 4 groups based on treatment strategy: SRS alone, surgery plus SRS, SRS plus whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and salvage SRS from more remote WBRT and/or surgery.

Results:

A total of 153 patients with 164 lesions were evaluated. The SRS alone was the treatment approach in 62 lesions, surgery followed by SRS to the resection bed (S + SRS) in 33, SRS + WBRT in 19, and salvage SRS in 50. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the 4 treatment groups ( P = .06). Median survival was highest in patients receiving surgery + SRS (12.2 months) followed by SRS + WBRT (6.9 months), SRS alone (6.6 months), and salvage SRS (6.1 months). There was also no significant difference for LR rates between the groups at 12 months. No significant variables on univariate analysis were noted for LR. The 12-month DBR rates were highest in the S + SRS group (52%), followed by salvage SRS (31%), SRS alone (28%), and SRS + WBRT (13%; P = .03).

Conclusion:

There were no significant predictors for local control. Keeping in mind that patient numbers in the SRS + WBRT group are small, the addition of WBRT to SRS did not appear to significantly improve survival or local control, supporting the delayed use of WBRT for some patients to prevent potential side effects provided regular imaging surveillance and salvage therapy are utilized. Prospective studies are needed to optimize SRS treatment regimens for patients with large brain metastases.

Patients with single brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer equally benefit from stereotactic radiosurgery and surgery: a systematic review

Background

The appropriate treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with single brain metastasis (SBM) is still controversial. A systematic review was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of neurosurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with SBM from NSCLC.

Material/Methods

PUBMED, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, Current Controlled Trials, Clinical Trials, and 2 conference websites were searched to select NSCLC patients with only SBM who received brain surgery or SRS. SPSS 18.0 software was used to analyze the mean median survival time (MST) and Stata 11.0 software was used to calculate the overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 18 trials including 713 patients were systematically reviewed. The MST of the patients was 12.7 months in surgery group and 14.85 months in SRS group, respectively. The 1, 2, and 5 years OS of the patients were 59%, 33%, and 19% in surgery group, and 62%, 33%, and 14% in SRS group, respectively. Furthermore, in the surgery group, the 1 and 3 years OS were 68% and 15% in patients with controlled primary tumors, and 50% and 13% in the other patients with uncontrolled primary tumors, respectively. Interestingly, the 5-year OS was up to 21% in patients with controlled primary tumors.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in MST or OS between patients treated with neurosurgery and SRS. Patients with resectable lung tumors and SBM may benefit from the resection of both primary lesions and metastasis.

Prognostic factors in patients with postoperative brain recurrence from completely resected non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Treatment strategies for brain metastasis from lung cancer have been making progress. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the post-recurrent prognostic factors in patients with brain metastasis after complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 patients found to have postoperative brain metastasis from NSCLC in our institution from 2002 to 2008. All patients had undergone radical pulmonary resection for the lung cancer. The impact of numerous variables on survival were assessed, including gender, age, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tumor size, N status, histological type, number of brain metastases, tumor size of brain metastasis, presence of symptoms from the brain tumor(s), and use of perioperative chemotherapy.

Results

The median follow-up was 20.6 months (range, 3.4–66 months). The five-year survival rate from the diagnosis of brain recurrence was 22.5%. In univariate analysis, the favorable prognostic factors after brain recurrence included a normal range of CEA, no extracranial metastasis, no symptoms from the brain metastasis, brain metastasis (less than 2 cm), and radical treatment (craniotomy or stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS]). The multivariate Cox model identified that a small brain metastasis and radical treatment were independent favorable prognostic factors.

Conclusions

This study found that the implementation of radical therapy for metastatic brain tumor(s) when the tumor is still small contributed to an increase in patients' life expectancy.

Brain metastasis and treatment

Despite major therapeutic advances in the management of patients with systemic malignancies, management of brain metastases remains a significant challenge. These patients often require multidisciplinary care that includes surgical resection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies. Complex decisions about the sequencing of therapies to control extracranial and intracranial disease require input from neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical/neuro-oncologists. With advances in understanding of the biology of brain metastases, molecularly defined disease subsets and the advent of targeted therapy as well as immunotherapeutic agents offer promise. Future care of these patients will entail tailoring treatment based on host (performance status and age) and tumor (molecular cytogenetic characteristics, number of metastases, and extracranial disease status) factors. Considerable work involving preclinical models and better clinical trial designs that focus not only on effective control of tumor but also on quality of life and neurocognition needs to be done to improve the outcome of these patients.

Intracranial microcapsule chemotherapy delivery for the localized treatment of rodent metastatic breast adenocarcinoma in the brain

Metastases represent the most common brain tumors in adults. Surgical resection alone results in 45% recurrence and is usually accompanied by radiation and chemotherapy. Adequate chemotherapy delivery to the CNS is hindered by the blood-brain barrier. Efforts at delivering chemotherapy locally to gliomas have shown modest increases in survival, likely limited by the infiltrative nature of the tumor. Temozolomide (TMZ) is first-line treatment for gliomas and recurrent brain metastases. Doxorubicin (DOX) is used in treating many types of breast cancer, although its use is limited by severe cardiac toxicity. Intracranially implanted DOX and TMZ microcapsules are compared with systemic administration of the same treatments in a rodent model of breast adenocarcinoma brain metastases. Outcomes were animal survival, quantified drug exposure, and distribution of cleaved caspase 3. Intracranial delivery of TMZ and systemic DOX administration prolong survival more than intracranial DOX or systemic TMZ. Intracranial TMZ generates the more robust induction of apoptotic pathways. We postulate that these differences may be explained by distribution profiles of each drug when administered intracranially: TMZ displays a broader distribution profile than DOX. These microcapsule devices provide a safe, reliable vehicle for intracranial chemotherapy delivery and have the capacity to be efficacious and superior to systemic delivery of chemotherapy. Future work should include strategies to improve the distribution profile. These findings also have broader implications in localized drug delivery to all tissue, because the efficacy of a drug will always be limited by its ability to diffuse into surrounding tissue past its delivery source.

Treatment of brain metastases

Brain metastases are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Key prognostic classification systems for brain metastases are reviewed. The role of surgery, particularly for single brain metastases, is discussed. This is followed by an overview of radiation, both whole brain and focal, in the treatment of brain metastases. Finally, we review examples of important concepts regarding the role of systemic therapy in the treatment of brain metastases.