Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury

The prescribing patterns and effectiveness of sedatives and analgesics for severe traumatic brain injury patients in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major global health challenge associated with high mortality and morbidity. Secondary brain injury caused by disrupted intracranial pressure (ICP) regulation often necessitates sedation; however, guidelines lack specificity for TBI management.

METHODS

This study analyzed sedation and analgesia prescribing patterns and their outcomes in severe TBI patients in Taiwan using National Health Insurance Research Database data (2012-2019). Severe TBI patients intubated during intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization were included. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, with sensitivity analyses for 14-day mortality and 30-day all-cause mortality excluding deaths within 3 days. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance patient characteristics across groups. Mortality rates across groups were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. At the same time, the Cox proportional hazards model simultaneously assessed the impact of various risk factors, such as age and comorbidities, on mortality.

RESULTS

Among 6030 patients, sedation and analgesia patterns varied, with midazolam combined with opioids being the most common regimen. Compared to the reference group (sedatives with opioids), the risk of death was highest in the no-prescription group (HR = 2.73, 95 % CI = 2.60-2.86), followed by the sedation-only group (HR = 1.58, 95 % CI = 1.50-1.66) and the opioids-only group (HR = 1.49, 95 % CI = 1.42-1.57; all p < 0.0001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent trends.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the importance of optimizing sedation practices and enhancing awareness to improve outcomes for severe TBI patients.

Functional Outcome of Adult Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Treated by Decompressive Craniectomy in an Ethiopian Trauma Center

OBJECTIVE

To describe the long-term functional outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients treated by decompressive craniectomy (DC).

METHODS

Data was collected on decompressive craniectomy performed on TBI patients admitted between May 1, 2018, and May 1, 2021, using a multi-center, cross-sectional study design. The long-term outcomes of survivors were assessed using a structured extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, mean, median, and range, were analyzed. Predictors of functional outcomes were determined using multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

In this study, 74 patients were examined. The mean age at the time of DC was 33.9 years, with a male:female ratio of 11:1. Primary DC was performed in 93.2% of cases. The in-hospital and overall mortality rates were 24.3% and 36.5% respectively. Overall, a favorable functional outcome (GOSE ≥4) was witnessed in 43 patients (58.1%). Among survivors, 91.5% had favorable outcomes. Age ≥40 years, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤5, chest infections, and noninfectious complications were independent predictors of an unfavorable functional outcome (GOSE<4). Patients with GCS ≤5 fared the worst, with an unfavorable functional outcome rate of 85.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that a significant number of our patients had favorable functional outcome after DC for TBI comparable to results from high-income countries. We found that age, admission GCS, postoperative chest infection, and noninfectious complications were all independent factors predicting unfavorable functional outcome. In particular, patients with GCS ≤5 had a higher rate of mortality and unfavorable outcome.

Potential techniques to facilitate dissection in patients undergoing cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy

Decompressive craniectomy is a common neurosurgical procedure for cases of increased intracranial pressure. In patients undergoing cranioplasty, dissection planes are usually difficult to identify due to adhesions. We highlight the possible ways to make dissection easier in cranioplasty. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase from inception until January 2025 to include studies that reported the possible techniques to mitigate the risk for adhesions following decompressive craniectomy and during cranioplasty. Operative metrics including the surgical time, estimated blood loss, the presence of gross adhesions, integrity of temporalis muscle, and the underlying dura as well as the primary pathology and the post-operative complications were extracted. Overall, 22 studies involving a total of 570 patients were included. Stroke was the primary pathology in 253 (54.6%) patients. The time between craniectomies and cranioplasties ranged from 10 days to several years. Different techniques were employed to reduce the risk for adhesion formation. A total of 99 out of 479 (20.5%) experienced postoperative complications following cranioplasty procedures. Epidural or subdural fluid collections were the most common complication, affecting 40 patients (8.6%), followed closely by wound infections in 39 patients (8.1%). Dural tears were reported in 10 patients (2%), while cortical injuries occurred in 6 patients (1.2%). Several materials have been used for duraplasty following decompressive craniectomy, with the aim of reducing adhesions and facilitating subsequent cranioplasty. Additionally, waterjet dissection has been proposed as a potential technique for safer tissue separation, but its safety profile and efficacy require further investigation. The evidence from these studies remains inconclusive and requires further investigation in large scale randomized controlled trials.

Dura fenestration is non-inferior and with lower complication incidence compared to augmented duraplasty in decompressive craniectomy

Decompressive craniectomy is a procedure for managing elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). However, it carries a high morbidity and mortality toll. While there is relative consensus regarding the bony part of the decompression, the role of dura opening and the optimal technique to perform it are under debate. Here we compared the commonly used augmented duraplasty technique to an understudied technique of dura fenestrations in a single center, prospective, non-controlled randomized study. The study included 23 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy. The lowering of ICP was significant in both methods when compared to preoperative values and compared to pre-duraplasty values. The ICP was similar in various postoperative time points between both techniques. The rate of complications was lower when the dura was fenestrated - brain herniation was over five time less common, infection was more than five times rarer. Contusion expansion, meningitis and contralateral subdural collection were all lower in fenestrated dura cases than in wide dura opening. These results hold promise for a superior surgical approach in duraplasty for intracranial pressure reduction.

Craniotomy versus Decompressive Craniectomy in Acute Subdural Hematoma Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

 This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and craniotomy in treating acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) to provide a more precise assessment of the procedures' outcomes.

METHODS

 We searched for relevant articles in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane till August 2023, including cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing craniotomy and DC for ASDH. The analysis was conducted using "Review Manager" software, using the risk ratio along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for categorical data, whereas continuous data were analyzed using the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI.

RESULTS

 Our analysis included 13 studies with a total of 4,689 patients, of whom 1,910 (40.7%) underwent DC and 2,779 (59.3%) underwent craniotomy. The results revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of craniotomy concerning good recovery in delayed GOS (risk ratio [RR] = 1.42; 95% CI [1.12, 1.81]), postoperative mortality (RR = 0.81; 95% CI [0.71, 0.94]), mortality at last follow-up (RR = 0.75; 95% CI [0.62, 0.91]), and hospital stay (MD = -3.71; 95%CI [-5.82, -1.60]). A nonsignificant difference (RR = 1.06; 95% CI [0.52, 2.17]; p = 0.87) was found between the two interventions concerning seizures.

CONCLUSION

 Despite craniotomy's favorable clinical outcomes and mortality rates, the significant baseline differences between DC and craniotomy make these data inconclusive. To establish solid evidence regarding the use of DC versus craniotomy in ASDH, it is necessary to conduct well-controlled randomized studies with large sample sizes.

Comparative Analysis of Duroplasty Techniques in Decompressive Craniectomy: The CANDID Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

At present, there is no consensus regarding the most optimal dural substitute to use for duroplasty in primary decompressive craniectomy (PDC) for traumatic brain injury (TBI). The author's objective was to conduct a retrospective analysis comparing 2 techniques of PDC: duroplasty using anterior-based vascularized galea pericranium (VP group) with synthetic dural substitute duroplasty (SR group).

METHODS

From April 2015 to February 2022, 379 craniotomies were done for TBI. The outcome of eligible 97 consecutive patients receiving PDC treatment were examined. Out of 97, 60 received vascularized galea pericranium and 37 received synthetic dural graft for dural augmentation. Propensity matching generated 28 pairs (56 patients) for analysis. The primary outcome was extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) measured at 6 months after injury. Secondary outcomes included were incidence of surgical complications (neurosurgical site infections, and hemorrhagic and hydrodynamic complications), surgical time, days in intensive care unit, hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, and GOS-E at 1 year after injury.

RESULTS

Patients in VP group, compared with those in SR group had better GOS-E score at 6 months ( P = .011) and 1 year ( P = .026). Hospital mortality ( P = .342), days in intensive care unit ( P = .574), hospital stay ( P = .155), surgical time ( P = .131), medical and surgical complications including neurosurgical infections, and hemorrhagic and hydrodynamic complications did not differ significantly in both groups. Complication of brain abscess was found exclusively in the SR group ( P = .327).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, adults who underwent PDC for TBI using anterior-based vascularized galea pericranial graft were associated with better clinical outcomes at 6 months and 1 year compared with standard repair group using synthetic dural substitute (G patch).

Role of timing of cranioplasty in improving Neurological functional outcome

Cranioplasty performed after a decompressive craniectomy (DC) for traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, or aneurysmal bleed has a role of restoring cerebral protection and craniofacial cosmesis as well as improving neuromotor function. There has been no consensus with regards to the ideal timing of cranioplasty (CP) after DC. A retrospective cohort study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital on patients who had undergone early (less than or equal to 12 weeks) and late (greater than 12 weeks) cranioplasty using autologous cranial bone after DC. Functional independence measure (FIM) tools were used to compare neuromotor and cognitive function outcome between the two groups. Appropriate statistical tools were used to compare neuromotor and cognitive function improvement as well as complication rates between early and late cranioplasty. A total of 31 adult patients of cranioplasty (21 male and 10 female) were evaluated. Sixteen had undergone early and 15 late cranioplasty. Comparison for neuromotor and cognitive function using FIM tools revealed statistically significant neuromotor and cognitive advantages in the early cranioplasty group. Overall complication rates between the two groups varied but were statistically insignificant. Performing an early cranioplasty provides advantages of improvement of neuromotor and cognitive function through early restoration of cerebrospinal fluid and intracerebral haemo-dynamics. It further avoids the potential problems of developing the 'Syndrome of the Trephined' (otherwise known as sinking skin flap syndrome) and resorption of the autologous bone.

Comparison of Outcomes of Hinge Craniotomy Versus Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients With Malignant Intracranial Hypertension: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study

Objective

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare the short-, mid-, and long-term outcomes in patients with malignant intracranial hypertension undergoing either decompressive craniectomy (DC) or hinge craniotomy (HC).

Methods

In this prospective RCT, 38 patients diagnosed with malignant intracranial hypertension due to ischemic infarction, traumatic brain injury, or non-lesional spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, who required cranial decompression, were randomly allocated to the DC and HC groups.

Results

The need for reoperation, particularly cranioplasty, in the DC group was significantly different from that in the HC group. The percentage of brain expansion was higher in the DC group versus the HC group; however, the difference was not significant. There was no significant intergroup difference in the functional outcome according to the modified Rankin Scale or the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Additionally, no significant intergroup differences were observed in the rates of in-hospital complications.

Conclusion

The HC and DC groups did not significantly differ in the rate of hospital complications such as infection, need for reoperation owing to the lack of intracranial pressure control, wound healing problems, or bone infection. Our results suggest that by performing HC, the probability of the need for major surgery (cranioplasty) is reduced, thereby removing financial burden from the patient and the health system.

Trial Registration

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: IRCT20180515039678N1.

Characteristics and outcome of patients requiring Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: a retrospective analysis

Brain swelling after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) can elevate intracranial pressure, necessitating Decompressive Craniectomy (DC) as the preferred surgical intervention. This study aimed to analyze a large institutional database to identify clinical characteristics of patients requiring primary DC and their outcomes. We reviewed TBI patients admitted to our center from 2015 to 2021, utilizing a prospectively maintained registry. Data collected included demographics, injury mechanisms, admission findings, neuroimaging results, DC necessity, procedures during hospitalization, and functional outcomes at discharge and six-month follow-up. A total of 4,011 patients were analyzed, with 506 undergoing primary DC. Factors such as International Normalized Ratio, activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, subdural hematoma, midline shift, epidural hematoma, intracerebral hemorrhage, and the presence of compressed or absent basal cisterns were independently linked to the need for DC. Additionally, the requirement for DC correlated with an increased likelihood of tracheostomy. For patients requiring DC, older age, lower hemoglobin levels, higher Rotterdam scores, and the presence of compressed or absent basal cisterns were associated with unfavorable outcomes in mild to moderate TBI cases. In severe TBI patients, lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores and fixed pupils were linked to poor outcomes. This study represents one of the most comprehensive analyses of primary DC requirements and outcomes, revealing that the need for DC is associated with worse outcomes in TBI patients and identifying several independent predictors of outcomes across varying severity levels.

The crisis of the third day in intracranial pressure dynamics following traumatic brain injury, fact or fiction?

Introduction

In 1960, Lazorthes and Campman introduced the concept of a 'crisis of the third day', which gained prominence in the field of traumatic brain injury (TBI), where it relates to neurological deterioration on the third day after injury. However, evidence regarding this phenomenon remains scarce.

Research question

This study aimed to analyze posttraumatic intracranial pressure (ICP) patterns in a large European cohort to investigate the existence of a third-day crisis and its impact on 12-month functional outcomes.

Materials and methods

Data were analyzed from the prospective Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. Patients with TBI admitted to ICUs in 65 European centers who received ICP monitoring were included. ICP measurements, averaged per day, were analyzed using mixed models. The association between ICP peak timing and functional outcome was examined with multivariable logistic regression.

Results

The study included 886 patients. Average ICP trajectories showed no significant changes over the first seven days post-injury, without elevation around the third day. Among 563 patients with ICP >20 during the first week, 45% reached their highest ICP after the third day. Elevated ICP (>20 mmHg) during the first week was associated with unfavorable 12-month outcomes, but the timing of ICP peak was not linked to functional outcomes.

Discussion and conclusion

This multicenter study challenges the 'crisis of the third day' concept. No distinct ICP or TIL elevations were observed around the third day. Elevated ICP remains a prognostic indicator, but ICP peak timing does not correlate with functional outcomes.

Decompressive craniectomy in children: indications and outcome from a tertiary centre

INTRODUCTION

The role of decompressive craniectomy (DC) is as a rescue therapy for the treatment of intracranial hypertension. The indications for the DC are variable.

METHODS

The clinical details, imaging, operative findings and follow-up data of children less than or equal to 18 years of age were reviewed for more information on the children who underwent DC in the last 5 years.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 128 children underwent DC. The trauma cases were 66, and the non-trauma cases were 62. The common indication for DC was pure acute subdural hematoma 33 (50%), followed by contusion 10 (15%) in the trauma group, and in non-trauma, arterial infarction in 20 (32%) and cerebral venous thrombosis in 17 (27%). Hemicraniectomy was done in 114 (89%), and bifrontal craniectomy was done in 7 (5.4%) cases. The median duration follow-up was 7 months in non-trauma and 6 months in trauma. GCS was less than 8, the motor score was less than 3, and pupillary asymmetry, hypotension and basal cistern effacement were factors related to an unfavourable outcome in the non-trauma group. In regression analysis, only a motor score of less than three was associated with the non-trauma group. Age less than 10 years, GCS less than 8, motor score less than three and preoperative infarction were the predictive factors in univariate analysis, and only GCS less than 8 was the predictive factor for unfavourable factors in regression analysis in the trauma group.

CONCLUSION

The DC is performed as a lifesaving procedure. The unfavourable outcome is slightly higher in non-trauma cases compared to trauma cases. However, the mortality rate is high in trauma cases.

Effect of Decompressive Craniectomy on Intracranial Pressure Waveforms and Vascular Reactivity: A Systematic Scoping Review

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) primarily aims at decreasing intracranial pressure (ICP) by allowing for the brain tissue to expand. However, it is uncertain to what extent DC impacts the transmission of vasogenic slow waves and thus the validity and utility of the pressure reactivity index (PRx). The purpose of this systematically performed scoping review is to assess the current knowledge of the impact of DC on ICP waveforms and measures of vascular reactivity. This scoping review considered studies including patients over 18 years old suffering from acute brain injuries (ABIs), who underwent secondary DC and had a perioperative (pre/post-DC) recording of ICP or waveform analysis. A search was conducted in EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline from November 2023 till January 2024, yielding 787 studies. Duplicated studies were automatically removed, and two researchers independently screened the remaining studies. After examining 586 titles and abstracts, 38 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, and 4 studies were included in the final review. The review suggests that cerebrovascular reactivity and slow waves are altered after DC, with positive PRx values and reduced slow power. One study suggested that the nature of slow waves and interactions is on the whole largely preserved. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to methodological limitations and the low number of studies.

Intracranial pressure changes in traumatic brain injury patients undergoing unilateral decompressive craniectomy with dural expansion

Background

The aim of this study is to assess the ICP changes induced by a unilateral fronto-temporo-parietal DC with dural expansion after moderate to severe TBI. The effect of different bone flap sizes on ICP and the neurological outcomes were also evaluated after the decompressive surgery.

Methods

52 TBI patients with clinical and radiological evidences of increased ICP were included in this prospective study. All patients received unilateral fronto-temporo-parietal DC with dural expansion and ventriculostomy at contralateral Kocher's point. Postoperatively, ICP values and the largest antero-posterior (AP) diameter of bone flap removed was measured, and the clinical outcomes were assessed using Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) at discharge and 6 months after DC.

Results

The median ICP significantly decreased with an average of 56.7 % reduction from the initial opening ICP. Similar ICP changes were observed in all groups. This study also found that the large bone flap group (AP diameter >15 cm) demonstrated better postoperative ICP control as compared to the small bone flap group (AP diameter 12-15 cm), although not statistically significant. The SDH and cerebral swelling groups did better in the GOS-E at 6 months after TBI compared with cerebral contusion group.

Conclusion

The ICP reduction in moderate to severe TBI patients undergoing unilateral fronto-temporo-parietal DC with dural expansion occurred in accordance with decompressive steps, regardless of intracranial lesions and the surgical procedure should be performed with the bone flap size of at least 12 cm in AP diameter for adequate and sustained ICP control.

Analysis on Short-Term Outcomes for Cerebral Protection Treatment in Post Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Single Neurosurgical Centre Study

Background

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and cerebral protection (CP) management might determine the outcome of the patient. CP in severe TBI is to protect the brain from further insults, optimise cerebral metabolism and prevent secondary brain injury. This study aimed to analyse the short-term Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at the intensive care unit (ICU) discharge and a month after ICU discharge of patients post CP and factors associated with the favourable outcome.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study from January 2021 to January 2022. The short-term outcomes of patients were evaluated upon ICU discharge and 1 month after ICU discharge using GOS. Favourable outcome was defined as GOS 4 and 5. Generalised Estimation Equation (GEE) was adopted to conduct bivariate GEE and subsequently multivariate GEE to evaluate the factors associated with favourable outcome at ICU discharge and 1 month after discharge.

Results

A total of 92 patients with severe TBI with GOS of 8 and below admitted to ICU received CP management. Proportion of death is 17% at ICU discharge and 0% after 1 month of ICU discharge. Proportion of favourable outcome is 26.1% at ICU discharge and 61.1% after 1 month of ICU discharge. Among factors evaluated, age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99; P = 0.004), duration of CP (OR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.84; P = 0.014) and hyperosmolar therapy (OR = 0.41; CI 95%: 0.21, 0.83; P = 0.013) had significant association.

Conclusion

CP in younger age, longer duration of CP and patient not receiving hyperosmolar therapy are associated with favourable outcomes. We recommend further clinical trial to assess long term outcome of CP.

Health-related quality of life measures in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: a 6-year follow-up analysis

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the long-term neurological outcomes and the functionality and QoL in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the 120 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI between 2002 and 2007, 101 were included based on the inclusion criteria. Long-term follow-up results (minimum 3 years) were available for 22 patients. The outcomes were assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and the functionality and HRQoL were assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) (v2) and Quality of Life After Brain Injury (QoLIBRI) questionnaires.

RESULTS

Among the patients with severe TBI, 62 (61.4%) died and 39 (38.6%) were discharged to either home or a physical therapy facility. Eleven of the thirty-nine patients could not be reached and were excluded from the final analysis. The mean GOS of the remaining 28 patients was 4.14 ± 0.8 after 6.46 ± 1.64 years of follow-up. The HRQoL was assessed in 22 of the 28 patients. The HRQoL scores were lower in patients with TBI than in healthy controls. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the HRQoL scores in patients with improved GOS scores than in those with unimproved GOS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Health-related outcome scores could help clinicians understand the requirements of survivors of severe TBI to create a realistic rehabilitation target for them. QoLIBRI served as a good way of communication in these subjects.

Influence of Blood Components on Neuroinflammation, Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown, and Functional Damage After Acute Subdural Hematoma in Rats

A central component of injury development after acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is the increased intracranial pressure and consecutive mechanical reduction of cerebral blood flow (CBF). However, the role of different blood constituents in ASDH as additional lesioning factors remains unclear. This study examines the influence of blood components on neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, and functional deficits in a rat model of ASDH. We infused corpuscular (whole blood, whole blood lysate, and red cell blood) and plasmatic (blood plasma, anticoagulated blood plasma, and aqueous isotonic solution) blood components into the subdural space while CBF was monitored. Rats then underwent behavioral testing. Lesion analysis and immunohistochemistry were performed 2 days after ASDH. Inflammatory reaction was assessed using staining for ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein, interleukin-1ß, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and membrane attack complex. Integrity of the BBB was evaluated with albumin and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) staining. We observed a significant drop in CBF in the corpuscular group (75% ± 7.5% of baseline) with distinct post-operative deficits and larger lesion volume compared to the plasmatic group (13.6 ± 5.4 vs. 1.3 ± 0.4 mm3). Further, inflammation was significantly increased in the corpuscular group with stronger immunoreaction. After whole blood infusion, albumin and MMP9 immunoreaction were significantly increased, pointing toward a disrupted BBB. The interaction between corpuscular and plasmatic blood components seems to be a key factor in the detrimental impact of ASDH. This interaction results in neuroinflammation and BBB leakage. These findings underscore the importance of performing surgery as early as possible and also provide indications for potential pharmacological targets.

Role of decompressive craniectomy in the management of acute ischemic stroke (Review)

The application of decompressive craniectomy (DC) is thoroughly documented in the management of brain edema, particularly following traumatic brain injury. However, an increasing amount of concern is developing among the universal medical community as regards the application of DC in the treatment of other causes of brain edema, such as subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral hemorrhage, sinus thrombosis and encephalitis. Managing stroke continues to remain challenging, and demands the aggressive and intensive consulting of a number of medical specialties. Middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarcts, which consist of 1-10% of all supratentorial infarcts, are often associated with mass effects, and high mortality and morbidity rates. Over the past three decades, a number of neurosurgical medical centers have reported their experience with the application of DC in the treatment of malignant MCA infarction with varying results. In addition, over the past decade, major efforts have been dedicated to multicenter randomized clinical trials. The present study reviews the pertinent literature to outline the use of DC in the management of malignant MCA infarction. The PubMed database was systematically searched for the following terms: 'Malignant cerebral infarction', 'surgery for stroke', 'DC for cerebral infarction', and all their combinations. Case reports were excluded from the review. The articles were categorized into a number of groups; the majority of these were human clinical studies, with a few animal experimental clinical studies. The surgical technique involved was DC, or hemicraniectomy. Other aspects that were included in the selection of articles were methodological characteristics and the number of patients. The multicenter randomized trials were promising. The mortality rate has unanimously decreased. As for the functional outcome, different scales were employed; the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended was not sufficient; the Modified Rankin Scale and Bathel index, as well as other scales, were applied. Other aspects considered were demographics, statistics and the very interesting radiological ones. There is no doubt that DC decreases mortality rates, as shown in all clinical trials. Functional outcome appears to be the goal standard in modern-era neurosurgery, and quality of life should be further discussed among the medical community and with patient consent.

Staged or simultaneous operations for ventriculoperitoneal shunt and cranioplasty: Evidence from a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To date, there is no consensus on the surgery strategies of cranioplasty (CP) and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety of staged and simultaneous operation in patients with comorbid cranial defects with hydrocephalus to inform future surgery protocols.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from the inception dates to February 8, 2023 adherent to PRISMA guidelines was conducted. The pooled analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. The outcomes included postoperative infection, reoperation, shunt obstruction, hematoma, and subdural effusion.

RESULTS

Of the 956 studies initially retrieved, 10 articles encompassing 515 patients were included. Among the total patients, 193 (37.48%) and 322 (62.52%), respectively, underwent simultaneous and staged surgeries. The finding of pooled analysis indicated that staged surgery was associated with lower rate of subdural effusion (14% in the simultaneous groups vs. 5.4% in the staged groups; OR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.04-5.49, p = 0.04). However, there were no significant differences in overall infection (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 0.74-4.97, p = 0.18), central nervous system infection (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 0.68-3.31, p = 0.31), cranioplasty infection (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.50-5.00, p = 0.44), shunt infection (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.38-4.52, p = 0.67), reoperation (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.38-6.00, p = 0.55), shunt obstruction (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.25-2.16, p = 0.57), epidural hematoma (OR = 2.20, 95% CI: 0.62-7.86, p = 0.22), subdural hematoma (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.10-14.19, p = 0.88), and intracranial hematoma (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.42-4.07, p = 0.64). Moreover, subgroup analysis failed to yield new insights.

CONCLUSIONS

Staged surgery is associated with a lower rate of postoperative subdural effusion. However, from the evidence of sensitivity analysis, this result is not stable. Therefore, our conclusion should be viewed with caution, and neurosurgeons in practice should make individualized decisions based on each patient's condition and cerebrospinal fluid tap test.

Diagnostic Value of the Combination of Ultrasonographic Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Width of Crural Cistern with Respect to the Intracranial Pressure in Patients Treated with Decompressive Craniotomy

BACKGROUND

The monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) and detection of increased ICP are crucial because such increases may cause secondary brain injury and a poor prognosis. Although numerous ultrasound parameters, including optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), width of the crural cistern (WCC), and the flow velocities of the central retinal artery and middle cerebral artery, can be measured in patients after hemicraniectomy, researchers have yet to determine which of these is better for evaluating ICP. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between ICP and ultrasound parameters and investigate the best noninvasive estimator of ICP.

METHODS

This observational study enrolled 50 patients with brain injury after hemicraniectomy from January 2021 to December 2021. All patients underwent invasive ICP monitoring with microsensor, transcranial, and ocular ultrasound postoperatively. We measured the ONSD including the dura mater (ONSDI), the ONSD excluding the dura mater, the optic nerve diameter (OND), the eyeball transverse diameter (ETD), the WCC, and the flow velocities in the central retinal artery and middle cerebral artery. Then, we calculated the ONSDI-OND (the difference between ONSDI and OND) and ONSDI/ETD (the ratio of ONSDI to ETD). Patients were divided into a normal ICP group (n = 35) and an increased ICP group (≥ 20 mm Hg, n = 15) according to the ICP measurements. Correlations were then assessed between the values of the ultrasound parameters and ICP.

RESULTS

The ONSDI, ONSDI-OND, and ONSDI/ETD were positively associated with ICP (r = 0.455, 0.482, 0.423 and p = 0.001, < 0.001, 0.002, respectively), whereas the WCC was negatively associated with ICP (r = - 0.586, p < 0.001). The WCC showed the highest predictive power for increased ICP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.904), whereas the ONSDI-OND and ONSDI also presented with acceptable predictive power among the ONSD-related parameters (AUC = 0.831, 0.803, respectively). The cutoff values for increased ICP prediction for ONSDI, ONSDI-OND, and WCC were 6.29, 3.03, and 3.68 mm, respectively. The AUC of the combination of ONSDI-OND and WCC was 0.952 (95% confidence interval 0.896-1.0, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ONSDI, ONSDI-OND, and WCC were correlated with ICP and had acceptable accuracy levels in estimating ICP in patients after hemicraniectomy. Furthermore, WCC showed a higher diagnostic value than ONSD-related parameters, and the combination of ONSDI-OND and WCC was a satisfactory predictor of increased ICP.

Hinge craniotomy versus standard decompressive hemicraniectomy: an experimental preclinical comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the most common surgical procedure to manage increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Hinge craniotomy (HC), which consists of fixing the bone operculum with a pivot, is an alternative method conceived to avoid some DC-related complications; nonetheless, it is debated whether it can provide enough volume expansion. In this study, we aimed to analyze the volume and ICP obtained with HC using an experimental cadaver-based preclinical model and compare the results to baseline and DC.

METHODS

Baseline conditions, HC, and DC were compared on both sides of five anatomical specimens. Volume and ICP values were measured with a custom-made system. Local polynomial regression was used to investigate volume differences.

RESULTS

The area of the bone opercula resulting from measurements was 115.55 cm2; the mean supratentorial volume was 955 mL. HC led to intermediate results compared to baseline and DC. At an ICP of 50 mmHg, HC offers 130 mL extra space but 172 mL less than a DC. Based on local polynomial regression, the mean volume difference between HC and the standard craniotomy was 10%; 14% between DC and HC; both are higher than the volume of brain herniation reported in the literature in the clinical setting. The volume leading to an ICP of 50 mmHg at baseline was less than the volume needed to reach an ICP of 20 mmHg after HC (10.05% and 14.95% from baseline, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm the efficacy of HC in providing sufficient volume expansion. HC is a valid intermediate alternative in case of potentially evolutionary lesions and non-massive edema, especially in developing countries.

Reduction in wound healing complications and infection rate by lumbar CSF drainage after decompressive hemicraniectomy

OBJECTIVE

Wound healing disorders and surgical site infections are the most frequently encountered complications after decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). Subgaleal CSF accumulation causes additional tension of the scalp flap and increases the risk of wound dehiscence, CSF fistula, and infection. Lumbar CSF drainage might relieve subgaleal CSF accumulation and is often used when a CSF fistula through the surgical wound appears. The aim of this study was to investigate if early prophylactic lumbar drainage might reduce the rate of postoperative wound revisions and infections after DHC.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed 104 consecutive patients who underwent DHC from January 2019 to May 2021. Before January 2020, patients did not receive lumbar drainage, whereas after January 2020, patients received lumbar drainage within 3 days after DHC for a median total of 4 (IQR 2-5) days if the first postoperative CT scan confirmed open basal cisterns. The primary endpoint was the rate of severe wound healing complications requiring surgical revision. Secondary endpoints were the rate of subgaleal CSF accumulations and hygromas as well as the rate of purulent wound infections and subdural empyema.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients died during the acute phase; 34 patients with and 39 patients without lumbar drainage were included for the analysis of endpoints. The predominant underlying pathology was malignant hemispheric stroke (58.8% vs 66.7%) followed by traumatic brain injury (20.6% vs 23.1%). The rate of surgical wound revisions was significantly lower in the lumbar drainage group (5 [14.7%] vs 14 [35.9%], p = 0.04). A stepwise linear regression analysis was used to identify potential covariates associated with wound healing disorder and reduced them to lumbar drainage and BMI. One patient was subject to paradoxical herniation. However, the patient's symptoms rapidly resolved after lumbar drainage was discontinued, and he survived with only moderate deficits related to the primary disease. There was no significant difference in the rate of radiological herniation signs. The median lengths of stay in the ICU were similar, with 12 (IQR 9-23) days in the drainage group compared with 13 (IQR 11-23) days in the control group (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients after DHC and open basal cisterns on postoperative CT, lumbar drainage appears to be safe and reduces the rate of surgical wound revisions and intracranial infection after DHC while the risk for provoking paradoxical herniation is low early after surgery.

The significance of decompressive craniectomy for older patients with traumatic brain injury: a propensity score matching analysis from large multi-center data

The efficacy of decompressive craniectomy (DC) for traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been investigated in two recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and DC is recommended as an optional treatment for improving overall survival compared to medical treatment. However, the two RCTs enrolled extremely young adults, and the efficacy of DC in older adults remains questionable. Therefore, to identify the efficacy of DC in older adults, we compared patients who received medical care with those who underwent DC after propensity score matching (PSM). From the Korea Multi-center Traumatic Brain Injury Database, 443 patients identified as having intracranial hypertension and a necessity of DC were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were classified into the DC (n = 375) and non-DC (n = 68) groups according to operation records. The PSM was conducted to match the patients in the DC group with those receiving medical care (non-DC). After PSM, the newly matched group (DC, n = 126) was compared with patients without DC (non-DC, n = 63). The mean difference in the logit of the propensity scores (LPS) was 0.00391 and the mean age of enrolled patients were 65 years. The results of the comparative analyses after PSM showed that the 6-month mortality rate of the non-DC group was higher than that of the DC group (61.9% vs. 51.6%, p = 0.179). In terms of favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score < 4), the DC group showed a lower rate of favorable mRS scores (11.9% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.296) than the non-DC group.

The Adjustable Cranial Plate: A Novel Implant Designed to Eliminate the Need for Cranioplasty Surgery Following a Hemicraniectomy Operation

BACKGROUND

Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is performed to relieve life-threatening intracranial pressure elevations. After swelling abates, a cranioplasty is performed for mechanical integrity and cosmesis. Cranioplasty is costly with high complication rates. Prior attempts to obviate second-stage cranioplasty have been unsuccessful. The Adjustable Cranial Plate (ACP) is designed for implantation during DHC to afford maximal volumetric expansion with later repositioning without requiring a second major operation.

METHODS

The ACP has a mobile section held by a tripod fixation mechanism. Centrally located gears adjust the implant between the up and down positions. Cadaveric ACP implantation was performed. Virtual DHC and ACP placement were done using imaging data from 94 patients who had previously undergone DHC to corroborate our cadaveric results. Imaging analysis methods were used to calculate volumes of cranial expansion.

RESULTS

The ACP implantation and adjustment procedures are feasible in cadaveric testing without wound closure difficulties. Results of the cadaveric study showed total volumetric expansion achieved was 222 cm3. Results of the virtual DHC procedure showed the volume of cranial expansion achieved by removing a standardized bone flap was 132 cm3 (range, 89-171 cm3). Applied to virtual craniectomy patients, the total volume of expansion achieved with the ACP implantation operation was 222 cm3 (range, 181-263 cm3).

CONCLUSIONS

ACP implantation during DHC is technically feasible. It achieves a volume of cranial expansion that will accommodate that observed following survivable hemicraniectomy operations. Moving the implant from the up to the down position can easily be performed as a simple outpatient or inpatient bedside procedure, thus potentially eliminating second-stage cranioplasty procedures.

Is the Human Touch Always Therapeutic? Patient Stimulation and Spreading Depolarization after Acute Neurological Injuries

Touch and other types of patient stimulation are necessary in critical care and generally presumed to be beneficial. Recent pre-clinical studies as well as randomized trials assessing early mobilization have challenged the safety of such routine practices in patients with acute neurological injury such as stroke. We sought to determine whether patient stimulation could result in spreading depolarization (SD), a dramatic pathophysiological event that likely contributes to metabolic stress and ischemic expansion in such patients. Patients undergoing surgical intervention for severe acute neurological injuries (stroke, aneurysm rupture, or trauma) were prospectively consented and enrolled in an observational study monitoring SD with implanted subdural electrodes. Subjects also underwent simultaneous video recordings (from continuous EEG monitoring) to assess for physical touch and other forms of patient stimulation (such as suctioning and positioning). The association of patient stimulation with subsequent SD was assessed. Increased frequency of patient stimulation was associated with increased risk of SD (OR = 4.39 [95%CI = 1.71-11.24]). The overall risk of SD was also increased in the 60 min following patient stimulation compared to times with no stimulation (OR = 1.19 [95%CI = 1.13-1.26]), though not all subjects demonstrated this effect individually. Positioning of the subject was the subtype of stimulation with the strongest overall effect on SD (OR = 4.92 [95%CI = 3.74-6.47]). We conclude that in patients with some acute neurological injuries, touch and other patient stimulation can induce SD (PS-SD), potentially increasing the risk of metabolic and ischemic stress. PS-SD may represent an underlying mechanism for observed increased risk of early mobilization in such patients.

Corticosteroid treatment for refractory intracranial hypertension: a rescue therapy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury with contusional lesions-a feedback

INTRODUCTION

Refractory intracranial hypertension (rICH) is a severe complication among patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). Medical treatment may be insufficient, and in some cases, the only viable treatment option is decompressive hemicraniectomy. The assessment of a corticosteroid therapy against vasogenic edema secondary to severe brain injuries seems interesting to prevent this surgery in sTBI patients with rICH caused by contusional areas.

METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective observational study including all consecutive sTBI patients with contusion injuries and a rICH requiring cerebrospinal fluid drainage with external ventricular drainage between November 2013 and January 2018. Patient inclusion criterium was a therapeutic index load (TIL; an indirect measure of TBI severity) > 7. Intracranial pressure (ICP) and TIL were assessed before and 48 h after corticosteroid therapy (CTC). Then, we divided the population into two groups according to the evolution of the TIL: responders and non-responders to corticosteroid therapy.

RESULTS

During the study period, 512 patients were hospitalized for sTBI, and among them, 44 (8.6%) with rICH were included. They received 240 mg per day [120 mg, 240 mg] of Solu-Medrol for 2 days [1; 3], 3 days after the sTBI. The average ICP in patients with rICH before the CTC bolus was 21 mmHg [19; 23]. After the CTC bolus, the ICP fell significantly to less than 15 mmHg (p < 0.0001) for at least 7 days. The TIL decreased significantly the day after the CTC bolus and until day 2. Among these 44 patients, 68% were included in the responder group (n = 30).

DISCUSSION

Short and systemic corticosteroid therapy in patients with refractory intracranial hypertension secondary to severe traumatic brain injury seems to be a potentially useful and efficient treatment for lowering intracranial pressure and decreasing the need for more invasive surgeries.

Space-expanding flap in decompressive hemicraniectomy for stroke

OBJECTIVE

Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DCE) is the standard of care for space-occupying malignant infarction of the medial cerebral artery in suitable patients. After DCE, the brain is susceptible to trauma and at risk for the syndrome of the trephined. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of using temporary space-expanding flaps, implanted during DCE, to shield the brain from these risks while permitting the injured brain to expand.

METHODS

The authors performed a prospective feasibility study to analyze the safety of space-expanding flaps in 10 patients undergoing DCE and evaluated clinical and radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

The relatives of 1 patient withdrew consent, leaving 9 patients in the final analysis. No patients required removal of the space-expanding flap because of uncontrolled increase of intracranial pressure or infection. One patient required additional external ventricular drainage and 1 received mannitol. The mean (range) midline shift decreased from 6.67 (3-12) mm to 1.26 (0-2.6) mm after DCE with the space-expanding flap. The authors observed no cases of sinking skin flap syndrome, other complications, or deaths. One patient underwent further treatment due to infection of the reimplanted autologous bone flap. Two patients later refused cranioplasty, preferring to keep the space-expanding flap and thus avoid the potential risks of cranioplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

This feasibility study showed that the concurrent use of space-expanding flaps appeared to be safe in patients who underwent DCE for malignant infarction of the medial cerebral artery. Moreover, space-expanding flaps may permit patients to avoid a second surgery for reimplantation of the autologous bone flap and the risks inherent to this procedure.

A prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing two surgical procedures of decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury: Dural closure without dural closure

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is used to treat severe traumatic brain injury [TBI]. The present study compared dural open and closed surgical procedures for DC and their relationship with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (E) (GOS-E) scores and survival in prospective randomized controlled TBI patients. Patients aged 10-65 (36.97 ± 13.23) with DC were hospitalized in the neurotrauma unit of King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India. The patients were randomized into test; with dural closure (n = 60) and control without dural closure (OD) (n = 60) groups. After decompressive craniectomy, patients were monitored daily until hospital discharge or death and for three months. GSC/E leakage, infection, and functional status were also assessed. Age (p = 0.795), sex (p = 0.104), mode of injury (p = 0.195), GCS score (p = 0.40, p = 0.469), Rotterdam score (p = 0.731), and preoperative midline shift (MLS) (p = 0.378) did not vary between the OD and CD groups. Neither technique affected the mortality, motor score, or pupil response (p > 0.05). After one and three months, GOS extension was associated with open and closed dural procedures (p = 0.089). Intracranial pressure, brain bulge, GCS score, and MLS were not associated with theoperative method(p > 0.05). The open dural group had a significantly shorter procedure time than the closed dural group (P = 0.026). Both groups showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) between CSF leak and post-traumatic hydrocephalus. Dural opensurgery for a compressed craniectomy is shorter and not associated with significant surgical consequences compared to close dural close surgery.

Comparative Study of Cerebral Perfusion in Different Types of Decompressive Surgery for Traumatic Brain Injury

Introduction Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) brain usefulness in the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is still being investigated. Comparative research of CTP in the various forms of decompressive surgery has not yet been reported to our knowledge. Patients with TBI who underwent decompressive surgery were studied using pre- and postoperative CTP. CTP findings were compared with patient's outcome.

Materials and Methods This was a single-center, prospective cohort study. A prospective analysis of patients who were investigated with CTP from admission between 2019 and 2021 was undertaken. The patients in whom decompressive surgery was required for TBI, were included in our study after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. CTP imaging was performed preoperatively and 5 days after decompressive surgery to measure cerebral perfusion. Numbers of cases included in the study were 75. Statistical analysis was done.

Results In our study, cerebral perfusion were improved postoperatively in the all types of decompressive surgery (p-value < 0.05). But association between type of surgery with improvement in cerebral perfusion, Glasgow Coma Scale at discharge, and Glasgow Outcome Scale-extended at 3 months were found to be statistically insignificant (p-value > 0.05).

Conclusion CTP brain may play a role as a prognostic tool in TBI patients undergoing decompressive surgery.

Improved strategy for post-traumatic hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy: Experience of a single center

Background

Patients with head trauma may develop hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy. Many studies have referred one-stage cranioplasty (CP) and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) was applied to treat cranial defect with post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH), but the safety and efficiency of the procedure remain controversial.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study including 70 patients of PTH following decompressive craniectomy who underwent simultaneous (50) and separated (20) procedures of cranioplasty and VPS from March 2014 to March 2021 at the authors' institution with at least 30 days of follow-up. Patient characteristics, clinical findings, and complications were collected and analyzed.

Results

Fifty patients with PTH underwent improved simultaneous procedures and 20 patients underwent staged surgeries. Among the cases, the overall complication rate was 22.86%. Complications suffered by patients who underwent one-stage procedure of CP and VPS did not differ significantly, compared with patients in the group of staged procedures (22% vs. 25%, p = 0.763). The significant difference was not observed in the two groups, regarding the complications of subdural/epidural fluid collection (4%/6% vs. 0/2%, p = 1.000/1.000), epidural hemorrhage (6% vs. 4%, p = 0.942), dysfunction of shunting system (0 vs. 2%, p = 0.286), postoperative seizure (8% vs. 4%, p = 1.000), and reoperation case (0 vs. 2%, p = 0.286). No case of subdural hemorrhage, incision/intracranial/abdominal infection, shunting system dysfunction, or reoperation was observed in the group of simultaneous procedure. Complications including subdural/epidural fluid collection, subdural hemorrhage, and incision/intracranial infection were not shown in the case series of the staged procedure group.

Conclusion

The improved simultaneous procedure of cranioplasty and VPS is effective and safe to treat cranial defect and post-traumatic hydrocephalus with low risk of complications.

Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Low Glasgow Coma Score Patients With Extradural Hematoma: A Review of Literature and Guidelines

An extradural hematoma (EDH), also known as an epidural hematoma, is a collection of blood between the inner skull table and the dura mater. It is restricted by the coronal, lambdoid, and sagittal sutures, as these are dural insertions. EDH most frequently occurs in 10- to 40-year-old patients. EDH is uncommon after age 60, as dura matter adheres firmly to the inner skull table. EDH is more common among men as compared to women. EDH most commonly occurs in the temporo-frontal regions and can also be seen in the parieto-occipital, parasagittal regions, and middle and posterior fossae. An EDH contributes approximately 2% of total head injuries and 15% of total fatal head injuries. In EDH, patients typically have a persistent, severe headache, and also, following a few hours of injury, they gradually lose consciousness. The primary bleeding vessels for EDH are the middle meningeal artery, middle meningeal vein, and torn dural venous sinuses. EDH is one of the many consequences of severe traumatic brain injuries that might lead to death. EDH is potentially a lethal condition that requires immediate intervention as, if left untreated, it can lead to growing transtentorial herniation, diminished consciousness, dilated pupils, and other neurological problems. Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) imaging is the gold standard of investigation for diagnosing EDH. For patients with surgical indications, early craniotomy and evacuation of acute extradural hematoma (AEDH) is the gold standard procedure and is predicted to have significant clinical results. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate regarding the best surgical operations for AEDH. Neurosurgeons must choose between a decompressive craniectomy (DC) or a craniotomy to manage EDH, especially in patients with low Glasgow coma scores, to have a better prognosis and clinical results. This is a consultant-based review article in which we have tried to contemplate various pieces of available literature. Here, the objective is to hypothesize DC as the primary surgical management for massive hematoma, which usually presents as a low Glasgow coma score. This is because DC was found to be beneficial in clinical practice.

Clinical outcomes and thermodynamics aspect of direct brain cooling in severe head injury

Background

Brain cooling therapy is one of the subjects of interest, and currently, data on direct brain cooling are lacking. Hence, the objective is to investigate the clinical outcomes and discuss the thermodynamics aspect of direct brain cooling on severely injured brain patients.

Methods

This pilot study recruited the severely injured brain patients who were then randomized to either a direct brain cooling therapy group using a constant cooling temperature system or a control group. All studied patients must be subjected to an emergency neurosurgical procedure of decompressive craniectomy and were monitored with intracranial pressure, brain oxygenation, and temperature. Further, comparison was made with our historical group of patients who had direct brain cooling therapy through the old technique.

Results

The results disclosed the direct brain cooling treated patients through a newer technique obtained a better Extended Glasgow Outcome Score than a control group (P < 001). In addition, there is a significant outcome difference between the combined cooling treated patients (new and old technique) with the control group (P < 0.001). Focal brain oxygenation and temperature are likely factors that correlate with better outcomes.

Conclusion

Direct brain cooling is feasible, safe, and affects the clinical outcomes of the severely traumatized brain, and physics of thermodynamics may play a role in its pathophysiology.

PrImary decompressive Craniectomy in AneurySmal Subarachnoid hemOrrhage (PICASSO) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is associated with poor neurological outcome and high mortality. A major factor influencing morbidity and mortality is brain swelling in the acute phase. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is currently used as an option in order to reduce intractably elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). However, execution and optimal timing of DC remain unclear.

METHODS

PICASSO resembles a multicentric, prospective, 1:1 randomized standard treatment-controlled trial which analyzes whether primary DC (pDC) performed within 24 h combined with the best medical treatment in patients with poor-grade SAH reduces mortality and severe disability in comparison to best medical treatment alone and secondary craniectomy as ultima ratio therapy for elevated ICP. Consecutive patients presenting with poor-grade SAH, defined as grade 4-5 according to the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), will be screened for eligibility. Two hundred sixteen patients will be randomized to receive either pDC additional to best medical treatment or best medical treatment alone. The primary outcome is the clinical outcome according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 12 months, which is dichotomized to favorable (mRS 0-4) and unfavorable (mRS 5-6). Secondary outcomes include morbidity and mortality, time to death, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospital stay, quality of life, rate of secondary DC due to intractably elevated ICP, effect of size of DC on outcome, use of duraplasty, and complications of DC.

DISCUSSION

This multicenter trial aims to generate the first confirmatory data in a controlled randomized fashion that pDC improves the outcome in a clinically relevant endpoint in poor-grade SAH patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS DRKS00017650. Registered on 09 June 2019.

Long-term Benefits for Younger Patients with Aggressive Immediate Intervention following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Cohort Analysis of 175 Patients from a Prospective Registry

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to rise, in part as a reflection of a growing elderly population. Concomitantly, nihilism may exist following substantial neurotrauma from a myriad of commonplace mechanisms, such as traffic incidents, assaults, or falls.

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses long-term outcomes following aggressive surgical intervention with invasive neuromonitoring to guard against nihilism, especially for patients with advantageous characteristics such as younger age.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients with severe TBI treated between 2008 and 2018 and enrolled into the Brain Trauma Research Center (BTRC) database, an Institutional Review Board (IRB 19030228) approved prospective, longitudinal cohort study, were extracted. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. Long-term functional outcome was recorded with the eight-point Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) score at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months by trained, qualified neuropsychology technicians. Chi-squared and analysis of variance tests were used to evaluate the relationship of age groups between different variables.

RESULTS

For this analysis, 175 patients with severe TBI who were enrolled in the BTRC database and required decompressive hemicraniectomy during the study period were included. Over one-third of the patients with a severe TBI, who were aged 35 years and younger, had a favorable outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite enduring a severe TBI, a substantial percentage of younger patients achieved favorable outcomes following aggressive treatment. As such, establishing a prognosis should be deferred to allow for recovery via individualized rehabilitation, multidisciplinary support, and community reintegration programs to cope with various long-term psychological, cognitive, and functional disabilities.

Decompressive Craniectomy for the Treatment of Severe Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background  Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading public health problems across the world. TBI is associated with high economic costs to the healthcare system specially in developing countries. Decompressive craniectomy is a procedure in which an area of the skull is removed to increase the volume of intracranial compartment. There are various techniques of decompressive craniectomy used that include subtemporal and circular decompression, and unilateral or bilateral frontotemporoparietal decompression. Objective  The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of decompressive craniectomy for the management of severe TBI versus conservative management alone at the Department of Neurosurgery, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Methods  The study (randomized controlled trial) was conducted from February 1, 2014, till June 30, 2017. Results  A total of 136 patients were included after following the inclusion criteria. They were randomly assigned to two groups, making it 68 patients in each study group. There were 89 males and 47 females. All the patients received standard care recommended by the Brain Trauma Foundation. The mortality rate observed at 6 months in decompressive craniectomy was 22.05%, while among conservative management group, it was 45.58%. Difference in mortality of both groups at 6 months was significant. Total 61.76% (42) of patients from decompressive craniectomy group had a favorable outcome (Glasgow outcome scale: 4-5) at 6 months. While among conservative management group, total 35.29% (24) had a favorable outcome (Glasgow outcome scale: 4-5). Difference in Glasgow outcome scale at 6 months of both groups was significant. Conclusion  In conclusion, decompressive craniectomy is simple, safe, and better than conservative management alone.

Early expansive single sided laminoplasty decompression treatment severe traumatic cervical spinal cord injury

Background

Severe traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (tcSCI) is a disastrous event for patients and families. Maximizing spinal cord function recovery has become the primary therapeutic goal. This study investigated the effect of early extensive posterior decompression on spinal cord function improvement after severe tcSCI.

Methods

A retrospective review of 83 consecutive patients who underwent extensive open-door laminoplasty decompression within 24 h after severe tcSCI (American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale (AIS) grade A to C) between 2009 and 2017 at our institution was performed. The patient clinical and demographic data were collected. Neurological functional recovery was evaluated according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score system, ASIA motor score (AMS) and AIS grade.

Results

Among the 83 patients initially included, the baseline AIS grade was A in 12, B in 28, and C in 43. Twenty-three patients (27.7%) had a high cervical injury. Cervical spinal stenosis (CSS) was identified in 37 patients (44.6%). The mean intramedullary lesion length was 59.6 ± 20.4 mm preoperatively and 34.2 ± 13.3 mm postoperatively (p < 0.0001). At the final follow-up visit, an improvement of at least one and two AIS grades was found in 75 (90.4%) and 41 (49.4%) patients, respectively. 24 (64.9%) patients with an improvement of least two AIS grades had CSS. The mean AMS and JOA score were significantly improved at discharge and the final follow-up visit compared with on admission (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that early expansive laminoplasty decompression may improve neurological outcomes after severe tcSCI, especially in patients with CSS. Larger and prospective controlled studies are needed to validate these findings.

Evaluation of decompressive craniectomy in mice after severe traumatic brain injury

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is of great significance for relieving acute intracranial hypertension and saving lives after traumatic brain injury (TBI). In this study, a severe TBI mouse model was created using controlled cortical impact (CCI), and a surgical model of DC was established. Furthermore, a series of neurological function assessments were performed to better understand the pathophysiological changes after DC. In this study, mice were randomly allocated into three groups, namely, CCI group, CCI+DC group, and Sham group. The mice in the CCI and CCI+DC groups received CCI after opening a bone window, and after brain injury, immediately returned the bone window to simulate skull condition after a TBI. The CCI+DC group underwent DC and contused tissue removal 6 h after CCI. The mice in the CCI group underwent the same anesthesia process; however, no further treatment of the bone window and trauma was performed. The mice in the Sham group underwent anesthesia and the process of opening the skin and bone window, but not in the CCI group. Changes in Modified Neurological Severity Score, rotarod performance, Morris water maze, intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral blood flow (CBF), brain edema, blood–brain barrier (BBB), inflammatory factors, neuronal apoptosis, and glial cell expression were evaluated. Compared with the CCI group, the CCI+DC group had significantly lower ICP, superior neurological and motor function at 24 h after injury, and less severe BBB damage after injury. Most inflammatory cytokine expressions and the number of apoptotic cells in the brain tissue of mice in the CCI+DC group were lower than in the CCI group at 3 days after injury, with markedly reduced astrocyte and microglia expression. However, the degree of brain edema in the CCI+DC group was greater than in the CCI group, and neurological and motor functions, as well as spatial cognitive and learning ability, were significantly poorer at 14 days after injury.

Absorbable Artificial Dura Versus Nonabsorbable Artificial Dura in Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Two Centers

BACKGROUND

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients usually need decompressive craniectomy (DC) to decrease intracranial pressure. Duraplasty is an important step in DC with various dura substitute choices. This study aims to compare absorbable dura with nonabsorbable dura in duraplasty for severe TBI patients.

METHODS

One hundred and three severe TBI patients who underwent DC and dura repair were included in this study. Thirty-nine cases used absorbable artificial dura (DuraMax) and 64 cases used nonabsorbable artificial dura (NormalGEN). Postoperative complications, mortality and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score in one year were compared in both groups.

RESULTS

Absorbable dura group had higher complication rates in transcalvarial cerebral herniation (TCH) (43.59% in absorbable dura group vs. 17.19% in nonabsorbable dura group, P = 0.003) and CSF leakage (15.38% in absorbable dura group vs. 1.56% in nonabsorbable dura group, P = 0.021). But severity of TCH described with hernial distance and herniation volume demonstrated no difference in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of postoperative intracranial infection, hematoma progression, secondary operation, hydrocephalus, subdural hygroma and seizure in both groups. KPS score in absorbable dura group (37.95 ± 28.58) was statistically higher than nonabsorbable dura group (49.05 ± 24.85) in one year after operation (P = 0.040), while no difference was found in the rate of functional independence (KPS ≥ 70). Besides, among all patients in this study, TCH patients had a higher mortality rate (P = 0.008), lower KPS scores (P < 0.001) and lower functionally independent rate (P = 0.049) in one year after surgery than patients without TCH.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of artificial biological dura, nonabsorbable dura is superior to absorbable dura in treatment of severe TBI patients with DC. Suturable nonabsorbable dura has fewer complications of TCH and CFS leakage, and manifest lower mortality and better prognosis. Postoperative TCH is an important complication in severe TBI which usually leads to a poor prognosis.

Complete hemispheric exposure vs. superior sagittal sinus sparing craniectomy: incidence of shear-bleeding and shunt-dependency

PURPOSE

Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DC) has been established as a standard therapeutical procedure for raised intracranial pressure. However, the size of the DC remains unspecified. The aim of this study was to analyze size related complications following DC.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2019, 306 patients underwent DC for elevated intracranial pressure at author´s institution. Anteroposterior and craniocaudal DC size was measured according to the postoperative CT scans. Patients were divided into two groups with (1) exposed superior sagittal sinus (SE) and (2) without superior sagittal sinus exposure (SC). DC related complications e.g. shear-bleeding at the margins of craniectomy and secondary hydrocephalus were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Craniectomy size according to anteroposterior diameter and surface was larger in the SE group; 14.1 ± 1 cm vs. 13.7 ± 1.2 cm, p = 0.003, resp. 222.5 ± 40 cm2 vs. 182.7 ± 36.9 cm2, p < 0.0001. The SE group had significantly lower rates of shear-bleeding: 20/176 patients; (11%), compared to patients of the SC group; 36/130 patients (27%), p = 0.0003, OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.5. There was no significant difference in the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus; 19/130 patients (14.6%) vs. 24/176 patients (13.6%), p = 0.9.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete hemispheric exposure in terms of DC with SE was associated with significantly lower levels of iatrogenic shear-bleedings compared to a SC-surgical regime. Although we did not find significant outcome difference, our findings suggest aggressive craniectomy regimes including SE to constitute the surgical treatment strategy of choice for malignant intracranial pressure.

Hydrocephalus and the neuro-intensivist: CSF hydrodynamics at the bedside

Hydrocephalus (HCP) is far more complicated than a simple disorder of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation. HCP is a common complication in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and after craniectomy. Clinical measurement in HCP is mainly related to intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral blood flow. The ability to obtain quantitative variables that describe CSF dynamics at the bedside before potential shunting may support clinical intuition with a description of CSF dysfunction and differentiation between normal pressure hydrocephalus and brain atrophy. This review discusses the advanced research on HCP and how CSF is generated, stored and absorbed within the context of a mathematical model developed by Marmarou. Then, we proceed to explain the main quantification analysis of CSF dynamics using infusion techniques for deciding on definitive treatment. We consider that such descriptions of multiple parameters of measurements need to be significantly appreciated by the caring neuro-intensivist, for better understanding of the complex pathophysiology and clinical management and finally, improve of the prognosis of these patients with HCP.

In this review article, we present current and novel theories of CSF circulation and pathophysiology of hydrocephalus, along with results from infusion studies for evaluating CSF dynamics at the bedside.

Microbiological profile and infection potential of different cryopreserved skull flaps after decompressive hemicraniectomy. Is cryopreservation at - 80 ℃ better?

OBJECTIVE

Patterns of cryopreservation of explanted skull bone flaps have long been a matter of debate, in particular the appropriate temperature of storage. To the best of our knowledge no study to date has compared the microbiological profile and the infection potential of skull bone flaps cryostored at the same institution at disparate degrees for neurosurgical purposes. In the context of our clinical trial DRKS00023283, we performed a bacterial culture of explanted skull bone flaps, which were cryopreserved lege artis at a temperature of either - 23 °C or - 80 °C after a decompressive hemicraniectomy. In a further step, we contaminated the bone fragments in a s uspension with specific pathogens (S. aureus, S. epidermidis and C. acnes, Colony forming unit CFU 103/ml) over 24 h and conducted a second culture.

RESULTS

A total of 17 cryopreserved skull flaps (8: - 23 °C; 9: - 80 °C) explanted during decompressive hemicraniectomies performed between 2019 and 2020 as well as 2 computer-aided-designed skulls (1 vancomycin-soaked) were analyzed. Median duration of cryopreservation was 10.5 months (2-17 months). No microorganisms were detected at the normal bacterial culture. After active contamination of our skull flaps, all samples showed similar bacterial growth of above-mentioned pathogens; thus, our study did not reveal an influence of the storage temperature upon infectious dynamic of the skulls.

Presenting Step-Ladder Expansive Cranioplasty as the Next Step After Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: It Is Different!

Context: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DC) is the final surgical remedy for refractory raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Even with years of experience and profound refination of technique, the procedure has less rewarding results in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Besides, arrangements for bone flap preservation and the necessity of follow-up surgery in the form of cranioplasty bring in unavoidable monetary and logistic burdens to the patients. Step-ladder expansive cranioplasty was conceptualized as an alternative to achieve adequate intracranial volume expansion to help normalize ICP, with immediate reinstitution of the Monro-Kellie doctrine. It is also expected to prevent cerebral cortical pressure injury to the cortex underlying the craniectomy defect. The evolution of this concept, as worked out on different models, the surgical technique, and our experience with this technique are discussed in this article. Evidence Acquisition: Multiple research projects undertaken by our team to build up the concept and acquire data necessary to plan the surgical procedure have been published over last eight years. This review article attempts to evaluate the existing knowledge and our clinical experience so far. Results: Step-ladder expansive cranioplasty allows an assured centrifugal displacement of the inner table and underlying dural bag at craniotomy site by at least 9 mm, thereby achieving a minimum volume expansion of 120 cc. Both of these parameters can be increased as desired, if considered necessary by the surgeon. Conclusions: Step-ladder expansive cranioplasty offers an alternative that takes the centripetal pressure exerted by the combination of the tensile strength of the scalp and atmospheric pressure off the brain surface while achieving an assured augmentation of intracranial volume that can be optimized on a case-to-case basis, based on our future understanding of the subject. While it can be a single-stage surgery for those satisfied with the cosmesis, a revision cranioplasty (if required) will be easier, cheaper, and cosmetically superior to achieving cover over a craniotomy defect routinely done after DC.

Hypothermia Therapy for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: An Updated Review

Although hypothermia has shown to protect against ischemic and traumatic neuronal death, its potential role in neurologic recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) remains incompletely understood. Herein, we systematically review the safety and efficacy of hypothermia therapy for TSCI. The English medical literature was reviewed using PRISMA guidelines to identify preclinical and clinical studies examining the safety and efficacy of hypothermia following TSCI. Fifty-seven articles met full-text review criteria, of which twenty-eight were included. The main outcomes of interest were neurological recovery and postoperative complications. Among the 24 preclinical studies, both systemic and local hypothermia significantly improved neurologic recovery. In aggregate, the 4 clinical studies enrolled 60 patients for treatment, with 35 receiving systemic hypothermia and 25 local hypothermia. The most frequent complications were respiratory in nature. No patients suffered neurologic deterioration because of hypothermia treatment. Rates of American Spinal Injury Association (AIS) grade conversion after systemic hypothermia (35.5%) were higher when compared to multiple SCI database control studies (26.1%). However, no statistical conclusions could be drawn regarding the efficacy of hypothermia in humans. These limited clinical trials show promise and suggest therapeutic hypothermia to be safe in TSCI patients, though its effect on neurological recovery remains unclear. The preclinical literature supports the efficacy of hypothermia after TSCI. Further clinical trials are warranted to conclusively determine the effects of hypothermia on neurological recovery as well as the ideal means of administration necessary for achieving efficacy in TSCI.

Decompressive craniectomy practice following traumatic brain injury, in comparison with randomized trials

High quality evidence shows decompressive craniectomy (DC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) may improve survival but increase the number of severely disabled survivors. Contemporary international practice is unknown. We sought to describe international use of DC, and the alignment with evidence and clinical practice guidelines, by analyzing the harmonized CENTER-TBI and OzENTER-TBI Core study datasets. These include patients admitted to ICUs in Europe, the United Kingdom and Australia between 2015 and 2017. Outcomes of interest were treatment with DC relative to clinical trial evidence and the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines. Of 2336 people admitted to ICUs following TBI, DC was performed in 320 (13.7%): in 64/1422 (4.5%) patients with diffuse TBI, and 195/640 (30.5%) patients with traumatic mass lesions. Secondary DC (for treatment of intracranial hypertension) was used infrequently in patients who met enrolment criteria of the two randomised clinical trials informing the guidelines: in 11/124 (8.9%) of those matching DECRA enrolment, and in 30/224 (13.4%) of those matching RESCUEicp. Of patients who underwent DC 258/320 (80.6%) were ineligible for either trial: 149/320 (46.6%) underwent primary DC, 62/320 (19.4%) were outside the trials' age criteria, and 126/320 (39.4%) did not develop intracranial hypertension refractory to non-operative therapies prior to DC. Secondary DC was used infrequently in patients in whom it had been shown to be potentially harmful, indicating alignment between contemporaneous evidence and practice. However, most patients who underwent DC were ineligible for the key trials; whether they benefitted from DC remains unknown.

Machine Learning Approaches-Driven for Mortality Prediction for Patients Undergoing Craniotomy in ICU

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to predict the mortality of patients with craniotomy in ICU by using predictive models to extract the high-risk factors leading to the death of patients from a retrospective a study.

METHODS

Five machine-learning (ML) algorithms were applied for training on mortality predictive models with the data from a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) database of the Fujian Provincial Hospital in China. The accuracy, precision, recall, f1 score and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of different models, and the calibration of the model was evaluated by brier score.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was more suitable for the task, demonstrating a AUC of 0.84. We analyzed the feature importance with the Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) analysis and further identified the high-risk factors of mortality in ICU through this study.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established the mortality predictive model of patients who had undergone craniotomy in ICU. Identification of the factors that had great influence on mortality has the potential to provide auxiliary decision support for clinical medical staff on their practices.

Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Bibliometric Analysis

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of mortality and disability among trauma-related injuries. Neuromonitoring plays an essential role in the management and prognosis of patients with severe TBI. Our bibliometric study aimed to identify the knowledge base, define the research front, and outline the social networks on neuromonitoring in severe TBI. We conducted an electronic search for articles related to neuromonitoring in severe TBI in Scopus. A descriptive analysis retrieved evidence on the most productive authors and countries, the most cited articles, the most frequently publishing journals, and the most common author's keywords. Through a three-step network extraction process, we performed a collaboration analysis among universities and countries, a cocitation analysis, and a word cooccurrence analysis. A total of 1884 records formed the basis of our bibliometric study. We recorded an increasing scientific interest in the use of neuromonitoring in severe TBI. Czosnyka, Hutchinson, Menon, Smielewski, and Stocchetti were the most productive authors. The most cited document was a review study by Maas et al. There was an extensive collaboration among universities. The most common keywords were "intracranial pressure," with an increasing interest in magnetic resonance imaging and cerebral perfusion pressure monitoring. Neuromonitoring constitutes an area of active research. The present findings indicate that intracranial pressure monitoring plays a pivotal role in the management of severe TBI. Scientific interest shifts to magnetic resonance imaging and individualized patient care on the basis of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure.

Predictive Factors of Surgical Site Infection Following Cranioplasty: A Study Including 3D Printed Implants

In patients who have undergone decompressive craniectomy (DC), subsequent cranioplasty is required to reconstruct cranial defects. Surgical site infection (SSI) following cranioplasty is a devastating complication that can lead to cranioplasty failure. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to identify predictive factors for SSI following cranioplasty by reviewing procedures performed over a 10-year period. A retrospective analysis was performed for all patients who underwent cranioplasty following DC between 2010 and 2020 at a single institution. The patients were divided into two groups, non-SSI and SSI, in order to identify clinical variables that are significantly correlated with SSI following cranioplasty. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were then performed to identify predictive factors associated with SSI following cranioplasty. A total of 172 patients who underwent cranioplasty, including 48 who received customized three-dimensional (3D) printed implants, were enrolled in the present study. SSI occurred in 17 patients (9.9%). Statistically significant differences were detected between the non-SSI and SSI groups with respect to presence of fluid collections on CT scans before and after cranioplasty. Presence of fluid collections on computed tomography (CT) scan before (p = 0.0114) and after cranioplasty (p < 0.0000) showed significant association with event-free survival rate for SSI. In a univariate analysis, significant predictors for SSI were fluid collection before (p = 0.0172) and after (p < 0.0001) cranioplasty. In a multivariate analysis, only the presence of fluid collection after cranioplasty was significantly associated with the occurrence of SSI (p < 0.0001). The present study investigated predictive factors that may help identify patients at risk of SSI following cranioplasty and provide guidelines associated with the procedure. Based on the results of the present study, only the presence of fluid collection on CT scan after cranioplasty was significantly associated with the occurrence of SSI. Further investigation with long-term follow-up and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm our conclusions.

Long-Term Outcome Following Decompressive Craniectomy in Pediatric Penetrating Blast Brain Injury; a Prospective Study

Background: Brain penetrating blast injury is a leading cause of early death due to excessively elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), culminating in trans-tentorial herniation. The role of craniectomy to decrease ICP and secondary injuries has been controversial particularly in pediatric patients. Three cases of pediatric penetrating blast injuries undergoing decompressive craniectomy are reported in Methods: The current study was a prospective series, including fifteen cases of pediatric blast-related brain injury referred to the emergency ward during a period of two years. Three survived patients had a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of four along with anisocoric pupillary light reflex (PLR). Decompressive craniectomy and ventriculostomy (EVD) were performed. The patients underwent ICP monitoring for two weeks. Results: Early postoperative GCS (5 days) was 7/15 in all three patients. Two weeks and one month’s GCS were 9 and 14, respectively. After three months, cranioplasty was performed. Long-term follow-up detected no major motor deficits after one year and was associated with excellent school performance. Neuroplasticity resulted in contralateral dominancy and handedness in one case. Conclusions: Survivors of pediatric blast brain injury had a favorable outcome after decompressive craniectomy in the current paper. However, there was a limited number of patients, and the results could not be generalized. Further research in this regard with larger sample size is recommended.

Contraindications to the Initiation of Veno-Venous ECMO for Severe Acute Respiratory Failure in Adults: A Systematic Review and Practical Approach Based on the Current Literature

(1) Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used for acute respiratory failure with few absolute but many relative contraindications. The provider in charge often has a difficult time weighing indications and contraindications to anticipate if the patient will benefit from this treatment, a decision that often decides life and death for the patient. To assist in this process in coming to a good evidence-based decision, we reviewed the available literature. (2) Methods: We performed a systematic review through a literature search of the MEDLINE database of former and current absolute and relative contraindications to the initiation of ECMO treatment. (3) Results: The following relative and absolute contraindications were identified in the literature: absolute-refusal of the use of extracorporeal techniques by the patient, advanced stage of cancer, fatal intracerebral hemorrhage/cerebral herniation/intractable intracranial hypertension, irreversible destruction of the lung parenchyma without the possibility of transplantation, and contraindications to lung transplantation; relative-advanced age, immunosuppressed patients/pharmacological immunosuppression, injurious ventilator settings > 7 days, right-heart failure, hematologic malignancies, especially bone marrow transplantation and graft-versus-host disease, SAPS II score ≥ 60 points, SOFA score > 12 points, PRESERVE score ≥ 5 points, RESP score ≤ -2 points, PRESET score ≥ 6 points, and "do not attempt resuscitation" order (DN(A)R status). (4) Conclusions: We provide a simple-to-follow algorithm that incorporates absolute and relative contraindications to the initiation of ECMO treatment. This algorithm attempts to weigh pros and cons regarding the benefit for an individual patient and hopefully assists caregivers to make better, informed decisions.