Estimation of the Quality-of-Life Impact of X-Linked Myotubular Myopathy

Utility Studies in Rare Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review

OBJECTIVES

There are challenges associated with generating health-state utility values for rare diseases, leading to a potential lack of standardization in the methods used. This systematic literature review characterized the approaches used to generate utility data in rare diseases.

METHODS

Searches of MEDLINE/Embase, health technology assessment and cost-effectiveness databases were conducted, supplemented by grey literature searches. Due to the large volume of evidence identified, articles were prioritized for full-text review by applying a 2020 date limit.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven articles (assessing 56 rare conditions) were included. Nineteen unique health-related quality-of-life tools were identified, 14 of which were generic. Indirect valuation methods were more common than direct (80 vs 43 instances). Among the indirect methods, the preference-based EQ-5D questionnaire was most reported (55 instances), followed by the non-preference-based short-form questionnaires (8 instances). Five disease-specific, non-preference-based questionnaires were reported. Mapping algorithms were used for preference-based and non-preference-based measures, typically mapped to EQ-5D, although challenges with mapping disease-specific tools to preference-based measures were noted. Vignettes were used in 29 articles; however, incomplete reporting on the development process limited the quality assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Generic, preference-based measures were commonly used to generate utility data in rare diseases among the identified studies, facilitating comparison but potentially limiting sensitivity of results. Development of appropriate and valid disease-specific measures and more transparent/consistent reporting of vignette development, would help ensure that all aspects of health-related quality-of-life impacted by rare diseases are suitably captured, to allow reliable demonstration of the value of treatments to support future reimbursement.

Estimating health state utilities for aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency (AADCd) in the United States

BACKGROUND

AADCd is a rare neurometabolic disorder presenting in infancy. Children with AADCd have motor dysfunction and development delays that result in the need for lifelong care; quality of life is greatly impacted. Current characterizations of health-related quality of life and associated health state utilities (HSUs) may be underestimated in AADCd. Accurate characterization of AADCd burden is important when evaluating the benefits of treatment, especially the improvements observed with the recently approved disease-modifying therapy eladocagene exuparvovec. Time-trade-off (TTO) vignette methods may be used to elicit HSUs in AADCd for assessing the value of new treatments. This study aimed to first update previously published health state vignettes, then estimate AADCd HSUs in the United States (US).

METHODS

Existing vignettes for five AADCd health states were updated based on the review of published literature and clinician/caregiver input. Health states included: "bedridden/no motor function," "head control," "sitting unassisted," "standing with support," "walking with assistance." Online composite TTO interviews were conducted 1:1 with adults from the US general public. Participants ranked health states in order of preference using a visual analog scale, then were presented with health state vignettes to elicit utilities using TTO. Mean TTO scores were calculated for each health state, and regression models were used to estimate disutility associated with use of feeding tube.

RESULTS

Following revision of the vignettes, 120 participants completed the TTO task (mean age: 47 years; 50% female; 70% White); characteristics were not significantly different from US population norms in terms of age, sex, race or ethnicity. Six participants who appeared to misunderstand the exercise were excluded. Mean (SD) HSUs were: -0.258 (0.534) for bedridden state, -0.155 (0.569) for head control, 0.452 (0.523) for sitting unassisted, 0.775 (0.242) for standing with support, and 0.796 (0.235) for walking with assistance. The need for a feeding tube was associated with a disutility of 0.07.

CONCLUSIONS

This study implemented TTO methods to estimate utilities for five health states which reflect the burden and impact of AADCd. The range in values from the most to least severe health state suggests that there is potential for effective treatments to substantially improve quality of life in these patients.

Assessment of health state utilities associated with adult and pediatric acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD)

INTRODUCTION

Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) type B is a rare genetic disorder leading to enlargement of the spleen and liver, pulmonary dysfunction, and other symptoms. Cost-utility analyses are often conducted to quantify the value of new treatments, and these analyses require health state utilities. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to estimate utilities associated with varying levels of severity of adult and pediatric ASMD type B.

METHODS

Seven adult and seven child health state vignettes describing ASMD were developed based on published literature, clinical trial results, and interviews with clinicians, patients with ASMD, and parents of children with ASMD. The health states were valued in time trade-off interviews with adult general population respondents in the UK.

RESULTS

Interviews were completed with 202 participants (50.0% female; mean age = 41.3 years). The health state representing ASMD without impairment had the highest mean utility for both the adult and child health states (0.92/0.94), and severe ASMD had the lowest mean utility (0.33/0.45). Every child health state had a significantly greater utility than the corresponding adult health state. Differences between adult/child paired states ranged from 0.02 to 0.13. Subgroup analyses explored the impact of parenting status on valuation of child health states.

DISCUSSION

Greater severity of ASMD was associated with lower mean utility. Results have implications for valuation of pediatric health states. The resulting utilities may be useful in cost-utility modeling estimating the value of treatment for ASMD.

Improving Interpretation of Evidence Relating to Quality of Life in Health Technology Assessments of Rare Disease Treatments

Rare diseases are often severe, debilitating, life-limiting conditions, many of which occur in childhood. These complex conditions have a wide range of clinical manifestations that have a substantial impact on the lives of patients, carers and families and often produce heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Therefore, the evaluation of quality-of-life (QoL) impacts is important. In health technology assessment (HTA), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and/or health state utility values (HSUVs) are used to determine QoL impacts of new treatments, but their use in rare diseases is challenging due to small and heterogeneous populations and limited disease knowledge. This paper describes challenges associated with the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs)/HSUVs to evaluate QoL in HTA of rare disease treatments (RDTs) and identifies five recommendations to ensure appropriate interpretation of QoL impacts. These were derived from mixed methods research (literature reviews, appraisal document analyses, appraisal committee observations and interviews) examining the use of PROs/HSUVs in HTA of RDTs. They highlight that HTAs of RDTs must (1) understand the QoL impacts of the disease and of treatments; (2) critically assess PRO data, recognising the nuances in development and administration of PROMs/HSUVs, considering what is feasible and what matters most to the patient population; (3) recognise that lack of significant effect on a PRO does not imply no QoL benefit; (4) use different forms of evidence to understand QoL impacts, such as patient input; and (5) provide methodological guidance to capture QoL impacts on patients/carers.

Estimating health state utilities in primary hyperoxaluria type 1: a valuation study

AIMS

Quantitative data on health state utilities in primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) are lacking. This study was conducted to estimate utility values in PH1 using 3 standard valuation techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Health state vignettes were developed with input from expert clinicians to describe different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) within the setting of PH1, along with a post-combined liver and kidney transplant (CLKT) health state ≥12 months following transplantation. The utility associated with living in each PH1 health state, as described by the vignettes, was evaluated by members of the UK general public using standard utility assessment techniques, including EQ-5D-5L, Visual Analog Scale, and Time Trade-Off.

RESULTS

A similar pattern across the three valuation methods was observed. Utility values were roughly constant from CKD stage 1-3b and then dropped sharply from these states to CKD stage 4. Decreases in utility in the later stages of CKD (stages 4-5) were followed by a recovery in quality of life in the post-CLKT health state.

LIMITATIONS

Vignettes may not fully capture the burden of living with PH1.

CONCLUSIONS

This study serves as an informative source of data on how the burden of PH1 varies across disease stages of CKD and post-CLKT in patients with PH1. The study findings highlight the unique clinical features of PH1 compared with non-PH1-related CKD, such as the need for earlier and more intensive hemodialysis, the risk of systemic oxalosis, and the potential need for CLKT (as opposed to kidney-only transplant). The impact of PH1 on health-related quality of life, which worsens once hemodialysis is required and systemic disease manifestations occur, is captured in this study using quantitative health state utilities. These data provide an understanding of the impact of PH1 on health-related quality of life and will facilitate health economic evaluation of future treatments.