1
|
Scholl M, Amerkamp J, Chermette C, Frank F, Funke C, Giesen L, Haas V, Heßbrügge M, Küppers L, Pilic L, Vitinius F, Biallas B. Patients' and stakeholders' experiences of a personalized self-management SUPport program (P-SUP) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease: a qualitative process evaluation : Maximilian Scholl. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:2566. [PMID: 39300369 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20034-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease cause medical, social, and economic burdens worldwide. Disease management programs in Germany mostly lack components to improve patients' self-management and health-promoting lifestyles despite clear guideline recommendations. Therefore, a Personalized Self-Management Support Program (P-SUP) was developed, which includes: (1) peer support groups; (2) telephone coaching; (3) feedback reports and, (4) a web portal. This study aims to explore patients' and implementing stakeholders' experiences in the implementation of P-SUP to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the intervention. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted using face-to-face focus group interviews with participating patients and telephone-based one-to-one expert interviews with implementing stakeholders, involved in the delivery of the intervention. The transcribed interview reports were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, and the contents were categorized according to Donabedian's Structure-Process-Outcome framework. RESULTS A total of six themes among patients (N = 35) and five themes among implementing stakeholders (N = 32) represent the experiences. The patient themes were: (1) technical conditions, (2) indoor facilities, (3) group composition, (4) acceptance of digital components, (5) supervision and feedback and (6) impact on lifestyle behavior. The themes among the implementing stakeholders were: (1) multiprofessional approach, (2) human resources, (3) patient acceptance, (4) supervision and feedback and (5) impact on lifestyle behavior. CONCLUSIONS Multiprofessional interventions such as P-SUP appear to be valuable for patients and implementing stakeholders. Although infrastructural barriers made the implementation of peer support and digital patient education difficult, patients rated the exchange with peers and experts on health-related topics positively. The lack of supervision and feedback during the course of the intervention might be compensated by regular telephone coaching. The findings from this study can be used in future studies to guide researchers and implementing stakeholders and to improve the feasibility and effectiveness of complex interventions in different contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION The P-SUP study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 16/07/2020 under the registration number DRKS00020592.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Scholl
- Institute of Movement Therapy and Movement-oriented Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sports University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Jessica Amerkamp
- Institute of Movement Therapy and Movement-oriented Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sports University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Chloé Chermette
- Institute of Psychology, German Sports University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Friederike Frank
- Institute for Digitalization and General Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Rare Diseases Aachen (ZSEA), Medical Faculty, RWTH , Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christian Funke
- IInstitute of General Practice, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Lisa Giesen
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Viviana Haas
- IInstitute of General Practice, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martina Heßbrügge
- Institute of General Practice, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lucas Küppers
- Institute of Family Medicine and General Practice, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Larisa Pilic
- Institute of General Practice, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Frank Vitinius
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Robert-Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Bianca Biallas
- Institute of Movement Therapy and Movement-oriented Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sports University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bender M, Williams MM. Describing a programme of implementation-effectiveness research on the organization and implementation of frontline nursing care delivery into diverse heath systems. J Adv Nurs 2024. [PMID: 39152611 DOI: 10.1111/jan.16395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Revised: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
AIMS The longitudinal programme of research described in this paper seeks to generate knowledge about factors influencing the implementation of a system-level intervention, the clinical nurse leader care model, involving nurses as leaders at the frontlines of care and the outcomes achievable with successful implementation. The research programme has the following aims, (a) to clarify clinical nurse leader practice, (b) develop and empirically validate a translational model of frontline care delivery that includes clinical nurse leader practice and (c) delineate the patterns of and critical outcomes of successful implementation of the clinical nurse leader care model. DESIGN This programme of research follows a knowledge-building trajectory involving multiple study designs in both qualitative (grounded theory, case study) and quantitative (descriptive, correlational and quasi-experimental) traditions. METHODS Multiple mixed methods within a system-based participatory framework were used to conduct this programme of implementation-effectiveness research. RESULTS Findings are demonstrating how the clinical nurse leader care model, as a complex system-level intervention, can be implemented in diverse healthcare contexts to make a difference to patient care quality and safety. Findings also contribute to implementation science, helping to better understand the dynamic interdependencies between implementation, the interventions implemented and the contexts in which they are implemented. CONCLUSION Findings translate into sets of evidence-informed implementation 'recipes' that health systems can match to their specific contexts and needs. This allows health systems to take on strategies that both maximize resource impact within their existing structures and support achieving intended outcomes. IMPLICATION This programme of research is producing actionable implementation and outcome evidence about ways to organize nursing knowledge and practice into care models that can be successfully adopted within real-world healthcare settings to achieve safer and higher quality patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Bender
- Sue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California, Irvine 854 Medical Sciences Quad, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Marjory Micki Williams
- Research Investigator (WOC), Research Service, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bahador RS, Dastyar N, Ahmadidarrehsima S, Rafati S, Rafati F. The patients' lived experiences with equitable nursing care. Nurs Ethics 2024; 31:859-874. [PMID: 37867260 DOI: 10.1177/09697330231209293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Equitable care is a fundamental value in the nursing profession. Healthcare workers have both a moral and professional duty to ensure that they do not discriminate. AIM This study aimed to explore how patients perceive equitable nursing care. RESEARCH DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND RESEARCH CONTEXT This descriptive phenomenological qualitative research study used purposeful sampling to select 17 patients from various departments of a general hospital in southern Iran. The participants were then interviewed using a semi-structured in-depth interview format, which aimed to delve into their experiences with equitable nursing care. The collected data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step method and MAXQDA20 software. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS Oral and written information about the study was provided before the participants gave their written consent. The transcribed interviews were de-identified. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiroft University of Medical Sciences. FINDINGS The data analysis of the study identified three main themes and six subthemes that were related to the experiences of patients with equitable nursing care. The first theme, equitable care, encompassed subthemes such as nurses' dedicated efforts to facilitate patient recovery and adherence to ethical behavior. The second theme, unconscious causes of inequitable nursing care, included subthemes such as unintentional discrimination stemming from organizational constraints and unconscious biases resulting from a lack of knowledge and skills. The third theme, discriminatory care, comprised subthemes such as deliberate discrimination based on personal traits and selective discrimination. CONCLUSION The study findings indicate that achieving equitable nursing care requires a multifaceted approach. This includes effective hospital management, organizational reforms, and regulatory enhancements. Additionally, it is crucial to pay close attention to the needs of patients, enhance nurses' theoretical and practical skills in providing equitable care, fostering a culture of equality within healthcare settings, and consider the personality dimensions and moral characteristics of nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raziyeh Sadat Bahador
- Department of Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran
| | - Neda Dastyar
- Department of Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran
| | - Sudabeh Ahmadidarrehsima
- Department of Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran
| | - Shideh Rafati
- Social Factors in Health Promotion Research Center, Hormozgan Health Research Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Foozieh Rafati
- Nursing and Midwifery School, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ostler C, Dickinson A, Metcalf C, Donovan-Hall M. Development of the ECLIPSE model of meaningful outcome domains following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation, through systematic review and best fit framework synthesis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0307523. [PMID: 39042623 PMCID: PMC11265722 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about which outcome domains characterise meaningful recovery following prosthetic rehabilitation and should be measured. Our previous qualitative work developed a conceptual model of outcome domains which are meaningful to patients. This qualitative synthesis aims to develop that model by exploring views and experiences of recovery captured in the limb loss literature, and use these to produce a second iteration of the model describing outcome domains of importance following prosthetic rehabilitation from the patient's perspective. METHODS Systematic searches were conducted using CINAHL, Psychinfo and Web of Science from 2011 to early 2023. Studies with a qualitative design focusing on views and experiences of lower limb prosthetic users were eligible for inclusion. Quality was assessed using the CASP tool. 'Best Fit' framework synthesis was used to synthesise the evidence and develop the conceptual model. RESULTS 40 studies were included, describing the experiences of 539 participants. Data supported the pre-existing conceptual model and led to development of four of the five domains. The newly named ECLIPSE model describes meaningful outcome domains as 1) Being able to participate in important activities and roles, 2) Participating in the way I want to, 3) My prosthesis works for me, 4) If I am in pain, I can manage it, and 5) I am able to accept my new normal. Studies came from 15 countries showing good coverage of high-income settings. Few participants from low-and-middle-income countries were included, it is unclear if the ECLIPSE model describes outcome domains of importance in these settings. CONCLUSIONS This synthesis provides a rigorous foundation for understanding outcome domains of importance following lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation from the patient's perspective. The ECLIPSE model is an accessible representation of recovery which could direct rehabilitation programmes, as well as inform the evaluation of prosthetic care through the selection of outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantel Ostler
- Portsmouth Enablement Centre, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Dickinson
- School of Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Cheryl Metcalf
- School of Healthcare Innovation and Enterprise, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Maggie Donovan-Hall
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
De Rosis S. Performance measurement and user-centeredness in the healthcare sector: Opening the black box adapting the framework of Donabedian. Int J Health Plann Manage 2024; 39:1172-1182. [PMID: 37947478 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The framework of Donabedian is widely applied to performance assessment at the healthcare system level. Donabedian categorised the care quality measurement around three dimensions, namely structure, process, and outcomes. The first dimension concerns the inputs; the second one, the combinations of factors and inputs; the last one, the effectiveness in terms of patients' health status. Donabedian early included in the last dimension the patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, nowadays, outcomes are generally measured through hard endpoints, such as re-admissions and mortality indicators. Recently, the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) have been included among the outcome measures within the Donabedian framework. How to move the concept of patient-centeredness to a macro level, including the patient point of view in care quality measurement, evaluation, and improvement? This paper integrates the Donabedian structure-process-outcome framework, by incorporating in the proper dimension the patient-indicators, namely the abovementioned PROMs and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs). While PROMs are clearly measures of outcome, PREMs can be collocated in the process dimension, since they can be useful for mapping processes and care pathways, in a lean perspective, as well as in the outcome dimension, because inherently linked to outcome, and enablers of patient-centeredness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina De Rosis
- Management and Healthcare Laboratory, Institute of Management and Department L'EMbeDS, Sant'Anna School, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moreno A, Lostao L, Sperlich S, Beller J, Ronda E, Geyer S, Regidor E. Socioeconomic Patterns in the Frequency of Doctor Visits in Germany and Spain in Subjects With and Without Chronic Diseases. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICES 2024; 54:121-130. [PMID: 38166504 DOI: 10.1177/27551938231224708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2024]
Abstract
The objective of universal health care systems is to achieve equality in the use of health services at the same level of care need. This study evaluates the relationship of socioeconomic position with the frequency of doctor visits in subjects with and without chronic diseases in Germany and Spain. The dependent variables included number of consultations and if a medical consultation occurred. The socioeconomic factors were income and education. The magnitude of the relationship between socioeconomic position and medical consultation frequency was estimated by calculating the percentage ratio using binomial regression and by calculating the difference in consultations by analysis of the covariance, in the case of number of visits. Statistically significant findings according to education were not observed. The percentage ratio in the medical consultations among those with lower and higher income was 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.88) in Germany and 1.11 (95% CI 1.03-1.20) in Spain among subjects with any of the studied chronic conditions. Also, in Germany the difference in the average number of consultations comparing lower income subjects with higher was 3.98 (95% CI 2.40-5.57) in those with chronic conditions. In both countries, there were no differences in the frequency of doctor visits according to education. However, a pro-inequality trend exists in favor of subjects with lower income.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almudena Moreno
- Department of Sociology. Medical Sociology, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- I-COMMUNITAS - Institute for Advanced Social Research, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Lourdes Lostao
- Department of Sociology. Medical Sociology, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- I-COMMUNITAS - Institute for Advanced Social Research, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Johannes Beller
- Medical Sociology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Elena Ronda
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Unit, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Siegfried Geyer
- Medical Sociology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Enrique Regidor
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schmit N, Topazian HM, Pianella M, Charles GD, Winskill P, White MT, Hauck K, Ghani AC. Modeling resource allocation strategies for insecticide-treated bed nets to achieve malaria eradication. eLife 2024; 12:RP88283. [PMID: 38329112 PMCID: PMC10957170 DOI: 10.7554/elife.88283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Large reductions in the global malaria burden have been achieved, but plateauing funding poses a challenge for progressing towards the ultimate goal of malaria eradication. Using previously published mathematical models of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax transmission incorporating insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) as an illustrative intervention, we sought to identify the global funding allocation that maximized impact under defined objectives and across a range of global funding budgets. The optimal strategy for case reduction mirrored an allocation framework that prioritizes funding for high-transmission settings, resulting in total case reductions of 76% and 66% at intermediate budget levels, respectively. Allocation strategies that had the greatest impact on case reductions were associated with lesser near-term impacts on the global population at risk. The optimal funding distribution prioritized high ITN coverage in high-transmission settings endemic for P. falciparum only, while maintaining lower levels in low-transmission settings. However, at high budgets, 62% of funding was targeted to low-transmission settings co-endemic for P. falciparum and P. vivax. These results support current global strategies to prioritize funding to high-burden P. falciparum-endemic settings in sub-Saharan Africa to minimize clinical malaria burden and progress towards elimination, but highlight a trade-off with 'shrinking the map' through a focus on near-elimination settings and addressing the burden of P. vivax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Schmit
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Hillary M Topazian
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Matteo Pianella
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Giovanni D Charles
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Peter Winskill
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Michael T White
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Analytics G5 Unit, Department of Global Health, Institut Pasteur, Université de ParisParisFrance
| | - Katharina Hauck
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, Imperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Azra C Ghani
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
French C, Dowrick A, Fudge N, Pinnock H, Taylor SJC. What do we want to get out of this? a critical interpretive synthesis of the value of process evaluations, with a practical planning framework. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:302. [PMID: 36434520 PMCID: PMC9700891 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01767-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Process evaluations aim to understand how complex interventions bring about outcomes by examining intervention mechanisms, implementation, and context. While much attention has been paid to the methodology of process evaluations in health research, the value of process evaluations has received less critical attention. We aimed to unpack how value is conceptualised in process evaluations by identifying and critically analysing 1) how process evaluations may create value and 2) what kind of value they may create. METHODS We systematically searched for and identified published literature on process evaluation, including guidance, opinion pieces, primary research, reviews, and discussion of methodological and practical issues. We conducted a critical interpretive synthesis and developed a practical planning framework. RESULTS We identified and included 147 literature items. From these we determined three ways in which process evaluations may create value or negative consequences: 1) through the socio-technical processes of 'doing' the process evaluation, 2) through the features/qualities of process evaluation knowledge, and 3) through using process evaluation knowledge. We identified 15 value themes. We also found that value varies according to the characteristics of individual process evaluations, and is subjective and context dependent. CONCLUSION The concept of value in process evaluations is complex and multi-faceted. Stakeholders in different contexts may have very different expectations of process evaluations and the value that can and should be obtained from them. We propose a planning framework to support an open and transparent process to plan and create value from process evaluations and negotiate trade-offs. This will support the development of joint solutions and, ultimately, generate more value from process evaluations to all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline French
- grid.4868.20000 0001 2171 1133Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB UK
| | - Anna Dowrick
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GC UK
| | - Nina Fudge
- grid.4868.20000 0001 2171 1133Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB UK
| | - Hilary Pinnock
- grid.4305.20000 0004 1936 7988Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Doorway 3, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
| | - Stephanie J. C. Taylor
- grid.4868.20000 0001 2171 1133Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Farah Saliba L, Allen P, Mazzucca SL, Rodriguez Weno E, Moreland-Russell S, Padek M, Brownson RC. Program adaptation by health departments. Front Public Health 2022; 10:892258. [PMID: 36172214 PMCID: PMC9512313 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.892258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The dissemination of evidence-based interventions (i.e., programs, practices, and policies) is a core function of US state health departments (SHDs). However, interventions are originally designed and tested with a specific population and context. Hence, adapting the intervention to meet the real-world circumstances and population's needs can increase the likelihood of achieving the expected health outcomes for the target population from the implemented intervention. This study identified how SHD employees decide to adapt public health programs and what influences decisions on how to adapt them. Materials and methods SHD employees (n = 45) were interviewed using a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Telephone interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were consensus-coded and themes were identified using thematic analysis. Several themes aligned with the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact. Results Data, outcomes, and health department evaluations influenced decisions to adapt a program (pre-adaptation), and reasons to adapt a program included organizational and sociopolitical contextual factors. SHD middle-level managers, program managers and staff, and local agencies were involved in the decisions to adapt the programs. Finally, the goals for adapting a program included enhancing effectiveness/outcomes, reach and satisfaction with the program; funding; and partner engagement. After SHD employees decided to adapt a program, data and evidence guided the changes. Program staff and evaluators were engaged in the adaptation process. Program managers consulted partners to gather ideas on how best to adapt a program based on partners' experiences implementing the program and obtaining community input. Lastly, program managers also received input on adapting content and context from coalition meetings and periodic technical assistance calls. Discussion The findings related to decisions to adapt public health programs provide practitioners with considerations for adapting them. Findings reaffirm the importance of promoting public health competencies in program evaluation and adaptation, as well as systematically documenting and evaluating the adaptation processes. In addition, the themes could be studied in future research as mechanisms, mediators, and moderators to implementation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Farah Saliba
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Peg Allen
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Stephanie L. Mazzucca
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Emily Rodriguez Weno
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Sarah Moreland-Russell
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Margaret Padek
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Ross C. Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Magnitude of terminological bias in international health services research: a disambiguation analysis in mental health. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2022; 31:e59. [PMID: 35993182 PMCID: PMC9428902 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796022000403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Health services research (HSR) is affected by a widespread problem related to service terminology including non-commensurability (using different units of analysis for comparisons) and terminological unclarity due to ambiguity and vagueness of terms. The aim of this study was to identify the magnitude of the terminological bias in health and social services research and health economics by applying an international classification system. METHODS This study, that was part of the PECUNIA project, followed an ontoterminology approach (disambiguation of technical and scientific terms using a taxonomy and a glossary of terms). A listing of 56 types of health and social services relevant for mental health was compiled from a systematic review of the literature and feedback provided by 29 experts in six European countries. The disambiguation of terms was performed using an ontology-based classification of services (Description and Evaluation of Services and DirectoriEs - DESDE), and its glossary of terms. The analysis focused on the commensurability and the clarity of definitions according to the reference classification system. Interrater reliability was analysed using κ. RESULTS The disambiguation revealed that only 13 terms (23%) of the 56 services selected were accurate. Six terms (11%) were confusing as they did not correspond to services as defined in the reference classification system (non-commensurability bias), 27 (48%) did not include a clear definition of the target population for which the service was intended, and the definition of types of services was unclear in 59% of the terms: 15 were ambiguous and 11 vague. The κ analyses were significant for agreements in unit of analysis and assignment of DESDE codes and very high in definition of target population. CONCLUSIONS Service terminology is a source of systematic bias in health service research, and certainly in mental healthcare. The magnitude of the problem is substantial. This finding has major implications for the international comparability of resource use in health economics, quality and equality research. The approach presented in this paper contributes to minimise differentiation between services by taking into account key features such as target population, care setting, main activities and type and number of professionals among others. This approach also contributes to support financial incentives for effective health promotion and disease prevention. A detailed analysis of services in terms of cost measurement for economic evaluations reveals the necessity and usefulness of defining services using a coding system and taxonomical criteria rather than by 'text-based descriptions'.
Collapse
|
11
|
Rondeaux S, Braeckman T, Beckwé M, Biset N, Maesschalck J, Duquet N, De Wulf I, Devroey D, De Vriese C. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Assessment in Community Pharmacies: An Implementation Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19148699. [PMID: 35886551 PMCID: PMC9316424 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The implementation of a new service is often challenging when translating research findings into routine clinical practices. This paper presents the results of the implementation study of a pilot project for a diabetes and cardiovascular diseases risk-assessment service in Belgian community pharmacies. To evaluate the implementation of the service, a mixed method was used that follows the RE-AIM framework. During the testing stage, 37 pharmacies participated, including five that dropped out due to a lack of time or COVID-19-related temporary obligations. Overall, 502 patients participated, of which 376 (74.9%) were eligible for according-to-protocol analysis. Of these, 80 patients (21.3%) were identified as being at high risk for the targeted diseases, and 100 (26.6%) were referred to general practice for further investigation. We presented the limited effectiveness and the key elements influencing optimal implementation. Additional strategies, such as interprofessional workshops, a data-sharing platform, and communication campaigns, should be considered to spread awareness of the new role of pharmacists. Such strategies could also promote collaboration with general practitioners to ensure the follow-up of patients at high risk. Overall, this service was considered easy to perform and feasible in practice but would require financial and external support to ensure its effectiveness, sustainability, and larger-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Rondeaux
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium; (S.R.); (N.B.)
| | - Tessa Braeckman
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (T.B.); (M.B.); (D.D.)
| | - Mieke Beckwé
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (T.B.); (M.B.); (D.D.)
| | - Natacha Biset
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium; (S.R.); (N.B.)
| | - Joris Maesschalck
- Association of Pharmacists Belgium, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (J.M.); (N.D.); (I.D.W.)
| | - Nathalie Duquet
- Association of Pharmacists Belgium, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (J.M.); (N.D.); (I.D.W.)
| | - Isabelle De Wulf
- Association of Pharmacists Belgium, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (J.M.); (N.D.); (I.D.W.)
| | - Dirk Devroey
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (T.B.); (M.B.); (D.D.)
| | - Carine De Vriese
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium; (S.R.); (N.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-26-505-310
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brunton L, Sammut-Powell C, Birleson E, Boaden R, Knowles SE, McQuaker C, Cross S, Greaves N, Paroutoglou K, Alzouabi O, Patel HC, Suman A, Kawafi K, Parry-Jones AR. Scale-up of ABC care bundle for intracerebral haemorrhage across two hyperacute stroke units in one region in England: a mixed methods evaluation of a quality improvement project. BMJ Open Qual 2022; 11:bmjoq-2021-001601. [PMID: 35428671 PMCID: PMC9014063 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) accounts for 10%–15% of strokes in the UK, but is responsible for half of all annual global stroke deaths. The ABC bundle for ICH was developed and implemented at Salford Royal Hospital, and was associated with a 44% reduction in 30-day case fatality. Implementation of the bundle was scaled out to the other hyperacute stroke units (HASUs) in the region from April 2017. A mixed methods evaluation was conducted alongside to investigate factors influencing implementation of the bundle across new settings, in order to provide lessons for future spread. Methods A harmonised quality improvement registry at each HASU captured consecutive patients with spontaneous ICH from October 2016 to March 2018 to capture process and outcome measures for preimplementation (October 2016 to March 2017) and implementation (April 2017 to March 2018) time periods. Statistical analyses were performed to determine differences in process measures and outcomes before and during implementation. Multiple qualitative methods (interviews, non-participant observation and project document analysis) captured how the bundle was implemented across the HASUs. Results HASU1 significantly reduced median anticoagulant reversal door-to-needle time from 132 min (IQR: 117–342) preimplementation to 76 min (64–113.5) after implementation and intensive blood pressure lowering door to target time from 345 min (204–866) preimplementation to 84 min (60–117) after implementation. No statistically significant improvements in process targets were observed at HASU2. No significant change was seen in 30-day mortality at either HASU. Qualitative evaluation identified the importance of facilitation during implementation and identified how contextual changes over time impacted on implementation. This identified the need for continued implementation support. Conclusion The findings show how the ABC bundle can be successfully implemented into new settings and how challenges can impede implementation. Findings have been used to develop an implementation strategy to support future roll out of the bundle outside the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Brunton
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Camilla Sammut-Powell
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Emily Birleson
- Stroke Department, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth Boaden
- Alliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah E Knowles
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Clare McQuaker
- Stroke Department, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, UK
| | - Stephen Cross
- Stroke Department, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, UK
| | - Natalie Greaves
- Stroke Department, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Omran Alzouabi
- Stroke Department, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Hiren C Patel
- Neurosurgical Department, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Appukuttan Suman
- Stroke Department, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, UK
| | - Khalil Kawafi
- Stroke Department, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Adrian R Parry-Jones
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alem MER, da Silva JB, Beleza ACS, Chaves TC, Driusso P. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement property analysis of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Three Incontinence Questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33:3053-3060. [PMID: 34985535 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05036-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS The differential diagnosis of urinary symptoms may allow health professionals to establish a therapeutic objective and to choose the appropriate treatment for the patient's complaint. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the Three Incontinence Questionnaire (3IQ) into Brazilian Portuguese (3IQ-Br) and to analyze test-retest reliability, construct, and criterion validity in women. METHODS The cross-cultural adaptation of the 3IQ-Br included forward-translation, back-translation, and consensus among an expert committee. Participants with and without urinary incontinence (UI) completed the 3IQ-Br, King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and Questionnaire for Female Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID-Br). Only women with UI answered 3IQ-Br after 7-10 days. Test-retest reliability and construct validity were analyzed using the Cohen linear kappa (k). The 3IQ-Br accuracy was analyzed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, considering the sensitivity and specificity to correctly classify women with and without UI. RESULTS The reliability of each question from the 3IQ-Br was considered substantial in the test-retest. The agreement among 3IQ-Br, QUID-Br, and KHQ was almost perfect for UI diagnosis (k > 0.8). The 3IQ-Br was considered to have good accuracy in distinguishing women with UI considering the KHQ (AUC 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 0.87, p < 0.001), and fair to the QUID-Br (AUC 0.73, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.78; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study showed that this version of the 3IQ-Br has acceptable measurement properties for identifying and differentiating UI symptoms in Brazilian women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Elisabete Rúbio Alem
- Women's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, 235 km, São Carlos, SP, CEP 13565-905, Brazil
| | - Jordana Barbosa da Silva
- Women's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, 235 km, São Carlos, SP, CEP 13565-905, Brazil
| | - Ana Carolina Sartorato Beleza
- Women's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, 235 km, São Carlos, SP, CEP 13565-905, Brazil
| | - Thais Cristina Chaves
- Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Patricia Driusso
- Women's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, 235 km, São Carlos, SP, CEP 13565-905, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Janic A, Vincent A, Stinson J, Dimaras H. Values of Retinoblastoma Survivors and Parents Regarding Treatment Outcomes: A Qualitative Study. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1000-e1015. [PMID: 34985991 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Retinoblastoma is an aggressive pediatric eye cancer. Patient-reported outcome measures reveal important insights into how patients perceive their own health. Currently, there is no widely used or validated measure for assessment of retinoblastoma outcomes. The purpose of this research was to uncover which treatment outcomes that retinoblastoma survivors and their parents value, to inform the development of a future measure. METHODS This qualitative, cross-sectional study included retinoblastoma survivors age 6 years and older and parents of retinoblastoma survivors. Participants who did not demonstrate fluency in English were excluded. Study participants participated in semistructured interviews or focus groups, either in person at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada, or through secure videoconference, between March 3, 2019, and January 25, 2020. Iterative rounds of opening coding, codebook development, and coresearcher analysis were used to identify key emergent themes and subthemes. RESULTS Seventeen adults participated in six focus groups. Nine pediatric survivors participated in individual interviews. Four common themes emerged from all participant groups: (1) definition of treatment success, (2) enucleation-acceptance and challenges, (3) treatment outcomes to measure, and (4) need for outcome reporting. An additional, unique theme was identified in all pediatric discussions: worries and coping mechanisms. Treatment outcomes deemed valuable were related to the following domains: psychosocial outcomes, daily functioning, functional vision, retinoblastoma education, cosmetic outcomes, and secondary eye conditions. CONCLUSION This study represents the first stage in the development of a retinoblastoma-specific patient-reported outcome measure. The findings reveal insight into what outcomes are valued by survivors after treatment and offer promise to improve outcomes assessment for retinoblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Janic
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ajoy Vincent
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Genetics and Genome Biology, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer Stinson
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Helen Dimaras
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,The Centre for Global Child Health, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Clinical Public Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Valenta S, Ribaut J, Leppla L, Mielke J, Teynor A, Koehly K, Gerull S, Grossmann F, Witzig-Brändli V, De Geest S. Context-specific adaptation of an eHealth-facilitated, integrated care model and tailoring its implementation strategies-A mixed-methods study as a part of the SMILe implementation science project. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:977564. [PMID: 36925799 PMCID: PMC10012712 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.977564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Contextually adapting complex interventions and tailoring their implementation strategies is key to a successful and sustainable implementation. While reporting guidelines for adaptations and tailoring exist, less is known about how to conduct context-specific adaptations of complex health care interventions. Aims To describe in methodological terms how the merging of contextual analysis results (step 1) with stakeholder involvement, and considering overarching regulations (step 2) informed our adaptation of an Integrated Care Model (ICM) for SteM cell transplantatIon faciLitated by eHealth (SMILe) and the tailoring of its implementation strategies (step 3). Methods Step 1: We used a mixed-methods design at University Hospital Basel, guided by the Basel Approach for coNtextual ANAlysis (BANANA). Step 2: Adaptations of the SMILe-ICM and tailoring of implementation strategies were discussed with an interdisciplinary team (n = 28) by considering setting specific and higher-level regulatory scenarios. Usability tests were conducted with patients (n = 5) and clinicians (n = 4). Step 3: Adaptations were conducted by merging our results from steps 1 and 2 using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME). We tailored implementation strategies according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation. Results Step 1: Current clinical practice was mostly acute-care-driven. Patients and clinicians valued eHealth-facilitated ICMs to support trustful patient-clinician relationships and the fitting of eHealth components to context-specific needs. Step 2: Based on information from project group meetings, adaptations were necessary on the organizational level (e.g., delivery of self-management information). Regulations informed the tailoring of SMILe-ICM`s visit timepoints and content; data protection management was adapted following Swiss regulations; and steering group meetings supported infrastructure access. The usability tests informed further adaptation of technology components. Step 3: Following FRAME and ERIC, SMILe-ICM and its implementation strategies were contextually adapted and tailored to setting-specific needs. Discussion This study provides a context-driven methodological approach on how to conduct intervention adaptation including the tailoring of its implementation strategies. The revealed meso-, and macro-level differences of the contextual analysis suggest a more targeted approach to enable an in-depth adaptation process. A theory-guided adaptation phase is an important first step and should be sufficiently incorporated and budgeted in implementation science projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Valenta
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Janette Ribaut
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lynn Leppla
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Juliane Mielke
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra Teynor
- Faculty of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Koehly
- Department of Acute Medicine, Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Gerull
- Department of Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Florian Grossmann
- Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Verena Witzig-Brändli
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Clinic for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sabina De Geest
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Casanova MP, Nelson MC, Pickering MA, Larkins LW, Appleby KM, Grindley EJ, Baker RT. Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8: psychometric evaluation. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2021; 13:153. [PMID: 34906195 PMCID: PMC8669416 DOI: 10.1186/s13102-021-00380-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Background Patient-centered care and evidence-based practice (EBP) are core competencies for health care professionals. The importance of EBP has led to an increase in research involving clinical outcomes; current recommendations emphasize collecting patient focused measures, thus increasing the need for psychometrically sound patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of health. Disablement has been identified as a valuable multi-dimensional construct for patient care. The Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8 (DPA SF-8) has been proposed as a tool to be used in the physically active population that assesses a physical summary component of health and a quality of life component however, further analysis is necessary to ensure the instrument is psychometrically sound. Methods Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were conducted on the DPA SF-8 at each time point to ensure factor structure. Reliability of the scale and internal consistency of the subscales were assessed, and a minimal detectable change (MDC) calculated. Additionally, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was also established, and invariance testing across three time points and groups was conducted. Results The CFAs at all three visits exceeded recommended model fit indices. The interclass correlation coefficient value (.924) calculated indicated excellent scale reliability and Cronbach’s alpha for subscales PHY and QOL were within recommend values. The MDC value calculated was 5.83 and the MCID for persistent injuries were 2 points and for acute injuries, 3 points. The DPA SF-8 was invariant across time and across subgroups. Conclusions The DPA SF-8 met CFA recommendations and criteria for multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing, which indicates the scale may be used to assess for differences between the groups or across time. Our overall analysis indicates the DPA SF-8 is a valid, reliable, and responsive instrument to assess patient improvement in the physically active population. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13102-021-00380-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan C Nelson
- University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, Moscow, ID, 83844, USA
| | | | | | - Karen M Appleby
- Idaho State University, 921 South 8th Ave, Pocatello, ID, 83209, USA
| | - Emma J Grindley
- University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, Moscow, ID, 83844, USA
| | - Russell T Baker
- University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, Moscow, ID, 83844, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fisher RJ, Chouliara N, Byrne A, Cameron T, Lewis S, Langhorne P, Robinson T, Waring J, Geue C, Paley L, Rudd A, Walker MF. Large-scale implementation of stroke early supported discharge: the WISE realist mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
In England, the provision of early supported discharge is recommended as part of an evidence-based stroke care pathway.
Objectives
To investigate the effectiveness of early supported discharge services when implemented at scale in practice and to understand how the context within which these services operate influences their implementation and effectiveness.
Design
A mixed-methods study using a realist evaluation approach and two interlinking work packages was undertaken. Three programme theories were tested to investigate the adoption of evidence-based core components, differences in urban and rural settings, and communication processes.
Setting and interventions
Early supported discharge services across a large geographical area of England, covering the West and East Midlands, the East of England and the North of England.
Participants
Work package 1: historical prospective patient data from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme collected by early supported discharge and hospital teams. Work package 2: NHS staff (n = 117) and patients (n = 30) from six purposely selected early supported discharge services.
Data and main outcome
Work package 1: a 17-item early supported discharge consensus score measured the adherence to evidence-based core components defined in an international consensus document. The effectiveness of early supported discharge was measured with process and patient outcomes and costs. Work package 2: semistructured interviews and focus groups with NHS staff and patients were undertaken to investigate the contextual determinants of early supported discharge effectiveness.
Results
A variety of early supported discharge service models had been adopted, as reflected by the variability in the early supported discharge consensus score. A one-unit increase in early supported discharge consensus score was significantly associated with a more responsive early supported discharge service and increased treatment intensity. There was no association with stroke survivor outcome. Patients who received early supported discharge in their stroke care pathway spent, on average, 1 day longer in hospital than those who did not receive early supported discharge. The most rural services had the highest service costs per patient. NHS staff identified core evidence-based components (e.g. eligibility criteria, co-ordinated multidisciplinary team and regular weekly multidisciplinary team meetings) as central to the effectiveness of early supported discharge. Mechanisms thought to streamline discharge and help teams to meet their responsiveness targets included having access to a social worker and the quality of communications and transitions across services. The role of rehabilitation assistants and an interdisciplinary approach were facilitators of delivering an intensive service. The rurality of early supported discharge services, especially when coupled with capacity issues and increased travel times to visit patients, could influence the intensity of rehabilitation provision and teams’ flexibility to adjust to patients’ needs. This required organising multidisciplinary teams and meetings around the local geography. Findings also highlighted the importance of good leadership and communication. Early supported discharge staff highlighted the need for collaborative and trusting relationships with patients and carers and stroke unit staff, as well as across the wider stroke care pathway.
Limitations
Work package 1: possible influence of unobserved variables and we were unable to determine the effect of early supported discharge on patient outcomes. Work package 2: the pragmatic approach led to ‘theoretical nuggets’ rather than an overarching higher-level theory.
Conclusions
The realist evaluation methodology allowed us to address the complexity of early supported discharge delivery in real-world settings. The findings highlighted the importance of context and contextual features and mechanisms that need to be either addressed or capitalised on to improve effectiveness.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15568163.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 22. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Fisher
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Niki Chouliara
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Adrian Byrne
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Trudi Cameron
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah Lewis
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter Langhorne
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Thompson Robinson
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Justin Waring
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Claudia Geue
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lizz Paley
- Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony Rudd
- Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Marion F Walker
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Paparini S, Papoutsi C, Murdoch J, Green J, Petticrew M, Greenhalgh T, Shaw SE. Evaluating complex interventions in context: systematic, meta-narrative review of case study approaches. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:225. [PMID: 34689742 PMCID: PMC8543916 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01418-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing need for methods that acknowledge and successfully capture the dynamic interaction between context and implementation of complex interventions. Case study research has the potential to provide such understanding, enabling in-depth investigation of the particularities of phenomena. However, there is limited guidance on how and when to best use different case study research approaches when evaluating complex interventions. This study aimed to review and synthesise the literature on case study research across relevant disciplines, and determine relevance to the study of contextual influences on complex interventions in health systems and public health research. METHODS Systematic meta-narrative review of the literature comprising (i) a scoping review of seminal texts (n = 60) on case study methodology and on context, complexity and interventions, (ii) detailed review of empirical literature on case study, context and complex interventions (n = 71), and (iii) identifying and reviewing 'hybrid papers' (n = 8) focused on the merits and challenges of case study in the evaluation of complex interventions. RESULTS We identified four broad (and to some extent overlapping) research traditions, all using case study in a slightly different way and with different goals: 1) developing and testing complex interventions in healthcare; 2) analysing change in organisations; 3) undertaking realist evaluations; 4) studying complex change naturalistically. Each tradition conceptualised context differently-respectively as the backdrop to, or factors impacting on, the intervention; sets of interacting conditions and relationships; circumstances triggering intervention mechanisms; and socially structured practices. Overall, these traditions drew on a small number of case study methodologists and disciplines. Few studies problematised the nature and boundaries of 'the case' and 'context' or considered the implications of such conceptualisations for methods and knowledge production. CONCLUSIONS Case study research on complex interventions in healthcare draws on a number of different research traditions, each with different epistemological and methodological preferences. The approach used and consequences for knowledge produced often remains implicit. This has implications for how researchers, practitioners and decision makers understand, implement and evaluate complex interventions in different settings. Deeper engagement with case study research as a methodology is strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Paparini
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Jamie Murdoch
- School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Judith Green
- Wellcome Centre for Cultures & Environments of Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Mark Petticrew
- Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sara E Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Azizian AR, Carr T, Muhajarine N, Verrall T, Hartness C, Vanstone J, Yasinian M, Skrapek C, Andreas B, Farthing G, Groot G. Developing a patient-oriented realist evaluation for COVID-19 vaccine implementation in Saskatchewan: a methodologic framework. CMAJ Open 2021; 9:E1034-E1039. [PMID: 34815258 PMCID: PMC8612651 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an urgent need to inform decision-making and safe delivery of vaccines in a timely manner. Our objective is to describe the methods we used to perform a patient-oriented realist evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination implementation in Saskatchewan, Canada, in order to understand the underlying mechanisms and contexts of vaccination implementation and vaccine uptake. METHODS This methodology paper describes a patient-oriented, realist, mixed-method evaluation to assess COVID-19 vaccination implementation in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert, Saskatchewan. The study comprised 3 iterative phases guided by Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards II (RAMESES II). In phase 1 (January-February 2021), we developed the initial program theory, in phase 2 (March-May 2021), we tested and refined the initial program theory, and in phase 3 (June-July 2021), we established the final program theory. Three patient and family partners with different backgrounds and experiences were selected purposively from various locations (urban and rural) in Saskatchewan to engage collaboratively in the evaluation. Data analysis and synthesis occurred at all 3 phases of the project. We analysed qualitative data from phases 2 and 3 using a "retroductive" approach. We used quantitative data to compare outcomes from the 3 sites. INTERPRETATION This protocol describes how we developed a final program theory for COVID-19 vaccination implementation with patient and family partners to show for whom, under what circumstances, how and why Saskatchewan's COVID-19 vaccination program has led to vaccine uptake. With patient and family partners' engagement, the evaluation findings will be shared with the Saskatchewan Health Authority and provincial government policy-makers and communications departments, published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at provincial or national conferences, and disseminated through any additional media identified by the patient and family partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Reza Azizian
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Tracey Carr
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Nazeem Muhajarine
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Tanya Verrall
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Collin Hartness
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Jason Vanstone
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Maryam Yasinian
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Candace Skrapek
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Brenda Andreas
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Gerald Farthing
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask
| | - Gary Groot
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Azizian, Carr, Muhajarine, Yasinian, Groot), College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Quality Council (Verrall), Saskatoon, Sask.; Saskatchewan Health Authority (Azizian, Groot, Hartness, Vanstone), Regina, Sask.; patient partner (Skrapek), Saskatoon, Sask.; patient partner (Andreas), Maple Creek, Sask.; family partner (Farthing), Saskatoon, Sask.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Knapp A, Harst L, Hager S, Schmitt J, Scheibe M. Use of Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Patient-reported Experience Measures within Evaluation Studies of Telemedicine Applications: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e30042. [PMID: 34523604 PMCID: PMC8663685 DOI: 10.2196/30042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background With the rise of digital health technologies and telemedicine, the need for evidence-based evaluation is growing. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are recommended as an essential part of the evaluation of telemedicine. For the first time, a systematic review has been conducted to investigate the use of PROMs and PREMs in the evaluation studies of telemedicine covering all application types and medical purposes. Objective This study investigates the following research questions: in which scenarios are PROMs and PREMs collected for evaluation purposes, which PROM and PREM outcome domains have been covered and how often, which outcome measurement instruments have been used and how often, does the selection and quantity of PROMs and PREMs differ between study types and application types, and has the use of PROMs and PREMs changed over time. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search of the MEDLINE and Embase databases and included studies published from inception until April 2, 2020. We included studies evaluating telemedicine with patients as the main users; these studies reported PROMs and PREMs within randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, noncontrolled trials, and feasibility trials in English and German. Results Of the identified 2671 studies, 303 (11.34%) were included; of the 303 studies, 67 (22.1%) were feasibility studies, 70 (23.1%) were noncontrolled trials, 20 (6.6%) were controlled trials, and 146 (48.2%) were randomized controlled trials. Health-related quality of life (n=310; mean 1.02, SD 1.05), emotional function (n=244; mean 0.81, SD 1.18), and adherence (n=103; mean 0.34, SD 0.53) were the most frequently assessed outcome domains. Self-developed PROMs were used in 21.4% (65/303) of the studies, and self-developed PREMs were used in 22.3% (68/303). PROMs (n=884) were assessed more frequently than PREMs (n=234). As the evidence level of the studies increased, the number of PROMs also increased (τ=−0.45), and the number of PREMs decreased (τ=0.35). Since 2000, not only has the number of studies using PROMs and PREMs increased, but the level of evidence and the number of outcome measurement instruments used have also increased, with the number of PREMs permanently remaining at a lower level. Conclusions There have been increasingly more studies, particularly high-evidence studies, which use PROMs and PREMs to evaluate telemedicine. PROMs have been used more frequently than PREMs. With the increasing maturity stage of telemedicine applications and higher evidence level, the use of PROMs increased in line with the recommendations of evaluation guidelines. Health-related quality of life and emotional function were measured in almost all the studies. Simultaneously, health literacy as a precondition for using the application adequately, alongside proper training and guidance, has rarely been reported. Further efforts should be pursued to standardize PROM and PREM collection in evaluation studies of telemedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Knapp
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, DE
| | - Lorenz Harst
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, DE
| | - Stefan Hager
- Comprehensive Pain Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Dresden, DE
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, DE
| | - Madlen Scheibe
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, DE
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, Boyd KA, Craig N, French DP, McIntosh E, Petticrew M, Rycroft-Malone J, White M, Moore L. Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-132. [PMID: 34590577 PMCID: PMC7614019 DOI: 10.3310/hta25570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Medical Research Council published the second edition of its framework in 2006 on developing and evaluating complex interventions. Since then, there have been considerable developments in the field of complex intervention research. The objective of this project was to update the framework in the light of these developments. The framework aims to help research teams prioritise research questions and design, and conduct research with an appropriate choice of methods, rather than to provide detailed guidance on the use of specific methods. METHODS There were four stages to the update: (1) gap analysis to identify developments in the methods and practice since the previous framework was published; (2) an expert workshop of 36 participants to discuss the topics identified in the gap analysis; (3) an open consultation process to seek comments on a first draft of the new framework; and (4) findings from the previous stages were used to redraft the framework, and final expert review was obtained. The process was overseen by a Scientific Advisory Group representing the range of relevant National Institute for Health Research and Medical Research Council research investments. RESULTS Key changes to the previous framework include (1) an updated definition of complex interventions, highlighting the dynamic relationship between the intervention and its context; (2) an emphasis on the use of diverse research perspectives: efficacy, effectiveness, theory-based and systems perspectives; (3) a focus on the usefulness of evidence as the basis for determining research perspective and questions; (4) an increased focus on interventions developed outside research teams, for example changes in policy or health services delivery; and (5) the identification of six 'core elements' that should guide all phases of complex intervention research: consider context; develop, refine and test programme theory; engage stakeholders; identify key uncertainties; refine the intervention; and economic considerations. We divide the research process into four phases: development, feasibility, evaluation and implementation. For each phase we provide a concise summary of recent developments, key points to address and signposts to further reading. We also present case studies to illustrate the points being made throughout. LIMITATIONS The framework aims to help research teams prioritise research questions and design and conduct research with an appropriate choice of methods, rather than to provide detailed guidance on the use of specific methods. In many of the areas of innovation that we highlight, such as the use of systems approaches, there are still only a few practical examples. We refer to more specific and detailed guidance where available and note where promising approaches require further development. CONCLUSIONS This new framework incorporates developments in complex intervention research published since the previous edition was written in 2006. As well as taking account of established practice and recent refinements, we draw attention to new approaches and place greater emphasis on economic considerations in complex intervention research. We have introduced a new emphasis on the importance of context and the value of understanding interventions as 'events in systems' that produce effects through interactions with features of the contexts in which they are implemented. The framework adopts a pluralist approach, encouraging researchers and research funders to adopt diverse research perspectives and to select research questions and methods pragmatically, with the aim of providing evidence that is useful to decision-makers. FUTURE WORK We call for further work to develop relevant methods and provide examples in practice. The use of this framework should be monitored and the move should be made to a more fluid resource in the future, for example a web-based format that can be frequently updated to incorporate new material and links to emerging resources. FUNDING This project was jointly funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the National Institute for Health Research (Department of Health and Social Care 73514).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Skivington
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lynsay Matthews
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sharon Anne Simpson
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Peter Craig
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Janis Baird
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- Medical Research Council ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research and Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kathleen Anne Boyd
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma McIntosh
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mark Petticrew
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Martin White
- Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Laurence Moore
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Salvador-Carulla L, Fernandez A, Sarma H, Mendoza J, Wands M, Gandre C, Chevreul K, Lukersmith S. Impact of Ed-LinQ: A Public Policy Strategy to Facilitate Engagement between Schools and the Mental Health Care System in Queensland, Australia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18157924. [PMID: 34360229 PMCID: PMC8345643 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18157924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Ed-LinQ is a mental health policy initiative to enhance the early detection and treatment of children with mental illness by improving the liaison between schools and health services in Queensland, Australia. We measured its impact from policy to practice to inform further program developments and public strategies. We followed a mixed quantitative/qualitative approach. The Adoption Impact Ladder (AIL) was used to analyse the adoption of this initiative by end-users (decision makers both in the health and education sectors) and the penetration of the initiative in the school sector. Survey respondents included representatives of schools (n = 186) and mental health providers (n = 78). In total, 63% of the school representative respondents were at least aware of the existence of the Ed-LinQ initiative, 74% were satisfied with the initiative and 28% of the respondent schools adopted the initiative to a significant extent. Adoption was higher in urban districts and in the health sector. The overall level of penetration in the school sector of Queensland was low (3%). The qualitative analysis indicated an improvement in the referral and communication processes between schools and the health sectors and the importance of funding in the implementation of the initiative. Mapping of existing programs is needed to assess the implementation of a new one as well as the design of different implementation strategies for urban and rural areas. Assessing the adoption of health policy strategies and their penetration in a target audience is critical to understand their proportional impacts across a defined ecosystem and constitutes a necessary preliminary step for the evaluation of their quality and efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Salvador-Carulla
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia; (L.S.-C.); (H.S.)
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia;
| | - Ana Fernandez
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia;
- Agencia de Salut Publica, 08023 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Haribondhu Sarma
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia; (L.S.-C.); (H.S.)
| | - John Mendoza
- ConNectica Consulting, Caloundra 4551, Australia; (J.M.); (M.W.)
| | - Marion Wands
- ConNectica Consulting, Caloundra 4551, Australia; (J.M.); (M.W.)
| | - Coralie Gandre
- IRDES, Institut de Recherche et Documentation en Économie de La Santé, 75019 Paris, France;
| | | | - Sue Lukersmith
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia; (L.S.-C.); (H.S.)
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mojdehkar R, Jahangiri K, Hajinabi K, Riahi L. Adapted fairness benchmarks for the evaluation of Iran health system reform. Int J Health Plann Manage 2021; 36:2118-2128. [PMID: 34240457 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study has been designed to localize fairness benchmarks for the evaluation of health system reform with an ethical approach. METHODS A descriptive-analytic study was applied in which a questionnaire with selected indicators and based on main fairness benchmarks was validated. Besides, the final indicators were chosen for surveys of 255 health equity experts from 31 provinces of Iran to localize fairness benchmarks using the exploratory factor analysis through the SPSS software. RESULTS Seven fairness benchmarks were adopted: (1) Efficacy, Efficiency, and Quality of Health Care; (2) Impact of Information Infrastructure on Health Reform; (3) Responsiveness; (4) Equitable Access, and Universal Health Coverage; (5) Equitable Financing; (6) Social Determinant of Health; and (7) Financial Barriers to Equitable Access. CONCLUSION The priorities of fairness benchmarking through localization included focusing on the quantity and quality of primary health care, allocating resources based on the need; for equitable efficiency, and paying attention to community-based information infrastructure, and social determinants for fair reform. Moreover, respecting patient rights as a part of democratic accountability was more close to equity. Elimination of financial and nonfinancial barriers for health access and coverage based on vulnerability, through fair financing, was also confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reyhaneh Mojdehkar
- Department of Health Services Administration, Faculty of Medical Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Katayoun Jahangiri
- Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kamran Hajinabi
- Department of Health Services Administration, Faculty of Medical Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Leila Riahi
- Department of Health Services Administration, Faculty of Medical Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Watson SI, Lilford RJ, Sun J, Bion J. Estimating the effect of health service delivery interventions on patient length of stay: A Bayesian survival analysis approach. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jianxia Sun
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Walker S, Fox A, Altunkaya J, Colbourn T, Drummond M, Griffin S, Gutacker N, Revill P, Sculpher M. Program Evaluation of Population- and System-Level Policies: Evidence for Decision Making. Med Decis Making 2021; 42:17-27. [PMID: 34041992 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211016427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policy evaluations often focus on ex post estimation of causal effects on short-term surrogate outcomes. The value of such information is limited for decision making, as the failure to reflect policy-relevant outcomes and disregard for opportunity costs prohibits the assessment of value for money. Further, these evaluations do not always consider all relevant evidence, other courses of action, or decision uncertainty. METHODS In this article, we explore how policy evaluation could better meet the needs of decision making. We begin by defining the evidence required to inform decision making. We then conduct a literature review of challenges in evaluating policies. Finally, we highlight potential methods available to help address these challenges. RESULTS The evidence required to inform decision making includes the impacts on the policy-relevant outcomes, the costs and associated opportunity costs, and the consequences of uncertainty. Challenges in evaluating health policies are described using 8 categories: 1) valuation space; 2) comparators; 3) time of evaluation; 4) mechanisms of action; 5) effects; 6) resources, constraints, and opportunity costs; 7) fidelity, adaptation, and level of implementation; and 8) generalizability and external validity. Methods from a broad set of disciplines are available to improve policy evaluation, relating to causal inference, decision-analytic modeling, theory of change, realist evaluation, and structured expert elicitation. LIMITATIONS The targeted review may not identify all possible challenges, and the methods covered are not exhaustive. CONCLUSIONS Evaluations should provide appropriate evidence to inform decision making. There are challenges in evaluating policies, but methods from multiple disciplines are available to address these challenges. IMPLICATIONS Evaluators need to carefully consider the decision being informed, the necessary evidence to inform it, and the appropriate methods.[Box: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Walker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Aimee Fox
- Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - James Altunkaya
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Tim Colbourn
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mike Drummond
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Susan Griffin
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Nils Gutacker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Paul Revill
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Sculpher
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Moreno A, Lostao L, Beller J, Sperlich S, Ronda E, Geyer S, Pulido J, Regidor E. Trends and equity in the use of health services in Spain and Germany around austerity in Europe. Int J Equity Health 2021; 20:120. [PMID: 33985518 PMCID: PMC8117640 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01459-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Following the 2008 economic crisis many countries implemented austerity policies, including reducing public spending on health services. This paper evaluates the trends and equity in the use of health services during and after that period in Spain – a country with austerity policies – and in Germany – a country without restriction on healthcare spending. Methods Data from several National Surveys in Spain and several waves of the Socio-Economic Panel in Germany, carried out between 2009 and 2017, were used. The dependent variables were number of doctor’s consultations and whether or not a hospital admission occurred. The measure of socioeconomic position was education. In each year, the estimates were made for people with and without pre-existing health problems. First, the average number of doctor’s consultations and the percentage of respondents who had had been hospitalized were calculated. Second, the relationship between education and use of those health services was estimated by calculating the difference in consultations using covariance analysis – in the case of number of consultations – and by calculating the percentage ratio using binomial regression – in the case of hospitalization. Results The annual mean number of consultations went down in both countries. In Spain the average was 14.2 in 2009 and 10.4 in 2017 for patients with chronic conditions; 16.6 and 13.5 for those with a mental illness; and 6.4 and 5.9 for those without a defined illness. In Germany, the averages were 13.8 (2009) and 12.9 (2017) for the chronic group; 21.1 and 17.0 for mental illness; and 8.7 and 7.5 with no defined illness. The hospitalization frequency also decreased in both countries. The majority of the analyses presented no significant differences in relation to education. Conclusion In both Spain and Germany, service use decreased between 2009 and 2017. In the first few years, this reduction coincided with a period of austerity in Spain. In general, we did not find socioeconomic differences in health service use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almudena Moreno
- Department of Sociology, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Campus de Arrosadía s/n, 31006, Pamplona, Spain. .,I-COMMUNITAS - Institute for Advanced Social Research, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
| | - Lourdes Lostao
- Department of Sociology, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Campus de Arrosadía s/n, 31006, Pamplona, Spain.,I-COMMUNITAS - Institute for Advanced Social Research, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Johannes Beller
- Medical Sociology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Elena Ronda
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Unit, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Siegfried Geyer
- Medical Sociology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - José Pulido
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Regidor
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fazel M, Rocks S, Glogowska M, Stepney M, Tsiachristas A. How does reorganisation in child and adolescent mental health services affect access to services? An observational study of two services in England. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250691. [PMID: 33951078 PMCID: PMC8099077 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in England are making significant changes to improve access and effectiveness. This 'transformation' variously involves easier access to services through a Single Point of Access (SPA), more integrated services within CAMHS and enhanced co-provision across education and third sector or non-profit organisations. METHODS A mixed-methods observational study was conducted to explore the process and impact of transformation over four years in two services. Ethnographic observations and in-depth interviews were conducted and Electronic Patient Records with over one million contacts analysed. Difference-in-differences analysis with propensity score matching to estimate the causal impact of the transformation on patient access was utilised. OUTCOMES Spend and staffing increased across both CAMHS. The SPA had growing rates of self-referral and new care pathways were seeing patients according to expected degree of psychopathology. Third sector partners were providing increasing numbers of low-intensity interventions. Although the majority of staff were supportive of the changes, the process of transformation led to service tensions. In the first year after transformation there was no change in the rate of new patients accessing services or new spells (episodes of care) in the services. However, by year three, the number of new patients accessing CAMHS was 19% higher (Incidence Rate Ratio: 1·19, CI: 1·16, 1·21) and the rate of new spells was 12% higher (Incidence Rate Ratio: 1·12, CI: 1·05, 1·20). INTERPRETATION Transformation investment, both financial and intellectual, can help to increase access to CAMHS in England, but time is needed to realise the benefits of reorganisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Fazel
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Rocks
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Margaret Glogowska
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Stepney
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gururaj S, Bird ML, Borschmann K, Eng JJ, Watkins CL, Walker MF, Solomon JM. Evidence-based stroke rehabilitation: do priorities for practice change and feasibility of implementation vary across high income, upper and lower-middle income countries? Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:4611-4618. [PMID: 33849357 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1910737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The context of implementation plays an important role in the delivery of optimal treatments in stroke recovery and rehabilitation. Considering that stroke systems of care vary widely across the globe, the goal of the present paper is to compare healthcare providers' priority of key areas in translating stroke research to clinical practice among High Income Countries, Upper Middle- and Lower Middle-Income Countries (HICs, UMICs, LMICs). We also aimed to compare perceptions regarding the key areas' feasibility of implementation, and formulate recommendations specific to each socioeconomic region. METHODS Data related to recommendations for knowledge translation in stroke, from a primary survey from the second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable were segregated based on socioeconomic region. Frequency distribution was used to compare the key areas for practice change and examine the perceived feasibility of implementation of the same across HIC, UMIC and LMICs. RESULTS A total of 632 responses from healthcare providers across 28 countries were received. Interdisciplinary care and access to services were high priorities across the three groups. Transitions in Care and Intensity of Practice were high priority areas in HICs, whereas Clinical Practice Guidelines were a high priority in LMICs. Interventions specific to clinical discipline, screening and assessment were among the most feasible areas in HICs, whereas Intensity of practice and Clinical Practice Guidelines were perceived as most feasible to implement in LMICs. CONCLUSION We have identified healthcare providers' priorities for addressing international practice change across socioeconomic regions. By focusing on the most feasible key areas, we can aid the channeling of appropriate resources to bridge the disparities in stroke outcomes across HICs, UMICs and LMICs.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONIt is pertinent to examine the differences in priorities of stroke rehabilitation professionals and the feasibility of implementing evidence-based practice across socioeconomic regions.There is an urgent necessity for the development of clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation in Low-Middle Income Countries, taking into consideration the cultural, economic and geographical constraints.In upper-middle income countries, encouraging family support and timely screening and assessment for aphasia, cognition and depression appear to be the low hanging fruits to enhance quality of life after stroke.Innovative ways to increase intensity of practice and channelling of resources to improve transitions in care may prove to be the most beneficial in advancing stroke rehabilitation in high income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjana Gururaj
- Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professionals, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Marie-Louise Bird
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia
| | - Karen Borschmann
- Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia.,St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Janice J Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Caroline Leigh Watkins
- Clinical Practice Research Unit, School of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marion F Walker
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - John M Solomon
- Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professionals, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.,Centre for Comprehensive Stroke Rehabilitation and Research, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Self-management education among women with pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud 2021; 117:103883. [PMID: 33548591 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Education is a cornerstone of self-management for adults with diabetes. Self-management is particularly important during pregnancy for women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, as perinatal outcomes are affected by maternal glycemic control. To our knowledge, literature describing the provision of diabetes education and support during pregnancy for women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes has not been synthesized, nor examined within its context as a complex intervention. OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN This scoping review aims to synthesize the evidence regarding prenatal diabetes education and support for women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and to apply the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions where appropriate. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS We searched EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE from inception to February 2019 for primary studies focused on prenatal diabetes education among women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Two independent reviewers screened eligible studies against inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis of the included studies was conducted. RESULTS Of 511 identified citations, 30 studies were included in the final review. Approximately 44% of the pooled sample were women with type 1 diabetes, 46% had gestational diabetes mellitus, and 10% had type 2 diabetes. Education focused on self-monitoring of blood glucose, attaining glycemic targets, and following a healthy diet. Many studies included educational elements that went beyond traditional didactic teaching and promoted self-management skills and self-management support. The majority of education was delivered via one-on-one outpatient appointments every one to three weeks. About half of the reviewed studies used a multidisciplinary team approach, with most including a combination of physicians, nurses, dietitians, and midwives. Application of the Medical Research Council framework revealed that most studies were limited in methods (i.e., randomization) and few examined process evaluation or intervention cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION We identified a lack of studies centred on educational interventions for women with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. As pregnancy for women with type 2 diabetes involves significant changes, including the transition from oral hypoglycemics to insulin therapy, often without exposure to diabetes-specific preconception care and counselling, future research may focus on optimizing preconception and prenatal education and support for this high-risk group. This is particularly relevant as the prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide. Future research ought to also design, implement and evaluate interventions in accordance with the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions.
Collapse
|
30
|
Fisher RJ, Byrne A, Chouliara N, Lewis S, Paley L, Hoffman A, Rudd A, Robinson T, Langhorne P, Walker M. Effect of stroke early supported discharge on length of hospital stay: analysis from a national stroke registry. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e043480. [PMID: 33472788 PMCID: PMC7818805 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The first observational study to investigate the impact of early supported discharge (ESD) on length of hospital stay in real-world conditions. DESIGN Using historical prospective Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) data (1 January 2013-31 December 2016) and multilevel modelling, cross-sectional (2015-2016; 30 791 patients nested within 55 hospitals) and repeated cross-sectional (2013-2014 vs 2015-2016; 49 266 patients nested within 41 hospitals) analyses were undertaken. SETTING Hospitals were sampled across a large geographical area of England covering the West and East Midlands, the East of England and the North of England. PARTICIPANTS Stroke patients whose data were entered into the SSNAP database by hospital teams. INTERVENTIONS Receiving ESD along the patient care pathway. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Length of hospital stay. RESULTS When adjusted for important case-mix variables, patients who received ESD on their stroke care pathway spent longer in hospital, compared with those who did not receive ESD. The percentage increase was 15.8% (95% CI 12.3% to 19.4%) for the 2015-2016 cross-sectional analysis and 18.8% (95% CI 13.9% to 24.0%) for the 2013-2014 versus 2015-2016 repeated cross-sectional analysis. On average, the increased length of hospital stay was approximately 1 day. CONCLUSIONS This study has shown that by comparing ESD and non-ESD patient groups matched for important patient characteristics, receiving ESD resulted in a 1-day increase in length of hospital stay. The large reduction in length of hospital stay overall, since original trials were conducted, may explain why a reduction was not observed. The longer term benefits of accessing ESD need to be investigated further. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15568163.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Fisher
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Adrian Byrne
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Niki Chouliara
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah Lewis
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lizz Paley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Hoffman
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony Rudd
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Thompson Robinson
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Peter Langhorne
- Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Marion Walker
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Avanceña ALV, Prosser LA. Examining Equity Effects of Health Interventions in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Systematic Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:136-143. [PMID: 33431148 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to catalogue and describe published applications of equity-informative cost-effectiveness analysis (CEAs). METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline for English-language, peer-reviewed CEAs published on or before August 2019. We included CEAs that evaluated 2 or more alternatives; explicitly mentioned equity as a consideration or decision-making principle; and applied an equity-informative CEA method to analyze or examine at least 1 equity criterion in an applied CEA. We extracted data on selected characteristics and analyzed reporting quality using the CHEERS checklist. RESULTS Fifty-four articles identified through a search and bibliography reviews met the inclusion criteria. All articles were published on or after 2010, with 80% published after 2015. Most studies evaluated primary prevention interventions in disease areas such as cancer, infectious diseases, and cardiovascular disease. Equity impact analysis alone was the most common equity-informative CEA (56%), followed by equity impact analysis with financial protection effects (30%). At least 11 different equity criteria have been used in equity-informative CEAs; socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity were used most frequently. Seventy-eight percent of studies reported finding "greater value" in an intervention after examining its distributional effects. CONCLUSION The number of equity-informative CEAs is increasing, and the wide range of equity criteria, diseases, interventions, settings, and populations represented suggests that broad application of these methods is feasible but will require further refinement. Inclusion of equity into CEAs may shift the value of evaluated interventions and can provide crucial additional information for decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton L V Avanceña
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Porzsolt F, Wiedemann F, Phlippen M, Weiss C, Weiss M, Schmaling K, Kaplan RM. The terminology conflict on efficacy and effectiveness in healthcare. J Comp Eff Res 2020; 9:1171-1178. [PMID: 33314965 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2020-0149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Designers and architects created the rule 'form follows function (FFF)' for their own profession. Our paper demonstrates that this FFF rule applies equally well to the designers of clinical studies. Four examples present are as follows: disregarding this FFF rule causes an inconsistent terminology to differentiate between efficacy and effectiveness, inconsistent differentiation of efficacy and effectiveness interferes with the consistent interpretation of the results of clinical studies, inconsistent interpretation of clinical studies results in an unexpectedly variance of recommendations in clinical guidelines and the fusion of the FFF designer rule and of the demands of Cochrane and Bradford Hill ('can it work?', 'does it work?' and 'is it worth it?') avoids the terminology problem and its misleading consequences. This strategy is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz Porzsolt
- Institute of Clinical Economics (ICE) e.V., D-89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Felicitas Wiedemann
- Institute of Clinical Economics (ICE) e.V., D-89081 Ulm, Germany.,Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.,Department of General Surgery, Diakonie Klinikum Stuttgart, 70176 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Meret Phlippen
- Institute of Clinical Economics (ICE) e.V., D-89081 Ulm, Germany.,Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.,Department of E.N.T., Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain Berlin, 10249 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christel Weiss
- Institute of Clinical Economics (ICE) e.V., D-89081 Ulm, Germany.,Department of Medical Statistics & Biomathematics, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Manfred Weiss
- Institute of Clinical Economics (ICE) e.V., D-89081 Ulm, Germany.,Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Karen Schmaling
- Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686-9600, USA
| | - Robert M Kaplan
- Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6015, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Batchelder L, Fox D, Potter CM, Peters M, Jones K, Forder JE, Fitzpatrick R. Rasch analysis of the long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and development of a short-form (LTCQ-8). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:375. [PMID: 33256754 PMCID: PMC7706038 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01626-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the current study was to evaluate the structural validity of the 20-item long-term conditions questionnaire (LTCQ) and to explore a potential short-form version of the scale using Rasch analysis. Methods Data were collected through postal surveys (February 2016–January 2017) from a sample of 1,211 participants diagnosed with at least one long-term condition (LTC). Identified participants were invited through either local authorities for a social care cohort (n = 294) or primary care practices for a health care cohort (n = 917). Participants were mailed a survey, including the LTCQ, demographic questions, a comorbidities measure, and other validated outcome measures. Respondents were invited to complete a follow-up survey including the LTCQ for assessment of reproducibility. Results The main assumptions of the Rasch model from the LTCQ were fulfilled, although infit and outfit indices indicated some items showed misfit. Misfitted items, items that did not have a preceding set or showed some local dependence were removed one at a time, with the remaining candidate items to form an 8-item short version, the LTCQ-8. The Rasch model for the LTCQ-8 explained 64% variance and had a reliability estimate greater than 0.80. Several items in the LTCQ showed uniform differential item function (DIF) in relation to the number of reported LTCs, age, cohort and type of LTCs, but fewer items exhibited DIF in the LTCQ-8. Spearman’s rho correlations between the LTCQ and the LTCQ-8 were strong across the total sample and various subgroups. Correlations between the LTCQ-8 and all reference measures were moderate to strong, and comparable to correlations found between the LTCQ and these measures. Conclusions The LTCQ measures a unidimensional construct, and it is therefore acceptable to use a summed total score. The LTCQ-8 also met the assumption of unidimensionality and had comparable construct validity with the LTCQ. Additional validation is required in an independent sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie Batchelder
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, School of Social Policy, Sociology, and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF, UK.
| | - Diane Fox
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, School of Social Policy, Sociology, and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Caroline M Potter
- Health Services Research Unit, The University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.,NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michele Peters
- Health Services Research Unit, The University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Karen Jones
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, School of Social Policy, Sociology, and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Julien E Forder
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, School of Social Policy, Sociology, and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Ray Fitzpatrick
- Health Services Research Unit, The University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.,NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Paparini S, Green J, Papoutsi C, Murdoch J, Petticrew M, Greenhalgh T, Hanckel B, Shaw S. Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges. BMC Med 2020; 18:301. [PMID: 33167974 PMCID: PMC7652677 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01777-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need for better methods for evaluation in health research has been widely recognised. The 'complexity turn' has drawn attention to the limitations of relying on causal inference from randomised controlled trials alone for understanding whether, and under which conditions, interventions in complex systems improve health services or the public health, and what mechanisms might link interventions and outcomes. We argue that case study research-currently denigrated as poor evidence-is an under-utilised resource for not only providing evidence about context and transferability, but also for helping strengthen causal inferences when pathways between intervention and effects are likely to be non-linear. MAIN BODY Case study research, as an overall approach, is based on in-depth explorations of complex phenomena in their natural, or real-life, settings. Empirical case studies typically enable dynamic understanding of complex challenges and provide evidence about causal mechanisms and the necessary and sufficient conditions (contexts) for intervention implementation and effects. This is essential evidence not just for researchers concerned about internal and external validity, but also research users in policy and practice who need to know what the likely effects of complex programmes or interventions will be in their settings. The health sciences have much to learn from scholarship on case study methodology in the social sciences. However, there are multiple challenges in fully exploiting the potential learning from case study research. First are misconceptions that case study research can only provide exploratory or descriptive evidence. Second, there is little consensus about what a case study is, and considerable diversity in how empirical case studies are conducted and reported. Finally, as case study researchers typically (and appropriately) focus on thick description (that captures contextual detail), it can be challenging to identify the key messages related to intervention evaluation from case study reports. CONCLUSION Whilst the diversity of published case studies in health services and public health research is rich and productive, we recommend further clarity and specific methodological guidance for those reporting case study research for evaluation audiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Paparini
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Judith Green
- Wellcome Centre for Cultures & Environments of Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jamie Murdoch
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Mark Petticrew
- Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicin, London, UK
| | - Trish Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Benjamin Hanckel
- Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia
| | - Sara Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
French C, Pinnock H, Forbes G, Skene I, Taylor SJC. Process evaluation within pragmatic randomised controlled trials: what is it, why is it done, and can we find it?-a systematic review. Trials 2020; 21:916. [PMID: 33168067 PMCID: PMC7650157 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04762-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Process evaluations are increasingly conducted within pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of health services interventions and provide vital information to enhance understanding of RCT findings. However, issues pertaining to process evaluation in this specific context have been little discussed. We aimed to describe the frequency, characteristics, labelling, value, practical conduct issues, and accessibility of published process evaluations within pragmatic RCTs in health services research. METHODS We used a 2-phase systematic search process to (1) identify an index sample of journal articles reporting primary outcome results of pragmatic RCTs published in 2015 and then (2) identify all associated publications. We used an operational definition of process evaluation based on the Medical Research Council's process evaluation framework to identify both process evaluations reported separately and process data reported in the trial results papers. We extracted and analysed quantitative and qualitative data to answer review objectives. RESULTS From an index sample of 31 pragmatic RCTs, we identified 17 separate process evaluation studies. These had varied characteristics and only three were labelled 'process evaluation'. Each of the 31 trial results papers also reported process data, with a median of five different process evaluation components per trial. Reported barriers and facilitators related to real-world collection of process data, recruitment of participants to process evaluations, and health services research regulations. We synthesised a wide range of reported benefits of process evaluations to interventions, trials, and wider knowledge. Visibility was often poor, with 13/17 process evaluations not mentioned in the trial results paper and 12/16 process evaluation journal articles not appearing in the trial registry. CONCLUSIONS In our sample of reviewed pragmatic RCTs, the meaning of the label 'process evaluation' appears uncertain, and the scope and significance of the term warrant further research and clarification. Although there were many ways in which the process evaluations added value, they often had poor visibility. Our findings suggest approaches that could enhance the planning and utility of process evaluations in the context of pragmatic RCTs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable for PROSPERO registration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline French
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
| | - Hilary Pinnock
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Doorway 3, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - Gordon Forbes
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), Kings College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Imogen Skene
- Emergency Department, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, UK
| | - Stephanie J C Taylor
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Thestrup Hansen S, Kjerholt M, Friis Christensen S, Brodersen J, Hølge-Hazelton B. User experiences on implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)in a Haematological outpatient clinic. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020; 4:87. [PMID: 33113030 PMCID: PMC7593370 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00256-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PROMs can help healthcare professionals gain an improved understanding of patients’ physical burdens, functional levels, and (health-related) quality of life throughout disease and medical treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the barriers and potential opportunities PROMs may present in a haematological outpatient clinic from three different perspectives: patients, nurses and haematologists. Methods The present study synthesizes three previously published studies that separately explored the experiences of patients, nurses and haematologists when implementing PROMs. The studies were all guided by the qualitative methodology Interpretive Description, including a focused ethnographic approach, to develop implications for future practice. Results The overall themes that emerged from the analysis were “Structural similarities influence the adoption of PROMs” and “Different perspectives on the potential of PROMs.” Conclusion Across the different user groups in the haematological outpatient clinic, the use of PROMs was thwarted due to an unquestioned commitment to biomedical knowledge and the system’s rationality and norms: PROM data was not used in patient consultations. Nurses and haematologists expressed different preferences related to potential future PROMs and different objectives for PROMs in clinical practice. From the different perspectives of the patients, nurses and haematologists, PROMs were not compatible with clinical practice. Further research is recommended to develop PROMs validated for use in haematological outpatient clinics. Moreover, implementation strategies adjusted to the structural barriers of the system are crucial. Supplementary information Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s41687-020-00256-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Thestrup Hansen
- Department of Haematology, Zealand University Hospital, Vestermarksvej 9, 1.sal, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark. .,Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. .,Department of Plastic Surgery and Breast Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
| | - Mette Kjerholt
- Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sarah Friis Christensen
- Department of Haematology, Zealand University Hospital, Vestermarksvej 9, 1.sal, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Brodersen
- Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General practice, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Primary Health Care Research Unit, Zealand Region, Denmark
| | - Bibi Hølge-Hazelton
- Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,The Research Support Unit, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Janic A, Bowden S, Levy S, Stinson J, Dimaras H. Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020; 4:66. [PMID: 32770435 PMCID: PMC7415058 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00232-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retinoblastoma is a childhood retinal cancer with lifelong consequences such as vision loss and increased risk of second cancer. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are instruments that measure outcomes related to health directly reported by patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the scope, characteristics and quality of PROMs used in retinoblastoma and related fields of pediatric ophthalmology and pediatric oncology. METHODS Databases MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies in the English language that reported on PROMs used in retinoblastoma, pediatric oncology, or pediatric ophthalmology; grey literature and studies reporting on developmental PROM phases were excluded. PROMs were grouped by the construct measured and domains assessed, and classified as condition-specific or generic. A subsequent search was then conducted in MEDLINE and Embase for studies assessing measurement properties of the identified PROMs. PROMs with associated studies were assessed for their methodologic quality using the COnsensus-based standard for the Selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) strategy. RESULTS Among 110 eligible studies uncovered by the database searches, 143 PROMs were identified: one retinoblastoma-specific, 56 ophthalmology- and 86 oncology-related. The most common construct measured was 'health-related quality of life' and the most common domain assessed was emotional well-being. Of the 143 PROMs, 100 had associated validation studies; the one retinoblastoma-specific PROM was not validated. Quality assessment revealed 34/100 PROMs received a score of sufficient quality in both subcategories of 'overall content validity'; 3/100 received a score of sufficient quality in both subcategories of 'internal structure'; 0/100 received a score of sufficient quality in all three subcategories of 'remaining measurement properties'. The Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Profile-25 was the highest-scoring PROM identified, meeting COSMIN standards for 2/3 measurement property categories (and 5/7 subcategories). Eleven additional PROMs were identified which had sufficient scores in 1/3 measurement property categories (and 5/7 subcategories). CONCLUSION The study identified several PROMs from the pediatric ophthalmology and pediatric oncology literature that could be relevant to the retinoblastoma population, but many have limits to their validation. Future development of a retinoblastoma-specific PROM, performed in partnership with retinoblastoma patients to support optimal content validity, could first focus on the selection and definition of the optimal construct to measure, followed potentially by adaptation and further validation of the relevant PROMs with strong methodologic quality identified in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Janic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, M5S 1A8, Canada
- Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, M5G 2R3, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, SickKids Research Institute, 686 Bay Street, Toronto, M5G 0A4, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, M5G 2R3, Canada
| | - Sylvie Bowden
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, M5S 1A8, Canada
- Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, M5G 2R3, Canada
| | - Sarah Levy
- Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, M5G 2R3, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, SickKids Research Institute, 686 Bay Street, Toronto, M5G 0A4, Canada
| | - Jennifer Stinson
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, SickKids Research Institute, 686 Bay Street, Toronto, M5G 0A4, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, M5G 2R3, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, M5T 1P8, Canada
| | - Helen Dimaras
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, M5S 1A8, Canada.
- Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, M5G 2R3, Canada.
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, SickKids Research Institute, 686 Bay Street, Toronto, M5G 0A4, Canada.
- The Centre for Global Child Health, SickKids Research Institute, 686 Bay Street, Toronto, M5G 0A4, Canada.
- Division of Clinical Public Health, University of Toronto, 150 College Street, Toronto, M5T 3M7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sowden S, Nezafat-Maldonado B, Wildman J, Cookson R, Thomson R, Lambert M, Beyer F, Bambra C. Interventions to reduce inequalities in avoidable hospital admissions: explanatory framework and systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035429. [PMID: 32709641 PMCID: PMC7380849 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Internationally there is pressure to contain costs due to rising numbers of hospital admissions. Alongside age, socioeconomic disadvantage is the strongest risk factor for avoidable hospital admission. This equity-focussed systematic review is required for policymakers to understand what has been shown to work to reduce inequalities in hospital admissions, what does not work and where the current gaps in the evidence-base are. METHODS AND ANALYSIS An initial framework shows how interventions are hypothesised to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in avoidable hospital admissions. Studies will be included if the intervention focusses exclusively on socioeconomically disadvantaged populations or if the study reports differential effects by socioeconomic status (education, income, occupation, social class, deprivation, poverty or an area-based proxy for deprivation derived from place of residence) with respect to hospital admission or readmission (overall or condition-specific for those classified as ambulatory care sensitive). Studies involving individuals of any age, undertaken in OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries, published from 2000 to 29th February 2020 in any language will be included. Electronic searches will include MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL and the Web of Knowledge platform. Electronic searches will be supplemented with full citation searches of included studies, website searches and retrieval of relevant unpublished information. Study inclusion, data extraction and quality appraisal will be conducted by two reviewers. Narrative synthesis will be conducted and also meta-analysis where possible. The main analysis will examine the effectiveness of interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in hospital admissions. Interventions will be characterised by their domain of action and approach to addressing inequalities. For included studies, contextual information on where, for whom and how these interventions are organised, implemented and delivered will be examined where possible. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was not required for this protocol. The research will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, conferences and an open-access policy-orientated paper. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019153666.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Sowden
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Josephine Wildman
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Richard Cookson
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK
| | - Richard Thomson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Mark Lambert
- North East Centre, Public Health England, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Fiona Beyer
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Clare Bambra
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fisher RJ, Byrne A, Chouliara N, Lewis S, Paley L, Hoffman A, Rudd A, Robinson T, Langhorne P, Walker MF. Effectiveness of Stroke Early Supported Discharge: Analysis From a National Stroke Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2020; 13:e006395. [PMID: 32674640 PMCID: PMC7439934 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.119.006395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Implementation of stroke early supported discharge (ESD) services has been recommended in many countries’ clinical guidelines, based on clinical trial evidence. This is the first observational study to investigate the effectiveness of ESD service models operating in real-world conditions, at scale. Methods and Results: Using historical prospective data from the United Kingdom Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (January 1, 2016–December 31, 2016), measures of ESD effectiveness were “days to ESD” (number of days from hospital discharge to first ESD contact; n=6222), “rehabilitation intensity” (total number of treatment days/total days with ESD; n=5891), and stroke survivor outcome (modified Rankin scale at ESD discharge; n=6222). ESD service models (derived from Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme postacute organizational audit data) were categorized with a 17-item score, reflecting adoption of ESD consensus core components (evidence-based criteria). Multilevel modeling analysis was undertaken as patients were clustered within ESD teams across the Midlands, East, and North of England (n=31). A variety of ESD service models had been adopted, as reflected by variability in the ESD consensus score. Controlling for patient characteristics and Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme hospital score, a 1-unit increase in ESD consensus score was significantly associated with a more responsive ESD service (reduced odds of patient being seen after ≥1 day of 29% [95% CI, 1%–49%] and increased treatment intensity by 2% [95% CI, 0.3%–4%]). There was no association with stroke survivor outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale. Conclusions: This study has shown that adopting defined core components of ESD is associated with providing a more responsive and intensive ESD service. This shows that adherence to evidence-based criteria is likely to result in a more effective ESD service as defined by process measures. Registration: URL: http://www.isrctn.com/; Unique identifier: ISRCTN15568163.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Fisher
- University of Nottingham, United Kingdom (R.J.F., A.B., N.C., S.L., M.F.W.)
| | - Adrian Byrne
- University of Nottingham, United Kingdom (R.J.F., A.B., N.C., S.L., M.F.W.)
| | - Niki Chouliara
- University of Nottingham, United Kingdom (R.J.F., A.B., N.C., S.L., M.F.W.)
| | - Sarah Lewis
- University of Nottingham, United Kingdom (R.J.F., A.B., N.C., S.L., M.F.W.)
| | - Lizz Paley
- King's College London, United Kingdom (L.P., A.H., A.R.)
| | - Alex Hoffman
- King's College London, United Kingdom (L.P., A.H., A.R.)
| | - Anthony Rudd
- King's College London, United Kingdom (L.P., A.H., A.R.)
| | | | | | - Marion F Walker
- University of Nottingham, United Kingdom (R.J.F., A.B., N.C., S.L., M.F.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Furst MA, Bagheri N, Salvador-Carulla L. An ecosystems approach to mental health services research. BJPsych Int 2020; 18:23-25. [PMID: 34287396 PMCID: PMC8274404 DOI: 10.1192/bji.2020.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Mental health ecosystems research is an emerging discipline which takes a whole-systems approach to mental healthcare, facilitating analysis of the complex environment and context of mental health systems, and translation of this knowledge into policy and practice. Evidence from the local context is needed in the analysis of complex interventions and of geographic variations in the outcomes of care. Technical tools and support have been developed to gather and interpret evidence from the local context and translate it in a meaningful and relevant manner for planners and policy makers to guide their decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Anne Furst
- Australian National University College of Health and Medicine.
| | - Nasser Bagheri
- Australian National University College of Health and Medicine.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Smith J, Rapport F, O’Brien TA, Smith S, Tyrrell VJ, Mould EVA, Long JC, Gul H, Cullis J, Braithwaite J. The rise of rapid implementation: a worked example of solving an existing problem with a new method by combining concept analysis with a systematic integrative review. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:449. [PMID: 32438909 PMCID: PMC7240003 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05289-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of rapid implementation has emerged in the literature recently, but without a precise definition. Further exploration is required to distinguish the concept's unique meanings and significance from the perspective of implementation science. The study clarifies the concept of rapid implementation and identifies its attributes, antecedents, and consequences. We present a theoretical definition of rapid implementation to clarify its unique meaning and characteristics. METHODS Rodgers evolutionary concept analysis method, combined with a systematic integrative review, were used to clarify the concept of rapid implementation. A comprehensive search of four databases, including EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and WEB OF SCIENCE was conducted, as well as relevant journals and reference lists of retrieved studies. After searching databases, 2442 papers were identified from 1963 to 2019; 24 articles were found to fit the inclusion criteria to capture data on rapid implementation from across healthcare settings in four countries. Data analysis was carried out using descriptive thematic analysis. RESULTS The results locate the introduction of rapid implementation, informed by implementation science. Guidance for further conceptualisation to bridge the gap between research and practice and redefine rigour, adapting methods used (current approaches, procedures and frameworks), and challenging clinical trial design (efficacy-effectiveness-implementation pipeline) is provided. CONCLUSIONS It is possible that we are on the cusp of a paradigm shift within implementation brought about by the need for faster results into practice and policy. Researchers can benefit from a deeper understanding of the rapid implementation concept to guide future implementation of rapid actionable results in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Smith
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute for Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Frances Rapport
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute for Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Tracey A. O’Brien
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephanie Smith
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA 6027 Australia
- Perth Children’s Hospital, Nedlands, Perth, Australia
| | - Vanessa J. Tyrrell
- Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Children’s Cancer Institute, University of New South Wales, C25/9 High Street, University of New South Wales, Kensington NSW, Sydney, 2750 Australia
| | - Emily V. A. Mould
- Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Children’s Cancer Institute, University of New South Wales, C25/9 High Street, University of New South Wales, Kensington NSW, Sydney, 2750 Australia
| | - Janet C. Long
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute for Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Hossai Gul
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute for Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Jeremy Cullis
- Clinical librarian, Information Access and Advisory Services, Macquarie University Library, Macquarie University, 16 Macquarie Walk, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute for Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW 2109 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lloyd HM, Ekman I, Rogers HL, Raposo V, Melo P, Marinkovic VD, Buttigieg SC, Srulovici E, Lewandowski RA, Britten N. Supporting Innovative Person-Centred Care in Financially Constrained Environments: The WE CARE Exploratory Health Laboratory Evaluation Strategy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E3050. [PMID: 32353939 PMCID: PMC7246834 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The COST CARES project aims to support healthcare cost containment and improve healthcare quality across Europe by developing the research and development necessary for person-centred care (PCC) and health promotion. This paper presents an overview evaluation strategy for testing 'Exploratory Health Laboratories' to deliver these aims. Our strategy is theory driven and evidence based, and developed through a multi-disciplinary and European-wide team. Specifically, we define the key approach and essential criteria necessary to evaluate initial testing, and on-going large-scale implementation with a core set of accompanying methods (metrics, models, and measurements). This paper also outlines the enabling mechanisms that support the development of the "Health Labs" towards innovative models of ethically grounded and evidenced-based PCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M. Lloyd
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Inger Ekman
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg University Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden;
| | - Heather L. Rogers
- Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, 48903 Bizkaia, Spain;
- IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, 48013 Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Vítor Raposo
- Centre for Business and Economics Research (CeBER), Centre of Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Av. Dr. Dias da Silva 165, 3004-512 Coimbra, Portugal;
| | - Paulo Melo
- Centre for Business and Economics Research, Faculty of Economics, INESC Coimbra, University of Coimbra, Av. Dr. Dias da Silva 165, 3004-512 Coimbra, Portugal;
| | - Valentina D. Marinkovic
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Legislation, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;
| | - Sandra C. Buttigieg
- Department of Health Services Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, MSD2080 Msida, Malta;
| | - Einav Srulovici
- Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel;
| | | | - Nicky Britten
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Besar Sa'aid H, Mathew S, Richardson M, Bielecki JM, Sander B. Mapping the evidence on health equity considerations in economic evaluations of health interventions: a scoping review protocol. Syst Rev 2020; 9:6. [PMID: 31915067 PMCID: PMC6950907 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1257-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Equity in health has become an important policy agenda around the world, prompting health economists to advance methods to enable the inclusion of equity in economic evaluations. Among the methods that have been proposed to explicitly include equity are the weighting analysis, equity impact analysis, and equity trade-off analysis. This is a new development and a comprehensive overview of trends and concepts of health equity in economic evaluations is lacking. Thus, our objective is to map the current state of the literature with respect to how health equity is considered in economic evaluations of health interventions reported in the academic and gray literature. METHODS We will conduct a scoping review to identify and map evidence on how health equity is considered in economic evaluations of health interventions. We will search relevant electronic, gray literature and key journals. We developed a search strategy using text words and Medical Subject Headings terms related to health equity and economic evaluations of health interventions. Articles retrieved will be uploaded to reference manager software for screening and data extraction. Two reviewers will independently screen the articles based on their titles and abstracts for inclusion, and then will independently screen a full text to ascertain final inclusion. A simple numerical count will be used to quantify the data and a content analysis will be conducted to present the narrative; that is, a thematic summary of the data collected. DISCUSSION The results of this scoping review will provide a comprehensive overview of the current evidence on how health equity is considered in economic evaluations of health interventions and its research gaps. It will also provide key information to decision-makers and policy-makers to understand ways to include health equity into the prioritization of health interventions when aiming for a more equitable distribution of health resources. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION This protocol was registered with Open Science Framework (OSF) Registry on August 14, 2019 (https://osf.io/9my2z/registrations).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hafizah Besar Sa'aid
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Petani, Kedah, Malaysia. .,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Sharon Mathew
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marina Richardson
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanna M Bielecki
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beate Sander
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Seeney R, Griffin J. The Lived Experience and Patient-reported Benefits of Yoga Participation in an Inpatient Brain Injury Rehabilitation Setting. Int J Yoga 2020; 13:25-31. [PMID: 32030018 PMCID: PMC6937874 DOI: 10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_46_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT The multifactorial benefits of yoga have been well documented in the literature, with the integration of yoga therapy into healthcare being an emerging field. In general, yoga therapy programs are utilized in the community as an adjunct to other therapy. At present, limited rehabilitation units routinely incorporate integrative therapy options within a hospital environment. AIMS The aim of this study is to explore the lived experience and patient-reported benefits of yoga in an inpatient brain injury rehabilitation setting. SETTINGS AND DESIGN Thirty-one participants were recruited to the study after voluntarily participating in a yoga class within an inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit of a major metropolitan hospital. Yoga sessions were held weekly for 60 min and consisted of a modified Hatha yoga style. This was a mixed-methods, quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest study. METHODOLOGY Quantitative data were collected to measure perceptions of relaxation and well-being before and after yoga classes, along with the satisfaction of the class. Semi-structured interviews were utilized to collect qualitative data of experiences and perceptions associated with yoga participation. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED Thematic analysis was completed for qualitative data. Quantitative data were analyzed using nonparametric statistical methods, and descriptive statistics were also provided. RESULTS The benefits described by participants are reported in this paper. These include improved relaxation, physical well-being, emotional well-being, being present, and self-awareness. CONCLUSIONS This study describes the personal benefits experienced from regular yoga participation within an inpatient rehabilitation setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Seeney
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- The Hopkins Centre, Griffith University and Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Janelle Griffin
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Papastavrou E, Igoumenidis M, Lemonidou C. Equality as an ethical concept within the context of nursing care rationing. Nurs Philos 2019; 21:e12284. [PMID: 31512809 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The concept of equality is subject to many different interpretations, and it is closely connected to similar concepts such as equity, justice, fairness, and human rights. As an ideal, equality entails many aspects that are untenable. For instance, genetic and social inequalities may never be extinct, but they can both be ameliorated by proper distribution of society's resources. Likewise, within the context of health care, equality can be promoted by proper rationing of health resources, amongst which nursing care stands out. In the field of nursing, the principle of equality presents itself in various forms of ethical and deontological mandates. However, beyond good intentions and abstract notions, there is a need to examine the ways in which nurses enforce this principle in practice, within the reality of modern health systems. Although there is scarcity of qualitative evidence in the nursing care rationing literature, existing studies suggest that fair treatment pertains to a largely intuitive sense of equality which involves subjective perceptions and judgements about rationing. Nurses' initial predisposition is to view all patients as equal and treat them in an equal manner; yet, on an individual basis, each patient has a different starting point, different needs and different prospects that render rationing decisions complex and uncertain. Equality should be accepted with its unavoidable limitations in practice and be further examined within the context of nursing care rationing, in the hope that it can be advanced in a consistent way, despite the idealistic nature in many of its aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Chryssoula Lemonidou
- Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Frith L, Hepworth L, Lowers V, Joseph F, Davies E, Gabbay M. Role of public involvement in the Royal College of Physicians' Future Hospitals healthcare improvement programme: an evaluation. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027680. [PMID: 31515414 PMCID: PMC6747633 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Royal College of Physician's (RCP) Future Hospital Programme (FHP) set out a blueprint for a radical new model of care that put patient experience centre stage. This paper reports on the results of an independent evaluation of the FHP and focuses on the role public patient involvement (PPI) played in these projects. The paper explores the perceptions and experiences of those involved in the FHP of how PPI was operationalised in this context, and develops an 'ex-post' programme theory of PPI in the FHP. We conclude by assessing the benefits and challenges of this work. SETTING Secondary care. The FHP consisted of eight clinician-led healthcare improvement hospital development sites with two phases. PARTICIPANTS Development site clinical teams, patient representatives, the RCP's Patient and Carer Network, members of the FHP team, and fellows and members of the RCP. DESIGN/METHODS We conducted an independent evaluation of the FHP using FHP documentation and data collected specifically for the evaluation: qualitative interviews, focus groups and a web-based survey. RESULTS The PPI initiatives set out to develop more patient-centred care and improve the patient experience. The mechanisms designed to meet these goals were (1) a programme of PPI in the development site's projects, (2) a better understanding of patient experience and (3) evaluation of patient experience. CONCLUSION This evaluation of the FHP identifies some key elements that need to be considered when attempting to more closely integrate PPI and co-production in service re-design. The structure of FHP over two phases enabled learning from phase I to be incorporated into phase II. Having the PPI representatives closely involved, developing communities of practice, and the oversight and measuring activities acted as 'disciplinary structures' that contributed to embedding PPI in the FHP and kept the patient experience at the forefront of the improvement initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Frith
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lauren Hepworth
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Victoria Lowers
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Frank Joseph
- Diabetes, Endocrinology & Internal Medicine, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester, UK
| | | | - Mark Gabbay
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Romero-López-Alberca C, Gutiérrez-Colosía MR, Salinas-Pérez JA, Almeda N, Furst M, Johnson S, Salvador-Carulla L. Standardised description of health and social care: A systematic review of use of the ESMS/DESDE (European Service Mapping Schedule/Description and Evaluation of Services and DirectoriEs). Eur Psychiatry 2019; 61:97-110. [PMID: 31426008 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-informed planning and interpretation of research results both require standardised description of local care delivery context. Such context analysis descriptions should be comparable across regions and countries to allow benchmarking and organizational learning, and for research findings to be interpreted in context. The European Service Mapping Schedule (ESMS) is a classification of adult mental health services that was later adapted for the assessment of health and social systems research (Description and Evaluation of Services and DirectoriEs - DESDE). The aim of the study was to review the diffusion and use of the ESMS/DESDE system in health and social care and its impact in health policy and decision-making. METHOD We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (1997-2018). RESULTS Out of 155 papers mentioning ESMS/DESDE, 71 have used it for service research and planning. The classification has been translated into eight languages and has been used by seven international research networks. Since 2000, it has originated 11 instruments for health system research with extensive analysis of their metric properties. The ESMS/DESDE coding system has been used in 585 catchment areas in 34 countries for description of services delivery at local, regional and national levels. CONCLUSIONS The ESMS/DESDE system provides a common terminology, a classification of care services, and a set of tools allowing a variety of aims to be addressed in healthcare and health systems research. It facilitates comparisons across and within countries for evidence-informed planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - José A Salinas-Pérez
- Department of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Asociación Científica Psicost, Spain
| | - Nerea Almeda
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain
| | - Maryanne Furst
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Luis Salvador-Carulla
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra. Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hamilton-West K, Gadsby E, Zaremba N, Jaswal S. Evaluability assessments as an approach to examining social prescribing. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2019; 27:1085-1094. [PMID: 30723977 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
We report on two evaluability assessments (EAs) of social prescribing (SP) services in South East England conducted in 2016/7. We aimed to demonstrate how EAs can be used to assess whether a programme is ready to be evaluated for outcomes, what changes would be needed to do so and whether the evaluation would contribute to improved programme performance. We also aimed to draw out the lessons learned through the EA process and consider how these can inform the design and evaluation of SP schemes. EAs followed the steps described by Wholey, New Dir Eval 33:77, (1987) and Leviton et al., Annu Rev Public Health 31:213, (2010), including collaboration with stakeholders, elaboration, testing and refinement of an agreed programme theory, understanding the programme reality, identification and review of existing data sources and assessment against key criteria. As a result, evaluation of the services was not recommended. Necessary changes to allow for future evaluation include gaining access to electronic patient records, establishing procedures for collection of baseline and outcome data and linking to data on use of other healthcare services. Lessons learned include ensuring that: (a) SP schemes are developed with involvement (and buy in) of relevant stakeholders; (b) information governance and data sharing agreements are in place from the start; (c) staffing levels are sufficient to cover the range of activities involved in service delivery, data monitoring, reporting, evaluation and communication with stakeholders; (d) SP schemes are co-located with primary care services; and (e) referral pathways and linkages to health service data systems are established as part of the programme design. We conclude that EA provides a valuable tool for informing the design and evaluation of SP schemes. EA can help commissioners to make best use of limited evaluation resources and prioritise which programmes need to be evaluated, as well as how, why and when.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Hamilton-West
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Erica Gadsby
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | | | - Sabrena Jaswal
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Fisher R, Chouliara N, Byrne A, Lewis S, Langhorne P, Robinson T, Waring J, Geue C, Hoffman A, Paley L, Rudd A, Walker M. What is the impact of large-scale implementation of stroke Early Supported Discharge? A mixed methods realist evaluation study protocol. Implement Sci 2019; 14:61. [PMID: 31196123 PMCID: PMC6567399 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0908-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke Early Supported Discharge (ESD) is a service innovation that facilitates discharge from hospital and delivery of specialist rehabilitation in patients' homes. There is currently widespread implementation of ESD services in many countries, driven by robust clinical trial evidence. In England, the type of ESD service patients receive on the ground is variable, and in some regions, ESD is still not offered at all. This protocol presents a study designed to investigate the mechanisms and outcomes of implementing ESD at scale in real-world conditions. This will help to establish which models of ESD are most effective and in what context. METHODS A realist evaluation approach composed of two interlinking work packages will be adopted to investigate how and why ESD works, for whom and in what circumstances. Work package 1 (WP1) will begin with a rapid evidence synthesis to formulate preliminary realist hypotheses. Quantitative analyses of historical prospective Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) data will be performed to evaluate service outcomes based on the degree to which evidence-based ESD has been implemented. Work package 2 (WP2) will involve the qualitative investigation of purposively selected case study sites featuring in WP1 and covering different regions in England. The perspectives of clinicians, managers, commissioners, and service users will be explored qualitatively. Cost implications of ESD models will be examined using a cost-consequence analysis. Cross-case comparisons and triangulation of the data sources from both work packages will be performed to test, revise, and refine initial programme theories and address research aims. DISCUSSION This study will investigate whether and how current large-scale implementation of ESD is achieving the outcomes suggested by the evidence base. The theory-driven evaluation approach will highlight key mechanisms and contextual conditions necessary to optimise outcomes and allow us to draw transferable lessons to inform the effective implementation and sustainability of ESD in clinical practice. In addition, the methodological framework will progress the theoretical understanding of implementation and evaluation of complex rehabilitation interventions in stroke care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN: 15568163, registration date: 26 October 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anthony Rudd
- King's College London, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Allan J, Ip RHL, Kemp M, Snowdon N. Increased demand for amphetamine treatment in rural Australia. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2019; 14:13. [PMID: 30929641 PMCID: PMC6442410 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-019-0144-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A substantial increase in substance treatment episodes for methamphetamine problems suggests characteristics of the treatment population could have changed and that targeted treatment programs are required. To determine who methamphetamine treatment should be designed for this study has two aims. First, to empirically describe changes in amphetamine treatment presentations to a rural NSW drug and alcohol treatment agency over time. Second, to examine how these characteristics may affect the likelihood of being treated for amphetamines compared to other drugs. Method The Australian Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Services National Minimum Data Set (AODTS-NMDS) containing closed treatment episodes from a single agency from three time periods was used. Characteristics of people receiving amphetamine treatments in these three periods were compared and the effects of these characteristics on the odds of being treated for amphetamine were estimated using a logistic regression model. The characteristics utilised in the analysis include age, sex, Indigenous status, usual accommodation, living arrangement, source of referral and source of income. Results The proportion of amphetamine treatment episodes doubled from 2006/2007 to 2015/2016 and overtook alcohol as the most commonly treated principal drug of concern. The estimated proportion of amphetamine treatments showed an increment across all ages and for men and women. It was found that younger people, women, people in temporary accommodation or homeless, people who were self-referred and people whose main source of income was not through employment are more likely to be treated for amphetamine use. Conclusion Significant changes over time in the age, sex and Indigenous status of people receiving treatment for amphetamine as the principal drug of concern requires service delivery to match demand from younger people, particularly women; and Indigenous people. The needs and preferences for treatment of younger women who use amphetamine will be important factors in treatment planning service providers who are more used to providing treatment for young men who use cannabis and older men who use alcohol. Further research on women’s experiences in treatment and outcomes would be useful for informing treatment practices. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13722-019-0144-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julaine Allan
- Lives Lived Well, Orange, NSW, Australia. .,Conjoint Academic, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, P.O. Box 9374, Orange East, NSW, 2800, Australia.
| | - Ryan H L Ip
- Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Kemp
- Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|