The efficacy of imatinib mesylate in patients with FIP1L1-PDGFR -positive hypereosinophilic syndrome. Results of a multicenter prospective study

Approach to the patient with eosinophilia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and biologicals

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we aim to explore the optimal approach to patients presenting with eosinophilia, considering recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Specifically, we focus on the integration of novel therapies into clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advanced insights into the clinical and genetic features of eosinophilic disorders have prompted revisions in diagnostic criteria by the World Health Organization classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). These changes reflect a growing understanding of disease pathogenesis and the development of targeted treatment options. The therapeutic landscape now encompasses a range of established and novel therapies. For reactive conditions, drugs targeting the eosinophilopoiesis, such as those aimed at interleukin-5 or its receptor, have demonstrated significant potential in decreasing blood eosinophil levels and minimizing disease flare-ups and relapse. These therapies have the potential to mitigate the side effects commonly associated with prolonged use of oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase (TK) gene fusions are managed by various TK inhibitors with variable efficacy. Diagnosis and treatment rely on a multidisciplinary approach. By incorporating novel treatment options into clinical practice, physicians across different disciplines involved in the management of eosinophilic disorders can offer more personalized and effective care to patients. However, challenges remain in accurately diagnosing and risk-stratifying patients, as well as in navigating the complexities of treatment selection.

World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

The eosinophilias encompass a broad range of non-hematologic (secondary or reactive) and hematologic (primary or clonal) disorders with the potential for end-organ damage.

DIAGNOSIS

Hypereosinophilia (HE) has generally been defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 1.5 × 109/L, and may be associated with tissue damage. After the exclusion of secondary causes of eosinophilia, diagnostic evaluation of primary eosinophilias relies on a combination of various tests. They include morphologic review of the blood and marrow, standard cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, molecular testing and flow immunophenotyping to detect histopathologic or clonal evidence for an acute or chronic hematolymphoid neoplasm.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Disease prognosis relies on identifying the subtype of eosinophilia. After evaluation of secondary causes of eosinophilia, the 2022 World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification endorse a semi-molecular classification scheme of disease subtypes. This includes the major category "myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions" (MLN-eo-TK), and the MPN subtype, "chronic eosinophilic leukemia" (CEL). Lymphocyte-variant HE is an aberrant T-cell clone-driven reactive eosinophila, and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a diagnosis of exclusion.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

The goal of therapy is to mitigate eosinophil-mediated organ damage. For patients with milder forms of eosinophilia (e.g., <1.5 × 109/L) without symptoms or signs of organ involvement, a watch and wait approach with close follow-up may be undertaken. Identification of rearranged PDGFRA or PDGFRB is critical because of the exquisite responsiveness of these diseases to imatinib. Pemigatinib was recently approved for patients with relapsed or refractory FGFR1-rearranged neoplasms. Corticosteroids are first-line therapy for patients with lymphocyte-variant HE and HES. Hydroxyurea and interferon-α have demonstrated efficacy as initial treatment and in steroid-refractory cases of HES. Mepolizumab, an interleukin-5 (IL-5) antagonist monoclonal antibody, is approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration for patients with idiopathic HES. Cytotoxic chemotherapy agents, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have been used for aggressive forms of HES and CEL, with outcomes reported for limited numbers of patients. Targeted therapies such as the IL-5 receptor antibody benralizumab, IL-5 monoclonal antibody depemokimab, and various tyrosine kinase inhibitors for MLN-eo-TK, are under active investigation.

Hematological Neoplasms with Eosinophilia

Eosinophils in peripheral blood account for 0.3-5% of leukocytes, which is equivalent to 0.05-0.5 × 109/L. A count above 0.5 × 109/L is considered to indicate eosinophilia, while a count equal to or above 1.5 × 109/L is defined as hypereosinophilia. In bone marrow aspirate, eosinophilia is considered when eosinophils make up more than 6% of the total nuclear cells. In daily clinical practice, the most common causes of reactive eosinophilia are non-hematologic, whether they are non-neoplastic (allergic diseases, drugs, infections, or immunological diseases) or neoplastic (solid tumors). Eosinophilia that is associated with a hematological malignancy may be reactive or secondary to the production of eosinophilopoietic cytokines, and this is mainly seen in lymphoid neoplasms (Hodgkin lymphoma, mature T-cell neoplasms, lymphocytic variant of hypereosinophilic syndrome, and B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma). Eosinophilia that is associated with a hematological malignancy may also be neoplastic or primary, derived from the malignant clone, usually in myeloid neoplasms or with its origin in stem cells (myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions, acute myeloid leukemia with core binding factor translocations, mastocytosis, myeloproliferative neoplasms, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, and myelodysplastic neoplasms). There are no concrete data in standardized cytological and cytometric procedures that could predict whether eosinophilia is reactive or clonal. The verification is usually indirect, based on the categorization of the accompanying hematologic malignancy. This review focuses on the broad differential diagnosis of hematological malignancies with eosinophilia.

A Young Man With a Neck Mass and Hypereosinophilia

A 31-year-old man presented with left cervical and left inguinal masses and intermittent itching and night sweats for 2 years. What is your diagnosis?

False-Negative Testing for FIP1L1::PDGFRA by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Is a Frequent Cause of Diagnostic Delay

The imatinib-sensitive fusion gene FIP1L1::PDGFRA is the most frequent molecular abnormality identified in patients with eosinophilic myeloid neoplasms. Rapid recognition of this mutation is essential given the poor prognosis of PDGFRA-associated myeloid neoplasms prior to the availability of imatinib therapy. We report a case of a patient in whom delayed diagnosis resulted in cardiac transplantation for eosinophilic endomyocardial fibrosis. The delay in diagnosis was due, in part, to a false-negative result in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for FIP1L1::PDGFRA. To explore this further, we examined our cohort of patients presenting with confirmed or suspected eosinophilic myeloid neoplasms and found 8 additional patients with negative FISH results despite a positive reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test for FIP1L1::PDGFRA. More importantly, false-negative FISH results delayed the median time to imatinib treatment by 257 days. These data emphasize the importance of empiric imatinib therapy in patients with clinical features suggestive of PDGFRA-associated disease.

Biologic therapies for hypereosinophilic disorders: From tyrosine kinase inhibitors to monoclonal antibodies. Towards an increasingly customized management?

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) encompass a wide range of disorders characterized by persistent peripheral blood hypereosinophilia (HE) (i.e., an eosinophil count ≥1.5 × 10⁹/L and ≥ 10% eosinophils preferably with a minimal duration of 6 months if documentation is available) associated with organ damage and/or dysfunction attributable to tissue eosinophilic infiltrate and release of granule contents. In most cases, HE is associated with atopic conditions/allergies, parasitic infections, medications, autoimmune disorders and/or solid tumors in most cases. More rarely, it can be one of the dominant manifestations of an underlying myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm. With regard to hematological forms, in recent decades the advances in understanding the pathogenic aspects of HES have led to a growing interest in these diseases, and in the 2016 WHO classification multiple subgroups were defined according to the molecular profile with the aim of better characterizing these syndromes and establishing which patients will benefit from specific pharmacological targeted therapies. This review article will provide a comprehensive overview of possible therapeutic approaches for HES in the light of each specific molecular alteration, considering both tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, either implemented in clinical practice or currently still under development.

Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia Presenting as Cardiac Failure

Chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) is a rare chronic myeloproliferative disorder characterized by sustained eosinophilia. Although the incidence of CEL is uncertain, it can be clinically devastating as it has a propensity to affect several important organ systems. This is of particular significance in Sub-Saharan Africa where helminthic infections are a more prevalent cause of eosinophilia. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first reported case of CEL complicated by cardiac disease in a Ghanaian. He presented with a history of orthopnoea and dyspnoea on exertion, and examination revealed a pansystolic murmur over the mitral region and moderate splenomegaly. Good symptomatic control was achieved using hydroxyurea after which haematologic and cytogenetic remission was achieved after 12 weeks on a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Physicians working in low resource environments should exclude clonality in patients presenting with eosinophilia and end-organ damage.

Available and emerging therapies for bona fide advanced systemic mastocytosis and primary eosinophilic neoplasms

The historically poor prognosis of patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) and primary eosinophilic neoplasms has shifted to increasingly favorable outcomes with the discovery of druggable targets. The multikinase/KIT inhibitor midostaurin and the highly selective KIT D816V inhibitor avapritinib can elicit marked improvements in measures of mast cell (MC) burden as well as reversion of MC-mediated organ damage (C-findings) and disease symptoms. With avapritinib, the achievement of molecular remission of KIT D816V and improved survival compared with historical therapy suggests a potential to affect disease natural history. BLU-263 and bezuclastinib are KIT D816V inhibitors currently being tested in trials of AdvSM. In the new World Health Organization and International Consensus Classifications, the category of "myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase (TK) gene fusions" is inclusive of rearrangements involving PDGFRA, PDGFRB, FGFR1, JAK2, FLT3, and ETV6::ABL1. While the successful outcomes with imatinib in FIP1L1::PDGFRA-positive cases and PDGFRB-rearranged neoplasms have become the "poster children" of these disorders, the responses of the other TK-driven neoplasms to small-molecule inhibitors are more variable. The selective FGFR inhibitor pemigatinib, approved in August 2022, is a promising therapy in aggressive FGFR1-driven diseases and highlights the role of such agents in bridging patients to allogeneic transplantation. This review summarizes the data for these approved and investigational agents and discusses open questions and future priorities regarding the management of these rare diseases.

Comparative Assessment of Echocardiographic Patterns Among Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients on Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and Healthy Controls

PURPOSE

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is one of the common hematological malignancies in Nigeria. Cardiac abnormalities are associated with CML irrespective of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib, which is available gratis in Nigeria.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and patterns of cardiac dysfunction among patients with CML irrespective of treatment with imatinib using transthoracic echocardiography, and 12-lead surface electrocardiography.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CML patients without Imatinib, CML patients with imatinib, and apparently healthy (age- and sex-matched) controls were 70 each in the study. Various echocardiographic parameters were measured and data obtained were analyzed, and the level of significance was taken as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 70 CML patients with imatinib, 54.3% were men and 45.7% were women, while the CML group without imatinib had 62.9% men and 37.1% women, non-CML control had 54.3% men and 45.7% women. The average hematocrit was significantly lower in the CML group without Imatinib compared with the other groups (p<0.001). And, 12.9% and 17.1% of CML groups with and without imatinib had LVH, respectively, and none of the non-CML controls had LVH (P<0.041). Impaired left ventricular relaxation in 25.71% and 28.57% of CML patients with and without imatinib respectively but only 8.57% of the non-CML control had impaired left ventricular relaxation (p=0.236). Mitral valve regurgitation was the most frequent valvular abnormality across the groups. Pulmonary hypertension in 17.4% and 20% of CML patients with and without imatinib, respectively, but none of the non-CML controls had pulmonary hypertension (p<0.001). Pericardial effusion in 32.86% and 45.71% of CML patients with and without imatinib, respectively, but none of the non-CML controls had pericardial effusion (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the QTC interval across the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac abnormalities are present in CML patients with or without Imatinib treatment, with significant prevalence than what is seen in the non-CML control group.

World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

The eosinophilias encompass a broad range of nonhematologic (secondary or reactive) and hematologic (primary or clonal) disorders with potential for end-organ damage.

DIAGNOSIS

Hypereosinophilia (HE) has generally been defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 1.5 × 10⁹ /L. After exclusion of secondary causes of eosinophilia, diagnostic evaluation of primary eosinophilias relies on morphologic review of the blood and marrow, standard cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, next generation sequencing gene assays, and flow immunophenotyping to detect histopathologic or clonal evidence for an acute or chronic hematolymphoid neoplasm.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Disease prognosis relies on identifying the subtype of eosinophilia. After evaluation of secondary causes of eosinophilia, the 2016 World Health Organization endorses a semi-molecular classification scheme of disease subtypes. This includes the major category "myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1 or with PCM1-JAK2", and the myeloproliferative neoplasm subtype, "chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified" (CEL, NOS). Lymphocyte-variant HE is an aberrant T-cell clone-driven reactive eosinophila, and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a diagnosis of exclusion.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

The goal of therapy is to mitigate eosinophil-mediated organ damage. For patients with milder forms of eosinophilia (eg, < 1.5 × 10⁹ /L) without symptoms or signs of organ involvement, a watch and wait approach with close follow-up may be undertaken. Identification of rearranged PDGFRA or PDGFRB is critical because of the exquisite responsiveness of these diseases to imatinib. Corticosteroids are first-line therapy for patients with lymphocyte-variant HE and HES. Hydroxyurea and interferon-α have demonstrated efficacy as initial treatment and in steroid-refractory cases of HES. Mepolizumab, an interleukin-5 (IL-5) antagonist monoclonal antibody, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with idiopathic HES. The use of the IL-5 receptor antibody benralizumab, as well as other targeted therapies such as JAK2 and FGFR1 inhibitors, is under active investigation.

Case Report: Evolution of KIT D816V-Positive Systemic Mastocytosis to Myeloid Neoplasm With PDGFRA Rearrangement Responsive to Imatinib

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare neoplasm resulting from extracutaneous infiltration of clonal mast cells (MC). The clinical features of SM are very heterogenous and treatment should be highly individualized. Up to 40% of all SM cases can be associated with another hematological neoplasm, most frequently myeloproliferative neoplasms. Here, we present a patient with indolent SM who subsequently developed a myeloid neoplasm with PDGFRA rearrangement with complete response to low-dose imatinib. The 63-year-old patient presented with eosinophilia and elevated serum tryptase level. Bone marrow analysis revealed aberrant MCs in aggregates co-expressing CD2/CD25 and KIT D816V mutation (0.01%), and the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene was not identified. In the absence of ‘B’ and ‘C’ findings, we diagnosed an indolent form of SM. For 2 years after the diagnosis, the absolute eosinophil count progressively increased. Bone marrow evaluation showed myeloid hyperplasia and the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene was detected. Thus, the diagnosis of myeloid neoplasm with PDGFRA rearrangement was established. The patient was treated with imatinib 100 mg daily and rapidly obtained a complete molecular remission. The clinical, biological, and therapeutic aspects of SM might be challenging, especially when another associated hematological disease is diagnosed. Little is known about the underlying molecular and immunological mechanisms that can promote one entity prevailing over the other one. Currently, the preferred concept of SM pathogenesis is a multimutated neoplasm in which KIT mutations represent a “phenotype modifier” toward SM. Our patient showed an evolution from KIT mutated indolent SM to a myeloid neoplasm with PDGFRA rearrangement; when the eosinophilic component expanded, a regression of the MC counterpart was observed. In conclusion, extensive clinical monitoring associated with molecular testing is essential to better define these rare diseases and consequently their prognosis and treatment.

A cryptic imatinib-sensitive G3BP1-PDGFRB rearrangement in a myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia

Targeted RNA sequencing detected a cryptic G3BP1-PDGFRB rearrangement in a myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and normal FISH studies. Consistent with the patient’s response to imatinib, we demonstrate this rearrangement is oncogenic and sensitive to TKI in cell culture.

Myeloid Neoplasm with PDGFRA Rearrangement Manifesting as a Retromolar Pad Mass

Myeloid neoplasms with PDGFRA rearrangement are rare, and most commonly present with features of chronic eosinophilic leukemia; however, they rarely manifest as acute myeloid or lymphoblastic leukemia. Patients typically present with symptoms of hypereosinophilia including cardiovascular and pulmonary symptoms. An increase in mast cells is also a common feature of this disease, and there may be elevated serum tryptase with significant clinical overlap with systemic mastocytosis. Here, we present an unusual case of a myeloid neoplasm with PDGFRA rearrangement manifesting as a retromolar pad mass in a patient with a prior diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis. This case highlights the possibility of soft tissue involvement by myeloid neoplasms with PDGFRA rearrangement in the oral cavity. The identification of this entity is of significant clinical importance because many patients can be effectively treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

A Novel Pharmacodynamic Biomarker and Mechanistic Modeling Facilitate the Development of Tovetumab, a Monoclonal Antibody Directed Against Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha, for Cancer Therapy

Tovetumab (MEDI-575) is a fully human IgG2κ monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to human platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα) and blocks receptor signal transduction by PDGF ligands. The affinity of tovetumab determined using surface plasmon resonance technology and flow cytometry demonstrated comparable binding affinity for human and monkey PDGFRα. In single and repeat-dose monkey pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) studies, tovetumab administration resulted in dose-dependent elevation of circulating levels of PDGF-AA, a member of the PDGF ligand family, due to displacement of PDGF-AA from PDGFRα by tovetumab and subsequent blockade of PDGFRα-mediated PDGF-AA degradation. As such, PDGF-AA accumulation is an indirect measurement of receptor occupancy and is a novel PD biomarker for tovetumab. The nonlinear PK of tovetumab and dose-dependent increase in circulating PDGF-AA profiles were well described by a novel mechanistic model, in which tovetumab and PDGF-AA compete for the binding to PDGFRα. To facilitate translational simulation, the internalization half-lives of PDGF-AA and tovetumab upon binding to PDGFRα were determined using confocal imaging to be 14 ± 4 min and 30 ± 8 min, respectively. By incorporating PDGFRα internalization kinetics, the model not only predicted the target receptor occupancy by tovetumab, but also the biologically active agonistic ligand-receptor complex. This work described a novel PD biomarker approach applicable for anti-receptor therapeutics and the first mechanistic model to delineate the in vivo tri-molecular system of a drug, its target receptor, and a competing endogenous ligand, which collectively have been used for optimal dose recommendation supporting clinical development of tovetumab.

Epidemiology, clinical picture and long-term outcomes of FIP1L1-PDGFRA-positive myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia: Data from 151 patients

FIP1L1-PDGFRA-positive myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia (F/P+ MN-eo) is a rare disease: robust epidemiological data are lacking and reported issues are scarce, of low sample-size and limited follow-up. Imatinib mesylate (IM) is highly efficient but no predictive factor of relapse after discontinuation has yet been identified. One hundred and fifty-one patients with F/P+ MN-eo (143 males; mean age at diagnosis 49 years; mean annual incidence: 0.18 case per million population) were included in this retrospective nationwide study involving all French laboratories who perform the search of F/P fusion gene (study period: 2003-2019). The main organs involved included the spleen (44%), skin (32%), lungs (30%), heart (19%) and central nervous system (9%). Serum vitamin B12 and tryptase levels were elevated in 74/79 (94%) and 45/57 (79%) patients, respectively, and none of the 31 patients initially treated with corticosteroids achieved complete hematologic remission. All 148 (98%) IM-treated patients achieved complete hematologic and molecular (when tested, n = 84) responses. Forty-six patients eventually discontinued IM, among whom 20 (57%) relapsed. In multivariate analysis, time to IM initiation (continuous HR: 1,01 [0.99-1,03]; P = .05) and duration of IM treatment (continuous HR: 0,97 [0,95-0,99]; P = .004) were independent factors of relapse after discontinuation of IM. After a mean follow-up of 80 (56) months, the 1, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates in IM-treated patients were 99%, 95% and 84% respectively. In F/P+ MN-eo, prompt initiation of IM and longer treatment durations may prevent relapses after discontinuation of IM.

Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Eosinophilia and TK Fusion Genes, Version 3.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes represent a heterogeneous group of neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions, characterized by more eosinophils in the peripheral blood, and may involve eosinophil-induced organ damage. In the WHO classification of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms, eosinophilic disorders characterized by dysregulated tyrosine kinase (TK) fusion genes are recognized as a new category termed, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1 or with PCM1-JAK2. In addition to these aforementioned TK fusion genes, rearrangements involving FLT3 and ABL1 genes have also been described. These new NCCN Guidelines include recommendations for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of any one of the myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (MLN-Eo) and a TK fusion gene included in the 2017 WHO Classification, as well as MLN-Eo and a FLT3 or ABL1 rearrangement.

Imatinib therapy in acute myeloid leukemia with DEK-NUP214 and FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement: A case report

The fusion product of FIP1-like-1 (FIP1L1) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) gene rearrangement is a tyrosine kinase oncoprotein sensitive to imatinib. This gene rearrangement characterizes a novel clinico-biological class of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and PDGFRA abnormalities. The DEK proto-oncogene (DEK) and nucleoporin 214 (NUP214) rearrangement is rare in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML); therefore, the coexistence of DEK-NUP214 and FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangements in patients with AML is extremely rare. The present study presents a rare relapse case of a patient with AML with DEK-NUP214 and FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangements, without marked eosinophilia in the peripheral blood or bone marrow. Low-dose imatinib monotherapy without intensive chemotherapy was used to achieve complete hematological remission.

Genetic Basis of Myocarditis: Myth or Reality?

The genetic basis of myocarditis remains an intriguing concept, at least as long as the definition of myocarditis constitutes the definitive presence of myocardial inflammation sufficient to cause the observed ventricular dysfunction in the setting of cardiotropic infections. Autoimmune or immune-mediated myocardial inflammation constitutes a complex area of clinical interest, wherein numerous and not yet fully understood role of hereditary auto-inflammatory diseases can result in inflammation of the pericardium and myocardium. Finally, myocardial involvement in hereditary immunodeficiency diseases, cellular and humoral, is a possible trigger for infections which may complicate the diseases themselves. Whether the role of constitutional genetics can make the patient susceptible to myocardial inflammation remains yet to be explored.

An Intriguing Case of Eosinophilia with FIP1L1/PDGFRA Rearrangement Who Presented as Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and FIP1-like-1-platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha (FIP1L1-PDGFRA) rearrangement is a multi-organ disease with diverse clinical presentation. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is characterized by the concomitant occurrence of often severe thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and a variable degree of ischemic organ damage. To our knowledge, only one case of eosinophilia with FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement presented as a case of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura reported in the literature. We herein report a case of a young male patient with hypereosinophilic syndrome and FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement who presented with asthma, transient ischemic attacks (TIA), and confusion. He had an acquired TTP that was successfully treated with plasma exchanges (PLEX), corticosteroids, rituximab, and later with the addition of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Novartis). He remains in complete remission on imatinib 100 mg daily for more than 28 months of follow-up.

World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

The eosinophilias encompass a broad range of non-hematologic (secondary or reactive) and hematologic (primary, clonal) disorders with potential for end-organ damage.

DIAGNOSIS

Hypereosinophilia has generally been defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 1.5 × 10⁹ /L, and may be associated with tissue damage. After exclusion of secondary causes of eosinophilia, diagnostic evaluation of primary eosinophilias relies on a combination of various tests. They include morphologic review of the blood and marrow, standard cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ-hybridization, flow immunophenotyping, and T-cell clonality assessment to detect histopathologic or clonal evidence for an acute or chronic hematolymphoid neoplasm.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Disease prognosis relies on identifying the subtype of eosinophilia. After evaluation of secondary causes of eosinophilia, the 2016 World Health Organization endorses a semi-molecular classification scheme of disease subtypes. This includes the major category "myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1 or with PCM1-JAK2", and the MPN subtype, "chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified" (CEL, NOS). Lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilia is an aberrant T-cell clone-driven reactive eosinophila, and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a diagnosis of exclusion.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

The goal of therapy is to mitigate eosinophil-mediated organ damage. For patients with milder forms of eosinophilia (eg, <1.5 × 10⁹ /L) without symptoms or signs of organ involvement, a watch and wait approach with close-follow-up may be undertaken. Identification of rearranged PDGFRA or PDGFRB is critical because of the exquisite responsiveness of these diseases to imatinib. Corticosteroids are first-line therapy for patients with lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilia and HES. Hydroxyurea and interferon-alfa have demonstrated efficacy as initial treatment and in steroid-refractory cases of HES. In addition to hydroxyurea, second line cytotoxic chemotherapy agents, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have been used for aggressive forms of HES and CEL, with outcomes reported for limited numbers of patients. The use of antibodies against interleukin-5 (IL-5) (mepolizumab), the IL-5 receptor (benralizumab), as well as other targets on eosinophils remains an active area of investigation.

The Role of Precision Medicine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Rare Cancers

Rare cancers pose unique challenges for patients and their physicians arising from a lack of information regarding the best therapeutic options. Very often, a lack of clinical trial data leads physicians to choose treatments based on small case series or case reports. Precision medicine based on genomic analysis of tumors may allow for selection of better treatments with greater efficacy and less toxicity. Physicians are increasingly using genetics to identify patients at high risk for certain cancers to allow for early detection or prophylactic interventions. Genomics can be used to inform prognosis and more accurately establish a diagnosis. Genomic analysis may also expose therapeutic targets for which drugs are currently available and approved for use in other cancers. Notable successes in the treatment of previously refractory cancers have resulted. New more advanced sequencing technologies, tools for interpretation, and an increasing array of targeted drugs offer additional hope, but challenges remain.

FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion-negative hypereosinophilic syndrome with uncommon cardiac involvement responding to imatinib treatment: A case report

Hypereosinophilic syndrome is a rare, chronic hematological disease characterized by a persistently elevated eosinophil count exceeding 1.5×10⁹/l, following the exclusion of other potential etiologies. The systemic involvement of the disease causes tissue damage through eosinophil infiltration, and may affect various organs; cardiac complications are observed in 50-60% of cases, which are predominately attributed to endomyocardial fibrosis. The treatment is based initially on determining the presence of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion. Patients with positive results for this mutation tend to achieve a complete response with imatinib treatment, which is thus the first line of treatment for this condition. However, patients who are negative for this mutation initially undergo treatment with corticosteroids. This study reports the case of a male 53-year-old patient diagnosed with hypereosinophilic syndrome in 2012, with negative results for the FIP1L1-PDGFRA mutation, and persistently high eosinophil levels, despite receiving the second line of standard treatment for this condition with hydroxyurea, and having already used corticosteroids without success. At the time of admission, the patient presented with acute decompensated heart failure due to severe mitral regurgitation, without any evidence of prior myocardial fibrosis or restrictive cardiomyopathy, and without suggestion of an associated ventricular hypertrophy. This clinical presentation is uncommon, as valvular involvement usually appears in the third stage of the development of cardiac involvement, and is usually associated with fibrosis and thrombotic events. Alternative therapeutic possibilities were evaluated due to the significant progression of the disease, and it was decided to attempt the use of imatinib, despite its use being preferably recommended for FIPIL1-PDGFRA-positive patients. The patient exhibited an evident and immediate response to imatinib, with normalization of the eosinophil count within 24 h of the first dose, which was maintained for at least the next 19 months. This clinical presentation is uncommon, as patients negative for FIPIL1-PDGFRA fusion do not frequently respond to imatinib treatment, and symptomatic heart failure usually appears in the third stage of disease progression.

Imatinib for the treatment of hypereosinophilic syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) encompass a group of disorders defined by sustained peripheral blood hypereosinophilia >1500/mm³ and evidence of eosinophilia-associated organ impairment. Approximately 10% of HES patients may harbor a cryptic deletion on chromosome 4 leading to formation of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA (F/P) fusion gene; these patients are diagnosed as F/P-mutated myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (MLN-eo). Areas covered: This review discusses the results of IM treatment in HES depending on mutation status. The literature on IM therapy in HES by searching PubMed for the terms 'imatinib mesylate', 'hypereosinophilic syndromes' and 'FIP1L1-PDGFRA' has been reviewed. The author's publications as well as his own experience in the field of HES treatment remain a significant contribution to this work. Expert commentary: Imatinib mesylate, a first generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has revolutionized the therapeutic approach to patients with hypereosinophilic syndromes and detectable F/P fusion gene. The response to IM in F/P-mutated MLN-eo is universal with minimal side effects. IM at 100mg per day induces complete molecular remission and even lower doses can be efficient to maintain durable response. Some patients may remain in continued remission after IM discontinuation. Resistance to IM is associated with dismal prognosis. IM is less effective in F/P-unmutated HES with short-lived response.

Oncogenic kinase fusions: an evolving arena with innovative clinical opportunities

Cancer biology relies on intrinsic and extrinsic deregulated pathways, involving a plethora of intra-cellular and extra-cellular components. Tyrosine kinases are frequently deregulated genes, whose aberrant expression is often caused by major cytogenetic events (e.g. chromosomal translocations). The resulting tyrosine kinase fusions (TKFs) prompt the activation of oncogenic pathways, determining the biological and clinical features of the associated tumors. First reported half a century ago, oncogenic TKFs are now found in a large series of hematologic and solid tumors. The molecular basis of TKFs has been thoroughly investigated and tailored therapies against recurrent TKFs have recently been developed. This review illustrates the biology of oncogenic TKFs and their role in solid as well as hematological malignancies. We also address the therapeutic implications of TKFs and the many open issues concerning their clinical impact.

Long-term outcomes of imatinib in patients with FIP1L1/ PDGFRA associated chronic eosinophilic leukemia: experience of a single center in China

BACKGROUND

The FIP1L1/PDGFRA (F/P) fusion gene is the most common clonal genetic abnormality of chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as imatinib, have been demonstrated to be effective therapies for F/P mutated disease. The aim of this study was to analyze the treatment response and long term prognosis in patients with F/P mutated CEL.

METHODS

The clinical features and treatment responses of 33 consecutive patients with F/P mutated CEL between August 2006 and October 2014 were analyzed. The 33 cases received imatinib therapy at an initial dose of 100 mg/day (30 patients) or 200 mg/day (3 patients); the maintenance dose depended on the response condition and patient willingness. Through the follow up, the molecular responses were regularly monitored.

RESULTS

With a median follow up of 64 months, 94% of the 33 patients with F/P mutated CEL achieved a complete hematologic remission (CHR), and 97% achieved a complete molecular remission (CMR) after a median of 3 (1.5-12) months. Twenty-four cases received maintenance therapy, with a median CMR duration of 43 (5-88) months. Imatinib therapy was discontinued in 8 cases, including 4 cases who experienced relapse, and 4 patients who maintained CHR or CMR after discontinuing therapy with a median time of 47 (2-74) months. One case exhibited primary resistance with a PDGFRA T674I mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

F/P mutated CEL has an excellent long-term prognosis following imatinib therapy. A 100 mg daily dose of imatinib is sufficient to induce remission, and a single 100 mg weekly dose maintains a durable remission. A subgroup of patients may maintain a durable remission after discontinuing therapy with a CMR.

World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

The eosinophilias encompass a broad range of nonhematologic (secondary or reactive) and hematologic (primary, clonal) disorders with potential for end-organ damage.

DIAGNOSIS

Hypereosinophilia has generally been defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 1500/mm³ and may be associated with tissue damage. After exclusion of secondary causes of eosinophilia, diagnostic evaluation of primary eosinophilias relies on a combination of morphologic review of the blood and marrow, standard cytogenetics, fluorescent in situ-hybridization, flow immunocytometry, and T-cell clonality assessment to detect histopathologic or clonal evidence for an acute or chronic myeloid or lymphoproliferative disorder.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Disease prognosis relies on identifying the subtype of eosinophilia. After evaluation of secondary causes of eosinophilia, the 2016 World Health Organization endorses a semi-molecular classification scheme of disease subtypes which includes the major category "myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1 or with PCM1-JAK2," and the "MPN subtype, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified" (CEL, NOS). Lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilia is an aberrant T-cell clone-driven reactive eosinophila, and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a diagnosis of exclusion.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

The goal of therapy is to mitigate eosinophil-mediated organ damage. For patients with milder forms of eosinophilia (e.g., < 1500/mm³ ) without symptoms or signs of organ involvement, a watch and wait approach with close-follow-up may be undertaken. Identification of rearranged PDGFRA or PDGFRB is critical because of the exquisite responsiveness of these diseases to imatinib. Corticosteroids are first-line therapy for patients with lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilia and HES. Hydroxyurea and interferon-alpha have demonstrated efficacy as initial treatment and steroid-refractory cases of HES. In addition to hydroxyurea, second line cytotoxic chemotherapy agents and hematopoietic cell transplant have been used for aggressive forms of HES and CEL with outcomes reported for limited numbers of patients. The use of antibodies against interleukin-5 (IL-5) (mepolizumab), the IL-5 receptor (benralizumab), and CD52 (alemtuzumab), as well as other targets on eosinophils remains an active area of investigation.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Neoplasms and Systemic Mastocytosis

The World Health Organization's semimolecular classification of eosinophilias emphasizes neoplasms driven by fusion tyrosine kinases. More than 80% of patients with systemic mastocytosis carry the KIT D816V mutation, the primary driver of disease pathogenesis. Genetic annotation of these diseases is critical and affords opportunities for targeted therapy. This article discusses our understanding of the mutated tyrosine kinome of eosinophilic neoplasms and systemic mast cell disease, and the successes and limitations of available therapies. Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors as a bridge to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and development of more selective and potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors is also highlighted.

Leukemogenic kinase FIP1L1-PDGFRA and a small ubiquitin-like modifier E3 ligase, PIAS1, form a positive cross-talk through their enzymatic activities

Fusion tyrosine kinases play a crucial role in the development of hematological malignancies. FIP1L1‐PDGFRA is a leukemogenic fusion kinase that causes chronic eosinophilic leukemia. As a constitutively active kinase, FIP1L1‐PDGFRA stimulates downstream signaling molecules, leading to cellular proliferation and the generation of an anti‐apoptotic state. Contribution of the N‐terminal FIP1L1 portion is necessary for FIP1L1‐PDGFRA to exert its full transforming activity, but the underlying mechanisms have not been fully characterized. We identified PIAS1 as a FIP1L1‐PDGFRA association molecule by yeast two‐hybrid screening. Our analyses indicate that the FIP1L1 portion of FIP1L1‐PDGFRA is required for efficient association with PIAS1. As a consequence of the association, FIP1L1‐PDGFRA phosphorylates PIAS1. Moreover, the kinase activity of FIP1L1‐PDGFRA stabilizes PIAS1. Therefore, PIAS1 is one of the downstream targets of FIP1L1‐PDGFRA. Moreover, we found that PIAS1, as a SUMO E3 ligase, sumoylates and stabilizes FIP1L1‐PDGFRA. In addition, suppression of PIAS1 activity by a knockdown experiment resulted in destabilization of FIP1L1‐PDGFRA. Therefore, FIP1L1‐PDGFRA and PIAS1 form a positive cross‐talk through their enzymatic activities. Suppression of sumoylation by ginkgolic acid, a small molecule compound inhibiting a SUMO E1‐activating enzyme, also destabilizes FIP1L1‐PDGFRA, and while the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib suppresses FIP1L1‐PDGFRA‐dependent cell growth, ginkgolic acid or siRNA of PIAS1 has a synergistic effect with imatinib. In conclusion, our results suggest that sumoylation by PIAS1 is a potential target in the treatment of FIP1L1‐PDGFRA‐positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia.

Blood and Bone Marrow Evaluation for Eosinophilia

Evaluation of peripheral blood and bone marrow for an indication of persistent eosinophilia can be a challenging task because there are many causes of eosinophilia and the morphologic differences between reactive and neoplastic causes are often subtle or lack specificity. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the differential diagnosis for eosinophilia, to recommend specific steps for the pathologist evaluating blood and bone marrow, and to emphasize 2 important causes of eosinophilia that require specific ancillary tests for diagnosis: myeloproliferative neoplasm with PDGFRA rearrangement and lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia

Molecular diagnostics has generated substantial dividends in dissecting the genetic basis of myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia. The family of diseases generated by dysregulated fusion tyrosine kinase (TK) genes is recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) category, “Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1, or with PCM1-JAK2.” In addition to myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), these patients can present with myelodysplastic syndrome/MPN, as well as de novo or secondary mixed-phenotype leukemias or lymphomas. Eosinophilia is a common, but not invariable, feature of these diseases. The natural history of PDGFRA- and PDGFRB-rearranged neoplasms has been dramatically altered by imatinib. In contrast, patients with FGFR1 and JAK2 fusion TK genes exhibit a more aggressive course and variable sensitivity to current TK inhibitors, and in most cases, long-term disease-free survival may only be achievable with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Similar poor prognosis outcomes may be observed with rearrangements of FLT3 or ABL1 (eg, both of which commonly partner with ETV6), and further investigation is needed to validate their inclusion in the current WHO-defined group of eosinophilia-associated TK fusion-driven neoplasms. The diagnosis chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL, NOS) is assigned to patients with MPN with eosinophilia and nonspecific cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities and/or increased myeloblasts. Myeloid mutation panels have identified somatic variants in patients with a provisional diagnosis of hypereosinophilia of undetermined significance, reclassifying some of these cases as eosinophilia-associated neoplasms. Looking forward, one of the many challenges will be how to use the results of molecular profiling to guide prognosis and selection of actionable therapeutic targets.

Biological Modulators in Eosinophilic Diseases

Eosinophils can regulate local and systemic inflammation, and their presence in higher numbers appears to play an important role in the pathology of various atopic and inflammatory diseases. Eosinophil maturation, recruitment, and survival depend on several cytokine regulators, including interleukin (IL)-5, IL-4, and IL-13 as well as growth factors such as GM-CSF. Over the last decade, the approach to treating eosinophilic diseases has changed greatly. A number of biologic modulators have been developed to target eosinophilic inflammatory pathways, and their usage has resulted in variable clinical improvement in the treatment of eosinophilic-associated conditions. Novel targeted therapies that are safe and effective for treating these disorders are being investigated. This review summarizes the clinical use of biologic agents that have been studied in clinical trials or approved for treating eosinophilic diseases.

[Clinical characteristics and long- term therapeutic effects of 60 patients with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome in a single center]

Objective: To analyze the long term outcome of patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome(HES). Methods: The clinical characteristics and efficacy of 60 newly diagnosed HES patients who received corticosteroids(CS)monotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The survival and death causes of patients were obtained by follow- up. Results: Of all 60 HES patients, 45 were male and 15 female. The median age was 38(11-80)years old. The most frequent organ involvement of HES occurred in cutaneous(55.0%), gastrointestinal(40.0%), pulmonary(35.0%), cardiac(13.3%), vascular(10.0%)and neuromuscular system(10.0%). Single organ involvement was observed in 45.0% of the patients, two or at least three organ involvements were observed in 36.7% and 18.3%, respectively. The median daily dose of prednisone equivalent was 30(15-60)mg. The total response rate(CR plus PR)was 88.3%, and the rate was elevated to 93.3% after receiving alterative or combined treatment regimens. Thirty- eight patients with response to treatment received corticosteroid(CS)as mono(33 cases)or combined(5 cases)maintenance treatment with a median duration of 51(5-92)months; the median maintenance daily dose of prednisone equivalent was 5(1.25-40)mg. Twenty patients experienced cessation of CS. The main causes of patients' withdrawal were poor compliance after CR or ineffective treatment. The 5-year overall survival was(90.0±4.3)%, and the main cause of mortality was cardiac dysfunction. Conclusion: CS was highly effective on HES with manageable side effects. Most patients who have not obtained satisfactory effect could improve response via combination therapy. Cardiac dysfunction was the most common cause of mortality.

Clinical features predict responsiveness to imatinib in platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha-negative hypereosinophilic syndrome

BACKGROUND

With the exception of the presence of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene, little is known about predictors of imatinib response in clinically-defined hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES).

METHODS

Subjects with FIP1L1-PDGFRA-myeloid neoplasm (FP; n =12), PDGFRA-negative HES with ≥4 criteria suggestive of a myeloid neoplasm (MHES; n =10), or steroid-refractory PDGFRA-negative HES with <4 myeloid criteria (SR; n = 5) were enrolled in a prospective study of imatinib therapy (NCT00044304: registered at clinicaltrials.gov). The primary outcome was an eosinophil count <1.5 × 109/L at one month and improvement of clinical symptoms. Clinical, molecular, and bone marrow responses to imatinib were assessed. A retrospective cohort of 18 subjects with clinically-defined HES who received imatinib (300-400 mg daily ≥ 1 month) were classified according to the criteria used in the prospective study.

RESULTS

Overall, imatinib response rates were 100% in the FP group (n = 16), 54% in the MHES group (n = 13) and 0% in the SR group (n = 16). The presence of ≥ 4 myeloid features was the sole predictor of response. After ≥ 18 months in complete remission, imatinib was tapered and discontinued in 8 FP and 1 MHES subjects. Seven subjects (6 FP, 1 MHES) remain in remission off therapy for a median of 29 months (range 14-36).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical features of MHES predict imatinib response in PDGFRA-negative HES.

Eosinophilia in Hematologic Disorders

Eosinophilia in the peripheral blood can be the manifestation various medical conditions, including benign or malignant disorders. There are 3 main types of eosinophilia-associated myeloid neoplasms (MN-eos): myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms, chronic eosinophilic leukemia not otherwise specified, and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the treatment of molecularly defined MN-eos, and novel agents have been successfully used to treat HES. The discovery of new, recurrent molecular alterations in patients with MN-eos may improve their diagnosis and therapy. This review focuses on the hematologist's approach to a patient with eosinophilia and treatment options for those with eosinophilic myeloid neoplasms.

Imatinib Treatment in PDGFRA-Negative Childhood Hypereosinophilic Syndrome

We report a 4-year-old female who presented with severe hypereosinophilia (215.7 K/μl) and end-organ dysfunction. Extensive evaluation including whole exome sequencing was performed, revealing no causative mutation. Initial treatment with corticosteroids, leukapheresis, and hydroxyurea decreased her absolute eosinophil count (AEC), although it remained elevated. Despite the absence of a PDGFRA mutation, an imatinib trial resulted in normalization of her AEC. Imatinib was discontinued after sustained normal counts for 1 month. AECs have remained normal for more than 1 year off therapy. This provides support for consideration of imatinib in the treatment of hypereosinophilia even in the absence of a known tyrosine kinase mutation.

World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2015 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

The eosinophilias encompass a broad range of non-hematologic (secondary or reactive) and hematologic (primary, clonal) disorders with potential for end-organ damage.

DIAGNOSIS

Hypereosinophilia has generally been defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 1,500/mm(3) and may be associated with tissue damage. After exclusion of secondary causes of eosinophilia, diagnostic evaluation of primary eosinophilias relies on a combination of morphologic review of the blood and marrow, standard cytogenetics, fluorescent in situ-hybridization, flow immunocytometry, and T-cell clonality assessment to detect histopathologic or clonal evidence for an acute or chronic myeloid or lymphoproliferative disorder.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Disease prognosis relies on identifying the subtype of eosinophilia. After evaluation of secondary causes of eosinophilia, the 2008 World Health Organization establishes a semi-molecular classification scheme of disease subtypes including 'myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and abnormalities of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1', chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified, (CEL, NOS), lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilia, and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), which is a diagnosis of exclusion.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

The goal of the therapy is to mitigate eosinophil-mediated organ damage. For patients with milder forms of eosinophilia (e.g. < 1,500/mm(3) ) without symptoms or signs of organ involvement, a watch and wait approach with close-follow-up may be undertaken. Identification of rearranged PDGFRA or PDGFRB is critical because of the exquisite responsiveness of these diseases to imatinib. Corticosteroids are first-line therapy for patients with lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilia and HES. Hydroxyurea and interferon-alpha have demonstrated efficacy as initial treatment and steroid-refractory cases of HES. In addition to hydroxyurea, second line cytotoxic chemotherapy agents and hematopoietic cell transplant have been used for aggressive forms of HES and CEL with outcomes reported for limited numbers of patients. Although clinical trials have been performed with anti IL-5 (mepolizumab) and anti-CD52 (alemtuzumab) antibodies, their therapeutic role in primary eosinophilic diseases and HES has yet to be established.

Comparison of two leukocytapheresis protocols in a case of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HEOS) is rare, and the efficacy of leukocytapheresis in this context is unclear. We here report the successful treatment of a patient with idiopathic HEOS with four leukocytapheresis procedures using two protocols.

CASE

A 4-year-old female presented with cardiac and respiratory dysfunction, and WBC of 225 K/μL with 96% eosinophils. Leukocytapheresis was started after initiation of methylprednisolone and hydroxyurea. She received two leukocytapheresis with polymorphonuclear cell (PMN) protocol, followed by initiation of imatinib therapy, then two leukocytapheresis with mononuclear cell (MNC) protocol. After the fourth leukocytapheresis, her WBC decreased to 69 K/μL with 82% eosinophils. She was discharged on hospital day 21 under stable condition with WBC of 22 K/μL with 86% eosinophils. WBC count and eosinophil percentage continued to decrease, and were 6.4 K/μL and 52% by 2 weeks and 3.9 K/μL and 4.9% by 3 months after discharge, respectively.

FINDINGS

WBC and absolute eosinophil (aEO) counts decreased by an average of 29.0 and 30.4% per leukocytapheresis, respectively. Normalized to estimated blood volume, procedures with PMN and MNC protocols changed, on average, WBC by -10.7 and -12.1%, aEO by -10.4 and -13.4%, platelet by -8.1 and -19.2%, and fluid balance by -129 and -47 mL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Leukocytapheresis was effective in decreasing WBC and aEO counts in HEOS, with PMN and MNC protocols achieving similar reductions. However, PMN protocol resulted in greater negative fluid balance and MNC protocol resulted in greater platelet loss. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:481-489, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.