Elevated lipoprotein (a), small apolipoprotein (a), and the risk of arterial ischemic stroke in North American children

Lipoprotein(a) in youth and childhood as a marker of cardiovascular risk stratification: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is recognized as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD), yet its impact during childhood and youth remains understudied. This study aims to evaluate the role of Lp(a) as an independent risk factor for premature ASCVD among young patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL Complete databases were systematically searched from inception to 12 December 2023 for adjusted observational studies examining the impact of Lp(a) in young patients. Premature coronary artery disease (CAD) and premature arterial stroke were designed as primary endpoints, while the association with family history of premature CAD and familial hypercholesterolemia were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies, encompassing 9923 patients, were included in the analysis. Nine studies assessed Lp(a) as an independent risk factor for premature CAD. Meta-analysis revealed Lp(a) to be significantly associated with premature CAD [odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.13, P = 0.02]. Four studies revealed that the high levels of Lp(a) were associated with a more than two-fold increased risk of arterial stroke (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.51-4.16, P = 0.004). However, insufficient studies were retrieved to perform a metanalysis for the secondary endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Findings from adjusted observational studies suggest that Lp(a) serves as a risk factor for premature CAD and for arterial stroke in the youngest population.

Association of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels with ischemic stroke in young patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an established independent causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis. However, its association with young-onset ischemic stroke is not well-established. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the association of elevated Lp(a) with young ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Four electronic databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library were systematically searched, profiling studies from inception till 6 Mar 2024. We included studies investigating the relationship between stratified Lp(a) levels and young ischemic stroke. We compared the odds of young stroke patients (age <65 years) having elevated Lp(a) compared to age-matched controls without stroke or transient ischemic attack.

RESULTS

Five case-control studies comprising a total of 1345 patients were included; 57.7 % (776/1345) were females, with a mean age of 41.5 years. Among them, 22.5 % (264/1171) were smokers. Additionally, 16.8 % (197/1171) had hypertension, 5.9 % (69/1171) had diabetes, and 29.2 % (284/971) had hyperlipidemia. Young stroke patients were more likely to have high Lp(a) level than age-matched controls (OR 1.61, 95 %CI 1.24-2.10). Four studies defined a high Lp(a) level as ≥30mg/dL, whilst one study used a Lp(a) level of >23.2mg/dL as the cut-off. A sensitivity analysis excluding this study showed that young stroke patients were still more likely to have Lp(a) ≥30mg/dL than controls (OR 1.43, 95 %CI 1.08-1.88).

CONCLUSION

Young stroke patients are more likely to have elevated Lp(a) compared to age-matched controls, suggesting an association between elevated Lp(a) and young stroke. Further research is warranted to evaluate the causal relationships between Lp(a) and young-onset ischemic stroke, as well as to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of Lp(a) screening in young adults as part of a primary prevention strategy.

The association between lipoprotein(a) levels and ischemic stroke in children: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is a rare disorder, associated with severe morbidity. In adults, elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), a cholesterol-like particle, is associated with ischemic stroke. However, data on Lp(a) and pediatric AIS are scarce. Therefore, we evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and pediatric AIS.

METHODS

We included children who suffered an AIS (≤18 years) and were treated in a tertiary center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Two groups of children with AIS were identified: (i) neonates and (ii) children older than 29 days. A case-control study was performed, with the latter group as cases and children without AIS as control group. Cases and controls were matched for age of Lp(a) testing and sex. Multivariable logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

Thirteen neonates and 23 children were included. Mean (SD) age of AIS was 0.6 (2.0) days and 9.2 (6.3) years, respectively. Children with AIS were matched to 62 controls. Lp(a) levels of greater than 50 mg/dL were more prevalent in children with AIS compared to controls (21.7% vs. 3.2%, p = .02). A significant association was found between Lp(a) and AIS (odds ratio [OR] adjusted for age at Lp(a) testing, body mass index [BMI], measurement assay: 1.36 per 10 mg/dL increase of Lp(a), 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.82, p = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, Lp(a) levels were positively associated with the risk of AIS in children, suggesting that high Lp(a) might be an independent risk factor for AIS. This underlines the importance of Lp(a) measurement in children with AIS.

Lipoprotein (a) and cerebrovascular disease

The role of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] in cerebrovascular disease is a topic of importance. In this narrative review, pertinent studies have been leveraged to comprehensively examine this relationship from diverse perspectives.Lp(a) shares structural traits with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Lp(a) is synthesized by hepatocytes, and its plasma levels are genetically determined by the LPA gene, which produces apolipoprotein (a).Numerous epidemiological studies have confirmed the positive correlation between elevated serum Lp(a) levels and the occurrence or recurrence of cerebrovascular events, especially ischemic strokes, in adults. It should be noted that the correlation strength varies among studies and is marginal in Mendelian randomization studies.Regarding pediatric patients, screening is currently limited to those with a relevant medical history. Lp(a) seems to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of arterial ischemic stroke in children because environmental thrombotic and atherogenic factors are generally not present.Phase 3 trials of novel Lp(a) targeting agents, such as pelacarsen and olpasiran, are anticipated to demonstrate their efficacy in reducing the incidence of stroke. Given the richness of the literature, new guidelines regarding Lp(a) screening and management in targeted populations are warranted to provide more effective primary and secondary prevention.

Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists Harmonized Pediatric Lipid Reporting Recommendations for Clinical Laboratories

Detecting dyslipidemia early is important because atherosclerosis originates in childhood and early treatment can improve outcomes. In 2022, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) and Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association (CPCA) published a clinical practice update to detect, evaluate, and manage pediatric dyslipidemia. However, guidance on its translation into clinical laboratories is lacking. The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists Working Group on Reference Interval Harmonization Lipid Team aims to assist guideline implementation and promote harmonized pediatric lipid reporting across Canada. The 2022 CCS/CPCA clinical practice update, 2011 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute integrated guidelines, and new data analysis (Canadian pediatric reference values from the Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals [CALIPER] and retrospective patient data from large community laboratories) were incorporated to develop 5 key recommendations. These include recommendations to: (1) offer nonfasting and fasting lipid testing; (2) offer a lipid panel including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, and triglycerides, with apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a) available as individually orderable tests; (3) flag total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C results ≥ 95th percentile, and HDL-C results < 10th percentile, as recommended by CCS/CPCA/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and validated by CALIPER, and flag apolipoprotein B and nonfasting triglyceride results ≥ 95th percentile on the basis of CALIPER, and do not flag Lp(a) results but mention the adult cutoff in the interpretive comments; (4) implement interpretive comments listed in the current report; and (5) implement the National Institutes of Health LDL-C equation. The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists Working Group on Reference Interval Harmonization Lipid Team will support clinical laboratories to implement these recommendations using knowledge translation strategies. Harmonizing pediatric lipid reporting across Canadian clinical laboratories will optimize clinical decision-making and improve cardiovascular risk management in youth.

Lipoprotein(a): a genetically determined risk factor for Cardiovascular disease

Lipoprotein(a) is a complex lipoprotein with unique characteristics distinguishing it from all the other apolipoprotein B-containing lipoprotein particles. Its lipid composition and the presence of a single molecule of apolipoprotein B per particle, render lipoprotein(a) similar to low-density lipoproteins. However, the presence of a unique, carbohydrate-rich protein termed apolipoprotein(a), linked by a covalent bond to apolipoprotein B imparts unique characteristics to lipoprotein(a) distinguishing it from all the other lipoproteins. Apolipoprotein(a) is highly polymorphic in size ranging in molecular weight from <300 KDa to >800 kDa. Both the size polymorphism and the concentration of lipoprotein(a) in plasma are genetically determined and unlike other lipoproteins, plasma concentration is minimally impacted by lifestyle modifications or lipid-lowering drugs. Many studies involving hundreds of thousands of individuals have provided strong evidence that elevated lipoprotein(a) is genetically determined and a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The concentration attained in adulthood is already present in children at around 5 years of age and therefore, those with elevated lipoprotein(a) are prematurely exposed to a high risk of cardiovascular disease. Despite the large number of guidelines and consensus statements on the management of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease published in the last decade, lipoprotein(a) is still seldom measured in clinical settings. In this review, we provide an overview of the most important features that characterize lipoprotein(a), its role in cardiovascular disease, and the importance of adding the measurement of lipoprotein(a) for screening adults and youths to identify those at increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease due to their elevated plasma concentration of lipoprotein(a).

Lipoprotein (a): Does It Play a Role in Pediatric Ischemic Stroke and Thrombosis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this paper is to describe the current understanding of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), clinical practice guidelines, and the potential pathophysiological mechanisms that appear to increase the risk of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events, specifically within the pediatric population.

RECENT FINDINGS

The proatherogenic and pro-thrombotic properties of Lp(a) may increase the risk of atherothrombotic disease. In adults, atherosclerotic plaques increase thrombotic risk, but antifibrinolytic and proinflammatory properties appear to have an important role in children. Although it is not well established in neonates, recent studies indicate the risk of incident thrombosis and ischemic stroke are approximately fourfold higher in children with elevated Lp(a) which also increases their risk of recurrent events. Despite this higher risk, Pediatric Lp(a) screening guidelines continue to vary among different medical societies and countries. The inconsistency is likely related to inconclusive evidence outside of observational studies and the lack of specific therapies for children with elevated levels. Additional research is needed to improve understanding of the pro-thrombotic mechanisms of Lp(a), appropriate screening guidelines for Lp(a) in the pediatric population, and to elucidate the short and long term effects of elevated Lp(a) on the risk of pediatric thrombosis and stroke.

Thrombophilia screening in the routine clinical care of children with arterial ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend thrombophilia evaluation in childhood arterial ischemic stroke, but the impact of screening on management is unknown. The objective of the current study is to report the incidence of thrombophilia identified as part of routine clinical care in the context of available literature reports, and to describe the impact of a diagnosis of thrombophilia on patient management.

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution retrospective chart review for all children with arterial ischemic stroke occurring between January 1, 2009 and January 1, 2021. We collected thrombophilia screening results, stroke etiology, and management. We also reviewed the literature of thrombophilia testing in childhood arterial ischemic stroke published prior to June 30, 2022. Meta-analysis methods were used to assess prevalence rates.

RESULTS

Among children with thrombophilia testing performed, 5% (six of 122 patients) were factor V Leiden heterozygous, 1% (one of 102 patients) were prothrombin gene mutation heterozygous, 1% (one of 122) had protein S deficiency, 20% (23/116 patients) had elevated lipoprotein(a), 3% (three of 110 patients) had elevated homocysteine levels, and 9% (10/112) had elevated antiphospholipid antibodies, only two of whom had persistently elevated levels. There was no change in stroke therapy due to these results. Literature review revealed a wide range of prevalence for most thrombophilia traits, with high cross-study heterogeneity in most cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of thrombophilia in our cohort were consistent with that expected in the general population. The identification of thrombophilia did not alter stroke care. However, some of the results were actionable, prompting evaluation for lipid disorders and patient-specific counseling on cardiovascular risk and risk for venous thrombosis.

Pediatric Stroke-Are We Asking the Right Questions? The 2022 Sidney Carter Award Lecture

Over the past few decades, robust clinical and research collaborations among pediatric stroke researchers have informed and improved the care of children with stroke. Risk factors and presentation of childhood stroke have been described, and the acute and chronic burden of childhood stroke has been better delineated. Nevertheless, high-quality data for the treatment of children with stroke is dwarfed by that available for adult stroke, and it is therefore tempting to extend research questions and treatment trials from adults to children. A trial designed to answer a question about stroke in adults may yield useful information about stroke in childhood, but a trial that incorporates the unique neurodevelopmental and etiologic aspects of childhood stroke is more likely to truly advance care. Research questions and study design in childhood stroke must capture the complexity of stroke mechanisms and medical comorbidities in children who suffer stroke, the impact on the developing nervous system, and the role of normal and aberrant neurodevelopment in recovery.

Lipid Biomarkers and Atherosclerosis-Old and New in Cardiovascular Risk in Childhood

Lipids are a complex group of molecules in the body, essential as structural, functional and metabolic components. When disbalanced, they are regarded as a cardiovascular risk factor, traditionally in cholesterol level evaluation. However, due to their complex nature, much research is still needed for a comprehensive understanding of their role in atherosclerosis, especially in the young. Several new lipid biomarkers are emerging, some already researched to a point, such as lipoproteins and apolipoproteins. Other lipid molecules are also being increasingly researched, including oxidized forms due to oxidative inflammation in atherosclerosis, and sphingolipids. For many, even those less new, the atherogenic potential is not clear and no clinical recommendations are in place to aid the clinician in using them in everyday clinical practice. Moreover, lipids' involvement in atherogenesis in children has yet to be elucidated. This review summarizes the current knowledge on lipids as biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in the paediatric population.

Use of Lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: A biomarker whose time has come. A scientific statement from the National Lipid Association

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-recognized, independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with elevated levels estimated to be prevalent in 20% of the population. Observational and genetic evidence strongly support a causal relationship between high plasma concentrations of Lp(a) and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-related events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, and valvular aortic stenosis. In this scientific statement, we review an array of evidence-based considerations for testing of Lp(a) in clinical practice and the utilization of Lp(a) levels to inform treatment strategies in primary and secondary prevention.

Expert position statements: comparison of recommendations for the care of adults and youth with elevated lipoprotein(a)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Summarize recent recommendations on clinical management of adults and youth with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] who are at-risk of or affected by cardiovascular disease (CVD).

RECENT FINDINGS

There is ample evidence to support elevated Lp(a) levels, present in approximately 20% of the general population, as a causal, independent risk factor for CVD and its role as a significant risk enhancer. Several guidelines and position statements have been published to assist in the identification, treatment and follow-up of adults with elevated levels of Lp(a). There is growing interest in Lp(a) screening and strategies to improve health behaviors starting in youth, although published recommendations for this population are limited. In addition to the well established increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and valvular aortic stenosis, data from the coronavirus pandemic suggest adults with elevated Lp(a) may have a particularly high-risk of cardiovascular complications. Lp(a)-specific-lowering therapies are currently in development. Despite their inability to lower Lp(a), use of statins have been shown to improve outcomes in primary and secondary prevention.

SUMMARY

Considerable differences exist amongst published guidelines for adults on the use of Lp(a) in clinical practice, and recommendations for youth are limited. With increasing knowledge of Lp(a)'s role in CVD, including recent observations of COVID-19-related risk of cardiovascular complications, more harmonized and comprehensive guidelines for Lp(a) in clinical practice are required. This will facilitate clinical decision-making and help define best practices for identification and management of elevated Lp(a) in adults and youth.

Prevalence and status of Lipoprotein (a) among Lebanese school children

Lipoprotein a (Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of high Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) in the Lebanese pediatric population is unknown. Our study aims to assess this prevalence and to study the relationship of Lp(a) with the lipid profile, age, body mass index (BMI) and socio-economic status (SES) in Lebanese schoolchildren. A total of 961 children aged 8–18 years (497 boys and 464 girls) were recruited from ten private and public schools in 2013–2014 using a stratified random sample. Schools were selected from the Greater Beirut and Mount Lebanon areas, and were categorized into three subgroups according to the schools’ SES status (high, medium, low). Lp(a) was assayed in 2018 on samples previously frozen at − 80 °C. Abnormal Lp(a) levels (≥ 75 nmol/L) were observed in 14.4% of the overall sample (13.5% for boys,15.3% of girls p = 0.56). The median of Lp(a) was 20(10–50) in the whole sample with no significant gender difference. No significant relationship was found between Lp(a) and age. However, Lp(a) was significantly correlated with BMI in whole sample, as well as in boys and girls (p = 0.02, p = 0.03, p = 0.03, respectively). A significant correlation was found between Lp(a) and non-HDL-C in the whole sample as well as in boys and girls (respectively p < 0.001,p = 0.024 and p = 0.03), but not with triglycerides and HDL-C. In a multivariate linear regression analysis, Lp(a) was only independently associated with BMI and non-HDL-C in boys and girls. Lp(a) was independently associated with BMI and non-HDL-C while no significant relationship was observed with age and sex confirming the strong genetic determination of Lp(a).

Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Risk of Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

High lipoprotein(a) is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and aortic valve stenosis. Previous studies have examined the association of lipoprotein(a) and risk of stroke; however, the results are conflicting.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to test if high lipoprotein(a) is associated with high risk of ischemic stroke observationally and causally from human genetics.

METHODS

The study included 49,699 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study and 10,813 individuals from the Copenhagen City Heart Study with measurements of plasma lipoprotein(a), LPA kringle-IV type 2 number of repeats, and LPA rs10455872. The endpoint of ischemic stroke was ascertained from Danish national health registries and validated by medical doctors.

RESULTS

Compared with individuals with lipoprotein(a) levels <10 mg/dl (<18 nmol/l: first to 50th percentile), the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for ischemic stroke was 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.24 to 2.05) for individuals with lipoprotein(a) levels >93mg/dl (>199 nmol/L: 96th to 100th percentile). In observational analyses for a 50 mg/dl (105 nmol/l) higher lipoprotein(a) level the age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio for ischemic stroke was 1.20 (95% CI: 1.13 to 1.28), while the corresponding age- and sex-adjusted genetic causal risk ratio for KIV-2 number of repeats was 1.20 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.43) and for rs10455872 was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.06 to 1.51). The highest absolute 10-year risk of ischemic stroke was 17% in active smoking individuals >70 years of age with hypertension and lipoprotein(a) levels >93 mg/dl (>199 nmol/l: 96th to 100th percentile). In the Copenhagen City Heart Study, risk estimates for high levels of lipoprotein(a) were in the same direction but did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large contemporary general population study, high plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) were associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke both observationally and causally from human genetics.

JCL roundtable-Lipoprotein(a): The emerging risk factor

Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), is a major risk factor for atherothrombotic events along with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and, inversely, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Lp(a) also contributes to the progression of calcific aortic stenosis and to the rare occurrence of arterial thrombotic strokes without atherosclerosis in children and younger women. Much has been learned about the inheritance of Lp(a) levels and the relationship between apolipoprotein(a) structure and function. Recent work suggests an intriguing interaction between oxidized phospholipids on Lp(a) and inflammatory interleukin-1 genotypes. New pharmaceutical approaches with antisense and RNA interference technology may achieve up to 90% lowering of Lp(a). This Roundtable includes practical considerations for clinically measuring and responding to Lp(a) levels.

Potent reduction of plasma lipoprotein (a) with an antisense oligonucleotide in human subjects does not affect ex vivo fibrinolysis

It is postulated that lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] inhibits fibrinolysis, but this hypothesis has not been tested in humans due to the lack of specific Lp(a) lowering agents. Patients with elevated Lp(a) were randomized to antisense oligonucleotide [IONIS-APO(a)_Rx] directed to apo(a) (n = 7) or placebo (n = 10). Ex vivo plasma lysis times and antigen concentrations of plasminogen, factor XI, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, and fibrinogen at baseline, day 85/92/99 (peak drug effect), and day 190 (3 months off drug) were measured. The mean ± SD baseline Lp(a) levels were 477.3 ± 55.9 nmol/l in IONIS-APO(a)_Rx and 362.1 ± 89.9 nmol/l in placebo. The mean± SD percentage change in Lp(a) for IONIS-APO(a)_Rx was -69.3 ± 12.2% versus -5.4 ± 6.9% placebo (P < 0.0010) at day 85/92/99 and -15.6 ± 8.9% versus 3.2 ± 12.2% (P = 0.003) at day 190. Clot lysis times and coagulation/fibrinolysis-related biomarkers showed no significant differences between IONIS-APO(a)_Rx and placebo at all time points. Clot lysis times were not affected by exogenously added Lp(a) at concentrations up to 200 nmol/l to plasma with very low (12.5 nmol/l) Lp(a) levels, whereas recombinant apo(a) had a potent antifibrinolytic effect. In conclusion, potent reductions of Lp(a) in patients with highly elevated Lp(a) levels do not affect ex vivo measures of fibrinolysis; the relevance of any putative antifibrinolytic effects of Lp(a) in vivo needs further study.

NHLBI Working Group Recommendations to Reduce Lipoprotein(a)-Mediated Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Aortic Stenosis

Pathophysiological, epidemiological, and genetic studies provide strong evidence that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal mediator of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). Specific therapies to address Lp(a)-mediated CVD and CAVD are in clinical development. Due to knowledge gaps, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute organized a working group that identified challenges in fully understanding the role of Lp(a) in CVD/CAVD. These included the lack of research funding, inadequate experimental models, lack of globally standardized Lp(a) assays, and inadequate understanding of the mechanisms underlying current drug therapies on Lp(a) levels. Specific recommendations were provided to facilitate basic, mechanistic, preclinical, and clinical research on Lp(a); foster collaborative research and resource sharing; leverage expertise of different groups and centers with complementary skills; and use existing National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute resources. Concerted efforts to understand Lp(a) pathophysiology, together with diagnostic and therapeutic advances, are required to reduce Lp(a)-mediated risk of CVD and CAVD.

Lipoprotein(a): An independent, genetic, and causal factor for cardiovascular disease and acute myocardial infarction

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a circulating lipoprotein, and its level is largely determined by variation in the Lp(a) gene (LPA) locus encoding apo(a). Genetic variation in the LPA gene that increases Lp(a) level also increases coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, suggesting that Lp(a) is a causal factor for CAD risk. Lp(a) is the preferential lipoprotein carrier for oxidized phospholipids (OxPL), a proatherogenic and proinflammatory biomarker. Lp(a) adversely affects endothelial function, inflammation, oxidative stress, fibrinolysis, and plaque stability, leading to accelerated atherothrombosis and premature CAD. The INTER-HEART Study has established the usefulness of Lp(a) in assessing the risk of acute myocardial infarction in ethnically diverse populations with South Asians having the highest risk and population attributable risk. The 2018 Cholesterol Clinical Practice Guideline have recognized elevated Lp(a) as an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk enhancer for initiating or intensifying statin therapy.

Thrombophilia Testing in High Pediatric Migraine Risk Children With Migraine

This study sought to investigate the need for thrombophilia screening in pediatric migraineurs. The cohort included 45/824 children (5.5%) aged 3-18 years with migraine who were tested for thrombophilia at a tertiary pediatric headache clinic. Results were analyzed by background factors and indications for screening. Rates of thrombotic factors were compared with a healthy historical control group. At least 1 thrombotic factor was positive in 19/45 patients (42%). The total thrombophilia risk rate was higher in patients with aura (n = 32). Lipoprotein(a) was the factor most often abnormal in the thrombophilia group of all factors tested (8/19, 42%), regardless of migraine type or gender. It was the only factor with a significantly higher prevalence in the migraine than the historical control group. Full thrombophilia testing in migraine in pediatric headache clinics does not seem to be justified. The high prevalence of elevated lipoprotein(a) in children with migraine warrants further investigation.

Lipoprotein (a) as a Predictor of Early Stroke Recurrence in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Inflammation plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of stroke. This study aims to determine lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels in serum and to investigate their associations with stroke recurrence events in a 3-month follow-up study in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Serum Lp(a) levels were determined in 203 ischemic stroke patients and 120 normal controls at admission. The severity and clinical outcome of ischemic stroke patients were evaluated by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). We followed the participants for a median of 3 months using a standard questionnaire to determine the stroke recurrence events. The correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed. Compared with controls, serum Lp(a) levels were significantly increased in ischemic stroke patients than in controls. NIHSS scores and infarct volume were positively correlated with Lp(a) (P < 0.001). Finally, 34 patients (16.7%; 95% CI, 11.6-21.9%) had a stroke recurrence. Serum Lp(a) levels in patients with recurrent stroke were significantly higher as compared with those in patients without recurrent stroke (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, there was an increased risk of stroke recurrence associated with Lp(a) levels ≥300 mg/l (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.98-4.32; P = 0.009) after adjusting for possible confounders. With an AUC of 0.872 (95% CI, 0.816-0.927), Lp(a) showed a significantly greater discriminatory ability to predict stroke recurrence as compared with NIHSS score (AUC, 0.782; 95% CI, 0.704-0.859; P < 0.01). Our findings suggest that elevated serum Lp(a) levels can predict the risk of early stroke recurrence in patients with first-ever ischemic stroke. Further research is needed to replicate these findings.

Dyslipidemia in Children With Arterial Ischemic Stroke: Prevalence and Risk Factors

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for pediatric stroke are poorly understood and require study to improve prevention. Total cholesterol and triglyceride values peak to near-adult levels before puberty, a period of increased stroke incidence. The role of lipids in childhood arterial ischemic stroke has been minimally investigated.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of lipid and Lp(a) concentrations in children with arterial ischemic stroke in the International Pediatric Stroke Study to compare the prevalence of dyslipidemia and high- or low-ranking lipid values in our dataset with reported population values. We analyzed sex, body mass index, race, ethnicity, family history, and stroke risk factors for associations with dyslipidemia, high non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and hypertriglyceridemia.

RESULTS

Compared with the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a higher proportion of children ≥5 years with arterial ischemic stroke had dyslipidemia (38.4% versus 21%), high total cholesterol (10.6% versus 7.4%), high non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (23.1% versus 8.4%), and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (39.8% versus 13.4%). The lipid values that corresponded to one standard deviation above the mean (84th percentile) in multiple published national studies generally corresponded to a lower ranking percentile in children aged five years or older with arterial ischemic stroke. Dyslipidemia was more likely associated with an underweight, overweight, or obese body mass index compared with a healthy weight. Ethnic background and an acute systemic illness were also associated with abnormal lipids.

CONCLUSIONS

Dyslipidemia and hypertriglyceridemia may be more prevalent in children with arterial ischemic stroke compared with stroke-free children.

Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for combined intracranial and extracranial artery stenosis in a child with arterial ischemic stroke: A case report

RATIONALE

Stroke is an uncommon disease in childhood with an estimated incidence of 1 to 6 per 100,000 and stenoocclusive arteriopathy is the main risk factor of recurrent pediatric arterial ischemic stroke (AIS). Dyslipidemia may influence strongly before puberty and in late adolescence when plasma levels are naturally highest.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 11-year-old male presented with acute onset seizure, a drowsy mentality, and right hemiplegia.

DIAGNOSES

Magnetic resonance (MR) angiogram demonstrated occlusion of distal basilar artery and left vertebral arteries. Serum Lp(a) was significantly increased as 269 nmol/L (normal<75 nmol/L) only. Thus, he was diagnosed as pediatric AIS.

INTERVENTIONS

He was started on aspirin (100 mg/day) for secondary stroke prevention and received nicotinic acid (2 g/day) as a Lp(a)-lowering agent.

OUTCOMES

Consciousness gradually improved and the patient regained a normal orientation after 2 weeks. The Lp(a) level was reduced to 48 nmol/L after nicotinic acid administration.

LESSONS

High Lp(a) level may be considered in the risk profile assessment of pediatric AIS. Niacin and certain inhibitors of cholesteryl ester transfer protein can be considered to reduce Lp(a).

Thrombophilia risk is not increased in children after perinatal stroke

Thrombophilia in children with perinatal stroke is rare, with rates similar to those in the normal population. Routine testing in childhood is not indicated.

Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke: Epidemiology, risk factors, and management

Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is an uncommon but important cause of neurologic morbidity in neonates and children, with consequences including hemiparesis, intellectual disabilities, and epilepsy. The causes of pediatric AIS are unique to those typically associated with stroke in adults. Familiarity with the risk factors for AIS in children will help with efficient diagnosis, which is unfortunately frequently delayed. Here we review the epidemiology and risk factors for AIS in neonates and children. We also outline consensus-based practices in the evaluation and management of pediatric AIS. Finally we discuss the outcomes observed in this population. While much has been learned in recent decades, many uncertainties sill persist in regard to pediatric AIS. The ongoing development of specialized centers and investigators dedicated to pediatric stroke will continue to answer such questions and improve our ability to effectively care for these patients.

Case report of male child with elevated lipoprotein (a) leading to acute ischemic stroke

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in children is rare with almost 40% diagnosed as cryptogenic. One possible mechanism associated with AIS is an elevated Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] level. Here, we discuss the case of an 11-year old boy who presented with multiple thrombotic strokes secondary to elevated Lp(a), which was identified as the only risk factor and immediately treated with lipoprotein apheresis (LA). Eighteen months post-AIS, he is still receiving LA treatments and has made remarkable progress in his recovery without another cerebrovascular event.

Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Recurrent Vascular Events After First Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose—

The association of elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels and the incidence of cardiovascular disease, especially coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke, is well established. However, evidence on the association between Lp(a) levels and residual vascular risk in stroke survivors is lacking. We aimed to elucidate the risk for recurrent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in the patients with first-ever ischemic stroke with elevated Lp(a).

Methods—

All patients with acute ischemic stroke who participated in the prospective Berlin C&S study (Cream & Sugar) between January 2009 and August 2014 with available 12-month follow-up data and stored blood samples were eligible for inclusion. Lp(a) levels were determined in serum samples using an isoform-insensitive nephelometry assay. We assessed the risk for the composite vascular end point of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, nonelective coronary revascularization, and cardiovascular death with elevated Lp(a) defined as >30 mg/dL using Cox regression analyses.

Results—

Of 465 C&S study participants, 250 patients were included into this substudy with a median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 2 (1–4). Twenty-six patients (10%) experienced a recurrent vascular event during follow-up. Among patients with normal Lp(a) levels, 11 of 157 subjects (7%) experienced an event at a median time of 161 days (interquartile range, 19–196 days), whereas in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels, 15 of 93 subjects (16%) experienced an event at a median time of 48 days (interquartile range, 9–194 days; P =0.026). The risk for a recurrent event was significantly higher in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels after adjustment for potential confounders (hazard ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.19–5.67; P =0.016).

Conclusions—

Elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with a higher risk for combined vascular event recurrence in patients with acute, first-ever ischemic stroke. This finding should be validated in larger, multicenter trials.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01378468.

Lipoprotein (a) level, apolipoprotein (a) size, and risk of unexplained ischemic stroke in young and middle-aged adults

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Circulating lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] level relates inversely to apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] size. Both smaller apo(a) isoforms and higher Lp(a) levels have been linked to coronary heart disease and stroke, but their independent contributions are less well defined. We examined the role of Lp(a) in younger adults with cryptogenic stroke.

METHODS

Lp(a) and apo(a) isoforms were evaluated in a prospectively designed case-control study of patients with unexplained ischemic stroke and stroke-free controls, ages 18 to 64. Serum Lp(a) was measured among 255 cases and 390 controls with both apo(a)-size independent and dependent assays. Apo(a) size was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis.

RESULTS

Cases and controls were similar in socio-demographic characteristics, but cases had more hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and migraine with aura. In race-specific analyses, Lp(a) levels showed positive associations with cryptogenic stroke in whites, but not in the smaller subgroups of blacks and Hispanics. After full adjustment, comparison of the highest versus lowest quartile in whites was significant for apo(a)-size-independent (OR = 2.10 [95% CI = 1.04, 4.27], p = 0.040), and near-significant for apo(a)-size-dependent Lp(a) (OR = 1.81 [95% CI = 0.95, 3.47], p = 0.073). Apo(a) size was not associated with cryptogenic stroke in any race-ethnic subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the importance of Lp(a) level, but not apo(a) size, as an independent risk factor for unexplained ischemic stroke in young and middle-aged white adults. Given the emergence of effective Lp(a)-lowering therapies, these findings support routine testing for Lp(a) in this setting, along with further research to assess the extent to which such therapies improve outcomes in this population.

Ischemic stroke in a young adult with extremely elevated lipoprotein(a): A case report and review of literature

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an apolipoprotein(a) molecule bound to 1 apolipoprotein B-100. Elevated levels of Lp(a) are thought to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis and to promote thrombosis through incompletely understood mechanisms. We report a 34-year-old man with an ischemic stroke in the setting of an extremely high Lp(a) level-212 mg/dL. He developed severe carotid artery stenosis over a 6-year period and had thrombus formation post-carotid endarterectomy. To our knowledge, this case is unique because the Lp(a) is the highest reported level in a patient without renal disease. Moreover, this is the first reported case of the youngest individual with a stroke presumably related to development of carotid plaque over a 6-year period. The thrombotic complication after endarterectomy may have been related to the prothrombotic properties of Lp(a). Of note, the Lp(a) level did not respond to atorvastatin but did decrease 15% after aspirin 325 mg was added although his Lp(a) levels were variable, and it is not clear that this was cause and effect. This case highlights the need to better understand the relation between Lp(a) and vascular disease and the need to screen family members for elevated Lp(a). We also review treatment options to lower Lp(a) and ongoing clinical trials of newer lipid-lowering drugs that can also lower Lp(a).

Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk factors in pediatric liver transplant recipients

Cardiovascular diseases induce long-term morbidity and mortality of adult LT recipients. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess CVRF, lipid abnormalities, and atherosclerosis (appraised by c-IMT), more than 10 yr after pediatric LT. Thirty-one children who underwent LT between December 1990 and December 2000 were included. Median age at LT was 14 months (range 4-64), and median follow-up after LT was 11.9 yr (range 9.0-17.3). In our cohort, obesity (9.7%) and treated hypertension (9.7%) were rare. None of the patients was smoker or diabetic. High TC and TG were both observed in 6.5% of the patients. The mean c-IMT for male patients was 1.22 ± 1.55 and 1.58 ± 1.23 mm in female patients. Seven patients (22%) had a mean c-IMT above +2 s.d. Values below the 5th percentile were noted for LDL-cholesterol (58.1%), HDL-cholesterol (25.8%), apolipoprotein B (40%), and apolipoprotein A1 (20%). LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels were significantly lower in patients treated by tacrolimus in comparison with CsA (p < 0.05). In conclusion, our results suggest that pediatric LT patients do not present significant CVRF; moreover, instead of hyperlipidemia, hypocholesterolemia (LDL-C) is frequent and immunosuppressive therapy is probably the cause.

Lipoprotein (a): truly a direct prothrombotic factor in cardiovascular disease?

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] have been determined to be a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease, and may similarly play a role in other atherothrombotic disorders. Lp(a) consists of a lipoprotein moiety indistinguishable from LDL, as well as the plasminogen-related glycoprotein, apo(a). Therefore, the pathogenic role for Lp(a) has traditionally been considered to reflect a dual function of its similarity to LDL, causing atherosclerosis, and its similarity to plasminogen, causing thrombosis through inhibition of fibrinolysis. This postulate remains highly speculative, however, because it has been difficult to separate the prothrombotic/antifibrinolytic functions of Lp(a) from its proatherosclerotic functions. This review surveys the current landscape surrounding these issues: the biochemical basis for procoagulant and antifibrinolytic effects of Lp(a) is summarized and the evidence addressing the role of Lp(a) in both arterial and venous thrombosis is discussed. While elevated Lp(a) appears to be primarily predisposing to thrombotic events in the arterial tree, the fact that most of these are precipitated by underlying atherosclerosis continues to confound our understanding of the true pathogenic roles of Lp(a) and, therefore, the most appropriate therapeutic target through which to mitigate the harmful effects of this lipoprotein.

Antisense inhibition of apolipoprotein (a) to lower plasma lipoprotein (a) levels in humans

Epidemiological, genetic association, and Mendelian randomization studies have provided strong evidence that lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an independent causal risk factor for CVD, including myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Lp(a) levels >50 mg/dl are highly prevalent (20% of the general population) and are overrepresented in patients with CVD and aortic stenosis. These data support the notion that Lp(a) should be a target of therapy for CVD event reduction and to reduce progression of aortic stenosis. However, effective therapies to specifically reduce plasma Lp(a) levels are lacking. Recent animal and human studies have shown that Lp(a) can be specifically targeted with second generation antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) that inhibit apo(a) mRNA translation. In apo(a) transgenic mice, an apo(a) ASO reduced plasma apo(a)/Lp(a) levels and their associated oxidized phospholipid (OxPL) levels by 86 and 93%, respectively. In cynomolgus monkeys, a second generation apo(a) ASO, ISIS-APO(a)Rx, significantly reduced hepatic apo(a) mRNA expression and plasma Lp(a) levels by >80%. Finally, in a phase I study in normal volunteers, ISIS-APO(a)Rx ASO reduced Lp(a) levels and their associated OxPL levels up to 89 and 93%, respectively, with minimal effects on other lipoproteins. ISIS-APO(a)Rx represents the first specific and potent drug in clinical development to lower Lp(a) levels and may be beneficial in reducing CVD events and progression of calcific aortic valve stenosis.

Association of a methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism with several blood chemical levels in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND

The methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism is associated with hypertension in certain populations. This study investigated the relationship between the MTHFR polymorphism and hypertension and correlated blood lipid indexes, including homocysteine (HCY), lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)], high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), apolipoprotein A I (Apo AI), Apo B, glucose (GLU), total cholesterol (TC), and triglyceride (TG), in a Chinese population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 174 patients with hypertension and 634 healthy control individuals from Jiangxi Province were recruited between June 2012 and September 2012 for genotyping of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Biochemical parameters were also assessed in these subjects and statistically compared to the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and the risk for hypertension.

RESULTS

HCY and Lp (a) levels were significantly higher in subjects with a MTHFR 677TT genotype than in those with a CC/CT genotype, independent of hypertension. The frequency of the TT genotype and the T allele in hypertension patients was significantly higher than in the healthy controls. Furthermore, in the male hypertension patient group, the average levels of HCY, HDL, Apo AI, and TC were significantly different from those in female hypertension patients (pHCY=0.001, pHDL=0.004, pApo AI<0.001, pTC=0.012). In the male control group, the average levels of HCY, HDL, Apo AI, GLU, and TC were significantly different from those of female controls (pHCY<0.001, pHDL<0.001, pApo AI<0.001, pGLU=0.001, and pTC=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that the MTHFR C677T polymorphism is positively correlated with an increased risk of hypertension through an increase in HCY levels. The blood lipid correlative index was different between male and female hypertension patients and controls.

Lipoprotein (a) as a risk factor for ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] harbors atherogenic potential but its role as a risk factor for ischemic stroke remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the relative strength of the association between Lp(a) and ischemic stroke and identify potential subgroup-specific risk differences.

METHODS

A systematic search using the MeSH terms "lipoproteins" OR "lipoprotein a" AND "stroke" was performed in PubMed and ScienceDirect for case-control studies from June 2006 and prospective cohort studies from April 2009 until December 20th 2014. Data from eligible papers published before these dates were reviewed and extracted from previous meta-analyses. Studies that assessed the relationship between Lp(a) levels and ischemic stroke and reported generic data-i.e. odds ratio [OR], hazard ratio, or risk ratio [RR]-were eligible for inclusion. Studies that not distinguish between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and transient ischemic attack were excluded. Random effects meta-analyses with mixed-effects meta-regression were performed by pooling adjusted OR or RR.

RESULTS

A total of 20 articles comprising 90,904 subjects and 5029 stroke events were eligible for the meta-analysis. Comparing high with low Lp(a) levels, the pooled estimated OR was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.26-1.57) for case-control studies (n = 11) and the pooled estimated RR was 1.29 (95% CI, 1.06-1.58) for prospective studies (n = 9). Sex-specific differences in RR were inconsistent between case-control and prospective studies. Study populations with a mean age of ≤55 years had an increased RR compared to older study populations. Reported Lp(a) contrast levels and ischemic stroke subtype significantly contributed to the heterogeneity observed in the analyses.

CONCLUSION

Elevated Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke and may be especially relevant for young stroke patients. Sex-specific risk differences remain conflicting. Further studies in these subgroups may be warranted.

Lipoprotein(a): Its relevance to the pediatric population

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a highly atherogenic and heterogeneous lipoprotein that is inherited in an autosomal codominant trait. A unique aspect of this lipoprotein is that it is fully expressed by the first or second year of life in children, a pattern that is distinctly different from other lipoproteins, which typically only reach adult levels after adolescence. Despite decades of research, Lp(a) metabolism is still poorly understood but what is abundantly clear is that it is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents does not recommend measuring Lp(a) levels as part of routine screening except in youth with an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or youth with a parental history of ASCVD not explained by classical risk factors. One of the reasons that both the pediatric and adult guidelines fail to include this lipoprotein as part of routine lipid screening is the absence of data to show that lowering Lp(a) will reduce current or future ASCVD risk independently of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering. The cholesterol carried by Lp(a) is included in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement, but a separate test is used to measure the lipoprotein mass and/or cholesterol carried only by Lp(a). Because levels seem to be largely under genetic control, studies of lifestyle modification have been inconclusive although one study in obese children showed a decrease in the Lp(a) level comparable with the favorable effect on other lipids. The most compelling data regarding the importance of Lp(a) in the pediatric population are the increased risk associated with arterial ischemic stroke, a risk that is comparable with that associated with antiphospholipid antibodies or protein C deficiency. Although no specific pharmaceutical treatments are recommended to lower Lp(a) levels in youth, it is vitally important to educate youth and their parents about the excessive risk associated with this lipoprotein and the need to avoid the acquisition of other lifestyle-related risk factors such as smoking, excess weight, and physical inactivity to preserve more ideal cardiovascular health in adulthood.

Isolated midbrain ischemic infarct in association with hyperlipoproteinemia (a): a report of 2 adolescent patients

Arterial ischemic strokes (AIS) localized solely to the midbrain are extremely uncommon in the pediatric population. Elevated lipoprotein (a), which promotes atherosclerosis and a prothrombotic state, has been associated with increased risk of AIS in children and adults. Here we describe a 17-year-old boy and a 15-year-old girl who presented with internuclear ophthalmoplegia secondary to an isolated midbrain AIS. Evaluation for risk factors for AIS in these otherwise healthy adolescents identified hyperlipoproteinemia (a) in combination with other potential prothrombotic conditions suggesting that hypercoagulable states such as hyperlipoproteinemia (a) may have contributed to development of small-vessel arteriopathy and localized AIS.

What is the ultimate test that lowering lipoprotein(a) is beneficial for cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis. We review recent studies that highlight Lp(a) in CVD and calcific aortic valve stenosis and propose pathways to clinical registration of Lp(a)-lowering agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last few years, almost irrefutable evidence has accumulated that Lp(a) is a causal, independent, genetic risk factor for CVD. Most recently, new data have emerged that elevated Lp(a) is causally associated with calcific aortic valve stenosis and the need for aortic valve replacement. Three levels of evidence to support these findings: epidemiological studies, Mendelian randomization studies and genetic association studies. A dedicated Lp(a)-lowering trial has not been performed to date. Emerging Lp(a)-lowering therapies with specific and potent lowering of Lp(a) are in phase II clinical trials and provide a tool to test the hypothesis that lowering Lp(a) plasma levels will lead to clinical benefit.

SUMMARY

We provide a rationale for the potential clinical use of Lp(a)-lowering therapies in high-risk patients or patients with established CVD whose major risk factor is elevated Lp(a) levels and propose clinical studies and trials to demonstrate that lowering Lp(a) levels will effectively reduce the risk of calcific aortic valve stenosis and CVD.

Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

The aim of this updated statement is to provide comprehensive and timely evidence-based recommendations on the prevention of stroke among individuals who have not previously experienced a stroke or transient ischemic attack. Evidence-based recommendations are included for the control of risk factors, interventional approaches to atherosclerotic disease of the cervicocephalic circulation, and antithrombotic treatments for preventing thrombotic and thromboembolic stroke. Further recommendations are provided for genetic and pharmacogenetic testing and for the prevention of stroke in a variety of other specific circumstances, including sickle cell disease and patent foramen ovale.

Arterial ischemic stroke in children: risk factors and etiologies

Stroke is increasingly recognized as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children, and as a financial burden for families and society. Recent studies have identified and confirmed presumptive risk factors, and have identified novel associations with childhood arterial ischemic stroke. A better understanding of risk factors for stroke in children, which differ from the atherosclerotic risk factors in adults, is the first step needed to improve strategies for stroke prevention and intervention, and ultimately minimize the physical, mental, and financial burden of arterial ischemic stroke. Here, we discuss recent advances in research for selected childhood stroke risk factors, highlighting the progress made in our understanding of etiologic mechanisms and pathophysiology, and address the future directions for acute and long-term treatment strategies for pediatric stroke.

Update on lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor and mediator

Recent genetic studies have put the spotlight back onto lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease. However, there remain significant gaps in our knowledge with respect to how the Lp(a) particle is assembled, the route of its catabolism, and the mechanism(s) of Lp(a) pathogenicity. It has long been speculated that the effects of Lp(a) in the vasculature can be attributed to both its low-density lipoprotein moiety and the unique apolipoprotein(a) component, which is strikingly similar to the kringle-containing fibrinolytic zymogen plasminogen. However, the ability of Lp(a) to modulate either purely thrombotic or purely atherothrombotic processes in vivo remains unclear. The presence of oxidized phospholipid on Lp(a) may underlie many of the proatherosclerotic effects of Lp(a) that have been identified both in cell models and in animal models, and provides a possible avenue for identifying therapeutics aimed at mitigating the effects of Lp(a) in the vasculature. However, the beneficial effects of targeted Lp(a) therapeutics, designed to either lower Lp(a) concentrations or interfere with its effects, on cardiovascular outcomes remains to be determined.

Lipoprotein (a), LPA Ile4399Met, and fibrin clot properties

INTRODUCTION

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels were reported to be associated with dense fibrin clots. The apo(a) component of Lp(a) is encoded by LPA, and the Met allele of the LPA Ile4399Met polymorphism is associated with elevated Lp(a) levels and cardiovascular disease risk. We investigated whether Ile4399Met was associated with fibrin clot properties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We determined plasma Lp(a) levels, fibrin clot permeability and lysis time for 64 LPA 4399Met carriers and 128 noncarriers matched for age, sex, ethnicity, and enrollment site.

RESULTS

Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with reduced clot permeability and prolonged lysis time (P<0.0001). Carriers of 4399Met had higher Lp(a) levels compared with noncarriers (P=0.0003). However, this association differed by ethnicity (P=0.003 for interaction between genotype and ethnicity): compared with noncarriers, 4399Met carriers had 2.89 fold higher Lp(a) levels among Caucasians while no difference was observed among non-Caucasians (primarily East Asians and Hispanics). Among all subjects, no association was observed between Ile4399Met and clot properties, but this relationship also differed by ethnicity: among non-Caucasians, 4399Met carriers had increased clot permeability and shorter lysis time; whereas among Caucasians, the trend was for decreased permeability and longer lysis time (P<0.01 for interactions between genotype and ethnicity).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed that elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with dense fibrin clots, and found that the association of LPA 4399Met carriers and clot permeability as well as lysis time differ by ethnicity.