The search for the origin of factor VIII synthesis and its impact on therapeutic strategies for hemophilia A

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

Hemophilia A Gene Therapy: Current and Next-Generation Approaches

INTRODUCTION

: Hemophilia comprises a group of X-linked hemorrhagic disorders that result from a deficiency of coagulation factors. The disorder affects mainly males and leads to chronic pain, joint deformity, reduced mobility, and increased mortality. Current therapies require frequent administration of replacement clotting factors, but the emergence of alloantibodies (inhibitors) diminishes their efficacy. New therapies are being developed to produce the deficient clotting factors and prevent the emergence of inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

: This article provides an update on the characteristics and disease pathophysiology of hemophilia A, as well as current treatments, with a special focus on ongoing clinical trials related to gene replacement therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

: Gene replacement therapies provide safe, durable, and stable transgene expression while avoiding the challenges of clotting factor replacement therapies in patients with hemophilia. Improving the specificity of the viral construct and decreasing the therapeutic dose are critical toward minimizing cellular stress, induction of the unfolded protein response, and the resulting loss of protein production in liver cells. Next-generation gene therapies incorporating chimeric DNA sequences in the transgene can increase clotting factor synthesis and secretion, and advance the efficacy, safety, and durability of gene replacement therapy for hemophilia A as well as other blood clotting disorders.

Deciphering the Ets-1/2-mediated transcriptional regulation of F8 gene identifies a minimal F8 promoter for hemophilia A gene therapy

Amajor challenge in the development of a gene therapy for hemophilia A is the selection of cell type- or tissue-specific promoters to ensure factor VIII (FVIII) expression without eliciting an immune response. As liver sinusoidal endothelial cells are the major FVIII source, understanding the transcriptional F8 regulation in these cells would help to optimize the minimal F8 promoter (pF8) to efficiently drive FVIII expression. In silico analyses predicted several binding sites (BS) for the E26 transformation-specific (Ets) transcription factors Ets-1 and Ets-2 in the pF8. Reporter assays demonstrated a significant up-regulation of pF8 activity by Ets-1 or Ets- 1/Est-2 combination, while Ets-2 alone was ineffective. Moreover, Ets-1/Ets- 2-DNA binding domain mutants (DBD) abolished promoter activation only when the Ets-1 DBD was removed, suggesting that pF8 up-regulation may occur through Ets-1/Ets-2 interaction with Ets-1 bound to DNA. pF8 carrying Ets-BS deletions unveiled two Ets-BS essential for pF8 activity and response to Ets overexpression. Lentivirus-mediated delivery of green fluorescent protein (GFP) or FVIII cassettes driven by the shortened promoters, led to GFP expression mainly in endothelial cells in the liver and to longterm FVIII activity without inhibitor formation in HA mice. These data strongly support the potential application of these promoters in hemophilia A gene therapy.

Immunohistochemical Studies of Age-Related Changes in Cell Proliferation and Angiogenesis during the Healing of Acetic Acid-Induced Gastric Ulcers in Rats

Cell proliferation and angiogenesis are of utmost importance for healing to take place. The KI67 and EGFR proteins are markers of cell proliferation, while CD31 and factor VIII are markers of angiogenesis. To elucidate the mechanism responsible for delayed healing of the gastric injury in old age, we analyzed the expression of these markers in rats of different months during the healing of an acetic acid-induced gastric ulcer. Male Wistar rats (aged 3, 6, 12, and 18 months) divided into four groups, according to their ages, formed the experimental animals. Stomach tissue samples were collected on days 3, 7, 14, and 21 after induction for assessment of ulcer healing. The area of gastric mucosa healed was inversely proportional to age. The expression of markers of proliferation (KI67 and EGFR) and angiogenesis (factor VIII and CD31) decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in older rats when compared with younger ones (3 months > six months > 12 months > 18 months) on days 7, 14, and 21 after induction of gastric ulcer. This study revealed that the slower gastric ulcer healing rate in older rats might be due to reduced epithelial cell proliferation and angiogenic activities.

Maternal microchimerism protects hemophilia A patients from inhibitor development

Deleterious F8 mutations do not necessarily lead to the incidence of inhibitors in hemophilia A patients receiving replacement therapy. Maternal chimeric cells migrated into a fetus with hemophilia A during pregnancy could induce tolerance toward FVIII.

Successful liver transplant from a hemophilia A donor with no development of hemophilia A in recipient

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A is an X-linked inherited bleeding disorder caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII. Factor VIII is activated as part of the intrinsic coagulation cascade. It plays a crucial role as the cofactor in the intrinsic "tenase" complex activating factor X to assist in clot formation. Absence or mutation of this coagulation factor leads to excessive bleeding. Clinical manifestations of hemophilia relate to bleeding from impaired hemostasis, sequelae from bleeding, or complications of coagulation factor infusion. Diagnostic criteria for Hemophilia A include factor VIII activity level below 40% of normal, presence of a mutated F8 gene, and the absence of von Willebrand disease (F8 gene - Genetics Home Reference - NIH. https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/F8). Patients who have this intrinsic defect in the coagulation cascade have a characteristically prolonged PTT. It is theorized that the majority of factor VIII is synthesized mainly in the liver, by way of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (Arruda VR. Haematologica. 2015;100(7):849-850). Extrahepatic production also occurs in the endothelial cells, kidneys, and lymphatic tissue. In 1969, Marchioro et al showed that transplantation of normal liver to hemophilia dog could normalize plasma factor VIII levels (Marchioro T L, Science. 1969;163(3863):188-190). These results were subsequently proven in humans. Liver transplantation from hemophilia A donors without factor VIII inhibitor is not commonly performed due to the perceived risk of developing hemophilia A in the recipient. There is currently limited literature aimed at elucidating this risk. We present a case of liver transplantation in a hemophilia A donor to a recipient with no history of hemophilia A with literature reviewis a case report, objective and method do not apply.

OBJECTIVE AND METHOD

We did a case report and literature review of a liver transplant receipient fro ma hemohpila A donor.

RESULTS

The receipient of the liver from hemophilia A donor did not develop hemophilia post transplant and had normal factor VIII levels.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is only the second case in humans of hemophilia A patient as a donor in liver transplantation. As the indications for liver transplantation have expanded, there is a need to expand the donor list, and possibly not exclude this population as viable donor option.

Tolerance induction in hemophilia: innovation and accomplishments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hemophilia is an X-linked blood coagulation genetic disorder, which can cause significant disability. Replacement therapy for coagulation factor VIII (hemophilia A) or factor IX (hemophilia B) may result in the development of high-affinity alloantibodies ('inhibitors') to the replacement therapy, thus making it ineffective. Therefore, there is interest in directing immunological responses towards tolerance to infused factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we will discuss latest advancements in the development of potentially less immunogenic replacement clotting factors, optimization of current tolerance induction protocols (ITI), preclinical and clinical data of pharmacological immune modulation, hepatic gene therapy, and the rapidly advancing field of cell therapies. We will also evaluate publications reporting data from preclinical studies on oral tolerance induction using chloroplast-transgenic (transplastomic) plants.

SUMMARY

Until now, no clinical prophylactic immune modulatory protocol exists to prevent inhibitor formation to infused clotting factors. Recent innovative technologies provide hope for improved eradication and perhaps even prevention of inhibitors.

Innovative Approaches for Immune Tolerance to Factor VIII in the Treatment of Hemophilia A

Hemophilia A (coagulation factor VIII deficiency) is a debilitating genetic disorder that is primarily treated with intravenous replacement therapy. Despite a variety of factor VIII protein formulations available, the risk of developing anti-dug antibodies (“inhibitors”) remains. Overall, 20–30% of patients with severe disease develop inhibitors. Current clinical immune tolerance induction protocols to eliminate inhibitors are not effective in all patients, and there are no prophylactic protocols to prevent the immune response. New experimental therapies, such as gene and cell therapies, show promising results in pre-clinical studies in animal models of hemophilia. Examples include hepatic gene transfer with viral vectors, genetically engineered regulatory T cells (Treg), in vivo Treg induction using immune modulatory drugs, and maternal antigen transfer. Furthermore, an oral tolerance protocol is being developed based on transgenic lettuce plants, which suppressed inhibitor formation in hemophilic mice and dogs. Hopefully, some of these innovative approaches will reduce the risk of and/or more effectively eliminate inhibitor formation in future treatment of hemophilia A.