1
|
Kjerland TM, Schroeder S, Tofaeono V. Increased community engagement of Indigenous Peoples in dementia research leads to higher context relevance of results. DEMENTIA 2024; 23:643-668. [PMID: 38445447 PMCID: PMC11059836 DOI: 10.1177/14713012241233651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health research that focuses on Indigenous Peoples must ensure that the community in question is actively engaged, and that the results have context relevance for Indigenous Peoples. Context relevance is "the benefits, usability, and respectful conduct of research from the perspective of Indigenous communities." The purpose of this study was to apply two tools within an already-published scoping review of 76 articles featuring research on cognitive impairment and dementia among Indigenous Peoples worldwide. One tool assessed levels of community engagement reported in the corpus, and the other tool assessed the context relevance of recommendations in the corpus. We hypothesized that research with higher levels of reported community engagement would produce recommendations with greater context relevance for Indigenous Peoples. METHODS We employed semi-structured deductive coding using two novel tools assessing levels of reported community engagement and context relevance of recommendations based on studies included in the existing scoping review. RESULTS Application of the two tools revealed a positive relationship between increasing community engagement and greater context relevance. Community engagement primarily occurred in studies conducted with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations in Canada and with Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Research with Alaska Native, American Indian, and Native Hawaiian Peoples in the USA stood out for its comparative lack of meaningful community engagement. DISCUSSION There is opportunity to utilize these tools, and the results of this assessment, to enhance training and mentorship for researchers who work with Indigenous populations. There is a need to increase investigator capacity to involve communities throughout all phases of research, particularly in the pre-research stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonya M Kjerland
- Department of Indigenous Health, University of North Dakota, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kępińska AP, Johnson JS, Huckins LM. Open Science Practices in Psychiatric Genetics: A Primer. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY GLOBAL OPEN SCIENCE 2024; 4:110-119. [PMID: 38298792 PMCID: PMC10829621 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Open science ensures that research is transparently reported and freely accessible for all to assess and collaboratively build on. Psychiatric genetics has led among the health sciences in implementing some open science practices in common study designs, such as replication as part of genome-wide association studies. However, thorough open science implementation guidelines are limited and largely not specific to data, privacy, and research conduct challenges in psychiatric genetics. Here, we present a primer of open science practices, including selection of a research topic with patients/nonacademic collaborators, equitable authorship and citation practices, design of replicable, reproducible studies, preregistrations, open data, and privacy issues. We provide tips for informative figures and inclusive, precise reporting. We discuss considerations in working with nonacademic collaborators and distributing research through preprints, blogs, social media, and accessible lecture materials. Finally, we provide extra resources to support every step of the research process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrianna P. Kępińska
- Pamela Sklar Division of Psychiatric Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica S. Johnson
- Pamela Sklar Division of Psychiatric Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Psychiatry Department, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Laura M. Huckins
- Pamela Sklar Division of Psychiatric Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garrison NA, Carroll SR. Genetic research with Indigenous Peoples: perspectives on governance and oversight in the US. Front Res Metr Anal 2023; 8:1286948. [PMID: 38078202 PMCID: PMC10702594 DOI: 10.3389/frma.2023.1286948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Indigenous Peoples are increasingly exerting governance and oversight over genomic research with citizens of their nations, raising questions about how best to enforce research regulation between American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian peoples and researchers. Methods Using a community-engaged research approach, we conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with Tribal leaders, clinicians, researchers, policy makers, and Tribal research review board members about their perspectives on ethical issues related to genetics research with Indigenous Peoples in the US. Results We report findings related to (1) considerations for Indigenous governance, (2) institutional relationships upholding sovereignty, (3) expectations for research approvals, and (4) agreements enacting Indigenous governance. Participants described concerns about different ways of exerting oversight, relationships and agreements between Indigenous Peoples and researchers, and gaps that need to be addressed to strengthen existing governance of genomic data. Discussion The results will ultimately guide policy-making and development of new strategies for Indigenous Peoples to enforce oversight in research to promote ethically and culturally appropriate research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanibaa' A. Garrison
- Traditional, ancestral and unceded territory of the Gabrielino/Tongva peoples, Institute for Society and Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Traditional, ancestral and unceded territory of the Gabrielino/Tongva peoples, Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Traditional, ancestral and unceded territory of the Gabrielino/Tongva peoples, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Stephanie Russo Carroll
- Lands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Lands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hutchins L, Mc Cartney A, Graham N, Gillespie R, Guzman A. Arthropods are kin: Operationalizing Indigenous data sovereignty to respectfully utilize genomic data from Indigenous lands. Mol Ecol Resour 2023. [PMID: 37455607 DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Indigenous peoples have cultivated biodiverse agroecosystems since time immemorial. The rise of metagenomics and high-throughput sequencing technologies in biodiversity studies has rapidly expanded the scale of data collection from these lands. A respectful approach to the data life cycle grounded in the sovereignty of indigenous communities is imperative to not perpetuate harm. In this paper, we operationalize an indigenous data sovereignty (IDS) framework to outline realistic considerations for genomic data that span data collection, governance, and communication. As a case study for this framework, we use arthropod genomic data collected from diversified and simplified farm sites close to and far from natural habitats within a historic Kānaka 'Ōiwi (Indigenous Hawaiian) agroecosystem. Diversified sites had the highest Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) richness for native and introduced arthropods. There may be a significant spillover effect between forest and farm sites, as farm sites near a natural habitat had higher OTU richness than those farther away. We also provide evidence that management factors such as the number of Polynesian crops cultivated may drive arthropod community composition. Through this case study, we emphasize the context-dependent opportunities and challenges for operationalizing IDS by utilizing participatory research methods, expanding novel data management tools through the Local Contexts Hub, and developing and nurturing community partnerships-all while highlighting the potential of agroecosystems for arthropod conservation. Overall, the workflow and the example presented here can help researchers take tangible steps to achieve IDS, which often seems elusive with the expanding use of genomic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leke Hutchins
- Department of Environmental Sciences Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Ann Mc Cartney
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA
| | - Natalie Graham
- Department of Environmental Sciences Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Rosemary Gillespie
- Department of Environmental Sciences Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Aidee Guzman
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baldwin JA, Alvarado A, Jarratt-Snider K, Hunter A, Keene C, Castagno AE, Ali-Joseph A, Roddy J, Begay MA, Joseph DH, Goldtooth C, Camplain C, Smith M, McCue K, Begay AB, Teufel-Shone NI. Understanding Resilience and Mental Well-Being in Southwest Indigenous Nations and the Impact of COVID-19: Protocol for a Multimethods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e44727. [PMID: 37205637 PMCID: PMC10365583 DOI: 10.2196/44727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite experiencing many adversities, American Indian and Alaska Native populations have demonstrated tremendous resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, drawing upon Indigenous determinants of health (IDOH) and Indigenous Nation Building. OBJECTIVE Our multidisciplinary team undertook this study to achieve two aims: (1) to determine the role of IDOH in tribal government policy and action that supports Indigenous mental health and well-being and, in turn, resilience during the COVID-19 crisis and (2) to document the impact of IDOH on Indigenous mental health, well-being, and resilience of 4 community groups, specifically first responders, educators, traditional knowledge holders and practitioners, and members of the substance use recovery community, working in or near 3 Native nations in Arizona. METHODS To guide this study, we developed a conceptual framework based on IDOH, Indigenous Nation Building, and concepts of Indigenous mental well-being and resilience. The research process was guided by the Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, Ethics (CARE) principles for Indigenous Data Governance to honor tribal and data sovereignty. Data were collected through a multimethods research design, including interviews, talking circles, asset mapping, and coding of executive orders. Special attention was placed on the assets and culturally, socially, and geographically distinct features of each Native nation and the communities within them. Our study was unique in that our research team consisted predominantly of Indigenous scholars and community researchers representing at least 8 tribal communities and nations in the United States. The members of the team, regardless of whether they identified themselves as Indigenous or non-Indigenous, have many collective years of experience working with Indigenous Peoples, which ensures that the approach is culturally respectful and appropriate. RESULTS The number of participants enrolled in this study was 105 adults, with 92 individuals interviewed and 13 individuals engaged in 4 talking circles. Because of time constraints, the team elected to host talking circles with only 1 nation, with participants ranging from 2 to 6 in each group. Currently, we are in the process of conducting a qualitative analysis of the transcribed narratives from interviews, talking circles, and executive orders. These processes and outcomes will be described in future studies. CONCLUSIONS This community-engaged study lays the groundwork for future studies addressing Indigenous mental health, well-being, and resilience. Findings from this study will be shared through presentations and publications with larger Indigenous and non-Indigenous audiences, including local recovery groups, treatment centers, and individuals in recovery; K-12 and higher education educators and administrators; directors of first responder agencies; traditional medicine practitioners; and elected community leaders. The findings will also be used to produce well-being and resilience education materials, in-service training sessions, and future recommendations for stakeholder organizations. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/44727.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Amanda Hunter
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
| | | | | | | | - Juliette Roddy
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
| | - Manley A Begay
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
| | | | | | | | - Melinda Smith
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
| | - Kelly McCue
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
| | - Andria B Begay
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hudson M, Carroll SR, Anderson J, Blackwater D, Cordova-Marks FM, Cummins J, David-Chavez D, Fernandez A, Garba I, Hiraldo D, Jäger MB, Jennings LL, Martinez A, Sterling R, Walker JD, Rowe RK. Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Data: a contribution toward Indigenous Research Sovereignty. Front Res Metr Anal 2023; 8:1173805. [PMID: 37215248 PMCID: PMC10192690 DOI: 10.3389/frma.2023.1173805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Indigenous Peoples' right to sovereignty forms the foundation for advocacy and actions toward greater Indigenous self-determination and control across a range of domains that impact Indigenous Peoples' communities and cultures. Declarations for sovereignty are rising throughout Indigenous communities and across diverse fields, including Network Sovereignty, Food Sovereignty, Energy Sovereignty, and Data Sovereignty. Indigenous Research Sovereignty draws in the sovereignty discourse of these initiatives to consider their applications to the broader research ecosystem. Our exploration of Indigenous Research Sovereignty, or Indigenous self-determination in the context of research activities, has been focused on the relationship between Indigenous Data Sovereignty and efforts to describe Indigenous Peoples' Rights in data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maui Hudson
- Te Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Stephanie Russo Carroll
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Jane Anderson
- Anthropology and Program in Museum Studies, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Felina M. Cordova-Marks
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Jewel Cummins
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Dominique David-Chavez
- Forest and Rangeland Stewardship Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - Adam Fernandez
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Ibrahim Garba
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Danielle Hiraldo
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- American Indian Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Mary Beth Jäger
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Lydia L. Jennings
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Andrew Martinez
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Rogena Sterling
- Te Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | - Robyn K. Rowe
- School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Emmons KM, Mendez S, Lee RM, Erani D, Mascioli L, Abreu M, Adams S, Daly J, Bierer BE. Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships. Soc Sci Med 2023; 325:115895. [PMID: 37062144 PMCID: PMC10308954 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, the National Institutes for Health (NIH) has implemented several policies designed to improve sharing of research data, such as the NIH public access policy for publications, NIH genomic data sharing policy, and National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Moonshot public access and data sharing policy. In January 2023, a new NIH data sharing policy has gone into effect, requiring researchers to submit a Data Management and Sharing Plan in proposals for NIH funding (NIH. Supplemental information to the, 2020b; NIH. Final policy for data, 2020a). These policies are based on the idea that sharing data is a key component of the scientific method, as it enables the creation of larger data repositories that can lead to research questions that may not be possible in individual studies (Alter and Gonzalez, 2018; Jwa and Poldrack, 2022), allows enhanced collaboration, and maximizes the federal investment in research. Important questions that we must consider as data sharing is expanded are to whom do benefits of data sharing accrue and to whom do benefits not accrue? In an era of growing efforts to engage diverse communities in research, we must consider the impact of data sharing for all research participants and the communities that they represent. We examine the issue of data sharing through a community-engaged research lens, informed by a long-standing partnership between community-engaged researchers and a key community health organization (Kruse et al., 2022). We contend that without effective community engagement and rich contextual knowledge, biases resulting from data sharing can remain unchecked. We provide several recommendations that would allow better community engagement related to data sharing to ensure both community and researcher understanding of the issues involved and move toward shared benefits. By identifying good models for evaluating the impact of data sharing on communities that contribute data, and then using those models systematically, we will advance the consideration of the community perspective and increase the likelihood of benefits for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Emmons
- Department of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Samuel Mendez
- Department of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Rebekka M Lee
- Department of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Diana Erani
- Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, 40 Court Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA
| | - Lynette Mascioli
- Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, 40 Court Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA
| | - Marlene Abreu
- Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, 40 Court Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA
| | - Susan Adams
- Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, 40 Court Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA
| | - James Daly
- Department of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Barbara E Bierer
- Division of Global Health Equity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sadeh Y, Denejkina A, Karyotaki E, Lenferink LIM, Kassam-Adams N. Opportunities for improving data sharing and FAIR data practices to advance global mental health. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2023; 10:e14. [PMID: 37860102 PMCID: PMC10581864 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2023.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
It is crucial to optimize global mental health research to address the high burden of mental health challenges and mental illness for individuals and societies. Data sharing and reuse have demonstrated value for advancing science and accelerating knowledge development. The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) Guiding Principles for scientific data provide a framework to improve the transparency, efficiency, and impact of research. In this review, we describe ethical and equity considerations in data sharing and reuse, delineate the FAIR principles as they apply to mental health research, and consider the current state of FAIR data practices in global mental health research, identifying challenges and opportunities. We describe noteworthy examples of collaborative efforts, often across disciplinary and national boundaries, to improve Findability and Accessibility of global mental health data, as well as efforts to create integrated data resources and tools that improve Interoperability and Reusability. Based on this review, we suggest a vision for the future of FAIR global mental health research and suggest practical steps for researchers with regard to study planning, data preservation and indexing, machine-actionable metadata, data reuse to advance science and improve equity, metrics and recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaara Sadeh
- Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Trauma Data Institute, Lovingston, VA, USA
| | - Anna Denejkina
- Graduate Research School, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
- Translational Health Research Institute, Sydney, Australia
- Young and Resilient Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lonneke I. M. Lenferink
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Nancy Kassam-Adams
- Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Trauma Data Institute, Lovingston, VA, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Carroll SR, Plevel R, Jennings LL, Garba I, Sterling R, Cordova-Marks FM, Hiratsuka V, Hudson M, Garrison NA. Extending the CARE Principles from tribal research policies to benefit sharing in genomic research. Front Genet 2022; 13:1052620. [PMID: 36437947 PMCID: PMC9691892 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1052620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Indigenous Peoples have historically been targets of extractive research that has led to little to no benefit. In genomics, such research not only exposes communities to harms and risks of misuse, but also deprives such communities of potential benefits. Tribes in the US have been exercising their sovereignty to limit this extractive practice by adopting laws and policies to govern research on their territories and with their citizens. Federally and state recognized tribes are in the strongest position to assert research oversight. Other tribes lack the same authority, given that federal and state governments do not recognize their rights to regulate research, resulting in varying levels of oversight by tribes. These governance measures establish collective protections absent from the US federal government's research oversight infrastructure, while setting expectations regarding benefits to tribes as political collectives. Using a legal epidemiology approach, the paper discusses findings from a review of Tribal research legislation, policy, and administrative materials from 26 tribes in the US. The discussion specifies issues viewed by tribes as facilitators and barriers to securing benefits from research for their nations and members/citizens, and describes preemptive and mitigating strategies pursued by tribes in response. These strategies are set within the framing of the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, Ethics), a set of standards developed to ensure that decisions made about data pertaining to Indigenous communities at the individual and tribal levels are responsive to their values and collective interests. Our findings illustrate gaps to address for benefit sharing and a need to strengthen Responsibility and Ethics in tribal research governance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Russo Carroll
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Rebecca Plevel
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Law Library, School of Law, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Lydia L. Jennings
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Ibrahim Garba
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Rogena Sterling
- Te Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Felina M. Cordova-Marks
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Vanessa Hiratsuka
- Center for Human Development, College of Health, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, United States
| | - Maui Hudson
- Te Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Nanibaa’ A. Garrison
- Institute for Society and Genetics, College of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sabatello M, Martschenko DO, Cho MK, Brothers KB. Data sharing and community-engaged research. Science 2022; 378:141-143. [PMID: 36227983 PMCID: PMC10155868 DOI: 10.1126/science.abq6851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Data sharing must be accompanied by responsibility sharing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Sabatello
- Center for Precision Medicine and Genomics at the Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center; New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Daphne O Martschenko
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics and Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Mildred K Cho
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics and Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- Norton Children's Research Institute Affiliated with the University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| |
Collapse
|