A Sensitive Whole Blood Assay Detects Antigen-Stimulated Cytokine Release From CD4+ T Cells and Facilitates Immunomonitoring in a Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Nexvax2 in Coeliac Disease

Immune therapies in coeliac disease and food allergies: Advances, challenges, and opportunities

Coeliac disease and food allergy management primarily relies on the strict avoidance of dietary antigens. This approach is challenging to maintain in real-world settings and in food allergy carries the risk of life-threatening anaphylaxis. Despite their distinct pathogenesis, both disorders are driven by maladaptive responses to dietary proteins, creating opportunities for shared treatment strategies. In food allergy, desensitisation therapies such as oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapy are well-established, complemented by biologics like omalizumab and dupilumab. However, the induction of sustained tolerance remains challenging. In contrast, therapeutic advancements for coeliac disease are still in their early stages. Current efforts focus on gluten detoxification or modification, immune blockade or modulation, tolerogenic approaches, and barrier restoration. Emerging therapies, including JAK and BTK inhibitors and microbiome-targeted interventions, support further targeted treatment options for both conditions. Biomarkers tracking gluten-specific T cells have emerged as valuable tools for immunomonitoring and symptom assessment in coeliac disease, although standardisation of patient-reported outcome measures and gluten challenge protocols is still needed. Food allergy trials are reliant on double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges to measure allergen reactivity, but these are time-consuming, carry risks, and underscore the need for surrogate biomarkers. The successful development of immune-targeted therapies will require building an immune toolset to optimally assess systemic responses to antigens in both conditions. Clinically, this could lead to better outcomes for patients who might otherwise remain undiagnosed or untreated due to the absence of significant enteropathy or allergen-specific symptoms.

BASTA, a simple whole-blood assay for measuring β cell antigen-specific CD4+ T cell responses in type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease where T cells mediate the destruction of the insulin-producing β cells found within the islets of Langerhans in the pancreas. Autoantibodies to β cell antigens are the only tests available to detect β cell autoimmunity. T cell responses to β cell antigens, which are known to cause T1D, can only be measured in research settings because of the complexity of assays and the large blood volumes required. Here, we describe the β cell antigen-specific T cell assay (BASTA). BASTA is a simple whole-blood assay that can detect human CD4+ T cell responses to β cell antigens by measuring antigen-stimulated interleukin-2 (IL-2) production. BASTA is both more sensitive and specific than the CFSE (carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester)-based proliferation assay. We used BASTA to identify the regions of preproinsulin that stimulated T cell responses specifically in blood from people with T1D. BASTA can be done with as little as 2 to 3 milliliters of blood. We found that effector memory CD4+ T cells are the primary producers of IL-2 in response to preproinsulin peptides. We then evaluated responses to individual and pooled preproinsulin peptides in a cross-sectional study of pediatric patients: without T1D, without T1D but with a first-degree relative with T1D, or diagnosed with T1D. In contrast with other preproinsulin peptides, full-length C-peptide (PI33-63) showed high specificity for T1D [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.86)]. We suggest that BASTA will be a useful tool for monitoring changes in β cell-specific CD4+ T cell responses both in research and clinical settings.

Celiac Disease-Narrative Review on Progress in Celiac Disease

Celiac disease is defined as a systemic immunological disorder caused by gluten (gliadin and other prolamin) in genetically predisposed individuals, who present with a variety of gluten-dependent symptoms, specific antibodies, the presence of the HLA DQ2 and DQ8 histocompatibility antigen, and enteropathy. Its prevalence, depending on the studied population and methodology, is estimated at 0.75-1.6% of the general population. During the complex immune reaction it induces, most cells involved in inflammatory processes are activated, which leads to the gradual atrophy of intestinal villi and the proliferation of enterocytes within intestinal crypts. The pathogenesis of celiac disease is extremely complicated and is still the subject of research. According to the current diagnostic guidelines, the following criteria should be taken into account: clinical symptoms (intestinal and extraintestinal), the presence of antibodies against tissue transglutaminase in the IgA class, the level of total IgA, and the presence of typical histological changes in duodenal biopsies. Diet-resistant celiac disease is one of the most important clinical challenges, causing serious complications. Currently, the basic method for treating celiac disease is an elimination diet (i.e., the exclusion of products that may contain gluten from the diet), however, new therapeutic strategies are still being sought, mainly based on supplementation with exogenous endopeptidases, modification of the immune response, and the use of zonulin inhibitors and transglutaminase 2 inhibitors. Clinical trials of new drugs are ongoing. The gradually expanding knowledge about the pathogenesis of celiac disease may allow for the development of new therapeutic strategies for both patients with a mild disease course, as well as those that are diet-resistant.

Current and Emerging Assays for Measuring Human T-Cell Responses Against Beta-Cell Antigens in Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease caused by T-cell mediated destruction of the pancreatic insulin-producing beta cells. Currently, the development of autoantibodies is the only measure of beta-cell autoimmunity used in the clinic. Despite T-cells' well-accepted role in the autoimmune pathogenesis of human T1D, autoimmune T-cell responses against beta cells remain very difficult to measure. An assay capable of measuring beta-cell antigen-specific T-cell responses has been a long-sought goal. Such an assay would facilitate the direct monitoring of T1D-associated T-cell responses facilitating, earlier diagnosis and rapid evaluation of candidate immune therapies in clinical trials. In addition, a simple and robust assay for beta-cell antigen-specific T-cell responses would be a powerful tool for dissecting the autoimmune pathogenesis of human T1D. Here, we review the challenges associated with measuring beta-cell antigen-specific T-cell responses, the current assays which are used to achieve this and, finally, we discuss BASTA, a promising emerging assay for measuring human beta-cell antigen-specific CD4+ T-cell responses.

Is the microbiome important in celiac disease?

Celiac disease (CeD) is an autoimmune condition driven by gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. CeD is characterized by small intestinal villous atrophy but presents with a spectrum of gastrointestinal and systemic manifestations. Its only treatment is a strict, life-long adherence to a gluten-free diet, which is difficult to manage and does not always lead to symptomatic or mucosal recovery. About 40% of the population express the CeD-associated risk genes, but only 1%-2% of the worldwide population has CeD. This, along with the rising prevalence of CeD suggests other cofactors in disease pathogenesis. The gut microbiome has been implicated in CeD based on epidemiology studies and clinical associations. Mechanistic studies using relevant in vitro and in vivo preclinical models have begun to elucidate mechanisms through which microbes can influence CeD. Ultimately, a better understanding of these cofactors and their mechanisms will provide rationale intervention strategies and novel therapeutic targets to prevent or treat CeD.

A novel whole blood assay to quantify the release of T cell associated cytokines in response to Bordetella pertussis antigens

BACKGROUND

Bordetella pertussis continues to cause whooping cough globally even in countries with high immunisation coverage. Booster vaccinations with acellular pertussis vaccines are thus used in children, adolescents, and adults. T cell immunity is crucial for orchestrating the immune response after vaccination. However, T cell assays can be expensive and difficult to implement in large clinical trials. In this study, a whole blood (WB) stimulation assay was developed to identify secreted T cell associated cytokines in different age groups after acellular pertussis booster vaccination.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Longitudinal WB samples were collected from a small set of subjects (n = 38) aged 7-70 years participating in a larger ongoing clinical trial. For assay development, samples were diluted and incubated with purified inactivated pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA), inactivated B. pertussis lysate, and complete medium (M) as stimulating conditions, with anti-CD28 and anti-CD49d as co-stimulants. Different timepoints around the vaccination (D0, D7, D14, D28), WB dilution factor (1:2, 1:4) and incubation time (24 h, 48 h, 72 h) were compared. Responses to 15 cytokines were tested with Luminex/multiplex immunoassay.

RESULTS

The optimized assay consisted of WB incubation with M, PT, and FHA (including the two co-stimulants). After 48 h incubation, supernatants were collected for measurement of seven selected T cell associated cytokines (IL-2, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17 A, IL-17F, and IFN-y) from samples before and 28 days after vaccination. PT stimulation showed a trend for upregulation of IL-2, IL-13, and IL-17 A/F for adult subjects, whereas the responses of all cytokines were downregulated for the paediatric subjects. Furthermore, PT and FHA-stimulated WB showed diverse cytokine producing profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed WB-based cytokine assay was shown to be less costly, easy to perform, and functional in differently aged individuals. Further, it requires only a small amount of fresh blood, which is beneficial especially for studies including infants. Our results support the use of this assay for other immunological studies in the future.

Evolution in coeliac disease diagnosis and management

The traditional gut-centric view of coeliac disease is evolving as immune and genetic insights underscore the central importance of a systemic, T cell immune response to gluten in disease pathogenesis. As the field increasingly recognize the limitations of small intestinal histology as the diagnostic standard, data supporting the accuracy of an immune (serologic) diagnosis of coeliac disease - well demonstrated in children - are growing for adults. Novel biomarkers such as interleukin-2 that identify the gluten-specific T cell demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity for coeliac disease and offer the potential for a diagnostic approach that avoids the need for gluten challenge. Asymptomatic disease and manifestations outside the gut pose considerable challenges for diagnosis using a case-finding strategy and enthusiasm for population screening is growing. The gluten-free diet remains a highly restrictive treatment and there is a paucity of controlled data to inform a safe gluten intake threshold. Ongoing symptoms and enteropathy are common and require systematic evaluation. Slowly-responsive disease is prevalent in the older patient diagnosed with coeliac disease, and super-sensitivity to gluten is an emerging concept that may explain many cases of nonresponsive disease. While there is great interest in developing novel therapies for coeliac disease, no drug has yet been registered. Efficacy studies are generally assessing drugs in patients with treated coeliac disease who undergo gluten challenge or in patients with nonresponsive disease; however, substantial questions remain around specific endpoints relevant for patients, clinicians and regulatory agencies and optimal trial design. Novel immune tools are providing informative readouts for clinical trials and are now shaping their design.

How Future Pharmacologic Therapies for Celiac Disease Will Complement the Gluten-Free Diet

The only proven treatment for celiac disease is adherence to a strict, lifelong, gluten-free diet. However, complete dietary gluten avoidance is challenging and a substantial number of patients do not respond fully, clinically, or histologically, despite their best efforts. As celiac disease is common and its central pathophysiology is well elucidated, it has become attractive for drug development to address the limitations of dietary treatment. Most efforts address nonresponsive celiac disease, defined as continued symptoms and/or signs of disease activity despite a gluten-free diet, and the more severe forms of refractory celiac disease, types I and II. An increasing spectrum of therapeutic approaches target defined mechanisms in celiac disease pathogenesis and some have advanced to current phase 2 and 3 clinical studies. We discuss these approaches in terms of potential efficiency, practicability, safety, and need, as defined by patients, regulatory authorities, health care providers, and payors.

A Look Into the Future: Are We Ready for an Approved Therapy in Celiac Disease?

As it appears that we are currently at the cusp of an era in which drugs that are new, re-purposed, or "supplements" will be introduced to the management of celiac disease, we need to reflect on whether the framework is set for celiac disease to be treated increasingly with pharmaceuticals as well as diet. This refers to reflecting on the rigor of current diagnostic practices; the limitations of the current standard of care, which is a gluten-free diet; and that we lack objective markers of disease severity. Investigating these issues will help us to identify gaps in technology and practices that could be critical for selecting patients with a well-defined need for an improved or alternative treatment. Both aspects, circumscribed limitations of the gluten-free diet and diagnostics helping to define celiac disease target groups, together with the guiding requirements by the responsible regulatory authorities, will contribute to defining the subgroups of patients with confirmed celiac disease eligible for distinct pharmacologic strategies. Because many patients with celiac disease are diagnosed in childhood, these aspects need to be differentially discussed for the pediatric setting. In this perspective, we aimed to describe these contextual issues and then looked ahead to the future. What might be the major challenges in celiac disease clinics in the coming years once drugs are an option alongside diet? And what will be the future objectives for researchers who further decipher the mucosal immunology of celiac disease? Speculating on the answers to these questions is as stimulating as it is fascinating to be part of this turning point.

Past, Present, and Future of Noninvasive Tests to Assess Gluten Exposure, Celiac Disease Activity, and End-Organ Damage

Although many biomarkers have been proposed, and several are in widespread clinical use, there is no single readout or combination of readouts that correlates tightly with gluten exposure, disease activity, or end-organ damage in treated patients with celiac disease. Challenges to developing and evaluating better biomarkers include significant interindividual variability-related to immune amplification of gluten exposure and how effects of immune activation are manifest. Furthermore, the current "gold standard" for assessment of end-organ damage, small intestinal biopsy, is itself highly imperfect, such that a marker that is a better reflection of the "ground truth" may indeed appear to perform poorly. The goal of this review was to analyze past and present efforts to establish robust noninvasive tools for monitoring treated patients with celiac disease and to highlight emerging tools that may prove to be useful in clinical practice.

Tolerance-inducing therapies in coeliac disease - mechanisms, progress and future directions

Coeliac disease is an autoinflammatory condition caused by immune reactions to cereal gluten proteins. Currently, the only available treatment for the condition is a lifelong avoidance of gluten proteins in the diet. There is an unmet need for alternative therapies. Coeliac disease has a strong association with certain HLA-DQ allotypes (DQ2.5, DQ2.2 and DQ8), and these disease-associated HLA-DQ molecules present deamidated gluten peptides to gluten-specific CD4+ T cells. The gluten-specific CD4+ T cells are the drivers of the immune reactions leading to coeliac disease. Once established, the clonotypes of gluten-specific CD4+ T cells persist for decades, explaining why patients must adhere to a gluten-free diet for life. Given the key pathogenic role of gluten-specific CD4+ T cells, tolerance-inducing therapies that target these T cells are attractive for treatment of the disorder. Lessons learned from coeliac disease might provide clues for treatment of other HLA-associated diseases for which the disease-driving antigens are unknown. Thus, intensive efforts have been and are currently implemented to bring an effective tolerance-inducing therapy for coeliac disease. This Review discusses mechanisms of the various approaches taken, summarizing the progress made, and highlights future directions in this field.

Whole blood cytokine release assays reveal disparity between capillary blood sampling methods

INTRODUCTION

The use of whole blood in rapid cytokine release assays (CRAs) is becoming an established technique for screening immune responses following natural infection or vaccination, especially in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Establishing an accurate capillary blood sampling method to replace the need for venipuncture could make CRAs more accessible. In this study, capillary blood was collected via two different methods alongside traditional venipuncture to investigate whether the method of blood draw affects cytokine quantification when performing CRAs.

METHODS

Adults previously vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines donated three blood samples: one by venipuncture, one by finger prick, and one by a microneedle device. Whole blood was aliquoted and incubated overnight with SARS-CoV-2 peptides or left unstimulated. Cytokine release in plasma was measured by multiplex array.

RESULTS

In unstimulated samples, little to no cytokines were detected in blood collected via venipuncture or by microneedle devices. Conversely, capillary blood collected by finger prick showed detectable levels of all cytokines analysed, with significantly inflated levels of TNFα, IL-10 (p < 0.0001), IL-2, GM-CSF, and IL-13 (p < 0.01), and 53% of these samples were also positive for IFN-γ. Following peptide stimulation, 25% of samples collected via finger prick showed dysregulated production of IFN-γ, TNFα, IL-2, and IL-10, with lower cytokine production than unstimulated controls. Contrastingly, this was seen in just 4% of venous blood samples and in none of the microneedle samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Capillary blood draw via a microneedle device results in highly comparable immune responses to those seen via venipuncture at baseline and following peptide stimulation, suggesting this is a viable method for rapid whole blood CRAs. Conversely, differential cytokine production is observed following capillary blood draw via finger prick.

Efficacy and safety of gluten peptide-based antigen-specific immunotherapy (Nexvax2) in adults with coeliac disease after bolus exposure to gluten (RESET CeD): an interim analysis of a terminated randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

A gluten-free diet is insufficient to treat coeliac disease because intestinal injury persists and acute reactions with cytokine release follow gluten exposure. Nexvax2 is a specific immunotherapy using immunodominant peptides recognised by gluten-specific CD4⁺ T cells that might modify gluten-induced disease in coeliac disease. We aimed to assess the effects of Nexvax2 on gluten-induced symptoms and immune activation in patients with coeliac disease.

METHODS

This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial done at 41 sites (29 community, one secondary, and 11 tertiary centres) in the USA, Australia, and New Zealand. Patients with coeliac disease aged 18-70 years who had excluded gluten for at least 1 year, were HLA-DQ2.5 positive, and had a worsening of symptoms after an unmasked 10 g vital gluten challenge were eligible for inclusion. Patients were stratified by HLA-DQ2.5 status (HLA-DQ2.5 non-homozygous vs homozygous). Patients who were non-homozygous were centrally (ICON; Dublin, Ireland) randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous Nexvax2 (non-homozygous Nexvax2 group) or saline (0·9% sodium chloride; non-homozygous placebo group) twice a week escalating from 1 μg to 750 μg during the first 5 weeks followed by 11 weeks of maintenance therapy at 900 μg per dose. The exploratory homozygous group was centrally randomly assigned (2:1) to receive Nexvax2 (homozygous Nexvax2 group) or placebo (homozygous placebo group); patients who were homozygous received the same doseage as those who were non-homozygous. The primary endpoint was change in coeliac disease patient reported outcomes (total gastrointestinal domain) from pretreatment baseline to the day of masked bolus 10 g vital gluten challenge given in week 14 analysed in the non-homozygous intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03644069.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 21, 2018, and April 24, 2019, 383 volunteers were screened for inclusion, of whom 179 (47%; 133 [74%] women, 46 [26%] men; median age 41 years [IQR 33-55]) were randomly assigned. One (1%) of 179 patients was excluded from analysis due to misassignment of genotype. The non-homozygous Nexvax2 group included 76 patients, the non-homozygous placebo group included 78 patients, the homozygous Nexvax2 group included 16 patients, and the homozygous placebo group included eight patients. The study was discontinued after planned interim analysis of 66 patients who were non-homozygous. We report an unmasked post-hoc analysis of all available data for the primary endpoint and secondary symptom-based endpoints combining data from 67 (66 were assessed in the planned interim analysis for the primary endpoint). Mean change from baseline to day of first masked gluten challenge in total gastrointestinal score for the non-homozygous Nexvax2 group was 2·86 (SD 2·28) compared with 2·63 (2·07) for the non-homozygous placebo group (p=0·43). Adverse events were similar between all patients who received Nexvax2 and those who received placebo. Serious adverse events were reported in five (3%) of 178 patients (two [2%] of 92 who received Nexvax2 and three [4%] of 82 who received placebo). One patient in the non-homozygous Nexvax2 group had a serious adverse event that occurred during gluten challenge (left-sided mid-back muscle strain with imaging suggestive of partial left kidney infarction). Serious adverse events were reported for three (4%) of 78 patients in the non-homozygous placebo group (one each with exacerbation of asthma and appendicitis, and one who had forehead abscess, conjunctivitis, and folliculitis) and one (1%) patient in the non-homozygous Nexvax2 group developed a pulmonary embolism. The most frequent adverse events in all 92 patients who received Nexvax2 compared with all 86 patients who received placebo were nausea (44 [48%] of 92 patients who received Nexvax2 vs 29 (34%) of 86 patients who received placebo), diarrhoea (32 [35%] vs 25 [29%]), abdominal pain (31 [34%] vs 27 [31%]), headache 32 [35%] vs 20 [23%]), and fatigue (24 [26%] vs 31 [36%]).

INTERPRETATION

Nexvax2 did not reduce acute gluten-induced symptoms. Masked bolus vital gluten challenge provides an alternative to extended gluten challenge in efficacy studies for coeliac disease.

FUNDING

ImmusanT.

Protocol to quantify and phenotype SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response using a rapid flow-cytometry-based whole blood assay

Monitoring antigen-specific T cell frequency, function, and phenotype is essential to assess the host immune response to pathogens or novel vaccines. Here, we describe a rapid and simple ex vivo whole blood assay to detect and phenotype the SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response. We detail steps for whole blood stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 spike peptide and subsequent cell fixation and cryopreservation. We further describe thawing and cell staining steps for flow cytometry analysis. This approach minimizes sample manipulation and has a quick turnaround time. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Riou et al. (2021).

Randomized phase I trial of antigen-specific tolerizing immunotherapy with peptide/calcitriol liposomes in ACPA+ rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUNDAntigen-specific regulation of autoimmune disease is a major goal. In seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA), T cell help to autoreactive B cells matures the citrullinated (Cit) antigen-specific immune response, generating RA-specific V domain glycosylated anti-Cit protein antibodies (ACPA VDG) before arthritis onset. Low or escalating antigen administration under "sub-immunogenic" conditions favors tolerance. We explored safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunological and clinical effects of s.c. DEN-181, comprising liposomes encapsulating self-peptide collagen II259-273 (CII) and NF-κB inhibitor 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol.METHODSA double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory, single-ascending-dose, phase I trial assessed the impact of low, medium, and high DEN-181 doses on peripheral blood CII-specific and bystander Cit64vimentin59-71-specific (Cit-Vim-specific) autoreactive T cell responses, cytokines, and ACPA in 17 HLA-DRB1*04:01+ or *01:01+ ACPA+ RA patients on methotrexate.RESULTSDEN-181 was well tolerated. Relative to placebo and normalized to baseline values, Cit-Vim-specific T cells decreased in patients administered medium and high doses of DEN-181. Relative to placebo, percentage of CII-specific programmed cell death 1+ T cells increased within 28 days of DEN-181. Exploratory analysis in DEN-181-treated patients suggested improved RA disease activity was associated with expansion of CII-specific and Cit-Vim-specific T cells; reduction in ACPA VDG, memory B cells, and inflammatory myeloid populations; and enrichment in CCR7+ and naive T cells. Single-cell sequencing identified T cell transcripts associated with tolerogenic TCR signaling and exhaustion after low or medium doses of DEN-181.CONCLUSIONThe safety and immunomodulatory activity of low/medium DEN-181 doses provide rationale to further assess antigen-specific immunomodulatory therapy in ACPA+ RA.TRIAL REGISTRATIONAnzctr.org.au identifier ACTRN12617001482358, updated September 8, 2022.FUNDINGInnovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (grant agreement 777357), supported by European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations; Arthritis Queensland; National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Senior Research Fellowship; and NHMRC grant 2008287.

Immunopathogenesis and environmental triggers in coeliac disease

Coeliac disease (CD) is a frequent immune enteropathy induced by gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. Its pathogenesis has been extensively studied and CD has emerged as a model disease to decipher how the interplay between environmental and genetic factors can predispose to autoimmunity and promote lymphomagenesis. The keystone event is the activation of a gluten-specific immune response that is driven by molecular interactions between gluten, the indispensable environmental factor, HLA-DQ2/8, the main predisposing genetic factor and transglutaminase 2, the CD-specific autoantigen. The antigluten response is however not sufficient to induce epithelial damage which requires the activation of cytotoxic CD8+ intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL). In a plausible scenario, cooperation between cytokines released by gluten-specific CD4+ T cells and interleukin-15 produced in excess in the coeliac gut, licenses the autoimmune-like attack of the gut epithelium, likely via sustained activation of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway in IEL. Demonstration that lymphomas complicating CD arise from IEL that have acquired gain-of-function JAK1 or STAT3 mutations stresses the key role of this pathway and explains how gluten-driven chronic inflammation may promote this rare but most severe complication. If our understanding of CD pathogenesis has considerably progressed, several questions and challenges remain. One unsolved question concerns the considerable variability in disease penetrance, severity and presentation, pointing to the role of additional genetic and environmental factors that remain however uneasy to untangle and hierarchize. A current challenge is to transfer the considerable mechanistic insight gained into CD pathogenesis into benefits for the patients, notably to alleviate the gluten-free diet, a burden for many patients.

Immunodominant MHC-II (Major Histocompatibility Complex II) Restricted Epitopes in Human Apolipoprotein B

BACKGROUND

CD (cluster of differentiation) 4+ T-cell responses to APOB (apolipoprotein B) are well characterized in atherosclerotic mice and detectable in humans. CD4+ T cells recognize antigenic peptides displayed on highly polymorphic HLA (human leukocyte antigen)-II. Immunogenicity of individual APOB peptides is largely unknown in humans. Only 1 HLA-II-restricted epitope was validated using the DRB1*07:01-APOB3036-3050 tetramer. We hypothesized that human APOB may contain discrete immunodominant CD4+ T-cell epitopes that trigger atherosclerosis-related autoimmune responses in donors with diverse HLA alleles.

METHODS

We selected 20 APOB-derived peptides (APOB20) from an in silico screen and experimentally validated binding to the most commonly occurring human HLA-II alleles. We optimized a restimulation-based workflow to evaluate antigenicity of multiple candidate peptides in HLA-typed donors. This included activation-induced marker assay, intracellular cytokine staining, IFNγ (interferon gamma) enzyme-linked immunospot and cytometric bead array. High-throughput sequencing revealed TCR (T-cell receptor) clonalities of APOB-reactive CD4+ T cells.

RESULTS

Using stringent positive, negative, and crossover stimulation controls, we confirmed specificity of expansion-based protocols to detect CD4+ T cytokine responses to the APOB20 pool. Ex vivo assessment of AIM+CD4+ T cells revealed a statistically significant autoimmune response to APOB20 but not to a ubiquitously expressed negative control protein, actin. Resolution of CD4+ T responses to the level of individual peptides using IFNγ enzyme-linked immunospot led to the discovery of 6 immunodominant epitopes (APOB6) that triggered robust CD4+ T activation in most donors. APOB6-specific responding CD4+ T cells were enriched in unique expanded TCR clonotypes and preferentially expressed memory markers. Cytometric bead array analysis detected APOB6-induced secretion of both proinflammatory and regulatory cytokines. In clinical samples from patients with angiographically verified coronary artery disease, APOB6 stimulation induced higher activation and memory phenotypes and augmented secretion of proinflammatory cytokines TNF (tumor necrosis factor) and IFNγ, compared with patients with low coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Using 3 cohorts, each with ≈20 donors, we discovered and validated 6 immunodominant, HLA-II-restricted APOB epitopes. The immune response to these APOB epitopes correlated with coronary artery disease severity.

Review article: Follow-up of coeliac disease

Coeliac disease is a lifelong immune-mediated enteropathy with systemic features associated with increased morbidity and modestly increased mortality. Treatment with a strict gluten-free diet improves symptoms and mucosal damage but is not curative and low-level gluten intake is common despite strict attempts at adherence. Regular follow-up after diagnosis is considered best-practice however this is executed poorly in the community with the problem compounded by the paucity of data informing optimal approaches. The aim of dietary treatment is to resolve symptoms, reduce complication risk and improve quality of life. It follows that the goals of monitoring are to assess dietary adherence, monitor disease activity, assess symptoms and screen for complications. Mucosal disease remission is regarded a key measure of treatment success as healing is associated with positive health outcomes. However, persistent villous atrophy is common, even after many years of a gluten-free diet. As the clinical significance of asymptomatic enteropathy is uncertain the role for routine follow-up biopsies remains contentious. Symptomatic non-responsive coeliac disease is common and with systematic follow-up a cause is usually found. Effective models of care involving the gastroenterologist, dietitian and primary care doctor will improve the consistency of long-term management and likely translate into better patient outcomes. Identifying suitable treatment targets linked to long-term health is an important goal.

Review article: Diagnosis of coeliac disease: a perspective on current and future approaches

Diagnostics will play a central role in addressing the ongoing dramatic rise in global prevalence of coeliac disease, and in deploying new non-dietary therapeutics. Clearer understanding of the immunopathogenesis of coeliac disease and the utility of serology has led to partial acceptance of non-biopsy diagnosis in selected cases. Non-biopsy diagnosis may expand further because research methods for measuring gluten-specific CD4+ T cells and the acute recall response to gluten ingestion in patients is now relatively straightforward. This perspective on diagnosis in the context of the immunopathogenesis of coeliac disease sets out to highlight current consensus, limitations of current practices, gluten food challenge for diagnosis and the potential for diagnostics that measure the underlying cause for coeliac disease, gluten-specific immunity.

Review article: therapeutic targets for the pharmacologic management of coeliac disease-the future beyond a gluten-free diet

BACKGROUND

Coeliac disease (CeD) is an immune-mediated small bowel enteropathy resulting from dietary gluten exposure. Presently, the only effective treatment is adoption of a gluten-free diet (GFD), although strict adherence is challenging to maintain, and inadvertent gluten exposures are inevitable for most patients. Hence, there is substantial interest in drug development in CeD and multiple novel therapies are under investigation.

AIMS

To review existing and upcoming clinical trial programmes for pharmacologic agents for CeD.

METHODS

A narrative review was performed, informed by a search of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane CENTRAL Library and clinicaltrials.gov.

RESULTS

We summarise the pathophysiology of CeD and the specific steps that are potentially amenable to pharmacologic treatment. We evaluate the evidence supporting existing and future drug targets, including trials of peptidases, gluten sequestrants, tight junction regulators, anti-transglutaminase 2 therapies, immune tolerizing agents, advanced biologics and small molecules, and microbiome-targeted strategies. We highlight unique considerations for conducting CeD trials, including identifying appropriate study populations, assessing results in the context of a gluten challenge, and interpreting CeD-specific clinical and histologic outcomes. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately appraising the evidence. Finally, we outline what the future of CeD therapy may hold with the introduction of pharmacotherapies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for pharmacologic options for CeD, either used adjunctively with a GFD for accidental or intentional gluten exposures or for refractory disease. Multiple promising agents are in development, and these trials are likely to lead to approvals for the first generation of pharmacologic agents for CeD within the next 5 years.

Emergence of an adaptive immune paradigm to explain celiac disease: a perspective on new evidence and implications for future interventions and diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

Recent patient studies have shown that gluten-free diet is less effective in treating celiac disease than previously believed, and additionally patients remain vulnerable to gluten-induced acute symptoms and systemic cytokine release. Safe and effective pharmacological adjuncts to gluten-free diet are in preclinical and clinical development. Clear understanding of the pathogenesis of celiac disease is critical for drug target identification, establishing efficacy endpoints and to develop non-invasive biomarkers suitable to monitor and potentially diagnose celiac disease.

AREAS COVERED

The role and clinical effects of CD4+ T cells directed against deamidated gluten in the context of an "adaptive immune paradigm" are reviewed. Alternative hypotheses of gluten toxicity are discussed and contrasted. In the context of recent patient studies, implications of the adaptive immune paradigm for future strategies to prevent, diagnose, and treat celiac disease are outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

Effective therapeutics for celiac disease are likely to be approved and necessitate a variety of new clinical instruments and tests to stratify patient need, monitor remission, and confirm diagnosis in uncertain cases. Sensitive assessments of CD4+ T cells specific for deamidated gluten are likely to play a central role in clinical management, and to facilitate research and pharmaceutical development.

Co-factors, Microbes, and Immunogenetics in Celiac Disease to Guide Novel Approaches for Diagnosis and Treatment

Celiac disease (CeD) is a frequent immune-mediated disease that affects not only the small intestine but also many extraintestinal sites. The role of gluten proteins as dietary triggers, HLA-DQ2 or -DQ8 as major necessary genetic predisposition, and tissue transglutaminase (TG2) as mechanistically involved autoantigen, are unique features of CeD. Recent research implicates many cofactors working in synergism with these key triggers, including the intestinal microbiota and their metabolites, nongluten dietary triggers, intestinal barrier defects, novel immune cell phenotypes, and mediators and cytokines. In addition, apart from HLA-DQ2 and -DQ8, multiple and complex predisposing genetic factors and interactions have been defined, most of which overlap with predispositions in other, usually autoimmune, diseases that are linked to CeD. The resultant better understanding of CeD pathogenesis, and its manifold manifestations has already paved the way for novel therapeutic approaches beyond the lifelong strict gluten-free diet, which poses a burden to patients and often does not lead to complete mucosal healing. Thus, supported by improved mouse models for CeD and in vitro organoid cultures, several targeted therapies are in phase 2-3 clinical studies, such as highly effective gluten-degrading oral enzymes, inhibition of TG2, cytokine therapies, induction of tolerance to gluten ingestion, along with adjunctive and preventive approaches using beneficial probiotics and micronutrients. These developments are supported by novel noninvasive markers of CeD severity and activity that may be used as companion diagnostics, allow easy-to perform and reliable monitoring of patients, and finally support personalized therapy for CeD.

Activated gut-homing CD8+ T cells for coeliac disease diagnosis on a gluten-free diet

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) in individuals that have started a gluten-free diet (GFD) without an adequate previous diagnostic work-out is a challenge. Several immunological assays such as IFN-γ ELISPOT have been developed to avoid the need of prolonged gluten challenge to induce the intestinal damage. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of activated gut-homing CD8⁺ and TCRγδ⁺ T cells in blood after a 3-day gluten challenge and to compare it with the performance of IFN-γ ELISPOT in a HLA-DQ2.5 subsample.

METHODS

A total of 22 CD patients and 48 non-CD subjects, all of them following a GFD, underwent a 3-day 10-g gluten challenge. The percentage of two T cell subsets (CD8⁺ CD103⁺ β7^hi CD38⁺/total CD8⁺ and TCRγδ⁺ CD103⁺ β7^hi CD38⁺/total TCRγδ⁺) in fresh peripheral blood drawn baseline and 6 days after the challenge was determined by flow cytometry. IFN-γ ELISPOT assays were also performed in HLA-DQ2.5 participants. ROC curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of the CD8⁺ T cell response and IFN-γ ELISPOT.

RESULTS

Significant differences between the percentage of the two studied subsets of CD8⁺ and TCRγδ⁺ cells at days 0 and 6 were found only when considering CD patients (p < 10^-3 vs. non-CD subjects). Measuring activated CD8⁺ T cells provided accurate CD diagnosis with 95% specificity and 97% sensitivity, offering similar results than IFN-γ ELISPOT.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide a highly accurate blood test for CD diagnosis in patients on a GFD of easy implementation in daily clinical practice.