The Pre-Transplant Non-HLA Antibody Burden Associates With the Development of Histology of Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

The impact of donor-specific antibody and non-HLA antibodies on acute cellular rejection in pediatric liver transplantation

Antibodies to HLA or non-HLA antigens are associated with detrimental outcomes in organ transplants. Here, we aim to examine whether donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and non-HLA antibodies are associated with rejection in a single-center cohort of 101 pediatric liver transplant (PLTx) recipients. Rejection was found in 50/101 biopsies (49.5 %). DSA was positive in 32 paired sera and associated with rejection (HR = 2.63[1.10-6.30]). Antibodies to 3 non-HLA antigens, SNRPB (small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptides B), GSTT1 (Glutathione S-transferase theta-1), and Actin were associated with rejection. Rejection was found in 22/35 cases positive for any of the three non-HLA antibodies. The presence of DSA and non-HLA antibodies was associated with an augmented risk of rejection (HR = 6.32[1.57-25.30], p < 0.01]. In conclusion, DSA or non-HLA antibodies were associated with a higher risk for rejection in PLTx recipients. When they were detected concomitantly, the risk for rejection increased significantly, indicating the synergistic effect of actions.

Management of concurrent severe COVID-19 pneumonia and antibody-mediated rejection following kidney transplantation: a case report

Background

Due to its high mutation rate, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has recurrently emerged worldwide in recent years, leading to an increased incidence of rejection following kidney transplantation and a worsened prognosis for recipients. The management of the concomitant occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and rejection in kidney transplant recipients poses significant challenges, with limited available experience on this topic. This study presents a case report highlighting the simultaneous manifestation of severe corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) during the early post-transplantation period.

Methods

The recipient underwent the renal transplantation from a deceased donor after brain death and received comprehensive management including antiviral therapy, adjustment of immunosuppressive medications, and relevant supportive care during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the overlapping period of severe COVID-19 pneumonia and ABMR, we implemented plasma exchange (PE) combined with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab treatment, while closely monitoring infection-related indicators and elucidate the impact of PE on SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Results

The administration of PE did not significantly impact the level of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody. Meanwhile, the combination of PE, IVIG, and rituximab treatment effectively reversed ABMR without exacerbating SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Conclusion

The timely administration of antiviral and anti-rejection therapies in the early stage of renal transplant recipient can lead to favorable outcome in case of SARS-CoV-2 infection and concurrent ABMR.

Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Antibody in Solid Organ Transplantation - Is It Time to Test?

Angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) has been mooted as a potential effector of both acute and chronic antibody mediated rejection (AMR). A growing body of literature on the topic is now coming under scrutiny in the context of the evolving Banff AMR diagnostic classification system and refinement of recommendations for histocompatibility testing by the Sensitization in Transplantation Assessment of Risk (STAR) workgroup. This mini-review discusses the latest understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical evidence for the pathogenicity of AT1R-Ab, and methods of laboratory testing.

Comprehensive Characterization of Anti-HLA and Non-HLA Antibodies in Patients on Kidney Transplant Waiting List and Evaluation of Their Impact on Alloimmunization Risk and Dialysis Treatment

Alloimmunization remains a major obstacle to successful kidney transplantation, mainly due to the formation of anti-HLA antibodies. In recent years, non-HLA antibodies have emerged as additional immunologic factors that can potentially contribute to graft rejection. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and specificity of both anti-HLA and non-HLA antibodies in patients with end-stage renal disease on a waiting list for kidney transplantation. Serum samples from 74 patients were analyzed using complement-dependent cytotoxicity and solid-phase assays. IgG anti-HLA antibodies were identified in 43.2% of participants, while IgG non-HLA antibodies were detected in 91.9%. The most frequent non-HLA antibodies included anti-ENO1 (28.4%), anti-FIBR1 (23.0%) and anti-PRKCZ (23.0%). A significant difference was found between the number of distinct IgG anti-HLA and IgG non-HLA antibody specificities. However, no significant correlation was found between the number of IgG non-HLA antibody specificities and previous alloimmunization events or dialysis treatments. These results suggest that non-HLA antibodies, although often overlooked, can sometimes play a critical role in transplant outcomes. Routine testing for non-HLA antibodies, in addition to mandatory anti-HLA antibody screening and identification, could improve immunologic risk assessment in transplant patients and post-transplant care.

The Clinical Relevance of the Infiltrating Immune Cell Composition in Kidney Transplant Rejection

Key Points

The estimated composition of immune cells in kidney transplants correlates poorly with the primary rejection categories defined by Banff criteria. Spatial cell distribution could be coupled with a detailed cellular composition to assess causal triggers for allorecognition. Intragraft CD8temra cells showed strong and consistent association with graft failure, regardless of the Banff rejection phenotypes.

Background

The link between the histology of kidney transplant rejection, especially antibody-mediated rejection, T-cell–mediated rejection, and mixed rejection, and the types of infiltrating immune cells is currently not well charted. Cost and technical complexity of single-cell analysis hinder large-scale studies of the relationship between cell infiltrate profiles and histological heterogeneity.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the composition of nine intragraft immune cell types by using a validated kidney transplant–specific signature matrix for deconvolution of bulk transcriptomics in three different kidney transplant biopsy datasets (N =403, N =224, N =282). The association and discrimination of the immune cell types with the Banff histology and the association with graft failure were assessed individually and with multivariable models. Unsupervised clustering algorithms were applied on the overall immune cell composition and compared with the Banff phenotypes.

Results

Banff-defined rejection was related to high presence of CD8+ effector T cells, natural killer cells, monocytes/macrophages, and, to a lesser extent, B cells, whereas CD4+ memory T cells were lower in rejection compared with no rejection. Estimated intragraft effector memory–expressing CD45RA (TEMRA) CD8+ T cells were strongly and consistently associated with graft failure. The large heterogeneity in immune cell composition across rejection types prevented supervised and unsupervised methods to accurately recover the Banff phenotypes solely on the basis of immune cell estimates. The lack of correlation between immune cell composition and Banff-defined rejection types was validated using multiplex immunohistochemistry.

Conclusions

Although some specific cell types (FCGR3A + myeloid cells, CD14 + monocytes/macrophages, and NK cells) partly discriminated between rejection phenotypes, the overall estimated immune cell composition of kidney transplants was ill-related to main Banff-defined rejection categories and added to the Banff lesion scoring and evaluation of rejection severity. The estimated intragraft CD8temra cells bore strong and consistent association with graft failure and were independent of Banff-grade rejection.

Evaluating the Clinical Relevance of Antibodies against Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen in Kidney Transplantation

Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the preferred modality of kidney replacement therapy for eligible patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), given that it has been found to reduce mortality rates, improve quality of life, and is cost-effective compared to dialysis. Recent advancements in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing and donor-specific antibody (DSA) detection have helped to reduce the risk of rejection, but antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) can still occur without DSA. Previous studies suggest that rejection can be attributed to antibodies against Non-Human Leucocyte Antigens (non-HLAs). We aimed to acquire further understanding of the prevalence and distribution of non-HLA antibodies in our local population and attempt to correlate these findings with graft outcomes, as well as assess whether non-HLA antibodies can be utilized to determine graft impairment and dysfunction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving kidney transplant recipients between January 2010 and December 2020. All included individuals were aged over 18 and underwent kidney-alone transplants; were ABO- and HLA-compatible; and were matched at A, B, and DR loci (mismatch 0:0:0). HLA testing was negative at the time of transplantation. The samples from both cases of early graft rejection and the control group were tested for non-HLA antibodies using One Lambda LABScreenTM, Autoantibody kit groups 1, 2, and 3, as well as the Immucor LIFECODES non-HLA autoantibody assay. Results: A total of 850 kidney transplant recipients were included, in which 12 patients experienced early graft rejection within the first month post transplant and 18 patients who did not experience graft rejection were selected as study controls. Our study reported no correlation between the total burden of non-HLA antibodies and early rejection, most likely as the result of a small sample size. Nevertheless, a sub-analysis revealed that specific high-frequency pre-transplant non-HLA antibodies such as GSTT, CXCL11, CXCL10, and HNR, detected by LIFECODES, were associated with rejection (Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni correction, p < 0.001). Most pre-transplant non-HLA antibody levels were reduced after transplantation, which was attributed to immunosuppression. Conclusion: The 'high frequency' non-HLA antibodies displayed an association with graft rejection, though the overall associations between the burden of non-HLA antibodies and rejection episodes remain inconclusive. Further work is needed to establish the rebound phenomenon of non-HLA antibodies, the development of de novo non-HLA antibodies in the long run, and their implications on graft survival.

Sensitive HLA antibody testing and the risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure

Solid phase detection and identification of HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation currently relies on single antigen bead (Luminex®) assays, which is more sensitive than the previously used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). To evaluate the impact of more sensitive HLA testing on antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurrence and allograft survival, we analysed 1818 renal allograft recipients transplanted between March 2004 and May 2021. In 2008, solid phase testing switched from ELISA to Luminex. We included 393 (21.6%) transplantations before and 1425 (78.4%) transplantations after transition from ELISA- to Luminex-based testing. For this study, bio-banked ELISA era samples were tested retrospectively with Luminex. Significantly less pretransplant DSA were found in patients transplanted with pre-existing HLA antibodies in the Luminex (109/387) versus the ELISA period (43/90) (28% vs. 48%, p < 0.01). Throughout histological follow-up, 169 of 1818 (9.3%) patients developed AMR. After implementing Luminex-based testing, the rate of AMR significantly decreased (p = 0.003). However, incidence of graft failure did not significantly differ between both eras. In conclusion, less patients with pretransplant DSA were transplanted since the implementation of Luminex HLA testing. Transition from ELISA- to Luminex-based HLA testing was associated with a significant decrease in AMR occurrence post-transplantation. Since the decline of AMR did not translate into improved graft survival, Luminex-based testing has the added value of preventing low-risk AMR cases. Therefore, Luminex' high sensitivity must be balanced against waiting time for a suitable organ.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction is associated with an increased number of non-HLA antibodies

BACKGROUND

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major cause of adverse outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Multiple factors, such as infection, alloimmunity, and autoimmunity, may lead to CLAD. Here, we aim to examine the role of non-human leukocytes antigen (HLA) antibodies in CLAD in a large retrospective cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed non-HLA antibodies in the pre- and post-transplant sera of 226 (100 CLAD, 126 stable) lung transplant recipients from 5 centers, and we used a separate cohort to confirm our findings.

RESULTS

A panel of 18 non-HLA antibodies was selected for analysis based on their significantly higher positive rates in CLAD vs stable groups. The panel-18 non-HLA antibodies (n > 3) may be positive pre- or post-transplant; the risk for CLAD is higher in the latter. The presence of both non-HLA antibody and HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) was associated with an augmented risk of CLAD (HR=25.09 [5.52-14.04], p < 0.001), which was higher than that for single-positive patients. In the independent confirmatory cohort of 61 (20 CLAD, 41 stable) lung transplant recipients, the risk for CLAD remained elevated in double-positive patients (HR=10.67 [0.98-115.68], p = 0.052). After adjusting for nonstandard immunosuppression, patients with double-positive DSA/Non-HLA antibodies had an elevated risk for graft loss (HR=2.53 [1.29-4.96], p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating non-HLA antibodies (n > 3) were independently associated with a higher risk for CLAD. Furthermore, when non-HLA antibodies and DSA were detected concomitantly, the risk for CLAD and graft loss was significantly increased. These results show that humoral immunity to HLA and non-HLA antigens may contribute to CLAD development.

The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Report: Reappraisal of microvascular inflammation and the role of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics

The XVI-th Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held at Banff, Alberta, Canada, from 19th to 23rd September 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. To mark the 30th anniversary of the first Banff Classification, premeeting discussions were held on the past, present, and future of the Banff Classification. This report is a summary of the meeting highlights that were most important in terms of their effect on the Classification, including discussions around microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis for diagnosis. In a postmeeting survey, agreement was reached on the delineation of the following phenotypes: (1) "Probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)," which represents donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-positive cases with some histologic features of AMR but below current thresholds for a definitive AMR diagnosis; and (2) "Microvascular inflammation, DSA-negative and C4d-negative," a phenotype of unclear cause requiring further study, which represents cases with microvascular inflammation not explained by DSA. Although biopsy-based transcript diagnostics are considered promising and remain an integral part of the Banff Classification (limited to diagnosis of AMR), further work needs to be done to agree on the exact classifiers, thresholds, and clinical context of use.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies and native kidney function in pediatric liver and intestinal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) has been associated with vascular injury and kidney dysfunction in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. The role of AT1R-Ab in the development of chronic kidney disease in pediatric liver and intestinal transplant recipients has not been explored.

METHODS

Twenty-five pediatric intestinal transplant recipients and 79 pediatric liver transplant recipients had AT1R-Ab levels measured at varying time points in the post-transplant period. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was determined using creatinine based CKiD U25 equation and measured at time of AT1R-Ab measurement, at 1 year post-AT1R-Ab measurement, at 5 years post-AT1R-Ab measurement, and at the most recent routine clinic visit. The prevalence of hypertension and antihypertensive medication use were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Younger age at time of AT1R-Ab measurement was associated with AT1R-Ab positivity in liver transplant recipients. There was no association between AT1R-Ab status and change in eGFR, prevalence of hypertension, or use of antihypertensive medications at the described time points.

CONCLUSIONS

AT1R-Ab positivity was not associated with a decline in eGFR or hypertension in pediatric liver and intestinal transplant recipients. Further studies are needed using other markers of kidney function, such as cystatin C, to validate this finding. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice

Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.

Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report

The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.

Anti-glutathione S-transferase theta 1 antibodies correlate with graft loss in non-sensitized pediatric kidney recipients

Introduction

Immunity to Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) cannot explain all cases of ABMR, nor the differences observed in the outcome of kidney recipients with circulating DSAs endowed with similar biologic characteristics. Thus, increasing attention has recently been focused on the role of immunity to non-HLA antigenic targets.

Methods

We analyzed humoral auto- and alloimmune responses to the non-HLA antigen glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1), along with development of de novo (dn)HLA-DSAs, in a cohort of 146 pediatric non-sensitized recipients of first kidney allograft, to analyze its role in ABMR and graft loss. A multiplex bead assay was employed to assess GSTT1 antibodies (Abs).

Results

We observed development of GSTT1 Abs in 71 recipients after transplantation, 16 with MFI &gt; 8031 (4th quartile: Q4 group). In univariate analyses, we found an association between Q4-GSTT1Abs and ABMR and graft loss, suggesting a potential role in inducing graft damage, as GSTT1 Abs were identified within ABMR biopsies of patients with graft function deterioration in the absence of concomitant intragraft HLA-DSAs. HLA-DSAs and GSTT1 Abs were independent predictors of graft loss in our cohort. As GSTT1 Ab development preceded or coincided with the appearance of dnHLA-DSAs, we tested and found that a model with the two combined parameters proved more fit to classify patients at risk of graft loss.

Discussion

Our observations on the harmful effects of GSTT1Abs, alone or in combination with HLA-DSAs, add to the evidence pointing to a negative role of allo- and auto-non-HLA Abs on kidney graft outcome.