TNF-α inhibitor ameliorates immune-related arthritis and pneumonitis in humanized mice

Application of humanized mice in the safety experiments of antibody drugs

Therapeutic antibodies are valued for their high specificity and selectivity in immunotherapy. However, the potential toxicity they may elicit underscores the necessity of assessing their preclinical efficacy and safety using suitable animal models. In this context, we review the various categories and applications of humanized mice, which have been engrafted with human cells or tissues to mimic the human immune system. These models are extensively utilized in the nonclinical assessment and development of various antibody drugs, acting as a conduit to clinical research. However, several challenges remain, including the limited lifespan of humanized mice, inadequate engraftment of human cells, and the rudimentary nature of the immune environment in these models. The development of humanized immune system models in mice presents both opportunities and challenges, potentially leading to new insights into the evolution and application of antibody therapeutics.

Immune-related events in individuals with solid tumors on immunotherapy associate with Th17 and Th2 signatures

BACKGROUNDImmune-related adverse events (irAEs) and their associated morbidity/mortality are a key concern for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Prospective evaluation of the drivers of irAEs in a diverse pan-tumor cohort is needed to identify patients at greatest risk and to develop rational treatment and interception strategies.METHODSIn an observational study, we prospectively collected blood samples and performed regular clinical evaluations for irAEs in patients receiving ICI therapy as standard of care for solid tumors. We performed in-parallel analysis of cytokines by Luminex immunoassay and circulating immune cells by cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) at baseline and on treatment to investigate mechanisms of irAEs.RESULTSWe enrolled 111 patients, of whom 40.5% developed a symptomatic irAE (grade ≥ 2). Development of a grade ≥ 2 irAE was positively associated with the use of combination ICI and a history of an autoimmune disorder. Early changes in T helper 17 (Th17) (IL-6, IL-17f), type 2 (IL-5, IL-13, IL-25), and type 1 (TNF-α) cytokine signatures and congruent on-treatment expansions of Th17 and Th2 effector memory (Th2EM) T cell populations in peripheral blood were positively associated with the development of grade ≥2 irAEs. IL-6 levels were also associated with inferior cancer-specific survival and overall survival.CONCLUSIONSIn a diverse, prospective pan-tumor cohort, Th17 and Th2 skewing during early ICI treatment was associated with the development of clinically relevant irAEs but not antitumor responses, providing possible targets for monitoring and therapeutic interventions.FUNDINGJohns Hopkins Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, the NCI SPORE in Gastrointestinal Cancers (P50 CA062924), NCI grant (R50CA243627 to LD), the NIH Center Core Grant (P30 CA006973), Swim Across America (to MY), NIAMS (K23AR075872 to LC), and imCORE-Genentech grant 137515 (to Johns Hopkins Medicine on behalf of MY).

Toxicity in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reinvigorate anti-tumor immune responses by disrupting co-inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Although ICIs have had unprecedented success and have become the standard of care for many cancers, they are often accompanied by off-target inflammation that can occur in any organ system. These immune related adverse events (irAEs) often require steroid use and/or cessation of ICI therapy, which can both lead to cancer progression. Although irAEs are common, the detailed molecular and immune mechanisms underlying their development are still elusive. To further our understanding of irAEs and develop effective treatment options, there is pressing need for preclinical models recapitulating the clinical settings. In this review, we describe current preclinical models and immune implications of ICI-induced skin toxicities, colitis, neurological and endocrine toxicities, pneumonitis, arthritis, and myocarditis along with their management.

The Roles of T cells in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Arthritis

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, a novel anti-tumor strategy, can specifically eliminate tumors by activating the immune system and inhibiting tumor immune escape. However, ICI therapy can lead to notable negative outcomes known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). ICI-induced arthritis, also known as ICI arthritis, stands as the prevailing form of irAEs. The purpose of this review is to highlight the crucial functions of T cells in the progression of ICI arthritis. Under the influence of different signaling molecules, T cells could gather in large numbers within the synovial membrane of joints, releasing inflammatory substances and enzymes that harm healthy tissues, ultimately causing ICI arthritis. Moreover, considering the functions of T cells in triggering ICI arthritis, this review suggests several treatments to prevent ICI arthritis, including inhibiting the overstimulation of T cells at the synovial sac of joints, enhancing the precision of ICI medications, and directing ICI drugs specifically towards tumor tissues instead of joints. Collectively, T lymphocytes play a vital role in the onset of ICI arthritis, offering a hopeful perspective on treating ICI arthritis through the specific targeting of T cells within the affected joints.

Pulmonary toxicity of immune checkpoint immunotherapy

Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality on a global scale. Lung cancer, specifically non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is a prominent contributor to this burden. The management of NSCLC has advanced substantially in recent years, with immunotherapeutic agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), leading to improved patient outcomes. Although generally well tolerated, the administration of ICIs can result in unique side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The occurrence of irAEs involving the lungs, specifically checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), can have a profound effect on both future therapy options and overall survival. Despite CIP being one of the more common serious irAEs, limited treatment options are currently available, in part due to a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in its development. In this Review, we aim to provide an overview of the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of CIP, followed by an examination of the emerging literature on the pathobiology of this condition.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Inflammatory Arthritis: Overview of Therapies and a Personalized Approach to Optimized Combined Therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4, anti-programmed cell death 1, and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies, are currently widely used in oncology clinical practice, achieving considerable success in improving disease outcomes. New checkpoint targets are being discovered and investigated through basic science research and clinical trials. ICI remove negative regulatory immune signals on T cells, leading to immune activation and induction of antitumor immunity. Patients who receive ICI, however, are at risk for developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are attributed to increased T cell activity against antigens in both tumors and in healthy tissues, to increased inflammatory cytokine levels, to increased levels of preexisting autoantibodies, and to enhanced complement-mediated inflammation. Arthritis is one of the most common irAEs. ICI-induced rheumatic irAEs are categorized by levels of severity which guide the choice of treatment options. Management of ICI-induced rheumatic irAEs includes the use of glucocorticoids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (mainly methotrexate), and biological agents (e.g., tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-6 receptor, and CD20 inhibitors). This review aims to summarize the current ICI subtypes, their role in rheumatic irAEs development, and therapies currently used in clinical practice to manage irAEs. In addition, we propose to use an ex vivo personalized diagnostic assay for the selection of the most effective ICI with antirheumatic drugs combinations that will inhibit the advancement of ICI-induced adverse events.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha gene polymorphism affects the pattern of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in Kuwaiti Arab children

OBJECTIVES

TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that has been implicated in many inflammatory diseases, but its association with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is poorly understood. This study looked for an association of TNF-α gene polymorphisms with INS, as well as its effect on steroid responsiveness among Kuwaiti Arab children.

METHODS

Genotypes of the TNF-a gene polymorphisms were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism in 151 INS Kuwaiti Arab patients and 64 age and sex-matched controls. Clinical data of all subjects were reviewed.

RESULTS

The heterozygous AG genotype was detected in 8.6% of INS patients compared 23.4% of the controls (p < 0.01). Comparing steroid responsiveness, AA genotype was significantly more common in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) cases than steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) patients (p = 0.001). However, AG genotype was significantly more common in SRNS patients compared to the SSNS cases (p = 0.001). No difference was found between these two subgroups in the GG genotype frequency.

CONCLUSION

AG genotype of TNF-a gene polymorphisms may be considered a suitable marker for INS disease among Kuwaiti children. Both AA and AG genotypes may be useful in predicting steroid responsiveness among these cases of Arab ethnicity. The findings might open the era for the use of genetic markers in the early treatment of NS.

Stocking the toolbox-Using preclinical models to understand the development and treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events

Cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are susceptible to a broad and variable array of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). With increasing clinical use of ICIs, defining the mechanism for irAE development is more critical than ever. However, it currently remains challenging to predict when these irAEs occur and which organ may be affected, and for many of the more severe irAEs, inaccessibility to the tissue site hampers mechanistic insight. This lack of understanding of irAE development in the clinical setting emphasizes the need for greater use of preclinical models that allow for improved prediction of biomarkers for ICI-initiated irAEs or that validate treatment options that inhibit irAEs without hampering the anti-tumor immune response. Here, we discuss the utility of preclinical models, ranging from exploring databases to in vivo animal models, focusing on where they are most useful and where they could be improved.

Predictive Biomarkers for Checkpoint Inhibitor Immune-Related Adverse Events

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antagonists of inhibitory receptors in the immune system, such as the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, the programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand PD-L1, and they are increasingly used in cancer treatment. By blocking certain suppressive pathways, ICIs promote T-cell activation and antitumor activity but may induce so-called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which mimic traditional autoimmune disorders. With the approval of more ICIs, irAE prediction has become a key factor in improving patient survival and quality of life. Several biomarkers have been described as potential irAE predictors, some of them are already available for clinical use and others are under development; examples include circulating blood cell counts and ratios, T-cell expansion and diversification, cytokines, autoantibodies and autoantigens, serum and other biological fluid proteins, human leucocyte antigen genotypes, genetic variations and gene profiles, microRNAs, and the gastrointestinal microbiome. Nevertheless, it is difficult to generalize the application of irAE biomarkers based on the current evidence because most studies have been retrospective, time-limited and restricted to a specific type of cancer, irAE or ICI. Long-term prospective cohorts and real-life studies are needed to assess the predictive capacity of different potential irAE biomarkers, regardless of the ICI type, organ involved or cancer site.