Tumor beta2-microglobulin and HLA-A expression is increased by immunotherapy and can predict response to CIT in association with other biomarkers

Beta-2 microglobulin in lymphoma

Lymphomas are heterogeneous hematologic malignancies characterised by the abnormal proliferation of lymphocytes. β2-Microglobulin (β2M) functions both as a structural subunit of primary histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) and as a circulating biomarker with established diagnostic and prognostic significance. Serum β2M > 2.5 mg/L is elevated in 60 % of mantle cell lymphoma and in > 50 % of advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, correlating with higher tumor burden, International Prognostic Index scores, and inferior survival; cerebrospinal fluid β2M enhances central nervous system lymphoma diagnosis with 97 % sensitivity and specificity. Mechanistically, β2M stabilizes MHC I to enable CD8+ T-cell antigen presentation and, when shed, activates JAK/STAT and NF-κB pathways that drive tumor proliferation and immune evasion. Preclinical strategies targeting these β2M-driven signals such as anti-β2M antibodies combined with proteasome inhibitors demonstrate enhanced cytotoxicity in resistant models. Advanced three-dimensional scaffold culture platforms preserve β2M-tumour-immune interactions, allowing for the investigation of matrix stiffness effects on signalling. Emerging mechanotherapy approaches leverage extracellular matrix rigidity to modulate β2M-related pathways and sensitize lymphoma cells to therapy. The remaining challenges include assay standardization, cohort variability, and lack of prospective validation of β2M-based indices. Future efforts should focus on harmonising β2M measurement methods and integrating mechanistic insights into refined risk stratification and therapeutic strategies.

From Bench to Bladder: The Rise in Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in the Treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represents a significant clinical challenge due to its high recurrence rate and need for frequent monitoring. The current treatment modality is bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy combined with chemotherapy after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT), which is highly effective in most patients. Yet, the cancer becomes resistant to these treatments in 30-40% of patients, necessitating the need for new treatment modalities. In the cancer world, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors that target molecules, such as programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), its ligand, PD-L1, and Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), have revolutionized the treatment of many cancer types. PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are shown to be upregulated in NMIBC in certain circumstances. PD-1/PD-L1 interactions play a role in immune evasion by suppressing T cell activity within the tumor microenvironment (TME), while the binding of CTLA-4 on T cells leads to downregulation of the immune response, making these pathways potential immunotherapeutic targets in NMIBC. This review seeks to understand the role of these therapies in treating NMIBC. We explore the cellular and non-cellular immune landscape in the TME of NMIBC, including Tregs, T effector cells, macrophages, B cells, and relevant cytokines. We also discuss the biological role of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 while covering the rationale for these immunotherapies in NMIBC. Finally, we cover key clinical trials that have studied these treatments in NMIBC clinically. Such a study will be helpful for urologists and oncologists to manage patients with NMIBC more effectively.

Advancing Breast Cancer Treatment: The Role of Immunotherapy and Cancer Vaccines in Overcoming Therapeutic Challenges

Breast cancer (BC) remains a significant global health challenge due to its complex biology, which complicates both diagnosis and treatment. Immunotherapy and cancer vaccines have emerged as promising alternatives, harnessing the body's immune system to precisely target and eliminate cancer cells. However, several key factors influence the selection and effectiveness of these therapies, including BC subtype, tumor mutational burden (TMB), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), PD-L1 expression, HER2 resistance, and the tumor microenvironment (TME). BC subtypes play a critical role in shaping treatment responses. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibits the highest sensitivity to immunotherapy, while HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive (HR+) subtypes often require combination strategies for optimal outcomes. High TMB enhances immune responses by generating neoantigens, making tumors more susceptible to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); whereas, low TMB may indicate resistance. Similarly, elevated TIL levels are associated with better immunotherapy efficacy, while PD-L1 expression serves as a key predictor of checkpoint inhibitor success. Meanwhile, HER2 resistance and an immunosuppressive TME contribute to immune evasion, highlighting the need for multi-faceted treatment approaches. Current breast cancer immunotherapies encompass a range of targeted treatments. HER2-directed therapies, such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, block HER2 dimerization and enhance antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), while small-molecule inhibitors, like lapatinib and tucatinib, suppress HER2 signaling to curb tumor growth. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) improve tumor targeting by coupling monoclonal antibodies with cytotoxic agents, minimizing off-target effects. Meanwhile, ICIs, including pembrolizumab, restore T-cell function, and CAR-macrophage (CAR-M) therapy leverages macrophages to reshape the TME and overcome immunotherapy resistance. While immunotherapy, particularly in TNBC, has demonstrated promise by eliciting durable immune responses, its efficacy varies across subtypes. Challenges such as immune-related adverse events, resistance mechanisms, high costs, and delayed responses remain barriers to widespread success. Breast cancer vaccines-including protein-based, whole-cell, mRNA, dendritic cell, and epitope-based vaccines-aim to stimulate tumor-specific immunity. Though clinical success has been limited, ongoing research is refining vaccine formulations, integrating combination therapies, and identifying biomarkers for improved patient stratification. Future advancements in BC treatment will depend on optimizing immunotherapy through biomarker-driven approaches, addressing tumor heterogeneity, and developing innovative combination therapies to overcome resistance. By leveraging these strategies, researchers aim to enhance treatment efficacy and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Mapping MAGE-A4 expression in solid cancers for targeted therapies

Melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4) is a promising target for anticancer therapy. However, limited contemporary data are available on the details of MAGE-A4 protein expression in different cancer types. In this study, the protein expression of MAGE-A4 is comprehensively studied in patients with unresectable and/or metastatic solid cancers to identify indications of the highest unmet medical need for anti-MAGE-A4 therapy. FFPE tumor sections from 200 patients, predominantly HLA-A*02:01 positive (n = 193), were examined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect MAGE-A4 expression. The patient cohort comprised various cancer types to pinpoint differences in the prevalence and intensity of MAGE-A4 positivity. MAGE-A4 expression was observed in 35% (69 patients) of the overall cohort. Certain cancer types exhibited notably higher frequencies of MAGE-A4 positivity. Specifically, adenoid cystic carcinoma demonstrated the highest prevalence at 82%, followed by liposarcoma at 67%. Ovarian serous/high-grade carcinoma showed a 64% positivity rate, identical to that observed in squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) presented a 60% prevalence, while esophageal cancer had a 54% prevalence of MAGE-A4 expression. These data highlight the variability of MAGE-A4 expression across different cancer types and underscore its relevance as a potential target of novel precision medicines. The significant presence of MAGE-A4 in specific cancers suggests potential for stratified therapeutic approaches and warrants further investigation into its role in oncogenesis and treatment response.

Advances in Cell and Immune Therapies for Melanoma

The incidence rate of cutaneous melanoma is on the rise worldwide, due to increased exposure to UV radiation, aging populations, and exposure to teratogen agents. However, diagnosis is more precise, and the increased number of new cases is related to the improved diagnosis tools. Despite better early diagnosis and better therapies, melanoma has remained a significant public health challenge because of its aggressive behavior and high potential for metastasis. In 2020, cutaneous melanoma constituted approximately 1.3% of all cancer deaths that occurred within the European Union, thereby highlighting the necessity for effective prevention, timely diagnosis, and sustainable treatment measures, especially as a growing number of cases occur among younger patients. Melanoma is regarded as one of the most inflamed cancers due to its high immune cell presence and strong response to immunotherapy, fueling the need for development of immune-driven innovative treatments. Approved therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4), have notably improved survival rates in melanoma. However, the limitations of the PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 axes inhibitors, such as low response rates, treatment resistance, and toxicity, have driven the need for continued research and advancements in treatment strategies. Current clinical trials are exploring various combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with costimulatory receptor agonists, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and other immunotherapies, with the goal of improving outcomes and reducing side effects for melanoma patients. Emerging approaches, including adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and oncolytic virotherapy, are showing promise. While CAR-T cell therapy has been less successful in melanoma compared to blood cancers, ongoing research is addressing challenges like the tumor microenvironment and antigen specificity. This review provides an overview of the requirement for advances in these medications, to mark a significant step forward in melanoma management, set to bring a fresh breath of hope for patients.

Current Landscape of Cancer Immunotherapy: Harnessing the Immune Arsenal to Overcome Immune Evasion

Cancer immune evasion represents a leading hallmark of cancer, posing a significant obstacle to the development of successful anticancer therapies. However, the landscape of cancer treatment has significantly evolved, transitioning into the era of immunotherapy from conventional methods such as surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted drug therapy. Immunotherapy has emerged as a pivotal component in cancer treatment, harnessing the body's immune system to combat cancer and offering improved prognostic outcomes for numerous patients. The remarkable success of immunotherapy has spurred significant efforts to enhance the clinical efficacy of existing agents and strategies. Several immunotherapeutic approaches have received approval for targeted cancer treatments, while others are currently in preclinical and clinical trials. This review explores recent progress in unraveling the mechanisms of cancer immune evasion and evaluates the clinical effectiveness of diverse immunotherapy strategies, including cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, and antibody-based treatments. It encompasses both established treatments and those currently under investigation, providing a comprehensive overview of efforts to combat cancer through immunological approaches. Additionally, the article emphasizes the current developments, limitations, and challenges in cancer immunotherapy. Furthermore, by integrating analyses of cancer immunotherapy resistance mechanisms and exploring combination strategies and personalized approaches, it offers valuable insights crucial for the development of novel anticancer immunotherapeutic strategies.

Case Report: Long-Term Survival of a Patient with Cerebral Metastasized Ovarian Carcinoma Treated with a Personalized Peptide Vaccine and Anti-PD-1 Therapy

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common cancers among women and the most lethal malignancy of all gynecological cancers. Surgery is promising in the early stages; however, most patients are first diagnosed in the advanced stages, where treatment options are limited. Here, we present a 49-year-old patient who was first diagnosed with stage III ovarian cancer. After the tumor progressed several times under guideline therapies with no more treatment options available at that time, the patient received a fully individualized neoantigen-derived peptide vaccine in the setting of an individual healing attempt. The tumor was analyzed for somatic mutations via whole exome sequencing and potential neoepitopes were vaccinated over a period of 50 months. During vaccination, the patient additionally received anti-PD-1 therapy to prevent further disease progression. Vaccine-induced T-cell responses were detected using intracellular cytokine staining. After eleven days of in vitro expansion, four T-cell activation markers (namely IFN-ɣ, TNF-α, IL-2, and CD154) were measured. The proliferation capacity of neoantigen-specific T-cells was determined using a CFSE proliferation assay. Immune monitoring revealed a very strong CD4+ T-cell response against one of the vaccinated peptides. The vaccine-induced T-cells simultaneously expressed CD154, TNF, IL-2, and IFN-ɣ and showed a strong proliferation capacity upon neoantigen stimulation. Next-generation sequencing, as well as immunohistochemical analysis, revealed a loss of Beta-2 microglobulin (B2M), which is essential for MHC class I presentation. The results presented here implicate that the application of neoantigen-derived peptide vaccines might be considered for those cancer stages, where promising therapeutic options are lacking. Furthermore, we provide more data that endorse the intensive investigation of B2M loss as a tumor escape mechanism in clinical trials using anti-cancer vaccines together with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.