The dynamic nature and territory of transcriptional machinery in the bacterial chromosome

Organization of the bacterial nucleoid by DNA-bridging proteins and globular crowders

The genomic DNA of bacteria occupies only a fraction of the cell called the nucleoid, although it is not bounded by any membrane and would occupy a volume hundreds of times larger than the cell in the absence of constraints. The two most important contributions to the compaction of the DNA coil are the cross-linking of the DNA by nucleoid proteins (like H-NS and StpA) and the demixing of DNA and other abundant globular macromolecules which do not bind to the DNA (like ribosomes). The present work deals with the interplay of DNA-bridging proteins and globular macromolecular crowders, with the goal of determining the extent to which they collaborate in organizing the nucleoid. In order to answer this question, a coarse-grained model was developed and its properties were investigated through Brownian dynamics simulations. These simulations reveal that the radius of gyration of the DNA coil decreases linearly with the effective volume ratio of globular crowders and the number of DNA bridges formed by nucleoid proteins in the whole range of physiological values. Moreover, simulations highlight the fact that the number of DNA bridges formed by nucleoid proteins depends crucially on their ability to self-associate (oligomerize). An explanation for this result is proposed in terms of the mean distance between DNA segments and the capacity of proteins to maintain DNA-bridging in spite of the thermal fluctuations of the DNA network. Finally, simulations indicate that non-associating proteins preserve a high mobility inside the nucleoid while contributing to its compaction, leading to a DNA/protein complex which looks like a liquid droplet. In contrast, self-associating proteins form a little deformable network which cross-links the DNA chain, with the consequence that the DNA/protein complex looks more like a gel.

Reprogramming T7RNA Polymerase in Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 under Specific Lac Operon for Efficient p-Coumaric Acid Production

Lac operon is the standard regulator used to control the orthogonality of T7RNA polymerase (T7RNAP) and T7 promoter inEscherichia coli BL21(DE3) strain for protein expression. However,E. coliNissle 1917 (EcN), the unique probiotic strain, has seldom been precisely adapted to the T7 system. Herein, we applied bioinformatics analysis on Lac operon from different strains, and it was observed that a weak promoter for LacI repressor existed in EcN. Furthermore, X-gal assay revealed a strong expression of lacZ in EcN. We demonstrated that Lac operon significantly affected the protein expression in the two T7-derived EcN, in which T7RNAP was integrated at lambda (ET7L) and HK022 (ET7H), respectively. Different combinations of replication origin, chaperonin GroELS, inducer, and medium were explored to fine-tune the best strain with tyrosine ammonia-lyase (TAL) for p-coumaric acid (pCA) production, which is one of the essential bioactive compounds for human health. Finally, the highest pCA conversion of 78.8% was achieved using RRtL (plasmid form) under the optimum condition, and a 51.5% conversion was obtained with L::Rt strain which has integrated T7-RtTAL at HK022 of ET7L in the simulated gut environment. The appropriate reprogramming of T7RNAP expedites EcN as an effective and promising cell factory for live bacterial therapeutics in the future.

Relationship between the Chromosome Structural Dynamics and Gene Expression—A Chicken and Egg Dilemma?

Prokaryotic transcription was extensively studied over the last half-century. A great deal of data has been accumulated regarding the control of gene expression by transcription factors regulating their target genes by binding at specific DNA sites. However, there is a significant gap between the mechanistic description of transcriptional control obtained from in vitro biochemical studies and the complexity of transcriptional regulation in the context of the living cell. Indeed, recent studies provide ample evidence for additional levels of complexity pertaining to the regulation of transcription in vivo, such as, for example, the role of the subcellular localization and spatial organization of different molecular components involved in the transcriptional control and, especially, the role of chromosome configurational dynamics. The question as to how the chromosome is dynamically reorganized under the changing environmental conditions and how this reorganization is related to gene expression is still far from being clear. In this article, we focus on the relationships between the chromosome structural dynamics and modulation of gene expression during bacterial adaptation. We argue that spatial organization of the bacterial chromosome is of central importance in the adaptation of gene expression to changing environmental conditions and vice versa, that gene expression affects chromosome dynamics.

Nucleoid-associated proteins shape chromatin structure and transcriptional regulation across the bacterial kingdom

Genome architecture has proven to be critical in determining gene regulation across almost all domains of life. While many of the key components and mechanisms of eukaryotic genome organization have been described, the interplay between bacterial DNA organization and gene regulation is only now being fully appreciated. An increasing pool of evidence has demonstrated that the bacterial chromosome can reasonably be thought of as chromatin, and that bacterial chromosomes contain transcriptionally silent and transcriptionally active regions analogous to heterochromatin and euchromatin, respectively. The roles played by histones in eukaryotic systems appear to be shared across a range of nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) in bacteria, which function to compact, structure, and regulate large portions of bacterial chromosomes. The broad range of extant NAPs, and the extent to which they differ from species to species, has raised additional challenges in identifying and characterizing their roles in all but a handful of model bacteria. Here we review the regulatory roles played by NAPs in several well-studied bacteria and use the resulting state of knowledge to provide a working definition for NAPs, based on their function, binding pattern, and expression levels. We present a screening procedure which can be applied to any species for which transcriptomic data are available. Finally, we note that NAPs tend to play two major regulatory roles - xenogeneic silencers and developmental regulators - and that many unrecognized potential NAPs exist in each bacterial species examined.

Clusters of bacterial RNA polymerase are biomolecular condensates that assemble through liquid-liquid phase separation

Bacterial cells are small and were long thought to have little to no internal structure. However, advances in microscopy have revealed that bacteria do indeed contain subcellular compartments. But how these compartments form has remained a mystery. Recent progress in larger, more complex eukaryotic cells has identified a novel mechanism for intracellular organization known as liquid–liquid phase separation. This process causes certain types of molecules to concentrate within distinct compartments inside the cell. Here, we demonstrate that the same process also occurs in bacteria. This work, together with a growing body of literature, suggests that liquid–liquid phase separation is a common mechanism for intracellular organization in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.

Once described as mere “bags of enzymes,” bacterial cells are in fact highly organized, with many macromolecules exhibiting nonuniform localization patterns. Yet the physical and biochemical mechanisms that govern this spatial heterogeneity remain largely unknown. Here, we identify liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) as a mechanism for organizing clusters of RNA polymerase (RNAP) in Escherichia coli. Using fluorescence imaging, we show that RNAP quickly transitions from a dispersed to clustered localization pattern as cells enter log phase in nutrient-rich media. RNAP clusters are sensitive to hexanediol, a chemical that dissolves liquid-like compartments in eukaryotic cells. In addition, we find that the transcription antitermination factor NusA forms droplets in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that it may nucleate RNAP clusters. Finally, we use single-molecule tracking to characterize the dynamics of cluster components. Our results indicate that RNAP and NusA molecules move inside clusters, with mobilities faster than a DNA locus but slower than bulk diffusion through the nucleoid. We conclude that RNAP clusters are biomolecular condensates that assemble through LLPS. This work provides direct evidence for LLPS in bacteria and demonstrates that this process can serve as a mechanism for intracellular organization in prokaryotes and eukaryotes alike.

Bacterial Nucleoid: Interplay of DNA Demixing and Supercoiling

This work addresses the question of the interplay of DNA demixing and supercoiling in bacterial cells. Demixing of DNA from other globular macromolecules results from the overall repulsion between all components of the system and leads to the formation of the nucleoid, which is the region of the cell that contains the genomic DNA in a rather compact form. Supercoiling describes the coiling of the axis of the DNA double helix to accommodate the torsional stress injected in the molecule by topoisomerases. Supercoiling is able to induce some compaction of the bacterial DNA, although to a lesser extent than demixing. In this work, we investigate the interplay of these two mechanisms with the goal of determining whether the total compaction ratio of the DNA is the mere sum or some more complex function of the compaction ratios due to each mechanism. To this end, we developed a coarse-grained bead-and-spring model and investigated its properties through Brownian dynamics simulations. This work reveals that there actually exist different regimes, depending on the crowder volume ratio and the DNA superhelical density. In particular, a regime in which the effects of DNA demixing and supercoiling on the compaction of the DNA coil simply add up is shown to exist up to moderate values of the superhelical density. In contrast, the mean radius of the DNA coil no longer decreases above this threshold and may even increase again for sufficiently large crowder concentrations. Finally, the model predicts that the DNA coil may depart from the spherical geometry very close to the jamming threshold as a trade-off between the need to minimize both the bending energy of the stiff plectonemes and the volume of the DNA coil to accommodate demixing.

The effects of polydisperse crowders on the compaction of the Escherichia coli nucleoid

DNA binding proteins, supercoiling, macromolecular crowders, and transient DNA attachments to the cell membrane have all been implicated in the organization of the bacterial chromosome. However, it is unclear what role these factors play in compacting the bacterial DNA into a distinct organelle-like entity, the nucleoid. By analyzing the effects of osmotic shock and mechanical squeezing on Escherichia coli, we show that macromolecular crowders play a dominant role in the compaction of the DNA into the nucleoid. We find that a 30% increase in the crowder concentration from physiological levels leads to a three-fold decrease in the nucleoid's volume. The compaction is anisotropic, being higher along the long axes of the cell at low crowding levels. At higher crowding levels, the nucleoid becomes spherical, and its compressibility decreases significantly. Furthermore, we find that the compressibility of the nucleoid is not significantly affected by cell growth rates and by prior treatment with rifampicin. The latter results point out that in addition to poly ribosomes, soluble cytoplasmic proteins have a significant contribution in determining the size of the nucleoid. The contribution of poly ribosomes dominates at faster and soluble proteins at slower growth rates.

Transcription of Bacterial Chromatin

Decades of research have probed the interplay between chromatin (genomic DNA associated with proteins and RNAs) and transcription by RNA polymerase (RNAP) in all domains of life. In bacteria, chromatin is compacted into a membrane-free region known as the nucleoid that changes shape and composition depending on the bacterial state. Transcription plays a key role in both shaping the nucleoid and organizing it into domains. At the same time, chromatin impacts transcription by at least five distinct mechanisms: (i) occlusion of RNAP binding; (ii) roadblocking RNAP progression; (iii) constraining DNA topology; (iv) RNA-mediated interactions; and (v) macromolecular demixing and heterogeneity, which may generate phase-separated condensates. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and, in combination, mediate gene regulation. Here, we review the current understanding of these mechanisms with a focus on gene silencing by H-NS, transcription coordination by HU, and potential phase separation by Dps. The myriad questions about transcription of bacterial chromatin are increasingly answerable due to methodological advances, enabling a needed paradigm shift in the field of bacterial transcription to focus on regulation of genes in their native state. We can anticipate answers that will define how bacterial chromatin helps coordinate and dynamically regulate gene expression in changing environments.

Preferential Localization of the Bacterial Nucleoid

Prokaryotes do not make use of a nucleus membrane to segregate their genetic material from the cytoplasm, so that their nucleoid is potentially free to explore the whole volume of the cell. Nonetheless, high resolution images of bacteria with very compact nucleoids show that such spherical nucleoids are invariably positioned at the center of mononucleoid cells. The present work aims to determine whether such preferential localization results from generic (entropic) interactions between the nucleoid and the cell membrane or instead requires some specific mechanism, like the tethering of DNA at mid-cell or periodic fluctuations of the concentration gradient of given chemical species. To this end, we performed numerical simulations using a coarse-grained model based on the assumption that the formation of the nucleoid results from a segregative phase separation mechanism driven by the de-mixing of the DNA and non-binding globular macromolecules. These simulations show that the abrupt compaction of the DNA coil, which takes place at large crowder density, close to the jamming threshold, is accompanied by the re-localization of the DNA coil close to the regions of the bounding wall with the largest curvature, like the hemispherical caps of rod-like cells, as if the DNA coil were suddenly acquiring the localization properties of a solid sphere. This work therefore supports the hypothesis that the localization of compact nucleoids at regular cell positions involves either some anchoring of the DNA to the cell membrane or some dynamical localization mechanism.

High-Copy-Number Plasmid Segregation-Single-Molecule Dynamics in Single Cells

Bacterial high-copy-number (hcn) plasmids provide an excellent model to study the underlying physical mechanisms of DNA segment segregation in an intracellular context. Using two-color fluorescent repressor-operator systems and a synthetic repressible replication origin, we tracked the motion and segregation of single hcn plasmid molecules in individual cells. The plasmid diffusion dynamics revealed between-plasmid temporal associations (clustering) as well as entropic and elastic recoiling forces in the confined intracellular spaces outside of nucleoids. These two effects could be effectively used in models to predict the heterogeneity of segregation. Additionally, the motile behaviors of hcn plasmids provide quantitative estimates of entropic exclusion strength and dynamic associations between DNA segments. Overall, this study utilizes a, to our knowledge, novel approach to predict the polymer dynamics of DNA segments in spatially confined, crowded cellular compartments as well as during bacterial chromosome segregation.

A toolbox for multiplexed super-resolution imaging of the E. coli nucleoid and membrane using novel PAINT labels

Maintenance of the bacterial homeostasis initially emanates from interactions between proteins and the bacterial nucleoid. Investigating their spatial correlation requires high spatial resolution, especially in tiny, highly confined and crowded bacterial cells. Here, we present super-resolution microscopy using a palette of fluorescent labels that bind transiently to either the membrane or the nucleoid of fixed E. coli cells. The presented labels are easily applicable, versatile and allow long-term single-molecule super-resolution imaging independent of photobleaching. The different spectral properties allow for multiplexed imaging in combination with other localisation-based super-resolution imaging techniques. As examples for applications, we demonstrate correlated super-resolution imaging of the bacterial nucleoid with the position of genetic loci, of nascent DNA in correlation to the entire nucleoid, and of the nucleoid of metabolically arrested cells. We furthermore show that DNA- and membrane-targeting labels can be combined with photoactivatable fluorescent proteins and visualise the nano-scale distribution of RNA polymerase relative to the nucleoid in drug-treated E. coli cells.

Extrachromosomal Nucleolus-Like Compartmentalization by a Plasmid-Borne Ribosomal RNA Operon and Its Role in Nucleoid Compaction

In the fast-growing Escherichia coli cells, RNA polymerase (RNAP) molecules are concentrated and form foci at clusters of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) operons resembling eukaryotic nucleolus. The bacterial nucleolus-like organization, spatially compartmentalized at the surface of the compact bacterial chromosome (nucleoid), serves as transcription factories for rRNA synthesis and ribosome biogenesis, which influences the organization of the nucleoid. Unlike wild type that has seven rRNA operons in the genome in a mutant that has six (Δ6rrn) rRNA operons deleted in the genome, there are no apparent transcription foci and the nucleoid becomes uncompacted, indicating that formation of RNAP foci requires multiple copies of rRNA operons clustered in space and is critical for nucleoid compaction. It has not been determined, however, whether a multicopy plasmid-borne rRNA operon (prrnB) could substitute the multiple chromosomal rRNA operons for the organization of the bacterial nucleolus-like structure in the mutants of Δ6rrn and Δ7rrn that has all seven rRNA operons deleted in the genome. We hypothesized that extrachromosomal nucleolus-like structures are similarly organized and functional in trans from prrnB in these mutants. In this report, using multicolor images of three-dimensional superresolution Structured Illumination Microscopy (3D-SIM), we determined the distributions of both RNAP and NusB that are a transcription factor involved in rRNA synthesis and ribosome biogenesis, prrnB clustering, and nucleoid structure in these two mutants in response to environmental cues. Our results found that the extrachromosomal nucleolus-like organization tends to be spatially located at the poles of the mutant cells. In addition, formation of RNAP foci at the extrachromosomal nucleolus-like structure condenses the nucleoid, supporting the idea that active transcription at the nucleolus-like organization is a driving force in nucleoid compaction.

Nucleolus-like compartmentalization of the transcription machinery in fast-growing bacterial cells

We have learned a great deal about RNA polymerase (RNA Pol), transcription factors, and the transcriptional regulation mechanisms in prokaryotes for specific genes, operons, or transcriptomes. However, we have only begun to understand how the transcription machinery is three-dimensionally (3D) organized into bacterial chromosome territories to orchestrate the transcription process and to maintain harmony with the replication machinery in the cell. Much progress has been made recently in our understanding of the spatial organization of the transcription machinery in fast-growing Escherichia coli cells using state-of-the-art superresolution imaging techniques. Co-imaging of RNA polymerase (RNA Pol) with DNA and transcription elongation factors involved in ribosomal RNA (rRNA) synthesis, and ribosome biogenesis has revealed similarities between bacteria and eukaryotes in the spatial organization of the transcription machinery for growth genes, most of which are rRNA genes. Evidence supports the notion that RNA Pol molecules are concentrated, forming foci at the clustering of rRNA operons resembling the eukaryotic nucleolus. RNA Pol foci are proposed to be active transcription factories for both rRNA genes expression and ribosome biogenesis to support maximal growth in optimal growing conditions. Thus, in fast-growing bacterial cells, RNA Pol foci mimic eukaryotic Pol I activity, and transcription factories resemble nucleolus-like compartmentation. In addition, the transcription and replication machineries are mostly segregated in space to avoid the conflict between the two major cellular functions in fast-growing cells.

Optical and force nanoscopy in microbiology

Microbial cells have developed sophisticated multicomponent structures and machineries to govern basic cellular processes, such as chromosome segregation, gene expression, cell division, mechanosensing, cell adhesion and biofilm formation. Because of the small cell sizes, subcellular structures have long been difficult to visualize using diffraction-limited light microscopy. During the last three decades, optical and force nanoscopy techniques have been developed to probe intracellular and extracellular structures with unprecedented resolutions, enabling researchers to study their organization, dynamics and interactions in individual cells, at the single-molecule level, from the inside out, and all the way up to cell-cell interactions in microbial communities. In this Review, we discuss the principles, advantages and limitations of the main optical and force nanoscopy techniques available in microbiology, and we highlight some outstanding questions that these new tools may help to answer.