Incidence of stroke in the first year after diagnosis of cancer-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk of stroke among patients with cancer is two times that of the general population due to a combination of cancer-, chemotherapy-, radiotherapy-, and surgery-related factors. There is a paucity of data regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to review the stroke recurrence in patients treated with different antithrombotic therapies (antiplatelets, warfarin, heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants). Our secondary objective was to review the bleeding risk across different antithrombotic therapies.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles that adequately assessed secondary prevention of stroke in patients with cancer were selected from the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from inception until March 2, 2025. We performed a network meta-analysis for stroke recurrence, major bleeding, and mortality. The treatments were ranked by P-SCORE. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on median D-dimer levels, multiple territories of stroke, and exclusion of studies with high risk of bias.

RESULTS

We included 11 studies (four RCTs, six retrospective studies, and one case series) with a total of 1319 patients. In the primary analysis, antiplatelets were the highest-ranked treatment for reducing stroke recurrence (RR 0.44 [0.20; 0.96]), followed by LMWH (RR 0.50 [0.26; 0.96]), both significantly superior to no treatment. However, LMWH consistently ranked higher than antiplatelets in all subgroup analyses. There was no difference regarding major bleeding or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Antiplatelets can be considered an option for secondary prevention of stroke in patients with cancer, especially in patients with a higher bleeding risk. Future research with high-quality studies is needed to confirm our preliminary findings and should focus on identifying subgroups of patients with cancer who may benefit most from specific antithrombotic therapies.

Risk of ischemic stroke after cancer diagnosis: a population-based matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding the association between cancer and ischemic stroke, particularly among individuals with previous stroke.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to measure and compare the risk of ischemic stroke in individuals with and without cancer.

METHODS

Population-based matched cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Participants aged ≥18 years with a new diagnosis of cancer were matched (1:1) to cancer-free controls by age and sex in 2 separate matched cohorts based on the absence (matched cohort 1) or presence (matched cohort 2) of prior ischemic stroke. The primary outcome was the incidence of ischemic stroke. We calculated subdistribution adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% CIs for ischemic stroke (death as a competing event).

RESULTS

In matched cohort 1, the rate and risk of ischemic stroke were higher among 620,647 patients with cancer versus 620,647 controls at 1.5 years (4.6/1000 person-years [95% CI, 4.5-4.7] vs 3.5/1000 person-years [95% CI, 3.4-3.6]; aHR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.34-1.47). In matched cohort 2, the rate and risk of ischemic stroke were similar among 13,924 patients with cancer and 13,924 controls at 1.5 years (26.9/1000 person-years [95%CI 25.1-28.9] vs 22.0 /1000 person-years [95% CI, 20.7-23.4]; aHR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.88-1.14). In both cohorts, the risk of ischemic stroke was lower in patients with cancer versus controls from 1.5 to 5 years (aHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.74 and aHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.46-0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with cancer-free controls, the rate and risk of ischemic stroke were higher 1.5 years after cancer diagnosis in individuals without prior stroke and varied according to cancer site and stage.

Insights into Cancer-Associated Thrombosis Leading Towards Ischemic Stroke

Stroke leads to significant disability in most patients, whereas cancer elevates the occurrence of stroke. The incidence of cancer-associated stroke (CAS) is projected to rise as a result of improvements in cancer therapies. Various forms of cancer have been demonstrated to be linked to ischemic stroke. Cancer might influence stroke pathophysiology either directly or through coagulation that creates a hypercoagulative state, in addition to infections. Treatment methods for cancer, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, have all been demonstrated to increase the risk of stroke as well. This review discusses the subtypes, epidemiology, pathophysiology, mechanisms of stroke within cancer patients, biomarkers, and signaling pathways of stroke in cancer while providing vital information on the involved transcription factors, treatment, and management of patients with cancer-associated ischemic stroke. Atherosclerosis, extracellular vesicles (EVs), and signaling biomolecules can also affect CAS. Overall, stroke is a significant and not uncommon complication of cancer, and there is an immediate demand for neurologists and oncologists to create strategies for screening and preventing strokes in cancer patients.

Characterizing Physiologic Swallowing Impairment Profiles: A Large-Scale Exploratory Study of Head and Neck Cancer, Stroke, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, and Parkinson's Disease

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to use a large swallowing database to explore and compare the swallow-physiology impairment profiles of five dysphagia-associated diagnoses: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, head and neck cancer (HNC), Parkinson's disease (PD), and stroke.

METHOD

A total of 8,190 patients across five diagnoses were extracted from a de-identified swallowing database, that is, the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile Swallowing Data Registry, for the present exploratory cross-sectional analysis. To identify the impairment profiles of the five diagnoses, we fit 18 partial proportional odds models, one for each of the 17 Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile components and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale, with impairment score as the dependent variable and diagnoses, age, sex, and race as the independent variables with interactions between age and diagnoses and between PD and dementia (in effect creating a PD with dementia [PDwDem] group). For components with > 5% missingness, we applied inverse probability weighting to correct for bias.

RESULTS

PD and COPD did not significantly differ on 13 of the 18 outcome variables (all ps > .02). Dementia, stroke, and PDwDem all showed worse impairments than COPD or PD on five of six oral components (all ps < .007). HNC had worse impairment than all diagnoses except PDwDem for nine of 10 pharyngeal components (all ps < .006). Stroke and HNC had worse penetration/aspiration than all other diagnoses (all ps < .003).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results show that there are both common and differing impairment profiles among these five diagnoses. These commonalities and differences in profiles provide a basis for the generation of hypotheses about the nature and severity of dysphagia in these populations. These results are also likely highly generalizable given the size and representativeness of the data set.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27478245.

Diagnosis of Incident Cancer After Cryptogenic Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis of the ARCADIA Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence, timing, and type of new cancer diagnosis among patients with cryptogenic stroke.

METHODS

We used data from the ARCADIA trial, which enrolled patients with cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. Participants were prospectively followed, and serious adverse events were assessed every 3 months or sooner if investigators were alerted between visits to an event. Kaplan-Meier statistics were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of a cancer diagnosis within the first year after randomization.

RESULTS

Among 878 participants without baseline history of cancer, 13 (1.5%) were diagnosed with incident cancer in the year after randomization, comprising 12 solid cancers (3 prostate, 2 breast, 2 gastrointestinal, and 5 other primary sites) and 1 hematologic cancer (non-Hodgkin lymphoma). The cumulative incidences of a cancer diagnosis were 0% at 3 months, 0.6% (95% CI 0.2%-1.5%) at 6 months, and 2.0% (95 CI 1.1%-3.4%) at 1 year. The median time from index stroke to cancer diagnosis was 261 days (interquartile range 183-358).

DISCUSSION

In a multicenter cryptogenic stroke cohort with prospective follow-up, the 1-year cumulative incidence of a cancer diagnosis was 2%. This rate may be an underestimation because of the clinical trial population and exclusion of cancers diagnosed immediately after stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192215. Registered June 20, 2017. First patient enrolled February 1, 2018.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Cancer-related arterial thromboembolic events"]

Cancer is associated with a hypercoagulable state and is a well-known independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism, whereas the association between cancer and arterial thromboembolism is less well established. Arterial thromboembolism, primarily defined as myocardial infarction or stroke is significantly more frequent in patients with cancer, independently of vascular risk factors and associated with a three-fold increase in the risk of mortality. Patients with brain cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer have the highest relative risk of developing arterial thromboembolism. Antithrombotic treatments should be used with caution due to the increased risk of haemorrhage, as specified in current practice guidelines.

Neuro-oncologic Emergencies

OBJECTIVE

Neuro-oncologic emergencies have become more frequent as cancer remains one of the leading causes of death in the United States, second only to heart disease. This article highlights key aspects of epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of acute neurologic complications in primary central nervous system malignancies and systemic cancer, following three thematic classifications: (1) complications that are anatomically or intrinsically tumor-related, (2) complications that are tumor-mediated, and (3) complications that are treatment-related.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The main driver of mortality in patients with brain metastasis is systemic disease progression; however, intracranial hypertension, treatment-resistant seizures, and overall decline due to increased intracranial burden of disease are the main factors underlying neurologic-related deaths. Advances in the understanding of tumor-specific characteristics can better inform risk stratification of neurologic complications. Following standardized grading and management algorithms for neurotoxic syndromes related to newer immunologic therapies is paramount to achieving favorable outcomes.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Neuro-oncologic emergencies span the boundaries of subspecialties in neurology and require a broad understanding of neuroimmunology, neuronal hyperexcitability, CSF flow dynamics, intracranial compliance, and neuroanatomy.

Development of an algorithm for identifying paraneoplastic ischemic stroke in association with lung, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer

Background

Paraneoplastic ischemic stroke has a poor prognosis. We have recently reported an algorithm based on the number of ischemic territories, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and granulocytosis to predict the underlying active cancer in a case-control setting. However, co-occurrence of cancer and stroke might also be merely incidental.

Objective

To detect cancer-associated ischemic stroke in a large, unselected cohort of consecutive stroke patients by detailed analysis of ischemic stroke associated with specific cancer subtypes and comparison to patients with bacterial endocarditis.

Methods

Retrospective single-center cohort study of consecutive 1612 ischemic strokes with magnetic resonance imaging, CRP, LDH, and relative granulocytosis data was performed, including identification of active cancers, history of now inactive cancers, and the diagnosis of endocarditis. The previously developed algorithm to detect paraneoplastic cancer was applied. Tumor types associated with paraneoplastic stroke were used to optimize the diagnostic algorithm.

Results

Ischemic strokes associated with active cancer, but also endocarditis, were associated with more ischemic territories as well as higher CRP and LDH levels. Our previous algorithm identified active cancer-associated strokes with a specificity of 83% and sensitivity of 52%. Ischemic strokes associated with lung, pancreatic, and colorectal (LPC) cancers but not with breast and prostate cancers showed more frequent and prominent characteristics of paraneoplastic stroke. A multiple logistic regression model optimized to identify LPC cancers detected active cancer with a sensitivity of 77.8% and specificity of 81.4%. The positive predictive value (PPV) for all active cancers was 13.1%.

Conclusion

Standard clinical examinations can be employed to identify suspect paraneoplastic stroke with an adequate sensitivity, specificity, and PPV when it is considered that the association of ischemic stroke with breast and prostate cancers in the stroke-prone elderly population might be largely incidental.

Seasonal Variations in Stroke and a Comparison of the Predictors of Unfavorable Outcomes among Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Cardioembolic Stroke

We investigated the seasonal variations in stroke in 4040 retrospectively enrolled patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) admitted between January 2011 and December 2022, particularly those with cardioembolic (CE) stroke, and compared predictors of unfavorable outcomes between AIS patients and CE stroke patients. The classification of stroke subtypes was based on the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke occurrence was stratified by seasons and weekdays or holidays. Of all AIS cases, 18% were of CE stroke. Of all five ischemic stroke subtypes, CE stroke patients were the oldest; received the most thrombolysis and thrombectomy; had the highest initial National Institutes of Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores; and had the highest rate of in-hospital complications, unfavorable outcomes (mRS > 2), and mortality. The highest CE stroke prevalence was noted in patients aged ≥ 85 years (30.9%); moreover, CE stroke prevalence increased from 14.9% in summer to 23.0% in winter. The main predictors of death in patients with CE stroke were age > 86 years, heart rate > 79 beats/min, initial NIHSS score > 16, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 6.4, glucose > 159 mg/dL, cancer history, in-hospital complications, and neurological deterioration (ND). The three most dominant factors influencing death, noted in not only patients with AIS but also those with CE stroke, are high initial NIHSS score, ND, and high NLR. We selected the most significant factors to establish nomograms for predicting fatal outcomes. Effective heart rhythm monitoring, particularly in older patients and during winter, may help develop stroke prevention strategies and facilitate early AF detection.

Cancer-related arterial thromboembolic events

Cancer is associated with a hypercoagulable state and is a well-known independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism, whereas the association between cancer and arterial thromboembolism is less well established. Arterial thromboembolism, primarily defined as myocardial infarction or stroke is significantly more frequent in patients with cancer, independently of vascular risk factors and associated with a three-fold increase in the risk of mortality. Patients with brain cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer have the highest relative risk of developing arterial thromboembolism. Antithrombotic treatments should be used with caution due to the increased risk of haemorrhage, as specified in current practice guidelines.

Previous Ischemic Stroke Significantly Alters Stroke Risk in Newly Diagnosed Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Previous ischemic stroke (IS) is a risk factor for subsequent IS in the general population; it is unclear if this relationship remains true in patients with cancer. Our objective was to examine the association between previous IS and risk for future IS in individuals newly diagnosed with cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective population-based matched cohort study of newly diagnosed adult cancer patients (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers and primary central nervous system tumors) in Ontario, Canada from 2010 to 2020; those with prior IS were matched (1:4) by age, sex, year of cancer diagnosis, cancer stage, and cancer site to those without a history of stroke. Cumulative incidence function curves were created to estimate the incidence of IS. Subdistribution adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs were calculated, where death was treated as a competing event. Multivariable analysis was adjusted for imbalanced baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

We examined 65 525 individuals with cancer, including 13 070 with a history of IS. The median follow-up duration was 743 days (interquartile range, 177-1729 days). The incidence of IS following cancer diagnosis was 261.3/10 000 person-years in the cohort with prior IS and 75.3/10 000 person-years in those without prior IS. Individuals with prior IS had an increased risk for IS after cancer diagnosis compared with those without a history (aHR, 2.68 [95% CI, 2.41-2.98]); they also had more prevalent cardiovascular risk factors. The highest risk for stroke compared with those without a history of IS was observed in the gynecologic cancer (aHR, 3.84 [95% CI, 2.15-6.85]) and lung cancer (aHR, 3.18 [95% CI, 2.52-4.02]) subgroups. The risk of IS was inversely correlated with lag time of previous stroke; those with IS 1 year before their cancer diagnosis had the highest risk (aHR, 3.68 [95% CI, 3.22-4.22]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among individuals with newly diagnosed cancer, those with IS history were almost 3× more likely to experience a stroke after cancer diagnosis, especially if the prediagnosis stroke occurred within 1 year preceding cancer diagnosis.

Non-Hypertensives and Those with Normal Cholesterol Are More Likely to Have Concomitant Cancer amongst Patients with Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Registry-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with cancer are known to have an increased risk of ischemic stroke (IS) around the time of their diagnosis. However, there is a paucity of data in Asian populations, and as such, we aimed to determine cancer incidence rates and patterns in Asian IS patients as well as investigate the differences in vascular risk profile of IS patients with and without concomitant cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using data from the Singapore Stroke and Cancer registries. We defined cases as patients with IS and a cancer diagnosis 2 years before or after the index IS. Cancer incidence was determined using the same direct age-standardization method performed for the Singapore general population in the 2015 Singapore cancer report. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze differences in vascular risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 21,068 IS patients (mean age, 67.9 ± 13.3 years), 6.3% (1,330) were found to have concomitant cancer; 4.4% (935) had prior cancer while 1.8% (395) had cancer diagnoses within 2 years following IS. The cancer incidence among IS patients was 3,393 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1,937-4,849) per 100,000 person-years compared to 219-231 per 100,000 person-years in the general population. Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.02] per year), males (OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.11-1.41), Chinese ethnicity (OR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.37-1.89]) and a lower prevalence of hypertension (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.73-0.97)]), and hyperlipidemia (OR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.45-0.62]) were independently associated with cancer-related IS.

CONCLUSIONS

The age-standardized cancer incidence was 15 times higher in IS patients than the general population. IS patients with concomitant cancer were older and had a lower prevalence of vascular risk factors.

Stroke as a cause of death in patients with cancer: a SEER-based study

BACKGROUND

Death from stroke is linked to cancer due to its pathogenesis and side effects of treatment. Despite this, guidelines regarding identifying cancer patients at the highest risk of mortality from stroke are unclear.

AIMS

To determine which cancer subtypes are associated with higher risk of death from stroke.

METHODS

The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was used to obtain data regarding patients with cancer who died of a stroke. We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) using SEER*Stat software, version 8.4.0.1.

RESULTS

Out of 6,136,803 patients with cancer, 57,523 (0.9%) died from stroke, and this rate was higher than general population (SMR= 1.05, 95%CI [1.04-1.06]). Deaths due to stroke decreased across years, from 24,280 deaths between 2000-2004 to 4,903 deaths between 2015-2019. Of the 57,523 stroke deaths, greatest numbers were observed in cancers of the prostate (n=11,761, 20.4%), breast (n=8,946, 15.5%), colon and rectum (n=7,401, 12.8%), and lung and bronchus (n=4,376, 7.6%). Patients with colon and rectum cancers (SMR= 1.08 95%CI [1.06-1.11]), lung and bronchus cancers (SMR=1.70 95%CI [1.65-1.75]) had a greater rate of death from stroke compared to the general population.

CONCLUSION

The risk of death from stroke in cancer patients is significantly higher than in the general population. Patients with colorectal cancer and lung and bronchus cancer are at higher risk of death by stroke compared to the general population.

Anticoagulation for the Prevention of Arterial Thrombosis in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The risk of arterial thrombotic events (ATEs) is high among patients on systemic anticancer therapies. Despite the efficacy of anticoagulants in the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, it is unknown whether anticoagulation is effective to prevent ATEs.

Objectives

This study sought to examine the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in ATE prevention among ambulatory cancer patients.

Methods

We performed a systematic review using Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to May 21, 2022, and included studies comparing oral or parenteral anticoagulation with no anticoagulation among ambulatory patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy with no other indication for anticoagulation. The primary outcome was ATE (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, intra-abdominal arterial embolism, or peripheral artery occlusion). The secondary outcomes were major and nonmajor bleeding and all-cause mortality.

Results

Fourteen randomized trials involving low-molecular-weight heparins, direct oral anticoagulants, and warfarin were included. ATEs were captured as coefficacy endpoints or adverse events. Anticoagulant use was not associated with a reduction in ATEs compared with placebo or standard treatment (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.50-1.04; P = 0.08; I2 = 0%). RRs of major and minor bleeding were 1.56 (95% CI: 1.12-2.17) and 2.25 (95% CI: 1.45-3.48) with anticoagulant use. In 13 trials that reported all-cause mortality, risk of death was not reduced with anticoagulants (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95-1.02; P = 0.38; I2 = 0%).

Conclusions

Anticoagulants did not reduce ATE risk among ambulatory patients on systemic anticancer therapy and were associated with increased bleeding. Based on the current data, anticoagulants have a limited role in ATE prevention in this population as a whole.

The Risk of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in Head and Neck Cancer: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Several studies have shown that head and neck cancer is associated with an increased risk of stroke incidence. However, investigations of the association between the two diseases based on a matching cohort dataset are still limited. Therefore, we identified the incidence and risk of stroke in patients with head and neck cancer using a nationwide population-based cohort dataset. A total of 5248 individuals without cancer and 1312 with cancer were enrolled from the dataset after a 4:1 propensity score matching. We found that the incidence of overall stroke (per 1000 person years) was 19.29 for those with head and neck cancer, consisting of 17.32 as ischemic type and 2.74 as hemorrhagic type. Additionally, patients with head and neck cancer had a significantly increased risk of overall and ischemic stroke development but not hemorrhagic stroke. Moreover, the risk of stroke development over time was relatively high within the first year after the diagnosis of head and neck cancer. However, in the subgroup analysis, oral cavity cancer survivors showed an increased risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Therefore, our nationwide population-based cohort study suggests that clinicians should closely monitor patients with head and neck cancers for the early detection of stroke.