1
|
van Rheede JJ, Sharott A. Tailoring deep brain stimulation for sleep: using actigraphy to understand the relationship between Parkinsonian brain activity and behavioral state. Sleep 2025; 48:zsaf066. [PMID: 40088453 PMCID: PMC12163122 DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsaf066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/17/2025] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joram J van Rheede
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Sharott
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guidetti M, Bocci T, De Pedro Del Álamo M, Deuschl G, Fasano A, Martinez-Fernandez R, Gasca-Salas C, Hamani C, Krauss JK, Kühn AA, Limousin P, Little S, Lozano AM, Maiorana NV, Marceglia S, Okun MS, Oliveri S, Ostrem JL, Scelzo E, Schnitzler A, Starr PA, Temel Y, Timmermann L, Tinkhauser G, Visser-Vandewalle V, Volkmann J, Priori A. Will adaptive deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease become a real option soon? A Delphi consensus study. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2025; 11:110. [PMID: 40325017 PMCID: PMC12052990 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-025-00974-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2025] [Indexed: 05/07/2025] Open
Abstract
While conventional deep brain stimulation (cDBS) treatment delivers continuous electrical stimuli, new adaptive DBS (aDBS) technology provides dynamic symptom-related stimulation. Research data are promising, and devices are already available, but are we ready for it? We asked leading DBS experts worldwide (n = 21) to discuss a research agenda for aDBS research in the near future to allow full adoption. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, along with a Delphi method, was employed. In the next 10 years, aDBS will be clinical routine, but research is needed to define which patients would benefit more from the treatment; second, implantation and programming procedures should be simplified to allow actual generalized adoption; third, new adaptive algorithms, and the integration of aDBS paradigm with new technologies, will improve control of more complex symptoms. Since the next years will be crucial for aDBS implementation, the research should focus on improving precision and making programming procedures more accessible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Guidetti
- Department of Health Sciences, "Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Bocci
- Department of Health Sciences, "Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, "Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Guenther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel and Christian Albrechts-University of Kiel Kiel Germany, Kiel, Germany
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raul Martinez-Fernandez
- HM CINAC, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Carlos III, CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Gasca-Salas
- HM CINAC, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Carlos III, CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain
| | - Clement Hamani
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joachim K Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure, Exzellenzcluster, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DZNE, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Patricia Limousin
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Simon Little
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Natale V Maiorana
- Department of Health Sciences, "Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Marceglia
- Department of Health Sciences, "Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Michael S Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Serena Oliveri
- Department of Health Sciences, "Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, "Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emma Scelzo
- Clinical Neurology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, "Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Philip A Starr
- UCSF Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Department of Physiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yasin Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lars Timmermann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Priori
- Department of Health Sciences, "Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, "Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dold M, Pereira J, Sajonz B, Coenen VA, Thielen J, Janssen MLF, Tangermann M. Dareplane: a modular open-source software platform for BCI research with application in closed-loop deep brain stimulation. J Neural Eng 2025; 22:026029. [PMID: 40014925 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/adbb20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2025] [Indexed: 03/01/2025]
Abstract
Objective.This work introduces Dareplane, a modular and broad technology-agnostic open source software platform for brain-computer interface (BCI) research with an application focus on adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS). One difficulty for investigating control approaches for aDBS resides with the complex setups required for aDBS experiments, a challenge Dareplane tries to address.Approach.The key features of the platform are presented and the composition of modules into a full experimental setup is discussed in the context of a Python-based orchestration module. The performance of a typical experimental setup on Dareplane for aDBS is evaluated in three benchtop experiments, covering (a) an easy-to-replicate setup using an Arduino microcontroller, (b) a setup with hardware of an implantable pulse generator, and (c) a setup using an established and CE certified external neurostimulator. The full technical feasibility of the platform in the aDBS context is demonstrated in a first closed-loop session with externalized leads on a patient with Parkinson's disease receiving DBS treatment and further in a non-invasive BCI speller application using code-modulated visual evoked potential (c-VEP).Main results.The platform is implemented and open-source accessible onhttps://github.com/bsdlab/Dareplane. Benchtop results show that performance of the platform is sufficient for current aDBS latencies, and the platform could successfully be used in the aDBS experiment. The timing-critical c-VEP speller could be successfully implemented on the platform achieving expected information transfer rates.Significance.The Dareplane platform supports aDBS setups, and more generally the research on neurotechnological systems such as BCIs. It provides a modular, technology-agnostic, and easy-to-implement software platform to make experimental setups more resilient and replicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Dold
- Data-Driven Neurotechnology Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joana Pereira
- Data-Driven Neurotechnology Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- BrainLinks-BrainTools Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Bastian Sajonz
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Volker A Coenen
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jordy Thielen
- Data-Driven Neurotechnology Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcus L F Janssen
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Tangermann
- Data-Driven Neurotechnology Lab, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Butler RD, Brinda AK, Blumenfeld M, Bryants MN, Grund PM, Pandey SR, Cornish CK, Sullivan D, Krieg J, Umoh M, Vitek JL, Almeida L, Orcutt T, Cooper SE, Johnson MD. Differentiating Postural and Kinetic Tremor Responses to Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2025; 12:166-176. [PMID: 39508598 PMCID: PMC11802662 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.14256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 10/12/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of thalamus or posterior subthalamic area (PSA) can suppress forms of action tremor in people with Essential Tremor, previous studies have suggested postural tremor may respond more robustly than kinetic tremor to DBS. OBJECTIVES In this study, we aimed to more precisely quantify the (1) onset/offset dynamics and (2) steady-state effects of VIM/PSA-DBS on postural and kinetic tremor. METHODS Tremor data from wireless inertial measurement units were collected from 11 participants with ET (20 unilaterally assessed DBS leads). Three postural hold tasks and one kinetic task were performed with stimulation turned off, in 2-min intervals after enabling unilateral DBS at the clinician-optimized DBS setting (15 min), and in 2-min intervals following cessation of DBS (5 min). RESULTS At baseline, kinetic tremor had significantly higher amplitudes, standard deviation, and frequency than postural tremor (P < 0.001). DBS had a more robust acute effect on postural tremors (54% decrease, P < 0.001), with near immediate tremor suppression in amplitude and standard deviation, but had non-significant improvement of kinetic tremor on the population-level across the wash-in period (34% decrease). Tremor response was not equivalent between wash-in and wash-out timepoints and involved substantial individual variability including task-specific rebound or long wash-out effects. CONCLUSIONS Programming strategies for VIM/PSA-DBS should consider the individual temporal and effect size variability in postural versus kinetic tremor improvement. Improved targeting and programming strategies around VIM and PSA may be necessary to equivalently suppress both postural and kinetic tremors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca D. Butler
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Annemarie K. Brinda
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Madeline Blumenfeld
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Marina N. Bryants
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Peter M. Grund
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Shivansh R. Pandey
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Chelsea K.S. Cornish
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Disa Sullivan
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Jordan Krieg
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Matthew Umoh
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Jerrold L. Vitek
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Tseganesh Orcutt
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Scott E. Cooper
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Matthew D. Johnson
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bernasconi E, Amstutz D, Averna A, Fischer P, Sousa M, Debove I, Petermann K, Alva L, Magalhães AD, Lachenmayer ML, Nguyen TAK, Schuepbach M, Nowacki A, Pollo C, Krack P, Tinkhauser G. Neurophysiological gradient in the Parkinsonian subthalamic nucleus as a marker for motor symptoms and apathy. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2025; 11:4. [PMID: 39753562 PMCID: PMC11698975 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-024-00848-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 01/06/2025] Open
Abstract
Sensing-based deep brain stimulation should optimally consider both the motor and neuropsychiatric domain to maximize quality of life of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Here we characterize the neurophysiological properties of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in 69 PD patients using a newly established neurophysiological gradient metric and contextualize it with motor symptoms and apathy. We could evidence a STN power gradient that holds most of the spectral information between 5 and 30 Hz spanning along the dorsal-ventral axis. It shows elevated power in the sub-beta range (8-12 Hz) toward the ventral STN, and elevated dorsal beta power (16-24 Hz) indicative for the hemispheres contralateral to the more affected hemi-body side. The rigidity response to DBS was highest dorsally on the axis. Importantly, apathetic symptoms can be related to reduced ventral alpha power. In conclusion, the STN spectral gradient may inform about the motor and neuropsychiatric domain, supporting integrative closed-loop strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Bernasconi
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School of Cellular and Biomedical Sciences (GCB), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Amstutz
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Averna
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Petra Fischer
- School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, University Walk, BS8 1TD, Bristol, UK
| | - Mario Sousa
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ines Debove
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Katrin Petermann
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Laura Alva
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreia D Magalhães
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - M Lenard Lachenmayer
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thuy-Anh K Nguyen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Andreas Nowacki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Claudio Pollo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul Krack
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
- Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oehrn CR, Cernera S, Hammer LH, Shcherbakova M, Yao J, Hahn A, Wang S, Ostrem JL, Little S, Starr PA. Chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation versus conventional stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a blinded randomized feasibility trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:3345-3356. [PMID: 39160351 PMCID: PMC11826929 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03196-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely used therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) but lacks dynamic responsiveness to changing clinical and neural states. Feedback control might improve therapeutic effectiveness, but the optimal control strategy and additional benefits of 'adaptive' neurostimulation are unclear. Here we present the results of a blinded randomized cross-over pilot trial aimed at determining the neural correlates of specific motor signs in individuals with PD and the feasibility of using these signals to drive adaptive DBS. Four male patients with PD were recruited from a population undergoing DBS implantation for motor fluctuations, with each patient receiving adaptive DBS and continuous DBS. We identified stimulation-entrained gamma oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus or motor cortex as optimal markers of high versus low dopaminergic states and their associated residual motor signs in all four patients. We then demonstrated improved motor symptoms and quality of life with adaptive compared to clinically optimized standard stimulation. The results of this pilot trial highlight the promise of personalized adaptive neurostimulation in PD based on data-driven selection of neural signals. Furthermore, these findings provide the foundation for further larger clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of personalized adaptive neurostimulation in PD and other neurological disorders. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03582891 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina R Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren H Hammer
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria Shcherbakova
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jiaang Yao
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Amelia Hahn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guidetti M, Bocci T, De Pedro Del Álamo M, Deuschl G, Fasano A, Fernandez RM, Gasca-Salas C, Hamani C, Krauss J, Kühn AA, Limousin P, Little S, Lozano A, Maiorana N, Marceglia S, Okun M, Oliveri S, Ostrem JL, Scelzo E, Schnitzler A, Starr P, Temel Y, Timmermann L, Tinkhauser G, Visser-Vandewalle V, Volkmann J, Priori A. Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Delphi Consensus Study. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.08.26.24312580. [PMID: 39252901 PMCID: PMC11383503 DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.26.24312580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
Importance If history teaches, as cardiac pacing moved from fixed-rate to on-demand delivery in in 80s of the last century, there are high probabilities that closed-loop and adaptive approaches will become, in the next decade, the natural evolution of conventional Deep Brain Stimulation (cDBS). However, while devices for aDBS are already available for clinical use, few data on their clinical application and technological limitations are available so far. In such scenario, gathering the opinion and expertise of leading investigators worldwide would boost and guide practice and research, thus grounding the clinical development of aDBS. Observations We identified clinical and academically experienced DBS clinicians (n=21) to discuss the challenges related to aDBS. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire along with a Delphi method was employed. 42 questions were submitted to the panel, half of them being related to technical aspects while the other half to clinical aspects of aDBS. Experts agreed that aDBS will become clinical practice in 10 years. In the present scenario, although the panel agreed that aDBS applications require skilled clinicians and that algorithms need to be further optimized to manage complex PD symptoms, consensus was reached on aDBS safety and its ability to provide a faster and more stable treatment response than cDBS, also for tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease patients and for those with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Conclusions and Relevance Despite the need of further research, the panel concluded that aDBS is safe, promises to be maximally effective in PD patients with motor fluctuation and dyskinesias and therefore will enter into the clinical practice in the next years, with further research focused on algorithms and markers for complex symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Guidetti
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - T. Bocci
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | | | - G. Deuschl
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel and Christian Albrechts-University of Kiel Kiel Germany
| | - A. Fasano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson’s Disease Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R. Martinez Fernandez
- HM CINAC, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Carlos III, CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain
| | - C. Gasca-Salas
- HM CINAC, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Carlos III, CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain
| | - C. Hamani
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Toronto, M5T 1P5, ON, Canada
| | - J.K. Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - A. A. Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure, Exzellenzcluster, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DZNE, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - P. Limousin
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - S. Little
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - A.M. Lozano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - N.V. Maiorana
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - S. Marceglia
- Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - M.S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, United States
| | - S. Oliveri
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - J. L. Ostrem
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - E. Scelzo
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - A. Schnitzler
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - P.A. Starr
- UCSF Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Department of Physiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Y. Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - L. Timmermann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - G. Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - V. Visser-Vandewalle
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - J. Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - A. Priori
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fang H, Berman SA, Wang Y, Yang Y. Robust adaptive deep brain stimulation control of in-silico non-stationary Parkinsonian neural oscillatory dynamics. J Neural Eng 2024; 21:036043. [PMID: 38834058 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad5406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Objective. Closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) that works by adjusting DBS patterns in real time from the guidance of feedback neural activity. Current closed-loop DBS mainly uses threshold-crossing on-off controllers or linear time-invariant (LTI) controllers to regulate the basal ganglia (BG) Parkinsonian beta band oscillation power. However, the critical cortex-BG-thalamus network dynamics underlying PD are nonlinear, non-stationary, and noisy, hindering accurate and robust control of Parkinsonian neural oscillatory dynamics.Approach. Here, we develop a new robust adaptive closed-loop DBS method for regulating the Parkinsonian beta oscillatory dynamics of the cortex-BG-thalamus network. We first build an adaptive state-space model to quantify the dynamic, nonlinear, and non-stationary neural activity. We then construct an adaptive estimator to track the nonlinearity and non-stationarity in real time. We next design a robust controller to automatically determine the DBS frequency based on the estimated Parkinsonian neural state while reducing the system's sensitivity to high-frequency noise. We adopt and tune a biophysical cortex-BG-thalamus network model as an in-silico simulation testbed to generate nonlinear and non-stationary Parkinsonian neural dynamics for evaluating DBS methods.Main results. We find that under different nonlinear and non-stationary neural dynamics, our robust adaptive DBS method achieved accurate regulation of the BG Parkinsonian beta band oscillation power with small control error, bias, and deviation. Moreover, the accurate regulation generalizes across different therapeutic targets and consistently outperforms current on-off and LTI DBS methods.Significance. These results have implications for future designs of closed-loop DBS systems to treat PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Fang
- MOE Frontier Science Center for Brain Science and Brain-machine Integration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, People's Republic of China
- Nanhu Brain-computer Interface Institute, Hangzhou 311100, People's Republic of China
| | - Stephen A Berman
- College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, United States of America
| | - Yueming Wang
- Nanhu Brain-computer Interface Institute, Hangzhou 311100, People's Republic of China
- Qiushi Academy for Advanced Studies, Hangzhou 310058, People's Republic of China
- College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Brain-machine Intelligence, Hangzhou 310058, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuxiao Yang
- MOE Frontier Science Center for Brain Science and Brain-machine Integration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, People's Republic of China
- Nanhu Brain-computer Interface Institute, Hangzhou 311100, People's Republic of China
- College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Brain-machine Intelligence, Hangzhou 310058, People's Republic of China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, People's Republic of China
- NHC and CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Quan Z, Li Y, Wang S. Multi-timescale neuromodulation strategy for closed-loop deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Eng 2024; 21:036006. [PMID: 38653252 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad4210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Beta triggered closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) shows great potential for improving the efficacy while reducing side effect for Parkinson's disease. However, there remain great challenges due to the dynamics and stochasticity of neural activities. In this study, we aimed to tune the amplitude of beta oscillations with different time scales taking into account influence of inherent variations in the basal ganglia-thalamus-cortical circuit.Approach. A dynamic basal ganglia-thalamus-cortical mean-field model was established to emulate the medication rhythm. Then, a dynamic target model was designed to embody the multi-timescale dynamic of beta power with milliseconds, seconds and minutes. Moreover, we proposed a closed-loop DBS strategy based on a proportional-integral-differential (PID) controller with the dynamic control target. In addition, the bounds of stimulation amplitude increments and different parameters of the dynamic target were considered to meet the clinical constraints. The performance of the proposed closed-loop strategy, including beta power modulation accuracy, mean stimulation amplitude, and stimulation variation were calculated to determine the PID parameters and evaluate neuromodulation performance in the computational dynamic mean-field model.Main results. The Results show that the dynamic basal ganglia-thalamus-cortical mean-field model simulated the medication rhythm with the fasted and the slowest rate. The dynamic control target reflected the temporal variation in beta power from milliseconds to minutes. With the proposed closed-loop strategy, the beta power tracked the dynamic target with a smoother stimulation sequence compared with closed-loop DBS with the constant target. Furthermore, the beta power could be modulated to track the control target under different long-term targets, modulation strengths, and bounds of the stimulation increment.Significance. This work provides a new method of closed-loop DBS for multi-timescale beta power modulation with clinical constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoyu Quan
- Academy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of AI & Robotics, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of AI & Robotics, Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Li
- Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence (Fudan University), Shanghai, Ministry of Education, People's Republic of China
- MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Zhangjiang Fudan International Innovation Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Shouyan Wang
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of AI & Robotics, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence (Fudan University), Shanghai, Ministry of Education, People's Republic of China
- MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
- Zhangjiang Fudan International Innovation Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lewis S, Radcliffe E, Ojemann S, Kramer DR, Hirt L, Case M, Holt-Becker AB, Raike R, Kern DS, Thompson JA. Pilot Study to Investigate the Use of In-Clinic Sensing to Identify Optimal Stimulation Parameters for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Parkinson's Disease. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:509-519. [PMID: 36797194 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming is time intensive. Recent advances in sensing technology of local field potentials (LFPs) may enable improvements. Few studies have compared the use of this technology with standard of care. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS Sensing technology of subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS leads in Parkinson's disease (PD) is reliable and predicts the optimal contacts and settings as predicted by clinical assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five subjects with PD (n = 9 hemispheres) with bilateral STN DBS and sensing capable battery replacement were recruited. An LFP sensing review of all bipolar contact pairs was performed three times. Contact with the maximal beta peak power (MBP) was then clinically assessed in a double-blinded fashion, and five conditions were tested: 1) entry settings, 2) off stimulation, 3) MBP at 30 μs, 4) MBP at 60 μs, and 5) MBP at 90 μs. RESULTS Contact and frequency of the MBP power in all hemispheres did not differ across sessions. The entry settings matched with the contact with the MBP power in 5 of 9 hemispheres. No clinical difference was evident in the stimulation conditions. The clinician and subject preferred settings determined by MBP power in 7 of 9 and 5 of 7 hemispheres, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that STN LFPs in PD recorded directly from contacts of the DBS lead provide consistent recordings across the frequency range and a reliably detected beta peak. Furthermore, programming based on the MBP power provides at least clinical equivalence to standard of care programming with STN DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydnei Lewis
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Erin Radcliffe
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Steven Ojemann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Daniel R Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lisa Hirt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Michelle Case
- Brain Modulation Business, Neuromodulation Operating Unit, Medtronic, Plc, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Abbey B Holt-Becker
- Brain Modulation Business, Neuromodulation Operating Unit, Medtronic, Plc, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Robert Raike
- Brain Modulation Business, Neuromodulation Operating Unit, Medtronic, Plc, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Drew S Kern
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - John A Thompson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kroneberg D, Al-Fatly B, Morkos C, Steiner LA, Schneider GH, Kühn A. Kinematic Effects of Combined Subthalamic and Dorsolateral Nigral Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2024; 14:269-282. [PMID: 38363617 PMCID: PMC10977420 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-230181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Background Additional stimulation of the substantia nigra (SNr) has been proposed to target axial symptoms and gait impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Objective This study aimed to characterize effects of combined deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and SNr on gait performance in PD and to map stimulation sites within the SNr. Methods In a double-blinded crossover design, 10 patients with PD and gait impairment underwent clinical examination and kinematic assessment with STN DBS, combined STN+SNr DBS and OFF DBS 30 minutes after reprogramming. To confirm stimulation within the SNr, electrodes, active contacts, and stimulation volumes were modeled in a common space and overlap with atlases of SNr was computed. Results Overlap of stimulation volumes with dorsolateral SNr was confirmed for all patients. UPDRS III, scoring of freezing during turning and transitioning, stride length, stride velocity, and range of motion of shank, knee, arm, and trunk as well as peak velocities during turning and transitions and turn duration were improved with STN DBS compared to OFF. On cohort level, no further improvement was observed with combined STN+SNr DBS but additive improvement of spatiotemporal gait parameters was observed in individual subjects. Conclusions Combined high frequency DBS of the STN and dorsolateral SNr did not consistently result in additional short-term kinematic or clinical benefit compared to STN DBS. Stimulation intervals, frequency, and patient selection for target symptoms as well as target region within the SNr need further refinement in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kroneberg
- Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bassam Al-Fatly
- Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cornelia Morkos
- Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leon Amadeus Steiner
- Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gerd-Helge Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A. Kühn
- Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Busch JL, Kaplan J, Habets JGV, Feldmann LK, Roediger J, Köhler RM, Merk T, Faust K, Schneider GH, Bergman H, Neumann WJ, Kühn AA. Single threshold adaptive deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease depends on parameter selection, movement state and controllability of subthalamic beta activity. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:125-133. [PMID: 38266773 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an invasive treatment option for patients with Parkinson's disease. Recently, adaptive DBS (aDBS) systems have been developed, which adjust stimulation timing and amplitude in real-time. However, it is unknown how changes in parameters, movement states and the controllability of subthalamic beta activity affect aDBS performance. OBJECTIVE To characterize how parameter choice, movement state and controllability interactively affect the electrophysiological and behavioral response to single threshold aDBS. METHODS We recorded subthalamic local field potentials in 12 patients with Parkinson's disease receiving single threshold aDBS in the acute post-operative state. We investigated changes in two aDBS parameters: the onset time and the smoothing of real-time beta power. Electrophysiological patterns and motor performance were assessed while patients were at rest and during a simple motor task. We further studied the impact of controllability on aDBS performance by comparing patients with and without beta power modulation during continuous stimulation. RESULTS Our findings reveal that changes in the onset time control the extent of beta power suppression achievable with single threshold adaptive stimulation during rest. Behavioral data indicate that only specific parameter combinations yield a beneficial effect of single threshold aDBS. During movement, action induced beta power suppression reduces the responsivity of the closed loop algorithm. We further demonstrate that controllability of beta power is a prerequisite for effective parameter dependent modulation of subthalamic beta activity. CONCLUSION Our results highlight the interaction between single threshold aDBS parameter selection, movement state and controllability in driving subthalamic beta activity and motor performance. By this means, we identify directions for the further development of closed-loop DBS algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes L Busch
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jonathan Kaplan
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jeroen G V Habets
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lucia K Feldmann
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Roediger
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Richard M Köhler
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Timon Merk
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Faust
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gerd-Helge Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagai Bergman
- The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Medical Neurobiology, Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, The Hebrew University, Hassadah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; NeuroCure, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fleming JE, Senneff S, Lowery MM. Multivariable closed-loop control of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. J Neural Eng 2023; 20:056029. [PMID: 37733003 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acfbfa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) methods for Parkinson's disease (PD) to-date modulate either stimulation amplitude or frequency to control a single biomarker. While good performance has been demonstrated for symptoms that are correlated with the chosen biomarker, suboptimal regulation can occur for uncorrelated symptoms or when the relationship between biomarker and symptom varies. Control of stimulation-induced side-effects is typically not considered.Approach.A multivariable control architecture is presented to selectively target suppression of either tremor or subthalamic nucleus beta band oscillations. DBS pulse amplitude and duration are modulated to maintain amplitude below a threshold and avoid stimulation of distal large diameter axons associated with stimulation-induced side effects. A supervisor selects between a bank of controllers which modulate DBS pulse amplitude to control rest tremor or beta activity depending on the level of muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity detected. A secondary controller limits pulse amplitude and modulates pulse duration to target smaller diameter axons lying close to the electrode. The control architecture was investigated in a computational model of the PD motor network which simulated the cortico-basal ganglia network, motoneuron pool, EMG and muscle force signals.Main results.Good control of both rest tremor and beta activity was observed with reduced power delivered when compared with conventional open loop stimulation, The supervisor avoided over- or under-stimulation which occurred when using a single controller tuned to one biomarker. When DBS amplitude was constrained, the secondary controller maintained the efficacy of stimulation by increasing pulse duration to compensate for reduced amplitude. Dual parameter control delivered effective control of the target biomarkers, with additional savings in the power delivered.Significance.Non-linear multivariable control can enable targeted suppression of motor symptoms for PD patients. Moreover, dual parameter control facilitates automatic regulation of the stimulation therapeutic dosage to prevent overstimulation, whilst providing additional power savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John E Fleming
- Neuromuscular Systems Laboratory, UCD School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TH, United Kingdom
| | - Sageanne Senneff
- Neuromuscular Systems Laboratory, UCD School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Madeleine M Lowery
- Neuromuscular Systems Laboratory, UCD School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chua MMJ, Vissani M, Liu DD, Schaper FLWVJ, Warren AEL, Caston R, Dworetzky BA, Bubrick EJ, Sarkis RA, Cosgrove GR, Rolston JD. Initial case series of a novel sensing deep brain stimulation device in drug-resistant epilepsy and consistent identification of alpha/beta oscillatory activity: A feasibility study. Epilepsia 2023; 64:2586-2603. [PMID: 37483140 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Here, we report a retrospective, single-center experience with a novel deep brain stimulation (DBS) device capable of chronic local field potential (LFP) recording in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and explore potential electrophysiological biomarkers that may aid DBS programming and outcome tracking. METHODS Five patients with DRE underwent thalamic DBS, targeting either the bilateral anterior (n = 3) or centromedian (n = 2) nuclei. Postoperative electrode lead localizations were visualized in Lead-DBS software. Local field potentials recorded over 12-18 months were tracked, and changes in power were associated with patient events, medication changes, and stimulation. We utilized a combination of lead localization, in-clinic broadband LFP recordings, real-time LFP response to stimulation, and chronic recordings to guide DBS programming. RESULTS Four patients (80%) experienced a >50% reduction in seizure frequency, whereas one patient had no significant reduction. Peaks in the alpha and/or beta frequency range were observed in the thalamic LFPs of each patient. Stimulation suppressed these LFP peaks in a dose-dependent manner. Chronic timeline data identified changes in LFP amplitude associated with stimulation, seizure occurrences, and medication changes. We also noticed a circadian pattern of LFP amplitudes in all patients. Button-presses during seizure events via a mobile application served as a digital seizure diary and were associated with elevations in LFP power. SIGNIFICANCE We describe an initial cohort of patients with DRE utilizing a novel sensing DBS device to characterize potential LFP biomarkers of epilepsy that may be associated with seizure control after DBS in DRE. We also present a new workflow utilizing the Percept device that may optimize DBS programming using real-time and chronic LFP recording.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa M J Chua
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matteo Vissani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David D Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Frederic L W V J Schaper
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Aaron E L Warren
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rose Caston
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Barbara A Dworetzky
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ellen J Bubrick
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rani A Sarkis
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John D Rolston
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oehrn CR, Cernera S, Hammer LH, Shcherbakova M, Yao J, Hahn A, Wang S, Ostrem JL, Little S, Starr PA. Personalized chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation outperforms conventional stimulation in Parkinson's disease. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.08.03.23293450. [PMID: 37649907 PMCID: PMC10463549 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.03.23293450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation is a widely used therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) but currently lacks dynamic responsiveness to changing clinical and neural states. Feedback control has the potential to improve therapeutic effectiveness, but optimal control strategy and additional benefits of "adaptive" neurostimulation are unclear. We implemented adaptive subthalamic nucleus stimulation, controlled by subthalamic or cortical signals, in three PD patients (five hemispheres) during normal daily life. We identified neurophysiological biomarkers of residual motor fluctuations using data-driven analyses of field potentials over a wide frequency range and varying stimulation amplitudes. Narrowband gamma oscillations (65-70 Hz) at either site emerged as the best control signal for sensing during stimulation. A blinded, randomized trial demonstrated improved motor symptoms and quality of life compared to clinically optimized standard stimulation. Our approach highlights the promise of personalized adaptive neurostimulation based on data-driven selection of control signals and may be applied to other neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina R Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren H Hammer
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Maria Shcherbakova
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jiaang Yao
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Amelia Hahn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Alva L, Bernasconi E, Torrecillos F, Fischer P, Averna A, Bange M, Mostofi A, Pogosyan A, Ashkan K, Muthuraman M, Groppa S, Pereira EA, Tan H, Tinkhauser G. Clinical neurophysiological interrogation of motor slowing: A critical step towards tuning adaptive deep brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 152:43-56. [PMID: 37285747 PMCID: PMC7615935 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Subthalamic nucleus (STN) beta activity (13-30 Hz) is the most accepted biomarker for adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD). We hypothesize that different frequencies within the beta range may exhibit distinct temporal dynamics and, as a consequence, different relationships to motor slowing and adaptive stimulation patterns. We aim to highlight the need for an objective method to determine the aDBS feedback signal. METHODS STN LFPs were recorded in 15 PD patients at rest and while performing a cued motor task. The impact of beta bursts on motor performance was assessed for different beta candidate frequencies: the individual frequency strongest associated with motor slowing, the individual beta peak frequency, the frequency most modulated by movement execution, as well as the entire-, low- and high beta band. How these candidate frequencies differed in their bursting dynamics and theoretical aDBS stimulation patterns was further investigated. RESULTS The individual motor slowing frequency often differs from the individual beta peak or beta-related movement-modulation frequency. Minimal deviations from a selected target frequency as feedback signal for aDBS leads to a substantial drop in the burst overlapping and in the alignment of the theoretical onset of stimulation triggers (to ∼ 75% for 1 Hz, to ∼ 40% for 3 Hz deviation). CONCLUSIONS Clinical-temporal dynamics within the beta frequency range are highly diverse and deviating from a reference biomarker frequency can result in altered adaptive stimulation patterns. SIGNIFICANCE A clinical-neurophysiological interrogation could be helpful to determine the patient-specific feedback signal for aDBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Alva
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elena Bernasconi
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Flavie Torrecillos
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Petra Fischer
- School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, University Walk, BS8 1TD Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Alberto Averna
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Bange
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Abteen Mostofi
- Neurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, United Kingdom
| | - Alek Pogosyan
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Keyoumars Ashkan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, King's College London, SE59RS, United Kingdom
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Erlick A Pereira
- Neurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, United Kingdom
| | - Huiling Tan
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gontier C, Surace SC, Delvendahl I, Müller M, Pfister JP. Efficient sampling-based Bayesian Active Learning for synaptic characterization. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1011342. [PMID: 37603559 PMCID: PMC10470935 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Bayesian Active Learning (BAL) is an efficient framework for learning the parameters of a model, in which input stimuli are selected to maximize the mutual information between the observations and the unknown parameters. However, the applicability of BAL to experiments is limited as it requires performing high-dimensional integrations and optimizations in real time. Current methods are either too time consuming, or only applicable to specific models. Here, we propose an Efficient Sampling-Based Bayesian Active Learning (ESB-BAL) framework, which is efficient enough to be used in real-time biological experiments. We apply our method to the problem of estimating the parameters of a chemical synapse from the postsynaptic responses to evoked presynaptic action potentials. Using synthetic data and synaptic whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, we show that our method can improve the precision of model-based inferences, thereby paving the way towards more systematic and efficient experimental designs in physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Gontier
- Department of Physiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | | | - Igor Delvendahl
- Department of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Müller
- Department of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- University Research Priority Program (URPP), Adaptive Brain Circuits in Development and Learning (AdaBD), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Radcliffe EM, Baumgartner AJ, Kern DS, Al Borno M, Ojemann S, Kramer DR, Thompson JA. Oscillatory beta dynamics inform biomarker-driven treatment optimization for Parkinson's disease. J Neurophysiol 2023; 129:1492-1504. [PMID: 37198135 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00055.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by loss of dopaminergic neurons and dysregulation of the basal ganglia. Cardinal motor symptoms include bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of select subcortical nuclei is standard of care for medication-refractory PD. Conventional open-loop DBS delivers continuous stimulation with fixed parameters that do not account for a patient's dynamic activity state or medication cycle. In comparison, closed-loop DBS, or adaptive DBS (aDBS), adjusts stimulation based on biomarker feedback that correlates with clinical state. Recent work has identified several neurophysiological biomarkers in local field potential recordings from PD patients, the most promising of which are 1) elevated beta (∼13-30 Hz) power in the subthalamic nucleus (STN), 2) increased beta synchrony throughout basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits, notably observed as coupling between the STN beta phase and cortical broadband gamma (∼50-200 Hz) amplitude, and 3) prolonged beta bursts in the STN and cortex. In this review, we highlight relevant frequency and time domain features of STN beta measured in PD patients and summarize how spectral beta power, oscillatory beta synchrony, phase-amplitude coupling, and temporal beta bursting inform PD pathology, neurosurgical targeting, and DBS therapy. We then review how STN beta dynamics inform predictive, biomarker-driven aDBS approaches for optimizing PD treatment. We therefore provide clinically useful and actionable insight that can be applied toward aDBS implementation for PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M Radcliffe
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Alexander J Baumgartner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Drew S Kern
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Mazen Al Borno
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States
| | - Steven Ojemann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Daniel R Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - John A Thompson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Neumann WJ, Gilron R, Little S, Tinkhauser G. Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation: From Experimental Evidence Toward Practical Implementation. Mov Disord 2023. [PMID: 37148553 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Closed-loop adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) can deliver individualized therapy at an unprecedented temporal precision for neurological disorders. This has the potential to lead to a breakthrough in neurotechnology, but the translation to clinical practice remains a significant challenge. Via bidirectional implantable brain-computer-interfaces that have become commercially available, aDBS can now sense and selectively modulate pathophysiological brain circuit activity. Pilot studies investigating different aDBS control strategies showed promising results, but the short experimental study designs have not yet supported individualized analyses of patient-specific factors in biomarker and therapeutic response dynamics. Notwithstanding the clear theoretical advantages of a patient-tailored approach, these new stimulation possibilities open a vast and mostly unexplored parameter space, leading to practical hurdles in the implementation and development of clinical trials. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the neurophysiological and neurotechnological aspects related to aDBS is crucial to develop evidence-based treatment regimens for clinical practice. Therapeutic success of aDBS will depend on the integrated development of strategies for feedback signal identification, artifact mitigation, signal processing, and control policy adjustment, for precise stimulation delivery tailored to individual patients. The present review introduces the reader to the neurophysiological foundation of aDBS for Parkinson's disease (PD) and other network disorders, explains currently available aDBS control policies, and highlights practical pitfalls and difficulties to be addressed in the upcoming years. Finally, it highlights the importance of interdisciplinary clinical neurotechnological research within and across DBS centers, toward an individualized patient-centered approach to invasive brain stimulation. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Simon Little
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Averna A, Debove I, Nowacki A, Peterman K, Duchet B, Sousa M, Bernasconi E, Alva L, Lachenmayer ML, Schuepbach M, Pollo C, Krack P, Nguyen TAK, Tinkhauser G. Spectral Topography of the Subthalamic Nucleus to Inform Next-Generation Deep Brain Stimulation. Mov Disord 2023; 38:818-830. [PMID: 36987385 PMCID: PMC7615852 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The landscape of neurophysiological symptoms and behavioral biomarkers in basal ganglia signals for movement disorders is expanding. The clinical translation of sensing-based deep brain stimulation (DBS) also requires a thorough understanding of the anatomical organization of spectral biomarkers within the subthalamic nucleus (STN). OBJECTIVES The aims were to systematically investigate the spectral topography, including a wide range of sub-bands in STN local field potentials (LFP) of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, and to evaluate its predictive performance for clinical response to DBS. METHODS STN-LFPs were recorded from 70 PD patients (130 hemispheres) awake and at rest using multicontact DBS electrodes. A comprehensive spatial characterization, including hot spot localization and focality estimation, was performed for multiple sub-bands (delta, theta, alpha, low-beta, high-beta, low-gamma, high-gamma, and fast-gamma (FG) as well as low- and fast high-frequency oscillations [HFO]) and compared to the clinical hot spot for rigidity response to DBS. A spectral biomarker map was established and used to predict the clinical response to DBS. RESULTS The STN shows a heterogeneous topographic distribution of different spectral biomarkers, with the strongest segregation in the inferior-superior axis. Relative to the superiorly localized beta hot spot, HFOs (FG, slow HFO) were localized up to 2 mm more inferiorly. Beta oscillations are spatially more spread compared to other sub-bands. Both the spatial proximity of contacts to the beta hot spot and the distance to higher-frequency hot spots were predictive for the best rigidity response to DBS. CONCLUSIONS The spatial segregation and properties of spectral biomarkers within the DBS target structure can additionally be informative for the implementation of next-generation sensing-based DBS. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Averna
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ines Debove
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Nowacki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Katrin Peterman
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Benoit Duchet
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mário Sousa
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elena Bernasconi
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Laura Alva
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martin L. Lachenmayer
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Claudio Pollo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul Krack
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thuy-Anh K. Nguyen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ortone A, Vergani AA, Ahmadipour M, Mannella R, Mazzoni A. Dopamine depletion leads to pathological synchronization of distinct basal ganglia loops in the beta band. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1010645. [PMID: 37104542 PMCID: PMC10168586 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease (PD) are associated with dopamine deficits and pathological oscillation of basal ganglia (BG) neurons in the β range ([12-30] Hz). However, how dopamine depletion affects the oscillation dynamics of BG nuclei is still unclear. With a spiking neurons model, we here capture the features of BG nuclei interactions leading to oscillations in dopamine-depleted condition. We highlight that both the loop between subthalamic nucleus (STN) and Globus Pallidus pars externa (GPe) and the loop between striatal fast spiking and medium spiny neurons and GPe display resonances in the β range, and synchronize to a common β frequency through interaction. Crucially, the synchronization depends on dopamine depletion: the two loops are largely independent for high levels of dopamine, but progressively synchronize as dopamine is depleted due to the increased strength of the striatal loop. The model is validated against recent experimental reports on the role of cortical inputs, STN and GPe activity in the generation of β oscillations. Our results highlight the role of the interplay between the GPe-STN and the GPe-striatum loop in generating sustained β oscillations in PD subjects, and explain how this interplay depends on the level of dopamine. This paves the way to the design of therapies specifically addressing the onset of pathological β oscillations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ortone
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pontedera, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alberto Arturo Vergani
- The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pontedera, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mahboubeh Ahmadipour
- The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pontedera, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Mazzoni
- The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pontedera, Italy
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang S, Zhu G, Shi L, Zhang C, Wu B, Yang A, Meng F, Jiang Y, Zhang J. Closed-Loop Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Procedures to Achieve It and Future Perspectives. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2023; 13:453-471. [PMID: 37182899 PMCID: PMC10357172 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-225053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease with a heavy burden on patients, families, and society. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can improve the symptoms of PD patients for whom medication is insufficient. However, current open-loop uninterrupted conventional DBS (cDBS) has inherent limitations, such as adverse effects, rapid battery consumption, and a need for frequent parameter adjustment. To overcome these shortcomings, adaptive DBS (aDBS) was proposed to provide responsive optimized stimulation for PD. This topic has attracted scientific interest, and a growing body of preclinical and clinical evidence has shown its benefits. However, both achievements and challenges have emerged in this novel field. To date, only limited reviews comprehensively analyzed the full framework and procedures for aDBS implementation. Herein, we review current preclinical and clinical data on aDBS for PD to discuss the full procedures for its achievement and to provide future perspectives on this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Guanyu Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Shi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chunkui Zhang
- Center of Cognition and Brain Science, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Bing Wu
- Center of Cognition and Brain Science, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Anchao Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Fangang Meng
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurostimulation, Beijing, China
| | - Yin Jiang
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurostimulation, Beijing, China
| | - Jianguo Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurostimulation, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vissani M, Nanda P, Bush A, Neudorfer C, Dougherty D, Richardson RM. Toward Closed-Loop Intracranial Neurostimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2022; 93:e43-e46. [PMID: 36123196 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Vissani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pranav Nanda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alan Bush
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Darin Dougherty
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Thenaisie Y, Lee K, Moerman C, Scafa S, Gálvez A, Pirondini E, Burri M, Ravier J, Puiatti A, Accolla E, Wicki B, Zacharia A, Castro Jiménez M, Bally JF, Courtine G, Bloch J, Moraud EM. Principles of gait encoding in the subthalamic nucleus of people with Parkinson's disease. Sci Transl Med 2022; 14:eabo1800. [PMID: 36070366 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abo1800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Disruption of subthalamic nucleus dynamics in Parkinson's disease leads to impairments during walking. Here, we aimed to uncover the principles through which the subthalamic nucleus encodes functional and dysfunctional walking in people with Parkinson's disease. We conceived a neurorobotic platform embedding an isokinetic dynamometric chair that allowed us to deconstruct key components of walking under well-controlled conditions. We exploited this platform in 18 patients with Parkinson's disease to demonstrate that the subthalamic nucleus encodes the initiation, termination, and amplitude of leg muscle activation. We found that the same fundamental principles determine the encoding of leg muscle synergies during standing and walking. We translated this understanding into a machine learning framework that decoded muscle activation, walking states, locomotor vigor, and freezing of gait. These results expose key principles through which subthalamic nucleus dynamics encode walking, opening the possibility to operate neuroprosthetic systems with these signals to improve walking in people with Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohann Thenaisie
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Centre for Interventional Neurotherapies, CHUV, UNIL, and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland
| | - Kyuhwa Lee
- Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering, Geneva CH-1202, Switzerland
| | - Charlotte Moerman
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Centre for Interventional Neurotherapies, CHUV, UNIL, and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Scafa
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Centre for Interventional Neurotherapies, CHUV, UNIL, and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,Institute of Digital Technologies for Personalized Healthcare (MeDiTech) , University of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Lugano-Viganello CH-6962 Switzerland
| | - Andrea Gálvez
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Centre for Interventional Neurotherapies, CHUV, UNIL, and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,Faculty of Life Sciences, EPFL, NeuroX Institute, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
| | - Elvira Pirondini
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh 15213, PA, USA.,Rehabilitation and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh 15213, PA, USA
| | - Morgane Burri
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Centre for Interventional Neurotherapies, CHUV, UNIL, and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,Faculty of Life Sciences, EPFL, NeuroX Institute, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
| | - Jimmy Ravier
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Centre for Interventional Neurotherapies, CHUV, UNIL, and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,Faculty of Life Sciences, EPFL, NeuroX Institute, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Puiatti
- Institute of Digital Technologies for Personalized Healthcare (MeDiTech) , University of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Lugano-Viganello CH-6962 Switzerland
| | - Ettore Accolla
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital Fribourgeois, Fribourg University, Fribourg CH-1708, Switzerland
| | - Benoit Wicki
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital du Valais, Sion CH-1951, Switzerland
| | - André Zacharia
- Clinique Bernoise, Crans-Montana CH-3963, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,Department of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva CH-1201, Switzerland
| | - Mayte Castro Jiménez
- Department of Neurology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland
| | - Julien F Bally
- Department of Neurology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland
| | - Grégoire Courtine
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Centre for Interventional Neurotherapies, CHUV, UNIL, and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,Faculty of Life Sciences, EPFL, NeuroX Institute, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland
| | - Jocelyne Bloch
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Centre for Interventional Neurotherapies, CHUV, UNIL, and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,Faculty of Life Sciences, EPFL, NeuroX Institute, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland
| | - Eduardo Martin Moraud
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Centre for Interventional Neurotherapies, CHUV, UNIL, and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne CH-1011, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tinkhauser G. The present and future role of clinical neurophysiology for Deep Brain Stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 140:161-162. [PMID: 35717329 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Merk T, Peterson V, Lipski WJ, Blankertz B, Turner RS, Li N, Horn A, Richardson RM, Neumann WJ. Electrocorticography is superior to subthalamic local field potentials for movement decoding in Parkinson's disease. eLife 2022; 11:e75126. [PMID: 35621994 PMCID: PMC9142148 DOI: 10.7554/elife.75126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain signal decoding promises significant advances in the development of clinical brain computer interfaces (BCI). In Parkinson's disease (PD), first bidirectional BCI implants for adaptive deep brain stimulation (DBS) are now available. Brain signal decoding can extend the clinical utility of adaptive DBS but the impact of neural source, computational methods and PD pathophysiology on decoding performance are unknown. This represents an unmet need for the development of future neurotechnology. To address this, we developed an invasive brain-signal decoding approach based on intraoperative sensorimotor electrocorticography (ECoG) and subthalamic LFP to predict grip-force, a representative movement decoding application, in 11 PD patients undergoing DBS. We demonstrate that ECoG is superior to subthalamic LFP for accurate grip-force decoding. Gradient boosted decision trees (XGBOOST) outperformed other model architectures. ECoG based decoding performance negatively correlated with motor impairment, which could be attributed to subthalamic beta bursts in the motor preparation and movement period. This highlights the impact of PD pathophysiology on the neural capacity to encode movement vigor. Finally, we developed a connectomic analysis that could predict grip-force decoding performance of individual ECoG channels across patients by using their connectomic fingerprints. Our study provides a neurophysiological and computational framework for invasive brain signal decoding to aid the development of an individualized precision-medicine approach to intelligent adaptive DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timon Merk
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Victoria Peterson
- Brain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUnited States
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Witold J Lipski
- Department of Neurobiology, University of PittsburghPittsburghUnited States
| | - Benjamin Blankertz
- Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität BerlnBerlinGermany
| | - Robert S Turner
- Department of Neurobiology, University of PittsburghPittsburghUnited States
| | - Ningfei Li
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Robert Mark Richardson
- Brain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUnited States
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| |
Collapse
|