1
|
Ferris RL, Mehanna H, Schoenfeld JD, Tahara M, Yom SS, Haddad R, König A, Witzler P, Bajars M, Tourneau CL. Xevinapant plus radiotherapy in resected, high-risk, cisplatin-ineligible LA SCCHN: the phase III XRay Vision study design. Future Oncol 2024; 20:739-748. [PMID: 38197296 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
There is a significant unmet need and lack of treatment options for patients with resected, high-risk, cisplatin-ineligible locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN). Xevinapant, a first-in-class, potent, oral, small-molecule IAP inhibitor, is thought to restore cancer cell sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in clinical and preclinical studies. We describe the design of XRay Vision (NCT05386550), an international, randomized, double-blind, phase III study. Approximately 700 patients with resected, high-risk, cisplatin-ineligible LA SCCHN will be randomized 1:1 to receive 6 cycles of xevinapant or placebo, in combination with radiotherapy for the first 3 cycles. The primary end point is disease-free survival, and secondary end points include overall survival, health-related quality of life, and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Ferris
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | | | | | - Makoto Tahara
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Sue S Yom
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Christophe Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rühle A, Weymann M, Behrens M, Marschner S, Haderlein M, Fabian A, Senger C, Dickstein DR, Kraft J, von der Grün J, Chen E, Aquino-Michaels T, Domschikowski J, Bickel A, Altay-Langguth A, Kalinauskaite G, Lewitzki V, Bonomi M, Blakaj DM, Jhawar SR, Baliga S, Barve R, Ferentinos K, Zamboglou C, Schnellhardt S, Haehl E, Spohn SKB, Kuhnt T, Zöller D, Guckenberger M, Budach V, Belka C, Bakst R, Mayer A, Schmidberger H, Grosu AL, Balermpas P, Stromberger C, Nicolay NH. A Multicenter Evaluation of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1282-1293. [PMID: 37914144 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and treatment of these patients is challenging. Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy concomitantly with radiation therapy is considered the standard regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC, there is substantial real-world heterogeneity regarding concomitant chemotherapy in older patients with HNSCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS The SENIOR study is an international multicenter cohort study including older patients (≥65 years) with HNSCC treated with definitive radiation therapy at 13 academic centers in the United States and Europe. Patients with concomitant chemoradiation were analyzed regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) via Kaplan-Meier analyses. Fine-Gray competing risk regressions were performed regarding the incidence of locoregional failures and distant metastases. RESULTS Six hundred ninety-seven patients with a median age of 71 years were included in this analysis. Single-agent cisplatin was the most common chemotherapy regimen (n = 310; 44%), followed by cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (n = 137; 20%), carboplatin (n = 73; 10%), and mitomycin C plus 5-fluorouracil (n = 64; 9%). Carboplatin-based regimens were associated with diminished PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 [1.03-1.89]; P < .05) and a higher incidence of locoregional failures (subdistribution HR, 1.54 [1.00-2.38]; P = .05) compared with single-agent cisplatin, whereas OS (HR, 1.15 [0.80-1.65]; P = .46) was comparable. There were no oncological differences between single-agent and multiagent cisplatin regimens (all P > .05). The median cumulative dose of cisplatin was 180 mg/m2 (IQR, 120-200 mg/m2). Cumulative cisplatin doses ≥200 mg/m2 were associated with increased OS (HR, 0.71 [0.53-0.95]; P = .02), increased PFS (HR, 0.66 [0.51-0.87]; P = .003), and lower incidence of locoregional failures (subdistribution HR, 0.50 [0.31-0.80]; P = .004). Higher cumulative cisplatin doses remained an independent prognostic variable in the multivariate regression analysis for OS (HR, 0.996 [0.993-0.999]; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS Single-agent cisplatin can be considered in the standard chemotherapy regimen for older patients with HNSCC who can tolerate cisplatin. Cumulative cisplatin doses are prognostically relevant in older patients with HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Maria Weymann
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Max Behrens
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marlen Haderlein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Johannes Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eric Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Todd Aquino-Michaels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Justus Domschikowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Amanda Bickel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alev Altay-Langguth
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Victor Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sachin R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rahul Barve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Sören Schnellhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - Erik Haehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kuhnt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniela Zöller
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Richard Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vugmeyster Y, Ravula A, Rouits E, Diderichsen PM, Kleijn HJ, Koenig A, Wang X, Schroeder A, Goteti K, Venkatakrishnan K. Model-Informed Selection of the Recommended Phase III Dose of the Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Inhibitor, Xevinapant, in Combination with Cisplatin and Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 115:52-61. [PMID: 37777832 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
Xevinapant, an oral inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in combination with chemoradiotherapy in a randomized phase II study (NCT02022098) in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck at 200 mg/day on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle. To confirm 200 mg/day as the recommended phase III dose (RP3D), we integrated preclinical, clinical, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD), and exposure-response modeling results. Population PK/PD modeling of IAP inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in 21 patients suggested the pharmacologically active dose range was 100-200 mg/day, with a trend for more robust inhibition at the end of the dosing interval at 200 mg/day based on an indirect response model. Additionally, the unbound average plasma concentration at 200 mg/day was similar to that associated with efficacy in preclinical xenograft models. Logistic regression exposure-response analyses of data from 62 patients in the phase II study showed exposure-related increases in probabilities of locoregional control at 18 months (primary end point), overall response, complete response, and the radiosensitization mechanism-related composite safety end point "mucositis and/or dysphagia" (P < 0.05). Exposure-response relationships were not discernible for 12 of 13 evaluated safety end points, incidence of dose reductions, and time to first dose reduction. Quantitative integration of all available data, including model-derived target inhibition profiles, positive exposure-efficacy relationships, and lack of discernible exposure-safety relationships for most safety end points, supports selection of xevinapant 200 mg/day on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle as the RP3D, allowing for successive dose reductions to 150 and 100 mg/day to manage adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Andre Koenig
- The healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park HC, Kim H, Kim JY, Lee HY, Lee J, Cha W, Ahn SH, Jeong WJ. PSMD1 as a prognostic marker and potential target in oropharyngeal cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1242. [PMID: 38104103 PMCID: PMC10725586 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11689-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the diverse genetic mutations in head and neck cancer, the chemotherapy outcome for this cancer has not improved for decades. It is urgent to select prognostic factors and therapeutic targets for oropharyngeal cancer to establish precision medicine. Recent studies have identified PSMD1 as a potential prognostic marker in several cancers. We aimed to assess the prognostic significance of PSMD1 expression in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients using immunohistochemistry. METHODS We studied 64 individuals with OPSCC tissue from surgery at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between April 2008 and August 2017. Immunostaining analysis was conducted on the tissue microarray (TMA) sections (4 μm) for p16 and PSMD1. H-score, which scale from 0 to 300, was calculated from each nucleus, cytoplasm, and cellular expression. Clinicopathological data were compared with Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, t-test, and logistic regression. Survival data until 2021 were achieved from national statistical office of Korea. Kaplan-Meier method and cox-regression model were used for disease-specific survival (DSS) analysis. RESULTS H-score of 90 in nucleus was appropriate cutoff value for 'High PSMD1 expression' in OPSCC. Tonsil was more frequent location in low PSMD1 group (42/52, 80.8%) than in high PSMD1 group (4/12, 33.3%; P = .002). Early-stage tumor was more frequent in in low PSMD1 group (45/52, 86.5%) than in high PSMD1 group (6/12, 50%; P = .005). HPV was more positive in low PSMD1 group (43/52, 82.7%) than in high PSMD1 group (5/12, 41.7%; P = .016). Patients with PSMD1 high expression showed poorer DSS than in patients with PSMD1 low expression (P = .006 in log rank test). In multivariate analysis, PSMD1 expression, pathologic T staging, and specimen age were found to be associated with DSS (P = .011, P = .025, P = .029, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In our study, we established PSMD1 as a negative prognostic factor in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, indicating its potential as a target for targeted therapy and paving the way for future in vitro studies on drug repositioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hae Chan Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hyojin Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Ji-Yeong Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hye-Yeon Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jinyi Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - WonJae Cha
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Soon-Hyun Ahn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo-Jin Jeong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
- Sensory Organ Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zahnreich S, El Guerzyfy S, Kaufmann J, Schmidberger H. The cGAS/STING/IFN-1 Response in Squamous Head and Neck Cancer Cells after Genotoxic Challenges and Abrogation of the ATR-Chk1 and Fanconi Anemia Axis. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:14900. [PMID: 37834346 PMCID: PMC10573837 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241914900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are often refractory to platinum-based radiochemotherapy and new immuno-oncological strategies. To stimulate immunogenic antitumor responses in HNSCC patients, we investigated the cGAS/STING/IFN-1 signaling pathway after genotoxic treatments and concomitant abrogation of the DNA damage response (DDR). For this purpose, FaDu and UM-SCC1 cells were exposed to X-rays or cisplatin and treated with an ATR or Chk1 inhibitor, or by Fanconi anemia gene A knockout (FANCA ko). We assessed clonogenic survival, cell cycle regulation, micronuclei, free cytosolic double-stranded DNA, and the protein expression and activity of the cGAS/STING/IFN-1 pathway and related players. Cell survival, regulation of G2/M arrest, and formation of rupture-prone cGAS-positive micronuclei after genotoxic treatments were most affected by ATR inhibition and FANCA ko. In UM-SCC-1 cells only, 8 Gy X-rays promoted IFN-1 expression unaltered by abrogation of the DDR or concomitant increased TREX1 expression. At a higher dose of 20 Gy, this effect was observed only for concurrent Chk1- or ATR-inhibition. FANCA ko or cisplatin treatment was ineffective in this regard. Our observations open new perspectives for the enhancement of cGAS/STING/IFN-1-mediated antitumor immune response in HNSCC by hypofractionated or stereotactic radiotherapy concepts in multimodal settings with immuno-oncological strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zahnreich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg, University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany (H.S.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haddad RI, Harrington K, Tahara M, Szturz P, Le Tourneau C, Salmio S, Bajars M, Lee NY. Managing cisplatin-ineligible patients with resected, high-risk, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Is there a standard of care? Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 119:102585. [PMID: 37392723 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
For the past 2 decades, cisplatin-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has remained the standard of care for patients with resected, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN) who are at high risk of disease recurrence. However, many patients are deemed ineligible for cisplatin-based CRT because of poor performance status, advanced biological age, poor renal function, or hearing loss. Because outcomes with radiotherapy (RT) alone remain poor, patients at high risk of disease recurrence deemed ineligible to receive cisplatin are a population with a significant unmet medical need, and alternative systemic therapy options in combination with RT are urgently needed. Clinical guidelines and consensus documents have provided definitions for cisplatin ineligibility; however, areas of debate include thresholds for age and renal impairment and criteria for hearing loss. Furthermore, the proportion of patients with resected LA SCCHN who are cisplatin ineligible remains unclear. Because of a scarcity of clinical studies, treatment selection for patients with resected, high-risk LA SCCHN who are deemed ineligible to receive cisplatin is often based on clinical judgment, with few treatment options specified in international guidelines. In this review, we discuss considerations related to cisplatin ineligibility in patients with LA SCCHN, summarize the limited clinical evidence for adjuvant treatment of patients with resected high-risk disease, and highlight ongoing clinical trials that have the potential to provide new treatment options in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert I Haddad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Head & Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Makoto Tahara
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba Prefecture, Japan.
| | - Petr Szturz
- Department of Oncology, University of Lausanne (UNIL) and Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Christophe Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France.
| | | | | | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rubió-Casadevall J, Cirauqui Cirauqui B, Martinez Trufero J, Plana Serrahima M, García Castaño A, Carral Maseda A, Iglesias Docampo L, Pérez Segura P, Ceballos Lenza I, Gutiérrez Calderón V, Fuster Salvà J, Pena Álvarez C, Hernandez I, del Barco Morillo E, Chaves Conde M, Martínez Galán J, Durán Sánchez M, Quiroga V, Ortega E, Mesia R. TTCC-2019-02: real-world evidence of first-line cetuximab plus paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1226939. [PMID: 37601652 PMCID: PMC10432957 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1226939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy of the ERBITAX scheme (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose, and then 250 mg/m2 weekly) as first-line treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who are medically unfit for cisplatin-based (PT) chemotherapy. Materials and methods This retrospective, non-interventional study involved 16 centers in Spain. Inclusion criteria were to have started receiving ERBITAX regimen from January 2012 to December 2018; histologically confirmed SCCHN including oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx; age ≥18 years; and platinum (PT) chemotherapy ineligibility due to performance status, comorbidities, high accumulated dose of PT, or PT refractoriness. Results A total of 531 patients from 16 hospitals in Spain were enrolled. The median age was 66 years, 82.7% were male, and 83.5% were current/former smokers. Patients were ineligible to receive PT due to ECOG 2 (50.3%), comorbidities (32%), PT cumulative dose ≥ 225 mg/m2 (10.5%), or PT refractoriness (7.2%). Response rate was 37.7%. Median duration of response was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.4-6.6). With a median follow-up of 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.7-10.2), median PFS and OS were 4.5 months (95% CI: 3.9-5.0) and 8.9 months (95% CI: 7.8-10.3), respectively. Patients treated with immunotherapy after ERBITAX had better OS with a median of 29.8 months compared to 13.8 months for those who received other treatments. The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were acne-like rash in 36 patients (6.8%) and oral mucositis in 8 patients (1.5%). Five (0.9%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia. Conclusion This study confirms the real-world efficacy and tolerability of ERBITAX as first-line treatment in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN when PT is not feasible. Immunotherapy after treatment with ERBITAX showed remarkable promising survival, despite potential selection bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Rubió-Casadevall
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - Beatriz Cirauqui Cirauqui
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia Badalona, B-ARGO Group, IGTP, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Maria Plana Serrahima
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO-Hospitalet), IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Llobregat, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Pedro Pérez Segura
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isaac Ceballos Lenza
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
| | | | - José Fuster Salvà
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Irene Hernandez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Edel del Barco Morillo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Manuel Chaves Conde
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Joaquina Martínez Galán
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Vanesa Quiroga
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia Badalona, B-ARGO Group, IGTP, Badalona, Spain
| | - Eugenia Ortega
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Ricard Mesia
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia Badalona, B-ARGO Group, IGTP, Badalona, Spain
- Spanish Group of Head and Neck Cancer Treatment (TTCC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Viani GA, Gouveia AG, Matsuura FK, Neves LVF, Marta GN, Chua MLK, Moraes YF. Assessing the efficacy of palliative radiation treatment schemes for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a meta-analysis. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:137-146. [PMID: 37456700 PMCID: PMC10348333 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The objective to assess the outcomes from different palliative radiotherapy (RT) schedules in incurable head and neck cancer (HNC), to evaluate if there is a relationship between RT dose, technique, and fractionation with tumor response in contrast to the occurrence of adverse effects. Materials and methods Eligible studies were identified on Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and annual meetings proceedings through June 2020. Following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, a cumulative meta-analysis of studies for overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), pain/dysphagia relief, and toxicity was performed. A meta-regression analysis was done to assess if there is a connection between RT dose, schedule, and technique with ORR. Results Twenty-eight studies with 1,986 patients treated with palliative RT due to incurable HNC were included. The median OS was 6.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.6-7.4], and PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 2.7-4.3). The ORR, pain and dysphagia relief rates were 72% (95% CI: 0.6-0.8), 83% (95% CI: 52-100%), and 75% (95% CI: 52-100%), respectively. Conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) or conformational radiotherapy (3D-RT) use were significantly associated with a higher acute toxicity rate (grade ≥ 3) than intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). On meta-regression analyses, the total biological effective doses (BED) of RT (p = 0.001), BED > 60 Gy10 (p = 0.001), short course (p = 0.01) and SBRT (p = 0.02) were associated with a superior ORR. Conclusions Palliative RT achieves tumor response and symptom relief in incurable HNC patients. Short course RT of BED > 60 Gy using IMRT could improve its therapeutic ratio. SBRT should be considered when available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo A Viani
- Department of Medical Imagings, Hematology And Oncology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), São Paulo, Brazil
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Andre G Gouveia
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Radiation Oncology Department, Americas Centro de Oncologia Integrado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Fernando K Matsuura
- Department of Medical Imagings, Hematology And Oncology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Leonardo V F Neves
- Department of Medical Imagings, Hematology And Oncology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gustavo N Marta
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Sirio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Melvin L K Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Y Fabio Moraes
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tao Y, Sun XS, Pointreau Y, Le Tourneau C, Sire C, Kaminsky MC, Coutte A, Alfonsi M, Calderon B, Boisselier P, Martin L, Miroir J, Ramee JF, Delord JP, Clatot F, Rolland F, Villa J, Magne N, Elicin O, Gherga E, Nguyen F, Lafond C, Bera G, Calugaru V, Geoffrois L, Chauffert B, Damstrup L, Crompton P, Ennaji A, Gollmer K, Nauwelaerts H, Bourhis J. Extended follow-up of a phase 2 trial of xevinapant plus chemoradiotherapy in high-risk locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 183:24-37. [PMID: 36796234 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report long-term efficacy and overall survival (OS) results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study (NCT02022098) investigating xevinapant plus standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs. placebo plus CRT in 96 patients with unresected locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN). METHODS Patients were randomised 1:1 to xevinapant 200 mg/day (days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle for 3 cycles), or matched placebo, plus CRT (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 3 cycles plus conventional fractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy [70 Gy/35 F, 2 Gy/F, 5 days/week for 7 weeks]). Locoregional control, progression-free survival, and duration of response after 3 years, long-term safety, and 5-year OS were assessed. RESULTS The risk of locoregional failure was reduced by 54% for xevinapant plus CRT vs. placebo plus CRT but did not reach statistical significance (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% CI, 0.19-1.13; P = .0893). The risk of death or disease progression was reduced by 67% for xevinapant plus CRT (adjusted HR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.67; P = .0019). The risk of death was approximately halved in the xevinapant arm compared with placebo (adjusted HR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.84; P = .0101). OS was prolonged with xevinapant plus CRT vs. placebo plus CRT; median OS not reached (95% CI, 40.3-not evaluable) vs. 36.1 months (95% CI, 21.8-46.7). Incidence of late-onset grade ≥3 toxicities was similar across arms. CONCLUSIONS In this randomised phase 2 study of 96 patients, xevinapant plus CRT demonstrated superior efficacy benefits, including markedly improved 5-year survival in patients with unresected LA SCCHN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yungan Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Xu-Shan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard and CHRU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Yoann Pointreau
- Oncologie-Radiothérapie, Institut Inter-Régional de Cancérologie, Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - Christophe Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Christian Sire
- South Brittany Hospital Center, Hôpital du Scorff Radiothérapie, Lorient, France
| | - Marie-Christine Kaminsky
- Institut Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, Oncologie Médicale, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - Marc Alfonsi
- Institut Sainte Catherine, Radiothérapie, Avignon, France
| | | | - Pierre Boisselier
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Val d'Aurelle, Oncologie-Radiothérapie, Montpellier, France
| | - Laurent Martin
- Centre de Radiothérapie Guillaume le Conquérant, Le Havre, France
| | - Jessica Miroir
- Jean Perrin Center, Radiothérapie, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Jean-Pierre Delord
- Medical Oncology Dept, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Florian Clatot
- Henri Becquerel Centre, Service Oncologie Médicale rue d'Amiens, Rouen, France
| | - Frederic Rolland
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Julie Villa
- CHU Grenoble, Radiothérapie, Pôle de Cancérologie, Grenoble, France
| | - Nicolas Magne
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, Radiothérapie, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elisabeta Gherga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard and CHRU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - France Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cédrik Lafond
- Oncologie-Radiothérapie, Institut Inter-Régional de Cancérologie, Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
| | - Guillaume Bera
- South Brittany Hospital Center, Hôpital du Scorff Radiothérapie, Lorient, France
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Lionnel Geoffrois
- Institut Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, Oncologie Médicale, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Bruno Chauffert
- CHU Amiens Picardie, Oncologie-Radiothérapie, Amiens, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean Bourhis
- CHUV, Radiation Oncology Department, Bâtiment Hospitalier, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferris RL, Harrington K, Schoenfeld JD, Tahara M, Esdar C, Salmio S, Schroeder A, Bourhis J. Inhibiting the inhibitors: Development of the IAP inhibitor xevinapant for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 113:102492. [PMID: 36640618 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Standard of care for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN) is surgery followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or definitive CRT. However, approximately 50 % of patients with LA SCCHN develop disease recurrence or metastasis within 2 years of completing treatment, and the outcome for these patients is poor. Despite this, the current treatment landscape for LA SCCHN has remained relatively unchanged for more than 2 decades, and novel treatment options are urgently required. One of the key causes of disease recurrence is treatment resistance, which commonly occurs due to cancer cells' ability to evade apoptosis. Evasion of apoptosis has been in part attributed to the overexpression of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs). IAPs, including X-linked IAP (XIAP) and cellular IAP 1 and 2 (cIAP1/2), are a class of proteins that regulate apoptosis induced by intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways. IAPs have been shown to be overexpressed in SCCHN, are associated with poor clinical outcomes, and are, therefore, a rational therapeutic target. To date, several IAP inhibitors have been investigated; however, only xevinapant, a potent, oral, small-molecule IAP inhibitor, has shown clinical proof of concept when combined with CRT. Specifically, xevinapant demonstrated superior efficacy in combination with CRT vs placebo + CRT in a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial in patients with unresected LA SCCHN. Here, we describe the current treatment landscape in LA SCCHN and provide the rationale for targeting IAPs and the clinical data reported for xevinapant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Ferris
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | | | | | - Makoto Tahara
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba Prefecture, Japan.
| | | | | | | | - Jean Bourhis
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abdulla M, Belal AA, Sakr A, El Arab LE, Mokhtar M, Allahloubi N, Ghali R, Hashem T, Arafat W. Eligibility criteria to cisplatin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Egyptian expert opinion. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e1037. [PMID: 36698712 PMCID: PMC9847398 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The use of cisplatin in clinical practice in the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is limited by its toxicity and acquired resistance, which makes the decision-making process of its prescription multifactorial. Methods An Egyptian expert panel (comprising nine Egyptian oncologists) meeting was held after a comprehensive literature review on the use of cisplatin in HNSCC. The panel aimed to develop a consensus on evidence-based recommendations for receiving cisplatin in the chemoradiotherapy management of HNSCC in Egyptian clinical practice. Results The panel indicated that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) > 2, creatinine clearance (CCR) < 50 ml/min, neuropathy grade ≥ 2, pre-existing hearing loss or tinnitus ≥2, hematological problems (platelets < 100,000/mm3, neutrophils < 1500/mm, and hemoglobin < 9 g/dl), and heart failure of New York Heart Association Classes III or IV (even if cardiovascular therapy is optimized); are all absolute contraindications to receiving cisplatin. On the other hand, relative contraindications to cisplatin according to the panel were an ECOG PS of 2, age more than 70 years, CCR between 50 and 60 ml/min, grade 1 neuropathy, grade 1 hearing loss, involuntary weight loss of ≥20% of body weight, Child-Pugh Scores B and C, previous induction chemotherapy, and heart failure of New York Heart Association Classes I or II with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%. The panel agreed that the socioeconomic status of patients should be considered when prescribing cisplatin to HNSCC patients. Conclusion Our discussion resulted in a set of evidence-based recommendations for cisplatin eligibility criteria in patients of HNSCC in Egypt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Abdulla
- Department of Oncology, Kasr Al‐Aini School of MedicineCairo UniversityCairoEgypt
| | - Abdel Aziz Belal
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of MedicineAlexandria UniversityAlexandriaEgypt
| | - Amr Sakr
- Department of Oncology, Kasr Al‐Aini School of MedicineCairo UniversityCairoEgypt
| | - Lobna E. El Arab
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of MedicineAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt
| | - Mohsen Mokhtar
- Department of Oncology, Kasr Al‐Aini School of MedicineCairo UniversityCairoEgypt
| | - Nasr Allahloubi
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer InstituteCairo UniversityCairoEgypt
| | - Ramy Ghali
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of MedicineAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt
| | - Tarek Hashem
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of MedicineMenoufia UniversityMenoufiaEgypt
| | - Waleed Arafat
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of MedicineAlexandria UniversityAlexandriaEgypt
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aggarwal P, Nader M, Gidley PW, Pratihar R, Jivani S, Garden AS, Mott FE, Goepfert RP, Ogboe CW, Charles C, Fuller CD, Lai SY, Gunn GB, Sturgis EM, Hanna EY, Hutcheson KA, Shete S. Association of hearing loss and tinnitus symptoms with health-related quality of life among long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors. Cancer Med 2022; 12:569-583. [PMID: 35695117 PMCID: PMC9844619 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the association of hearing loss and tinnitus with overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among long-term oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors. METHODS This study included OPC survivors treated between 2000 and 2013 and surveyed from September 2015 to July 2016. Hearing loss and tinnitus were measured by asking survivors to rate their "difficulty with hearing loss and/or ringing in the ears" from 0 (not present) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Hearing loss and tinnitus scores were categorized as follows: 0 for none, 1-4 for mild, and 5-10 for moderate to severe. The primary outcome was the mean score of MD nderson Symptom Inventory Head & Neck module interference component as a HRQoL surrogate dichotomized as follows: 0 to 4 for none to mild and 5 to 10 for moderate to severe interference. RESULTS Among 880 OPC survivors, 35.6% (314), reported none, 39.3% (347) reported mild, and 25.1% (221) reported moderate to severe hearing loss and tinnitus. On multivariable analysis, mild (OR, 5.83; 95% CI; 1.48-22.88; p = 0.012) and moderate (OR, 30.01; 95% CI; 7.96-113.10; p < 0.001) hearing loss and tinnitus were associated with higher odds of reporting moderate to severe symptom interference scores in comparison to no hearing loss and tinnitus. This association of hearing dysfunction was consistent with all domains of HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide preliminary evidence to support the need for continued audiological evaluations and surveillance to detect hearing dysfunction, to allow for early management and to alleviate the long-term impact on QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja Aggarwal
- Department of EpidemiologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Marc‐Elie Nader
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Paul W. Gidley
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Raj Pratihar
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Shirin Jivani
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Adam S. Garden
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Frank E. Mott
- Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Ryan P. Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | | | - Camille Charles
- Department of EpidemiologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Stephen Y. Lai
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA,Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - G. Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Erich M. Sturgis
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Ehab Y. Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Katherine A. Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA,Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Sanjay Shete
- Department of EpidemiologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA,Department of BiostatisticsThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUnited States,Division of Cancer Prevention and Population SciencesThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miccichè F, Chiloiro G, Longo S, Autorino R, Massaccesi M, Lenkowicz J, Bonomo P, Desideri I, Belgioia L, Bacigalupo A, D’Angelo E, Bertolini F, Merlotti A, Denaro N, Franco P, Bussu F, Paludetti G, Ricardi U, Valentini V. Development of a prognostic model of overall survival in oropharyngeal cancer from real-world data: PRO.M.E.THE.O. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA 2022; 42:205-214. [PMID: 35396587 PMCID: PMC9330744 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-n1672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective The PRO.M.E.THE.O. study (PredictiOn Models in Ent cancer for anti-EGFR based THErapy Optimization) aimed to develop a predictive model (PM) of overall survival (OS) for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer (LAOC) treated with radiotherapy (RT) and cetuximab (Cet) from an Italian dataset. Methods We enrolled patients with LAOC from 6 centres treated with RT-Cet. Clinical and treatment variables were collected. Patients were randomly divided into training (TS) (80%) and validation (VS) (20%) sets. A binary logistic regression model was used on the TS with stepwise feature selection and then on VS. Timepoints of 2, 3 and 5 years were considered. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic of 2, 3 and 5 year and confusion matrix statistics at 5-threshold were used as performance criteria. Results Overall, 218 patients were enrolled and 174 (79.8%) were analysed. Age at diagnosis, gender, ECOG performance, clinical stage, dose to high-risk volume, overall treatment time and day of RT interruption were considered in the final PMs. The PMs were developed and represented by nomograms with AUC of 0.75, 0.73 and 0.73 for TS and 0.713, 0.713, 0.775 for VS at 2, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Conclusions PRO.M.E.THE.O. allows the creation of a PM for OS in patients with LAOC treated with RT-Cet.
Collapse
|
14
|
Durvalumab with cetuximab and radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase 1/2 trial. Radiother Oncol 2022; 169:64-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
15
|
Falco A, de Oliveira TB, Cacicedo J, Ospina AV, Ticona MÁ, Galindo H, Pereira MD, Aguilar-Ponce JL, Rueda-Domínguez A, Soria T, Taberna M, Iglesias L, Sowley T, Mesía R. Ibero-American Expert Consensus on Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Treatment in Patients Unable to Receive Cisplatin: Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:6689-6703. [PMID: 34471383 PMCID: PMC8405157 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s322411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cisplatin is the standard of treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) that has demonstrated efficacy, either in locally advanced disease when combined with radiotherapy at high doses, or in metastatic/recurrent disease when combined with other agents. However, the usual toxicities related to cisplatin, such as neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and hematologic toxicities, especially when high doses have been administered, have important implications in the patients' quality of life. The decision to administer cisplatin depends on several patient factors, such as age, performance status, weight loss, comorbidities, previous toxicities, chronic viral infection, or even the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In order to establish recommendations for the management of patients with SCCHN, a group of experts in medical and radiation oncology from Spain and Latin-American discussed how to identify patients who are not candidates for cisplatin to offer them the most suitable therapeutic alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agustín Falco
- Instituto Alexander Fleming, Asociación Argentina de Oncología Clínica (AAOC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Jon Cacicedo
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Aylen Vanessa Ospina
- ICCAL, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Asociación Colombiana de Hematología y Oncología (ACHO), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Miguel Ángel Ticona
- Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de Lima, Sociedad Peruana de Oncología Médica (SPOM), Lima, Perú
| | - Héctor Galindo
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Sociedad Chilena de Oncología Médica (SCOM), Santiago, Chile
| | - Marcos David Pereira
- Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Asociación Argentina de Oncología Clínica (AAOC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - José Luis Aguilar-Ponce
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Sociedad Mexicana de Oncología (SMeO), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Antonio Rueda-Domínguez
- UGC Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Tannia Soria
- Hospital SOLCA de Quito, Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Oncología (SEO), Quito, Ecuador
| | - Miren Taberna
- Institut Català d’Oncologia, ICO L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Taysser Sowley
- Instituto Oncológico Nacional (ION) de Panamá, Sociedad Panameña de Oncología (SPO), Panama City, Panama
| | - Ricard Mesía
- Institut Català d’Oncologia, ICO Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - On behalf of TTCC group (Spanish Group for the Treatment of the Head and Neck Cancer)
- Instituto Alexander Fleming, Asociación Argentina de Oncología Clínica (AAOC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica (SBOC), São Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
- ICCAL, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Asociación Colombiana de Hematología y Oncología (ACHO), Bogotá, Colombia
- Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de Lima, Sociedad Peruana de Oncología Médica (SPOM), Lima, Perú
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Sociedad Chilena de Oncología Médica (SCOM), Santiago, Chile
- Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Asociación Argentina de Oncología Clínica (AAOC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Sociedad Mexicana de Oncología (SMeO), Mexico City, Mexico
- UGC Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
- Hospital SOLCA de Quito, Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Oncología (SEO), Quito, Ecuador
- Institut Català d’Oncologia, ICO L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Oncológico Nacional (ION) de Panamá, Sociedad Panameña de Oncología (SPO), Panama City, Panama
- Institut Català d’Oncologia, ICO Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Viani GA, Faustino AC, Danelichen AFB, Matsuura FK, Neves LVF, Fernandes MH, Fernandes JP. Radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in elderly patients: results and prognostic factors a single cohort. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:12-19. [PMID: 33948297 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background The objective of this study was to assess the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of elderly patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Materials and methods A retrospective cohort from a single institution, from 2000 to 2015, including patients older than 65 years old with LAHNC (stage III-IVa) treated by RT combined or not with chemotherapy (CRT). Univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed to identify prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CS), and locoregional control (LRC). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results 220 patients with LAHNC and > 65 years of age were identified. The median follow-up was 3.8 years, the 3/5 years estimated OS, CS, and LRC rate was 40%/30%, 49%/34%, 76%/45%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, clinical stage (III vs. IVa/b, p = 0.01), tumor stage (T1/2 vs. T3/4, p = 0.035), Karnofsky performance status (KPS, 60-70, p = 0.03) and tumor site (other than vs. hypopharynx, p = 0.0001) were associated with lower OS. Patients with clinical stage (III vs. IVa/b, p = 0.01), tumor stage (T1/2 vs. T3/4, p = 0.015), N stage (N0/1 vs. N2/3, p = 0.04), (KPS 60-70, p = 0.04) and tumor site (other than vs. hypopharynx, p = 0.0001) had worst CS. For the LRC, clinical stage (III vs. IVa/b, p = 0.02), tumor stage (T1/2 vs. T3/4, p = 0.02), treatment type (CRT vs. RT, p = 0.02), RT technique (IMRT vs. 2DRT/3DRT, p = 0.0001), and tumor site (other than vs. hypopharynx, p = 0.02) were significant. In the MVA, KPS maintained significant for OS and CS. For LRC, clinical stage (Iva/b, p = 0.007), tumor stage (T3/4, p = 0.047) and radiotherapy technique other than IMRT (p = 0.0001) were significant. Conclusion The OS, CS, and LRC were associated with several prognostic factors. The clinical performance was the main marker of OS and CS. Chemoradiation should be offered to selected elderly patients using IMRT to improve LRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Arruda Viani
- Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Ciufi Faustino
- Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Fernando Kojo Matsuura
- Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Leonardo Vicente Fay Neves
- Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco Henrique Fernandes
- Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Garcia-Mayea Y, Mir C, Carballo L, Castellvi J, Temprana-Salvador J, Lorente J, Benavente S, García-Pedrero JM, Allonca E, Rodrigo JP, LLeonart ME. TSPAN1: A Novel Protein Involved in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Chemoresistance. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113269. [PMID: 33167355 PMCID: PMC7694336 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Therapy resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients is the main obstacle to achieve more effective treatments that improve survival and quality of life of these patients. Therefore, it is of vital importance to unravel the molecular and cellular mechanisms by which tumor cells acquire resistance to chemotherapy. We conducted a comparative proteomic study involving cisplatin-resistant cells and cancer stem cells with the aim of identifying proteins potentially implicated in the acquisition of cisplatin resistance. Through this study, we identified for the first time tetraspanin-1 (TSPAN1) as an important protein involved in the development, progression and chemoresistance of HNSCC tumors. Abstract Sensitization of resistant cells and cancer stem cells (CSCs) represents a major challenge in cancer therapy. A proteomic study revealed tetraspanin-1 (TSPAN1) as a protein involved in acquisition of cisplatin (CDDP) resistance (Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD020159). TSPAN1 was found to increase in CDDP-resistant cells, CSCs and biopsies from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. TSPAN1 depletion in parental and CDDP-resistant HNSCC cells reduced cell proliferation, induced apoptosis, decreased autophagy, sensitized to chemotherapeutic agents and inhibited several signaling cascades, with phospho-SRC inhibition being a major common target. Moreover, TSPAN1 depletion in vivo decreased the size and proliferation of parental and CDDP-resistant tumors and reduced metastatic spreading. Notably, CDDP-resistant tumors showed epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) features that disappeared upon TSPAN1 inhibition, suggesting a link of TSPAN1 with EMT and metastasis. Immunohistochemical analysis of HNSCC specimens further revealed that TSPAN1 expression was correlated with phospho-SRC (pSRC), and inversely with E-cadherin, thus reinforcing TSPAN1 association with EMT. Overall, TSPAN1 emerges as a novel oncogenic protein and a promising target for HNSCC therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoelsis Garcia-Mayea
- Biomedical Research in Cancer Stem Cells, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.G.-M.); (C.M.); (L.C.); (J.C.); (J.T.-S.)
- Genetic, Microbiology and Statistics Department, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Avenida Diagonal 643, 08014 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Mir
- Biomedical Research in Cancer Stem Cells, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.G.-M.); (C.M.); (L.C.); (J.C.); (J.T.-S.)
| | - Laia Carballo
- Biomedical Research in Cancer Stem Cells, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.G.-M.); (C.M.); (L.C.); (J.C.); (J.T.-S.)
| | - Josep Castellvi
- Biomedical Research in Cancer Stem Cells, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.G.-M.); (C.M.); (L.C.); (J.C.); (J.T.-S.)
| | - Jordi Temprana-Salvador
- Biomedical Research in Cancer Stem Cells, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.G.-M.); (C.M.); (L.C.); (J.C.); (J.T.-S.)
| | - Juan Lorente
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital Vall d’Hebron (HUVH), Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Sergi Benavente
- Radiotherapy Unit, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Juana M. García-Pedrero
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Central University Hospital of Asturias, University of Oviedo, ISPA, IUOPA, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (J.M.G.-P.); (E.A.); (J.P.R.)
- Spanish Biomedical Research Network Centre in Oncology (CIBERONC), Av. Roma SN, 33011 Oviedo, Spain
| | - Eva Allonca
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Central University Hospital of Asturias, University of Oviedo, ISPA, IUOPA, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (J.M.G.-P.); (E.A.); (J.P.R.)
| | - Juan P. Rodrigo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Central University Hospital of Asturias, University of Oviedo, ISPA, IUOPA, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (J.M.G.-P.); (E.A.); (J.P.R.)
- Spanish Biomedical Research Network Centre in Oncology (CIBERONC), Av. Roma SN, 33011 Oviedo, Spain
| | - Matilde E. LLeonart
- Biomedical Research in Cancer Stem Cells, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.G.-M.); (C.M.); (L.C.); (J.C.); (J.T.-S.)
- Spanish Biomedical Research Network Centre in Oncology (CIBERONC), Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Passeig Vall d´Hebron 119–129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-934894169; Fax: +34-932746708
| |
Collapse
|