Endoscopic Screening for Second Primary Tumors of the Esophagus Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Biomarkers for predicting second primary malignancy risk in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An integrated molecular perspective

Second primary malignancies (SPMs) threaten long-term survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Advancing our understanding of the molecular events driving these secondary tumors is essential. This review has explicated molecular drivers of SPM development, including epigenetic alterations such as DNA hypermethylation, genetic polymorphisms affecting detoxification pathways, and shifts in gene and protein expression profiles. Disruptions in the p53 signaling pathway, immune-related pathways, and impairments in glutathione S-transferase-mediated detoxification, emerge as central contributors to SPM risk. Additionally, direct comparisons of tumor specimens with adjacent or distant normal mucosa highlight field cancerization biomarkers, underscoring widespread carcinogen-induced damage. Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome arm 13q, p53 overexpression in tumor-distant epithelia, and proteomic abnormalities in ostensibly healthy mucosa collectively promote a tumor-prone field that encourages the formation of independent secondary tumors. This interplay underscores a multifactorial landscape of SPM pathogenesis, involving genetic susceptibility, environmental exposures, and intricate epigenetic and transcriptomic networks. By recognizing and validating reliable biomarkers, clinicians may pinpoint high-risk patients with greater precision, intervene earlier, and customize follow-up protocols and treatment regimens. Ultimately, translating these insights into routine practice promises a more proactive, individualized approach to preventing SPMs in HNSCC.

The Significance of Screening Endoscopy at 2-Year Interval for Detecting Pharyngeal and Esophageal Cancer in the Japanese General Population

PURPOSE

We previously identified examination time and 2-year interval as effective quality indicators for detecting upper gastrointestinal cancer during screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). We evaluated the significance of biennial endoscopy in detecting pharyngeal and esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Individuals who underwent multiple EGD examinations as health checkups at our center between August 2012 and January 2022 were included. Endoscopists were categorized into two groups based on their mean examination time for normal EGD findings, using a threshold of 5 min. The associations between cancer detection rate and these indicators were analyzed using multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Twelve endoscopists performed more than 1000 examinations each, for a total of 28,842 examinations, detecting all (6 pharyngeal and 26 esophageal) cancers. Intervals between endoscopies were classified into three groups: ≤ 1 year (Group 1), 1 to ≤ 2 years (Group 2), and > 2 years (Group 3). This cancer detection rate did not differ significantly between Groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.761) but was significantly higher in Group 3 than in Group 2 (OR = 4.356, 95% CI = 1.161-16.333, p = 0.029). When Groups 1 and 2 were combined (≤ 2 years) and compared with Group 3, an interval of > 2 years was significantly associated with a higher detection rate, including cases not curable by endoscopic resection (OR, 4.710; 95% CI, 1.806-12.282; p = 0.002). Examination time was not associated with the cancer detection rate (p = 0.944).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the significance of biennial endoscopy in detecting pharyngeal and esophageal cancer as well.

Cost-utility and clinical impact of endoscopic screening for esophageal and gastric neoplasia in patients with head and neck neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

Patients with head and neck neoplasms (HNN) are at an increased risk of esophageal neoplasia (EN) and gastric neoplasia (GN). We aimed to assess the clinical impact and cost-utility of endoscopic screening in this population in the Western setting.

METHODS

In this single-center study HNN patients eligible for curative treatment underwent screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy. We assessed the frequency, clinical, and pathological outcomes of EN and GN. The cost-effectiveness of an annual endoscopic screening for EN was evaluated from a societal perspective, using a Markov model and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. In addition, we performed a sensitivity analysis using data on the prevalence of detected EN lesions in the four largest previous Western studies on this topic.

RESULTS

Forty-six HNN patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent endoscopic screening. Six EN were detected in five patients (10.9%, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-19.9%). Additionally, five GN were detected in five patients. Most patients had early-stage EN or GN (90%) and were treated with endoscopic resection (80%). Endoscopic screening strategy had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 39 357.8 €/quality-adjusted life years gained, being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of two times the Portuguese gross domestic product per capita. In the sensitivity analysis, it remained cost-effective when considering the prevalence of EN reported in Germany, France, and Brazil.

CONCLUSION

An endoscopic screening program identified EN or GN in a fifth of HNN patients, most presenting at an early stage. The program implementation appears to be cost-effective in Portugal. These results may be applicable to other medium-to-high-income Western countries.

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy: a Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Second primary esophageal cancer often develops in patients with head and neck cancer, and esophagectomy in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is challenging. However, the clinical outcomes of these patients have yet to be examined in a multicenter setting.

METHODS

We evaluated the surgical outcomes of a nationwide cohort of 62 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with a history of TPL.

RESULTS

Ivor-Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies were performed in 32 (51.6%) and 30 (48.4%) patients, respectively. Postoperatively, 23 patients (37.1%) developed severe complications, and 7 patients (11.3%) required reoperation within 30 days. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 (21.0%) and 16 (25.8%) patients, respectively. Anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in the McKeown group than in the Ivor-Lewis group (46.7% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for anastomotic leakage in the McKeown group was 9.64 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.11-70.82, P = 0.008). Meanwhile, the 5-year overall survival rates were comparable between the groups (41.8% for Ivor-Lewis and 42.7% for McKeown), and the adjusted hazard ratio of overall survival was 1.44 (95% CI, 0.64-3.29; P = 0.381; Ivor-Lewis as the reference).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently after McKeown than Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, and almost half of patients in the McKeown group experienced leakage. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is preferred for decreasing anastomotic leakage when oncologically and technically feasible.

Associations of head and neck cancers with herpes zoster in the preceding five years

This population-based study investigated the risk of having had prior herpes zoster within five years preceding a diagnosis of head and neck cancer. We conducted a case-control study that included 9,191 patients with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer in Taiwan's Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2010 and 36,764 matched controls. We assessed the odds of patients with head and neck cancer having had a diagnosis of herpes zoster during the five years preceding head and neck cancer using multiple logistic regression analysis. The prevalence of prior herpes zoster among the total sample was 4.6%, 7.9% and 3.8% among patients with and without head and neck cancer, respectively (p < 0.001). The odds ratio of herpes zoster among the head and neck cancer- versus control group was 2.198 (95% CI = 2.001 ~ 2.415) after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, tobacco use disorder, HPV infection, and alcohol dependence syndrome. Statistically significant excess odds were observed for all specific subtypes of head and neck cancer except for sinonasal cancer. Herpes zoster infection within the 5 years preceding a diagnosis of head and neck cancer may be a harbinger of developing head and neck cancer.

Impact of earthworms on antibiotic resistance genes removal in ampicillin-contaminated soil through bacterial community alteration

The emergence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) as contaminants in soil poses a significant threat to public health. Earthworms (Eisenia foetida), which are common inhabitants of soil, have been extensively studied for their influence on ARGs. However, the specific impact of earthworms on penicillin-related ARGs remains unclear. In this study, we investigate the role of earthworms in mitigating ARGs, specifically penicillin-related ARGs, in ampicillin-contaminated soil. Utilizing high-throughput quantitative PCR (HT-qPCR), we quantified a significant reduction in the relative abundance of penicillin-related ARGs in soil treated with earthworms, showing a decrease with a p-value of <0.01. Furthermore, high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed that earthworm intervention markedly alters the microbial community structure, notably enhancing the prevalence of specific bacterial phyla such as Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, and Tenericutes. Our findings not only demonstrate the effectiveness of earthworms in reducing the environmental load of penicillin-related ARGs but also provide insight into the alteration of microbial communities as a potential mechanism. This research contributes to our understanding of the role of earthworms in mitigating the spread of antibiotic resistance and provides valuable insights for the development of strategies to combat this global health issue.

Optimal number of images and 2-year interval affect cancer detection in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy: An observational study

We aimed to identify quality indicator for esophagogastroduodenoscopy for detecting upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer. Data from 43,526 consecutive health checkups from August 2012 to January 2022 were retrospectively collected. The study ultimately analyzed 42,387 examinations by 12 endoscopists who performed more than 1000 examinations, including all cancers detected. These endoscopists were classified either into fast/slow group based on their mean examination time for a normal finding of esophagogastroduodenoscopy during their first year of the examination, or small/large group based on number of endoscopic images, respectively. The association between UGI cancer detection rate and examination time or the number of images was analyzed, using 5 minutes or 50 images as cutoff values. The detection rate of overall (8 pharyngeal, 39 esophageal, 69 gastric) cancers in the fast, slow, small, and large groups were 0.17%, 0.32%, 0.21%, and 0.31%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, endoscopists in the fast group or the small group were less likely to detect overall UGI cancer (OR: 0.596, 95% CI: 0.373-0.952, P = .030; OR: 0.652, 95% CI: 0.434-0.979, P = .039). Additionally, repeated endoscopy within 2 years had a higher overall cancer detection rate, compared with repeated screening after 2 years. In a sub-analysis, a significant negative relationship was found between the detection rate of gastric cancer and the number of gastric images < 35 (OR: 0.305, 95% CI: 0.189-0.492, P = .000). There was also a negative correlation trend between the detection rate of pharyngeal and esophageal cancers and the number of esophageal images < 11 (OR: 0.395, 95% CI: 0.156-1.001, P = .050). The optimal number of images and screening 2-year interval are considered useful quality indicators for detecting UGI cancer. This study also suggests that a total of 50 images, or 35 images of the stomach are suitable for detecting UGI cancer, or gastric cancer, during screening endoscopy.

Routine image-enhanced endoscopic surveillance for metachronous esophageal squamous cell neoplasms in head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Esophageal squamous cell neoplasms (ESCNs) are common second primary tumors in patients with head and neck cancer. Image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) with Lugol chromoendoscopy or magnifying narrow-band imaging both increase the detection of early ESCNs. No evidence-based ESCN surveillance program for head and neck cancer patients without a history of synchronous ESCNs exists. We aimed to evaluate the performance of an IEE surveillance program with magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy and Lugol chromoendoscopy.

METHODS

From April 2016, we routinely used IEE with magnifying narrow-band imaging and Lugol chromoendoscopy to evaluate patients with head and neck cancer history. All patients who were negative for ESCNs at the first surveillance endoscopy and received at least 2 IEEs through December 2019 were included. Demographic profiles, clinical data, cancer characteristics, IEE results and pathology reports were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients were included. Only 4 patients (2.2%) developed metachronous ESCNs during follow-up, all of whom received curative resection treatment. The interval for the development of metachronous ESCNs was 477 to 717 days. In multivariate Firth logistic regression and Kaplan‒Meier survival curve analysis, Lugol's voiding lesion type C had an increased risk of esophageal cancer development (adjusted odds ratio = 15.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-185.87, p = 0.029). Eight patients died during the study period, and none of them had metachronous ESCNs.

CONCLUSIONS

IEE with magnifying narrow-band imaging and Lugol chromoendoscopy is an effective surveillance program in head and neck cancer patients without a history of ESCNs. Annual surveillance can timely detect early ESCNs with low ESCN-related mortality.

Incidence and survival of second primary non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate patient survival and factors associated with survival in second primary non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) compared with the first primary NHL.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2000 and 2014. Demographic characteristics, histological types, Ann Arbor stage, and treatment information were collected. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the first and second primary NHLs.

RESULTS

Of 318,168 cases followed for 5 years, 299,248 patients developed the first primary NHL and 18,920 patients developed the second primary NHL. This study identified a rising incidence of first and second primary NHL from 2000 to 2014. For the second primary NHL, the OS risk was higher when compared to the first primary NHL (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.15, P <0.001). Risk factors that negatively affected OS in the first primary NHL included being male, over 40 years of age, certain marital statuses, specific histological types, and advanced disease stages. In contrast, being of White race and having histological types such as Follicular Lymphoma (FL), Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL), and mantle B-cell NHL were associated with better OS outcomes. Treatments like surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy were associated with a lower risk of OS and CSS in the first primary NHL. For the second primary NHL, the detrimental risk factors were similar but also included being over the age of 60. Certain histological types showed a lower OS risk relative to diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). While surgery and chemotherapy were beneficial for OS, radiation therapy did not improve survival in second primary NHL cases. Notably, undergoing chemotherapy for the first primary cancer increased the OS risk in the second primary NHL, whereas surgery and radiation seemed to offer a protective effect against OS risk in the second primary NHL (all P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings emphasize the need for tailored strategies in managing the second primary NHL, given the distinct survival patterns and risk factor profiles compared to the first primary NHL. Future research should aim to further elucidate these differences to improve prognosis and treatment approaches for second primary NHL patients.

Screening and surveillance of esophageal cancer by magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging improves the survival of hypopharyngeal cancer patients

Introduction

Patients with head and neck cancer may develop a second primary neoplasm (SPN) of the esophagus due to field cancerization. This study investigated the impacts of esophageal cancer screening using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) on the outcomes of hypopharyngeal cancer patients.

Methods

Patients with hypopharyngeal cancer diagnosed from 2008 to 2021 in a tertiary hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Screening and surveillance using ME-NBI examination of the esophagus were divided into three patterns: (1) ME-NBI never performed or more than 6 months after diagnosis of index primary hypopharyngeal cancer, (2) ME-NBI within 6 months only, and (3) ME-NBI within 6 months and regular surveillance.

Results

A total of 261 were reviewed and 21 (8%) patients were in stage I, 20 (8%) in stage II, 27 (10%) in stage III, 116 (44%) in stage IVA, 65 (25%) in stage IVB, and 12 (5%) in stage IVC. Sixty-seven (26%) patients had SPN (50 esophagus, 10 oral cavity, 3 oropharynx, 2 nasopharynx, 1 larynx and 1 lung). Among esophageal SPN, 35 (70%) and 15 (30%) patients developed synchronous and metachronous neoplasia, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, advanced stages III and IV (compared with stages I and II, HR: 1.86, 1.18-2.95, p=0.008), ME-NBI examination of the esophagus received within 6 months and regular surveillance (HR: 0.53, 0.36-0.78, p=0.001) were independent factors affecting the overall survival of patients with hypopharyngeal cancer.

Discussion

Our findings demonstrated that screening and surveillance of esophageal SPN by ME-NBI improves the survival of patients with hypopharyngeal cancer.

Clinical Value of Endoscopic Esophageal Screening in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical benefit of routine esophageal screening in newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

METHODS

This retrospective study selected newly diagnosed HNSCC patients from the Chang Gung Research Database between January 2007 and December 2019. Patients who underwent endoscopic esophageal examinations within 2 months of the initial diagnosis of HNSCC were included in the screening group. The clinical outcomes of the screening and nonscreening groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 13,627 HNSCC patients were included, comprising 1032 females and 12,640 males (mean age 55.0 years), and the esophageal screening group included 7033 (51.4%) patients. The prevalence rate of esophageal tumors was 4.5%. Hypopharyngeal cancer patients were the most likely to have (13.4%) second primary esophageal tumors. The American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of the esophageal tumor was lower in the esophageal screening group than in the nonesophageal screening group. The oral, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer patients in the esophageal screening group had better survival outcomes than their counterparts in the nonesophageal screening group.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic esophageal screening of newly diagnosed HNSCC patients can detect esophageal tumors at an early stage and improve overall survival. Esophageal screening could be a routine survey in HNSCC patients, particularly those with lifestyle risk factors and in countries with a high prevalence of esophageal cancer.

Elucidating the clonal relationship of esophageal second primary tumors in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Laryngeal cancer ranks as the second most prevalent upper airway malignancy, following Lung cancer. Although some progress has been made in managing laryngeal cancer, the 5-year survival rate is disappointing. The gradual increase in the incidence of second primary tumors (SPTs) plays a crucial role in determining survival outcomes during long-term follow-up, and the esophagus was the most common site with a worse prognosis. In clinical practice, the treatment of esophageal second primary tumors (ESPT) in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) has always been challenging. For patients with synchronous tumors, several treatment modalities, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy and potentially curative surgery are necessary but are typically poorly tolerated. Secondary cancer therapy options for metachronous patients are always constrained by index cancer treatment indications. Therefore, understanding the clonal origin of the second primary tumor may be an important issue in the treatment of patients. LSCC cells demonstrate genetic instability because of two distinct aetiologies (human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative and HPV-positive) disease. Various etiologies exhibit distinct oncogenic mechanisms, which subsequently impact the tissue microenvironment. The condition of the tissue microenvironment plays a crucial role in determining the destiny and clonal makeup of mutant cells during the initial stages of tumorigenesis. This review focuses on the genetic advances of LSCC, the current research status of SPT, and the influence of key carcinogenesis of HPV-positive and HPV-negative LSCC on clonal evolution of ESPT cells. The objective is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the molecular basis underlying the clonal origins of SPT, thereby offering novel perspectives for future investigations in this field.

McKeown Versus Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Patients with a History of Total Pharyngolaryngectomy: A Comparison Study

BACKGROUND

Oncologic esophagectomy in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is challenging. There are two different esophagectomy procedures: total esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis (McKeown) and subtotal esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis). Differences in outcomes between McKeown and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomies for patients with this history remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients with a history of TPL who underwent oncologic esophagectomy and compared the clinical outcomes between the procedures.

RESULTS

Twelve (33.3%) and 24 (66.7%) patients underwent McKeown and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomies, respectively. McKeown esophagectomy was more frequently performed for the supracarinal tumors (P = 0.002). Other baseline characteristics, including the history of radiation therapy, were comparable between the groups. Postoperatively, the incidences of pneumonia and anastomotic leakage were higher in the McKeown group than in the Ivor-Lewis group (P = 0.029 and P < 0.001, respectively). Neither tracheal necrosis nor remnant esophageal necrosis was observed. The overall and recurrence-free survival rates were comparable between the groups (P = 0.494 and P = 0.813, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

When performing esophagectomy for patients with a history of TPL, if it is oncologically acceptable and technically available, Ivor-Lewis is preferable over McKeown esophagectomy for avoiding postoperative complications.

Surveillance of head neck cancer: Case for personalized and standardized surveillance

Although surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or combined treatment often elicits an initial satisfactory response, relapses are frequently observed within two years. Current surveillance methods, including clinical exams and imaging evaluations, have not unambiguously demonstrated a survival benefit, most probably due to a lack of sensitivity in detecting very early recurrence. Current guidelines advise post-treatment surveillance of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients should involve scheduled appointments with a variety of practitioners. The benefits of prolonged routine follow-up on survival have not been proven. Increasing numbers of HNC survivors raise the burden to provide efficient and effective care.

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Concomitant Primary Tumors, What Do We Know? A Review of the Literature

Head and neck cancer is among the top ten cancers worldwide, with most lesions in the oral cavity. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) accounts for more than 90% of all oral malignancies and is a significant public health concern. Patients with OSCC are at increased risk for developing concomitant tumors, especially in the oral cavity, due to widely genetically susceptible mucosa to carcinogenic factors. Based on fulfilling specific criteria, these concomitant tumors can be called second primary tumors (SPTs), which can be further categorized into metachronous and synchronous tumors. This research reviews the literature that investigated the concurrent OSCC with second or multiple primaries to improve understanding of the definition, classification guidelines, and its effect on cancer survival. It also highlights the current investigation methods, the variation of standard treatment approaches due to such a phenomenon, and preventive measures discussed in the literature.