Prognostic value of cachexia index in patients with colorectal cancer: A retrospective study

Modified cachexia index and survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDK 4-6 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to evaluate the correlation between survival outcomes and the modified cachexia index (mCXI) in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have been treated with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors.

METHODS

This study was conducted on patients with metastatic breast cancer who received CDK 4/6 inhibitors (either Palbociclib or Ribociclib) between January 2020 and November 2024.

RESULTS

240 patients were included. A total of 236 patients (98.3%) were female. Median age was 57 (IQR: 48-66 years). The median follow-up period from the initiation of CDK 4/6 inhibitors to the last control was 20 months. One hundred eighty-four patients (76.7%) received ribociclib, while 56 (23.3%) received palbociclib. At diagnosis, 179 patients (74.6%) had metastatic disease. Patients are classified as modified cachexia index-low (mCXI-Low) and mCXI-High according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis results for overall survival (OS) prediction [AUC: 0,654 p:<0,001 Cut-off value = 93.5]. Following multivariate analysis, both progression-free survival [HR: 1.50 (95% CI 1.07-2.12), p = 0.02] and overall survival [HR: 3.22 (95% CI 1.90-5.46), p < 0.001] were found to be significantly associated with mCXI.

CONCLUSION

mCXI is associated with overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients who are treated with CDK 4-6 inhibitors.

Skeletal Muscle Index-Based Cachexia Index as a Predictor of Prognosis in Patients With Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Cachexia is associated with poor survival rates. In the clinical setting, the diagnosis of cancer cachexia is challenging. The cachexia index (CXI), a new index for predicting survival time, is a promising tool for diagnosing cancer cachexia; however, its efficacy in predicting patient survival has not been validated.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to explore the CXI's prognostic value in patients with cancer.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies to determine the association between CXI findings and prognosis.

DATA EXTRACTION

The outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-, disease-, and recurrence-free survival (PFS/DFS/RFS) rates, and the rate of complete response.

DATA ANALYSIS

The QUality In Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included trials. This meta-analysis comprised 14 studies involving 2777 patients. A low CXI was associated with decreased OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01-2.72; P < .001), PFS/DFS/RFS (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.68-2.22; P < .001), and complete response (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66; P < .001). Patients with a low CXI had a lower body mass index (mean difference [MD] -0.75, 95% CI -1.00 to 0.50; P < .001), skeletal muscle index (standardized MD -0.80, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.61; P < .001), and serum albumin level (MD -0.23, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.20; P < .001); and a higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (MD 1.88, 95% CI 1.29-2.47; P < .001) and more advanced disease stages (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.91; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

A low CXI was found to be associated with poor survival in patients with cancer. While the CXI is a promising marker for predicting cancer cachexia, further studies are required to verify its usefulness.

Prognostic Value of the Modified Cachexia Index in Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery

Background/Aim

The cachexia index (CXI) has been reported to be a useful indicator for predicting the prognosis of cancer patients. However, CXI calculation requires skeletal muscle index (SMI) measurements, which involves an analysis of computed tomography images using an imaging software program, which makes the calculation process highly complex and time-consuming. Recently, the modified cachexia index (mCXI), calculated using the urea-to-creatinine ratio (UCR) instead of SMI, has been reported to be a useful marker that is easier to calculate than CXI. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between mCXI and the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

Patients and Methods

A total of 291 patients who underwent curative surgery for stage I-III CRC were enrolled. mCXI was calculated as the serum albumin concentration/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)/UCR. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of the mCXI for predicting prognosis.

Results

The median mCXI was 0.089 (range=0.012-0.354). The ROC curve analysis revealed that the appropriate cut-off value for mCXI was 0.113. The low mCXI group had significantly shorter relapse-free and overall survival rates than the high mCXI group (p=0.030 and p=0.014, respectively).

Conclusion

mCXI, which does not require an image analysis, may be closely associated with prognosis in patients undergoing curative surgery for CRC.

Fusobacterium nucleatum Abundance is Associated with Cachexia in Colorectal Cancer Patients: The ColoCare Study

BACKGROUND

Cachexia accounts for about 20% of all cancer-related deaths and indicates poor prognosis. The impact of Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), a microbial risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), on the development of cachexia in CRC has not been established.

METHODS

We evaluated the association between Fn abundance in pre-surgical stool samples and onset of cachexia at 6 months post-surgery in n = 87 patients with stages I-III CRC in the ColoCare Study.

RESULTS

High fecal Fn abundance compared to negative/low fecal Fn abundance was associated with 4-fold increased risk of cachexia onset at 6 months post-surgery (OR = 4.82, 95% CI = 1.15, 20.10, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that high fecal Fn abundance was associated with an increased risk of cachexia at 6 months post-surgery in CRC patients. This is the first study to link Fn abundance with cachexia in CRC patients, offering novel insights into biological mechanisms and potential management of cancer cachexia. Due to the small sample size, our results should be interpreted with caution. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.

Prognostic value of the fat-free mass index-based cachexia index in patients with colorectal cancer

Studies have shown that the cachexia index (CXI) is a useful predictor of cachexia in patients with colorectal cancer. However, the application of the CXI is limited stemming from the intricacy and additional cost of radiographic examinations. This study aimed to develop an easy-to-use and practical CXI based on fat-free mass index (FFMI-CXI) to evaluate the prognostic value of FFMI-CXI in CRC. A total of 656 patients with CRC were enrolled in the Investigation on Nutrition Status and Clinical Outcome of Common Cancers (INSCOC) study. The FFMI-CXI was calculated as [FFMI (kg)/height (m)2 × serum albumin (g/L)]/neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. The cutoff value for FFMI-CXI was determined through the analysis of ROC curves and Youden's index for both male and female cohorts. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank tests were conducted to compare time-event relationships between different groups. Cox proportional hazards regression models incorporating both univariate and multivariate variables were employed to explore the independent prognostic factors associated with OS. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association of the FFMI-CXI with secondary outcomes. The major outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). Based on the cutoff values, 331 patients had low FFMI-CXI, and 325 patients had high FFMI-CXI. Patients in the low FFMI-CXI subgroup were significantly older and had advanced TNM stage, malnutrition, high systemic inflammation, long hospitalizations, high hospitalization costs, adverse short-term outcomes, and all-cause mortality. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that FFMI-CXI (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.66; p < 0.001) and TNM stage (HR 3.38, 95% CI 2.63-4.35; p < 0.001) were independently associated with OS in CRC patients. K-M survival curves revealed that the CRC patients with a high FFMI-CXI had significantly more favorable OS than those with low FFMI-CXI (62.84% vs. 84.31%; log-rank p < 0.001). Furthermore, the FFMI-CXI was valuable for predicting 90-day outcomes, malnutrition, cancer cachexia, length of hospitalization, and hospitalization expenses. This study revealed that the FFMI-CXI can be used as a prognostic indicator in patients with CRC. Patients with low FFMI-CXI should receive more attention.

Developing and validating a Modified Cachexia Index to predict the outcomes for colorectal cancer after radical surgery

BACKGROUND

It was reported that the cachexia index (CXI:ALB * SMI NLR ) was an essential index for predicting the prognosis of tumor patients. However, since for SMI needs to be measured by CT imaging methods and its calculation was inconvenient. Thus, we developed a modified cachexia index (mCXI:ALB NLR * UCR ). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between mCXI and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

An analysis of 215 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer was carried out retrospectively. An optimal cut-off value of mCXI was established by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting prognosis. Prognostic implications of mCXI were investigated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. A comparative assessment of the predictive capacity between mCXI and the CXI was performed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Patients were classified into two groups based on the cut-off value of mCXI: the LOW mCXI group (n = 60) and the HIGH mCXI group (n = 155). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) (76.6% vs 96.7%, p < 0.01) and 3-year Recurrence-free survival (RFS) (68.3% vs 94.1%, p < 0.01) were significantly worse in the LOW mCXI group in contrast to that in the HIGH mCXI group. In Cox multivariate regression analysis, mCXI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 8.951, 95%CI: 3.105-25.807, <0.01). Moreover, compared with CXI (AUC = 0.723), mCXI (AUC = 0.801) has better predictive efficacy, indicating that mCXI is more suitable for prognostic assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The mCXI significantly correlated with survival outcomes for colorectal cancer patients after radical surgery.

Evaluating the Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool: A Systematic Review

Background

The current systematic review aimed to evaluate the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) for its effectiveness in determining patient outcomes (length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, infection rates, and survival) for colorectal cancer.

Methods

Utilizing a comprehensive search strategy, this review mined literature up to December 2023 from the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. The focus was on identifying studies that scrutinize the prognostic value of MUST in relation to hospital outcomes in colorectal cancer contexts. Adherence to PRISMA guidelines ensured a systematic approach, encompassing various study designs and outcome measures.

Results

Among the seven studies incorporating 1950 patients, a significant correlation emerged between MUST scores and key hospital outcomes. Specifically, patients categorized as high MUST risk faced longer hospital stays, with a mean length of stay for high-risk patients extending up to 26.6 days compared to 14 days for those at lower risk. The prevalence of postoperative complications was substantially higher in the high-risk group, with up to 41.4% of high MUST risk patients experiencing severe complications (Clavien-Dindo 3-5) compared to 8.5% in the low-risk category. Notably, the review found that high MUST scores were strongly predictive of increased postoperative complications and a prolonged hospital stay, underscoring the tool's critical predictive utility for quality of life and use in clinical settings.

Conclusions

Therefore, MUST's capability to predict longer hospital stays and a higher incidence of postoperative complications among high-risk patients highlights its essential function in preoperative evaluations and supports the integration of MUST into routine clinical assessments.

Cachexia Index in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The cachexia index is a novel biomarker of cancer cachexia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of cachexia index on prognosis after surgery for gastrointestinal cancer.

METHODS

In August 2023, we systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ovid for relevant studies on the oncological outcome after gastrointestinal cancer surgery and analyzed the findings from these studies for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Our systematic and meta-analysis review identified eight studies involving 1876 patients. The number of patients with low cachexia index accounted for 813 patients (43.3%). We found that low cachexia index was associated with worse overall survival (pooled HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.85-2.87; z = 7.49; P < 0.001) and disease/relapse/progression-free survival (pooled HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.45-2.18; z = 5.50; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed that cachexia index was associated with oncological outcome after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. However, the limitations of this meta-analysis should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results.

Cachexia Index as a Predictor of Reduced Survival in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The cachexia index is a novel indicator of cachexia, but its prognostic implications for survival outcomes have not been systematically assessed in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the association between the cachexia index and survival outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies that evaluated the prognostic significance of the cachexia index in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The prognostic value of the cachexia index was determined by combining the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Thirteen studies were identified, including a total of 4207 patients. Meta-analysis indicated that a lower cachexia index was associated with shorter overall survival (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.78-2.66) and disease-free survival (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.50-1.97) in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Further stratified analysis confirmed the significant association between a lower cachexia index and shorter overall survival in different study designs, regions, patients' age, sample sizes, gastrointestinal cancer subtypes, tumor stages, and follow-up duration subgroups. The cachexia index could be utilized as a predictor of overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. However, future prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

CT-determined low skeletal muscle index predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is highly prevalent among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Computed tomography (CT)-based assessment of low skeletal muscle index (SMI) is widely used for diagnosing sarcopenia. However, there are conflicting findings on the association between low SMI and overall survival (OS) in CRC patients. The objective of this study was to investigate whether CT-determined low SMI can serve as a valuable prognostic factor in CRC.

METHODS

We collected data from patients with CRC who underwent radical surgery at our institution between June 2020 and November 2021. The SMI at the third lumbar vertebra was calculated using CT scans, and the cutoff values for defining low SMI were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the associations between clinical characteristics and postoperative major complications.

RESULTS

A total of 464 patients were included in the study, 229 patients (46.7%) were classified as having low SMI. Patients with low SMI were older and had a lower body mass index (BMI), a higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and higher nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002) scores compared to those with normal SMI. Furthermore, patients with sarcopenia had a higher rate of major complications (10.9% vs. 1.3%; p < 0.001) and longer length of stay (9.09 ± 4.86 days vs. 8.25 ± 3.12 days; p = 0.03). Low SMI and coronary heart disease were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative major complications. Moreover, CRC patients with low SMI had significantly worse OS. Furthermore, the combination of low SMI with older age or TNM stage II + III resulted in the worst OS in each subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-determined low SMI is associated with poor prognosis in patients with CRC, especially when combined with older age or advanced TNM stage.

The Utility of the Cachexia Index and the Modified Glasgow Score in Young Patients With Breast Cancer

Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Body composition and inflammatory markers are increasingly important for predicting cancer prognosis. The Cancer Cachexia Index (CXI) and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) are two new markers evaluating prognosis in cancer. In this study, we evaluated the utility of the CXI and the modified GPS in young patients with breast cancer. Methods Eighty patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2023 were included in the study. The following information was recorded: patient features, pathological subtype, estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, disease stage, therapies, disease recurrence, and last control or death date. The CXI and the modified GPS were calculated using clinical data, including skeletal muscle index, albumin, C-reactive protein, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Results There were no differences in overall survival with respect to the CXI in the study population (p=0.96). Only stage 4 patients showed statistically significant survival differences according to the CXI (p=0.046). Although the median survival time was not reached for the modified GPS groups, there was a statistical overall survival difference favoring the negative group (p=0.017). No significant differences were observed in disease-free survival due to the CXI (p=0.128). In multivariate analysis, no factors, including the modified GPS and the CXI, influenced overall survival. There was a significant effect of the modified GPS and body mass index on recurrence (p=0.037; p=0.034). The CXI had a non-significant marginal p-value (p=0.074). Conclusion Our study showed that the modified GPS may be related to disease-free survival and overall survival, whereas the CXI has a more prominent prognostic effect on overall survival in advanced-stage breast cancers. In early-stage and young patients, optimization of risk scores is lacking.

Prognostic Significance of the Cachexia Index in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases after Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Background

The cachexia index (CXI) has been proposed as a novel biomarker of cancer cachexia. We aimed to investigate the association between CXI and survival outcomes after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases.

Methods

Data from 145 patients with NSCLC, who underwent SRT for brain metastases between April 2016 and August 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Cachexia index was calculated as skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin level/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, whereas SMI was calculated from computed tomography images captured at the L1 level. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The prognostic values of CXI and other cachexia biomarkers were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Lower pretreatment CXI (<30.8) was significantly associated with older age (P = .039), lower Karnofsky performance score (P = .009), and a high likelihood of extracranial metastases (P = .001). Patients with a lower pretreatment CXI had a significantly shorter PFS and OS than those with a higher CXI (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that pretreatment CXI was an independent risk factor for both PFS, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.375; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.610-3.504; P < .001, and OS, HR = 2.340; 95% CI = 1.562-3.505; P < .001. Compared with other biomarkers, pretreatment CXI had the highest area under the ROC curve value for prognostic assessment, reaching 0.734. Moreover, the loss of CXI was a strong risk factor for survival independent of pretreatment CXI (P = .011).

Conclusions

Cachexia index may serve as a clinically useful tool for predicting survival outcomes of patients with NSCLC and brain metastases who undergo SRT.

Comparison of the cachexia index based on hand-grip strength (H-CXI) with the original CXI for the prediction of cancer cachexia and prognosis in patients who underwent radical colectomy for colorectal cancer

Background and aims

The cachexia index (CXI) is a novel biomarker for estimating cancer cachexia. The cachexia index based on hand-grip strength (H-CXI) has been recently developed as a simple proxy for CXI. The present study aims to compare both the H-CXI and CXI for the prediction of cancer cachexia and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent radical colectomy for colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients who underwent radical operations for colorectal cancer were included in this study. Cancer cachexia was diagnosed according to the international consensus outlined by Fearon et al. The cachexia index (CXI) was calculated as [skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)]. The H-CXI was calculated as [hand-grip strength (HGS)/height2 × serum albumin/NLR]. The SMI was measured based on the preoperative CT images at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level. HGS was measured before surgery.

Results

From July 2014 to May 2021, a total of 1,411 patients were included in the present study, of whom 361 (25.6%) were identified as having cancer cachexia. Patients with cachexia had a lower CXI (p < 0.001) and lower H-CXI (p < 0.001) than those without cachexia. A low CXI but not low H-CXI independently predicted cancer cachexia in the multivariate analysis (OR 1.448, p = 0.024). Both a low CXI (HR 1.476, p < 0.001 for OS; HR 1.611, p < 0.001 for DFS) and low H-CXI (HR 1.369, p = 0.007 for OS; HR 1.642, p < 0.001 for DFS) were independent predictors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after adjusting for the same covariates. A low H-CXI but not low CXI was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (OR 1.337, p = 0.044). No significant association was found between cancer cachexia and postoperative complications.

Conclusion

The CXI and H-CXI exhibited better prognostic value than cancer cachexia for the prediction of postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent radical colectomy for colorectal cancer. The H-CXI was a superior index over the CXI in predicting short-term clinical outcomes, whereas the CXI demonstrated a closer correlation with Fearon's criteria for cancer cachexia. Ideal tools for the assessment of cancer cachexia should incorporate not only weight loss but also muscle mass, physical function, and inflammatory state.

Effect of serum lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) on the short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer after radical surgery

BACKGROUND

Whether serum lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) influenced the outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after radical surgery remained unclear. Therefore, this study sought to examine how LAR influences the short-term and long-term outcomes of CRC patients who have undergone radical surgery.

METHODS

This study retrospectively included CRC patients who underwent radical resection between January 2011 and January 2020. We compared short-term outcomes, as well as overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), among various groups. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to pinpoint independent risk factors associated with overall complications and major complications. Moreover, Cox regression analysis were conducted for OS and DFS. Odds ratio (OR) and Hazard ratio (HR) were adjusted.

RESULTS

This study encompassed a cohort of 3868 patients. 3440 patients were in the low LAR group and 428 patients constituted the high LAR group. In the high LAR group, patients experienced significantly longer operative times (p < 0.01), larger intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.01), and extended postoperative hospital stays (p < 0.01). Additionally, the incidence of both overall complications (p < 0.01) and major complications (p < 0.01) was higher in the high LAR group compared to the low LAR group. Furthermore, LAR was emerged as an independent prognostic factor for overall complications [OR/95% CI: (1.555/1.237 to 1.954), p < 0.01] and major complications [OR/95% CI: (2.178/1.279 to 3.707), p < 0.01]. As for long-term survival, the high LAR group had worse OS in stage II (p < 0.01) and stage III (p < 0.01). In both stage II (p < 0.01) and stage III (p < 0.01), the high LAR group exhibited poorer DFS. Additionally, according to Cox regression analysis, LAR was identified as an independent predictor for both OS [HR/95% CI: (1.930/1.554 to 2.398), p < 0.01] and DFS [HR/95% CI: (1.750/1.427 to 2.146), p < 0.01].

CONCLUSION

LAR emerged as an independent predictor not only for overall complications and major complications but also for both OS and DFS, highlighting its significance and deserving the attention of surgeons.

The Cancer Cachexia Index Can Be Used to Prognostically Predict Patients with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Cancer cachexia occurs in cancer patients more frequently as the cancer progresses, with a negative impact on treatment outcomes. In this study, we sought to clarify the clinical impact of a cancer cachexia index (CXI) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing gastrectomy.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2018, we reviewed data from 556 patients treated for GC at our hospital. CXI was calculated using skeletal muscle index (SMI), serum albumin, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios (NLR). Patients were divided into high (n = 414) or low CXI (n = 142) groups. We investigated the clinical impact of CXI in patients with GC undergoing gastrectomy.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses of 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates indicated that a low CXI was independently associated with unfavorable outcomes for patients with GC. In multivariate analyses, SMI was independent predictor of OS but not CSS. NLR was not an independent predictor of either OS or CSS. Complication incidences (≥ Clavien Dindo 3) were non-significantly higher in the low (vs. high) CXI group.

CONCLUSION

CXI was a more valuable prognostic biomarker when compared with SMI or NLR in GC patients undergoing gastrectomy. We suggest that patients with low CXI values should be given more comprehensive treatment, including exercise and nutritional therapy to improve clinical outcomes.