Adverse Event Profiles of PARP Inhibitors: Analysis of Spontaneous Reports Submitted to FAERS

Pregabalin Safety in Pregnancy: A Disproportionality Analysis of VigiBase Spontaneous Reporting System

Background/Objectives: Some product information on pregabalin suggests a potential risk for congenital anomalies (CAs), although evidence remains inconsistent and lacks clear patterns. This study aimed to provide additional safety information on pregabalin use in pregnancy by analyzing VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs). Methods: The analysis included de-duplicated ICSRs related to pregabalin exposure in pregnancy, collected up to 16 January 2024. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for CA categories reported in at least 10 ICSRs, with a statistical threshold defined as a 95% CI lower bound > 1. Results: Among 410 ICSRs, the majority originated from Europe (64.8%) and North America (26.5%). Of these, 59 (14.4%) ICSRs documented only pregabalin exposure in pregnancy, while 351 (85.6%) also reported adverse events in pregnancy. CAs occurred in 82 ICSRs (23.3%), most commonly involving heart defects (30), nervous system anomalies (18), and limb anomalies (12). No signals of disproportionate reporting were identified for these categories compared to the full database (heart defects: ROR 0.587, 95% CI 0.410-0.839; nervous system anomalies: ROR 0.588, 95% CI 0.370-0.933; limb anomalies: ROR 0.671, 95% CI 0.381-1.183). Conclusions: Future disproportionality analyses, along with pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiological studies using patient registries and large-scale collaborative projects, are essential for the ongoing monitoring of pregabalin safety in pregnancy.

Unveiling the differences: infection disorders associated with tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors in pediatric patients-a pharmacovigilance study (2004-2023)

The increasing use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in pediatric patients has raised concerns about their potential impact on the immune system and related adverse events. Infection-related adverse events (AEs) caused by TNFi have already raised widespread concerns in real-world settings. This study aims to comprehensively analyze and summarize the infection-related AEs associated with TNFi in pediatric patients. A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted to identify cases of TNFi-related infections reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between Q1 2004 and Q1 2023. TNFi reports were carefully reviewed to exclude confounding factors like other AEs, concomitant medications, and prescription indications. Proportionality analysis was conducted by comparing TNFi reports to the entire FAERS database to identify infection-related AEs significantly associated with TNFi use. Infection-related AEs accounted for 8.36% of all TNFi-related adverse event reports in the FAERS database. A total of 8050 cases of TNFi-associated infections were identified in the pediatric population, with 2.57% of reports resulting in fatalities. Infliximab and golimumab showed a stronger association with infection-related AEs compared to other TNFi. Notably, only adalimumab shows a lower risk of viral infections, while it exhibits an increased risk of bacterial and mycobacterial infections, similar to other TNFi.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified a significant association between TNFi use and infection-related AEs in pediatric patients, providing the foothold for further research. However, due to its retrospective nature, further investigations are warranted to confirm these findings and identify potential risk factors in a controlled, prospective study setting.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• There is sufficient evidence to demonstrate the infection risk associated with TNFi in adult patients. • Pediatric patients, whose immune systems are still developing, are more vulnerable to certain infections.

WHAT IS NEW

• There is a significant association between TNFi use and infection-related adverse events in pediatric patients, and different TNFi have distinct infection profiles.

Detection and analysis of the safety profile of talazoparib based on FAERS database

BACKGROUND

Talazoparib was approved for the treatment of breast cancer. However, the safety of talazoparib in a large population sample over an extended period remained uncertain. The objective of this study is to offer guidance for the secure utilization of talazoparib in clinical settings.

METHODS

Four algorithms were used to quantify the signals of talazoparib associated adverse events(AEs), using data from the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system(FAERS) between fourth quater of 2018 and second quater of 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 7,186,517 records were reported, with 737 indicating talazoparib as the primary suspected (PS) AEs. A total of 40 significant preferred terms (PTs) that adhere to the four algorithms were simultaneously retained. There is a possibility of experiencing unforeseen and noteworthy AEs, including embolism(0.46%), pulmonary embolism(1.06%), hyponatremia(0.46%), hypokalemia(0.40%), hematuria(0.33%), and pericardial effusion(0.26%). Most of the AEs related to talazoparib occurred within the initial month of starting the medication, with a median onset time of 79 days (IQR: 22-207 days).

CONCLUSION

Results of our study were consistent with clinical observations, and we also found potential new and unexpected AEs signals for talazoparib, suggesting prospective clinical studies were needed to confirm these results and illustrate their relationship. Our results may provide valuable evidence for further safety studies of talazoparib.

Comparison Study of the Safety Profile of Olaparib Versus Niraparib: Analysis of Real-World Data from EudraVigilance

Background: Olaparib and niraparib are poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) used primarily for the treatment of ovarian cancer. While both drugs have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, their safety profiles, particularly in real-world clinical settings, remain to be fully elucidated. Objectives: This study aimed to (i) characterize the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with olaparib and niraparib as reported in the EudraVigilance database, (ii) compare the frequency of the ADRs occurring during treatment with the two drugs, and (iii) compare post-marketing safety data with those from clinical trials. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using data from the EudraVigilance database (2017-2024), focusing on individual case safety reports (ICSRs) related to olaparib and niraparib. Descriptive statistics and disproportionality analysis were performed to compare the frequency and severity of reported ADRs. Results: Both olaparib and niraparib had common ADRs including nausea, vomiting, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue. However, olaparib was associated with a higher risk of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and interstitial lung disease, while niraparib had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal events and thrombocytopenia. Our analysis demonstrates that some specific ADRs, including peripheral neuropathy with niraparib, were reported at higher frequencies compared to clinical trials. The incidence of serious ADRs, including hospitalizations and life-threatening events, was higher with niraparib than with olaparib. Conclusions: This study highlights significant differences in the safety profiles of olaparib and niraparib, with implications for clinical decision-making. Continuous monitoring and personalized management of ADRs are essential to optimize patient outcomes.

Rotigotine safety in real-world settings: a pharmacovigilance study using FAERS data

BACKGROUND

This pharmacovigilance study aims to assess adverse reactions to rotigotine based on spontaneous reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, providing insights for clinical dosing.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis using FAERS data from Q2 2007 to Q2 2024, employing four disproportionality analysis methods: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multinomial Gamma Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS). These methods were utilized to detect and evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with rotigotine.

RESULTS

The dataset retrieved from the FAERS, encompassing 17,522,075 reports, a subset of 7,570 AE reports specifically implicated rotigotine. Upon analysis, 172 preferred terms (PTs) exhibited significant disproportionality and were consistently identified by the four employed algorithms. Particularly, product adhesion issue(N = 1,336, ROR 115,28 [108.94-121.98], PRR 108.46 [135850.43], EBGM 103.57 [98.79], IC (5.03) [5.03]) emerged as the predominant AE. Serious and unexpected AEs, such as drug ineffectiveness(N = 651, ROR 1.32 [ 1.22-1.43], PRR 1.31 [50.04], EBGM 1.31 [1.23], IC 0.39 [-1.27]), fall incidents(N = 361, ROR 2.93 [2.64-3.25 ], PRR 2.9 [451.76], EBGM 2.9 [2.66], IC 1.54 [-0.13]), and Parkinson's disease(N = 345, ROR 51.57 [46.31-57.42], PRR 50.79 [16476.71], EBGM 49.7 [45.43], IC 5.64 [3.97], were also recorded.The majority of these AEs were reported within the initial 30 days of therapy (n = 298, 22.1%), whereas a significant number were noted after 360 days of treatment (n = 507, 36.2%). The median time to the onset of AEs was 213 days.

CONCLUSION

Our findings, which align with the established safety profile of rotigotine, reveal the presence of unexpected serious AEs and emphasize the importance of continued vigilance in post-marketing surveillance.

Disproportionality analysis of vibegron-associated adverse events using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS): a real-world pharmacovigilance study

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome has a significant impact on quality of life, and vibegron has emerged as a therapeutic option. This study aims to evaluate the safety profile of vibegron in a disproportionality analysis by analyzing adverse event (AE) reports from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the FAERS database from January 2021 to September 2023. After duplicate removal and thorough screening, 1137 vibegron-related AE reports were identified. We analyzed these reports for demographic and clinical characteristics, signal detection at the system organ class (SOC) level, and specific AEs.

RESULTS

Females comprised a higher percentage (67.72%) of AE reports compared to males. The elderly population (age > 64 years) accounted for 15.84% of the cases. The majority (95.69%) of the reports originated from the USA. Signal detection revealed significant findings across 19 organ systems with notable SOCs, including renal and urinary disorders (ROR = 7.72, 95%CI 6.83-8.72), gastrointestinal disorders (ROR = 1.38, 95%CI 1.21-1.58), and respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (ROR = 1.21, 95%CI 1.01-1.45). In addition, several unexpected AEs were identified, such as dry mouth, hot flush, constipation, and increased blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides comprehensive insights into vibegron's safety profile, revealing both known and unexpected AEs. The findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and monitoring, especially among females and the elderly. The results advocate for ongoing pharmacovigilance and further research to ensure vibegron's safe and effective use in OAB treatment.

Comparison of serious adverse effects of methylphenidate, atomoxetine and amphetamine in the treatment of ADHD: an adverse event analysis based on the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

Methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine are the most commonly prescribed medications for ADHD, approved by the FDA. Despite their widespread use, real-world studies on their serious adverse effects are limited. This study leverages the FAERS database to analyze the safety of these drugs.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using FAERS data from 2004 to 2023. Adverse event (AE) signals for methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine were identified by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs), proportional reporting ratios (PRRs), information components (ICs), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM).

RESULTS

The analysis included 72,298 reports, with 37,471 linked to methylphenidate, 17,335 to atomoxetine, and 17,492 to amphetamine. Significant AE signals were found, especially in psychotic disorders for methylphenidate (ROR = 4.47, PRR = 3.7) and amphetamines (ROR = 4.06, PRR = 3.43), and psychiatric and reproductive disorders for atomoxetine (ROR = 5.44, PRR = 4.29; ROR = 2.49, PRR = 2.46). At the PT level, the most common adverse safety signals for the three ADHD drugs were Application site erythema, Somnolence, and Headache. Further analysis showed that "Aggression", "Mydriasis", "Trichotillomania" and suicide-related adverse reactions showed strong signals in the three ADHD drugs. However, there are also differences between the three ADHD medications. For example, serious adverse effects related to cardiovascular and neurological effects were stronger in amphetamines, with the "coronary artery dissection" and "carotid artery dissection" signals being the most significant; "Precocious puberty" has a stronger signal in methylphenidate, and the signal associated with elevated liver enzymes is strongest in atomoxetine. In addition, we also found some PTs that were not included in the drug label, such as "Disturbance in social behaviour" and "Trichotillomania".

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, pharmacovigilance analysis of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine was performed using the FAERS database, and we identified significant safety signals. Of note, three ADHD medications are associated with suicide-related signals, amphetamine associated with coronary artery dissection, methylphenidate associated with precocious puberty, and atomoxetine associated with testicle, penile lesions, and liver damage, which require special attention. This study provides a reference for the clinical personalized medication of ADHD patients.

A real-world disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system events for ibuprofen

INTRODUCTION

Ibuprofen is commonly used as an over-the-counter (OTC) antipyretic and analgesic. As the frequency of its use has increased, there has been a corresponding increase in reports of associated adverse events (AEs). However, these events have not been systematically reported in the literature. Meanwhile, the importance of effective pharmacovigilance in evaluating the benefits and risks of drugs is being recognized.

METHODS

The data was obtained indirectly from FAERS using the OpenVigil 2 database, lexically mapped using software such as MySQL, Microsoft Excel, and the R language, and then subjected to four more rigorous algorithms to detect risk signals associated with ibuprofen AEs.

RESULTS

By analyzing data from the past 18 years, 878 ibuprofen-related AEs were identified as primary AEs. Notably, unexpected reproductive system and breast diseases, etc., which were unexpected, were observed as important system organ classes (SOCs) associated with ibuprofen. Among the 651 preferred terms (PTs) that simultaneously satisfy the four arithmetic methods, renal tubular acidosis and lip oedema are proposed as new signals for ibuprofen AEs.

CONCLUSION

This study explores the important and valuable potential AEs and ADRs of ibuprofen at the SOC and PT levels, respectively. To provide a reference on decision-making for ibuprofen to promote rational clinical dosing.

Incidence and Risk of Thromboembolic and Cardiovascular Adverse Events with PARP Inhibitor Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Safety Meta-analysis

Background and objective

PARP inhibitor (PARPi) treatment is an effective option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). There are few data on the cardiovascular and thromboembolic safety of these agents in mCRPC, as cardiovascular and thromboembolic adverse events (AEs) are uncommon. Our aim was to analyze the incidence and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), thromboembolic events, and hypertension with PARPi therapy in mCRPC.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology meeting abstracts for clinical trials on PARPi use in mCRPC up to March 31, 2024. We analyzed the pooled incidence of all-grade and high-grade MACEs, thromboembolic events, and hypertension, and calculated risk ratios (RRs) for PARPi versus non-PARPi treatment.

Key findings and limitations

We included 11 phase 2 or 3 trials in our meta-analysis. Hypertension was the most common AE for both any-grade (17.2%) and high-grade (9.3%) events. In comparison to other treatments, PARPi was associated with significantly higher risk of high-grade MACEs (RR 2.03; p = 0.03) and thromboembolic events (RR 2.15; p = 0.002), especially venous thromboembolism (VTE; RR 2.13; p = 0.004) and pulmonary embolism (RR 3.60; p = 0.001). The risk of hypertension, any-grade MACEs, and thromboembolic AEs was not significantly higher, apart from VTE (RR 2.17; p = 0.01).

Conclusions and clinical implications

There is higher risk of high-grade cardiovascular and thromboembolic toxicity with PARPi use in comparison to other treatments in mCRPC, although these toxicities are rare. Clinicians should be aware of this risk, especially in a population that often has comorbidities and concomitant treatments, for correct monitoring and management of these AEs.

Patient summary

Drugs called PARP inhibitors are very effective in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer that does not respond to hormone treatment. However, their use is associated with some cardiovascular adverse events, although these are rare. Our study shows that these events seem to be more frequent with PARP inhibitors than with other treatments, especially for severe grades. Doctors and patients should be aware of this risk to help in preventing, recognizing, and managing the occurrence of these rare complications.

Incidence and risk of endocrine and metabolic abnormalities linked to PARP inhibitors in solid tumors: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) serve as crucial therapeutic agents in solid tumor treatment. Preclinical investigations suggest a potential protective function of PARPi against endocrine and metabolic impairments. Nevertheless, the existing body of evidence remains inconclusive on this aspect.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate the potential impact of PARPi on endocrine and metabolic disruptions in clinical trials.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a comprehensive search across the Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases, along with the ClinicalTrials.gov registry.

STUDY SELECTION

Phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of PARPi in metabolic and endocrine processes were selected for inclusion in patients with solid tumors.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary outcomes of interest encompassed metabolic and endocrine dysfunctions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 26 trials (n = 9,590 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. Niraparib demonstrated an increased risk of any-grade hyperglycemia (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.28-3.62), with patients receiving PARPi for metastatic pancreatic cancer showing a higher susceptibility to any-grade hyperglycemia (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.04-3.04). Conversely, rucaparib exhibited a potential ameliorative effect on hyperglycemia (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.97). No statistically significant disparities were observed for other outcomes associated with PARPi utilization.

LIMITATIONS

Among these RCTs included, 50% were assessed as low qualities due to high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that PARPi may exert adverse effects on endocrine and metabolic pathways. Close monitoring of hyperglycemia is recommended for patients undergoing niraparib therapy, especially those with pancreatic cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This meta-Analysis was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database with ID CRD42023457959.

Drug-induced Parkinson-like events: a real-world study from 2004 to the first quarter of 2024 based on FAERS

Background

Timely identification of drug-induced Parkinson-like events is essential to improve clinical management and enhance patients' quality of life. However, there is a significant lack of studies addressing these events in real-world settings.

Methods

To bridge this gap, we analyzed adverse event (AE) reports related to Parkinson-like events from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2024. Our objective was to summarize a list of potential drugs at high risk for Parkinson-like events and their corresponding proportions of AE reports.

Results

As a result, a total of 54,639 AE reports linked to Parkinson-like events involving 1,224 drugs were identified. Among these, carbidopa/levodopa exhibited the highest number of reports, followed by baclofen and pimavanserin. The most frequently reported drug class was antiparkinsonian drugs and psycholeptics, followed by psychoanaleptics. Using two disproportionate analysis methods, the reporting odds ratio and proportional reporting ratio, we found that 136 drugs exhibited positive results in both methods, while 1,063 drugs did not show any positive signals.

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of drugs associated with Parkinson-like events, aiming to promote rational drug use and inform clinical practice.

Hematopoietic adverse events associated with PARP inhibitors: A FAERS database study

OBJECTIVES

Analyze hematopoietic ADR signals of PARP inhibitors (Olaparib, Niraparib, Rucaparib, Talazoparib) using FAERS data to inform clinical practice.

METHODS

Extracted ASCII data for these drugs from Q1 2019 to Q2 2024. Employed SMQ and PT for standardization. Screened ADR signals via ROR, PRR, and MHRA method, comparing SMQ ratios.

RESULTS

Hematopoietic ADRs peaked within 30 days post-treatment, with cytopenia and leukopenia most prevalent. Niraparib showed the highest adverse event count and signal intensity. Olaparib and Talazoparib also indicated strong hematotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

PARP inhibitors vary in ADR incidence and duration, necessitating personalized treatment plans for optimized safety and rational use.

BRCA and Beyond: Impact on Therapeutic Choices Across Cancer

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients with gBRCAm is crucial to facilitate screening strategies, preventive measures and the usage of targeted therapeutics in their management. This review examines the evidence for the latest predictive and therapeutic approaches in BRCA-associated cancers.

CLINICAL DESCRIPTION

Data supports the use of adjuvant olaparib in patients with gBRCAm high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer. In advanced gBRCAm HER2-negative breast cancer, the PARPis talazoparib and olaparib have demonstrated benefit over standard chemotherapy. In ovarian cancer, olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib can be used as monotherapy in frontline maintenance. Olaparib and bevacizumab as a combination can also be used as frontline maintenance. In the relapsed platinum-sensitive setting, olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib are effective maintenance options in BRCAm patients who are PARPi naive. Both olaparib and rucaparib are effective options in BRCAm metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Evidence also exists for the benefit of PARPi combinations in mCRPC. In metastatic pancreatic cancer, olaparib can be used in gBRCAm patients who are responding to platinum chemotherapy. However, there may be a development of PARPi resistance. Understanding the pathophysiology that contributes to such resistance may allow the development of novel therapeutics. Combination therapy appears to have promising results in emerging trials. Seeking avenues for subsidised genetic testing can reduce the total costs of cancer management, leading to improve detection rates.

CONCLUSION

Identifying breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer patients with gBRCAm plays a crucial predictive role in selecting those who will benefit significantly from PARPi therapy. The use of PARPi in gBRCAm HBOC-related cancers has resulted in significant survival benefits. Beyond BRCA1/2, HRR gene assessment and the consideration of other cancer predisposition syndromes may allow more patients to be eligible for and benefit from targeted therapies.

Adverse events associated with oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil in against influenza virus therapy: A pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

Influenza virus is a widespread pathogen that poses significant health risks to humans. Oseltamivir and Baloxavir Marboxil are commonly utilized medications for both treating and preventing influenza infections. Despite their widespread use, there remains a need to thoroughly investigate their safety profiles and potential adverse reactions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to comprehensively analyze the adverse events associated with oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil in real-world clinical settings, with the goal of assessing their safety and potential risks in the management of influenza virus infections.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis utilizing data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, spanning from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2023. The analysis encompassed examination of drug utilization patterns, types of adverse events reported, patient demographics, and other pertinent factors.

RESULTS

From the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2023, FAERS collected over 17,035,521 adverse event reports (AE reports). Among these reports, there were 38,384 reports associated with oseltamivir, and 3,364 reports associated with baloxavir marboxil. Oseltamivir and Baloxavir Marboxil were primarily used for the treatment of influenza virus infections, accounting for 62.43% and 67.49% of their total usage, respectively. The main adverse reactions reported for oseltamivir were vomiting (case reports = 1402) followed by confusional state (case reports = 353), while for baloxavir marboxil, adverse reactions mainly centered around off-label use (case reports = 378) and intentional product use issues (case reports = 278). In terms of systemic adverse reactions, oseltamivir primarily affected psychiatric disorders (n = 45), whereas baloxavir marboxil mainly impacted the gastrointestinal system (n = 7). Additionally, regarding adverse reactions in pregnant women, the occurrence of normal newborns was a significant signal for oseltamivir, suggesting a certain level of safety during maternal use. Conversely, reports of adverse reactions such as respiratory arrest were documented for baloxavir marboxil, while no such reports were associated with oseltamivir.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the adverse reactions observed with the clinical use of oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil, revealing the safety and risks associated with these two drugs in the treatment and prevention of influenza virus infections. Firstly, although both drugs are used for influenza treatment, they exhibit different types of adverse reactions. Oseltamivir predominantly affects the psychiatric system, while baloxavir marboxil primarily impacts the gastrointestinal system. Additionally, oseltamivir demonstrates a certain level of safety for use in pregnant women, while reports of adverse reactions such as respiratory arrest are associated with baloxavir marboxil. Despite the clinical significance of this study, limitations exist due to the voluntary nature of data reporting, which may lead to reporting biases and incomplete information. Future research could employ more rigorous prospective study designs, integrating clinical trials and epidemiological studies, to more accurately assess the safety risks of oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil.

Evaluation of pitolisant, sodium oxybate, solriamfetol, and modafinil for the management of narcolepsy: a retrospective analysis of the FAERS database

Objective

Narcolepsy, a rare neurological disorder believed to have an autoimmune etiology, necessitates lifelong management. This study aimed to provide evidence supporting the safety of pharmacological treatment for narcolepsy.

Methods

Five-year data on pitolisant, sodium oxybate, solriamfetol, and modafinil were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) self-reporting database for the period spanning from 2019 to 2023. Various statistical methods, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network analysis (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), were employed to quantify the signals. Finally, a comparative analysis was conducted between demographic data, outcomes, and inherent associations among the medications and the signals.

Results

After data analysis, we obtained 50 signals (a cumulative count of 762 cases) for pitolisant, 640 signals (corresponding to 46,962 cases) for sodium oxybate, 40 signals (equivalent to 1,228 cases) for solriamfetol, and finally, 72 signals (representing 632 cases) for modafinil. The majority of these patients were female. Psychiatric and nervous system disorders were identified as the predominant adverse drug events (ADEs). For sodium oxybate, it is crucial to consider psychiatric disorders (such as suicidal ideation), respiratory disorders (including sleep apnea syndrome and respiratory depression), and signs of pregnancy and congenital familial diseases. For solriamfetol, noteworthy new ADEs include drug inefficacy, suicidal ideation, restless legs syndrome, and somnambulism. Furthermore, a relationship has been observed between modafinil use and restricted fetal growth, spontaneous abortion, cognitive disorders, and drug inefficacy and abuse.

Conclusion

The majority of observed adverse reactions in this study were consistent with those listed in the product instructions. However, potential novel or notable ADE signals were identified through real-world pharmacovigilance analysis. It is anticipated that this paper will offer additional information regarding safe and rational medication for narcolepsy.

Comparison of adverse events of poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors in patients with ovarian cancer using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

Olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib are the three primary poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors that are currently available in the market. Previous studies indicate different incidences of adverse events based on the PARP inhibitor or country.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study used data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System collected between January 2018 and December 2023. The data analyzed in this study involved patients receiving PARP inhibitors for treating ovarian cancer. A comparative analysis of the three PARP inhibitors was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the adjusted ROR (aROR) controlling for patient background differences.

RESULTS

The aROR for niraparib was significant at > 1.000, including platelet count decreased (p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001) when olaparib was set as the reference. Conversely, the aROR for niraparib was significant at < 1.000, including anemia (p < 0.001). Additionally, significant differences were observed in various adverse events for rucaparib. Moreover, significant differences were observed when comparing between countries.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the types of adverse events may vary by PARP inhibitor and by country. These results will be beneficial in clinical practice.

Antihypertensive drug-associated adverse events in osteoarthritis: a study of a large real-world sample based on the FAERS database

Background

Hypertension is a common complication in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). There is increasing interest in the relationship between hypertension and OA. However, hypertension has been reported to negatively affect symptoms and quality of life in patients with OA. Therefore, treating hypertension is crucial for patients with OA. However, there is a lack of real-world studies on the effects of medications for treating hypertension on OA.

Methods

Data from the FAERS database from January 2004 to December 2023 were extracted for disproportionality analyses, and proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) were used to assess the association between medications for hypertension and all types of arthritis. Adverse event signals were identified and determined using reporting odds ratios (RORs) Adverse event signals were considered to have occurred if a drug-induced adverse event was recorded more than or equal to 3 and the lower limit of the ROR confidence interval was more than 1. We selected five classes of drugs including, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), thiazide diuretics and β-blockers and representative drugs were analysed for osteoarthritis-related adverse reactions, and age and gender subgroups were analysed for drugs of significance. We also analysed the occurrence of AEs in relation to time using the Weibull distribution.

Results

In terms of overall data, we found significant OA adverse reaction signals only for ARBs among the five drug classes.ARB AEs for spinal osteoarthritis (ROR 4.64, 95% CI 3.62-5.94), osteoarthritis (ROR 3.24 95% CI 2.82-3.72) and gouty arthritis (ROR 3.27 95% CI 1.22-8.75) were the three adverse reactions with the loudest signals. Next, we found that valsartan had strong osteoarthritis adverse reaction signals among the three ARBs, namely, irbesartan, cloxartan, and valsartan. We also analysed age and gender subgroups and found that osteoarthritis signals were strongest in the 18-65 and 65+ population, while females seem to be more prone to valsartan-related OA AEs.

Conclusion

ARBs, especially valsartan, have significant positive signals for OA AEs. Therefore, ARB drugs, especially valsartan, should be used with caution when treating patients with OA combined with hypertension.

Talazoparib for the treatment of prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Around 25% of patients with advanced prostate cancer harbor alterations in the homologous recombination/DNA damage repair (HRR) pathway. Inhibiting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in these patients leads to synthetic lethality, making PARP inhibitors (PARPi), including talazoparib, a promising treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and potentially for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

AREAS COVERED

This article examines the mechanism of action, chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical safety and efficacy data of different PARPis, including talazoparib in prostate cancer. It reviews the TALAPRO-1 and TALAPRO-2 clinical trials and the ongoing TALAPRO-3 trial.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite recent therapeutic advancements, mCRPC remains a lethal disease. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) are approved for patients with mCRPC and mHSPC, yet most patients first receive these agents in the castration-resistant setting. Real-world data indicate that around half of patients with mCRPC do not receive subsequent lines of therapy, underscoring the efficacy of upfront combination therapies. The combinations of ARPI plus PARPi are indicated for patients with mCRPC harboring HRR mutations, though identifying these patients is challenging due to limited genomic testing. Further research and improved access to genomic testing are essential to optimize treatment strategies.

Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and hearing impairment: a disproportionality analysis using the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the association between phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) and hearing impairment adverse events (HIAEs) while providing an overview of the characteristics of drug-related HIAEs.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a detailed pharmacovigilance analysis using data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering 2004 to 2022. By calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC), we identified signals that indicate the association between PDE-5i use and HIAEs.

RESULTS

Among the 191,398 reports related to PDE-5i, we identified 2,608 cases of HIAEs. Signals were observed for both PDE-5i monotherapy and polytherapy, indicating combinations of drugs. Avanafil exhibited the strongest signal (ROR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.56-7.41, IC: 2.09, 95% CI: 0.10-3.51), while vardenafil showed the weakest signal (ROR: 2.69, 95% CI: 2.21-3.28, IC: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.74-2.04). Sildenafil had the highest reported cases (ROR: 3.03, 95% CI: 2.82-3.24, IC: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.34-1.80).

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight a significant correlation between PDE-5i use and HIAEs, emphasizing the need for careful evaluation in clinical practice and providing appropriate guidance to patients before initiating treatment.

Application of PARP inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in ovarian cancer

The advent of polyadenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) has brought about significant changes in the field of ovarian cancer treatment. However, in 2022, Rucaparib, Olaparib, and Niraparib, had their marketing approval revoked for third-line and subsequent therapies due to an increased potential for adverse events. Consequently, the exploration of new treatment modalities remains imperative. Recently, the integration of PARPi with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a potential remedy option within the context of ovarian cancer. This article offers a comprehensive examination of the mechanisms and applications of PARPi and ICIs in the treatment of ovarian cancer. It synthesizes the existing evidence supporting their combined use and discusses key considerations that merit attention in ongoing development efforts.

CAR-T therapy pulmonary adverse event profile: a pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database (2017-2023)

Background

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, a rapidly emerging treatment for cancer that has gained momentum since its approval by the FDA in 2017, involves the genetic engineering of patients' T cells to target tumors. Although significant therapeutic benefits have been observed, life-threatening adverse pulmonary events have been reported.

Methods

Using SAS 9.4 with MedDRA 26.1, we retrospectively analyzed data from the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from 2017 to 2023. The analysis included the Reporting Odds Ratio Proportional Reporting Ratio Information Component and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean to assess the association between CAR-T cell therapy and adverse pulmonary events (PAEs).

Results

The FAERS database recorded 9,400 adverse events (AEs) pertaining to CAR-T therapies, of which 940 (10%) were PAEs. Among these CAR-T cell-related AEs, hypoxia was the most frequently reported (344 cases), followed by respiratory failure (127 cases). Notably, different CAR-T cell treatments demonstrated varying degrees of association with PAEs. Specifically, Tisa-cel was associated with severe events including respiratory failure and hypoxia, whereas Axi-cel was strongly correlated with both hypoxia and tachypnea. Additionally, other CAR-T therapies, namely, Brexu-cel, Liso-cel, Ide-cel, and Cilta-cel, have also been linked to distinct PAEs. Notably, the majority of these PAEs occurred within the first 30 days post-treatment. The fatality rates varied among the different CAR-T therapies, with Tisa-cel exhibiting the highest fatality rate (43.6%), followed by Ide-cel (18.8%).

Conclusion

This study comprehensively analyzed the PAEs reported in the FAERS database among recipients of CAR-T cell therapy, revealing conditions such as hypoxia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, and atelectasis. These CAR-T cell therapy-associated events are clinically significant and merit the attention of clinicians and researchers.

Cardiovascular adverse events associated with PARP inhibitors for ovarian cancer: a real world study (RWS) with Bayesian disproportional analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

To investigate the pharmacovigilance (PV) and make pairwise comparisons on reporting proportion, seriousness, and severity of outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-inhibitors (PARPis) in treating ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal cancer (collectively named EOC) from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data on adverse cardiovascular events reports related to EOC treatment submitted to FAERS from the first quarter of 2015 to the second quarter of 2023 were harvested. Three PARPis were identified: olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib.

RESULTS

Eventually, a total of 258,596 eligible records were enrolled with 12,331 reports including 5,292 reports of MACE and 7,039 reports of other cardiovascular events. For the primary composite endpoint, a PV signal associated with MACE was detected in niraparib (ROR = 1.12; IC025 = 0.03), whereas it was not detected in olaparib and rucaparib; For the secondary endpoint, PV signals associated with other cardiovascular events were detected in niraparib (ROR = 1.17;IC025 = 0.04), but not in olaparib and rucaparib.

CONCLUSIONS

For EOC patients, close monitoring of blood pressure, heart rate, and coagulation function should be conducted when selecting niraparib for treatment.

Improved QSAR models for PARP-1 inhibition using data balancing, interpretable machine learning, and matched molecular pair analysis

The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) enzyme is an important target in the treatment of breast cancer. Currently, treatment options include the drugs Olaparib, Niraparib, Rucaparib, and Talazoparib; however, these drugs can cause severe side effects including hematological toxicity and cardiotoxicity. Although in silico models for the prediction of PARP-1 activity have been developed, the drawbacks of these models include low specificity, a narrow applicability domain, and a lack of interpretability. To address these issues, a comprehensive machine learning (ML)-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) approach for the informed prediction of PARP-1 activity is presented. Classification models built using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for data balancing gave robust and predictive models based on the K-nearest neighbor algorithm (accuracy 0.86, sensitivity 0.88, specificity 0.80). Regression models were built on structurally congeneric datasets, with the models for the phthalazinone class and fused cyclic compounds giving the best performance. In accordance with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guidelines, a mechanistic interpretation is proposed using the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to identify the important topological features to differentiate between PARP-1 actives and inactives. Moreover, an analysis of the PARP-1 dataset revealed the prevalence of activity cliffs, which possibly negatively impacts the model's predictive performance. Finally, a set of chemical transformation rules were extracted using the matched molecular pair analysis (MMPA) which provided mechanistic insights and can guide medicinal chemists in the design of novel PARP-1 inhibitors.

Adverse Event Profiles of the Third-Generation Aromatase Inhibitors: Analysis of Spontaneous Reports Submitted to FAERS

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), represented by letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, have been used as a standard first-line adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer patients with positive hormone receptor. However, their safety in the real world has not been systematically analyzed. We used the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate adverse event (AE) profiles of the three AIs, covering the period from Q1 2004 to Q3 2023. The time-to-event onset profiles and cumulative incidence were analyzed by Weibull shape parameter test and Kaplan-Meier method, respectively. The disproportionality analysis was utilized to assess drug toxicity risk. Based on the FAERS database, 18,035, 8242, and 7011 reports listing letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane as primary suspected drugs were extracted, respectively. AEs associated with anastrozole displayed the latest onset (p < 0.0001); meanwhile, WSP test showed that all three AIs had early failure-type profiles. At the preferred term level, we acquired 95, 59, and 42 significant signals associated with letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, which involved 18, 13, and 15 system organ classes, respectively. The three AIs all reported that their strongest AE signal was trigger finger. Neutropenia was the most frequent AE for letrozole, while the highest occurrences of anastrozole and exemestane were arthralgia. We also found that interstitial lung disease, a rare but serious AE, showed strong signal intensity in all three AIs. Additionally, letrozole was also associated with lots of other rare but serious AEs in hematologic, respiratory, and hepatic systems, which were not recorded in the instructions. Our analysis of safety warning signals of the third-generation AIs from the FAERS database provided reference for clinical safe and rational drug use.

Expanding the Perspective on PARP1 and Its Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: From DNA Damage Repair to Immunomodulation

The emergence of PARP inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy for tumors with high genomic instability, particularly those harboring BRCA mutations, has advanced cancer treatment. However, recent advances have illuminated a multifaceted role of PARP1 beyond its canonical function in DNA damage repair. This review explores the expanding roles of PARP1, highlighting its crucial interplay with the immune system during tumorigenesis. We discuss PARP1's immunomodulatory effects in macrophages and T cells, with a particular focus on cytokine expression. Understanding these immunomodulatory roles of PARP1 not only holds promise for enhancing the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy but also paves the way for novel treatment regimens targeting immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Analysis of eplerenone in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database: a focus on overall patient population and gender-specific subgroups

Introduction: Eplerenone is approved for the treatment of hypertension as well as symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following an acute myocardial infarction. However, the adverse events (AEs) have not been systematically analyzed. The aim of this study was to identify adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to eplerenone using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. By identifying previously unreported AEs, the study could potentially contribute to updating the drug's label. Methods: In order to find significant AEs, four algorithms, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM), were used to analyze the signal strength of the ADRs connected to eplerenone that were gathered from the FAERS database over the previous 20 years. Results: From 2004Q1 to 2023Q4, a total of 20, 629, 811 reported cases were gathered from the FAERS database for this study. After processing the data and filtering, 1,874 case reports were analyzed. Of these cases, 1,070 AEs were identified, 128 of which were eplerenone-related ADRs. We investigated the occurrence of ADRs induced by eplerenone in 27 organ systems. Our study showed that the AEs listed in the medication's package insert correspond with those listed in the literature, including hyperkalemia and increased creatinine. Additionally, the prescription label for eplerenone does not include all system organ class (SOC) terms, like Vascular disorders, hepatobiliary Disorders, etc. Discussion: The study used multiple algorithms to quantify the signal strength and then identified any previously unrecognized ADRs, further studies are needed to confirm the association of ADRs with eplerenone. The findings of this study may provide important insights into the safety profile of eplerenone, ensure that healthcare providers have up-to-date information about their potential risks and help guide them in the correct use of the drug.

Safety of tildrakizumab: a disproportionality analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database from 2018-2023

Background: Tildrakizumab, the IL-23 inhibitor, is used to treat plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Many studies have reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with Tildrakizumab. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe ADRs associated with Tildrakizumab monotherapy by mining data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: The signals of Tildrakizumab-associated ADRs were quantified using disproportionality analyses such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multiitem gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms. Results: A total of 10,530,937 reports of ADRs were collected from the FAERS database, of which 1,177 reports were identified with tildrakizumab as the "primary suspect (PS)". Tildrakizumab-induced ADRs occurred against 27 system organ classes (SOCs). A total of 32 significant disproportionality Preferred Terms (PTs) conformed to the algorithms. Unexpected significant ADRs such as coronavirus infection, herpes simplex, diverticulitis, atrial fibrillation and aortic valve incompetence were also possible. The median time to onset of Tildrakizumab-associated ADRs was 194 days (interquartile range [IQR] 84-329 days), with the majority occurring, within the first 1 and 3 months after initiation of Tildrakizumab. Conclusion: This study identified a potential signal for new ADRs with Tildrakizumab, which might provide important support for clinical monitoring and risk prediction.

New exploration of signal detection of Regional Risks from the perspective of data mining: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on spontaneous reporting data in Zhenjiang, China

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to adopt the conventional signal detection methods to explore a new way of risk identification and to mine important drug risks from the perspective of big data based on Zhenjiang Adverse Event Reporting System (ZAERS).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were extracted from ZAERS database between 2012 and 2022. The risks of all the reported drug event combinations were identified at the preferred term level and the standardized MedDRA query level using disproportionality analysis. Then, we conducted signal assessment according to the descriptions of drug labels.

RESULTS

In total 41,473 ADE were reported and there were 12 risky signals. Signal assessment indicates the suspected causal associations in clindamycin-taste and smell disorders, valsartan-hepatic enzyme increased and valsartan-edema peripheral; the specific manifestations of allergic reactions triggered by clindamycin, cefotaxime, cefazodime, ShexiangZhuanggu plaster, ShexiangZhuifeng plaster, and Yanhuning need to be refined in drug labels. In addition, the drug labels of NiuHuangShangQing tablet/capsule, Fuyanxiao capsule, and BiYanLing tablet should be improved.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we attempted a new way to find potential drug risks using small spontaneous reporting data. Our findings also suggested the need for more precise identification of allergic risks and the improvement of traditional Chinese medicine labels.

Possible adverse events of imidazole antifungal drugs during treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Azole antifungal drugs are commonly used to treat vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). The nephrotoxicity and developmental toxicity of azole drugs have not been systematically analyzed in the real world. We used the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate the adverse events (AEs) associated with imidazole therapy for VVC. FAERS data (from quarter 1 2004 to quarter 3 2022) were retrieved using OpenVigil 2.1, and AEs were retrieved and standardized according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). In the top 10 System Organ Class (SOC), all four drugs have been found to have kidney and urinary system diseases and pregnancy. We found significant signals, including clotrimazole [bladder transitional cell carcinoma, (report odds ratio, ROR = 291.66)], [fetal death, (ROR = 10.28)], ketoconazole[nephrogenic anemia (ROR = 22.1)], [premature rupture of membranes (ROR = 22.91 46.45, 11, 3)], Miconazole[hematuria (ROR = 19.03)], [neonatal sepsis (ROR = 123.71)], [spontaneous abortion (ROR = 5.98)], Econazole [acute kidney injury (ROR = 4.41)], [spontaneous abortion (ROR = 19.62)]. We also discovered new adverse reactions that were not reported. Therefore, when using imidazole drugs for treatment, it is necessary to closely monitor the patient's renal function, pay attention to the developmental toxicity of the fetus during pregnancy, and be aware of potential adverse reactions that may occur.

A pharmacovigilance study of chronic kidney disease in diabetes mellitus patients with statin treatment by using the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system

Background

Statins were regarded as a main medication for managing hypercholesterolemia. Administration of statin therapy could reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), which was recognized by multipal clinical guidelines. But previous studies had conflicting results on whether the long-term use of statins could benefit the renal function in diabetic patients.

Aim

To evaluate the association between statin treatment and Chronic Kidney Disease in DM patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective disproportionality analysis and cohort study based on real-world data. All DM cases reported in US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS) between the first quarter of 2004 and the fourth quarter of 2022 were included. Disproportionality analyses were conducted by estimating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC). We further compared the CKD odds ratio (OR) between the statins group and the other primary suspected drug group among the included diabetes mellitus cases.

Results

We finally included 593647 DM cases from FAERS, 5113 (5.31%) CKD cases in the statins group and 8810 (1.77%) CKD cases in the control group. Data analysis showed that the statins group showed a significant CKD signal (ROR: 3.11, 95% CI: 3.00-3.22; IC: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07-1.29). In case group with two or more statins treatment history, the CKD signal was even stronger (ROR: 19.56, 95% CI: 18.10-21.13; IC: 3.70, 95% CI:3.44-3.93) compared with cases with one statin treatment history.

Conclusion

The impact of statin therapy on the progression of renal disease in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) remains inconclusive. After data mining on the current FAERS dataset, we discovered significant signals between statin treatment and CKD in diabetic patients. Furthermore, the incidence rate of CKD was higher among DM patients who used statins compared to those who did not.

Detection and analysis of signals of adverse events of memantine based on the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Despite its widespread use, the adverse effects (AEs) of memantine have not been well documented, and there is a need to find new ways to analyze the AEs of memantine.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

AEs in which the primary suspected drug was memantine were retrieved from the FAERS database. The proportional report ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) were used to detect potential positive signals between memantine and AEs. SAS, MySQL, EXCEL, and R language software were used for data processing and statistical analysis.

RESULTS

This study gathered a total of 5808 reports of AEs associated with memantine. Of these reports, a greater proportion of female patients (51.17%) than male patients (36.33%) had AEs. The AEs reported by FAERS were mainly in psychiatric category (n = 2157, IC025 = 2.69), various neurologic disorders (n = 1608, IC025 = 2.04), systemic disorders and various site reactions (n = 842, IC025 = 1.29). Unexpected ocular adverse events have been reported, ophthalmic vein thrombosis (n = 4, IC025 = 3.47) and scleral discolouration (n = 7, IC025 = 3.1), which may worsen glaucoma.

CONCLUSIONS

This study observed conceivable new AEs signals and may supply important assist for scientific monitoring and threat identification of memantine.

Post-marketing safety surveillance of dalfampridine for multiple sclerosis using FDA adverse event reporting system

Objective: To investigate and analyze the post-marketing adverse event (AE) data of multiple sclerosis (MS) therapeutic drug dalfampridine using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for its clinical safety application. Methods: Use OpenVigil2.1 platform to obtain AE data of dalfampridine from FAERS from February 2010 to September 2022. Match "adverse drug reaction" with preferred term (PT) and system organ class (SOC) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), then merge the same PT and delete non-AE PT. Positive signals were identified by the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) methods. When AE signals met the criteria of those three methods, they were identified as positive signals. Results: A total of 44,092 dalfampridine-related AE reports were obtained, and 335 AE signals were identified, including 11,889 AE reports. AEs were more common in females and in the 45-65 age group, which is consistent with the epidemiological characteristics of MS. The 335 AE signals involved 21 SOCs, including investigations, infections and infestations, eye disorders, etc. Among the top 20 PTs in signal strength, 10 were associated with abnormal lymphocyte percentage and count, and 5 were associated with abnormal urine tests, some of which were not described in the instruction, such as spinal cord injury cauda equina, haemoglobin urine present, urinary sediment abnormal and so on. The most frequently reported AE signals were urinary tract infection, dizziness, condition aggravated. In addition, 23 AE signals with death outcomes were identified, with an incidence of less than 0.1%. Conclusion: Data mining of FAERS was conducted to analyze the AEs of dalfampridine, and new AE signals were found. This study provides a reference for the safe use of dalfampridine in the treatment of MS.

Interstitial lung disease in patients treated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi): analysis of results from clinical trials and the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System database

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of interstitial lung disease associated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and characterize its clinical features.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed phase III randomized clinical trials of interstitial lung disease related to PARPi and calculated Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pharmacovigilance studies were conducted by collecting cases of PARPi-related interstitial lung disease from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System and assessing disproportionalities by reporting ORs and information components.

RESULTS

A total of five randomized clinical trials involving 2980 patients were included. Although PARPi showed a tendency to increase the risk of interstitial lung disease compared with controls, this difference was not significant (Peto OR: 4.92; 95% CI: 0.92 to 26.35). A total of 170 cases of interstitial lung disease related to PARPi were included, with a median latency of 99 days. PARPi had a significantly increased reporting of interstitial lung disease (reporting OR: 2.86; 95% CI: 2.46 to 3.33; information component (IC): 1.49; 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.74). Our sensitivity analyses showed strong robustness of the disproportionalities between PARPi as a class, olaparib, and interstitial lung disease. Some 91.9% of patients experienced discontinuation, 51.6% achieved remission, and no deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

Our pharmacovigilance study suggested increased reporting of interstitial lung disease related to PARPi particularly olaparib.

Peripheral Neuropathy Potentially Associated to Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors: An Analysis of the Eudravigilance Database

Poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have emerged as a targeted therapy in cancer treatment with promising results in various types of cancer. This work aims to investigate the profile of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with PARPi through the reports provided by the Eudravigilance (EV) database. We also intend to analyze the potential association of peripheral neuropathy to PARPi. Data on individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were obtained by accessing the European spontaneous reporting system via the EV website. A total of 12,762 ICSRs were collected from the EV database. Serious cases of nervous system disorders were analyzed providing strong evidence that peripheral neuropathy was reported in a higher frequency in patients treated with niraparib. Most cases reported a not recovered/not resolved outcome and involved drug withdrawal. However, several studies suggest that PARPi attenuate chemotherapy-induced painful neuropathy. Unexpected ADRs such as peripheral neuropathy may also occur, mostly in patients taking niraparib. Further pharmacovigilance studies should be conducted in this area to clarify with more precision the toxicity profile of these drugs.

Managing Adverse Effects Associated With Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: A Synthesis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data

The use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy is standard care in the management of patients with various malignancies including ovarian, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. PARP inhibitors have been approved in different settings for patients with specific hereditary pathogenic variants, most notably homologous recombination repair pathways such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The vast experience with PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib) has been in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer. There have not been any head-to-head comparisons of PARP inhibitors in randomized trials, and we can only perform cross-comparison on the basis of the reported literature. The three approved PARP inhibitors share several common adverse effects because of a class effect including nausea, fatigue, and anemia, but there are notable differences likely because of variations in their poly-pharmacology and off-target effects. Finally, patients included in clinical trials are often younger with a good performance status and less comorbidities than the real-world population, and hence, the potential benefits and adverse effects may not be superimposable. In this review, we describe these differences and discuss strategies to mitigate and manage adverse side effects effectively.

Reporting of Drug-Induced Myopathies Associated with the Combination of Statins and Daptomycin: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

Myopathy is one of the most common adverse reactions of daptomycin and statins. We aimed to evaluate the muscular toxicity of the combination therapy of daptomycin and statins in a large pharmacovigilance database.

METHODS

This was a retrospective disproportionality analysis based on real-world data. All cases reported between the first quarter of 2004 and the fourth quarter of 2022 where daptomycin and statins were reported were gathered from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Disproportionality analyses were conducted by estimating the proportional reporting ratios (PRRs), reporting odds ratio (ROR), and information component (IC).

RESULTS

A total of 971,861 eligible cases were collected from the FAERS database. Data analysis showed that rosuvastatin (ROR: 124.39, 95% CI: 87.35-178.47), atorvastatin (ROR: 68.53, 95% CI: 51.93-90.43), and simvastatin (ROR: 94.83, 95% CI: 71.12-126.46) combined with daptomycin increased the reporting frequency of myopathy. Moreover, myopathy was reported more frequently with the 3-drug combination (ROR: 598.01, 95% CI: 231.81-1542.71). For rhabdomyolysis, the frequency of reports also increased when daptomycin was combined with rosuvastatin (ROR: 156.34, 95% CI: 96.21-254.05), simvastatin (ROR: 72.65, 95% CI: 47.36-111.44), and atorvastatin (ROR: 66.31, 95% CI: 44.06-99.81).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of daptomycin and statins increased the association of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis, especially with rosuvastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin.

Myeloid neoplasms post PARP inhibitors for ovarian cancer

The incidence of myeloid neoplasms following treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in patients with ovarian cancer has been gradually increasing over the last few years. The cumulative exposure to PARPi and the improved overall survival of patients with ovarian cancer may represent key underlying explanations behind such trend. Fortunately, the earlier introduction of PARPi in the frontline setting reduces the risk of developing secondary myeloid neoplasms. The etiopathogenesis is still unclear but is likely to be multifactorial. The first 2 years of PARPi exposure seem to be the critical window for the onset of myeloid neoplasms post PARPi, with persistent cytopenia recognized as an early warning sign. Despite intensive treatment strategies, the outcome remains poor. There is an unmet clinical need to learn how to minimize risk, make an early diagnosis, and manage myeloid neoplasms post PARPi. First, decision making regarding the optimal maintenance treatment should avoid a 'PARPi-for-all' strategy. PARPi should be used cautiously in cases of high baseline risk for myeloid neoplasms and/or patients who are less likely to have a benefit. Active surveillance, accurate differential diagnosis, and prompt hematological referral are key management pillars. This review discusses what is known on this emerging issue as well as unresolved questions.

Recent advances in cancer therapy using PARP inhibitors

When DNA repair is inadequate it increases the chances of the genome becoming unstable and it undergoes a malignant mutation. The deficiency of DNA repair PARP proteins may be leveraged for cancer therapy by increasing genomic instability and causing massive DNA damage in cancer cells. DNA repair components are under increased demand in cancer cells because of the continuous replication of DNA. The oncogenic loss of BRCA and an inefficient DNA repair led to cancer cells being dependent on particular DNA repair pathways, like the Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase pathway. Breast cancer gene 1 and 2 plays a crucial role in DNA repair and genome integrity explaining how BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations raise the menace of cancer. PARP inhibitors inhibit the base exclusion repair pathway, resulting in the buildup of unrepaired single strand breaks, which cause inflated replication forks in the S phase and subsequently the development of damaging double stranded breaks. Cells having BRCA mutations are unable to repair DNA breaks, leading to apoptosis and eventually death of cancer cells. Numerous indicators, such as a lack of homologous recombination and a high degree of replication pressure, indicate that this therapy will be very effective. Combining PARP inhibitors with chemotherapy, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, and a targeted drug is an effective strategy for combating PARP inhibitors resistance. Several PARP-based combination approaches are in preclinical and clinical development. Various clinical trials are successfully completed and some are undergoing to evaluate the efficacy of these molecules. This review will describe the current views and clinical updates on PARP inhibitors.

Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events Induced by PARP Inhibitors Using JADER and Time to Onset

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are effective against breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations. Clinical trials have reported hematologic toxicity and gastrointestinal symptoms as class effects of PARP inhibitors. However, information on adverse events (AEs) in a Japanese clinical cohort is currently lacking. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive survey of the AEs of two PARP inhibitors, olaparib and niraparib, using the Japanese Adverse Reaction Reporting (JADER) database provided by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Moreover, we also analyzed the course and time to the onset of AEs. Signals were detected for 15 and 11 AEs for olaparib and niraparib, respectively. Most occurred within the first month of treatment with either agent. These results may indicate the importance of early response and monitoring after beginning PARP inhibitor therapy. The results of this study may be useful for managing side effects and suggesting supportive care for patients using PARP inhibitors in the future.