Association of proton pump inhibitors with gastric and colorectal cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) and European Society of Pathology (ESP) Guideline update 2025

At a population level, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) suggest endoscopic screening for gastric cancer (and precancerous conditions) in high-risk regions (age-standardized rate [ASR] > 20 per 100 000 person-years) every 2 to 3 years or, if cost-effectiveness has been proven, in intermediate risk regions (ASR 10-20 per 100 000 person-years) every 5 years, but not in low-risk regions (ASR < 10).ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that irrespective of country of origin, individual gastric risk assessment and stratification of precancerous conditions is recommended for first-time gastroscopy. ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest that gastric cancer screening or surveillance in asymptomatic individuals over 80 should be discontinued or not started, and that patients' comorbidities should be considered when treatment of superficial lesions is planned.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that a high quality endoscopy including the use of virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE), after proper training, is performed for screening, diagnosis, and staging of precancerous conditions (atrophy and intestinal metaplasia) and lesions (dysplasia or cancer), as well as after endoscopic therapy. VCE should be used to guide the sampling site for biopsies in the case of suspected neoplastic lesions as well as to guide biopsies for diagnosis and staging of gastric precancerous conditions, with random biopsies to be taken in the absence of endoscopically suspected changes. When there is a suspected early gastric neoplastic lesion, it should be properly described (location, size, Paris classification, vascular and mucosal pattern), photodocumented, and two targeted biopsies taken.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP do not recommend routine performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT prior to endoscopic resection unless there are signs of deep submucosal invasion or if the lesion is not considered suitable for endoscopic resection.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for differentiated gastric lesions clinically staged as dysplastic (low grade and high grade) or as intramucosal carcinoma (of any size if not ulcerated or ≤ 30 mm if ulcerated), with EMR being an alternative for Paris 0-IIa lesions of size ≤ 10 mm with low likelihood of malignancy.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest that a decision about ESD can be considered for malignant lesions clinically staged as having minimal submucosal invasion if differentiated and ≤ 30 mm; or for malignant lesions clinically staged as intramucosal, undifferentiated and ≤ 20 mm; and in both cases with no ulcerative findings.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommends patient management based on the following histological risk after endoscopic resection: Curative/very low-risk resection (lymph node metastasis [LNM] risk < 0.5 %-1 %): en bloc R0 resection; dysplastic/pT1a, differentiated lesion, no lymphovascular invasion, independent of size if no ulceration and ≤ 30 mm if ulcerated. No further staging procedure or treatment is recommended.Curative/low-risk resection (LNM risk < 3 %): en bloc R0 resection; lesion with no lymphovascular invasion and: a) pT1b, invasion ≤ 500 µm, differentiated, size ≤ 30 mm; or b) pT1a, undifferentiated, size ≤ 20 mm and no ulceration. Staging should be completed, and further treatment is generally not necessary, but a multidisciplinary discussion is required. Local-risk resection (very low risk of LNM but increased risk of local persistence/recurrence): Piecemeal resection or tumor-positive horizontal margin of a lesion otherwise meeting curative/very low-risk criteria (or meeting low-risk criteria provided that there is no submucosal invasive tumor at the resection margin in the case of piecemeal resection or tumor-positive horizontal margin for pT1b lesions [invasion ≤ 500 µm; well-differentiated; size ≤ 30 mm, and VM0]). Endoscopic surveillance/re-treatment is recommended rather than other additional treatment. High-risk resection (noncurative): Any lesion with any of the following: (a) a positive vertical margin (if carcinoma) or lymphovascular invasion or deep submucosal invasion (> 500 µm from the muscularis mucosae); (b) poorly differentiated lesions if ulceration or size > 20 mm; (c) pT1b differentiated lesions with submucosal invasion ≤ 500 µm with size > 30 mm; or (d) intramucosal ulcerative lesion with size > 30 mm. Complete staging and strong consideration for additional treatments (surgery) in multidisciplinary discussion.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest the use of validated endoscopic classifications of atrophy (e. g. Kimura-Takemoto) or intestinal metaplasia (e. g. endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia [EGGIM]) to endoscopically stage precancerous conditions and stratify the risk for gastric cancer.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that biopsies should be taken from at least two topographic sites (2 biopsies from the antrum/incisura and 2 from the corpus, guided by VCE) in two separate, clearly labeled vials. Additional biopsy from the incisura is optional.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that patients with extensive endoscopic changes (Kimura C3 + or EGGIM 5 +) or advanced histological stages of atrophic gastritis (severe atrophic changes or intestinal metaplasia, or changes in both antrum and corpus, operative link on gastritis assessment/operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia [OLGA/OLGIM] III/IV) should be followed up with high quality endoscopy every 3 years, irrespective of the individual's country of origin.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that no surveillance is proposed for patients with mild to moderate atrophy or intestinal metaplasia restricted to the antrum, in the absence of endoscopic signs of extensive lesions or other risk factors (family history, incomplete intestinal metaplasia, persistent H. pylori infection). This group constitutes most individuals found in clinical practice.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend H. pylori eradication for patients with precancerous conditions and after endoscopic or surgical therapy.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that patients should be advised to stop smoking and low-dose daily aspirin use may be considered for the prevention of gastric cancer in selected individuals with high risk for cardiovascular events.

Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review, evidence synthesis and life course epidemiology perspective

OBJECTIVES

Since proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have been introduced, many concerns were raised regarding potential gastric carcinogenicity. We aim to summarise and weigh the epidemiological evidence and address possible causality.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review, evidence synthesis and life-course assessment.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane database (from inception up to October 2024), and back- and forward citation tracking (Web of Science).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Original studies and quantitative evidence syntheses assessing the association between PPIs and gastric cancer in humans, without language restrictions.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Study design, definitions (and participant numbers) of PPI use and gastric cancer, study characteristics (setting, period, follow-up, lag-time), age and sex distribution presented in tables and evidence mapping.

RESULTS

We identified 33 original studies, 21 meta-analyses, three umbrella meta-analyses, one individual patient data meta-analysis and a Markov model (2006-2023). PPIs were consistently associated with an increased gastric cancer risk with 20/21 meta-analyses reporting pooled relative risks between 1.3 and 2.9. Available trials were underpowered. Reverse causation/protopathic bias, residual confounding (by indication) and lag time seem the largest methodological challenges, as well as disentangling the effects of Helicobacter pylori and its' eradication. Insufficient data are available on age and sex-specific risks, with no studies specifically addressing PPIs in young populations. We hypothesise a sensitive-period exposure model, in which PPI use during pregnancy and early life may be particularly damaging regarding long-term cancer risk. An exploration of Swedish cancer incidence data suggests potential cohort effects as overall gastric cancer risk decreased over time (1970-2022). The risk has increased in young (<40 years) men since the early 2000s, ~10 years after the introduction of Helicobacter pylori eradication and PPIs.

CONCLUSION

Although for older individuals with valid indications, the gastric cancer risk related to PPI use may be limited, we do argue for a more rational and evidence-supported use of PPIs in young populations.

Prenatal and Early Childhood Exposure to Proton Pump Inhibitors and Antibiotics and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Our microbiome is established during infancy, a time important for later health and long-term effects. Proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics are regularly prescribed during pregnancy. Both drugs cause microbiome disturbance and have been associated with increased cancer risk in adults, but effects of these drugs on the growing foetus and infant remain understudied.

AIM

The aim of this study is to study the association between prenatal and early life proton pump inhibitor and antibiotics exposure and the risk of childhood cancer.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective population-based cohort design, using registry data on all births (n = 722,372) in Sweden between 2006 and 2016, according to the STROBE checklist. For women who had multiple children in the timeframe of the study, only the first child during the time period was included in the cohort. Exposure was defined as either ≥ 1 proton pump inhibitor or antibiotics prescription during pregnancy, or during the first 2 years of life. Outcome was defined as cancer at any time during the follow-up or cancer after the age of 2 years for early life exposure. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios.

RESULTS

In total, 1091 (0.2%) children were diagnosed with malignant cancer during the follow-up. Prenatal exposure to proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics were not associated with an increased risk of cancer. Regarding early life exposure, proton pump inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of cancer at age two or older (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24-6.06).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence that prenatal proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics were associated with overall childhood cancer. However, proton pump inhibitors during early life were associated with an increased risk of childhood cancer, but indication on drug use was not available and confounding by indication may be present.

A pharmacovigilance study of the association between proton pump inhibitors and tumor adverse events based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective treatments for acid-related disorders but may pose tumor risks with long-term use. Current research on PPI-associated tumor adverse events (TAEs) is limited and inconclusive. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the relationship between PPIs and TAEs.

Methods

We analyzed PPI adverse reaction reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database spanning from 2004 to 2024, focusing on five commonly used PPIs: esomeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, and rabeprazole. We conducted a disproportionality analysis utilizing the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) to identify potential TAEs associated with PPIs. We conducted univariate logistic regression analysis to explore the influencing factors.

Results

A total of 3,133 TAEs were identified, representing 2.36% of all PPI-related adverse events (AEs). The most common TAEs were gastric cancer (19.05%) and malignant neoplasm (7.23%). Disproportionality analysis revealed ten significant TAEs associated with PPIs, including gastric adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma. The median age of those reporting TAEs was 59 (interquartile range [IQR]: 51-70), and 29.70% of them resulted in a fatality. TAEs associated with PPIs were less likely to occur in elderly patients (65-75: OR = 0.91 [0.87-0.95], p < 0.001; >75: OR = 0.93 [0.89-0.98], p < 0.01).

Conclusion

TAEs constitute a small but significant fraction of PPI-related AEs. This study highlights the need for cautious long-term use of PPIs and further research to understand the underlying mechanisms and risk factors. Clinicians should be aware of the potential tumor risks associated with prolonged PPI treatment.

The influence of Helicobacter pylori, proton pump inhibitor, and obesity on the gastric microbiome in relation to gastric cancer development

Helicobacter pylori infection is still the main risk factor for the development of gastric cancer (GC). We explore the scientific evidence for the role of the gastric microbiome beyond Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in gastric carcinogenesis. The composition of the gastric microbiome in healthy individuals, in presence and absence of H. pylori infection, in proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-users, obese individuals, and GC patients was investigated. Possible mechanisms for microbial involvement, limitations of available research and options for future studies are provided. A common finding amongst studies was increased levels of Streptococcus, Prevotella, Neisseria, and Actinomyces in healthy individuals or those with H. pylori-negative gastritis. In PPI-users the risk for GC increases with the treatment duration, and the gastric microbiome shifts, with the most consistent increase in the genus Streptococcus. Similarly, in obese individuals, Streptococcus was the most abundant genus, with an increased risk for cardia GC. The genera Streptococcus, Lactobacillus and Prevotella were found to be more prominent in GC patients in multiple studies. Potential mechanisms of non-H. pylori microbiota contributing to GC are linked to lipopolysaccharide production, contribution to inflammatory pathways, and the formation of N-nitroso compounds and reactive oxygen species. In conclusion, the knowledge of the gastric microbiome in GC is mainly descriptive and based on sequencing of gastric mucosal samples. For a better mechanistic understanding of microbes in GC development, longitudinal cohorts including precancerous lesions, different regions in the stomach, and subtypes of GC, and gastric organoid models for diffuse and intestinal type GC should be employed.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Oral-Gut Microbiota: From Mechanism to Clinical Significance

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are some of the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide, but there are increasing concerns about digestive complications linked to PPIs. Next-generation sequencing studies have suggested that PPIs can significantly affect the composition of the gut microbiota, which in turn may substantially contribute to the development of these complications. Recently, emerging evidence has suggested that the translocation of oral microbes into the gut may be the primary mechanism underlying the alterations in the gut microbiota induced by PPIs in the presence of gastric acid suppression and impaired oral-gut barrier function. Moreover, the significance of oral-gut microbial translocation in health and disease conditions has gained increasing recognition. Consequently, it is imperative to enhance our understanding of the functions of the oral-gut microbiota axis in digestive disorders associated with PPI therapies. This review aims to summarize current research findings and further elucidate the contribution of the oral-gut microbiota to the pathogenesis of PPI-related digestive diseases. We aim to provide a theoretical foundation for future therapeutic and preventive strategies targeting PPI-related digestive complications through modulation of the oral-gut microbiota.

Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor-Acid Suppressive Treatment Can Cause Vitamin B12 Deficiency in Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome (ZES) Patients

Whether the long-term treatment of patients with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with different diseases [GERD, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), etc.] can result in vitamin B12 (VB12) deficiency is controversial. In this study, in 175 patients undergoing long-term ZES treatment with anti-acid therapies, drug-induced control acid secretory rates were correlated with the presence/absence of VB12 deficiency, determined by assessing serum VB12 levels, measurements of VB12 body stores (blood methylmalonic acid (MMA) and total homocysteine[tHYC]), and other features of ZES. After a mean of 10.2 yrs. of any acid treatment (5.6 yrs. with PPIs), 21% had VB12 deficiency with significantly lower serum and body VB12 levels (p < 0.0001). The presence of VB12 deficiency did not correlate with any feature of ZES but was associated with a 12-fold lower acid control rate, a 2-fold higher acid control pH (6.4 vs. 3.7), and acid control secretory rates below those required for the activation of pepsin (pH > 3.5). Over a 5-yr period, the patients with VB12 deficiency had a higher rate of achlorhydria (73% vs. 24%) and a lower rate of normal acid secretion (0% vs. 49%). In conclusion, in ZES patients, chronic long-term PPI treatment results in marked acid hyposecretion, resulting in decreased serum VB12 levels and decreased VB12-body stores, which can result in VB12 deficiency.

Two Cases of Increased Gastrointestinal Polyps in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis following Antiacid Agent Intake

INTRODUCTION

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), a hereditary disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, is an autosomal dominant inherited condition caused by germline mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. It is characterized by the development of hundreds to thousands of colorectal adenomatous polyps, which, if left untreated, can eventually develop into colorectal carcinomas. Representative extracolonic tumors in FAP include multiple duodenal adenomas and desmoid tumors. Moreover, multiple fundic gland polyps are frequently identified in the stomachs of patients with FAP.

CASE PRESENTATION

Herein, we report the two cases. A 52-year-old woman who underwent total colectomy for FAP, and pancreatoduodenectomy was initiated on esomeprazole for the treatment of anastomotic erosion. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed 42 months later showed an increased number and size of gastric fundic gland polyps, which subsequently decreased after replacing esomeprazole with ranitidine. Similarly, a 39-year-old woman with FAP was initiated on vonoprazan for the treatment of reflux symptoms. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy performed 14 months later indicated an increase in the number of gastric fundic gland polyps and colorectal polyps, which subsequently decreased after vonoprazan discontinuation. In these two cases, the increase and decrease in the number and size of fundic gland polyps and colon adenoma were associated with serum gastrin levels.

CONCLUSION

Gastric fundic gland polyps and colon polyps may rapidly increase in number and size due to increased gastrin levels induced by proton pump inhibitor/potassium-competitive acid blocker use. Hence, these drugs should be prescribed with caution.

Gastric Mucosal Protective Effects of Cinnamomum cassia in a Rat Model of Ethanol-Induced Gastric Injury

Cinnamomum cassia (cassia) is a tropical aromatic evergreen tree of the Lauraceae family well known for its fragrance and spicy flavor and widely used in Asian traditional medicine. It has recently garnered attention for its diverse potential health benefits, including anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and anti-diabetic properties. However, the gastroprotective effect of C. cassia, particularly against ethanol-induced gastric damage, remains unclear. We investigated the potential gastroprotective property of C. cassia and the underlying mechanisms of action in a rat model of ethanol-induced gastric injury. To assess its effectiveness, rats were fed C. cassia for a 14-day period prior to inducing gastric damage by oral administration of ethanol. Our results indicated that pre-treatment with C. cassia mitigated ethanol-induced gastric mucosal lesions and bleeding. Reduced gastric acid secretion and expression of acid secretion-linked receptors were also observed. Additionally, pretreatment with C. cassia led to decreased levels of inflammatory factors, including TNF-α, p-p65, and IκBα. Notably, C. cassia upregulated the expressions of HO1 and HSP90, with particular emphasis on the enhanced expression of PAS and MUC, the crucial gastric mucosa defense molecules. These findings suggest that C. cassia has protective effects on the gastric mucosa and can effectively reduce oxidative stress and inflammation.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Likelihood of Colorectal Cancer in the Korean Population: Insights from a Nested Case-Control Study Using National Health Insurance Data

The potential connection between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk remains unclear, with specific ethnic genetic backgrounds playing a role in PPI-induced adverse effects. In this nested case-control study, we investigated the risk of CRC in relation to preceding PPI use and the duration of use using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database, including 9374 incident CRC patients and 37,496 controls. To assess the impact of preceding PPI exposure (past vs. current) and use duration (days: <30, 30-90, and ≥90) on incident CRC, we conducted propensity score overlap-weighted multivariate logistic regression analyses, adjusted for confounding factors. Our findings revealed that past and current PPI users had an increased likelihood of developing CRC. Regardless of duration, individuals who used PPIs also had higher odds of developing CRC. Subgroup analyses revealed that CRC occurrence increased independent of history or duration of prior PPI use, consistent across various factors such as age, sex, income level, and residential area. These findings suggest that PPI use, regardless of past or present use and duration of use, may be related to an increased risk of developing CRC in the Korean population.

The Complex Interaction between Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cancer Treatment

We have read the article authored by Rizzo et al [...].

Relevance of early management by proton-pump inhibitor in acute upper gastro-intestinal tract disorder: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently used in the emergency and general practice settings in several clinical presentations linked to acute upper gastro-intestinal tract disorders as abdominal or chest pain without recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this scoping review was to assess pain reduction, diagnostic performance, and safety in the first 24 h-management in primary care or emergency medicine.

METHODS

Search was realized by 2 independent reviewers in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Only original articles or systematic reviews in English were included. Studies about chronic and/or bleeding conditions, therapeutic cocktails and studies without pain evaluation were excluded. Two methodologies were used for bias estimation.

RESULTS

From 4442 titles, 79 full-text articles were assessed, and 9 were included. There is no strong evidence supporting the use of PPI as a first line analgesic or diagnostic test in acute syndromes linked to acute upper gastro-intestinal tract disorder. A small effect in pain reduction was retrieved in patients with low pain scores. A poor additional value in patients with gastric reflux, and a low specificity compared to other diagnostic tests were observed. A short-term PPI administration appears to be safe with low risk of serious allergic reactions, and poor adverse effects (moderate evidence).

CONCLUSION

Although PPIs may contribute to the multimodal analgesia in acute settings, with few and/or minor side effects, no recommendation can be drawn for their use as a primary analgesic. Data regarding the relevance of the PPI test are much less clear, no data regarding care pathways are available.

Long-term proton pump inhibitors use and its association with premalignant gastric lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Long-term maintenance therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is a common treatment strategy for acid-related gastrointestinal diseases. However, concerns have been raised about the potential increased risk of gastric cancer and related precancerous lesions with long-term PPI use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate this potential risk. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials published before 1 March 2023, with no language restrictions. The primary endpoint was the occurrence and progression of gastric mucosal atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, Enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell hyperplasia, gastric polyps, and gastric cancer during the trial and follow-up. Data were analysed using a random effects model. Results: Of the 4,868 identified studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis, comprising 27,283 participants. Compared with other treatments, PPI maintenance therapy for more than 6 months was associated with an increased risk of ECL cell hyperplasia (OR 3.01; 95% CI 1.29 to 7.04; p = 0.01). However, no significant increase was found in the risk of gastric mucosal atrophy (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.85; p = 0.97), intestinal metaplasia (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.49 to 2.68; p = 0.76), gastric polyps (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.89; p = 0.64), or gastric cancer (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.43; p = 0.71). Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis does not support an increased risk of gastric cancer or related precancerous lesions with long-term PPI maintenance therapy. However, long-term PPI use should be monitored for potential complications such as ECL cell hyperplasia. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate the safety of PPI maintenance therapy for acid-related gastrointestinal diseases. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Identifier: PROSPERO (CRD42022379692).